WEBVTT - AI Accelerators, AI PCs and GameStop's Surge

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.480 --> 0:00:13.720
<v Speaker 2>From Bahard where Innovation, money and power Collie in Silicon Valley, NBN.

0:00:14.120 --> 0:00:18.120
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlove.

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:34.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm Karen hide A, Bloomberg's World Headquarters in New York.

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 3>Ed Ludlow, He's off today. This is Bloomberg Technology coming.

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:38.920
<v Speaker 4>Up in video.

0:00:39.000 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 3>CEO Jason Wang says the company plans to upgrade its

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:43.120
<v Speaker 3>AI accelerators every year.

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 4>We bring you the details.

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:47.520
<v Speaker 3>From Taiwan as he steals the limelight from AMD's Lisa

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 3>sou Plus, we sit down with the CEO of Qualcom

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 3>to discuss aipc's that's all amid the Computer Text conference

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 3>over in Taiwan that kicks off and game Stop shares

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:00.920
<v Speaker 3>surge and new as Roaring Kitty unveils one hundred and

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 3>sixteen million dollar position in the company. Well, that is

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 3>so much more ahead. But first it's checking on these markets.

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 3>It is a macro picture. It is a slow down

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 3>in manufacturing that actually helps send stocks to the upside.

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 3>And indeed, the borrowing market, the debt market ten year

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 3>yeld carrying down by some nine basis points as some

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:19.480
<v Speaker 3>of the slowing in the economy seems to be good

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 3>news for investors who want to see some ability for

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 3>the FED to cut rates.

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 4>Of course, we have some big labour data later in

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 4>the week.

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:26.560
<v Speaker 3>Now is that coming off of its highs, we're up

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:28.320
<v Speaker 3>just a tenth of a percent. I want to shine

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 3>a light on the parent company of the New York

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 3>Stock Exchange here the Intercontinental Exchange off by three quarters

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 3>a percent, actually hitting some of the lows of the day.

0:01:35.440 --> 0:01:38.120
<v Speaker 3>That said, they seem to be having some technical glitches,

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:41.679
<v Speaker 3>as is currently being the technical phrase being used. But

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:43.960
<v Speaker 3>think of Berkshire, Hathaways, think of some of the stocks

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:45.920
<v Speaker 3>that have been impacted to the tune of a ninety

0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 3>nine percent drop. Just for a few seconds. We're currently

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 3>off by eighteen percent. Will bring you updates throughout the hour. Meanwhile,

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 3>I want to shine a line on some of the

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 3>individual names that are on the move today. And look,

0:01:55.560 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 3>GameStop has been where it's at. At one point, pre

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 3>market was up more than one hundred percent. Now are

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 3>up some thirty percent. As Roaring Kitty or deep value

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 3>is is no one on Reddit took back to another

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 3>form of social media, going on Reddit to post what

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 3>seems to be one hundred and sixteen million dollar long

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:14.679
<v Speaker 3>position in game Stop, making him one of the top

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:17.800
<v Speaker 3>five holders of this name. The crowd goes world paramount

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 3>up some seven percent as we understand that maybe we

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 3>could be getting nearer that deal for sky Dance, as

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 3>David Ellison offers a sweetened bid for some fifteen.

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 4>Dollars a share.

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 3>It's not at that level yet, so still some caution

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 3>out there from investors and the socks off by half

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 3>percentage point right now. AMD on the downside, but other

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 3>chip names being galvanized by some of the announcements coming

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:40.080
<v Speaker 3>out of Taiwan. A big and a big set of announcements,

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:45.920
<v Speaker 3>but big key landmark focuses coming from both in Nvidio

0:02:46.080 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 3>and indeed from AMD. The Computex trade show is fact underway.

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 3>All the chip makers, the heavy hitters are present and

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 3>in video CEO Joseph Wang basically took the stage last

0:02:55.639 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 3>night when he stole the show somewhat introducing new tools

0:02:58.320 --> 0:02:59.079
<v Speaker 3>and software models.

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 5>Your future laptop, your future PC will become an AI.

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 5>It'll be constantly helping you, assisting you in the background.

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 5>The PC will also run applications that are enhanced by AI,

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:20.639
<v Speaker 5>and your PC will also host applications with digital humans

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 5>that are AIS now.

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 3>He announced a Blackwell Ultra chip set to debut in

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty five, and the next generation platform another one

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 3>in development called Rubin in twenty twenty six. Meanwhile, the

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:34.519
<v Speaker 3>actual keynote of the event was meant to be MDCO

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 3>Lisa Sue. She announced the company will speed up the

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:41.760
<v Speaker 3>rollout of new AI processes too. Let's get the details

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 3>of all of this bloombergs in. A woman is here

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 3>to join us, and well, it felt as though Jensen

0:03:47.000 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 3>Wang sort of organized himself an event a keynote speech,

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 3>even though he was the keynote talker of the previous year.

0:03:55.000 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 3>But it seems to be the pace of announcements that

0:03:57.040 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 3>the investors like.

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 6>Absolutely yes, I think it's going to be even trickier

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 6>for tech reporters and editors such as myself to keep

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 6>track of all these code names and project names. We're

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 6>already talking Blackwell, Ultra and Reuben, even though the twenty

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 6>twenty four ships are still forthcoming, so we're really the

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 6>roadmap keeps getting longer and longer, and amb to its credit,

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 6>is also committing to annual refresh cycles.

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:22.919
<v Speaker 3>Annual refresh seems to be what people want to see.

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 3>What was it that maybe Lisa Sue lacked given the

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:31.159
<v Speaker 3>investors stop reaction that Jensen Wang is able to bring.

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 3>Is it just that Nvidia is so dominant, particularly when

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:36.839
<v Speaker 3>it comes to day to them just right now?

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely?

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:39.800
<v Speaker 6>I mean, I think AMD is in a catch up

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:42.839
<v Speaker 6>position and Nvidia is the reigning leader in the AI space,

0:04:42.880 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 6>and I don't know that that is changing anytime soon.

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:48.240
<v Speaker 6>I also think, interestingly, just on a personal note, this

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 6>is a study in two different leadership styles. Huang is

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:55.240
<v Speaker 6>sort of seen as the embodiment of Nvidia itself, whereas

0:04:55.279 --> 0:04:58.359
<v Speaker 6>Lisa Sue sort of surrounded herself by this really large

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:02.159
<v Speaker 6>collection of heavy hitter industry partners, from PC makers like

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 6>HP and Lenovo to the Windows chief over at Microsoft.

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 6>And not to denigrate that approach at all, but it

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 6>is as really interesting to observe two very different approaches.

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:16.040
<v Speaker 3>Coming from two people who come from Taiwan, both speaking

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 3>in Taiwan, in fact, are in some way related, which

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:22.720
<v Speaker 3>is an extraordinary thing to really consider the fact that

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 3>Jensen Wang and Lisusu are vague cousins of one another.

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 4>But what they're trying to steal.

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:32.159
<v Speaker 3>Is the limelight of artificial intelligence in the future. Is

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:34.800
<v Speaker 3>the AIPC managing to land.

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:36.839
<v Speaker 4>Because that seemed to also be where Lisa su was shining.

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:39.960
<v Speaker 6>I don't think just yet. And that's partly that they're

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:43.479
<v Speaker 6>not available, and partly that I don't think the companies

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 6>involved can speak so clearly to what the software applications

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 6>are exactly. So I think, rightfully or wrongly, it might

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:55.720
<v Speaker 6>seem to some people like a solution that's in need

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 6>of a problem, and I don't know that that's going

0:05:58.320 --> 0:05:59.360
<v Speaker 6>to be true in the long term.

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:01.040
<v Speaker 4>But I do think you've got these chips.

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 6>They hold great promise. I don't think these software applications

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 6>are as obvious. And meanwhile, I don't think Nvidia has

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 6>to persuade anyone of the utility of its chips, whether

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 6>the twenty twenty four chips, twenty twenty five, twenty six, etc.

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 3>And always naming these with code names of well very

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:20.599
<v Speaker 3>prominent scientists, often diverse scientists, people of.

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:22.920
<v Speaker 4>Color with Blackwell or a female with Lubin.

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm interested in who wins from both, and there are

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 3>suppliers who serve both in VIDIA and indeed AMD.

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:34.039
<v Speaker 6>With Taiwan Semi being the biggest, and actually their stock

0:06:34.120 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 6>was up more this morning than even AMDs I noticed.

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:40.640
<v Speaker 3>And the fact that also, I mean, are we worrying

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 3>about bottlenecks, because this seems to be a real focus,

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 3>particularly some of the higher focus on memory.

0:06:47.080 --> 0:06:52.359
<v Speaker 6>Nvidia did flick at that in their keynote yesterday, so

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:54.160
<v Speaker 6>I wouldn't say it's not a concern. I think it's

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 6>been a strong concern, but in Nvidia is looking to

0:06:57.480 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 6>assuage the public investors that memory won't be such a

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 6>bottleneck going forward, particularly.

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 3>If they're able to keep on promising these updates coming

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:08.479
<v Speaker 3>in twenty twenty five and twenty six.

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 4>Great to have your take, Dana Welman.

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 3>Bear with all what's happening in Taiwan, but not quite all,

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 3>because we want to focus on another chip name, Qualcom's

0:07:16.040 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 3>processes when they're now powering Microsoft and Dell's new aipcs

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 3>as part of the company's years long effort to grab

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:24.680
<v Speaker 3>a foothold basically in the PC market. Please to say,

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 3>our own ed Ludlow caught up with the Qualcom CEO

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 3>Cristiano I'm on ahead of speaking at a computext conference

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 3>in Taiwan this week.

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 4>Just take a listen.

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 2>So people are going to be able to not only

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:37.040
<v Speaker 2>have the best performance, not only have the ai use cage,

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 2>not having a very small and thin laptop, but they're

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 2>going to have battery life for everything they need to do.

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 2>You're going to leave your charger at home.

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 7>Christiano, from one technology nerd to another. When grandmothers all

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 7>around the world go to the store and buy their

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 7>first AIPC and they take it home and they try

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 7>to plug in their print, will it work?

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 2>Of course you will. So one of the things that

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 2>it's important to understand the journey that we have been

0:08:09.240 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 2>on Microsoft is it's a fundamental shift from Microsoft changing

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 2>Windows from x eighty six to an ARM instruction set

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 2>and it's changing into an AIPC. And part of what

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 2>we have been doing is to bring the ecosystem along.

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 2>Is not only the printers, it is not only the

0:08:26.760 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 2>docking station, also the games. We've been working with Microsoft

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 2>to have the top twelve hundred games optimized on the platform,

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 2>and it's really about the future of the Windows ecosystem.

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 2>So the thing to think about it is not only

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:43.600
<v Speaker 2>you'll be able to work for an old printer, but

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 2>you'll be able to do things you were not able

0:08:45.559 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 2>to do before with your old PC.

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 7>Christiana, we recognize the following that snap Dragon Exley has.

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 7>You can go on any social media platform. I see it.

0:08:57.000 --> 0:09:00.320
<v Speaker 7>But Intel still sort of dominates the traditional set sales

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:04.559
<v Speaker 7>channels for PC. They've got their name on all the shelves.

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 7>You know, Clowd cooms in a different part of its history.

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 7>But do you think you can take them on on

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:13.800
<v Speaker 7>those sales channels the marketing spend the R and D

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 7>where they're quite entrenched.

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So on the R and D I beg to differ.

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 2>I think the performance leadership now is clearly within the

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 2>Windows ecosystem and it's clearly worth accelete just looking on

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:33.599
<v Speaker 2>the CPU performance Orion's custom CPU developed by qualcoms the

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:37.679
<v Speaker 2>vested CPU out there for any personal computing, and then

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:41.439
<v Speaker 2>the NPU and EI engine it's only possible on a

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:44.320
<v Speaker 2>Qualcom platform. So I do beg to differ on the

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 2>R and D. But let's just talk about the big question,

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:49.320
<v Speaker 2>which is it's a new market, it's a new channel

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 2>for Qualcom. And I'll tell you what is different this time.

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 2>There are two aspects. One aspect is consumers are more savvy,

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:02.720
<v Speaker 2>and consumers actually come from a phone. Actually, your most

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:06.559
<v Speaker 2>important purchase decision I will think today is your smartphone,

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:08.960
<v Speaker 2>and you have another knowledge coming from the phone. So

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 2>stop Snapdragon is not something new to you. But the

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 2>most important thing is exactly not that. Well, the most

0:10:17.440 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 2>important thing when you usually see the incumbency position on

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:25.880
<v Speaker 2>PC is at the enterprise, but the enterprise actually has

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:31.079
<v Speaker 2>US and Microsoft one hundred percent aligne. Usually enterprises have

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 2>been slower to adopt new version of Windows. But Microsoft

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:38.720
<v Speaker 2>actually is doing a great job with enterprises around the

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:41.600
<v Speaker 2>world to get them to embrace the Copilot in the

0:10:41.640 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 2>Copilot Plus. So that's a big tailwind. The Microsoft is

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 2>driving the enterprises into the future of AIPC. That's great

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 2>news for Qualcom and that builds on the incredible platform

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:54.600
<v Speaker 2>with the Snapdragon accellete.

0:10:56.960 --> 0:11:00.319
<v Speaker 3>Christiana, I'm on speaking with ED just last week. Up,

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:03.559
<v Speaker 3>we'll be joined by Kristin Smith, CEO Blockchain Association. We're

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 3>going to be talking about crypto in the election, crypto

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 3>in regulation.

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:26.960
<v Speaker 4>This is Bluemoe technology. Let's just talk about.

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:29.439
<v Speaker 3>Crypto and the lobby that is boosting its war Chester

0:11:29.480 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 3>ahead of the US presidential and congressional elections in November

0:11:32.440 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 3>Andreson Horowitz for example, Ripple another one that's just been

0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 3>announcing a donation of twenty five million dollars each that

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 3>was just last week to the pro Cryptopac Fairshake, which

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 3>aims to back candidates from both sides of the aisle

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 3>will better represent the crypto industry's interests. Let's bring in

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:50.439
<v Speaker 3>someone who knows well what lobbying is like on the

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 3>hell right now, Christi Smith, CEO Blockchain Association. Look at

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:56.840
<v Speaker 3>your members, including the sectors, leading investors, and companies in Kristin,

0:11:57.480 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 3>is the lobbying landing all it feels to me given

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 3>the action last week, that suddenly members of Congress are

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 3>aligning themselves more with crypto.

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:11.840
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, no, great question, Caroline. I think it is clear

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:15.080
<v Speaker 8>that the month of May was a game changing month

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:17.960
<v Speaker 8>for the crypto industry. I think the industry has long

0:12:18.040 --> 0:12:22.440
<v Speaker 8>felt that the SEC and other regulators really haven't been

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 8>giving us a fair opportunity to work constructively to find

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:29.680
<v Speaker 8>the right kind of regulation, and the industry is upset.

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 8>And I think over what we've seen over the past

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:34.839
<v Speaker 8>couple of years, and really just mostly in the past

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:39.320
<v Speaker 8>few months and weeks is a continued investment into the

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 8>tools that can help bring more crypto forward policy makers

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:47.840
<v Speaker 8>into power and also constructively work to get the right

0:12:47.920 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 8>kind of policies. So we've seen a tremendous amount of

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:53.840
<v Speaker 8>investment in the fair Shake pack. I think that, as

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 8>you noted some very large investments over the past week,

0:12:57.080 --> 0:13:00.719
<v Speaker 8>that is the largest industry pack out there of any industries.

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 8>So obviously a wonderful tool for the industry. But I

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:06.960
<v Speaker 8>think more importantly what we're seeing is that individual crypto

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 8>users are.

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 4>Following these issues.

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 8>Digital Currency Group did a poll with Harris X a

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:16.440
<v Speaker 8>couple of weeks ago that found one in five swing

0:13:16.480 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 8>state voters consider crypto a major issue in the upcoming election,

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 8>and I think what we're seeing is both at the

0:13:23.760 --> 0:13:27.000
<v Speaker 8>presidential level and at the congressional level, that candidates and

0:13:27.040 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 8>policymakers are seeing this and realizing that they need to

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 8>be more responsive to working with a crypto industry to

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 8>get better policy.

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:36.199
<v Speaker 4>But Christen, how then do.

0:13:36.160 --> 0:13:40.439
<v Speaker 3>You push back on a discomfort? So basically you're buying

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:43.200
<v Speaker 3>a way to Congress listening to you, rather than it

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 3>being coming from the users of crypto talking or wanting well.

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 8>It is coming also though from the users of crypto, right,

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:53.320
<v Speaker 8>it is sort of a one two punch here. I

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 8>think we've got, you know, the industry that is willing

0:13:56.120 --> 0:13:59.440
<v Speaker 8>to put the investment in. But as I was saying before,

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 8>we have individual voters that are writing their members of Congress,

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 8>that are looking on congressional and presidential websites to see

0:14:08.760 --> 0:14:12.319
<v Speaker 8>what does this candidate believe about crypto policy. You know,

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:14.600
<v Speaker 8>this is very unusual, right, Like we don't see bank

0:14:14.679 --> 0:14:17.199
<v Speaker 8>customers going out and doing this, but we are seeing

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 8>this in the crypto world. And it's because crypto is

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 8>more than an industry. It is an ecosystem with users

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 8>and creators and developers and a lot of independent people

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 8>contributing to these networks. So, you know, we're very excited

0:14:29.240 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 8>about this sort of newfound political power, at least I

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 8>know I am as somebody who has seen both sides

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 8>of it. But I have been telling people, you know,

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 8>we have now gotten to like base camp of Mount Everest,

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 8>and we need to get to the top of the summit.

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 8>We have a long way to go. It's a hard

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 8>journey ahead of us, but we're certainly in a much

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 8>better position than we were even a couple of weeks ago.

0:14:49.600 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 3>Is it a hot journey when it comes to the

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 3>actual car and administration because we still had a veto,

0:14:55.680 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 3>for example, coming from President Biden. When it comes to

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 3>SAB one two one, can you just talk us through

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:03.280
<v Speaker 3>ultimately what SAB one to one was wanting to push for.

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 3>It seemed to be well allowing wanting to allow more banks,

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 3>institutional banks be able to offer crypto investments, but at

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 3>the moment it's pretty costly for them to do so.

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, yeah, no, I think I think you said it

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:21.840
<v Speaker 8>exactly right. So Staff Accounting Bulletin one twenty one was

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 8>a piece of guidance that came out of the SEC

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 8>a couple of years ago. And what this is is

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 8>it really puts in place an accounting policy that makes

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 8>it impossible for banks to go into the business of

0:15:33.680 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 8>custody and crypto you know, I think inherent in consumer

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 8>protection is consumer choice, and we want to have more

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 8>responsible institutions that have the ability to custody crypto assets,

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 8>especially now that we not only have the spot Bitcoin

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 8>of ETF, but we'll soon hopefully have an e ETF.

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 8>You know, we want to have more custodian options out there,

0:15:56.560 --> 0:16:00.120
<v Speaker 8>and so Congress realized that this policy was passed without

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 8>any public input. The GAO viewed it as a rule

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 8>which gave Congress the ability to use a special Congressional

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 8>Review Act process in order to try to undo that rule.

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 8>Both the House and Senate, in a bipartisan manner, voted

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:20.479
<v Speaker 8>to repeal the SAB one twenty one guidance, but unfortunately

0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 8>President Biden did sign that veto on Friday. So I think,

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 8>you know, we've seen a lot of progress with the

0:16:27.440 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 8>Biden administration and being a little bit more open minded

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:34.160
<v Speaker 8>towards working on crypto policy. But you know, without question,

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:38.120
<v Speaker 8>that veto was not received well within the crypto industry.

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:41.800
<v Speaker 8>In the crypto community, it's incredibly disappointing, and I still

0:16:41.800 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 8>think we have some work to do with the administration.

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 3>We want to thank you Christ Smiths a Rock Chane Association,

0:16:48.360 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 3>really talking about how politics is infusing itself with crypto

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 3>or vice versa, and let's just stick on politics for

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 3>a moment. What's happening over the United Kingdom.

0:16:56.120 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 4>Of course, he was.

0:16:56.880 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 3>A key proponent of Brexit, of Britten exiting the European Union.

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 3>Nigel Farage is now saying that he will stand as

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 3>a candidate in the United Kingdom election, which of course

0:17:07.320 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 3>is being fast tracked to this summer as it stands,

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 3>far says he'll stand in Clacton on the coast of

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:16.160
<v Speaker 3>Essex and ultimately he's standing for a candidate in the

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 3>UK election, so wanting to once again become a member

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 3>of Parliament as it stands, So who was of course

0:17:23.160 --> 0:17:24.200
<v Speaker 3>a Brexit champion.

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:34.119
<v Speaker 4>And we'll bring you more on that time now for

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:34.640
<v Speaker 4>talking tech.

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:37.200
<v Speaker 3>First up, online fashion retailer Sheen is set to file

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:40.000
<v Speaker 3>for an IPO in London as soon as this week.

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:42.160
<v Speaker 3>According to a person familiar with the matter, The offering

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:44.439
<v Speaker 3>could value the company as much as sixty four billion

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 3>dollars and could become one of the UK's biggest IPOs ever.

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 3>Bloombernus reported in February that Sheen was actively looking at

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 3>London after it judged it unlikely that the SEC would

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 3>approve in New York initial public offering. Meanwhile, shares a

0:17:57.640 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 3>GameStop are surging after the redded account that fueled the

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:03.440
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty one means stock Mania posted what appears to

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 3>be one hundred and sixteen million dollar position in the

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:08.920
<v Speaker 3>retailer In a screenshot, the account operated by Keith Gill

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 3>showed a stake of five million shares at twenty one

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:14.119
<v Speaker 3>dollars twenty seven a piece, positioning Gill at one of

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:15.639
<v Speaker 3>the company's five biggest investors.

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 4>Will have more on that later.

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 3>Meanwhile, shares a Paramount are trading higher. Bloomberg News has

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:22.919
<v Speaker 3>learned that the movie producer David Ellison's latest offer for

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 3>Paramount Global includes an option for non voting shareholders to

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 3>cash out on a portion of their stock for about

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 3>fifteen dollars a share. The cash payout is the latest

0:18:31.560 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 3>attempt by Ellison to basically sweeten the terms of a

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:36.199
<v Speaker 3>deal that he has faced opposition from some investors on.

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:37.159
<v Speaker 4>The offer is.

0:18:37.119 --> 0:18:40.720
<v Speaker 3>Basically roughly twenty six percent premium to Friday's closing price

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 3>and is only for some of the shares. For more

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:47.640
<v Speaker 3>on this story, were pleased to welcome Chris Palmery and look,

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 3>is that why we haven't seen the shares immediately fling

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 3>themselves two fifteen dollars for those known non voting ones.

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 4>What is still the caution around it?

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:57.120
<v Speaker 9>Well, a people.

0:18:56.920 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 10>Aren't going to be able to sell all of their

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:02.160
<v Speaker 10>shares at that price and for the rest of the company.

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 10>There's still a lot of uncertainties overall uncertainties about the

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 10>media business. But we know some of the points about

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:12.359
<v Speaker 10>this deal, but we really don't know everything. But the

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:15.480
<v Speaker 10>big picture here is this amounts to a giant takeover

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:19.119
<v Speaker 10>of this storied company. David Ellison will control not just

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 10>the controlling shares of the company, but the majority of

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 10>the stock and the business. Forty one years old, he's

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:29.200
<v Speaker 10>got a potentially long road ahead of him running this business.

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 10>So that's kind of the big take here.

0:19:32.760 --> 0:19:34.080
<v Speaker 4>He's not doing it alone.

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:37.879
<v Speaker 3>Redberg Capital there along with his father Larry Ellison of

0:19:37.880 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 3>Oracle fame, that are putting up a lot of the

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:41.120
<v Speaker 3>cash here.

0:19:41.200 --> 0:19:43.040
<v Speaker 4>Chris, I'm interested in the long term.

0:19:42.920 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 3>Is that then Skydos gets folded into Paramount, some of

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:47.240
<v Speaker 3>the debt is paid off.

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:49.240
<v Speaker 4>But what's the future of this business look like.

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 10>Well, that's kind of the next step that we've been asking.

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:56.119
<v Speaker 10>A lot of questions are of and we don't have

0:19:56.200 --> 0:19:59.920
<v Speaker 10>answers entirely. We know that they're going to be making

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 10>some changes. You know, there could be a deal for

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:07.720
<v Speaker 10>the Paramount Plus streaming service, a joint venture with Comcast

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 10>or another streaming company. That's been a business that's losing

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 10>a lot of money. You know, there could be some

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 10>sales of other assets. That's something that has come up

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 10>quite a lot. But I'm sure this will be positioned

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:27.719
<v Speaker 10>as David Ellison and his partners investing in the future

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:30.040
<v Speaker 10>of the content of paramounts. So there will be a

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 10>lot of talk about movies and TV shows, you know,

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 10>many of which you know we're familiar with, and one

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:36.200
<v Speaker 10>still to come.

0:20:37.040 --> 0:20:41.400
<v Speaker 3>The holdouts, the value investors, the people who have been

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:43.960
<v Speaker 3>in this stock for a very long time and still

0:20:44.000 --> 0:20:45.119
<v Speaker 3>need some persuading.

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 4>What are they worried about here.

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:52.159
<v Speaker 10>Chris, massive dilution. So the Redstones are getting bought out

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:54.400
<v Speaker 10>at a premium. It might not has been as high

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:56.400
<v Speaker 10>as well as a while back, but it could be,

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:59.679
<v Speaker 10>you know, considerably higher than what this stock they have

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:03.879
<v Speaker 10>the voting A shares are trading at now, and so

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:06.119
<v Speaker 10>then everyone else will be able to get some of

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 10>their money out, but are largely stuck with this business.

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 10>They have even sort of less control over than they

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:16.919
<v Speaker 10>had before this deal was because Ellison will own so

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:17.399
<v Speaker 10>much of it.

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:20.360
<v Speaker 3>We have to see with the suitetened off of how

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:23.399
<v Speaker 3>Aerial Investments Strom Lodgers responds to it how Mary Bally

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:25.920
<v Speaker 3>does as well. I'm interesting to see how this continues

0:21:25.920 --> 0:21:27.679
<v Speaker 3>to unfold. But Chris pal Mary your team has been

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:29.639
<v Speaker 3>leading a charge. We thank you very much for the

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 3>latest on paramount.

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:42.760
<v Speaker 1>When Apple launched the new iPad Pro and May, one

0:21:42.760 --> 0:21:45.440
<v Speaker 1>of the big questions was if the iPad can finally

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 1>replace the laptop. After using it for about two weeks

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 1>instead of primarily a map foot pro, I can confidently

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:55.280
<v Speaker 1>say that the new iPad can replace laptops for most

0:21:55.320 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 1>people and many use cases. A big driver of that

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:01.199
<v Speaker 1>is the new Magic keyboard. It has a metal design

0:22:01.520 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>but also a full function row and a bigger track pad,

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:06.560
<v Speaker 1>making it much more like a MacBook Air or a

0:22:06.600 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 1>MacBook Pro. The other thing is stage Manager. Apple over

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:12.879
<v Speaker 1>the past year or so has made major improvements to

0:22:12.920 --> 0:22:16.400
<v Speaker 1>stage Manager, a new multitasking interface that lets you run

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:19.240
<v Speaker 1>multiple windows side by side and move them around on

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:21.879
<v Speaker 1>your iPad display. But Apple will need to take that

0:22:21.920 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 1>to the next level, enable to support for more than

0:22:24.320 --> 0:22:27.040
<v Speaker 1>four windows at once, as well as a speedier interface,

0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:30.919
<v Speaker 1>plus expose a multitasking like features from the Mac in

0:22:31.000 --> 0:22:33.679
<v Speaker 1>order to really make the iPad Pro a true Pro device.

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:37.400
<v Speaker 1>The other thing a bigger screen. Well, thirteen inch displays

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:40.200
<v Speaker 1>might be enough for college students or people who are traveling,

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 1>consumers who work from home, video editors, photographers, or people

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 1>like myself won an even bigger display. For the iPad

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:49.520
<v Speaker 1>pro to really take off, it's going to need a

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 1>combination of even better multitasking plus a sixteen inch version

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:56.639
<v Speaker 1>to match the MacBook Pro. I'm Mark Erman, this is

0:22:56.680 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 1>power On.

0:23:07.160 --> 0:23:09.199
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back to Blue Mere Technology. I'm Karen had in

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 3>New York. Let's check in on those markets.

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:13.160
<v Speaker 4>They're doing well. If you're in tech, they have been

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:14.399
<v Speaker 4>managing to be higher than this.

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:15.959
<v Speaker 3>We're coming off of our highs, but we're still up

0:23:15.960 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 3>two tents of percent on the Nasdaq one hundred, and

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 3>we're seeing some optimism around well. Some of the data

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:23.760
<v Speaker 3>coming from the US economy.

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:24.880
<v Speaker 4>Not being quite as strong as we've seen.

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:27.640
<v Speaker 3>Does that leave the Federal reserve room to cut rates

0:23:27.720 --> 0:23:29.840
<v Speaker 3>later in the year. Manufacturing seems to be speaking to

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:32.400
<v Speaker 3>that today, two ten percent high in the NASDAK Big

0:23:32.440 --> 0:23:35.360
<v Speaker 3>tech is leading the charge tenure yield down by nine

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:37.840
<v Speaker 3>basis points on the back of that manufacturing data. Bitcoin

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 3>up some two two percent in fact, just showing a

0:23:40.640 --> 0:23:43.120
<v Speaker 3>little bit of risk on sentiment around crypto today. Let's

0:23:43.119 --> 0:23:43.960
<v Speaker 3>move on and to have a look at some of

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:46.359
<v Speaker 3>the individual movers. Look, we're just hearing from Mark German

0:23:46.440 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 3>all about Apple. We're up more than a percentage point.

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 3>That's actually as Goldman SAX seems to be getting excited

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:54.879
<v Speaker 3>as well from its focus at WWDC. We're looking ahead to,

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 3>of course, the announcements that Apple might make. We think

0:23:57.600 --> 0:23:59.640
<v Speaker 3>AI is going to be largely one of them, interweaved

0:23:59.640 --> 0:24:01.680
<v Speaker 3>within We're looking at In Video up more than three

0:24:01.720 --> 0:24:04.880
<v Speaker 3>percent as well. Maybe Johnson Huang steals the show from

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:06.800
<v Speaker 3>a keynote that was meant to come from the key

0:24:06.840 --> 0:24:11.399
<v Speaker 3>Taiwanese Computechs event from Lisa Su of AMD, but in

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 3>Video makes their own event and announces yet further developments

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 3>and chips coming on an annual basis were up more

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:19.240
<v Speaker 3>than three percent GameStop of twenty six percent.

0:24:19.560 --> 0:24:21.280
<v Speaker 4>Why while they're surging.

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 3>After Keith Gill aka Roaring Kitty shared a post actually

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 3>on Reddit, this time showing what appears to be one

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 3>hundred and sixteen million dollar position in the company.

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:32.200
<v Speaker 4>For more, let's bring in Bloomberg's Bailey Lipshaltz.

0:24:32.200 --> 0:24:36.880
<v Speaker 3>His actual handle is a slightly expletive ridden deep Value

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 3>Bailey and what.

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:41.480
<v Speaker 11>It seemed to show, Yeah, DFV is back and that

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:44.119
<v Speaker 11>is on Reddit, first time in almost three years posting

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 11>on Reddit showing that potentially massive stake. There's a lot

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:50.679
<v Speaker 11>of uncertainty and inability to verify if that position is

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 11>in fact Keith Gillen, if it is in fact real,

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:55.080
<v Speaker 11>and the mean uncertainty around that is the fact that

0:24:55.119 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 11>the last time he posted an update on that portfolio,

0:24:57.840 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 11>last time checking in on the portfolio was worth about

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:03.240
<v Speaker 11>thirty four million dollars, so a humongous jump in terms

0:25:03.280 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 11>of the actual value underlying that position, in addition to

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 11>the fact that there's some forty five million dollars potentially

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:12.399
<v Speaker 11>in cash. But nonetheless, it drove a flurry of trading

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:14.439
<v Speaker 11>activity this morning. At one point the stock was at

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:17.199
<v Speaker 11>one hundred and five percent, opened up seventy five percent,

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:19.399
<v Speaker 11>but as you mentioned at the top, closer to twenty

0:25:19.440 --> 0:25:23.679
<v Speaker 11>seven to thirty percent gain four game stop tracking some

0:25:23.760 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 11>of the buying and selling on apps like Fidelity, that

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:30.280
<v Speaker 11>platform showing modest buying orders outpacing those to sell, so

0:25:30.280 --> 0:25:33.320
<v Speaker 11>it doesn't really feel like that twenty twenty one craze

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:35.760
<v Speaker 11>where a number of investors were rushing in to buy it.

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:38.400
<v Speaker 11>As you can see these stocks well below those all

0:25:38.440 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 11>time highs back in twenty twenty one.

0:25:40.280 --> 0:25:42.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm looking at the biggest holders. That's the joy of

0:25:42.200 --> 0:25:44.320
<v Speaker 3>the Bloomberg terminal. You can see who the biggest holder

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 3>is of a name like GameStop, and of course it's

0:25:46.200 --> 0:25:50.240
<v Speaker 3>ars Aventures. Rog Cohen have made his name and becoming

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:52.960
<v Speaker 3>the game Stop lead a de facto with chairmanship and

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:55.200
<v Speaker 3>the like. But we've got Vanguard, black Rock, State Street.

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:57.480
<v Speaker 4>Where next? I mean, I love the story.

0:25:57.280 --> 0:26:00.000
<v Speaker 3>From a technology perspective because it's being driven to us

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 3>via social media. Originally it was x when the first

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:05.400
<v Speaker 3>excitement brewed in May.

0:26:05.640 --> 0:26:07.760
<v Speaker 4>Now it turns to Reddit. I'm wondering when.

0:26:07.640 --> 0:26:09.640
<v Speaker 3>YouTube is going to come into play again, That's what

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm wondering, And I just off of a hunch.

0:26:11.680 --> 0:26:14.920
<v Speaker 11>It feels like with earnings and the company's AGM coming

0:26:15.000 --> 0:26:17.600
<v Speaker 11>up in a few weeks, maybe Roring Kitty Keith Gill

0:26:17.640 --> 0:26:20.159
<v Speaker 11>posts a YouTube video for the first time again in

0:26:20.200 --> 0:26:22.720
<v Speaker 11>about three years, maybe that'll be the next driver.

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 9>Carol.

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:24.639
<v Speaker 11>The main thing that stands out to me when I

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:26.200
<v Speaker 11>look at this stock and you look at the follow

0:26:26.200 --> 0:26:29.080
<v Speaker 11>through this month compared to May that May Flurry really

0:26:29.160 --> 0:26:31.360
<v Speaker 11>lasted two days, shares more than triple than a two

0:26:31.400 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 11>day span, quickly gave back the bulk of those games.

0:26:33.760 --> 0:26:36.600
<v Speaker 11>GameStop took advantage of that to sell shares to raise

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:38.720
<v Speaker 11>cash through and at the market offering. The question is,

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:41.200
<v Speaker 11>with today opening up seventy five percent giving back the

0:26:41.240 --> 0:26:44.120
<v Speaker 11>bulk of those games, can Rooring Kitty, can Keith Gill

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:46.879
<v Speaker 11>find a way to keep the momentum going into the

0:26:46.920 --> 0:26:49.199
<v Speaker 11>earnings and whether this is going to be again a

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:50.960
<v Speaker 11>flash in the pan that lasts two days, does it

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:53.320
<v Speaker 11>last one day or does it return to YouTube and

0:26:53.359 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 11>potentially kind of opening the floodgates bring back a number

0:26:57.080 --> 0:26:59.680
<v Speaker 11>of those retail investors, just given how different the underlying

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:02.919
<v Speaker 11>day dynamics are for the company, for short sellers, and

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:05.440
<v Speaker 11>for the world as a whole now compared to where

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:07.080
<v Speaker 11>it was at in early twenty twenty one.

0:27:07.560 --> 0:27:10.120
<v Speaker 3>Well for now, AMC, BlackBerry, some of the other companies

0:27:10.160 --> 0:27:11.720
<v Speaker 3>doing very well off the back of it to Bailey

0:27:11.760 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 3>Lipshalt's great to have you back on the show.

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 4>Thank you.

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:16.879
<v Speaker 3>Meanwhile, let's talk about Tesla for a moment is issued

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:19.960
<v Speaker 3>a statement against the ISS views on.

0:27:20.119 --> 0:27:22.960
<v Speaker 4>Well his pay package, remember Elon Musks. That is after

0:27:23.000 --> 0:27:23.919
<v Speaker 4>the proxy.

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:28.360
<v Speaker 3>Advisor ISS urged shareholders to reject Elol Musk's pay package.

0:27:28.400 --> 0:27:31.320
<v Speaker 3>Of course, it's been coming back from previous years for more.

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:34.199
<v Speaker 3>Let's bring in Bloomberg's Max Jack Jaffrikin. Look, there's a

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:37.879
<v Speaker 3>long statement. This is all regarding a twenty eighteen performance

0:27:37.880 --> 0:27:41.679
<v Speaker 3>award that ended up being ginormous, but largely because the

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:46.399
<v Speaker 3>market capitalization of Tesla and the stock performance became phenomenal.

0:27:46.640 --> 0:27:50.600
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, So this award, as you say, five years ago,

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 12>roughly was made with the idea that if Elon Musk

0:27:55.080 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 12>were able to grow the market cap of Tesla by

0:27:57.320 --> 0:28:00.159
<v Speaker 12>an enormous sum, he would get this gigantic paypacker. And

0:28:00.320 --> 0:28:02.240
<v Speaker 12>you know, fifty six billion is the number you see

0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:06.720
<v Speaker 12>thrown around. You know, at the time, these proxy advisor services,

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:09.760
<v Speaker 12>Glass Lewis which is another one, and ISS both advised

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 12>against it.

0:28:10.840 --> 0:28:12.480
<v Speaker 9>Shareholders voted for it. Anyway.

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:16.280
<v Speaker 12>The difference now, though, is that the gain in question

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:19.119
<v Speaker 12>has already happened. So you sort of have the board

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 12>asking to pay Elon Musk even though the thing that he.

0:28:23.000 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 9>Was supposed to achieve has already been achieved.

0:28:24.600 --> 0:28:26.800
<v Speaker 12>And in that press release, a big part of Elon

0:28:26.880 --> 0:28:29.240
<v Speaker 12>Musk's argument is like, hey, we had a deal.

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 9>It's not fair to go back on that deal.

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:33.679
<v Speaker 12>And so he's sort of resorting to that, to this

0:28:33.800 --> 0:28:37.199
<v Speaker 12>kind of basically like a moral point. And you have

0:28:37.280 --> 0:28:39.760
<v Speaker 12>ISS and glass Lewis on the other hand saying, look,

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:42.040
<v Speaker 12>on one hand, this is an insane amount of money.

0:28:42.080 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 12>It's too much money, even given the gain of the

0:28:45.640 --> 0:28:48.360
<v Speaker 12>market cap, and also, you know, it's not clear that

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 12>shareholders had enough information. And also again the gain has

0:28:52.160 --> 0:28:53.959
<v Speaker 12>already been realized, so it's sort of a little bit

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:56.760
<v Speaker 12>hard to justify how to justify.

0:28:57.280 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 3>Meanwhile, the board and indeed Tesla seems to be trying

0:28:59.840 --> 0:29:02.720
<v Speaker 3>to justify that IS has got a lot of things

0:29:02.800 --> 0:29:05.640
<v Speaker 3>right by saying this is a mountainous market cap growth

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:09.520
<v Speaker 3>and the twenty eighteen continues to create a strong incentive.

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:10.200
<v Speaker 4>For Elon overall.

0:29:10.400 --> 0:29:13.400
<v Speaker 3>But they say, technically ISS is getting something wrong with

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 3>how the payment is being made. What do you make

0:29:17.120 --> 0:29:19.760
<v Speaker 3>of I mean, ISS is going to respond, I suppose,

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 3>So whether they're technically right or wrong.

0:29:21.760 --> 0:29:24.640
<v Speaker 12>Well, Tesla is engaged in what amounts to a marketing campaign.

0:29:24.640 --> 0:29:26.000
<v Speaker 9>So we're going to have a vote in ten days.

0:29:26.240 --> 0:29:29.160
<v Speaker 12>The vote is going to largely involve Elon Musk and

0:29:29.200 --> 0:29:30.720
<v Speaker 12>his brother Kim Bulk are not going to be able

0:29:30.720 --> 0:29:33.720
<v Speaker 12>to vote in this election or in this proxy vote.

0:29:33.800 --> 0:29:35.840
<v Speaker 9>And Tesla is campaigning.

0:29:35.880 --> 0:29:39.480
<v Speaker 12>You know, they're advertising, they're producing videos, and they're producing

0:29:39.920 --> 0:29:43.600
<v Speaker 12>documents like this is press release. Probably more importantly, Elon

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 12>Musk is tweeting about this all the time. And you

0:29:45.960 --> 0:29:48.719
<v Speaker 12>see we've seen a lot of SEC filings that are

0:29:48.800 --> 0:29:52.440
<v Speaker 12>essentially Elon Musk responding to various influencers sort of pro

0:29:52.560 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 12>Tesla bulls, talking about this vote. So they're trying to

0:29:57.080 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 12>reach you know, retail shareholders, which is the main of

0:30:00.600 --> 0:30:02.640
<v Speaker 12>ownership of Tesla, And.

0:30:02.560 --> 0:30:05.080
<v Speaker 3>Apparently they've got to decide whether or not Elon was

0:30:05.120 --> 0:30:09.520
<v Speaker 3>actually galvanized by this stock compensation.

0:30:11.080 --> 0:30:13.960
<v Speaker 12>The question is, well, you have like a fear among

0:30:14.120 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 12>even Tesla bulls that if this pay package isn't approved

0:30:17.240 --> 0:30:20.239
<v Speaker 12>that Elon Musk could just walk away. And that is

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 12>something that Elon Musk himself has kind of helped stoke

0:30:23.200 --> 0:30:25.680
<v Speaker 12>by saying, you know, hey, there's all this AI stuff,

0:30:25.840 --> 0:30:27.840
<v Speaker 12>maybe I'll do it outside of Tesla maybe not. So

0:30:27.880 --> 0:30:29.720
<v Speaker 12>you have this kind of a bit of a game

0:30:29.760 --> 0:30:31.960
<v Speaker 12>of chicken, which is, on one hand, Elon is saying,

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 12>I'm committed to Tesla. I love it, you know, it's

0:30:35.400 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 12>I care so much about it. On the other hand,

0:30:37.400 --> 0:30:39.400
<v Speaker 12>he's making these threats, and there is this fear that

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:41.800
<v Speaker 12>if he walked away that would hurt the share price

0:30:41.840 --> 0:30:44.960
<v Speaker 12>because so much of Tesla's, you know, investors, so much

0:30:44.960 --> 0:30:46.920
<v Speaker 12>of what is about the company has to do with

0:30:47.000 --> 0:30:49.840
<v Speaker 12>Elon Musk's, you know, essentially his cult of personality and

0:30:49.880 --> 0:30:51.480
<v Speaker 12>his reputation as an innovator.

0:30:51.960 --> 0:30:54.920
<v Speaker 3>June thirteenth, we wait, we watch, and for the marketing

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:56.320
<v Speaker 3>ahead of it megs Max Chafkin.

0:30:56.400 --> 0:30:56.840
<v Speaker 4>We thank him.

0:30:56.840 --> 0:30:59.280
<v Speaker 3>Meanwhile, it has to talk about EV's in another way

0:30:59.320 --> 0:31:02.440
<v Speaker 3>because Ford SEO Jim Farley says his company is just

0:31:02.440 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 3>two years away from offering technology that will allow drivers

0:31:05.160 --> 0:31:07.400
<v Speaker 3>to take their eyes off the road and the hands

0:31:07.440 --> 0:31:10.320
<v Speaker 3>off the wheel. Caught up with Bloomberg's David Weston, just

0:31:10.360 --> 0:31:10.840
<v Speaker 3>take a listen.

0:31:11.880 --> 0:31:14.239
<v Speaker 13>We're getting really close. In fact, we can do it

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:17.000
<v Speaker 13>now pretty regularly with a prototype, but doing it in

0:31:17.000 --> 0:31:19.840
<v Speaker 13>a cost effective way is just the progress we're going

0:31:19.880 --> 0:31:20.440
<v Speaker 13>to need to make.

0:31:20.840 --> 0:31:20.920
<v Speaker 5>To.

0:31:21.360 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 13>We have to build the electric architecture inside the company.

0:31:24.800 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 13>We can't delegate it to our suppliers anymore. We need

0:31:27.360 --> 0:31:30.000
<v Speaker 13>all the software code in the company to control the car.

0:31:30.680 --> 0:31:31.840
<v Speaker 9>But it's close.

0:31:32.840 --> 0:31:35.560
<v Speaker 3>Coming out New York Tech Week. It kicks off right

0:31:35.560 --> 0:31:36.960
<v Speaker 3>here in the Big Apple. We'll speak to some of

0:31:37.000 --> 0:31:40.400
<v Speaker 3>the key participants from the event that's next. Meanwhile, let's

0:31:40.440 --> 0:31:41.800
<v Speaker 3>just keep an eye on some of the stocks that

0:31:41.800 --> 0:31:43.560
<v Speaker 3>are on the move. Auto Desk want to shine a

0:31:43.600 --> 0:31:45.800
<v Speaker 3>light on this software company's.

0:31:45.240 --> 0:31:46.680
<v Speaker 4>Higher to the tune of seven percent.

0:31:47.240 --> 0:31:50.920
<v Speaker 3>No financial statements will be restated or adjusted following the

0:31:50.960 --> 0:31:53.600
<v Speaker 3>results of an investigation by the Boards Audit Committee. We

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:58.160
<v Speaker 3>understand the CFO has been reassigned after the internal accounting probe,

0:31:58.160 --> 0:31:59.800
<v Speaker 3>but a weight is lifted.

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:16.680
<v Speaker 4>This is Blouemoid Technology on New York Tech Week. It's

0:32:16.720 --> 0:32:18.440
<v Speaker 4>back officially, kicking off today.

0:32:18.280 --> 0:32:21.240
<v Speaker 3>In the Big Apple with Industry Titans, VC's startups gathering

0:32:21.240 --> 0:32:25.000
<v Speaker 3>throughout this week for events, panels, conversations, so much more.

0:32:25.320 --> 0:32:27.200
<v Speaker 3>All week long on Bluebog Technology, We're going to be

0:32:27.240 --> 0:32:30.920
<v Speaker 3>speaking with those founders, those investors, those executors to discuss

0:32:31.280 --> 0:32:33.560
<v Speaker 3>the ecosystem right here in New York City. Why they

0:32:33.600 --> 0:32:36.040
<v Speaker 3>choose to call NYC home and pleased to say we're

0:32:36.080 --> 0:32:39.200
<v Speaker 3>joining now. By Julie Samuels, CEO of Tech NYC. Look,

0:32:39.200 --> 0:32:42.400
<v Speaker 3>it is the organization representing New York's fast growing entrepreneurial

0:32:42.440 --> 0:32:45.160
<v Speaker 3>tech industry. You're also very much in the weeds of

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:48.960
<v Speaker 3>how we can support this, whether it's from self mentorship,

0:32:49.000 --> 0:32:51.120
<v Speaker 3>whether it's from coming together as an industry, whether it's

0:32:51.160 --> 0:32:54.520
<v Speaker 3>the government's role here. Why is New York City feeling

0:32:55.000 --> 0:32:56.960
<v Speaker 3>like the place to build a startup right now?

0:32:57.560 --> 0:33:00.360
<v Speaker 14>Well, I think there's so many reasons. It feels reredibly

0:33:00.400 --> 0:33:04.120
<v Speaker 14>optimistic here. That energy is palpable tech Week especially, but

0:33:04.400 --> 0:33:06.800
<v Speaker 14>even without Tech Week here it feels amazing. I think

0:33:06.840 --> 0:33:09.440
<v Speaker 14>a big part of that reason, honestly is people want

0:33:09.480 --> 0:33:11.680
<v Speaker 14>to live in New York. People want to live in

0:33:11.720 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 14>New York. We've seen that there's a lot of net

0:33:14.040 --> 0:33:18.000
<v Speaker 14>migration here. About in recent data show is about fifteen

0:33:18.040 --> 0:33:21.640
<v Speaker 14>percent of relocating tech workers actually come to New York City.

0:33:22.120 --> 0:33:25.600
<v Speaker 14>And because people want to be here, there's just an

0:33:25.720 --> 0:33:28.280
<v Speaker 14>enormous amount of energy around what people are building, where

0:33:28.280 --> 0:33:31.440
<v Speaker 14>they're plugging in, and we're seeing it at all ends

0:33:31.480 --> 0:33:34.720
<v Speaker 14>of the spectrum. Huge companies, tiny startups, everything in between.

0:33:34.920 --> 0:33:35.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I've been.

0:33:35.680 --> 0:33:39.200
<v Speaker 3>There's events coming from old school New York tech IBM

0:33:39.560 --> 0:33:41.760
<v Speaker 3>what to be seen. Of course, currents still in modern

0:33:41.840 --> 0:33:44.200
<v Speaker 3>day innovators but have been based in New York State

0:33:44.240 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 3>for a long time.

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:46.160
<v Speaker 4>But then there's the founders and.

0:33:46.080 --> 0:33:48.520
<v Speaker 3>The startups and the vcs that continue to come Andrews

0:33:48.560 --> 0:33:52.000
<v Speaker 3>in a Horowitz, for example, putting their boots to the ground.

0:33:52.640 --> 0:33:54.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm interested as to what people are building them from

0:33:54.960 --> 0:33:55.840
<v Speaker 3>a startup perspective.

0:33:55.880 --> 0:33:57.160
<v Speaker 4>Is it all about autificial intelligence?

0:33:57.240 --> 0:33:57.760
<v Speaker 5>Hit too? So?

0:33:57.880 --> 0:34:01.440
<v Speaker 14>Artificial intelligence is obviously booming here. There's well over a

0:34:01.520 --> 0:34:04.080
<v Speaker 14>thousand venture backed startups. They've raised something like twenty seven

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:07.680
<v Speaker 14>billion dollars collectively. That's just the AI startup kind of

0:34:07.680 --> 0:34:10.359
<v Speaker 14>the AI segment of our startup ecosystem. But the thing

0:34:10.360 --> 0:34:13.279
<v Speaker 14>about New York I think that is incredibly special is

0:34:13.280 --> 0:34:16.759
<v Speaker 14>because every other industry is headquartered here or has their

0:34:16.760 --> 0:34:19.920
<v Speaker 14>center of gravity here. What we see is startups building

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:23.640
<v Speaker 14>in all of those segments. And that is that diversity

0:34:23.680 --> 0:34:26.400
<v Speaker 14>of type of company is what really sets our New

0:34:26.480 --> 0:34:29.200
<v Speaker 14>York tech sector apart in a way that I feel

0:34:29.200 --> 0:34:30.680
<v Speaker 14>like is incredibly healthy.

0:34:31.239 --> 0:34:35.239
<v Speaker 3>A diversity of industry and problems and solutions. What about

0:34:35.320 --> 0:34:36.920
<v Speaker 3>diversity of actual talent.

0:34:37.360 --> 0:34:39.080
<v Speaker 4>So obviously we have a lot of work to do there.

0:34:39.080 --> 0:34:42.200
<v Speaker 14>I will say New York is better on that than

0:34:42.280 --> 0:34:44.640
<v Speaker 14>any other major city in the US. We have something

0:34:44.719 --> 0:34:47.680
<v Speaker 14>like twenty twenty two percent of the workforce here is

0:34:48.800 --> 0:34:51.759
<v Speaker 14>from underrepresented groups, which is significantly higher than in the

0:34:51.840 --> 0:34:55.000
<v Speaker 14>Valley or in Boston. We obviously have a lot more

0:34:55.040 --> 0:34:57.759
<v Speaker 14>work to do, but our tech community here is pretty

0:34:57.800 --> 0:35:01.680
<v Speaker 14>engaged there. We partner with New york'sity public schools to

0:35:01.760 --> 0:35:04.760
<v Speaker 14>get the kids in the students, you know, into the companies,

0:35:04.800 --> 0:35:08.360
<v Speaker 14>meeting the right people. There's a huge push to teach

0:35:08.400 --> 0:35:11.200
<v Speaker 14>computer science in our schools. There's a huge push to

0:35:11.320 --> 0:35:15.040
<v Speaker 14>work with nonprofits across the city to get more New

0:35:15.120 --> 0:35:18.640
<v Speaker 14>Yorkers into the tech ecosystem. At the beginning, I talked

0:35:18.680 --> 0:35:21.000
<v Speaker 14>about how we attract a lot of people who want

0:35:21.040 --> 0:35:23.880
<v Speaker 14>to move here. We also need to make sure that

0:35:24.000 --> 0:35:26.520
<v Speaker 14>New Yorkers who are born here and raised here have

0:35:26.600 --> 0:35:28.040
<v Speaker 14>access to these jobs as well.

0:35:28.120 --> 0:35:29.959
<v Speaker 3>I mean, what is it that we have a new

0:35:30.200 --> 0:35:34.840
<v Speaker 3>focus on Startup NYC. That seems to be a support

0:35:34.920 --> 0:35:35.640
<v Speaker 3>system for what.

0:35:35.760 --> 0:35:36.560
<v Speaker 4>I've as founders.

0:35:36.680 --> 0:35:39.320
<v Speaker 14>We're working on a project at Tech NYICE the organization

0:35:39.360 --> 0:35:41.799
<v Speaker 14>I run called Startup NYC, where we kind of put

0:35:41.840 --> 0:35:44.319
<v Speaker 14>a little bit of scaffolding around some programming for some

0:35:44.440 --> 0:35:49.040
<v Speaker 14>underrepresented founders founders building in some really interesting, maybe non

0:35:49.080 --> 0:35:53.239
<v Speaker 14>traditional spaces. We don't put money into those startups, but

0:35:53.320 --> 0:35:55.200
<v Speaker 14>what we do is we kind of help them with

0:35:55.320 --> 0:35:59.120
<v Speaker 14>our network. We help them understand how to navigate this space.

0:36:00.160 --> 0:36:02.240
<v Speaker 14>I mean tech and Yc's network is amazing. It pretty

0:36:02.280 --> 0:36:04.640
<v Speaker 14>much represents everyone in tech in New York. And what

0:36:04.680 --> 0:36:06.799
<v Speaker 14>we do to these founders is say, hey, we're going

0:36:06.840 --> 0:36:09.239
<v Speaker 14>to help you get access to those people, not just

0:36:09.280 --> 0:36:12.600
<v Speaker 14>people in tech, but also the entire business sector here,

0:36:12.680 --> 0:36:16.000
<v Speaker 14>which is their customers, their clients, their mentors going forward.

0:36:16.080 --> 0:36:17.960
<v Speaker 14>And that to me is what's really exciting.

0:36:18.400 --> 0:36:21.279
<v Speaker 3>I'm sad aed isn't here because at the moment we're

0:36:21.320 --> 0:36:24.160
<v Speaker 3>two women in New York, and of course we're going

0:36:24.200 --> 0:36:26.080
<v Speaker 3>to say that New York's the best and amazing to

0:36:26.080 --> 0:36:29.719
<v Speaker 3>build technology companies in. But San Francisco is doing a

0:36:29.840 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 3>mighty fine job at ensuring you feel really reinvigorated around AI.

0:36:34.200 --> 0:36:36.480
<v Speaker 3>In particular, Open AI is out there and still all

0:36:36.520 --> 0:36:38.880
<v Speaker 3>the headquarters of the biggest technology companies in the.

0:36:38.960 --> 0:36:41.840
<v Speaker 4>US is West coast. Does it matter?

0:36:42.000 --> 0:36:42.360
<v Speaker 9>Ultimately?

0:36:42.360 --> 0:36:43.319
<v Speaker 4>You can all boats rise?

0:36:43.400 --> 0:36:46.200
<v Speaker 3>Do we have to have this y versus La versus

0:36:46.520 --> 0:36:47.080
<v Speaker 3>West Coast?

0:36:47.320 --> 0:36:48.440
<v Speaker 14>Let me say this first of all, I think all

0:36:48.480 --> 0:36:52.080
<v Speaker 14>boats have to rise. The technology jobs, however you define tech,

0:36:52.160 --> 0:36:53.360
<v Speaker 14>these are the jobs of the future.

0:36:53.400 --> 0:36:54.120
<v Speaker 4>This is what the.

0:36:54.040 --> 0:36:57.080
<v Speaker 14>Economy, the world economy, looks like going forward.

0:36:57.280 --> 0:36:59.840
<v Speaker 4>So we need across the country, across.

0:36:59.600 --> 0:37:01.680
<v Speaker 14>The world, we need all boats to rise together. So

0:37:01.800 --> 0:37:04.320
<v Speaker 14>I hear what you are saying, and I actually agree

0:37:04.360 --> 0:37:06.680
<v Speaker 14>with you. I love New York. There are different versions

0:37:06.680 --> 0:37:09.000
<v Speaker 14>for different people of how you want to build this.

0:37:09.719 --> 0:37:11.840
<v Speaker 14>I think historically what we've seen is a lot of

0:37:11.920 --> 0:37:15.720
<v Speaker 14>startups building kind of hard technology on the West Coast

0:37:15.840 --> 0:37:17.799
<v Speaker 14>than they tend to expand here when they're ready to

0:37:17.840 --> 0:37:21.400
<v Speaker 14>apply it, when they're ready to figure out how to

0:37:21.400 --> 0:37:24.279
<v Speaker 14>make it profitable, who's going to buy the technology, what

0:37:24.320 --> 0:37:26.640
<v Speaker 14>it's going to look like in practice. So I think

0:37:26.680 --> 0:37:29.839
<v Speaker 14>we'll see a lot of that happening here in New York.

0:37:30.080 --> 0:37:31.880
<v Speaker 14>There's one other this is kind of maybe this is

0:37:31.880 --> 0:37:34.040
<v Speaker 14>a little trie there's this little kind of saying I

0:37:34.120 --> 0:37:35.640
<v Speaker 14>like or not saying, this is how I think of

0:37:35.680 --> 0:37:37.920
<v Speaker 14>the difference between the Valley and New York. I used

0:37:37.920 --> 0:37:39.680
<v Speaker 14>to live in the valley when I lived there, and

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:42.400
<v Speaker 14>it was great for a lot of reasons. When you

0:37:42.440 --> 0:37:44.200
<v Speaker 14>live there, you meet a lot of tech people who

0:37:44.280 --> 0:37:46.520
<v Speaker 14>live in the valley. But when you're in New York,

0:37:46.640 --> 0:37:48.800
<v Speaker 14>you meet a lot of New Yorkers who work in tech,

0:37:48.960 --> 0:37:51.160
<v Speaker 14>and that I mean, that speaks to me and how

0:37:51.239 --> 0:37:51.800
<v Speaker 14>I want.

0:37:51.640 --> 0:37:52.200
<v Speaker 9>To be in the world.

0:37:52.239 --> 0:37:54.920
<v Speaker 14>But again for everyone, you know, you should do it

0:37:54.920 --> 0:37:55.439
<v Speaker 14>your own way.

0:37:56.080 --> 0:37:59.000
<v Speaker 3>The most risings to all the eventency going to many

0:37:59.480 --> 0:38:02.319
<v Speaker 3>gates sales through this week, Julie Samuels with all the

0:38:02.400 --> 0:38:06.279
<v Speaker 3>energy this Monday, Tech NY CEO, We thanker. Meanwhile, let's

0:38:06.320 --> 0:38:07.920
<v Speaker 3>have a quick look at what's happening in New York

0:38:08.040 --> 0:38:10.080
<v Speaker 3>or the New York Stock Exchange, no less because equities

0:38:10.600 --> 0:38:12.880
<v Speaker 3>the New York Stock Exchange basically saying that technical issues

0:38:12.880 --> 0:38:16.479
<v Speaker 3>have been resolved. Look, there was a glitch, shall we say,

0:38:16.560 --> 0:38:20.440
<v Speaker 3>earlier that was hitting companies such as Berkshire Hathaway, some volatilities,

0:38:20.520 --> 0:38:22.920
<v Speaker 3>some halting that was happening. They now say that the

0:38:22.960 --> 0:38:25.279
<v Speaker 3>technical issue has been resolved at the New York Stock

0:38:25.280 --> 0:38:36.440
<v Speaker 3>Exchange parent company ICE. We want to continue our coverage

0:38:36.440 --> 0:38:39.160
<v Speaker 3>of New York Tech Week, joining us on why he's

0:38:39.160 --> 0:38:39.879
<v Speaker 3>building right.

0:38:39.800 --> 0:38:41.320
<v Speaker 4>Here in the city is Michael Charlotte.

0:38:42.280 --> 0:38:44.360
<v Speaker 3>Fire Blocks, the CEO five Blocks is actually.

0:38:44.080 --> 0:38:45.120
<v Speaker 4>Found in twenty nineteen.

0:38:45.320 --> 0:38:49.239
<v Speaker 3>It's a digital asset security platform that helps financial institutions

0:38:49.360 --> 0:38:53.760
<v Speaker 3>protect digital assets from hackers from theft. Important problems you're solving,

0:38:54.440 --> 0:38:55.319
<v Speaker 3>Why solve them?

0:38:55.480 --> 0:38:56.080
<v Speaker 4>From New York?

0:38:56.160 --> 0:38:58.640
<v Speaker 15>Thanks for having me here so great in the arc

0:38:58.760 --> 0:39:04.000
<v Speaker 15>is the financial center globally, and it was really important

0:39:04.000 --> 0:39:06.520
<v Speaker 15>for us to be as close as possible to the

0:39:06.560 --> 0:39:09.520
<v Speaker 15>market basically where a lot of our clients are and

0:39:09.560 --> 0:39:12.920
<v Speaker 15>our first design partners basically the first early adopters of

0:39:13.000 --> 0:39:13.840
<v Speaker 15>our technology.

0:39:13.840 --> 0:39:17.000
<v Speaker 3>We're here in New York, So fintech makes total sense. You,

0:39:17.080 --> 0:39:21.960
<v Speaker 3>of course, your previous company was purchased by Checkpoint.

0:39:21.800 --> 0:39:24.640
<v Speaker 4>And you've been building businesses for a long time.

0:39:24.680 --> 0:39:27.680
<v Speaker 3>You understand what is necessary an the ecosystem that's needed

0:39:27.719 --> 0:39:30.000
<v Speaker 3>to be bred. What is it that's here that also

0:39:30.080 --> 0:39:31.560
<v Speaker 3>supports you other than your client base.

0:39:31.719 --> 0:39:33.760
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, so actually it's a good point. With the previous

0:39:33.800 --> 0:39:36.640
<v Speaker 15>company actually moved to San Francisco, and then Fireblocks we

0:39:36.719 --> 0:39:39.480
<v Speaker 15>really started in New York, and really the main reason

0:39:39.680 --> 0:39:44.000
<v Speaker 15>was first and foremost to be really close to the customers.

0:39:44.239 --> 0:39:46.239
<v Speaker 15>When you're in San Francisco, and if you're doing a

0:39:46.239 --> 0:39:49.760
<v Speaker 15>B to B startup, it's actually quite difficult to basically

0:39:49.880 --> 0:39:52.920
<v Speaker 15>meet your customers where they are unless you're basically selling

0:39:52.960 --> 0:39:55.520
<v Speaker 15>directly to the tech sector. All the other sectors are

0:39:55.840 --> 0:39:59.080
<v Speaker 15>either on the East Coast or somewhere in the Midwest.

0:39:59.520 --> 0:40:02.279
<v Speaker 15>And the second component is that actually, if you want

0:40:02.280 --> 0:40:04.719
<v Speaker 15>to have global rich and firebooks today is really a

0:40:04.719 --> 0:40:07.480
<v Speaker 15>global company, New York is much easier. First of all,

0:40:07.480 --> 0:40:09.440
<v Speaker 15>more people transit through New York and you can meet

0:40:09.480 --> 0:40:11.840
<v Speaker 15>them over here. And second level, it's actually easier to

0:40:11.840 --> 0:40:13.759
<v Speaker 15>fly to Europe or Middle East and so on.

0:40:14.120 --> 0:40:16.640
<v Speaker 4>Time zone is nice. I can imagine for sure. What

0:40:16.719 --> 0:40:17.560
<v Speaker 4>about the talent base.

0:40:17.640 --> 0:40:19.560
<v Speaker 3>We were just talking about how people perhaps there's net

0:40:20.000 --> 0:40:22.640
<v Speaker 3>immigration for people wanting to be in the tech sect,

0:40:22.640 --> 0:40:24.480
<v Speaker 3>to work within the tech sect to come into New York.

0:40:25.040 --> 0:40:26.520
<v Speaker 4>Is it still tough to hire here.

0:40:27.800 --> 0:40:30.279
<v Speaker 15>It's tough, But I will actually argue that at least

0:40:30.320 --> 0:40:33.480
<v Speaker 15>for us, it's easier to hire here than in other areas.

0:40:33.840 --> 0:40:36.120
<v Speaker 15>And the main reason is that we really trying to

0:40:36.120 --> 0:40:39.640
<v Speaker 15>find people that have this combination of technology and finance

0:40:39.880 --> 0:40:42.360
<v Speaker 15>right because basically there are not that many people who

0:40:42.640 --> 0:40:46.239
<v Speaker 15>run crypto or digital asses companies at scale, and in

0:40:46.239 --> 0:40:49.520
<v Speaker 15>New York you find you can find really great leadership

0:40:49.560 --> 0:40:52.920
<v Speaker 15>and individuals that they have deep expertise in finance and

0:40:53.600 --> 0:40:56.480
<v Speaker 15>I would say deep expertise in tech. Maybe slightly less

0:40:56.520 --> 0:40:59.839
<v Speaker 15>than in SF or the Bay Area, but it's still enough.

0:41:00.040 --> 0:41:02.200
<v Speaker 15>The combination is really crucial for US.

0:41:02.640 --> 0:41:05.800
<v Speaker 3>I can imagine also it's relatively helpful being BUTTONN Amtrak

0:41:05.880 --> 0:41:08.399
<v Speaker 3>ride away from Washington. At the moment, crypto is being

0:41:08.440 --> 0:41:11.520
<v Speaker 3>regalvanized in some ways by changes in legislation.

0:41:11.680 --> 0:41:12.560
<v Speaker 4>How is it affecting you?

0:41:12.880 --> 0:41:15.360
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, that's true. Actually been on that trend quite a

0:41:15.400 --> 0:41:19.399
<v Speaker 15>few times in the last couple of years. To be fair,

0:41:19.480 --> 0:41:25.040
<v Speaker 15>I think we've seen pretty decent momentum the US clearly globally.

0:41:25.080 --> 0:41:27.399
<v Speaker 15>I think that this is probably the most important thing

0:41:27.440 --> 0:41:31.520
<v Speaker 15>that we still seeing. The global regulatory landscape front running

0:41:31.560 --> 0:41:34.160
<v Speaker 15>the US. We hope that it will start catching up

0:41:34.200 --> 0:41:37.120
<v Speaker 15>towards the end of the year. The approval of the

0:41:37.160 --> 0:41:42.160
<v Speaker 15>ETFs by the SEC was a big, very strong tailwinds

0:41:42.239 --> 0:41:45.759
<v Speaker 15>for the industry and for US and actually bringing it

0:41:45.800 --> 0:41:48.399
<v Speaker 15>back to New York. I think that actually in New York,

0:41:48.440 --> 0:41:50.440
<v Speaker 15>the New York, the FS, the New York Department of

0:41:50.480 --> 0:41:54.719
<v Speaker 15>Financial Services. They've been probably one of the most thoughtful

0:41:55.000 --> 0:41:58.440
<v Speaker 15>state regulators in the US that we've been working with

0:41:58.520 --> 0:41:59.879
<v Speaker 15>closely for the last couple of years.

0:42:00.440 --> 0:42:04.000
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I'm glad that we're managing to interweave how politics,

0:42:04.000 --> 0:42:06.680
<v Speaker 3>of course, is intersecting with crypto and indeed with New York.

0:42:06.760 --> 0:42:09.040
<v Speaker 4>Right here, Michael Shada, great to have some time with him,

0:42:09.040 --> 0:42:10.480
<v Speaker 4>Fiblock CEO. Hope you come back.

0:42:10.719 --> 0:42:12.400
<v Speaker 3>We can talk really about the business and how it

0:42:12.440 --> 0:42:14.879
<v Speaker 3>continues to grow. But meanwhile, look that does it. From

0:42:14.880 --> 0:42:17.279
<v Speaker 3>this edition of Bloomberg Technology right here from New York.

0:42:17.480 --> 0:42:19.160
<v Speaker 4>Do not forget to check out our podcast.

0:42:19.480 --> 0:42:21.239
<v Speaker 3>You can find it on the terminal as well as

0:42:21.239 --> 0:42:25.400
<v Speaker 3>online on Apple, on Spotify, on iHeart, so many choices

0:42:25.719 --> 0:42:28.200
<v Speaker 3>from New York and of course from San Francisco. Back

0:42:28.200 --> 0:42:36.400
<v Speaker 3>there tomorrow. This is Bloomberg Technology.