WEBVTT - Will Elon Get Paid 1,000,000,000,000,000?

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:07.920 --> 0:00:10.559
<v Speaker 2>Let me tell you we have a new star. A

0:00:10.720 --> 0:00:11.600
<v Speaker 2>star is born.

0:00:11.600 --> 0:00:15.239
<v Speaker 3>Elon humped up on Mars Jus and Kennemy. He is

0:00:15.280 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 3>the Thomas Edison plus plus plus of our age. Probably

0:00:19.040 --> 0:00:21.159
<v Speaker 3>his whole life is from a position of insecurity. I

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:21.800
<v Speaker 3>feel for the guy.

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:25.319
<v Speaker 4>I would say ninety eight percent really appreciate what he does.

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:28.479
<v Speaker 1>But those two percent that are nasty, they are out

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 1>in four post. We were meant for great things in

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the United States of America, and Elon reminds us of that.

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm very disappointed in Elan.

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 3>I've helped Elon a lot.

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 4>At Welcome to Elan and Bloomberg's weekly podcast about Elon Musk.

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 4>It's Tuesday, September ninth. I'm your host, David Popatoppolos. Okay,

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 4>So Elon, it appears, just may have himself a new

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:02.680
<v Speaker 4>Tesla package. I'm I mean a very very big pay package.

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:06.240
<v Speaker 4>If all goes well, and you know, every home in

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:10.040
<v Speaker 4>America has an optimist robot wiping baby bottoms and a

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 4>driverless car to parked in the driveway, and Tesla's stock

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 4>is worth many times more than it is today, well,

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 4>then the package could be worth one trillion dollars. Max,

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 4>that's that's trillion with the T. Yeah, I'm getting this right.

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 5>I mean, if it's wiping the baby bottoms though, that's

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:30.000
<v Speaker 5>a trillion dollar opportunity right there.

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 4>Okay, you know that guy, that's co host Max Chafkin. Now,

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 4>all the package needs is shareholder approval. The vote comes

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:40.040
<v Speaker 4>at the company's annual shareholder meeting on November sixth. We'll

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 4>look ahead to that vote and break down the inns

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 4>and the outs and the whys of the package the

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 4>Tesla board is proposing. And also at that meeting, less

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 4>dramatic perhaps, but also very important, shareholders will vote to

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 4>determine if Tesla should start investing in Elon's AI company XAI.

0:01:56.800 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 4>Will be joined a little later by Bloomberg Tech reporter

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 4>Kurt Wagner at the sci Us that potential Tesla XA ideal.

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 4>But first for Elon's payday. Sitting here with me is

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 4>that guy, Max. Hey, Max, Hey, David, and over in

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:15.520
<v Speaker 4>Oakland Bloomberg's top muscologist, Dana Hall. Dana Hello, Hey, Hey, okay,

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:20.120
<v Speaker 4>so but wait a minute, by the way, Max, congratulations,

0:02:20.360 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 4>you have big book news today.

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:26.360
<v Speaker 5>Yep, that's right, David and listeners. The paperback of my

0:02:26.440 --> 0:02:29.919
<v Speaker 5>book The Contrarian, which is a biography of Peter Teal,

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 5>is out today as we're recording this Tuesday, September ninth.

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:38.600
<v Speaker 5>I actually originally wrote it in twenty twenty one, but

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 5>I updated it for the paperback. I wrote a new

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:46.079
<v Speaker 5>essay trying to kind of make sense of Elon and

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 5>how he related to some of the stuff I wrote

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 5>about back then. And yeah, I wrote a whole whole

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 5>new essay about it. Basically, the argument in it, I'll

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:57.919
<v Speaker 5>keep the Church Sweet, is that Peter Teal's kind of

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 5>activism and advocacy and waste and his money became kind

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 5>of a model for Elon during the last election cycle.

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:07.919
<v Speaker 5>So hopefully it's something for people listen to this podcast.

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:08.799
<v Speaker 2>I've read it.

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:10.680
<v Speaker 5>I'd really appreciate it if you checked it out and

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 5>review it.

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 2>And so, oh, I already read it.

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 4>Do I need to reread it?

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? You do from cover to cover?

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 4>Jeez, Okay, then I shall excellent. Congratulations again, Max, very cool.

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 4>All right, So Dan, before we talk about this new

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 4>or potentially new Musk pay package, let's just step back

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 4>a little for a minute and talk about the old

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 4>Musk pay package, the one that ran into trouble in

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:34.640
<v Speaker 4>Delaware court.

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 2>What exactly is the status of that? Is it totally dead?

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 2>Mostly dead?

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 5>What?

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 3>No, not at all? So the Delaware Chance recurt struck

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 3>down the pay package. Tesla appealed the pay package to

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 3>the Delaware Supreme Court. Oral arguments for that are in October.

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 3>In the interim, Tesla has already awarded Musk like a

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 3>third of that twenty eighteen pay package, as like a hedge,

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 3>depending on which way where it goes. But then you know,

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 3>in Elon's mind, he still hasn't been paid, and he

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:08.040
<v Speaker 3>would like very much like to get paid, particularly if

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 3>they want him to stick around. So this is a

0:04:10.000 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 3>new it's like the go forward pay package. Like, forget

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:16.359
<v Speaker 3>about Delaware, forget about twenty eighteen. That's all up in

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 3>the courts. How do we incentivize Elon to stick around

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 3>for this new wave of growth which he sees as

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:25.360
<v Speaker 3>all being about optimism and robotics at AI.

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 5>But to Dana's point, Tesla very much still plans to

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:30.679
<v Speaker 5>give him that money, that old pay package.

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 2>What was that old one worth?

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it was like fifty billion dollars at the time.

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:36.359
<v Speaker 4>Jump change.

0:04:36.640 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 3>Max.

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:40.599
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, yeah, but it's fluctuated a bit because it's the

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:44.479
<v Speaker 5>it reflects the stock press under So so fifty ish billion,

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 5>give or take, still significantly smaller, I think if my

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 5>math is right, then one trillion.

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:52.280
<v Speaker 2>Yes, So, Dana, here's the thing.

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 4>When he had that package, and as you always reminded us,

0:04:56.320 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 4>and as Max is doing again, so now there was

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 4>no like truly set number on it because the value

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 4>of the package, that old package fluctuated with the value

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 4>of the stock and some other things. But that package

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:14.599
<v Speaker 4>was deemed, if I'm remembering correctly, totally unprecedented and slightly

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 4>inconceivable to us mere masses. So how do we go

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 4>from a number that already seemed large to a number

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 4>that seems inconceivable. Why did the board feel obligated to say, hey, Elon,

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 4>here's up to potentially one trillion.

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:34.040
<v Speaker 3>Dollars because Elon threatened to quit. So here's the thing

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:35.720
<v Speaker 3>that you need to understand about Elon and Max and

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:38.920
<v Speaker 3>I have talked about this a lot. Like money alone

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:40.599
<v Speaker 3>does not motivate Elon.

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:41.560
<v Speaker 5>He is already the.

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:44.839
<v Speaker 3>Richest person in the world. What motivates him is really

0:05:45.000 --> 0:05:47.919
<v Speaker 3>huge Swinging from the fence's goals that everyone thinks is

0:05:47.960 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 3>crazy and control, and what he wants is a bigger

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:54.719
<v Speaker 3>stake in Tesla. He wants twenty five percent. So the

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 3>new pay package is a series of twelve trenches, and

0:05:57.279 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 3>it's like a video game, like as you hit these milestone,

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 3>you unlock a trnch, and the tronch is both market

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:05.839
<v Speaker 3>cap which goes up with these you know, the first

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:08.159
<v Speaker 3>tronch you have to hit two trillion dollars, the second

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:10.280
<v Speaker 3>tronch is two point five trillion, all the way up

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:13.360
<v Speaker 3>to the over eight trillion dollar mark. But you also

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 3>have to hit operational milestones that have to do with

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 3>revenue and like products like robotaxis, FSD, take rate, all

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:24.599
<v Speaker 3>this other kind of stuff. And with each tranch that

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:29.359
<v Speaker 3>Elon unlocks, presumably I mean shareholders win too, right, Like

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 3>if the company goes for me worth a trillion dollars

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 3>to over eight trillion, everybody wins. That is the premise

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 3>of the pay package. And with each trnch, Elon gets

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 3>more stock, which gives him more control. So conceivably, by

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 3>the end of this he'll be a trillionaire and I'll

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:44.839
<v Speaker 3>have a twenty five percent stake in the company.

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 5>I would amend what Dana said just slightly, which is

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:50.720
<v Speaker 5>to say, I agree with her that Elon does not

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:54.040
<v Speaker 5>care about money really, but he does care about really,

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 5>really large amounts. And I think Dana's right, like a

0:06:57.160 --> 0:07:00.840
<v Speaker 5>big part of this, like the money is part of it.

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 5>And of course he has big plans, right he wants

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 5>to colonize Mars. He can definitely find a use White

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 5>Baby trillion dollars. But also like, this is a way

0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 5>I think to take the focus away from Tesla's current issues.

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 5>And I went back to look at the context of

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 5>that twenty eighteen award, because you're right, David, like at

0:07:22.600 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 5>the time there were headlines like this is the biggest

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 5>this is like more money than anyone could could conceivably

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 5>be and the headlines were very similar. But on the

0:07:32.080 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 5>other hand, like, if he were to do this, it

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 5>would be like an amazing, unprecedented amount of growth. Now,

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 5>what was happening in early twenty eighteen when that award

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 5>was made, Well, Tesla was basically in crisis. They were

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 5>frantically struggling to produce Model three Sedans. They were in

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 5>what Elon you know, would took to calling quote unquote

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 5>production hell, this all kind of seems quaint, but at

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 5>the time it didn't seem totally clear that he was

0:07:58.720 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 5>going to figure out a way to like actually mass

0:08:01.520 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 5>produce this car and do so profitably. And as Dana remembers, well,

0:08:04.880 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 5>they were short sellers who were convinced the company was

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 5>going out of business, and this was kind of a

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 5>way back then to say, Okay, let's ignore the problems

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 5>for a second and think about what the future could

0:08:15.760 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 5>look like. And I think that's what's happening again. This

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 5>is a way, in addition to incentivize must to keep

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 5>them from quitting, to from the point of view of

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 5>a lot of Tesla investors, to pay them what is worth.

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 5>It's a way to change the channel and to create

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 5>some sort of defined goals. Elon loves talking about these

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 5>kind of abstract, far off goals, stuff like optimize wiping

0:08:38.520 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 5>baby butts without a clear timeline for doing so. But

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:43.959
<v Speaker 5>now look, we have a timeline. Sort of yeah.

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:47.320
<v Speaker 4>I mean, there is seemingly a somewhat fantastical quality to

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:50.319
<v Speaker 4>it all, and the changing the narrative thought is an

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 4>interesting one, although I guess it's not super intuitive to me,

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 4>And yet I look at the stock price, and the

0:08:55.960 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 4>stock price Loan and Behold is grinding ever higher? Is

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:02.720
<v Speaker 4>that I don't I know, you don't follow every twist

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:04.960
<v Speaker 4>and turn of the stock price. But is some of

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 4>that rebound in the stock predicated on the fact that

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 4>it looks like the board has Elon signed on for

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 4>the long haul?

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 3>I think so, I mean, that's always you know, they're

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:17.960
<v Speaker 3>sort of in this like mutually assured chokehold right where

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:20.840
<v Speaker 3>like the board needs Elon, Elon threatens to quit, the

0:09:20.880 --> 0:09:23.320
<v Speaker 3>board tries to appease him. He is the sort of

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:26.560
<v Speaker 3>singular person who's got the vision of the company. He's

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 3>been the CEO since two thousand and eight. But another

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 3>way to think about the pay packages is if the

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:35.120
<v Speaker 3>twenty eighteen package was described as like a moonshot that

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 3>everyone thought was crazy, like he did actually achieve all

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:41.560
<v Speaker 3>the milestones and then some So now they're sort of

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 3>re upping the same conceit, although now it's like a

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 3>Mars shot and we're talking trillions not billions. And Musk

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:50.720
<v Speaker 3>has always said that he thinks that there's a path

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 3>for Tesla to be the most valuable company in the world,

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:56.439
<v Speaker 3>and if that's what it takes to motivate him. I

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 3>think the board has made the deduction like, well, why not,

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 3>let's do whatever we can to motivate it and Wall

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 3>win in the process. And I think that this will

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:06.560
<v Speaker 3>easily pass at the shareholder meeting on November sixth, And

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 3>clearly there's gonna be like a whole campaign to get

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 3>people engaged with shareholders, particularly the retail fan base. And yeah,

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:18.440
<v Speaker 3>it's like unprecedented incorporated America. But but Elon is an

0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 3>unprecedented figure.

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:21.679
<v Speaker 4>That's I was going to ask you that, so you

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 4>see it totally sailing through, Max, you as well. This

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:27.079
<v Speaker 4>is like a ninety nine to one vote.

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:31.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, this is like Vladimir Putin's Latimer reelection. Yes, it's

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:33.440
<v Speaker 5>going to pass. This is a huge amount of money.

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 5>And if you're if you're mad about inequity in the world,

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:39.559
<v Speaker 5>there are lots of reasons to sort of think this

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:41.600
<v Speaker 5>is a bad idea. I mean, it is kind of

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:45.959
<v Speaker 5>funny that like Elon Musk has spent the last I

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 5>don't know a year or so, like just unbelie alienating

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 5>his customers, like just totally taking essentially like a boring

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 5>company flamethrower to his existing business. And the board has

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:01.560
<v Speaker 5>turning around thanking him and going to write him like

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 5>a gigantic check. But as Danna says, what they're doing

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 5>is saying, hey, if you can back up these these

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 5>very brand statements that you've been making, Yeah, sure, we'll

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:12.160
<v Speaker 5>pay you. There's one thing I don't did Dana mention

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:14.559
<v Speaker 5>that that there's a succession planning part of this as well?

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 5>I don't know that, like the latter tranches.

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 4>With one of his kids, require him to.

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 5>Come up with a succession plan and for the board

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 5>to approve it. I think that also does kind of

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:31.200
<v Speaker 5>answer some of the concerns that you were seeing even

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:34.760
<v Speaker 5>from Tesla bulls around the time when Elon was kind

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:36.600
<v Speaker 5>of at his most erratic earlier.

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:37.840
<v Speaker 2>This my money's on X.

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 4>If that's what they're he's grooming him at a young age,

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 4>just get him, get him right there within twenty five

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 4>years actually running the show.

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:44.840
<v Speaker 2>All right?

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 4>So Dan, it sails through a November sixth in the

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:53.320
<v Speaker 4>shareholder meeting. Is there potentially any other court obstacles to

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 4>overcome on this one too? Just like the prior one

0:11:56.120 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 4>or the fact that Tesla is now domicile in Texas

0:11:59.840 --> 0:12:03.199
<v Speaker 4>means that are no longer domicile than Delaware means nah,

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 4>it's the core problems are a thing of the past.

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:09.079
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think that now that they are you know,

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:12.680
<v Speaker 3>legally domiciled in Texas, it will be much harder to

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 3>bring a lawsuit, in part because there's also like the

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:20.600
<v Speaker 3>shareholder that brought the lawsuit in Delaware was like it

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:22.440
<v Speaker 3>was like a pocket plainiff, right, Like it's you know,

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:24.680
<v Speaker 3>basically the way these things work is you have plainiffs

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 3>attorneys who like find a plaintiff to bring suit, and

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:29.559
<v Speaker 3>the plaintiff might own like ten shares. It's gonna be

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 3>much harder to do that in Texas, and you have

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:35.000
<v Speaker 3>to have a larger shareholder. So I just think that

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:37.719
<v Speaker 3>they moved to Texas for a reason and they've got

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 3>a very favorable court system there. The proxy also has

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 3>some interesting language about how Muscus to quote unquote like

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 3>wind down his political work within a reasonable timeframe, but

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't exactly specify what that means, Like does that

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 3>mean he can no longer like fund you know, candidates

0:12:56.480 --> 0:12:58.680
<v Speaker 3>and like elections. Does it mean that he has to

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:01.960
<v Speaker 3>stop like, you know, ripping on politics on X Like

0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 3>It's very ill defined.

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean he's been doing a lot of politicking

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:09.440
<v Speaker 5>over the last last couple of days even so I know,

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:10.560
<v Speaker 5>so I don't know.

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 4>But is that just can eat politic abroad or is

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:15.880
<v Speaker 4>it just domestic politics or all politics? I mean, can you,

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, go on and on about UK politics

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 4>as long as you don't mention US politics, Hey.

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:25.440
<v Speaker 5>Dana, just question the political thing? Is that this proposal

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 5>for political neutrality or that's a different No, it's separate, Okay, Okay.

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:32.680
<v Speaker 3>There's a sharel of our resolution about political neutrality that

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:35.080
<v Speaker 3>the Tesla board is urging everyone to vote know on.

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:38.600
<v Speaker 3>But within the proxy itself there's language about how they

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:41.440
<v Speaker 3>would like Musk to wind down his political activities in

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:42.680
<v Speaker 3>a reasonable fashion.

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:46.200
<v Speaker 4>Dana, before we move on to Tesla and Xai, anything

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:47.960
<v Speaker 4>else we need to know about this package.

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 3>I just would really encourage all listeners of the show

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 3>and investors to actually read the proxy. It's over three

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 3>hundred pages long. Three board members are up for reelection,

0:13:57.720 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 3>there are sixteen resolutions. It's a big package. If you're

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:02.959
<v Speaker 3>an investor, you really need to read the proxy.

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:05.920
<v Speaker 4>You know, Max is funny. The other day, I think

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:10.200
<v Speaker 4>when we had talked about a similar musk package. But

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 4>if Elon's worth one trillion dollars, come on, you can't

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 4>tell me that I'm not worth a billion. That I

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 4>don't I'm not one one thousandth right as good as Elon.

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 2>Give me a give me a give me a billion.

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 2>Misplayed this negotiation.

0:14:26.360 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 5>You gotta spend uh, you gotta start a political party,

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 5>spend months fighting with the president. There's just a lot

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 5>of lot of you haven't done that. Elon has done that.

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:49.800
<v Speaker 4>That fine, pam, Okay. So we're now joined by Bloomberg

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 4>Ace Tech reporter Kurt Wagner. Kurt, Hello, and Kurt, by

0:14:52.560 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 4>the way, no hard feelings. I think the last time

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 4>I introduced you, it got you know, I kind of

0:14:57.360 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 4>got in your face.

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:00.240
<v Speaker 2>You're good with that. We're good, We're cool.

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, who's talking to me about your name against sir?

0:15:03.960 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 2>Of course we're good.

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 1>We're always good on this pod. Yeah, that's all good.

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 4>Welcome back, Hurt. So listen, we just talked about the

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 4>pay package, which will be voted on at the shareholder

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 4>meeting and no members six and then shareholders are also

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 4>going to vote on whether Tesla should go ahead and

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 4>invest in Xai tell Us a little bit about what

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:25.280
<v Speaker 4>this investment would look like.

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 1>So Xai is Elon Musk's ai startup. It's been around

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 1>for a little over two years now, and it's been

0:15:34.000 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 1>raising money like crazy because the company is out buying

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 1>all these expensive GPUs and data centers and trying to

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:44.040
<v Speaker 1>keep pace with the open aies of the world, the

0:15:44.080 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Googles of the world on the ai race, and so

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Elon has been fundraising heavily. He has talked publicly on

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 1>several occasions on his x account about the idea of

0:15:54.880 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Tesla becoming an investor in Xai. But you know, instead

0:15:59.840 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 1>of just simply making that decision himself, he says, we

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 1>are going to put this to a shareholder vote, and

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 1>so that is what will happen in November, is that

0:16:06.280 --> 0:16:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the shareholders will decide should they essentially encourage the board

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 1>to invest in Xai. Now, there's a few things I

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 1>would point out, at least my interpretation of the proxy.

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>The first is that they're not stipulating a dollar amount.

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 1>They would leave that up to the board. Whatever the

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 1>board deems appropriate would be sort of the decision here.

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:29.760
<v Speaker 1>But second, I my understanding, if you go to page

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 1>one seventy six of the proxy. I'm sure everybody has

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 1>been scouring this thing. It seems that this is a recommendation.

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 1>It is not a binding vote. So even if shareholders

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 1>say yes, we should invest inn XA, or even know

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:46.280
<v Speaker 1>we should not, those are just recommendations from shareholders. My

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:48.880
<v Speaker 1>understanding is that the board can make this decision one

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 1>way or the other on its own, regardless of the

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 1>outcome of.

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:56.520
<v Speaker 4>The vote, So non binding. In other words, to eat right. Indeed,

0:16:56.520 --> 0:17:00.720
<v Speaker 4>even if shareholders this doesn't seem terribly likely, but shareholders

0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 4>say no, we're not going for this, the board just says, hey, no,

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:05.320
<v Speaker 4>we're going to do it anyways.

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:08.800
<v Speaker 1>That's my understanding. You know, it says that it's a

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:11.639
<v Speaker 1>non binding vote and that the board will continue to

0:17:11.760 --> 0:17:16.640
<v Speaker 1>invest in AI based on its fiduciary responsibility. So in theory,

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 1>even if shareholders say, please, don't do this, but the

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:22.119
<v Speaker 1>board believes it's in the best interest of shareholders. Okay,

0:17:22.200 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 1>My again reading of it is that they can kind

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:25.879
<v Speaker 1>of make the decision they want, right.

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 4>So Max, I ask you, sir, is this a bailout

0:17:31.320 --> 0:17:37.119
<v Speaker 4>for Xai and Albatross going forward for Tesla or a

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 4>great opportunity because what's hotter in the world, my friend

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:41.520
<v Speaker 4>than Ai.

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:45.680
<v Speaker 5>I mean it could be either, right, and I think

0:17:46.760 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 5>if you're looking at Tesla like a normal company, this

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 5>would be insane. I mean, you have a CEO who

0:17:54.200 --> 0:17:57.959
<v Speaker 5>is ostensibly working on AI, the hottest industry there is,

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 5>who has a side project started this other ostensibly maybe

0:18:02.920 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 5>competing AI thing, kind of started.

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:10.200
<v Speaker 2>Poaching competing with Tesla. He's poaching employees. Xai is poaching

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:10.719
<v Speaker 2>from Tesla.

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:13.399
<v Speaker 5>Well, their employees have gone from Tesla at XAI. I

0:18:14.440 --> 0:18:17.160
<v Speaker 5>don't think Elon Musk would would do something as as

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:19.720
<v Speaker 5>ruthless as try to try to poach employees from one.

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:20.199
<v Speaker 2>Company to the other.

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:23.719
<v Speaker 5>But I'm just saying, like from a normal perspective, like

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:27.880
<v Speaker 5>this is crazy. It raises so many different issues. From

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:30.119
<v Speaker 5>an Elon in perspective, I hate to say it, but

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:32.359
<v Speaker 5>it's totally normal. This is just like this is like

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:36.440
<v Speaker 5>Elon being Elon. He in so many different ways, doesn't

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:40.440
<v Speaker 5>operate as if these companies are separate. I'm sure that

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 5>we're good reasons in his mind to create Xai as

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 5>a separate and he allows it to raise money, you know,

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 5>on private markets take advantage of this boom and venture

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:55.399
<v Speaker 5>capital like you can probably compensate these AI engineers in

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:58.439
<v Speaker 5>ways that are are helpful if you're especially if you're

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:01.359
<v Speaker 5>trying to recruit from some of the other privately held

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 5>AI companies. So so, I don't know, I mean, it

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 5>seems like this could turn into an albatross at the time.

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:12.960
<v Speaker 5>I think in retrospect, Tesla's purchase of Solar City, which

0:19:13.000 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 5>Elon Musk also co founded.

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I was gonna go there. So now that you've

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:18.960
<v Speaker 4>jumped the shark, so tell us remind us a little

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 4>bit about the Tesla Solar City saga from years ago.

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:26.880
<v Speaker 5>Well, right, So, so Elon Musk started this solar company,

0:19:27.080 --> 0:19:31.119
<v Speaker 5>Solar City, that went public and then ran into a

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:34.000
<v Speaker 5>lot of issues. Basically, it's its main business, which was

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 5>installing solar panels, became less and less profitable, and Tesla

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:41.880
<v Speaker 5>eventually bought it in what, at the time to some

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 5>critics looked like a bailout. I think in retrospect it

0:19:46.080 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 5>does look that way, because Tesla has not done as

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 5>much with solar than as I think some some sort

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 5>of solar fans, you know, would have hoped. I think,

0:19:56.720 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 5>you know, we could look back at this that way.

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:01.200
<v Speaker 5>On the other hand, you know, if when the singularity

0:20:01.280 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 5>comes and when we're all praying to our robot gods

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:06.600
<v Speaker 5>and they're not already Yeah, not me, but I know

0:20:06.600 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 5>that I understand that some are. But you know, maybe

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 5>this will look like a smart move if Tesla's in

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:14.080
<v Speaker 5>the AI business, Elon Musk is somewhat distracted, has this

0:20:14.119 --> 0:20:17.640
<v Speaker 5>other AI company. I do get the argument that even

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 5>if you're just a Tesla shareholder being totally kind of

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 5>rational about this, that you would just say it'd be

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 5>better if these were one thing.

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 2>Dnaholl what say you?

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:29.439
<v Speaker 3>Well, this is where related party transactions get super interesting

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:32.920
<v Speaker 3>because you have to remember that Xai is a customer

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 3>of Tesla. Tesla sells their megapacks, which are the batteries

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:40.160
<v Speaker 3>that power utilities, you know, the big energy storage product

0:20:40.200 --> 0:20:43.679
<v Speaker 3>that Tesla is banking on to Xai. This data center

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 3>in Memphis that Xai is building is like now filled

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:48.919
<v Speaker 3>with megapacks. And so there's a lot of ways in

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:52.679
<v Speaker 3>which the companies are already overlapping with each other. Groc

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:56.160
<v Speaker 3>is now being integrated into Tesla's cars. So I guess

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:58.639
<v Speaker 3>I'm curious for Kurt, like, do you think there's do

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:03.480
<v Speaker 3>you think that Tesla would buy Xai or would like

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 3>which vehicle is more important to elon going forward?

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:10.400
<v Speaker 4>Before you answer that question, Kurt, I will say, right,

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:15.120
<v Speaker 4>so you have Xai buys x right, indeed, now does

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 4>Tesla buy Xai or to I mean, like one fish

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 4>keeps eating the other, what's the next fish to get

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:21.400
<v Speaker 4>consumed here?

0:21:21.520 --> 0:21:23.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it really depends on the amount of money invested.

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 1>We saw SpaceX, for example, already invest in Xai, and

0:21:27.800 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I believe it was a two billion dollar investment. In

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:32.320
<v Speaker 1>the world of tech right now, and certainly in the

0:21:32.320 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 1>world of AI, that's relatively small, right. This is not

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:38.920
<v Speaker 1>a massive we are chaining ourselves to this company forever

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:40.680
<v Speaker 1>and if they go down, we go down with them

0:21:40.760 --> 0:21:43.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of situation. And so if that's what we see

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:46.080
<v Speaker 1>from Tesla, is you know, hey, here's two billion dollars,

0:21:46.119 --> 0:21:48.760
<v Speaker 1>here's five billion dollars. Other than the fact that it's

0:21:48.760 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 1>a massive conflict of interest, I think we probably all

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 1>agree this same person running two companies. I don't think

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:56.360
<v Speaker 1>it's that dramatic of an idea to say, hey, there's

0:21:56.400 --> 0:21:59.040
<v Speaker 1>this up and coming AI startup, let's pick our horse here.

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 1>If they decide to go the opposite, and I think

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:05.879
<v Speaker 1>Xai is raising money somewhere around two hundred billion dollars

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. So if Tesla were to try

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:12.200
<v Speaker 1>to swallow this whale hole, that is where I think

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 1>things become incredibly not only you know, probably inappropriate if

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:21.119
<v Speaker 1>you're a Tesla shareholder, but become much more potentially damaging

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:22.919
<v Speaker 1>for Tesla too, because now all of a sudden, you

0:22:22.920 --> 0:22:25.480
<v Speaker 1>are in that situation where if Xai goes down, you're

0:22:25.480 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 1>probably going to have a meaningful decline with it. And

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:32.360
<v Speaker 1>so until we know the investment amount, it's a little

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 1>bit hard for me to say whether this is like

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the worst idea or the best idea ever. We have

0:22:36.920 --> 0:22:39.879
<v Speaker 1>heard Elon say he doesn't believe Tesla should buy Xai.

0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Now we all know that Elon's saying one thing doesn't

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 1>necessarily make it so, But as far as what he

0:22:46.080 --> 0:22:48.919
<v Speaker 1>has said publicly, he sees this as an investment, not

0:22:49.040 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 1>an acquisition, And I think until we know the dollar amount,

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 1>we kind of have to reserve a little bit.

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 3>And he did a poll a while back where he

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:57.399
<v Speaker 3>floated the idea of was it wasn't it five billion?

0:22:57.560 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 3>But then the I think it was five billion, and figure.

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:04.920
<v Speaker 2>But then what were what were the pole results? It's

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:06.200
<v Speaker 2>like flat putin.

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, you'd be shocked, David to learn that the pole

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:13.119
<v Speaker 1>that Elon put out on X was in favor of

0:23:13.160 --> 0:23:16.160
<v Speaker 1>such a thing. So I'm sure that's surprising.

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:18.919
<v Speaker 5>Even at two billion or five billion or whatever. Sure, Like,

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 5>what's the argument for a Tesla shareholder that this is

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:26.160
<v Speaker 5>a good use of their cash because like they could

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:29.960
<v Speaker 5>also invest in open Ai or Anthropic or one.

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:30.160
<v Speaker 2>Of the other.

0:23:30.520 --> 0:23:35.359
<v Speaker 5>I don't understand, except like, what's gonna make our CEO happy?

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 5>And he's gonna he's gonna baby be happy, like if

0:23:38.760 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 5>a happy Elon is a happy Tesla, Like.

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 4>I mean, like, what's going to go out and sink

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 4>money at the Sam Altman's company. Come on, he'll be

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:47.680
<v Speaker 4>He'll go around Poudy phase for months.

0:23:47.960 --> 0:23:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Two things, one part of the investments, like, yes, could

0:23:51.359 --> 0:23:53.400
<v Speaker 1>they invest two billion dollars in open Ai they I'm

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:55.760
<v Speaker 1>sure sureholders would. But the open ay is not going

0:23:55.840 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 1>to take Elon in Tesla's money, right, So okay, So

0:23:58.600 --> 0:24:01.080
<v Speaker 1>some of these avenues are close to them. But the

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 1>thing you just said actually in Elon Inc. In the

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:07.480
<v Speaker 1>world of Elon, is a real thing, like do you

0:24:07.600 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 1>keep Elon happy, do you keep him motivated? Do you

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:15.440
<v Speaker 1>keep him feeling like, yeah, spending money on and time

0:24:15.480 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 1>on his Ai startup? That does not benefit a Tesla shareholder.

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:21.200
<v Speaker 1>And so if you're sitting there saying, hey, I think

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:23.479
<v Speaker 1>Xai and everything Elon touches is going to go from

0:24:23.520 --> 0:24:26.440
<v Speaker 1>two hundred billion to a trillion, then you're a shareholder

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 1>saying this is my chance to five x my my

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 1>investment in Xai. So again, these are all hypothetical, but

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 1>you have to and I know you know this, Max,

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:37.359
<v Speaker 1>but if you are an Elon fan and Elon stan

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 1>and investor, this is the way you think of it

0:24:39.520 --> 0:24:42.679
<v Speaker 1>is that you are building and buying into the world

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 1>of Elon Musk. And that's what makes sense, I think

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 1>to a lot of people.

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:49.200
<v Speaker 4>All Right, Dane, so you told us the Musk pay

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:52.959
<v Speaker 4>package totally sales through November six, So too, then does

0:24:53.160 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 4>does this one? Whether it turns out to be exactly

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:58.639
<v Speaker 4>binding or not, this one gets thumbs up from shareholders.

0:24:58.119 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 3>As well, I think. So, I mean Elon has signed

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 3>that he approves it, and we have to remember that

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 3>Tesla has a very engaged shareholder base. Retail investors actually

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:09.439
<v Speaker 3>do vote their shares. You know, the board will be

0:25:09.480 --> 0:25:12.920
<v Speaker 3>doing a lot of discussions with the big institutional investors,

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 3>and I'm sure they'll be campaigns around these various items

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 3>that will be before everyone.

0:25:19.760 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 5>I mean, if you do think about the challenges that

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:25.639
<v Speaker 5>some of these AI companies face, which is that, like

0:25:26.400 --> 0:25:31.159
<v Speaker 5>it's not clear that the returns from using large language

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 5>models are awesome. You also wonder, like how easy is

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:36.080
<v Speaker 5>it going to be for them to say, like double

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:38.200
<v Speaker 5>sales from where they are now. Like, obviously a lot

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:42.240
<v Speaker 5>of big companies are purchasing licenses for large language models.

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:44.680
<v Speaker 5>This is potentially a growth field, Like if you buy

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 5>into the idea that Elon's going to put a million

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:50.400
<v Speaker 5>starts on a million optimizer year or whatever, like this

0:25:50.480 --> 0:25:54.879
<v Speaker 5>is definitely perhaps a more promising growth channel than like

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:59.679
<v Speaker 5>Rock's current like number one revenue stream, which is I

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 5>think memes.

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:03.879
<v Speaker 2>Basically, yeah, that's a big that's a big business.

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Soon to be video games, and I think like an

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:07.000
<v Speaker 1>AI movie.

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:11.160
<v Speaker 4>So for posterity, here here's my call. Right Indeed, Xai

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:14.199
<v Speaker 4>bought X, Tesla will at some point in the not

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:22.600
<v Speaker 4>so distant future buy XAI SpaceX, then buys Tesla and

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:24.720
<v Speaker 4>then the last one. The US government buys the whole thing,

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:26.200
<v Speaker 4>buy SpaceX.

0:26:25.840 --> 0:26:30.440
<v Speaker 1>For fifty dollars the Russian nestindl of Ink.

0:26:34.640 --> 0:26:36.159
<v Speaker 4>All right, let's sen Kurt stick with us for a

0:26:36.200 --> 0:26:39.439
<v Speaker 4>second here, because we're actually this is a little gift

0:26:39.440 --> 0:26:42.359
<v Speaker 4>that we were handed. In a story from Politico yesterdays,

0:26:42.359 --> 0:26:44.480
<v Speaker 4>I feel like we have another. Cage match is still

0:26:44.520 --> 0:26:46.960
<v Speaker 4>a thing, Max. We haven't done a cage match in

0:26:47.000 --> 0:26:50.800
<v Speaker 4>a long long time. But you remember the Scott Bess

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:55.320
<v Speaker 4>and Elon musk Uh streaming match where apparently there was

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 4>even maybe a little there was a little freakus.

0:26:57.280 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 2>There was a little altercation, a little rough housing.

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 5>There are some reports of a shove, I believe maybe

0:27:02.640 --> 0:27:05.639
<v Speaker 5>like a physical alter It depends on who you're who

0:27:05.680 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 5>you're listening to. I think Steve Bannon mentioned a physical something,

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 5>a physical present.

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 2>Elon is a big guy. Yeah, he's a pretty big.

0:27:15.359 --> 0:27:19.160
<v Speaker 4>Guy too, And apparently at one point bessn't the Treasury secretary.

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 4>This is back when Elon was in Washington twenty four

0:27:22.880 --> 0:27:26.320
<v Speaker 4>to seven, back in the winter and early spring. Best

0:27:26.359 --> 0:27:28.359
<v Speaker 4>In at one point it said to musk as they

0:27:28.400 --> 0:27:31.680
<v Speaker 4>were going nose to nose about some some point or another.

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 2>You you you now.

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 4>At the time, we all thought and assumed it was

0:27:37.320 --> 0:27:40.040
<v Speaker 4>just Musk that like, you know, obviously Musk.

0:27:39.800 --> 0:27:41.280
<v Speaker 2>Had just brought it out of it, brought it out

0:27:41.320 --> 0:27:41.639
<v Speaker 2>of him Ian.

0:27:41.640 --> 0:27:43.880
<v Speaker 4>I think the Atlantic wrote that, you know, Musk brought

0:27:43.880 --> 0:27:48.119
<v Speaker 4>it out of this mild mannered billionaire. Turns out, we

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:52.720
<v Speaker 4>find out this week Scott Bessen is no mild mannered billionaire.

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 4>He and Bill Poulty, right of of now rising fame,

0:27:57.119 --> 0:28:00.439
<v Speaker 4>head of the Federal Housing Finance Agency and a and

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:05.520
<v Speaker 4>a prominent Trump loyalist, went toe to toe themselves just

0:28:05.560 --> 0:28:08.959
<v Speaker 4>the other day, with Bessen getting in Poultice's face and

0:28:09.040 --> 0:28:12.159
<v Speaker 4>saying to him, why the are you talking to the

0:28:12.200 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 4>president about me? He likes the word I'm noticing here,

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:19.640
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna punch you in your face, So.

0:28:20.080 --> 0:28:23.159
<v Speaker 5>The same phrase basically.

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:26.480
<v Speaker 4>So kind of yes, the same word at least. So

0:28:26.560 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 4>what I'm thinking is it's either the best in Musk.

0:28:29.840 --> 0:28:33.960
<v Speaker 4>One has to happen, because Besson still seems like he's

0:28:34.440 --> 0:28:37.280
<v Speaker 4>got some of these anger, some of the animosity I

0:28:37.320 --> 0:28:40.760
<v Speaker 4>feel like is still for Musk, or so we get that,

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:42.560
<v Speaker 4>make that happen, or we go the three of them

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:42.960
<v Speaker 4>are ringing.

0:28:43.200 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 5>So, Okay, I'm really glad you brought this up, David.

0:28:46.040 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 5>This really brings up a lot of important questions. I

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:51.960
<v Speaker 5>think you're right that you could you could say, well, actually,

0:28:52.000 --> 0:28:54.520
<v Speaker 5>what we've learned is that Scott Beson is just like

0:28:54.560 --> 0:28:57.280
<v Speaker 5>a guy likes to pix it up, you know, who

0:28:57.280 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 5>can get physical, and that reputation of being mild mannered

0:29:01.600 --> 0:29:03.840
<v Speaker 5>was like not true all along, and we just you know,

0:29:03.840 --> 0:29:06.280
<v Speaker 5>we were lulled into that sense. But he has a

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:10.320
<v Speaker 5>Southern accent, he's from like us. He seems like a

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 5>you know whatever. But anyway, I think what it could

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:18.520
<v Speaker 5>be is that bessent't like essentially was transformed by this

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 5>experience with Musk.

0:29:19.880 --> 0:29:22.720
<v Speaker 2>Now, recall that I'm.

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 5>Joking mostly, but I do think you think about the

0:29:26.840 --> 0:29:31.280
<v Speaker 5>conflict between the two men, it was not clear to

0:29:31.440 --> 0:29:34.360
<v Speaker 5>me or I think to anyone else, that Bessnt prevails

0:29:34.360 --> 0:29:37.719
<v Speaker 5>in that conflict. Remember, Elon is Trump's number one donor.

0:29:37.840 --> 0:29:42.360
<v Speaker 5>He's like the the certified best friend. He's in family photos, like, like,

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 5>who is Scott Besson? Exactly right, He's a prominent hedge

0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:48.080
<v Speaker 5>fund guy, but certainly not as high profile as Elon Musk.

0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:50.840
<v Speaker 5>It would have been possible for Bessint to go toe

0:29:50.880 --> 0:29:53.160
<v Speaker 5>to toe with Elon Musk and for this to end

0:29:53.360 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 5>with bessentt in some kind of weird Oval office exit

0:29:56.360 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 5>with his own black eye, just like Elon had hot,

0:29:58.320 --> 0:30:00.760
<v Speaker 5>But instead it ended with Elon of Cour exiting the

0:30:00.760 --> 0:30:03.600
<v Speaker 5>Trump administration, essentially like Taylor.

0:30:03.320 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, you're telling me best, I'm saying Bolden.

0:30:05.920 --> 0:30:08.600
<v Speaker 5>In Bolden, he has figured out like this is this

0:30:08.640 --> 0:30:10.240
<v Speaker 5>could be a way to take on.

0:30:11.360 --> 0:30:14.120
<v Speaker 4>Mosk and Bolden he turned Scott Besson into a different man.

0:30:14.200 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 4>Kurt Wagner, what say you?

0:30:16.560 --> 0:30:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh my gosh, I mean, I feel like the least

0:30:19.200 --> 0:30:22.280
<v Speaker 1>qualified person to comment on this thing. But what I

0:30:22.320 --> 0:30:26.040
<v Speaker 1>will say is that we have seen instance defense several

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:29.800
<v Speaker 1>instances here of Elon also sort of picking some fights

0:30:29.800 --> 0:30:32.000
<v Speaker 1>with people. So I think we just have two two

0:30:32.160 --> 0:30:34.600
<v Speaker 1>rowdy boys over there who are trying to who are

0:30:34.640 --> 0:30:37.440
<v Speaker 1>trying to show their uh this.

0:30:37.360 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 5>Is I mean, this gets this gets pretty far removed

0:30:40.000 --> 0:30:42.440
<v Speaker 5>from Elon, But I think this is an intelligent way

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:45.760
<v Speaker 5>to deal with a rival in the Trump administration. And

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:49.680
<v Speaker 5>that is what Scott Bessont learned in the Elon thing.

0:30:49.840 --> 0:30:53.000
<v Speaker 5>Because the way these feuds play out is in the media.

0:30:53.160 --> 0:30:57.320
<v Speaker 5>The way you get media attention is yeah, by like

0:30:57.760 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 5>a big room of people to reporters and and sam

0:31:02.160 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 5>f word, which I would never do.

0:31:04.160 --> 0:31:06.560
<v Speaker 4>I feel like Dana, this conversation is beneath Dana.

0:31:06.720 --> 0:31:08.960
<v Speaker 2>She's just she's written.

0:31:09.200 --> 0:31:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Over here, like breaking news or answers, embarrassing ourselves exactly.

0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 4>Someone's got to work around here. All right, good stuff, Kurt,

0:31:19.960 --> 0:31:25.160
<v Speaker 4>thank you for joining. Thank you, Dana, Max brilliant as always.

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:27.760
<v Speaker 5>Of course, always great to be with you, David and

0:31:27.840 --> 0:31:28.600
<v Speaker 5>Dana and Kurt.

0:31:36.040 --> 0:31:40.080
<v Speaker 4>This episode was produced by Stacy Wong and edited by Annamasirakas,

0:31:40.400 --> 0:31:44.640
<v Speaker 4>Blake Maples handles engineering, and Dave Purcell fact checks. Delon

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:47.440
<v Speaker 4>Ink theme is written and performed by Taki Yasusau and

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:52.280
<v Speaker 4>Alex Sugiurra. Our supervising producer is Magnus Hendrickson. Sage Bauman

0:31:52.360 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 4>is the head of Bloomberg Podcasts. A big thanks to

0:31:55.120 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 4>our supporters Joel Weber and Brad Stone.

0:31:57.760 --> 0:31:59.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm David Papadopolis.

0:31:59.600 --> 0:32:02.080
<v Speaker 4>If you have a minute, rate and review our show,

0:32:02.280 --> 0:32:06.720
<v Speaker 4>it'll help other listeners find us. See you next week.