WEBVTT - The Trouble With Passion

0:00:11.880 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Good morning, peeps, and welcome to okay f Daily with

0:00:14.840 --> 0:00:18.599
<v Speaker 1>Meet Your Girl Danielle Moody, recording not so live from

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:22.599
<v Speaker 1>the Podstream studios here in Times Square. Folks. I'm really

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>excited to bring on today's guest because for the longest

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 1>time I have been thinking about my relationship to work

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:34.080
<v Speaker 1>as my work has shifted and evolved over the past

0:00:34.120 --> 0:00:38.480
<v Speaker 1>couple of years. And author and sociologist Aaron Seck, who

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:42.159
<v Speaker 1>wrote the book The Trouble with Passion, How searching for

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>fulfillment at work fosters inequality, brings up some really interesting questions.

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 1>For the longest time, we've always been taught or told right,

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 1>love what you do, and then it won't feel like work.

0:00:55.440 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Follow your passion right to do all of these grand things. One,

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I think we need to acknowledge the place of privilege

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 1>that those sentiments come from, because there are plenty of

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:10.679
<v Speaker 1>people who work in service oriented industries where there is

0:01:10.720 --> 0:01:13.960
<v Speaker 1>anything but passion or joy. Right, it is a means

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 1>to an end and an opportunity for them to put

0:01:16.280 --> 0:01:18.560
<v Speaker 1>food on their table, pay their bills, you know, and

0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 1>simply adult. But for those of us who are in

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:29.120
<v Speaker 1>more white collar professional spaces, I think that the past

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>year plus has offered us an opportunity to really think

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:36.200
<v Speaker 1>about how it is that we work and what we

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 1>want our relationship to work to be. A couple of

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>years ago, I decided after I had been working in

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 1>policy in Washington, d C. For many years, and then

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>had transitioned into doing more media work, then transitioned out

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of both of those things, and then wanted to make

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 1>a move from Washington, DC to New York. I was

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 1>working at a very well known PR and communications firm,

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 1>and my relationship to work changed dramatically. I was working

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:18.079
<v Speaker 1>roughly on average, sixty to eighty hours a week. My

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:22.080
<v Speaker 1>phone was attached to my hip. It went off all

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the time, anytime, morning, noon, or night, holidays. It didn't

0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:31.520
<v Speaker 1>matter because part of my work was PR, the other

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 1>part was crisis PR right, and so you just need

0:02:34.760 --> 0:02:37.640
<v Speaker 1>to be on all the time and the client is

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>always right. That was the sentiment my relationship to work,

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 1>where I had always oriented myself with organizations and spaces

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 1>where I had and felt shared mission and value, and

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I was just exhausted. On top of which I was

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 1>making an obscene commute because I had just moved back

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:02.359
<v Speaker 1>to New York and I didn't have a place of

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 1>my own yet, and so I was staying with my

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 1>family on Long Island. I was making an obscene commute

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 1>into the city every day. It was a three hour

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:15.240
<v Speaker 1>round trip commute, every single day, five days a week.

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Everything was weighing on me. The job was weighing on me,

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the commute was weighing on me, and it showed. It

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 1>showed up because everything for me, when it pertains to stress,

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>manifests itself Physically. I was starting to look really ashy,

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 1>lose color, I was gaining tons of weight. I just

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 1>felt like shit, and so I made a really tough decision,

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:42.120
<v Speaker 1>And it was a similar decision that I had made

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years prior. There are moments in my

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:52.119
<v Speaker 1>life where either tragedy or just burnout requires me to

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 1>make adjustments and realign myself. When I had left a

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 1>nonprofit back in DC, I left in the midst of tragedy.

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 1>One of my closest friends had died in a motorcycle

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 1>accident outside of the country, and it had me wondering

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 1>what the fuck I was doing with my life. If

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>everything can be up in smoke and gone in an instant,

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 1>then what does it mean to really live, and I

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:25.840
<v Speaker 1>recognized that at that time I was working at an

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 1>organization that was doing really great work, working on environmental education,

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 1>working on saving the planet and the environment, but it

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>wasn't my passion and it didn't feel like my purpose.

0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 1>I was getting promoted and I was good at what

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>I was doing, but I didn't love it. And for me,

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:44.920
<v Speaker 1>loving what I'd do was more important than anything else,

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:48.480
<v Speaker 1>And in the moment of tragedy and loss, it had

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 1>me reassess what I was doing and how I wanted

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 1>my time. Whatever time I did have left to be

0:04:55.680 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 1>of service, but what kind of service? So I left

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 1>my job and I replaced my energy, realigned my energy

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 1>into building out my first podcast and my first media platform.

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:16.719
<v Speaker 1>That was in the early twenty tens. Then fast forward

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 1>to a couple of years later when I would enter

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 1>into a completely different industry working in PR. Because everything

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:29.279
<v Speaker 1>in media at that point I had learned. I taught myself,

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:34.720
<v Speaker 1>but the hours were ridiculous. My body, my mind, my

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:38.479
<v Speaker 1>spirit just could not keep pace. So after a couple

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:41.559
<v Speaker 1>of years, I decided to pull the plug and thought

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 1>that I wanted to go and work at a startup.

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 1>But after a couple of months there, I realized that

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>this wasn't a good fit either. So I did the

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 1>ultimate thing. I took a risk and a bet on myself,

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:53.480
<v Speaker 1>and I said, I'm going to take a handful of

0:05:53.480 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 1>clients that I have, I'm going to take the media

0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 1>work that I do, and I'm going to create. Essentially,

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 1>if I were in college, they would call it an

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:05.720
<v Speaker 1>independent study. I created my own path, design my own

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:09.599
<v Speaker 1>work and how I wanted to work and the things

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:12.599
<v Speaker 1>that allow me to do what it is that I

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 1>do is one All of you who are so supportive,

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 1>both financially and emotionally and spiritually with your you know,

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 1>keep going and keep pushing and keep speaking out sis.

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:27.360
<v Speaker 1>I can't tell you how much your comments and your

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:31.160
<v Speaker 1>thumbs up and your likes and your shares really do

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 1>bolster me, particularly when our political climate gets me down.

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:39.040
<v Speaker 1>But I say all that to say that I decided

0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 1>to design my life around how I wanted to feel

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 1>and how I wanted to be of service. And again

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 1>understanding that that's a privilege, I knew that if I

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:52.720
<v Speaker 1>wanted to take this risk on myself, and God forbid

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:55.280
<v Speaker 1>I failed, I wasn't going to be out on the street.

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I didn't have kids, you know, so I don't have

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:01.160
<v Speaker 1>to worry about mouth to feed other than my own.

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:04.240
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I know that I have family and

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:08.839
<v Speaker 1>friends that act as emotional support and if I needed

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 1>to lean on them in another way could also float

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 1>me as well. Again understanding those points of privilege. But

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the reality is is that we do have the ability

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 1>to design the kind of lives that we want. And

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that the questions and the tools that Erin

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 1>provides in her book really allow us to kind of

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 1>think about how do I want to feel right? Knowing

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 1>that we all, unless you're some type of heiress, will

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>need to work, right, but what is our relationship to

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>work and how do we create a relationship that is healthy.

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 1>One of the questions that you will hear me ask

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Aaron is about, you know, whether or not we're asking

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 1>or expecting too much of work? Right? Well, we know

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 1>that work expects too much of us, But because we

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 1>are there for forty fifty sixty and plus hours a week,

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 1>are we looking at work in the way that if

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:09.840
<v Speaker 1>we had more time or could reorient our time, we

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>would be able to put towards hobbies. Does work or

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 1>should work be a passion project, when in fact, we

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>should never be pouring all of ourselves into one thing,

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 1>one person, or one space or place. And so what

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 1>does it look like to diversify, right, what is meaningful

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:34.000
<v Speaker 1>to us and where we find that meaning? Aaron will

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 1>unpack this in our conversation, which I hope that you

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 1>guys enjoy, because it really was incredibly illuminating. You know.

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 1>I can remember in high school one hundred moons ago

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 1>going in to sit down with my guidance counselor. I

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:55.600
<v Speaker 1>think it was approaching. I was in eleventh grade, right,

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:59.680
<v Speaker 1>so you're starting to really think about college and where

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 1>you want to go and what you want to do.

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 1>And it's so crazy to me now as an adult,

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 1>thinking that we expect people at sixteen and seventeen years

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>old to put a stake in the ground and decide, Yeah,

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:16.440
<v Speaker 1>for the next four years, I'm going to concentrate on

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 1>this thing, and then I'm going to go get this

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 1>job and I'm going to live this life. And we

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 1>expect people to be able to make that decision at

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 1>sixteen and seventeen years old, but then don't allow people

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:29.200
<v Speaker 1>to drink until twenty one. It's very odd, what we like,

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the pressures and the expectations that we have, and what

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 1>we're socialized to believe is normal. And then in hindsight

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 1>you're like, yeah, that's a terrible idea because for me,

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:42.439
<v Speaker 1>I would have if I could go back in time,

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I would have wanted to take a gap year. I

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 1>believe in a gap year, I would have taken the

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:52.439
<v Speaker 1>year between high school and going to college and go

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:57.079
<v Speaker 1>and volunteer, do AmeriCorps, do Peace Corps, do something that

0:09:57.120 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 1>allowed me to actually see and experience the world and

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 1>feel and understand what I wanted my role to be

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:07.959
<v Speaker 1>before I would then dive into anybody's studies. I also think,

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:12.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, regardless of what kind of student that you are,

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 1>those twelve years, right, those you know from K through

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:22.680
<v Speaker 1>twelve or isn't aggressive time of learning and growing and

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 1>experiencing life. And so really you should take a break,

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>right so that when you were showing up on campus

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 1>or at your vocational you know place that you are

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:41.320
<v Speaker 1>ready and prepared and refreshed to be able to align

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 1>yourself and really like have an open mind and are

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 1>ready to grow and experience. Because I'll tell you that

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I remember walking into my Guidance Counselor's office. I took

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 1>some type of test that was going to tell me

0:10:57.600 --> 0:11:00.959
<v Speaker 1>what kind of career that I should have, and if

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 1>funny enough, I believe God, I wish I had saved

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:07.280
<v Speaker 1>that paper because that would be like wild to see.

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>But I want to say that some of the things

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 1>that were like pushed out after this test were journalists

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 1>I want to say was one of them. Lawyer was

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:24.319
<v Speaker 1>another one. Something anything that had to do with like research, investigation,

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:28.040
<v Speaker 1>asking lots of questions were the things. And you know,

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 1>if you know me, and obviously you do because you

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 1>listen to OKAYEF, you know that I pretty much kind

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 1>of hit the nail on the head, but not without

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of, you know, trial and error along the way.

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>But I think that it's really interesting that instead of

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 1>asking young people what do you want to do, we

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:50.680
<v Speaker 1>should start asking them how do you want to feel?

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 1>So that you can then learn to create a life

0:11:54.480 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 1>and a work life balance around that. Right. And I

0:12:00.960 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 1>think that these next generations are understanding their relationship to themselves,

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:11.960
<v Speaker 1>their identities, and the kind of alignment that they want.

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:16.959
<v Speaker 1>And I think, honestly it's from watching their parents and

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 1>their grandparents work out of alignment and work in a

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:24.240
<v Speaker 1>way that it's just like, well, this is just the grind,

0:12:24.440 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 1>this is the hustle, this is what you do, and

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:31.559
<v Speaker 1>recognizing that they are pausing their happiness for forty hours

0:12:31.600 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 1>a week right in and hoping that the weekend or

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 1>that day and a half that we get is going

0:12:38.640 --> 0:12:41.240
<v Speaker 1>to be enough to fill all of the other gaps.

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:44.680
<v Speaker 1>So this is a really exciting conversation that I have

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 1>with sociologists Aaron Seck and tell me in the comment

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:51.840
<v Speaker 1>sections what you guys think about your relation to work.

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:56.079
<v Speaker 1>Has it changed, you know, during the great pause that

0:12:56.120 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 1>many of us had in twenty twenty. Did you leave

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:02.520
<v Speaker 1>a job? J did you start a new job? Are

0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 1>you in between spaces? Are you going into a totally

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 1>new industry? Let us know in the comment section below,

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:11.440
<v Speaker 1>because I think it's in the conversation at least I

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 1>know that I've been having with my friends and family,

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and I'm certain that you all are having it with yours.

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:20.200
<v Speaker 1>So coming up next is my conversation with sociologist and

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 1>author Aron sek Folks. I am very excited to welcome

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 1>to woka F for the first time, sociologist Aron Seck,

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:34.959
<v Speaker 1>who is the author of The Trouble with Passion, how

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 1>searching for fulfillment at work fosters inequality er I feel

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 1>like I have been telling people and providing people with

0:13:44.440 --> 0:13:50.840
<v Speaker 1>the wrong advice after reading your book. The thing that

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 1>we've always been told that if you love what you do,

0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 1>it won't feel like work, that if you just go

0:13:57.520 --> 0:14:01.199
<v Speaker 1>after your passion, then you know, all will be Well,

0:14:01.640 --> 0:14:05.679
<v Speaker 1>what are we getting wrong about this? Well, first of all,

0:14:05.720 --> 0:14:10.200
<v Speaker 1>it's a natural response to the complexity of the labor market. Right.

0:14:10.200 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 1>We see the labor market out there. We know that

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 1>people are working not forty hours a week, but fifty

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:18.679
<v Speaker 1>or sixty or seventy hours a week, and so the

0:14:18.720 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 1>idea of saying, well, I might as well love when

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 1>I do if that's going to be the labor force

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm going into, seems like a pretty rational response. So

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 1>what we're getting wrong is the recognition that passion seeking

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:38.720
<v Speaker 1>is based in privilege. So it's based in having safety

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>nets and springboards that can be able to support people

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 1>to be able to manage the kind of precarity of

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:50.080
<v Speaker 1>searching out jobs that they might be passionate about, or

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 1>changing up what they're doing in their career to find

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 1>a brand new field where they don't have a whole

0:14:56.240 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of experience and kind of retool having the social

0:14:59.200 --> 0:15:03.440
<v Speaker 1>networks to get those kinds of connections. Ultimately, the sense

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:07.560
<v Speaker 1>that we tell people that they can do whatever they

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 1>like as long as they're passionate about it and work

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 1>hard enough is precisely in line with the idea of

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the meritocratic ideology, which we know doesn't exactly describe the

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:21.760
<v Speaker 1>way that the labor market is structured. You know, it's

0:15:21.800 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 1>funny because right now, you know, we keep seeing articles, right,

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure that you are paying attention to all

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 1>of them. There is a mass what do they call it?

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 1>The Wall Street Journal I think did an article and

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 1>they called it the mass resignation, right, that over eleven

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 1>million people have left the workforce. And you know, we

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 1>keep talking about our listening in mainstream media and on

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 1>cable news about there being a labor shortage, and my

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 1>response to that is that there isn't actually a labor shortage.

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 1>There's a shortage of good quality jobs. There's a shortage

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 1>of jobs that you know, allow for people to be

0:15:57.560 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 1>able to not only put food on their table, but

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 1>by medicine at the same time, provide them with the

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 1>health benefits that they need, the childcare credits that they need,

0:16:06.640 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 1>and so on and so forth. And so why do

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 1>you think that, you know, aside from the things that

0:16:12.880 --> 0:16:16.680
<v Speaker 1>I listed, when you see those headlines about, you know,

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the work industry right now and the fact that across

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:25.440
<v Speaker 1>industries there are thousands of people on strike right why

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:27.360
<v Speaker 1>do you think that that is happening? And was it

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 1>a shock to you? It's not a shock to me.

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:36.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think in part the quote unquote labor shortage

0:16:36.160 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 1>or the great resignation is in part due to all

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden there is a competition of employers for workers,

0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 1>and so they're put in competition and having to elevate

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 1>things like pay and benefits in a way that they

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 1>weren't pressured to before. So part of it is structural,

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:57.080
<v Speaker 1>but there's also this huge cultural part of it. So

0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 1>what I talk about in the book is the way

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 1>that understanding our experiences with the labor market is not

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 1>just an economic consideration. It's also a moral one. It's

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 1>also an existential one. The labor force, regardless of where

0:17:12.760 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 1>we are in it is a site of meaning making

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 1>in our lives that can be fantastic or can be

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>drudgerous and full of dread. And so what happens with

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the great resignation is for especially the college educated folks

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 1>that sort of have a potential ability to step back

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and say, what do I want from my work? What

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:39.240
<v Speaker 1>does being a worker mean to me? These questions about

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:43.600
<v Speaker 1>wanting to find meaning fulfillment and work come to be

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 1>front and center. And in fact, some of the research

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:48.720
<v Speaker 1>I did that is beyond this Trouble with Passion book

0:17:48.760 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 1>with my graduate student Sophia Hiltner, we actually looked at

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:57.919
<v Speaker 1>workers during a pandemic, so this is October twenty twenty,

0:17:58.000 --> 0:18:03.880
<v Speaker 1>and we surveyed college educated workers and compared the commitments

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 1>to different labor market priorities of people who had kept

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 1>their jobs the same over the course of the pandemic

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:14.399
<v Speaker 1>and people who had lost a job or refurloughed. And

0:18:14.440 --> 0:18:16.479
<v Speaker 1>we found that people who had lost a job and

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:21.680
<v Speaker 1>referlowed were more invested in seeking passion than people who

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 1>had kept a stable job. And that is in part

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:31.280
<v Speaker 1>related to the kinds of existential instability insecurity that comes

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:36.240
<v Speaker 1>with this context of a global pandemic, alongside the kind

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:41.440
<v Speaker 1>of immediate experience of losing or potentially losing one's one

0:18:41.520 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 1>sense of economic stability. And so it's not just necessarily

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:48.280
<v Speaker 1>people looking for the highest income or the most stability,

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 1>but rather how kind how can I align my work

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:54.680
<v Speaker 1>with who I want to be or what I want

0:18:55.640 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 1>so to look like it? Is it now? Right? And

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:04.720
<v Speaker 1>is this? Are we privileged in this sense? Right? That

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 1>we are in a space where I mean, for me

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 1>and and i'll and I'll say this for me, the

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:15.119
<v Speaker 1>height of the pandemic provided an opportunity for me to

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:19.359
<v Speaker 1>take a pause, right when when we were in quarantine

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 1>and when you know, the world slowed down, it provided

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity for me to have a pause and really

0:19:26.119 --> 0:19:28.639
<v Speaker 1>think about what is the kind of content that I'm

0:19:28.680 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 1>putting out into the world. How is it that I

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 1>want to be aligned with my work? Um? How is

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 1>it that I want to show up? And I found

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I understood in that moment that that indeed was a privilege, right,

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:43.879
<v Speaker 1>It was a deep privilege to be able to do that.

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I was not an essential worker, right, So I understand

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 1>it from that vantage point. But is it also you know,

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 1>are we looking for passion or are we looking for

0:19:56.160 --> 0:20:00.439
<v Speaker 1>alignment and is there a difference between those those two things?

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Great question. So I would say we are looking for

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:09.520
<v Speaker 1>alignment in our paid work in a way that's really risky.

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 1>So there's the risk of financial ruin potentially if someone

0:20:16.840 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 1>follows their passion and don't doesn't have the privilege or

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 1>of some form of savings or other things they can

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:27.879
<v Speaker 1>rely upon. But it's also an existential risk in a

0:20:27.920 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of ways to try and align our work with

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:32.679
<v Speaker 1>our sense of self. And the reason I say that

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 1>is because even if you're in a job that you

0:20:37.080 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 1>find deeply fulfilling and meaningful, it's very likely that the

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 1>people that you're working for, the organization that you're working with,

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:48.439
<v Speaker 1>is benefiting far more from the passion based labor that

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:51.439
<v Speaker 1>you are providing to them than you are getting paid for.

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 1>One of the things I find in the book is

0:20:53.840 --> 0:21:00.720
<v Speaker 1>through an experiment, an experiment that employers really light job

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:04.120
<v Speaker 1>applicants who express passion for their work, and it's not

0:21:04.200 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 1>just that they like them because they think that they'll

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 1>be fun colleagues or you know, bring a good vibe

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 1>to the community, but that they'll be able to get

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 1>more labor out of them without an increase in pay.

0:21:16.760 --> 0:21:24.160
<v Speaker 1>So right, so there's a knowing exploitation of passion. And

0:21:24.240 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 1>so if we hand ourselves over hand our meaning making

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:32.840
<v Speaker 1>over to the labor market, something that is so precarious

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:36.920
<v Speaker 1>and unstable and certainly is not designed to support our

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 1>meaning making goals, that puts us at risk our deep

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 1>sense of self. And so it's so interesting because this

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 1>moment where people are taking stock of their work, the

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:53.680
<v Speaker 1>content of their work exactly as you described, in this moment,

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 1>if they find a misalignment in that, there's one solution

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:02.200
<v Speaker 1>that let me fire the work, let me find something

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 1>about work that I like more. Another thing is, let

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:07.639
<v Speaker 1>me find meaning outside of work. Let me let me

0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:10.440
<v Speaker 1>shrink the space of work in my life and expand

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the space of work outside of my life so I

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 1>can find that meaning fulfillment that's missing in my life

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:20.480
<v Speaker 1>outside of my paid employment. You know, it's it's so

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:24.239
<v Speaker 1>interesting because it's like, do we work so much that

0:22:24.320 --> 0:22:26.720
<v Speaker 1>we have a lack of hobbies that we're looking for

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:30.840
<v Speaker 1>everything to be in this one space and place right, Like,

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:35.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you are putting in on average, forty

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:39.400
<v Speaker 1>plus hours a week at a job, it's and then

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 1>you sleep and then you eat, and if you care

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:45.720
<v Speaker 1>for kids or an elderly parent or what have you,

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:49.400
<v Speaker 1>like that's your time, right Like, that's that's your life

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:52.120
<v Speaker 1>in a nutshell. And so it's like are we putting

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:57.160
<v Speaker 1>are we as workers placing too much value in what

0:22:57.240 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 1>it is that we're doing because we're looking forward to

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 1>fill all of the other avenues of our life that

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 1>we may have gaps. Yeah, absolutely, And I think it's

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 1>really tricky because the labor force is not set up

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:15.200
<v Speaker 1>to help us get out of that trap either. So

0:23:16.359 --> 0:23:20.199
<v Speaker 1>the difficulty, So the reason that that that passion seeking

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:23.919
<v Speaker 1>is so risky financially is because we don't have the

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:29.119
<v Speaker 1>same social safety nets and protections as other post industrialized nations.

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 1>So if one says, you know what, I just want

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:35.639
<v Speaker 1>to work part time so that I can invest in

0:23:35.680 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 1>myself and invest in my own meaning making, there's very

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:42.160
<v Speaker 1>little support for someone who is in that kind of position,

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:45.680
<v Speaker 1>or who might be in some kind of precarious work

0:23:45.760 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 1>and loses their job or is furloughed to some respect.

0:23:49.920 --> 0:23:52.639
<v Speaker 1>So the riskiness involved is part of the kind of

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 1>structure of the American labor force, but it's also tied

0:23:56.400 --> 0:24:00.439
<v Speaker 1>into culturally what we think of as as being a

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:05.679
<v Speaker 1>good worker. So it is very unusual for somebody who says,

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to come in and I'm going to do

0:24:07.640 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 1>my work and I'm going to leave after him where

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:11.800
<v Speaker 1>my forty hours are done. I'm gonna put my effort in,

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:14.600
<v Speaker 1>but then I'm going to leave and not have a

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:18.240
<v Speaker 1>sense of personal dedication to that work to be coded

0:24:18.280 --> 0:24:21.600
<v Speaker 1>as a good worker. The idea of an ideal worker

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:25.200
<v Speaker 1>in the United States is, and has been for over

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:28.359
<v Speaker 1>half a century, the sense of you are devoted to

0:24:28.560 --> 0:24:31.439
<v Speaker 1>the work that you do, and so breaking from that

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:36.439
<v Speaker 1>not only risks potential sanctions from one's employer, but people

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:41.199
<v Speaker 1>thinking that one is not morally aligned with expectations of

0:24:41.240 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 1>being a worker, especially for professional workers. Why do we

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:47.199
<v Speaker 1>think that this is the case? Now? What is it

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 1>about these younger generations that is shifting how we are

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:56.320
<v Speaker 1>thinking and looking at work right like? What what? What

0:24:56.480 --> 0:25:00.199
<v Speaker 1>is what is it about our society right now and

0:25:00.280 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the people that it is producing that we are that

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:06.919
<v Speaker 1>we are in this moment. So I think it's a

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:12.680
<v Speaker 1>confluence of two historical processes. One is a cultural process.

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:18.639
<v Speaker 1>One is related to the ex huge explosion of the

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:24.480
<v Speaker 1>expectation for self expression and an identity formation sense about

0:25:24.520 --> 0:25:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the late nineteen eighties early nineteen nineties, right, everything that

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:30.920
<v Speaker 1>we have in our lives we expect to be connected

0:25:30.960 --> 0:25:33.200
<v Speaker 1>to a sense of self expression. One of my favorite

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:39.160
<v Speaker 1>favorite examples is the little the Firefox web browser has

0:25:39.160 --> 0:25:41.639
<v Speaker 1>at the very top of it. You can change the

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:44.920
<v Speaker 1>skin on it to be something that aligns with something

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:47.840
<v Speaker 1>that's self expressive to you, whether that's like a color

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 1>or a sports team, or you know, a particular form

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:55.720
<v Speaker 1>of architecture or something. So there's this giant expectation, this

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:59.240
<v Speaker 1>ubiquitous expectation that everything in our life we should be

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:02.439
<v Speaker 1>able to do self expressively, and so our work is

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:06.120
<v Speaker 1>certainly no exception to that. But then alongside of that

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:11.000
<v Speaker 1>is this huge shift in precarity in a labor market

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 1>since the nineteen seventies, So even for those who have

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:18.040
<v Speaker 1>a college degree, the expectation that you can get a

0:26:18.119 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 1>job in a company and that company will sort of

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 1>take care of you as long as you do your

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:27.160
<v Speaker 1>work and put your time in just doesn't exist anymore.

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 1>And so one solution to that kind of procurity might

0:26:31.840 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 1>have been a big growth, a big swell in collective

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:41.159
<v Speaker 1>action of pushing back on expectations for overwork, pushing back

0:26:41.240 --> 0:26:44.359
<v Speaker 1>on the kind of precarity that exists in a labor force.

0:26:44.720 --> 0:26:47.320
<v Speaker 1>But what has happened instead, the kind of general reaction,

0:26:47.560 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 1>in part because of the lack of structural support for

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of collective solutions, is people saying, well, if I

0:26:55.800 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 1>need to work sixty seventy eight hours a week, and

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:04.720
<v Speaker 1>I and that's my path as a college educated worker,

0:27:05.760 --> 0:27:07.879
<v Speaker 1>I might as well do something that I like, I

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:09.879
<v Speaker 1>might as well have it align with my sense of self.

0:27:10.200 --> 0:27:13.560
<v Speaker 1>And so part of it is the lack of other

0:27:13.640 --> 0:27:18.879
<v Speaker 1>alternatives for individual workers to seem to see ways out

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:25.240
<v Speaker 1>of the issue of precurity and overwork. You know, is

0:27:25.359 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 1>there a way too? Like how how does this? How

0:27:28.760 --> 0:27:32.439
<v Speaker 1>does this connect to our understanding of burnout? And also

0:27:32.600 --> 0:27:36.160
<v Speaker 1>it's burnout a privileged term as well. Like again, like

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:39.679
<v Speaker 1>I asked these questions because I realized that, you know,

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:44.919
<v Speaker 1>I have only ever work, only ever had white collar

0:27:44.960 --> 0:27:49.480
<v Speaker 1>work experiences, right, like outside of being a teenager and

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:52.040
<v Speaker 1>working in a grocery store when I was a teenager,

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 1>and that was really for fun, right, that was not

0:27:54.240 --> 0:27:56.199
<v Speaker 1>to put food on the table. It was to like

0:27:56.359 --> 0:27:59.679
<v Speaker 1>buy what my parents wouldn't buy me right, um, and

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:02.199
<v Speaker 1>and wasn't like you were forced to work. It was

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:04.439
<v Speaker 1>just like I wanted to because I want this extra

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:09.919
<v Speaker 1>thing outside of that. My entire career is in white

0:28:09.960 --> 0:28:14.639
<v Speaker 1>collar type of work. Is burnout? Right? And this word

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 1>that we use we see everywhere, we see memed, we

0:28:17.040 --> 0:28:20.359
<v Speaker 1>see quoted, we see self care. Now you know as

0:28:20.440 --> 0:28:26.040
<v Speaker 1>as as prevalent as ever. Is that also one privilege?

0:28:26.040 --> 0:28:29.639
<v Speaker 1>And then two? Is there a way to set up

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 1>your life where you don't have burnout? Or is burnout

0:28:33.119 --> 0:28:37.200
<v Speaker 1>just a product of having to work? Right? And and

0:28:37.440 --> 0:28:39.719
<v Speaker 1>that like when you have to work and you have

0:28:39.800 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 1>to work a lot because you're adulting, and as much

0:28:42.920 --> 0:28:45.440
<v Speaker 1>as you know, we may not like it, like that's

0:28:45.520 --> 0:28:48.960
<v Speaker 1>part of life. It is burnout just a part of life?

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Or is that the way in which we have been

0:28:51.800 --> 0:28:56.680
<v Speaker 1>socialized to understand work. That's a really great question. So

0:28:57.200 --> 0:29:00.760
<v Speaker 1>my sense is that burnout is a way is a

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:06.000
<v Speaker 1>language that's been utilized to try and claw back some

0:29:06.200 --> 0:29:09.520
<v Speaker 1>pushback on the expectations of the labor market. But it

0:29:09.600 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 1>is a privileged term. Any time workers have the opportunity

0:29:14.840 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 1>to think about adjusting the quality of their work, their

0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:25.000
<v Speaker 1>work circumstances the environment in which they work to find

0:29:25.040 --> 0:29:27.640
<v Speaker 1>a better option for them. That in itself is a

0:29:27.680 --> 0:29:30.600
<v Speaker 1>privilege and usually something that's that's only reserved for those

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:33.480
<v Speaker 1>with the college degree. Because of the kind of precarity

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and the bifurcation of good jobs and bad jobs. In

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the United States, people with out of college degree, those

0:29:40.640 --> 0:29:44.080
<v Speaker 1>in the service sector blue collar work increasingly have more

0:29:44.120 --> 0:29:49.760
<v Speaker 1>precarious hours, less advantageous kind of work, more deskilled kind

0:29:49.800 --> 0:29:53.800
<v Speaker 1>of work, where even thinking about does this give me

0:29:53.880 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 1>burnout or not? Or is this something that aligns with

0:29:56.200 --> 0:30:00.440
<v Speaker 1>their passion or not is really outside of the realm

0:30:00.520 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 1>of what is often available to them structurally because of

0:30:03.600 --> 0:30:06.640
<v Speaker 1>how work is organized in the United States, and so

0:30:07.480 --> 0:30:11.280
<v Speaker 1>with burnout is aligned the idea of passion seeking. It's

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:15.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of the contrast of one another. People often want

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:18.000
<v Speaker 1>to seek out their passion if they feel burnt out,

0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:22.479
<v Speaker 1>but burnout is attached to a sense of overwork in

0:30:22.520 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of ways. So one can seek passion because

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 1>they feel burnt out. One can seek passion because they

0:30:27.960 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 1>don't feel connected to the work that they do, but

0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:32.480
<v Speaker 1>burnout is often attached to the sense of I am

0:30:32.560 --> 0:30:36.760
<v Speaker 1>working more than I want to and it is bleeding

0:30:36.800 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 1>over into other areas of my life, and that that

0:30:43.520 --> 0:30:48.400
<v Speaker 1>sentiment of work affecting our non work lives is something

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:52.480
<v Speaker 1>that all work will have an impact on. It's sort

0:30:52.480 --> 0:30:56.640
<v Speaker 1>of that's the characteristic of labor, of giving our labor

0:30:56.680 --> 0:31:00.120
<v Speaker 1>over to somebody else in a capitalist economy, but the

0:31:00.720 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 1>expectations that the labor force has of us are extreme

0:31:08.440 --> 0:31:10.640
<v Speaker 1>in many ways. That leads the kind of burnout. So

0:31:10.680 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 1>we can think about burnout on an individual level, what

0:31:13.080 --> 0:31:15.200
<v Speaker 1>we can think about the kinds of structural practices and

0:31:15.280 --> 0:31:21.479
<v Speaker 1>processes that lead to this overwhelming amount of burnout that

0:31:21.520 --> 0:31:23.640
<v Speaker 1>I think we've seen grow over the last couple of

0:31:23.680 --> 0:31:28.080
<v Speaker 1>decades is a burnout unique to America because of the

0:31:28.120 --> 0:31:32.000
<v Speaker 1>way in which we overwork, the way in which we

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:36.840
<v Speaker 1>have the least vacation time of any other industrialized nation.

0:31:37.920 --> 0:31:41.000
<v Speaker 1>You know the joke every summer always comes around where

0:31:41.400 --> 0:31:43.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you send a if you send an

0:31:43.360 --> 0:31:47.080
<v Speaker 1>email to somebody in Europe between like July and September,

0:31:47.160 --> 0:31:50.360
<v Speaker 1>it's like I'm off for the next six weeks, you know,

0:31:50.520 --> 0:31:54.320
<v Speaker 1>wish you will like. And in the United States, US

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:58.240
<v Speaker 1>even taking the two weeks standard vacation time and taking

0:31:58.280 --> 0:32:01.960
<v Speaker 1>that as a block is seen as crazy. So I'm like,

0:32:02.240 --> 0:32:07.719
<v Speaker 1>is burnout something that is unique to America because of

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:11.560
<v Speaker 1>how we're because of our culture and how we're socialized.

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:14.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's certainly not unique in terms of

0:32:14.840 --> 0:32:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the experience of right, there's many other countries where that,

0:32:17.920 --> 0:32:20.240
<v Speaker 1>you know that happens. But I think it's unique in

0:32:21.040 --> 0:32:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the extent that particularly professional workers experience burnout because of

0:32:26.600 --> 0:32:32.480
<v Speaker 1>these intensive hours, compared to European nations, for example. But

0:32:32.720 --> 0:32:37.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it's also unique in the utilization of burnout

0:32:37.360 --> 0:32:42.520
<v Speaker 1>as a concept to interpret people's experiences. And I think

0:32:42.520 --> 0:32:46.280
<v Speaker 1>in other places the same experience of the characteristics that

0:32:46.440 --> 0:32:49.880
<v Speaker 1>feeling burnt out may be more likely to be identified

0:32:49.880 --> 0:32:54.920
<v Speaker 1>as exploitation, something that is structural, something that is not

0:32:55.000 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 1>at the individual level. But in the United States, because

0:32:58.480 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 1>of neuroliberal norms about us being responsible for our own

0:33:01.480 --> 0:33:05.120
<v Speaker 1>lives and our own work, there's more likely that we

0:33:05.480 --> 0:33:11.080
<v Speaker 1>interpret the experiences of our workplace as something that is

0:33:11.280 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 1>that is connected to us and call it burnout rather

0:33:13.680 --> 0:33:18.840
<v Speaker 1>than exploitation. So what is what should we be thinking

0:33:18.840 --> 0:33:21.959
<v Speaker 1>about when we think about work eron? Like, you know,

0:33:22.640 --> 0:33:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I know that for myself, I left traditional firms. I

0:33:28.360 --> 0:33:31.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, came from a policy background, a political background,

0:33:32.200 --> 0:33:35.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, left traditional nonprofits, left firm life in order

0:33:35.960 --> 0:33:38.720
<v Speaker 1>to work for myself. Why did I make that decision?

0:33:38.800 --> 0:33:41.479
<v Speaker 1>Because I wanted to own my own hours, and I

0:33:41.520 --> 0:33:44.560
<v Speaker 1>wanted to decide who and when and how I wanted

0:33:44.600 --> 0:33:48.520
<v Speaker 1>to work right And I understood that to be the

0:33:48.600 --> 0:33:52.400
<v Speaker 1>privilege of the experience that I've had, the degrees that

0:33:52.400 --> 0:33:55.040
<v Speaker 1>I've had, and the ability to build a brand in

0:33:55.080 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 1>a certain way that has allowed me to, you know,

0:33:58.080 --> 0:34:03.520
<v Speaker 1>so far, continue to be success full. But how is

0:34:03.560 --> 0:34:06.960
<v Speaker 1>it everybody can't be an entrepreneur, nor does everybody want

0:34:07.000 --> 0:34:09.760
<v Speaker 1>to be an entrepreneur, right, because that is a different

0:34:09.760 --> 0:34:12.120
<v Speaker 1>type of hustle and a whole different type of burnout,

0:34:12.239 --> 0:34:15.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, to be honest, But how should we be

0:34:15.560 --> 0:34:19.000
<v Speaker 1>looking at work? How should we be looking at work's

0:34:19.160 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 1>role in our life? Is it just that, you know, look,

0:34:22.719 --> 0:34:25.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a means to an end, which I've heard a

0:34:25.120 --> 0:34:27.239
<v Speaker 1>number of my friends start to say now where I

0:34:27.280 --> 0:34:30.880
<v Speaker 1>never heard them say those things before, But again this time,

0:34:31.400 --> 0:34:34.600
<v Speaker 1>in this very you know, black mirror world that we're

0:34:34.640 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 1>living in is having us think in different ways. So

0:34:37.840 --> 0:34:39.879
<v Speaker 1>is it a means to an end is that our

0:34:39.920 --> 0:34:43.239
<v Speaker 1>passion project. Do we need more hobbies so that we

0:34:43.320 --> 0:34:46.520
<v Speaker 1>create more of a balance. How should we be how

0:34:46.560 --> 0:34:50.280
<v Speaker 1>should our relationship with work be growing, and how should

0:34:50.320 --> 0:34:55.080
<v Speaker 1>we be engaging moving forward? Sure, there are individual solutions,

0:34:55.080 --> 0:34:58.320
<v Speaker 1>and I think there's collective solutions. So at the individual level,

0:34:59.040 --> 0:35:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I think we need to see what ways we can

0:35:02.160 --> 0:35:06.480
<v Speaker 1>shrink the footprint of work on our lives, regardless of

0:35:06.640 --> 0:35:09.480
<v Speaker 1>if we're passionate about our work or not, just to

0:35:10.200 --> 0:35:14.080
<v Speaker 1>allow ourselves to reclaim as much time as we can

0:35:14.280 --> 0:35:19.839
<v Speaker 1>outside of our paid employment with the intense pressures of overwork.

0:35:20.800 --> 0:35:24.160
<v Speaker 1>And for everyone, regardless of if they're in their passion

0:35:24.239 --> 0:35:27.480
<v Speaker 1>or not, but especially people who are following their passion

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:30.280
<v Speaker 1>or in their passion. As I talk about in the book,

0:35:30.680 --> 0:35:34.880
<v Speaker 1>we should diversify our meaning making portfolios. By that, I

0:35:34.960 --> 0:35:41.120
<v Speaker 1>mean finding places outside of work to anchor our identity

0:35:41.239 --> 0:35:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and our sense of self, to protect that sense of

0:35:43.560 --> 0:35:48.959
<v Speaker 1>self from the vagaries of the instability of the labor market.

0:35:49.040 --> 0:35:51.439
<v Speaker 1>And that's hard. If you work a lot. That's hard.

0:35:51.480 --> 0:35:57.640
<v Speaker 1>It's work to find space for that other meaning making

0:35:57.680 --> 0:36:00.800
<v Speaker 1>in our lives. It takes practice, it takes scheduling. We

0:36:01.600 --> 0:36:04.279
<v Speaker 1>have to think about it and do it very explicitly,

0:36:05.000 --> 0:36:08.520
<v Speaker 1>but then at more general at the kind of collective level,

0:36:09.600 --> 0:36:12.080
<v Speaker 1>I think we have to really question how we talk

0:36:12.239 --> 0:36:15.480
<v Speaker 1>to young adults about career decision making. So I was

0:36:15.520 --> 0:36:19.240
<v Speaker 1>a passion principle evangelist I told students for this research,

0:36:19.320 --> 0:36:22.520
<v Speaker 1>so like, oh, you're passion figure out the job stuff later,

0:36:22.880 --> 0:36:26.440
<v Speaker 1>And that's not the way that we should be approaching

0:36:26.520 --> 0:36:28.920
<v Speaker 1>career decision making. I think we have a much more

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:33.359
<v Speaker 1>holistic way of talking to young adults about the role

0:36:33.400 --> 0:36:35.560
<v Speaker 1>of work in their lives, the kinds of goals that

0:36:35.640 --> 0:36:37.479
<v Speaker 1>they have, and if they say I want to spend

0:36:37.520 --> 0:36:39.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time with my family and I don't

0:36:39.600 --> 0:36:41.839
<v Speaker 1>want to be working a whole lot, how can we

0:36:42.120 --> 0:36:47.040
<v Speaker 1>help them think about engaging in work that furthers those goals.

0:36:47.080 --> 0:36:49.040
<v Speaker 1>And then we also want to think about the way

0:36:49.040 --> 0:36:55.080
<v Speaker 1>that we're communicating expectations to blue collar and service workers,

0:36:55.080 --> 0:36:59.240
<v Speaker 1>people who are in jobs that may have very little

0:36:59.320 --> 0:37:02.279
<v Speaker 1>option for the expression of passion. I think there's a

0:37:02.320 --> 0:37:05.520
<v Speaker 1>sentiment where there's more more and more of an expectation

0:37:05.680 --> 0:37:09.680
<v Speaker 1>of the performance of being passionate about one's job. For

0:37:09.840 --> 0:37:13.880
<v Speaker 1>baristas and hotel clerks and things. If you go and

0:37:14.040 --> 0:37:18.640
<v Speaker 1>you look at sort of plaquards for coffee shops and things,

0:37:18.680 --> 0:37:21.399
<v Speaker 1>they will often use the language of passion. And it's

0:37:21.440 --> 0:37:25.560
<v Speaker 1>an additional burden we place onto service workers if we

0:37:25.640 --> 0:37:29.319
<v Speaker 1>expect them to perform making a coffee for us as

0:37:29.400 --> 0:37:32.200
<v Speaker 1>though it was their passion, as well as being nice

0:37:32.239 --> 0:37:35.719
<v Speaker 1>and kind to us and performing the emotional labor that's

0:37:35.760 --> 0:37:39.000
<v Speaker 1>always been there. And then beyond that, we need to

0:37:39.040 --> 0:37:43.400
<v Speaker 1>really champion the kinds of legislation and kinds of changes

0:37:43.440 --> 0:37:47.839
<v Speaker 1>in our own workplaces that help reduce things like overwork,

0:37:48.200 --> 0:37:52.200
<v Speaker 1>that allow for more work life balance and give access

0:37:52.280 --> 0:37:57.360
<v Speaker 1>to a wider array of people to benefits and social

0:37:57.480 --> 0:38:01.640
<v Speaker 1>safety nets, and things that can engagement in the labor

0:38:01.680 --> 0:38:06.759
<v Speaker 1>force less risky, less precurious in general. I have one

0:38:06.840 --> 0:38:09.960
<v Speaker 1>one more question for you too, that came up as

0:38:10.000 --> 0:38:14.600
<v Speaker 1>you were answering the last question, which is, so should

0:38:14.680 --> 0:38:19.000
<v Speaker 1>we then be if I am a high school guidance

0:38:19.040 --> 0:38:24.360
<v Speaker 1>counselor right and A and and you know my students

0:38:24.360 --> 0:38:27.960
<v Speaker 1>are coming in and they're should I be tapping into

0:38:29.000 --> 0:38:32.640
<v Speaker 1>how they want to feel as opposed to what they

0:38:32.680 --> 0:38:36.319
<v Speaker 1>want to do? Because what I'm hearing from you and

0:38:36.360 --> 0:38:38.920
<v Speaker 1>what I what I think that the message of your

0:38:38.960 --> 0:38:42.120
<v Speaker 1>book is is that it isn't just about the doing

0:38:42.239 --> 0:38:45.239
<v Speaker 1>of the thing or the being passionate about the doing

0:38:45.239 --> 0:38:47.560
<v Speaker 1>of the thing. It's about how do I want to

0:38:47.640 --> 0:38:51.160
<v Speaker 1>feel in my life? Right? Like it? Am? I? Right?

0:38:51.200 --> 0:38:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Should we be? Is it more about us tapping into

0:38:56.080 --> 0:39:00.040
<v Speaker 1>that which is very different than how we work in

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:02.280
<v Speaker 1>this country, and I think how we work in general.

0:39:02.520 --> 0:39:04.319
<v Speaker 1>You know, the joke was always work as a four

0:39:04.400 --> 0:39:07.279
<v Speaker 1>letter word, like all of these kinds of things, you know,

0:39:07.440 --> 0:39:10.320
<v Speaker 1>should we be tapping into the feeling and then building

0:39:10.880 --> 0:39:13.919
<v Speaker 1>our work around that. I think it's a two part.

0:39:14.080 --> 0:39:18.879
<v Speaker 1>One is more pragmatic. One is trying to see how

0:39:18.920 --> 0:39:21.720
<v Speaker 1>we can encourage them to have a wide variety of skills.

0:39:21.760 --> 0:39:25.520
<v Speaker 1>So if someone is really interested in anthropology, have them

0:39:25.600 --> 0:39:28.920
<v Speaker 1>get a computer science minor, for example, something that can

0:39:28.960 --> 0:39:33.280
<v Speaker 1>actually be give them more options on the labor market

0:39:33.360 --> 0:39:37.800
<v Speaker 1>to help the reduce the potential for procurity. But also

0:39:37.840 --> 0:39:41.000
<v Speaker 1>aligned with that sense of feeling, asking essentially what kind

0:39:41.000 --> 0:39:42.600
<v Speaker 1>of human do they want to be in the world,

0:39:42.760 --> 0:39:47.360
<v Speaker 1>and allowing that to be one of the guiding principles

0:39:47.360 --> 0:39:51.040
<v Speaker 1>they take into account, and really making sure that we

0:39:51.080 --> 0:39:56.680
<v Speaker 1>are not moralizing passion as the most valuable way to

0:39:56.760 --> 0:40:00.000
<v Speaker 1>think about career decision making. When I interviewed career counsel

0:40:00.160 --> 0:40:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and coaches for the book, I was really struck by

0:40:02.920 --> 0:40:06.040
<v Speaker 1>how many of them were willing to tell the people

0:40:06.080 --> 0:40:10.640
<v Speaker 1>that they advise students and workers not to worry about money,

0:40:10.680 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 1>that they shouldn't care so much about money, that they

0:40:13.239 --> 0:40:16.200
<v Speaker 1>really should find work that aligns with their sense of

0:40:16.239 --> 0:40:18.399
<v Speaker 1>self and their sense of identity. And this is These

0:40:18.400 --> 0:40:23.880
<v Speaker 1>are the professions that are given permission to give us advice,

0:40:23.920 --> 0:40:26.399
<v Speaker 1>that we trust to give us advice, and if even

0:40:26.480 --> 0:40:30.080
<v Speaker 1>they are not able to move outside of the trap

0:40:30.160 --> 0:40:35.239
<v Speaker 1>of passion, I think it's more and more important that

0:40:35.320 --> 0:40:40.000
<v Speaker 1>we think about how to do that, folks. The book

0:40:40.239 --> 0:40:45.200
<v Speaker 1>is how the book is, I'm sorry, The Trouble with Passion,

0:40:45.560 --> 0:40:50.560
<v Speaker 1>How searching for fulfillment at work fosters inequality by sociologists

0:40:50.560 --> 0:40:53.399
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Sik Aaron, thank you so much. This was such

0:40:53.440 --> 0:40:56.759
<v Speaker 1>an illuminating conversation and one that I think that we

0:40:56.880 --> 0:41:00.800
<v Speaker 1>all are finding ourselves having right in you know, at

0:41:00.880 --> 0:41:04.640
<v Speaker 1>our at our brunches, at our offices, you know, on zooms,

0:41:04.719 --> 0:41:07.520
<v Speaker 1>in the private chats and all of these spaces to

0:41:07.640 --> 0:41:09.520
<v Speaker 1>figure out what it is that we're all doing so

0:41:09.680 --> 0:41:12.360
<v Speaker 1>your book is more timely than ever. Thank you so

0:41:12.440 --> 0:41:15.080
<v Speaker 1>much for making the time to join Woke. F thank you.

0:41:21.920 --> 0:41:24.760
<v Speaker 1>That is it for me today. Folks on woke app

0:41:24.920 --> 0:41:29.080
<v Speaker 1>as always, Power to the people and to all the people. Power,

0:41:29.280 --> 0:41:31.560
<v Speaker 1>get woke and stay woke as fuck.