WEBVTT - Single Best Idea with Tom Keene: Julia Coronado & Eric Balchunas

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:14.120 --> 0:00:17.759
<v Speaker 2>Single best idea on an odd Monday, torrential rains here

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:20.239
<v Speaker 2>in New York and for all of you, particularly to

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:23.160
<v Speaker 2>the southwest of US, we're thinking of you. Really brutal

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:26.240
<v Speaker 2>weather out there, but we say good morning on an

0:00:26.239 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 2>eventful week. The FED meeting on Wednesday, the FED deicides

0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:32.279
<v Speaker 2>will be at one thirty looking forward to that. Have

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 2>no idea how important this meeting is. They do the

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 2>dots and all that, but given the geopolitics, the political economy,

0:00:40.080 --> 0:00:43.600
<v Speaker 2>the economic politics of the moment, I have no clue

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 2>what's in store this week. What I know is Julia

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 2>Cornado is very, very good at macro policy perspectives. Here's

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 2>Julia Cornado framing out that FED meeting.

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 1>A rate cut isn't going to be the antidote to

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>all the worries that investors and businesses have right now.

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:07.600
<v Speaker 1>There is a tremendous number of sources of uncertainty right now.

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Trade policy is one of them, Immigration is another, Cuts

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 1>and cuts and government contracts is another. Reshaping global alliances

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:24.039
<v Speaker 1>is another. So I think there's just many sources of uncertainty.

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 1>They collide with each other. It's very difficult for businesses

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>to make longer term plans. Of course, everybody, we all

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:33.959
<v Speaker 1>get up in the morning and go to work and

0:01:34.040 --> 0:01:37.120
<v Speaker 1>run our businesses and do our jobs. But are you

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:40.840
<v Speaker 1>going to make the bigger decisions about hiring, about cap x,

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 1>about moving forward with strategic initiatives in this environment? It's difficult.

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>It's challenging. So Noah, rate cut isn't the antidote to

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the uncertainty that we face.

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 2>Julian card out macropolicy perspectives. We're going to get a

0:01:57.280 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 2>lot of different opinions here on what the FED should do,

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 2>but I'm much more interested in the weight the importance

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 2>of the FED right now given the massive policy shocks

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 2>that we see not only here but early around the world.

0:02:11.320 --> 0:02:14.360
<v Speaker 2>Eric Belchunas was into day riveting always we bust as

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:16.400
<v Speaker 2>chops and there's like, you know, there's a comedy to it.

0:02:16.880 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 2>But he is the heavyweight on thinking about these new

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:28.640
<v Speaker 2>fangled things exchange traded funds. Here is Eric Belchunas on

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 2>the dominant low cost vanguard and the idea their effect

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 2>on the economy. The vanguard put I.

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 3>Would call it the vanguard BID. I also think that

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:44.360
<v Speaker 3>the reason it's immovable is people, especially older people with

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 3>a lot of money. They they dated active managers in

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 3>the eighties and nineties and they have found some luck,

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:52.880
<v Speaker 3>and then the ad manager underperformed. When they finally found

0:02:52.919 --> 0:02:55.800
<v Speaker 3>a Vanguard index fund or a black Rock index fund,

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:58.080
<v Speaker 3>they were like, I'm done, I'm off the market. I'm

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 3>getting married. And they're happily. They feel like they have

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 3>the best deal in their personal account and there's just

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 3>nothing that's going to get them to come out of that. Now,

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:09.360
<v Speaker 3>let's talk about maybe a two thousands where you have

0:03:09.480 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 3>the market's flat over a decade. Anything's possible. But until

0:03:13.760 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 3>we see you know, I'm talking a year, I just

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 3>don't think the Vanguard put is it's immovable, at least

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 3>for a year. Beyond that, we'll see. But that's why

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 3>we're only in a couple months. That's why I really

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 3>try to take the other direction here. And the thing

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 3>is spy taking in money also shows the trading crowd

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 3>buying the dip. So that's why, you know, I haven't

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 3>seen anything that ties with the headlines tightly yet. I

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 3>think it's algos and rage selling.

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 2>Eric belchunas there. I think I was filling out my

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 2>bracket when he was talking about that, and you know

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 2>it's like you're dating and then you get married. I

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 2>guess that's, you know, a good investment analogy over the

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 2>span of decades that we could use as well on

0:03:55.960 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 2>your commute across the nation, Apple Car Play, Android Auto,

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 2>Good Morning Night ninety nine point one in Washington, Bloomberg

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 2>eleventh three to zero in New York, Good Morning ninety

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 2>two nine FM in Boston. Humbled by the response in Boston,

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:14.320
<v Speaker 2>thank you for that. On YouTube. Subscribe to Bloomberg Podcasts

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:18.040
<v Speaker 2>for the show and of course, single best idea out

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 2>on YouTube.