WEBVTT - Surveillance: Broad Virus Testing Needed, Hochul Says

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene Jay Lee.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomber Some

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 1>of these numbers worldwide still not great, just to subtle

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>a subtle sign of stabilization in some key economies, some

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>key countries, and we hope that continues. Tom. Great lineup

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:38.960
<v Speaker 1>of guests through this morning, Bam bloom Book Surveillance as always,

0:00:39.000 --> 0:00:42.640
<v Speaker 1>and we begin this morning with Troitsky of sky Bridge. Troy,

0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>always great to catch up with you. Howard Mark's putting

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 1>out a memo yesterday. Let me bring you a quote

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:49.560
<v Speaker 1>from that, just to start this conversation off. The bottom

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 1>line for me is that I'm not all troubled, at all,

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:56.360
<v Speaker 1>troubled saying markets may well be considerably lower sometime in

0:00:56.400 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the coming months, and we're buying today when we find

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 1>good value. I don't find in these statements inconsistence. Your

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:06.560
<v Speaker 1>response to that, Troy, Yeah, No, I think he's right.

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you can never time a bottom perfectly right,

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 1>and so I think the broader point there is that

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, there are many asset classes that are pricing

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>in apocalypse and many securities um Yet at the same time,

0:01:19.920 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>as you guys always note, you've seen unprecedented government government stimulus,

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 1>both at the fiscal level and more importantly in our opinion,

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>on the FED balance sheet level, and in terms of

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 1>money supply growth. So you know, it would be nice

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 1>to sit back in a perfect world and say, hey,

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to time the perfect bottom and every security

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:40.319
<v Speaker 1>and every asset class. But the reality is is that

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>you have tremendous discounts. Now you could take a little

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 1>bit of mark to market pain as you're legging in,

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 1>but that's the price you have to be willing to

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 1>take or to pay in order to have you know,

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:54.720
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary upside. And that's one of the reasons why you know,

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 1>groups like oak Tree have been so successful over time,

0:01:57.760 --> 0:02:00.520
<v Speaker 1>and that they're in a position to add capital and

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 1>monetize dislocations, huge dislocations off the back of forced liquidation,

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>an ugly face that draw down a number of weeks ago.

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:10.679
<v Speaker 1>Many people have been taking advantage of those dislocations, particularly

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:12.679
<v Speaker 1>in high grade credit, and a question I want to

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 1>explore beginning with you this morning, Troy, is what the

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>recovery looks like in the lower quality segments of this

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 1>market towards high yield across an A M. What are

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:23.680
<v Speaker 1>you looking at the moment? Yeah, so I think that

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 1>that's a million dollar question. And I think, you know,

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:28.799
<v Speaker 1>the way this has always worked historically, in the way

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 1>it appears to be working now, but just at a

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>much more rapid pace, given you know the fact that

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the FED response has been so much more muscular, and

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 1>you know you have TALF too that's coming online and

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 1>in the government stimulus. Is that you know, when you

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 1>go through a deep downturn in markets and markets are

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:48.800
<v Speaker 1>pricing in you know, in some cases armageddon, in other cases,

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, severe recession, you know the upend quality always

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 1>starts to move first, right. Analysts always have more confidence

0:02:56.800 --> 0:02:58.640
<v Speaker 1>when they're looking at you know, a company with an

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 1>unlovered balance sheet, or you're looking you know, at the

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:04.639
<v Speaker 1>top of the capital structure and commercial real estate, or

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:08.240
<v Speaker 1>or Celo said, hey, you can run math six ways

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:11.520
<v Speaker 1>to Sunday doomsday, this to the cows come home. But

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 1>there's still money, good securities, and so you know, you've

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 1>seen that rebound start, you know, it's slow and fitful um.

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:21.920
<v Speaker 1>And then what happens is as that liquidity starts to

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 1>filter down in and some of the more you know,

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 1>dire scenarios don't play out, um, you start to see

0:03:29.320 --> 0:03:31.960
<v Speaker 1>lower parts of the capital structure starting catch up or

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 1>lower quality. The thing that's interesting know about this is

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:37.839
<v Speaker 1>that you've already had a pretty significant rebound in high

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 1>yield um. You know that. You know, dollar prices are

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 1>back up to about eighty five cents and a dollar.

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I wouldn't get carried away right now

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>on specific high yield because you know, so much of

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the potential upside has always been realized, already been realized.

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Try You've got a beautiful vision into the hedge fund business.

0:03:56.920 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 1>And I know the media loves to try out somebody

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 1>who's up a hundred in the last three days. It's

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 1>all great and wonderful. What's the real story our alternative

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 1>investments doing? Are they? As a general statement, surviving creating

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 1>alpha here? Yeah? So I think it's a general statement

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 1>that would be true. I mean it's not like, you know,

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:21.159
<v Speaker 1>the hedge fund industry has had a great run um by,

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:24.480
<v Speaker 1>but there are time you always choke around it. But

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:26.679
<v Speaker 1>but if you think of what's happened so far this year,

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the most part capital has been protected.

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I think discretionary macro managers and systematic trend followers have

0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 1>done fairly well. You know. Some of the bigger MULTIPM

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 1>shops um you know, like you guys report on, like

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Citadel and Millennium have done fine. Where there's a cute pain.

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Um Hare's been more in the credit instructure, credit area

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 1>where they got caught up in the margin calling that

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 1>was hid in the reeds and a lot of their

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>assets were sold down, you know, in sympathy. And so

0:04:56.240 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 1>that's where you know, when we look at risk reward

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 1>versus fundamentals, we think there's the most upside there, and

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:04.480
<v Speaker 1>we also think there's the most upside in distress corporate credit.

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:07.480
<v Speaker 1>But again you have to be selective, you know, firmly

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:11.039
<v Speaker 1>focus on good, good company with good balance sheet. You know,

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 1>no reason to get involved in energy or anything of

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 1>that nature. But you know, even hospitality names or you know,

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:20.839
<v Speaker 1>six Flags is a good example of a of a

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:24.039
<v Speaker 1>company that's good, good balance sheet, low dollar prices, that

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 1>franchise is very strong, and we'll survive, Troy. I think

0:05:27.200 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting you're talking about margin calls and some of

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the technical stress in markets appears that we've moved from

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 1>a financial market crisis going forward to a real economic crisis,

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:41.039
<v Speaker 1>which is what we're looking at trying to assess. Now

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 1>there's sort of a knee jerk by the dip mentality

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:46.279
<v Speaker 1>because it's worked in the past. What's the risk that

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:48.599
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to work the same way this time

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 1>as people look into the abyss of a potential downturn

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 1>economically that rivals what we saw in in the nineties. Yeah, no, No,

0:05:57.400 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a great question least. And I think you hit

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the nail on the head with your w analysis. I mean,

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that is arguably the biggest risk or that

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 1>you know and know the dreams of v shape recovery

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:10.360
<v Speaker 1>went out the window, you know, four to six weeks ago.

0:06:10.720 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 1>No market participants thinks that's going to happen. But maybe

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the you tend to have you know, a much much

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 1>longer bottom, right um So, And the other thing I'd

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:25.040
<v Speaker 1>say is, no one is really recklessly buying dips, right Uh.

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:27.159
<v Speaker 1>You know, people are trying to be very careful and

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 1>calculated on again like that we talked about with credit quality,

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:33.919
<v Speaker 1>Like okay, let's start with the higher, higher top of

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the capital structure. You know, obviously an I G. Credit

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:40.480
<v Speaker 1>you're getting fed support directly, and then let's roll down.

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:43.840
<v Speaker 1>So no, no one's you know, I think delusional enough

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 1>to think that markets are going to rebound in a

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 1>straight line. And you know, we're gonna have this you

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 1>know or twenty percent annualized keyword and annualized economic contraction,

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:55.840
<v Speaker 1>and you know, mortgage delinquencies are going to go from

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 1>point nine percent to eight percent and then suddenly all

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 1>those people are gonna start paying in you know, two

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:03.719
<v Speaker 1>weeks later. No one's doing that. People are trying to

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 1>be very careful and selective. UM. But but to your point,

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>if if things get materially worse than the economic level,

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>like meaning we don't really bottom in Q two, which

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 1>is the expectation, now, don't start to recover you know

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:21.680
<v Speaker 1>in Q three, in Q four, UM, and instead it's

0:07:21.720 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 1>a it's a much longer stretch or or or a

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 1>false don with a W. Then clearly you know that's

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the scenario where you could have more downside and markets. UM.

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 1>But then again against that uh and I know you

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 1>saw probably saw no it's coming over. I mean you

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:39.840
<v Speaker 1>think of what the FED is doing from a liquidity standpoint,

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 1>it's just it's incredible. I mean, it's unreal. They're expanding

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 1>their balance sheet at almost fifteen times the taste of

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:52.559
<v Speaker 1>q E three fifteen times. Money supply growth is growing

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 1>at an analyzed rate of seventy eight percent, while the

0:07:55.920 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 1>banking system excess reserves have gone up by you know,

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 1>probably about seven fift billion. That data series has to

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 1>come out, but that's you know, that's our estimate. So

0:08:03.640 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>you know that is that, in our humble opinion, is

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 1>what's really put a floor under market. Obviously, the fiscal

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 1>stimulus is very critical. TOALTH two is very critical. An

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 1>expansion of TOALTH two to include other assets like they

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:18.120
<v Speaker 1>did back you know eight, you know they gradually expanded

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 1>that very critical. Hi, Troy, always great to get your

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on a program. So I'm my best of the

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 1>team of Skybridge Anti even yours, Troyasky Skybridge Capital right

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 1>now to bring us up to date on the state

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 1>of the State of New York. Cathy Hokel joins us.

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Of course, the Lieutenant Governor of this state Kathy, these

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 1>are extraordinary times. It is a test for all politicians

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 1>and the test of exhaustion. How are you getting to

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 1>the weekend? What is the path on this Wednesday to

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:53.680
<v Speaker 1>get to a long weekend and to Easter. Well, for

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 1>those of us who are on the front lines, there

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:58.679
<v Speaker 1>is no thought that this week is going to end.

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:02.319
<v Speaker 1>So I'm looking forward to Easter to celebrate remotely with

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 1>my family Lisa virtually, and I want I wish everyone

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:06.600
<v Speaker 1>a happy pass Over and happy Easter as we head

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 1>into this week. But this is a week where there's

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 1>tremendous temptation to uh start hearing some little glimmers of

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 1>hope and saying that people could become a little more complacent,

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and you haven't seen Graham and Grandpa in a while,

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:20.560
<v Speaker 1>you want to catch up with your siblings because these

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 1>are wonderful celebration. We have to make sure that people

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:26.960
<v Speaker 1>do not succumb to that temptation. And that is the

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 1>warning that I cannot convey strongly enough that if we

0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 1>start going back to our old ways or even just

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:35.880
<v Speaker 1>taking a little more steps out, they're becoming a little

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 1>less uh, you know, guarded in our behavior toward others.

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 1>If we don't stay home, we could actually set ourselves back,

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:46.800
<v Speaker 1>and after all the sacrifice that New Yorkers in American

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 1>have had to go through for the last three weeks,

0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:50.600
<v Speaker 1>we do not want to go there. And that's a

0:09:50.640 --> 0:09:52.960
<v Speaker 1>strong message. I wanted to make sure that everyone hears

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 1>these are wonderful holidays, and we'll certainly have next year

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:59.719
<v Speaker 1>to celebrate, but let's make sure that everyone who can

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 1>will be sitting at those tables with us next year

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:04.959
<v Speaker 1>because we took those preventative steps now and continued our

0:10:05.000 --> 0:10:07.960
<v Speaker 1>social distancing. I will say, I'm I'm looking forward to

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:11.440
<v Speaker 1>my zoom pass a versator tonight. Lieutenant Governor. I'm wondering

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 1>everyone's trying to figure out how quickly New York can

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:19.080
<v Speaker 1>restart its economy. Do you have any sense of the

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:21.840
<v Speaker 1>path for that and what the plan is to reopen.

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Before we can reopen, we have to have broad broadly

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 1>undertaken testing. And what we're doing now in the Governor

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 1>announced this yesterday, is that we are working with our

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 1>businesses to try to find ways to increase the capacity

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 1>for rapid testing. There are possibilities to do testing in

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 1>five minutes, fifteen minutes and get results back quickly, and

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 1>only when we feel secure that we can have a

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 1>workforce that is free of coronavirus because they've already contracted

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 1>it and they have developed the antibodies and are not

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:56.840
<v Speaker 1>vulnerable themselves, or that they would spread it to others.

0:10:56.920 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 1>I think those are important scientific metrics that we're going

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 1>to be focusing on as we I start to identify

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:06.320
<v Speaker 1>which industries can come back online. But again, this is

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:09.200
<v Speaker 1>a conversation we want to have because we are anxious

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 1>to get this going again. But it is a little

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:14.840
<v Speaker 1>bit premature to start giving out dates, and it's certainly

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>premature to know how that's going to look. All we

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:20.479
<v Speaker 1>do know is that we have to continue these distancing

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 1>from each other, the social distance, reduced density, but the

0:11:23.880 --> 0:11:27.320
<v Speaker 1>increased testing will really be the link that tells us

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:30.200
<v Speaker 1>when we were able to test enough New Yorkers to

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:33.559
<v Speaker 1>start jump starting our economy again. Kathy, premature to be

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 1>thinking about many many things at this point. I'm sure,

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:38.320
<v Speaker 1>given the crisis that it's unfolding right before our eyes

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:40.559
<v Speaker 1>over the last few weeks. One thing we can discuss,

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 1>though there's not too premature to discuss, is the help

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:44.840
<v Speaker 1>that you might need in the future. Kathy, what do

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:47.080
<v Speaker 1>you need from the federal level. What kind of assistance

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 1>do you need from the government. We need money. Uh,

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 1>this is something that the governor just yesterday rode to

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 1>our congressional delegation. He's spoken to the President when there

0:11:57.200 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 1>is the next stimulus plan, and there needs to be

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 1>another one. They cannot overlook the fact that a place

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 1>like New York City, the epicenter, has now taken a

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:08.960
<v Speaker 1>ten to fifteen billion dollar hit to our budget, and

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 1>we just wrapped up a budget a couple of days ago.

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 1>But it allows the governor to have flexibility to reopen

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:17.440
<v Speaker 1>if necessary based on either a decline or hopefully an

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 1>increase in revenues. But we need financial assistance from the

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:24.440
<v Speaker 1>federal government. We also have been asking for them to

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:27.679
<v Speaker 1>invoke the Events Production Act much earlier than has been

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 1>even used at all in a wide scale way to

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 1>get us the personal protection equipment, to ramp up testing kits,

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the testing supplies as well. As we've been saying for

0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:40.600
<v Speaker 1>weeks and liarly months, we need more ventilators to be

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:43.719
<v Speaker 1>produced in this country. I think this crisis is going

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 1>to have a wholesale rethinking of where we get our

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:51.160
<v Speaker 1>life saving products, are supplies, our medical supplies, our ventilators,

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:53.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's going to make us wonder do

0:12:53.040 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 1>we want to continue to be reliant on other countries

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 1>when we have the capacity, that know how, in the

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 1>ability to make those right here in New York. And

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:02.679
<v Speaker 1>I think that's going to be a conversation. They will

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 1>be had sooner than later. Another thing that's not theoretical

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>is the impact that the coronavirus and the shutdowns have

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 1>had on the economy. And one area that you highlighted

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 1>in a recent OpEd in The Hill was that women

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 1>are hit hardest. You argue by the impact of the coronavirus.

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Why do you say that? In two areas, One is

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:28.840
<v Speaker 1>that seventy six percent of healthcare workers are female. That's

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:31.319
<v Speaker 1>staggering when you think about how we are honoring our

0:13:31.400 --> 0:13:34.600
<v Speaker 1>frontline workers. The people are putting on uniforms and hopefully

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:37.560
<v Speaker 1>protective equipment going into their jobs, literally going into the

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 1>heat of battle every day. The majority of them, vast majority,

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 1>are women, and they've many of them have children, children

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:46.920
<v Speaker 1>who otherwise would be occupied in school or being watched

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:51.680
<v Speaker 1>by grandparents, So there is literally childcare crisis associated with them. Secondly,

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:55.440
<v Speaker 1>two thirds of America's minimum wage workers are women. These

0:13:55.440 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 1>are the ones who worked in restaurants, and had worked

0:13:57.760 --> 0:14:00.360
<v Speaker 1>in hotels, and had worked in housekeeping, and all this

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:02.920
<v Speaker 1>work that had to get done and now either laid

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:04.920
<v Speaker 1>off or they're the ones vulnerable having to go in

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 1>to work every single day. Tenant Governor, you are more

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 1>qualified than any politician in this country to talk about

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the cittiness of this pandemic. You are out of Buffalo.

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:20.119
<v Speaker 1>You know the distance to Lockport, the distance to Batavia

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 1>down the US rather down the New York State Thruway system.

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Is well. Explain to those in smaller cities, villages in

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 1>rural America why they need to support the big cities

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 1>in this pandemic. Oh. Absolutely, And I've been on radio

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Intellivision NonStop saying, you know, we think about when there's

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 1>a snowstorm that paralyzes upstate New York, those utility trucks

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:47.960
<v Speaker 1>are coming up from Long Island and New York City

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 1>to get our power back on. So I'll just talk

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 1>about something we all can relate to it in upstates.

0:14:53.920 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 1>I represent the entire state, and I spend vacia majority

0:14:56.680 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 1>of my time in New York City. So I feel

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm adapted there as well. But what I've been saying

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 1>to Western New Yorkers just like we route one team

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 1>up here of football seas and we are one state,

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 1>and the Governor and I have said for sure, if

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 1>there is any part of that state upstate boundstate that

0:15:14.880 --> 0:15:18.800
<v Speaker 1>need life staving equipment, we will personally transform their ourselves.

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 1>We had to reassure people, and there was some anxiety,

0:15:21.480 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 1>some political people trying to make hay out of it,

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 1>which I think is disgraceful. But you know, we shut

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:28.960
<v Speaker 1>exactly that. You know, that's that's not happening. We are

0:15:29.040 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 1>one state, period. That's the answer. Don't be a stranger.

0:15:32.600 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Lieutenant Governor Oco from Buffalo and from New York, stay,

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining Bloomberg Surveillance worldwide. I

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 1>think we should carry forward into the Chairman's comments that

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 1>we'll see tomorrow. Of course, we'll have a lot of

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 1>details on that across all of the Bloomberg platforms. Steven

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Roach is identified at Yale University with China and of

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 1>course his leadership at Morgan Stanley on the China Watch

0:15:57.680 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 1>for many years involving his Wonderful Look the Next Asia

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and other efforts as well. Before that he had leadership

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:07.320
<v Speaker 1>and looking at what we do with our monetary and

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 1>fiscal systems within the United States, and maybe we can

0:16:10.760 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 1>focus on that today. Stephen Rotch, I know you, John,

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Lisa me. We never imagined this expansion of the balance

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 1>sheet back to calculus one. Is there a limit to

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:26.840
<v Speaker 1>where a balance sheet can go? No, there's no limit

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 1>numerically in a world of electronic or fiat currencies. The

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>question is is there a limit economically? And um what

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 1>this ultimately means for addressing the problems that are now

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:46.000
<v Speaker 1>afflicting the world. Tom The underpinning of this, and we

0:16:46.080 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 1>talked to William White about this yesterday. The folks the

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 1>conversation was hugely valuable was to go back to something

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Joe Stiglitz has talked about, which is the underpinning of

0:16:55.760 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 1>this is the small G and economics, which is the

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 1>growth rate could be the growth rate of it'll the

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 1>growth rate of the US, it can be the growth

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:05.119
<v Speaker 1>rate of New York City for that matter. How do

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:08.160
<v Speaker 1>you Dove tell Steve Roach what we're going through right

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:14.840
<v Speaker 1>now with the small G that's in all the equations. Well, look, um,

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the monetary um stimulus, the fiscal stimulus. You know, the

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:26.120
<v Speaker 1>two words we described to address these actions UH during

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the global financial crisis of oh, you know nine was

0:17:28.880 --> 0:17:35.200
<v Speaker 1>big bazooka UH. And they're effective and addressing UH financial problems,

0:17:35.240 --> 0:17:39.720
<v Speaker 1>but they're not effective in addressing a pandemic. We know that,

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 1>and Chairman Powell said it very clearly when he gave

0:17:44.760 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 1>his rare interview on the Today Show now close to

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks ago, when he said that, you know,

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the FEDS actions are aimed at sparking post COVID recovery,

0:17:56.520 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 1>not in addressing the downside of containment and workers being

0:18:03.680 --> 0:18:06.000
<v Speaker 1>told to stay at home. So we're deluding ourselves into

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 1>thinking that these actions are going to bring an end

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 1>to this crisis. The only thing they can bring an

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 1>end to the crisis is containing the disease. We're trying

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 1>to build a bridge to the other side here, Professor,

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:20.960
<v Speaker 1>on a number of levels and help companies get through

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:25.400
<v Speaker 1>an unpresidented economic shutdown. I'm just wondering, from your perspective, Stephen,

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:28.159
<v Speaker 1>what more needs to be done on the fiscal side,

0:18:28.320 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>both in terms of size and just calibration. The specific

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 1>policies that you'd like to see in the coming weeks

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:35.879
<v Speaker 1>and months if we haven't seen them already. Well, you

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:38.959
<v Speaker 1>use the words on calibration, I mean, I don't know

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 1>quite what that means, but I would take that as

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:46.440
<v Speaker 1>meaning that the fiscal actions need to be focused at

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:51.719
<v Speaker 1>providing support for our public health infrastructure which is woefully inadequate,

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 1>adequate the scientific research we need for anti viral medication

0:18:56.720 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately the vaccine um. You know, I've I've argued

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:04.480
<v Speaker 1>that we should place as much emphasis on that as

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:08.399
<v Speaker 1>we do to bridge loans to corporations and even small

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:12.439
<v Speaker 1>and medium sized businesses. Certainly, we've got to put a

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:15.960
<v Speaker 1>floor under the economic carnage. But you know as well

0:19:15.960 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 1>as I do that, the longer the shutdown exists, the

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:21.399
<v Speaker 1>more and more we're gonna have to go back to

0:19:21.440 --> 0:19:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the well, uh, in dealing with the these bridge loans.

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 1>We've got to get the science and the public health

0:19:28.160 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure right before we can hope to do anything in

0:19:31.400 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 1>terms of supporting economic recovery. Stephen Roe, professor and former

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Stanley Asia chairman, joining us right now. I'm wondering, Stephen,

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:43.119
<v Speaker 1>taking a look at what the roadmap will be to

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 1>reopen the US economy. A lot of people are looking

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 1>to China. What are the initial size You're seeing a

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of people questioning, uh, the sort of veracity of

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the numbers that we're getting out of China. Are you

0:19:55.280 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 1>optimistic about what you've seen in terms of a bounce

0:19:59.080 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 1>back from the shut out over there? Look, the Chinese

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:06.480
<v Speaker 1>template tells us some important things. It told us how

0:20:06.520 --> 0:20:10.800
<v Speaker 1>to address the disease, as did South Korea. And they're

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:14.399
<v Speaker 1>there are two different models, and one is about Drayconian

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 1>lockdowns China, and the others about rigorous testing and contact

0:20:20.040 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 1>tracing South Korea. Uh, And what they're telling us about,

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:28.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, the reopening is that, uh, it's possible to

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 1>reopen the supply side, but it's very very difficult to

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:34.960
<v Speaker 1>reopen the demand side, given the shock that's occurred to

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:40.440
<v Speaker 1>behavioral norms of disease infected and fearful of people, families

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:43.800
<v Speaker 1>slash consumers. And so we've got to look very carefully

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:48.359
<v Speaker 1>at at other countries in terms of their struggles to

0:20:48.880 --> 0:20:54.639
<v Speaker 1>reopen their systems and go back to anything close to normal.

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:57.720
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be very difficult to put Humpty Dumpty back

0:20:57.720 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 1>together again. The immediacy of the health crisis the entire

0:21:02.320 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 1>world is facing as a sort of overwhelmed some of

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:09.720
<v Speaker 1>the tensions that seem to be percolating and ongoing between

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the US and China. And I'm wondering how that plays

0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:15.240
<v Speaker 1>out at a time when there seems to be something

0:21:15.320 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 1>of an information war with a lot of bickering going

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:21.240
<v Speaker 1>back and forth with US and China as to the

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 1>message who's who's it blame and taking leadership globally and

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 1>managing the health crisis. You know, look, that's a great point.

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:32.199
<v Speaker 1>I've written about that on on the Bloomberg platform and

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:35.679
<v Speaker 1>and elsewhere. Finger Pointing in the blame game is going

0:21:35.720 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 1>to get us nowhere if we really aspire for a collaboration,

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:43.720
<v Speaker 1>which is what we need to address a global problem.

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 1>That's what a pandemic is. And and you know, the

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration, you know, is backed off a little bit

0:21:50.240 --> 0:21:54.920
<v Speaker 1>from naming this the Chinese virus, or Secretary of State

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Pompeo calls it the Wuhan virus. But you know where

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 1>we continue to uh point fingers uh and one another

0:22:04.560 --> 0:22:08.960
<v Speaker 1>in uh trying to assess culpability and blame and that's

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 1>just not the stuff of collaborating. We gotta put that

0:22:12.080 --> 0:22:16.120
<v Speaker 1>aside and UH and really work together. There's so much

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:19.560
<v Speaker 1>we can do together. Stephen the China Watch. Elizabeth Economy

0:22:19.560 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 1>at c FAR I thought was way away out front

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 1>on the challenges domestically that Mr g has in China.

0:22:26.119 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Minxing Pay of Claremont wrote a fabulous article for Foreign

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Affairs in the last ten days on the Chinese Communist

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:37.359
<v Speaker 1>Party on the future for we've given the shocks that

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:40.440
<v Speaker 1>we've seen in the Chinese system. Do you share with

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:45.359
<v Speaker 1>doctor Economy this worry about the stability of of of

0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:50.320
<v Speaker 1>president She's rain No, I don't. I think she's overblown that,

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:54.359
<v Speaker 1>And I've felt that it was a case um before

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:58.080
<v Speaker 1>this crisis, and I certainly feel that's the case now. Certainly,

0:22:58.119 --> 0:23:04.439
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese leadership did not necessarily perform admirably during the

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 1>early days of this horrific disease, and there's a there's

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:12.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of questions that are being raised both inside

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 1>of China, especially outside of China and looking back on that,

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:18.360
<v Speaker 1>but you know, to to view this as an existential

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:23.080
<v Speaker 1>threat to his leadership into the party I think goes

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 1>well beyond what is um actually accurate in the current situation. Professor,

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 1>you say we should collaborate with China. According to our reporting,

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 1>China is still concealing the cases and deaths and they're

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 1>intentionally leaving those cases and the reporting of those cases incomplete.

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:44.439
<v Speaker 1>How can we collaborate with a country that intelligence of

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 1>fishals in this country think we shouldn't trust. Well, that's

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:51.680
<v Speaker 1>a great question, and so you know, you've got to

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:55.360
<v Speaker 1>look at, you know, what what the results are in

0:23:55.440 --> 0:24:00.040
<v Speaker 1>terms of how the Chinese economy is getting back to

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:03.600
<v Speaker 1>UM at least production and what they're attempting to do

0:24:03.760 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 1>on consumption. If the numbers were as poor as you're reporting,

0:24:09.359 --> 0:24:14.440
<v Speaker 1>uh suggests, then UM, they would not have reopened Wuhan,

0:24:14.640 --> 0:24:19.479
<v Speaker 1>they would not have made progress in normalizing and bringing

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:23.160
<v Speaker 1>production back and the travel back that they're doing right now.

0:24:23.240 --> 0:24:28.480
<v Speaker 1>So certainly there's issues of accuracy down to the last

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 1>decent point. We have problems with that in our country

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:35.520
<v Speaker 1>as well, because we don't have data on testing and

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:38.720
<v Speaker 1>the incidence of the disease. And you know, I just

0:24:38.720 --> 0:24:42.119
<v Speaker 1>think we have to be careful in um pointing fingers

0:24:42.119 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 1>at others. It's like the pot calling the kettle black hair.

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Stephen roaches, thank you so much. With the university greatly

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:55.560
<v Speaker 1>appreciated that. Today. What we've tried to do here, not

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:58.880
<v Speaker 1>all the time, but throughout Bloomberg Surveillance is to bring

0:24:58.880 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 1>you the smartest asked, the most informed that we can.

0:25:02.359 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Within the medical community. That's been someone like Dollar Bernheim

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:09.040
<v Speaker 1>here Dr Brenheim, i should say, rather at Mount Sinai

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:13.359
<v Speaker 1>and radiology Dr Hotez at Baylor University, Stephen Reiley, the

0:25:13.400 --> 0:25:17.200
<v Speaker 1>great epidemiologist over at Imperial College in London. And now

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:21.919
<v Speaker 1>for the emergency room, she is Lauren Sour. She is

0:25:21.960 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 1>at the Johns Hopkins University and their medical system out

0:25:26.560 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 1>of their Bloomberg School of Public Health. And of course

0:25:31.640 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 1>we have to mention that Mr Bloomberg, of course is

0:25:34.160 --> 0:25:37.320
<v Speaker 1>with Bloomberg LP and a great benefactor of his engineering

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 1>school Johns Hopkins. And with that said, Laurence Sour is

0:25:42.160 --> 0:25:48.439
<v Speaker 1>exceptionally competent in emergency medicine and on the doings of

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 1>emergency rooms. Here is Lauren Soer. I think the key

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 1>is to actually not walk into the emergency room unless

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:58.399
<v Speaker 1>you're absolutely critically ill. Um We want to keep people

0:25:58.400 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 1>out of the emergency department to make sure that the

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:04.240
<v Speaker 1>space is there for the patients. We need this critical

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 1>resource the road. You're going to see stick patients in

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the emergency department now, Um, a lot of emergency departments

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:15.520
<v Speaker 1>are separating patients using KENT to separate out COVID likely

0:26:15.560 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 1>patients and COVID unlikely patients to reduce the risk of

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:22.760
<v Speaker 1>spread in waiting rooms and things like that. Lauren, we

0:26:22.840 --> 0:26:25.800
<v Speaker 1>have seen in the last couple of days the beginning

0:26:25.840 --> 0:26:28.679
<v Speaker 1>of an understanding of this virus with the ebbs and

0:26:28.720 --> 0:26:31.119
<v Speaker 1>the flows, and of course all focused on the Prime

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Minister of the United Kingdom, but for each and every

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 1>virus patient, there seems to be a point where they

0:26:38.080 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 1>get better and then they get worse as well. What

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 1>have you learned with the Johns Hopkins medical team about

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the ebb and flow of the virus the day to

0:26:49.359 --> 0:26:53.120
<v Speaker 1>day of this pathogen. One of the things we've seen

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:55.520
<v Speaker 1>about these patients is that they have to be watched

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:59.679
<v Speaker 1>really carefully. UM. Their oxygen saturation can look like it's

0:26:59.680 --> 0:27:02.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be fine and then go uh, then really

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:07.679
<v Speaker 1>go off the rails. We've seen these patients. We really

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:09.520
<v Speaker 1>we really need to pay a close eye to them

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:11.639
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that they're at the right resource level

0:27:11.720 --> 0:27:15.120
<v Speaker 1>for managing them, so trying not to move them out

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:17.840
<v Speaker 1>of the CU into a step down unit too early

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:20.880
<v Speaker 1>with the risk that they might get worse and then

0:27:20.960 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 1>have to be moved back to the I c U.

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:26.160
<v Speaker 1>We want to avoid transferring patients as much as possible

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and reduce the number of transfers within our public health system.

0:27:31.760 --> 0:27:34.480
<v Speaker 1>With a belinguered New York and yes there's other geographies

0:27:34.520 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 1>across this country. They're just overwhelmed right now. It's a

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 1>movement from the emergency room to a hospital bed and

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:46.440
<v Speaker 1>then as the Prime Minister, to an intensive care unit.

0:27:46.960 --> 0:27:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Explain the differences of I see you. Explain the nuances

0:27:52.080 --> 0:27:55.240
<v Speaker 1>there that we need to know. Sure, So when the

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:58.400
<v Speaker 1>patients move from the emergency department, depending on how sick

0:27:58.440 --> 0:28:00.840
<v Speaker 1>they are, they may go to a regular floor that

0:28:01.080 --> 0:28:03.080
<v Speaker 1>or up to the I see you and that I

0:28:03.200 --> 0:28:05.520
<v Speaker 1>see you level of care is really important for these

0:28:05.520 --> 0:28:10.359
<v Speaker 1>patients who may need mechanical ventilation or other higher level care.

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:14.119
<v Speaker 1>That mechanical ventilation piece is really important. So if someone

0:28:14.240 --> 0:28:16.359
<v Speaker 1>can't breathe on their own and it's going to need

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:19.959
<v Speaker 1>to be intibated and mechanically ventilated, which we've talked a

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:23.760
<v Speaker 1>lot about with these patients, UM, you need that I

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:26.479
<v Speaker 1>see you level of care because the staffing is higher.

0:28:26.560 --> 0:28:30.360
<v Speaker 1>So UM, you have more nurse to patient, higher nurse

0:28:30.400 --> 0:28:34.680
<v Speaker 1>to patient race vio, higher level of critical care doctors,

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 1>and you have the respiratory therapist you need to need

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:41.400
<v Speaker 1>to manage the ventilators, and you have the antise geologists

0:28:41.440 --> 0:28:45.120
<v Speaker 1>there to manage the levels of medication that these patients require.

0:28:46.280 --> 0:28:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Explain to us your view on this debate of the

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 1>protection of nurses, the protection of doctors, and indeed of

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:58.640
<v Speaker 1>all of hospitals in America. It's a ranging debate right

0:28:58.680 --> 0:29:03.440
<v Speaker 1>now about getting per tective gear in give us your perspective. Please.

0:29:04.280 --> 0:29:07.960
<v Speaker 1>We absolutely have to keep our medical staff are frontline

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:11.280
<v Speaker 1>healthcare workers healthy because the patients are going to keep coming,

0:29:11.400 --> 0:29:14.320
<v Speaker 1>whether the physicians and the nurses and the respiratory therapist

0:29:14.400 --> 0:29:17.000
<v Speaker 1>and everyone else to keep the hospital running is there

0:29:17.040 --> 0:29:20.480
<v Speaker 1>and healthy or not. So the personal protective equipment or

0:29:20.480 --> 0:29:24.640
<v Speaker 1>we call it PPE is critical to protecting these these

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 1>healthcare workers. We need the masks or the pappers, the

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 1>personal air purifying devices, UM, so that you can safely

0:29:33.320 --> 0:29:36.200
<v Speaker 1>come and go from these patients rooms. You can safely

0:29:36.240 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 1>do the procedures you need to do to keep the

0:29:38.400 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 1>patients UH breathing. A lot of our procedures that we

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:46.680
<v Speaker 1>do for these respiratory patients generate air assaults or smart

0:29:46.720 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 1>small particles that have the virus in it. So the

0:29:50.400 --> 0:29:54.960
<v Speaker 1>PPE is critical to keeping healthcare workers safe and and

0:29:55.640 --> 0:30:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the hospital running. Laurence with the Johns Hopkins University in

0:30:00.720 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 1>their Bloomberg School of Public Health just in Paul I thought,

0:30:03.880 --> 0:30:07.080
<v Speaker 1>there's just an extraordin ordinary time interview. She's truly in

0:30:07.120 --> 0:30:09.680
<v Speaker 1>the trenches. She's out of Boston University, and of course

0:30:09.760 --> 0:30:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Johns Hopkins as well, in her whole career is focused

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 1>on that room. We hate to go in. You know,

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:22.560
<v Speaker 1>every parent dreads it for all sorts of reasons. I

0:30:22.640 --> 0:30:25.200
<v Speaker 1>hate to go on emergency rooms and these people to

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:28.800
<v Speaker 1>spend their whole careers in them. I'm one block away

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:32.520
<v Speaker 1>or from Mount Sinai's acclaimed emergency room, and it's it's

0:30:32.560 --> 0:30:35.800
<v Speaker 1>a science under its own within hospitals. Yeah, it's a

0:30:35.800 --> 0:30:38.440
<v Speaker 1>special calling I think for for those types of people.

0:30:38.560 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Tom and they and they really are on the front

0:30:41.200 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 1>lines here. And you know Dr Sowers commentary there at

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the end about the importance of PPE having the proper

0:30:47.320 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 1>equipment to protect our healthcare providers, particularly on the front lines,

0:30:51.720 --> 0:30:54.400
<v Speaker 1>is really critical. And that's something we've seen called out

0:30:54.400 --> 0:30:57.680
<v Speaker 1>by you know lots of politicians and speakers, whether it's

0:30:57.720 --> 0:31:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Cuomos talking about initially we have to have the

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:03.440
<v Speaker 1>ppe UH and we have to have ventilators. And those

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:06.239
<v Speaker 1>are the two key issues we've heard from you know

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:08.880
<v Speaker 1>leaders around the country, around the world as they talk

0:31:08.960 --> 0:31:16.560
<v Speaker 1>about their response to this from the health care system.

0:31:16.640 --> 0:31:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Let me U move this to oil and this is extraordinary, folks.

0:31:20.400 --> 0:31:22.560
<v Speaker 1>It's off the radar to a great many of us

0:31:22.600 --> 0:31:25.640
<v Speaker 1>as we focus on this pandemic, we focus on this

0:31:25.800 --> 0:31:29.360
<v Speaker 1>massive economic contraction. I read not one, not too but

0:31:29.520 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 1>three Bloomberg hydrocarbon articles today on Alberta and it is

0:31:34.600 --> 0:31:38.080
<v Speaker 1>a depression. Paul sanky has been following this for years.

0:31:38.120 --> 0:31:40.920
<v Speaker 1>He's with MISSOOO. He is one of the best best

0:31:41.080 --> 0:31:44.880
<v Speaker 1>best is taking the microeconomics of oil and dovetailing it

0:31:44.920 --> 0:31:48.720
<v Speaker 1>into some vision of where oil and natural guests are heading.

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Paul Sanki joins us UH this morning. Paul I was

0:31:52.000 --> 0:31:57.240
<v Speaker 1>flabbergasted by the financial price boosted by all that money

0:31:57.280 --> 0:32:01.840
<v Speaker 1>betting on higher oil prices. And rebound versus the physical price,

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 1>witnessing Western Canada oil plunging from ten and eight dollars

0:32:08.400 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 1>a barrel down under five dollars a barrel. Are we

0:32:12.560 --> 0:32:17.360
<v Speaker 1>actually going to be giving oil away for nothing? It's

0:32:17.360 --> 0:32:21.120
<v Speaker 1>getting close, I mean, certainly elaborates which doesn't as you know,

0:32:21.240 --> 0:32:24.760
<v Speaker 1>have a traditionally strong hand of cards when dealing with Russia.

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:28.240
<v Speaker 1>But there are reports that Belarius offered four dollars a

0:32:28.320 --> 0:32:32.640
<v Speaker 1>barrel and and and the bid was hit by Russia. Though. Yeah,

0:32:32.680 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 1>things are obviously extraordinarily low and will remain that way

0:32:36.320 --> 0:32:39.520
<v Speaker 1>because obviously the demand environment here is unlike anything other

0:32:39.600 --> 0:32:44.320
<v Speaker 1>than ever seen times five for tomorrow, Okay, plus is

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:47.280
<v Speaker 1>mating that we're talking about supply. Can they do enough

0:32:47.320 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 1>on the supply side to offset this massive drop we've

0:32:50.600 --> 0:32:54.640
<v Speaker 1>had in demand over the last several months. Obviously not

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:56.920
<v Speaker 1>in the short term, but I think the markets very

0:32:56.960 --> 0:33:01.600
<v Speaker 1>focused on the level of inventory build, which will follow

0:33:01.640 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 1>obviously from from excess production over lack of demands. The

0:33:05.680 --> 0:33:09.680
<v Speaker 1>question is, um, you know, how long does the inventory overhang?

0:33:09.680 --> 0:33:12.080
<v Speaker 1>And there's a risk which really tom was reference thing,

0:33:12.120 --> 0:33:16.360
<v Speaker 1>which is that if you ultimately exceed storage capacity, which

0:33:16.400 --> 0:33:19.400
<v Speaker 1>is within the parameters of the current market. That's when

0:33:19.400 --> 0:33:21.719
<v Speaker 1>you could go negative on price. We've talked about this

0:33:22.640 --> 0:33:26.240
<v Speaker 1>since the Opaque meeting early March, that if the cost

0:33:26.280 --> 0:33:28.480
<v Speaker 1>of storage is above the price of a barrel, the

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:31.120
<v Speaker 1>price will be negative. And we've seen it with natural gas,

0:33:30.960 --> 0:33:33.760
<v Speaker 1>and you know, we've seen it actually with barking creues.

0:33:33.840 --> 0:33:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Further to what Tom was saying as recently as a

0:33:36.560 --> 0:33:40.000
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks ago. So the key question here is

0:33:40.000 --> 0:33:43.600
<v Speaker 1>is the extent to which imagery overhang can be mitigated.

0:33:43.760 --> 0:33:45.720
<v Speaker 1>It's not very bullish for the old price because you

0:33:45.760 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 1>then have specupacity for production. But at least we don't

0:33:48.840 --> 0:33:51.680
<v Speaker 1>have a total cataclysm in terms of um, you know,

0:33:51.840 --> 0:33:55.560
<v Speaker 1>just the inability to manage this black fiscus, you know,

0:33:55.720 --> 0:34:00.040
<v Speaker 1>somewhat dangerous liquid. Paul to that point, I think of

0:34:00.400 --> 0:34:03.640
<v Speaker 1>my favorite, my favorite story on the Bloomberg is about

0:34:03.680 --> 0:34:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the cost to rent out supertankers. In six months, it

0:34:08.120 --> 0:34:11.160
<v Speaker 1>has surged to more than seventy thousand dollars a day,

0:34:11.200 --> 0:34:14.400
<v Speaker 1>from thirty to forty thousand a day earlier last month.

0:34:14.680 --> 0:34:17.840
<v Speaker 1>And I'm wondering when din't we reach that tipping point.

0:34:17.960 --> 0:34:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's say there is a ten million barrel per day

0:34:21.239 --> 0:34:24.400
<v Speaker 1>production cut which some people are hoping for between Saudi

0:34:24.480 --> 0:34:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Arabia and Russia. How long do we still have before

0:34:28.400 --> 0:34:33.960
<v Speaker 1>we sort of tip the scales and and and exceed capacity. Um, well,

0:34:34.000 --> 0:34:36.600
<v Speaker 1>actually there's a slew to that. There's an interesting development

0:34:36.640 --> 0:34:38.800
<v Speaker 1>this week, which is that with a lack of need

0:34:38.920 --> 0:34:43.040
<v Speaker 1>for pipelines in the US, Phillips sixty thinks, for example,

0:34:43.120 --> 0:34:46.440
<v Speaker 1>is offering its new pipeline is a storage facility. So this,

0:34:46.840 --> 0:34:48.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is a very innovativety know in the

0:34:48.960 --> 0:34:53.480
<v Speaker 1>industry that can manage the extreme situations. So there's we

0:34:53.560 --> 0:34:55.640
<v Speaker 1>always thought that there would be a lot of different ways.

0:34:55.680 --> 0:34:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Filling train cars is another one, but as you can imagine,

0:34:58.960 --> 0:35:01.560
<v Speaker 1>and the old joke is the starts swimming filling swimming

0:35:01.560 --> 0:35:05.360
<v Speaker 1>pools around Houston. But you know that the fact is

0:35:05.480 --> 0:35:10.040
<v Speaker 1>that by by June, at the current rate, assuming that

0:35:10.120 --> 0:35:12.480
<v Speaker 1>New York is at a lockdown twenty eighth of April,

0:35:13.360 --> 0:35:16.160
<v Speaker 1>you would still be that the Saudi oil is on

0:35:16.239 --> 0:35:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the water, as you know, so that hits in May.

0:35:19.239 --> 0:35:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Um that May period is the one where you have

0:35:22.160 --> 0:35:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the lowest refining utilization with the highest supply, and that's

0:35:26.040 --> 0:35:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the point where you think that maybe we'll go over

0:35:28.000 --> 0:35:31.919
<v Speaker 1>the top of the tanks beyond that, hopefully demanded snapping back,

0:35:32.000 --> 0:35:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, and I'm sure you guys have

0:35:33.680 --> 0:35:35.239
<v Speaker 1>a stronger you than me, But I don't think you

0:35:35.239 --> 0:35:38.680
<v Speaker 1>can keep the US economy, New York economy shutdown much

0:35:38.719 --> 0:35:41.080
<v Speaker 1>beyond the twenty eight I'd add that Tom would be

0:35:41.160 --> 0:35:44.239
<v Speaker 1>very interested by the combination here of OPEC plus and

0:35:44.280 --> 0:35:48.719
<v Speaker 1>then an emergency meeting of G twenty energy ministers on

0:35:48.800 --> 0:35:53.799
<v Speaker 1>Good Friday is also a very interesting moment the loyal history. Well, Paul,

0:35:53.840 --> 0:35:55.360
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about it. What do you expect the outcome

0:35:55.360 --> 0:35:58.160
<v Speaker 1>of that meeting to actually be? And when the Russians

0:35:58.160 --> 0:36:00.879
<v Speaker 1>start talking about US participation, I think a question we've

0:36:00.880 --> 0:36:02.719
<v Speaker 1>had on a program like this is what does US

0:36:02.760 --> 0:36:07.640
<v Speaker 1>participation in any cuts actually look like? Well, from the

0:36:07.680 --> 0:36:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Russian point of view, less sanctions, I think you can.

0:36:11.920 --> 0:36:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it will be explicitly, you know, I

0:36:14.160 --> 0:36:15.959
<v Speaker 1>don't think anyone's going to be dumb enough to link

0:36:15.960 --> 0:36:18.200
<v Speaker 1>it directly to the outcome of the meeting, But I

0:36:18.239 --> 0:36:21.520
<v Speaker 1>think in a few weeks time you might find, you know,

0:36:21.560 --> 0:36:23.680
<v Speaker 1>things are a bit easier for Russians around the world,

0:36:24.160 --> 0:36:27.680
<v Speaker 1>But in all seriousness, it's it's obviously a very big deal.

0:36:27.719 --> 0:36:29.800
<v Speaker 1>And it was described to me by your own truly

0:36:29.800 --> 0:36:32.239
<v Speaker 1>excellent journalists. Have you a Blast was saying this is

0:36:32.280 --> 0:36:35.080
<v Speaker 1>actually too big to fail. You know, Saudi's got so

0:36:35.160 --> 0:36:38.840
<v Speaker 1>much on the line here. If obviously it's annoyedly go ahead.

0:36:38.840 --> 0:36:40.719
<v Speaker 1>But I was just gonna say, it's enormously risky to

0:36:40.760 --> 0:36:44.239
<v Speaker 1>bring together the G twenty energy ministers at a time

0:36:44.320 --> 0:36:48.920
<v Speaker 1>like now and not deliver on Good Friday, exactly deliver

0:36:49.000 --> 0:36:51.400
<v Speaker 1>a big deal. You know. Well, let's help Pavey Blast

0:36:51.480 --> 0:36:53.319
<v Speaker 1>with his next story. Paul, we can all do that

0:36:53.360 --> 0:36:57.840
<v Speaker 1>together here. What is your recommendation of the correct approach

0:36:58.360 --> 0:37:01.000
<v Speaker 1>of the State Department and I guess our Energy Department

0:37:01.000 --> 0:37:04.480
<v Speaker 1>in Washington in these two sets of talks, what is

0:37:04.520 --> 0:37:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the most efficacious way for the US to help the

0:37:07.600 --> 0:37:10.920
<v Speaker 1>world out of this mess? Well, I think the optics

0:37:10.920 --> 0:37:14.080
<v Speaker 1>that they point to yesterday's short term energy Outlook published

0:37:14.080 --> 0:37:17.439
<v Speaker 1>by the US Department of Energy, and and they've got

0:37:17.560 --> 0:37:19.439
<v Speaker 1>production down, you know, a million, million and a half

0:37:19.440 --> 0:37:21.960
<v Speaker 1>barrels a day this year, and say, there you go,

0:37:22.120 --> 0:37:24.279
<v Speaker 1>that's the market and we will be cutting and that's

0:37:24.320 --> 0:37:26.880
<v Speaker 1>good enough for Stauity quite frankly, and then it becomes

0:37:26.880 --> 0:37:30.799
<v Speaker 1>a question of Russia versus Sauty, which is another very

0:37:30.840 --> 0:37:34.520
<v Speaker 1>interesting issue which surrounds a the fact that Staudi is

0:37:34.560 --> 0:37:37.239
<v Speaker 1>at search levels, so they're at over twelve million. Are

0:37:37.239 --> 0:37:39.839
<v Speaker 1>they cutting from there or are they cutting from where

0:37:39.840 --> 0:37:42.759
<v Speaker 1>they were before they searched. That's the problem for the Russians.

0:37:43.239 --> 0:37:45.880
<v Speaker 1>The Russians are physically constrained that they're going to have

0:37:45.920 --> 0:37:48.400
<v Speaker 1>to cut anyway, so they're starting with a cut offer.

0:37:48.920 --> 0:37:51.319
<v Speaker 1>But the understanding is the Russia is only down I

0:37:51.360 --> 0:37:53.920
<v Speaker 1>think only down about a million barrels a day. But

0:37:54.000 --> 0:37:56.480
<v Speaker 1>also it doesn't have storage, you know, they're short storage

0:37:56.480 --> 0:37:59.879
<v Speaker 1>where Staudy is not. Additionally, technically, Snawity can just flick

0:37:59.880 --> 0:38:03.239
<v Speaker 1>a switch. They've signed this system to be uh you know,

0:38:03.360 --> 0:38:05.040
<v Speaker 1>they can just turn it off and there's no damage,

0:38:05.040 --> 0:38:07.960
<v Speaker 1>whereas if Russia cuts hard, that's going to damage that

0:38:08.040 --> 0:38:11.680
<v Speaker 1>productive capacity, which is a key point. So you know,

0:38:11.719 --> 0:38:13.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a ton of things here. And then of course,

0:38:13.520 --> 0:38:16.520
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned, Albertsa is cutting a million. I think

0:38:16.560 --> 0:38:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Brazil is struggling to so so there's a lot of

0:38:19.040 --> 0:38:23.480
<v Speaker 1>optical cut to the market driven West Saudi. Okay, it's

0:38:23.520 --> 0:38:26.640
<v Speaker 1>really just Russia versus Saudi that we're worried about. Paul,

0:38:26.680 --> 0:38:28.160
<v Speaker 1>thank you, thank you so much. Let us know in

0:38:28.200 --> 0:38:30.360
<v Speaker 1>a gallon a guest gets under a dollar gallon that

0:38:30.400 --> 0:38:33.440
<v Speaker 1>would like to know that as well. He is with missool.

0:38:34.040 --> 0:38:38.239
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and

0:38:38.320 --> 0:38:43.640
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast

0:38:43.680 --> 0:38:47.920
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom Keane before

0:38:47.960 --> 0:38:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg

0:38:51.880 --> 0:38:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Radio