1 00:00:00,560 --> 00:00:03,120 Speaker 1: You're about to listen to the Late Round Fantasy Football show, 2 00:00:03,120 --> 00:00:05,760 Speaker 1: which originally aired on YouTube. If you'd like to catch 3 00:00:05,760 --> 00:00:07,920 Speaker 1: the show live this offseason, you can head to the 4 00:00:07,960 --> 00:00:11,600 Speaker 1: Late Round Fantasy Football YouTube channel YouTube dot com slash 5 00:00:11,680 --> 00:00:15,280 Speaker 1: at Late Round FF will be live each Wednesday at 6 00:00:15,320 --> 00:00:17,680 Speaker 1: noon Eastern without further ado. 7 00:00:18,160 --> 00:00:30,320 Speaker 2: Here's this week's episode. 8 00:00:33,600 --> 00:00:37,080 Speaker 3: Welcome In. Welcome In. It's a Late Round Fantasy football 9 00:00:37,240 --> 00:00:41,560 Speaker 3: show sponsored by DraftKings. David Kitchen here COO of Late 10 00:00:41,680 --> 00:00:48,520 Speaker 3: Round Media, with my CEO JJ Zacharyeson. Jj I saw 11 00:00:50,120 --> 00:00:53,880 Speaker 3: a post on X Today and it said something along 12 00:00:53,920 --> 00:00:57,920 Speaker 3: the lines of the biggest hack in life is to 13 00:00:58,040 --> 00:01:00,560 Speaker 3: find you a manager that is a middle a girl. 14 00:01:00,640 --> 00:01:00,880 Speaker 4: Dad. 15 00:01:01,680 --> 00:01:04,360 Speaker 2: Oh really is that that? Actually? 16 00:01:04,560 --> 00:01:07,720 Speaker 1: That actually kind of probably is a very real thing. 17 00:01:07,880 --> 00:01:10,759 Speaker 1: There's more, there's more compassion. You know, they're not too 18 00:01:10,840 --> 00:01:14,560 Speaker 1: old where their life is just their job. They have 19 00:01:14,640 --> 00:01:18,760 Speaker 1: to do things outside of work. But they're raising girls 20 00:01:18,800 --> 00:01:20,920 Speaker 1: instead of boys. So there's you know, there's a little 21 00:01:20,920 --> 00:01:21,959 Speaker 1: bit more of that empathy. 22 00:01:22,200 --> 00:01:23,200 Speaker 4: There's a synath there. 23 00:01:23,480 --> 00:01:25,919 Speaker 2: Yeah, not not to say that that boy dads can't. 24 00:01:26,240 --> 00:01:27,399 Speaker 2: I'm just saying I have. 25 00:01:27,360 --> 00:01:29,640 Speaker 1: A boy and I have a girl, and my boy 26 00:01:30,160 --> 00:01:33,200 Speaker 1: is a lot more wild than my girl is that. 27 00:01:34,880 --> 00:01:38,200 Speaker 4: Uh, this is the post launch. 28 00:01:39,520 --> 00:01:43,120 Speaker 3: Era of late round media as far as we just 29 00:01:43,360 --> 00:01:49,040 Speaker 3: launched our Prospect Guide on Monday, actually Sunday night. 30 00:01:49,120 --> 00:01:52,080 Speaker 4: As is the case that we usually do, so people 31 00:01:52,160 --> 00:01:53,320 Speaker 4: have been diving into that. 32 00:01:54,160 --> 00:01:59,440 Speaker 3: I had our friend Stephen Krupka messaged me yesterday a 33 00:01:59,520 --> 00:02:03,000 Speaker 3: picture he goes to FedEx every year and gives the 34 00:02:03,000 --> 00:02:05,920 Speaker 3: guide to them and has them print it out and 35 00:02:05,960 --> 00:02:08,160 Speaker 3: put it in a binder. 36 00:02:08,360 --> 00:02:09,720 Speaker 2: I've seen people do that before. 37 00:02:09,800 --> 00:02:12,680 Speaker 1: I've also we've already gotten the request from someone to 38 00:02:12,800 --> 00:02:14,840 Speaker 1: make it an audio book, you know, an. 39 00:02:14,840 --> 00:02:16,880 Speaker 2: Audio file for the guide. 40 00:02:16,919 --> 00:02:19,040 Speaker 1: I will say the Prospect Guide is a lot easier 41 00:02:19,080 --> 00:02:20,600 Speaker 1: to do that than the Draft Guide is because the 42 00:02:20,680 --> 00:02:24,840 Speaker 1: Draft Guide is so image and chart heavy and stuff 43 00:02:24,880 --> 00:02:28,520 Speaker 1: that it's really really difficult to translate that into audio. 44 00:02:29,040 --> 00:02:32,560 Speaker 1: You could hypothetically do it for the Prospect Guide, but look, 45 00:02:33,240 --> 00:02:34,720 Speaker 1: I don't I don't want to get into that. 46 00:02:34,720 --> 00:02:36,200 Speaker 2: That's what we're already doing a lot. 47 00:02:36,240 --> 00:02:39,120 Speaker 1: It's one hundred and seventy pages of content, and I 48 00:02:39,160 --> 00:02:41,360 Speaker 1: don't have time to like to record it. Could I 49 00:02:41,360 --> 00:02:44,239 Speaker 1: get someone else to record it? I mean, let's let's 50 00:02:44,240 --> 00:02:46,639 Speaker 1: talk in a couple of years when AI is like flawless. 51 00:02:46,680 --> 00:02:48,720 Speaker 4: I was about to say, ROBOJJ is coming. 52 00:02:48,760 --> 00:02:50,320 Speaker 3: I don't want to be like I don't. I don't 53 00:02:50,320 --> 00:02:53,440 Speaker 3: want to scare people. But it's just like a perfect 54 00:02:53,520 --> 00:02:56,640 Speaker 3: use case for you reading your own draft guide but 55 00:02:56,760 --> 00:02:59,760 Speaker 3: not having to read all one hundred and seventy three 56 00:02:59,760 --> 00:03:04,119 Speaker 3: page Also, we'd have to, like, you know, the it's 57 00:03:04,120 --> 00:03:08,960 Speaker 3: not exactly the profile pages themselves are a little bit 58 00:03:09,000 --> 00:03:12,480 Speaker 3: scattered where you have like the colleges and the comps, 59 00:03:12,480 --> 00:03:14,520 Speaker 3: the player comps, the three player comps. 60 00:03:14,280 --> 00:03:17,760 Speaker 4: And the zapp score. So it's there have to be 61 00:03:17,760 --> 00:03:20,880 Speaker 4: a little bit of finagling. 62 00:03:21,160 --> 00:03:22,320 Speaker 2: Well, yeah, I mean it would be. 63 00:03:22,639 --> 00:03:24,400 Speaker 1: It would I mean, in my opinion, would be really 64 00:03:24,440 --> 00:03:29,240 Speaker 1: awkward because you just be like Jeremiah Love six foot zero, 65 00:03:29,639 --> 00:03:34,840 Speaker 1: you know, like two hundred and twelve pounds comps, Ezekiel Elliott, 66 00:03:34,960 --> 00:03:37,320 Speaker 1: b John Robinson, you know, like it like it would 67 00:03:37,400 --> 00:03:39,960 Speaker 1: just be And I get it entertaining. 68 00:03:40,320 --> 00:03:42,800 Speaker 3: But as someone who likes to oh the uh, you know, 69 00:03:42,840 --> 00:03:45,800 Speaker 3: hop the hop on the riding mower, I listened to it. 70 00:03:46,000 --> 00:03:47,880 Speaker 1: The thing is, though I've always I've always viewed the 71 00:03:47,880 --> 00:03:50,920 Speaker 1: Prospect Guide as like a reference sheet. Yes, you know, 72 00:03:50,960 --> 00:03:53,120 Speaker 1: the draft Guide, I think is one that you for 73 00:03:53,160 --> 00:03:56,360 Speaker 1: sure consoom and like like sit down, and you can 74 00:03:56,400 --> 00:03:58,080 Speaker 1: do that with the Prospect Guide too, don't get me wrong, 75 00:03:58,160 --> 00:04:01,080 Speaker 1: but you know, it's so it's so player page heavy 76 00:04:01,080 --> 00:04:03,520 Speaker 1: and stuff that I always view it as like a 77 00:04:03,600 --> 00:04:05,800 Speaker 1: you know, a year later or something, or even like 78 00:04:05,880 --> 00:04:09,080 Speaker 1: during the redraft drafts or or when you are looking 79 00:04:09,120 --> 00:04:11,320 Speaker 1: at the waiver wire and you're like, hey, is this 80 00:04:11,320 --> 00:04:13,400 Speaker 1: guy any good? You can go back to the Prospect 81 00:04:13,360 --> 00:04:15,720 Speaker 1: Guide and kind of see where things were at there, 82 00:04:16,600 --> 00:04:19,240 Speaker 1: you know, whenever that was published. But yeah, did you 83 00:04:19,279 --> 00:04:21,480 Speaker 1: see this comment? By the way, I think kitchen looks 84 00:04:21,520 --> 00:04:22,120 Speaker 1: more handsome that. 85 00:04:22,120 --> 00:04:24,240 Speaker 3: I wasn't going to bring it up, but this is, 86 00:04:24,560 --> 00:04:27,280 Speaker 3: you know, an interactive show, so during the show, after 87 00:04:27,360 --> 00:04:28,280 Speaker 3: the show, you're the thing. 88 00:04:28,279 --> 00:04:30,040 Speaker 1: The fact that they're bringing that up means that is 89 00:04:30,080 --> 00:04:32,120 Speaker 1: it Is it the default that I look more handsomely? 90 00:04:33,520 --> 00:04:36,520 Speaker 4: Maybe just the vandy hat, you know, March madness happening. 91 00:04:36,720 --> 00:04:37,200 Speaker 4: I don't know. 92 00:04:37,560 --> 00:04:40,240 Speaker 3: I feel like j JJ we talked about like the 93 00:04:40,279 --> 00:04:44,839 Speaker 3: post post launch era. You want to to kind of 94 00:04:44,839 --> 00:04:48,760 Speaker 3: fill people in on what you've been filling your your 95 00:04:48,800 --> 00:04:50,760 Speaker 3: week with, which I think just let me go on 96 00:04:50,760 --> 00:04:53,400 Speaker 3: the record, I think is well deserved. 97 00:04:53,839 --> 00:04:54,200 Speaker 2: Thank you. 98 00:04:54,560 --> 00:04:58,760 Speaker 1: Yeah, look, the the guides done I've needed. I've been working. 99 00:04:58,800 --> 00:05:02,080 Speaker 2: So I did the Agency episode those a half hour long. 100 00:05:02,200 --> 00:05:05,159 Speaker 1: On first half hour solo, which is a low Yeah, 101 00:05:05,440 --> 00:05:07,480 Speaker 1: a lot. I was sweating at the end of recording that. 102 00:05:09,080 --> 00:05:10,640 Speaker 1: But yeah, I did the you know, free agency show. 103 00:05:10,640 --> 00:05:12,240 Speaker 1: We got the mail bag later in the week. I'm 104 00:05:12,279 --> 00:05:14,279 Speaker 1: doing other shows and stuff, but there's not as many 105 00:05:14,360 --> 00:05:17,760 Speaker 1: like pressing, non weekly things going on. 106 00:05:18,880 --> 00:05:20,559 Speaker 2: And look, I game. 107 00:05:21,200 --> 00:05:23,320 Speaker 1: I'm not like a massive gamer anymore because I have 108 00:05:23,400 --> 00:05:27,000 Speaker 1: other responsibilities that that just don't allow me to sit 109 00:05:27,040 --> 00:05:28,360 Speaker 1: down and like do a lot of cool stuff. I've 110 00:05:28,400 --> 00:05:31,159 Speaker 1: never been like a huge campaign guy, more multiplayer and stuff. 111 00:05:31,240 --> 00:05:36,560 Speaker 1: But regardless, I picked up Pocopia. I did the new 112 00:05:36,560 --> 00:05:39,800 Speaker 1: Pokemon game. I back in the day played Pokemon. I 113 00:05:39,800 --> 00:05:43,960 Speaker 1: played maybe one or two in my like adult life. 114 00:05:44,000 --> 00:05:47,600 Speaker 1: I haven't been like, I'm not like really really into Pokemon, 115 00:05:47,960 --> 00:05:50,760 Speaker 1: but I played Animal Crossing. Animal cross came out during 116 00:05:50,760 --> 00:05:53,640 Speaker 1: the pandemic. It was the perfect kind of escape during 117 00:05:53,680 --> 00:05:56,280 Speaker 1: that time of of you know, the war, what was 118 00:05:56,320 --> 00:05:58,760 Speaker 1: going on in the world. I feel almost similarly right 119 00:05:58,760 --> 00:06:02,400 Speaker 1: now or just the world is crazy and Pocopia is 120 00:06:02,440 --> 00:06:05,159 Speaker 1: a mix of like Minecraft, which I didn't really play, 121 00:06:05,680 --> 00:06:11,040 Speaker 1: and an Animal Crossing, and it is phenomenal. 122 00:06:11,240 --> 00:06:12,040 Speaker 2: It's it's the. 123 00:06:12,000 --> 00:06:16,640 Speaker 1: Most addicting, fun cozy games that I've ever played, if 124 00:06:16,680 --> 00:06:20,279 Speaker 1: not just number one on that list. And yeah, yesterday 125 00:06:20,279 --> 00:06:22,880 Speaker 1: I wasn't feeling that well and so I told Godoula 126 00:06:22,920 --> 00:06:24,800 Speaker 1: and Kitchen. I was like, I'm just gonna hang out 127 00:06:24,839 --> 00:06:26,559 Speaker 1: this afternoon and not really do much work. 128 00:06:27,200 --> 00:06:29,360 Speaker 2: And I built a house in Pocopia. 129 00:06:28,880 --> 00:06:34,960 Speaker 4: That makes money. Get a switch to you know the girls. 130 00:06:34,960 --> 00:06:39,720 Speaker 4: We only have a switch. Yeah, but you know, maybe 131 00:06:39,720 --> 00:06:41,919 Speaker 4: maybe one day we can elevate to switch to. 132 00:06:42,000 --> 00:06:45,719 Speaker 3: But I also know that if I got Pacopia the 133 00:06:45,760 --> 00:06:48,640 Speaker 3: way that I am, it's just like that's why I 134 00:06:49,080 --> 00:06:51,560 Speaker 3: can't really get on video games, because I will get 135 00:06:51,920 --> 00:06:53,919 Speaker 3: I told you about my stint with Clash of Clans. 136 00:06:54,240 --> 00:06:56,240 Speaker 3: Same thing happened to the Kansas City Royals, where it 137 00:06:56,279 --> 00:06:57,799 Speaker 3: almost like derailed their season. 138 00:06:58,320 --> 00:07:01,240 Speaker 4: It almost derailed Fantasy and back in the day when 139 00:07:01,480 --> 00:07:02,760 Speaker 4: when we had that company. 140 00:07:02,839 --> 00:07:05,920 Speaker 3: So I'm just gonna stay away and I'm gonna live 141 00:07:05,960 --> 00:07:06,800 Speaker 3: vicariously through you. 142 00:07:07,120 --> 00:07:09,080 Speaker 1: This one's great because I can play and like the 143 00:07:09,080 --> 00:07:11,560 Speaker 1: family gets involved and like we all watch it or 144 00:07:11,600 --> 00:07:13,960 Speaker 1: they watch me play and like we all like see 145 00:07:13,960 --> 00:07:15,920 Speaker 1: what's going on, and it's like a it's there's the 146 00:07:15,920 --> 00:07:18,000 Speaker 1: family involvement too, But yesterday it was just straight me. 147 00:07:18,120 --> 00:07:19,760 Speaker 2: I mean I was just built and hire. 148 00:07:19,840 --> 00:07:24,200 Speaker 3: Now, all right, I want to say just thank you 149 00:07:24,280 --> 00:07:27,520 Speaker 3: to DraftKings for their sponsorship of the show. They have 150 00:07:27,600 --> 00:07:31,120 Speaker 3: the early best ball contests out there, and then that 151 00:07:31,480 --> 00:07:34,360 Speaker 3: I don't think we you know, you can use the 152 00:07:34,680 --> 00:07:38,840 Speaker 3: code that's in the description and read everything about that. 153 00:07:38,880 --> 00:07:41,160 Speaker 3: But we're going to get in a few segments. We're 154 00:07:41,160 --> 00:07:45,160 Speaker 3: gonna compare the top four as far as like the 155 00:07:45,600 --> 00:07:50,040 Speaker 3: best values compared to JJ's app model rankings with the rookies. 156 00:07:49,800 --> 00:07:53,760 Speaker 4: And the worst value compared to his rankings. 157 00:07:53,880 --> 00:07:58,480 Speaker 3: So stick around for that and again Late Round, Draft Guide, 158 00:07:59,480 --> 00:08:02,800 Speaker 3: Late Round dot Com join the membership because we got 159 00:08:02,880 --> 00:08:05,440 Speaker 3: Dynasty stuff coming. So you can go to h Late 160 00:08:05,560 --> 00:08:08,440 Speaker 3: Late Round and then hop on over to the Patreon 161 00:08:08,600 --> 00:08:11,680 Speaker 3: and with that, JJ, you ready to to get onto 162 00:08:11,720 --> 00:08:12,680 Speaker 3: the next segment. 163 00:08:12,760 --> 00:08:15,920 Speaker 2: Let's do it, all right, Today's Fantasy News. 164 00:08:19,520 --> 00:08:22,200 Speaker 4: I feel like me not being there last week. 165 00:08:22,240 --> 00:08:25,360 Speaker 3: You know, we lest we we didn't have a lot 166 00:08:25,400 --> 00:08:26,560 Speaker 3: of it'll just been the. 167 00:08:26,640 --> 00:08:28,280 Speaker 4: Free agency show. Basically, if I was. 168 00:08:28,440 --> 00:08:29,080 Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean it was. 169 00:08:29,120 --> 00:08:30,840 Speaker 1: It would have been really hard to do the news 170 00:08:30,840 --> 00:08:33,760 Speaker 1: segment last week because I was gonna be doing this 171 00:08:33,880 --> 00:08:36,400 Speaker 1: show like I did the Debro Perspective episode where we 172 00:08:36,440 --> 00:08:38,240 Speaker 1: talked about the big moves in free agency and then 173 00:08:38,280 --> 00:08:41,360 Speaker 1: I talked about those plus others and the Free Agency show. 174 00:08:41,440 --> 00:08:44,319 Speaker 1: So you know, this is more of like the initial 175 00:08:44,440 --> 00:08:46,560 Speaker 1: reaction to kind of to some of the stuff, and 176 00:08:46,559 --> 00:08:48,640 Speaker 1: then you guys can get deeper analysis on the actual show. 177 00:08:48,720 --> 00:08:51,959 Speaker 1: Like the first item on today's list I will almost 178 00:08:52,000 --> 00:08:55,120 Speaker 1: definitely talk about on the Mailbag episode, but I'll at 179 00:08:55,160 --> 00:08:57,000 Speaker 1: least give you guys a teaser slash give you the 180 00:08:57,000 --> 00:08:58,280 Speaker 1: analysis here today too. 181 00:08:58,720 --> 00:09:01,480 Speaker 3: Yeah, Wattle all the way to Denver. Obviously the big 182 00:09:01,559 --> 00:09:05,199 Speaker 3: trade that we weren't really expecting. Supposedly they were working 183 00:09:05,240 --> 00:09:08,440 Speaker 3: on it during the season. But as much as we've 184 00:09:08,440 --> 00:09:12,719 Speaker 3: talked about Jalen Waddell, having the newslawy yesterday that he 185 00:09:12,800 --> 00:09:17,160 Speaker 3: was going to the Broncos was kind of crazy. Yeah, 186 00:09:17,160 --> 00:09:20,240 Speaker 3: there's lots of implications there. We'll talk about the next item. 187 00:09:20,440 --> 00:09:24,559 Speaker 3: We'll just bundle them together because we're talking about. 188 00:09:24,600 --> 00:09:27,560 Speaker 4: The Dolphins here, but report. 189 00:09:27,240 --> 00:09:31,400 Speaker 3: Today saying that a chance not available, say the Dolphins, 190 00:09:31,440 --> 00:09:34,080 Speaker 3: And I'm not sure if that's just saying, you know, 191 00:09:34,160 --> 00:09:36,320 Speaker 3: for the right price, he could be for like a 192 00:09:36,400 --> 00:09:41,760 Speaker 3: first rounder, but saying he's not available. We thought that 193 00:09:41,800 --> 00:09:43,480 Speaker 3: he was going to be traded because he was rumored 194 00:09:43,520 --> 00:09:46,720 Speaker 3: to be traded during the season, rumored to be traded 195 00:09:46,760 --> 00:09:50,120 Speaker 3: to the Seahawks, And so now they're saying he's not available, 196 00:09:50,160 --> 00:09:52,000 Speaker 3: which is, I guess is a good thing if you're 197 00:09:52,000 --> 00:09:57,440 Speaker 3: Malik Willis, because the question that we're asking ourselves is 198 00:09:57,480 --> 00:09:59,959 Speaker 3: did he know they were just stripping this. 199 00:10:00,080 --> 00:10:04,480 Speaker 4: Down all the way and you know that his leading 200 00:10:04,520 --> 00:10:05,800 Speaker 4: receiver is gonna be two two out? Well? 201 00:10:06,320 --> 00:10:07,640 Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean right now, what they have two to 202 00:10:07,640 --> 00:10:11,000 Speaker 1: two out? Well, Jalen Tolbert, Malik Washington out of the slot. 203 00:10:11,800 --> 00:10:13,160 Speaker 2: You know you Theo Weese who. 204 00:10:13,120 --> 00:10:15,840 Speaker 1: Played with Luther Burden. I remember doing his profile last year. 205 00:10:15,920 --> 00:10:19,960 Speaker 1: Tarras Marshall. It's a it's just a bunch of dudes 206 00:10:19,960 --> 00:10:23,800 Speaker 1: who either have busted or you know, we're not you know, 207 00:10:24,000 --> 00:10:28,360 Speaker 1: highly sought after prospects. So look, I want to start 208 00:10:28,360 --> 00:10:32,360 Speaker 1: with with a Chan. Since we're on the Dolphins. I've 209 00:10:32,360 --> 00:10:34,520 Speaker 1: seen some takes that like this is fine for a 210 00:10:34,679 --> 00:10:38,320 Speaker 1: Chan because he can maintain a high target share, et cetera, 211 00:10:38,520 --> 00:10:39,839 Speaker 1: or like his target share is going to go out 212 00:10:39,840 --> 00:10:43,520 Speaker 1: of control. The issue I have is like eightfold with 213 00:10:43,520 --> 00:10:47,280 Speaker 1: with with a Chan. So Han already had an amazing 214 00:10:47,280 --> 00:10:49,640 Speaker 1: target chair, which is why he was so relevant fantasy football. 215 00:10:49,640 --> 00:10:51,959 Speaker 1: He's a great running back, but but having that kind 216 00:10:51,960 --> 00:10:54,079 Speaker 1: of volume through the air is what allowed him to 217 00:10:54,080 --> 00:10:55,640 Speaker 1: be in RB one and has allowed him to be 218 00:10:55,640 --> 00:10:59,559 Speaker 1: an RB one. Now you lose the competition of Jalen 219 00:10:59,600 --> 00:11:02,520 Speaker 1: Waddle because again, target share is this giant one hundred 220 00:11:02,520 --> 00:11:05,760 Speaker 1: percent pie. So if you lose a twenty four percent 221 00:11:05,800 --> 00:11:08,680 Speaker 1: target share in Jalen Waddle, then that's more looks that 222 00:11:08,720 --> 00:11:11,600 Speaker 1: can go elsewhere, more looks going to your playmaker, which 223 00:11:11,600 --> 00:11:14,320 Speaker 1: is devon a Chan. The issue I have is that 224 00:11:14,360 --> 00:11:16,959 Speaker 1: his target shair was already very, very high. You know, 225 00:11:17,080 --> 00:11:20,160 Speaker 1: like if you're if you see a Chan last year 226 00:11:20,240 --> 00:11:23,640 Speaker 1: or the year before, and you see the situation right 227 00:11:23,679 --> 00:11:28,760 Speaker 1: now as lateral, I disagree, mostly because we have a 228 00:11:28,840 --> 00:11:31,360 Speaker 1: new coaching staff that we don't know exactly how they're 229 00:11:31,360 --> 00:11:33,480 Speaker 1: gonna want to deploy him and how well he'll fit 230 00:11:33,840 --> 00:11:36,080 Speaker 1: and what they do on the ground. We have a 231 00:11:36,200 --> 00:11:38,960 Speaker 1: new quarterback in Malik Willis, who has not thrown twenty 232 00:11:38,960 --> 00:11:42,360 Speaker 1: five pass attempts in the game throughout his career. Maybe 233 00:11:42,360 --> 00:11:45,280 Speaker 1: there's more efficiency on the ground for Chan, uh, and that. 234 00:11:45,240 --> 00:11:45,959 Speaker 2: Would be helpful. 235 00:11:46,000 --> 00:11:49,640 Speaker 1: But what I'm saying is that essentially, like I don't know, 236 00:11:50,000 --> 00:11:54,600 Speaker 1: like is there a twenty five percent target share ceiling 237 00:11:54,640 --> 00:11:57,640 Speaker 1: for a Chan in this offense? I don't know, Like 238 00:11:57,679 --> 00:12:00,840 Speaker 1: that's not something that we see outside of Christian McCaffrey 239 00:12:00,840 --> 00:12:03,800 Speaker 1: really in the NFL. And that's really the next step 240 00:12:03,840 --> 00:12:05,760 Speaker 1: that eight Chan would have to take in order to 241 00:12:05,800 --> 00:12:09,280 Speaker 1: be relevant. And then you think about the amount of 242 00:12:09,679 --> 00:12:12,920 Speaker 1: scoring that's going to be available in Miami, and there's 243 00:12:12,920 --> 00:12:13,720 Speaker 1: a question a lot. 244 00:12:14,559 --> 00:12:16,720 Speaker 2: Yeah, there's a question market quarterback right now. 245 00:12:16,760 --> 00:12:19,320 Speaker 1: And not to say that, you know, I definitively feel 246 00:12:19,320 --> 00:12:21,360 Speaker 1: one way or another about Malik Willis. I'm just saying 247 00:12:21,360 --> 00:12:23,800 Speaker 1: that we don't know what Malik Willis is. Like objectively, 248 00:12:23,840 --> 00:12:25,559 Speaker 1: he's thrown one hundred and fifty five pass attempts in 249 00:12:25,600 --> 00:12:28,160 Speaker 1: the NFL. We don't know how good or bad Malik 250 00:12:28,240 --> 00:12:30,680 Speaker 1: Willis is. And then you look at the weapons that we. 251 00:12:30,760 --> 00:12:32,920 Speaker 2: Just talked about and you're like, how on Earth? 252 00:12:32,960 --> 00:12:35,600 Speaker 1: And I'm sure they're gonna add somebody, But how on 253 00:12:35,640 --> 00:12:38,960 Speaker 1: earth is this team gonna score a lot of touchdowns? 254 00:12:39,120 --> 00:12:42,200 Speaker 1: You know, like, where is that touchdown total coming from? 255 00:12:42,240 --> 00:12:45,559 Speaker 1: We know that running backs and their success, the high 256 00:12:45,640 --> 00:12:48,199 Speaker 1: end ones especially will correlate to at least moderately good 257 00:12:48,600 --> 00:12:51,120 Speaker 1: offensive environments. You don't want bad environments, and this could 258 00:12:51,120 --> 00:12:52,719 Speaker 1: be a really bad environment for. 259 00:12:52,720 --> 00:12:53,440 Speaker 2: Devon a chance. 260 00:12:53,520 --> 00:12:57,920 Speaker 1: So I'm worried that the target chair ceiling has already 261 00:12:57,920 --> 00:13:00,160 Speaker 1: been reached or at least is close to getting and 262 00:13:00,400 --> 00:13:03,600 Speaker 1: on top of that, you have a poor offensive environment. 263 00:13:03,640 --> 00:13:06,480 Speaker 2: So this is lateral to people, I would say this 264 00:13:06,520 --> 00:13:06,719 Speaker 2: is a. 265 00:13:06,679 --> 00:13:09,160 Speaker 1: Downgrade and what's going on right now in Miami it 266 00:13:09,200 --> 00:13:11,520 Speaker 1: was a downgrade when they got Malik Willis and then 267 00:13:12,000 --> 00:13:15,120 Speaker 1: Jalen Waddle being traded. Sure you could say that that 268 00:13:15,240 --> 00:13:17,360 Speaker 1: doesn't matter that much, but overall it's not like things 269 00:13:17,360 --> 00:13:20,959 Speaker 1: are getting better for Devon agent right, Jalen Wattle going 270 00:13:21,000 --> 00:13:23,760 Speaker 1: to Denver. I've also seen some takes that this is 271 00:13:23,880 --> 00:13:28,000 Speaker 1: lateral or this isn't a great opportunity for Wattle, or 272 00:13:28,200 --> 00:13:31,360 Speaker 1: whatever the case may be, because look, Wattle in Miami 273 00:13:31,600 --> 00:13:34,280 Speaker 1: could have seen a thirty percent target chair and then offense. Right, 274 00:13:35,160 --> 00:13:38,600 Speaker 1: But I see this at this is a very classic 275 00:13:38,640 --> 00:13:41,760 Speaker 1: case of like a lot of above average to mid 276 00:13:41,800 --> 00:13:46,240 Speaker 1: wide receivers on Denver and US not wanting to assume 277 00:13:46,679 --> 00:13:49,719 Speaker 1: certain target shairs for those players. Even Courtland Sutton, he's 278 00:13:49,760 --> 00:13:52,720 Speaker 1: getting older. He's not as dominant as he used to be. 279 00:13:52,880 --> 00:13:57,280 Speaker 1: Not that he was ever like amazingly dominant, but look, 280 00:13:57,320 --> 00:13:59,400 Speaker 1: it's like, you know, the Pat Bryant of the world, 281 00:13:59,400 --> 00:14:02,560 Speaker 1: Troy Franklin. I think this hurts Troy Franklin probably most 282 00:14:03,040 --> 00:14:05,600 Speaker 1: out of that group because he's someone that started to 283 00:14:05,600 --> 00:14:07,120 Speaker 1: lose snaps towards the end of last year. 284 00:14:07,160 --> 00:14:08,880 Speaker 2: He's not the best blocker in the world. 285 00:14:09,559 --> 00:14:11,920 Speaker 1: And it seemed like Pat Bryant especially, I mean Pat 286 00:14:11,920 --> 00:14:13,679 Speaker 1: Bryant looked like he was gonna be a focal point 287 00:14:13,720 --> 00:14:14,719 Speaker 1: that one playoff. 288 00:14:14,320 --> 00:14:16,960 Speaker 2: Game before he went out in that game and got injured. 289 00:14:17,000 --> 00:14:20,440 Speaker 1: But like Pat Bryant is something that could play sort 290 00:14:20,440 --> 00:14:23,080 Speaker 1: of a slot role for them. Sutton on the outside, 291 00:14:23,120 --> 00:14:25,440 Speaker 1: Wattle can move inside out and do pretty much anything 292 00:14:25,480 --> 00:14:29,840 Speaker 1: for them. I think that's their their their base eleven personnel, 293 00:14:29,920 --> 00:14:33,800 Speaker 1: three wide receiver set. Look with the Bryant, you know, 294 00:14:34,160 --> 00:14:36,640 Speaker 1: Pat Bryant rotating more than what we would see from 295 00:14:36,680 --> 00:14:39,480 Speaker 1: like a Sutton then obviously a Wattle, But Jalen Wattle. 296 00:14:40,080 --> 00:14:41,880 Speaker 1: I mean, look, I know that two years ago I 297 00:14:41,880 --> 00:14:43,240 Speaker 1: called him out as a player to target and it 298 00:14:43,280 --> 00:14:45,400 Speaker 1: was his worst career statistically, and I got a lot 299 00:14:45,440 --> 00:14:47,280 Speaker 1: of crap for it, understandably, so it is a really 300 00:14:47,320 --> 00:14:50,440 Speaker 1: bad call. But Wattle's been below a two point one 301 00:14:50,400 --> 00:14:52,200 Speaker 1: to nine, which is what he had last year yards 302 00:14:52,200 --> 00:14:54,320 Speaker 1: pro out run rate, and only two of his five 303 00:14:54,360 --> 00:14:56,600 Speaker 1: seasons he's been at or above two point one nine, 304 00:14:56,600 --> 00:14:57,400 Speaker 1: which is incredible. 305 00:14:57,440 --> 00:14:59,320 Speaker 2: It's a that's unbelievable efficiency. 306 00:14:59,760 --> 00:15:01,240 Speaker 1: One one of them was his rookie year. One was 307 00:15:01,280 --> 00:15:03,560 Speaker 1: two years ago when that whole offense was horrific. Even 308 00:15:03,600 --> 00:15:06,960 Speaker 1: Tyreek Hill had a really bad season. From an efficiency standpoint, 309 00:15:07,280 --> 00:15:09,280 Speaker 1: He's consistently in that twenty two to twenty four percent 310 00:15:09,320 --> 00:15:13,000 Speaker 1: target share range. His targets per route run has diplowent 311 00:15:13,240 --> 00:15:16,000 Speaker 1: only twenty two percent once, which is a great number. 312 00:15:16,600 --> 00:15:18,760 Speaker 1: Had the like I said, had that one outlier year 313 00:15:18,760 --> 00:15:21,200 Speaker 1: in twenty twenty four, but he already bounced back from 314 00:15:21,200 --> 00:15:22,320 Speaker 1: that season and he can. 315 00:15:22,240 --> 00:15:24,600 Speaker 2: Win in anywhere, everywhere, all across the formation. 316 00:15:24,720 --> 00:15:27,080 Speaker 1: So I think Jalen Waddle himself as a player is 317 00:15:27,160 --> 00:15:30,480 Speaker 1: very very good Denver two straight years. Over the last 318 00:15:30,480 --> 00:15:33,800 Speaker 1: two seasons pass right over expected over zero they were 319 00:15:34,240 --> 00:15:37,320 Speaker 1: fourth top five and pass attempts rob pass attempts last season. 320 00:15:37,760 --> 00:15:40,800 Speaker 1: I'm not worried about this competition on this team. Jalen 321 00:15:40,840 --> 00:15:44,360 Speaker 1: Wattle is easily the best wide receiver in Denver right now, 322 00:15:44,440 --> 00:15:46,920 Speaker 1: Like he is easily the best talent that they have 323 00:15:47,000 --> 00:15:50,000 Speaker 1: a wide receiver. I would argue it's not that close. 324 00:15:50,080 --> 00:15:52,880 Speaker 1: I know that some people like Courtland Sutton. I've never 325 00:15:52,960 --> 00:15:56,280 Speaker 1: been like a massive Courtland Sutton dude, but he just 326 00:15:56,400 --> 00:15:59,360 Speaker 1: you know, he wins differently than Jalen Wattle. Will Wattle 327 00:15:59,400 --> 00:16:02,560 Speaker 1: can command a higher target share and such, and maybe 328 00:16:02,720 --> 00:16:05,000 Speaker 1: Sutton be more of that red zone threat for them. 329 00:16:05,160 --> 00:16:07,600 Speaker 1: I mean, I think Jalen Waddele is a tier above 330 00:16:07,680 --> 00:16:09,880 Speaker 1: Courtland Sutton in terms of just raw talent, especially at 331 00:16:09,880 --> 00:16:12,560 Speaker 1: this point and their career. So I think, you know, 332 00:16:12,920 --> 00:16:17,720 Speaker 1: in the end, good players create, good players create target share. 333 00:16:18,040 --> 00:16:19,560 Speaker 1: Jalen Wattle should be able to walk in and see 334 00:16:19,600 --> 00:16:21,880 Speaker 1: a twenty two to twenty four percent target share and 335 00:16:22,240 --> 00:16:24,080 Speaker 1: if he gets that in this offense, that could be 336 00:16:24,120 --> 00:16:26,520 Speaker 1: really effective. He's a I mean, this is an upgrade 337 00:16:26,560 --> 00:16:29,000 Speaker 1: for Jalen Waddel, I think overall, Yeah. 338 00:16:28,880 --> 00:16:31,160 Speaker 3: And we talk about draft capital. I mean, you have 339 00:16:31,200 --> 00:16:34,000 Speaker 3: to look at what the Broncos did. Yeah, they had 340 00:16:34,040 --> 00:16:39,440 Speaker 3: this room of receivers. Benjamin Sleek said that possibly they 341 00:16:39,520 --> 00:16:42,720 Speaker 3: might be able to trade Troy Franklin and Marvin mems 342 00:16:42,720 --> 00:16:44,320 Speaker 3: Now or at least put him on the block. But 343 00:16:44,920 --> 00:16:48,080 Speaker 3: they gave up a first and a third swapped fourth 344 00:16:48,160 --> 00:16:49,880 Speaker 3: round picks with the Dolphins. 345 00:16:49,920 --> 00:16:52,840 Speaker 4: But that's that's a lot of draft capital. 346 00:16:52,640 --> 00:16:55,520 Speaker 3: For, you know, for someone, so I you know, there 347 00:16:55,720 --> 00:16:57,480 Speaker 3: they plan on using him. 348 00:16:58,040 --> 00:16:58,920 Speaker 2: I think that. 349 00:16:59,000 --> 00:17:01,040 Speaker 1: So, like I compare it to like, you know, Buffalo 350 00:17:01,120 --> 00:17:03,160 Speaker 1: giving up what they give up for DJ Moore, And 351 00:17:03,200 --> 00:17:04,399 Speaker 1: I think DJ Moore fits. 352 00:17:04,160 --> 00:17:04,960 Speaker 2: Buffalo really well. 353 00:17:05,000 --> 00:17:07,119 Speaker 1: Like I like both of those players in their new 354 00:17:07,200 --> 00:17:10,400 Speaker 1: environments quite a bit for redraft purposes and season long purposes. 355 00:17:11,359 --> 00:17:14,439 Speaker 1: But I think Wattle is like any Buffalo fans out 356 00:17:14,440 --> 00:17:16,200 Speaker 1: there that are trying to cope, Like, I think Wattle 357 00:17:16,240 --> 00:17:18,200 Speaker 1: is not only that's the end of the first round, 358 00:17:18,600 --> 00:17:21,600 Speaker 1: first round pick, but but I think I think Wattle 359 00:17:21,680 --> 00:17:23,600 Speaker 1: is definitely a better. 360 00:17:23,440 --> 00:17:25,359 Speaker 2: Wide receiver than DJ Moore at this point. 361 00:17:26,240 --> 00:17:29,199 Speaker 1: And so yeah, I mean, like I understand why they 362 00:17:29,240 --> 00:17:31,480 Speaker 1: did all this, you know, I would imagine that Troy 363 00:17:31,520 --> 00:17:33,560 Speaker 1: Franklin is more of the guy that they should move 364 00:17:33,880 --> 00:17:36,560 Speaker 1: over Marvin Mims if they are moving somebody. 365 00:17:36,480 --> 00:17:38,320 Speaker 4: Just because as special teams. 366 00:17:38,600 --> 00:17:41,600 Speaker 1: Yeah, Mims does does a lot of different stuff for them, 367 00:17:41,640 --> 00:17:45,480 Speaker 1: like he's at least gadgety. Troy Franklin is someone who 368 00:17:45,800 --> 00:17:47,560 Speaker 1: I know he was putting up fantasy points and I 369 00:17:47,600 --> 00:17:50,720 Speaker 1: know that he was at one point basically getting the 370 00:17:50,800 --> 00:17:53,200 Speaker 1: best target share in that offense for like a four 371 00:17:53,240 --> 00:17:56,200 Speaker 1: week stretch last year. But there was a very clear 372 00:17:56,400 --> 00:17:58,040 Speaker 1: change in the way that they were approaching things. I 373 00:17:58,040 --> 00:17:59,240 Speaker 1: think a lot of that has to do with he's 374 00:17:59,480 --> 00:18:01,920 Speaker 1: he's a why he doesn't win against press as well, 375 00:18:01,920 --> 00:18:04,080 Speaker 1: and he doesn't block as well, and that's just not 376 00:18:04,240 --> 00:18:07,240 Speaker 1: something that they're gonna want in that offense, especially when JK. 377 00:18:07,320 --> 00:18:10,120 Speaker 1: Dobbins went down when they needed more blockers or better 378 00:18:10,160 --> 00:18:11,280 Speaker 1: blockers for. 379 00:18:11,119 --> 00:18:13,080 Speaker 2: More inexperienced running backs last season. 380 00:18:13,200 --> 00:18:16,000 Speaker 1: So you know, I think they're gonna just keep the 381 00:18:16,080 --> 00:18:18,239 Speaker 1: room as is, But we'll see what happens, because there 382 00:18:18,240 --> 00:18:21,120 Speaker 1: are obviously teams out there that need some wide receiver help, 383 00:18:21,119 --> 00:18:23,640 Speaker 1: including Miami Hollywood. 384 00:18:23,680 --> 00:18:30,080 Speaker 3: Brown moving to the Eagles, so ten million dollar, one 385 00:18:30,160 --> 00:18:33,400 Speaker 3: year deal for Hollywood Brown. Obviously, we know the Eagles 386 00:18:33,440 --> 00:18:38,720 Speaker 3: are currently in flux with AJ Brown and trade talks, 387 00:18:38,760 --> 00:18:40,400 Speaker 3: but they get they get Hollywood for a year. 388 00:18:41,119 --> 00:18:44,520 Speaker 1: Hollywood's fine. They've needed a wide receiver three forever. They've 389 00:18:44,560 --> 00:18:46,080 Speaker 1: been trying to solve that and they haven't. You know, 390 00:18:46,119 --> 00:18:48,320 Speaker 1: they had Johan Dotson who went to Atlanta and stuff 391 00:18:48,320 --> 00:18:51,840 Speaker 1: like that. I'm I'm you know, if you want to 392 00:18:51,920 --> 00:18:54,560 Speaker 1: like try to buy really really low as a throw 393 00:18:54,600 --> 00:18:57,600 Speaker 1: in in dynasty because he's already you know, he's not 394 00:18:57,720 --> 00:18:59,400 Speaker 1: done much for a while, and it's not like he's 395 00:18:59,400 --> 00:19:01,720 Speaker 1: a special. And then you say, oh, I'm going to 396 00:19:01,800 --> 00:19:05,359 Speaker 1: just gain value assuming that AJ Brown where to get traded, 397 00:19:05,359 --> 00:19:07,600 Speaker 1: Because if a J Brown gets traded, Hollywood Brown then 398 00:19:07,680 --> 00:19:11,000 Speaker 1: becomes someone that would be more valuable. You're just gaining value. 399 00:19:11,040 --> 00:19:15,960 Speaker 1: I don't think Hollywood would be a massive winner from 400 00:19:16,000 --> 00:19:17,760 Speaker 1: like a like all of a sudden, you're starting him 401 00:19:17,760 --> 00:19:20,639 Speaker 1: every week in fantasy football. If AJ Brown's gone, I 402 00:19:20,640 --> 00:19:23,960 Speaker 1: think we're just gonna because they kept Dallas Goddard. You know, 403 00:19:24,080 --> 00:19:27,560 Speaker 1: DeVante Smith I think is better than what his general time. 404 00:19:27,560 --> 00:19:29,719 Speaker 1: I mean, I feel like I have DeVante Smith as 405 00:19:29,760 --> 00:19:32,800 Speaker 1: a target and fantasy every single year at this point. 406 00:19:32,840 --> 00:19:35,639 Speaker 1: But I think Devantae Smith is a really good wide receiver, 407 00:19:36,080 --> 00:19:37,399 Speaker 1: and so I think they do too. 408 00:19:37,440 --> 00:19:38,240 Speaker 2: I think they know that. 409 00:19:38,440 --> 00:19:41,440 Speaker 1: And so you know, if Hollywood Brown is there too, 410 00:19:41,520 --> 00:19:43,560 Speaker 1: I could see like a fifteen to seventeen percent target 411 00:19:43,640 --> 00:19:45,440 Speaker 1: chair season from him as long as he stays healthy. 412 00:19:45,560 --> 00:19:48,840 Speaker 2: But and then they'll probably what's that? 413 00:19:49,359 --> 00:19:51,360 Speaker 4: So let's just hope they throw the ball this year? 414 00:19:51,440 --> 00:19:54,879 Speaker 2: Yeah, right, right? I mean different different coordinator in situations. 415 00:19:54,960 --> 00:19:59,240 Speaker 3: We'll see, say it with me jj better and best 416 00:19:59,240 --> 00:20:01,800 Speaker 3: ball better in bastball, that's right, Yeah, that's hort it 417 00:20:01,800 --> 00:20:04,719 Speaker 3: would Brown. Christian Kirk goes to the forty nine ers, 418 00:20:04,720 --> 00:20:11,320 Speaker 3: so he's joining Mike Evans there, and that Niners receive 419 00:20:11,440 --> 00:20:12,880 Speaker 3: room is gonna look a little different this year. 420 00:20:13,160 --> 00:20:16,040 Speaker 1: I don't think this is nothing with Christian Kirk there. 421 00:20:17,160 --> 00:20:19,480 Speaker 1: You know, it could signal because I think he's just 422 00:20:19,520 --> 00:20:21,359 Speaker 1: at this point in his career best served out of 423 00:20:21,400 --> 00:20:23,720 Speaker 1: the slot. He's had his moments, he had his moments 424 00:20:23,720 --> 00:20:25,919 Speaker 1: in the playoffs. You know, if you look at what 425 00:20:25,960 --> 00:20:29,199 Speaker 1: they have healthy, uh, it's you know, George Kittle's more 426 00:20:29,200 --> 00:20:30,920 Speaker 1: than likely not gonna be ready to start the year, 427 00:20:31,480 --> 00:20:33,600 Speaker 1: or at least one hundred percent, and then you know 428 00:20:33,640 --> 00:20:35,960 Speaker 1: you have Mike Evans, Ricky Piersall, and you know Jawan 429 00:20:36,040 --> 00:20:39,920 Speaker 1: Jennings is not there at the moment, and so you're 430 00:20:39,960 --> 00:20:42,679 Speaker 1: really staring at like Christian Kirk could be their starting 431 00:20:42,680 --> 00:20:45,640 Speaker 1: slot to kick off the year, and I think peer 432 00:20:45,680 --> 00:20:48,200 Speaker 1: Sall's an inside out guy, so you can get creative there. 433 00:20:48,240 --> 00:20:52,520 Speaker 1: And Kirk Kirk fits the Kyle Shanahan yak, you know, 434 00:20:52,640 --> 00:20:54,720 Speaker 1: kind of kind of player that he always kind of 435 00:20:54,760 --> 00:20:57,680 Speaker 1: strives for and gets. So I think it makes sense 436 00:20:57,720 --> 00:21:00,880 Speaker 1: from a fit perspective. And obviously it's a pretty good environment, 437 00:21:01,000 --> 00:21:03,600 Speaker 1: so you know, it's again you could throw a dart 438 00:21:03,640 --> 00:21:04,240 Speaker 1: and best ball. 439 00:21:04,359 --> 00:21:06,359 Speaker 2: That's really what this kind of signing is. 440 00:21:06,400 --> 00:21:09,360 Speaker 1: This isn't a you know, Adam from a season long perspective. 441 00:21:09,359 --> 00:21:11,760 Speaker 1: And by the way, the stuff that I talked about 442 00:21:11,800 --> 00:21:14,240 Speaker 1: on the free agency episode, I think it needs to 443 00:21:14,280 --> 00:21:16,400 Speaker 1: be clear that that was more from a season long 444 00:21:16,480 --> 00:21:20,320 Speaker 1: redraft perspective. Like the base Shall Tuton Chris Rodriguez discussion. 445 00:21:20,720 --> 00:21:23,760 Speaker 1: Base Shall Tuton is the by far the season long 446 00:21:23,840 --> 00:21:26,320 Speaker 1: upside kind of guy where even if you miss, you 447 00:21:26,320 --> 00:21:28,600 Speaker 1: can make up for it, and such, Chris Rodriguez might 448 00:21:28,640 --> 00:21:31,320 Speaker 1: be the better value from a best ball perspective, because 449 00:21:31,720 --> 00:21:35,240 Speaker 1: you're gonna get some production, you know, late in your draft. 450 00:21:34,920 --> 00:21:37,680 Speaker 4: And that that's big a few spike weeks from him. 451 00:21:37,760 --> 00:21:38,280 Speaker 2: Yeah yeah. 452 00:21:38,320 --> 00:21:40,280 Speaker 1: And and because like I think the most likely outcome 453 00:21:40,400 --> 00:21:42,480 Speaker 1: is a committee in that in that backfield, but the 454 00:21:42,800 --> 00:21:46,040 Speaker 1: ceiling outcome is easily base shall Tuton between the two. 455 00:21:46,320 --> 00:21:49,800 Speaker 1: But that's again, like Christian Kirk very unlikely to be 456 00:21:49,840 --> 00:21:51,399 Speaker 1: someone in season long that we're gonna be plucking and 457 00:21:51,400 --> 00:21:52,000 Speaker 1: playing each week. 458 00:21:53,240 --> 00:21:58,440 Speaker 4: Yeah, what about this one? Justin Field's going to the Chiefs. 459 00:21:59,760 --> 00:22:04,119 Speaker 3: Yeah yeah, I mean I think it's like a long 460 00:22:04,320 --> 00:22:06,800 Speaker 3: pause because people don't know what to think about this. 461 00:22:06,920 --> 00:22:09,520 Speaker 1: When I saw it go down, my initial thought was, Okay, 462 00:22:09,600 --> 00:22:13,360 Speaker 1: Patrick Mahomes obviously had the ACL last year. They want 463 00:22:13,359 --> 00:22:16,360 Speaker 1: to have like a veteran that could play behind him, 464 00:22:16,400 --> 00:22:18,119 Speaker 1: that could step in. I saw some people be like, 465 00:22:18,160 --> 00:22:20,159 Speaker 1: why wouldn't they get Kirk Cousins. Well, I think that 466 00:22:20,200 --> 00:22:22,600 Speaker 1: they ideally would want to have someone in development too 467 00:22:22,640 --> 00:22:26,280 Speaker 1: that they could feel confident in that's younger and such, 468 00:22:26,280 --> 00:22:27,240 Speaker 1: and that could be dynamic. 469 00:22:27,280 --> 00:22:30,160 Speaker 2: And obviously Justin Fields is that, just like Fields is. 470 00:22:30,119 --> 00:22:34,840 Speaker 1: Capable of doing big things in an individual game environment. 471 00:22:34,920 --> 00:22:37,560 Speaker 2: The problem with Justin Fields is the consistency. 472 00:22:37,040 --> 00:22:39,520 Speaker 1: Game in game out, you know, and him doing that 473 00:22:39,600 --> 00:22:41,879 Speaker 1: across the entirety of a season and such like. 474 00:22:42,200 --> 00:22:44,560 Speaker 2: We know that he can win games with his legs and. 475 00:22:44,920 --> 00:22:47,040 Speaker 1: It's not like he can't complete a pass, and so 476 00:22:47,520 --> 00:22:49,320 Speaker 1: I think the Chiefs see that, and obviously he's a 477 00:22:49,400 --> 00:22:52,119 Speaker 1: dynamic player. And the other thing too, signing Fields instead 478 00:22:52,119 --> 00:22:55,000 Speaker 1: of a guy like Cousins, you could hypothetically have special 479 00:22:55,000 --> 00:22:58,359 Speaker 1: packages for Justin Fields and and Andy Reid and. 480 00:23:00,400 --> 00:23:04,960 Speaker 3: Yeah yeah, someone said triple option with with Mahomes, Fields 481 00:23:04,960 --> 00:23:05,800 Speaker 3: and Kenth Walker. 482 00:23:06,320 --> 00:23:12,280 Speaker 4: Just just imagine the possibilities there. Yeah. Oh right, Darnald 483 00:23:12,320 --> 00:23:13,520 Speaker 4: Mooney to the Giants. 484 00:23:13,840 --> 00:23:15,560 Speaker 2: I like missed this. 485 00:23:15,680 --> 00:23:18,960 Speaker 3: I went back through our channel, you know, in the 486 00:23:19,240 --> 00:23:22,000 Speaker 3: the Discord, we have our news and rumors channel. I 487 00:23:22,040 --> 00:23:24,760 Speaker 3: was like, oh, I totally missed this signing. So Darnall 488 00:23:24,840 --> 00:23:27,000 Speaker 3: Movie Mooney goes to the Giants this year. 489 00:23:27,440 --> 00:23:28,880 Speaker 2: Yeah, deep threat for them. 490 00:23:29,400 --> 00:23:32,480 Speaker 1: You know, he's like another type of like Darius Slayton 491 00:23:32,560 --> 00:23:35,000 Speaker 1: type player for them. But yeah, I like, I mean, 492 00:23:35,119 --> 00:23:36,879 Speaker 1: I don't want to bring up Darnell Mooney too much 493 00:23:36,960 --> 00:23:39,879 Speaker 1: on this show anymore. After telling people last year in 494 00:23:40,000 --> 00:23:41,600 Speaker 1: season like three weeks in a row to pick. 495 00:23:41,480 --> 00:23:42,919 Speaker 2: Him up and then he did absolutely nothing. 496 00:23:43,359 --> 00:23:45,240 Speaker 1: But I still think that he can play like a 497 00:23:45,280 --> 00:23:47,880 Speaker 1: down the field role in that offense, and there's really 498 00:23:47,920 --> 00:23:50,320 Speaker 1: no obvious two in that offense. 499 00:23:50,320 --> 00:23:52,160 Speaker 2: So it's a little bit intriguing from that perspective. 500 00:23:53,000 --> 00:23:58,240 Speaker 3: Okay, let's look at some available still available free agents. 501 00:23:58,240 --> 00:24:00,359 Speaker 3: So I've got him listed here. I thought caliber Ridley 502 00:24:00,440 --> 00:24:02,000 Speaker 3: was gonna be on this list, but he took a 503 00:24:02,040 --> 00:24:05,080 Speaker 3: pay cut to stay with Tennessee, which was, yeah, he knows. 504 00:24:05,000 --> 00:24:07,240 Speaker 2: That the Titans are super Bowl bound. Baby. 505 00:24:07,880 --> 00:24:11,160 Speaker 3: He saw those jerseys and he was like, yeah, I'm 506 00:24:11,200 --> 00:24:14,320 Speaker 3: not going anywhere. You cut my price tag, my cap 507 00:24:14,400 --> 00:24:17,840 Speaker 3: hit by eleven million, I'll be I'll be good Quarterbacks. 508 00:24:17,840 --> 00:24:21,720 Speaker 3: You saw Kirk Cousins and Aaron Rodgers. Assuming Aaron Rodgers 509 00:24:21,800 --> 00:24:24,000 Speaker 3: right now goes to the Steelers. 510 00:24:24,200 --> 00:24:27,200 Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm assuming. I'm assuming Rogers will be a Steeler. 511 00:24:28,080 --> 00:24:28,399 Speaker 3: Uh. 512 00:24:28,440 --> 00:24:31,640 Speaker 4: And then receivers, we have Tyreek Hill, Stefon Diggs, Deebo. 513 00:24:31,359 --> 00:24:36,400 Speaker 3: Samuel, and Juwan Jennings. I don't know if like Ayuka 514 00:24:36,440 --> 00:24:37,160 Speaker 3: is gonna be in this list. 515 00:24:37,880 --> 00:24:40,000 Speaker 1: The only the only person that surprises me a little 516 00:24:40,000 --> 00:24:43,680 Speaker 1: bit there is Juwan just because yeah, I mean remember 517 00:24:43,760 --> 00:24:45,399 Speaker 1: last year he was like he was like hoping to 518 00:24:45,440 --> 00:24:46,760 Speaker 1: get a big contract and stuff. 519 00:24:46,800 --> 00:24:48,800 Speaker 4: Yeah, huge contract is coming right off. 520 00:24:48,680 --> 00:24:50,600 Speaker 1: The Super Bowl, And yeah, I think I think Juwan 521 00:24:50,680 --> 00:24:54,880 Speaker 1: Jennings is a good player, but he's not like take 522 00:24:54,880 --> 00:24:57,720 Speaker 1: over the game type player. You know, he's always gonna 523 00:24:57,760 --> 00:25:01,200 Speaker 1: have separation issues and such. But like Debo and Stefan Diggs, 524 00:25:01,240 --> 00:25:03,679 Speaker 1: Tyreek Kill coming off the injury, they're all kind of 525 00:25:03,720 --> 00:25:04,639 Speaker 1: over the hill. 526 00:25:04,680 --> 00:25:05,359 Speaker 2: At this point. 527 00:25:05,440 --> 00:25:07,280 Speaker 1: And I think, you know, if you look at the 528 00:25:07,400 --> 00:25:09,480 Speaker 1: last like five to ten years in the way that 529 00:25:09,640 --> 00:25:12,439 Speaker 1: especially wide receiver has sort of played out, you do 530 00:25:12,560 --> 00:25:15,320 Speaker 1: generally see some of these veterans sign later in the 531 00:25:15,359 --> 00:25:18,280 Speaker 1: process then then right away Juwan's Juan's the only one. 532 00:25:18,320 --> 00:25:22,040 Speaker 1: Like I wouldn't be shocked if he's a one of 533 00:25:22,040 --> 00:25:24,800 Speaker 1: the Dolphins go tos or if Deebo is one of 534 00:25:24,800 --> 00:25:25,960 Speaker 1: those players. 535 00:25:27,320 --> 00:25:29,800 Speaker 2: Just because you know they need they need something. It's 536 00:25:29,840 --> 00:25:30,160 Speaker 2: just a. 537 00:25:30,040 --> 00:25:33,159 Speaker 1: Matter of at this point in their careers, what's going 538 00:25:33,240 --> 00:25:34,120 Speaker 1: to be important for them? 539 00:25:34,359 --> 00:25:35,320 Speaker 2: Is it? 540 00:25:35,359 --> 00:25:37,720 Speaker 1: Is it that Like I think from Jetting's perspective, it 541 00:25:37,760 --> 00:25:41,320 Speaker 1: would be money, because it's not like he's been highly 542 00:25:41,520 --> 00:25:45,040 Speaker 1: sought after and touted throughout his career and so therefore 543 00:25:45,359 --> 00:25:48,880 Speaker 1: maybe the Dolphins can offer him something to be their one, 544 00:25:49,200 --> 00:25:52,280 Speaker 1: you know, this year, to get them something, whereas the 545 00:25:52,280 --> 00:25:54,280 Speaker 1: other guys might be might be searching for that ring. 546 00:25:55,000 --> 00:25:59,119 Speaker 3: Yeah, he hasn't had like a huge contract, and so 547 00:26:00,040 --> 00:26:03,119 Speaker 3: he's I think he's going to be searching for some 548 00:26:03,280 --> 00:26:05,400 Speaker 3: for some cash. 549 00:26:04,560 --> 00:26:06,720 Speaker 1: Which, by the way, which by the shout out friend 550 00:26:06,720 --> 00:26:08,720 Speaker 1: of the Show Kendrick Bourne for his new new team 551 00:26:08,920 --> 00:26:10,840 Speaker 1: in Arizona and signing a contract there. 552 00:26:11,560 --> 00:26:15,359 Speaker 4: Yeah. Yeah, yeah, that's what we were talking about. 553 00:26:16,320 --> 00:26:18,159 Speaker 3: As far as Malik willis, he had the option to 554 00:26:18,200 --> 00:26:23,280 Speaker 3: go to the Cardinals or the Dolphins, And to me, 555 00:26:23,400 --> 00:26:25,680 Speaker 3: it's like, if you had the option and you were 556 00:26:26,160 --> 00:26:30,440 Speaker 3: in like winning or like your environment was important, I'd 557 00:26:30,440 --> 00:26:32,959 Speaker 3: want to go to the Cardinals because at least they 558 00:26:33,000 --> 00:26:34,320 Speaker 3: have past catching options there. 559 00:26:34,359 --> 00:26:36,720 Speaker 4: Friend of the Show, MHJ. 560 00:26:37,880 --> 00:26:41,160 Speaker 3: Trey McBride, you know, like they there's at least options 561 00:26:41,160 --> 00:26:42,200 Speaker 3: there in Arizona. 562 00:26:42,720 --> 00:26:45,480 Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, I mean maybe, I I mean, I think 563 00:26:45,480 --> 00:26:48,560 Speaker 1: both franchises are are kind of you know, in the 564 00:26:48,600 --> 00:26:49,760 Speaker 1: Crapper at the moment. 565 00:26:49,920 --> 00:26:53,560 Speaker 3: So yeah, I'm just saying one one Crapper seems to 566 00:26:53,600 --> 00:26:54,840 Speaker 3: be a lot crappier. 567 00:26:54,440 --> 00:26:54,880 Speaker 4: Than the other. 568 00:26:55,160 --> 00:26:59,200 Speaker 2: I mean, yeah, agreed, uh that. 569 00:26:59,240 --> 00:27:02,520 Speaker 3: Calvin Ridley though, when he stayed with the Titans. Does 570 00:27:02,560 --> 00:27:08,720 Speaker 3: that make you bullish on the Titans passing attack this year? 571 00:27:09,520 --> 00:27:13,800 Speaker 2: I wouldn't say bullish. It's probably probably a little too 572 00:27:13,840 --> 00:27:14,320 Speaker 2: strong over. 573 00:27:14,640 --> 00:27:17,760 Speaker 4: You don't know if you're coming around to things so fine. 574 00:27:17,760 --> 00:27:19,760 Speaker 1: I think cam Ward would might end up being like 575 00:27:19,760 --> 00:27:22,080 Speaker 1: a late round Darth yeah this year, because I just 576 00:27:22,160 --> 00:27:25,560 Speaker 1: care care about mobility. Like quarterback is so deep that 577 00:27:26,040 --> 00:27:28,639 Speaker 1: you're gonna get Malik Willis relatively late, You're gonna get 578 00:27:28,720 --> 00:27:30,960 Speaker 1: cam Ward relatively late. I think Malik Willis is a 579 00:27:31,040 --> 00:27:36,399 Speaker 1: much better obviously, Like Malik Willis is like potentially maybe 580 00:27:36,400 --> 00:27:40,080 Speaker 1: this is too hot, potentially like prolific as a rusher, right, 581 00:27:40,240 --> 00:27:43,959 Speaker 1: Like I'm not saying that, like that's what's gonna come 582 00:27:44,000 --> 00:27:47,920 Speaker 1: out and what we're gonna see, but that floor because remember, 583 00:27:48,000 --> 00:27:51,000 Speaker 1: rushing at quarterback in fantasy is about floor, not ceiling. 584 00:27:51,000 --> 00:27:52,640 Speaker 2: You need the passing for a ceiling to. 585 00:27:52,640 --> 00:27:55,760 Speaker 1: Hit floor will get you Turell Pryor and Tim Tebow 586 00:27:55,800 --> 00:27:57,919 Speaker 1: and stuff like that that we saw throughout the the 587 00:27:57,960 --> 00:28:01,160 Speaker 1: mid twenty tens. Ceiling what we've seen from these Unicorns 588 00:28:01,160 --> 00:28:03,960 Speaker 1: recently as the Josh Allens Lamar Jackson's where they're putting 589 00:28:04,040 --> 00:28:07,120 Speaker 1: up seven percent touchdown rates on top of having these 590 00:28:07,119 --> 00:28:09,359 Speaker 1: crazy rushing numbers and finding the end zone so much. 591 00:28:09,720 --> 00:28:12,080 Speaker 1: I think Malik Willis can do the rushing side. Can 592 00:28:12,160 --> 00:28:14,160 Speaker 1: he do the passing side? I don't know, but I'm 593 00:28:14,160 --> 00:28:16,720 Speaker 1: willing to throw that dart because why wouldn't we again? 594 00:28:16,840 --> 00:28:20,520 Speaker 1: Season long redraftick although it's mostly the same, probably in 595 00:28:20,560 --> 00:28:21,200 Speaker 1: Bestball too. 596 00:28:21,720 --> 00:28:27,320 Speaker 3: Hashtag layer on QB says joebol Bondi and Thomas Scotti. Translation, JJ, 597 00:28:27,480 --> 00:28:29,159 Speaker 3: please say something nice about the Titans. 598 00:28:29,240 --> 00:28:32,800 Speaker 4: Yes, that's what it was. I am all for these mocks. 599 00:28:32,560 --> 00:28:34,960 Speaker 3: That have Jeremiah Love going to the Titans. I know 600 00:28:35,280 --> 00:28:38,800 Speaker 3: it's a lot at number four to draft a running back. 601 00:28:38,880 --> 00:28:42,360 Speaker 1: It's a lot for that particular franchise in my opinion. 602 00:28:42,440 --> 00:28:46,840 Speaker 3: Ye, yes, but it'd be fun. And that's kind of 603 00:28:46,840 --> 00:28:49,720 Speaker 3: where I'm at right now. Let's just have some fun. Sure, 604 00:28:50,360 --> 00:28:52,600 Speaker 3: let's have some fun with today's data as well. 605 00:28:53,280 --> 00:28:54,240 Speaker 2: Today's data. 606 00:28:57,760 --> 00:29:01,080 Speaker 3: All right, we got best and worst ZAP values versus 607 00:29:01,200 --> 00:29:05,080 Speaker 3: DraftKings average draft position. So we mentioned earlier DraftKings has 608 00:29:05,120 --> 00:29:07,880 Speaker 3: the they have the early best ball and so this 609 00:29:07,920 --> 00:29:11,640 Speaker 3: is before the draft has kicked off a million dollars 610 00:29:12,440 --> 00:29:15,960 Speaker 3: for this contest, and right now people are just they're 611 00:29:15,960 --> 00:29:19,560 Speaker 3: throwing darts and they are assuming. You know, things change 612 00:29:19,600 --> 00:29:23,680 Speaker 3: like the Wattle trade that would change ADP draft is 613 00:29:23,720 --> 00:29:27,640 Speaker 3: going to change ADP as far as before and after. 614 00:29:28,360 --> 00:29:30,920 Speaker 3: But JJ, you took your ZAP values and compare them 615 00:29:31,200 --> 00:29:32,160 Speaker 3: to these ADPs. 616 00:29:32,560 --> 00:29:35,560 Speaker 1: Yeah, I have the ZAP categories for these guys, and 617 00:29:35,600 --> 00:29:37,680 Speaker 1: then I have my positional ranks and my rankings. Then 618 00:29:37,680 --> 00:29:40,960 Speaker 1: I'm showing the delta the difference between my positional rankings 619 00:29:41,040 --> 00:29:45,440 Speaker 1: and where DraftKings ADP currently has them. The biggest player 620 00:29:45,640 --> 00:29:49,160 Speaker 1: where there's the biggest difference is Antonio Williams. So Antonio 621 00:29:49,200 --> 00:29:53,320 Speaker 1: Williams coming out of Clemson was productive every year there, 622 00:29:53,320 --> 00:29:54,880 Speaker 1: but never ultra productive. 623 00:29:55,040 --> 00:29:56,800 Speaker 2: And more than likely. 624 00:29:57,240 --> 00:30:00,920 Speaker 1: Uh is a is a slot player at the NFL level, 625 00:30:00,920 --> 00:30:03,800 Speaker 1: and that definitely, you know, I've written talked about a 626 00:30:03,800 --> 00:30:08,080 Speaker 1: lot of that this offseason. I wrote about in newsletters 627 00:30:08,600 --> 00:30:12,080 Speaker 1: about the slot player kind of disappearing from the game. 628 00:30:12,200 --> 00:30:15,520 Speaker 1: But in the right environment, number one, maybe he could 629 00:30:15,520 --> 00:30:18,200 Speaker 1: be a little bit more. But number two, if a 630 00:30:18,240 --> 00:30:19,880 Speaker 1: team runs a lot of eleven personnel, I think that 631 00:30:19,920 --> 00:30:21,560 Speaker 1: he can make an impact. His top comp in the 632 00:30:21,600 --> 00:30:24,680 Speaker 1: model was actually Lad Mconkee. Now that doesn't mean that 633 00:30:24,760 --> 00:30:28,320 Speaker 1: he is Lad, but it is saying not only that, 634 00:30:28,360 --> 00:30:30,959 Speaker 1: but the model wasn't like, didn't hate Lad the new 635 00:30:31,000 --> 00:30:31,800 Speaker 1: iterations and stuff. 636 00:30:31,800 --> 00:30:33,560 Speaker 2: It didn't like love mconky. 637 00:30:34,960 --> 00:30:38,240 Speaker 1: But the weird thing with Antonio Williams right now, you 638 00:30:38,240 --> 00:30:40,720 Speaker 1: can see my positional rank as eleventh a wide receiver 639 00:30:40,800 --> 00:30:44,800 Speaker 1: for him, and he's ranked nineteenth by ADP right now, 640 00:30:45,400 --> 00:30:47,719 Speaker 1: So all the zapp scores in my rankings are going 641 00:30:47,760 --> 00:30:50,040 Speaker 1: to be anchored by projected draft capital. Right now in 642 00:30:50,120 --> 00:30:53,080 Speaker 1: NFL mock draft database, he's a top seventy overall pick. 643 00:30:53,480 --> 00:30:59,080 Speaker 1: He's he's projected to go after Malachi Fields before Elijah Surrat, 644 00:30:59,240 --> 00:31:02,200 Speaker 1: who people have way above him. Understand I love Surat 645 00:31:02,280 --> 00:31:06,840 Speaker 1: so understandably, so above Skylar Bell, above Bryce Lance. I mean, 646 00:31:06,880 --> 00:31:09,479 Speaker 1: there's there's a lot of players that people like. Then 647 00:31:09,480 --> 00:31:11,840 Speaker 1: Antonio Williams is projected to be drafted ahead of We'll 648 00:31:11,840 --> 00:31:14,120 Speaker 1: see what happens, but I do think that you should 649 00:31:14,160 --> 00:31:17,200 Speaker 1: be leveraging a lot of the mock draft resources out 650 00:31:17,200 --> 00:31:20,320 Speaker 1: there when you're doing these early best ball drafts, because 651 00:31:20,640 --> 00:31:23,640 Speaker 1: you could be drafting players like Eric McAllister, for instance, 652 00:31:23,960 --> 00:31:27,160 Speaker 1: who the that Moodel likes a lot like McAllister has 653 00:31:27,200 --> 00:31:29,640 Speaker 1: one of the best breakout scores in this class. But 654 00:31:30,160 --> 00:31:32,720 Speaker 1: I don't know if McAllister is going to be a 655 00:31:32,800 --> 00:31:34,920 Speaker 1: Day two pick, and if he's a Day three pick, 656 00:31:35,320 --> 00:31:37,560 Speaker 1: then I mean it's it's rough, right. 657 00:31:37,640 --> 00:31:38,880 Speaker 2: There's some off the field stuff. 658 00:31:38,880 --> 00:31:40,760 Speaker 1: I didn't even write about this in the in the guide, 659 00:31:41,280 --> 00:31:44,239 Speaker 1: but there's some small off the field stuff that that 660 00:31:44,320 --> 00:31:46,320 Speaker 1: might be driving that cost down a little bit. But 661 00:31:46,600 --> 00:31:48,760 Speaker 1: if he's a Day three pick, we don't see wide 662 00:31:48,800 --> 00:31:52,600 Speaker 1: receivers very frequently give us much usability, especially as rookies 663 00:31:53,200 --> 00:31:55,800 Speaker 1: out of Day three. So McAllister being one of those 664 00:31:55,840 --> 00:31:58,040 Speaker 1: players where right now I have him ranked four spots 665 00:31:58,080 --> 00:32:00,520 Speaker 1: lower than where he's he's going. Let's go back to 666 00:32:00,560 --> 00:32:01,240 Speaker 1: the favorable guys. 667 00:32:01,280 --> 00:32:01,800 Speaker 2: Ted Hurst. 668 00:32:02,480 --> 00:32:05,360 Speaker 1: I have him seven wide receiver spots ahead. This is 669 00:32:05,400 --> 00:32:08,960 Speaker 1: more of a I think like I actually think ted 670 00:32:09,040 --> 00:32:10,880 Speaker 1: Hurst could be better in best ball. He's he's a 671 00:32:10,920 --> 00:32:13,360 Speaker 1: deep threat, he's a down the field player, perimeter player. 672 00:32:14,080 --> 00:32:14,920 Speaker 2: One of his three. 673 00:32:14,760 --> 00:32:17,520 Speaker 1: Comps was Nico Collins, but he's leaner than Collins. Collins 674 00:32:17,520 --> 00:32:21,520 Speaker 1: a little bit beefier that than ted Hurst is but Hurst, 675 00:32:21,600 --> 00:32:24,120 Speaker 1: you know, coming from a smaller school, I get a 676 00:32:24,160 --> 00:32:27,040 Speaker 1: little bit afraid of that because we don't generally see 677 00:32:27,080 --> 00:32:31,320 Speaker 1: many hits from small school wide receivers. But in this class, 678 00:32:31,360 --> 00:32:32,959 Speaker 1: in this draft class, you get a lot of like 679 00:32:33,040 --> 00:32:35,280 Speaker 1: mediocre profiles once you get outside of the top six 680 00:32:35,360 --> 00:32:38,280 Speaker 1: or seven wide receivers. And I'm willing to place that 681 00:32:38,320 --> 00:32:41,600 Speaker 1: bet On Hurst at wide receiver ten right now versus 682 00:32:41,680 --> 00:32:46,240 Speaker 1: wide receiver seventeen via draftings ADP Chris Belt. 683 00:32:46,440 --> 00:32:47,680 Speaker 2: Chris Belt, what were we gonna say? 684 00:32:47,960 --> 00:32:50,760 Speaker 3: I was just gonna say that with these ADPs of 685 00:32:50,760 --> 00:32:53,920 Speaker 3: like Antonio Williams, Ted Hurst, and Chris Bell, they're in 686 00:32:53,960 --> 00:32:56,320 Speaker 3: the two thirties right now, which is basically in the 687 00:32:56,400 --> 00:32:57,680 Speaker 3: twentieth round. 688 00:32:58,320 --> 00:33:00,360 Speaker 4: Yeah, so they are there free. 689 00:33:00,400 --> 00:33:02,760 Speaker 3: And what this is also saying with the two thirties 690 00:33:02,800 --> 00:33:04,600 Speaker 3: is that there are some drafts that they are not 691 00:33:04,640 --> 00:33:09,360 Speaker 3: being drafted at all. To talk about like unique, having 692 00:33:09,440 --> 00:33:11,960 Speaker 3: some of these guys being on your team would set 693 00:33:12,000 --> 00:33:14,560 Speaker 3: you up for potential success during the season. 694 00:33:14,800 --> 00:33:17,360 Speaker 1: One thing I'll say about Chris Bell, and I wanted 695 00:33:17,360 --> 00:33:18,840 Speaker 1: to keep him on here because I just wanted to 696 00:33:18,840 --> 00:33:20,800 Speaker 1: go with a process. To show you the difference between 697 00:33:20,800 --> 00:33:24,040 Speaker 1: my is that Bell is coming off in ACL, so 698 00:33:24,520 --> 00:33:27,640 Speaker 1: I do think that you can largely ignore him from 699 00:33:27,680 --> 00:33:31,440 Speaker 1: a draft perspective if you want to, because we don't 700 00:33:31,440 --> 00:33:32,080 Speaker 1: know when he's going to. 701 00:33:32,000 --> 00:33:33,560 Speaker 2: Actually be healthy enough to play. 702 00:33:33,880 --> 00:33:37,080 Speaker 1: But Bell right now has a fifty fourth overall draft 703 00:33:37,120 --> 00:33:40,360 Speaker 1: capital tag on a NFL mock draft database, so he's 704 00:33:40,680 --> 00:33:43,040 Speaker 1: he's in a spot where he's likely to go Day two. 705 00:33:43,520 --> 00:33:45,600 Speaker 1: I don't love Chris Bell. I don't hate him. He's 706 00:33:45,640 --> 00:33:49,720 Speaker 1: just another one of those like bigger bodied out outside 707 00:33:49,720 --> 00:33:51,640 Speaker 1: perimeter receivers, but he does have a little bit more 708 00:33:52,280 --> 00:33:54,080 Speaker 1: to his build than some of the other guys, like 709 00:33:54,080 --> 00:33:56,680 Speaker 1: a Chris Brazzle or you know, a Ted Hurst who 710 00:33:56,680 --> 00:33:59,120 Speaker 1: I talked about, a Jacobe Lane, those players that are 711 00:33:59,120 --> 00:34:01,280 Speaker 1: a little bit leaner. Chris Bell has a little bit 712 00:34:01,320 --> 00:34:04,480 Speaker 1: more bulk to him, which might intrigue a team, which 713 00:34:04,560 --> 00:34:07,320 Speaker 1: might rise his his draft capital a little bit. But 714 00:34:07,360 --> 00:34:08,879 Speaker 1: you got to you gotta watch out for him because 715 00:34:08,880 --> 00:34:10,920 Speaker 1: of the injury. And then at running back, I have 716 00:34:10,960 --> 00:34:14,359 Speaker 1: Emma Johnson at RB two in this class right now. 717 00:34:14,680 --> 00:34:15,480 Speaker 2: That can change. 718 00:34:15,560 --> 00:34:18,680 Speaker 1: That probably will change because there's a lot of variability 719 00:34:19,080 --> 00:34:22,200 Speaker 1: in there, but right now he's RB five over on DraftKings, 720 00:34:22,800 --> 00:34:24,399 Speaker 1: but one thing I'll say is DraftKings is a full 721 00:34:24,400 --> 00:34:27,320 Speaker 1: PPR site, and Emma Johnson is probably the best pass 722 00:34:27,320 --> 00:34:29,640 Speaker 1: catching running back in this class. So there's a very 723 00:34:29,680 --> 00:34:32,480 Speaker 1: real chance that especially if he it's Day two draft capital, 724 00:34:32,520 --> 00:34:34,520 Speaker 1: I don't know if he will, but early day three, 725 00:34:34,560 --> 00:34:37,120 Speaker 1: even if he's a round four pick, you know, he 726 00:34:37,160 --> 00:34:39,680 Speaker 1: could play some sort of pass catching role to start 727 00:34:39,719 --> 00:34:41,320 Speaker 1: the season if he finds the right spot. So I 728 00:34:41,880 --> 00:34:44,320 Speaker 1: like Emma Johnson as a as a player, as a prospect, 729 00:34:45,080 --> 00:34:46,759 Speaker 1: and the fact that he's three, you know, I'm three 730 00:34:46,800 --> 00:34:50,040 Speaker 1: spots ahead. That high in a rankings list is pretty significant. 731 00:34:50,200 --> 00:34:51,759 Speaker 1: And then on the bad and I already talked about 732 00:34:51,840 --> 00:34:55,960 Speaker 1: Eric McCallister, Zach Branch, who I've talked about a lot 733 00:34:55,960 --> 00:34:59,640 Speaker 1: on shows. He's a gadgety player who might be better 734 00:34:59,680 --> 00:35:01,920 Speaker 1: in best So I can understand this to a degree. 735 00:35:02,600 --> 00:35:04,640 Speaker 1: I'm just not in love with the profile. This is 736 00:35:04,640 --> 00:35:07,319 Speaker 1: a profile where you know, he got a lot of 737 00:35:07,320 --> 00:35:10,520 Speaker 1: looks behind the line of scrimmage, a lot of manufactured stuff. 738 00:35:10,719 --> 00:35:12,200 Speaker 1: And if you look at history, this is in the 739 00:35:12,239 --> 00:35:15,200 Speaker 1: Prospect Guide, but if you look at history, players who've 740 00:35:15,200 --> 00:35:17,640 Speaker 1: been drafted on Day two with this kind of just 741 00:35:17,680 --> 00:35:20,319 Speaker 1: in general, actually, but in day two in particular, with 742 00:35:20,480 --> 00:35:22,759 Speaker 1: this kind of usage, the only guys that have really 743 00:35:22,840 --> 00:35:25,600 Speaker 1: hit over the last five or six years has been 744 00:35:25,680 --> 00:35:27,759 Speaker 1: Luther Burden and Wandel Robinson. But both of them had 745 00:35:27,800 --> 00:35:30,640 Speaker 1: way better age Ajustine production than Zach Branch. Did You 746 00:35:30,760 --> 00:35:33,600 Speaker 1: You're gonna get guys like Anthony Schwartz, like Rondel Moore 747 00:35:33,840 --> 00:35:36,840 Speaker 1: rest in Peace. You know, like just a lot of 748 00:35:36,880 --> 00:35:40,160 Speaker 1: players who were decent in college, had a lot of 749 00:35:40,200 --> 00:35:43,360 Speaker 1: speed and ability, but they were on the smaller side 750 00:35:43,440 --> 00:35:46,160 Speaker 1: and they didn't find the right team to really maximize 751 00:35:46,200 --> 00:35:48,439 Speaker 1: that gadgetiness to their game. And I think that that's 752 00:35:48,480 --> 00:35:51,479 Speaker 1: what we have was Zach Branch, where like his top 753 00:35:51,480 --> 00:35:52,520 Speaker 1: comp is me Cole Hardman. 754 00:35:52,560 --> 00:35:54,239 Speaker 2: That's another example I could have thrown out there. 755 00:35:54,960 --> 00:35:56,600 Speaker 1: But like the you know, like I would not be 756 00:35:56,760 --> 00:35:59,000 Speaker 1: shocked at all if the Chiefs really like Zach Branch, 757 00:35:59,040 --> 00:36:01,440 Speaker 1: because this is just the archetype that they seem to 758 00:36:02,120 --> 00:36:05,959 Speaker 1: enjoy going after, whether it be Mikol Hardman or ending 759 00:36:06,000 --> 00:36:09,480 Speaker 1: up with Kadarius Tony, who's another player that would profile 760 00:36:09,520 --> 00:36:10,640 Speaker 1: as this kind of kind of guy. 761 00:36:11,480 --> 00:36:13,759 Speaker 2: He just scares me from a production perspective. 762 00:36:14,000 --> 00:36:19,560 Speaker 1: Jacobe Lane, lanky outside perimeter receiver, find enough production profile, 763 00:36:19,600 --> 00:36:21,680 Speaker 1: but I didn't think he had anything special to his game. 764 00:36:22,280 --> 00:36:25,719 Speaker 1: I'm five spots below and then Bryce Lance. Now I 765 00:36:25,719 --> 00:36:28,759 Speaker 1: think I subjectively might like Bryce Lance a little bit 766 00:36:28,760 --> 00:36:31,560 Speaker 1: more than what the ZAP model is showing, but it's 767 00:36:31,760 --> 00:36:34,640 Speaker 1: he's getting a lot of steam. People really like Bryce Lance, 768 00:36:34,640 --> 00:36:36,719 Speaker 1: and I think there's a lot of things that are 769 00:36:36,760 --> 00:36:40,120 Speaker 1: at play here. Number One, he's unbelievably athletic. Number Two, 770 00:36:40,200 --> 00:36:42,400 Speaker 1: he's coming from the same school that Christian Watson came from, 771 00:36:42,480 --> 00:36:46,200 Speaker 1: and Christian Watson obviously has moderately hit, and he's at 772 00:36:46,239 --> 00:36:48,799 Speaker 1: least like a big play threat that's great in best Ball, 773 00:36:49,000 --> 00:36:51,680 Speaker 1: and so we're making that direct comp There's also the 774 00:36:51,680 --> 00:36:54,240 Speaker 1: story of him being Trey Lance's brother, which might. 775 00:36:54,080 --> 00:36:55,880 Speaker 4: Say the family dynamic. 776 00:36:55,960 --> 00:36:58,839 Speaker 1: Yeah, get him on people's radars, but there's a lot 777 00:36:58,880 --> 00:37:00,680 Speaker 1: of red flags. Who was an a litle profile. He 778 00:37:00,680 --> 00:37:03,640 Speaker 1: didn't produce until after three years in college, like he 779 00:37:03,680 --> 00:37:07,440 Speaker 1: did nothing, literally like nothing. And then he's older, he's 780 00:37:07,440 --> 00:37:09,600 Speaker 1: an older prospect, and the combination of all that, he 781 00:37:09,680 --> 00:37:12,520 Speaker 1: is a breakout score of zero. He just didn't register 782 00:37:12,600 --> 00:37:15,160 Speaker 1: it because his adjusted receiving yards for team pass attempt 783 00:37:15,520 --> 00:37:16,640 Speaker 1: never got high enough at. 784 00:37:16,600 --> 00:37:17,240 Speaker 2: The right age. 785 00:37:17,280 --> 00:37:20,040 Speaker 1: So he you know, he did give us crazy production 786 00:37:20,080 --> 00:37:22,040 Speaker 1: towards the end of his collegiate career, but it was 787 00:37:22,040 --> 00:37:23,840 Speaker 1: a little bit too late just given his age, and 788 00:37:23,840 --> 00:37:26,240 Speaker 1: then you adjusted down based on the program strength. 789 00:37:26,640 --> 00:37:29,840 Speaker 2: It just it's a very very volatile profile. 790 00:37:30,120 --> 00:37:34,319 Speaker 1: And when I'm approaching the draft, like pre draft, I 791 00:37:34,320 --> 00:37:37,080 Speaker 1: don't want to put a very volatile profile very high 792 00:37:37,080 --> 00:37:40,120 Speaker 1: in my rankings until I see landing spot in draft 793 00:37:40,120 --> 00:37:43,480 Speaker 1: capital officially, you know, I'll play it a little bit safer, 794 00:37:43,480 --> 00:37:45,759 Speaker 1: which is why I think, like in Antonio Williams, who 795 00:37:45,840 --> 00:37:47,480 Speaker 1: I think can play in a lot of spots aside 796 00:37:47,480 --> 00:37:49,640 Speaker 1: from you know, the eleven personnel stuff that I talked about, 797 00:37:49,760 --> 00:37:51,680 Speaker 1: he's at least a safe bet as a player, like 798 00:37:51,680 --> 00:37:53,360 Speaker 1: we generally know what we're getting from him, or like 799 00:37:53,480 --> 00:37:55,320 Speaker 1: I think ted Hurst can work almost anywhere. 800 00:37:56,040 --> 00:38:00,879 Speaker 2: And so that's that's my stance on bred Lance right now. 801 00:38:00,920 --> 00:38:03,000 Speaker 1: I mean, Deebro really likes him, and I respect the 802 00:38:03,000 --> 00:38:04,799 Speaker 1: crap out of Debro and the work that he does, 803 00:38:05,239 --> 00:38:08,640 Speaker 1: and he talked him up last week on perspectives and 804 00:38:08,680 --> 00:38:10,040 Speaker 1: so like there's a lot and I know that like 805 00:38:10,080 --> 00:38:13,880 Speaker 1: Brugler seems to like Lance and so like, there's a 806 00:38:13,920 --> 00:38:16,400 Speaker 1: lot of people that are on Lance that I, you know, 807 00:38:16,440 --> 00:38:19,120 Speaker 1: approve of as analysts that I'm I'm that I enjoy 808 00:38:19,239 --> 00:38:21,880 Speaker 1: as analysts, and so yeah, that makes me think a 809 00:38:21,920 --> 00:38:24,239 Speaker 1: little bit differently. And this is the thing with the 810 00:38:24,280 --> 00:38:27,600 Speaker 1: player like Lance, and this is more dynasty and rookie 811 00:38:27,680 --> 00:38:31,520 Speaker 1: draft focus. But with a player like Lance, I'm fine 812 00:38:31,560 --> 00:38:33,920 Speaker 1: with you like spending a third or a fourth round 813 00:38:34,000 --> 00:38:35,839 Speaker 1: pick on a player like this. You know, it's when 814 00:38:36,480 --> 00:38:38,919 Speaker 1: the hype train does get you know, or at least 815 00:38:38,920 --> 00:38:40,680 Speaker 1: a lot of people start to back the guy, and 816 00:38:40,719 --> 00:38:44,120 Speaker 1: then his adp rises and then you know he's overdrafted 817 00:38:44,120 --> 00:38:47,719 Speaker 1: because of the athleticism. We know historically that those kinds 818 00:38:47,760 --> 00:38:49,520 Speaker 1: of players have screwed us in the past, and I 819 00:38:49,560 --> 00:38:51,680 Speaker 1: don't want to get screwed. I think that he's the 820 00:38:51,760 --> 00:38:55,359 Speaker 1: right upside play. So sure, you know, in best ball, 821 00:38:55,560 --> 00:38:57,240 Speaker 1: if you want to throw that dart, be my guest. 822 00:38:57,560 --> 00:38:59,200 Speaker 1: But I do think there's a lot of red flags 823 00:38:59,200 --> 00:38:59,840 Speaker 1: of his profile. 824 00:39:00,840 --> 00:39:05,680 Speaker 3: And speaking of volatile, let's get onto today's main event. 825 00:39:06,680 --> 00:39:12,000 Speaker 2: It's the late round main event, all right. 826 00:39:12,080 --> 00:39:16,400 Speaker 3: We've got favorite twenty twenty six draft comps and this 827 00:39:16,520 --> 00:39:19,600 Speaker 3: is for the rookie running backs. JJ, do you want 828 00:39:19,640 --> 00:39:22,520 Speaker 3: to give us just a just a brief overview of this? 829 00:39:23,320 --> 00:39:26,560 Speaker 1: Yeah, So all I'm gonna do this is just for fun, really, like, 830 00:39:26,680 --> 00:39:30,040 Speaker 1: this is just for fun comps. Comps in general, in 831 00:39:30,040 --> 00:39:34,239 Speaker 1: my opinion, get thrown out too loosely oftentimes, Like I 832 00:39:34,280 --> 00:39:37,719 Speaker 1: could rant about player comps for days, but like you know, 833 00:39:37,719 --> 00:39:42,080 Speaker 1: a lot of times people are skewing towards like successful 834 00:39:42,080 --> 00:39:44,359 Speaker 1: players in the NFL. So they see some of the 835 00:39:44,360 --> 00:39:46,279 Speaker 1: comps in the Prospect Guide and they're like, well, I thought, 836 00:39:46,360 --> 00:39:48,920 Speaker 1: Jordan Tyson, why Jordan Tyson one of his three comps 837 00:39:48,960 --> 00:39:51,440 Speaker 1: is Corey Davis. Corey Davis sucked, and Jordan Tyson's a 838 00:39:51,480 --> 00:39:54,520 Speaker 1: legendary performer. Why are things looking the way they're looking. 839 00:39:54,960 --> 00:39:56,759 Speaker 1: They're they're looking the way they're looking, Because it's just 840 00:39:56,760 --> 00:39:58,840 Speaker 1: trying to be realistic, like we you're not going to 841 00:39:58,960 --> 00:40:01,440 Speaker 1: only get hits out of unless you're Jeremiah Love. He 842 00:40:01,480 --> 00:40:06,360 Speaker 1: has basically like three really good comps overall, but you know, 843 00:40:06,520 --> 00:40:09,880 Speaker 1: like generally speaking, you're gonna have bad comps for players. 844 00:40:09,920 --> 00:40:10,880 Speaker 2: It's just the way that it is. 845 00:40:10,920 --> 00:40:13,399 Speaker 1: So what I did though for this and the way 846 00:40:13,400 --> 00:40:16,000 Speaker 1: that my comps are generated, So people know, it's like 847 00:40:16,040 --> 00:40:19,320 Speaker 1: a distance formula. So it's the equivalent of like, okay, 848 00:40:19,360 --> 00:40:21,920 Speaker 1: this guy, and like certain certain factors are weighed a 849 00:40:21,920 --> 00:40:24,799 Speaker 1: little bit more so think about height and weight. Those 850 00:40:24,800 --> 00:40:28,120 Speaker 1: are weighed fairly heavily, but a player could have a 851 00:40:28,120 --> 00:40:30,440 Speaker 1: little bit different of a weight, let's say, or a 852 00:40:30,480 --> 00:40:34,239 Speaker 1: height let's say, if the production metrics really line up 853 00:40:34,360 --> 00:40:37,080 Speaker 1: and are really really tight. So what it's doing is 854 00:40:37,200 --> 00:40:40,080 Speaker 1: is calculating the distance from you know, with adjusted yards 855 00:40:40,080 --> 00:40:42,680 Speaker 1: per team player running back or a reception share, and 856 00:40:42,719 --> 00:40:44,839 Speaker 1: it's saying, Okay, this is the closest comp based on 857 00:40:45,239 --> 00:40:48,000 Speaker 1: the things that you're valuing height and weight and some 858 00:40:48,080 --> 00:40:49,960 Speaker 1: of this stuff, and some of the production metrics, but 859 00:40:50,040 --> 00:40:53,120 Speaker 1: like how you're valuing them from a hierarchy standpoint, and 860 00:40:53,120 --> 00:40:54,960 Speaker 1: it's saying, this is the closest comp based on all 861 00:40:55,000 --> 00:40:55,560 Speaker 1: of those things. 862 00:40:55,600 --> 00:40:57,200 Speaker 2: So when you see. 863 00:40:56,920 --> 00:40:59,319 Speaker 1: Certain heights and weights that aren't total, although I think 864 00:40:59,320 --> 00:41:01,960 Speaker 1: the ones Ontoday Show are all pretty on point, but 865 00:41:02,280 --> 00:41:04,759 Speaker 1: you know, I think like like Ezekiel Elliott was a 866 00:41:04,760 --> 00:41:07,000 Speaker 1: comp for Jeremiah Love, for instance, and he was like 867 00:41:07,120 --> 00:41:10,600 Speaker 1: twelve or thirteen pounds heavier at the combine, but their 868 00:41:10,680 --> 00:41:14,520 Speaker 1: production metrics were really really similar, which is why that 869 00:41:14,640 --> 00:41:16,279 Speaker 1: was one of his comps. But I have another comp 870 00:41:16,360 --> 00:41:19,000 Speaker 1: for Jeremiah Love on today's show. So with all that 871 00:41:19,040 --> 00:41:22,400 Speaker 1: being said, these are all analytical comps. They're all in 872 00:41:22,480 --> 00:41:24,919 Speaker 1: the model right sorry, in the Prospect Guide, and they're 873 00:41:24,960 --> 00:41:27,080 Speaker 1: from and they stem from the ZAP model. 874 00:41:27,560 --> 00:41:30,920 Speaker 2: Jonah Coleman, who is not getting much. 875 00:41:31,600 --> 00:41:34,080 Speaker 1: Hype right now because he's done no testing and we 876 00:41:34,200 --> 00:41:37,680 Speaker 1: just don't know how fast he is. Jonah cole I 877 00:41:37,719 --> 00:41:39,520 Speaker 1: think he just had his pro day, but I don't 878 00:41:39,520 --> 00:41:42,319 Speaker 1: think that he ran. Jonah Coleman right now is a 879 00:41:42,360 --> 00:41:45,520 Speaker 1: fringe top one hundred pick in the NFL draft. I 880 00:41:45,520 --> 00:41:47,560 Speaker 1: think if he goes down like I love his production profile, 881 00:41:47,600 --> 00:41:50,640 Speaker 1: it's actually pretty good. If he goes on day two, 882 00:41:51,200 --> 00:41:53,560 Speaker 1: he could be my RB two in this class realistically. 883 00:41:54,600 --> 00:41:55,320 Speaker 2: But he's small. 884 00:41:55,520 --> 00:41:57,600 Speaker 1: You know, you can see right here he's he's you 885 00:41:57,640 --> 00:42:00,000 Speaker 1: have Doug Doug Martin again, rest in peace, Doug Martin. 886 00:42:00,120 --> 00:42:03,759 Speaker 1: But Muscle Hampster was five nine to twenty three when 887 00:42:03,800 --> 00:42:06,399 Speaker 1: he was playing and came out. Jonah Coleman is five 888 00:42:06,440 --> 00:42:10,800 Speaker 1: eight two twenty so very similar. Size is these shorter, stouter, strong, 889 00:42:12,239 --> 00:42:15,960 Speaker 1: wrecking balls if you will, of running backs reception share 890 00:42:16,200 --> 00:42:19,200 Speaker 1: for Jonah Coleman thirteen point two percent in his best season. 891 00:42:19,239 --> 00:42:22,520 Speaker 1: That's adjusted reception share. Doug Martin nine point four percent 892 00:42:22,560 --> 00:42:24,920 Speaker 1: is not quite as high. And then adjusted yards per 893 00:42:24,960 --> 00:42:27,400 Speaker 1: team play one point sixty eight versus one point seven three. 894 00:42:28,040 --> 00:42:31,320 Speaker 1: Martin is likely more athletic, like I said, and Martin 895 00:42:31,440 --> 00:42:34,239 Speaker 1: was more prolific on the ground, which is why you 896 00:42:34,320 --> 00:42:38,440 Speaker 1: see the adjusted yards per team play as being fairly comparable, 897 00:42:38,680 --> 00:42:42,560 Speaker 1: but the reception share best season reception share not as comparable. 898 00:42:42,800 --> 00:42:45,120 Speaker 1: So those are kind of the call out metrics that 899 00:42:45,160 --> 00:42:49,399 Speaker 1: the model was seeing when making that comp. It's very 900 00:42:49,440 --> 00:42:52,160 Speaker 1: hard for a player who's five foot eight, two hundred 901 00:42:52,160 --> 00:42:55,960 Speaker 1: and twenty pounds to have very clear comps because there's 902 00:42:56,000 --> 00:42:58,359 Speaker 1: not many players since twenty eleven that have come out 903 00:42:58,719 --> 00:43:00,680 Speaker 1: at that size. So I actually thought that the Doug 904 00:43:00,719 --> 00:43:04,120 Speaker 1: Martin comp was fairly on point all things considered. 905 00:43:05,600 --> 00:43:09,719 Speaker 3: Yeah, I saw where Jonah Coleman obviously, you know he 906 00:43:09,800 --> 00:43:13,160 Speaker 3: said a U dub guy, Washington guy, but he made 907 00:43:13,200 --> 00:43:15,239 Speaker 3: a visit yesterday to the Seahawks. 908 00:43:16,640 --> 00:43:18,080 Speaker 2: Yeah, fun, Jonah. 909 00:43:17,840 --> 00:43:20,879 Speaker 1: Coleman and Seattle would be easily the RB two because 910 00:43:20,880 --> 00:43:22,560 Speaker 1: that would mean that they probably spend a day two 911 00:43:22,560 --> 00:43:24,919 Speaker 1: pick and there's an opening. 912 00:43:24,560 --> 00:43:27,560 Speaker 3: There and they need running back right now for sure. 913 00:43:28,400 --> 00:43:31,160 Speaker 3: All right, let's get on to the next one. This 914 00:43:31,239 --> 00:43:33,560 Speaker 3: guy has had some a little bit of hype this 915 00:43:33,560 --> 00:43:34,040 Speaker 3: this year. 916 00:43:34,880 --> 00:43:35,600 Speaker 4: Mike Washington. 917 00:43:36,239 --> 00:43:38,920 Speaker 1: Yeah, so I mentioned this one on perspectives last week. 918 00:43:39,120 --> 00:43:43,520 Speaker 1: I think that Washington looks a lot like Latavius Murray analytically. Again, 919 00:43:43,560 --> 00:43:45,839 Speaker 1: this is not a run style thing, because Latavius Murray 920 00:43:45,840 --> 00:43:48,560 Speaker 1: had a pretty uh glare. I don't know if you 921 00:43:48,560 --> 00:43:50,640 Speaker 1: guys remember watching him, but like a very glaring, like 922 00:43:50,760 --> 00:43:53,799 Speaker 1: upright style of running. And I don't know if Mike 923 00:43:53,880 --> 00:43:58,040 Speaker 1: Washington is necessarily that from a stylistic perspective. But Washington's 924 00:43:58,080 --> 00:44:00,000 Speaker 1: coming out of an age age is another factor. I mean, 925 00:44:00,040 --> 00:44:02,120 Speaker 1: there's other factors. I'm just highlighting the major ones for 926 00:44:02,160 --> 00:44:05,360 Speaker 1: these comps. But Mike Washington, twenty two point eighty is 927 00:44:05,400 --> 00:44:07,480 Speaker 1: a little bit older, you know, not super old for 928 00:44:07,840 --> 00:44:10,279 Speaker 1: what we see these days. Latavius Murray when he came out, 929 00:44:10,320 --> 00:44:13,400 Speaker 1: he was older, twenty three point three, six one and 930 00:44:13,440 --> 00:44:15,680 Speaker 1: six two. They're both two hundred and twenty three pounds. 931 00:44:15,840 --> 00:44:19,279 Speaker 1: They both had really good speed scores. Reception share was 932 00:44:19,600 --> 00:44:21,759 Speaker 1: only one to one and a half percent off from 933 00:44:21,760 --> 00:44:25,360 Speaker 1: one another. Adjusted yards per team play, Mike Washington was 934 00:44:25,360 --> 00:44:28,040 Speaker 1: a little bit better, but you know, fairly comparable. And 935 00:44:28,120 --> 00:44:31,320 Speaker 1: then both of them had kind of below average adjusted 936 00:44:31,360 --> 00:44:34,959 Speaker 1: yards per team pass atten numbers. So again, not stylistic 937 00:44:35,000 --> 00:44:38,480 Speaker 1: comps here between Mike Washington Latavius Murray. But I do 938 00:44:38,560 --> 00:44:41,160 Speaker 1: think that the comp itself makes sense. And again people 939 00:44:41,239 --> 00:44:43,400 Speaker 1: hear that and they're like, oh, Mike Washington sucks. 940 00:44:43,640 --> 00:44:44,240 Speaker 2: Number one. 941 00:44:44,640 --> 00:44:46,600 Speaker 1: If you get a Latavious Murray outcome, that's not a 942 00:44:46,600 --> 00:44:49,440 Speaker 1: bad NFL career at all for a player that is 943 00:44:49,480 --> 00:44:51,800 Speaker 1: a fringe day two pick right now. And the only 944 00:44:51,880 --> 00:44:54,640 Speaker 1: reason why Mike Washington's a fringe day two pick is 945 00:44:54,680 --> 00:44:57,280 Speaker 1: because of what he did at the combine, which fine, whatever, 946 00:44:57,600 --> 00:45:00,759 Speaker 1: but you have to keep that in mind. It's not 947 00:45:00,840 --> 00:45:03,279 Speaker 1: like he has this like flawless production profile. And so 948 00:45:03,360 --> 00:45:06,720 Speaker 1: if he is Latavia's Murray, that's not a bad, bad, 949 00:45:06,960 --> 00:45:09,759 Speaker 1: like late second rookie pick. I mean, Latavius Murray had 950 00:45:09,800 --> 00:45:11,120 Speaker 1: his moments in the NFL. 951 00:45:13,280 --> 00:45:17,920 Speaker 3: Yeah, somewhat as a Titans fan, I saw that one 952 00:45:17,920 --> 00:45:21,799 Speaker 3: of those moments towards the end of his career. Yeah, 953 00:45:21,840 --> 00:45:24,040 Speaker 3: all right, let's get on to the the next one. 954 00:45:24,120 --> 00:45:26,400 Speaker 4: Made me a little bit sad as a Kendre Miller truther. 955 00:45:27,480 --> 00:45:28,680 Speaker 2: Are you Kendry Miller Truther? 956 00:45:29,080 --> 00:45:33,319 Speaker 4: Yeah, I had a lot of them last year, even I've. 957 00:45:33,239 --> 00:45:34,319 Speaker 2: Never been a big Kendrey Miller. 958 00:45:34,400 --> 00:45:35,880 Speaker 4: Yeah, I'm sorry. 959 00:45:36,040 --> 00:45:38,600 Speaker 2: I think that he was fine last year. 960 00:45:39,360 --> 00:45:41,240 Speaker 1: The one thing that kept me going with Kendrey Miller 961 00:45:41,320 --> 00:45:43,759 Speaker 1: was that he was very young entering the league, like 962 00:45:43,760 --> 00:45:46,319 Speaker 1: a very young prospect. And that's a key difference between 963 00:45:46,360 --> 00:45:48,520 Speaker 1: k Tron Allen and Kendrey Miller, because Kateron Allen is 964 00:45:48,560 --> 00:45:51,839 Speaker 1: not a young prospect and so but aside from that, 965 00:45:52,280 --> 00:45:55,280 Speaker 1: you know, Kendrey Miller didn't show receiving chops in college 966 00:45:55,280 --> 00:45:58,080 Speaker 1: seven point two percent best season reception share and his 967 00:45:58,200 --> 00:46:00,880 Speaker 1: adjusted yards per team pass attempt was point five to one, 968 00:46:01,320 --> 00:46:03,680 Speaker 1: very similar to Kateron Allen. But they're both five eleven 969 00:46:04,040 --> 00:46:08,560 Speaker 1: two sixteen, two fifteen similarly like mediocre receiving profiles. But 970 00:46:08,600 --> 00:46:11,040 Speaker 1: then their adjusted yards for team play is actually not 971 00:46:11,160 --> 00:46:13,920 Speaker 1: that bad, and it's not that bad because they were 972 00:46:13,960 --> 00:46:14,560 Speaker 1: good on the ground. 973 00:46:14,640 --> 00:46:16,279 Speaker 2: K Tron Allen was really good on the ground. 974 00:46:16,320 --> 00:46:19,040 Speaker 1: I mean, he was the leading Penn State rusher of 975 00:46:19,080 --> 00:46:21,600 Speaker 1: all time by the end that by the end of 976 00:46:21,640 --> 00:46:24,680 Speaker 1: his collegiate career. Now obviously like longevity and just playing 977 00:46:24,719 --> 00:46:26,879 Speaker 1: there a lot and for a while, like we'll play 978 00:46:26,880 --> 00:46:29,399 Speaker 1: into that. But he's good on the ground, not much 979 00:46:29,440 --> 00:46:32,080 Speaker 1: of a pass catcher. That's what we got from Kendre Miller, 980 00:46:32,640 --> 00:46:34,239 Speaker 1: and that's what I think we're gonna see with with 981 00:46:34,320 --> 00:46:35,600 Speaker 1: k Tron Allen in the NFL. 982 00:46:37,239 --> 00:46:39,759 Speaker 3: Okay, the the next one is a a little bit 983 00:46:39,760 --> 00:46:42,640 Speaker 3: of smaller running back. You get Desmond Reid with the 984 00:46:42,920 --> 00:46:44,279 Speaker 3: Tree Cohen comparison. 985 00:46:44,560 --> 00:46:46,160 Speaker 2: Yeah, I gotta throw my pit guy in there. 986 00:46:46,160 --> 00:46:47,960 Speaker 1: You know, there's no wide receivers from Pitt that are 987 00:46:48,000 --> 00:46:49,960 Speaker 1: that went to the combine that I that I wrote up. 988 00:46:49,960 --> 00:46:52,680 Speaker 1: But but des Reid Man, he's a fun player. And 989 00:46:52,680 --> 00:46:54,759 Speaker 1: that's that's how we described the small guys, right, the 990 00:46:54,800 --> 00:46:56,600 Speaker 1: small their their. 991 00:46:56,520 --> 00:46:57,720 Speaker 4: Gagedy or fun. 992 00:46:57,920 --> 00:46:58,640 Speaker 2: Yeah. 993 00:46:58,719 --> 00:47:02,200 Speaker 1: Yeah, I always there's always some fun running back in 994 00:47:02,239 --> 00:47:04,840 Speaker 1: every class that I latch onto. This one would be 995 00:47:04,920 --> 00:47:08,520 Speaker 1: des Reed, who actually has like an incredible production profile 996 00:47:08,560 --> 00:47:11,200 Speaker 1: from like a receiving standpoint. Now, again, if you go 997 00:47:11,239 --> 00:47:13,440 Speaker 1: back to what I said about Joonah Coleman, you get 998 00:47:13,800 --> 00:47:17,160 Speaker 1: a weird body type that you don't see very frequently. 999 00:47:17,200 --> 00:47:20,359 Speaker 1: So it's you're you're limiting the amount of possible comps, right, 1000 00:47:20,719 --> 00:47:23,280 Speaker 1: But with Tarik Cohen they're both five six. 1001 00:47:23,320 --> 00:47:24,640 Speaker 2: Cohen was five pounds heavier. 1002 00:47:25,360 --> 00:47:29,120 Speaker 1: Reception share was twenty point four percent for Reed nineteen 1003 00:47:29,160 --> 00:47:34,120 Speaker 1: point four percent for Cohen. Cohen had worse adjusted yards 1004 00:47:34,120 --> 00:47:36,680 Speaker 1: per team pass attempts and adjusted total yards per team 1005 00:47:36,680 --> 00:47:39,080 Speaker 1: play numbers because he played it a worse program, a 1006 00:47:39,120 --> 00:47:42,520 Speaker 1: smaller program. I should say worse, just because then Pitt 1007 00:47:42,560 --> 00:47:45,960 Speaker 1: can actually look good for ones. But you know, des 1008 00:47:46,040 --> 00:47:48,680 Speaker 1: Reed had better marks across the board in the model 1009 00:47:49,040 --> 00:47:51,880 Speaker 1: than Tarik Cohen did. I think that this could easily 1010 00:47:51,920 --> 00:47:54,120 Speaker 1: be more of like a Douce Bond situation that we 1011 00:47:54,160 --> 00:47:58,840 Speaker 1: saw recently, where ultra productive in college, but it just 1012 00:47:58,840 --> 00:48:00,880 Speaker 1: doesn't translate to the NFL as the size. You know, 1013 00:48:00,880 --> 00:48:02,840 Speaker 1: he's one hundred and seventy four pounds and a player 1014 00:48:02,920 --> 00:48:05,439 Speaker 1: like this. I think that like a Tarik Cohen type 1015 00:48:05,480 --> 00:48:08,880 Speaker 1: worked a lot better when running back target chairs were 1016 00:48:08,960 --> 00:48:12,520 Speaker 1: higher in like that twenty sixteen twenty seventeen ish range, 1017 00:48:12,560 --> 00:48:14,920 Speaker 1: like when teams were really peppering the running back out 1018 00:48:14,920 --> 00:48:18,080 Speaker 1: of the backfield, whereas now that doesn't happen as frequently. 1019 00:48:18,080 --> 00:48:19,919 Speaker 1: We're going after tight ends a lot more and such 1020 00:48:20,040 --> 00:48:21,440 Speaker 1: with with this heavier personnel. 1021 00:48:21,840 --> 00:48:24,160 Speaker 2: It doesn't work as well with these smaller backs. 1022 00:48:24,160 --> 00:48:26,480 Speaker 1: So I do think Reid is going to be more landing, 1023 00:48:26,480 --> 00:48:30,239 Speaker 1: spot dependent, creative, offensive, mind dependent. He's not going to 1024 00:48:30,280 --> 00:48:31,960 Speaker 1: be a high volume player. But I do think the 1025 00:48:31,960 --> 00:48:35,080 Speaker 1: comp makes sense. From Reed to tari Con. 1026 00:48:36,320 --> 00:48:39,760 Speaker 3: Okay, let's get to a you mentioned a fun player. 1027 00:48:39,840 --> 00:48:44,520 Speaker 3: Let's get to a really fun player, the most fun player. 1028 00:48:44,760 --> 00:48:46,359 Speaker 4: Some might say Jeremiah Love. 1029 00:48:47,120 --> 00:48:48,319 Speaker 2: Yeah, so Jeremiah Love. 1030 00:48:48,360 --> 00:48:50,760 Speaker 1: I have Vijon Robinson, who I think is the closer 1031 00:48:50,800 --> 00:48:55,360 Speaker 1: comp or closest within the database to Love. Robinson was 1032 00:48:55,360 --> 00:48:58,000 Speaker 1: an inch shorter, three pounds heavier, so he had a 1033 00:48:58,040 --> 00:49:00,520 Speaker 1: little bit more bulk, a little bit better share, a 1034 00:49:00,560 --> 00:49:02,919 Speaker 1: little bit better adjusted yards per team play, a little 1035 00:49:02,920 --> 00:49:05,640 Speaker 1: bit better adjusted yards per team pass attempt. But they 1036 00:49:05,640 --> 00:49:08,160 Speaker 1: were all in the vicinity of one another like that. 1037 00:49:08,360 --> 00:49:10,440 Speaker 1: This is exactly why B Jhon Robinson. I've said this 1038 00:49:10,480 --> 00:49:13,000 Speaker 1: on shows before. I don't think Jeremiah Love is as 1039 00:49:13,000 --> 00:49:15,040 Speaker 1: good of a prospect as like a Bjon Robinson and 1040 00:49:15,120 --> 00:49:18,120 Speaker 1: Jamior Gibbs and Ashton Genty. I just don't think he's 1041 00:49:18,160 --> 00:49:21,120 Speaker 1: there analytically. Now, there are some reasons for it. But 1042 00:49:21,160 --> 00:49:23,360 Speaker 1: you could make the same argument to a degree with 1043 00:49:23,440 --> 00:49:26,319 Speaker 1: b Jhon Robinson and the competition that he played, with 1044 00:49:26,560 --> 00:49:30,560 Speaker 1: the reasons being Jeneian Price for Jeremiah Love. Now, Price 1045 00:49:30,840 --> 00:49:34,680 Speaker 1: is the better prospect from a draft capital standpoint, we're assuming. 1046 00:49:34,680 --> 00:49:35,800 Speaker 2: Than Roshan Johnson. 1047 00:49:36,680 --> 00:49:38,759 Speaker 1: But that's another reason why this comp makes sense, right, 1048 00:49:38,760 --> 00:49:42,120 Speaker 1: because they were playing with an NFL caliber running. 1049 00:49:41,760 --> 00:49:44,320 Speaker 2: Back in their backfield in college. 1050 00:49:44,360 --> 00:49:48,600 Speaker 1: So look, I think that you're splitting hairs and you're 1051 00:49:48,640 --> 00:49:50,399 Speaker 1: making an argument that doesn't need to be made because 1052 00:49:50,400 --> 00:49:54,080 Speaker 1: it's irrelevant by saying you know is Jeremiah By asking 1053 00:49:54,160 --> 00:49:58,160 Speaker 1: is Jeremiah Love better than Bjhon Robinson, Jamier Gibbs, Ashton Genty, 1054 00:49:58,239 --> 00:50:00,319 Speaker 1: these guys that have come out in recent years, my 1055 00:50:00,400 --> 00:50:03,200 Speaker 1: answer to that is no, definitively. I don't think analytically 1056 00:50:03,200 --> 00:50:06,400 Speaker 1: he has as good of a profile, but he's still 1057 00:50:06,560 --> 00:50:08,560 Speaker 1: an elite player. I wrote all about this in the 1058 00:50:08,560 --> 00:50:12,360 Speaker 1: Prospect Guide because his draft capital just keeps rising. He's 1059 00:50:12,400 --> 00:50:15,200 Speaker 1: in the legendary performer category and he's going to be 1060 00:50:15,280 --> 00:50:19,240 Speaker 1: more than likely a legendary performer post draft. And players 1061 00:50:19,239 --> 00:50:21,440 Speaker 1: in that bucket we don't see them very often at 1062 00:50:21,520 --> 00:50:25,720 Speaker 1: running back, but they give us really really good fantasy production, 1063 00:50:26,000 --> 00:50:28,640 Speaker 1: like even Ashton Gent who also lands in that bucket. 1064 00:50:28,920 --> 00:50:30,960 Speaker 1: You can say what you want about him disappointing last year, 1065 00:50:30,960 --> 00:50:33,799 Speaker 1: I wouldn't disagree. He was still fantasy relevant, Like he 1066 00:50:33,880 --> 00:50:35,840 Speaker 1: was still like he still had like what fourteen and 1067 00:50:35,880 --> 00:50:38,360 Speaker 1: a half PPR points per game, and things are trending 1068 00:50:38,360 --> 00:50:40,359 Speaker 1: in the right direction I think for him. From a 1069 00:50:40,440 --> 00:50:43,880 Speaker 1: coaching standpoint, in a situation standpoint, you know, I do 1070 00:50:43,920 --> 00:50:46,719 Speaker 1: think that anytime a player like Love is projected to 1071 00:50:46,760 --> 00:50:49,120 Speaker 1: go high in the draft, you're thinking, oh, he's going 1072 00:50:49,200 --> 00:50:52,160 Speaker 1: to go to a bad team, and so there are 1073 00:50:52,200 --> 00:50:53,840 Speaker 1: some spots that are probably better than others. 1074 00:50:53,880 --> 00:50:56,200 Speaker 2: But in the end, guys, if. 1075 00:50:56,080 --> 00:50:58,520 Speaker 1: You're a top sixteen running back, and I talked about 1076 00:50:58,520 --> 00:51:00,879 Speaker 1: this on the Draft Capital episode last week, if you're 1077 00:51:00,880 --> 00:51:03,239 Speaker 1: a tier I guess yeah last week. But if you're 1078 00:51:03,239 --> 00:51:06,200 Speaker 1: a top sixteen running back by Draft Capital, the odds 1079 00:51:06,200 --> 00:51:09,080 Speaker 1: of you just flaming out are so so slim in 1080 00:51:09,160 --> 00:51:11,520 Speaker 1: fantasy that you just gotta you gotta go for it, 1081 00:51:11,520 --> 00:51:12,719 Speaker 1: like Jeremiah Love should. 1082 00:51:12,520 --> 00:51:13,760 Speaker 2: Be a stud in fantasy football. 1083 00:51:14,320 --> 00:51:17,200 Speaker 3: Yeah, And this is what I was saying for the Titans, 1084 00:51:17,400 --> 00:51:21,000 Speaker 3: especially compared to the other running backs. Having a Bijon 1085 00:51:21,200 --> 00:51:24,960 Speaker 3: esque player on the Titans would at least be fun 1086 00:51:25,320 --> 00:51:26,080 Speaker 3: for the other thing. 1087 00:51:25,960 --> 00:51:27,839 Speaker 1: Is is that I think I think the one thing 1088 00:51:27,840 --> 00:51:29,719 Speaker 1: that we have to I agree, like if you just 1089 00:51:29,840 --> 00:51:33,799 Speaker 1: had Bjon Robinson Shore. I've said this for years on 1090 00:51:34,000 --> 00:51:35,840 Speaker 1: in like the discord and stuff, like, I think Bjon 1091 00:51:35,920 --> 00:51:38,040 Speaker 1: Robinson is one of the greatest running backs I've ever 1092 00:51:38,080 --> 00:51:42,000 Speaker 1: watched period, Like I think he is. His contact balance 1093 00:51:42,080 --> 00:51:46,000 Speaker 1: is unreal, like I've never seen anything like that, and 1094 00:51:46,040 --> 00:51:50,000 Speaker 1: he's a great receiver, and I you know, he's hit 1095 00:51:50,840 --> 00:51:54,480 Speaker 1: a high end outcome even for where he was drafted, 1096 00:51:54,520 --> 00:51:55,880 Speaker 1: which was very high, you know. 1097 00:51:56,239 --> 00:51:58,120 Speaker 2: And so I do think that like. 1098 00:51:58,120 --> 00:52:01,120 Speaker 1: The idea of that is definitely and it's definitely safer 1099 00:52:01,160 --> 00:52:04,040 Speaker 1: to get a guy like Jeremiah Love than some other 1100 00:52:04,480 --> 00:52:05,640 Speaker 1: players you might go after. 1101 00:52:05,760 --> 00:52:08,560 Speaker 2: I'm not going to say the expected value is greater, but. 1102 00:52:08,560 --> 00:52:13,160 Speaker 1: It's safer from a player projection standpoint to just get 1103 00:52:13,239 --> 00:52:14,840 Speaker 1: Jeremiah Love. And if you want to put butts in 1104 00:52:14,840 --> 00:52:16,600 Speaker 1: the seats, that's definitely a way to. 1105 00:52:16,560 --> 00:52:17,120 Speaker 2: Go as well. 1106 00:52:17,160 --> 00:52:19,680 Speaker 1: But yeah, I mean, like like Love is a very 1107 00:52:19,760 --> 00:52:21,839 Speaker 1: very good prospect. I think that's the takeaway that people 1108 00:52:21,840 --> 00:52:22,480 Speaker 1: should have here. 1109 00:52:24,040 --> 00:52:32,160 Speaker 3: Yeah, again especially in comparison and supposedly going to be 1110 00:52:32,239 --> 00:52:35,200 Speaker 3: like a top five pick. I think he's actually favored 1111 00:52:35,239 --> 00:52:39,439 Speaker 3: now on DraftKings to be the number four overall pick, 1112 00:52:39,560 --> 00:52:42,520 Speaker 3: like that's his Yeah, like he's actually a favorite to go, 1113 00:52:42,800 --> 00:52:43,680 Speaker 3: which which. 1114 00:52:43,719 --> 00:52:47,200 Speaker 1: That's you know, that's where we had like Leonard Fournette 1115 00:52:47,200 --> 00:52:49,520 Speaker 1: as probably I mean obviously Trent Richardson, but like Leonard 1116 00:52:49,520 --> 00:52:53,160 Speaker 1: Fournette as the weaker one of the last like five 1117 00:52:53,280 --> 00:52:56,000 Speaker 1: to seven years or ten years, you know, in terms 1118 00:52:56,000 --> 00:52:58,279 Speaker 1: of like fantasy production and stuff, which is still not 1119 00:52:58,360 --> 00:53:03,000 Speaker 1: a terrible outcome. He still was fairly good fantasy asset, 1120 00:53:03,160 --> 00:53:04,320 Speaker 1: really good fantasy asset. 1121 00:53:04,880 --> 00:53:10,400 Speaker 4: Yeah. 1122 00:53:10,800 --> 00:53:14,600 Speaker 3: All right, let's wrap up this show again. Make sure 1123 00:53:14,719 --> 00:53:22,640 Speaker 3: to subscribe, like comment, especially on YouTube, and just want 1124 00:53:22,640 --> 00:53:27,800 Speaker 3: to highlight a few comments. Bes perfect, Good morning, guys. 1125 00:53:28,040 --> 00:53:30,400 Speaker 3: Cool seeing you guys on the NFL Network ticker. 1126 00:53:30,800 --> 00:53:31,680 Speaker 2: It is always cool. 1127 00:53:32,040 --> 00:53:35,320 Speaker 1: Yeah, That's That's something that doesn't get old is when people, 1128 00:53:36,200 --> 00:53:37,000 Speaker 1: you know, point that out. 1129 00:53:37,080 --> 00:53:37,479 Speaker 2: It's fun. 1130 00:53:38,320 --> 00:53:41,160 Speaker 3: Our buddy Tyler says, shout out to the best prospect 1131 00:53:41,160 --> 00:53:41,839 Speaker 3: guy every year. 1132 00:53:41,760 --> 00:53:43,840 Speaker 4: At the industry bar. None Styler. 1133 00:53:44,640 --> 00:53:47,680 Speaker 3: Tyler said that not us, and then Petrip we were 1134 00:53:47,680 --> 00:53:49,520 Speaker 3: talking about Corey Davis and he said Corey Davis would 1135 00:53:49,520 --> 00:53:51,520 Speaker 3: have got me fired as a GM. 1136 00:53:51,840 --> 00:53:54,560 Speaker 1: But I think that this is another like again, smaller 1137 00:53:54,560 --> 00:53:57,879 Speaker 1: school guy where the adjustments and stuff and I'm trying 1138 00:53:57,880 --> 00:54:00,480 Speaker 1: to make in the in the Zap model. It still 1139 00:54:00,520 --> 00:54:04,080 Speaker 1: really likes Corey Davis. Don't getting wrong. Uh, But like 1140 00:54:04,320 --> 00:54:06,719 Speaker 1: you know, I think we should be weary always after 1141 00:54:06,760 --> 00:54:08,560 Speaker 1: I said that stuff about Ted Hurst. But still we 1142 00:54:08,560 --> 00:54:11,239 Speaker 1: should be weary if a guy is coming from a 1143 00:54:11,320 --> 00:54:12,240 Speaker 1: smaller program. 1144 00:54:12,880 --> 00:54:13,200 Speaker 4: Yeah. 1145 00:54:14,160 --> 00:54:16,600 Speaker 3: Uh, And then we were talking about prospects. He might 1146 00:54:16,640 --> 00:54:19,959 Speaker 3: be a small guy, but he has a big heart. 1147 00:54:19,960 --> 00:54:20,080 Speaker 4: Time. 1148 00:54:20,160 --> 00:54:20,759 Speaker 2: I'll tell you what. 1149 00:54:21,239 --> 00:54:25,080 Speaker 1: When when college football came back last year for for 1150 00:54:25,480 --> 00:54:28,520 Speaker 1: you know the game, yeah, I played his pitt. Actually 1151 00:54:28,600 --> 00:54:32,040 Speaker 1: I started out as as the Bowling Green head coach. Okay, 1152 00:54:32,440 --> 00:54:35,920 Speaker 1: I had no idea who Harold Fannon was at that time. 1153 00:54:36,160 --> 00:54:37,920 Speaker 4: And you know who the Bowling Green head coach is? 1154 00:54:39,200 --> 00:54:40,920 Speaker 4: What Eddie George? 1155 00:54:41,640 --> 00:54:44,520 Speaker 1: Yeah but not he wasn't two years ago though, Okay, gotcha, 1156 00:54:44,600 --> 00:54:48,920 Speaker 1: I don't think so TSU's two years ago. But but 1157 00:54:49,080 --> 00:54:52,200 Speaker 1: so so I was Bowling Green's head coach and I'm like, man, 1158 00:54:52,600 --> 00:54:54,799 Speaker 1: this tight end is like out of control, Like he's 1159 00:54:54,840 --> 00:54:57,000 Speaker 1: so good and it was Harold Fannon little that I know. 1160 00:54:57,040 --> 00:54:58,600 Speaker 2: I went, I'm I know his mom now. 1161 00:55:00,520 --> 00:55:03,480 Speaker 1: But then I transferred to Pitt because they offered me, 1162 00:55:03,520 --> 00:55:05,000 Speaker 1: and I'm not gonna say no to a job of 1163 00:55:05,040 --> 00:55:07,279 Speaker 1: my alma monor, you know. And so I went to 1164 00:55:07,400 --> 00:55:09,880 Speaker 1: Pitt and des Reid won the Heisman because he was 1165 00:55:09,920 --> 00:55:11,800 Speaker 1: just on those types of players. 1166 00:55:12,000 --> 00:55:14,000 Speaker 2: That type of player is so good in video games, 1167 00:55:14,440 --> 00:55:15,000 Speaker 2: so good. 1168 00:55:14,880 --> 00:55:17,680 Speaker 1: The shifty, you know, smaller running backs like they're so 1169 00:55:17,800 --> 00:55:20,000 Speaker 1: good in video games. And maybe that's where my bias 1170 00:55:20,040 --> 00:55:21,759 Speaker 1: comes in, where I always like fall in love with 1171 00:55:21,800 --> 00:55:24,759 Speaker 1: these random, like round four rookie pick type running backs 1172 00:55:24,800 --> 00:55:26,880 Speaker 1: that are smaller and have good receiving profiles. 1173 00:55:27,400 --> 00:55:28,600 Speaker 2: That's that's Des Reid. 1174 00:55:29,560 --> 00:55:29,759 Speaker 4: Yeah. 1175 00:55:29,800 --> 00:55:34,520 Speaker 3: There was a mptshue running back who had like his 1176 00:55:34,560 --> 00:55:39,640 Speaker 3: own Heisman campaign, Dwan Hicks. And this was like way 1177 00:55:39,760 --> 00:55:43,000 Speaker 3: back when, you know, I mean, I'm I'm NK status. 1178 00:55:42,680 --> 00:55:46,719 Speaker 4: Right now, but on n c A he was amazing. 1179 00:55:47,000 --> 00:55:50,759 Speaker 3: Yeah, and he did win the Heisman for me when 1180 00:55:50,760 --> 00:55:54,160 Speaker 3: I when I played as him all right again, Prospect 1181 00:55:54,239 --> 00:55:57,160 Speaker 3: guy lateround dot com our Patreon, you can join in 1182 00:55:57,200 --> 00:56:00,759 Speaker 3: all the chats, the discussions, and you know what I'm 1183 00:56:00,760 --> 00:56:04,160 Speaker 3: gonna do JJ for today for our Patreon members. I'm 1184 00:56:04,160 --> 00:56:08,600 Speaker 3: gonna create an NTAA bracket for us. Oh, we can 1185 00:56:08,680 --> 00:56:11,440 Speaker 3: have just so we can have some fun. It's all 1186 00:56:11,480 --> 00:56:15,040 Speaker 3: about the community there, so look out for that. 1187 00:56:16,280 --> 00:56:17,920 Speaker 4: Any final thoughts, JJ. 1188 00:56:18,320 --> 00:56:19,240 Speaker 2: No, I'm excited. 1189 00:56:19,320 --> 00:56:21,319 Speaker 1: You know next week, the next couple weeks, we'll be 1190 00:56:21,320 --> 00:56:23,279 Speaker 1: doing more comps. It's you know, this time of year, 1191 00:56:23,280 --> 00:56:25,680 Speaker 1: it's a little bit slower and trying to give all 1192 00:56:25,680 --> 00:56:27,560 Speaker 1: my analysis on the shows that I'm doing. I'll have 1193 00:56:27,600 --> 00:56:29,799 Speaker 1: a fun one early next week that I think you 1194 00:56:29,800 --> 00:56:33,239 Speaker 1: guys will enjoy. But for this particular show, we're just 1195 00:56:33,239 --> 00:56:35,480 Speaker 1: looking at comps and talking prospects, is really what it 1196 00:56:35,480 --> 00:56:35,960 Speaker 1: comes down to. 1197 00:56:36,800 --> 00:56:39,719 Speaker 3: And again make sure that you are subscribed to the 1198 00:56:39,800 --> 00:56:43,560 Speaker 3: Late Round newsletter. Have some bangers coming out in the 1199 00:56:43,600 --> 00:56:47,120 Speaker 3: middle of the week by our senior research analysts or 1200 00:56:47,160 --> 00:56:49,040 Speaker 3: senior analyst Brandon Cadula. 1201 00:56:49,520 --> 00:56:50,920 Speaker 4: So and that's free. 1202 00:56:51,280 --> 00:56:51,640 Speaker 2: It's free. 1203 00:56:52,200 --> 00:56:54,440 Speaker 3: I've never done as much free stuff as we have 1204 00:56:55,719 --> 00:56:57,560 Speaker 3: these days on Lateround dot com. 1205 00:56:57,600 --> 00:57:00,200 Speaker 4: So on behalf of JJ. I'm Dave bed. 1206 00:57:00,480 --> 00:57:03,000 Speaker 3: We'll see you next time here on the Late Round 1207 00:57:03,040 --> 00:57:03,960 Speaker 3: Fantasy Football show. 1208 00:57:04,040 --> 00:57:04,320 Speaker 4: Peace