WEBVTT - MVP Push, Championship Window Closing on SF, & Detective Wright

0:00:01.720 --> 0:00:04.480
<v Speaker 1>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable. Discover the

0:00:04.519 --> 0:00:07.880
<v Speaker 1>inspiring true story about Anthony Roebliss, who defined every expectation

0:00:07.960 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>to become a national wrestling champion, and Unstoppable, a new

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>original movie from Amazon MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg,

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>thrilling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:24.759
<v Speaker 1>including Jirel Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheatle, Michael Panya, and

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Bobby Canavali. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:46.040
<v Speaker 2>Welcome in. What's driving the great episode to eighty two?

0:00:46.960 --> 0:00:49.839
<v Speaker 2>And we got to get right into it today demands

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:52.559
<v Speaker 2>because we're not going to be able to go as

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 2>long as we typically do because I have had my

0:00:57.640 --> 0:01:03.200
<v Speaker 2>Tuesday Coward hit time adjusted today. I've been doing this

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 2>hit for eight years, same time, every Tuesday for eight years.

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:13.680
<v Speaker 2>One oh five Eastern. I get a text yesterday, Uh,

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 2>there's a little scheduling conflict. Nick, can you come on

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:20.480
<v Speaker 2>at twelve forty? And I'm like, well, yeah, of course,

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 2>do anything for Colin, that's no problem. But you know,

0:01:26.160 --> 0:01:31.320
<v Speaker 2>out of curiosity who is the guest that is super

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:35.560
<v Speaker 2>that you're moving me for that? It was you need

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:37.960
<v Speaker 2>like it's not, oh you can only you know, can

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 2>you come on at twelve forty because Nick Wright in

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 2>the best, you know, twenty minutes of sports TV in America.

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 2>You're herd hierarchy right into Nick and Colin together. We're

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 2>not gonna, you know, screw up that almost decade long synergy.

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 2>And the answer I got was Tom Brady, Like God,

0:01:56.440 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 2>I knew it. I mean, he's uh, I mean listen,

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean to be now. I mean I have been

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 2>with the company for eight and a half years, and

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Tommy for you know, I think two. But I suppose

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:14.639
<v Speaker 2>those seven Super Bowl rings carry quite a bit of weight.

0:02:15.280 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 2>And so I'll be home with Colin today at twelve

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 2>forty nine forty am Pacific while you're having your morning coffee,

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:26.240
<v Speaker 2>I suppose. So it's gonna be me and Colin, followed

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 2>by hurt hierarchy, followed by Colin and Tom Brady. I'm

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:32.799
<v Speaker 2>gonna go ahead and say it might be the best

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:36.520
<v Speaker 2>forty five minutes in sports television history right there. I

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:38.920
<v Speaker 2>mean I don't, I mean I can't. I can't guarantee it,

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:40.920
<v Speaker 2>but that might be coming. So because of that, we

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:44.359
<v Speaker 2>got a motor through today's show, which means in the

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 2>mist the cut department is the Monday night football game

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 2>last night, I work. You're gonna have to what you

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:52.960
<v Speaker 2>tune into the TV show to hear my bon Nick's opinions?

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 2>You know too long, didn't read version. I'm still not

0:02:56.639 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 2>a believer. Oh my god, did you guys? Did you

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 2>see the one play? Listen? The one play was a

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:05.400
<v Speaker 2>little lucky, pretty sweet. I give them credit for it,

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 2>but that game was more about Jamis giving you the

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 2>full Jameis Winston experience from start to finish and a crushing,

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:21.400
<v Speaker 2>absolutely crushing loss. If you had Cleveland plus six and

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 2>a half, you had no business not covering that game.

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:28.839
<v Speaker 2>If you had Cleveland plus six and a half, they

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 2>have the ball down to chance to go win it,

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 2>certainly cover. Jamis picks six because the Browns forget to

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 2>touch a guy down. But so now you're down nine.

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 2>But even then, down nine, getting six and a half

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 2>not a terrible spot to be in, because a field

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 2>goal covers for you, a touchdown covers for you, and

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 2>the other team's gonna be playing preven defense. They get

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:55.880
<v Speaker 2>all the way to the goal line with a minute

0:03:55.960 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 2>left like this is great, Gonna take a couple of

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 2>shots to the end and then if need be, just

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 2>kick this chip shot field goal. Nope, Jamis pick immediately

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 2>just I mean, just an unbelievable Jameis Winston experience.

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 3>What demanse I saw what he was trying to do there,

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 3>it was, it was was a good effort. No, it

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 3>picked off.

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean it was the all time last night's game,

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 2>the most yards by a quarterback in NFL history for

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 2>his own team's passing yard and interception return yards. No,

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 2>that's true, that's not a made up stet. Six hundred

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 2>and sixty five yards came off, completed, Jameis Winston passes

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 2>to his team and the other team six hundred and

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:49.840
<v Speaker 2>sixty five yards. Never seen an NFL game like it.

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 2>And so all that's going on. Also, the other missed

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 2>the cut. The college football rivalries I get you know,

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:58.680
<v Speaker 2>I'll give you a little mini takes on all these things. Whatever, Uh,

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:03.160
<v Speaker 2>don't lose whose home rivalry games? And you don't have

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 2>to worry about a flag and he planted pretty easy,

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 2>And part of coaching college of football needs to be

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:11.840
<v Speaker 2>for rivalry games, they're in your stadium. You let your

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 2>players know. Guys, if you needed any extra motivation, know this.

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 2>If we lose today, we're gonna have to watch them

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 2>play in a flag in our in our mid at,

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, at our fifty yard line. So coaches need

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 2>to have their teams, you know, prepared. And also, by

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 2>the way I understand Ohio State Michigan got a little tough.

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:38.480
<v Speaker 2>Let's also stadium cops try to, you know, have our

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:41.280
<v Speaker 2>hand off the pepper spray a little bit longer if

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 2>we could. Didn't love that piece of it. And last,

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 2>but not least, a ziz All Shai ear So, I

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 2>was so aziz All Shair. I don't think he's a

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 2>bad person, but is a dirty player. It's just the

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 2>way he plays. He punched a guy, he choked Tom Brady,

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 2>he took out Caleb, he took out Tony Pollard. He

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 2>just took out Trevor. He didn't give a veryry, heartfelt apology,

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:03.120
<v Speaker 2>which seems sincere. And I'm most like, okay, but you're

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 2>not gonna stop like you know what I mean? You

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 2>have a taste for blood and can't I get that.

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't get that but yeah, he choked Tom Brady,

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:15.839
<v Speaker 2>grabbed by the grabbing by the wind pipe. But I

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 2>was nervous because I was like, oh, he's definitely getting suspended.

0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:26.479
<v Speaker 2>And I was like, please, NFL either suspend him for

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 2>one game or three games, not two games, because three

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:36.719
<v Speaker 2>games from now, the Texans play the Chiefs and I

0:06:36.720 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 2>don't need Aziz al Shair having been sidelined for two weeks,

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:43.359
<v Speaker 2>you know what I mean, dying to get back on

0:06:43.400 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 2>the field only to see Mahomes' ACL sitting out there.

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:50.839
<v Speaker 2>So the NFL announced today they did suspend him four

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:53.600
<v Speaker 2>three games, So he's not gonna be available for the

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:56.599
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs game, thank god. All Right, so there's the news.

0:06:56.880 --> 0:06:59.720
<v Speaker 2>Let's get to the bigger topics of the day. Go ahead,

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 2>all right.

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 3>So everybody's saying that Josh Allen should be the front

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 3>runter for MVP after two back to back statement wins.

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 3>You say that there's a chance that the Bills, I

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 3>mean that the voters might snub him this year. Why

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:16.239
<v Speaker 3>is that when this is his best case?

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, so it's what I think. Is this? I think

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 2>right now, Saquan's the MVP of the league, and I

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 2>have been as we will get into later a legitimate

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 2>Bills supporter in the national media, when other folks believed

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 2>in the Jets and Aaron Rodgers, some believed in the Dolphins,

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 2>I believed correctly that if you have a superhero quarterback,

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 2>if you give them a legitimate defensive line to generate

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 2>a pass rush, an offensive line to protect him, that's

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 2>the way you need to build out the team. Everything

0:07:57.440 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 2>else is optional. If you have the those two things,

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 2>your team's gonna be excellent. That's what the Bills did,

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 2>and the team is excellent, and Josh has been great.

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 2>He's been great, He's cut down on the turnovers, he

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:14.160
<v Speaker 2>still makes the big plays. I think that this is

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 2>the best Bills team he's ever been on, and he

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 2>is a very deserving MVP candidate. The reason that right

0:08:24.920 --> 0:08:30.119
<v Speaker 2>now I feel strongly it should be Saquon is if

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 2>Josh wins it this year over Saquon, then we are

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 2>officially saying, again, if it were to end right now,

0:08:39.000 --> 0:08:41.800
<v Speaker 2>there's another five weeks, but based you know, if the

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 2>we're season ended today, we're officially saying running backs can't

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:50.960
<v Speaker 2>win it. And that would bum me out because Josh

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:58.559
<v Speaker 2>Allen's numbers are good, but not unreal. The two quarterbacks

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 2>whose numbers are unreal are Burrow and Lamar. Burrow and

0:09:04.120 --> 0:09:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Lamar has one of the highest passer ratings ever. He

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:10.560
<v Speaker 2>has twenty nine touchdowns three picks. Burrow leads the league

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:13.679
<v Speaker 2>in passing yards, is thirty touchdowns five picks. Both have

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 2>They have a one thirteen to one oh seven rating

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:21.840
<v Speaker 2>Josh right now this moment is fourteenth in the league

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 2>in passing yards, is sixth in the league in touchdowns,

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:34.440
<v Speaker 2>is tenth in the league in rating. Those are good numbers,

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:40.200
<v Speaker 2>but they're not the best numbers of his career. That

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:42.960
<v Speaker 2>would have been twenty twenty, and they're not the best

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:47.079
<v Speaker 2>numbers any quarterbacks had this year. Saquan, on the other hand,

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 2>is on pace to break the single season rushing record.

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 2>And so if Saquan doesn't win it this year and

0:09:56.600 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 2>the quarterbacks that's just having a good but not historically

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 2>great season does win it, then in three years, you

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 2>know what people will say when a running back's having

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:09.840
<v Speaker 2>an unbelievable year and the MVP discussion comes up, Well,

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 2>how are we gonna give it to him? When we

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 2>didn't give it to Saquon when the team went fourteen

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 2>and three and he ran for two thousand yards. So

0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 2>it's not about diminishing what Josh is doing. It's just

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 2>that I think Saquon is having an all time season

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 2>at his position. Now here's the other thing about the

0:10:31.320 --> 0:10:35.720
<v Speaker 2>MVP debate, and this is where some of the folks

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 2>most more often than not, in the analytics community get

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:46.200
<v Speaker 2>a little aggravating to me when somebody sent a tweet

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 2>yesterday since it was like, if you want to, you know,

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:55.720
<v Speaker 2>disregard the v the valuable in MVP entirely, so be it.

0:10:56.040 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 2>But if you actually think that a running back can

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:02.240
<v Speaker 2>add more value to a team than a star quarterback,

0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:06.840
<v Speaker 2>then you're just a fool or you donors in football, guys,

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 2>everyone understands that quarterbacks the most valuable position in football.

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:17.440
<v Speaker 2>Everybody gets it. And if because of that you truly

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 2>believe they are the only people definitionally eligible for MVP,

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:28.000
<v Speaker 2>then so be it. But then actually put that in

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 2>the award. Then just put in the award. This is

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 2>a quarterback only award. I look at MVP as an

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 2>amalgamation of value excellence team success sprinkled on top of it,

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 2>because if team success wasn't a piece of it, Joe

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 2>Burrow and Lamar would be the two leading contenders. Lamar's

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 2>kind of out right now because his team has five losses,

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 2>and that's not how we've done the MVP, you know,

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:05.960
<v Speaker 2>the last twenty years. Burrows definitively out because his team

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 2>has eight losses, and so of course, like I understand

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:16.560
<v Speaker 2>that this year, let me find a good example of

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 2>it that Kyler Murray has been more valuable to the

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 2>Cardinals than Saquon's been to the Eagles, because without Kyler

0:12:31.600 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 2>they are totally unequivocally cooked, and without Saquon the Eagles

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 2>might still be okay, because it's you can so much

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 2>more easily replace a running back than a quarterback. But

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't look at the award purely like that, and

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't want it to be a quarterback on the award.

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:50.600
<v Speaker 2>So I just I don't.

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 3>Think i'm getting I'm getting some notes that it's kind

0:12:53.040 --> 0:12:55.200
<v Speaker 3>of been like that in the past, like Derrick Henry

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:58.840
<v Speaker 3>had two thousand yards a few seasons or in a

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 3>season he didn't get a single vote.

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:06.240
<v Speaker 2>So that is true, but let's also look at what

0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:10.680
<v Speaker 2>the context when that happened. So when Derrick Henry had

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 2>two thousand, had two thousand yards. I just want to

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 2>pull the Titans that year were eleven and five, which

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 2>was good, and the MVP voting that season, I'm pulling

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:28.320
<v Speaker 2>it up right now twenty So this was twenty twenty,

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:34.679
<v Speaker 2>so that would have been Rogers' third MVP and Rogers

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 2>that season had forty eight touchdowns, five interceptions, and forty

0:13:41.840 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 2>three hundred passing yards. So that year, for whatever it's worth,

0:13:47.000 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 2>Mahomes had thirty eight touchdown six picks. Rogers had forty

0:13:51.600 --> 0:13:55.600
<v Speaker 2>eight touchdowns, five picks. I think his team went thirteen

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:59.840
<v Speaker 2>and three, ain't, Yeah, they did, and he had the

0:14:00.480 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 2>he had a one twenty two passer rating. So that

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 2>that was a year when a quarterback had an unbelievable

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 2>team success and a historically great statistical season. Rogers numbers

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 2>that year were seventy one percent, forty eight touchdowns, five picks,

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 2>one twenty one rating. That's not what we're talking about

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 2>with Josh right now. Yeah, So like when Adrian Peterson

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 2>ran for two thousand yards, he did win league MVP.

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 2>Now when Chris Johnson did, he did not. But we

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 2>are not just talking about two thousand yards. We're talking

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 2>about whether or not he is going to break Eric

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 2>Dickerson's all time record, and so all of that kind

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 2>of plays into this to me at least, and again

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:55.240
<v Speaker 2>like Josh having a good year. But it would be

0:14:56.800 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 2>to me the Aaron Rodgers comp versus Derrick Henry would

0:15:02.720 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 2>be more apt if the Eagles were a good but

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:14.800
<v Speaker 2>not great team like the Titans, and if Lamar Lamar's

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 2>team was ten and two and you were like, this

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:22.320
<v Speaker 2>quarterback was having this unbelievable historical season and it was,

0:15:22.400 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 2>for record wise, the best team in his conference. So

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 2>that would be that. Speaking of the Bills, though, Demonte,

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 2>there's one other piece of this which is such a

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 2>happy accident of this season. Go ahead.

0:15:35.880 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so, usually you know, Bills fans hate here or whatever,

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 3>you're on the wrong side of things. But they posted

0:15:41.680 --> 0:15:44.120
<v Speaker 3>a video on social media and it kind of painted

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 3>you out to be the good guy. Seems like they

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 3>might have lost the plot here a little bit.

0:15:49.160 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So here's the unbelievable piece of this video. It's

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:55.960
<v Speaker 2>ninety seconds long. We can't play it because there's highlights

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 2>in it, but it's just a cavalcade of people being

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 2>wrong about the Bills. And then me and Shannon Sharp

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 2>being right. And then, by the way, I don't know

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 2>if we can put that graphic back up, but my

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:17.720
<v Speaker 2>AFC's predictions, I might go one through four exact Bills, Dolphins, Jets, Patriots,

0:16:18.120 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 2>with everyone but the Bills missing the playoffs. That might

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:25.920
<v Speaker 2>end up being perfect across the board. The only real

0:16:26.000 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 2>concern there is are the Patriots gonna catch the Jets,

0:16:30.160 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 2>which is possible. They're both three win teams right now.

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 2>Here was what I found remarkable about that video the

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 2>Bills posted. They included in it me saying I've been

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:51.120
<v Speaker 2>the only person in the media right about the Bills

0:16:51.160 --> 0:16:55.239
<v Speaker 2>the last four years, and now I'm going to continue

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 2>being the only person right about the Bills. That was

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 2>a wild choice, because the way I have been correct

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 2>about the Bills previously is by essentially calling them choking

0:17:08.760 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 2>fake contenders like that's and Bill's social media teams like, hey,

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:17.760
<v Speaker 2>gotta give him credit where it's due. He's call us

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 2>exactly right. Uh, but this year is different. I couldn't

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 2>believe that was in there. Uh, And so yeah, that

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:32.240
<v Speaker 2>was listen, it is part of there is a world

0:17:32.359 --> 0:17:37.680
<v Speaker 2>that exists where somehow the chiefs don't make the Super Bowl,

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:43.199
<v Speaker 2>and the Super Bowl is the Eagles, who I have

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:47.879
<v Speaker 2>been a constant doubter of, and the Bills, who I

0:17:48.000 --> 0:17:52.120
<v Speaker 2>was probably their most famous detractor. It's an Eagles Bill's

0:17:52.200 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 2>Super Bowl, and you see me on TV taking I

0:17:56.440 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 2>told you so, victory laps because, as you guys know,

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:03.480
<v Speaker 2>the Eagles are my new NFC team, and as you

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:06.159
<v Speaker 2>all know, I've believed in the Bills this year. So

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:08.359
<v Speaker 2>what are you gonna do about that? Speaking of the Eagles,

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 2>let's move on.

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, So the Eagles, who are your new NFC

0:18:13.320 --> 0:18:16.960
<v Speaker 3>Super Bowl picks? They beat my Ravens on Sunday. What

0:18:17.160 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 3>is the case for the Eagles over the Lions as

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 3>the best team in the NFC right now?

0:18:23.720 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 2>So multi layered, The first case would be I am

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:35.680
<v Speaker 2>legitimately worried about the Lions' injuries. Listen, every team can't

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:39.199
<v Speaker 2>sustain injuries the way the Chiefs have been able to.

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:44.480
<v Speaker 2>The Chiefs lose their top two wide receivers, their top

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 2>running back all in the first couple weeks of the season.

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 2>They lose their second best corner and their kicker later

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:55.119
<v Speaker 2>in the season, and they just keep chugging along and

0:18:55.160 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 2>people just talk about what's wrong with the team that

0:18:57.400 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 2>keeps winning. Usually if you have injuries, particularly cluster injuries,

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:06.200
<v Speaker 2>and the Lions injuries are really clustering on the defensive

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:08.920
<v Speaker 2>side of the ball, that can bite you. So that

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:13.119
<v Speaker 2>concerns me. Another thing that I have been the one

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:17.399
<v Speaker 2>person kind of doing the clarion call on this, but

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 2>I really think more attention should be paid to it

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 2>is from a seating perspective demonse. The Eagles' worst case

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:34.359
<v Speaker 2>scenario is the two seed. They have essentially already locked

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 2>up that division, and obviously the NFC West and the

0:19:39.119 --> 0:19:42.199
<v Speaker 2>NFC South are not going to have a champion that

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:45.439
<v Speaker 2>has a better record than the Eagles as the division

0:19:45.520 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 2>leaders there have six or seven wins right now and

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 2>the Eagles already of ten. And the Eagles have games

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 2>left against the Panthers, Giants, one other awful oh and Cowboys.

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:03.400
<v Speaker 2>So the Eagle's worst case scenario is the two seed.

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 2>The Lions are oddly in a different spot where the

0:20:09.440 --> 0:20:15.160
<v Speaker 2>Lions have a team right on their heels in their

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:21.160
<v Speaker 2>own division in Minnesota, and because of that, the Lions

0:20:21.160 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 2>are one hiccup away from falling to the five seed,

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 2>and if that happens, they are outdoors potentially for the

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:36.359
<v Speaker 2>entire playoffs. They are in cold weather for most of

0:20:36.400 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 2>the playoffs, and everything about their situation changes. The Lions

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:48.120
<v Speaker 2>have Green Bay in two days and then home for Buffalo, Like,

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:51.439
<v Speaker 2>is there a scenario where the Lions find themselves in

0:20:51.520 --> 0:20:56.880
<v Speaker 2>twelve days in second place in their own division? Yeah,

0:20:57.160 --> 0:21:00.480
<v Speaker 2>and then they have the Vikings in week eighteen, which

0:21:00.520 --> 0:21:04.199
<v Speaker 2>could be the division deciding game. So that I think works.

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:07.840
<v Speaker 2>The Lions are more likely to be the one seed,

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 2>but it's also on the board the Vikings catch them

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 2>and they all of a sudden fall to the five seed.

0:21:15.040 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 2>And the other piece of it is I just think

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:22.879
<v Speaker 2>the Eagles, and this is shocking to me, defense is

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:26.280
<v Speaker 2>great right now, and I don't trust the Lions defense

0:21:26.320 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 2>as much. Even the Lions Stephens has been very good.

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:32.160
<v Speaker 2>I think overachieved this year. Aaron Glenn's an excellent job.

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:36.360
<v Speaker 2>So when AJ Brown's healthy, Jalen Hurts is playing more

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 2>like he did two years ago, where he's not trying

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:41.480
<v Speaker 2>to really be the star and he's taking care of

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:45.919
<v Speaker 2>the football. Saquan's been unbelievable, Sirianni's staying out of the way.

0:21:46.800 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 2>I just think the Eagles look like the best team

0:21:49.880 --> 0:21:54.959
<v Speaker 2>and are really well positioned and sneaky alive for the

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:57.879
<v Speaker 2>one seed, will not seeky live, but obviously alive for

0:21:57.920 --> 0:22:00.520
<v Speaker 2>the one seed. But their worst case in area was

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:03.359
<v Speaker 2>the two seed, which is not the case for the Lions.

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:04.880
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's go on to the Chiefs.

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:08.720
<v Speaker 3>All right, So the Chiefs keep pulling it off by

0:22:08.720 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 3>any means, but you gotta admit after a close game

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:14.719
<v Speaker 3>to like Vegas got a close game with the Raiders,

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 3>you have a close game with the Panthers two back

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 3>to back weeks for those better teams than Panthers.

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 2>Panthers hot right well with those teams.

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:32.080
<v Speaker 3>With them playing those teams that closely, don't you think

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 3>it gives other good teams, like the Charges that they

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:38.440
<v Speaker 3>have coming up more hope that they can get them.

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, certainly they don't look invincible. But I saw

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 2>folks trying to argue that this is the weakest or

0:22:52.119 --> 0:22:59.400
<v Speaker 2>most vulnerable Chiefs team, and I just feel like everyone

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 2>has such short memories. Do you guys know how many

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:07.199
<v Speaker 2>games the Chiefs won last year? Eleven all year in

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:11.200
<v Speaker 2>the regular season. If the Chiefs lost every single one

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 2>of their remaining games, they would have the same record

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:19.800
<v Speaker 2>they had last year. Last year, the Chiefs lost five

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 2>of eight games at one point, and they were some

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 2>ugly losses. They lost to Denver twenty four to nine

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:38.520
<v Speaker 2>when Russell Wilson threw for one hundred and fourteen yards.

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:44.440
<v Speaker 2>They lost. They then lost to Philly right before Philly

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:49.200
<v Speaker 2>fell apart entirely. They lost to Green Bay. They lost

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:52.919
<v Speaker 2>the game to Buffalo when Mahomes flipped out about the offsides,

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:57.160
<v Speaker 2>and they lost that game to the Raiders on Christmas

0:23:57.240 --> 0:24:04.480
<v Speaker 2>Day to fall to nine and six. And they absolutely

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:09.560
<v Speaker 2>and Mahomes' numbers last year were worse than his numbers

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 2>this year. The offense was worse than it was this year.

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:17.359
<v Speaker 2>This chief team, on the other hand, despite the injuries

0:24:17.400 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 2>that I talked about earlier, is eleven and one, despite

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 2>the fact that Mahomes already went through a legitimate slump

0:24:26.280 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 2>that he is clearly out of to start the year,

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:33.639
<v Speaker 2>is eleven and one. They have right now two significant weaknesses.

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 2>What is the left tackle position. They have a new

0:24:36.920 --> 0:24:40.679
<v Speaker 2>left tackle starting this week, Dj Humphreys, who was a

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:45.160
<v Speaker 2>Pro bowler in Arizona. The other is the pass defense

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:47.520
<v Speaker 2>has not been what it was, but they have Charles

0:24:47.560 --> 0:24:50.639
<v Speaker 2>Amena who coming back. He just came back. Now they

0:24:50.680 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 2>need to figure out the cornerback two spot, which hasn't

0:24:53.640 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 2>been the same since Jalen Watson broke his ankle. But

0:24:57.600 --> 0:25:02.159
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs being discussed as if they have these major

0:25:02.320 --> 0:25:07.640
<v Speaker 2>structural problems when they're like, oh, they're winning all these

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:12.720
<v Speaker 2>close games. They just broke the record for consecutive victories

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:16.640
<v Speaker 2>in one score games. That record was held by the

0:25:17.160 --> 0:25:23.360
<v Speaker 2>three to four Patriots, which were the best two year

0:25:23.480 --> 0:25:28.880
<v Speaker 2>stretch of the entire Patriot dynasty was three to four.

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 2>The only back to back championships was three to four.

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:34.879
<v Speaker 2>So I just think everyone has it wrong on the

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:39.960
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs flatly. I think right now they probably should be

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 2>nine and three, but they're not. And because they are

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:49.080
<v Speaker 2>not nine and three, and they are only going to

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 2>be getting better because DJ Humphries is here, because Pacheco

0:25:53.440 --> 0:25:56.679
<v Speaker 2>is now back, because Hollywood Brown comes back in a

0:25:56.680 --> 0:26:00.440
<v Speaker 2>few weeks, because Mahomes is out of his slump, because

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:05.520
<v Speaker 2>Chris Jones is going to be Chris Jones come winning

0:26:05.560 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 2>time in the playoffs. I cannot believe how many people,

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:15.920
<v Speaker 2>my buddy Adam Shine one of them, who were dead

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 2>certain last year, the Chiefs would get got picked against

0:26:21.160 --> 0:26:26.080
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs in every playoff game they had, as I

0:26:26.119 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 2>think Scott Van Pelt did, I think Shine did. As

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:35.160
<v Speaker 2>soon as the Super Bowl ended, they all swore fealty said,

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 2>I will never make that mistake again. Now they're doing

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:42.439
<v Speaker 2>it again, as if the Chiefs were seven and five,

0:26:43.359 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 2>they're eleven and one. And the other piece of it

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:53.320
<v Speaker 2>is where I said yesterday on TV that the Chiefs

0:26:53.320 --> 0:26:59.880
<v Speaker 2>are making otherwise smart people dumb the mental gymnastics that

0:27:00.440 --> 0:27:04.399
<v Speaker 2>folks are doing to turn Chiefs losses into win or

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:10.120
<v Speaker 2>wins into losses. Like, let's just go through it, because

0:27:10.160 --> 0:27:14.119
<v Speaker 2>this is what you hear a week one against Baltimore,

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:21.200
<v Speaker 2>the likely toenail, Okay, give Isaiah likely that touchdown. Then

0:27:21.240 --> 0:27:25.920
<v Speaker 2>what happens The Ravens either kick an extra point, which,

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 2>by the way, these days not a guarantee, but let's

0:27:29.280 --> 0:27:31.919
<v Speaker 2>give Tucker the benefit of the doubt, and they go

0:27:31.960 --> 0:27:34.240
<v Speaker 2>to overtime. They still got to win that, oh, Nick,

0:27:34.280 --> 0:27:37.880
<v Speaker 2>they would have gone for two, okay, So what they

0:27:37.960 --> 0:27:41.600
<v Speaker 2>needed was a play the likely play to be in

0:27:41.680 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 2>bounds in order to have a coin flip chance to

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 2>beat the Chiefs the next one. People talk about that

0:27:48.040 --> 0:27:53.200
<v Speaker 2>bangles defensive pass interference. Well, what is the argument there,

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:56.360
<v Speaker 2>because it was a It's not like that was Oh

0:27:56.400 --> 0:27:59.399
<v Speaker 2>my god, that ball was incomplete and there was a

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 2>foulow away from the ball that had none do with it,

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:04.920
<v Speaker 2>so perfectly thrown football that would have put the Chiefs

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:07.720
<v Speaker 2>in field goal range. The guy got interfered with, and

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:09.639
<v Speaker 2>then they made the field goal. Okay, so take that

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:13.480
<v Speaker 2>one out. People talk about the Atlanta game that there

0:28:13.560 --> 0:28:16.360
<v Speaker 2>was a missed DPI on the Chiefs. So I went

0:28:16.440 --> 0:28:18.920
<v Speaker 2>and looked that up. That happened with five and a

0:28:18.960 --> 0:28:21.359
<v Speaker 2>half minutes left in that game and the Chiefs leading.

0:28:21.800 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 2>So you're saying, give it Atlanta that call, and what

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 2>they magically just win that game? Maybe that Tampa Bay,

0:28:30.720 --> 0:28:37.760
<v Speaker 2>Oh Tampa they what they should have gone for two. Okay,

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:43.080
<v Speaker 2>if they go for two in that spot, what happens, Well,

0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:46.680
<v Speaker 2>first of all, they have to get the two point conversion.

0:28:47.120 --> 0:28:50.040
<v Speaker 2>And then if they do get the two point conversion,

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 2>do you guys remember how much time was left when

0:28:52.800 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 2>they scored, because I do. There was twenty seven seconds left.

0:28:58.960 --> 0:29:03.480
<v Speaker 2>It would have been Chiefs multiple timeouts, twenty seven seconds

0:29:03.560 --> 0:29:07.440
<v Speaker 2>left with at the time still at Harrison butker so okay,

0:29:07.440 --> 0:29:10.720
<v Speaker 2>So Tampa could have won if they had gone for

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:13.480
<v Speaker 2>two gotten it in stop Mahomes from getting in field

0:29:13.480 --> 0:29:16.760
<v Speaker 2>goal range. Okay, what's the next one? Oh, the next

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:22.200
<v Speaker 2>one is they blocked a field goal against uh against

0:29:22.360 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 2>the Broncos, but they blocked it. And this one was

0:29:26.160 --> 0:29:32.800
<v Speaker 2>the Raiders game, where again, let's just assume that they

0:29:32.960 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 2>incorrectly call the illegal shift a false start and the

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 2>Raiders keep the ball. Okay, great, The Raiders kicker, who

0:29:41.360 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 2>had already missed three field goals, now is to make

0:29:43.840 --> 0:29:47.720
<v Speaker 2>a fifty five yarder. So there's just a lot of

0:29:48.080 --> 0:29:51.240
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs should have lost and would have lost. But

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:55.120
<v Speaker 2>actually I need to pretend a million things happened that didn't.

0:29:55.640 --> 0:29:59.239
<v Speaker 2>And that's been so much of the Chiefs discourse this

0:29:59.360 --> 0:30:04.880
<v Speaker 2>year relies on this idea if only things that didn't

0:30:05.000 --> 0:30:10.920
<v Speaker 2>happen did happen, like if only or if only things

0:30:11.000 --> 0:30:14.840
<v Speaker 2>that did happen didn't happen. If they hadn't won the

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 2>Super Bowl last year, but they did, if they hadn't

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:21.920
<v Speaker 2>won but they did. And I'm gonna add one last

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:27.160
<v Speaker 2>thing and we can move on. These morons that are like,

0:30:27.280 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 2>oh man, this Chiefs team sure reminds me of And

0:30:33.240 --> 0:30:36.120
<v Speaker 2>then they bring up ten and one or eleven and

0:30:36.240 --> 0:30:41.760
<v Speaker 2>one teams from Christmas Pass that were frauds, and every

0:30:41.920 --> 0:30:45.880
<v Speaker 2>single one of those teams that if you left the

0:30:46.280 --> 0:30:50.800
<v Speaker 2>everything about the team the same and made Patrick Mahomes

0:30:50.880 --> 0:30:54.920
<v Speaker 2>the quarterback or Andy Reid the coach, those teams would

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:58.480
<v Speaker 2>have been awesome. They're like, Oh, got a lot of

0:30:58.560 --> 0:31:01.680
<v Speaker 2>shades of the Vikings a couple of years ago that

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:05.480
<v Speaker 2>were thirteen and four and went one and done. If

0:31:05.520 --> 0:31:09.800
<v Speaker 2>you replaced Kirk Cousins with Mahomes, that Vikings team would

0:31:09.840 --> 0:31:13.240
<v Speaker 2>have been awesome. Reminds me a lot of the twenty

0:31:13.400 --> 0:31:20.800
<v Speaker 2>twenty Steelers. If you replaced fossilizing Ben Roethlisberger with Mahomes,

0:31:21.080 --> 0:31:26.200
<v Speaker 2>that team would have won the Super Bowl. Oh, reminds

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:30.200
<v Speaker 2>me a lot of the Eagles last year who fell

0:31:30.240 --> 0:31:34.600
<v Speaker 2>apart entirely. If you replaced forget even Mahomes there Nick

0:31:34.680 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 2>Sirianni with Andy Reid and left everything the same, that

0:31:38.640 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 2>Eagles team would have been fine. So again, yes, I

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:47.520
<v Speaker 2>agree with you. If the Chiefs didn't have read in Mahomes,

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:50.959
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't be as confident. But if they didn't have

0:31:51.040 --> 0:31:54.960
<v Speaker 2>reading Mahomes, they wouldn't be the Chiefs. So I just

0:31:55.640 --> 0:31:58.400
<v Speaker 2>so much of this discourse is just idiotic, and it's

0:31:58.480 --> 0:32:01.560
<v Speaker 2>people who made this exactness state last year, swore they

0:32:01.560 --> 0:32:04.120
<v Speaker 2>weren't going to do it again, and now they're doing it.

0:32:04.280 --> 0:32:08.080
<v Speaker 2>Despite the fact that the Chiefs have played five playoff teams,

0:32:08.400 --> 0:32:11.360
<v Speaker 2>beaten four of them the one they lost to Buffalo,

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:13.720
<v Speaker 2>everyone thinks of the best team in football, and even

0:32:13.760 --> 0:32:16.520
<v Speaker 2>the Buffalo game. I can play this game the other way.

0:32:17.240 --> 0:32:20.640
<v Speaker 2>Oh my goodness. If the Chiefs get one stop on

0:32:20.760 --> 0:32:23.240
<v Speaker 2>fourth and two against Josh Allen, they win that game

0:32:23.280 --> 0:32:26.440
<v Speaker 2>and they're undefeated. They're doing all of it, even though

0:32:26.800 --> 0:32:29.200
<v Speaker 2>they've dealt with the worst of the injuries. They have

0:32:29.280 --> 0:32:32.000
<v Speaker 2>the best record in the league. Mahomes is playing great.

0:32:32.440 --> 0:32:37.400
<v Speaker 2>So people are just dumb too long didn't listen for

0:32:37.440 --> 0:32:45.720
<v Speaker 2>the third consecutive year. No, yep, maybe maybe.

0:32:45.360 --> 0:32:48.240
<v Speaker 3>I think that's folks saying like they are getting lucky

0:32:48.280 --> 0:32:49.200
<v Speaker 3>some of these times.

0:32:49.520 --> 0:32:52.880
<v Speaker 2>I think that's okay, So who isn't? So who is it?

0:32:54.640 --> 0:32:57.240
<v Speaker 2>Did the Lions get lucky that the Bears? Did the

0:32:57.320 --> 0:33:01.560
<v Speaker 2>Lions get lucky that the Bears had such a catastrophic

0:33:02.160 --> 0:33:06.040
<v Speaker 2>end of game? Meltdown that they fired a coaching season

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:08.440
<v Speaker 2>for the first time in one hundred years. Was that lucky?

0:33:08.800 --> 0:33:16.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm just curious, Okay, the no, no, no, Let's keep

0:33:16.240 --> 0:33:19.680
<v Speaker 2>playing the game. Did the Did the Lions get lucky

0:33:20.240 --> 0:33:24.640
<v Speaker 2>that they won a game this year? When was it?

0:33:24.720 --> 0:33:27.520
<v Speaker 2>Was it a sixty one? No? The Bills? Pardon me?

0:33:27.920 --> 0:33:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Did the Bills get lucky when they're notoriously unreliable kicker

0:33:33.000 --> 0:33:36.880
<v Speaker 2>made a sixty one yard field goal at the gun

0:33:37.280 --> 0:33:41.920
<v Speaker 2>to beat Miami? Sure? Did the I mean we can

0:33:42.240 --> 0:33:46.080
<v Speaker 2>go up? And did the Lions get lucky that they

0:33:46.160 --> 0:33:50.720
<v Speaker 2>won a game when Golf threw five interceptions? Did the

0:33:50.760 --> 0:33:56.320
<v Speaker 2>Eagles get lucky that they played so poorly against the

0:33:56.360 --> 0:34:01.440
<v Speaker 2>Browns that their fans were booing serials so much that

0:34:01.560 --> 0:34:05.080
<v Speaker 2>he's yelled at his own fans and they won that game? Anyway?

0:34:05.640 --> 0:34:09.719
<v Speaker 2>Like it's the NFL, almost all the games come down

0:34:09.760 --> 0:34:13.680
<v Speaker 2>to a few plays. Yeah, of course, there's some luck

0:34:13.840 --> 0:34:18.680
<v Speaker 2>involved in a lot of things. But I just it's

0:34:18.760 --> 0:34:21.799
<v Speaker 2>just gonna be another year where everyone's wrong and I'm right,

0:34:22.440 --> 0:34:24.880
<v Speaker 2>So I'm fine with it. But I just would have

0:34:24.920 --> 0:34:28.040
<v Speaker 2>thought folks were to learn their lesson. Let's go to

0:34:28.040 --> 0:34:31.440
<v Speaker 2>the Niners. Oh another one. Oh, here's another one. So,

0:34:31.680 --> 0:34:32.359
<v Speaker 2>speaking of.

0:34:32.520 --> 0:34:36.000
<v Speaker 3>Forty nine Ers, season is just getting worse and worse.

0:34:36.520 --> 0:34:39.520
<v Speaker 3>They've been dealing with injuries and Christom McCaffrey just went

0:34:39.560 --> 0:34:43.680
<v Speaker 3>down on that game on Sunday. You know, they could

0:34:43.760 --> 0:34:46.360
<v Speaker 3>keep bottoming it out and losing and drafting a quarterback.

0:34:46.640 --> 0:34:48.719
<v Speaker 3>The question here is do you think that the forty

0:34:48.800 --> 0:34:52.239
<v Speaker 3>nine Ers championship window is closed or did it just reopen?

0:34:52.600 --> 0:34:53.680
<v Speaker 3>What's their situation?

0:34:54.080 --> 0:34:57.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, so, no, I don't listen. The idea that the

0:34:57.640 --> 0:35:00.640
<v Speaker 2>Niners could be in have such a bad that they

0:35:00.719 --> 0:35:05.560
<v Speaker 2>consider drafting a quarterback is not something anyone's talking about.

0:35:06.960 --> 0:35:13.520
<v Speaker 2>But it is an interesting thought exercise depending on where

0:35:13.560 --> 0:35:20.439
<v Speaker 2>they fall in the draft order. And oh, they would

0:35:20.520 --> 0:35:23.359
<v Speaker 2>never do that to Purty. Perty's taking them to an

0:35:23.440 --> 0:35:26.040
<v Speaker 2>NFC championship game in a Super Bowl. So did Jimmy

0:35:26.080 --> 0:35:28.920
<v Speaker 2>g And they gave up three first round picks to

0:35:28.960 --> 0:35:32.840
<v Speaker 2>go get his replacement. Now, that didn't work out. But

0:35:32.920 --> 0:35:34.960
<v Speaker 2>if they all of a sudden just had a quarterback

0:35:35.000 --> 0:35:38.360
<v Speaker 2>fall into their lap in an offseason, when Perty's you know,

0:35:38.520 --> 0:35:43.520
<v Speaker 2>gonna be wanting sixty million a year. Huh. But here's

0:35:43.560 --> 0:35:45.080
<v Speaker 2>the thing that I want to say about the Niners.

0:35:45.080 --> 0:35:49.160
<v Speaker 2>Demant say, you don't hear so much anymore? Nick, you

0:35:49.239 --> 0:35:53.360
<v Speaker 2>disrespect Brock? Do you you don't hear so much anymore?

0:35:53.400 --> 0:35:56.600
<v Speaker 2>What more do you want Brock to do? You don't

0:35:56.600 --> 0:36:00.600
<v Speaker 2>hear so much anymore? Nick, you're unfair judge him because

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:02.799
<v Speaker 2>he was a seven round pick. Why won't you give

0:36:02.880 --> 0:36:11.040
<v Speaker 2>him credit? Amazing? Uh amazing, How the moment Brock Purdy

0:36:11.160 --> 0:36:15.719
<v Speaker 2>goes from having the most stacked supporting cast in the

0:36:15.800 --> 0:36:21.680
<v Speaker 2>league to having a league average supporting cast. He looks

0:36:21.800 --> 0:36:26.279
<v Speaker 2>like a league average quarterback. I'm not here to say

0:36:26.320 --> 0:36:30.560
<v Speaker 2>I told you so, except for the case I effing

0:36:30.760 --> 0:36:36.800
<v Speaker 2>told you so so many times, and so many people

0:36:37.239 --> 0:36:42.360
<v Speaker 2>were so adamant that I was unfair that I wouldn't

0:36:42.400 --> 0:36:47.680
<v Speaker 2>give the guy credit, when my argument was, I think

0:36:47.680 --> 0:36:54.480
<v Speaker 2>he's the sixth best player on his offense. Trent Williams AYUK, McCaffrey,

0:36:54.840 --> 0:37:00.440
<v Speaker 2>Kittle debo. Then Brock, that's how I stack the offense,

0:37:01.400 --> 0:37:06.680
<v Speaker 2>probably Trent Williams, CMC, AYUK Kittle tebo. But all of

0:37:06.719 --> 0:37:09.000
<v Speaker 2>a sudden he has a year where CMC is not there,

0:37:09.920 --> 0:37:12.080
<v Speaker 2>Trent Williams in and out of the lineup as of late,

0:37:12.360 --> 0:37:15.800
<v Speaker 2>and shout out Trent Williams, who's dealing with an unspeakable tragedy.

0:37:15.920 --> 0:37:19.840
<v Speaker 2>Just awful. Ayuk gets hurt. Diebo's not quite the same,

0:37:20.160 --> 0:37:22.880
<v Speaker 2>Kittle's still there, looks a little older, Well, he is

0:37:22.920 --> 0:37:25.920
<v Speaker 2>a little older, doesn't look quite as dominant and listens

0:37:25.920 --> 0:37:31.280
<v Speaker 2>I like, party's terrible. It's like he is a mirror.

0:37:32.440 --> 0:37:34.839
<v Speaker 2>How good is my team around me? That's how good

0:37:34.880 --> 0:37:39.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to be. And there is now a very

0:37:39.200 --> 0:37:41.759
<v Speaker 2>real question about whether or not you want to pay

0:37:41.800 --> 0:37:44.319
<v Speaker 2>that guy. I think it would be insane to pay

0:37:44.400 --> 0:37:47.360
<v Speaker 2>him after this year. I would play him for another

0:37:47.480 --> 0:37:50.840
<v Speaker 2>year on a million dollar contract and see what he

0:37:50.880 --> 0:37:56.400
<v Speaker 2>looks like before I commit myself to whether it's fifty

0:37:56.440 --> 0:37:59.720
<v Speaker 2>million or sixty million. If it's a mistake at fifty,

0:38:00.000 --> 0:38:01.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry. If it's a mistake at sixty, it's a

0:38:01.920 --> 0:38:06.520
<v Speaker 2>mistake at fifty. The distinction is not, oh, is he

0:38:06.600 --> 0:38:09.640
<v Speaker 2>gonna want Jordan love money or Dak Prescott money. That

0:38:09.800 --> 0:38:12.680
<v Speaker 2>actually is I don't want to say it's irrelevant, but

0:38:12.719 --> 0:38:16.480
<v Speaker 2>it's not that relevant. It's not it does he you know,

0:38:16.840 --> 0:38:19.080
<v Speaker 2>does he get top top of the market or does

0:38:19.160 --> 0:38:23.000
<v Speaker 2>close the top of the market. Because if you feel

0:38:23.000 --> 0:38:26.520
<v Speaker 2>good about him at fifty five, you feel fine at sixty.

0:38:26.840 --> 0:38:31.440
<v Speaker 2>The question is do you want him to be your

0:38:31.760 --> 0:38:37.640
<v Speaker 2>quarterback at you know, top eight salary over the next

0:38:37.719 --> 0:38:40.920
<v Speaker 2>few years. I wouldn't do it, And depending on how

0:38:41.000 --> 0:38:43.719
<v Speaker 2>I think about quarterbacks in this draft class, would I

0:38:43.800 --> 0:38:49.000
<v Speaker 2>consider drafting one and seeing quietly, hey, is there a

0:38:49.080 --> 0:38:52.480
<v Speaker 2>team out there that loves brock Party that wants to

0:38:52.520 --> 0:38:57.719
<v Speaker 2>give me multiple premium draft picks for him? Yeah, of

0:38:57.719 --> 0:39:03.440
<v Speaker 2>course I'd have that conversation. But listen, just like I

0:39:03.560 --> 0:39:06.239
<v Speaker 2>was always very and he's better than Jimmy Garoppolo. But

0:39:06.440 --> 0:39:10.200
<v Speaker 2>just like I was always very confident that my Jimmy

0:39:10.239 --> 0:39:14.680
<v Speaker 2>Garoppolo take history would say, oh he was right and

0:39:14.719 --> 0:39:17.680
<v Speaker 2>all the quarterback whens sick of fans were wrong. I

0:39:17.719 --> 0:39:20.200
<v Speaker 2>feel the exact same way about my brock Party take

0:39:20.719 --> 0:39:23.880
<v Speaker 2>like he's gonna have a long career and keep playing

0:39:24.239 --> 0:39:27.680
<v Speaker 2>and people are gonna be like, you, guys, remember when

0:39:27.760 --> 0:39:31.359
<v Speaker 2>people were debating is he a top five quarterback? You

0:39:31.520 --> 0:39:39.120
<v Speaker 2>remember when four days ago David Lombardi, who covers the Niners,

0:39:39.160 --> 0:39:41.759
<v Speaker 2>used to beak for the athletic. Now he's uh independent,

0:39:41.800 --> 0:39:47.000
<v Speaker 2>I think said that brock Party has accomplished more than

0:39:47.080 --> 0:39:50.640
<v Speaker 2>Josh Allen in the NFL. Is a more efficient quarterback

0:39:50.680 --> 0:39:54.759
<v Speaker 2>than Josh Allen. That was a conversation four days ago.

0:39:55.600 --> 0:39:58.759
<v Speaker 2>So I don't think Nier's championship windows closed because I

0:39:58.800 --> 0:40:01.960
<v Speaker 2>think Lynch and Shane are great, and I think Shannan's brilliant.

0:40:02.120 --> 0:40:04.680
<v Speaker 2>And if Shannan can get to multiple super Bowls with

0:40:04.760 --> 0:40:07.640
<v Speaker 2>Jimmy g and Brock Party, imagine if he ever has

0:40:07.680 --> 0:40:12.120
<v Speaker 2>an actual awesome quarterback. But the Brock Party debate is

0:40:12.200 --> 0:40:17.880
<v Speaker 2>winding down because the unpopular opinion seems to be the

0:40:17.880 --> 0:40:27.759
<v Speaker 2>correct one. Quick break right back, What's right? Welcome back

0:40:27.800 --> 0:40:30.080
<v Speaker 2>in What's Right? With Nick Wright. Sorry, I'm firing off

0:40:30.120 --> 0:40:33.480
<v Speaker 2>an angry tweet to Colin Cowherd because he just promoted

0:40:33.480 --> 0:40:37.479
<v Speaker 2>the Tom Brady appearance quote tweet. So this is why

0:40:37.880 --> 0:40:43.279
<v Speaker 2>I got coming Eastern today. So much for loyalty at

0:40:43.360 --> 0:40:50.160
<v Speaker 2>Colin cowhard S. M h. There we go post and send,

0:40:51.000 --> 0:40:54.960
<v Speaker 2>done and done, all right, demons, before we get to

0:40:55.000 --> 0:40:58.960
<v Speaker 2>our game, Nick Wright, private investigator, Uh, let's talk a

0:40:59.000 --> 0:41:01.279
<v Speaker 2>little Kirk Cousins just a moment, Go ahead, all.

0:41:01.200 --> 0:41:03.680
<v Speaker 3>Right, man. So Kirk Cousins is out there showing his age.

0:41:03.960 --> 0:41:07.240
<v Speaker 3>He threw four picks. Against the Chargers in that crazy defense.

0:41:08.080 --> 0:41:10.319
<v Speaker 3>So they obviously owe him a lot of money. But

0:41:10.400 --> 0:41:14.279
<v Speaker 3>they also have Michael Pinnox over there. The Bucks are

0:41:14.320 --> 0:41:16.959
<v Speaker 3>now breathing down their neck. If you were in charge

0:41:16.960 --> 0:41:20.280
<v Speaker 3>in Atlanta, how would you handle the quarterback situation?

0:41:22.360 --> 0:41:26.080
<v Speaker 2>All right? So listen, I let me see if this

0:41:26.239 --> 0:41:33.239
<v Speaker 2>is correct. So, oh my goodness, gracious, I thought that

0:41:33.360 --> 0:41:37.200
<v Speaker 2>might be a lie. So I knew it. So I

0:41:37.719 --> 0:41:41.080
<v Speaker 2>have to clarify something from the show yesterday. So I

0:41:41.320 --> 0:41:48.239
<v Speaker 2>was listening to Bill Simmons podcast and he said that

0:41:48.440 --> 0:41:53.280
<v Speaker 2>next Gen Stats said that Cousins didn't throw a single

0:41:53.440 --> 0:41:58.360
<v Speaker 2>pass faster than thirty six miles per hour on Sunday,

0:41:59.120 --> 0:42:03.799
<v Speaker 2>and I on the TV show. I kept attributing it

0:42:03.840 --> 0:42:05.879
<v Speaker 2>to Simmons because I'm like, I don't even think that's

0:42:05.960 --> 0:42:10.359
<v Speaker 2>like a thing. Next Gen stance tracks it did kind

0:42:10.360 --> 0:42:13.560
<v Speaker 2>of pass the eye test, so I've now found the

0:42:14.120 --> 0:42:18.640
<v Speaker 2>genesis of it. And Hayden Winks on Twitter wrote, Kirk

0:42:18.640 --> 0:42:21.040
<v Speaker 2>Cousins the game first quarterback, the next Gen stats here

0:42:21.040 --> 0:42:23.120
<v Speaker 2>and not throw pass over thirty six miles per hour

0:42:23.120 --> 0:42:28.759
<v Speaker 2>in a game minimum twenty attempts. He then tweeted, this

0:42:28.800 --> 0:42:30.919
<v Speaker 2>is a completely made up stat for what it's worth.

0:42:31.360 --> 0:42:35.000
<v Speaker 2>I thought that might be fake news, but like, yeah,

0:42:35.080 --> 0:42:38.319
<v Speaker 2>so now it did seem like that possibly could have

0:42:38.360 --> 0:42:42.920
<v Speaker 2>been true. Uh and Kirk Cousins does look cooked like

0:42:43.000 --> 0:42:46.560
<v Speaker 2>he does. He does look cooked. Here is what I

0:42:46.600 --> 0:42:53.520
<v Speaker 2>will say. I am hesitant to give the Falcons too

0:42:53.600 --> 0:42:59.200
<v Speaker 2>much credit because people are like, oh, savvy Falcons, this

0:42:59.400 --> 0:43:02.439
<v Speaker 2>is why they drafted Pennix, as if the exact people

0:43:02.480 --> 0:43:05.120
<v Speaker 2>who drafted Pinnix weren't also the people who gave Kirk

0:43:05.160 --> 0:43:08.360
<v Speaker 2>a hundred million guaranteed. So it I mean, there is

0:43:08.440 --> 0:43:12.600
<v Speaker 2>a bit of a an element of oh, my goodness,

0:43:13.680 --> 0:43:19.480
<v Speaker 2>look at how smart you were. Nick. You didn't sell

0:43:19.560 --> 0:43:22.520
<v Speaker 2>your old car when you just went him out and

0:43:22.640 --> 0:43:26.160
<v Speaker 2>bought one hundred thousand dollars sports car because you knew

0:43:26.880 --> 0:43:30.040
<v Speaker 2>that sports car was a lemon I was gonna break

0:43:30.080 --> 0:43:32.200
<v Speaker 2>down and you were gonna need the other one. It's like, well,

0:43:32.239 --> 0:43:36.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, kind of smart, but also maybe a bad purchase.

0:43:37.080 --> 0:43:41.600
<v Speaker 2>I would not bench Kirk yet, but the leash is

0:43:41.920 --> 0:43:47.320
<v Speaker 2>very very short. And I thought if people didn't watch

0:43:47.440 --> 0:43:52.480
<v Speaker 2>that Chargers Falcons game, the Chargers didn't exactly cover themselves

0:43:52.480 --> 0:43:57.960
<v Speaker 2>in glory in that game, but Kirk played impossibly bad

0:43:58.000 --> 0:44:02.640
<v Speaker 2>football and now the foulcons after starting six to three,

0:44:03.200 --> 0:44:07.040
<v Speaker 2>they have lost to New Orleans horrible loss. They have

0:44:07.120 --> 0:44:10.399
<v Speaker 2>lost to Denver thirty eight to six in a game

0:44:10.480 --> 0:44:13.840
<v Speaker 2>I picked him to win, and they lost to the

0:44:13.960 --> 0:44:18.080
<v Speaker 2>Chargers seventeen to thirteen in a game Herbert threw for

0:44:18.120 --> 0:44:22.080
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and forty seven yards. Also, Justin Herbert's numbers

0:44:22.080 --> 0:44:30.360
<v Speaker 2>this year are hard to believe. Thirteen touchdowns through twelve games,

0:44:31.200 --> 0:44:39.200
<v Speaker 2>not great, one interception. So the thirteen touchdowns, one pick

0:44:39.239 --> 0:44:41.759
<v Speaker 2>for Justin Herbert for a team that just wants to

0:44:41.760 --> 0:44:44.319
<v Speaker 2>take care of the football and play good defense. And

0:44:44.360 --> 0:44:47.520
<v Speaker 2>their defense has been great aside from that Baltimore game.

0:44:48.800 --> 0:44:53.520
<v Speaker 2>So but to answer your question, I would I would

0:44:53.600 --> 0:44:58.000
<v Speaker 2>give Kirk at least another week, especially he is playing

0:44:58.040 --> 0:45:01.719
<v Speaker 2>the Vikings now. That Brian Flora's defense. Oh boy, I

0:45:01.760 --> 0:45:05.080
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't want to throw Pinnis into that Brian Flores defense.

0:45:05.480 --> 0:45:08.720
<v Speaker 2>I also wouldn't necessarily want to see totally immobile Kirk

0:45:08.760 --> 0:45:12.759
<v Speaker 2>Cousins hobbling around against the Flores defense. But I would

0:45:12.800 --> 0:45:15.840
<v Speaker 2>give him another week see if he can pull himself

0:45:15.840 --> 0:45:18.279
<v Speaker 2>out of it, because if he can, you then have

0:45:18.480 --> 0:45:25.480
<v Speaker 2>Raiders Giants Commander's panthers. You have three awful defenses to

0:45:25.680 --> 0:45:29.120
<v Speaker 2>you over your last month, and you probably do still

0:45:29.160 --> 0:45:31.799
<v Speaker 2>trust Kirk more than Pinnis. So I wouldn't go to

0:45:31.800 --> 0:45:36.080
<v Speaker 2>Pinnicks yet, but for next year, the Kirk Cousins thing

0:45:36.200 --> 0:45:40.080
<v Speaker 2>could be ending faster than most of us anticipated. All right,

0:45:40.360 --> 0:45:42.080
<v Speaker 2>let's play Nick right, private eye.

0:45:43.239 --> 0:45:47.160
<v Speaker 3>All right, after many sleepless, sleepless nights down at the stations,

0:45:47.880 --> 0:45:49.960
<v Speaker 3>me and my boys, Yeah, we couldn't figure out and

0:45:49.960 --> 0:45:54.000
<v Speaker 3>crack these cases. So he decided to call out private investigator,

0:45:54.120 --> 0:46:01.200
<v Speaker 3>mister Nick Wright. Welcome back two generations. Yeah, you went

0:46:01.239 --> 0:46:03.759
<v Speaker 3>all in on two generational number one picks, or at

0:46:03.840 --> 0:46:07.760
<v Speaker 3>least that's how they were build. An investigation is needed,

0:46:08.239 --> 0:46:12.000
<v Speaker 3>Detective right, Is Caleb just just as Caleb just Lawrence

0:46:12.040 --> 0:46:12.640
<v Speaker 3>in disguise?

0:46:14.760 --> 0:46:17.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well listen. First of all, I don't like Trevor

0:46:17.480 --> 0:46:22.120
<v Speaker 2>Lawrence being used as the kind of the control group

0:46:22.280 --> 0:46:26.279
<v Speaker 2>for underwhelming number one picks, But to be fair, that's

0:46:26.360 --> 0:46:29.240
<v Speaker 2>what he has been up to this point. I really

0:46:29.320 --> 0:46:33.000
<v Speaker 2>like how Caleb has played the last few weeks. I

0:46:33.000 --> 0:46:36.360
<v Speaker 2>thought he was good on Thanksgiving. Now obviously he was

0:46:36.400 --> 0:46:39.719
<v Speaker 2>an accomplice in the butchering of the very end of

0:46:39.760 --> 0:46:42.080
<v Speaker 2>the game. But he's a rookie quarterback and that's what

0:46:42.120 --> 0:46:44.840
<v Speaker 2>coaches are for. He won't make that mistake again. But

0:46:44.920 --> 0:46:49.239
<v Speaker 2>I thought Caleb after an awful first half, rallying the

0:46:49.280 --> 0:46:52.640
<v Speaker 2>way he did through for two point fifty three touchdowns

0:46:52.760 --> 0:46:58.920
<v Speaker 2>ninety eight rating. Like, Caleb has had seven uh no, six,

0:46:59.040 --> 0:47:03.600
<v Speaker 2>pardon me, really good games this year. Now he's also

0:47:03.680 --> 0:47:07.879
<v Speaker 2>had five awful games. But he's not turning the ball over.

0:47:08.200 --> 0:47:10.960
<v Speaker 2>He's starting to run a little bit more. You're starting

0:47:11.000 --> 0:47:15.360
<v Speaker 2>to see more of the big time talent that you

0:47:15.520 --> 0:47:19.200
<v Speaker 2>saw at USC. So if they get the coach higher, right,

0:47:19.680 --> 0:47:24.479
<v Speaker 2>I'm optimistic about Caleb. So no, I am far more

0:47:24.520 --> 0:47:27.360
<v Speaker 2>worried about Trevor than I am about Caleb.

0:47:27.560 --> 0:47:32.520
<v Speaker 3>Next, Justin Tucker went from being arguably the goat of

0:47:32.680 --> 0:47:36.600
<v Speaker 3>kickers to completely broken. My god, he's missed ten total

0:47:36.719 --> 0:47:40.759
<v Speaker 3>kicks this year and has cost the Ravens games. Detective right,

0:47:41.280 --> 0:47:42.839
<v Speaker 3>what cost Tucker's fall off?

0:47:44.719 --> 0:47:50.920
<v Speaker 2>Listen, he stopped being money from fifty plus a year

0:47:50.960 --> 0:47:55.480
<v Speaker 2>and a half ago. So that happened last season. Now,

0:47:55.560 --> 0:47:58.280
<v Speaker 2>I know people want me to say that Travis Kelsey

0:47:58.400 --> 0:48:00.839
<v Speaker 2>broke him when he tossed his helmet and kicking tea

0:48:00.920 --> 0:48:03.919
<v Speaker 2>when he was warming up, you know, the chief side

0:48:03.920 --> 0:48:07.640
<v Speaker 2>of the field, and I think that played a small part.

0:48:08.040 --> 0:48:11.080
<v Speaker 2>A lot of people are saying it's age. The thing

0:48:11.200 --> 0:48:17.240
<v Speaker 2>is this Demanse kickers typically age quite well. The oh

0:48:17.320 --> 0:48:19.839
<v Speaker 2>I see Kelsey, Yeah, I see the If people are

0:48:19.840 --> 0:48:23.160
<v Speaker 2>watching on YouTube, there's a whole little detective board. He's

0:48:23.200 --> 0:48:26.920
<v Speaker 2>only thirty five, so kickers are usually good. You know,

0:48:27.920 --> 0:48:31.279
<v Speaker 2>Vinetari was kicking into his forties. I think it's in

0:48:31.320 --> 0:48:33.879
<v Speaker 2>his head right now. Now. I will also say this,

0:48:35.160 --> 0:48:38.120
<v Speaker 2>everyone's like, oh that the Ravens should cut you know,

0:48:38.280 --> 0:48:41.520
<v Speaker 2>cut him. Guys there are not good kickers on the

0:48:41.600 --> 0:48:45.520
<v Speaker 2>unemployment line. Like Tucker is not good right now, he

0:48:45.680 --> 0:48:49.759
<v Speaker 2>is still likely better than a guy who's there's only

0:48:49.840 --> 0:48:54.240
<v Speaker 2>like twenty good kickers in the world. There's thirty two teams,

0:48:54.520 --> 0:48:57.439
<v Speaker 2>so the guys who aren't even on a team are

0:48:57.520 --> 0:49:01.880
<v Speaker 2>typically super shaky. So I wouldn't move on from Tucker.

0:49:02.400 --> 0:49:06.080
<v Speaker 2>But I will tell you this, A guy who now

0:49:06.760 --> 0:49:13.239
<v Speaker 2>sneaky has a chance to take Tucker's goat spot is

0:49:13.320 --> 0:49:20.920
<v Speaker 2>Bucker because what Justin Tucker doesn't have is these all

0:49:21.040 --> 0:49:25.759
<v Speaker 2>time playoff moments. He just like he doesn't have a

0:49:25.800 --> 0:49:31.719
<v Speaker 2>ton of you know, like, oh, or really, I mean

0:49:31.760 --> 0:49:37.920
<v Speaker 2>he has high levery, but he I mean he they

0:49:37.960 --> 0:49:40.440
<v Speaker 2>won a Super Bowl when he was a rookie. But

0:49:40.640 --> 0:49:43.880
<v Speaker 2>you don't think of like Justin Tucker playoff game winning

0:49:43.960 --> 0:49:46.440
<v Speaker 2>kicks the way you feel about Bucker, like in the

0:49:46.480 --> 0:49:51.399
<v Speaker 2>thirteen seconds game in the AFC Championship game against the Bengals,

0:49:51.840 --> 0:49:58.080
<v Speaker 2>in the Super Bowl, the against San Francisco, not San Francisco,

0:49:58.120 --> 0:50:01.520
<v Speaker 2>pardon me, against Philadelphia, and so many superols they run together,

0:50:02.440 --> 0:50:07.640
<v Speaker 2>and so that there is just like Buckker now, thanks

0:50:07.640 --> 0:50:11.920
<v Speaker 2>to Tucker's misses, is the most accurate kicker in NFL history.

0:50:12.719 --> 0:50:15.080
<v Speaker 2>He has the record for the most accurate kicker in

0:50:15.200 --> 0:50:18.960
<v Speaker 2>NFL history is Bucker even while he's injured, because Tucker's

0:50:19.000 --> 0:50:24.359
<v Speaker 2>missed right now, like Vina Terry obviously has I think

0:50:24.400 --> 0:50:27.880
<v Speaker 2>the mantle for goat kicker. But I wonder what Buckker

0:50:28.120 --> 0:50:31.800
<v Speaker 2>if Butckker can catch him, and how much this impacts Tucker.

0:50:32.400 --> 0:50:37.319
<v Speaker 2>And so I do think that it is a intriguing

0:50:37.600 --> 0:50:41.160
<v Speaker 2>spot we find ourselves in with Justin Tucker, and the

0:50:41.200 --> 0:50:43.520
<v Speaker 2>fact that the Ravens are openly talking about if they

0:50:43.520 --> 0:50:46.040
<v Speaker 2>have to replace him is not a good sign for

0:50:46.080 --> 0:50:47.480
<v Speaker 2>them all right? Next?

0:50:48.600 --> 0:50:51.920
<v Speaker 3>All right? Uh, the Steelers have revived Russell Wilson and

0:50:51.960 --> 0:50:55.839
<v Speaker 3>are the surprising leaders of the AFC North Detective Right,

0:50:56.200 --> 0:50:58.759
<v Speaker 3>what evidence is there that Pittsburgh can win their first

0:50:58.760 --> 0:51:00.720
<v Speaker 3>playoff game since twenty sixteen?

0:51:02.600 --> 0:51:04.279
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I think there's a lot of evidence of it.

0:51:04.640 --> 0:51:08.480
<v Speaker 2>So even if they fall so oddly to win their

0:51:08.520 --> 0:51:12.440
<v Speaker 2>first playoff game, they might be in a better position

0:51:12.480 --> 0:51:15.040
<v Speaker 2>if they don't win the division. That's probably not true,

0:51:15.400 --> 0:51:17.880
<v Speaker 2>but it wouldn't be as bad as you think, because

0:51:18.800 --> 0:51:21.720
<v Speaker 2>if they don't win the division, if the Ravens catch them,

0:51:22.320 --> 0:51:25.640
<v Speaker 2>then Pittsburgh's first playoff game would be going to Houston.

0:51:26.000 --> 0:51:28.720
<v Speaker 2>And I just think Houston's a wounded team right now

0:51:28.840 --> 0:51:31.279
<v Speaker 2>who would not be able to block Pittsburgh, and the

0:51:31.280 --> 0:51:36.120
<v Speaker 2>Pittsburgh defensive front would beat them. If Baltimore doesn't catch them,

0:51:36.400 --> 0:51:39.040
<v Speaker 2>then their first playoff game is either going to be

0:51:39.120 --> 0:51:44.120
<v Speaker 2>against Baltimore, the Chargers, or the Broncos. I think they

0:51:44.160 --> 0:51:49.200
<v Speaker 2>would be legit favorites against the Broncos, coin flip against

0:51:49.200 --> 0:51:54.399
<v Speaker 2>the Chargers, and slight favorites against the Ravens, And so yeah,

0:51:54.440 --> 0:51:56.680
<v Speaker 2>I do think they break the streak. I do think

0:51:56.760 --> 0:51:58.879
<v Speaker 2>this is the year they finally won a playoff game.

0:51:58.920 --> 0:52:00.839
<v Speaker 2>All right, next, all right?

0:52:01.040 --> 0:52:03.920
<v Speaker 3>Uh, The Patriots had a questionable decision at the end

0:52:03.920 --> 0:52:07.240
<v Speaker 3>of their game versus the Colts. The only seconds remaining,

0:52:07.719 --> 0:52:10.319
<v Speaker 3>they opted to kick a sixty eight yard er over

0:52:10.360 --> 0:52:13.600
<v Speaker 3>a Heil Mary. You guessed it. The ball fell short,

0:52:14.080 --> 0:52:16.719
<v Speaker 3>Detective right, Why did they kick it?

0:52:18.960 --> 0:52:22.560
<v Speaker 2>I because jid Mail is not a good coach. I

0:52:22.680 --> 0:52:25.160
<v Speaker 2>just don't know what to tell you, like the maybe

0:52:25.200 --> 0:52:26.960
<v Speaker 2>he will be one day. Up to this point, he

0:52:27.000 --> 0:52:28.759
<v Speaker 2>hasn't been go ahead.

0:52:28.480 --> 0:52:33.320
<v Speaker 3>No enerject. This is the small investigator, many investigator. The

0:52:33.719 --> 0:52:36.719
<v Speaker 3>chances of you completing a hell Mary or what like?

0:52:37.640 --> 0:52:41.319
<v Speaker 3>I get it, Like the the kick looked pretty good.

0:52:41.600 --> 0:52:43.400
<v Speaker 3>I will say that he got the kick was the

0:52:43.760 --> 0:52:44.839
<v Speaker 3>obviously didn't get there.

0:52:45.000 --> 0:52:49.399
<v Speaker 2>The kick was the kick was zero percent, Like that's

0:52:49.520 --> 0:52:52.799
<v Speaker 2>he hit it perfectly as hard as he could hit it.

0:52:54.200 --> 0:52:56.920
<v Speaker 2>Everything went right on the kick and it was short.

0:52:57.000 --> 0:53:00.359
<v Speaker 2>You know why, because you can't make a six eight

0:53:00.440 --> 0:53:05.000
<v Speaker 2>yard field goal outdoors in the cold unless you're maybe

0:53:05.040 --> 0:53:08.160
<v Speaker 2>Brandon Aubrey certainly not the kick or the Patriots have

0:53:08.640 --> 0:53:11.279
<v Speaker 2>the kick was at zero percent, so I thought it

0:53:11.320 --> 0:53:15.360
<v Speaker 2>was dumb, like hail Mary is at close to zero percent,

0:53:15.719 --> 0:53:18.800
<v Speaker 2>but it's not zero percent. We've seen one. I guess

0:53:18.840 --> 0:53:23.239
<v Speaker 2>my point would be this, we have literally seen a

0:53:23.320 --> 0:53:27.480
<v Speaker 2>hail Mary work this season, this season and countless in

0:53:27.520 --> 0:53:32.440
<v Speaker 2>our lives. We've never ever, ever, ever, ever seen what

0:53:32.600 --> 0:53:35.640
<v Speaker 2>he tried work. We've never seen a sixty eight yard

0:53:35.680 --> 0:53:38.680
<v Speaker 2>or work in all of football history. We've seen a

0:53:38.680 --> 0:53:41.879
<v Speaker 2>hail Mary work a month ago. So I just thought

0:53:41.920 --> 0:53:44.120
<v Speaker 2>it was dumb, that's all. Like, I just it's not

0:53:44.280 --> 0:53:48.960
<v Speaker 2>the move I would have made. All right, Next, Uh no,

0:53:49.160 --> 0:53:49.560
<v Speaker 2>that's it.

0:53:50.160 --> 0:53:51.360
<v Speaker 3>We'll go going into the season.

0:53:51.360 --> 0:53:53.520
<v Speaker 2>Oh, that's it. Sorry, my computer died, so I didn't

0:53:53.560 --> 0:53:55.840
<v Speaker 2>know where we were in the rundown. All right, quick break,

0:53:56.120 --> 0:54:05.440
<v Speaker 2>answered some listener questions. Next, what's right? All right? Welcome

0:54:05.480 --> 0:54:07.600
<v Speaker 2>back in What's right with Nick? Right? All right, demons,

0:54:07.840 --> 0:54:09.719
<v Speaker 2>let's get through these listener questions quick.

0:54:10.560 --> 0:54:14.360
<v Speaker 3>Tyler Fisher, Nick, I know it's not basketball discussion season,

0:54:14.400 --> 0:54:16.400
<v Speaker 3>but can you talk for a minute about how Lebron's

0:54:16.440 --> 0:54:19.640
<v Speaker 3>ten point streak is likely coming to an end very soon?

0:54:20.000 --> 0:54:21.960
<v Speaker 3>In three games this year, he's gone to quarter four

0:54:22.080 --> 0:54:23.080
<v Speaker 3>under ten points.

0:54:24.520 --> 0:54:28.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, listen, I would be surprised if it survives the season,

0:54:29.080 --> 0:54:32.799
<v Speaker 2>and Lebron wanting to play all eighty two games makes

0:54:32.840 --> 0:54:36.000
<v Speaker 2>it less likely it survives the season. Listen, it's lasted

0:54:36.080 --> 0:54:39.520
<v Speaker 2>for years, longer than any other player in league history.

0:54:39.800 --> 0:54:41.880
<v Speaker 2>This is one of the many records that when Michael

0:54:41.920 --> 0:54:44.759
<v Speaker 2>Jordan held it, people cared about it, and when once

0:54:44.800 --> 0:54:47.439
<v Speaker 2>Michael Jordan didn't hold it, everyone acts like it doesn't matter.

0:54:47.480 --> 0:54:50.680
<v Speaker 2>It's a fake record. But the fact that Lebron's gone

0:54:51.719 --> 0:54:57.080
<v Speaker 2>what is it now, fifteen years, sixteen years and not

0:54:57.239 --> 0:55:00.239
<v Speaker 2>had scored in single digits once, not got thrown out out,

0:55:00.320 --> 0:55:03.560
<v Speaker 2>not got injured, not had just one horrific night is

0:55:04.120 --> 0:55:07.480
<v Speaker 2>a remarkable achievement. But yeah, it probably ends this year.

0:55:07.640 --> 0:55:09.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm okay with it. I've made my peace with that.

0:55:10.960 --> 0:55:14.680
<v Speaker 2>I used to sweat it the no. I love that.

0:55:15.160 --> 0:55:17.600
<v Speaker 2>I love that he's not doing load management. It's like

0:55:17.640 --> 0:55:21.879
<v Speaker 2>a final gift to the NBA. Is like showing then

0:55:21.920 --> 0:55:22.640
<v Speaker 2>on his way out.

0:55:22.680 --> 0:55:24.440
<v Speaker 3>It's like, hey, you guys need to be playing.

0:55:24.880 --> 0:55:27.960
<v Speaker 2>I get it, Yes, I you know, like the Lake.

0:55:28.040 --> 0:55:31.279
<v Speaker 2>If I thought the Lakers were actually a championship contender,

0:55:32.080 --> 0:55:34.719
<v Speaker 2>then I would want him to make sure he's at

0:55:34.760 --> 0:55:37.960
<v Speaker 2>peak performance for the playoffs. They're not, though, so it's

0:55:38.000 --> 0:55:39.680
<v Speaker 2>like one last gift to the NBA.

0:55:39.760 --> 0:55:46.319
<v Speaker 3>All right, Next, Isaac merbrathu Hey Nick? Last year? Yeah,

0:55:46.719 --> 0:55:51.160
<v Speaker 3>MOBRATU Sorry? Just last year McCaffrey had an incredible stats

0:55:51.160 --> 0:55:53.680
<v Speaker 3>on a great team. They gave the award to Lamar

0:55:53.920 --> 0:55:56.839
<v Speaker 3>without eye popping stats. Can we argue that they did

0:55:56.840 --> 0:55:58.720
<v Speaker 3>the same thing that they're going to do to Barkley

0:55:59.600 --> 0:56:01.160
<v Speaker 3>last year or last year this year?

0:56:01.280 --> 0:56:07.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, listen, here's the distinction. CMC had great stats. He also,

0:56:07.080 --> 0:56:09.560
<v Speaker 2>though kind of split his portion of the vote with

0:56:09.600 --> 0:56:12.879
<v Speaker 2>his quarterback with Perty because party had great stats too.

0:56:13.200 --> 0:56:16.839
<v Speaker 2>CMC didn't have like the record breaking numbers that looks

0:56:16.880 --> 0:56:21.280
<v Speaker 2>like Saquan's gonna have. And Jalen's not an MVP candidate,

0:56:21.560 --> 0:56:24.719
<v Speaker 2>So I don't think it's gonna be. It might be

0:56:24.800 --> 0:56:27.320
<v Speaker 2>the same thing, but it wouldn't. It's not the exact

0:56:27.360 --> 0:56:28.239
<v Speaker 2>same circumstance.

0:56:28.239 --> 0:56:32.040
<v Speaker 3>All right, Next, uh Ronnie, who do you think is

0:56:32.080 --> 0:56:34.880
<v Speaker 3>the best coach? The best coach to coach the Prince? Next?

0:56:37.040 --> 0:56:42.040
<v Speaker 2>Uh Man? Everyone wants Ben Johnson. I don't know who's

0:56:42.040 --> 0:56:48.680
<v Speaker 2>gonna get him. I would, I would, truly in Jacksonville.

0:56:48.760 --> 0:56:51.879
<v Speaker 2>Not I would love Mike Vrabel like I don't think

0:56:51.880 --> 0:56:55.399
<v Speaker 2>he has to be an offensive coach. I would love

0:56:55.560 --> 0:56:58.279
<v Speaker 2>just a no nonsense guy. It's gonna clean up a

0:56:58.280 --> 0:57:00.760
<v Speaker 2>lot of the issues with the franchise. I think Brabel

0:57:00.800 --> 0:57:03.160
<v Speaker 2>would do that and could have a long runway there.

0:57:03.200 --> 0:57:08.160
<v Speaker 3>All right, next, Isaiah, give how many extra games the

0:57:08.239 --> 0:57:11.000
<v Speaker 3>Chiefs and the Niners play in the playoffs the past years?

0:57:11.360 --> 0:57:14.080
<v Speaker 3>Why are only the Niners getting significant injuries that make

0:57:14.120 --> 0:57:14.520
<v Speaker 3>them worse?

0:57:16.480 --> 0:57:20.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, the Chiefs can just sustain them better. The Chiefs

0:57:20.120 --> 0:57:23.800
<v Speaker 2>lost their number one, number two receiver for the year.

0:57:24.040 --> 0:57:26.760
<v Speaker 2>Then their Hollywood's gonna come back, but they haven't had

0:57:26.800 --> 0:57:29.200
<v Speaker 2>him all year. They lost for shoot Rice in Week three.

0:57:29.480 --> 0:57:34.000
<v Speaker 2>They lost Isaiah Pacheco. Shortly thereafter, they lost their number

0:57:34.000 --> 0:57:37.480
<v Speaker 2>two corner. Their kicker's been out. They the Chiefs are

0:57:37.520 --> 0:57:40.920
<v Speaker 2>just sustaining it better. It's not that now the Niners

0:57:40.920 --> 0:57:43.760
<v Speaker 2>have had a spate of injuries, but they're also a

0:57:43.840 --> 0:57:46.800
<v Speaker 2>much older team. When you have an older team, that

0:57:46.960 --> 0:57:47.880
<v Speaker 2>happens as well.

0:57:48.040 --> 0:57:53.040
<v Speaker 3>All right, last one, Batman, why are you talking? Why

0:57:53.080 --> 0:57:56.280
<v Speaker 3>are you taking victory laps on party? You were consistently

0:57:56.360 --> 0:57:58.840
<v Speaker 3>wrong about how far the Niners would go last year.

0:57:59.240 --> 0:58:01.920
<v Speaker 3>No one said that he can crush with replacement level guys.

0:58:04.280 --> 0:58:07.160
<v Speaker 2>They're not replacement level guys. And by the way, people

0:58:07.200 --> 0:58:09.520
<v Speaker 2>absolutely did say that if you say he's one of

0:58:09.560 --> 0:58:12.080
<v Speaker 2>the best quarterbacks in the league, then you need to

0:58:12.120 --> 0:58:13.760
<v Speaker 2>hold them to the standard that we hold the best

0:58:13.800 --> 0:58:16.080
<v Speaker 2>quarterbacks in the league. That's first of all. Second of all,

0:58:16.160 --> 0:58:19.400
<v Speaker 2>he doesn't have replacement level guys. He has league average guys.

0:58:20.160 --> 0:58:24.480
<v Speaker 2>If all, you go from six All Pros on your offense,

0:58:24.520 --> 0:58:28.520
<v Speaker 2>five All pros on your offense, to just a good

0:58:28.640 --> 0:58:31.439
<v Speaker 2>offensive line with the best left tackle in football there

0:58:31.440 --> 0:58:35.200
<v Speaker 2>most of the year, a top three tight end Deebo Samuel,

0:58:35.520 --> 0:58:39.360
<v Speaker 2>Juwan Jennings, Jordan Mason at running back, Kyle Shannan calling

0:58:39.360 --> 0:58:41.840
<v Speaker 2>your plays. Now, all of a sudden, you are just

0:58:41.960 --> 0:58:47.280
<v Speaker 2>in a median circumstance. You're not in a He's not

0:58:47.360 --> 0:58:51.000
<v Speaker 2>out there playing for the Patriots. The Patriots have replacement

0:58:51.040 --> 0:58:54.280
<v Speaker 2>level guys out there right now, right The Panthers have

0:58:54.400 --> 0:58:58.560
<v Speaker 2>replacement level guys out there right now. The try to

0:58:58.600 --> 0:59:03.880
<v Speaker 2>find another team that's just reft of offensive talent. The

0:59:03.880 --> 0:59:07.920
<v Speaker 2>the who Juice I didn't know, Daniel said, but the

0:59:08.360 --> 0:59:14.400
<v Speaker 2>the Titans, that's the Titans probably have you know, above

0:59:14.480 --> 0:59:19.040
<v Speaker 2>replacement level, but not not great. Like there are teams

0:59:19.080 --> 0:59:22.920
<v Speaker 2>out there with replacement level. The Niners ain't one of them.

0:59:23.240 --> 0:59:29.040
<v Speaker 2>They have league average. But if you if you're born

0:59:29.120 --> 0:59:34.600
<v Speaker 2>in a thirty bedroom mansion and all of a sudden

0:59:35.880 --> 0:59:40.400
<v Speaker 2>you live in a six bedroom, four thousand square foot house,

0:59:41.240 --> 0:59:45.840
<v Speaker 2>you might feel like, oh, I'm poor. Like no, you

0:59:46.240 --> 0:59:50.280
<v Speaker 2>just don't have the best situation in the world. So

0:59:51.080 --> 0:59:54.160
<v Speaker 2>why am I taking a brock Pardy victory lap? Because

0:59:54.160 --> 0:59:57.960
<v Speaker 2>it's well damned deserved. See you guys on Collins Show

0:59:58.000 --> 1:00:00.480
<v Speaker 2>in like a half hour. I gotta hurry see guys later.

1:00:00.560 --> 1:00:04.720
<v Speaker 2>What's right? Hey, thanks for watching. If you're still here,

1:00:04.800 --> 1:00:07.680
<v Speaker 2>do me a favor. Hit the subscribe button, then hit

1:00:07.720 --> 1:00:09.840
<v Speaker 2>the bell so you can be notified when we have

1:00:09.960 --> 1:00:13.480
<v Speaker 2>new episodes. After you've done that, one more favor, go

1:00:13.520 --> 1:00:17.120
<v Speaker 2>to your favorite audio platform of choice and subscribe there

1:00:17.160 --> 1:00:21.120
<v Speaker 2>as well. Don't forget. We're live every Tuesday and Thursday

1:00:21.240 --> 1:00:25.120
<v Speaker 2>ten thirty am Eastern Ish ten thirty five, ten forty.

1:00:25.160 --> 1:00:27.720
<v Speaker 2>It sometimes changes, but that's why you hit the bell.

1:00:28.040 --> 1:00:31.240
<v Speaker 2>You hit the bell so you're notified. You subscribe so

1:00:31.240 --> 1:00:34.080
<v Speaker 2>we can get to two hundred thousand followers. We're right

1:00:34.080 --> 1:00:36.280
<v Speaker 2>around one hundred and fifty thousand. We'd love to get

1:00:36.280 --> 1:00:39.240
<v Speaker 2>to two hundred thousand, Get Demondday. Another plaque, so like

1:00:39.520 --> 1:00:42.920
<v Speaker 2>subscribe rate, send a rating to do all that cool stuff.

1:00:42.920 --> 1:00:43.480
<v Speaker 2>Thanks guys,