WEBVTT - 8/4/26: Flock Camera Revolt, China Gives Iran Weapons Amid US Decline

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:01.599
<v Speaker 1>Hey guys, Saga and Crystal here.

0:00:01.680 --> 0:00:05.200
<v Speaker 2>Independent media has played a truly massive role in this election,

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.840
<v Speaker 2>and we are so excited about what that means for

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 2>the future of this show.

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:10.760
<v Speaker 1>This is the only place where you can find honest

0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:13.239
<v Speaker 1>perspectives from the left and the right that simply does

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:14.680
<v Speaker 1>not exist anywhere else.

0:00:14.760 --> 0:00:17.080
<v Speaker 2>So if that is something that's important to you, please

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:19.599
<v Speaker 2>go to Breakingpoints dot com. Become a member today and

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:22.800
<v Speaker 2>you'll get access to our full shows, unedited, ad free,

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:25.600
<v Speaker 2>and all put together for you every morning in your inbox.

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>We need your help to build the future of independent

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 1>news media and we hope to see you at Breakingpoints

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 1>dot com.

0:00:34.120 --> 0:00:38.519
<v Speaker 2>So the mass spread of flock cameras across the country

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:43.280
<v Speaker 2>has increasingly become an issue of deep concern to Americans.

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:46.480
<v Speaker 2>There's one organization that has sprung up called Deflock, which

0:00:46.520 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 2>you can go to their website and you can see

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:52.320
<v Speaker 2>a map of where all the flock cameras are located.

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 2>They're doing sort of standard First Amendment advocacy against the

0:00:56.960 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 2>spread of this surveillance technology. Flo CEO was asked about

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 2>this group and he labeled them as a terrorist organization.

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:06.839
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a listen.

0:01:07.319 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 3>You've got organizations like the ACLU and the FF who

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 3>take an above a board approach to fight for their

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:16.320
<v Speaker 3>point of view. And thankfully we live in a beautifully democratic,

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 3>capitalistic country where we can fight in court, and I

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 3>have a lot of respect for those groups because they

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 3>have reasonable debates and we follow the law. And then

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:30.840
<v Speaker 3>unfortunately there's terroristic organizations like dflock whose primary motivation is chaos.

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 3>They are closer to Antifa than they are anything else,

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:36.959
<v Speaker 3>and now I think is unfortunate because we don't want chaos,

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 3>or I don't want chaos. I like law and order,

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 3>like a society that has a better rock of safety.

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:44.319
<v Speaker 3>So for those groups, I think it's just disappointing that

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 3>they haven't chosen a more constructive minnerism to try to

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:50.000
<v Speaker 3>get what they want, which they have a right to have.

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 3>But that's why we have a democratically elected process, right

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 3>Like we're not forcing flock on anyone. Elected officials know

0:01:57.640 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 3>that as a community, you want to be safe.

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, this is complete insanity, Sager, but it also

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 2>fits into the rhetorical and legal framework that the Trump

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 2>admin has set up. It's not an accident that he

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 2>named tex Antifa here because they've used NSBM seven and

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:15.520
<v Speaker 2>other tools to try to go after these left wing

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 2>groups that they label as terrorists, and so he adopts

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 2>that language to try to you know, put deflock in

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 2>the same category as these other groups that have been

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:28.519
<v Speaker 2>identified by the Trump administration as terrorists. But literally, you

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 2>can go to their website, the tagline says welcome to

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 2>deflock and open source Project Mapping license plate readers, Like,

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 2>that's just a basic service and advocacy group that is,

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:41.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, being provided to the public so that they

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 2>can push back on what's happening in their communities where

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 2>they've had very little.

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:48.079
<v Speaker 1>Say yeah, I think this is absolutely insane, and it's

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:51.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty obvious that this CEO first of all, dflock is

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>a nonprofit organization, So if you're going to say that

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:57.239
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, terroristic or whatever, frankly, they should be

0:02:57.240 --> 0:03:00.160
<v Speaker 1>able to sue if they want to, because you know,

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 1>you can't just say sorry. So genuinely, I mean, like

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 1>that's an actual term which has meaning. It's a nonprofit organization,

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 1>which is open source, which allows people just to flag

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 1>where flock cameras actually are. By that definition, weighs as

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:18.280
<v Speaker 1>a terrorist organization because it lets you flag where police

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>officers are whenever they're trying to speed trap you. So

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 1>let's start with that the second thing. And you know

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:26.799
<v Speaker 1>I said this, I got such an angry message from

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 1>a right wing friend of mine where I said, I

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 1>genuinely would trust a place like China or Singapore to

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 1>surveil me and to a master avail me, then I

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 1>would Flock. And I'm about to show you why is

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 1>because it is a for profit company with very sketchy

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 1>ability to actually hold to account and is, by the way,

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>not wholly bought in by our democratic system, also with

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 1>a profit motive. Okay, so you put those three things together,

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 1>and oh lo and behold, you have the problems that

0:03:57.600 --> 0:04:00.920
<v Speaker 1>befall all American institutions. Let's go and put this next

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:04.119
<v Speaker 1>one up here on a screen. In one California town,

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Flock misread license plates in seventy one percent of the

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>alerts that it sent to police. Summer of twenty twenty four,

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 1>a police called a man to discuss a persistent problem

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 1>with his license plate. The city's AI powered license plate reader,

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:21.479
<v Speaker 1>made up by Flock, had repeatedly misread the plate six times.

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:24.279
<v Speaker 1>They had sent alerts to the Roseville Police Department, identifying

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the vehicle as stolen or used in a felony crime.

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:31.479
<v Speaker 1>Police could see that the flock software kept confusing nine

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:34.160
<v Speaker 1>four an eight. The car owner said he would take

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:37.839
<v Speaker 1>off his license plate cover, and soon after it happened again.

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:41.800
<v Speaker 1>So this guy is getting harassed by the police because

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:45.359
<v Speaker 1>the AI license plate reader is not you know, is

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 1>not reading his plate correctly. Now again, if you're going

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 1>to pay this company all this money, you're going to

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:52.360
<v Speaker 1>mount all these cameras in public and make it so

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 1>that we're basically eroding all public privacy, you would at

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:58.479
<v Speaker 1>the very least say could it work? And yet in

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 1>this case it's not working. Oh. Second one is that

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:06.040
<v Speaker 1>we also know about institutional misuse and abuse. This also

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:09.600
<v Speaker 1>happened many times with the NSA with their warrant list

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 1>spuying program. Let's put this one up here on the screen.

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:17.159
<v Speaker 1>How raw rogue officers turned a nationwide camera network into

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>a tool for stalking. So, for example, they interview a

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:24.280
<v Speaker 1>woman Marcy Bakley. She couldn't understand how her ex boyfriend

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>always seemed to know where she was when she went

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 1>to buy groceries. He would text her about it. Sometimes

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>within minutes, despite he was working fifteen miles from her

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:34.039
<v Speaker 1>home as police chief in a small town in Atlanta.

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 1>One day in twenty twenty four, when he incorrectly suspected

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:38.839
<v Speaker 1>that she'd gone to see a man against his witches,

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:41.160
<v Speaker 1>he messaged her, I didn't think he would slip up.

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 1>She began to feel like she was constantly being watched.

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 1>She installed cameras around her home and on her patio

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:49.240
<v Speaker 1>to see if he was stalking her. She bought hidden

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 1>camera detective a detector. Three times, in desperation, she drove

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 1>her car to a mechanic shop. Then one day she

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 1>pressed him for answers, and he said he was using

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 1>his flock access as a police officer quote like thousands

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>of other law enforcement agencies, his police cars can his

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 1>police force can follow cars spotted by flocks sprawling network

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 1>of AI roadside cameras which record passing license plate into

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:17.840
<v Speaker 1>a mappable database that officers can then search while investigating

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:21.359
<v Speaker 1>a crime. However, they then note that it's obviously rife

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and abuse. Now, to be clear, he was arrested on

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:28.599
<v Speaker 1>charges of stocking harassment and license plate misreader abuse, but

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:32.480
<v Speaker 1>as you can see very clearly is that there are

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 1>no actual checks within the system from stopping these small

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:40.360
<v Speaker 1>town sheriffs or any of these other places with very

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:43.719
<v Speaker 1>little accountability to be able to use it for whatever

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>ends that they want. And I'm not, you know, against

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:50.159
<v Speaker 1>the police or any of that, but I do think

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 1>it's very very clear that if we're going to have

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:56.400
<v Speaker 1>a system like this and then spread it very oddly

0:06:56.920 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 1>with no real like federal government oversight, keep it to

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, contracts with localities and with states, that is

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:09.479
<v Speaker 1>clearly to the advantage of flock the flock the company,

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 1>which is way less accountable, as I said, to some

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 1>nationally organized system with at the very least you could

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 1>have some ability to have democratic checks on this ability.

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 1>And it also just gets to the point of these

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 1>cameras went up. We have no say about it at all. Yeah,

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:26.680
<v Speaker 1>we're all out there here, Okay, they're here. Better deal

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 1>with it.

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 2>And think about how terrifying this was for this woman.

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:33.360
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god, he had looked up her tags and

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 2>those of her teenage daughter more than six hundred times.

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 2>More than six hundred times. By the way, you can

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 2>go to have I been flocked, and they do a

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 2>search that aggregates police search logs to see if your

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:50.200
<v Speaker 2>license plate has been searched. So at least that public

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 2>tool is available to you. And I think it's no

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:57.520
<v Speaker 2>accident that the CEO of Flock finds this sort of

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, open access in for me to be such

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 2>a threat to their business model, because you do start

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 2>to see the public. The more they become aware of this,

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 2>the more horrified they are by it, and the more

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 2>sort of organic push back there is to it. But

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 2>lest you think that this was a one off case

0:08:14.600 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 2>with this, you know one bad apple who was using

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 2>the technology, misusing the technology to stalk his ex and

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 2>her teenage daughter. Authorities have charged your accused at least

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 2>fifty law enforcement officers of using this for unauthorized purposes.

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 2>You had one dude who was tracking an X to

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 2>see if she was going to an abortion clinic. You

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 2>had all kinds of stalking to see if they were

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:39.960
<v Speaker 2>with a new man, or stalking the new man to

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:44.199
<v Speaker 2>see what he was up to. Threats, abuse, horrifying, horrifying

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:46.680
<v Speaker 2>stuff that is going on with this, And to your point,

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 2>there's really no laws around it, and you think the

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:51.839
<v Speaker 2>police departments are going to just on their own make

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:55.439
<v Speaker 2>sure that there's you know, limited use of this technology. No,

0:08:55.640 --> 0:08:57.320
<v Speaker 2>they want a free hand to be able to do

0:08:57.400 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 2>whatever they want with it, so that they can deploy

0:09:00.600 --> 0:09:02.839
<v Speaker 2>it in the ways that they, you know, think are

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 2>going to be useful and easy for them. It really

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:06.840
<v Speaker 2>is sort of like crack cocaine to these police departments,

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 2>because even that one in California where they found the

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 2>license plates were being misread seventy one percent of the time.

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:15.680
<v Speaker 2>You might look at that and go, this seems like

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 2>it might be more trouble than it's worth. Maybe they'll

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:19.560
<v Speaker 2>just get rid of it. They're not getting rid of

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:23.440
<v Speaker 2>it because in the certain cases they find it useful.

0:09:23.760 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 2>And so once this technology becomes embedded, even when it

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 2>performs extremely poorly, even when it causes all sorts of

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 2>civil rights violations and privacy violations, it is very difficult

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 2>to dislodge because the police departments like it, They enjoy it,

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:44.200
<v Speaker 2>and just one other piece here in terms of you know,

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 2>all right, so what's the big deal if they misidentify

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 2>the license plate? Who really, you know, who really cares? Okay,

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of awkward for the police departments, et cetera.

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 2>Maybe there's misuse an expenditure of resources that they wouldn't need.

0:09:56.280 --> 0:09:58.600
<v Speaker 2>Put D four up on the screen. Just think about

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 2>what this would look like for you, you and your family.

0:10:01.200 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 2>So this is a guy who test drives vehicles, like

0:10:04.160 --> 0:10:06.080
<v Speaker 2>that's his job. He like test drives vehicles and then

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:08.439
<v Speaker 2>he writes up reviews of them for this website called

0:10:08.520 --> 0:10:13.600
<v Speaker 2>The Drive. Well, because of a sort of technical glitch

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:16.360
<v Speaker 2>and error in the way that they were tracking these

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 2>test drive vehicles, the vehicle that he was test driving,

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 2>this very expensive one, was flagged as having been stolen.

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 2>So police in this town tracked him and his family

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 2>for days. They had all this video recording of him,

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:32.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, going about his life, going to the grocery store,

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:35.360
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. He and his wife pull into a Kohle's

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:40.680
<v Speaker 2>parking lot. Multiple police vehicles like race up, surround them,

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 2>pin them in. He's freaking out, like what is going

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:46.960
<v Speaker 2>on here, and you know, responds in a way that

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 2>sort of de escalates the situation. Fortunately, these cops listened

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 2>to him and believed what he had to say. One

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:55.720
<v Speaker 2>of them, luckily, was actually familiar with the drive and

0:10:55.800 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 2>was like, Okay, this is legit. Because you can imagine

0:10:57.880 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 2>this sounds like bullshit, Like no, no, I just test

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 2>drive these cars for a living, these expensive cars for

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:04.360
<v Speaker 2>a living. You could see how that would sound like bullshit.

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 2>And they told him, Hey, you're lucky that this happened here,

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:08.960
<v Speaker 2>because if it happened in the city, they would come

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:12.080
<v Speaker 2>at you guns drawn. Like that's what we're talking about here.

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:16.520
<v Speaker 2>This is complete insanity. And to the point about the

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:19.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, the rising political consciousness and why some of

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:23.199
<v Speaker 2>this just information being accessible to the public is creating

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 2>a real problem for them. You can see some response

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:28.959
<v Speaker 2>on both the right and the left as politicians try

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 2>to position themselves as caring about these issues in local communities.

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 2>Byron Donald's down in Florida, we can put D five up.

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:36.840
<v Speaker 1>On the screen.

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:40.960
<v Speaker 2>He's sounding the alarm about flock surveillance cameras. He's saying

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:44.320
<v Speaker 2>that they're impinging on constitutional rights. He's calling for a

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 2>full pause. And I took note of this. Francesca, hang,

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:49.679
<v Speaker 2>how I think you know we talked earlier about the

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:51.840
<v Speaker 2>whole canceled Thanksgiving situation.

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:53.160
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot to say about that.

0:11:53.600 --> 0:11:57.359
<v Speaker 2>In terms of why she's leading in the Democratic primary

0:11:57.760 --> 0:12:00.680
<v Speaker 2>and certainly has a shot in the general election, is

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:02.800
<v Speaker 2>because of the range of issues that she has really

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 2>chosen to focus on, among them data centers, and she

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:11.440
<v Speaker 2>gives a mention to flot cameras in this new ad

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 2>that she just put out.

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a listen to that.

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 4>I'm here at the failed fox Con manufacturing site. This

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 4>is now a Microsoft AI data center plan. Just like

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:25.400
<v Speaker 4>in twenty eighteen with fox Con, Republicans will sell out

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 4>our communities again.

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:28.680
<v Speaker 2>I think we can say this is we can say

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:30.840
<v Speaker 2>this is the eighth wonder of the world.

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 4>Flock cameras, poison groundwater and eye source that don't create

0:12:35.880 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 4>future good jobs, two billion dollars in tax breaks that

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:42.320
<v Speaker 4>you and I will be paying for. I'm the only

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:45.280
<v Speaker 4>candidate in this race to call for a moratorium on

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 4>the construction of new AI data centers. We can't afford

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 4>to be fox conned again. The people deserve a same.

0:12:53.040 --> 0:12:56.280
<v Speaker 2>So there you see the mention of flot cameras being

0:12:56.440 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 2>pulled into this broader issue said around, you know, pushing

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:02.560
<v Speaker 2>back on data centers, tapping into the whole Fox counn

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:05.079
<v Speaker 2>situation in Wisconsin as well. But I took note of

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:07.959
<v Speaker 2>she was the first Democratic candidate that I'd seen put

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:10.000
<v Speaker 2>this in you know, any of the ads, and so

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:13.760
<v Speaker 2>you ask yourself, why has she quickly skyrocketed to the

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 2>top of the Democratic primary leader board and you know

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 2>is basically FATA company that she's going to be the

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:23.840
<v Speaker 2>Democratic nominee against some very prominent establishment back candidates that

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:26.160
<v Speaker 2>she was up against. And I think it's because she

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 2>really has had her finger on the pulse of some

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:32.200
<v Speaker 2>of these bubbling issues that are really also cross ideological right.

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>And that's that's why we show the Byron Donalds thing,

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, very likely to be the next governor of Florida.

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 1>He is saying that you need a full pause. We've

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 1>had a number actually of GOP representatives very recently who

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 1>have been talking about flock. I mean, it's very obvious

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 1>because at the high level, like I said, there's no

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:54.439
<v Speaker 1>federal regulation on AI license plate readers. It's all state

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 1>and local. The company is getting fantastically rich. These have

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>come across the entire name. You can just go to

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:03.600
<v Speaker 1>deflock and actually look at the map of where they

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 1>all are. Very likely it's already in your community, or

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you drive one at least unwittingly. You have at a

0:14:09.920 --> 0:14:12.440
<v Speaker 1>minimum in the last few months, and you have no

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 1>say in this whole Like have I had been flocked.

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:19.200
<v Speaker 1>That's only because a foia information that you're able to see.

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 1>But there's no actual regulatory body on whether this is

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 1>okay that we're outsourcing all this info completely to a

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 1>private company which is now saying that if you track

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 1>where they are that you're somehow a terrorist. So I

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>think that the political dynamics around this are very important.

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Anybody should be deeply concerned about this ability of a

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 1>private company to just come in partner with the localities

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 1>of which there's very little insight, regulation or even knowledge

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>of the community itself. They come up everywhere and then

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, the justification is is that it's vital in

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 1>helping solve crime, and I think that's probably true, But

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 1>there's also a significant downside we're seeing already with the abuse,

0:14:56.480 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 1>with the mystery. There needs to be the ability for

0:14:58.560 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the public to have some sort of say to keep

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>things actually accountable, and it's become I mean, I've seen

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 1>this spread like wildfire in terms of people who are

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:10.160
<v Speaker 1>upset about this, you know, general feeling not just with

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 1>data centers, but with the cameras of being mass surveiled

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:17.359
<v Speaker 1>all the time. Imagine COVID if this type of technology

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 1>had been as widespread at that time, they're like, oh,

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 1>you got a ticket, you left your house during lockdown

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 1>like that. It's so so easy. I mean to think

0:15:26.560 --> 0:15:28.520
<v Speaker 1>about what you know, the state of California would have

0:15:28.520 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 1>done in the middle of a lockdown if they had

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:33.560
<v Speaker 1>this type of technology, and how they easily could have

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:36.720
<v Speaker 1>made it and integrated it into their enforcement regime. If

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 1>you're worried about immigration, yeah, well, oh you're an activist

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and you happen to be in the area. Here you go,

0:15:42.320 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 1>here's a ticket. You know, beds are coming to your door,

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>And frankly, I think that's already happening. I was just

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 1>reading a Wall Street Journal piece passive this morning. But

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 1>this is what enables it. This is the reason, and

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 1>this is exactly why I think most people at the

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 1>very lea should demand a hell of a lot more

0:15:57.160 --> 0:16:00.400
<v Speaker 1>regulation and safeguard as opposed to just allowing private company

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 1>states and locality just put these things up wherever we live,

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 1>basically with no real notice, I think, to all of us.

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 2>And so, yeah, well, and Sager, you're making an important

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 2>point here, which is, well, it may help solve certain

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 2>types of crimes. It's also opening up an entirely new

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:21.280
<v Speaker 2>vector of potential criminality, as you can see with all

0:16:21.320 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 2>of this stalking and harassment that is going on here.

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:27.360
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, I mean in kind of a similar way

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 2>with the immigration crackdown, where on the one hand you

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 2>could say, oh, this is law and order. On the

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 2>other hand, you saw all the chaos that created and

0:16:33.520 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 2>all the criminal behavior from the ICE agents in the

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 2>street which just went completely unpunished. You can see a

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 2>similar nexus here where, yes, on the one hand, it

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:45.280
<v Speaker 2>may make it easier to track some of the bad guys,

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 2>on the other hand, it enables a whole other series

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:50.320
<v Speaker 2>of bad guys to do things that are really horrifying

0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 2>and terrifying and infringe on our liberties. There's always a

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 2>balance in a society between you know, this sort of

0:16:56.760 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 2>like authoritarianism, but you know, maybe the crime get solved

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 2>versus people having some liberty that has to be struck.

0:17:04.040 --> 0:17:05.920
<v Speaker 2>And I think most Americans are saying this goes way

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 2>too far in the direction of just a complete, a

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:09.880
<v Speaker 2>total surveillance state.

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because it's it comes down to enforcement, you know,

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:15.200
<v Speaker 1>it comes down to and you you could to it

0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:18.960
<v Speaker 1>in multiple different directions. If you are in Seattle, people

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 1>are literally smoking crack on the bus. But if you speed,

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna get a ticket. That's insane. That is a

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 1>complete insane. Now let me do the other way. So

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:30.439
<v Speaker 1>I just talked about the lowest common denominor named lowest

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:33.880
<v Speaker 1>common denominator of society, a literal crackhead or a fence

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 1>and all head. Well, let's switch it. If you are

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 1>one of these people who Trump just pardoned for a

0:17:38.680 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 1>multi billion dollars ponzi scheme, right, and you get out

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 1>of prison, But I run a red light and I

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:47.400
<v Speaker 1>get twenty five dollars ticket. That's bullshit too. So that's

0:17:47.400 --> 0:17:51.359
<v Speaker 1>what it comes back. There's no consistent enforcement. It comes

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 1>down to run of the middle. Actual everyday citizen is

0:17:55.680 --> 0:17:58.440
<v Speaker 1>dually screwed, and there's this type of system. We have

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of compassion. You know, you got a federal

0:18:00.880 --> 0:18:03.159
<v Speaker 1>government on the side of the ultra rich. But if

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:05.199
<v Speaker 1>you're just a normal everyday guy and you're just you know,

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 1>you're not a fentanyl addict, you're not an ultra rich billionaire.

0:18:08.119 --> 0:18:10.439
<v Speaker 1>You're the person actually who's has the most consistent law

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:13.159
<v Speaker 1>enforcement directed at you. And I think that's what is

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:16.920
<v Speaker 1>wrong with our country. So anyway, some free from free

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 1>law and order discourse there for some of the candidates

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:22.200
<v Speaker 1>that are out there. All right, let's get to Japan.

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Joining us now is Daniel Besner. He is the author

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:30.880
<v Speaker 1>of the Imperious Realism substack, the author of Imperious Realism,

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:33.119
<v Speaker 1>the book which we could show all of you, and

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:37.359
<v Speaker 1>the host of the American Prestige podcast. That's a record

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:41.480
<v Speaker 1>intro here for guests. But again someone have corresponded with

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 1>a few times and who really caught my interest with

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:47.359
<v Speaker 1>some of his writing and some of his analysis. So

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much for joining us, Dan, we appreciate it.

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:51.879
<v Speaker 5>Thank you so much for having me. Really happy to

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:52.119
<v Speaker 5>be here.

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:55.479
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely so, you've been really lasered in on this theory

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 1>of imperious realism which you've developed. Kind of the fallout

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 1>of post Cold War liberalism and the rise of a

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:05.200
<v Speaker 1>new multi polar world one of the things topics that

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:08.640
<v Speaker 1>we cover pretty extensively here on our show. Just to

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 1>link it to today's news, let's put this one up

0:19:10.600 --> 0:19:14.280
<v Speaker 1>here for example, on the screen about Iran is said

0:19:14.320 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 1>to get some Chinese shoulder launched missile systems in weeks

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 1>made me think of some of your analysis. This is

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:23.160
<v Speaker 1>exactly the same type of tactics the United States undertook

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:26.720
<v Speaker 1>during the Cold War against the Soviet Union. But you know,

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Joe or generally, maybe give the audience an idea of

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:34.119
<v Speaker 1>your framework here around imperious realism, what it means for

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:35.879
<v Speaker 1>the United States and then the future of the world,

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:37.880
<v Speaker 1>and connected here to the Iran situation.

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely so. I think there's something interesting happening in how

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:48.040
<v Speaker 5>Americans understand their role in the world and what I

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 5>would term the American Empire, which is this notion that

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:54.879
<v Speaker 5>there's really no changing it, that there's really no way

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 5>to transform the American Empire, to transform geopolitics. And I

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:02.240
<v Speaker 5>think this is a transformation from how Americans understood their

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 5>world role as recently as the nineteen nineties, when someone

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:07.920
<v Speaker 5>like madel and Olivery could say on the Today Show

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 5>that the United States sees further than other countries, which

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 5>gives us license to act in the world. I think

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 5>the failures of the global War on Terror and also

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:19.399
<v Speaker 5>the end of what I would call mass politics, the

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:23.720
<v Speaker 5>inability of people to actually affect foreign policy and economic policy,

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:27.480
<v Speaker 5>and a number of other issue areas has engendered this

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 5>cynicism about American power, but this idea that we must

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:34.280
<v Speaker 5>nevertheless act in the world, but then we feel guilty

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 5>about it and don't think that anything could really change.

0:20:36.960 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 5>So the way that I think about imperialist realism is

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 5>that it's easier to imagine the end of the world

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 5>than it is to imagine the end of the American empire.

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:49.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean fascinating kind of to put in that perspective,

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:52.720
<v Speaker 1>but just break it down more towards the path towards

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:55.200
<v Speaker 1>multipolarity and how it fits within that framework.

0:20:56.000 --> 0:20:59.399
<v Speaker 5>Sure, so I think this is why it actually matters,

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 5>because I think that the world is becoming a more

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 5>multi polar world. The United States was uniquely powerful both

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 5>after World War Two, were controlled something like half of

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:12.119
<v Speaker 5>the world's manufacturing base, had an atomic monopoly, that is,

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 5>a monopoly of atomic weapons, really had the world's only

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 5>real air force, and the more we learn about the

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:20.560
<v Speaker 5>Soviet Union, particularly in the fifties, sixties, and seventies, the

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 5>more we learned that it was actually incredibly weak, much

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:26.080
<v Speaker 5>weaker than Americans could have really known at the time.

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:28.160
<v Speaker 5>And then, of course, after the end of the Cold War,

0:21:28.200 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 5>the United States was the last remaining superpower. It was

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:34.879
<v Speaker 5>really the global hedgemon. This was the so called unipolar moment,

0:21:35.240 --> 0:21:41.119
<v Speaker 5>which Charles Crowdhammer term that Charles Crowdhammer basically identified. But

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 5>I think that two things have happened in the last

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 5>twenty five years when the United States squandered its global power.

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:50.159
<v Speaker 5>You see with the global War terror and just failure

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 5>after failure there, whether you're looking at Iraq, Libya, or Afghanistan,

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:58.480
<v Speaker 5>just total disintegration of American farm policy there. And then

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:01.480
<v Speaker 5>you also have the recession, which I think has really

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:05.639
<v Speaker 5>damaged the United States's global position. And so you have

0:22:05.760 --> 0:22:09.440
<v Speaker 5>those two things coupled with the quote unquote rise of China,

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:11.680
<v Speaker 5>but really the re emergence of China as a major

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 5>global power, which it was for most of human history,

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:16.720
<v Speaker 5>and also the re emergence of Russia as a global power.

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:19.879
<v Speaker 5>So you have this new multipolar world. And just to

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 5>wrap up here, why this is important is that this

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:24.720
<v Speaker 5>is precisely the moment where we need to imagine alternatives

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:28.919
<v Speaker 5>to American global empire, because this alternative is going to happen.

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 5>The question is not a matter of if, but when,

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 5>And the real issue for us in this country is

0:22:34.560 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 5>how we manage this transition to multipolarity. Is it going

0:22:37.040 --> 0:22:39.159
<v Speaker 5>to be violent or is it going to be not violent?

0:22:40.480 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 2>Danielle talk a little bit about the shift away from

0:22:44.119 --> 0:22:48.680
<v Speaker 2>even rhetorical support for the quote unquote liberal international order.

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:51.239
<v Speaker 2>So for my entire life, you know, all of our

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:55.520
<v Speaker 2>wars and interventions have been framed in these liberal international values.

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 2>We all know the ways that the American Empire has

0:22:57.520 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 2>fallen short of that rhetoric, but the rhetoric was deployed,

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 2>We're going to bring freedom to the Iraqis et cetera,

0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:06.280
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. And now between the genocide and Gaza, and

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:10.679
<v Speaker 2>you know, the attacks on Iran and the enabling of

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:14.080
<v Speaker 2>any number of continued Israeli war crimes, there's really not

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:18.720
<v Speaker 2>even a sort of gesture towards that liberal internationalism. You

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 2>could see it also with just kidnapping Maduro and saying

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 2>we're going to take Venezuela. There's no wrapping it in oh,

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:26.680
<v Speaker 2>human rights, and he was a bad guy. It's all

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:28.679
<v Speaker 2>just like, no, we want their stuff and we're going

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:30.600
<v Speaker 2>to take it, and we're going to be overt about it.

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:33.359
<v Speaker 2>You write that this is effectively a sign of the times,

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 2>and that We're moving into an era where no longer

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:39.439
<v Speaker 2>will there be this sort of overarching ideological frameworks that

0:23:39.480 --> 0:23:42.800
<v Speaker 2>are used to justify actions in the world. So talk

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:45.879
<v Speaker 2>a little bit about what that shift, how that shift

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:46.720
<v Speaker 2>is occurring, and.

0:23:46.640 --> 0:23:50.119
<v Speaker 5>What it means absolutely, and it's a really important question.

0:23:50.600 --> 0:23:53.600
<v Speaker 5>So it's perhaps the easiest way to see this is

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:56.679
<v Speaker 5>to compare something like the George W. Bush administration's national

0:23:56.680 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 5>security strategy with national security strategies. And this where I

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:02.800
<v Speaker 5>think it's interesting from not only the Trump administration but

0:24:02.840 --> 0:24:05.440
<v Speaker 5>the Biden administration. When you look back on the War

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:09.160
<v Speaker 5>on Terror George W. Bush national security strategies, you see

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:13.600
<v Speaker 5>consistent references to democracy promotion, to democracy promotion being the

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 5>key to American security, and this, you know, I'm an

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 5>elder millennial, This really defined American foreign policy in the

0:24:20.280 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 5>two thousands and really even into the twenty tens. Obama

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 5>himself also talks about things like democracy and humanity and

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:32.480
<v Speaker 5>humane war and bringing effectively liberalism to the international space.

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 5>But I think that this is, as you said, Crystal,

0:24:34.600 --> 0:24:37.120
<v Speaker 5>this is just impossible to believe after the global war

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 5>and terror and what you see, and this is really interesting,

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 5>this transition to begin not even really in the first

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 5>Trump administration, but more so in the Biden administration. So

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:49.480
<v Speaker 5>if you remember, Biden came into office framing international politics

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:52.679
<v Speaker 5>as a struggle between democracy and authoritarianism. But when you

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 5>actually look at how policymakers and the Biden administration talked,

0:24:56.600 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 5>for example, about the Ukraine War and Russia's invasion of

0:24:59.840 --> 0:25:02.720
<v Speaker 5>u and why the United States should, for examples, and

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:06.440
<v Speaker 5>weapons to Ukraine, they almost never talked about democracy or

0:25:06.480 --> 0:25:11.280
<v Speaker 5>protecting Ukrainian democracy. They talked totally in the language of interests.

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 5>Lincoln says, like, the United States needs to do this,

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:16.240
<v Speaker 5>otherwise there'll be another power and that will be bad

0:25:16.280 --> 0:25:19.200
<v Speaker 5>for American interests. They never talk about democracy. And obviously

0:25:19.240 --> 0:25:21.920
<v Speaker 5>this is tripled down with the second Trump administration, who

0:25:21.960 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 5>never even pretends to have this sort of global human

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 5>rights vision. And what I think is really interesting here

0:25:28.160 --> 0:25:29.720
<v Speaker 5>is that this is something that you don't only see

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:31.920
<v Speaker 5>in the United States. You also see it in China,

0:25:32.000 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 5>and you also see it in Russia. When you look

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 5>at the national security strategies of China and Russia, there's

0:25:36.520 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 5>almost no discussion of ideology. For example, the Chinese national

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 5>security strategy, you'd think they'd mentioned communism or socialism. They

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 5>mentioned it like something thirteen times, and they mentioned security

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 5>hundreds and hundreds of times, and in the Russian national

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:53.480
<v Speaker 5>security strategy they barely mention ideology. So what you see here,

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 5>I think, and then we could talk more about this.

0:25:55.520 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 5>This is the consequence of what happens when all major

0:25:58.880 --> 0:26:01.439
<v Speaker 5>nations on Earth, basically every nation except in North Korea,

0:26:01.720 --> 0:26:05.479
<v Speaker 5>has embraced a capitalist form of organizing the industrialist and

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 5>industrial and post industrial economies. There's nothing really ideological to

0:26:09.880 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 5>fight over any longer. No one's promoting a fascist way

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:14.840
<v Speaker 5>to organize an economy. No one's even promoting a communist

0:26:14.840 --> 0:26:17.919
<v Speaker 5>way to organize an economy. We're all different forms of capitalism.

0:26:18.040 --> 0:26:20.840
<v Speaker 5>So where Francis Fukuyama said that the end of history

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:23.520
<v Speaker 5>would mean the triumph of liberalism, what we see is

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:25.159
<v Speaker 5>that the end of history, which is to say the

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 5>spread of capitalism, actually just means means that liberalism itself

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:31.679
<v Speaker 5>is withering away. And I think this explains a lot

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:34.360
<v Speaker 5>about international politics and also domestic politics.

0:26:36.960 --> 0:26:38.960
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that you said which is important

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 1>there is, you know, the World War two, at the

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:46.159
<v Speaker 1>most reductive level could be understood as a battle between

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 1>authoritarianism and fascist organization alongside democracy or the people's way

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:56.480
<v Speaker 1>to One way is literal Bolshevism, other is democracy. A

0:26:56.520 --> 0:26:58.760
<v Speaker 1>lot more complicated than that, but that's an easy way

0:26:59.000 --> 0:27:01.560
<v Speaker 1>to understand it. However, you know, the Chinese are just

0:27:01.640 --> 0:27:04.399
<v Speaker 1>better capitalists than we are at a certain point. Russia

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:07.879
<v Speaker 1>itself is like state sponsored capitalism. We're not fighting about that.

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:10.119
<v Speaker 1>We're fighting in the language of interest. But as I

0:27:10.200 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 1>understand it, I actually think that maybe makes the world

0:27:12.640 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 1>more dangerous, because if we're all just scrambling for interest

0:27:16.119 --> 0:27:19.440
<v Speaker 1>and not even having ideological underpinning, it seems to make

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:22.439
<v Speaker 1>conflict more likely. I'm curious for your reaction.

0:27:23.119 --> 0:27:25.359
<v Speaker 5>It could go either way, because when you look at

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:27.960
<v Speaker 5>what the United States thought about the Soviet Union, particularly

0:27:28.000 --> 0:27:31.040
<v Speaker 5>in the nineteen fifties, effectively until the Cuban Missile Crisis,

0:27:31.560 --> 0:27:35.000
<v Speaker 5>American policy makers viewed the Soviet Union as totally illegitimate

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:37.240
<v Speaker 5>because it was so ideologically different. They thought that you

0:27:37.280 --> 0:27:41.320
<v Speaker 5>couldn't actually make deals. Now, why is foreign policy makers

0:27:41.359 --> 0:27:44.119
<v Speaker 5>in a world organized around interests might actually find it

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:46.560
<v Speaker 5>easier to reach deals because there are just these quote

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:49.360
<v Speaker 5>unquote objectives. Now, nothing's objective, but you know what I'm

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:53.399
<v Speaker 5>saying here, there are these spaces where you could agree.

0:27:53.840 --> 0:27:56.960
<v Speaker 5>You could agree to work together about climate change, you

0:27:56.960 --> 0:28:00.200
<v Speaker 5>could agree to work together about global inequality. The problem

0:28:00.240 --> 0:28:04.359
<v Speaker 5>is that American foreign policy is still ideological in the

0:28:04.400 --> 0:28:08.560
<v Speaker 5>sense of not liberal based. But Americans still believe they

0:28:08.600 --> 0:28:11.280
<v Speaker 5>need to dominate the world. The Americans still believe many

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:13.760
<v Speaker 5>Americans at least still believe that there's no genuine alternative

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:17.119
<v Speaker 5>to American empire. So an American foreign policy elite that

0:28:17.160 --> 0:28:20.000
<v Speaker 5>embraces a form of imperialist realism, even as they know

0:28:20.080 --> 0:28:21.680
<v Speaker 5>the United States is not going to make the world

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:25.800
<v Speaker 5>a better place, actually makes international politics more dangerous because

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 5>then maybe you're not going to leave East Asia, maybe

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:30.800
<v Speaker 5>you genuinely believe that you have to stay in East

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:33.680
<v Speaker 5>Asia for American security. And even someone who's genuinely good

0:28:33.680 --> 0:28:37.000
<v Speaker 5>on some of these things, like John Mersheimer, he argues

0:28:37.000 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 5>that the United States needs to maintain its forward position

0:28:39.120 --> 0:28:41.160
<v Speaker 5>in East Asia basically now until the end of time.

0:28:41.920 --> 0:28:44.480
<v Speaker 5>So I think it's those types of ideas that the

0:28:44.560 --> 0:28:46.880
<v Speaker 5>United States needs to maintain a global primacy now and

0:28:46.920 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 5>forever that could actually make the world more dangerous. Soccer,

0:28:49.600 --> 0:28:52.480
<v Speaker 5>like you're claiming but doesn't have to be that way,

0:28:53.000 --> 0:28:55.240
<v Speaker 5>but it currently is now interesting.

0:28:55.000 --> 0:28:58.640
<v Speaker 2>Dan, how does AI development fit into your analysis? You've

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:01.280
<v Speaker 2>got Elon Musk in a Reason interviews saying, not only

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:03.920
<v Speaker 2>is everyone going to have universal high income, but money

0:29:03.960 --> 0:29:06.240
<v Speaker 2>is not going to be a thing. You've had books

0:29:06.280 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 2>written from the left about, you know, fully automated luxury

0:29:09.040 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 2>communism that could potentially be enabled by AI. You have

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:15.880
<v Speaker 2>all of these technolog arcs who are basically talking about

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:18.440
<v Speaker 2>how we need to rip up the current social contract

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:22.520
<v Speaker 2>and do something completely different. I mean, doesn't that potentially

0:29:23.080 --> 0:29:28.480
<v Speaker 2>augur for a new ideological valance and you know, new

0:29:29.360 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 2>systems that break significantly from the capitalist order that we

0:29:32.960 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 2>have now that could come into could come into play

0:29:36.000 --> 0:29:37.400
<v Speaker 2>over the next decade or so.

0:29:39.160 --> 0:29:41.600
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely, I think it's really important. And I think to

0:29:41.680 --> 0:29:44.200
<v Speaker 5>my mind, and I think I'm perhaps a little unique

0:29:44.200 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 5>on the left where I situate myself on this. I

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 5>think the major problem with AI is that it's going

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 5>to exist in under capitalism because to some degree you

0:29:51.200 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 5>could view it as achieving Marxist fantasy where you no

0:29:54.560 --> 0:29:57.320
<v Speaker 5>longer have to engage in the types of BS jobs

0:29:57.360 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 5>that someone like David Graeber wrote about that it would

0:29:59.400 --> 0:30:02.200
<v Speaker 5>actually free you to rear cattle in the morning and

0:30:02.240 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 5>criticize in the afternoon and drink beer in the evenings.

0:30:05.880 --> 0:30:08.040
<v Speaker 5>But in actually existing capitalism, all it's going to do

0:30:08.160 --> 0:30:12.520
<v Speaker 5>is basically destroy labor. And I view AI primarily as

0:30:12.560 --> 0:30:15.040
<v Speaker 5>related to the falling rate of profit, which is this

0:30:15.160 --> 0:30:18.400
<v Speaker 5>idea put forward by Marx and other economists, not just Marxists,

0:30:18.400 --> 0:30:21.920
<v Speaker 5>which is that over time profits become more difficult to

0:30:21.960 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 5>basically squeeze out of a capitalist order. I mean, the

0:30:24.560 --> 0:30:26.200
<v Speaker 5>way that I talk about it to my students is

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:28.840
<v Speaker 5>if you build Saint Louis in the nineteenth century, you're

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:30.440
<v Speaker 5>going to make a lot of money. But now in

0:30:30.480 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 5>the twenty first century you have to basically manipulate financial

0:30:33.160 --> 0:30:35.680
<v Speaker 5>derivatives in order to achieve a stable level of growth.

0:30:36.280 --> 0:30:39.280
<v Speaker 5>So I think that the capitalist class, whether consciously unconsciously,

0:30:39.320 --> 0:30:41.760
<v Speaker 5>is trying to de industrialize the white collar and professional

0:30:41.760 --> 0:30:45.120
<v Speaker 5>managerial class. So that's what I think artificial intelligence primarily

0:30:45.960 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 5>it's economic incentive is. And when it comes to international politics,

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:52.280
<v Speaker 5>I think the major issue that we could face is

0:30:52.280 --> 0:30:54.480
<v Speaker 5>something that we saw in Iran, which is AI doing

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:57.760
<v Speaker 5>target selection based on houtmoded data and you get the

0:30:58.160 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 5>it seems to be, you get the destruction of you know,

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 5>children's schools, and there's also potential for AI arms races

0:31:04.320 --> 0:31:06.640
<v Speaker 5>and things along those lines. But I think the technology

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 5>is a bit too immature to see where that will go.

0:31:10.000 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 5>But like atomic weaponry, you would ideally have some form

0:31:12.880 --> 0:31:15.760
<v Speaker 5>of international regulation of it. But again in this interest

0:31:15.800 --> 0:31:18.040
<v Speaker 5>based world where the United States thinks it has to

0:31:18.080 --> 0:31:20.080
<v Speaker 5>be primed now and forever, it's unlikely you're going to

0:31:20.120 --> 0:31:20.320
<v Speaker 5>get that.

0:31:20.920 --> 0:31:24.720
<v Speaker 1>So just going forward, like what exactly? So we're gonna

0:31:24.720 --> 0:31:28.080
<v Speaker 1>have a new world order? Obviously that loaded term, but

0:31:28.680 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 1>it's actually literally quite coming. So what's that?

0:31:31.360 --> 0:31:31.520
<v Speaker 3>You know?

0:31:31.520 --> 0:31:34.040
<v Speaker 1>What are our different options here? You just said there's

0:31:34.080 --> 0:31:37.280
<v Speaker 1>one East Asia. I agree with me. I'm or Shira.

0:31:37.360 --> 0:31:39.680
<v Speaker 1>For the record, we could debate that a little bit later.

0:31:39.760 --> 0:31:44.200
<v Speaker 1>That's one option is kind of retrenchment, focusing on core objectives.

0:31:44.320 --> 0:31:46.600
<v Speaker 1>The other is the Iran option is you break the

0:31:46.600 --> 0:31:49.720
<v Speaker 1>back of the empire on a stupid foreign conflict, which

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:52.320
<v Speaker 1>is completely meaningless. If you were to look at history,

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:55.840
<v Speaker 1>that's usually how an empire dies. I guess another option

0:31:55.960 --> 0:31:57.960
<v Speaker 1>is that we end up potentially fighting home. You know,

0:31:57.960 --> 0:32:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the mythical Taiwan conflict. Where can we end up?

0:32:01.080 --> 0:32:03.520
<v Speaker 5>What do you think I mean, I think the choices

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:09.160
<v Speaker 5>between restraining and reduction of American presence abroad or fighting wars.

0:32:09.200 --> 0:32:12.320
<v Speaker 5>I think this is put it in starkest terms. Either

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:14.760
<v Speaker 5>the United States is going to reduce its global footprint.

0:32:14.800 --> 0:32:16.720
<v Speaker 5>It's you know, at this point seven hundred and fifty

0:32:16.760 --> 0:32:19.160
<v Speaker 5>or so military basis, it's going to accept that it's

0:32:19.200 --> 0:32:21.400
<v Speaker 5>no longer the power it was in nineteen forty five

0:32:21.480 --> 0:32:24.360
<v Speaker 5>or eighty nine or ninety one, and it is going

0:32:24.400 --> 0:32:27.640
<v Speaker 5>to come home, which I actually think is a much

0:32:28.400 --> 0:32:32.440
<v Speaker 5>deeper health strand in American politics. And actually the period

0:32:32.440 --> 0:32:34.720
<v Speaker 5>since World War Two is quite unique going.

0:32:34.560 --> 0:32:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Back to I totally agree. Yeah, that's how it I

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:40.560
<v Speaker 1>go to a normal outcome for the majority of history precisely.

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:43.400
<v Speaker 5>And you look at George Washington's farewell address, which was

0:32:43.440 --> 0:32:47.120
<v Speaker 5>actually a letter. Fun fact, he warns against not participating

0:32:47.120 --> 0:32:50.120
<v Speaker 5>in foreign entanglements in Europe. But you know, people have

0:32:50.600 --> 0:32:52.720
<v Speaker 5>talked about this South Rouayre. This isn't to deny that

0:32:52.760 --> 0:32:55.680
<v Speaker 5>the United States has always been an empire westward expansion.

0:32:56.160 --> 0:32:58.880
<v Speaker 5>Native tribes are understood as foreign nations literally, which is

0:32:58.880 --> 0:33:03.080
<v Speaker 5>why Neil Gorsich is ironically good on native relations, but

0:33:03.600 --> 0:33:06.640
<v Speaker 5>I think that we're entering a moment where we really

0:33:06.640 --> 0:33:12.000
<v Speaker 5>need to rethink global power, and if we don't accept

0:33:12.200 --> 0:33:15.000
<v Speaker 5>novel realities, I think we're going to get violent. Let's

0:33:15.040 --> 0:33:17.840
<v Speaker 5>just link this to Iran, because I think it's difficult

0:33:17.880 --> 0:33:19.960
<v Speaker 5>to know right now, but I think we might look

0:33:20.000 --> 0:33:23.480
<v Speaker 5>back on the Iran conflict as auguring a revolution in

0:33:23.520 --> 0:33:25.680
<v Speaker 5>military affairs of the type that we haven't really seen

0:33:25.720 --> 0:33:27.800
<v Speaker 5>since the invention of the rifle in the middle of

0:33:27.800 --> 0:33:30.360
<v Speaker 5>the nineteenth century and then later the machine gun. Because

0:33:30.760 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 5>before the rifle and the machine gun, you had basically

0:33:32.960 --> 0:33:36.040
<v Speaker 5>Napoleonic battles. Armies would face and they'd go at each other.

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:38.920
<v Speaker 5>Robert E. Lee discovered that that wasn't how it worked

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 5>during the Civil War, and then all the European leaders

0:33:41.640 --> 0:33:43.720
<v Speaker 5>discovered that wasn't how it worked in World War One

0:33:43.760 --> 0:33:46.080
<v Speaker 5>because the machine guns could just mow you down. I

0:33:46.120 --> 0:33:49.000
<v Speaker 5>think that the biggest thing happening in military affairs right

0:33:49.040 --> 0:33:51.000
<v Speaker 5>now is the effects of jeron warfare. The way that

0:33:51.040 --> 0:33:53.560
<v Speaker 5>I put it, Think about what if one day the

0:33:53.640 --> 0:33:55.880
<v Speaker 5>United States puts in an aircraft carrier in the South

0:33:56.000 --> 0:33:59.560
<v Speaker 5>China Sea, and China sends literally one million drones at

0:33:59.600 --> 0:34:03.880
<v Speaker 5>that airraft carrier. This is the transformation in warfare that

0:34:04.000 --> 0:34:06.520
<v Speaker 5>is also, as we've already seen, going to force a

0:34:06.600 --> 0:34:09.279
<v Speaker 5>wise American foreign policy elite. Not sure we have the

0:34:09.760 --> 0:34:12.760
<v Speaker 5>wise blob, but imagine that we did to actually rethink

0:34:12.840 --> 0:34:16.839
<v Speaker 5>basing bait. These are structures, literal American bases. A lot

0:34:16.840 --> 0:34:18.560
<v Speaker 5>of these were bases that were taken over from the

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:21.640
<v Speaker 5>British Empire during World War Two. They are artifacts of

0:34:21.680 --> 0:34:24.560
<v Speaker 5>a different age of warfare and the age of drone warfare.

0:34:24.760 --> 0:34:27.640
<v Speaker 5>Literally send a million drones to the Middle Eastern bases.

0:34:27.840 --> 0:34:30.239
<v Speaker 5>But it doesn't seem like the foreign policy establishment is

0:34:30.280 --> 0:34:34.080
<v Speaker 5>rethinking those fundamental premises. And again this is imperialist realism.

0:34:34.280 --> 0:34:37.000
<v Speaker 5>This notion that you really can't think on alternative world,

0:34:37.280 --> 0:34:39.080
<v Speaker 5>which is the type of thing that could lead to violence.

0:34:40.640 --> 0:34:44.719
<v Speaker 1>Well fascinating, Dan, Yeah.

0:34:43.880 --> 0:34:44.520
<v Speaker 5>Thank you guys.

0:34:44.680 --> 0:34:46.719
<v Speaker 1>Are you're welcome. Everybody go buy the book, listen to

0:34:46.760 --> 0:34:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the pods, subscribe to the substack, any other things I

0:34:49.360 --> 0:34:50.239
<v Speaker 1>need to promote.

0:34:51.120 --> 0:34:53.680
<v Speaker 5>No, I mean, really, the only path forward is to

0:34:53.719 --> 0:34:56.040
<v Speaker 5>subscribe to the podcast and the subset. That is the

0:34:56.080 --> 0:34:58.360
<v Speaker 5>first thing, and that's the only way for the world.

0:34:58.640 --> 0:35:01.319
<v Speaker 1>I hear that one. See you man, Thank you very

0:35:01.360 --> 0:35:02.080
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us.

0:35:02.200 --> 0:35:02.319
<v Speaker 5>Hi.

0:35:02.400 --> 0:35:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Dan. All right, everybody, we're gonna kick the Japan

0:35:05.640 --> 0:35:08.480
<v Speaker 1>segment to Thursday. We talked a little bit too much

0:35:08.760 --> 0:35:11.680
<v Speaker 1>with Dan, but we will have of course, our lives,

0:35:11.719 --> 0:35:13.600
<v Speaker 1>so you got a lot of content, so you shouldn't complain.

0:35:13.760 --> 0:35:17.200
<v Speaker 1>There's a live stream today seven thirty pm Eastern Time

0:35:17.280 --> 0:35:20.400
<v Speaker 1>with Crystal and Ryan. There's a Wednesday show, and then

0:35:20.400 --> 0:35:23.200
<v Speaker 1>there's still be our normal programming on Thursday and Friday.

0:35:23.200 --> 0:35:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Don't forget we got a free month trial going on.

0:35:25.040 --> 0:35:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Go ahead and take advantage of breakingpoints dot com. So

0:35:27.440 --> 0:35:29.319
<v Speaker 1>I guess Chrystal and Ryan will see you at seven

0:35:29.440 --> 0:35:32.240
<v Speaker 1>thirty pm Eastern Time right here on the Breaking Points channel.