WEBVTT - Cowboys Break: Back From The Bye

0:00:01.600 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>The following is a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:04.160 --> 0:00:07.320
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club. Are you ready for

0:00:07.360 --> 0:00:11.039
<v Speaker 1>a break? Yes? Are you ready for a break? Absolutely?

0:00:11.160 --> 0:00:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Ready for a break? Yeah? And so much for that.

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>It's time for The Break on Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:19.840 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 1>wa with Nick Eatman, David Hellman, and bar Garcia and

0:00:26.200 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Derek Eagleton. It is Tuesday, October seventeenth, twenty seventeen, season thirteen,

0:00:31.080 --> 0:00:34.480
<v Speaker 1>episode number fifty five. Welcome to another edition of The Break,

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 1>live on the SWBC Mortgage Studios at the Star. And

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:40.600
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot for us to get into today. It's

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>been a little while since we've been on the air.

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:44.480
<v Speaker 1>We had a nice little bye week. There a couple

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:46.519
<v Speaker 1>of days to just kind of kick back. Don't look

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>like that, Dave. You had a couple of days to

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of kick back. And I was on the air

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 1>yesterday and Thursday. I think, yeah, but Friday, Saturday, Sunday,

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 1>you didn't have to do anything, all right. So I

0:00:56.840 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>was saying the little break saying, relatively speaking, yeah, you're

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 1>right all right? How you doing? Nick? Good? Good? Amber Good?

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Nick has this lawyer face on because I don't have

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:07.959
<v Speaker 1>a lawyer face, and I'm not about to talk. I'm

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 1>really not about to tell you anything. You're not. I

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 1>talked a little bit about what's going on. I try

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:14.959
<v Speaker 1>to figure some stuff out, but I only had like

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 1>five minutes, so it's gonna take a lot more than that. Oh,

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>we got a whole hour, so you can you can

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:22.280
<v Speaker 1>definitely just feel it on whatever you know. We'll get

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>into that in just a second. We'll also spend some

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>time to day talking about the NFC East. All the

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 1>teams in the NFC East except for the Cowboys, played

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:32.399
<v Speaker 1>last weekend. All of them won. We'll see if what

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 1>you guys are thinking about this NFC East and uh,

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 1>and if maybe these giants who are who were winless

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>until last weekend can possibly get on a role here

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and maybe beat some teams you want them to beat

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:45.040
<v Speaker 1>here in the second half of the season. All right,

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>before we start, I mean, let's go ahead and get

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 1>into it and talk a little bit about this, this

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>situation with Ezekiel Elliott. Uh, there's a lot that's still

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 1>going on. As of last Friday, Nick, you guys jumped

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:57.560
<v Speaker 1>on the air and did I thought a really good

0:01:57.560 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 1>show for you guys that didn't hear it talking about

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the Zeke situation and the fact that now the NFL

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 1>is reinstated, they were allowed by the courts to reinstate

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the suspension UM. And then as of yesterday, I think

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:15.520
<v Speaker 1>there was some filings that happened with Zeke's team tell

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 1>us about I guess what's happening right now, What should

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:20.800
<v Speaker 1>fans be looking looking at and what should they be

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 1>paying attention to with regards to axiculoity. Well, I think

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:27.560
<v Speaker 1>today they are. They're meeting again today in New York.

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:32.079
<v Speaker 1>They're trying to the NFLPA is trying to get another

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess restraining order or stay for the suspension they're

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:40.080
<v Speaker 1>trying to to, which I think would only last fourteen

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:43.839
<v Speaker 1>days um. Because what they're trying to do is get

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:47.520
<v Speaker 1>all of the twelve twelve circuit judges I guess together

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 1>for this and while they're doing that, they're hoping to

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>get a stay for this so so he will continue

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 1>to play would block the suspension again right until they

0:02:57.760 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>can get all those so they can get them all

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:01.640
<v Speaker 1>together together to be able to hear it. Yeah, and

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 1>that which apparently takes forever to do that. So the

0:03:04.800 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 1>nfl PA is hoping to get you know, while this happens,

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 1>to get a stay so so as he can continue

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:14.240
<v Speaker 1>to play. And that's that's what I think. It's going

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 1>to be ruled on today at one thirty, So maybe

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 1>this afternoon we'll find out if he's going to play

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>in this game. But I mean, there's so many more

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 1>layers to this, you know, and and we can get

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:28.240
<v Speaker 1>into a little bit more about why he's doing that day.

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>You might know more about what's happening this week or today,

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:34.079
<v Speaker 1>or I know there's a ruling today that's going to

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 1>determine I mean, I was under the impression it might

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>determine his status period because if he doesn't get this,

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 1>there's not a whole lot else he can do, right, right,

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 1>if he goes against him, then he's kind of waiting

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 1>until they get those all those judges together and then

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 1>they would hear the case. Basically, the way I understand

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>it is that today is about getting the stay until

0:03:57.160 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 1>they can get together to actually hear the case and

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 1>then make a ruling. But the problem is if you

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>don't get to stay, then who knows how long that's

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>going to take. And all that time as of as

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 1>of yet, as a Friday, the NFL said he's suspended,

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>could theoretically serve his whole suspension while he's waiting. While

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>he's waiting, correct, Yeah, yeah, which Again, if his goal

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:17.160
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day is to clear his name,

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 1>then it's kind of irrelevant if he has to serve

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the six game suspension and then the court case continues.

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 1>He still wants to have the court case because he

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 1>wants to be able to clear his name. But you're right,

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:29.720
<v Speaker 1>it could happen that the courts take so long if

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:31.279
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't have a stay, the courts take so long

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 1>that he serves a suspension anyway, which would seem to

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 1>be a bit of a travesty, especially if he should

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 1>win the court case at some point. Yeah, which, and

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>by no means, and I am I an expert on this,

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I'm more and more out of my

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 1>depth every time this thing takes a turn. But I'm

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:52.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm not under the impression that he's got like a

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 1>favorable chance on this one. I mean, he's refiling in

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the second District of New York, which has been friendly

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to the NFL before the where the Brady case played out,

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 1>And it sounds like I go into this expecting him

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 1>to not get it and then not when or not

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 1>get a stay, not get the stay. I don't know

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:15.960
<v Speaker 1>what happens with the course, I mean the case once

0:05:15.960 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 1>it's eventually you know, heard. But I'm expecting him to

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 1>not get this stay just and that's I mean, that's

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 1>just my intuition and my feeling about it. I don't mean,

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:29.360
<v Speaker 1>we'll see if I'm right or wrong. But um, I

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:34.000
<v Speaker 1>think it was an upset or maybe not unforeseen but

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 1>a little unexpected, that that that injunction got thrown out

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:39.599
<v Speaker 1>in New Orleans. I think that was the big thing

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:42.560
<v Speaker 1>for Zeke's team, that that they wanted to have. I mean,

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 1>that clearly worked so well in his favor, and now

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:46.680
<v Speaker 1>he's kind of behind the eight ball. Well, but if

0:05:46.800 --> 0:05:49.280
<v Speaker 1>if memories, I mean, if if I'm understanding this correctly,

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:52.039
<v Speaker 1>the ruling that happened last week was not so much

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 1>about the merits of his case as much as it

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:59.279
<v Speaker 1>was about the timing and where it was being adjudicated. Correct. Yes, none,

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 1>none of this is really about the merits of the case, right,

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, other than I do think at this point

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 1>now with the refiling, it does become more about the

0:06:07.880 --> 0:06:10.800
<v Speaker 1>merits of the case, because you are presumably in the

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>right court because you're doing it in New York in

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the Fifth Circuit, right, so you're in the right court.

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 1>The timing is right because the appeal has already been

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 1>heard by the NFL, by the arbitrator, and you've gotten

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:23.480
<v Speaker 1>a ruling, So the timing is right. So now it

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:26.600
<v Speaker 1>does become about the merits of the case. And that's

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Speaker 1>why I kind of am the flip of you. I

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:32.039
<v Speaker 1>think there's a lot of reason why you can think

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:35.279
<v Speaker 1>that maybe the court will give him the stay in

0:06:35.400 --> 0:06:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the fact that in all that time, if he's missing games,

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>he can't get those games back. So there is a

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 1>clear situation here where there's irreparable harm that's done before

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:46.599
<v Speaker 1>there's a ruling. I don't have a lot of faith

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 1>that in the long term this is going to play

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 1>out in his favor, because, like you said, this is

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the same situation. There have been a lot of There

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 1>have been a few different situations, I should say, where

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:57.919
<v Speaker 1>players have ended up taking their things the court and

0:06:58.200 --> 0:07:01.599
<v Speaker 1>rarely I don't think, if ever, they've won. Because of

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:03.720
<v Speaker 1>the way the CBA is set up for the league

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 1>to have the kind of jurisdiction that they do, and

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:09.360
<v Speaker 1>so Nick, so you're telling me, even if he gets this,

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>that only buys him two weeks. That's what That's what

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 1>I was told. Fourteen days would be how long the

0:07:16.920 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 1>restraining order would be temporary restraining order, and I my

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:23.080
<v Speaker 1>assumption is that one or two things would happen at

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 1>that point. Either they get all these guys together to

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 1>be able to hear this case, or they would follow

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 1>another temporary restraining order to continue to continue until they

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>can get everybody to all the until they can have

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>it heard and obviously get a ruling. Right. Yeah, this

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 1>is like when you go down to walk down the

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:43.240
<v Speaker 1>stairs to go eat. See how that art that's up

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 1>and down like that. That's what this is. Trying to

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 1>piece it together. Now that's the hell Mary, I got it. Yeah,

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of what those of you guys who aren't

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>in this building and have never been in this building.

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 1>There's a neat little art display that shows all the

0:07:57.240 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 1>different frames of thet No. It goes like three stories. Yeah,

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 1>it's huge, and it's actually pretty cool, but it shows

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 1>different frames, different photo frames of the hell Mary play.

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, you're right, now, this is it's gonna be tough.

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 1>But let me kind of throw this part out there too,

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that I know the fans they can't help but care

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 1>about what they care about, and they care about their

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 1>favorite team and their favorite players playing in the game

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 1>to help him win. I understand that. And so for

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 1>all the fans that say, just take it now, just

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 1>take take this suspension, let's just get it over with,

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>because it's gonna happen anyways. Let's sen we're not that

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:37.080
<v Speaker 1>good this year or two and three will probably just

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:39.320
<v Speaker 1>take it. Like there's so much more to it than that,

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Like he cannot quit. He cannot quit. Now, do you

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>realize when you're on the number four overall, pick all

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:46.959
<v Speaker 1>the guaranteed moneies that that come with that. I mean,

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 1>when you are suspended for this for one game, even

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:54.199
<v Speaker 1>if it's just this one game, all of his guaranteed

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:56.840
<v Speaker 1>moneys out the window. So knock on wood. If he

0:08:56.920 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 1>had a really bad injury, one of those injuries that

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 1>you're like, oh my god, I mean, he's done. He

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:04.320
<v Speaker 1>cannot He won't get any of that money because he

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's not the team's decision, right, it's a it's

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna be in the neighborhood about two million dollars that

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:16.199
<v Speaker 1>he will lose just from that alone, just from the

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:21.080
<v Speaker 1>just from playing or missing game checks and incentives and

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:24.320
<v Speaker 1>all that stuff. Then you got to remember court costs,

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Like he's taking all this on himself. This is in

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the neighborhood of maybe a million when it's all said

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 1>and done. If you know, if Cam Newton's losing sponsors

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:35.840
<v Speaker 1>for what happened, you know he's not getting any So

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:38.440
<v Speaker 1>look at all of the all of what what could

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 1>be lost here and then the top of his comptation.

0:09:41.120 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>And the NFLPA doesn't want to quit this thing either,

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:45.560
<v Speaker 1>because this is more about this isn't They're not just

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 1>fighting for Zeke, they're fighting against Goodell. They're fighting against

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 1>and the next you know, labor deal of Like, no,

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 1>the commissioner doesn't have this much power as much as

0:09:55.760 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 1>he thinks he's. So there's so many different levels here

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:02.319
<v Speaker 1>that that it's just it's not eive to say, just

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 1>drop the case. Let's get it on, because because it's

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 1>hurting your team and your fantasy team, it's a lot

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 1>more to it than that I don't understand something, and

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe you guys can explain it. To me, But I

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:19.200
<v Speaker 1>can't understand how a suspension can come into effect whilst

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 1>a case is still going on, since that's something, I mean,

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 1>a suspension is something you can't take back, just like

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:28.559
<v Speaker 1>let's put you in jail while we finish the investigation.

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:31.439
<v Speaker 1>That's something you can't take back. So I don't understand

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the whole procedure in this whole case. Well, whether you

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:37.560
<v Speaker 1>believe it or not, the NFL is arguing the same

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 1>thing that Zeke is arguing, which is there is irreparable

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:44.559
<v Speaker 1>harm by letting him play. So they're arguing while the league,

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:46.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, while the NFLPA is trying to get this

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 1>temporary restraining order under the thought that if Zeke is

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 1>forced not to play while the case is still being adjudicated,

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 1>then there's a reparable harm him he can't get those

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 1>games back. Well, the league is saying the exact same thing, Well,

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 1>there's a reparable harm to us. I'm not really sure

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 1>how they I'm not sure how they're making that argument.

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>They're probably saying something to the effect of, hey, if

0:11:10.520 --> 0:11:13.320
<v Speaker 1>if if we let him play, then this sets up

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:16.680
<v Speaker 1>a bad precedent and then players will take things to court.

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 1>When that's not a part of CBA. I don't know

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:21.080
<v Speaker 1>what their argument is, and that's my assumption that would

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:23.560
<v Speaker 1>be their argument, But they are making the argument there's

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:26.959
<v Speaker 1>a reparable harm being done the league if Zeke continues

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 1>to play in the meantime while this thing's being judicated.

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 1>So just depends on how the judges. Yeah, it just

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:33.960
<v Speaker 1>depends on how the judges rule. On On top of that,

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I think you're you're going a level deeper than you

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:38.320
<v Speaker 1>need to, like, for the point of answering your question,

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:41.439
<v Speaker 1>the investigations over. As far as the NFL's concerned, they

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 1>investigated it, they made a decision. They think he violated

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:48.960
<v Speaker 1>their policy, so they suspended him. He is taking outside

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:51.679
<v Speaker 1>means and going above and beyond to try to fight that.

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 1>But as far as the NFL's concerned, they've already made

0:11:54.320 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 1>that decision, and I get that. I'm just even then,

0:11:57.040 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, they made their decision, but the whole thing

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 1>is still going on. So if you're taking that to

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 1>another court, it's like, Okay, let's just keep it in

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 1>hold on hold and until we figure out. But exactly

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:10.199
<v Speaker 1>what to do, And if I'm the NFL, and again

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying what they did was right or whatever.

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:16.679
<v Speaker 1>But I'm saying, we made our ruling and we want you.

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:19.160
<v Speaker 1>You're going to serve that suspension while this gets sorted out,

0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 1>and whether or not whatever comes of this, we have

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 1>decided that you're suspended, right, And that's the league's perspective.

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 1>I think Amber saying, I guess the way I took

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 1>it was the courts are now the ones that are

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 1>left to decide should this be on hold until we

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 1>finished making a ruling, or should it not be? And

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:37.079
<v Speaker 1>that's I guess what they're gonna argue today and say,

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna figure out see how they fall on this.

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:43.080
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be interesting either way. Let's talk about the

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 1>contingencies here for the Cowboys. Let's assume for a second

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>that Zeke does not get to stay and he is

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 1>forced to miss game, at least miss this weekend's game.

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:54.559
<v Speaker 1>What are the Cowboys going to do at the running

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 1>back position. We've seen Alfred Morris be the guy that's

0:12:57.040 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 1>been the number two. We've seen Darren McFadden in act.

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 1>If there's a thought that maybe Darren mcatt McFadden, they're

0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:04.600
<v Speaker 1>doing that because they want to keep him fresh, to

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:07.520
<v Speaker 1>make him now jump into that starting spot. If this

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 1>were to happen, what do you guys believe this thing's

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna fall. As far as playing time for the running backs, Well,

0:13:12.640 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is, it's gonna be a little bit more

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 1>of a split, you know, split carries than what we've seen.

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we've seen ninety five percent to Zekee and

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe five percent to Morris. I don't think

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 1>it'll be like that. It'll probably be in the sixty

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:31.679
<v Speaker 1>forty range. I don't flavoring who. If had to guess,

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:33.959
<v Speaker 1>I would say Morris, I guess because they like him more.

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 1>But I don't. I don't know. I mean I would

0:13:37.360 --> 0:13:40.559
<v Speaker 1>imagine that whatever it is, I mean they're gonna play,

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 1>I would probably go with Morris because I think McFadden

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:45.319
<v Speaker 1>would be your better third down back if you want

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 1>to go that route. But yeah, I have a hard

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 1>time believing they're gonna vault a guy into the lion's

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:53.560
<v Speaker 1>share of the carries after sitting on the bench for

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 1>a month and a half, although I will say practicing though, right,

0:13:56.720 --> 0:13:58.959
<v Speaker 1>No sure, But I mean, you know, just Alfred Morris

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:00.200
<v Speaker 1>has been in the swing of the season, and he's

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 1>been getting carries during the games I had a big run,

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I would have the longest run of the year. Yeah,

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine he if Yeah, I think Nick's right.

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Something you know, committee sixty sixty thirty five or five

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 1>percent left over for Rod Smith probably something you guys

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:16.720
<v Speaker 1>are saying that if by chance, somebody that you know

0:14:16.840 --> 0:14:20.200
<v Speaker 1>owns Zeke Elliott in their fantasy league, that Morris might

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 1>be the guy you'd want to pick up to replace him. Honestly,

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say I picked him up on Friday,

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 1>but I was scared, like really, yeah I did? What?

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Like who? What kind of bums? Or I have a

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 1>horrible running back? No, but what kind of bums are

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 1>in your league that nobody thought to pick him up?

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Like my all, but Darren mcfatten picked up in every

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 1>other league. Been texting me since September like, which of

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 1>these guys should I have him? Nobody knew that's the problem.

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I've had Morris on my bench since week one, for

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:49.840
<v Speaker 1>whatever that's worth. But all right, I'm just saying so

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 1>for you. For you, when Darren mcfatten was sitting on

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the bench when he was inactive, to you, that signaled

0:14:56.720 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 1>he Morris is the guy in the event that has

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 1>to sit. I think you know. And yeah, I'm gonna

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:05.440
<v Speaker 1>have to go on a fantasy show later this week

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 1>where they're gonna ask me this question. I'm gonna say

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:09.720
<v Speaker 1>there isn't a good answer. I'm sorry, there, it's not

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 1>There's no way any of these guys are gonna get

0:15:11.800 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 1>ninety five percent of the carries. I don't believe that.

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 1>And if Jason Garrett came up to me today and

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 1>said our decision to sit Darren McFadden for the last

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 1>six weeks has nothing to do with Zeke's situation, I

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't believe him. No, he could tell me that, and

0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 1>I just say, you're full of crap. I don't believe.

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 1>But one of those guys is gonna have to be

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:30.440
<v Speaker 1>an active though right, they weren't gonna have both but

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Alfred Morris. But the conscientious decision to go with one

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 1>repeatedly week after week after favoring the other one all

0:15:39.240 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 1>through training camp. I just I don't buy it. And again,

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 1>you can tell me I'm wrong, and I'll just stick

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>to my opinion. What do you make again? You're saying

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 1>that that they sat McFadden. I think the the the

0:15:51.760 --> 0:15:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the what the continuous decision to sit him every week

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>and just constantly go with Morris. So you thought they

0:15:58.360 --> 0:16:01.280
<v Speaker 1>should have rotated between who was I think it was

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:03.840
<v Speaker 1>close enough that the fact that it was always McFadden

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 1>all six weeks tells me that they're like, we'd rather

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:09.280
<v Speaker 1>just have this guy definitely be ready if we unless,

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:11.520
<v Speaker 1>of course, they were trying to tell him he wasn't

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 1>as good as Morris, like if if Morris was better

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 1>to them in the preseason and in training camp, and

0:16:16.880 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 1>they wanted to make sure McFadden knew that nothing nothing.

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 1>The way to do that is to sit him down.

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Nothing they did during preseason or training camp insinuated that

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 1>they thought Morris was better. McFadden got them McFadden started.

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 1>If Fadden started, McFadden got more work right often than

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 1>not at all. And if and if they felt and

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 1>if they felt like in that situation he wasn't taking

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 1>advantage of it and he wasn't showing them enough, then

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Fadden was on their rest cycle. Like they were like,

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna give him this day off because he's a veteran.

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 1>He needs it, understood, But if all that time in

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 1>preseason you're offering they didn't feel like he was he

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 1>was playing better than Morris. You're offering a strong counter argument,

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:56.080
<v Speaker 1>and Jason Garrett could offer the same thing, and I

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:58.600
<v Speaker 1>would say, that's cool. I don't believe you, straight up,

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 1>no matter what you say, I don't believe. I don't believe.

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 1>And that's okay. Yeah, I mean, if I can be wrong,

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:05.239
<v Speaker 1>if I want to be wrong, I just it just

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:08.160
<v Speaker 1>makes too much sense with what's facing them right now,

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 1>where they're like, well, it's really good that we decided

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:12.679
<v Speaker 1>to keep our most injury prone running back on the

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:15.320
<v Speaker 1>shelf because now we got them. Yeah. I just and

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 1>and if they didn't do it on purpose, then it's

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 1>a very good unintended consequence. Put it that way. I

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:23.719
<v Speaker 1>don't know if they ever really intended that Zeke are

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 1>really thought that Zeke was going to be out. I mean,

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 1>who knows. But but when you have this surplus of

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:30.639
<v Speaker 1>running backs, it makes a hell of a lot of

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:32.439
<v Speaker 1>sense to try to protect them as much as you

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:34.440
<v Speaker 1>can when you don't know how much you can count

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 1>on your starter. Yep. So but if that's the mentality,

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is not even close to being the same.

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:46.440
<v Speaker 1>But why not make Cooper Rush active instead? Because that's

0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:48.439
<v Speaker 1>the same kind of mentality because you're only ever one

0:17:48.480 --> 0:17:52.159
<v Speaker 1>play away from needing your backup quarterback and whatever. For

0:17:52.200 --> 0:17:54.359
<v Speaker 1>whatever reason, they trust Kellen Moore to do that more

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:56.920
<v Speaker 1>than they trust Cooper Rush. But if Zeke had gotten

0:17:57.000 --> 0:17:58.760
<v Speaker 1>hurt in any of these games, you've still got two

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 1>capable guys behind him, So I don't think that's the

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 1>same thing. So it sounds like they feel pretty good

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:08.959
<v Speaker 1>with the options they have right now. According to Stephen Jones,

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean that, Yeah, it's it's not as exciting as

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Ezekiel Elliott or if you had drafted a guy. But

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, it hasn't made sense why they've had all

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:20.719
<v Speaker 1>these running backs for the last six months, but now

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:22.520
<v Speaker 1>it does. Yeah, we're gonna take our break when we

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 1>come back. I actually want you guys to answer that

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 1>question for me. Looking at what the Cowboys have over

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the next six games, how confident are you the Cowboys

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 1>can still make this offense move with these backup running backs.

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 1>If Zeke's going to be out for all of those games,

0:18:35.080 --> 0:18:36.960
<v Speaker 1>well that when we come right back. This dalas Cowboys

0:18:36.960 --> 0:18:39.919
<v Speaker 1>dot Com Radio, we the entertainment loving people want a

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:42.880
<v Speaker 1>smartphone built for us with AT and T and Direct TV.

0:18:43.000 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 1>You can get the Samsung Galaxy Saight with an Infinity

0:18:45.680 --> 0:18:48.280
<v Speaker 1>edge to edge screen. It's perfect for entertainment. We want

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 1>exactly what you just said. Buy a Samsung Galaxy sa

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 1>and then get one free after bill credits when you

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 1>buy both on AT and T next and a Direct TV.

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Visit your local AT and T store today by seven

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:00.639
<v Speaker 1>hundred fifty dollars on installment. Agreeing with Eligi service newlines

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 1>three off to seven hundred fifty thousan credits over thirty months,

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:04.440
<v Speaker 1>credits starting two to three billins if service canceled. Y

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Spanlands two taxes, fees and restricts and apply Lindy Time Offices.

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Twelfrety Towns. Star Sports Tours is the only official fan

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:14.160
<v Speaker 1>travel partner of the Dallas Cowboys, offering exclusive game weekend

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>travel packages with sideline access and photo ops with current players,

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 1>alumni and cheerleaders. That's not all, though, You'll get to

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:23.880
<v Speaker 1>talk xs and os with Senior Director of Player Personnel

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:26.919
<v Speaker 1>Will McClay and of course with yours truly, me, Brian

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:29.680
<v Speaker 1>broad Us. You can trust the official fan travel partner

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 1>of the Dallas Cowboys, and with us you'll travel like

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 1>a pro. Visit Cowboys Travel dot com to book your

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:39.120
<v Speaker 1>travel package today. Cowboys fans know that the second best

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 1>of anything simply won't cut it, and your skincare should

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 1>be no different. A long time locker room favorite of

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the players and the official men's skincare brand of the

0:19:46.680 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys, Dallas based Jack Black is the number one

0:19:50.160 --> 0:19:52.720
<v Speaker 1>best selling men's skincare brand in the country because we

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 1>make products that help guys look, smell and feel better.

0:19:56.040 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Visit get Jack Black dot com slash Cowboys to get

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 1>ten dollars off your first order fifty dollars of more.

0:20:01.200 --> 0:20:04.879
<v Speaker 1>Jack Blithe look good, smell good, feel good, official men

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 1>skincare brand of the Dallas Cowboys. I hear all this

0:20:07.720 --> 0:20:10.359
<v Speaker 1>talk about what it takes to be a cowboy. Everyone's

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:12.880
<v Speaker 1>got their ideas, but I just say to myself, it's

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:15.720
<v Speaker 1>what's up top that matters. Sure, you need men with

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the muscle and heart to get her done. But if

0:20:18.119 --> 0:20:20.880
<v Speaker 1>your scouts and coaches are listening out there, a word

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:24.120
<v Speaker 1>of advice. Pick the man with the most well worn stetson.

0:20:24.280 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 1>That's the one most cut out to be a cowboy.

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:29.359
<v Speaker 1>Stetson hats are handmade right here in Texas and have

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 1>been on Cowboys heads for over one hundred and fifty years.

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 1>The rest of you can visit stetson dot com slash

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:39.679
<v Speaker 1>cowboy to find a retailer nearest you. Back to the Break,

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back. It's the second segment of the Break Live

0:20:42.560 --> 0:20:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the SWBC board get studios at the Star and we're

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:48.640
<v Speaker 1>talking about Ezekiel Elliott and talking about his legal issues,

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:51.720
<v Speaker 1>talking about how that's going to affect the Cowboys. And

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:53.719
<v Speaker 1>right before break, I told you guys, I wanted to

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:57.640
<v Speaker 1>get your opinions on what you think that will happen

0:20:57.680 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 1>with the Cowboys over these next six games. You've a

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 1>game at San Francisco this weekend. San Francisco is oh

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 1>and six. Then you go at Washington, who's three and two.

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Then you come home to play the Kansas City Chiefs

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:12.360
<v Speaker 1>who are five and one, Then at Atlanta, who's three

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:14.919
<v Speaker 1>and two record. I don't know if you really think

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 1>it reflects how good a team they are. Maybe it does.

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:20.160
<v Speaker 1>And then you play Philadelphia who is now five and one,

0:21:20.160 --> 0:21:22.720
<v Speaker 1>sitting atop of the division. And then round out the

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:25.680
<v Speaker 1>six games against the Chargers on Thanksgiving Day, who are

0:21:25.680 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 1>two and four. What do you think the likelihood is

0:21:28.600 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 1>that this offense can still run as efficiently as it

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 1>needs to run, because I think we all agree in

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:34.640
<v Speaker 1>order for this team to be successful, the offense has

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:38.160
<v Speaker 1>to be efficient, has to be good. How confident are

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:39.720
<v Speaker 1>you that they can do that over those six games

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:43.359
<v Speaker 1>with these opponents. If ezecuel Eli is out, well, I

0:21:43.359 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 1>don't think they're gonna go like they wouldn't go six

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:47.360
<v Speaker 1>and oh, but I mean I think they can still win,

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:50.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, three or four of these games. I mean,

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:51.680
<v Speaker 1>but you look around the league, there's a lot of

0:21:51.720 --> 0:21:54.400
<v Speaker 1>people that play with a lot less at running back

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and especially from an offensive line running back standpoints, so

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 1>they can they still have as much fire firefower as

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 1>other teams To mean that, they're gonna need to be

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:09.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, better on defense to be able to withstand that.

0:22:09.240 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they've been scoring thirty points a game at

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:12.760
<v Speaker 1>home and they haven't been able to win, and that's

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:16.120
<v Speaker 1>because you know, the defense hasn't really done anything to

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:18.719
<v Speaker 1>really help them that much. So I think they can

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:20.880
<v Speaker 1>still do some things, but it's gonna it's gonna take

0:22:20.880 --> 0:22:22.679
<v Speaker 1>more of a team effort. You can't just lean on,

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, Zeke Amber, I think it will open up

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean more options, just maybe other defenses trying not

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:35.920
<v Speaker 1>to focus so much on stopping Zeke. Maybe that gives

0:22:35.920 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 1>them other options there. But honestly, I don't think this

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:44.399
<v Speaker 1>changes anything by much in my honest I mean, again,

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 1>not having zek yeah, that's gonna affect them, but we

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 1>have seen that he hasn't been the same guy that

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 1>we thought he would be like the year before. So

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:57.399
<v Speaker 1>the offense just needs to kind of keep pushing, and

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:02.200
<v Speaker 1>it's I'm concerned about the defense more than anything. Dave

0:23:02.840 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 1>I said this yesterday on the specialty show we did,

0:23:05.680 --> 0:23:08.680
<v Speaker 1>which is I'm not going to try to convince anybody

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:11.520
<v Speaker 1>that it's not a big deal, and there's some validity

0:23:11.560 --> 0:23:14.080
<v Speaker 1>to that, Amber, just that you know, the running game

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:16.120
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been what you thought it would be anyway, but

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:19.960
<v Speaker 1>you're still losing an incredibly talented player and one of

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the best running backs in the league. So I don't

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 1>think that's going to be great, obviously, but I'm not

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 1>just going to assume it's going to be a train

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:32.640
<v Speaker 1>wreck until I see that, because you know, you spent

0:23:32.720 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 1>these resources on quality veteran running backs for a reason.

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 1>We've seen them. Both have their moments. I mean, Darren

0:23:38.400 --> 0:23:41.440
<v Speaker 1>McFadden ran for eleven hundred yards in his one year

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 1>as the starter. Alfred Morris has had very brief moments.

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:47.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, the seventy one yard run comes to mind.

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:50.240
<v Speaker 1>He's had a couple other decent outings. They all looked

0:23:50.240 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 1>good in the preseason. I certainly think you lose an

0:23:53.080 --> 0:23:56.680
<v Speaker 1>element of explosiveness, but I mean I expect that they'll

0:23:56.680 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 1>still be able to run the ball effectively. The big

0:23:59.800 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 1>thing for me is, you know who's going to be

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 1>that guy that turns the zero or one yard game

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:07.879
<v Speaker 1>into two or three, which is you know, we haven't

0:24:07.880 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 1>seen that from McFadden and Morris as well as we

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 1>saw it from Zeke maybe Rod Smith as a guy

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 1>who can do that. I mean, good lord, he's like

0:24:13.800 --> 0:24:17.600
<v Speaker 1>sixty three two forty, So there. I mean, and you

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:19.879
<v Speaker 1>think about how much they struggled in short yardage in

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:23.199
<v Speaker 1>twenty fifteen. I think that's that's what really scares me

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 1>more than you know, what they're running for like one

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine a game right now. I think I would

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:32.240
<v Speaker 1>imagine that they can still hover at or above one

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 1>hundred yards a game. I think they're I think that's reasonable,

0:24:36.840 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 1>but you're you're missing an element of explosiveness, and you

0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:42.240
<v Speaker 1>need to find a guy who can get you that

0:24:42.440 --> 0:24:45.679
<v Speaker 1>fourth down like Zeke did against the Packers. That's definitely

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:49.159
<v Speaker 1>something that worries me. But but I think in the

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:51.120
<v Speaker 1>long run, I don't think I'm not ready to call

0:24:51.160 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 1>this a train wreck. Let me ask you this question.

0:24:53.080 --> 0:24:56.439
<v Speaker 1>I look at this offense, and to me, I know

0:24:56.520 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people have been focusing a lot on

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 1>what the running game has not been. I think Zeke's

0:25:00.800 --> 0:25:03.719
<v Speaker 1>run really hard, and I think the offensive line at

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:05.360
<v Speaker 1>times has not been able to give him any holes.

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:07.399
<v Speaker 1>But you're right, he takes that one yard game, he

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 1>turns it into three yards, and people don't see that

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 1>as a great run, but it's a great run. I

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 1>think one of the bigger differences between last year and

0:25:15.000 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 1>this year is I don't think the receivers have been

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:20.080
<v Speaker 1>as consistently good as they were last year. And I

0:25:20.080 --> 0:25:22.840
<v Speaker 1>think if Zekiel Ellid is out of the game for

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 1>six weeks, I think it now becomes important for this

0:25:26.200 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 1>quarterback and for these wide receivers to be more consistent.

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 1>I think you've had in big moments, you've had guys

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:35.760
<v Speaker 1>dropping balls. They just haven't seemed to have that same

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:37.639
<v Speaker 1>kind of Last year, it seemed like at moments they

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:39.879
<v Speaker 1>were actually making plays when they were needed, the receivers

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:42.639
<v Speaker 1>are actually making plays, and this year it seems like

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:46.159
<v Speaker 1>they're they're not as frequently making those same kinds of plays.

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:48.359
<v Speaker 1>Do you guys agree with that that that's a big

0:25:48.400 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 1>difference that this year and that's something to be something

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 1>that's that they're going to have to change if they're

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:54.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be successful while Zeke's out, Yeah, I do

0:25:54.520 --> 0:25:57.760
<v Speaker 1>think that the receivers are kind of the biggest issue

0:25:57.800 --> 0:26:01.680
<v Speaker 1>that this offense has because it allows defenses to say,

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:04.160
<v Speaker 1>we're just gonna try to load up and make sure

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 1>that this that we don't get blown off the ball

0:26:06.520 --> 0:26:08.879
<v Speaker 1>because we'll take our chances with the receivers and that

0:26:09.400 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 1>they don't beat them that much. They don't get they

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:13.880
<v Speaker 1>don't get burned by that. So that's gonna be an issue.

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:15.719
<v Speaker 1>But I do agree with what Amber said about I

0:26:15.720 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 1>think defenses are gonna now kind of try to play

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:20.960
<v Speaker 1>it differently. Um, And I think we already saw that

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 1>this year. We already saw that they didn't play at

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the same when forty six was back there. There's no

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 1>way Zeke's ripping off a seventy yard run like that.

0:26:27.760 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 1>They don't have the same middle of the defense wouldn't

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:32.320
<v Speaker 1>have been there. So you're gonna see a little bit

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:36.200
<v Speaker 1>more of that. Um. But you know, I think I

0:26:36.240 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 1>think it'll open things up for the Cowboys. But but

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:42.919
<v Speaker 1>like you said, short yardage is gonna be tough. I mean,

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:45.440
<v Speaker 1>we saw McFadden go for eleven hundred yards two years ago,

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:47.200
<v Speaker 1>but they were one of the worst teams in the league.

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:49.600
<v Speaker 1>The goal line short yards, third and one. They couldn't

0:26:49.680 --> 0:26:52.400
<v Speaker 1>push and run, So I think that's that's a big

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:54.480
<v Speaker 1>issue there. I'm with Dave on that. I kind of

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:56.720
<v Speaker 1>want to see Rod Smith in that role. Honestly, He's

0:26:56.760 --> 0:26:59.359
<v Speaker 1>got a big body, he's strong. You would think he

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 1>could push for yard right. I would like to see

0:27:02.200 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Rod Smith get an opportunity to really just play some

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:08.760
<v Speaker 1>running back. I mean, you know, short yardage fine, whatever,

0:27:08.760 --> 0:27:12.119
<v Speaker 1>And that's tough because you're talking about you know, guys

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:15.159
<v Speaker 1>with Pro Bowl nods and a thousand yard seasons. I

0:27:15.240 --> 0:27:18.320
<v Speaker 1>get that. But you know, he showed you a lot

0:27:18.440 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 1>in in preseason training camp all the way back to

0:27:21.000 --> 0:27:23.879
<v Speaker 1>OTA's and uh, you know. I hope they don't forget

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 1>about that, because you're never gonna be able to impress

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:28.919
<v Speaker 1>anybody if you don't get the opportunity to do so.

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Just so, I mean, that's something I've got my eye on.

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:34.680
<v Speaker 1>The Other thing I'll throw out there on the short yardage,

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:37.080
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to see a lot more quarterback sneaks. I

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 1>think when you have short yardage and you have a

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:41.119
<v Speaker 1>quarterback as strong as him. I know their teams like

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:44.359
<v Speaker 1>New England regularly, if they got short yardage, they just

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:47.159
<v Speaker 1>plow right in there behind the center or behind the guard,

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 1>and they get in there for the first down. And

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:54.000
<v Speaker 1>their quarterback isn't nearly as fleet footed as as as Prescott.

0:27:54.080 --> 0:27:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Forget fleet footed, he's a linebacker. He's just a true stock.

0:27:58.440 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Just let him push forward regardless of Zeke. If it's

0:28:02.800 --> 0:28:06.840
<v Speaker 1>fourth and one or less, I sneak the freak in all, Yeah,

0:28:06.880 --> 0:28:09.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't that should be a guaranteed yard every time,

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, pushed behind Frederick and let him just

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:14.600
<v Speaker 1>push it and get him behind him. But I do

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:18.520
<v Speaker 1>agree with that sentiment that obviously, I mean, if Zeke's

0:28:18.560 --> 0:28:22.119
<v Speaker 1>not there, I mean, the whole passing game Dak receivers,

0:28:22.240 --> 0:28:24.919
<v Speaker 1>all of them gotta be better, have to be. All right,

0:28:25.000 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 1>let's talk a little bit about this NFC East. As

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 1>I said for in the first segment, everybody in the

0:28:30.640 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 1>NFC East played this last weekend. Every team one, now

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:36.080
<v Speaker 1>that Philly, the Philadelphia Eagles to the top of the

0:28:36.080 --> 0:28:39.640
<v Speaker 1>division at five and one after beating the Carolina Panthers,

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 1>who were also five and one, I mean four and

0:28:41.120 --> 0:28:45.160
<v Speaker 1>one at the time. Washington's now three and two, Dallas

0:28:45.160 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 1>in third place at two and three, and then Giants

0:28:47.440 --> 0:28:49.680
<v Speaker 1>pulling up the rear at one and five. They were

0:28:49.680 --> 0:28:52.360
<v Speaker 1>only five going into this weekend. But the Giants went

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:55.560
<v Speaker 1>into Denver and surprise a lot of people, myself included,

0:28:56.120 --> 0:28:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I didn't expect to see that kind of game from them.

0:28:58.520 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that was just an aberration? Obviously there

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 1>were some things that they did that were different, Like

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:05.040
<v Speaker 1>they had a new guy plant calling plays. They had

0:29:05.040 --> 0:29:07.200
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of new guys out there at wide at

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the wide receiver position that the teams didn't know. Do

0:29:10.240 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 1>you think that those kinds of differences were the reason

0:29:13.400 --> 0:29:15.480
<v Speaker 1>why they were able to win because Denver, you know,

0:29:15.560 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 1>they weren't hadn't seen it on film they they had,

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:19.480
<v Speaker 1>we weren't able to prepare for it in the same way,

0:29:19.600 --> 0:29:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and that do you think that's something that continue or

0:29:21.520 --> 0:29:23.080
<v Speaker 1>do you think it was just an aberration. That'll be

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 1>one week and the Giants will go back to being

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 1>a bad team. You know, they didn't even they didn't

0:29:27.760 --> 0:29:29.320
<v Speaker 1>score a whole lot of points. I mean, they don't

0:29:29.360 --> 0:29:31.840
<v Speaker 1>even score as many points as the Cowboys did up there.

0:29:32.040 --> 0:29:34.880
<v Speaker 1>So they won with the defense. They scored with the defense.

0:29:34.880 --> 0:29:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I believe the Giants scored sixteen points on offense.

0:29:37.960 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 1>So the defense was the reason there. The Cowboys don't

0:29:42.520 --> 0:29:44.920
<v Speaker 1>have that kind of defense, and a lot of teams don't.

0:29:44.960 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the Giants have it when they when they're playing,

0:29:47.280 --> 0:29:49.960
<v Speaker 1>they're getting after the quarterback and they're there there there

0:29:50.600 --> 0:29:53.200
<v Speaker 1>secondary guys are playing really well and going after the ball.

0:29:53.360 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 1>They're really tough to beat. And we saw that there

0:29:56.360 --> 0:29:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and so it allowed the Giants to kind of, you know,

0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:02.239
<v Speaker 1>play with the lead and and give Eli credit as

0:30:02.320 --> 0:30:04.320
<v Speaker 1>much as people don't want to do that, you know,

0:30:04.360 --> 0:30:06.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think right off the top of the show,

0:30:06.480 --> 0:30:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Chris Collinsworth said they still have Eli Manning, a two

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:12.120
<v Speaker 1>time Super Bowl winning quarterback. And even though these receivers

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:14.040
<v Speaker 1>you've never heard of unless they were in the Cowboys

0:30:14.040 --> 0:30:17.720
<v Speaker 1>camp last year, Ed Egan one had heard of these guys,

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:22.000
<v Speaker 1>so he Ed Egan from New Orleans, Louisiana, for whatever

0:30:22.000 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 1>that's worth. Right, Sorry, what do you go to college?

0:30:24.280 --> 0:30:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Northwestern State mcidish Louisiana. It's not Midwestern State, it's Northwestern State. Yeah, yeah,

0:30:31.360 --> 0:30:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll get it confused. Good job for the Giants. They've

0:30:35.200 --> 0:30:37.719
<v Speaker 1>won less win than the Cowboys, so it's not like

0:30:38.360 --> 0:30:40.760
<v Speaker 1>you know they're way back there too. I didn't even

0:30:40.800 --> 0:30:44.160
<v Speaker 1>think about that. You're right, just one who one and

0:30:44.200 --> 0:30:46.760
<v Speaker 1>a half. If you can consider that they've already beat him,

0:30:46.880 --> 0:30:50.000
<v Speaker 1>that sets me up for something. Two things that really

0:30:50.040 --> 0:30:53.480
<v Speaker 1>annoyed me this weekend. One, I mean that that you're

0:30:53.560 --> 0:30:56.440
<v Speaker 1>right there, they have one fewer win than the Cowboys,

0:30:56.480 --> 0:31:01.480
<v Speaker 1>but like everybody's everybody seemed like was freaking out. And

0:31:01.600 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 1>it's not good when the whole division wins while you're

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:05.920
<v Speaker 1>not playing. I know that, but everybody's like it doesn't

0:31:05.920 --> 0:31:08.480
<v Speaker 1>feel good. Every but it doesn't feel good, but does

0:31:08.480 --> 0:31:11.320
<v Speaker 1>it matter mathematically? Everybody's like they're all they've got one

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:14.240
<v Speaker 1>more game ahead of it. Doesn't. It doesn't work that way.

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:17.080
<v Speaker 1>They just they took a week off. Everybody else hasn't

0:31:17.080 --> 0:31:18.920
<v Speaker 1>taken their week off yet. That's all that means. The

0:31:18.960 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Redskins have only played what they're three and two now exist,

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:25.560
<v Speaker 1>so they took their by. The Eagles haven't taken their by.

0:31:25.640 --> 0:31:27.920
<v Speaker 1>They're not two games up on you more so, they

0:31:27.960 --> 0:31:29.600
<v Speaker 1>just haven't taken their boy. But the part that the

0:31:29.680 --> 0:31:31.760
<v Speaker 1>part that I think for a fan that probably bummed

0:31:31.760 --> 0:31:34.120
<v Speaker 1>you out this last weekend was at least two of

0:31:34.160 --> 0:31:36.560
<v Speaker 1>those games, you felt like there was a legitimate chance

0:31:36.720 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 1>that the teams in the division were gonna take a loss. Yeah,

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:42.360
<v Speaker 1>you thought that Philly going to play Carolina at Carolina

0:31:42.400 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 1>who was just had the exact same record. They very nice.

0:31:45.280 --> 0:31:46.600
<v Speaker 1>There was a good yeah, it was a good chance

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:49.240
<v Speaker 1>they take a loss there. You were absolutely certain. I

0:31:49.240 --> 0:31:51.880
<v Speaker 1>don't know anybody that wasn't certain that the Giants were

0:31:51.880 --> 0:31:54.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna go to Denver and take a loss there and

0:31:54.160 --> 0:31:56.240
<v Speaker 1>they get a win. So that's the part that was

0:31:56.280 --> 0:32:01.840
<v Speaker 1>probably more more just surprising for for all these Giants.

0:32:01.840 --> 0:32:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Win is a good thing for the Cowboys, regardless of

0:32:04.160 --> 0:32:06.040
<v Speaker 1>what people think. It is a good thing. They're gonna

0:32:06.040 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 1>play the Eagles again. They're gonna play the Redskins, They're

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:10.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna play some teams. They're gonna be competitive, they're gonna

0:32:10.520 --> 0:32:12.600
<v Speaker 1>stay in this thing. And that game up in the

0:32:12.600 --> 0:32:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Meadowlands in December is not going to be easy and

0:32:15.360 --> 0:32:18.560
<v Speaker 1>never never was going to be right. And another beautiful

0:32:18.600 --> 0:32:22.960
<v Speaker 1>segue for me to rant, thank you, because I'm sick

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:26.280
<v Speaker 1>of people acting like this is college football. Like remember

0:32:26.400 --> 0:32:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Dan Hawkins at Colorado ranting like it's the Big twelve.

0:32:29.320 --> 0:32:33.520
<v Speaker 1>It's the NFL. This is professional football. And no, I

0:32:33.560 --> 0:32:36.400
<v Speaker 1>did not expect the Giants to go to Denver and

0:32:36.480 --> 0:32:40.520
<v Speaker 1>beat the Broncos. But everybody's like, how did we lose

0:32:40.600 --> 0:32:43.320
<v Speaker 1>to this awful Denver team? The Giants are beating that

0:32:43.440 --> 0:32:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the Giants lost to the Bucks by three, the Chargers

0:32:46.040 --> 0:32:49.040
<v Speaker 1>by two, the Eagles by three on a last second

0:32:49.080 --> 0:32:51.360
<v Speaker 1>sixty one yard field goal. Like it's not like they've

0:32:51.400 --> 0:32:54.240
<v Speaker 1>just been getting their doors blown off. Yeah, but the

0:32:54.280 --> 0:32:57.000
<v Speaker 1>only team that has blown the doors off the Giants

0:32:57.080 --> 0:33:01.040
<v Speaker 1>is the Cowboys. That's the only one. It is professional football.

0:33:01.080 --> 0:33:03.320
<v Speaker 1>You spend a week telling a team that they suck

0:33:03.400 --> 0:33:08.120
<v Speaker 1>and they usually respond that way. And also, not only

0:33:08.240 --> 0:33:11.600
<v Speaker 1>is everybody incredibly good, just on an individual level. In

0:33:11.640 --> 0:33:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the NFL, every team also has a ridiculously glaring weakness

0:33:16.560 --> 0:33:19.400
<v Speaker 1>because the salary cap designs the league that way, so

0:33:19.560 --> 0:33:23.560
<v Speaker 1>you're one bad game away from looking like that. Trevor

0:33:23.640 --> 0:33:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Simeon looked amazing against the Cowboys. He looked like crap

0:33:26.440 --> 0:33:30.200
<v Speaker 1>against the Giants. The Broncos liked their kicker enough to

0:33:30.240 --> 0:33:32.760
<v Speaker 1>sign to an extension the week they that we went

0:33:32.840 --> 0:33:37.720
<v Speaker 1>up there. He had even horrible. He's been awful, And

0:33:37.760 --> 0:33:40.600
<v Speaker 1>that's just the nature of the NFL. Like if it's

0:33:40.640 --> 0:33:43.520
<v Speaker 1>college football, where you clearly have your has and your

0:33:43.560 --> 0:33:47.160
<v Speaker 1>have nots. I get it. I understand that hierarchy, but

0:33:47.680 --> 0:33:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the fact that people are still surprised by these things

0:33:50.240 --> 0:33:53.440
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL just baffles me. Yeah, I think I

0:33:53.560 --> 0:33:56.640
<v Speaker 1>agree with what you're saying, and you're right. Anytime you

0:33:56.680 --> 0:33:59.120
<v Speaker 1>think you know something for certain in the NFL, it's

0:33:59.120 --> 0:34:01.120
<v Speaker 1>probably going to go the the way. I get all that,

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:04.920
<v Speaker 1>but it was just this was such a huge thing

0:34:05.040 --> 0:34:07.640
<v Speaker 1>because it wasn't just the Giants were Owen five. It

0:34:07.680 --> 0:34:10.000
<v Speaker 1>was the Giants were Owen five, and they lost their

0:34:10.080 --> 0:34:13.600
<v Speaker 1>top player, then they lost their second wide receiver, then

0:34:13.640 --> 0:34:16.160
<v Speaker 1>they lost their fourth wide receiver and kick returner and

0:34:16.239 --> 0:34:19.040
<v Speaker 1>special teams player, and then their third wide receiver is

0:34:19.040 --> 0:34:21.320
<v Speaker 1>out for this game and maybe a couple more games,

0:34:21.560 --> 0:34:24.120
<v Speaker 1>and the offensive line has already been bad, but now

0:34:24.200 --> 0:34:26.760
<v Speaker 1>it's going to face one of the most dominant pass

0:34:26.880 --> 0:34:29.920
<v Speaker 1>rushing defenses in the league. All those things set up

0:34:30.000 --> 0:34:33.160
<v Speaker 1>to say there's no way the Giants go to Denver

0:34:33.560 --> 0:34:36.279
<v Speaker 1>and get a win, and yet it happened, right, I

0:34:36.320 --> 0:34:38.319
<v Speaker 1>guess so, Yes, it was a reason for people to

0:34:38.360 --> 0:34:40.720
<v Speaker 1>be surprised by that. I'm not saying it's not shocking,

0:34:40.840 --> 0:34:42.919
<v Speaker 1>like I said, I'm not. I wasn't out here last

0:34:42.920 --> 0:34:45.320
<v Speaker 1>week telling you that the Giants were gonna beat the Bronchos.

0:34:45.560 --> 0:34:48.839
<v Speaker 1>But for people to just get all up in arms

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:51.960
<v Speaker 1>like it reflects like it's this horrible thing that this

0:34:52.200 --> 0:34:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Broncos team is actually awful and the Cowboys couldn't beat

0:34:55.239 --> 0:34:58.000
<v Speaker 1>them and the Giants. That like, crazy stuff happens in

0:34:58.040 --> 0:35:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the NFL. Because you know what, the guy, the guy

0:35:00.719 --> 0:35:02.879
<v Speaker 1>that they signed to replace Odell Beckham, I don't even

0:35:02.960 --> 0:35:04.680
<v Speaker 1>know who he is. He's still good enough to be

0:35:04.719 --> 0:35:07.359
<v Speaker 1>on an NFL roster. That still means something. He's not

0:35:07.400 --> 0:35:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Odell Beckham. I mean, you know, does am I crazy? Like?

0:35:11.120 --> 0:35:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Am I crazy for thinking that? People are crazy for

0:35:14.440 --> 0:35:17.200
<v Speaker 1>thinking that's crazy? That's I went like three deep right there.

0:35:17.760 --> 0:35:20.080
<v Speaker 1>I just don't understand why with the Giants, why does

0:35:20.080 --> 0:35:21.719
<v Speaker 1>that even matter to see the Cowboys? So like what

0:35:21.840 --> 0:35:24.520
<v Speaker 1>the Giant like, what does that mean that that they

0:35:24.560 --> 0:35:27.520
<v Speaker 1>won the game? I mean because it puts them one

0:35:27.600 --> 0:35:30.360
<v Speaker 1>game closer to catching the Cowboys, especially if the Cowboys,

0:35:30.719 --> 0:35:33.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, don't handle their business. Well, Nick, you know

0:35:33.000 --> 0:35:35.480
<v Speaker 1>why it matters. It matters because fans just don't want

0:35:35.520 --> 0:35:37.279
<v Speaker 1>to see teams in the division win. That's why it

0:35:37.320 --> 0:35:39.680
<v Speaker 1>matters matters to the Cowboys. And I mean, at the

0:35:39.760 --> 0:35:40.920
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, it's just they don't want to

0:35:40.920 --> 0:35:42.600
<v Speaker 1>see the Giants ever win. They don't want to see

0:35:42.600 --> 0:35:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles ever win unless they're playing each other. And

0:35:44.480 --> 0:35:46.200
<v Speaker 1>you want the team with the worst record to win, right,

0:35:46.200 --> 0:35:48.120
<v Speaker 1>And that's that's the only thing that matters. The point

0:35:48.239 --> 0:35:50.920
<v Speaker 1>is that they the Giants are not gonna give up.

0:35:50.960 --> 0:35:53.480
<v Speaker 1>And so they're gonna play and they're gonna play some

0:35:53.520 --> 0:35:56.279
<v Speaker 1>teams here, and they're gonna beat some teams and it's

0:35:56.280 --> 0:35:58.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna it's gonna start even and out because the Eagles

0:35:58.719 --> 0:36:02.360
<v Speaker 1>are the Eagles that franchisees. That's if that franchise is

0:36:02.360 --> 0:36:04.960
<v Speaker 1>still sitting up there, they're still gonna They're gonna come

0:36:05.000 --> 0:36:07.600
<v Speaker 1>down to Earth and they're gonna be the Eagles like

0:36:07.680 --> 0:36:12.000
<v Speaker 1>they've always been. I don't know if I despise that rationale.

0:36:12.120 --> 0:36:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't care. I mean, I don't care. I mean

0:36:15.360 --> 0:36:17.879
<v Speaker 1>when if they ever won, I mean that they're hot

0:36:17.960 --> 0:36:20.160
<v Speaker 1>right now, they're playing well, they're defense. Did the Cubs

0:36:20.160 --> 0:36:22.840
<v Speaker 1>ever win? Okay, for not for one hundred years and

0:36:22.840 --> 0:36:25.280
<v Speaker 1>then they did. I mean that's not a good that.

0:36:25.280 --> 0:36:28.000
<v Speaker 1>That's not a good rationale, Like what past results are

0:36:28.000 --> 0:36:30.000
<v Speaker 1>not an indicator of future results. And they're not even

0:36:30.040 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 1>same guys like I mean, they're led by quarterback now,

0:36:33.080 --> 0:36:35.239
<v Speaker 1>Like they haven't had a good quarterback since McNab left.

0:36:35.280 --> 0:36:37.719
<v Speaker 1>So they got a good quarterback, they really do. He's

0:36:37.719 --> 0:36:41.359
<v Speaker 1>playing well. I just think that that in this league.

0:36:41.400 --> 0:36:44.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you just said it yourself that the Giants

0:36:44.280 --> 0:36:47.960
<v Speaker 1>like barely, I mean lost to the Eagles. They needed

0:36:48.000 --> 0:36:50.520
<v Speaker 1>a sixty one yard field goal to win. So it's

0:36:50.560 --> 0:36:53.319
<v Speaker 1>not like the Eagles are just running over everybody. Oh no,

0:36:53.400 --> 0:36:55.839
<v Speaker 1>and they they won that game the other day from

0:36:55.840 --> 0:36:59.400
<v Speaker 1>two tipped in interceptions inside the twenty yard line and

0:36:59.400 --> 0:37:01.200
<v Speaker 1>they were able to score from there. I mean, it's

0:37:01.239 --> 0:37:03.160
<v Speaker 1>not like they weren't up and down the field and

0:37:03.320 --> 0:37:05.120
<v Speaker 1>mall the But you know, I think that's they are

0:37:05.200 --> 0:37:07.520
<v Speaker 1>playing well. I think that's the point there is they're

0:37:07.600 --> 0:37:09.640
<v Speaker 1>just as good as you say their offense is. Their

0:37:09.680 --> 0:37:12.520
<v Speaker 1>defense is playing really really well. So but when you

0:37:12.600 --> 0:37:14.960
<v Speaker 1>play with fire like that, you are gonna get burned,

0:37:15.040 --> 0:37:17.719
<v Speaker 1>and they will. They'll start losing. I guarantee you they

0:37:17.719 --> 0:37:20.239
<v Speaker 1>will lose two in a row at some point, and

0:37:20.280 --> 0:37:22.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe even three in a row this year. They will.

0:37:22.560 --> 0:37:25.280
<v Speaker 1>They're just the way it's worked that you they haven't

0:37:25.320 --> 0:37:28.439
<v Speaker 1>been playing that impressively to just keep running the table.

0:37:28.560 --> 0:37:30.560
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't work like that. You'll they'll come back and

0:37:30.600 --> 0:37:32.480
<v Speaker 1>they'll lose. I'm not saying they won't win the division

0:37:32.560 --> 0:37:34.960
<v Speaker 1>or make the playoffs. I'm just saying that this isn't

0:37:35.000 --> 0:37:38.640
<v Speaker 1>like fourteen and two, thirteen and three football team. They're

0:37:38.640 --> 0:37:40.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna probably go ten and six. I think the same

0:37:40.560 --> 0:37:42.319
<v Speaker 1>thing could have been said about the Cowboys at this

0:37:42.320 --> 0:37:44.239
<v Speaker 1>point last year. People were like, at some point they're

0:37:44.239 --> 0:37:46.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna be the Cowboys. They're gonna lose two, and they

0:37:46.080 --> 0:37:48.160
<v Speaker 1>were in the pointoffs in the playoffs though, but I

0:37:48.200 --> 0:37:50.120
<v Speaker 1>think during the regular season they were a thirteen and

0:37:50.200 --> 0:37:52.560
<v Speaker 1>three team. And I'm saying this Eagles team is showing

0:37:52.600 --> 0:37:55.000
<v Speaker 1>sign that they're a good team. Their defense is good,

0:37:55.000 --> 0:37:57.680
<v Speaker 1>their offense is good. They just have a good team.

0:37:57.680 --> 0:37:59.600
<v Speaker 1>And so I won't take anything away from it. I'm

0:37:59.640 --> 0:38:02.239
<v Speaker 1>not taking it away from I'm just saying that. And

0:38:02.320 --> 0:38:04.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe I think history does repeat itself, and

0:38:04.760 --> 0:38:08.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's there's They're not set up to

0:38:08.680 --> 0:38:11.120
<v Speaker 1>be a thirteen and three football team. They're not that

0:38:11.200 --> 0:38:13.600
<v Speaker 1>they'll They'll probably go ten and six to eleven and five.

0:38:13.880 --> 0:38:16.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't agree with Nick's rationale, as I

0:38:16.719 --> 0:38:18.800
<v Speaker 1>already said, but at the end of the day, I

0:38:19.440 --> 0:38:21.439
<v Speaker 1>agree with what he's saying because I was talking about

0:38:21.480 --> 0:38:23.040
<v Speaker 1>this on Twitter the other night. If you look around

0:38:23.080 --> 0:38:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the NFC in light of Aaron Rodgers injury, there isn't

0:38:27.080 --> 0:38:29.319
<v Speaker 1>a team out there that I'm just like, well, yeah,

0:38:29.360 --> 0:38:30.680
<v Speaker 1>like I agree with that they're gonna have the one

0:38:30.719 --> 0:38:33.120
<v Speaker 1>seed locked up by Christmas, you know, Like, I don't

0:38:33.160 --> 0:38:35.880
<v Speaker 1>think it's gonna be that way. I would be surprised

0:38:36.239 --> 0:38:38.239
<v Speaker 1>if there's a thirteen or fourteen win team in the

0:38:38.320 --> 0:38:40.359
<v Speaker 1>NFC this year, just based on what we've seen through

0:38:40.360 --> 0:38:42.719
<v Speaker 1>the first season, there's no team that's dominant right now.

0:38:42.719 --> 0:38:44.560
<v Speaker 1>That's my point. Yeah, there's no team that's done. And

0:38:44.640 --> 0:38:47.560
<v Speaker 1>if there is a thirteen wins whoever it is, if

0:38:47.600 --> 0:38:49.399
<v Speaker 1>they get hot and like the Cowboys did and then

0:38:49.560 --> 0:38:51.560
<v Speaker 1>last year they just kind of keep winning, keep winning

0:38:51.560 --> 0:38:55.000
<v Speaker 1>these close games. Let's say it is Philadelphia or somebody.

0:38:55.360 --> 0:38:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Nobody in the in the playoffs is going to be

0:38:57.880 --> 0:39:01.280
<v Speaker 1>afraid of them going to Philly and winning or going

0:39:01.480 --> 0:39:05.120
<v Speaker 1>anywhere whoever the top team is, No one's No one's

0:39:05.160 --> 0:39:07.759
<v Speaker 1>afraid of anybody because they don't have a guy like

0:39:07.800 --> 0:39:10.359
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers, right right, Yeah. I mean that's that's why

0:39:10.400 --> 0:39:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you get afraid of playing a team, is because there's

0:39:12.520 --> 0:39:14.160
<v Speaker 1>that one player that you're like, I just don't have

0:39:14.160 --> 0:39:16.040
<v Speaker 1>an answer for this guy, no doubt. And with Aaron

0:39:16.120 --> 0:39:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers out, I don't know if there's a team in

0:39:17.600 --> 0:39:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the NFC where you got that one player you like,

0:39:19.640 --> 0:39:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't have an answer for her. It's it's a

0:39:23.360 --> 0:39:27.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a bummer. Yeah you're gonna say that, but I

0:39:27.040 --> 0:39:29.440
<v Speaker 1>thought you were. Did you say the Falcons. I mean

0:39:29.480 --> 0:39:31.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe the Falcons, but do you feel like that about

0:39:31.560 --> 0:39:35.759
<v Speaker 1>about their guy Ryan Well, I mean, I'm just saying

0:39:35.760 --> 0:39:37.279
<v Speaker 1>if you had to go up and play them, like

0:39:37.400 --> 0:39:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about in the playoffs, you have to go

0:39:39.239 --> 0:39:41.399
<v Speaker 1>up there and play them, that that's that would be

0:39:41.800 --> 0:39:43.759
<v Speaker 1>that would be a challenge. That's probably the scariest thing

0:39:43.760 --> 0:39:45.319
<v Speaker 1>in the NFC right now, is what you say, yeah,

0:39:45.520 --> 0:39:47.399
<v Speaker 1>just because they'll they'll get back on track and they'll

0:39:47.440 --> 0:39:49.520
<v Speaker 1>get going. I mean, they're getting beat by AFC teams

0:39:49.520 --> 0:39:52.080
<v Speaker 1>at home right now. So, by no means am I

0:39:52.200 --> 0:39:55.040
<v Speaker 1>trying to close the book on the Cowboys season. Unlike

0:39:55.520 --> 0:39:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Brian Roddis, who I argued with and said, he said

0:39:58.160 --> 0:40:00.520
<v Speaker 1>it's over, that we might as well start the draft everything.

0:40:00.680 --> 0:40:03.400
<v Speaker 1>If you'd been on this show with Brian and Nate yesterday,

0:40:03.440 --> 0:40:05.319
<v Speaker 1>you would have thought the Cowboys were two and ten,

0:40:05.520 --> 0:40:07.720
<v Speaker 1>like it was unbelievable. Those two guys take it personal

0:40:07.800 --> 0:40:10.360
<v Speaker 1>those but you can see that by no means in

0:40:10.440 --> 0:40:12.239
<v Speaker 1>my closing the book on their season. But when you

0:40:12.280 --> 0:40:15.120
<v Speaker 1>think about that, it is disappointing that they haven't been

0:40:15.200 --> 0:40:18.560
<v Speaker 1>better to this point. And I'm I love Aaron Rodgers,

0:40:18.600 --> 0:40:20.759
<v Speaker 1>I love Watchington play. I don't want him to be hurt,

0:40:20.880 --> 0:40:23.640
<v Speaker 1>but this is a huge opportunity for somebody to take

0:40:23.680 --> 0:40:27.000
<v Speaker 1>advantage of if he's done for the year, and right

0:40:27.000 --> 0:40:29.040
<v Speaker 1>now the Cowboys don't look like they're in a great

0:40:29.040 --> 0:40:31.560
<v Speaker 1>position to do that so hopefully. But I thought you

0:40:31.600 --> 0:40:33.719
<v Speaker 1>just said that you don't think it's a huge it's

0:40:33.800 --> 0:40:35.800
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily you're not ready, right This team on a

0:40:36.000 --> 0:40:39.120
<v Speaker 1>running back, right, No, but they have not looked like

0:40:39.160 --> 0:40:41.680
<v Speaker 1>a team so far that it is capable because of

0:40:41.680 --> 0:40:44.400
<v Speaker 1>other things, not just a running back. Everything. Zeke's not

0:40:44.440 --> 0:40:46.520
<v Speaker 1>playing like Zeke. The offensive line hadn't been good, the

0:40:46.520 --> 0:40:49.360
<v Speaker 1>defense is terrible. Like this doesn't look like a playoff

0:40:49.360 --> 0:40:51.640
<v Speaker 1>team right now. I'm not saying they still can be.

0:40:52.080 --> 0:40:54.480
<v Speaker 1>You get better as the season goes along, but you

0:40:54.520 --> 0:40:56.800
<v Speaker 1>can't sit here at two and three after five games

0:40:56.800 --> 0:40:59.720
<v Speaker 1>and say that this team looks like they're capable of contending.

0:41:00.000 --> 0:41:01.360
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna go and take our final break. When we

0:41:01.360 --> 0:41:02.879
<v Speaker 1>come back, we're gonna get some phone calls, you guys.

0:41:02.920 --> 0:41:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Give us a call the numbers two one four eight

0:41:05.239 --> 0:41:07.359
<v Speaker 1>seven two twenty one O two again two one four

0:41:07.440 --> 0:41:09.680
<v Speaker 1>eight seven two twenty one oh two, or hit us

0:41:09.719 --> 0:41:12.600
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter. At Cowboys Break. This is the break. To

0:41:12.640 --> 0:41:15.800
<v Speaker 1>work this big land, you need equipment with values rooted

0:41:15.800 --> 0:41:18.560
<v Speaker 1>as deep in Texas soil as you are. Like John

0:41:18.600 --> 0:41:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Deer Compact tractors for the six year power training. Warrant

0:41:21.880 --> 0:41:24.440
<v Speaker 1>to hit big features that help you work less so

0:41:24.560 --> 0:41:26.680
<v Speaker 1>you have more time to do what you love. John

0:41:26.719 --> 0:41:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Deer was first in the Texas fields, and we're proud

0:41:29.239 --> 0:41:31.200
<v Speaker 1>to be on the field as the official agg and

0:41:31.280 --> 0:41:34.720
<v Speaker 1>turf equipment of the Dallas Cowboys. Find Texas Sized deals

0:41:34.719 --> 0:41:38.960
<v Speaker 1>and my John Deer Dealer dot com. Slash Football Terms, Conditions, exclusions,

0:41:39.000 --> 0:41:41.240
<v Speaker 1>and warranty limitations apply so you can you love for details,

0:41:41.680 --> 0:41:45.359
<v Speaker 1>We the entertainment loving people, want a smartphone built for us.

0:41:45.560 --> 0:41:47.359
<v Speaker 1>With AT and T and Direct TV, you can get

0:41:47.400 --> 0:41:50.439
<v Speaker 1>the Samsung Galaxy Saight with an Infinity edge to edge screen.

0:41:50.520 --> 0:41:54.520
<v Speaker 1>It's perfect for entertainment. We want exactly what you just said.

0:41:54.680 --> 0:41:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Buy a Samsung Galaxy sa and get one free after

0:41:57.000 --> 0:41:58.640
<v Speaker 1>bill credits when you buy both on AT and T

0:41:58.800 --> 0:42:01.000
<v Speaker 1>next and a Direct TV. Visit your local AT and

0:42:01.040 --> 0:42:03.040
<v Speaker 1>T store today by each seven hundred fifty dollars on

0:42:03.040 --> 0:42:05.160
<v Speaker 1>installment agreement with eligible service. Newline is three to seven

0:42:05.200 --> 0:42:07.239
<v Speaker 1>hundred fifty thousan credits over thirty months, credit starting two

0:42:07.239 --> 0:42:09.239
<v Speaker 1>to three bills. If service canceled, vice fails, two taxes,

0:42:09.280 --> 0:42:11.560
<v Speaker 1>fees and restrictions apply. Money Time Offices, DW three details,

0:42:11.640 --> 0:42:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Ice Cold, Doctor Pepper and the Dallas Cowboys go way back.

0:42:15.200 --> 0:42:19.080
<v Speaker 1>They belong together, like Texas and football, silver and blue

0:42:19.280 --> 0:42:23.240
<v Speaker 1>shotgun formations and Hail Mary's. Having a Cowboys football party

0:42:23.280 --> 0:42:27.560
<v Speaker 1>without doctor Pepper is like having Thanksgiving without the Cowboys. Basically,

0:42:27.840 --> 0:42:31.520
<v Speaker 1>we wouldn't recommend it. So next time you have a tailgate, homegate,

0:42:31.680 --> 0:42:34.280
<v Speaker 1>or whatever else kind of gate, grab some ice cold

0:42:34.360 --> 0:42:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Pepper for you and your friends to enjoy. It's

0:42:37.120 --> 0:42:40.920
<v Speaker 1>a Dallas Cowboys tradition. Doctor Pepper the one you crave.

0:42:41.200 --> 0:42:43.160
<v Speaker 1>It can be hard to find the right resource for

0:42:43.280 --> 0:42:47.080
<v Speaker 1>learning about important financial matters. You search how to build savings,

0:42:47.080 --> 0:42:49.520
<v Speaker 1>you end up reading about the one weird ingredient from

0:42:49.560 --> 0:42:52.880
<v Speaker 1>supermarkets that can make you taller. That's why Bank of

0:42:52.920 --> 0:42:55.799
<v Speaker 1>America build Better Money Habits dot Com, a safe little

0:42:55.840 --> 0:42:58.759
<v Speaker 1>corner of the Internet for answering your financial questions. Full

0:42:58.800 --> 0:43:01.319
<v Speaker 1>of simple videos and tips. Better Money Habits can show

0:43:01.320 --> 0:43:03.160
<v Speaker 1>you how to make the most of your money. Without

0:43:03.200 --> 0:43:05.840
<v Speaker 1>resorting to random searches that always seem to lead to

0:43:05.880 --> 0:43:09.399
<v Speaker 1>unbelievable photos of childhood stars grown up. To learn more,

0:43:09.520 --> 0:43:16.040
<v Speaker 1>visit Better Money habits dot com. Back to the break

0:43:16.280 --> 0:43:18.359
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back. It's the final segment of The Breaklof from

0:43:18.360 --> 0:43:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the s WBC Morgan Studios at the Star Nick Take

0:43:21.239 --> 0:43:24.200
<v Speaker 1>it away shop exclusive Cowboys underwear Tommy John dot com

0:43:24.239 --> 0:43:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Forward Slash Cowboys for twenty percent off your first order

0:43:26.680 --> 0:43:31.799
<v Speaker 1>Tommy John dot com Forward Slash Cowboys. And that's all

0:43:31.840 --> 0:43:34.959
<v Speaker 1>we got all you need. That's really not all? Yeah, left,

0:43:35.280 --> 0:43:40.799
<v Speaker 1>left leg, right leg, pull them up. Go okay, Well,

0:43:40.960 --> 0:43:44.240
<v Speaker 1>well what about the drawstring? Mine don't have a drawstring.

0:43:44.600 --> 0:43:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Don't really know your stone either. It's not true whatever.

0:43:52.640 --> 0:43:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they do, maybe they do, can't prove it. I

0:43:55.520 --> 0:43:58.719
<v Speaker 1>don't want to, nor do I. All right, you know,

0:43:58.840 --> 0:44:01.480
<v Speaker 1>even when I just try to just go really quick

0:44:01.520 --> 0:44:03.759
<v Speaker 1>and move it on, it's too much. It's not Yeah,

0:44:03.560 --> 0:44:05.800
<v Speaker 1>you're killing it. That's supposed to be a fun segment

0:44:05.800 --> 0:44:08.440
<v Speaker 1>because I grabbed the one that says pick your plays,

0:44:08.520 --> 0:44:10.520
<v Speaker 1>not your weggies or something like. That's wrong with that?

0:44:10.680 --> 0:44:13.759
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, just like you haven't said worse I

0:44:13.840 --> 0:44:18.359
<v Speaker 1>have but we are not comfortable. True story, Amber, One

0:44:18.480 --> 0:44:25.200
<v Speaker 1>those just saying she's not wrong. She's not wrong, not

0:44:25.320 --> 0:44:28.279
<v Speaker 1>wrong at all. Tommy Johns doesn't give you weggies right,

0:44:28.400 --> 0:44:30.720
<v Speaker 1>damn right. I don't know about it, but you guys should.

0:44:31.080 --> 0:44:36.000
<v Speaker 1>You're right about that, Amber, You're very right. All right,

0:44:36.000 --> 0:44:37.960
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna get into the phone calls. Let's get a

0:44:38.000 --> 0:44:41.160
<v Speaker 1>phone call. We got a call from Reggie in Germany. Reggie,

0:44:41.200 --> 0:44:44.839
<v Speaker 1>what up? Hey, Reggie checking in from Germany again? What's up? Guys?

0:44:46.040 --> 0:44:50.719
<v Speaker 1>All right? Amber? Oh god, Okay, listen, I'm gonna throw

0:44:50.719 --> 0:44:53.799
<v Speaker 1>a whole bunch of stuff at you guys real quick. Okay. Um,

0:44:53.880 --> 0:44:55.399
<v Speaker 1>First of all, I think this is the second half

0:44:55.400 --> 0:44:57.560
<v Speaker 1>of this season is gonna it's really shaping to be

0:44:57.680 --> 0:45:00.520
<v Speaker 1>really exciting. You know, you got the Redskins the game

0:45:00.520 --> 0:45:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and a half out over the Eagles. If they played

0:45:03.040 --> 0:45:04.799
<v Speaker 1>Eagles this weekend, they win that game, there only a

0:45:04.800 --> 0:45:07.480
<v Speaker 1>half a game out. If we played real serious ball

0:45:07.520 --> 0:45:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the second half of the season, we're in it. I

0:45:09.520 --> 0:45:11.799
<v Speaker 1>agree with Nick. You know, we we could, we could

0:45:11.840 --> 0:45:16.839
<v Speaker 1>still do this. Um, and the Giants is gonna play

0:45:16.880 --> 0:45:18.400
<v Speaker 1>some ball. They're going to close the gap with some

0:45:18.520 --> 0:45:21.560
<v Speaker 1>things here and as I see the Eagle schedule. They

0:45:21.600 --> 0:45:24.040
<v Speaker 1>got the Broncos. Still, they got the Seahawks, they got

0:45:24.080 --> 0:45:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the Grams, they got the Raiders. Those are some some

0:45:27.280 --> 0:45:29.440
<v Speaker 1>tough ball games. And so we can still do this

0:45:29.480 --> 0:45:32.360
<v Speaker 1>if we if we play some ball. UM, you know,

0:45:32.520 --> 0:45:34.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe if we think about Navarro Bowman coming in, I

0:45:34.680 --> 0:45:36.399
<v Speaker 1>don't know if you know he had thought about that,

0:45:36.960 --> 0:45:39.080
<v Speaker 1>UM picking him up, maybe there'll be some help at

0:45:39.120 --> 0:45:42.520
<v Speaker 1>the linebacker spot. UM. My real belief is that we

0:45:42.560 --> 0:45:45.799
<v Speaker 1>need to get Lyo Collins back at guard at some

0:45:45.880 --> 0:45:47.560
<v Speaker 1>point in time. Maybe not this season. I don't know.

0:45:47.600 --> 0:45:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it's gonna happen this season, but

0:45:49.080 --> 0:45:51.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe next year. He's a beast of guard. You know,

0:45:51.640 --> 0:45:53.759
<v Speaker 1>he's he's doing okay at a tackle because he's just

0:45:53.760 --> 0:45:56.440
<v Speaker 1>a quality player. But I think we need a guard. UM.

0:45:56.880 --> 0:45:59.680
<v Speaker 1>And those two thoughts that I have right now, I

0:45:59.719 --> 0:46:01.800
<v Speaker 1>just to throw all that out you how did you guys?

0:46:01.840 --> 0:46:07.040
<v Speaker 1>God blessed? And one last thing, you know, I know

0:46:07.080 --> 0:46:10.080
<v Speaker 1>it's off topic, but I'm really worried about what's going

0:46:10.120 --> 0:46:12.440
<v Speaker 1>on in the locker room in the context of what

0:46:12.600 --> 0:46:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Jerry kind of threw out there and throw grenade in

0:46:15.920 --> 0:46:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the locker room with his comments. I don't know what

0:46:19.320 --> 0:46:20.640
<v Speaker 1>we're doing there. I don't know if you guys have

0:46:20.680 --> 0:46:23.120
<v Speaker 1>any comments to say about that, if you even want

0:46:23.160 --> 0:46:26.680
<v Speaker 1>to touch that, But that's my comment. Okay, I'm out,

0:46:26.880 --> 0:46:30.160
<v Speaker 1>all right, Thanks for the call. There were a couple

0:46:30.160 --> 0:46:32.080
<v Speaker 1>of things he said there that I don't think have

0:46:32.160 --> 0:46:34.800
<v Speaker 1>a likelihood of happening. Obviously, the Navarro Bowman thing is

0:46:34.880 --> 0:46:37.160
<v Speaker 1>not going to happen. He is assigned to the Oakland Raiders,

0:46:37.760 --> 0:46:40.120
<v Speaker 1>which makes a whole lot of sense. To be honest

0:46:40.120 --> 0:46:41.239
<v Speaker 1>with you, I kind of think this is one of

0:46:41.280 --> 0:46:45.040
<v Speaker 1>those situations where you kind of accept and offer from

0:46:45.040 --> 0:46:47.279
<v Speaker 1>another team to come visit so that you can go

0:46:47.320 --> 0:46:49.279
<v Speaker 1>to the Raiders and say, hey, if we leave it

0:46:49.400 --> 0:46:51.719
<v Speaker 1>without a deal, we're heading somewhere else and they may

0:46:51.760 --> 0:46:53.640
<v Speaker 1>give us a deal, and that just kind of gives

0:46:53.680 --> 0:46:56.319
<v Speaker 1>them more impetus to get a deal done before you

0:46:56.400 --> 0:46:58.919
<v Speaker 1>leave the building. It makes sense for him, he say,

0:46:58.920 --> 0:47:01.000
<v Speaker 1>he keeps his family in the same area, and you

0:47:01.000 --> 0:47:03.000
<v Speaker 1>know we're running right. I don't think he was going

0:47:03.040 --> 0:47:05.640
<v Speaker 1>to sign with the Cowboys. I don't either. I think

0:47:05.680 --> 0:47:07.720
<v Speaker 1>that was again, I think it was it was an

0:47:07.800 --> 0:47:11.280
<v Speaker 1>option for him to be able to make the Raiders

0:47:11.280 --> 0:47:14.080
<v Speaker 1>want to do a deal quicker right, right. But that

0:47:14.160 --> 0:47:17.480
<v Speaker 1>being said, also Lyle Collins thing, I mean, at this point,

0:47:17.520 --> 0:47:19.680
<v Speaker 1>that's water unto the bridge. That's not gonna change. I

0:47:19.680 --> 0:47:21.240
<v Speaker 1>don't even think it's going to change in the future.

0:47:21.360 --> 0:47:24.399
<v Speaker 1>I think they are they are committed to the fact

0:47:24.440 --> 0:47:25.960
<v Speaker 1>that he is going to be the right tackle. You

0:47:26.000 --> 0:47:27.920
<v Speaker 1>guys agree with that. When was he a beast at

0:47:27.960 --> 0:47:31.560
<v Speaker 1>guard because he pulled and not the safety for the

0:47:31.680 --> 0:47:34.200
<v Speaker 1>for the Seahawks or a linebacker. I mean he can

0:47:34.200 --> 0:47:36.400
<v Speaker 1>still do that at tackle. I mean when was he

0:47:36.480 --> 0:47:40.040
<v Speaker 1>really beastly at guard? Because they were one of the

0:47:40.080 --> 0:47:42.600
<v Speaker 1>worst teams in the league in short yardage situations, they

0:47:42.600 --> 0:47:45.759
<v Speaker 1>were considerably better when Leary got there. Of course, Zeke

0:47:45.840 --> 0:47:48.440
<v Speaker 1>got there too, so that he hasn't blocked it guarded

0:47:48.480 --> 0:47:51.120
<v Speaker 1>behind with Zeke. I understand that, But I just don't

0:47:51.160 --> 0:47:53.719
<v Speaker 1>remember him being a beast at guard. I think he

0:47:54.040 --> 0:47:56.840
<v Speaker 1>his body type and his quick feet, I think he

0:47:57.000 --> 0:48:00.440
<v Speaker 1>is a better tackle. He'll get better there. You remember

0:48:00.480 --> 0:48:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Doug Free played ten years. He didn't play for the

0:48:02.400 --> 0:48:05.279
<v Speaker 1>first three years of his career. You have to it

0:48:05.360 --> 0:48:07.880
<v Speaker 1>takes some time. He's learning on the run. He'll be

0:48:07.920 --> 0:48:10.040
<v Speaker 1>fine at tackle. I don't think he's going to be

0:48:10.280 --> 0:48:12.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he would be even be better at guard.

0:48:12.480 --> 0:48:14.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, we talk about expectations a lot on this show.

0:48:15.480 --> 0:48:17.560
<v Speaker 1>If the Cowboys would have gotten Lyle Collins of the

0:48:17.560 --> 0:48:20.680
<v Speaker 1>first round pick, they did not because he dropped dropped. Obviously,

0:48:20.680 --> 0:48:23.040
<v Speaker 1>they ended up getting him as a free agent. But

0:48:23.080 --> 0:48:24.640
<v Speaker 1>if he would have been a first round pick, do

0:48:24.680 --> 0:48:26.640
<v Speaker 1>you think that there would be talk that he has

0:48:26.719 --> 0:48:30.000
<v Speaker 1>been not a bust. Yeah, but it has been a

0:48:30.080 --> 0:48:32.520
<v Speaker 1>lot less than what they expected from a first round pick,

0:48:32.640 --> 0:48:35.120
<v Speaker 1>especially thinking about the other three first round picks they

0:48:35.160 --> 0:48:37.959
<v Speaker 1>have on that offensive line and what they've done really

0:48:37.960 --> 0:48:40.279
<v Speaker 1>starting in their first years and they first got plugged in,

0:48:40.640 --> 0:48:44.000
<v Speaker 1>all three of them immediately had some success. Yeah, Lyle,

0:48:44.120 --> 0:48:46.799
<v Speaker 1>not quite right. Probably it wouldn't have been moved though.

0:48:47.280 --> 0:48:49.400
<v Speaker 1>You drafted him and tackle, you wouldn't have. You have

0:48:49.440 --> 0:48:50.680
<v Speaker 1>to meant guard. You would have drafted him in and

0:48:50.719 --> 0:48:52.640
<v Speaker 1>tackle and you would have played there, and he would

0:48:52.640 --> 0:48:55.120
<v Speaker 1>have stayed there, because that's how you have to justify

0:48:55.239 --> 0:48:57.759
<v Speaker 1>your pick. So he would have you know, he might

0:48:57.840 --> 0:48:59.719
<v Speaker 1>have been better, you know, playing This has been a

0:49:00.239 --> 0:49:03.240
<v Speaker 1>year at tackle. If you can rewind this thing, because

0:49:03.239 --> 0:49:08.520
<v Speaker 1>it's funny, you know. We report what we're told more often,

0:49:08.560 --> 0:49:10.880
<v Speaker 1>like more so than our opinions, you know, And for

0:49:10.880 --> 0:49:13.440
<v Speaker 1>forever the Cowboys front office was like, we like him

0:49:13.440 --> 0:49:15.879
<v Speaker 1>at guard. We like him at guard, and so that's

0:49:15.880 --> 0:49:17.399
<v Speaker 1>what we say. We're like, they like him at guard,

0:49:17.400 --> 0:49:22.200
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna leave him there, and then they change their mind. Honestly,

0:49:22.280 --> 0:49:25.680
<v Speaker 1>if you know, going rewinding it back to January or February,

0:49:26.120 --> 0:49:28.480
<v Speaker 1>I would have been intrigued to see what the offensive

0:49:28.520 --> 0:49:31.400
<v Speaker 1>line would look like with Lyle playing left guard and

0:49:31.480 --> 0:49:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Chaz Green playing right tackle, but they decided that they

0:49:35.480 --> 0:49:38.600
<v Speaker 1>wanted to play him at tackle. He has been way

0:49:38.640 --> 0:49:41.080
<v Speaker 1>better than he's gotten credit for, in my opinion. If

0:49:41.080 --> 0:49:44.400
<v Speaker 1>you go watch the games, you can see that. And

0:49:44.800 --> 0:49:46.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, as much as I don't like to admit it,

0:49:46.960 --> 0:49:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the concerns about Chaz Green's durability have been confirmed again,

0:49:52.880 --> 0:49:56.239
<v Speaker 1>I guess is the word I'm looking for. So as

0:49:56.480 --> 0:49:58.400
<v Speaker 1>having said that, having said that, I would have liked

0:49:58.400 --> 0:49:59.840
<v Speaker 1>to have seen that. I don't have a problem with

0:49:59.840 --> 0:50:01.839
<v Speaker 1>the decision at all. And I think he's been better

0:50:01.840 --> 0:50:03.680
<v Speaker 1>than he's gotten credit for, and I think he will

0:50:03.719 --> 0:50:06.520
<v Speaker 1>continue to get better and that will be a good thing.

0:50:06.560 --> 0:50:09.239
<v Speaker 1>In the long run, people are just very impatient, don't

0:50:09.239 --> 0:50:11.359
<v Speaker 1>you think they were also scared off and it's being

0:50:11.400 --> 0:50:13.640
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of beared out to be true, but they

0:50:13.640 --> 0:50:16.640
<v Speaker 1>were scared of maybe placing him at guard and putting

0:50:16.680 --> 0:50:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Chaz Green a tackle because of the fact that they

0:50:18.920 --> 0:50:20.920
<v Speaker 1>were afraid of his durability from side. They have any

0:50:20.960 --> 0:50:23.360
<v Speaker 1>other options? I think if Chads go down to tackle,

0:50:23.400 --> 0:50:24.759
<v Speaker 1>you don't have a lot of other options. He goes

0:50:24.800 --> 0:50:26.719
<v Speaker 1>down to guard, you've got a few options. All of

0:50:26.760 --> 0:50:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the factors. The Cowboys have been justified at many turns

0:50:31.040 --> 0:50:35.200
<v Speaker 1>in that decision because like Lyle has played pretty well

0:50:35.239 --> 0:50:37.840
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, and Chads Green has had problems staying

0:50:37.840 --> 0:50:42.480
<v Speaker 1>on the field. So you know the fact that your

0:50:42.560 --> 0:50:45.560
<v Speaker 1>tackle spot is solid, but you've got questions at guard.

0:50:45.560 --> 0:50:47.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that's preferable, and so like a, yeah, I

0:50:48.280 --> 0:50:50.200
<v Speaker 1>would have liked to have seen that combination, like I

0:50:50.239 --> 0:50:52.680
<v Speaker 1>just said, but I don't fault them at all for

0:50:52.719 --> 0:50:54.640
<v Speaker 1>what they did, and I think it's working out pretty

0:50:54.640 --> 0:50:57.760
<v Speaker 1>well so far. All right, let's take a question from Twitter.

0:50:58.400 --> 0:51:02.239
<v Speaker 1>So if the whole scene suspension does come into fact

0:51:02.239 --> 0:51:04.920
<v Speaker 1>and he keeps going forward like that, do you guys

0:51:04.960 --> 0:51:07.880
<v Speaker 1>think that Switzer will get more action in the slot

0:51:07.920 --> 0:51:11.879
<v Speaker 1>with Beastley, I hope. So that's I thought about that

0:51:11.960 --> 0:51:16.520
<v Speaker 1>because the conundrum has been, well, who you've taken off

0:51:16.520 --> 0:51:18.759
<v Speaker 1>the field to put Switzer on, and it's probably gonna

0:51:18.800 --> 0:51:21.960
<v Speaker 1>be Jason Witten or Zeek. So now you think instead

0:51:21.960 --> 0:51:24.279
<v Speaker 1>of maybe going to eleven personnel, especially when they go

0:51:24.320 --> 0:51:26.719
<v Speaker 1>empty eleven, now what they do is they just have

0:51:26.920 --> 0:51:29.560
<v Speaker 1>a tight end, no running back and an extra wide receiver.

0:51:30.480 --> 0:51:33.440
<v Speaker 1>You theoretically could or and we've seen Switzer motion in

0:51:33.520 --> 0:51:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the backfield a couple of times as well. I think,

0:51:37.200 --> 0:51:39.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm not trying to anoint the guy because

0:51:39.840 --> 0:51:42.360
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't done anything to deserve that yet. And the

0:51:42.360 --> 0:51:45.440
<v Speaker 1>biggest play, the most meaningful play of his season so far,

0:51:45.480 --> 0:51:49.120
<v Speaker 1>as a muffed punt. But you know, he's a he's

0:51:49.120 --> 0:51:51.560
<v Speaker 1>a shifty guy, he looks dynamic with the ball in

0:51:51.600 --> 0:51:53.480
<v Speaker 1>his hands, and I think it would be a shame

0:51:53.600 --> 0:51:55.399
<v Speaker 1>not to again, kind of like what I said about

0:51:55.480 --> 0:51:57.719
<v Speaker 1>Rod Smith, give you know, it'd be a shame not

0:51:57.760 --> 0:51:59.640
<v Speaker 1>to give him the opportunity to do something with that.

0:51:59.719 --> 0:52:02.279
<v Speaker 1>So maybe a silver lining of this is that you

0:52:02.320 --> 0:52:04.160
<v Speaker 1>can find more ways to get him onto the field.

0:52:05.480 --> 0:52:07.440
<v Speaker 1>This is kind of hard to answer, but do you

0:52:07.480 --> 0:52:11.239
<v Speaker 1>guys think think that the Cowboys address everything that needed

0:52:11.280 --> 0:52:16.520
<v Speaker 1>to be addressed during this bye week? Kind of wish

0:52:16.600 --> 0:52:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Navarro Bowman was on the team, but be nice address,

0:52:21.480 --> 0:52:24.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I mean, I don't think there's a good

0:52:24.239 --> 0:52:26.279
<v Speaker 1>way to answer that until you see him play another game.

0:52:26.680 --> 0:52:30.320
<v Speaker 1>I think Sean Lee coming back to good health, Anthony

0:52:30.400 --> 0:52:34.279
<v Speaker 1>Hitchins getting another week, Cheeto getting a week. I mean,

0:52:34.360 --> 0:52:36.960
<v Speaker 1>all those things sound good and hopefully it leads to

0:52:37.040 --> 0:52:39.640
<v Speaker 1>better results for your defense, but you also may have

0:52:39.680 --> 0:52:42.200
<v Speaker 1>lost your running back. Yeah, there's that too, and offsets

0:52:42.239 --> 0:52:45.320
<v Speaker 1>those things for sure that are kind of positive. Although sorry,

0:52:45.320 --> 0:52:47.840
<v Speaker 1>go ahead, they'll probably be a roster move today. I

0:52:47.880 --> 0:52:51.880
<v Speaker 1>would imagine they'll they'll, I mean, the interesting part about

0:52:51.920 --> 0:52:56.200
<v Speaker 1>this situation is Zeke is off the roster and on

0:52:56.280 --> 0:52:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the suspension list. But you can't just go and just

0:52:58.520 --> 0:53:01.719
<v Speaker 1>replace him right now because you might be it might

0:53:01.800 --> 0:53:04.240
<v Speaker 1>be back. But that's why this is going down today

0:53:04.239 --> 0:53:07.640
<v Speaker 1>at one thirty UM, So they'll have that spot. I

0:53:07.640 --> 0:53:09.799
<v Speaker 1>think they have another spot open too, with maybe with

0:53:09.840 --> 0:53:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Paya being on injured reserve UM slash retire or whatever

0:53:15.400 --> 0:53:18.080
<v Speaker 1>whatever list, they decided to put him on, but they'll

0:53:18.080 --> 0:53:21.000
<v Speaker 1>have two spots open too, So I mean, if they

0:53:21.040 --> 0:53:23.640
<v Speaker 1>wanted to sign Bowman, they'll probably sign some linebacker. I

0:53:23.640 --> 0:53:27.560
<v Speaker 1>would imagine, you know, to to help or the then

0:53:27.719 --> 0:53:30.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe call up one of those young tackles,

0:53:30.680 --> 0:53:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Richard ash or Lewis Neil maybe or Paya. It's an idea. Yeah,

0:53:35.440 --> 0:53:39.080
<v Speaker 1>that's true, could help. Um. It's funny because it reminds

0:53:39.080 --> 0:53:41.600
<v Speaker 1>me of a preseason debate that I had with brought

0:53:41.680 --> 0:53:44.879
<v Speaker 1>us like it got really animated too, which was, when

0:53:44.920 --> 0:53:48.239
<v Speaker 1>does it not right? Would you rather try to make

0:53:48.280 --> 0:53:50.319
<v Speaker 1>this offense work without Zeke or try to make this

0:53:50.400 --> 0:53:54.520
<v Speaker 1>defense work without Lee? So you're gonna get a good

0:53:54.520 --> 0:53:56.640
<v Speaker 1>look at it now, I mean, so you know, let

0:53:56.680 --> 0:54:00.279
<v Speaker 1>you rather have Lee on the defense. I actually, I

0:54:00.320 --> 0:54:03.000
<v Speaker 1>will say I argued that I'd way rather have Zeke

0:54:03.239 --> 0:54:05.640
<v Speaker 1>because going back to what I've said time and time again,

0:54:05.760 --> 0:54:08.080
<v Speaker 1>you're only going You're only as good as your offense is,

0:54:08.719 --> 0:54:11.279
<v Speaker 1>and your offense isn't as good without him. But but

0:54:11.320 --> 0:54:14.360
<v Speaker 1>what we saw, what we saw when Lee was not playing,

0:54:14.680 --> 0:54:17.640
<v Speaker 1>is that this defense is so bad that even if

0:54:17.640 --> 0:54:21.279
<v Speaker 1>you score thirty plus, you're not necessarily going to get

0:54:21.280 --> 0:54:23.759
<v Speaker 1>a win. I will gladly eat microw. We're gonna get

0:54:23.760 --> 0:54:26.080
<v Speaker 1>to see it. It looks like, assuming Zeke is suspended

0:54:26.120 --> 0:54:28.200
<v Speaker 1>and Lee is healthy, we're going to get to see

0:54:28.239 --> 0:54:30.759
<v Speaker 1>what this looks like where your best defenders playing and

0:54:30.800 --> 0:54:32.640
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to make it work with your other running backs.

0:54:32.680 --> 0:54:35.399
<v Speaker 1>And if it turns out that they're actually better in

0:54:35.400 --> 0:54:37.960
<v Speaker 1>that situation, then I'll gladly admit I was wrong. The

0:54:37.960 --> 0:54:41.000
<v Speaker 1>thing is the drop off between Zeke and say how

0:54:41.080 --> 0:54:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Fred Morris or a dear McFadden, whichever one you want

0:54:43.080 --> 0:54:46.600
<v Speaker 1>to plug in, and then Sean Lee versus Jalen Smith.

0:54:46.880 --> 0:54:49.240
<v Speaker 1>I guess at this point, I think the drop between

0:54:49.239 --> 0:54:52.600
<v Speaker 1>those two is vastly different. I think the linebacker position

0:54:52.680 --> 0:54:55.600
<v Speaker 1>is a much bigger drop between one to two than

0:54:55.640 --> 0:54:57.880
<v Speaker 1>there is at the running back Jayalen was playing anyways,

0:54:58.120 --> 0:55:02.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, but you know, justin Durant it has been

0:55:02.760 --> 0:55:04.800
<v Speaker 1>playing more. I mean that's really the drop off. I

0:55:04.880 --> 0:55:08.239
<v Speaker 1>think Sean leads to Durant because Jalen Smith was out there. Yeah,

0:55:08.280 --> 0:55:10.640
<v Speaker 1>but I think the problem is the more weeks that

0:55:10.719 --> 0:55:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Jalen is playing a huge number of plays, the more

0:55:13.560 --> 0:55:16.080
<v Speaker 1>we've seen him get exposed. And so I think if

0:55:16.160 --> 0:55:18.160
<v Speaker 1>you if you're gonna get good play out of him

0:55:18.200 --> 0:55:21.000
<v Speaker 1>this year while he's returning and getting himself back into

0:55:21.040 --> 0:55:24.040
<v Speaker 1>it and that, and again, as far as last I've heard,

0:55:24.160 --> 0:55:26.600
<v Speaker 1>he still didn't have one hundred percent feeling in that leg.

0:55:26.719 --> 0:55:29.279
<v Speaker 1>So with all that being said, I still think that,

0:55:29.360 --> 0:55:32.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, Jalen is still if you're gonna put him

0:55:32.280 --> 0:55:35.000
<v Speaker 1>out there as a starter and play him sixty seventy plays,

0:55:35.239 --> 0:55:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that's gonna be a problem for you. Anthony

0:55:37.600 --> 0:55:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Hitchins is nowhere near as good of a player as

0:55:40.520 --> 0:55:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Sean Lee, but I don't think you can underestimate how

0:55:44.200 --> 0:55:47.399
<v Speaker 1>big it is having him back alongside Sean Lee, because

0:55:47.440 --> 0:55:50.600
<v Speaker 1>now you've got an all pro playing with a competent,

0:55:51.320 --> 0:55:57.040
<v Speaker 1>uninjured starter as opposed to a rookie who's not one

0:55:57.080 --> 0:55:59.239
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent healthy who's still trying to feel his way.

0:55:59.280 --> 0:56:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that having having leadback is huge, but having

0:56:02.440 --> 0:56:04.760
<v Speaker 1>both of them back, I think that's what really matters.

0:56:05.880 --> 0:56:08.600
<v Speaker 1>After taking a week off and being able to analyze

0:56:08.680 --> 0:56:12.240
<v Speaker 1>this team. What is still the biggest area of concern

0:56:12.600 --> 0:56:16.600
<v Speaker 1>for you guys? Easily safety for me, And that was

0:56:16.640 --> 0:56:18.520
<v Speaker 1>what it was a week ago, it's what it still

0:56:18.600 --> 0:56:26.480
<v Speaker 1>is now. What do you guys think probably stopping the run,

0:56:26.880 --> 0:56:29.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean, just which they play into that

0:56:29.400 --> 0:56:32.160
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. Yeah, I think I answer this question.

0:56:32.719 --> 0:56:36.160
<v Speaker 1>We answered this on Thursday for the gut feeling. And

0:56:37.080 --> 0:56:39.120
<v Speaker 1>my biggest concern is the fact that they're not making

0:56:39.160 --> 0:56:42.600
<v Speaker 1>any plays on turnovers. They're not getting any turnovers. That

0:56:42.600 --> 0:56:44.759
<v Speaker 1>could be the safeties aren't doing anything that could be that.

0:56:44.800 --> 0:56:46.680
<v Speaker 1>They're not ripping the ball out and not getting picks.

0:56:46.960 --> 0:56:49.160
<v Speaker 1>And I get enough pressure, you know, and I know

0:56:49.200 --> 0:56:52.120
<v Speaker 1>they have the sack leader, but you know, what was it?

0:56:52.239 --> 0:56:55.000
<v Speaker 1>What is it doing? I mean, I mean he's caused

0:56:55.040 --> 0:56:57.239
<v Speaker 1>one fumble that led to a touchdown in Denver, but

0:56:57.440 --> 0:56:59.759
<v Speaker 1>that's really it. So for turnovers, So they need more

0:56:59.800 --> 0:57:02.880
<v Speaker 1>tour over somehow, some way, they need more turnovers. I

0:57:02.920 --> 0:57:05.520
<v Speaker 1>think I said in that story that I thought it

0:57:05.600 --> 0:57:08.239
<v Speaker 1>was the offensive line in the ground game, and that

0:57:08.320 --> 0:57:10.960
<v Speaker 1>was before I knew that Ezekiel Elliott would be suspended.

0:57:11.000 --> 0:57:13.680
<v Speaker 1>So I mean that's definitely concerning. And I said, I'm

0:57:13.680 --> 0:57:16.280
<v Speaker 1>not ready to write them off. But you know, for

0:57:16.320 --> 0:57:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the millionth time, I think this team is only as

0:57:18.400 --> 0:57:21.360
<v Speaker 1>good as their offense, and I know that their defense

0:57:21.480 --> 0:57:23.280
<v Speaker 1>is bad. I get that, and they do need to

0:57:23.320 --> 0:57:25.320
<v Speaker 1>be able to stop the run, and they haven't caused

0:57:25.400 --> 0:57:29.040
<v Speaker 1>enough turnovers. But if their offense is one dimensional and

0:57:29.200 --> 0:57:32.600
<v Speaker 1>can't move the ball, then it doesn't None of that matters.

0:57:32.720 --> 0:57:35.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, I maybe being a naive. I probably am

0:57:35.560 --> 0:57:38.800
<v Speaker 1>to some degree. I just always assume that, assuming Zeke

0:57:38.960 --> 0:57:41.320
<v Speaker 1>wasn't going to be suspended, that as a season war

0:57:41.400 --> 0:57:43.120
<v Speaker 1>on the running game would get going because I just

0:57:43.160 --> 0:57:45.400
<v Speaker 1>felt like, with this offensive line, you got two pieces

0:57:45.440 --> 0:57:47.439
<v Speaker 1>that are new, it was going to take some time

0:57:47.480 --> 0:57:49.760
<v Speaker 1>for them to really jail. I expected that over time

0:57:49.800 --> 0:57:51.640
<v Speaker 1>they'd get better and by the time you hit the

0:57:51.640 --> 0:57:54.120
<v Speaker 1>midway point, they'd be in a stride. And that's what

0:57:54.240 --> 0:57:55.760
<v Speaker 1>she really wants. You want them to be in a

0:57:55.800 --> 0:57:57.960
<v Speaker 1>stride by the end. I think everything changes if Zeke's

0:57:58.000 --> 0:58:00.360
<v Speaker 1>not there. That doesn't mean the running game goes to nothing,

0:58:00.560 --> 0:58:02.240
<v Speaker 1>but I think it does change because you're not going

0:58:02.320 --> 0:58:04.480
<v Speaker 1>to have that explosive guy to running back position that

0:58:04.520 --> 0:58:09.160
<v Speaker 1>you that you once had. Yep, move Crawford back to

0:58:09.440 --> 0:58:15.480
<v Speaker 1>defensive tackle. Does it matter? Well, I mean, I'm not

0:58:15.520 --> 0:58:17.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not trying to be right. What I'm just saying,

0:58:18.160 --> 0:58:20.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that he was when he was at tackle.

0:58:20.160 --> 0:58:23.760
<v Speaker 1>He wasn't He wasn't making game changing type plays at

0:58:23.800 --> 0:58:26.400
<v Speaker 1>defensive end. He's not really making game changing type plays.

0:58:26.400 --> 0:58:28.080
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know if it makes a huge difference.

0:58:28.120 --> 0:58:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Where do you need him? Like do you need where

0:58:29.440 --> 0:58:31.280
<v Speaker 1>do you need a body? He's a steady guy, he's

0:58:31.320 --> 0:58:33.400
<v Speaker 1>a solid guy, but going to Knick's point, he's not

0:58:33.440 --> 0:58:34.960
<v Speaker 1>going to get you a ton of turnover no matter

0:58:35.000 --> 0:58:37.400
<v Speaker 1>where you put him. Right As of right now, don't

0:58:37.440 --> 0:58:40.640
<v Speaker 1>they only have two full fledged defensive tackles on the roster.

0:58:41.080 --> 0:58:44.680
<v Speaker 1>That's my problem, which is why I think I would

0:58:44.680 --> 0:58:49.040
<v Speaker 1>expect that either Richard ass or a Richard ash or

0:58:49.160 --> 0:58:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Lewis Neil will probably be called up at some point

0:58:52.400 --> 0:58:54.240
<v Speaker 1>just because you need I mean, you need somebody there,

0:58:54.360 --> 0:58:57.400
<v Speaker 1>so somebody needs to play tackle. It can be Tyron Crawford,

0:58:57.400 --> 0:59:01.880
<v Speaker 1>it can be Lewis and need Collins, Brian Price. You

0:59:01.920 --> 0:59:04.400
<v Speaker 1>don't call You don't think that that's where Urban's got.

0:59:04.760 --> 0:59:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I think Iran's okay. Yeah, I mean, well, you know

0:59:06.840 --> 0:59:11.160
<v Speaker 1>you've got Irving, Tyrone and even Taco that can do both.

0:59:11.560 --> 0:59:14.240
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, yeah, I know you have tackles there.

0:59:14.320 --> 0:59:17.800
<v Speaker 1>But that's my point is full fledged no questions asked,

0:59:18.680 --> 0:59:20.240
<v Speaker 1>did he play defensive end this last game? I thought

0:59:20.240 --> 0:59:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the only time I saw him was at tack out,

0:59:21.880 --> 0:59:26.400
<v Speaker 1>and that's fine. Probably, yeah, I would think that you

0:59:26.440 --> 0:59:28.720
<v Speaker 1>still have Crawford moving back and forth a little bit

0:59:28.760 --> 0:59:32.440
<v Speaker 1>depending on the play. Taco will be there, but but

0:59:32.640 --> 0:59:36.200
<v Speaker 1>they probably could use someone else. I mean, because now

0:59:36.240 --> 0:59:40.800
<v Speaker 1>they have five down and Tapper, so maybe I'm missing

0:59:40.800 --> 0:59:44.800
<v Speaker 1>a guy. I got Lawrence and Mayo, Mayowa and and Taco.

0:59:45.440 --> 0:59:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Who what? Who else is playing end? I guess Crawford.

0:59:49.440 --> 0:59:52.360
<v Speaker 1>So so either Crawford plays tackle on you another end,

0:59:52.440 --> 0:59:55.520
<v Speaker 1>or Crawford plays end and you need another tackle. And

0:59:55.600 --> 0:59:58.480
<v Speaker 1>since you have two defensive tackles on the practice squad

0:59:58.960 --> 1:00:02.320
<v Speaker 1>and no ends, right, probably makes more sense to do that.

1:00:03.320 --> 1:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>I was going over all day, guys in my head,

1:00:05.400 --> 1:00:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, is it bad that I kind of forgot

1:00:08.080 --> 1:00:13.440
<v Speaker 1>about Taco? That's bad. Yeah, it's not good. I'm not good.

1:00:13.520 --> 1:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>It's actually really not good. All right, We appreciate you, guys,

1:00:17.200 --> 1:00:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Joan us. We're back tomorrow nine thirty at our normal time.

1:00:19.960 --> 1:00:21.640
<v Speaker 1>When tomorrow we'll get into a little bit more talk

1:00:21.680 --> 1:00:24.479
<v Speaker 1>between Cowboys and San Francisco forty nine ers at games

1:00:24.520 --> 1:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>this Sunday until then for Nick Eatn, Dave Hellman, Amber Garcia.

1:00:28.240 --> 1:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm Derek Eagles and this has been The Break live

1:00:30.160 --> 1:00:36.000
<v Speaker 1>on Dallas Cowboys dot Com Taco. This has been a

1:00:36.080 --> 1:00:39.640
<v Speaker 1>production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com and the Dallas Cowboys

1:00:39.720 --> 1:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Football Club