1 00:00:02,759 --> 00:00:07,280 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. 2 00:00:07,920 --> 00:00:10,360 Speaker 2: With four days left now in the Biden administration, the 3 00:00:10,400 --> 00:00:13,400 Speaker 2: transition is in full swing, but they are still working 4 00:00:13,480 --> 00:00:16,680 Speaker 2: at the FTC. Case in point, filing suit today against 5 00:00:16,680 --> 00:00:19,600 Speaker 2: one of the largest ag equipment companies in the world, 6 00:00:19,760 --> 00:00:23,200 Speaker 2: alleging Deer In Company restricted the ability of customers to 7 00:00:23,280 --> 00:00:26,560 Speaker 2: make repairs. Joining us now for an important conversation on 8 00:00:26,600 --> 00:00:28,440 Speaker 2: this and a lot more, including her four years at 9 00:00:28,440 --> 00:00:32,120 Speaker 2: the helm of the agency is FTC Chair Lena Khan. 10 00:00:32,159 --> 00:00:33,240 Speaker 2: Wonderful to see you in person. 11 00:00:33,240 --> 00:00:34,880 Speaker 3: Thanks for coming in, Thanks for having me. 12 00:00:34,840 --> 00:00:37,720 Speaker 2: An important action today that you're rolling out here, and 13 00:00:37,760 --> 00:00:40,239 Speaker 2: some of your critics are calling this partisan ship in 14 00:00:40,320 --> 00:00:42,320 Speaker 2: terms of its timing, why is it happening now? 15 00:00:43,000 --> 00:00:45,360 Speaker 4: Well, Look, the FTC has been focused these last few 16 00:00:45,440 --> 00:00:48,280 Speaker 4: years in making sure that Americans can enjoy the right 17 00:00:48,320 --> 00:00:52,199 Speaker 4: to repair. I've met with farmers numerous times over the 18 00:00:52,280 --> 00:00:54,360 Speaker 4: last few years, and one of the biggest pain points 19 00:00:54,360 --> 00:00:57,200 Speaker 4: they share is that they're no longer able to easily 20 00:00:57,240 --> 00:01:00,200 Speaker 4: repair their own equipment or even be able to take 21 00:01:00,320 --> 00:01:04,360 Speaker 4: their tractors and combines to independent repair shops, and instead 22 00:01:04,400 --> 00:01:08,199 Speaker 4: they've been steered into Deer's network of authorized dealers, which 23 00:01:08,240 --> 00:01:11,800 Speaker 4: practically means they're paying more, and especially for farmers that 24 00:01:11,840 --> 00:01:14,080 Speaker 4: live in rural areas, it means they sometimes have to 25 00:01:14,200 --> 00:01:17,759 Speaker 4: drive hours to even get to the nearest dealer. Practically, 26 00:01:17,800 --> 00:01:20,560 Speaker 4: we all know that farming is a very time sensitive business, 27 00:01:20,600 --> 00:01:23,240 Speaker 4: and so we've even had farmers that have lost their 28 00:01:23,280 --> 00:01:26,959 Speaker 4: crop faced ruinous delays, and so we think there's real 29 00:01:27,000 --> 00:01:29,680 Speaker 4: harm here. There's a law violation, and we want to 30 00:01:29,720 --> 00:01:32,600 Speaker 4: make sure farmers can enjoy the right to repair well. 31 00:01:32,600 --> 00:01:34,960 Speaker 5: And you and two other commissioners did vote to bring 32 00:01:35,000 --> 00:01:38,800 Speaker 5: this claim forward. Yet the two Republican commissioners did not, 33 00:01:38,840 --> 00:01:41,880 Speaker 5: including the man who will be FTC chair, just stays 34 00:01:41,920 --> 00:01:44,680 Speaker 5: from now, is it your expectation that Andrew Ferguson is 35 00:01:44,720 --> 00:01:46,840 Speaker 5: actually going to see this through or was it just 36 00:01:46,920 --> 00:01:49,480 Speaker 5: brought today to make a point knowing that that may 37 00:01:49,520 --> 00:01:51,760 Speaker 5: not happen under new leadership under the FTC. 38 00:01:52,240 --> 00:01:54,360 Speaker 4: Well, look, I can't speak to what any new leadership 39 00:01:54,400 --> 00:01:56,400 Speaker 4: will do, but this did have the support of the 40 00:01:56,440 --> 00:02:00,280 Speaker 4: majority of the commission. This follows a multi year investigation, 41 00:02:00,520 --> 00:02:03,680 Speaker 4: and I always think it's important that we act with 42 00:02:03,840 --> 00:02:06,960 Speaker 4: urgency and swiftly, and if there is real harm, we 43 00:02:06,960 --> 00:02:09,640 Speaker 4: shouldn't let politics get in the way of delivering real 44 00:02:09,680 --> 00:02:10,600 Speaker 4: relief to farmers. 45 00:02:10,960 --> 00:02:12,560 Speaker 2: You've got a lot of things on the works right 46 00:02:12,560 --> 00:02:16,280 Speaker 2: now that you're going to be leaving behind, including court 47 00:02:16,360 --> 00:02:20,000 Speaker 2: actions against Facebook, I believe in the spring Amazon next year. 48 00:02:20,040 --> 00:02:22,160 Speaker 2: Will we expect those to continue? 49 00:02:22,960 --> 00:02:25,200 Speaker 4: Well, Look, we are set to go to trial against 50 00:02:25,240 --> 00:02:28,960 Speaker 4: Facebook this spring, set to go to trial against Amazon 51 00:02:29,080 --> 00:02:32,839 Speaker 4: in fall of twenty twenty six. Those actions are only 52 00:02:32,880 --> 00:02:36,280 Speaker 4: going to trial because the FTC was victorious along the way, 53 00:02:36,400 --> 00:02:40,000 Speaker 4: defeating motions to dismiss, and so we are on strong 54 00:02:40,080 --> 00:02:43,040 Speaker 4: grounds and I fully expect that we'll be able to 55 00:02:43,040 --> 00:02:46,200 Speaker 4: see these trials go forward. Of course, whenever there's a 56 00:02:46,200 --> 00:02:49,280 Speaker 4: new administration, defendants may want to see if they can 57 00:02:49,320 --> 00:02:51,919 Speaker 4: come in and get a cheap settlement, but I hope 58 00:02:51,919 --> 00:02:52,960 Speaker 4: we wouldn't see that here. 59 00:02:53,360 --> 00:02:56,280 Speaker 5: Well, and from people we've talked to who've just observed 60 00:02:56,320 --> 00:02:59,320 Speaker 5: the FTC from the outside, the suggestion has been that 61 00:02:59,520 --> 00:03:01,960 Speaker 5: your leader ship and Andrew Ferguson's leadership when it comes 62 00:03:02,000 --> 00:03:04,960 Speaker 5: to big tech specifically, may not be that different. Do 63 00:03:05,000 --> 00:03:06,720 Speaker 5: you see that as an area in which you've been 64 00:03:06,800 --> 00:03:09,480 Speaker 5: most aligned in your time serving together on the Commission. 65 00:03:09,560 --> 00:03:12,920 Speaker 4: Well, look, there's no doubt that there is strong bipartisan 66 00:03:13,080 --> 00:03:18,600 Speaker 4: concern about the economic power of large technology companies and 67 00:03:18,680 --> 00:03:23,680 Speaker 4: how that can undermine fair competition, undermine people's free speech rights. 68 00:03:24,160 --> 00:03:26,280 Speaker 4: And so we'll of course have to see what the 69 00:03:26,320 --> 00:03:29,200 Speaker 4: next administration does, but it's certainly been an area of 70 00:03:29,280 --> 00:03:32,040 Speaker 4: strong bipartisan concern during my tenure. 71 00:03:32,240 --> 00:03:36,960 Speaker 2: Social media has created a whole new realm of possibility here, 72 00:03:37,000 --> 00:03:39,880 Speaker 2: and we're considering the potential for a sale or a 73 00:03:39,920 --> 00:03:43,360 Speaker 2: divestment of TikTok right now. Even Elon Musk has been 74 00:03:43,400 --> 00:03:45,880 Speaker 2: floated as a potential buyer. He's got a pretty large 75 00:03:45,920 --> 00:03:50,680 Speaker 2: presence on social media. Are you concerned about consolidation as 76 00:03:50,680 --> 00:03:53,160 Speaker 2: a result of divestment of TikTok if it happens. 77 00:03:54,080 --> 00:03:56,800 Speaker 4: Well, look, as you know, there is a TikTok specific 78 00:03:56,920 --> 00:04:01,000 Speaker 4: build that we just heard an argument at the court around, 79 00:04:01,200 --> 00:04:02,240 Speaker 4: so you. 80 00:04:02,160 --> 00:04:04,000 Speaker 3: Know, this is a very live issue. 81 00:04:04,560 --> 00:04:08,360 Speaker 4: Of course, we have seen these antitrust lawsuits filed in 82 00:04:08,480 --> 00:04:12,480 Speaker 4: part because we've seen a lot of illegal monopolization in 83 00:04:12,520 --> 00:04:15,119 Speaker 4: these markets, and so of course we wouldn't just want 84 00:04:15,120 --> 00:04:18,359 Speaker 4: to forget or ignore all the lessons of those harms 85 00:04:18,400 --> 00:04:19,960 Speaker 4: and repeat those mistakes. 86 00:04:20,000 --> 00:04:21,800 Speaker 3: But we'll have to see what happens. 87 00:04:22,080 --> 00:04:24,800 Speaker 5: Well, and considering that you really had your claim to 88 00:04:24,839 --> 00:04:29,280 Speaker 5: flame flame fame as an academic looking at Amazon specifically 89 00:04:29,360 --> 00:04:31,719 Speaker 5: from an academic landscape, when you look at large tech 90 00:04:31,720 --> 00:04:33,840 Speaker 5: companies like this, can you see a world in which 91 00:04:33,839 --> 00:04:37,080 Speaker 5: it wouldn't be anti competitive for a big tech company 92 00:04:37,520 --> 00:04:39,920 Speaker 5: to absorb a company that has one hundred and seventy 93 00:04:39,960 --> 00:04:42,960 Speaker 5: million users in the US and a valuation our analyst 94 00:04:43,000 --> 00:04:45,359 Speaker 5: suggests could be north of forty billion dollars without it 95 00:04:45,440 --> 00:04:46,840 Speaker 5: raising antitrust concerns. 96 00:04:47,240 --> 00:04:50,640 Speaker 4: Well, look, all of these questions and investigations are highly 97 00:04:50,800 --> 00:04:53,640 Speaker 4: fact specifics. You'd want to look at all sides, but 98 00:04:54,640 --> 00:04:56,919 Speaker 4: at a high level, if you have a firm that 99 00:04:57,040 --> 00:04:59,840 Speaker 4: is dominant in one market that's going out and b 100 00:05:00,000 --> 00:05:03,360 Speaker 4: buying a rival or another company in that same market 101 00:05:04,160 --> 00:05:07,480 Speaker 4: by ordinary standards, that often raises at least initial concerns. 102 00:05:08,120 --> 00:05:12,960 Speaker 2: You've talked about how extreme a concentration of economic power 103 00:05:13,320 --> 00:05:15,960 Speaker 2: can have great political influence. You could correct me if 104 00:05:16,000 --> 00:05:18,560 Speaker 2: I'm not getting the words perfectly right there. You've talked 105 00:05:18,560 --> 00:05:22,160 Speaker 2: about this as potentially the beginning of another Gilded Age. 106 00:05:22,240 --> 00:05:26,680 Speaker 2: Elon Musk is reportedly taking an office in the White 107 00:05:26,720 --> 00:05:30,440 Speaker 2: House complex in the old executive office building, even as 108 00:05:30,480 --> 00:05:34,560 Speaker 2: one of the most prolific government contractors out there. Is 109 00:05:34,560 --> 00:05:36,799 Speaker 2: this the kind of example you're talking about, and should 110 00:05:36,839 --> 00:05:38,360 Speaker 2: that be in the purfew with the FTC? 111 00:05:39,240 --> 00:05:43,479 Speaker 4: Well, look, the FTC's mandate is squarely looking at commerce 112 00:05:43,560 --> 00:05:46,440 Speaker 4: in our economic realm, and so we're very focused on 113 00:05:46,480 --> 00:05:49,480 Speaker 4: the specific facts. Do we see monopolization, do we see 114 00:05:49,520 --> 00:05:53,159 Speaker 4: mergers that are illegal, rather than waiting into kind of 115 00:05:53,200 --> 00:05:56,960 Speaker 4: big picture political questions. But it's certainly true that for 116 00:05:57,240 --> 00:06:00,679 Speaker 4: the lawmakers who passed the antitrust laws over one hundred 117 00:06:00,800 --> 00:06:04,880 Speaker 4: years ago, one of the animating concerns was the way 118 00:06:04,880 --> 00:06:10,239 Speaker 4: in which concentrated economic power can be translated into political power. 119 00:06:10,320 --> 00:06:11,360 Speaker 2: We're not seeing it now. 120 00:06:11,960 --> 00:06:15,719 Speaker 4: Well, look, certainly we've seen, you know, time and time again, 121 00:06:15,880 --> 00:06:18,680 Speaker 4: including you know, over the last few years, efforts by 122 00:06:19,080 --> 00:06:21,960 Speaker 4: dominant companies to use political sway. 123 00:06:23,200 --> 00:06:25,320 Speaker 5: Well, when we consider companies and their behavior and what 124 00:06:25,360 --> 00:06:28,159 Speaker 5: they might be gearing up to do in the coming years, 125 00:06:28,160 --> 00:06:31,480 Speaker 5: we have bank earnings today, including some big investment banks 126 00:06:31,480 --> 00:06:34,160 Speaker 5: like Goldman Sachs talking about what they see is going. 127 00:06:33,920 --> 00:06:35,880 Speaker 3: To be a better deal environment. 128 00:06:35,920 --> 00:06:39,240 Speaker 5: It actually echoed what the CFO of Goldman, Dennis Coleman 129 00:06:39,320 --> 00:06:41,719 Speaker 5: had to say last month about the new direction the 130 00:06:41,760 --> 00:06:44,880 Speaker 5: FTC specifically could be taking in this upcoming administration. 131 00:06:44,960 --> 00:06:48,600 Speaker 1: Let's listen with Fergen's nominee. There could be a new 132 00:06:48,640 --> 00:06:51,720 Speaker 1: direction at the FTC. Obviously as a as a sitting 133 00:06:51,760 --> 00:06:55,359 Speaker 1: commissioner dissented with the current leadership on a number of cases, 134 00:06:55,640 --> 00:06:58,200 Speaker 1: and so we could see a more favorable environment heading 135 00:06:58,200 --> 00:07:01,200 Speaker 1: into twenty twenty five that could act spur more by 136 00:07:01,240 --> 00:07:04,960 Speaker 1: way of CEO confidence and in turn unlocking more investment, 137 00:07:05,360 --> 00:07:09,680 Speaker 1: more activity, and provide a more favorable strategic backdrop. 138 00:07:11,120 --> 00:07:13,840 Speaker 5: People are kind of expecting chair con it seems what 139 00:07:13,880 --> 00:07:16,520 Speaker 5: could be a tidal wave of m and A. Do 140 00:07:16,560 --> 00:07:18,680 Speaker 5: you think it's actually that simple. 141 00:07:19,600 --> 00:07:22,560 Speaker 4: Well, look, we certainly heard over the last few years 142 00:07:22,600 --> 00:07:26,640 Speaker 4: directly from deal makers, directly from anti trust lawyers who 143 00:07:26,720 --> 00:07:31,000 Speaker 4: acknowledge that several years ago they wouldn't even think about 144 00:07:31,000 --> 00:07:34,640 Speaker 4: anti trust risk when initially putting together some of these deals, 145 00:07:35,080 --> 00:07:38,640 Speaker 4: but under the Biden administration they had to think very 146 00:07:38,680 --> 00:07:42,160 Speaker 4: early about whether a certain merger would pose legal risk. 147 00:07:42,520 --> 00:07:45,240 Speaker 4: And as a law enforcer, of course, that type of 148 00:07:45,280 --> 00:07:47,760 Speaker 4: deterrence is good for the public. It leads to more 149 00:07:47,800 --> 00:07:51,480 Speaker 4: efficient outcomes and so I would hope that we wouldn't 150 00:07:51,520 --> 00:07:56,840 Speaker 4: see a backsliding, a return to an environment where flagrantly 151 00:07:56,920 --> 00:08:00,920 Speaker 4: illegal deals are being proposed and deal makers are thinking, well, 152 00:08:00,920 --> 00:08:03,000 Speaker 4: maybe we can get this one through even though it 153 00:08:03,080 --> 00:08:07,280 Speaker 4: violates the law. So we'll have to wait and see. 154 00:08:07,360 --> 00:08:11,800 Speaker 4: We have had several merger lawsuits filed with unanimous support 155 00:08:11,920 --> 00:08:14,800 Speaker 4: at the Commission, and so we'll have to wait. 156 00:08:14,720 --> 00:08:15,360 Speaker 3: And see what happens. 157 00:08:15,480 --> 00:08:17,760 Speaker 2: Well, it may not be flagrantly illegal, but we keep 158 00:08:17,800 --> 00:08:22,200 Speaker 2: hearing about the pipeline, the backlog, animal spirits. How do 159 00:08:22,240 --> 00:08:25,120 Speaker 2: you envision the next one hundred days looking. 160 00:08:25,320 --> 00:08:25,960 Speaker 3: In that realm? 161 00:08:26,840 --> 00:08:28,960 Speaker 4: Well, look, we'll have to see, you know, what actually 162 00:08:29,080 --> 00:08:32,680 Speaker 4: ends up being proposed. One interesting fact that we've seen 163 00:08:32,720 --> 00:08:35,920 Speaker 4: in some of the data is instances in which firms, 164 00:08:36,000 --> 00:08:39,160 Speaker 4: especially large technology firms, have known that they can't just 165 00:08:39,280 --> 00:08:39,920 Speaker 4: go out. 166 00:08:39,800 --> 00:08:41,120 Speaker 3: And buy their rivals. 167 00:08:41,400 --> 00:08:45,040 Speaker 4: We've actually seen them have to invest, invest more in 168 00:08:45,040 --> 00:08:50,080 Speaker 4: innovation and actually try to organically expand and improve their 169 00:08:50,120 --> 00:08:51,760 Speaker 4: business rather than just go. 170 00:08:51,720 --> 00:08:53,160 Speaker 3: Out and snuff competition. 171 00:08:53,800 --> 00:08:56,559 Speaker 4: So I think we want to see markets where firms 172 00:08:56,559 --> 00:09:00,160 Speaker 4: are fairly competing and being incentivized to really compete on 173 00:09:00,200 --> 00:09:03,640 Speaker 4: the merits rather than just buy out their rivals. 174 00:09:03,280 --> 00:09:04,520 Speaker 5: And if we were to look at this kind of 175 00:09:04,559 --> 00:09:07,080 Speaker 5: on an industry by industry basis. Obviously we've talked about 176 00:09:07,120 --> 00:09:10,120 Speaker 5: agriculture already in this conversation about technology, But is there 177 00:09:10,160 --> 00:09:13,239 Speaker 5: an industry in which you see the potential for potentially 178 00:09:13,280 --> 00:09:17,320 Speaker 5: aggressive consolidation that you maybe not during your tenure had 179 00:09:17,320 --> 00:09:21,120 Speaker 5: a chance to address that gives you concern going forward? 180 00:09:22,360 --> 00:09:25,880 Speaker 4: Well, look when we put out a request for comment 181 00:09:25,960 --> 00:09:29,040 Speaker 4: from the public about our new merger guidelines and ask 182 00:09:29,120 --> 00:09:32,920 Speaker 4: people where have there been waves of consolidation that you're 183 00:09:32,960 --> 00:09:33,640 Speaker 4: worried about. 184 00:09:33,840 --> 00:09:35,440 Speaker 3: We've really heard it across the board. 185 00:09:35,480 --> 00:09:38,120 Speaker 4: I mean, healthcare came up over and over again, including 186 00:09:38,160 --> 00:09:42,920 Speaker 4: from healthcare workers, including from patients and patient advocates. We've 187 00:09:42,920 --> 00:09:47,520 Speaker 4: heard a lot of concern about consolidation in media. We've 188 00:09:47,679 --> 00:09:52,240 Speaker 4: personally had to file several lawsuits against big hospital mergers 189 00:09:52,640 --> 00:09:55,920 Speaker 4: that we know result in higher costs and worse quality. 190 00:09:56,480 --> 00:09:59,440 Speaker 4: So you know, my approach was to focus on the 191 00:09:59,480 --> 00:10:02,199 Speaker 4: markets that can have a huge impact on people's day 192 00:10:02,240 --> 00:10:05,280 Speaker 4: to day lives, and healthcare really sort to the top 193 00:10:05,320 --> 00:10:05,840 Speaker 4: of the list. 194 00:10:06,679 --> 00:10:07,880 Speaker 3: While I was at the home. 195 00:10:07,760 --> 00:10:11,760 Speaker 4: The FTC took a particularly assertive approach to farmer mergers, 196 00:10:12,160 --> 00:10:14,960 Speaker 4: making sure that we were not just looking strictly at 197 00:10:15,280 --> 00:10:18,200 Speaker 4: what is the overlap today, but understanding more from a 198 00:10:18,240 --> 00:10:23,840 Speaker 4: business perspective, could this deal undermine even potential competition and 199 00:10:23,880 --> 00:10:25,520 Speaker 4: make things worse for Americans over. 200 00:10:25,400 --> 00:10:25,920 Speaker 3: The long term. 201 00:10:25,960 --> 00:10:28,400 Speaker 2: We talk about technology as this big, squishy thing, but 202 00:10:28,480 --> 00:10:31,640 Speaker 2: specifically when it comes to AI, we're seeing technology advance 203 00:10:32,200 --> 00:10:34,520 Speaker 2: so quickly that we're having trouble keeping up with it. 204 00:10:34,840 --> 00:10:36,439 Speaker 2: If you were staying in this job, or to the 205 00:10:36,480 --> 00:10:39,680 Speaker 2: extent that you'll be in this space in your next role, 206 00:10:39,720 --> 00:10:42,280 Speaker 2: how concerned are you about the way AI is actually 207 00:10:42,360 --> 00:10:43,280 Speaker 2: changing the rules? 208 00:10:44,440 --> 00:10:48,400 Speaker 4: Well, the FTC has been very focused on understanding across 209 00:10:48,440 --> 00:10:52,280 Speaker 4: the stack, where are areas where there may be bottlenecks 210 00:10:52,400 --> 00:10:55,200 Speaker 4: or choke points that some of the incumbents might be 211 00:10:55,240 --> 00:10:58,840 Speaker 4: able to exploit in ways that undermine competition. And so 212 00:10:58,880 --> 00:11:01,640 Speaker 4: we've been going later by hi layer, looking at the chips, 213 00:11:01,679 --> 00:11:04,120 Speaker 4: looking at the cloud, looking at some of the models. 214 00:11:04,800 --> 00:11:09,080 Speaker 4: We have an active inquiry examining the active investments and 215 00:11:09,200 --> 00:11:14,680 Speaker 4: partnerships between some of the hyperscalers, big cloud computing providers 216 00:11:15,440 --> 00:11:18,280 Speaker 4: and some of the newer AI firms to try to 217 00:11:18,360 --> 00:11:22,680 Speaker 4: understand is this undermining competition. I think historically we've seen 218 00:11:22,760 --> 00:11:26,560 Speaker 4: that these moments of technological inflection points are ones where 219 00:11:26,640 --> 00:11:30,920 Speaker 4: enforcers have to be extraordinarily vigilant because there's huge opportunity 220 00:11:30,960 --> 00:11:34,440 Speaker 4: here for real competition, real innovation, real growth. 221 00:11:34,760 --> 00:11:35,880 Speaker 3: But those are also. 222 00:11:35,679 --> 00:11:39,160 Speaker 4: The moments where the incumbent monopolists can panic because they 223 00:11:39,160 --> 00:11:45,559 Speaker 4: can imagine themselves becoming overtaken or disintermediated. And so those 224 00:11:45,600 --> 00:11:47,400 Speaker 4: are just some of the concerns we have to keep 225 00:11:47,440 --> 00:11:47,800 Speaker 4: in mind. 226 00:11:48,160 --> 00:11:50,160 Speaker 5: All Right, we'll leave it on that note. Chair con 227 00:11:50,200 --> 00:11:52,560 Speaker 5: thank you so much for joining us here on Balance 228 00:11:52,559 --> 00:11:54,680 Speaker 5: of Power. That is the outgoing chair of the FTC 229 00:11:54,960 --> 00:11:55,440 Speaker 5: Lenacon