WEBVTT - Jackie Brown with Sadia Azmat

0:00:01.000 --> 0:00:03.960
<v Speaker 1>On the Bechdel Cast, the questions ask if movies have

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:07.960
<v Speaker 1>women and them, are all their discussions just boyfriends and husbands?

0:00:08.039 --> 0:00:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Or do they have individualism?

0:00:10.080 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 2>It's the patriarchy, zeph and best start changing with the

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:15.320
<v Speaker 2>Bechdel Cast.

0:00:16.640 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 3>Hey, Jamie, Hey Caitlyn, can you smuggle half a million

0:00:22.079 --> 0:00:26.439
<v Speaker 3>dollars out of Cobbo for me? I need the money

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 3>to get a haircut because my hair and beard are

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:33.360
<v Speaker 3>really strange.

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Classic Caitlin. Yes, of course, and I will. I promise

0:00:41.040 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 1>to be like everyone in this movie, really bad at it.

0:00:45.880 --> 0:00:48.199
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much. Cool, cool, cool, yeah ough.

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:52.080
<v Speaker 1>An iconic introduction. Welcome to the Bechdel Cast. My name

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 1>is Jamie Loftis.

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 3>My name is Caitlyn Deronte, and this is our show

0:00:56.520 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 3>where we examine movies through an intersectional feminist lens, using

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 3>the Bechdel Test simply as a jumping off point to

0:01:03.760 --> 0:01:05.960
<v Speaker 3>initiate a larger conversation.

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:09.400
<v Speaker 1>We sure do. But what is the Bechdel Test? Well

0:01:09.880 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>we'll tell you. Yeah. So, if you've been listening to

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 1>this show for a long time, you very likely know

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:18.280
<v Speaker 1>what it is. It is a media metric created by

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 1>queer cartoonist Alison Bechdel. Originally in her comic dys To

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Watch Out For in the eighties. It was a one

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:30.759
<v Speaker 1>off joke just sort of pointing out how infrequently women

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>talked to each other in blockbuster movies. But it has

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:38.840
<v Speaker 1>since been sort of taken on by culture at large

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 1>to talk about how infrequently women talk in movies. So

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of different versions of this test. The

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 1>one we use on this show is as follows. We

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 1>require that there be two people of a marginalized gender

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 1>with names who speak to each other about something other

0:01:58.120 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 1>than a man for two lines of die or more preferably,

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 1>it should be a meaningful exchange of dialogue. Which we

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 1>made that change Win Caitlyn like a couple of years ago,

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:13.240
<v Speaker 1>because there were so many movies that it was like, well,

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:16.680
<v Speaker 1>someone talks to a waitress at one point, and the

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 1>waitress is wearing a name tag, so it's feminist, and

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>you're just like, well, okay, we have to make some adjustments.

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:22.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:24.119
<v Speaker 1>Anyways, that's the version we use.

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:30.959
<v Speaker 3>Indeed, and today's movie is a long time request. Yes,

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 3>it's Jackie Brown, the nineteen ninety seven movie written and

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 3>directed by Quentin Tarantino.

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Someone who I don't think has ever experienced a scandal before.

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I think a no famously scandalous director.

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:48.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 3>Also the production company Miramax.

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:55.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I've ever heard a bad word about this,

0:02:56.680 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>So really, I don't think that we'll have really much

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 1>talk about. It will be a really quick episode, yea, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:03.360
<v Speaker 5>No.

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 3>So we're doing Jackie Brown. We have an amazing guest

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:10.400
<v Speaker 3>with us who is a comedian, author of the book

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 3>sex Bomb, and host of the BBC podcast No Country

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 3>for Young Women. It's Saudia Asthmat.

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 5>Hello, welcome, Welcome, Thank you for having me.

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 3>Hello, thank you for being here and for bringing us

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:26.080
<v Speaker 3>this movie.

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 1>So, you sent us a number of options of movies

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 1>you'd like to cover on the show, and this was

0:03:33.400 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 1>on the list. So we're curious. What is your history

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 1>with the movie, Jackie Brown? And I guess sort of

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 1>like with Tarantino movies overall, because I feel like it's

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>hard to talk about one Tarantino movie without accidentally talking

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:49.720
<v Speaker 1>about all of them truly.

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 4>So you know what I'm not gonna lie.

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 5>I was going through my watch the Robert de Naro

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:57.119
<v Speaker 5>movie Zone or Era.

0:03:57.040 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 4>At that point in time, so I was just I.

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 5>Really liked him, and I heard a lot about Jackie Brown,

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 5>but not in terms of in any detail, like it

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 5>would be thrown around, like I didn't know if it

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 5>was a real movie about like a Jackie Brown was

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 5>a real person, or like it's just a name that

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:16.279
<v Speaker 5>seems to crop up now and then. So it felt

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 5>like it was part of pop culture and I just

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 5>hadn't come across it. And also I don't know actually

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:24.159
<v Speaker 5>if I was trying to. I don't know if I

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 5>was on my watching Robert de Niro or watching Sam

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:30.040
<v Speaker 5>Jackson zone, but I don't know what that's not a zone,

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 5>but like in terms of my routine, if you like, so,

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 5>I love both of them. And then I just watched

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 5>I didn't know it was directed by Tarantino at the time,

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 5>and I was blown away because it's not even about

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 5>Robert de Niro or Sam Jackson, even though they're really great.

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:51.040
<v Speaker 4>It's about like Pam Grier's character, and.

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 5>It really felt like a portrayal of a woman who

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:58.719
<v Speaker 5>is from a minority in a way that I'd never

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:01.360
<v Speaker 5>seen before that I felt like, obviously I've never had

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 5>to smuggle money, right, but like that I could really

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 5>relate to.

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:06.599
<v Speaker 4>In terms of the decisions that she had to make.

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:09.920
<v Speaker 4>So it was like breathless and I love this movie.

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 5>And talking about Tarantino, so, I mean, he's made some

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 5>of the best movies ever, Like Pulp Fiction is clearly like, ah,

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 5>it's so good. I didn't really like Reservoir I'm not

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 5>going to go through all of his movies, by the

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 5>way and.

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 4>Just tell you why. I thought. That's not very ring.

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 4>That's not fair, is it.

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 5>But there's a few that come to my like Django.

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 4>I think that's how you say it, Jango one change change.

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I really enjoyed it, although I didn't really like

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 5>and Glorious Bastards and I didn't really like Reservoir Dogs.

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 5>I think I was gonna say, and so obviously he's

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:47.839
<v Speaker 5>a genius, but I think we all know that being

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 5>a genius doesn't come without its pitfalls.

0:05:51.760 --> 0:05:54.160
<v Speaker 4>And I think you might know a few of them

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 4>more than me. But yeah, I mean I don't know

0:05:57.279 --> 0:06:00.200
<v Speaker 4>like he yeah, as you alluded to, he was.

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 5>I think obviously he knew about Weinstein, but you know,

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 5>so many actors probably did, and maybe it didn't occur

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:12.040
<v Speaker 5>to them to open their mouths even though everyone listens

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 5>to them.

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 4>But anyway, so I really like his movies and I

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:17.839
<v Speaker 4>don't know him personally.

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 3>Hey me either, Yeah, Jamie, what's your relationship with the

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 3>Tarantino Expanded Universe slash Jackie Brown specifically.

0:06:31.920 --> 0:06:35.599
<v Speaker 1>Let's see. I Yeah, I feel like we've covered pulp

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:38.920
<v Speaker 1>fiction and kill Bill on the show before.

0:06:39.680 --> 0:06:42.240
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we still need to redo our kill Bill episode.

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 3>I know, I thought that was a raised from existence.

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:48.039
<v Speaker 1>Yes, so we did at one point. It was our

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 1>first episode ever and we didn't know what we were

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:53.720
<v Speaker 1>talking about. So we'll REDI that at some point. But

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think, like a lot of people, I'm

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>very kind of hit and miss on Tarantino. Like obviously,

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 1>he's very technically talented, and you know, I'm never gonna

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 1>judge someone for enjoying his work. Kill Bill is still

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 1>one of my favorite movies ever, for all of its flaws. So,

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yes, as far as Tarantino goes, I it

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:20.240
<v Speaker 1>feels like almost an impossible discussion to have. Creatively, he's

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 1>hit or missed for me, He's made stuff that I

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 1>really love. I think that it's I don't know. His

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 1>history on race is very talked about and occurred yes,

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 1>it's I don't know. He's such a complicated person to

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 1>talk about because he's written women characters in particular that

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:41.280
<v Speaker 1>I have a lot of love for and had influence

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 1>on me. But at the same time, you have the

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>kill Bill example, when during the Me Too movement, it

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 1>came out that Uma Thurman was extremely injured on the

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 1>set of Kill Bill, and Tarantino did nothing to help her,

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 1>And so it's and.

0:07:57.480 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 3>He was the reason why, Like he yeah, he pushed,

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 3>he instructed her to drive like basically do a very

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 3>unsafe stunt, and then she got badly injured because of it.

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 1>And I think, you know, sometimes even the things I

0:08:09.240 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>enjoy about him creatively doesn't come through in his personal

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 1>life or personal record whatsoever. Anyways, Jackie Brown, I had

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 1>seen it once before. I remember one liking it too,

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 1>being like it's so long. I still feel that way now, Yeah, Caitlin,

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 1>what's your history with Jackie Brown?

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 3>I had never seen it before. This was I think

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:35.320
<v Speaker 3>the one Tarantino movie that I had yet to watch.

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:38.600
<v Speaker 3>It's been on my list for a long time, but

0:08:39.000 --> 0:08:41.800
<v Speaker 3>I just didn't get around to it until I had

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:45.839
<v Speaker 3>an excuse to do so for this podcast and I'm

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:48.320
<v Speaker 3>glad I finally watched it. I quite enjoyed it. I

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 3>would rank it toward the top of my list of

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 3>Tarantino movies because I think so too. Yeah, same with

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:57.960
<v Speaker 3>everyone else. I mean, he is a bit hit or miss.

0:08:58.000 --> 0:08:58.199
<v Speaker 4>For me.

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 3>I generally like most of his movies, but Hateful Eight,

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 3>for example, I couldn't stand it. I did not like

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:11.439
<v Speaker 3>Once upon a Time in Hollywood at all. Other ones

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:15.320
<v Speaker 3>I like a bit more kill Bill is similarly my

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 3>favorite of his. But yeah, Jackie Brown, I think it's

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:23.680
<v Speaker 3>an interesting departure to some degree from his other work,

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 3>and I found it just like refreshing and fun to watch,

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 3>and I really like the characters and performances, and there's

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 3>just a lot of interesting things going on that we

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 3>will discuss.

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:40.080
<v Speaker 1>But I definitely agree. I think it's like one of

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:42.680
<v Speaker 1>my especially because I think the last time I watched it,

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I was in college or something, and I mean I

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>liked it the first time. I liked it even better

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 1>this time because I feel like I just know more

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:52.679
<v Speaker 1>about the actors and had more interest in the context,

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:56.079
<v Speaker 1>and the context of this movie is really fascinating. So

0:09:56.400 --> 0:09:57.079
<v Speaker 1>there's so much to.

0:09:57.000 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 3>Talk about, for sure. Shall I do the recap and

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:02.720
<v Speaker 3>we'll go from there.

0:10:03.080 --> 0:10:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's do it, and Sadia feels free to jump in

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:07.559
<v Speaker 1>at any point.

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 4>Thank you.

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:12.360
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Well, again, this is a long movie, although it's

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 3>not even long by today's standards. Every movie that comes

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:18.080
<v Speaker 3>out is three hours long, and it's like, only Titanic

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 3>should be that long anyway.

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 4>I mean, Titanic shouldn't have been that long either.

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 5>Really, come on, Oh don't sorry, I didn't realize that.

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:27.440
<v Speaker 4>I want to you.

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:30.600
<v Speaker 3>I don't disagree. I could do an edit of Titanic

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:33.320
<v Speaker 3>that is two and a half hours, which would cut

0:10:33.360 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 3>forty five minutes out of the runtime.

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 1>So no way, no way, no way.

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 5>I think only Mob movies should be three hours long

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 5>because the Mob ones.

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 4>I love them. I don't know why everybody's gonna die

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 4>and lose the money. I know that, but I.

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Just like Barbie was an hour fifty two and I

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:52.440
<v Speaker 1>celebrated that both times. I was like, wow, I didn't

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:54.800
<v Speaker 1>even know it was legal to make a movie under

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 1>two hours anymore.

0:10:56.000 --> 0:11:00.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeay, anyway, okay, So here it is the recap for

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 3>Jackie Brown. We briefly meet a flight attendant for Cabo

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:08.959
<v Speaker 3>Air named Jackie Brown. Played by Pam Greer.

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:12.960
<v Speaker 1>I felt very film bro proud of myself during the

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 1>opening shot where I was like, hey, this is the

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:19.559
<v Speaker 1>chef from a graduate and it is this, I was like, Wow,

0:11:19.600 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 1>this is normally something that a guy would yell at.

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 3>Me, but now you're the one yelling.

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I am the yelling at No. One.

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:34.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So then we cut to Ordell played by Samuel L. Jackson,

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 3>who is an arms dealer talking about guns to Lewis

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 3>played by Robert de Niro. Ordell has a girlfriend, Melanie,

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:49.199
<v Speaker 3>who we meet played by Bridget Fonda, who he does

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 3>not treat very well. FYI, and we also learned that

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:59.680
<v Speaker 3>Ordell has half a million dollars in cash stashed in

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:05.439
<v Speaker 3>Then Ordell gets a call from his pal Beaumont, who

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:08.599
<v Speaker 3>needs to be bailed out of jail. So Ordell and

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:14.120
<v Speaker 3>Lewis go to a bail bondsman named Max Cherry played

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:19.440
<v Speaker 3>by Robert Forster. Ordell pays for Beaumont to be bailed

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 3>out of jail, and then he pays Beaumont a visit

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 3>he's played by Chris Tucker, and then Ordell shoots and

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:31.680
<v Speaker 3>kills Beaumont because Ordell figured that Beaumont would rat him

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 3>out to avoid a long jail sentence. Then we cut

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 3>back to Jackie Brown at Lax after one of her

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:46.920
<v Speaker 3>flight attendant shifts and two cops approach her, Mark and

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:51.840
<v Speaker 3>Ray played by Michael Bowen and Michael Keaton, and they

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 3>want to look in Jackie Brown's bag where they find

0:12:57.840 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 3>fifty thousand dollars in cash and they know that she's

0:13:01.920 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 3>smuggling it and they want to know who and Cabo

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 3>gave it to her and who in the US she's

0:13:07.000 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 3>giving it too, but she refuses to talk. But then

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 3>they find a little baggie of cocaine with the cash,

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 3>so then she is arrested and thrown in jail for

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 3>possession with the intent to distribute, which is a bogus

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 3>thing which they comment on, but anyway, she's arrested and

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:30.560
<v Speaker 3>thrown in jail and her bail is set at ten

0:13:30.600 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 3>thousand dollars. So Ordell goes back to the bail bondsman,

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 3>Max Cherry, wanting to transfer the ten thousand dollars bond

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 3>that he paid for Beaumont and transfer it over to

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:49.960
<v Speaker 3>Jackie Brown. So Max goes and bails Jackie out of jail,

0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 3>and he sees her and he's like Hubba hubba a wooga, who's's.

0:13:57.040 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 1>That in love? Att first cites her.

0:14:01.559 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 3>And then he takes her for a drink to discuss

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 3>her options, like kind of what she should do moving forward,

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 3>and then he drops her off at home. Ordell then

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 3>goes to Jackie's house, and it seems like he plans

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 3>to kill Jackie for the same reason he killed Beaumont.

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 3>He doesn't want anyone ratting him out, but she assures

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 3>him that she didn't tell the cops anything. But she

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 3>also realizes that his intentions might be malicious and that

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 3>he might be trying to kill her, so she pulls

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 3>a gun on him that she stole from Max Cherry,

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 3>and then she negotiates a deal with Ordell so that

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 3>he won't be put away in prison and where she

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 3>will be set up financially if she does have to

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 3>go to jail. The next morning, Max Cherry comes over

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 3>to Jackie Brown's house to get his gun back, and

0:14:56.320 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 3>she invites him in for coffee, and they're listening to

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 3>and music and they're kind of vibing, and she tells

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 3>him that she does not actually intend to cooperate with

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 3>Ordell and that she's going to try to make a

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 3>deal with the cops because she's fearful for her future,

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:19.320
<v Speaker 3>her financial security. Things like that.

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I will say Jackie throughout this movie, she's I mean,

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:25.480
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about what an incredible character she is, But

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:28.920
<v Speaker 1>I just kept thinking about how many times if I

0:15:29.000 --> 0:15:31.480
<v Speaker 1>were Jackie that I would have forgotten something that I

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 1>told someone. I was like, wow, I'm not smart enough

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 1>to play the four D game of chess that she's playing.

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Because sometimes I'm like wait what and I'm like, oh, right,

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 1>she's a genius, Like.

0:15:41.680 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 3>Like is she keeping a diary? Like I don't know

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 3>how she got drug?

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:48.920
<v Speaker 5>And even just caring about you know, having that portrayal

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 5>of someone caring about their like financial freedom, their finances,

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 5>their future. That's like something I never saw before either, really,

0:15:57.600 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 5>you know.

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 4>So that's like she's a smart like she's yeah, she's

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:02.600
<v Speaker 4>very admirable.

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, she's so cool and just like even objectively and

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 1>like her memory and ability to like juggle five thousand

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 1>things at once is incredible. She's such a cool character

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 1>for sure.

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so kind of out sorry do you ever lie, Jamie?

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 4>Because I am bad at lying.

0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 5>So I think that's why I would have got shot, like,

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 5>you know, I would have got shut.

0:16:25.120 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 1>I definitely like I feel like outside of like small

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 1>like like little white lie kind of things, and even

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>sometimes I lose track of those, and then I'd be like,

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 1>oh wait, I told that weird lie trying to impress

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 1>someone once and now I've accidentally told them myself. Anyways,

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't do what she did. I would be dead

0:16:43.000 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 1>in the first twenty minutes.

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 3>So same, Yeah, I couldn't keep anything straight. Yeah, Okay.

0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 3>Then we see Jackie meeting with those cops, Mark and

0:16:55.440 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 3>Ray telling them about her dealings with Ordell, and then

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 3>she meets with Ordell again and makes him think that

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:05.879
<v Speaker 3>she's working with the cops as a cover and that

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:08.919
<v Speaker 3>she is still loyal to him, and they make a

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:13.119
<v Speaker 3>plan where they will need two women to be and

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 3>they specify women. They're like, it needs to be women

0:17:16.560 --> 0:17:21.359
<v Speaker 3>to be kind of like intermediaries between Jackie and Ordell

0:17:21.600 --> 0:17:25.960
<v Speaker 3>as far as like handing off the money to trick

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:30.000
<v Speaker 3>the cops into following the wrong woman during these couple

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 3>different handoffs that they will be doing in order for

0:17:33.680 --> 0:17:38.159
<v Speaker 3>Jackie to get this half million dollars from Cabo to

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 3>Ordell in Los Angeles, where the story takes place, by

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:45.159
<v Speaker 3>the way, ever heard of it? Ever heard of it?

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:49.960
<v Speaker 3>Then Ordell leaves this meeting with Jackie, but then he

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:55.239
<v Speaker 3>sees Max run into Jackie and they're chatting, and He's like,

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:57.880
<v Speaker 3>what the fuck? Like, do they know each other? What's

0:17:57.880 --> 0:18:00.639
<v Speaker 3>going on here? So now he's suspicious.

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 4>He's so insecure, isn't he?

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 5>Like?

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:07.439
<v Speaker 1>Ah truly and it is always his downfall. Same with

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the de Niro character too.

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:12.880
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah for sure, yep. I can't wait to talk

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 3>about male fragility with these characters.

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:19.199
<v Speaker 1>My feet at top.

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So everyone goes through with this trial run of

0:18:25.840 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 3>Jackie handing off ten thousand dollars to a woman named Shiranda.

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 3>She's one of Ordell's many girlfriends, and this is happening

0:18:36.119 --> 0:18:39.680
<v Speaker 3>at a mall food court, and then Shiranda will then

0:18:39.760 --> 0:18:41.680
<v Speaker 3>hand it off the cash to Ordell.

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:46.640
<v Speaker 1>I wrote not to brag, but I wrote a story

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 1>about mall food courts earlier this year, and there are

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 1>so many iconic movie scenes that happen in mall food courts.

0:18:55.000 --> 0:18:57.920
<v Speaker 1>I think the Jackie Brown scene is way up there.

0:18:57.960 --> 0:19:01.159
<v Speaker 1>It was tied for me internally eighth grade. I was

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna say eighth grade, impactful mall food court seemed to.

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:08.199
<v Speaker 3>Me personally, they're some good ones. Yeah, fast times at

0:19:08.240 --> 0:19:10.400
<v Speaker 3>Ridgemont High. I feel like has.

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 1>And clueless has one. I love them all. I love

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:16.440
<v Speaker 1>a food court. I love drama at set location.

0:19:17.000 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:23.160
<v Speaker 3>Same, Okay, So this handoff happens and the cops are

0:19:23.200 --> 0:19:27.480
<v Speaker 3>there watching. Max is also there, and it seems like

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 3>Max and Jackie are becoming somewhat of an item. He

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:37.919
<v Speaker 3>also notices another woman, Simone, who is involved in this handoff,

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:40.679
<v Speaker 3>who the cops are not aware of, so she's like

0:19:40.720 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 3>the second woman who's there to be tricksy basically. Then

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:50.879
<v Speaker 3>Jackie goes to see Ordell and they hash out the

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:55.240
<v Speaker 3>second handoff of the half million dollars. So this time

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 3>Jackie will hand off the money in a fitting room

0:19:58.400 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 3>at a department store at the same mall. Now the

0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:07.359
<v Speaker 3>exact plan with all of these like changes in the

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:13.919
<v Speaker 3>amounds are sunny. Yeah, I got confused because now Simone

0:20:13.960 --> 0:20:18.119
<v Speaker 3>is not involved, but Ordell's girlfriend Melanie.

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Is well because Simone didn't Simone get ten thousand dollars

0:20:22.560 --> 0:20:25.200
<v Speaker 1>during the trial run And then she's like, I'm od

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:28.159
<v Speaker 1>of hearing and we were like good girl smoney.

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:34.959
<v Speaker 3>Yes, but it's unclear like who knows what or I

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 3>forget like which information. It's just like it's all a

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:39.400
<v Speaker 3>bit confusing.

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 5>It becomes so much about who you can trust at

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:45.159
<v Speaker 5>this point because there's no logic, sensors gone out.

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 4>Of the windows.

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:48.640
<v Speaker 5>So yeah, it is about like you've got instinct, then

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 5>who's going to let you down?

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:54.480
<v Speaker 4>Or can you afford to risk everything on? You know?

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 5>This weird situation. But it was so strange because I've

0:20:57.840 --> 0:20:59.879
<v Speaker 5>never had smuggle. I have to keep saying that, but

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:05.399
<v Speaker 5>we believe, you know, like please believe you guys. But

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:08.639
<v Speaker 5>actually we could all do the We're three women, we

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:11.720
<v Speaker 5>could do the test one. No, I'm just saying that, true. Yeah,

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 5>it is, so it's weird how real this all felt,

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:17.640
<v Speaker 5>even though the stakes were so high and not very

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:18.520
<v Speaker 5>day to day.

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:19.639
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, Yeah, it feels very grounded, especially for a Tarantino movie.

0:21:24.840 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 3>It's I would probably his most grounded one. Yeah. Anyway, Also,

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:33.960
<v Speaker 3>while all of this is happening, it seems like Jackie

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:39.399
<v Speaker 3>intends to only hand off fifty thousand dollars of the

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:42.760
<v Speaker 3>money to whoever's going to get it to Ordell, and

0:21:42.800 --> 0:21:45.399
<v Speaker 3>that she's going to run off with the rest, and

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 3>she's kind of co conspiring with Max about this plan.

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:54.720
<v Speaker 3>Then it's time for the big exchange, so Jackie heads

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:59.919
<v Speaker 3>to the mall, as does Max, as does Lewis and Melanie,

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:04.119
<v Speaker 3>and Jackie hands off the fifty thousand dollars to Melanie

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 3>in the dressing room, and then Jackie leaves the remaining

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:12.639
<v Speaker 3>half million dollars in the dressing room on purpose, and

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:16.480
<v Speaker 3>then she rushes out of the store and calls for Ray,

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 3>the Michael Keaton cop, and she tells him that Melanie

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 3>burst into the dressing room and took all of the

0:22:23.880 --> 0:22:29.159
<v Speaker 3>money and ran out, so she's spinning this web of lies.

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Yarns. Yeah.

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:36.200
<v Speaker 3>Then we flash back to this exchange from Melanie and

0:22:36.280 --> 0:22:41.240
<v Speaker 3>Lewis's point of view. Louis is on edge. He's being

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:45.959
<v Speaker 3>aggressive and awful, and then after the handoff, he keeps

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 3>getting lost in the department store and then in the

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:53.719
<v Speaker 3>parking lot, and Melanie keeps taunting him about it, and

0:22:53.760 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 3>he blows a gasket and shoots and kills Melanie in

0:22:57.359 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 3>the parking lot.

0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Which I forgot about and did not see coming and

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:02.720
<v Speaker 1>was quite shocked.

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 3>It happens really abruptly, yeah.

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:10.920
<v Speaker 3>Then we get the exchange from Max's point of view

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:15.160
<v Speaker 3>where he watches Jackie come out of the dressing room,

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:18.159
<v Speaker 3>and then he goes in and retrieves the bag with

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 3>the half million dollars in cash, and he leaves the

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:28.479
<v Speaker 3>mall cut two Louis picking up Ordell, and Lewis is like,

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:35.679
<v Speaker 3>by the way, I shot Melanie, and Ordell is not

0:23:36.080 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 3>mad about it, but he is mad when he looks

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 3>in the bag and discovers that only forty thousand dollars

0:23:43.680 --> 0:23:47.280
<v Speaker 3>is in there, not the full half million, and he

0:23:47.400 --> 0:23:50.560
<v Speaker 3>suspects that it was Jackie Brown who stole it. And

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:52.440
<v Speaker 3>then Lewis is like, oh, wait a minute, I did

0:23:52.480 --> 0:23:55.760
<v Speaker 3>see Max Cherry in the department store, but I didn't

0:23:56.000 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 3>even think anything of it. But it is by yeah,

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 3>and Ordella is like, well, you're bad at your job,

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 3>and then he shoots and kills Lewis.

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 3>Which It's funny to see a Robert de Niro character

0:24:09.960 --> 0:24:13.080
<v Speaker 3>being bad at crime, because in most of his other

0:24:13.200 --> 0:24:15.920
<v Speaker 3>movies he's pretty good at crime.

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I really enjoyed, Like, I mean, obviously his character is horrible,

0:24:21.600 --> 0:24:25.159
<v Speaker 1>but I feel like it's, Yeah, it's really rare to

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 1>see him in like a very like I don't know,

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:33.359
<v Speaker 1>like Lewis is a diption outside of being like he yeah,

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 1>he's like a total dufeist like he. I don't know.

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 1>I think I just associate de Niro characters with like

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 1>hyper competence that I'm like, Wow, he's really not gonna

0:24:42.720 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 1>get He's not He's got nothing to hide. He's just

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:45.920
<v Speaker 1>not good at this.

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:48.919
<v Speaker 3>There's a scene I think he might be really high

0:24:48.960 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 3>and that's why he's acting this way. But he's like

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 3>spacing out after he has called Simone to try to

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 3>figure out where she is, and he's like trying to

0:24:57.920 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 3>hang up the phone and he keeps spending it around

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 3>because he can't figure out how to hang up this

0:25:04.119 --> 0:25:10.159
<v Speaker 3>landline and it's just it's great. Uh Anyway, So Ordell

0:25:10.359 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 3>shoots and kills Lewis for being bad at his job,

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 3>and then he hides out at Sharonda's place. Then we

0:25:19.440 --> 0:25:23.639
<v Speaker 3>cut to Ray questioning Jackie Brown, and he's just like,

0:25:23.760 --> 0:25:27.360
<v Speaker 3>what the hell happened? Because of what Jackie told him,

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:30.200
<v Speaker 3>he thinks that, you know, she tried to hand off

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 3>this fifty thousand dollars to Melanie and that Melanie ran

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:37.119
<v Speaker 3>off with it and that's why Melanie got shot, and

0:25:37.200 --> 0:25:40.439
<v Speaker 3>he has no idea about this half million dollars that

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 3>Max has. But Ray feels that he now has enough

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:50.080
<v Speaker 3>evidence to convict Ordell because he's been after Ordell this

0:25:50.160 --> 0:25:53.119
<v Speaker 3>whole time. But before the cops can get to Ordell,

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:57.880
<v Speaker 3>Ordell and Max have a conversation where Ordell is like, Okay,

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 3>I know you helped Jackie steal money, so she needs

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:04.160
<v Speaker 3>to give it back or I'm going to kill her.

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:08.199
<v Speaker 3>And so Max tells Ordell that Jackie does want to

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:13.040
<v Speaker 3>give the money back. So they head to Max's office

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 3>where Jackie and the money are and Ordell comes into

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:23.080
<v Speaker 3>the office, but it's a setup and the cops are there,

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:28.680
<v Speaker 3>and Ray jumps out and shoots Ordell. Then we cut

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:33.399
<v Speaker 3>to three days later. Jackie has the half million dollars

0:26:33.760 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 3>that only Max knows about of the people who are

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:41.960
<v Speaker 3>still alive at least, and she's given some of it

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:45.320
<v Speaker 3>to Max for helping, and then she says goodbye to Max.

0:26:46.080 --> 0:26:49.159
<v Speaker 3>They kiss, she tells him she's headed to Spain.

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:52.399
<v Speaker 1>Kiss it's it's fine.

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:53.919
<v Speaker 3>Really, I was like, uh.

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was a good kiss. I don't know,

0:26:56.800 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe it was just early sure.

0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:03.320
<v Speaker 3>But she tells him she's heading to Spain, and then

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 3>the movie ends with her driving off. So that's the movie.

0:27:09.040 --> 0:27:11.760
<v Speaker 3>Let's take a quick break and then we'll come back

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:20.639
<v Speaker 3>to discuss and we're back.

0:27:21.200 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Yes, where shall we start, Well, let's do some context

0:27:26.680 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 1>corner and then yeah, go from there. Excellent.

0:27:31.119 --> 0:27:38.440
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So basically prior to this movie, Tarantino had directed

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:42.919
<v Speaker 3>Reservoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction, and he had you know,

0:27:43.160 --> 0:27:47.440
<v Speaker 3>written and starred in a few other movies before this,

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:50.359
<v Speaker 3>and all of that has had cemented him as this

0:27:50.440 --> 0:27:54.919
<v Speaker 3>kind of like Indie Darling director that also had box

0:27:54.960 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 3>office appeal, who also had this very distinct style. So

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:01.879
<v Speaker 3>he's on his way to being this like, you know,

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:04.680
<v Speaker 3>a tour status.

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:07.000
<v Speaker 1>And also I feel like something that also carries through

0:28:07.000 --> 0:28:08.960
<v Speaker 1>and Jackie Brown is like he was already gaining this

0:28:09.040 --> 0:28:13.080
<v Speaker 1>reputation as someone who is able to like revive an

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:16.560
<v Speaker 1>actor's career, because I feel like John Travolta's career was

0:28:16.600 --> 0:28:20.120
<v Speaker 1>really sort of kickstarted again by Pulp Fiction. I feel

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:24.160
<v Speaker 1>like Pam Greer's career here and Max Cherry, who I

0:28:24.200 --> 0:28:25.359
<v Speaker 1>had not heard of.

0:28:25.280 --> 0:28:30.200
<v Speaker 3>This actor Robert Forster, Yeah, he was bigger in I

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 3>think the late sixties and seventies, but by the time

0:28:33.960 --> 0:28:36.679
<v Speaker 3>this movie was being cast, he didn't even have like

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 3>an agent or a manager, like his career was basically over.

0:28:40.840 --> 0:28:43.760
<v Speaker 1>And then we got nominated for a goddamn Oscar. I

0:28:43.760 --> 0:28:45.960
<v Speaker 1>think that Pam Greer should have been also nominated for

0:28:46.280 --> 0:28:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Oscar like but anyways, yes, yeah.

0:28:49.520 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 3>So anyway, Tarantino acquired the rights to three Elmore Leonard

0:28:55.200 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 3>novels because he wanted to make at least one of

0:28:57.800 --> 0:29:01.600
<v Speaker 3>them into a movie. He wasn't sure which one. One

0:29:01.600 --> 0:29:05.440
<v Speaker 3>of these novels is called rum Punch, which is the

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 3>one that Tarantino decided to adapt, and it was his

0:29:09.240 --> 0:29:13.280
<v Speaker 3>first time adapting anything. And so the significant thing here

0:29:13.440 --> 0:29:17.160
<v Speaker 3>is that in the book rum Punch, the main character,

0:29:17.680 --> 0:29:22.600
<v Speaker 3>Jackie Burke, is a white woman, and Tarantino rewrote the

0:29:22.720 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 3>character as a black woman, Jackie Brown, with Pam Grier

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:32.160
<v Speaker 3>in mine specifically yea, yeah exactly, so like Jackie Brown's

0:29:32.240 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 3>last name is a nod to her character in Foxy Brown,

0:29:37.960 --> 0:29:43.360
<v Speaker 3>which is a famous nineteen seventies blacksploitation film. Now, as

0:29:43.400 --> 0:29:46.800
<v Speaker 3>far as why Tarantino made this change, I couldn't find

0:29:46.880 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 3>anything super explicit or specific, but it just seems like

0:29:50.280 --> 0:29:55.560
<v Speaker 3>he wanted to pay homage to blacksplotation film and pay

0:29:55.600 --> 0:30:00.440
<v Speaker 3>homage to Pam Greer and her career as an actor

0:30:00.560 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 3>in these nineteen seventies blax quotation films such as Foxy

0:30:05.040 --> 0:30:07.120
<v Speaker 3>Brown and Coffee Right.

0:30:07.160 --> 0:30:09.200
<v Speaker 1>I was reading that there was a bunch of because

0:30:09.200 --> 0:30:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I have not seen either of those movies, but I

0:30:11.000 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 1>guess that there's a bunch of references to them. Yes,

0:30:14.000 --> 0:30:16.320
<v Speaker 1>within Jackie Brown. I was Yeah, for what I was

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:19.160
<v Speaker 1>able to gather, it just it seems like what you're saying,

0:30:19.200 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 1>and that he just wanted to meet Pam Greer really bad.

0:30:23.440 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Clay question Mark, Yeah, I was. I mean, especially with

0:30:28.720 --> 0:30:33.120
<v Speaker 1>conversations about Tarantino, and because the Uma Thorntman story kind

0:30:33.160 --> 0:30:36.280
<v Speaker 1>of haunts me so much because I have so much

0:30:36.320 --> 0:30:39.320
<v Speaker 1>love for kill Bill and what happened to her on

0:30:39.360 --> 0:30:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the side of that movie was so terrible. I was like,

0:30:41.080 --> 0:30:44.560
<v Speaker 1>how did Pam Greer feel about working with this man?

0:30:45.440 --> 0:30:49.920
<v Speaker 1>It turns out pretty good, which is great. I'm I

0:30:49.960 --> 0:30:54.160
<v Speaker 1>am glad that Pamger had a good experience, But yeah,

0:30:54.280 --> 0:30:55.880
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like he just sort of sought her out

0:30:55.920 --> 0:30:57.520
<v Speaker 1>and was like, Hey, I wrote this for you. Do

0:30:57.560 --> 0:31:01.600
<v Speaker 1>you want to be super fame miss again and she

0:31:01.680 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 1>was like.

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 3>Yes, yes, although she did not realize that the part

0:31:05.400 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 3>was written for her, because when Tarantino sent her the script,

0:31:09.240 --> 0:31:12.080
<v Speaker 3>she didn't take it very seriously because she thought he

0:31:12.200 --> 0:31:14.800
<v Speaker 3>was sending it to her because she was being considered

0:31:14.840 --> 0:31:19.160
<v Speaker 3>for the much smaller role of Melanie. And so she's

0:31:19.280 --> 0:31:23.840
<v Speaker 3>just like whatever. And then when Tarantino called her, he's like, no,

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:28.440
<v Speaker 3>I want you as Jackie Brown, and she's like, oh

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:34.720
<v Speaker 3>yeah tight. So, like we said, this movie revitalized her

0:31:34.920 --> 0:31:39.760
<v Speaker 3>career because she had come to fame in the seventies

0:31:40.040 --> 0:31:44.840
<v Speaker 3>with these various bl exploitation films, and then her career

0:31:44.960 --> 0:31:47.680
<v Speaker 3>kind of tapered off after that, and.

0:31:47.600 --> 0:31:52.360
<v Speaker 1>She she turned forty, which is not allowed, not.

0:31:52.400 --> 0:31:56.960
<v Speaker 3>Allowed if you're a woman. That is sort of the

0:31:57.000 --> 0:32:02.240
<v Speaker 3>context that we are working with that I feel like

0:32:03.120 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 3>could transition into a conversation about Tarantino's handling of race. Yeah,

0:32:11.920 --> 0:32:17.800
<v Speaker 3>because as we said, he makes choices and he's he's

0:32:17.920 --> 0:32:20.960
<v Speaker 3>got a checkered history when it comes to treatment of

0:32:21.040 --> 0:32:25.200
<v Speaker 3>race in his movies, where, for example, you know, he

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:29.200
<v Speaker 3>cast himself in pulp fiction as a character who very

0:32:29.280 --> 0:32:31.080
<v Speaker 3>casually throws around.

0:32:30.760 --> 0:32:31.400
<v Speaker 1>The n word.

0:32:32.080 --> 0:32:35.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he's also, you know, one of the few white

0:32:35.000 --> 0:32:39.560
<v Speaker 3>directors of that time who was even willing to address

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:44.000
<v Speaker 3>race in his movies at all and willing to cast

0:32:44.880 --> 0:32:47.720
<v Speaker 3>I would say, more actors of color in his movies

0:32:47.800 --> 0:32:52.760
<v Speaker 3>than most other big name auteur white guy directors of

0:32:52.800 --> 0:32:56.240
<v Speaker 3>that time. Again not saying that he handles race well

0:32:56.600 --> 0:32:59.600
<v Speaker 3>every time he does it. But there are interesting things

0:32:59.640 --> 0:33:03.000
<v Speaker 3>happen in this movie, one of the main ones being

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:06.560
<v Speaker 3>the thing we mentioned of him specifically rewriting, because this

0:33:06.640 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 3>almost never happens, where oftentimes, in a book a character

0:33:12.440 --> 0:33:14.880
<v Speaker 3>will be a person of color, and then when a

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 3>director gets their hands on it, they adapt it and

0:33:18.160 --> 0:33:22.520
<v Speaker 3>whitewash it and now the character is suddenly white. It

0:33:22.680 --> 0:33:27.200
<v Speaker 3>very rarely happens in the reverse. And I mean him

0:33:27.240 --> 0:33:31.840
<v Speaker 3>wanting to pay homage to black exploitation films, is I

0:33:31.880 --> 0:33:32.160
<v Speaker 3>don't know.

0:33:32.160 --> 0:33:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, do you.

0:33:32.760 --> 0:33:35.360
<v Speaker 4>Explain black exploitation to me? Please? Is that?

0:33:35.560 --> 0:33:35.680
<v Speaker 5>Like?

0:33:35.920 --> 0:33:37.640
<v Speaker 4>What genre is that? Or you don't have to if

0:33:37.640 --> 0:33:37.960
<v Speaker 4>you don't.

0:33:38.600 --> 0:33:43.280
<v Speaker 3>So it's basically so it's a genre, a subgenre most

0:33:43.320 --> 0:33:47.840
<v Speaker 3>popular in the nineteen seventies, where a lot of black

0:33:47.880 --> 0:33:53.040
<v Speaker 3>filmmakers and the casts were predominantly black. So it was

0:33:53.120 --> 0:33:57.680
<v Speaker 3>like a very black run and black lead group of movies.

0:33:58.400 --> 0:34:02.560
<v Speaker 3>But they're called black splotation of because they are relying

0:34:02.600 --> 0:34:06.440
<v Speaker 3>on different stereotypes a lot of times, like the characters

0:34:06.440 --> 0:34:10.160
<v Speaker 3>were like pimps or drug dealers or gun runners, things

0:34:10.200 --> 0:34:10.480
<v Speaker 3>like that.

0:34:11.320 --> 0:34:14.719
<v Speaker 5>So it's what the name suggested it to be exploiting

0:34:14.840 --> 0:34:16.520
<v Speaker 5>the black dive in a way.

0:34:17.120 --> 0:34:20.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, although it does feel worth mentioning that the two

0:34:20.360 --> 0:34:23.479
<v Speaker 1>black exploitation movies that Pamger is most famous for were

0:34:23.600 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 1>written and directed by white director Jack Hill.

0:34:27.640 --> 0:34:27.879
<v Speaker 4>True.

0:34:27.960 --> 0:34:31.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so there are sort of like variations within the genre.

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:33.640
<v Speaker 3>You know, not all of them are necessarily relying on

0:34:33.680 --> 0:34:38.239
<v Speaker 3>stereotypes things like that. But Tarantino wanting to pay homage

0:34:38.600 --> 0:34:42.480
<v Speaker 3>to those films is I don't know, I don't know

0:34:42.480 --> 0:34:45.680
<v Speaker 3>how to feel about it necessarily one way or another.

0:34:46.440 --> 0:34:49.320
<v Speaker 3>And then another thing he does is he has various

0:34:49.400 --> 0:34:57.000
<v Speaker 3>characters comment on race throughout the film. Mostly it's Samuel L. Jackson.

0:34:57.719 --> 0:35:00.920
<v Speaker 3>Another thing to note here is that Tarantino originally wrote

0:35:00.960 --> 0:35:06.160
<v Speaker 3>the part of Ordell for himself. Tarantino was planning for

0:35:06.200 --> 0:35:08.719
<v Speaker 3>a long time to play Ordell, so.

0:35:08.800 --> 0:35:12.799
<v Speaker 1>Glad he stopped acting in so stressful watching him act

0:35:13.080 --> 0:35:13.960
<v Speaker 1>it really is.

0:35:14.960 --> 0:35:19.360
<v Speaker 3>So after a long time he decided to you know,

0:35:19.440 --> 0:35:24.240
<v Speaker 3>relinquish the part and cast Samuel L. Jackson in the role,

0:35:24.520 --> 0:35:27.680
<v Speaker 3>which I'm again glad he did. I'd much rather watch

0:35:27.880 --> 0:35:34.560
<v Speaker 3>Samuel L. Jackson on screen than Tarantino. But that lends

0:35:34.560 --> 0:35:38.440
<v Speaker 3>itself to Ordell making different comments about how like when

0:35:38.440 --> 0:35:42.080
<v Speaker 3>he's in Max Cherry's office and Max wants to know, well,

0:35:42.120 --> 0:35:44.440
<v Speaker 3>if you already have ten thousand dollars, why can't you

0:35:44.600 --> 0:35:46.640
<v Speaker 3>just you know, why do you need a bond? Why

0:35:46.680 --> 0:35:49.960
<v Speaker 3>can't you take that money and bail out Beaumont? And

0:35:50.680 --> 0:35:53.120
<v Speaker 3>Ordell is like a black man showing up with ten

0:35:53.160 --> 0:35:55.359
<v Speaker 3>thousand dollars in cash. They're gonna want to know how

0:35:55.400 --> 0:35:57.759
<v Speaker 3>I got it. They'll want to keep a chunk of it,

0:35:57.800 --> 0:36:00.960
<v Speaker 3>claiming that there's like court costs all this stuff. So

0:36:01.000 --> 0:36:04.480
<v Speaker 3>he's saying, yeah, that they're gonna make racist assumptions about him,

0:36:04.640 --> 0:36:08.360
<v Speaker 3>and you know, nothing will work out in his favor. Similarly,

0:36:08.920 --> 0:36:13.359
<v Speaker 3>he's talking about when he wants Jackie Brown bailed out,

0:36:13.560 --> 0:36:17.319
<v Speaker 3>and he's commenting on the charge that she has been

0:36:17.640 --> 0:36:20.439
<v Speaker 3>charged with that she you know, was caught with less

0:36:20.440 --> 0:36:25.120
<v Speaker 3>than two ounces of cocaine but charged with intent to distribute,

0:36:25.400 --> 0:36:27.520
<v Speaker 3>and he says, you know, a movie star gets caught

0:36:27.560 --> 0:36:31.160
<v Speaker 3>with that same amount, they'd get charged with just possession,

0:36:31.320 --> 0:36:34.759
<v Speaker 3>which is a far less severe crime. But because it's

0:36:34.800 --> 0:36:39.960
<v Speaker 3>a black woman, she's charged with this bogus, far more

0:36:40.040 --> 0:36:41.080
<v Speaker 3>severe crime.

0:36:41.680 --> 0:36:45.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I mean, it's again like I don't know, I'm

0:36:45.280 --> 0:36:48.960
<v Speaker 1>like not trying to hand it to Tarantina too much

0:36:49.560 --> 0:36:52.920
<v Speaker 1>because it feels weird too. But yeah, like you were

0:36:52.960 --> 0:36:56.239
<v Speaker 1>saying earlier, Caitlin, it's like this is more commentary you

0:36:56.239 --> 0:36:59.680
<v Speaker 1>would get from a movie by a white director than

0:37:00.520 --> 0:37:03.280
<v Speaker 1>than most directors at this time, and just more commentary

0:37:03.320 --> 0:37:07.319
<v Speaker 1>on race in a big movie. In general, beau Vivie

0:37:07.440 --> 0:37:08.400
<v Speaker 1>is super successful.

0:37:09.360 --> 0:37:09.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:37:10.239 --> 0:37:13.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So, I mean, I guess my point is like

0:37:13.719 --> 0:37:20.480
<v Speaker 3>I wasn't necessarily expecting to see that in this movie

0:37:20.640 --> 0:37:24.239
<v Speaker 3>because again I didn't really I knew very little about

0:37:24.280 --> 0:37:27.400
<v Speaker 3>it going in, just that it was a Tarantino movie.

0:37:27.440 --> 0:37:27.920
<v Speaker 1>And again he.

0:37:30.360 --> 0:37:34.400
<v Speaker 3>Based on his treatment of race and him throwing around

0:37:34.480 --> 0:37:37.560
<v Speaker 3>the N word very casually a few years before in

0:37:37.600 --> 0:37:42.200
<v Speaker 3>pulp fiction, but then him turning around and adapting this

0:37:42.320 --> 0:37:46.960
<v Speaker 3>character to specifically include a black woman as the protagonist

0:37:47.160 --> 0:37:50.400
<v Speaker 3>of his movie and framing her in a way that

0:37:51.040 --> 0:37:54.480
<v Speaker 3>in my opinion, makes her really awesome and like a

0:37:54.480 --> 0:38:00.240
<v Speaker 3>really complex character. And that plus like including other commentary

0:38:00.280 --> 0:38:05.120
<v Speaker 3>about race. Nothing too extensive in this movie, but again

0:38:05.160 --> 0:38:09.160
<v Speaker 3>it's more than you'd expect from a white director in

0:38:09.520 --> 0:38:12.479
<v Speaker 3>the nineties, which you know, the bar is very low,

0:38:12.600 --> 0:38:15.960
<v Speaker 3>and that doesn't necessarily, you know, mean that he should

0:38:16.000 --> 0:38:20.120
<v Speaker 3>get all these prizes and recognition. But I don't know,

0:38:20.200 --> 0:38:22.200
<v Speaker 3>it's complicated.

0:38:22.239 --> 0:38:26.560
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting, which like there's I mean, we can link

0:38:26.600 --> 0:38:28.560
<v Speaker 1>this in the description of the episode two because yeah,

0:38:28.600 --> 0:38:31.799
<v Speaker 1>that topic alone there has been so much written about. Yeah,

0:38:31.880 --> 0:38:34.840
<v Speaker 1>it like comes up every time he releases a movie,

0:38:35.600 --> 0:38:39.160
<v Speaker 1>usually because he has once again written it into the movie, right,

0:38:39.239 --> 0:38:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and I know that he is. He and Spike Lee

0:38:42.000 --> 0:38:45.560
<v Speaker 1>have had this sort of long standing back and forth

0:38:45.640 --> 0:38:48.799
<v Speaker 1>about how Spike Lee feels like Spike Lee has a

0:38:49.120 --> 0:38:52.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of storied history of being like, this is fucking

0:38:52.400 --> 0:38:55.879
<v Speaker 1>weird that you do this this much like knock it off. Yeah,

0:38:55.920 --> 0:38:57.600
<v Speaker 1>we can link that in the description because it is

0:38:57.680 --> 0:39:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think, very relevant. And also there's it

0:39:01.320 --> 0:39:06.240
<v Speaker 1>like infinite there is like twenty plus years of debate

0:39:07.560 --> 0:39:10.000
<v Speaker 1>about his use of the N word in movies, which

0:39:10.040 --> 0:39:15.000
<v Speaker 1>is absolutely wild and this movie was another example of

0:39:15.040 --> 0:39:17.960
<v Speaker 1>like there was a wave of discourse like that in

0:39:18.040 --> 0:39:21.279
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety seven. So for longer than some of our

0:39:21.320 --> 0:39:24.640
<v Speaker 1>listeners have been alive, this conversation has been going on.

0:39:25.120 --> 0:39:28.839
<v Speaker 5>For the listeners who haven't heard like his rationale if

0:39:28.840 --> 0:39:32.160
<v Speaker 5>you want to call it rationale, Like does he explain?

0:39:32.239 --> 0:39:35.000
<v Speaker 4>He does he ever own why he says it?

0:39:35.560 --> 0:39:39.759
<v Speaker 1>So he's commented on it many times. I don't know.

0:39:39.800 --> 0:39:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I guess everyone react the way react, so

0:39:44.239 --> 0:39:46.640
<v Speaker 1>he sort of in twenty fifteen, I think he had

0:39:46.640 --> 0:39:49.040
<v Speaker 1>his all time worst response to it. When The Hateful

0:39:49.080 --> 0:39:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Eight came out. He did an interview with Brett Easton Ellis,

0:39:52.000 --> 0:39:57.640
<v Speaker 1>which I feel like doesn't help and address this controversy again,

0:39:58.320 --> 0:40:01.080
<v Speaker 1>saying quote, if you sit through the criticism, you see

0:40:01.120 --> 0:40:04.759
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty evenly divided between pros and cons. But when

0:40:04.800 --> 0:40:07.720
<v Speaker 1>black critics came out with savage think pieces about Django,

0:40:08.000 --> 0:40:11.239
<v Speaker 1>Django unchained, I couldn't have cared less. If people don't

0:40:11.280 --> 0:40:12.880
<v Speaker 1>like my movies, they don't like my movies, and if

0:40:12.880 --> 0:40:15.760
<v Speaker 1>they don't get it, it doesn't matter. The bad taste

0:40:15.760 --> 0:40:17.400
<v Speaker 1>that was left in my mouth had to do with this.

0:40:17.600 --> 0:40:19.239
<v Speaker 1>It's been a long time since the subject of a

0:40:19.280 --> 0:40:22.920
<v Speaker 1>writer's skin was mentioned as often as mine. You wouldn't

0:40:22.920 --> 0:40:24.719
<v Speaker 1>think the color of a writer's skin should have any

0:40:24.719 --> 0:40:27.359
<v Speaker 1>effect on the words themselves. In a lot of the

0:40:27.360 --> 0:40:30.040
<v Speaker 1>more ugly pieces, my motives were really brought to bear

0:40:30.120 --> 0:40:32.200
<v Speaker 1>in the most negative way. It's like I'm some super

0:40:32.239 --> 0:40:34.960
<v Speaker 1>villain coming up with this stuff unquote, which seems like

0:40:35.080 --> 0:40:38.000
<v Speaker 1>playing the victim to a pretty absurd extent.

0:40:38.960 --> 0:40:41.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I really don't understand, who don't.

0:40:42.280 --> 0:40:45.240
<v Speaker 5>This sounds like a very like a lot of words,

0:40:45.360 --> 0:40:48.400
<v Speaker 5>but I didn't get any thread in what.

0:40:49.520 --> 0:40:50.399
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I don't even get.

0:40:50.400 --> 0:40:55.759
<v Speaker 1>It's those sharp sentences that it's so bizarre too, because

0:40:55.760 --> 0:40:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean that reaction. It's I again, like this movie,

0:40:59.680 --> 0:41:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I think like Addresses, Like there's a scene between Ordell

0:41:04.520 --> 0:41:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and Max where Max essentially is like, are you appealing

0:41:09.040 --> 0:41:12.279
<v Speaker 1>to my white guilt to get me to do this?

0:41:12.360 --> 0:41:14.680
<v Speaker 1>And it's like, for I don't know, for a writer,

0:41:14.800 --> 0:41:18.600
<v Speaker 1>that is like trying to interact with those concepts and

0:41:18.640 --> 0:41:22.399
<v Speaker 1>these conversations to also say that in such a clueless way,

0:41:22.440 --> 0:41:28.560
<v Speaker 1>it's just like, yeah, baffling. Anyways, So we'll link more,

0:41:29.280 --> 0:41:31.200
<v Speaker 1>but yeah.

0:41:30.560 --> 0:41:32.759
<v Speaker 3>Let's take a quick break and then we'll come back

0:41:33.080 --> 0:41:43.000
<v Speaker 3>to discuss further and we're back.

0:41:43.320 --> 0:41:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about Jackie Brown.

0:41:45.120 --> 0:41:48.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, let's do it. Sadia, you had mentioned that you

0:41:48.520 --> 0:41:52.640
<v Speaker 3>related to this character in meaningful ways, so I'm interested

0:41:52.640 --> 0:41:55.600
<v Speaker 3>to hear your thoughts on that.

0:41:56.880 --> 0:42:01.360
<v Speaker 5>I'm just totally blown away by the character and this movie.

0:42:01.120 --> 0:42:01.719
<v Speaker 4>Is about her.

0:42:02.000 --> 0:42:04.640
<v Speaker 5>This is such a strong movie given that the cast,

0:42:05.080 --> 0:42:08.360
<v Speaker 5>the other cast is quite a list past, but she

0:42:08.520 --> 0:42:09.759
<v Speaker 5>just overshadows the.

0:42:09.719 --> 0:42:13.479
<v Speaker 4>Whole film, Like the whole deal is, like you can't

0:42:13.480 --> 0:42:14.319
<v Speaker 4>start watching her.

0:42:15.440 --> 0:42:21.839
<v Speaker 6>She's sassy, she's real, she's vulnerable, she's flawed, she's a survivor,

0:42:22.239 --> 0:42:25.000
<v Speaker 6>and she's all of those things most of the time,

0:42:25.200 --> 0:42:28.960
<v Speaker 6>and we're we're really with her, and like, you know,

0:42:29.000 --> 0:42:32.080
<v Speaker 6>it's hard what she's going through, and I don't know, it's.

0:42:31.960 --> 0:42:33.919
<v Speaker 5>Like I don't know, I just I fell in love

0:42:33.960 --> 0:42:36.000
<v Speaker 5>with her so so much. And I think it's also

0:42:36.160 --> 0:42:38.120
<v Speaker 5>like for me when I watched it, it was just

0:42:38.160 --> 0:42:40.560
<v Speaker 5>like a reminder, like I did get this kind of

0:42:41.040 --> 0:42:43.160
<v Speaker 5>moment where it's like, what I've never seen.

0:42:43.000 --> 0:42:43.920
<v Speaker 4>Anybody like her.

0:42:44.040 --> 0:42:47.360
<v Speaker 5>So that added to the impact that she had is

0:42:47.400 --> 0:42:49.799
<v Speaker 5>that this is a figure that we really need to

0:42:49.880 --> 0:42:53.480
<v Speaker 5>watch and this is a character a person like her

0:42:53.520 --> 0:42:56.160
<v Speaker 5>that I love to watch, and I could have continued

0:42:56.200 --> 0:42:57.560
<v Speaker 5>to watch her go to Spain.

0:42:57.760 --> 0:42:59.040
<v Speaker 4>And you know, it wasn't.

0:42:58.840 --> 0:43:03.080
<v Speaker 5>Even about relationship, which is really rare, like I think

0:43:03.719 --> 0:43:05.800
<v Speaker 5>or women is often you know, you want them to

0:43:05.920 --> 0:43:08.719
<v Speaker 5>kind of have a partner or that's a big part

0:43:08.760 --> 0:43:11.280
<v Speaker 5>of the story, if not the story. But this wasn't

0:43:11.320 --> 0:43:15.040
<v Speaker 5>about those. That was so secondary and so for her

0:43:15.080 --> 0:43:18.320
<v Speaker 5>to own everything in those in that kind of context,

0:43:18.480 --> 0:43:20.640
<v Speaker 5>for me, it was like I've never seen it before.

0:43:21.080 --> 0:43:23.440
<v Speaker 5>I couldn't start watching it. I wanted her to have

0:43:23.480 --> 0:43:25.840
<v Speaker 5>all the money. I wanted her to win and I

0:43:25.880 --> 0:43:27.880
<v Speaker 5>don't know how, but it was just like it was

0:43:27.960 --> 0:43:30.920
<v Speaker 5>really cool, and it just felt she was very honest,

0:43:32.120 --> 0:43:34.760
<v Speaker 5>she'd been through a lot. And yeah, just to repeat,

0:43:35.280 --> 0:43:37.080
<v Speaker 5>I hate repeating myself, but it's just like I think

0:43:37.120 --> 0:43:40.000
<v Speaker 5>it's because there's such an absence of women like her

0:43:40.080 --> 0:43:43.440
<v Speaker 5>on screen that it really like touched me quite a lot.

0:43:43.960 --> 0:43:47.160
<v Speaker 3>Right, I mean, because it's rare to have a movie

0:43:47.200 --> 0:43:51.240
<v Speaker 3>of this genre, you know, like a crime thriller, noir

0:43:51.480 --> 0:43:55.520
<v Speaker 3>type movie that center is a woman as the protagonist

0:43:55.680 --> 0:43:58.719
<v Speaker 3>who we are rooting for, the one where she's like

0:43:58.920 --> 0:44:01.719
<v Speaker 3>the smartest person in the room, in any room she's in,

0:44:01.880 --> 0:44:05.359
<v Speaker 3>she's doing a lot of the planning. She's playing all

0:44:05.400 --> 0:44:09.479
<v Speaker 3>of these people like she's she's the one. She comes

0:44:09.480 --> 0:44:09.960
<v Speaker 3>out on top.

0:44:10.040 --> 0:44:14.160
<v Speaker 2>She's not hyper sexualized, which yeah, and you can't be

0:44:14.239 --> 0:44:16.120
<v Speaker 2>bad at her, like even though she's got all of

0:44:16.160 --> 0:44:18.239
<v Speaker 2>the strings, like you know how sometimes you hate like

0:44:18.280 --> 0:44:20.680
<v Speaker 2>the villain in Bond or whatever, Like we're so with her,

0:44:20.880 --> 0:44:23.399
<v Speaker 2>even though we're annoyed because we don't know what's going

0:44:23.440 --> 0:44:25.200
<v Speaker 2>on or whatever, we're feeling for her and it's like

0:44:25.200 --> 0:44:27.080
<v Speaker 2>we're really going through it as the audience.

0:44:27.120 --> 0:44:30.919
<v Speaker 5>But like she's Yeah, she doesn't really do a lot wrong.

0:44:30.960 --> 0:44:33.600
<v Speaker 5>There's no victim blaming. It's like this sometimes, you know,

0:44:33.680 --> 0:44:37.680
<v Speaker 5>if there's you know, women in crime, it's like we

0:44:37.680 --> 0:44:39.680
<v Speaker 5>we have only like a one D relationship with them

0:44:39.719 --> 0:44:42.279
<v Speaker 5>or something like that. But even though she's a little

0:44:42.280 --> 0:44:44.359
<v Speaker 5>bit flawed, like we're still with her.

0:44:44.520 --> 0:44:45.800
<v Speaker 4>There's no blame here.

0:44:45.920 --> 0:44:50.360
<v Speaker 5>There's really complex and it's kind of just enjoyable to

0:44:50.400 --> 0:44:51.880
<v Speaker 5>see this that you can't start watching.

0:44:52.320 --> 0:44:55.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and yeah, like you were saying, Jamie, she's the

0:44:55.480 --> 0:44:59.239
<v Speaker 3>way that a lot of women in her position as

0:44:59.239 --> 0:45:04.120
<v Speaker 3>a female character in a crime thriller movie, that character

0:45:04.160 --> 0:45:06.920
<v Speaker 3>would be hyper sexualized and or she would be framed

0:45:06.960 --> 0:45:10.440
<v Speaker 3>as like the fem fetal, but that is never how

0:45:11.080 --> 0:45:16.080
<v Speaker 3>she's represented, and especially for her to be centered as

0:45:16.080 --> 0:45:20.960
<v Speaker 3>the protagonist in a movie like this, especially as a

0:45:21.000 --> 0:45:23.600
<v Speaker 3>black woman, and especially as a black woman who is

0:45:24.120 --> 0:45:27.759
<v Speaker 3>older than thirty or thirty five, Like, these are very

0:45:27.880 --> 0:45:29.400
<v Speaker 3>rare things to see.

0:45:29.760 --> 0:45:32.520
<v Speaker 1>And this is I forget when we talked about this, Caitlin,

0:45:32.600 --> 0:45:35.160
<v Speaker 1>But I feel like it's like Pam gre the actor

0:45:35.800 --> 0:45:39.840
<v Speaker 1>is over forty when this is filmed. But we also

0:45:39.880 --> 0:45:43.960
<v Speaker 1>I feel like often see actors who are older, but

0:45:44.000 --> 0:45:46.839
<v Speaker 1>they're still playing like a thirty seven year old, and

0:45:46.920 --> 0:45:49.560
<v Speaker 1>in this movie it is stated she is forty four

0:45:49.640 --> 0:45:53.040
<v Speaker 1>years old. And also like does I don't know, like

0:45:53.120 --> 0:45:56.040
<v Speaker 1>also the character matches that because I do think that

0:45:56.080 --> 0:46:00.000
<v Speaker 1>there is, like even now, like a pressure to eternally

0:46:00.320 --> 0:46:03.360
<v Speaker 1>seem like you are in your late thirties early forties,

0:46:03.400 --> 0:46:06.560
<v Speaker 1>even if you're an actor into your fifties and sixties.

0:46:07.400 --> 0:46:10.240
<v Speaker 3>The Sandra Bullock effect, Yeah.

0:46:09.680 --> 0:46:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Totally, and I and it's like has nothing to do

0:46:13.960 --> 0:46:17.080
<v Speaker 1>with the actors. It's all the whatever cultural pressure to

0:46:17.160 --> 0:46:21.320
<v Speaker 1>look at a certain age long after that makes human sense.

0:46:22.200 --> 0:46:25.400
<v Speaker 1>But I liked that like, Yeah, like Jackie Brown is,

0:46:27.040 --> 0:46:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I liked how this movie approached age

0:46:31.160 --> 0:46:34.759
<v Speaker 1>as a theme, And I didn't even realize until those

0:46:34.840 --> 0:46:37.759
<v Speaker 1>conversations were had between a few different characters, because I think,

0:46:38.000 --> 0:46:41.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Jackie obviously talks about it most explicitly when

0:46:41.680 --> 0:46:47.000
<v Speaker 1>she talks about aging with Max and also points out

0:46:47.040 --> 0:46:51.520
<v Speaker 1>how aging for her is framed differently than the way

0:46:51.520 --> 0:46:53.440
<v Speaker 1>it is for him. And I thought that scene was

0:46:53.480 --> 0:46:57.680
<v Speaker 1>like really great and like beautifully done between them. And

0:46:57.719 --> 0:47:01.560
<v Speaker 1>you also see the freaky DeNiro care talk about aging too,

0:47:01.560 --> 0:47:04.879
<v Speaker 1>because now he can't smoke weed at he are like,

0:47:05.800 --> 0:47:08.880
<v Speaker 1>but it's like everyone like most characters. I don't know

0:47:08.960 --> 0:47:11.440
<v Speaker 1>as much for Ordell, but for like most characters, we

0:47:11.480 --> 0:47:16.160
<v Speaker 1>get to know interact with the idea of aging in

0:47:16.200 --> 0:47:19.200
<v Speaker 1>a way that felt I don't know, like I guess,

0:47:19.239 --> 0:47:23.920
<v Speaker 1>more thoughtful than I was expecting it to. Yeah, And

0:47:24.000 --> 0:47:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it's like also rare to see you know,

0:47:27.040 --> 0:47:31.279
<v Speaker 1>Pam Career and oh what's the what's Max Cherry's name? Again?

0:47:31.360 --> 0:47:35.319
<v Speaker 1>God damn it? Oh, Robert Forster, Robert Forster to see

0:47:35.360 --> 0:47:39.120
<v Speaker 1>actually like age well, like whatever, I mean, I don't

0:47:39.160 --> 0:47:41.360
<v Speaker 1>want to get into age gap discourse today, but like

0:47:41.520 --> 0:47:46.520
<v Speaker 1>age appropriate older couple as the leading romantic story is

0:47:46.920 --> 0:47:52.080
<v Speaker 1>again just like doesn't really happen even now still and

0:47:52.200 --> 0:47:54.319
<v Speaker 1>I just thought it was I don't know. I liked

0:47:54.360 --> 0:47:58.000
<v Speaker 1>how each character sort of got to explore what that

0:47:58.200 --> 0:48:01.240
<v Speaker 1>meant to them, And I think that's seen like between

0:48:01.360 --> 0:48:05.759
<v Speaker 1>Jackie and Max illustrates her motivation on why she's doing

0:48:05.800 --> 0:48:10.480
<v Speaker 1>what she's doing so beautifully and so empathetically and like

0:48:10.880 --> 0:48:14.040
<v Speaker 1>you can't watch that scene and not want her to

0:48:14.320 --> 0:48:17.560
<v Speaker 1>get every cent as well.

0:48:18.000 --> 0:48:20.000
<v Speaker 5>Just on the same point as you, Jamie, is that

0:48:20.440 --> 0:48:23.759
<v Speaker 5>I'm not objectifying her. I don't know that sounds really weird,

0:48:23.760 --> 0:48:25.799
<v Speaker 5>but in terms of like I'm not fixated with her

0:48:25.800 --> 0:48:29.280
<v Speaker 5>appearance as beautiful as she is, Like that doesn't really

0:48:29.400 --> 0:48:32.480
<v Speaker 5>like it's not my central focal point. Like I think

0:48:32.520 --> 0:48:34.400
<v Speaker 5>I only realized at the end when that, like you

0:48:34.440 --> 0:48:36.640
<v Speaker 5>said that that kiss happened, that I'm like, she's a

0:48:36.680 --> 0:48:39.719
<v Speaker 5>sexy lady, but like you, I'm seeing her as a

0:48:39.800 --> 0:48:42.799
<v Speaker 5>human and outrounded person. I'm not just like checking her

0:48:42.840 --> 0:48:45.520
<v Speaker 5>out like the whole time, or it's not that she's

0:48:45.600 --> 0:48:47.279
<v Speaker 5>a Yeah, I think you already made that point about

0:48:47.320 --> 0:48:49.359
<v Speaker 5>her not being sexualized.

0:48:50.040 --> 0:48:52.719
<v Speaker 1>Yes, which is like really cool. I don't know, Like

0:48:52.800 --> 0:48:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I again, I just like didn't expect it because Tarantino's

0:48:56.200 --> 0:48:59.520
<v Speaker 1>super hidden miss on how he sexualizes his female characters

0:48:59.560 --> 0:49:03.800
<v Speaker 1>as well. And you know, there's a bajillion studies about

0:49:03.840 --> 0:49:07.480
<v Speaker 1>how women of color in general are more likely to

0:49:07.520 --> 0:49:12.400
<v Speaker 1>be sexualized in movies that anyone is making, especially in

0:49:12.840 --> 0:49:15.319
<v Speaker 1>the West, And so I don't know, I just like

0:49:15.400 --> 0:49:17.799
<v Speaker 1>I loved the scene where like Max falls in love

0:49:17.800 --> 0:49:21.480
<v Speaker 1>with Jackie at first sight and she's just walking like.

0:49:21.480 --> 0:49:25.960
<v Speaker 3>She's having spent several days maybe in jail, and she's

0:49:26.080 --> 0:49:29.239
<v Speaker 3>like disheveled, and she wants to go to like a

0:49:29.360 --> 0:49:31.560
<v Speaker 3>dark bar so that no one can see her because

0:49:31.600 --> 0:49:33.680
<v Speaker 3>she's like, I look like I just got out of jail.

0:49:33.680 --> 0:49:36.040
<v Speaker 3>But he's just like, that's the most beautiful woman I've

0:49:36.080 --> 0:49:36.759
<v Speaker 3>ever seen, and.

0:49:36.719 --> 0:49:37.400
<v Speaker 1>He's not wrong.

0:49:37.520 --> 0:49:40.799
<v Speaker 3>Like Pam Greer has such a presence on screen, like

0:49:41.120 --> 0:49:44.280
<v Speaker 3>she has just a face that you want to stare

0:49:44.360 --> 0:49:46.880
<v Speaker 3>at for hours and hours and hours, Like it's just

0:49:46.880 --> 0:49:50.800
<v Speaker 3>she's just so magnetic and every man who she encounters

0:49:50.840 --> 0:49:54.000
<v Speaker 3>basically falls in love with her because Max sees her

0:49:54.280 --> 0:49:57.360
<v Speaker 3>it's love at first sight. There are various allusions to

0:49:58.080 --> 0:50:01.640
<v Speaker 3>Ray the Michael Keaton cop liking her, having a crush

0:50:01.640 --> 0:50:03.640
<v Speaker 3>on her. He like takes her out to dinner several

0:50:03.680 --> 0:50:07.960
<v Speaker 3>times to like discuss the case, but like it doesn't

0:50:07.960 --> 0:50:09.920
<v Speaker 3>need to be over dinner, but he's just like, I

0:50:10.160 --> 0:50:12.680
<v Speaker 3>love I just want to look at her. The bartender.

0:50:12.719 --> 0:50:14.839
<v Speaker 3>It's like a brief, like two second scene, but like

0:50:15.320 --> 0:50:21.280
<v Speaker 3>the bartender at the cockatoo, Inn is like, hey baby.

0:50:21.120 --> 0:50:24.880
<v Speaker 5>But the characters like her can be made. Why why

0:50:25.000 --> 0:50:28.480
<v Speaker 5>aren't they made since then? Or obviously not before? Fine,

0:50:28.520 --> 0:50:32.719
<v Speaker 5>but like since then, how come it's proven that this

0:50:32.800 --> 0:50:37.399
<v Speaker 5>is a realistic portrayal of a character? Like it's very rare,

0:50:37.480 --> 0:50:38.799
<v Speaker 5>isn't it?

0:50:38.560 --> 0:50:40.960
<v Speaker 1>It does still feel I mean, it's like, yeah, I

0:50:41.000 --> 0:50:45.400
<v Speaker 1>feel like there's far fewer examples since Jackie Brown then

0:50:45.440 --> 0:50:48.080
<v Speaker 1>there should be. And I don't know, like I think

0:50:48.080 --> 0:50:50.440
<v Speaker 1>this is probably all Pam Greer, but it feels so

0:50:51.040 --> 0:50:55.000
<v Speaker 1>cool and rare to have a character who is sexy

0:50:55.080 --> 0:51:00.239
<v Speaker 1>but not sexualized, Like I don't I don't know. I mean,

0:51:00.400 --> 0:51:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it just has to deal with like her

0:51:02.360 --> 0:51:05.600
<v Speaker 1>persona and what a good like an amazing actor and

0:51:05.600 --> 0:51:08.440
<v Speaker 1>what an amazing performance this is. But like she's so

0:51:09.680 --> 0:51:15.040
<v Speaker 1>naturally like magnetic and sexy and cool that it's like,

0:51:15.680 --> 0:51:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, like it feels like this movie just

0:51:18.120 --> 0:51:22.480
<v Speaker 1>lets Pam Greer do her work and perform and just

0:51:22.520 --> 0:51:25.920
<v Speaker 1>like you have no trouble believing that anyone would fall

0:51:25.960 --> 0:51:26.360
<v Speaker 1>in love.

0:51:26.239 --> 0:51:29.160
<v Speaker 5>With her, And it's so like freeing because I'm not

0:51:29.239 --> 0:51:32.800
<v Speaker 5>focused on her being sexualized. I'm seeing so many different

0:51:32.840 --> 0:51:36.719
<v Speaker 5>aspects of her that I wouldn't if she was being sexualized.

0:51:36.760 --> 0:51:40.280
<v Speaker 5>So I'm not saying that there's no room for sexualized characters,

0:51:40.320 --> 0:51:43.719
<v Speaker 5>but I think because it's just always the case that, like,

0:51:44.160 --> 0:51:47.920
<v Speaker 5>because I'm so unpreoccupied with her, like those kind of

0:51:48.000 --> 0:51:51.120
<v Speaker 5>aspects of her, I'm allowed to just let go and

0:51:51.160 --> 0:51:54.000
<v Speaker 5>be in the story and follow her and not just

0:51:54.080 --> 0:51:56.759
<v Speaker 5>parts of her, like I don't. Yeah, it's not focunistic

0:51:57.040 --> 0:51:59.839
<v Speaker 5>at all. It's just like you're with the character, you're

0:51:59.880 --> 0:52:02.319
<v Speaker 5>not we've had because of her looks or because of

0:52:02.600 --> 0:52:04.080
<v Speaker 5>superficial things.

0:52:03.880 --> 0:52:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Right, totally, Yeah, you just need her. I wanted to

0:52:07.040 --> 0:52:09.600
<v Speaker 1>point out one more of the age things because I

0:52:09.640 --> 0:52:11.480
<v Speaker 1>just I don't know, I'm like, wow, age is never

0:52:11.520 --> 0:52:14.640
<v Speaker 1>discussed in movies, but the Cops at one point in

0:52:15.120 --> 0:52:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the first scene that Jackie has with the two cops

0:52:18.920 --> 0:52:23.160
<v Speaker 1>where they're going through her bag and she's holding her ground.

0:52:23.200 --> 0:52:26.960
<v Speaker 1>She's not putting up with like not taking the bait

0:52:27.000 --> 0:52:29.440
<v Speaker 1>after bait after bait that they're throwing at her. And

0:52:29.480 --> 0:52:32.600
<v Speaker 1>one of those pieces of bait is related to both

0:52:32.640 --> 0:52:35.279
<v Speaker 1>her age, race, and class, I think, all in the

0:52:35.320 --> 0:52:39.000
<v Speaker 1>same sentence where one of the characters says something akin

0:52:39.040 --> 0:52:40.960
<v Speaker 1>to like, if I was a forty four year old

0:52:41.000 --> 0:52:43.080
<v Speaker 1>black woman with a shitty job, I don't think I

0:52:43.080 --> 0:52:45.279
<v Speaker 1>would have another year to throw away, So you better

0:52:45.320 --> 0:52:48.440
<v Speaker 1>cooperate with us. Yeah, And I don't know. It's just

0:52:48.480 --> 0:52:51.759
<v Speaker 1>like such a vile thing to say to her, and

0:52:51.800 --> 0:52:55.400
<v Speaker 1>she just like does I mean, obviously doesn't fall for it.

0:52:55.440 --> 0:52:58.880
<v Speaker 1>She doesn't fall for anyone's bullshit, but it was you know.

0:52:59.160 --> 0:53:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that like that line sticks with her because

0:53:03.280 --> 0:53:06.000
<v Speaker 1>it comes up in a roundabout way later in that

0:53:06.040 --> 0:53:10.400
<v Speaker 1>conversation with Max, and her takeaway is like that's the

0:53:10.440 --> 0:53:12.759
<v Speaker 1>reason she's not going to cooperate with the cops. Is

0:53:12.800 --> 0:53:18.240
<v Speaker 1>like she's going to get her fucking eat prey love story,

0:53:18.360 --> 0:53:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and like there's totally there's Jackie Brown, two very different vibes. Almost, Well,

0:53:27.040 --> 0:53:27.640
<v Speaker 1>that's the thing.

0:53:27.560 --> 0:53:33.560
<v Speaker 3>Like her motivation is the intersection of her age, her race,

0:53:33.640 --> 0:53:38.560
<v Speaker 3>and her class because she and her status as someone

0:53:38.600 --> 0:53:43.440
<v Speaker 3>who has been incarcerated because she has a prior conviction

0:53:43.920 --> 0:53:46.200
<v Speaker 3>and where she served. I don't know if she served

0:53:46.280 --> 0:53:48.520
<v Speaker 3>jail time, but she was on probation for a while,

0:53:48.560 --> 0:53:53.440
<v Speaker 3>because it's referenced that she was formerly married and her husband,

0:53:53.440 --> 0:53:58.120
<v Speaker 3>who was a pilot, got caught for smuggling drugs I

0:53:58.120 --> 0:54:01.480
<v Speaker 3>think or something and she was his accomplice. So she

0:54:02.320 --> 0:54:07.120
<v Speaker 3>got apprehended by the law to some degree, and it

0:54:07.239 --> 0:54:10.000
<v Speaker 3>made it so that she couldn't get work with the

0:54:10.040 --> 0:54:12.640
<v Speaker 3>major airlines, which is why she's working for Cabo Air,

0:54:13.239 --> 0:54:15.440
<v Speaker 3>which I don't know if that's a real airline or not,

0:54:15.560 --> 0:54:19.759
<v Speaker 3>but in the movie, it's widely known that it's like

0:54:19.840 --> 0:54:22.719
<v Speaker 3>the shittiest airline to work for, and it's you know,

0:54:22.800 --> 0:54:25.719
<v Speaker 3>referenced that she only makes sixteen thousand dollars a year,

0:54:26.320 --> 0:54:29.520
<v Speaker 3>and so she's looking out for herself and she knows

0:54:29.520 --> 0:54:33.560
<v Speaker 3>that like as a black woman in her mid forties

0:54:33.840 --> 0:54:37.879
<v Speaker 3>with a prior arrest or, like you know, something on

0:54:37.920 --> 0:54:42.200
<v Speaker 3>her record, the cards are very much stacked against her,

0:54:42.360 --> 0:54:46.080
<v Speaker 3>and she needs to do whatever it takes to look

0:54:46.120 --> 0:54:50.839
<v Speaker 3>out for herself. And that's why she's like, I'm going

0:54:50.920 --> 0:54:54.760
<v Speaker 3>to steal this half a million dollars from this shitty

0:54:54.920 --> 0:55:01.240
<v Speaker 3>arms dealer who's like bad hit everything, and we're rooting

0:55:01.280 --> 0:55:02.359
<v Speaker 3>for her because of it.

0:55:02.480 --> 0:55:03.320
<v Speaker 4>Did you guys?

0:55:03.360 --> 0:55:06.080
<v Speaker 5>Sorry, we talked about this very briefly at the beginning,

0:55:06.480 --> 0:55:09.120
<v Speaker 5>but did you learn anything about yourselves when you watch

0:55:09.200 --> 0:55:11.359
<v Speaker 5>this that did you think you would do the same

0:55:11.400 --> 0:55:14.759
<v Speaker 5>as her? Or what was your anxiety that was like,

0:55:14.800 --> 0:55:16.880
<v Speaker 5>oh my god, I couldn't do that, Like, what did

0:55:16.920 --> 0:55:17.880
<v Speaker 5>you learn about your pelf?

0:55:18.160 --> 0:55:21.760
<v Speaker 3>I would be so afraid of getting murdered by someone

0:55:22.000 --> 0:55:24.960
<v Speaker 3>that I and I'm such a rule follower that.

0:55:24.920 --> 0:55:27.040
<v Speaker 4>I'd be like, okay, so not for you.

0:55:27.320 --> 0:55:28.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm such a baby.

0:55:29.000 --> 0:55:30.880
<v Speaker 4>It was hard. It was hard to decide.

0:55:31.360 --> 0:55:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I was also, I mean, I think you mentioned

0:55:35.080 --> 0:55:36.719
<v Speaker 1>it earlier. I was like, I don't know if I

0:55:36.719 --> 0:55:41.000
<v Speaker 1>could keep my facts straight sufficiently morally. I have no

0:55:41.080 --> 0:55:45.680
<v Speaker 1>scruples about what Jackie is doing. And if I were

0:55:45.800 --> 0:55:48.680
<v Speaker 1>in a similar position, I you know, if I thought

0:55:48.719 --> 0:55:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I could pull it off, Yeah, maybe I would try,

0:55:51.560 --> 0:55:54.080
<v Speaker 1>but I don't know. I was like, I would need

0:55:54.560 --> 0:55:59.200
<v Speaker 1>someone that I trust to be like wait, what lie?

0:55:59.280 --> 0:56:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Did I tell again? Like I would need someone.

0:56:02.840 --> 0:56:05.479
<v Speaker 3>Well, she trusts Max, and I want to just chat

0:56:05.520 --> 0:56:08.319
<v Speaker 3>about that relationship a little bit more because, like as

0:56:08.320 --> 0:56:12.360
<v Speaker 3>you said, Saudia, it is that relationship is like almost

0:56:13.040 --> 0:56:15.839
<v Speaker 3>it's like barely even a subplot in this movie. It's

0:56:15.920 --> 0:56:19.160
<v Speaker 3>just sort of there. It's not really taking up any

0:56:19.600 --> 0:56:24.160
<v Speaker 3>space there. You know, he likes her from the get go.

0:56:24.440 --> 0:56:29.800
<v Speaker 3>She's not like exploiting him or using him necessarily because

0:56:29.840 --> 0:56:32.040
<v Speaker 3>she never tries to be like I love you and

0:56:32.040 --> 0:56:33.839
<v Speaker 3>that's why you have to do this for me. She's

0:56:33.960 --> 0:56:36.400
<v Speaker 3>just like I'm trying to do this thing. Can you

0:56:36.440 --> 0:56:38.879
<v Speaker 3>help me? And he's like, well, I love you so yes.

0:56:40.719 --> 0:56:43.439
<v Speaker 3>And I was like, hm, I wonder if they're gonna

0:56:43.480 --> 0:56:47.280
<v Speaker 3>like stick them together at the end, and she does

0:56:47.360 --> 0:56:50.080
<v Speaker 3>like kind of halfheartedly invite him to go to Spain

0:56:50.120 --> 0:56:54.200
<v Speaker 3>with her. He declines, I'm not surprised that this movie

0:56:54.200 --> 0:56:57.239
<v Speaker 3>didn't do it, because like that's not a Tarantino thing

0:56:57.280 --> 0:57:01.480
<v Speaker 3>to do. He usually doesn't go for those cliche Hollywood endings.

0:57:02.200 --> 0:57:04.880
<v Speaker 1>But I think, I mean, I was surprised at how

0:57:05.600 --> 0:57:07.799
<v Speaker 1>like I think it again, like for me connected to

0:57:07.880 --> 0:57:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the sexy but not sexualized thing where I don't know,

0:57:12.120 --> 0:57:14.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean trying to think of a clear cut example.

0:57:14.880 --> 0:57:20.040
<v Speaker 1>But again just with like women over forty in movies,

0:57:20.080 --> 0:57:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I flick it is the older you get as an actor,

0:57:24.720 --> 0:57:27.040
<v Speaker 1>if you're a woman or anyone of a marginalized gender,

0:57:27.120 --> 0:57:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the less likely it is that you are going to

0:57:29.480 --> 0:57:33.720
<v Speaker 1>be shown as romantically viable for sure. And I like

0:57:33.800 --> 0:57:36.360
<v Speaker 1>that she kind of gets her little like I don't know.

0:57:36.440 --> 0:57:39.360
<v Speaker 1>This relationship is like very much a side quest of

0:57:39.400 --> 0:57:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the movie. It is there. It helps move the plot

0:57:42.320 --> 0:57:45.360
<v Speaker 1>along a little bit, but it's like she I kind

0:57:45.360 --> 0:57:49.000
<v Speaker 1>of liked where they left it, where it was like, yeah,

0:57:49.040 --> 0:57:52.880
<v Speaker 1>they didn't force the relationship and that like I don't know.

0:57:53.040 --> 0:57:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously he'll be hung up on her until

0:57:55.520 --> 0:57:59.160
<v Speaker 1>he dies, but that's kind of his prefer She's got

0:57:59.200 --> 0:58:02.520
<v Speaker 1>to move on. And I love that the movie gives us,

0:58:02.560 --> 0:58:05.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, those like book endings of Jackie by herself,

0:58:05.480 --> 0:58:08.360
<v Speaker 1>like moving through the world, and this time she's like

0:58:08.800 --> 0:58:12.080
<v Speaker 1>driving with intention. She's not being ushered along by this

0:58:12.440 --> 0:58:15.600
<v Speaker 1>moving whatever at the airport, like I don't know, she's

0:58:15.680 --> 0:58:19.880
<v Speaker 1>It's wow. It feels very like and my life was

0:58:20.080 --> 0:58:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the prize at the end of the movie, and you're like,

0:58:23.200 --> 0:58:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm in control. It's cool.

0:58:25.480 --> 0:58:30.040
<v Speaker 3>This is from a Variety piece from a few years

0:58:30.040 --> 0:58:34.240
<v Speaker 3>ago entitled Jackie Brown at twenty, meaning the movie is

0:58:34.280 --> 0:58:37.120
<v Speaker 3>twenty years old, Jackie Brown at twenty. Pam Greer has

0:58:37.520 --> 0:58:43.040
<v Speaker 3>a better idea for an ending, and so Pam Greer's

0:58:43.120 --> 0:58:46.840
<v Speaker 3>pitch for an alternate ending for this movie is this quote.

0:58:47.840 --> 0:58:51.080
<v Speaker 3>In my ending, we have a nice kiss, a second kiss,

0:58:51.160 --> 0:58:54.440
<v Speaker 3>and embrace, and he lets all the phone calls go

0:58:54.520 --> 0:58:57.560
<v Speaker 3>to voicemail. He'll take care of them later. He turns

0:58:57.600 --> 0:59:01.320
<v Speaker 3>out the lights, takes the keys, with me kids in

0:59:01.320 --> 0:59:03.840
<v Speaker 3>the car, I drive off, and all of a sudden

0:59:04.040 --> 0:59:07.840
<v Speaker 3>he becomes this chatterbox and annoying. I go around the block,

0:59:08.040 --> 0:59:10.000
<v Speaker 3>drop him off, and peel out of there.

0:59:10.640 --> 0:59:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, that's great.

0:59:13.720 --> 0:59:17.800
<v Speaker 4>I like that because I think what made their you

0:59:17.840 --> 0:59:18.360
<v Speaker 4>can't call.

0:59:18.200 --> 0:59:22.200
<v Speaker 5>It relationship, but their connection interesting was the whole kind

0:59:22.200 --> 0:59:25.720
<v Speaker 5>of danger of this kind of smuggling deal type of thing.

0:59:25.840 --> 0:59:30.040
<v Speaker 5>And so if that's the sexy thing and that's kind

0:59:30.080 --> 0:59:33.640
<v Speaker 5>of resolved itself, then yeah, maybe like the reality, I

0:59:33.640 --> 0:59:38.280
<v Speaker 5>think basically it's a bittersweet, but it's probably more correct

0:59:38.320 --> 0:59:41.160
<v Speaker 5>that they don't end up together because daily life just

0:59:41.200 --> 0:59:41.800
<v Speaker 5>isn't going to be.

0:59:41.760 --> 0:59:45.400
<v Speaker 1>For Jackie right, Yeah, I think he's too much of

0:59:45.440 --> 0:59:47.840
<v Speaker 1>a square for her, and it seems like he kind

0:59:47.840 --> 0:59:50.680
<v Speaker 1>of I kind of appreciated that he seemed to have

0:59:50.720 --> 0:59:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the self knowledge to understand that, and that's part of

0:59:53.240 --> 0:59:56.600
<v Speaker 1>why he's like, I can't I can't go on a vacation.

0:59:57.080 --> 0:59:58.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm too boring.

0:59:58.440 --> 0:59:59.840
<v Speaker 4>Oh, Jamie is going in.

1:00:01.280 --> 1:00:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, I really know, I really liked Max, Like I

1:00:04.240 --> 1:00:07.360
<v Speaker 1>thought that like he was a I don't know, I

1:00:07.360 --> 1:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>think it's kind of Yeah, there's a lot about this,

1:00:11.520 --> 1:00:13.880
<v Speaker 1>especially for a Tarantino movie that surprised me, where I

1:00:13.880 --> 1:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>feel like you don't get a lot of like gentle men,

1:00:17.800 --> 1:00:22.120
<v Speaker 1>not not gentlemen, but like gentle men in Tarantino movies.

1:00:22.440 --> 1:00:25.520
<v Speaker 1>But Max Cherry is, you know, a pretty gentle man,

1:00:25.920 --> 1:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and I appreciated him. And I also was like, would

1:00:30.560 --> 1:00:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to go on a European vacation with him?

1:00:32.200 --> 1:00:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Probably not. I feel like Jackie's on to I truly

1:00:36.720 --> 1:00:41.600
<v Speaker 1>am like, what is the like? Yeah? And I also,

1:00:41.680 --> 1:00:43.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I think I'm just a sucker for

1:00:43.440 --> 1:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>like relationship subplots that are like we like had this

1:00:47.560 --> 1:00:51.760
<v Speaker 1>really weird, interesting moment in our lives that we shared together,

1:00:51.840 --> 1:00:54.240
<v Speaker 1>and then we moved on. I always kind of appreciate

1:00:54.760 --> 1:00:57.680
<v Speaker 1>that kind of story, and it seems like they'll both,

1:00:57.880 --> 1:01:02.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, remember each other fondly. And also I kind

1:01:02.280 --> 1:01:04.720
<v Speaker 1>of liked that they're like, well, I didn't like this,

1:01:04.840 --> 1:01:07.800
<v Speaker 1>but it was like Max was so like, I don't know,

1:01:07.880 --> 1:01:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I think inspired by meeting Jackie that he's like, I'm

1:01:10.160 --> 1:01:12.480
<v Speaker 1>getting out of the bail bond game and then he

1:01:12.800 --> 1:01:15.439
<v Speaker 1>does not, which just felt very true to life, true

1:01:15.800 --> 1:01:20.080
<v Speaker 1>like I'm always like I'm I'm done with whoever whatever,

1:01:20.400 --> 1:01:23.240
<v Speaker 1>and then you know, two seconds later you're like, well, no,

1:01:23.360 --> 1:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>I actually have to pay rent this month, so I

1:01:25.880 --> 1:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>guess I'm not done.

1:01:27.320 --> 1:01:27.480
<v Speaker 4>Uh.

1:01:29.840 --> 1:01:34.960
<v Speaker 3>Can we talk about the other women in the movie?

1:01:35.360 --> 1:01:40.480
<v Speaker 3>Who oh boy? Are all girlfriends of Ordell?

1:01:41.600 --> 1:01:44.800
<v Speaker 1>I feel like, yeah, Tarantino used up all his respect

1:01:44.880 --> 1:01:47.560
<v Speaker 1>for women on Jackie's character, and he had none despair

1:01:47.720 --> 1:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>for anybody else.

1:01:49.000 --> 1:01:49.680
<v Speaker 3>This is true.

1:01:49.840 --> 1:01:50.080
<v Speaker 4>Yes.

1:01:51.280 --> 1:01:56.360
<v Speaker 3>The character with the most screened time of those girlfriends

1:01:56.360 --> 1:02:01.800
<v Speaker 3>of Ordell is Melanie, played by Bridget Fon. So we

1:02:01.920 --> 1:02:06.720
<v Speaker 3>learn very early on that Ordell mistreats Melanie. He expects

1:02:06.800 --> 1:02:11.280
<v Speaker 3>her to wait on him hand and foot. There's a

1:02:11.320 --> 1:02:16.960
<v Speaker 3>scene where they're watching feminist masterpiece Chicks who love guns.

1:02:18.440 --> 1:02:22.440
<v Speaker 1>I thought that was like funny satire for yeah.

1:02:22.680 --> 1:02:27.280
<v Speaker 3>Also noteworthy in that scene is Ordell is like talking

1:02:27.400 --> 1:02:30.680
<v Speaker 3>to Lewis about all of his gun knowledge, and he's

1:02:30.720 --> 1:02:34.600
<v Speaker 3>saying that his customers want particular guns because certain movies

1:02:34.640 --> 1:02:37.560
<v Speaker 3>made them look cool, even if the guns themselves are

1:02:37.640 --> 1:02:40.640
<v Speaker 3>not very good quality. But he's like, well, they want

1:02:40.680 --> 1:02:43.680
<v Speaker 3>the cool guns from the cool movies. And so he's

1:02:43.760 --> 1:02:50.240
<v Speaker 3>just commenting on how influential media is. Anyway, So Melanie

1:02:50.280 --> 1:02:53.960
<v Speaker 3>is mistreated if she tries to, you know, challenge Ordell,

1:02:54.320 --> 1:02:57.400
<v Speaker 3>he threatens her with violence. She spends most of the

1:02:57.440 --> 1:03:02.320
<v Speaker 3>movie shit talking or Dell to Lewis, saying like he

1:03:02.400 --> 1:03:06.960
<v Speaker 3>doesn't actually know anything. He's like he thinks he's Johnny

1:03:07.000 --> 1:03:10.320
<v Speaker 3>Gunn or something, but he doesn't know shit. She also

1:03:10.400 --> 1:03:15.160
<v Speaker 3>later shit talks Lewis to his face, saying like, oh, no,

1:03:15.280 --> 1:03:18.360
<v Speaker 3>wonder you got arrested and like went to jail. You're

1:03:18.480 --> 1:03:22.919
<v Speaker 3>really bad at this, uh, and then he retaliates by

1:03:23.080 --> 1:03:25.720
<v Speaker 3>shooting her, which we'll get to in a second.

1:03:25.800 --> 1:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>But when you when you explain it like that, it's

1:03:28.400 --> 1:03:31.480
<v Speaker 1>sort it's interesting. I don't know, maybe there's nothing to this,

1:03:31.640 --> 1:03:35.720
<v Speaker 1>but like it seems like Melanie is this sort of

1:03:35.840 --> 1:03:40.560
<v Speaker 1>like behavioral inverse of Jackie in a lot of ways,

1:03:40.600 --> 1:03:43.880
<v Speaker 1>where like Jackie knows that she is mostly surrounded by

1:03:44.080 --> 1:03:49.880
<v Speaker 1>incompetent men, but generally has enough patience to play it

1:03:49.920 --> 1:03:54.960
<v Speaker 1>to her advantage. Yeah, where Melanie does not have that patience. True,

1:03:55.080 --> 1:03:58.400
<v Speaker 1>And I like, I don't know, I'm not trying to

1:03:58.720 --> 1:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>like I I'm I'm so curious of like what you're

1:04:01.240 --> 1:04:04.520
<v Speaker 1>supposed to think about her death. I didn't know what

1:04:04.600 --> 1:04:08.160
<v Speaker 1>to take because I feel like there's a way that

1:04:08.240 --> 1:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>it's just like aid an act of cruelty and like

1:04:12.240 --> 1:04:16.040
<v Speaker 1>some sort of comment on like masculinity about the DeNiro character.

1:04:16.240 --> 1:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>But I also think there's a viewing of it that

1:04:17.960 --> 1:04:20.200
<v Speaker 1>it's like, well, she brought it upon herself.

1:04:21.360 --> 1:04:24.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's but I don't know that's the thing. Like

1:04:25.000 --> 1:04:29.920
<v Speaker 3>she so she gets she later gets roped into this

1:04:30.040 --> 1:04:33.840
<v Speaker 3>like hand off sting thing and she becomes an integral

1:04:33.960 --> 1:04:37.040
<v Speaker 3>part of the plan. But then she almost immediately is

1:04:37.560 --> 1:04:39.840
<v Speaker 3>shot and killed in a way that, like we said,

1:04:39.920 --> 1:04:43.240
<v Speaker 3>we do not see coming at all. And it got

1:04:43.280 --> 1:04:46.240
<v Speaker 3>me thinking about the other characters who are killed in

1:04:46.240 --> 1:04:49.400
<v Speaker 3>the movie and why they are killed. Because the people

1:04:49.400 --> 1:04:54.360
<v Speaker 3>who are killed are Beaumont, Lewis, Ordell, and Melanie, not

1:04:54.680 --> 1:04:58.280
<v Speaker 3>in that order exactly, but Beaumont and Lewis are killed

1:04:58.400 --> 1:05:04.040
<v Speaker 3>by Ordell because they do something foolish. They're a liability

1:05:04.080 --> 1:05:08.000
<v Speaker 3>to Ordell. Basically, they're screwing up his operation, and so

1:05:08.400 --> 1:05:14.880
<v Speaker 3>he kills them to protect himself and eliminate these liabilities.

1:05:15.720 --> 1:05:18.840
<v Speaker 3>Ordell is killed because he's the bad guy who has

1:05:18.920 --> 1:05:24.200
<v Speaker 3>to be taken down. He is also him getting killed

1:05:24.200 --> 1:05:26.960
<v Speaker 3>to me felt like the movie punishing him for his

1:05:27.520 --> 1:05:31.880
<v Speaker 3>bad behavior. He's cruel to women, he's he's going to

1:05:31.960 --> 1:05:34.800
<v Speaker 3>kill the character that we're rooting for, Jackie Brown, so

1:05:35.560 --> 1:05:39.360
<v Speaker 3>he has to die, and that's the narrative punishing him.

1:05:39.920 --> 1:05:47.880
<v Speaker 3>But then Melanie is killed, like because she challenged Lewis's

1:05:47.920 --> 1:05:52.360
<v Speaker 3>fragile ego, and it's just like I don't know how

1:05:52.360 --> 1:05:55.600
<v Speaker 3>to interpret it exactly like you were saying, Jamie.

1:05:55.720 --> 1:05:56.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

1:05:56.160 --> 1:05:58.840
<v Speaker 3>And then Ordell is like, when Lewis is like, yeah,

1:05:59.760 --> 1:06:05.480
<v Speaker 3>I did shoot Melanie and she's basically dead, Ordell is

1:06:05.520 --> 1:06:08.720
<v Speaker 3>like you couldn't talk to her, you couldn't just hit her.

1:06:09.040 --> 1:06:11.720
<v Speaker 3>And then Lewis is like, well, I don't know, I

1:06:11.800 --> 1:06:14.800
<v Speaker 3>just shot her, and so Ordell is like, well, if

1:06:14.800 --> 1:06:16.760
<v Speaker 3>you had to do it, you had to do it.

1:06:16.920 --> 1:06:19.640
<v Speaker 1>And which which says to me just like based on

1:06:20.520 --> 1:06:22.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, Like it's hard to put on nineteen

1:06:22.880 --> 1:06:26.800
<v Speaker 1>ninety seven goggles for like watching this, but it feels

1:06:26.840 --> 1:06:30.600
<v Speaker 1>like in that scene with Sam Jackson and de Niro

1:06:30.840 --> 1:06:34.480
<v Speaker 1>that like it's kind of played as a joke right

1:06:34.520 --> 1:06:37.800
<v Speaker 1>after it happens, because that's like such a Tarantino scene

1:06:37.920 --> 1:06:40.400
<v Speaker 1>of like Sam Jackson in a car talking about a

1:06:40.440 --> 1:06:43.400
<v Speaker 1>recent murder, and it's like some of the most iconic

1:06:43.440 --> 1:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>scenes that he's written. I don't know. This is not

1:06:46.400 --> 1:06:49.360
<v Speaker 1>one of them, obviously, but I don't know. I felt

1:06:49.360 --> 1:06:52.840
<v Speaker 1>like her, I don't understand why in a movie where

1:06:52.880 --> 1:06:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I did understand most of why things

1:06:56.480 --> 1:07:00.480
<v Speaker 1>were happening, that felt casual and random in Seid, And

1:07:00.480 --> 1:07:02.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's what it was supposed to be. I don't

1:07:02.880 --> 1:07:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't really know. And I also, towards the end

1:07:05.760 --> 1:07:10.760
<v Speaker 1>of Melanie's character arc, was not sure what she was

1:07:10.800 --> 1:07:13.080
<v Speaker 1>trying to do either, because it's like she had we

1:07:13.160 --> 1:07:16.840
<v Speaker 1>know that her motive is that Ordele treats her poorly

1:07:17.040 --> 1:07:20.960
<v Speaker 1>and she wants to fuck him over in some way,

1:07:21.360 --> 1:07:25.240
<v Speaker 1>and that's why she's leveraging this new I don't know,

1:07:25.640 --> 1:07:33.400
<v Speaker 1>like awkward, weed smoking hang situation with Lewis to her advantage.

1:07:34.400 --> 1:07:37.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand really why, Like, but on the day

1:07:38.200 --> 1:07:44.320
<v Speaker 1>of their plan, like she is running behind, Like there's

1:07:44.520 --> 1:07:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I just like didn't understand what we were supposed to

1:07:47.520 --> 1:07:52.120
<v Speaker 1>take away from her behavior like that was very unsettled,

1:07:52.120 --> 1:07:53.960
<v Speaker 1>and I think just was made to some extent to

1:07:53.960 --> 1:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>make her seem like incompetent and kind of just like

1:07:57.520 --> 1:08:02.880
<v Speaker 1>a bimbo in the bad way, not in the coup way.

1:08:04.000 --> 1:08:07.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, there are a lot of male directors who do

1:08:07.920 --> 1:08:11.440
<v Speaker 3>this where they're like, yeah, there are certain types of

1:08:11.440 --> 1:08:15.040
<v Speaker 3>women who do deserve respect, but if you're this type

1:08:15.080 --> 1:08:18.599
<v Speaker 3>of woman, you do not deserve respect. And I think

1:08:18.680 --> 1:08:24.400
<v Speaker 3>Tarantino views someone like the Melanie character as the type

1:08:24.439 --> 1:08:28.679
<v Speaker 3>of woman who does not deserve respect, and therefore she's

1:08:29.479 --> 1:08:34.760
<v Speaker 3>gonna make choices that ultimately get her killed, and the

1:08:34.840 --> 1:08:38.839
<v Speaker 3>movie is gonna basically sort of blame her for getting killed,

1:08:38.840 --> 1:08:42.000
<v Speaker 3>and it's like, well, she was asking for it basically

1:08:42.360 --> 1:08:45.200
<v Speaker 3>because of the way she is. That's at least my

1:08:45.760 --> 1:08:49.240
<v Speaker 3>interpretation of it. I think you could read it differently,

1:08:49.320 --> 1:08:51.599
<v Speaker 3>but that's how I sort of feel.

1:08:51.880 --> 1:08:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm I'm on bored with that. It's just bizarre

1:08:54.360 --> 1:08:57.040
<v Speaker 1>because it's like this, she feels more in line with

1:08:57.120 --> 1:09:01.400
<v Speaker 1>like a more stereotypical Quentin Tarantina character wedged inside of

1:09:01.439 --> 1:09:04.439
<v Speaker 1>this movie that pushes against a lot of what you

1:09:04.479 --> 1:09:08.400
<v Speaker 1>would consider to be stereotypical Quentin Tarantino characters. And I

1:09:08.400 --> 1:09:10.760
<v Speaker 1>also just like Bridget Fonda, and I wish that she

1:09:11.000 --> 1:09:14.679
<v Speaker 1>got a better ending. I like that at least at

1:09:14.760 --> 1:09:17.519
<v Speaker 1>least before she dies. You do get like this moment

1:09:18.040 --> 1:09:22.240
<v Speaker 1>between her and Jackie, even though it doesn't pass the

1:09:22.280 --> 1:09:24.599
<v Speaker 1>fact with us and they don't even ever really meet,

1:09:24.640 --> 1:09:29.120
<v Speaker 1>like face to face really because anytime that Jackie is entering,

1:09:29.760 --> 1:09:31.719
<v Speaker 1>I think the one time that they might have a conversation,

1:09:31.840 --> 1:09:37.839
<v Speaker 1>Melanie is leaving as Jackie arrives. But Jackie does try

1:09:37.880 --> 1:09:41.320
<v Speaker 1>to like give her extra like she gives her like

1:09:41.360 --> 1:09:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the cherry on top, because what did Ordella ever do

1:09:43.920 --> 1:09:47.839
<v Speaker 1>for either of us? Yeah, I liked that little moment

1:09:47.960 --> 1:09:53.519
<v Speaker 1>of solidarity even though she's got like forty five minutes

1:09:53.600 --> 1:09:58.439
<v Speaker 1>left to live for reasons unclear to me, Yeah, I liked.

1:09:58.479 --> 1:10:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean the other two we hear about two other characters.

1:10:03.920 --> 1:10:06.320
<v Speaker 1>They're both girlfriends of Wordel.

1:10:06.479 --> 1:10:08.360
<v Speaker 3>I think Simone and Shiranda.

1:10:08.520 --> 1:10:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yes, I don't know. The way that Ordel talks

1:10:12.200 --> 1:10:15.920
<v Speaker 1>about women is just horrible. Does not have a good

1:10:15.920 --> 1:10:19.960
<v Speaker 1>thing to say about anybody. I think he's talking about

1:10:20.000 --> 1:10:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Shiranda when he says that he basically prayed on her

1:10:23.560 --> 1:10:28.439
<v Speaker 1>dream of moving to Hollywood. Yeah, and is keeping her

1:10:28.960 --> 1:10:33.479
<v Speaker 1>captive to some extent as his girlfriend talks about her

1:10:33.520 --> 1:10:35.519
<v Speaker 1>like she is not smart at all. But I believe

1:10:35.560 --> 1:10:37.040
<v Speaker 1>she is also the one that takes the money and

1:10:37.080 --> 1:10:37.680
<v Speaker 1>fucks him over.

1:10:38.280 --> 1:10:41.360
<v Speaker 3>Right, No, that's Simone. Oh, good for Simone. So Simone

1:10:41.640 --> 1:10:47.040
<v Speaker 3>is right. So Simone is the middle aged woman who

1:10:47.600 --> 1:10:50.439
<v Speaker 3>who we meet when she's like doing a little dance

1:10:50.760 --> 1:10:54.439
<v Speaker 3>for Lewis in this like blue sequin dress. She's the

1:10:54.720 --> 1:10:58.080
<v Speaker 3>kind of secret person who's there for the trial run

1:10:58.360 --> 1:11:01.439
<v Speaker 3>of that like first money and Off, and then she

1:11:01.479 --> 1:11:04.519
<v Speaker 3>skips town with ten thousand dollars and they never hear

1:11:04.560 --> 1:11:09.920
<v Speaker 3>from her again, good for her. Shironda is the younger woman.

1:11:09.960 --> 1:11:16.040
<v Speaker 3>She's only nineteen. Meanwhile, Sam Jackson, like his character's in

1:11:16.080 --> 1:11:20.240
<v Speaker 3>his forties, late forties, presumably, like you said, he talks

1:11:20.240 --> 1:11:23.719
<v Speaker 3>about her very disrespectfully calls her like a country bumpkin

1:11:23.920 --> 1:11:28.360
<v Speaker 3>kind of thing, and then later she does that handoff

1:11:28.520 --> 1:11:33.400
<v Speaker 3>and she interacts very briefly with Jackie, and that's kind

1:11:33.400 --> 1:11:36.240
<v Speaker 3>of all we see of the food at the food court.

1:11:36.360 --> 1:11:41.040
<v Speaker 3>She eats some of her meal, and then later she's

1:11:41.120 --> 1:11:44.960
<v Speaker 3>in the room when Ordell and Max are talking, and

1:11:45.560 --> 1:11:49.599
<v Speaker 3>it's implied that she's like so stoned out of her mind.

1:11:49.880 --> 1:11:54.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm guessing on Heroin that she's like basically incapacitated and

1:11:54.720 --> 1:11:59.640
<v Speaker 3>she doesn't even like speak or does like barely conscious

1:11:59.720 --> 1:12:03.360
<v Speaker 3>in that scene. So those other two women of like

1:12:03.760 --> 1:12:08.599
<v Speaker 3>Simone and Shiranda, they are important to the story for

1:12:08.720 --> 1:12:12.400
<v Speaker 3>like the different sting operations that go down, but they

1:12:12.400 --> 1:12:14.800
<v Speaker 3>get very little screen time, They get very little characterization.

1:12:15.360 --> 1:12:18.719
<v Speaker 3>The characters nor the movie seem to respect them very much,

1:12:19.479 --> 1:12:21.840
<v Speaker 3>and then they're you know, in a couple scenes and

1:12:21.880 --> 1:12:24.800
<v Speaker 3>then gone, so there isn't really even much to talk

1:12:24.840 --> 1:12:25.639
<v Speaker 3>about with them.

1:12:26.120 --> 1:12:29.479
<v Speaker 1>I really do like picture Quinn Garantino in his house

1:12:29.520 --> 1:12:33.720
<v Speaker 1>with like a vial full of respect for women characters,

1:12:33.840 --> 1:12:35.840
<v Speaker 1>and he's like, I don't know, I'm fresh out.

1:12:36.040 --> 1:12:37.479
<v Speaker 3>I used it all up on that one.

1:12:37.560 --> 1:12:42.280
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna have to phone it in. Yeah, which sucks

1:12:42.280 --> 1:12:44.120
<v Speaker 1>because again, I feel like we've been talking about this

1:12:44.280 --> 1:12:46.840
<v Speaker 1>for as long as the show has existed. I think

1:12:46.880 --> 1:12:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the first time we may have talked about it was

1:12:48.680 --> 1:12:52.759
<v Speaker 1>in the original Star Wars a New Hope episode where

1:12:52.760 --> 1:12:57.920
<v Speaker 1>it's like movies that have one amazing woman character and

1:12:57.960 --> 1:13:00.920
<v Speaker 1>then no one for them to really talk to other

1:13:01.000 --> 1:13:03.439
<v Speaker 1>than men for the whole movie. Yeah, which this movie

1:13:03.479 --> 1:13:06.599
<v Speaker 1>is not completely an example of, but for the most part,

1:13:06.680 --> 1:13:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I mean, it's not perfect, but what

1:13:09.840 --> 1:13:11.760
<v Speaker 1>movie is. I just love Jackie Brown so much that

1:13:11.840 --> 1:13:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to forget this movie for certain things. But also,

1:13:16.640 --> 1:13:21.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm team Bridget Fonda. She's very talented, she's

1:13:21.040 --> 1:13:24.400
<v Speaker 1>married to Danny Elfman, whoa is that fun.

1:13:24.520 --> 1:13:29.800
<v Speaker 3>She's also a NEPO person because she's Henry Fonda's granddaughter,

1:13:30.360 --> 1:13:35.240
<v Speaker 3>Peter Fonda's daughter. The whole Fonda family is just I mean,

1:13:35.240 --> 1:13:38.080
<v Speaker 3>I like them, Jane Fonda's she's Jane Fonda's niece.

1:13:39.600 --> 1:13:42.799
<v Speaker 1>This is I'm pro Fonda. I'm not made of stone.

1:13:44.760 --> 1:13:47.520
<v Speaker 3>Does anyone have anything else they'd like to discuss?

1:13:48.560 --> 1:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Uh?

1:13:48.920 --> 1:13:48.960
<v Speaker 7>Not?

1:13:49.200 --> 1:13:51.280
<v Speaker 1>That was uh, that's battle I had.

1:13:51.479 --> 1:13:55.559
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Well, we were kind of alluding to this There

1:13:55.640 --> 1:13:59.320
<v Speaker 3>are a couple interactions between women, but as far as

1:13:59.360 --> 1:14:02.679
<v Speaker 3>this movie passed seeing the Bechdel test, I do think

1:14:02.800 --> 1:14:07.200
<v Speaker 3>that an exchange between Jackie and Sharonda, Yes at the

1:14:07.200 --> 1:14:09.320
<v Speaker 3>mall court does pass.

1:14:09.640 --> 1:14:11.880
<v Speaker 1>It does, yeah, because they are and I would say

1:14:11.880 --> 1:14:16.639
<v Speaker 1>that that's their meeting. Is definitely very meaningful. Even though

1:14:16.640 --> 1:14:20.280
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't have a ton of plot relevance, it feels

1:14:20.479 --> 1:14:22.559
<v Speaker 1>I was really happy that the movie at least took

1:14:22.600 --> 1:14:27.519
<v Speaker 1>a second to introduce them to each other. They're mostly

1:14:27.520 --> 1:14:31.480
<v Speaker 1>talking about food at the mall, but yeah, there's subtext.

1:14:31.560 --> 1:14:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it counts true. But I think that that

1:14:35.160 --> 1:14:40.120
<v Speaker 1>is the only time that we get because the other

1:14:40.160 --> 1:14:46.280
<v Speaker 1>exchanges are very brief. Between Pamguer and Bridget Fonda, there's

1:14:46.280 --> 1:14:49.559
<v Speaker 1>a moment of solidarity, but it's over a mutual being

1:14:49.640 --> 1:14:52.360
<v Speaker 1>fucked over by Ordell, so that that doesn't pass.

1:14:52.439 --> 1:14:55.320
<v Speaker 3>But maybe when Melanie is like, you look really good

1:14:55.320 --> 1:14:58.960
<v Speaker 3>in that suit and Jackie's like thanks.

1:14:58.560 --> 1:15:03.559
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's true. Okay, feminist masterpiece. I take back everything.

1:15:03.560 --> 1:15:08.479
<v Speaker 3>I can take it all back, but onto the real

1:15:08.840 --> 1:15:15.040
<v Speaker 3>end all be all of movie rating systems, the Nipple scale, Yes,

1:15:15.240 --> 1:15:18.639
<v Speaker 3>where we rate the movie on a scale of zero

1:15:18.680 --> 1:15:23.360
<v Speaker 3>to five Nipples based on examining the movie through an

1:15:23.439 --> 1:15:28.840
<v Speaker 3>intersectional feminist lens. So this one, oh, this is a

1:15:28.840 --> 1:15:33.360
<v Speaker 3>tricky one. You know, you have such an incredible character

1:15:33.520 --> 1:15:38.680
<v Speaker 3>in Jackie Brown. Again, she's the smartest person in the room.

1:15:39.000 --> 1:15:44.240
<v Speaker 3>You know, she's a realistically flawed character. She's you know,

1:15:44.320 --> 1:15:49.639
<v Speaker 3>she's highly motivated. What is motivating her are interesting relatable

1:15:49.680 --> 1:15:53.920
<v Speaker 3>things as far as like, again the intersection of her age, race,

1:15:54.080 --> 1:15:55.160
<v Speaker 3>and class.

1:15:55.240 --> 1:15:59.200
<v Speaker 5>And I like that she's not like beholden to anybody

1:15:59.360 --> 1:16:01.320
<v Speaker 5>like those flaws are hers.

1:16:01.439 --> 1:16:03.439
<v Speaker 4>It's not like there's a whole I.

1:16:03.360 --> 1:16:06.519
<v Speaker 5>Mean, there's probably a big backstory, but it's not kind

1:16:06.560 --> 1:16:09.880
<v Speaker 5>of alluded to, and so there's no like you feel

1:16:09.920 --> 1:16:12.360
<v Speaker 5>for her, but it's not like a pity feel.

1:16:12.120 --> 1:16:13.280
<v Speaker 3>For her for sure.

1:16:13.520 --> 1:16:13.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

1:16:13.840 --> 1:16:18.559
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, she's highly empathetic as a character, and I'm rooting

1:16:18.600 --> 1:16:21.720
<v Speaker 3>for her every step of the way. And you know,

1:16:21.760 --> 1:16:25.000
<v Speaker 3>the Pam Greer performance is incredible, and there's just so

1:16:25.080 --> 1:16:28.719
<v Speaker 3>much to love and admire about the Jackie Brown character.

1:16:29.400 --> 1:16:33.800
<v Speaker 3>But as we said, Tarantino seems to have used up

1:16:33.840 --> 1:16:36.920
<v Speaker 3>all of his respect for women on that one character,

1:16:37.720 --> 1:16:42.160
<v Speaker 3>and then the rest of the female characters are not

1:16:42.880 --> 1:16:49.639
<v Speaker 3>offered that same level of respect or characterization, and yeah,

1:16:49.640 --> 1:16:50.400
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, there's just.

1:16:50.439 --> 1:16:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Melanie could have just disappeared, Yeah, like she could have

1:16:53.479 --> 1:16:54.880
<v Speaker 1>like like we didn't need to.

1:16:54.920 --> 1:16:57.920
<v Speaker 3>Gotten away from Lewis.

1:16:57.479 --> 1:17:00.640
<v Speaker 4>In some respect, I think the treatment of the.

1:17:02.120 --> 1:17:04.599
<v Speaker 5>Smaller roles of the women it says a lot about

1:17:04.640 --> 1:17:07.080
<v Speaker 5>the guys as well, and I feel like it's also

1:17:07.120 --> 1:17:09.240
<v Speaker 5>about the world that's been created.

1:17:09.280 --> 1:17:12.520
<v Speaker 4>They're not very I don't know what the word I mean, upmarket.

1:17:12.080 --> 1:17:13.880
<v Speaker 5>Is probably a bad choice of word, but it's like

1:17:14.479 --> 1:17:17.559
<v Speaker 5>I still hold them accountable to an extent. Does that

1:17:17.560 --> 1:17:19.240
<v Speaker 5>make sense what I'm saying, Like in terms of the

1:17:19.240 --> 1:17:25.920
<v Speaker 5>male characters, their sloppiness towards the women, it's about them

1:17:26.080 --> 1:17:26.559
<v Speaker 5>as well.

1:17:27.040 --> 1:17:30.000
<v Speaker 3>I do think the movie is commenting on their like

1:17:31.080 --> 1:17:33.280
<v Speaker 3>fragile male egos and.

1:17:33.840 --> 1:17:36.559
<v Speaker 5>They're in a funk, right, These guys are in a funk.

1:17:37.040 --> 1:17:39.680
<v Speaker 5>As you kind of said earlier about Robert de Niro's character, like.

1:17:39.640 --> 1:17:41.240
<v Speaker 4>He's basically a loser.

1:17:41.640 --> 1:17:44.880
<v Speaker 5>So yeah, I think it's like it's not like the

1:17:44.880 --> 1:17:46.839
<v Speaker 5>best portrayal of women, or it's not a good portrayal

1:17:46.880 --> 1:17:50.759
<v Speaker 5>of women. However, I think they're also accountable in terms

1:17:50.760 --> 1:17:53.280
<v Speaker 5>of they're not great portrayals of men.

1:17:53.200 --> 1:17:59.840
<v Speaker 3>Either, right, I mean Tarantino does not have respect. I

1:18:00.080 --> 1:18:02.040
<v Speaker 3>don't know, I don't know how he feels about like

1:18:02.280 --> 1:18:06.040
<v Speaker 3>ordell Or, but I mean he seems to think Max

1:18:06.560 --> 1:18:10.439
<v Speaker 3>Cherry is a pretty nice guy. Yeah, and I can't

1:18:10.560 --> 1:18:12.439
<v Speaker 3>argue with him. I was like, I was like, I

1:18:13.320 --> 1:18:16.400
<v Speaker 3>like Max, but also like we didn't oh, we didn't

1:18:16.400 --> 1:18:21.240
<v Speaker 3>even talk about like Jackie Brown colluding with the cops

1:18:21.320 --> 1:18:24.200
<v Speaker 3>and like her cooperation with the police and you know,

1:18:25.560 --> 1:18:27.640
<v Speaker 3>but also maybe you just have to chalk it up

1:18:27.640 --> 1:18:30.800
<v Speaker 3>to again, she's gonna do whatever it takes, because she

1:18:30.840 --> 1:18:34.040
<v Speaker 3>also plays the cops like she's not like there to

1:18:34.120 --> 1:18:37.160
<v Speaker 3>be like, no, you guys are awesome and I'm definitely

1:18:37.240 --> 1:18:39.360
<v Speaker 3>helping you with one hundred percent integrity.

1:18:39.680 --> 1:18:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I wouldn't say that this movie is procused pro coright, No,

1:18:43.800 --> 1:18:46.880
<v Speaker 1>it seems like she she makes it very like I

1:18:46.880 --> 1:18:49.360
<v Speaker 1>think that, like especially in that scene where it's hurt,

1:18:49.400 --> 1:18:53.520
<v Speaker 1>She's like, I'm going to do whatever is necessary to

1:18:53.560 --> 1:18:56.600
<v Speaker 1>survive in a way where I can be happy. Like

1:18:57.240 --> 1:19:02.400
<v Speaker 1>justifies how she games everything in every single role, right

1:19:02.479 --> 1:19:05.519
<v Speaker 1>and where like woaho, hell Yeah. But then like I

1:19:05.520 --> 1:19:08.840
<v Speaker 1>think more it's pro cop to make Michael Keaton a

1:19:08.880 --> 1:19:12.000
<v Speaker 1>cop because I think he's really hot. Well, I know,

1:19:12.800 --> 1:19:18.000
<v Speaker 1>someone is so sexy. That's sort of my thing. Casting

1:19:18.040 --> 1:19:20.559
<v Speaker 1>someone as young Michael Keaton does it for me, right.

1:19:20.640 --> 1:19:23.559
<v Speaker 3>Casting someone as likable as Michael Keaton as a cop

1:19:23.680 --> 1:19:27.600
<v Speaker 3>character is a little too pro cop for my for

1:19:27.680 --> 1:19:31.080
<v Speaker 3>my taste, but even so, yeah, it's It's just it's

1:19:31.160 --> 1:19:33.960
<v Speaker 3>Jackie Brown again being the smartest person in the room,

1:19:34.320 --> 1:19:36.840
<v Speaker 3>being able to keep track of everything that she's said

1:19:36.880 --> 1:19:41.840
<v Speaker 3>to everyone, anticipating things that will probably like she knows

1:19:41.880 --> 1:19:45.840
<v Speaker 3>all about Murphy's Law, like whatever can go wrong will,

1:19:46.000 --> 1:19:50.800
<v Speaker 3>She's like anticipating things. I also like the contrast between Beaumont,

1:19:51.000 --> 1:19:54.880
<v Speaker 3>who willingly gets in the trunk of a car for

1:19:55.000 --> 1:19:59.639
<v Speaker 3>like basically no reason. He's like the reason that Ordell

1:19:59.760 --> 1:20:02.200
<v Speaker 3>is like, yeah, because I need you to spring out

1:20:02.280 --> 1:20:04.920
<v Speaker 3>and surprise these people. I'm selling the guns too. It's

1:20:05.000 --> 1:20:09.680
<v Speaker 3>just like the flimsiest thing ever. Bowman's just like, well, okay.

1:20:09.320 --> 1:20:12.439
<v Speaker 1>It's horrible, and how the horrible thing is When that

1:20:12.479 --> 1:20:18.720
<v Speaker 1>scene happened, I believed him. I was like, wow, I

1:20:18.760 --> 1:20:21.200
<v Speaker 1>really would not make it five minutes into this movie.

1:20:21.240 --> 1:20:23.760
<v Speaker 1>I would have been like, yeah, I guess I owe

1:20:23.760 --> 1:20:24.400
<v Speaker 1>you as sure.

1:20:24.640 --> 1:20:27.879
<v Speaker 3>You get into the trunk of a car, no problem.

1:20:28.760 --> 1:20:32.559
<v Speaker 3>But when as soon as you know, Max tells Jackie

1:20:32.600 --> 1:20:37.160
<v Speaker 3>about like, oh yeah, Beaumont got killed a few days ago.

1:20:38.040 --> 1:20:41.120
<v Speaker 3>Jackie's like, oh, well, that was obviously Ordell, and obviously

1:20:41.200 --> 1:20:43.120
<v Speaker 3>he's going to try to kill me too, So I

1:20:43.240 --> 1:20:45.639
<v Speaker 3>need to prepare. Like she's just so good at being

1:20:45.720 --> 1:20:49.320
<v Speaker 3>hyper aware of the situation and all the nuances and

1:20:49.400 --> 1:20:55.160
<v Speaker 3>like anticipating anything that might happen, and she's incredible. So

1:20:55.920 --> 1:20:57.880
<v Speaker 3>with all of this in mind, I think I'll give

1:20:57.920 --> 1:20:58.439
<v Speaker 3>the movie.

1:20:59.400 --> 1:21:00.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of.

1:21:00.120 --> 1:21:03.880
<v Speaker 3>Tempted to give it like three nipples because there are

1:21:03.920 --> 1:21:06.439
<v Speaker 3>some maybe even three and a half.

1:21:06.560 --> 1:21:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, Wow, I was even gonna go for it.

1:21:10.200 --> 1:21:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Is that too scary?

1:21:11.320 --> 1:21:12.120
<v Speaker 3>That's not scary?

1:21:12.280 --> 1:21:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Is that too scary?

1:21:13.360 --> 1:21:16.360
<v Speaker 3>All right, I'll go three and at half because at

1:21:16.400 --> 1:21:18.800
<v Speaker 3>the end of the day, it is still Quentin Tarantino

1:21:19.160 --> 1:21:22.439
<v Speaker 3>writing the N word into his script one hundred times. Yeah,

1:21:22.479 --> 1:21:25.080
<v Speaker 3>So three and a half nipples, and I'm going to

1:21:25.120 --> 1:21:30.720
<v Speaker 3>distribute them between Pam Greer, the actors who played Shiranda

1:21:31.040 --> 1:21:36.439
<v Speaker 3>and Simone, and Sam Jackson, who I just love and

1:21:36.680 --> 1:21:39.720
<v Speaker 3>he's the greatest, so much so that I'm on a

1:21:39.840 --> 1:21:41.240
<v Speaker 3>first name basis with him.

1:21:41.680 --> 1:21:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Hey Sam, Wow, yeah yeah.

1:21:45.960 --> 1:21:46.120
<v Speaker 4>Four.

1:21:46.280 --> 1:21:49.160
<v Speaker 1>For some reason, four doesn't sit right with my with

1:21:49.240 --> 1:21:51.559
<v Speaker 1>my spirit, So I'll go, I'll go three point seven. Five.

1:21:51.640 --> 1:21:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's get let's get into some real decimones. Get number freaky.

1:21:55.960 --> 1:21:59.639
<v Speaker 1>Jackie Brown is such an awesome character. I feel like it. Yeah,

1:21:59.720 --> 1:22:03.080
<v Speaker 1>there's just so many elements of like, I mean, we

1:22:03.320 --> 1:22:06.680
<v Speaker 1>have talked about it, but centering a black woman in

1:22:06.720 --> 1:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>her forties in a like huge movie was really rare then,

1:22:11.240 --> 1:22:14.519
<v Speaker 1>is really rare now. And also that like she's sexy,

1:22:14.600 --> 1:22:17.599
<v Speaker 1>but she's not like I don't know, the camera doesn't

1:22:17.680 --> 1:22:19.920
<v Speaker 1>like make a meal of her in a creepy way

1:22:19.960 --> 1:22:23.640
<v Speaker 1>at any point. She's really smart, she's really motivated, but

1:22:23.880 --> 1:22:27.799
<v Speaker 1>not in a way that it's like becomes like weird

1:22:27.960 --> 1:22:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Mary Sue kind of behavior. Like the steaks are very real,

1:22:32.200 --> 1:22:34.240
<v Speaker 1>and like she's I don't know, she's just like the

1:22:34.240 --> 1:22:39.280
<v Speaker 1>coolest fucking character, and I wish that she had again,

1:22:39.400 --> 1:22:43.320
<v Speaker 1>just like women in her life to talk to. I

1:22:43.320 --> 1:22:45.800
<v Speaker 1>always think it's fascinating when you find these characters who

1:22:45.800 --> 1:22:48.599
<v Speaker 1>are like these amazing women that you're like, how does

1:22:48.760 --> 1:22:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Jackie Brown not have five? Hundred friends like, she is

1:22:55.120 --> 1:22:59.519
<v Speaker 1>so cool and so loved by everyone she encounters that

1:22:59.560 --> 1:23:02.719
<v Speaker 1>you would think if the movie allowed her to encounter

1:23:02.880 --> 1:23:06.160
<v Speaker 1>more women, they too would love her. And I just

1:23:07.000 --> 1:23:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I mean, we don't really get into

1:23:10.160 --> 1:23:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Jackie Brown's or anyone in this movie's you know, backstory

1:23:13.840 --> 1:23:16.240
<v Speaker 1>in a meaningful way, which didn't bother me, But I

1:23:16.320 --> 1:23:19.080
<v Speaker 1>just I don't know. It would have been cool to

1:23:19.160 --> 1:23:23.960
<v Speaker 1>see what a true, like deep friendship would have seemed

1:23:24.040 --> 1:23:28.479
<v Speaker 1>like for her. But whatever it's she is incredible. I

1:23:28.520 --> 1:23:33.719
<v Speaker 1>think Melanie and Simone and Ronda were all done different

1:23:33.920 --> 1:23:41.360
<v Speaker 1>types and degrees of disservice, but Jackie She's untouchable. And

1:23:41.439 --> 1:23:45.000
<v Speaker 1>so I'm gonna give it three point seven five. I'm

1:23:45.000 --> 1:23:48.160
<v Speaker 1>giving them all to Pam Greer because it's her movie. Baby.

1:23:48.880 --> 1:23:51.559
<v Speaker 3>I feel like you could have written out as much

1:23:51.600 --> 1:23:53.280
<v Speaker 3>as I like Robert de Niro as an actor, I

1:23:53.280 --> 1:23:54.680
<v Speaker 3>feel like you could have written him out of the

1:23:54.680 --> 1:23:58.240
<v Speaker 3>movie and then given Jackie Brown a friend instead of

1:23:58.280 --> 1:24:03.080
<v Speaker 3>giving Ordell a friend. That's my controversial This.

1:24:03.000 --> 1:24:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't This doesn't resolve the problem, but it would been

1:24:05.400 --> 1:24:08.439
<v Speaker 1>kind of fun if Rubbertcenio is Jackie Brown's best friend.

1:24:10.479 --> 1:24:13.840
<v Speaker 3>Anyway, Sardio, how about you? What say you?

1:24:14.560 --> 1:24:19.240
<v Speaker 5>This is so hard because it's my choice, but I think, yeah,

1:24:19.680 --> 1:24:21.719
<v Speaker 5>I was going to go for four, but maybe three

1:24:21.760 --> 1:24:24.200
<v Speaker 5>point nine, but that's just weird, so probably let me

1:24:24.240 --> 1:24:24.760
<v Speaker 5>go for four.

1:24:25.000 --> 1:24:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Okay, oh yeah, because it.

1:24:27.160 --> 1:24:31.719
<v Speaker 7>Definitely did make me see things in a really refreshing way,

1:24:32.000 --> 1:24:35.360
<v Speaker 7>even though like we've definitely commented and I've taken on

1:24:35.400 --> 1:24:41.760
<v Speaker 7>board the notes about the side characters, which isn't great from.

1:24:41.479 --> 1:24:43.880
<v Speaker 5>Like obviously when we're kind of in the industry, so

1:24:43.920 --> 1:24:46.320
<v Speaker 5>we know that all characters should be rounded, but like

1:24:46.600 --> 1:24:49.559
<v Speaker 5>that's not what he's gone for really, so, but she

1:24:49.760 --> 1:24:53.960
<v Speaker 5>is totally eclipsed everything, and I think given that I

1:24:54.040 --> 1:24:58.120
<v Speaker 5>really don't see women black women so real and so

1:24:58.600 --> 1:25:02.880
<v Speaker 5>kind of winners and inspiring survivors all of those things,

1:25:02.920 --> 1:25:04.520
<v Speaker 5>it's like yeah, before.

1:25:04.680 --> 1:25:06.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, hell yeah.

1:25:06.840 --> 1:25:09.519
<v Speaker 3>Well, Sadia, thank you so much for joining us for

1:25:09.600 --> 1:25:16.160
<v Speaker 3>this discussion. Tell us where people can follow you online,

1:25:16.520 --> 1:25:19.000
<v Speaker 3>tell us about your book, or plug anything you want

1:25:19.040 --> 1:25:19.439
<v Speaker 3>to plug.

1:25:19.880 --> 1:25:20.839
<v Speaker 4>Thank you, ladies.

1:25:20.920 --> 1:25:23.439
<v Speaker 5>It's been so much fun and like, yeah, you made

1:25:23.439 --> 1:25:25.680
<v Speaker 5>me love this movie again and so much more. I

1:25:25.680 --> 1:25:28.160
<v Speaker 5>don't know why I don't watch this like more often,

1:25:28.720 --> 1:25:31.800
<v Speaker 5>so My book is called Texom. You can't see it

1:25:31.800 --> 1:25:33.360
<v Speaker 5>because I've learned my zoom.

1:25:34.080 --> 1:25:36.559
<v Speaker 4>Oh. Anyway, my book is my memoir.

1:25:36.680 --> 1:25:40.840
<v Speaker 5>It's about kind of dating as a Muslim woman, which

1:25:40.880 --> 1:25:43.360
<v Speaker 5>you never get to hear about in a nuanced way.

1:25:43.800 --> 1:25:45.400
<v Speaker 5>I guess, well you ever get to hear about is

1:25:45.439 --> 1:25:49.160
<v Speaker 5>Muslim women being repressed. So I'm really excited it's coming

1:25:49.200 --> 1:25:52.479
<v Speaker 5>out in America. I'm confused because I was told that

1:25:52.720 --> 1:25:54.640
<v Speaker 5>it's coming out on the twenty ninth of August, but

1:25:54.760 --> 1:25:57.720
<v Speaker 5>my friend in America said they can already order it now,

1:25:57.880 --> 1:26:00.640
<v Speaker 5>so if you do want to support you can. You

1:26:00.680 --> 1:26:04.080
<v Speaker 5>can get your good, older independent bookstore to order it,

1:26:04.200 --> 1:26:08.320
<v Speaker 5>or you can get it from Amazon or anywhere basically. So,

1:26:08.360 --> 1:26:11.880
<v Speaker 5>I really enjoyed writing that and hopefully I can write

1:26:11.880 --> 1:26:14.760
<v Speaker 5>another one. You can find me on Instagram mostly at

1:26:14.840 --> 1:26:18.080
<v Speaker 5>Sadia underscore asthmats with an at the end. And I

1:26:18.120 --> 1:26:21.360
<v Speaker 5>also have a website which is Sadia asthmat dot com

1:26:21.400 --> 1:26:23.240
<v Speaker 5>and it has a free guide if you want to

1:26:23.280 --> 1:26:25.760
<v Speaker 5>sign up to my mailing list. It's ten things You've

1:26:25.760 --> 1:26:27.880
<v Speaker 5>always wanted to ask about my head scarf but we're

1:26:27.920 --> 1:26:28.800
<v Speaker 5>too afraid to ask.

1:26:29.000 --> 1:26:30.800
<v Speaker 4>So you can download it for free.

1:26:30.880 --> 1:26:33.120
<v Speaker 5>And it's a little list that I made and that's

1:26:33.160 --> 1:26:34.080
<v Speaker 5>my plugs.

1:26:34.120 --> 1:26:35.800
<v Speaker 3>Amazing. Thank you again.

1:26:35.840 --> 1:26:38.240
<v Speaker 4>And I'm coming to America. Sorry, oh my god, of

1:26:38.280 --> 1:26:38.880
<v Speaker 4>another movie.

1:26:38.880 --> 1:26:42.040
<v Speaker 5>I'm coming to New York September and October twenty twenty three.

1:26:42.040 --> 1:26:45.439
<v Speaker 4>So I'm really excited. So hell yeah, my first ever

1:26:45.560 --> 1:26:49.040
<v Speaker 4>time in America and I can't wait. I'm so excited.

1:26:49.320 --> 1:26:52.920
<v Speaker 5>Well, I'm away from the melt More food courts because

1:26:53.080 --> 1:26:54.680
<v Speaker 5>I hear there's a lot of there's a lot of

1:26:54.720 --> 1:26:56.759
<v Speaker 5>trouble that goes down there, so I wrote.

1:26:56.560 --> 1:26:57.840
<v Speaker 1>So dangerous it goes down.

1:26:57.880 --> 1:27:02.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, We'll enjoy your travels, and thanks again for coming

1:27:02.880 --> 1:27:03.439
<v Speaker 3>on the show.

1:27:03.800 --> 1:27:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much.

1:27:05.400 --> 1:27:10.439
<v Speaker 3>You can follow us on social media at Bechdel Cast

1:27:11.040 --> 1:27:16.479
<v Speaker 3>and subscribe to our Matreon at patreon dot com slash

1:27:16.479 --> 1:27:19.720
<v Speaker 3>Bechdel Cast, where you will get two bonus episodes every

1:27:19.760 --> 1:27:24.880
<v Speaker 3>single month, always centering a super fun, awesome genius theme.

1:27:25.840 --> 1:27:29.880
<v Speaker 3>And you'll also get access to our back catalog of many,

1:27:29.920 --> 1:27:33.960
<v Speaker 3>many episodes, all for five dollars a month.

1:27:33.960 --> 1:27:35.559
<v Speaker 4>I imagine.

1:27:34.720 --> 1:27:43.920
<v Speaker 1>And you can also get our our merchover at teapublic

1:27:43.960 --> 1:27:47.639
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash the Bechdel Cast for all of your

1:27:48.240 --> 1:27:54.920
<v Speaker 1>merchandizing needs. And on that note, let's get into the

1:27:55.040 --> 1:27:59.880
<v Speaker 1>car of our recently dead guy we knew and Dry.

1:28:00.080 --> 1:28:02.880
<v Speaker 1>I have to the airport and go eat prey love

1:28:02.920 --> 1:28:03.720
<v Speaker 1>in Madrid.

1:28:05.680 --> 1:28:06.960
<v Speaker 3>Bye bye bye