WEBVTT - Silvergate CEO Alan Lane On the Business of Stablecoin

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots podcast.

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe Wisn't Thal and I'm Tracy Halloway. So, Tracy,

0:00:19.840 --> 0:00:24.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, we recently had the collapse of the stable

0:00:24.400 --> 0:00:29.240
<v Speaker 1>coin us T and the total disaster of that didn't

0:00:29.280 --> 0:00:31.840
<v Speaker 1>turn out to be a particularly stable coin in the end.

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 1>You're not gonna say it. You're not going to say

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 1>unstable coin. You're so close, so close to to saying

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:43.479
<v Speaker 1>the cliche. Okay, Yes, so Tara slash Luna collapsed and

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>that kicked off I would say soul searching. Maybe not

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:52.240
<v Speaker 1>soul searching, I think so searching is a fine word. Well,

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 1>a vast amount of criticism of the stable coin space,

0:00:56.000 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>and we saw some other stable coins, notably Tether start

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>to cobble a bit, although it looks like it's gotten

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>back closer to its PEG since all of this happened,

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 1>but lots of people asking tough questions about the space.

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Are stable coins sustainable? Are they inherently susceptible to some

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:18.959
<v Speaker 1>sort of bank run like phenomenon? And then secondly, is

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>this whole terror Luna collapse going to expose the sector

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 1>to more regulation? Is there going to be even more

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 1>attention trained on this, yeah, right, because if there are

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:31.200
<v Speaker 1>different models of stable coins, so this is really important.

0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 1>So there are stable coins where a issuer has a

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>dollars equivalent of assets in a regulated bank. There are

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>stable coins in which the issuer has in theory a

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 1>dollar or more than a dollar's worth of crypto assets

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 1>held up in some smart contract. And then there are

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>these so called algorithmic stable coins in which I don't

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>know through magic, they they don't really seem to work,

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 1>but they keep trying. Whether it's like somehow the price

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 1>is supposed to just stay there even without the money,

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 1>but what if The point is, if you sell something

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 1>that is nominally supposed to be worth a dollar and

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't stay at a dollar, then regulators are going

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:09.639
<v Speaker 1>to get interested. And of course we saw in the

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 1>financial crisis that one of this sort of loci a

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:19.799
<v Speaker 1>source of instability, yeah, was money market mutual funds, which

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 1>we're supposed to stay at a dollar and didn't the

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 1>reserve the reserve funds. And so any time you have

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 1>something that's supposed to hold a dollar or supposed to

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 1>be stable and is not, this is a major source

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 1>of regulatory interest, regardless of what the model is that's right,

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:39.520
<v Speaker 1>and regulators are well aware that when you have something

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:41.960
<v Speaker 1>that's supposed to be worth a dollar, if it dips

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>below a dollar, like reserve primary did back in two

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 1>thousand eight, it can actually have massive consequences for the

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:51.080
<v Speaker 1>rest of the financial system. You get a contagion effect.

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 1>And I think this is partially why they're worried about

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:56.079
<v Speaker 1>the space. But the other thing I would say is

0:02:56.440 --> 0:02:59.240
<v Speaker 1>this is why when people say, oh, Tera Luna, you

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 1>should have known better. This was a terrible, you know,

0:03:01.880 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>volatile asset, It's like, well, the marketing actually matters here.

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 1>If you say this thing is always going to be

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 1>worth a dollar. Yes, obviously people can do due diligence

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:14.520
<v Speaker 1>and decide for themselves whether or not that's true. But

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>you're putting it forth as a stable, one dollar pegged asset,

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and that comes with some sort of responsibility that regulators

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 1>might well want to enforce. Absolutely. Like that to me

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 1>is the key thing, Like, Okay, yes, at some level, right,

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 1>people can learn about the smart contract risk, and they

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 1>can learn about you know, what theoretically isn't isn't back

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 1>into coin, but call something a stable coinet falls that

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:42.920
<v Speaker 1>seems like a problem, so we need to learn more

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 1>about the space. And the other question I have like

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 1>why is it growing? I thought the whole point of

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>crypto was to make a lot of money and have

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the number go up, So why the attraction to a

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 1>coin that doesn't go up? Is another well? Also also

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 1>to get away from fiat dollars, right, and instead of

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>away from it, it seems like we've just created the

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>shadow banking system, almost like the euro dollar market, just

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 1>to create more dollars that are pegged to dollars. Anyway,

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 1>I have so many questions. Let's let's get attitude. So

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm really excited about our guest because he has a

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>great position within this world to understand the sort of

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 1>intersection of crypto and traditional banking, which is kind of

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:25.159
<v Speaker 1>what a stable coin is. It is this attempt to

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:28.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of like bridge. Okay, you have the US dollar

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:30.719
<v Speaker 1>and you have crypto, and you sort of make a

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 1>crypto version of the US dollar. We're gonna be talking

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:35.840
<v Speaker 1>to someone who is a great viewpoint on that. We're

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna be speaking with Allen Lane. He's the CEO of

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 1>silver Gate Bank, which is a bank that has kind

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 1>of become the bank that banks crypto. It's been banking

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 1>and working with crypto companies since it is active in

0:04:50.800 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the sort of like plumbing the backside of the stable

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:56.719
<v Speaker 1>coin space. So we're gonna get all into the business

0:04:56.760 --> 0:04:59.280
<v Speaker 1>of stable coins. So, Ellen, thank you so much for

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:02.159
<v Speaker 1>joining us. Yeah, thank you for the opportunity. It's it's

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 1>great to be here with with both of you. Ellen,

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 1>why do people why are people so excited about stable coins?

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I thought the whole point of cryptocurrency was like a

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 1>number shooting up to the moon. What's so exciting about

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 1>a coin that just stays flat at the U. S dollar? Yeah, yeah,

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:22.200
<v Speaker 1>you're you're you're referencing the number go up, right, you know,

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean point of a coin that doesn't go up. Yeah, well, um,

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>you know. As a regulated financial institution UM Silvergate is

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 1>a California State chartered bank. We are a member of

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Reserve. Our deposits are insured by the fdi

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 1>C and so we're very interested in the stability of

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:48.279
<v Speaker 1>the US dollar and and making sure that anytime any

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 1>of our customers show up, they you know, that they

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 1>can get their dollars back out and and so you're

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:58.039
<v Speaker 1>absolutely right. I heard in your introductory comments that we've

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:00.600
<v Speaker 1>been banking this ecosystem since in your ray of two

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 1>thousand fourteen, which is an important data point because back

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 1>then it was bitcoin only, and so we entered the

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:13.039
<v Speaker 1>space really focused on this this new digital asset called bitcoin,

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 1>and some of the companies that were being formed at

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:21.799
<v Speaker 1>the time to provide services to this budding bitcoin space,

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:26.679
<v Speaker 1>and many of them were struggling to find and maintain

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 1>bank accounts, and so that was really where we started.

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:32.800
<v Speaker 1>We've obviously evolved quite a bit over the last eight years,

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 1>and and happy to talk a little bit about that,

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:37.840
<v Speaker 1>but I don't want to derail the state the stable

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 1>coin conversation. Well, I mean, I'll take you up on

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 1>both those topics. So, you know, a regulated bank interested

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:49.599
<v Speaker 1>in the stability of the US dollar and presumably you know,

0:06:49.680 --> 0:06:53.640
<v Speaker 1>relatively interested in kind of boring investments. You got into

0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 1>crypto in when stable coins didn't really exist, and you've

0:06:59.000 --> 0:07:03.280
<v Speaker 1>since evolved old from becoming just a bank for crypto

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 1>related businesses to one that is more intricately involved in

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the stable coin business. Can you explain that transition to

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 1>us and what exactly is is the opportunity there for

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you when it comes to stable coins. Let's go back

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 1>briefly to to our entrance into the space, and it

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 1>was really preceded by intellectual cure curiosity on my behalf. Personally,

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I was looking at bitcoin in two thousand thirteen and

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 1>this meme was with bitcoin you could be your own bank,

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and you know, being a career banker, I thought that

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 1>was interesting. And so as I went down the bitcoin

0:07:41.320 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>rabbit hole, as they as they say, back in two

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 1>thousand thirteen, I was really intrigued by this concept of

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the fact that bitcoin had a fixed supply. And you know,

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>we're talking a little bit here about the stability of

0:07:55.640 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the US dollar UM, and we know that the FEDS

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 1>mandate is to try to to try to maintain inflation

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 1>around two percent. You know, there's obviously we're quite a

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>bit above that right now. But even with just that mandate,

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the fact that inflation at a target rate of two

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 1>percent means that by definition, even though I mentioned at

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the outset that we're interested in the stability of the

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 1>US dollar, the fact is the US dollar is destined

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 1>to go down and value um if the FED hits

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>their target by two percent a year UM. And so

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I fell down the bitcoin rabbit hole. Um, I was

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 1>intrigued by it. I didn't buy as much as I

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 1>should have. And that's probably the pointers there you go.

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 1>That's that's probably every bitcoiners, um you know thought, no

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:41.800
<v Speaker 1>matter when you get in. But the fact of the

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:44.560
<v Speaker 1>matter is at once we got into the ecosystem and

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 1>we were trying to help our customers. So the first

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 1>thing we did, Tracy, is is we were just a

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 1>bank willing to talk to these these new companies. And

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:57.199
<v Speaker 1>I should mention right up front. Silver Gate is institutionally focused,

0:08:57.280 --> 0:09:01.079
<v Speaker 1>so we do not bank consumers directly. Uh So this

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>is an important distinction because many of our customers provide

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:08.440
<v Speaker 1>services to consumers, but we are an institutionally focused bank.

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 1>And so we were opening bank accounts for businesses who

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 1>were providing services to the bitcoin ecosystem. And what did

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 1>that look like back in two thousand fourteen, Well, it

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 1>looked like Genesis, which at the time was still called

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:25.560
<v Speaker 1>second Market. Um. They were enabling some of their customers

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 1>to um, you know, to buy and sell bitcoin. And

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 1>we went deep on this early so um you know,

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 1>because we needed to satisfy ourselves in our regulators that

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 1>we knew what was the use of proceeds. You know,

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 1>what was this money being used for. These businesses are

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:45.720
<v Speaker 1>deemed to be money service businesses. And so what we

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 1>would do is when when Genesis then called Second Market,

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:53.840
<v Speaker 1>would actually UM try to transact on behalf of a customer.

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:55.560
<v Speaker 1>So one of their customers wanted to buy our self

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin and that meant that they were sending a wire

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:02.600
<v Speaker 1>transfer across our platform. We asked at the time, okay,

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>give us the bitcoin address you know for this transaction.

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 1>And what we wanted to see on the blockchain was

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 1>if someone was sent in a hundred thousand dollars to

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 1>buy ourselves bitcoin. We wanted to go out to the

0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 1>blockchain and see that there was in fact a transaction

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 1>that represented a hundred thousand dollars of value. And I

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 1>think at the time Second Market was was somewhat amazed

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 1>that this this bank in southern California was actually asking,

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:31.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, for blockchain addresses, UM and I think we

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:34.960
<v Speaker 1>have a pretty deep understanding of of this ecosystem. To

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 1>now get to the point of the story around stable Coin,

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:41.839
<v Speaker 1>you first have to understand what is silver Gate known

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 1>for today, and that is a platform. It's a global

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:51.440
<v Speaker 1>payments platform that is referred to as the SIN, which

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:53.680
<v Speaker 1>is an acronym S E N. It stands for the

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:57.440
<v Speaker 1>silver Gate Exchange Network. And what that is is it

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 1>is a two sided network where we connect digital asset

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:07.680
<v Speaker 1>exchange platforms such as coin base and Gemini and crack

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 1>in and f t X. And as soon as I

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:13.360
<v Speaker 1>start naming, I'm I'm worried, I'm gonna let leave somebody out,

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 1>We've We've got all of them, all of the major ones,

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 1>anybody that is serious about regulation, and that's an important

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 1>distinction because they have to satisfy not only their own

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:27.319
<v Speaker 1>legal and regulatory requirements, but then we have to verify

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 1>that that that their compliance programs are sound. So that's

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 1>one side of the network, um. And then on the

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:38.439
<v Speaker 1>other side of the network is institutional investors other folks

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 1>who are providing access to to bitcoin and other digital assets,

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 1>and we connect them across our platforms so that they

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 1>can interact twenty four hours a day, seven days a week.

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 1>It is only fiat currency, though, and that's that's another

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 1>important distinction, especially as we moved to the stable coin topic,

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 1>because our customers are dealing with US dollars and and

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 1>now euros. We we launched the euro sand platform back

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 1>in February so that we can provide this service over

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 1>in Europe as well. But it is a seven A

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 1>p I enabled connection, so that our customers can move

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:23.599
<v Speaker 1>US dollars amongst themselves around the ecosystem any time or

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:25.640
<v Speaker 1>the day of the day or night. We launched this

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 1>back in two thousand seventeen, and it was really a

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 1>game changer for the industry and for Silvergate because we

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 1>were the first bank in the world to actually bring

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 1>this the legacy banking system that only operates forty hours

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 1>a week Monday through Friday, into the seven digital asset

0:12:44.320 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 1>market that trade around the clock around the world. So

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 1>can you describe how stable coin issuers use your services directly?

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Where are you in the ecosystem because obviously, as you mentioned,

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:13.320
<v Speaker 1>you have a lot of clients who are in the

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:16.560
<v Speaker 1>broader crypto space f t X and all these exchanges

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 1>and so forth. How would a stable coin issuer what

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:25.320
<v Speaker 1>value do they get from silver Gate? Yeah, so, so

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:29.440
<v Speaker 1>they use the sen and our a p I for

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the important you know that that on ramp and off ramp.

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 1>I've often tried to just describe what we do is, Hey,

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:40.959
<v Speaker 1>we are the regulated on ramp from the US dollar

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 1>and other fiat currencies into the bitcoin and digital asset market.

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:49.440
<v Speaker 1>And then likewise we are the off ramp from that

0:13:49.559 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the digital asset market back into fiat currencies and the

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 1>way that's done. And so let's talk about the stable coins,

0:13:57.000 --> 0:14:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the stable coin issuers who use our platform. So, UM,

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:06.679
<v Speaker 1>they are all of the regulated US dollar backed stable

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 1>coin issuers. And UM, by that distinction I heard in

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:15.320
<v Speaker 1>your opening remarks, you were you were distinguishing between the

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:18.840
<v Speaker 1>different types of stable coins, the dollar backed ones are

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 1>the only ones we back. UM, So we don't bank

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:26.880
<v Speaker 1>bank the algorithmic stable coin offerings, nor do we, um,

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 1>you know these other you know stable coins that are

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe collateralized by other digital assets. Um, those are those

0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 1>all they don't need a US dollar bank because they're

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 1>not backed by U S dollars. So by definition, but importantly,

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 1>we also don't bank Tether. And believe it or not,

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 1>we had the opportunity to work with Tether very early on,

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:51.920
<v Speaker 1>but because they weren't inside the United States, and you know,

0:14:51.960 --> 0:14:56.120
<v Speaker 1>again we're very serious about regulation and and so we

0:14:56.200 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 1>looked at it and we thought, you know, this is

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 1>an interesting idea Tether was launched before Circle um launched

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the U S you know USDC, so we thought, yeah, gosh,

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 1>that's an interesting idea. But they're offshore. We can't really

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 1>get our hands around, you know, their regulatory status in

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the United States and so so we were not able

0:15:15.720 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 1>to bank them back then, so back in two thousand seventeen,

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 1>nor do we bank them today. So that's what we

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:24.520
<v Speaker 1>don't do. What we do is for U S d C,

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 1>for the packs dollar, which is issued by pass, for

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the Gemini dollar issued by Gemini, and for true US

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 1>d UM they use the san and our a p

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 1>I for the minting and burning of their tokens, so

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 1>they're they're those tokens are issued when a dollar hits

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 1>their silver Gate bank account, and it's all programmatic and

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 1>so so if if somebody wants to purchase U S

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 1>d C from Circle, what they would do is they

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 1>would send dollars into circles bank account at silver Gate,

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 1>and when those dollars hit the bank account, then at

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:15.280
<v Speaker 1>that moment, there is an a p I call from

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:19.640
<v Speaker 1>silver Gate to Circle that says we just received X

0:16:19.680 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>amount of dollars from this customer, and at that point

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Circle knows we have the dollars in our possession, so

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 1>they turn around and they meant the U s DC

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 1>token and send it to the wallet address of that

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 1>that institution that is looking to purchase the U s

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:42.400
<v Speaker 1>DC And then the same thing happens in reverse. So

0:16:43.000 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 1>if someone wants to redeem their USDC and go back

0:16:45.840 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 1>to U s dollars, they send the USDC to to

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the wallet at Circle Circle. At that point, once they

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:55.760
<v Speaker 1>have possession of the U s d C, they then

0:16:55.800 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 1>send an instruction to us via a p I and

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 1>we then in turn will send the dollars back to

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 1>that prior USDC tokenhore. So, can I ask a step

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 1>back question, a broader question about the space? Is there

0:17:11.480 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 1>an irony here that you know, a lot of crypto

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:18.119
<v Speaker 1>is sold on the basis that you can have financial

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 1>assets that sit outside of the traditional financial system. And

0:17:22.200 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned one of the things that got you interested

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:26.880
<v Speaker 1>in crypto in the first place was this idea of,

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:30.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, be your own bank with bitcoin. But you know,

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:33.119
<v Speaker 1>fast forward some years and you are a bank that

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:37.120
<v Speaker 1>deals in the crypto space. Isn't there a fundamental tension

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:42.440
<v Speaker 1>there about having a financial system outside of traditional regulation,

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:49.440
<v Speaker 1>but still needing to be plugged into a regulated financial entity. Yeah. So, um,

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 1>so get an important distinction. What would be that these

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:58.879
<v Speaker 1>entities that we're banking aren't operating outside of regulations. That

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 1>would be the first thing I would say. But to

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:05.720
<v Speaker 1>the broader kind of fundamental question, I distinctly remember when

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:09.200
<v Speaker 1>I was talking with our team internally about this back

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:13.199
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand thirteen, and um, you know I and

0:18:13.320 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 1>this meme was be your own Bennic, and my thought

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 1>process was, well, if this takes off, you know, it's

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:22.920
<v Speaker 1>going to take years. It's going to take decades. I've

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:25.480
<v Speaker 1>been in banking for forty years, so I've seen all

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the different things. I mean, I was there right as

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 1>reg Hugh was being repealed, which limited the amount of

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 1>interest that you could pay on deposits. I was there

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:37.920
<v Speaker 1>when the first A t M s were being installed.

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:42.360
<v Speaker 1>So I've seen all of this quote unquote innovation. Bitcoin

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 1>is the true innovation in my opinion, but it's not

0:18:45.840 --> 0:18:51.120
<v Speaker 1>going to displace government, sovereign government's desire to issue their

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 1>own currencies. And so I view bitcoin as you know,

0:18:56.720 --> 0:18:59.399
<v Speaker 1>you guys are very familiar with the meme. Digital gold,

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:02.280
<v Speaker 1>you know is a way to save a portion of

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:06.639
<v Speaker 1>your wealth. And I think that we still need to

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:11.160
<v Speaker 1>operate in the financial world with fiat currencies, the world

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:13.960
<v Speaker 1>that we actually live in UM and and just like

0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 1>some some people might might try to, you know, try

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 1>to save some of their wealth in gold or in

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:23.199
<v Speaker 1>some other you know, in stocks and bonds, etcetera. I

0:19:23.240 --> 0:19:26.240
<v Speaker 1>think bitcoin UM is certainly an alternative, but I don't

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to replace the dollar. And so I

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:33.639
<v Speaker 1>actually think silvergate is perfectly positioned to UM. You know,

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:37.359
<v Speaker 1>kind of have a foot in, you know, in both ecosystems.

0:19:37.440 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 1>So you're the owner of the assets that were DM

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 1>so Facebook for a few years at least, I think

0:19:44.760 --> 0:19:48.720
<v Speaker 1>starting in twenty I think starting they tried to get

0:19:48.760 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 1>their own stable coin off the ground. It's gonna be

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of a global thing. It just never really worked.

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Why couldn't What was the problem from your view? Why

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:01.120
<v Speaker 1>didn't that work? And one of the asset what constitutes

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the assets that were left over that you've played, Why

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>it didn't work? You know? Unfortunately, I think it's because

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:10.440
<v Speaker 1>it was Facebook, you know, I I will say early on,

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:13.680
<v Speaker 1>I think you know, they not only you know, kind

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 1>of raised the ire of the US government, but of

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 1>of you know, a lot of governments when they when

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 1>they announced that they were going to issue this and

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:26.480
<v Speaker 1>make it a you know, backed by a basket of currency.

0:20:26.600 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 1>So it's like, well, let's let's not only you know,

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:32.240
<v Speaker 1>upset the US, you know, the US government, but let's

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:35.680
<v Speaker 1>upset you know, all of these other sovereign nations who

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 1>are issuing their own currencies, and let's make it a basket,

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you know. So so I I think they quickly realized

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 1>that that it needed to be backed by a single currency. Unfortunately,

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:50.439
<v Speaker 1>by that time, you know, I think they were just

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 1>in the crosshairs and no matter what they did, you know,

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 1>they tried to move off shore. Um. You know, they

0:20:56.080 --> 0:20:58.359
<v Speaker 1>were a Swiss entity for a while trying to issue

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 1>a U. S Dollar back token. That you know, if

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 1>you just stop and think about what I just said, um,

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:07.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's you know, that's gonna be problematic, a

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:11.919
<v Speaker 1>Swiss entity issuing a U. S dollar back token. And

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:14.359
<v Speaker 1>so you know, there are a lot of challenges. But

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, what we saw as

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity, and I should mention we were not involved

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:23.959
<v Speaker 1>with Facebook um at all during any of that we

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:27.680
<v Speaker 1>ended up coming on the scenes late, so they had

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:31.359
<v Speaker 1>as as you'll know. Just remind you that they started

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:34.240
<v Speaker 1>out as Libra. They then switched to ink too d M.

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:36.920
<v Speaker 1>They then moved to UM at some point in that

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 1>they moved from the US to Switzerland. And during that

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:45.679
<v Speaker 1>entire time, we at silver Gate we're looking at the

0:21:45.720 --> 0:21:49.239
<v Speaker 1>feasibility of issuing our own stable coin. So we were

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:52.920
<v Speaker 1>already banking UM, USDC and some of the other early

0:21:53.119 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 1>entrants UM, and we were looking at the pros and

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:57.880
<v Speaker 1>cons of whether or not we should issue our own

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Why would we do that? Well, back at that time,

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:04.359
<v Speaker 1>the thought process was what we've We've got this send

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the silver Gate Exchange networks. So a lot of our

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 1>customers are using the send to transact dollars U seven.

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 1>But that's not on a blockchain, it doesn't candidate, it

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:17.200
<v Speaker 1>doesn't need to be to do an an intra bank

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:20.399
<v Speaker 1>transfer UM. But if they want to take their dollars

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:23.360
<v Speaker 1>outside of silver Gate, well then oftentimes what they were

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 1>doing was they were starting on the send, they were

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:29.679
<v Speaker 1>then buying a you know, USDC UM and then taking

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:33.760
<v Speaker 1>that U S D c UM to places where where UM,

0:22:33.800 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 1>where they didn't have a silver Gate bank account, for instance,

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and so we started thinking about whether or not we

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 1>should issue our own. We did the legal permissibility analysis,

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 1>UM we we believe that it's legally permissible for UM

0:22:48.359 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 1>for us to issue a stable coin. We have not

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:54.520
<v Speaker 1>actually heard anything to the contrary and all the conversations

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:57.399
<v Speaker 1>we've had with our regulators, so so we do believe

0:22:57.400 --> 0:23:00.679
<v Speaker 1>it is legally permissible. And we were getting ready to,

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:02.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind as they say, go to Washington and

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 1>talk about this back in March of right as the

0:23:05.760 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 1>pandemic hit and so obviously everybody's priorities shifted a little bit,

0:23:10.760 --> 0:23:13.800
<v Speaker 1>and so we we cooled our heels in the first

0:23:13.800 --> 0:23:17.240
<v Speaker 1>and second quarter of but we were still working on

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the idea. And it was late where we actually were

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:26.919
<v Speaker 1>approached by the d M Association and they wanted to

0:23:26.920 --> 0:23:30.879
<v Speaker 1>talk with us because they were familiar with our ability

0:23:31.000 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 1>to mint and burn tokens. And at the time they

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 1>were working with four other banks. I don't know who

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:39.359
<v Speaker 1>those banks were, but four other large banks, and the

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:42.440
<v Speaker 1>concept was these four banks were going to hold the reserves,

0:23:42.520 --> 0:23:44.200
<v Speaker 1>but you know, each of them was going to hold

0:23:45.200 --> 0:23:47.960
<v Speaker 1>of the dollars back in these tokens, So you're gonna

0:23:47.960 --> 0:23:51.399
<v Speaker 1>have this this broad array of banks holding the reserves,

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 1>but none of those banks really had the capability that

0:23:54.800 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Silvergate has developed to be able to interact with the

0:23:58.040 --> 0:24:01.760
<v Speaker 1>technology mint minting and burning and all of that. So what,

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, what what we looked at at that time was, well,

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:07.399
<v Speaker 1>this is a this is a completely separate use case

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:10.399
<v Speaker 1>from what we had been contemplating, you know, to go back,

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:12.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, to what I was saying a minute ago.

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 1>We were were contemplating potentially issuing a stable coin because

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:19.960
<v Speaker 1>we saw the value in helping our customers have a

0:24:20.000 --> 0:24:22.960
<v Speaker 1>dollar token that could be used in the crypto ecosystem.

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 1>But what the d M Association was trying to do

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:30.159
<v Speaker 1>was really take this concept of a tokenized dollar to

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:33.960
<v Speaker 1>be able to use it for for for commerce, for payments,

0:24:33.960 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 1>for remittance, you know, not cryptocurrency trading. And that was

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:42.120
<v Speaker 1>fascinating to us. And again right at that intersection of hey,

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 1>we're a bank and banks participated in payment systems, and

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:48.359
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't this wouldn't this be interesting to be able to

0:24:48.480 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 1>unlock the ability for people all over the world to

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:55.119
<v Speaker 1>have a tokenized dollar in an app on their phone

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:57.159
<v Speaker 1>that they could use to pay for things and and

0:24:57.200 --> 0:25:01.880
<v Speaker 1>that would be interoperable. And so that is our our

0:25:01.960 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 1>thesis going in and so we said, yeah, we'd absolutely

0:25:04.359 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 1>like to be a part of this. Um As we

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:11.359
<v Speaker 1>worked with the d M Association over the first six months,

0:25:11.160 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 1>it got to the point where they abandoned that multi

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:18.480
<v Speaker 1>bank kind of approach, and um we agreed, and we

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:22.440
<v Speaker 1>announced in May of last year May at silver Gate

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:25.080
<v Speaker 1>was going to be the exclusive issuer of the d

0:25:25.280 --> 0:25:29.000
<v Speaker 1>m U S Dollar and and so um that was

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, that was at the time a big deal

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 1>for us, and obviously we thought that we saw a

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 1>path to us participating and you know, partnering with them

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:42.560
<v Speaker 1>to issue the d m U S D. Unfortunately, um

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:47.320
<v Speaker 1>AS is now somewhat ancient history. There's a President's Working

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Group of regulators. It's called the President's Working Group. It's

0:25:50.119 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the U S. Treasury, the Federal Reserve, the SEC, and

0:25:54.800 --> 0:25:58.719
<v Speaker 1>the CFTC and um they've been looking at this question

0:25:58.720 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 1>of stable coins. They were doing some work last year,

0:26:02.320 --> 0:26:05.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, to address the potential regulation for stable coins,

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and so we were strongly encouraged to wait and to

0:26:08.480 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 1>not launch last summer and to wait for that work

0:26:11.800 --> 0:26:14.400
<v Speaker 1>to be done, and that report was issued on November

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:18.760
<v Speaker 1>one last year. What's it been like generally to work

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:22.720
<v Speaker 1>with regulators and you know, people like the Federal Reserve

0:26:22.800 --> 0:26:26.400
<v Speaker 1>because my my general impression of it when it comes

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:29.440
<v Speaker 1>to the crypto spaces that often it's sort of like

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:33.080
<v Speaker 1>it's better to just do it without asking permission and

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:35.720
<v Speaker 1>you see no. But honestly, when you apply to the

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 1>regulators officially, you tend to get rejected, whereas if you

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:42.600
<v Speaker 1>go out and do it, I mean, I'm thinking specifically

0:26:42.680 --> 0:26:44.560
<v Speaker 1>of tether Um, if you go out and do it

0:26:44.600 --> 0:26:47.560
<v Speaker 1>like often you you just kind of get away with it.

0:26:47.640 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 1>So I'm curious what those conversations are are actually, Like, yeah, Tracy,

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a it's a fair question, um. And you know,

0:26:57.520 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 1>at times some of our investors, you know, have asked

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:03.520
<v Speaker 1>us the same question, Well, why don't you just you know,

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:06.880
<v Speaker 1>watch something. Well, I think there's a big difference between

0:27:07.560 --> 0:27:11.359
<v Speaker 1>a a regulated bank that is already operating under the

0:27:11.480 --> 0:27:16.440
<v Speaker 1>supervision of you know, and under the authority of these regulators, um,

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:20.439
<v Speaker 1>these different regulatory agencies, versus a tech startup that's going

0:27:20.480 --> 0:27:23.439
<v Speaker 1>to spend something up and launch it in into the Market.

0:27:23.680 --> 0:27:26.119
<v Speaker 1>But to your question of what's it been like, you know,

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 1>our our regulators have really come up the learning curve.

0:27:31.320 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we've been doing this now, as I mentioned,

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:36.359
<v Speaker 1>for for eight years. And just to go back for

0:27:36.480 --> 0:27:39.919
<v Speaker 1>just a second, in two thou fourteen, we did a

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:43.760
<v Speaker 1>version of what you're suggesting, obviously at a very small scale,

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:47.920
<v Speaker 1>but we started opening accounts for for these these customers

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:50.120
<v Speaker 1>such as Second Market at the time, but we were

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:55.359
<v Speaker 1>confident that we understood how the existing regulations applied to

0:27:55.440 --> 0:27:58.399
<v Speaker 1>that activity. So you know, there have been finns and

0:27:58.480 --> 0:28:00.720
<v Speaker 1>guidance issued in two thousand third team there there was

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 1>clear guidance for how we bank should interact with the

0:28:03.640 --> 0:28:06.919
<v Speaker 1>money service business. So but what we did was so

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:10.840
<v Speaker 1>we applied these existing regulations to to the activity that

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:15.560
<v Speaker 1>these um customers were engaging in. And then we invited

0:28:15.560 --> 0:28:17.920
<v Speaker 1>our regulators into our offices in the summer of two

0:28:17.920 --> 0:28:22.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand fourteen and we gave them a bitcoin tutorial. Not

0:28:22.119 --> 0:28:24.720
<v Speaker 1>to be unfair to them, but bitcoin was brand new

0:28:24.960 --> 0:28:27.359
<v Speaker 1>and in two thousand fourteen when I asked the question,

0:28:27.400 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 1>so it was the State Banking Department and the FED,

0:28:30.200 --> 0:28:32.200
<v Speaker 1>and I asked the question if they had heard of bitcoin,

0:28:32.760 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and there they were thinking about it, well, is that

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:38.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of like, um, you know, banking marijuana companies, um,

0:28:38.640 --> 0:28:41.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, and so it was kind of all, you know,

0:28:41.080 --> 0:28:44.600
<v Speaker 1>it was very unclear, but I I could show you

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the presentation. It was like an eight page or fourteen

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 1>page presentation. This is what bitcoin is and these are

0:28:50.560 --> 0:28:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the types of companies that are being formed. Um, this

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 1>is the finn Send guides that came out last year.

0:28:55.320 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 1>This is how we're thinking about banking the companies. We

0:28:57.760 --> 0:29:01.280
<v Speaker 1>engaged very early with our relators and then over the

0:29:01.360 --> 0:29:04.440
<v Speaker 1>last eight years they've been in at least annually, and

0:29:04.760 --> 0:29:07.960
<v Speaker 1>most years they've come in for an interim visit to

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:09.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of look and make sure that you know that

0:29:10.640 --> 0:29:13.680
<v Speaker 1>we're doing everything appropriately. So our regulators have had a

0:29:13.720 --> 0:29:17.320
<v Speaker 1>long time to go to school on the different things

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:20.000
<v Speaker 1>that that we're doing. Um, I'll just mention one other

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:25.680
<v Speaker 1>thing off topic. But we also offer loans collateralized by bitcoin,

0:29:25.880 --> 0:29:28.680
<v Speaker 1>and that was a that was another path that we

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 1>went down with our regulators starting back in two thousand

0:29:32.200 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 1>and nineteen, where we did the legal analysis. You know,

0:29:35.480 --> 0:29:39.560
<v Speaker 1>we satisfied ourselves that it was permissible to lend against

0:29:39.560 --> 0:29:43.200
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin as collateral. We then engaged with our regulators. We

0:29:43.240 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 1>told them how we were thinking about doing it, all

0:29:45.440 --> 0:29:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the risk mitigains that we had in place. We launched

0:29:48.400 --> 0:29:52.600
<v Speaker 1>a pilot in early ran that pilot for several months, UM,

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 1>and then came out of the pilot. Now back then

0:29:54.960 --> 0:29:58.480
<v Speaker 1>in in two thousand and twenty, and we sit here

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 1>today now with over a billion dollars in send leverage commitments.

0:30:04.360 --> 0:30:08.040
<v Speaker 1>We call the product send leverage. And so that's another

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 1>example of engaging with our regulators. And so Tracy, they've

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:17.400
<v Speaker 1>they understand this this technology, they have bigger questions. So

0:30:17.440 --> 0:30:19.760
<v Speaker 1>when we get back to d M, and I want

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:22.760
<v Speaker 1>to tie in the last part of your question, UM,

0:30:22.920 --> 0:30:26.640
<v Speaker 1>which was, Okay, we bought these assets, UM, what what

0:30:26.680 --> 0:30:28.520
<v Speaker 1>did we buy? And what do we plan to do

0:30:28.560 --> 0:30:32.200
<v Speaker 1>with it? So when the President's Working Group Report was

0:30:32.240 --> 0:30:36.400
<v Speaker 1>issued in on November one of last year, it clearly

0:30:37.040 --> 0:30:41.880
<v Speaker 1>UM stated a preference for stable coins to be inside

0:30:41.880 --> 0:30:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the banking system. So we're a bank, so we can

0:30:45.720 --> 0:30:50.120
<v Speaker 1>check that box. UM. The other thing that it clearly

0:30:50.160 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 1>said was there was a desire to see that these

0:30:53.160 --> 0:30:56.680
<v Speaker 1>payment networks were essentially not UM, you know, kind of

0:30:56.720 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 1>controlled by I forget the terminology that was used. But

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I'll just say big tech okay, um, you know, we

0:31:02.480 --> 0:31:04.840
<v Speaker 1>can go back and look at the actual language, and

0:31:04.920 --> 0:31:07.960
<v Speaker 1>so look at we look at that guidance and then

0:31:08.040 --> 0:31:10.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of breathed a sigh of relief that

0:31:10.240 --> 0:31:14.640
<v Speaker 1>we had not gone ahead and launched. So to your point, Tracy,

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:17.959
<v Speaker 1>they didn't tell us no, you can't do this, you

0:31:17.960 --> 0:31:21.800
<v Speaker 1>know in the summer. What they strongly encouraged us to

0:31:21.960 --> 0:31:25.960
<v Speaker 1>wait until this guidance came out. And once the guidance

0:31:26.000 --> 0:31:27.880
<v Speaker 1>was out, it was pretty clear that nan if we

0:31:27.920 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 1>had launched with with DM, we would have then been

0:31:31.240 --> 0:31:35.120
<v Speaker 1>operating a stable coin that was in direct contravention of

0:31:35.280 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 1>what the regulatory guidance was. And so so we were

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:42.239
<v Speaker 1>glad that we hadn't moved forward at the time. And

0:31:42.360 --> 0:31:45.600
<v Speaker 1>now to your question, so what did we buy? So

0:31:45.760 --> 0:31:48.280
<v Speaker 1>at the same time that we read the report, the

0:31:48.400 --> 0:31:51.280
<v Speaker 1>d M folks read the report, they were looking at that,

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 1>and we called them up and we said, well, what

0:31:53.320 --> 0:31:55.640
<v Speaker 1>do you guys think And they said, yeah, you know,

0:31:55.720 --> 0:31:58.880
<v Speaker 1>we think we're gonna We're gonna pause. This effort. Looks

0:31:58.880 --> 0:32:00.760
<v Speaker 1>like we're kind of dead in the water. My words,

0:32:00.800 --> 0:32:04.720
<v Speaker 1>not theirs um and so we're going to engage strategic

0:32:04.720 --> 0:32:06.800
<v Speaker 1>advisors to help us figure out what to do with,

0:32:07.320 --> 0:32:09.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, with this because the one thing I can

0:32:09.720 --> 0:32:12.840
<v Speaker 1>say with confidence is, you know, they didn't spend Facebook,

0:32:12.840 --> 0:32:15.160
<v Speaker 1>who was the initiator of this. They didn't spend two

0:32:15.240 --> 0:32:19.160
<v Speaker 1>or three years and you know, you know, millions and

0:32:19.240 --> 0:32:22.240
<v Speaker 1>millions of dollars with some of the best software engineers

0:32:22.240 --> 0:32:25.440
<v Speaker 1>in the world. They didn't build this technology to turn

0:32:25.480 --> 0:32:28.760
<v Speaker 1>around and sell it to somebody else. Um. But yet

0:32:28.880 --> 0:32:31.600
<v Speaker 1>that's where they found themselves. And so we looked at that.

0:32:32.160 --> 0:32:34.360
<v Speaker 1>We had been ready to go, um, we had done

0:32:34.360 --> 0:32:37.040
<v Speaker 1>all that work to integrate with them, and so we

0:32:37.120 --> 0:32:38.719
<v Speaker 1>looked at the tech and and we said, you know,

0:32:39.560 --> 0:32:43.959
<v Speaker 1>this is actually purpose built for payments. They had some

0:32:44.040 --> 0:32:47.040
<v Speaker 1>of the you know, best technologists in the world building it.

0:32:47.320 --> 0:32:50.760
<v Speaker 1>They had a lot of digital first retail platforms ready

0:32:50.800 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 1>to engage with it to start offering it to their

0:32:53.520 --> 0:32:58.200
<v Speaker 1>retail customers. And so let's let's see if we can

0:32:58.240 --> 0:33:02.000
<v Speaker 1>acquire this technology and and then you know, we'll just

0:33:02.120 --> 0:33:04.000
<v Speaker 1>come back to where we were a couple of years ago,

0:33:04.120 --> 0:33:06.760
<v Speaker 1>and we'll issue it ourselves. And so that's what we

0:33:06.840 --> 0:33:11.480
<v Speaker 1>bought in January. So we bought the protocol itself, which

0:33:11.520 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 1>is open source. And you know, some folks have said, well, gos,

0:33:13.840 --> 0:33:15.800
<v Speaker 1>what did you really buy because isn't this open source?

0:33:15.840 --> 0:33:18.480
<v Speaker 1>It's it's absolutely open source, and we think it needs

0:33:18.480 --> 0:33:20.160
<v Speaker 1>to be. People need to be able to look at

0:33:20.160 --> 0:33:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the blockchain, just as we looked at the blockchain back

0:33:23.040 --> 0:33:25.760
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand fourteen when we were looking at bitcoin

0:33:25.840 --> 0:33:29.600
<v Speaker 1>transactions because we wanted to verify that leg of the transaction.

0:33:29.680 --> 0:33:35.160
<v Speaker 1>So it's open source, but importantly, there are proprietary regulatory

0:33:35.160 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 1>compliance elements that have been built on top of it

0:33:37.800 --> 0:33:41.160
<v Speaker 1>to satisfy the Know your customer, the anti money laundering,

0:33:41.200 --> 0:33:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the b s A requirements, um So buying all of

0:33:44.120 --> 0:33:47.240
<v Speaker 1>that together in furtherance of then us being able to

0:33:47.240 --> 0:33:50.360
<v Speaker 1>issue our own stable coin, and again for the use

0:33:50.400 --> 0:33:54.040
<v Speaker 1>of payments and remittance and not for a cryptocurrency you

0:33:54.360 --> 0:34:14.240
<v Speaker 1>use cans. So I want to ask another regulatory question,

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:18.680
<v Speaker 1>which is what, in your view should back stable coins?

0:34:18.880 --> 0:34:23.439
<v Speaker 1>Should they be entirely say, short term treasuries like one

0:34:23.480 --> 0:34:26.359
<v Speaker 1>to one because this is a big question. And then

0:34:26.520 --> 0:34:29.040
<v Speaker 1>also if there is going to be sort of non

0:34:29.440 --> 0:34:32.480
<v Speaker 1>perfectly liquid assets like maybe there's some commercial paper or

0:34:32.480 --> 0:34:35.759
<v Speaker 1>maybe there's some more longer dated treasuries. Is their risk

0:34:35.880 --> 0:34:39.480
<v Speaker 1>of contagion to the broader financial system if in a

0:34:39.560 --> 0:34:42.960
<v Speaker 1>crypto crash and people want to pull out, stable coin

0:34:43.040 --> 0:34:47.520
<v Speaker 1>issuers have to liquid date some of their assets rapidly.

0:34:47.600 --> 0:34:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Like I know, you're not in the business of actually

0:34:49.719 --> 0:34:51.840
<v Speaker 1>holding them, because if you talk of the assets, because

0:34:52.120 --> 0:34:54.960
<v Speaker 1>you're in the uh, the API, the minting and burning

0:34:54.960 --> 0:34:57.760
<v Speaker 1>of stable coins. Nonetheless, I want to get your take

0:34:57.920 --> 0:35:00.879
<v Speaker 1>on if I buy a stable coin, what should I

0:35:00.960 --> 0:35:03.920
<v Speaker 1>expect in terms of what's backing it? And then this

0:35:04.120 --> 0:35:08.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of like potential spillover effects of crypto volatility into

0:35:08.920 --> 0:35:12.560
<v Speaker 1>assets that don't necessarily have that you know, uh, into

0:35:12.640 --> 0:35:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the into the broader financial assets. Yep, yep, great question. Uh.

0:35:18.120 --> 0:35:21.600
<v Speaker 1>And we think a lot about this because candidly we

0:35:21.800 --> 0:35:25.480
<v Speaker 1>treat sin and all, you know, so so we have UM.

0:35:25.520 --> 0:35:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I've mentioned this yet, but we have

0:35:27.200 --> 0:35:31.040
<v Speaker 1>over fifteen hundred institutional customers at silver Gate in this

0:35:31.120 --> 0:35:35.839
<v Speaker 1>initiative who are using the sin every day and UM

0:35:35.880 --> 0:35:38.320
<v Speaker 1>as an example, in the in the first quarter of

0:35:38.400 --> 0:35:41.480
<v Speaker 1>this year we had a hundred and forty two billion dollars,

0:35:41.520 --> 0:35:45.040
<v Speaker 1>so we're about you know, fifteen sixteen billion dollar bank.

0:35:45.400 --> 0:35:47.480
<v Speaker 1>In terms of total assets, we had a hundred and

0:35:47.560 --> 0:35:51.120
<v Speaker 1>forty two billion dollars move across the sin in the

0:35:51.160 --> 0:35:53.680
<v Speaker 1>first quarter of this year alone. That was actually down

0:35:53.800 --> 0:35:56.160
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit from the fourth quarter UM and as

0:35:56.520 --> 0:35:59.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, the currency trading was down, but in the

0:35:59.480 --> 0:36:02.919
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter we had over two and so what that

0:36:03.000 --> 0:36:07.360
<v Speaker 1>means is that we have to stay liquid. There's different

0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:10.480
<v Speaker 1>definitions of liquidity, right. The way we define it as

0:36:10.760 --> 0:36:15.560
<v Speaker 1>is that we we have a very large investment securities portfolio.

0:36:15.880 --> 0:36:19.160
<v Speaker 1>So on fifteen billion in assets, we probably have twelve

0:36:19.239 --> 0:36:23.520
<v Speaker 1>billion in investment securities. I already mentioned, you know, we

0:36:23.719 --> 0:36:27.759
<v Speaker 1>were the collateralized bitcoin lending UM. You know, we we

0:36:27.840 --> 0:36:31.640
<v Speaker 1>have about a billion dollars in commitments there. But the

0:36:31.760 --> 0:36:37.040
<v Speaker 1>overwhelming majority of our balance sheet is in investment securities.

0:36:37.440 --> 0:36:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Now they're not all treasuries, but but they importantly they

0:36:44.880 --> 0:36:48.239
<v Speaker 1>all trade actively. You know, the types of securities that

0:36:48.280 --> 0:36:51.520
<v Speaker 1>we buy as a bank, we can we can trade

0:36:51.600 --> 0:36:55.000
<v Speaker 1>out of those on any given day. Obviously, if if

0:36:55.040 --> 0:36:57.560
<v Speaker 1>they're longer in duration and interest rates have gone up,

0:36:57.640 --> 0:37:00.239
<v Speaker 1>then you know we're gonna have to take a haircut.

0:36:59.800 --> 0:37:02.160
<v Speaker 1>But we do look at at this and this is

0:37:02.200 --> 0:37:05.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons we don't We don't pay interest

0:37:05.960 --> 0:37:09.200
<v Speaker 1>on our deposits. And we don't and and we actually

0:37:09.320 --> 0:37:13.760
<v Speaker 1>encourage our customers to only keep as much at silver

0:37:13.880 --> 0:37:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Gate as that they need for for their for their

0:37:18.040 --> 0:37:21.920
<v Speaker 1>trading and investing activities. We you know, you you mentioned

0:37:22.000 --> 0:37:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Joe that you know that we don't hold all the

0:37:24.000 --> 0:37:28.240
<v Speaker 1>reserves for USDC. For instance, usdcs over fifty billion dollars.

0:37:28.360 --> 0:37:31.600
<v Speaker 1>We're only a fifteen billion dollar bank, and we have customers,

0:37:31.600 --> 0:37:35.280
<v Speaker 1>so obviously we don't have the majority of those dollars.

0:37:35.360 --> 0:37:39.759
<v Speaker 1>They're spread elsewhere in the banking system. And there is

0:37:40.080 --> 0:37:42.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, um, there are other banks that have obviously

0:37:42.840 --> 0:37:44.759
<v Speaker 1>since we've got into the space, or other banks that

0:37:44.800 --> 0:37:49.879
<v Speaker 1>are banking this this crypto space. UM. And candidly, I

0:37:49.920 --> 0:37:52.120
<v Speaker 1>think what they're doing with the deposits, and this is

0:37:52.120 --> 0:37:55.239
<v Speaker 1>not criticism, this is just a factual statement. They are

0:37:55.719 --> 0:37:58.520
<v Speaker 1>doing what we did back in two thousand fourteen, which

0:37:58.760 --> 0:38:01.080
<v Speaker 1>we looked at this and we and thought, heck, this

0:38:01.160 --> 0:38:05.839
<v Speaker 1>is a potential source of deposits to fund our lending activities. Um.

0:38:06.000 --> 0:38:08.399
<v Speaker 1>And and so if if you were to look at

0:38:08.480 --> 0:38:10.400
<v Speaker 1>some of the other banks that are banking the space,

0:38:10.719 --> 0:38:12.799
<v Speaker 1>and what are they doing with the deposits. You know,

0:38:12.840 --> 0:38:16.279
<v Speaker 1>I think they're primarily using those in some of their

0:38:16.360 --> 0:38:21.520
<v Speaker 1>lending operations. Um and and again UM that their banks,

0:38:21.560 --> 0:38:25.760
<v Speaker 1>that's what they do. We have decided that the industry

0:38:25.840 --> 0:38:30.080
<v Speaker 1>is relying on us as critical infrastructure to provide liquidity.

0:38:30.120 --> 0:38:33.560
<v Speaker 1>And when you know, when Tera was melting down, obviously

0:38:33.600 --> 0:38:37.560
<v Speaker 1>we didn't have any exposure whatsoever to Tara, but that contagion,

0:38:37.640 --> 0:38:39.920
<v Speaker 1>if you will, that was spreading throughout the ecosystem and

0:38:40.000 --> 0:38:42.080
<v Speaker 1>causing people to go to cash or go to stable

0:38:42.120 --> 0:38:44.359
<v Speaker 1>coiner you know, go to a dollar back stable coin.

0:38:44.680 --> 0:38:47.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, you you can imagine that we might have

0:38:47.080 --> 0:38:52.160
<v Speaker 1>seen heightened activity across our platform um and and the

0:38:52.200 --> 0:38:55.799
<v Speaker 1>industry relies on us for that critical function. So can

0:38:55.840 --> 0:38:58.319
<v Speaker 1>you talk a little bit more about risk management and

0:38:58.440 --> 0:39:02.160
<v Speaker 1>specifically in the context of this sort of one way

0:39:02.480 --> 0:39:05.920
<v Speaker 1>risk which is basically what we saw over the past

0:39:05.960 --> 0:39:08.719
<v Speaker 1>month or so when Tera Luna collapsed, which is that

0:39:08.880 --> 0:39:13.320
<v Speaker 1>you had bonds and stocks falling, you had all sorts

0:39:13.320 --> 0:39:16.520
<v Speaker 1>of crypto and tokens falling at the same time. There

0:39:16.600 --> 0:39:19.880
<v Speaker 1>was lots of anecdotes about people potentially having to liquidate

0:39:19.920 --> 0:39:23.759
<v Speaker 1>positions in order to pay off collateral on margin that

0:39:23.800 --> 0:39:27.239
<v Speaker 1>they needed to to pay because of the volatility. How

0:39:27.280 --> 0:39:31.160
<v Speaker 1>do you actually handle that risk, because it feels like

0:39:31.239 --> 0:39:35.040
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of crypto, it's basically crypto exposure kind

0:39:35.120 --> 0:39:40.960
<v Speaker 1>of squared and also pegged too, occasionally tied into stocks

0:39:40.960 --> 0:39:43.440
<v Speaker 1>and bonds, so it's sort of it feels like it

0:39:43.560 --> 0:39:47.680
<v Speaker 1>feeds on itself at certain times. I what I can

0:39:47.760 --> 0:39:50.480
<v Speaker 1>say about the way we're set up at silver Gate

0:39:51.520 --> 0:39:55.600
<v Speaker 1>is because we are not the bank that is holding

0:39:56.400 --> 0:40:00.719
<v Speaker 1>like the reserves, we technically do, you know, don't want

0:40:00.760 --> 0:40:04.200
<v Speaker 1>to be their primary bank in the sense that you know,

0:40:04.480 --> 0:40:07.200
<v Speaker 1>where I've spent most of my career as a business banker.

0:40:07.680 --> 0:40:09.839
<v Speaker 1>You know, the idea is, well, gosp let's get them,

0:40:09.960 --> 0:40:13.640
<v Speaker 1>let's get the operating deposits, let's make them alone, you know,

0:40:13.719 --> 0:40:17.200
<v Speaker 1>let's get the full relationship. We take a very narrow

0:40:17.360 --> 0:40:20.440
<v Speaker 1>view here, which is, you know, don't keep with us

0:40:20.600 --> 0:40:25.120
<v Speaker 1>excess deposits that are needed for other things, because we

0:40:25.200 --> 0:40:29.360
<v Speaker 1>are primarily a liquidity source. And and so what that means,

0:40:29.400 --> 0:40:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Tracy is is that when when there's this type of activity,

0:40:34.160 --> 0:40:36.320
<v Speaker 1>we see a lot of money going through our bank,

0:40:37.000 --> 0:40:40.560
<v Speaker 1>but um, but we actually see our deposits. I talked

0:40:40.560 --> 0:40:43.440
<v Speaker 1>about this on an investor call last week. I I

0:40:43.520 --> 0:40:47.440
<v Speaker 1>referred folks on that call back to our earnings transcript

0:40:47.800 --> 0:40:50.280
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the first quarter. If you remember

0:40:50.320 --> 0:40:54.280
<v Speaker 1>back at that time, you know, pandemic hit markets were crazy.

0:40:54.320 --> 0:40:57.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, Bitcoin sold off, you know the crypto markets

0:40:57.120 --> 0:40:59.680
<v Speaker 1>were selling off as well. And what we saw back

0:40:59.719 --> 0:41:02.920
<v Speaker 1>at that time was a surge in our deposits. And

0:41:02.920 --> 0:41:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and we reported on that because it was quarter end.

0:41:05.080 --> 0:41:08.200
<v Speaker 1>We said, look, our deposits are elevated at quarter end.

0:41:08.719 --> 0:41:11.560
<v Speaker 1>We believe that's temporary. Um And by the time we

0:41:11.719 --> 0:41:14.360
<v Speaker 1>released our earnings the third week of April, we're already

0:41:14.400 --> 0:41:17.840
<v Speaker 1>seeing deposits kind of normalized, and we reported on that fact.

0:41:18.200 --> 0:41:22.120
<v Speaker 1>But critically, we are this critical um, you know, piece

0:41:22.160 --> 0:41:26.120
<v Speaker 1>of infrastructure where where folks as their exiting the ecosystem,

0:41:26.160 --> 0:41:28.879
<v Speaker 1>we're wanting to go to cash. Those dollars passed through

0:41:28.920 --> 0:41:31.400
<v Speaker 1>silver Gate and then end up wherever they're going to

0:41:31.480 --> 0:41:34.200
<v Speaker 1>put them. Sometimes it just ends up at USDC, in

0:41:34.239 --> 0:41:36.640
<v Speaker 1>which case those dollars aren't going to sit at silver Gate.

0:41:36.640 --> 0:41:38.880
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna sit it in Reserve, but they might pass

0:41:38.920 --> 0:41:41.719
<v Speaker 1>through us on on their way. One of the things

0:41:41.840 --> 0:41:44.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we've been bent managing liquidity this way since

0:41:44.280 --> 0:41:47.319
<v Speaker 1>we launched the SIN in two thousand seventeen. Back at

0:41:47.360 --> 0:41:49.000
<v Speaker 1>that time, believe it or not, we were a two

0:41:49.000 --> 0:41:52.960
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar bank and we we had a billion dollars

0:41:53.120 --> 0:41:56.440
<v Speaker 1>in crypto related deposits. We were holding almost all of

0:41:56.480 --> 0:41:59.080
<v Speaker 1>that at the time at the Federal Reserve. Because when

0:41:59.160 --> 0:42:02.760
<v Speaker 1>you're going are these times of of liquidity and stress,

0:42:03.239 --> 0:42:05.480
<v Speaker 1>you want to make sure that you're not investing those

0:42:05.640 --> 0:42:08.960
<v Speaker 1>those those funds um you know, into something that's more

0:42:09.040 --> 0:42:11.200
<v Speaker 1>long term, because you don't know how sticky it's gonna be.

0:42:11.719 --> 0:42:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I just want to go back to this point earlier.

0:42:14.200 --> 0:42:17.800
<v Speaker 1>It's like about contagion. Like we have seen Tether's total

0:42:17.880 --> 0:42:21.480
<v Speaker 1>assets shrink in this latest market volatility, so presumably it

0:42:21.560 --> 0:42:23.680
<v Speaker 1>had to sell some of its assets. I haven't looked

0:42:23.680 --> 0:42:25.960
<v Speaker 1>at what's going on with us DC. I don't know

0:42:26.040 --> 0:42:28.960
<v Speaker 1>if it's had to actually liquidate or if people are

0:42:29.000 --> 0:42:33.320
<v Speaker 1>just hanging out in USDC. But is there risk of volatility?

0:42:33.360 --> 0:42:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you expect, obviously the stable coin industry to

0:42:36.000 --> 0:42:37.920
<v Speaker 1>get much bigger, otherwise you wouldn't be in it, you

0:42:37.960 --> 0:42:42.480
<v Speaker 1>know today, One like, is there risk of crypto market volatility,

0:42:42.640 --> 0:42:46.720
<v Speaker 1>forcing liquidations and other assets and therefore spreading volatility elsewhere

0:42:46.719 --> 0:42:52.479
<v Speaker 1>into the financial system. Yeah, I certainly think that's one

0:42:52.520 --> 0:42:55.239
<v Speaker 1>of the things that the regulators are concerned about. And

0:42:55.280 --> 0:42:57.080
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, if you go back and look at

0:42:57.120 --> 0:43:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the President's Working Group report that I've referenced a couple

0:43:00.080 --> 0:43:05.040
<v Speaker 1>times already, you know, they there are concerns about contagion

0:43:05.200 --> 0:43:09.840
<v Speaker 1>and you know this points of liquidity stress, etcetera. Which

0:43:09.880 --> 0:43:13.640
<v Speaker 1>is which is candidly one of the reasons that that

0:43:13.719 --> 0:43:16.040
<v Speaker 1>that we think, you know, from our perspective, and I'm

0:43:16.080 --> 0:43:19.280
<v Speaker 1>not you know, hey, I'm a free markets guy. UM.

0:43:19.320 --> 0:43:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Clearly USDC has found you know, product market fit, right.

0:43:24.160 --> 0:43:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean they didn't you know, they weren't sitting in

0:43:26.640 --> 0:43:29.160
<v Speaker 1>their garage trying to come up with something they hoped

0:43:29.360 --> 0:43:33.440
<v Speaker 1>that the industry would use. They launched something, and the industry,

0:43:33.480 --> 0:43:36.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, has said yes, and and they're speaking with

0:43:36.120 --> 0:43:39.920
<v Speaker 1>their wallets, and there's over fifty billion dollars of UM

0:43:39.960 --> 0:43:44.400
<v Speaker 1>you know backing USDC right now. What What we see

0:43:44.760 --> 0:43:47.920
<v Speaker 1>is UM is that there is a there is a

0:43:48.080 --> 0:43:55.480
<v Speaker 1>need for a tokenized dollar to be used by consumers

0:43:55.960 --> 0:43:58.879
<v Speaker 1>to pay for things. UM. And you know, the way.

0:43:58.920 --> 0:44:01.000
<v Speaker 1>And I know I'm getting off your question, Joe, But

0:44:01.000 --> 0:44:03.080
<v Speaker 1>but but this is important for you know, for me

0:44:03.200 --> 0:44:05.560
<v Speaker 1>to say, because the way I think about this is

0:44:05.600 --> 0:44:08.879
<v Speaker 1>not dissimilar to the way I've described how we don't,

0:44:08.920 --> 0:44:11.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, we don't encourage our customers to keep a

0:44:11.480 --> 0:44:14.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of access deposits with us. I think about a

0:44:14.600 --> 0:44:19.080
<v Speaker 1>tokenized dollar the way I think about a physical dollar bill,

0:44:19.600 --> 0:44:21.640
<v Speaker 1>or let's let's say a twenty because you know, you

0:44:21.960 --> 0:44:24.080
<v Speaker 1>typicularly can only get twenties out of the A t M. Right,

0:44:24.320 --> 0:44:26.000
<v Speaker 1>So if I go to the A t M and

0:44:26.520 --> 0:44:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I pulled twenty dollars out, well, now that's no longer

0:44:30.239 --> 0:44:33.160
<v Speaker 1>in my bank. It's not f D. I c ensured.

0:44:33.560 --> 0:44:35.319
<v Speaker 1>I can take it anywhere and I can use it

0:44:35.360 --> 0:44:38.600
<v Speaker 1>to pay for something. But importantly, I didn't withdraw all

0:44:38.640 --> 0:44:40.759
<v Speaker 1>my money out of the bank. I only withdrew what

0:44:40.840 --> 0:44:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I needed to transact. So I think that that is

0:44:45.120 --> 0:44:50.440
<v Speaker 1>that is the place for a silver gate issued tokenized dollar.

0:44:50.719 --> 0:44:53.880
<v Speaker 1>And and we've also started talking about it internally, and

0:44:53.920 --> 0:44:56.279
<v Speaker 1>we're beginning to talk with our regulators about this as well.

0:44:56.760 --> 0:44:59.279
<v Speaker 1>We're getting we're getting away from calling or stable coin

0:45:00.040 --> 0:45:04.320
<v Speaker 1>because obviously stable coins on a really bad name because

0:45:05.040 --> 0:45:09.080
<v Speaker 1>they've proven themselves to not be stable um in many cases. Um.

0:45:09.120 --> 0:45:11.839
<v Speaker 1>But but for us we're looking at this is Hey,

0:45:11.880 --> 0:45:16.160
<v Speaker 1>this is a tokenized dollar right now on my iPhone.

0:45:16.960 --> 0:45:19.839
<v Speaker 1>I have both the dunkin Donuts app and the Starbucks app,

0:45:20.320 --> 0:45:22.319
<v Speaker 1>and I can load both of those with value. But

0:45:22.400 --> 0:45:26.560
<v Speaker 1>guess what, it's not interoperable. I can't pull it back off. Um.

0:45:26.800 --> 0:45:29.760
<v Speaker 1>And and I you know, I can't take my dunkin

0:45:29.840 --> 0:45:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Donuts app and pay for a coffee at Starbucks. And

0:45:32.600 --> 0:45:35.160
<v Speaker 1>so so what we see and this is a longer

0:45:35.280 --> 0:45:37.040
<v Speaker 1>view and it's going to take a while to get there,

0:45:37.480 --> 0:45:41.439
<v Speaker 1>but everything in the world is moving digital um. And

0:45:41.640 --> 0:45:44.239
<v Speaker 1>people say, well, money is digital too, And that's true

0:45:44.280 --> 0:45:46.600
<v Speaker 1>for all of us in the first world, but there

0:45:46.600 --> 0:45:49.239
<v Speaker 1>there are many people that don't have access. They all

0:45:49.280 --> 0:45:52.120
<v Speaker 1>have phones, um, but they don't have the ability to

0:45:52.120 --> 0:45:55.400
<v Speaker 1>pay for things. Um. And so I just view a

0:45:55.480 --> 0:46:00.120
<v Speaker 1>tokenized dollar as a way to take some portion of

0:46:00.440 --> 0:46:03.160
<v Speaker 1>your value that whether you have it sitting in a

0:46:03.160 --> 0:46:05.200
<v Speaker 1>bank account or whether you have it sitting in bitcoin,

0:46:05.600 --> 0:46:08.360
<v Speaker 1>pull that out, put it in a digital wallet on

0:46:08.400 --> 0:46:11.000
<v Speaker 1>your phone so that you can use it to pay

0:46:11.040 --> 0:46:14.400
<v Speaker 1>for things, whether that be an online merchant, whether that

0:46:14.520 --> 0:46:18.600
<v Speaker 1>be at a physical merchant, and so that's that and

0:46:18.600 --> 0:46:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and to me that shouldn't create any concern about financial

0:46:22.719 --> 0:46:25.520
<v Speaker 1>contagion and runs on the bank and all of that stuff,

0:46:25.520 --> 0:46:28.879
<v Speaker 1>because it's no, it's no different than withdrawing cash out

0:46:28.880 --> 0:46:33.080
<v Speaker 1>of an a t M. So Tether okay, clearly controversial

0:46:33.160 --> 0:46:36.080
<v Speaker 1>in many ways. There have been questions swirling around what

0:46:36.239 --> 0:46:40.600
<v Speaker 1>exactly is backing it for many many years. Now. You

0:46:40.680 --> 0:46:44.319
<v Speaker 1>have a vantage point where you see the flows and

0:46:44.360 --> 0:46:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the mechanics of what happens when stable coins are are

0:46:49.200 --> 0:46:52.680
<v Speaker 1>moving or not moving. So you described, for instance, when

0:46:52.719 --> 0:46:55.880
<v Speaker 1>we had the big run recently, there was an increase

0:46:55.880 --> 0:46:58.920
<v Speaker 1>in your deposits and lots of money flowing in. Can

0:46:58.960 --> 0:47:02.279
<v Speaker 1>you give us your take on tether and what exactly

0:47:02.520 --> 0:47:04.200
<v Speaker 1>is going on there, because I think a lot of

0:47:04.200 --> 0:47:08.440
<v Speaker 1>people are still concerned about a lack of transparency on

0:47:08.480 --> 0:47:10.719
<v Speaker 1>the backing and a lot of people have also been

0:47:10.760 --> 0:47:14.399
<v Speaker 1>looking at the deposit data for tether and I think

0:47:14.440 --> 0:47:17.319
<v Speaker 1>their bank is UM. It's in the Bahamas, right, like

0:47:17.600 --> 0:47:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Deltech or something UM And and basically saying that we

0:47:21.280 --> 0:47:24.879
<v Speaker 1>don't see deposits moving in the way that you might

0:47:25.000 --> 0:47:28.040
<v Speaker 1>expect when tether is actually moving. And again, this is

0:47:28.080 --> 0:47:30.600
<v Speaker 1>something that's supposed to have billions and billions of dollars

0:47:31.000 --> 0:47:33.719
<v Speaker 1>worth of assets backing it. So could you maybe just

0:47:34.360 --> 0:47:38.440
<v Speaker 1>give us your opinion of what is going on there. So, unfortunately,

0:47:38.520 --> 0:47:43.040
<v Speaker 1>my knowledge is is limited, UM, just as the rest

0:47:43.080 --> 0:47:46.200
<v Speaker 1>of the of the world's knowledge is limited because you know,

0:47:46.239 --> 0:47:49.319
<v Speaker 1>we don't bank them, as I mentioned, UM. But what

0:47:49.480 --> 0:47:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you is that our customers who use

0:47:54.200 --> 0:47:57.359
<v Speaker 1>tether um. You know, we have customers all over the world.

0:47:57.400 --> 0:48:01.719
<v Speaker 1>We have customers in Europe and Asia and Latin America UM,

0:48:02.000 --> 0:48:07.560
<v Speaker 1>and those customers that use tether do not have the

0:48:07.719 --> 0:48:12.400
<v Speaker 1>same concern that I hear that you just you know,

0:48:12.440 --> 0:48:16.320
<v Speaker 1>are articulated. And so there's a there's clearly a difference

0:48:16.560 --> 0:48:20.759
<v Speaker 1>in perception between those who are inside the ecosystem and

0:48:20.800 --> 0:48:23.799
<v Speaker 1>those who are outside of it. Now I don't know

0:48:23.880 --> 0:48:26.919
<v Speaker 1>why that is, Tracy I, but I do know that

0:48:27.000 --> 0:48:29.160
<v Speaker 1>when we talk to our customers, because we've asked them,

0:48:29.160 --> 0:48:30.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, what if we were to issue our own

0:48:30.640 --> 0:48:33.400
<v Speaker 1>staff This goes back obviously like two thousand and eighteen nineteen.

0:48:33.600 --> 0:48:35.480
<v Speaker 1>What if we were to issue our own you know,

0:48:35.640 --> 0:48:38.759
<v Speaker 1>how do you view tether um and they use tether

0:48:38.840 --> 0:48:42.880
<v Speaker 1>because it works, and so unless and until there is

0:48:42.920 --> 0:48:46.239
<v Speaker 1>a run um that actually causes them to burn through

0:48:46.239 --> 0:48:48.719
<v Speaker 1>all their cash and then their securities and then you know,

0:48:48.840 --> 0:48:52.359
<v Speaker 1>theoretically their commercial paper and you know, it's it's it

0:48:52.560 --> 0:48:55.759
<v Speaker 1>just works. And there are, by the way, also use

0:48:55.800 --> 0:48:58.680
<v Speaker 1>cases that I've heard of where people in other countries

0:48:59.080 --> 0:49:01.759
<v Speaker 1>who want to hold old U S dollars because they

0:49:01.840 --> 0:49:06.080
<v Speaker 1>might be in a country that that is experiencing hyperinflation. Um,

0:49:06.320 --> 0:49:10.080
<v Speaker 1>they're comfortable um. And these are like consumer folks. They

0:49:10.120 --> 0:49:16.080
<v Speaker 1>are comfortable holding holding color um as as a dollar proxy. UM.

0:49:16.239 --> 0:49:18.480
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I I don't know that how widespread

0:49:18.480 --> 0:49:28.000
<v Speaker 1>that is, but I've certainly heard that. Ellen. Thank you

0:49:28.080 --> 0:49:30.760
<v Speaker 1>so much for coming on. This is just like such

0:49:30.800 --> 0:49:32.920
<v Speaker 1>a big area and we know there's like tons of

0:49:32.960 --> 0:49:36.560
<v Speaker 1>money going into this space and it's so crucial and

0:49:36.680 --> 0:49:39.279
<v Speaker 1>so really appreciate getting your perspective. I feel like we

0:49:39.280 --> 0:49:42.480
<v Speaker 1>could probably do like three hours actually on this topic.

0:49:42.560 --> 0:49:44.759
<v Speaker 1>We'll have to have you back because I think, like

0:49:44.920 --> 0:49:49.080
<v Speaker 1>stable coin design, stable coin regulation, the business of stable

0:49:49.080 --> 0:49:52.560
<v Speaker 1>coins is not going away anytime soon. So I appreciate

0:49:52.560 --> 0:49:56.360
<v Speaker 1>you coming on. Udlines. Yeah, I really appreciate the opportunity.

0:49:56.400 --> 0:50:00.799
<v Speaker 1>It's um, I'm happy to come back anytime. Absolutely love

0:50:00.880 --> 0:50:03.600
<v Speaker 1>this space and I appreciate all the work that you

0:50:03.640 --> 0:50:19.040
<v Speaker 1>guys are doing. Absolutely, thank you girl. You know it's

0:50:19.120 --> 0:50:23.960
<v Speaker 1>interesting was that Ellen said that they might think about

0:50:24.080 --> 0:50:27.440
<v Speaker 1>rebranding stable coins, that it does seem like it's kind

0:50:27.440 --> 0:50:29.839
<v Speaker 1>of gotten tarnish because on the one hand you have

0:50:29.880 --> 0:50:32.759
<v Speaker 1>tarra usd, which is not stable, and then on the

0:50:32.760 --> 0:50:37.080
<v Speaker 1>other hand, the other stable coin is tether and people

0:50:37.120 --> 0:50:39.800
<v Speaker 1>are just sort of suspicious of it for obvious reasons.

0:50:40.080 --> 0:50:42.240
<v Speaker 1>So it's like, if you're gonna launch something, maybe that's smart,

0:50:42.280 --> 0:50:44.560
<v Speaker 1>like call it a tokenized dollar or something else, because

0:50:44.800 --> 0:50:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I do think it's sort of a dirty word at

0:50:46.480 --> 0:50:50.279
<v Speaker 1>this point. I agree, But you know what this whole

0:50:50.320 --> 0:50:53.000
<v Speaker 1>thing reminds me of, and this is a slight tangent,

0:50:53.160 --> 0:50:56.560
<v Speaker 1>but like it is actually really a parallel to what's

0:50:56.560 --> 0:51:01.640
<v Speaker 1>going on here. Do you remember pure to pure lending? Yeah? Absolutely, okay,

0:51:01.680 --> 0:51:05.240
<v Speaker 1>So peer to peer lending this whole idea that individuals

0:51:05.280 --> 0:51:10.000
<v Speaker 1>could lend to other individuals and thereby bypass the banks completely.

0:51:10.680 --> 0:51:14.040
<v Speaker 1>And the irony was always that there was actually a

0:51:14.080 --> 0:51:16.839
<v Speaker 1>bank underwriting all these loans. It was called web Bank,

0:51:17.080 --> 0:51:20.880
<v Speaker 1>So this kind of you know, reminds me. Um. So

0:51:20.920 --> 0:51:25.200
<v Speaker 1>that's point one. And then secondly, they also rebranded from

0:51:25.239 --> 0:51:28.520
<v Speaker 1>peer to peer lending to direct lending once it became

0:51:28.680 --> 0:51:31.880
<v Speaker 1>very very apparent that the lending was not in fact

0:51:31.920 --> 0:51:34.880
<v Speaker 1>peer to peer, So it kind of reminds it reminds

0:51:34.920 --> 0:51:37.040
<v Speaker 1>me a lot of that. That's a that's a really

0:51:37.080 --> 0:51:41.600
<v Speaker 1>good analogy, you know, speaking on the Tether point, and

0:51:41.680 --> 0:51:43.600
<v Speaker 1>this came up. You know, I think, like going back

0:51:43.600 --> 0:51:47.399
<v Speaker 1>to the first time we ever interviewed Sam Bankman Freed,

0:51:47.640 --> 0:51:51.680
<v Speaker 1>it really is striking the degree of confidence that people

0:51:51.840 --> 0:51:54.600
<v Speaker 1>in the industry have with tether and their comfort that

0:51:54.640 --> 0:51:58.120
<v Speaker 1>they have redeeming and minting and burning tether versus the

0:51:58.160 --> 0:52:01.200
<v Speaker 1>outside skepticism. It's like there's huge bid Esque spread, so

0:52:01.280 --> 0:52:04.680
<v Speaker 1>to speak on tether as a concept. I mean, it

0:52:04.719 --> 0:52:08.440
<v Speaker 1>would be pretty amazing if all of Tether's problems just

0:52:08.719 --> 0:52:12.160
<v Speaker 1>boiled down to like a perception gap and a bad

0:52:12.239 --> 0:52:15.560
<v Speaker 1>pr strategy between people who understand it and people who

0:52:15.680 --> 0:52:18.760
<v Speaker 1>are outside of the space, Like that would be pretty

0:52:18.920 --> 0:52:22.280
<v Speaker 1>insane and also a massive own goal for the company itself.

0:52:22.920 --> 0:52:26.759
<v Speaker 1>Um But that's kind of what we hear consistently. It's

0:52:26.800 --> 0:52:28.719
<v Speaker 1>like well, the people who deal with it have full

0:52:28.760 --> 0:52:31.160
<v Speaker 1>faith in it, and people who are not dealing in

0:52:31.239 --> 0:52:36.000
<v Speaker 1>it are extremely skeptical. Yes, But on the other hand,

0:52:36.040 --> 0:52:40.320
<v Speaker 1>note that Allen is not a Tether business partner, so

0:52:40.560 --> 0:52:43.640
<v Speaker 1>it is striking that. I mean, again the reasons for that,

0:52:43.680 --> 0:52:46.680
<v Speaker 1>they're offshore, etcetera. But here is the company that's sort

0:52:46.680 --> 0:52:49.920
<v Speaker 1>of like, is the core banking infrastructure to all of crypto,

0:52:50.040 --> 0:52:53.120
<v Speaker 1>and Tether isn't one of them. So you know there's

0:52:53.160 --> 0:52:55.840
<v Speaker 1>something going down there, and not necessarily bad per se,

0:52:56.520 --> 0:53:00.279
<v Speaker 1>but there's a reason you know, silver Gate is not

0:53:00.360 --> 0:53:03.720
<v Speaker 1>a t other business. Yeah, but I do think getting

0:53:03.719 --> 0:53:06.120
<v Speaker 1>back to that rebranding point. I mean, we started out

0:53:06.120 --> 0:53:09.319
<v Speaker 1>this conversation by saying that the marketing here matters. And

0:53:09.360 --> 0:53:11.719
<v Speaker 1>if you say you've created a stable coin and it's

0:53:11.719 --> 0:53:13.800
<v Speaker 1>one for one with a dollar and then it isn't,

0:53:14.320 --> 0:53:17.680
<v Speaker 1>then that's an issue and that's something that regulators you know,

0:53:17.800 --> 0:53:21.160
<v Speaker 1>will pursue and will be interested in. But if you

0:53:21.480 --> 0:53:24.279
<v Speaker 1>morph into something like a tokenized dollar or I don't know,

0:53:24.360 --> 0:53:28.400
<v Speaker 1>call yourself like a variable stable coin or something like that,

0:53:28.440 --> 0:53:31.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, then then maybe that does lessen some

0:53:31.400 --> 0:53:33.600
<v Speaker 1>of the pressure. But of course the question is whether

0:53:33.680 --> 0:53:37.680
<v Speaker 1>or not you're sort of um abdicating your original use purpose.

0:53:38.280 --> 0:53:41.240
<v Speaker 1>I also think this question of like, Okay, if something

0:53:41.320 --> 0:53:43.120
<v Speaker 1>is going to be called a stable coin or whatever

0:53:43.160 --> 0:53:46.800
<v Speaker 1>it is, well there's gonna need to be more rules.

0:53:46.840 --> 0:53:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I think about what actually backs it and how much

0:53:50.080 --> 0:53:53.600
<v Speaker 1>it has to be backed by short term treasuries or

0:53:53.640 --> 0:53:58.080
<v Speaker 1>long term treasuries or things that absolutely our dollar equivalent

0:53:58.600 --> 0:54:02.920
<v Speaker 1>versus other assets. Because as they get bigger as an industry,

0:54:03.239 --> 0:54:06.120
<v Speaker 1>these sorts of like stresses are going to emerge. And

0:54:06.160 --> 0:54:09.440
<v Speaker 1>again going back to the financial crisis, the lesson is

0:54:09.840 --> 0:54:13.440
<v Speaker 1>crises happen in essentially assets that are deemed to be stable,

0:54:13.480 --> 0:54:16.880
<v Speaker 1>like that is the source of trouble. And so how

0:54:17.239 --> 0:54:19.719
<v Speaker 1>what they what they can really hold, how liquid they

0:54:19.760 --> 0:54:21.760
<v Speaker 1>have to be, how fast they have to be able

0:54:21.800 --> 0:54:24.880
<v Speaker 1>to liquidate their assets to meet redemptions are sort of

0:54:24.920 --> 0:54:27.239
<v Speaker 1>like huge questions that I think we're gonna need to

0:54:27.239 --> 0:54:30.680
<v Speaker 1>just get like clearer answers on. Right, So I guess

0:54:30.719 --> 0:54:33.480
<v Speaker 1>there's two options here. One is you agree these are

0:54:33.560 --> 0:54:35.799
<v Speaker 1>safe assets, They're supposed to be safe and there's going

0:54:35.840 --> 0:54:38.359
<v Speaker 1>to have to be some sort of oversight on them.

0:54:38.480 --> 0:54:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Or two you say, actually, maybe they're not that safe,

0:54:42.280 --> 0:54:44.319
<v Speaker 1>and you step away from that marketing and you go

0:54:44.360 --> 0:54:47.640
<v Speaker 1>in a totally different direction. But then again the question

0:54:47.719 --> 0:54:50.239
<v Speaker 1>is what impact does that have on crypto? Yeah, now

0:54:50.280 --> 0:54:52.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a fascinating We We really could probably talk like

0:54:52.480 --> 0:54:55.120
<v Speaker 1>three hours and go down all kinds of little avenues

0:54:55.160 --> 0:54:57.799
<v Speaker 1>on this, because it really is like pretty big to

0:54:57.880 --> 0:55:01.680
<v Speaker 1>think about the future of crypto, the stable coin rabbit hole.

0:55:01.760 --> 0:55:04.120
<v Speaker 1>It's also, i mean, it's also just interesting from the

0:55:04.160 --> 0:55:07.080
<v Speaker 1>perspective of what is money and what is the financial

0:55:07.120 --> 0:55:11.040
<v Speaker 1>asset and what makes something safe and contagion effect and anyway, Yes,

0:55:11.080 --> 0:55:12.880
<v Speaker 1>you're right, Okay, we should stop. Shall we leave it there?

0:55:12.960 --> 0:55:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's leave it there? All right? This has been another

0:55:15.360 --> 0:55:18.160
<v Speaker 1>episode of the All Thoughts podcast. I'm Tracy Alloway. You

0:55:18.160 --> 0:55:20.759
<v Speaker 1>can follow me on Twitter at Tracy Alloway and I'm

0:55:20.840 --> 0:55:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Joe wisen't though. You can follow me on Twitter at

0:55:23.560 --> 0:55:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the Stalwart. Follow our producer Carmen Rodriguez at Carmen Armann.

0:55:28.239 --> 0:55:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Follow the Bloomberg head of podcast, Francesca Leivi at Francesca Today,

0:55:32.680 --> 0:55:35.480
<v Speaker 1>and check out all of our podcasts at Berg under

0:55:35.520 --> 0:56:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the handle at podcasts. Thanks for listening to to