WEBVTT - 7 Mindset Shifts That ACTUALLY Work (Finally Change How You Think, React & Show Up)

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I want to be honest with you about something before

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:06.560
<v Speaker 1>we start. Most mindset content is forgettable, not because the

0:00:06.600 --> 0:00:09.520
<v Speaker 1>ideas are wrong. Some of them are genuinely good, but

0:00:09.560 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>because they're delivered like fortune cookies. They're punchy, quotable, and

0:00:14.240 --> 0:00:17.279
<v Speaker 1>gone by Tuesday. You read the book, you highlight the line,

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:21.119
<v Speaker 1>you feel something shift, and then life comes back. The argument,

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the deadline, the three am spiral, and the highlight in

0:00:24.400 --> 0:00:27.479
<v Speaker 1>the book means nothing because the idea never got deep

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>enough to actually change anything. You might see yourself feel

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:34.600
<v Speaker 1>this way, You're still reacting the same way. You're still

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:37.559
<v Speaker 1>choosing the same kind of people. You're still telling yourself

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:41.239
<v Speaker 1>the same stories about why things aren't working. The mindsets

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:44.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to share with you today are actually going

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 1>to shift something and change something for you for real.

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 1>They're the ones that, when they finally landed, really landed

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 1>in the body, not just in the head, change something

0:00:55.560 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 1>that stayed changed, changed how I see a difficult conversation, changed,

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:03.320
<v Speaker 1>how I moved through failure, changed how I love people.

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>There are seven of them, and I'm going to give

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:08.760
<v Speaker 1>you them straight, with the science, with the wisdom traditions

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 1>behind them, and with the stories from my own life,

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>and with the specific way you can use each one immediately,

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 1>not next month, not when things calm down. Immediately, let's

0:01:19.640 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 1>get stired. Mindset one. Pain is a postcard, not a

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:29.280
<v Speaker 1>permanent address. The first mindset that changed my life sounds

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 1>almost insultingly simple when I say it out loud, but

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I need you to hear what's underneath. Pain is a postcard,

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:40.560
<v Speaker 1>not a permanent address. Here's what I mean. When I

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 1>was at my lowest, when the career I thought I

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 1>wanted had fallen apart, when I had moved back home

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>after failing at the monastery in a way that felt permanent,

0:01:50.000 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 1>when I was surrounded by people who had expected more

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 1>from me, and I had expected more from myself, I

0:01:56.600 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>made a mistake that I think almost everyone makes when

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 1>things go badly. I moved in, not literally mentally. I

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 1>took the painful chapter and turned it into my identity.

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:13.360
<v Speaker 1>I stopped treating it like something that was happening, and

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:16.840
<v Speaker 1>started treating it like something that was true, Like the

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 1>failure wasn't something I'd been through, like it was something

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I was. And here's what the neuroscience says about that distinction.

0:02:25.560 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Because it's not just poetic, it's biological. The psychologist Martin

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Seligmann spent decades studying what he called explanatory style, the

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 1>way people explained bad events to themselves, and he found

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 1>that when people experience setbacks, they tend to explain them

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:46.960
<v Speaker 1>in one of two fundamentally different ways. Some people explain

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:51.920
<v Speaker 1>setbacks as temporary, specific, and external. This happened in this

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:57.520
<v Speaker 1>situation for these reasons. Others explain them as permanent, pervasive,

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>and personal. This is who I am, I am, this

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 1>is what always happens. This is what I can always expect.

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 1>The first group recovers faster, more completely, and often stronger

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:15.640
<v Speaker 1>than before. The second group gets stuck, not because they're weaker,

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:20.240
<v Speaker 1>because they moved into the pain and started decorating. The

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Vedic tradition has a concept that maps onto this perfectly,

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:30.240
<v Speaker 1>a nitia, the Sanskrit word for impermanence. Nothing is permanent,

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:34.639
<v Speaker 1>not the good and not the bad. The ancient teachers

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 1>weren't saying this to comfort you. They were saying it

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 1>as a precise description of reality. Everything passes, everything, including this.

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 1>The postcard mindset is this when pain arrives, and it

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 1>will it always does. You read the postcard. You sit

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 1>with it, you feel it fully, because unfelt pain doesn't leave,

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 1>it just goes underground. But you do not unpack your bags,

0:04:03.640 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 1>You do not redecorate, you do not forward your mail.

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>You're a visitor in this moment, not a resident. This

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 1>too shall pass. Here's how you apply this immediately the

0:04:16.120 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 1>next time something painful arrives, a rejection, a failure, a loss,

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 1>a conversation that goes badly, ask yourself one question before

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:30.360
<v Speaker 1>you do anything else. Am I feeling this? Or am

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:36.159
<v Speaker 1>I becoming it? Feeling it is healthy, necessary, human Becoming

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 1>it is the decision, often unconscious, always costly, to let

0:04:41.480 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 1>a moment define you instead of shape you. You are

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 1>allowed to feel everything, you are not required to become it.

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Pain is a postcard, Read it, learn from it, then

0:04:55.920 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 1>put it down. Mindset too. You are not your thoughts,

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:03.360
<v Speaker 1>you or what you do with them. This one took

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 1>me years to actually understand. You may have heard it before,

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 1>but I don't just want you to understand it intellectually.

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:14.919
<v Speaker 1>I understood the theory almost immediately, but to actually understand

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 1>it in the way that changes behavior. Here's the version

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:22.359
<v Speaker 1>I was living before this mindset. I believed that because

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I thought something, it meant something that because a thought arrived,

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 1>you're not good enough. They don't really respect you. This

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>is never going to work. It was delivering truth. I

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:37.400
<v Speaker 1>was taking delivery of every thought like it was a

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 1>certified letter from reality. I was wrong and it was

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:46.239
<v Speaker 1>costing me everything. The cognitive psychologist Aaron Beck, the founder

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:49.479
<v Speaker 1>of cognitive behavioral therapy, one of the most evidence based

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:55.039
<v Speaker 1>psychological frameworks, we have identified something he called automatic thoughts,

0:05:55.720 --> 0:06:00.720
<v Speaker 1>rapid reflexive mental commentary that runs continuously below the level

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:05.599
<v Speaker 1>of deliberate thinking. And he found that in people experiencing depression, anxiety,

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and relational difficulties, these automatic thoughts shared consistent characteristics. They

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:18.200
<v Speaker 1>were distorted, they were negative. They were experienced as unquestionable truth.

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 1>The thought arrives, it feels true, therefore it is true.

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Beck's entire therapeutic revolution was built on one insight. The

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 1>thought is not the truth. The thought is a hypothesis,

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:38.720
<v Speaker 1>and like any hypothesis, it can be tested. Marcus Aurelius

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 1>wrote in his Meditations, you have power over your mind,

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 1>not outside events. Realize this and you will find strength.

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Here's the immediate application. It's three words and I want

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:56.040
<v Speaker 1>you to use them. Every time a thought arrives that

0:06:56.160 --> 0:07:02.039
<v Speaker 1>feels like an indictment. Is this true? Not? Is this possible? Not?

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:08.039
<v Speaker 1>Could this be true? Is this actually demonstrably, evidentially true?

0:07:08.600 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 1>And if you can't answer with concrete evidence, if the

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 1>thought is a feeling dressed as a fact, you are

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 1>not required to take delivery. You are not your thoughts.

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 1>You are what you do with them, and what you

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 1>do with them starts with the radical act of questioning

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 1>whether they deserve your belief. Mindset three. This is a

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 1>rough one. The people who trigger you the most are

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 1>your greatest teachers. I hate this one. It hurts me,

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 1>It pains me, it worries me. I'm like, God, do

0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 1>I have to learn it that way? And I need

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>to be careful with this one because it can be

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 1>misunderstood in a way that causes genuine harm. I'm not

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 1>saying that people who hurt you deserve a medal. Just

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 1>to be clear, I'm not saying abuse is a lesson

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:55.560
<v Speaker 1>you should be grateful for. I'm not saying that toxic

0:07:55.640 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 1>behavior is secretly your spiritual curriculum. What I am saying

0:08:00.760 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 1>is something more specific and more useful than that. The

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 1>emotional reactions that hit hardest, the ones that seem disproportionate,

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the ones that linger longer than make sense, the ones

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 1>that make you behave in ways you don't recognize as yourself.

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Are almost never fully about the present moment. They are signals,

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 1>and the person who triggered the signal is pointing without

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 1>knowing it, at something that was already there. Here's the

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 1>psychology behind this. The concept is called transference, first identified

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 1>by Freud, but significantly developed and validated by modern relational therapists.

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:45.959
<v Speaker 1>Transference is the unconscious redirection of feelings from a past

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>relationship onto a present one. When someone in your life

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 1>provokes a reaction that feels too big, too intense to immediate,

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 1>too hard to let go of, it is frequently because

0:08:56.160 --> 0:09:00.439
<v Speaker 1>they have activated a wound that predates them entirely. The

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 1>partner who dismisses your feelings isn't just a dismissive partner.

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 1>They are also for your nervous system. Every person who

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:12.119
<v Speaker 1>ever dismissed you, the parent who didn't have the emotional bandwidth,

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the teacher who made you feel stupid, the friend who

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 1>chose someone else. The reaction you're having right now is

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:23.199
<v Speaker 1>the sum of all those reactions, which means the most

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:26.760
<v Speaker 1>triggering people in your life are giving you a map,

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 1>a map to the places that still need your attention,

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 1>a map to the wounds that haven't yet healed, a

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 1>map to the patterns that keep repeating, not because you're broken,

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:42.560
<v Speaker 1>but because the nervous system keeps seeking resolution for what

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 1>was never resolved. The Youngean concept of the shadow is

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:51.960
<v Speaker 1>essential here. Carl Jung believed that every person carries a shadow,

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the parts of themselves they've disowned, suppressed, or refused to acknowledge.

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:01.960
<v Speaker 1>And he observed that what he most disliked in others

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:06.719
<v Speaker 1>is frequently what he most refused to see in himself.

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 1>The person who infuriates you with their arrogance? Do you

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 1>have arrogance you've been trained to suppress. The person whose

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 1>neediness exhausts you. Do you have needs you've convinced yourself

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 1>not to have. The person whose anger frightens you. Do

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:25.439
<v Speaker 1>you have anger you've never allowed yourself to feel. This

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:30.079
<v Speaker 1>is not accusation, This is cartography. You're mapping yourself through

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 1>your reactions. Here's how to use this sensitively. The next

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 1>time someone triggers you, and I mean really triggers you,

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the disproportionate reaction, the one you can't shake. Instead of

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 1>asking why are they like this, ask two different questions. First,

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 1>what specifically is being activated in me right now? Not

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:53.680
<v Speaker 1>what did they do? What got activated? Name the feeling

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:57.680
<v Speaker 1>as precisely as you can. Second, where have I felt

0:10:57.720 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 1>this before? Not in this relationship, earlier, younger, way back?

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 1>When When was the first time you felt this particular

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>flavor of hurt. The answer to that second question is

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 1>not the person in front of you. And when you

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 1>know that, when you can see that trigger as a

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:16.840
<v Speaker 1>door to something much older, you stop trying to solve

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the present moment and start attending to the actual source.

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:24.079
<v Speaker 1>That is where the real healing is. And the most

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 1>aggravating person in your life is often the one holding

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the door open mine Set number four. Clarity is not found,

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:57.880
<v Speaker 1>it's built through action. This is for anyone who's waiting,

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:00.960
<v Speaker 1>waiting for the sign, waiting to feel a ready, waiting

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 1>for the path to become clear. Take the first step.

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 1>I have to tell you something that I wish someone

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 1>told me ten years earlier. The clarity is not coming

0:12:11.640 --> 0:12:15.960
<v Speaker 1>before the action. The clarity is the product of the action.

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 1>You do not think your way to a clear life.

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 1>You live your way to a clear life. The path

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 1>doesn't become clear by just looking. The path becomes clear

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:30.719
<v Speaker 1>by putting one foot in front of the other, and

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:35.000
<v Speaker 1>then it appears. Here's the science. The psychologist Mihi Chick

0:12:35.080 --> 0:12:38.720
<v Speaker 1>sent me High, whose work on flow states we've referenced before,

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 1>found that people most commonly experienced their deepest sense of

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:46.840
<v Speaker 1>purpose and meaning not in moments of reflection, but in

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 1>moments of engaged activity, not when they're thinking about what

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 1>they want to do, but when they're doing it. This

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:58.080
<v Speaker 1>maps directly onto what neuroscience now knows about how the

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 1>brain generates meaning. Meaning is not a conclusion the brain

0:13:01.880 --> 0:13:06.600
<v Speaker 1>reaches after sufficient contemplation. It is a byproduct of engagement,

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 1>of doing, creating, building, moving. The brain makes meaning retrospectively

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>from the raw material of lived experience. You cannot think

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:21.439
<v Speaker 1>yourself into a meaningful life. You have to live yourself

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:26.199
<v Speaker 1>into one. The ancient Sanskrit concept of karma is entirely

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 1>misunderstood in Western culture. We think of karma as cosmic justice.

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:32.839
<v Speaker 1>What goes around comes around, and there's truth to that,

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 1>but in its original philosophical context, Karma simply means action.

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Karma is the act itself, and The Bug with Ghita

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 1>is perhaps the world's most sophisticated treatise on action, specifically

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 1>on the relationship between action, identity, and liberation. Christna's central

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:53.679
<v Speaker 1>teaching to origin in the Geta is not figure out

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:56.960
<v Speaker 1>your purpose and an act. It is act without attachment

0:13:57.040 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 1>to the outcome, and purpose will reveal its self. Listen

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:04.679
<v Speaker 1>to that again, write it down. Think about that. The

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 1>action comes first, the clarity follows. So many people are

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 1>paralyzed waiting to know, waiting to be sure, waiting for

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the vision to be clear enough before they risk moving

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 1>toward it. And the painful irony is that the waiting

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 1>is the very thing preventing the clarity from arriving. Here's

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the immediate application, and it's simply enough to do today.

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 1>You don't need to know the five year plan. You

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>just need to know your next five steps. You don't

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 1>need to know where you'll be in ten years. All

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 1>you need to know is what you're going to do

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:44.880
<v Speaker 1>next today, whatever it is, whether it's a phone call,

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 1>an application, a conversation, and hours spent doing the thing

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 1>instead of thinking about the thing. The clarity you're waiting

0:14:52.160 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 1>for is hiding inside the action you keep postponing. Stop

0:14:57.320 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 1>waiting to know, start doing. Find out. Mindset five. You

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 1>don't rise to your goals, you fall to your environment.

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 1>This one changed how I designed every aspect of my

0:15:10.400 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 1>daily life, and it is the mindset that I think

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:17.560
<v Speaker 1>most people resist the hardest, because accepting it means accepting

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 1>something deeply uncomfortable. Your willpower is not the problem. Your

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 1>environment is. Let me say that again, because it runs

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 1>counter to everything productivity culture tells you. Your willpower is

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 1>not the problem. Your environment is. The psychologist James Clear,

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 1>building on decades of behavioral science, articulated something in atomic

0:15:38.960 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 1>habits that has now been validated across hundreds of studies.

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Human behavior is far less driven by conscious intention than

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:51.440
<v Speaker 1>we believe, and far more driven by environmental cues. What

0:15:51.520 --> 0:15:55.200
<v Speaker 1>we see, what's accessible, what surround us, what the people

0:15:55.240 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 1>around us do. These are the primary drivers of behavior,

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 1>not goals, Motivation not discipline. The person who wants to

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 1>eat better but keeps their kitchen full of food that

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 1>undermines that goal is not going to succeed through willpower.

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 1>The person who wants to read more but keeps their

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 1>phone on their bedside table instead of a book is

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 1>not going to succeed through discipline. The person who wants

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 1>to grow but surrounds themselves exclusively with people who are

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 1>comfortable with stagnation is not going to succeed through intention.

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 1>This is not pessimism. This is power, because if the

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 1>environment is the primary driver of behavior, then designing your

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 1>environment is the most powerful thing you can do for

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 1>your goals, more powerful than motivation, more powerful than a

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 1>vision board, more powerful than any amount of willpower. The

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 1>ancient Indian concept of Sunger understood this completely. Sunger or

0:16:52.760 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 1>sut sung literally means the company of truth. This was

0:16:58.240 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the practice of deliberately sourrounding yourself with people whose presence

0:17:02.920 --> 0:17:07.360
<v Speaker 1>pulled you toward your highest self, not just people you liked,

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 1>people who, by virtue of who they were and how

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:14.159
<v Speaker 1>they lived, made it easier for you to be who

0:17:14.200 --> 0:17:17.880
<v Speaker 1>you were trying to become. The tradition understood that humans

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:23.680
<v Speaker 1>are profoundly inevitably influenced by their environment, especially their social environment,

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and rather than fighting that influence through discipline, the wisdom

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 1>was to design the environment so that the influence worked

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:36.720
<v Speaker 1>for you rather than against you. Research by social psychologist

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Nicholas Christakis at Yale confirmed this at scale in a

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 1>landmark study tracking thousands of people over decades. He found

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 1>that behaviors including happiness, obesity, smoking, and even loneliness spread

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:55.239
<v Speaker 1>through social networks like contagion. You're not just influenced by

0:17:55.240 --> 0:17:59.480
<v Speaker 1>your friends. You were influenced by your friends, friends, friends,

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:05.640
<v Speaker 1>three degrees of separation. The environment is that powerful. Here's

0:18:05.680 --> 0:18:08.119
<v Speaker 1>the immediate application. You don't have to quit on all

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:12.400
<v Speaker 1>your friends. Three questions to ask about your current environment. First,

0:18:12.640 --> 0:18:17.040
<v Speaker 1>does your physical space make your most important behaviors easier

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:20.159
<v Speaker 1>or harder? If you want to meditate, is there a

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:24.200
<v Speaker 1>clear quiet space that invites it? If you want to create,

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 1>is your workspace organized around creation or is everything arranged

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 1>around distraction? Second? Does your social environment the five people

0:18:33.600 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 1>you spend the most time with make you more or

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 1>less likely to become who you're trying to be, not

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 1>whether you love them, whether their orbit is pulling you

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 1>forward or holding you in place. Third, what is the

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:48.639
<v Speaker 1>single easiest change you could make to your environment today,

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:52.960
<v Speaker 1>right now, that would make your most important goal more likely?

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:57.919
<v Speaker 1>Not a dramatic thing, The smallest possible environmental adjustment that

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 1>removes friction between you and who you're trying to become.

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:04.439
<v Speaker 1>You don't rise to your goals, as James Claire says,

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 1>you fall to your environment. So build an environment worth

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:13.200
<v Speaker 1>falling to. Mindset six, The most dangerous story you tell

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:16.880
<v Speaker 1>is the one about yourself. Every person walking the planet

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:19.560
<v Speaker 1>is a narrator of their own life, and like all

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:24.399
<v Speaker 1>narrators were, unreliable. We edit. We emphasize certain chapters and

0:19:24.400 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 1>minimize others. We assign causation where there's only correlation. We

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:32.600
<v Speaker 1>cast ourselves in roles, sometimes the hero, sometimes the victim,

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:36.000
<v Speaker 1>always the protagonist, and we mistake those roles for truth.

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:39.680
<v Speaker 1>The story you tell about yourself is the most powerful

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>force in your life, more powerful than your circumstances, more

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 1>powerful than your talent, more powerful than your opportunities, because

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the story decides which opportunities you see, which risks you take,

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:56.879
<v Speaker 1>which relationships you believe you deserve, and which version of

0:19:56.920 --> 0:20:00.719
<v Speaker 1>your future you allow yourself to move forward. The psychologist

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Dan mccadams at Northwestern University has spent his career studying

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:10.160
<v Speaker 1>what he calls narrative identity, the story each person constructs

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 1>about who they are and how they came to be

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:15.920
<v Speaker 1>that way, and his research has found something both obvious

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:21.680
<v Speaker 1>and profound. The content of yourself narrative predicts your psychological

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:25.920
<v Speaker 1>well being, your resilience, and your capacity for growth more

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 1>reliably than almost any other variable. Not what happened to you,

0:20:31.440 --> 0:20:35.120
<v Speaker 1>how you story what happened to you. Two people can

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 1>go through almost identical experiences, the difficult childhood, the professional failure,

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:44.639
<v Speaker 1>the painful relationship, and construct completely different narratives from the

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 1>same raw material. One person stories it as evidence of

0:20:48.640 --> 0:20:52.159
<v Speaker 1>their damage, the other stories it as the origin of

0:20:52.240 --> 0:20:57.360
<v Speaker 1>their depth. The experiences were similar, the narrators made different choices.

0:20:58.080 --> 0:21:02.639
<v Speaker 1>McAdams identified what he called the redemption narrative, a story

0:21:02.680 --> 0:21:07.120
<v Speaker 1>structure where difficult chapters are told as leading to growth, insight,

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:10.960
<v Speaker 1>or strength. He found that people who naturally organize their

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 1>self narratives around redemption are significantly more psychologically healthy, more generative,

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 1>and more resilient than those who organize around contamination, where

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:24.440
<v Speaker 1>a good thing was ruined, where a hopeful beginning led

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 1>to a bad end. The difference is not in what happened.

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:31.199
<v Speaker 1>The difference is in how it is told. Here's what

0:21:31.240 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 1>I want you to do with this immediately, think of

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the story you most consistently tell about yourself, the one

0:21:37.280 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 1>that comes up in therapy or with close friends, or

0:21:40.119 --> 0:21:42.920
<v Speaker 1>at three am when you're being most honest, the one

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:45.919
<v Speaker 1>that explains why things are the way they are, why

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:49.399
<v Speaker 1>you are the way you are. Now ask is this

0:21:49.520 --> 0:21:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the only story the evidence supports or is it one story,

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 1>one edit, one emphasis, of many that could be constructed

0:21:57.280 --> 0:22:00.520
<v Speaker 1>from the same facts. What would the story look like

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:03.960
<v Speaker 1>if you're telling it as evidence of your strength rather

0:22:04.040 --> 0:22:07.760
<v Speaker 1>than your damage, as evidence of your wisdom rather than

0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:12.159
<v Speaker 1>your wounds, as a chapter rather than a conclusion. You

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:16.919
<v Speaker 1>are the narrator, the raw materials fixed, The narration is yours.

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:21.120
<v Speaker 1>This isn't toxic positivity. Choose a story that is honest

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:24.879
<v Speaker 1>that gives you somewhere to go. Mindset seven. Love is

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:28.520
<v Speaker 1>not a feeling. It is a daily decision. A student

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 1>once asked a teacher, what's the difference between I like

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 1>you and I love you? The teacher replied, when you

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:40.399
<v Speaker 1>like a flower, you simply pluck it, but when you

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 1>love a flower, you water it every day. Love is

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:49.080
<v Speaker 1>a daily act, a daily decision, not just a feeling.

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I've saved this one for last deliberately because I think

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 1>it is the most important, and I think it is

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the most misunderstood, and I think getting it wrong is

0:22:58.280 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 1>responsible for more human suffering than almost anything else I

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 1>could name. Here's the story our culture tells us about love.

0:23:05.720 --> 0:23:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Love is a feeling that arrives, a lightning bolt, a chemistry,

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:12.480
<v Speaker 1>a sense of recognition there you are, that happens to

0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 1>you rather than being made by you. And when the

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 1>feeling is there, the relationship works. And when the feeling fades,

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 1>which it inevitably does because all feelings are temporary, the

0:23:23.080 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 1>relationship is over because the love is gone. This story

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 1>is everywhere, in every rom com and every love song

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 1>and every dating app designed around the initial spark. It

0:23:33.320 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 1>is so pervasive that most people have never questioned it.

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 1>The psychologist Robert Sternberg at Yale developed what he called

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the triangular theory of love, a framework that identifies three

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:51.119
<v Speaker 1>components of genuine, durable love passion, intimacy, and commitment, and

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:54.480
<v Speaker 1>his research found that of the three, passion, the feeling,

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:58.760
<v Speaker 1>the spark, the chemistry has the shortest lifespan. It peaks early,

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:02.800
<v Speaker 1>often within months of relationship beginning, and it declines predictably

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:06.399
<v Speaker 1>regardless of how compatible, how suited, or how deeply in

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:09.560
<v Speaker 1>love two people genuinely are. This is not a bug,

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:14.480
<v Speaker 1>This is biology. The neurochemicals responsible for the early intensity

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 1>of romantic love, dopamine uropanephrine, are designed to initiate bonding,

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:23.880
<v Speaker 1>not maintain it. They're a starter motor, not an engine.

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 1>The relationships that last, the ones that deepen rather than erode,

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 1>are built on what remains after the starter motor quiets,

0:24:32.600 --> 0:24:35.640
<v Speaker 1>And what remains is not a feeling. It is a

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:41.119
<v Speaker 1>series of daily, often mundane, often imperfect choices. The choice

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:44.959
<v Speaker 1>to be curious about this person rather than certain about them,

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the choice to repair the rupture rather than catalog it.

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:52.119
<v Speaker 1>The choice to see them fully, not just the version

0:24:52.160 --> 0:24:55.680
<v Speaker 1>you fell for, but the complex, contradictory, sometimes maddening, a

0:24:55.680 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 1>whole person in front of you, and choose them anyway.

0:24:58.800 --> 0:25:03.160
<v Speaker 1>The difference between a relationship that survives and a relationship

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:07.439
<v Speaker 1>that dies is not the absence of conflict. It was

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the presence of what John Gotman calls bids for connection,

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the small, daily, often trivial, attempts one person makes to

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:21.680
<v Speaker 1>reach toward the other, a joke, a question, a touch,

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 1>a look, and the critical variable was whether those bids

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 1>were met, turned toward in Gotman's language, rather than turned

0:25:30.560 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 1>away from. The Relationships that lasted were not the ones

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:37.879
<v Speaker 1>with the most passion or the best compatibility scores or

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the fewest arguments. They were the ones where both people,

0:25:42.119 --> 0:25:45.160
<v Speaker 1>most of the time, in the small moments that feel

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:49.440
<v Speaker 1>like they don't count, choose to turn toward each other.

0:25:50.200 --> 0:25:53.720
<v Speaker 1>That is not a feeling, That is a practice. Here's

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the immediate application. Think of the most important relationship in

0:25:57.280 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 1>your life right now, and ask what is the smallest,

0:26:01.160 --> 0:26:05.360
<v Speaker 1>most available, most concrete bid for connection I could make

0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 1>toward this person today. Not a grand gesture, not a

0:26:09.080 --> 0:26:14.359
<v Speaker 1>difficult conversation, the smallest genuine movement toward them. A text

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:16.800
<v Speaker 1>that says I was thinking of you, A question that

0:26:16.800 --> 0:26:20.040
<v Speaker 1>shows you've been paying attention, five minutes of eye contact

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:22.399
<v Speaker 1>without a phone in the room, the choice to be

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:26.440
<v Speaker 1>curious rather than reactive in the next disagreement. Love is

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 1>a daily decision. Make it today. Here's what I know

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:33.680
<v Speaker 1>about mindsets. They don't change your life by being interesting.

0:26:34.240 --> 0:26:37.920
<v Speaker 1>They change your life by being practiced, by being returned

0:26:37.920 --> 0:26:41.000
<v Speaker 1>to again and again until they stop being ideas you

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:44.159
<v Speaker 1>agree with and start being the lens through which you

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 1>automatically see. That process takes time, takes repetition, takes the

0:26:49.000 --> 0:26:51.840
<v Speaker 1>courage to keep applying an idea even when the situation

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:55.520
<v Speaker 1>is hard and the easier thing is to react from habit.

0:26:56.119 --> 0:26:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for listening today. I hope you'll

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:01.000
<v Speaker 1>share this with a friend, and I hope you'll choose

0:27:01.000 --> 0:27:04.199
<v Speaker 1>a mindset to practice for the next seven days. Remember

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm forever in your corner and I'm always rooting for you.

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:09.879
<v Speaker 1>If you enjoyed this conversation, you're going to love my

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:14.120
<v Speaker 1>episode with Arnold Schwarzenegger on how to make your visions

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:17.920
<v Speaker 1>of reality and how to stop having a limited mindset.

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I never believed in Plan B. If I start having

0:27:21.600 --> 0:27:25.120
<v Speaker 1>a Plan B, that means now that I'm saying, well,

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe this isn't working out.