Speaker 1: I want to be honest with you about something before
Speaker 1: we start. Most mindset content is forgettable, not because the
Speaker 1: ideas are wrong. Some of them are genuinely good, but
Speaker 1: because they're delivered like fortune cookies. They're punchy, quotable, and
Speaker 1: gone by Tuesday. You read the book, you highlight the line,
Speaker 1: you feel something shift, and then life comes back. The argument,
Speaker 1: the deadline, the three am spiral, and the highlight in
Speaker 1: the book means nothing because the idea never got deep
Speaker 1: enough to actually change anything. You might see yourself feel
Speaker 1: this way, You're still reacting the same way. You're still
Speaker 1: choosing the same kind of people. You're still telling yourself
Speaker 1: the same stories about why things aren't working. The mindsets
Speaker 1: I'm going to share with you today are actually going
Speaker 1: to shift something and change something for you for real.
Speaker 1: They're the ones that, when they finally landed, really landed
Speaker 1: in the body, not just in the head, change something
Speaker 1: that stayed changed, changed how I see a difficult conversation, changed,
Speaker 1: how I moved through failure, changed how I love people.
Speaker 1: There are seven of them, and I'm going to give
Speaker 1: you them straight, with the science, with the wisdom traditions
Speaker 1: behind them, and with the stories from my own life,
Speaker 1: and with the specific way you can use each one immediately,
Speaker 1: not next month, not when things calm down. Immediately, let's
Speaker 1: get stired. Mindset one. Pain is a postcard, not a
Speaker 1: permanent address. The first mindset that changed my life sounds
Speaker 1: almost insultingly simple when I say it out loud, but
Speaker 1: I need you to hear what's underneath. Pain is a postcard,
Speaker 1: not a permanent address. Here's what I mean. When I
Speaker 1: was at my lowest, when the career I thought I
Speaker 1: wanted had fallen apart, when I had moved back home
Speaker 1: after failing at the monastery in a way that felt permanent,
Speaker 1: when I was surrounded by people who had expected more
Speaker 1: from me, and I had expected more from myself, I
Speaker 1: made a mistake that I think almost everyone makes when
Speaker 1: things go badly. I moved in, not literally mentally. I
Speaker 1: took the painful chapter and turned it into my identity.
Speaker 1: I stopped treating it like something that was happening, and
Speaker 1: started treating it like something that was true, Like the
Speaker 1: failure wasn't something I'd been through, like it was something
Speaker 1: I was. And here's what the neuroscience says about that distinction.
Speaker 1: Because it's not just poetic, it's biological. The psychologist Martin
Speaker 1: Seligmann spent decades studying what he called explanatory style, the
Speaker 1: way people explained bad events to themselves, and he found
Speaker 1: that when people experience setbacks, they tend to explain them
Speaker 1: in one of two fundamentally different ways. Some people explain
Speaker 1: setbacks as temporary, specific, and external. This happened in this
Speaker 1: situation for these reasons. Others explain them as permanent, pervasive,
Speaker 1: and personal. This is who I am, I am, this
Speaker 1: is what always happens. This is what I can always expect.
Speaker 1: The first group recovers faster, more completely, and often stronger
Speaker 1: than before. The second group gets stuck, not because they're weaker,
Speaker 1: because they moved into the pain and started decorating. The
Speaker 1: Vedic tradition has a concept that maps onto this perfectly,
Speaker 1: a nitia, the Sanskrit word for impermanence. Nothing is permanent,
Speaker 1: not the good and not the bad. The ancient teachers
Speaker 1: weren't saying this to comfort you. They were saying it
Speaker 1: as a precise description of reality. Everything passes, everything, including this.
Speaker 1: The postcard mindset is this when pain arrives, and it
Speaker 1: will it always does. You read the postcard. You sit
Speaker 1: with it, you feel it fully, because unfelt pain doesn't leave,
Speaker 1: it just goes underground. But you do not unpack your bags,
Speaker 1: You do not redecorate, you do not forward your mail.
Speaker 1: You're a visitor in this moment, not a resident. This
Speaker 1: too shall pass. Here's how you apply this immediately the
Speaker 1: next time something painful arrives, a rejection, a failure, a loss,
Speaker 1: a conversation that goes badly, ask yourself one question before
Speaker 1: you do anything else. Am I feeling this? Or am
Speaker 1: I becoming it? Feeling it is healthy, necessary, human Becoming
Speaker 1: it is the decision, often unconscious, always costly, to let
Speaker 1: a moment define you instead of shape you. You are
Speaker 1: allowed to feel everything, you are not required to become it.
Speaker 1: Pain is a postcard, Read it, learn from it, then
Speaker 1: put it down. Mindset too. You are not your thoughts,
Speaker 1: you or what you do with them. This one took
Speaker 1: me years to actually understand. You may have heard it before,
Speaker 1: but I don't just want you to understand it intellectually.
Speaker 1: I understood the theory almost immediately, but to actually understand
Speaker 1: it in the way that changes behavior. Here's the version
Speaker 1: I was living before this mindset. I believed that because
Speaker 1: I thought something, it meant something that because a thought arrived,
Speaker 1: you're not good enough. They don't really respect you. This
Speaker 1: is never going to work. It was delivering truth. I
Speaker 1: was taking delivery of every thought like it was a
Speaker 1: certified letter from reality. I was wrong and it was
Speaker 1: costing me everything. The cognitive psychologist Aaron Beck, the founder
Speaker 1: of cognitive behavioral therapy, one of the most evidence based
Speaker 1: psychological frameworks, we have identified something he called automatic thoughts,
Speaker 1: rapid reflexive mental commentary that runs continuously below the level
Speaker 1: of deliberate thinking. And he found that in people experiencing depression, anxiety,
Speaker 1: and relational difficulties, these automatic thoughts shared consistent characteristics. They
Speaker 1: were distorted, they were negative. They were experienced as unquestionable truth.
Speaker 1: The thought arrives, it feels true, therefore it is true.
Speaker 1: Beck's entire therapeutic revolution was built on one insight. The
Speaker 1: thought is not the truth. The thought is a hypothesis,
Speaker 1: and like any hypothesis, it can be tested. Marcus Aurelius
Speaker 1: wrote in his Meditations, you have power over your mind,
Speaker 1: not outside events. Realize this and you will find strength.
Speaker 1: Here's the immediate application. It's three words and I want
Speaker 1: you to use them. Every time a thought arrives that
Speaker 1: feels like an indictment. Is this true? Not? Is this possible? Not?
Speaker 1: Could this be true? Is this actually demonstrably, evidentially true?
Speaker 1: And if you can't answer with concrete evidence, if the
Speaker 1: thought is a feeling dressed as a fact, you are
Speaker 1: not required to take delivery. You are not your thoughts.
Speaker 1: You are what you do with them, and what you
Speaker 1: do with them starts with the radical act of questioning
Speaker 1: whether they deserve your belief. Mindset three. This is a
Speaker 1: rough one. The people who trigger you the most are
Speaker 1: your greatest teachers. I hate this one. It hurts me,
Speaker 1: It pains me, it worries me. I'm like, God, do
Speaker 1: I have to learn it that way? And I need
Speaker 1: to be careful with this one because it can be
Speaker 1: misunderstood in a way that causes genuine harm. I'm not
Speaker 1: saying that people who hurt you deserve a medal. Just
Speaker 1: to be clear, I'm not saying abuse is a lesson
Speaker 1: you should be grateful for. I'm not saying that toxic
Speaker 1: behavior is secretly your spiritual curriculum. What I am saying
Speaker 1: is something more specific and more useful than that. The
Speaker 1: emotional reactions that hit hardest, the ones that seem disproportionate,
Speaker 1: the ones that linger longer than make sense, the ones
Speaker 1: that make you behave in ways you don't recognize as yourself.
Speaker 1: Are almost never fully about the present moment. They are signals,
Speaker 1: and the person who triggered the signal is pointing without
Speaker 1: knowing it, at something that was already there. Here's the
Speaker 1: psychology behind this. The concept is called transference, first identified
Speaker 1: by Freud, but significantly developed and validated by modern relational therapists.
Speaker 1: Transference is the unconscious redirection of feelings from a past
Speaker 1: relationship onto a present one. When someone in your life
Speaker 1: provokes a reaction that feels too big, too intense to immediate,
Speaker 1: too hard to let go of, it is frequently because
Speaker 1: they have activated a wound that predates them entirely. The
Speaker 1: partner who dismisses your feelings isn't just a dismissive partner.
Speaker 1: They are also for your nervous system. Every person who
Speaker 1: ever dismissed you, the parent who didn't have the emotional bandwidth,
Speaker 1: the teacher who made you feel stupid, the friend who
Speaker 1: chose someone else. The reaction you're having right now is
Speaker 1: the sum of all those reactions, which means the most
Speaker 1: triggering people in your life are giving you a map,
Speaker 1: a map to the places that still need your attention,
Speaker 1: a map to the wounds that haven't yet healed, a
Speaker 1: map to the patterns that keep repeating, not because you're broken,
Speaker 1: but because the nervous system keeps seeking resolution for what
Speaker 1: was never resolved. The Youngean concept of the shadow is
Speaker 1: essential here. Carl Jung believed that every person carries a shadow,
Speaker 1: the parts of themselves they've disowned, suppressed, or refused to acknowledge.
Speaker 1: And he observed that what he most disliked in others
Speaker 1: is frequently what he most refused to see in himself.
Speaker 1: The person who infuriates you with their arrogance? Do you
Speaker 1: have arrogance you've been trained to suppress. The person whose
Speaker 1: neediness exhausts you. Do you have needs you've convinced yourself
Speaker 1: not to have. The person whose anger frightens you. Do
Speaker 1: you have anger you've never allowed yourself to feel. This
Speaker 1: is not accusation, This is cartography. You're mapping yourself through
Speaker 1: your reactions. Here's how to use this sensitively. The next
Speaker 1: time someone triggers you, and I mean really triggers you,
Speaker 1: the disproportionate reaction, the one you can't shake. Instead of
Speaker 1: asking why are they like this, ask two different questions. First,
Speaker 1: what specifically is being activated in me right now? Not
Speaker 1: what did they do? What got activated? Name the feeling
Speaker 1: as precisely as you can. Second, where have I felt
Speaker 1: this before? Not in this relationship, earlier, younger, way back?
Speaker 1: When When was the first time you felt this particular
Speaker 1: flavor of hurt. The answer to that second question is
Speaker 1: not the person in front of you. And when you
Speaker 1: know that, when you can see that trigger as a
Speaker 1: door to something much older, you stop trying to solve
Speaker 1: the present moment and start attending to the actual source.
Speaker 1: That is where the real healing is. And the most
Speaker 1: aggravating person in your life is often the one holding
Speaker 1: the door open mine Set number four. Clarity is not found,
Speaker 1: it's built through action. This is for anyone who's waiting,
Speaker 1: waiting for the sign, waiting to feel a ready, waiting
Speaker 1: for the path to become clear. Take the first step.
Speaker 1: I have to tell you something that I wish someone
Speaker 1: told me ten years earlier. The clarity is not coming
Speaker 1: before the action. The clarity is the product of the action.
Speaker 1: You do not think your way to a clear life.
Speaker 1: You live your way to a clear life. The path
Speaker 1: doesn't become clear by just looking. The path becomes clear
Speaker 1: by putting one foot in front of the other, and
Speaker 1: then it appears. Here's the science. The psychologist Mihi Chick
Speaker 1: sent me High, whose work on flow states we've referenced before,
Speaker 1: found that people most commonly experienced their deepest sense of
Speaker 1: purpose and meaning not in moments of reflection, but in
Speaker 1: moments of engaged activity, not when they're thinking about what
Speaker 1: they want to do, but when they're doing it. This
Speaker 1: maps directly onto what neuroscience now knows about how the
Speaker 1: brain generates meaning. Meaning is not a conclusion the brain
Speaker 1: reaches after sufficient contemplation. It is a byproduct of engagement,
Speaker 1: of doing, creating, building, moving. The brain makes meaning retrospectively
Speaker 1: from the raw material of lived experience. You cannot think
Speaker 1: yourself into a meaningful life. You have to live yourself
Speaker 1: into one. The ancient Sanskrit concept of karma is entirely
Speaker 1: misunderstood in Western culture. We think of karma as cosmic justice.
Speaker 1: What goes around comes around, and there's truth to that,
Speaker 1: but in its original philosophical context, Karma simply means action.
Speaker 1: Karma is the act itself, and The Bug with Ghita
Speaker 1: is perhaps the world's most sophisticated treatise on action, specifically
Speaker 1: on the relationship between action, identity, and liberation. Christna's central
Speaker 1: teaching to origin in the Geta is not figure out
Speaker 1: your purpose and an act. It is act without attachment
Speaker 1: to the outcome, and purpose will reveal its self. Listen
Speaker 1: to that again, write it down. Think about that. The
Speaker 1: action comes first, the clarity follows. So many people are
Speaker 1: paralyzed waiting to know, waiting to be sure, waiting for
Speaker 1: the vision to be clear enough before they risk moving
Speaker 1: toward it. And the painful irony is that the waiting
Speaker 1: is the very thing preventing the clarity from arriving. Here's
Speaker 1: the immediate application, and it's simply enough to do today.
Speaker 1: You don't need to know the five year plan. You
Speaker 1: just need to know your next five steps. You don't
Speaker 1: need to know where you'll be in ten years. All
Speaker 1: you need to know is what you're going to do
Speaker 1: next today, whatever it is, whether it's a phone call,
Speaker 1: an application, a conversation, and hours spent doing the thing
Speaker 1: instead of thinking about the thing. The clarity you're waiting
Speaker 1: for is hiding inside the action you keep postponing. Stop
Speaker 1: waiting to know, start doing. Find out. Mindset five. You
Speaker 1: don't rise to your goals, you fall to your environment.
Speaker 1: This one changed how I designed every aspect of my
Speaker 1: daily life, and it is the mindset that I think
Speaker 1: most people resist the hardest, because accepting it means accepting
Speaker 1: something deeply uncomfortable. Your willpower is not the problem. Your
Speaker 1: environment is. Let me say that again, because it runs
Speaker 1: counter to everything productivity culture tells you. Your willpower is
Speaker 1: not the problem. Your environment is. The psychologist James Clear,
Speaker 1: building on decades of behavioral science, articulated something in atomic
Speaker 1: habits that has now been validated across hundreds of studies.
Speaker 1: Human behavior is far less driven by conscious intention than
Speaker 1: we believe, and far more driven by environmental cues. What
Speaker 1: we see, what's accessible, what surround us, what the people
Speaker 1: around us do. These are the primary drivers of behavior,
Speaker 1: not goals, Motivation not discipline. The person who wants to
Speaker 1: eat better but keeps their kitchen full of food that
Speaker 1: undermines that goal is not going to succeed through willpower.
Speaker 1: The person who wants to read more but keeps their
Speaker 1: phone on their bedside table instead of a book is
Speaker 1: not going to succeed through discipline. The person who wants
Speaker 1: to grow but surrounds themselves exclusively with people who are
Speaker 1: comfortable with stagnation is not going to succeed through intention.
Speaker 1: This is not pessimism. This is power, because if the
Speaker 1: environment is the primary driver of behavior, then designing your
Speaker 1: environment is the most powerful thing you can do for
Speaker 1: your goals, more powerful than motivation, more powerful than a
Speaker 1: vision board, more powerful than any amount of willpower. The
Speaker 1: ancient Indian concept of Sunger understood this completely. Sunger or
Speaker 1: sut sung literally means the company of truth. This was
Speaker 1: the practice of deliberately sourrounding yourself with people whose presence
Speaker 1: pulled you toward your highest self, not just people you liked,
Speaker 1: people who, by virtue of who they were and how
Speaker 1: they lived, made it easier for you to be who
Speaker 1: you were trying to become. The tradition understood that humans
Speaker 1: are profoundly inevitably influenced by their environment, especially their social environment,
Speaker 1: and rather than fighting that influence through discipline, the wisdom
Speaker 1: was to design the environment so that the influence worked
Speaker 1: for you rather than against you. Research by social psychologist
Speaker 1: Nicholas Christakis at Yale confirmed this at scale in a
Speaker 1: landmark study tracking thousands of people over decades. He found
Speaker 1: that behaviors including happiness, obesity, smoking, and even loneliness spread
Speaker 1: through social networks like contagion. You're not just influenced by
Speaker 1: your friends. You were influenced by your friends, friends, friends,
Speaker 1: three degrees of separation. The environment is that powerful. Here's
Speaker 1: the immediate application. You don't have to quit on all
Speaker 1: your friends. Three questions to ask about your current environment. First,
Speaker 1: does your physical space make your most important behaviors easier
Speaker 1: or harder? If you want to meditate, is there a
Speaker 1: clear quiet space that invites it? If you want to create,
Speaker 1: is your workspace organized around creation or is everything arranged
Speaker 1: around distraction? Second? Does your social environment the five people
Speaker 1: you spend the most time with make you more or
Speaker 1: less likely to become who you're trying to be, not
Speaker 1: whether you love them, whether their orbit is pulling you
Speaker 1: forward or holding you in place. Third, what is the
Speaker 1: single easiest change you could make to your environment today,
Speaker 1: right now, that would make your most important goal more likely?
Speaker 1: Not a dramatic thing, The smallest possible environmental adjustment that
Speaker 1: removes friction between you and who you're trying to become.
Speaker 1: You don't rise to your goals, as James Claire says,
Speaker 1: you fall to your environment. So build an environment worth
Speaker 1: falling to. Mindset six, The most dangerous story you tell
Speaker 1: is the one about yourself. Every person walking the planet
Speaker 1: is a narrator of their own life, and like all
Speaker 1: narrators were, unreliable. We edit. We emphasize certain chapters and
Speaker 1: minimize others. We assign causation where there's only correlation. We
Speaker 1: cast ourselves in roles, sometimes the hero, sometimes the victim,
Speaker 1: always the protagonist, and we mistake those roles for truth.
Speaker 1: The story you tell about yourself is the most powerful
Speaker 1: force in your life, more powerful than your circumstances, more
Speaker 1: powerful than your talent, more powerful than your opportunities, because
Speaker 1: the story decides which opportunities you see, which risks you take,
Speaker 1: which relationships you believe you deserve, and which version of
Speaker 1: your future you allow yourself to move forward. The psychologist
Speaker 1: Dan mccadams at Northwestern University has spent his career studying
Speaker 1: what he calls narrative identity, the story each person constructs
Speaker 1: about who they are and how they came to be
Speaker 1: that way, and his research has found something both obvious
Speaker 1: and profound. The content of yourself narrative predicts your psychological
Speaker 1: well being, your resilience, and your capacity for growth more
Speaker 1: reliably than almost any other variable. Not what happened to you,
Speaker 1: how you story what happened to you. Two people can
Speaker 1: go through almost identical experiences, the difficult childhood, the professional failure,
Speaker 1: the painful relationship, and construct completely different narratives from the
Speaker 1: same raw material. One person stories it as evidence of
Speaker 1: their damage, the other stories it as the origin of
Speaker 1: their depth. The experiences were similar, the narrators made different choices.
Speaker 1: McAdams identified what he called the redemption narrative, a story
Speaker 1: structure where difficult chapters are told as leading to growth, insight,
Speaker 1: or strength. He found that people who naturally organize their
Speaker 1: self narratives around redemption are significantly more psychologically healthy, more generative,
Speaker 1: and more resilient than those who organize around contamination, where
Speaker 1: a good thing was ruined, where a hopeful beginning led
Speaker 1: to a bad end. The difference is not in what happened.
Speaker 1: The difference is in how it is told. Here's what
Speaker 1: I want you to do with this immediately, think of
Speaker 1: the story you most consistently tell about yourself, the one
Speaker 1: that comes up in therapy or with close friends, or
Speaker 1: at three am when you're being most honest, the one
Speaker 1: that explains why things are the way they are, why
Speaker 1: you are the way you are. Now ask is this
Speaker 1: the only story the evidence supports or is it one story,
Speaker 1: one edit, one emphasis, of many that could be constructed
Speaker 1: from the same facts. What would the story look like
Speaker 1: if you're telling it as evidence of your strength rather
Speaker 1: than your damage, as evidence of your wisdom rather than
Speaker 1: your wounds, as a chapter rather than a conclusion. You
Speaker 1: are the narrator, the raw materials fixed, The narration is yours.
Speaker 1: This isn't toxic positivity. Choose a story that is honest
Speaker 1: that gives you somewhere to go. Mindset seven. Love is
Speaker 1: not a feeling. It is a daily decision. A student
Speaker 1: once asked a teacher, what's the difference between I like
Speaker 1: you and I love you? The teacher replied, when you
Speaker 1: like a flower, you simply pluck it, but when you
Speaker 1: love a flower, you water it every day. Love is
Speaker 1: a daily act, a daily decision, not just a feeling.
Speaker 1: I've saved this one for last deliberately because I think
Speaker 1: it is the most important, and I think it is
Speaker 1: the most misunderstood, and I think getting it wrong is
Speaker 1: responsible for more human suffering than almost anything else I
Speaker 1: could name. Here's the story our culture tells us about love.
Speaker 1: Love is a feeling that arrives, a lightning bolt, a chemistry,
Speaker 1: a sense of recognition there you are, that happens to
Speaker 1: you rather than being made by you. And when the
Speaker 1: feeling is there, the relationship works. And when the feeling fades,
Speaker 1: which it inevitably does because all feelings are temporary, the
Speaker 1: relationship is over because the love is gone. This story
Speaker 1: is everywhere, in every rom com and every love song
Speaker 1: and every dating app designed around the initial spark. It
Speaker 1: is so pervasive that most people have never questioned it.
Speaker 1: The psychologist Robert Sternberg at Yale developed what he called
Speaker 1: the triangular theory of love, a framework that identifies three
Speaker 1: components of genuine, durable love passion, intimacy, and commitment, and
Speaker 1: his research found that of the three, passion, the feeling,
Speaker 1: the spark, the chemistry has the shortest lifespan. It peaks early,
Speaker 1: often within months of relationship beginning, and it declines predictably
Speaker 1: regardless of how compatible, how suited, or how deeply in
Speaker 1: love two people genuinely are. This is not a bug,
Speaker 1: This is biology. The neurochemicals responsible for the early intensity
Speaker 1: of romantic love, dopamine uropanephrine, are designed to initiate bonding,
Speaker 1: not maintain it. They're a starter motor, not an engine.
Speaker 1: The relationships that last, the ones that deepen rather than erode,
Speaker 1: are built on what remains after the starter motor quiets,
Speaker 1: And what remains is not a feeling. It is a
Speaker 1: series of daily, often mundane, often imperfect choices. The choice
Speaker 1: to be curious about this person rather than certain about them,
Speaker 1: the choice to repair the rupture rather than catalog it.
Speaker 1: The choice to see them fully, not just the version
Speaker 1: you fell for, but the complex, contradictory, sometimes maddening, a
Speaker 1: whole person in front of you, and choose them anyway.
Speaker 1: The difference between a relationship that survives and a relationship
Speaker 1: that dies is not the absence of conflict. It was
Speaker 1: the presence of what John Gotman calls bids for connection,
Speaker 1: the small, daily, often trivial, attempts one person makes to
Speaker 1: reach toward the other, a joke, a question, a touch,
Speaker 1: a look, and the critical variable was whether those bids
Speaker 1: were met, turned toward in Gotman's language, rather than turned
Speaker 1: away from. The Relationships that lasted were not the ones
Speaker 1: with the most passion or the best compatibility scores or
Speaker 1: the fewest arguments. They were the ones where both people,
Speaker 1: most of the time, in the small moments that feel
Speaker 1: like they don't count, choose to turn toward each other.
Speaker 1: That is not a feeling, That is a practice. Here's
Speaker 1: the immediate application. Think of the most important relationship in
Speaker 1: your life right now, and ask what is the smallest,
Speaker 1: most available, most concrete bid for connection I could make
Speaker 1: toward this person today. Not a grand gesture, not a
Speaker 1: difficult conversation, the smallest genuine movement toward them. A text
Speaker 1: that says I was thinking of you, A question that
Speaker 1: shows you've been paying attention, five minutes of eye contact
Speaker 1: without a phone in the room, the choice to be
Speaker 1: curious rather than reactive in the next disagreement. Love is
Speaker 1: a daily decision. Make it today. Here's what I know
Speaker 1: about mindsets. They don't change your life by being interesting.
Speaker 1: They change your life by being practiced, by being returned
Speaker 1: to again and again until they stop being ideas you
Speaker 1: agree with and start being the lens through which you
Speaker 1: automatically see. That process takes time, takes repetition, takes the
Speaker 1: courage to keep applying an idea even when the situation
Speaker 1: is hard and the easier thing is to react from habit.
Speaker 1: Thank you so much for listening today. I hope you'll
Speaker 1: share this with a friend, and I hope you'll choose
Speaker 1: a mindset to practice for the next seven days. Remember
Speaker 1: I'm forever in your corner and I'm always rooting for you.
Speaker 1: If you enjoyed this conversation, you're going to love my
Speaker 1: episode with Arnold Schwarzenegger on how to make your visions
Speaker 1: of reality and how to stop having a limited mindset.
Speaker 1: I never believed in Plan B. If I start having
Speaker 1: a Plan B, that means now that I'm saying, well,
Speaker 1: maybe this isn't working out.