1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:03,239 Speaker 1: Some pretty big earnings. We're talking about Meta Microsoft and Qualcom. 2 00:00:03,240 --> 00:00:05,760 Speaker 1: We're going to be all over them. We'd also love 3 00:00:05,800 --> 00:00:08,319 Speaker 1: to hear your questions, and it's easy to do so 4 00:00:08,400 --> 00:00:12,040 Speaker 1: you can submit them to us and you'll get answers 5 00:00:12,119 --> 00:00:17,120 Speaker 1: from our expert analysiss and analysts and experts. They will 6 00:00:17,160 --> 00:00:19,239 Speaker 1: answer them live on air. Just go to Bloomberg dot 7 00:00:19,239 --> 00:00:23,240 Speaker 1: com slash Ask Radio send in your questions. We should 8 00:00:23,239 --> 00:00:27,080 Speaker 1: point out this is exclusive to Bloomberg dot com subscribers 9 00:00:27,080 --> 00:00:30,280 Speaker 1: and terminal clients. You can really get some answers and 10 00:00:30,320 --> 00:00:33,000 Speaker 1: analysis and thoughts from some of the smartest minds. When 11 00:00:33,040 --> 00:00:35,640 Speaker 1: it comes to Meta Microsoft and Qualcom, we'll be breaking 12 00:00:35,720 --> 00:00:38,360 Speaker 1: them down going through them again. Just go to Bloomberg 13 00:00:38,360 --> 00:00:41,600 Speaker 1: dot com, slash Ask Radio, and then of course listen 14 00:00:41,640 --> 00:00:44,360 Speaker 1: to us watch us Bloomberg Radio and watch on Bloomberg 15 00:00:44,360 --> 00:00:46,800 Speaker 1: Originals and YouTube. That's all coming your way at four 16 00:00:46,840 --> 00:00:55,960 Speaker 1: pm Wall Street Time, Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. 17 00:00:57,160 --> 00:01:00,840 Speaker 2: You're listening to Bloomberg BusinessWeek with care gerol Master and 18 00:01:00,920 --> 00:01:05,119 Speaker 2: Tim Steneveek on Bloomberg Radio. It's Today's Big Take. It's 19 00:01:05,319 --> 00:01:07,880 Speaker 2: one of the most read stories on the Bloomberg terminal. 20 00:01:07,920 --> 00:01:11,240 Speaker 2: It's a BusinessWeek deep dive into the department of Cerberus. 21 00:01:11,680 --> 00:01:14,080 Speaker 1: Yeah, like you know this firm. It's a financial firm. 22 00:01:14,080 --> 00:01:18,039 Speaker 2: If you're paying attention during the financial crisis, then you 23 00:01:18,080 --> 00:01:18,640 Speaker 2: know this firm. 24 00:01:18,720 --> 00:01:21,880 Speaker 1: You remember them from the auto bailout and takeover of 25 00:01:21,920 --> 00:01:25,840 Speaker 1: some of the auto companies. Deputy Defense Secretary Stephen Feinberg 26 00:01:25,959 --> 00:01:28,680 Speaker 1: wants America's war machine to get cozier with companies. The 27 00:01:28,680 --> 00:01:31,839 Speaker 1: private equity firm he co founded is building a constellation 28 00:01:32,240 --> 00:01:35,120 Speaker 1: of next generation businesses to answer the call. As we mentioned, 29 00:01:35,160 --> 00:01:37,000 Speaker 1: it is among our most read It is the Bloomberg 30 00:01:37,040 --> 00:01:39,319 Speaker 1: Big Take here with more on his reporting. It is 31 00:01:39,360 --> 00:01:43,200 Speaker 1: a very deep dive. Bloomberg News investigative reporter Caleb Melby. 32 00:01:43,200 --> 00:01:46,480 Speaker 1: He joins Tim and me in our Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio. 33 00:01:47,080 --> 00:01:51,000 Speaker 1: Quite a mission and missive, I should say tell us 34 00:01:51,040 --> 00:01:53,360 Speaker 1: about first of all, what for those who might not 35 00:01:53,400 --> 00:01:55,400 Speaker 1: know what Cerberus is, But I believe that the Bloomberg 36 00:01:55,440 --> 00:01:59,680 Speaker 1: audience knows. But remind us kind of their history and 37 00:01:59,720 --> 00:02:00,640 Speaker 1: what the up to now. 38 00:02:00,880 --> 00:02:04,639 Speaker 3: Yeah, private equity and alternative asset manager founded in nineteen 39 00:02:04,680 --> 00:02:08,120 Speaker 3: ninety two by Steve Feinberg, who is the subject of 40 00:02:08,160 --> 00:02:12,639 Speaker 3: this piece. Cerberus has been in this business for a 41 00:02:12,720 --> 00:02:17,840 Speaker 3: few decades now, and in recent years, basically since the 42 00:02:17,880 --> 00:02:21,120 Speaker 3: early two thousands, Steve Feinberg, who has a personal interest 43 00:02:21,200 --> 00:02:25,080 Speaker 3: in national security and defense and spycraft, has really started 44 00:02:25,080 --> 00:02:29,320 Speaker 3: to push them into investments that contract with the Department 45 00:02:29,360 --> 00:02:32,639 Speaker 3: of Defense and are otherwise involved in what we might 46 00:02:32,680 --> 00:02:36,440 Speaker 3: otherwise call the national security space, so critical minerals, supply 47 00:02:36,560 --> 00:02:37,520 Speaker 3: chain stuff like that. 48 00:02:37,560 --> 00:02:40,840 Speaker 2: I don't typically think of private equity firms as defense contractors. 49 00:02:41,160 --> 00:02:42,560 Speaker 2: Explain how Cerberus got there. 50 00:02:42,680 --> 00:02:46,840 Speaker 3: Yeah, so they actually appeared for many years on the 51 00:02:46,880 --> 00:02:49,480 Speaker 3: government's list of top one hundred contractors to the Defense 52 00:02:49,520 --> 00:02:52,480 Speaker 3: Department through their ownership of dine Core. Dine Core was 53 00:02:52,520 --> 00:02:56,960 Speaker 3: the largest services firm in Afghanistan. They did things like 54 00:02:57,040 --> 00:03:03,560 Speaker 3: trained police forces, build barracks in similar activities. They continue 55 00:03:03,560 --> 00:03:08,079 Speaker 3: to operate in acquiring companies that contract with the Department 56 00:03:08,080 --> 00:03:11,840 Speaker 3: of Defense, including some new big ones including and One 57 00:03:11,919 --> 00:03:15,880 Speaker 3: Support Services, which services aircraft and is also among the 58 00:03:15,960 --> 00:03:18,240 Speaker 3: largest contractors to the Defense Department. 59 00:03:18,320 --> 00:03:20,960 Speaker 2: Private equity firms typically, well, I don't want to say 60 00:03:20,960 --> 00:03:23,640 Speaker 2: there's a typical way, but you know, some would argue 61 00:03:23,639 --> 00:03:25,880 Speaker 2: that there's a textbook sort of like depending if you're 62 00:03:25,880 --> 00:03:29,080 Speaker 2: doing a leverage buyout or not. But you make an investment, 63 00:03:29,240 --> 00:03:33,519 Speaker 2: you buy a company, you create efficiencies at the company. Yeah, 64 00:03:33,560 --> 00:03:36,440 Speaker 2: efficiencies can be a euphemism for laying people off, correct 65 00:03:36,920 --> 00:03:38,600 Speaker 2: or just best to be fair. 66 00:03:38,760 --> 00:03:38,840 Speaker 1: Ye. 67 00:03:39,400 --> 00:03:41,760 Speaker 2: Then they sell it, Yeah, and there's a return. Is 68 00:03:41,800 --> 00:03:44,360 Speaker 2: that Is that the model that Cerberus and Finberg are 69 00:03:44,440 --> 00:03:45,760 Speaker 2: using for defense companies. 70 00:03:45,880 --> 00:03:48,200 Speaker 3: It's a really interesting question, and we're starting to get 71 00:03:48,240 --> 00:03:50,760 Speaker 3: some clues about that for this new wave of companies 72 00:03:50,760 --> 00:03:53,640 Speaker 3: that they started acquiring and in some cases investing in 73 00:03:53,640 --> 00:03:56,760 Speaker 3: because they created a venture arm as well, going back 74 00:03:56,800 --> 00:03:59,560 Speaker 3: to about twenty eighteen. But one company we talk about 75 00:03:59,600 --> 00:04:02,680 Speaker 3: in looking in our stories called SubCom, which lays subc 76 00:04:02,800 --> 00:04:06,000 Speaker 3: fiber optic cables, very important right now with straight of 77 00:04:06,000 --> 00:04:10,240 Speaker 3: horror moves and everything else. They recently put Subcomm into 78 00:04:11,120 --> 00:04:17,000 Speaker 3: a single asset continuation vehicle. It's valuation sextupled over like 79 00:04:17,920 --> 00:04:21,760 Speaker 3: about eight years to two point three billion dollars, and 80 00:04:21,800 --> 00:04:24,719 Speaker 3: that will allow them to kind of circumvent that sort 81 00:04:24,760 --> 00:04:27,440 Speaker 3: of deal life cycle that you're talking about here. They'll 82 00:04:27,440 --> 00:04:29,920 Speaker 3: be able to hold onto that asset through their funds 83 00:04:29,960 --> 00:04:32,880 Speaker 3: for longer. They really care about it, and they're really 84 00:04:32,880 --> 00:04:34,400 Speaker 3: interested in it. 85 00:04:34,320 --> 00:04:37,880 Speaker 1: You know, safe to say fair, to say accurate, to 86 00:04:37,920 --> 00:04:40,320 Speaker 1: say that. We have an administration where the lines get 87 00:04:40,400 --> 00:04:43,360 Speaker 1: a little bit messy. So here you have someone who 88 00:04:44,600 --> 00:04:47,200 Speaker 1: created this firm, co founded this firm, and now he's 89 00:04:47,200 --> 00:04:50,919 Speaker 1: Deputy Secretary of Defense. Yeah, and then he's making investment Like, 90 00:04:51,240 --> 00:04:51,760 Speaker 1: tell us. 91 00:04:51,680 --> 00:04:56,280 Speaker 3: How that works? Yeah? Absolutely, fold all of that. So 92 00:04:56,400 --> 00:04:59,920 Speaker 3: coming into the Defense Apartment with Steve Finberg are four 93 00:05:00,120 --> 00:05:02,520 Speaker 3: other guys who have worked with him on these types 94 00:05:02,560 --> 00:05:06,560 Speaker 3: of investments. At Cerberus, He's created a whole team within 95 00:05:06,600 --> 00:05:10,720 Speaker 3: the department that includes these service guys. They're in several 96 00:05:10,800 --> 00:05:14,080 Speaker 3: very important roles. One is running the newly created Economic 97 00:05:14,120 --> 00:05:16,719 Speaker 3: Defense Unit, and the other is running the Office of 98 00:05:16,720 --> 00:05:19,960 Speaker 3: Strategic Capital, which has a two hundred billion dollar lending 99 00:05:20,000 --> 00:05:24,520 Speaker 3: budget to help onshore America's critical mineral supply chain and 100 00:05:24,600 --> 00:05:29,240 Speaker 3: other important investments. At the same time, over here, Cerberus 101 00:05:29,360 --> 00:05:32,440 Speaker 3: is in the process of acquiring, building and investing in 102 00:05:32,800 --> 00:05:36,040 Speaker 3: a lot of companies that do business with the Defense Department. 103 00:05:36,800 --> 00:05:40,120 Speaker 1: How does that work? And to be fair, just because 104 00:05:40,120 --> 00:05:42,599 Speaker 1: something looks like it's very connected doesn't mean that there's 105 00:05:42,640 --> 00:05:44,560 Speaker 1: anything going wrong. I want to be fair about that. 106 00:05:44,920 --> 00:05:49,720 Speaker 3: But yeah, so our story documents a few places where 107 00:05:49,760 --> 00:05:54,280 Speaker 3: things are overlapping. So the US is behind in hypersonic 108 00:05:54,360 --> 00:06:00,400 Speaker 3: weapons and hypersonic technology. Servers owns Strata Launch, one of 109 00:06:00,480 --> 00:06:05,720 Speaker 3: the premier companies for testing hypersonic technology in America, and 110 00:06:05,760 --> 00:06:08,000 Speaker 3: it's and they're playing part of the role to catch 111 00:06:08,080 --> 00:06:11,200 Speaker 3: up to that, so they're getting new government contracts in 112 00:06:11,240 --> 00:06:14,400 Speaker 3: real time. And the US has also been interested in 113 00:06:14,440 --> 00:06:17,360 Speaker 3: a while now for creating essentially what some people call 114 00:06:17,480 --> 00:06:22,159 Speaker 3: Huawei Killer, finding a way to onshore communications technology back 115 00:06:22,160 --> 00:06:25,680 Speaker 3: to the US and create an AI native six G network. 116 00:06:26,160 --> 00:06:29,960 Speaker 3: And Cerberus also owns a company that is in mesh 117 00:06:30,360 --> 00:06:33,000 Speaker 3: in this kind of syndicate and of companies, most of 118 00:06:33,040 --> 00:06:36,320 Speaker 3: them much bigger Navidia, Booz, Allen Hamilton that are working 119 00:06:36,400 --> 00:06:39,120 Speaker 3: with the Defense Department to develop that technology as an 120 00:06:39,160 --> 00:06:40,680 Speaker 3: America first technology. 121 00:06:41,400 --> 00:06:43,000 Speaker 2: One point that you make in your piece is that 122 00:06:43,160 --> 00:06:46,000 Speaker 2: this isn't really new to Cerberus, and at least in 123 00:06:46,080 --> 00:06:49,120 Speaker 2: terms of like being a defense contractor owning companies that 124 00:06:49,200 --> 00:06:52,640 Speaker 2: are defense contractors. In twenty ten, as your piece points out, 125 00:06:52,839 --> 00:06:56,000 Speaker 2: they were the eleventh biggest US defense contractor. Why has 126 00:06:56,040 --> 00:06:57,919 Speaker 2: it waxed and wane so much? Is it tied to 127 00:06:57,960 --> 00:06:58,760 Speaker 2: politics at all. 128 00:06:59,480 --> 00:07:04,479 Speaker 3: It's tied to some of their biggest defense contractors that 129 00:07:04,520 --> 00:07:06,960 Speaker 3: they hold. So dine Core when they bought it was 130 00:07:07,040 --> 00:07:09,480 Speaker 3: already gaining into a lot of trouble with the government, 131 00:07:10,320 --> 00:07:14,440 Speaker 3: allegations of over billing the government, allegations of shoddy work, 132 00:07:14,920 --> 00:07:20,400 Speaker 3: and Serberus bought it basically as like a classic turnaround effort, 133 00:07:20,400 --> 00:07:22,920 Speaker 3: can we clean up this company and everything else? But 134 00:07:24,640 --> 00:07:28,680 Speaker 3: US intervention in Afghanistan obviously went away, and instead of 135 00:07:29,520 --> 00:07:33,480 Speaker 3: winning new contracts, Dinecre lost a lot of contracts. So 136 00:07:34,200 --> 00:07:37,640 Speaker 3: you saw Dynecre's revenue fall and then you saw them 137 00:07:37,680 --> 00:07:41,560 Speaker 3: sell dine Core. And from what we can see, we 138 00:07:41,600 --> 00:07:44,000 Speaker 3: don't have twenty twenty five data from the government yet, 139 00:07:44,040 --> 00:07:46,360 Speaker 3: but from the companies they bought in twenty twenty four, 140 00:07:46,680 --> 00:07:49,000 Speaker 3: it looks very likely they'll start to reappear in those 141 00:07:49,040 --> 00:07:51,720 Speaker 3: lists in the future of the biggest contractors. 142 00:07:53,760 --> 00:07:56,440 Speaker 1: A lot of questions, there's a lot in here, and 143 00:07:56,520 --> 00:07:59,200 Speaker 1: I highly recommend everybody check it out online. But it's 144 00:07:59,760 --> 00:08:04,360 Speaker 1: just kind of fascinating to track and you do you 145 00:08:04,400 --> 00:08:05,960 Speaker 1: know there's questions of oversight. 146 00:08:05,640 --> 00:08:08,840 Speaker 3: Right, yeah, yeah, I mean really, what we have in 147 00:08:08,920 --> 00:08:11,840 Speaker 3: c Feinberg is a guy who cares a lot about 148 00:08:11,920 --> 00:08:15,080 Speaker 3: America's competition on the global stage and invested as a 149 00:08:15,120 --> 00:08:18,680 Speaker 3: private businessman to do that. And now he's leading with 150 00:08:18,760 --> 00:08:20,560 Speaker 3: a lot of the same strategies and a lot of 151 00:08:20,600 --> 00:08:22,840 Speaker 3: the same focuses, and a lot of the same people 152 00:08:22,960 --> 00:08:24,200 Speaker 3: on the other side of the equation. 153 00:08:24,480 --> 00:08:27,480 Speaker 1: Yeah, I just as they say, Department of Cerberus, but 154 00:08:27,600 --> 00:08:28,840 Speaker 1: within the. 155 00:08:28,800 --> 00:08:31,880 Speaker 2: Government, we barely scratch the surface. Check out the story. 156 00:08:32,080 --> 00:08:35,719 Speaker 2: It's got incredible visuals, yeah. 157 00:08:34,920 --> 00:08:37,319 Speaker 1: And a lot of information. It is the Bloomberg Big Take. 158 00:08:37,400 --> 00:08:39,320 Speaker 1: It is among the most read stories, and it is 159 00:08:39,320 --> 00:08:42,920 Speaker 1: by the amazing Calud Melby. He's Bloomberg News investigative reporter. 160 00:08:43,120 --> 00:08:44,319 Speaker 1: Joining us here in studio