WEBVTT - NFL Week 11 Game Lines Reactions (Ep. 26)

0:00:09.280 --> 0:00:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Hey everyone, welcome back to the Betting Pros NFL podcast,

0:00:12.360 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>brought to you by bet MGM. I'm your host, Dan

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Harris and you can find me on Twitter at Dan

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Harris Hadi. It is time for our early look at

0:00:19.560 --> 0:00:21.400
<v Speaker 1>next week's lines, and with me to break it all

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>down is Seawan Green, the co creator and co host

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:26.799
<v Speaker 1>of the Sports Gamling podcast. You can find him on

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Shawn T. Green. Shawn, thanks for coming back

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:29.800
<v Speaker 1>on the show.

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:32.479
<v Speaker 2>How you doing, I'm doing great, man. Yeah, just a

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 2>kind of crazy weekend. You know. He saw a lot

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 2>of big dogs win out right, and that always makes

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 2>things interesting. As far as the next week's.

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Spreads, I have to imagine that the books had a monstrous,

0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:47.600
<v Speaker 1>monstrous weekend, right, I mean the Chiefs and nonetheless the

0:00:47.720 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs right where everybody was probably you know, on the

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:53.199
<v Speaker 1>money line I'm sure, and taking them in parlays and

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that. I mean, they must have totally cleaned

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>up this weekend.

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean there's a couple, there's probably like a

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 3>couple of sharp people who had the Dolph and Colts

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:05.959
<v Speaker 3>or sorry, I mean the Dolphins and Falcons moneyline parlay together.

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:07.840
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, I think the.

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:10.680
<v Speaker 3>Chiefs were probably in everyone's teaser a lot of moneyline

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 3>Parlay's probably got killed, and then you know you got

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 3>the I mean even the.

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 2>Dallas Cowboys at home Sunday night.

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 3>I feel like that's a big public opportunity and Vikings

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 3>winning out right must have heard them.

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this is how Vegas builds buildings. Man, this is

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:28.120
<v Speaker 1>what it's all about. Well, let's see how this weekend,

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 1>this upcoming week looks so as usual. Now, Shawn has

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 1>been here twice already. I love it for the Monday show,

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:35.880
<v Speaker 1>so I don't really need to explain this to him,

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 1>but I will explain it to you in cases is

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 1>your first time listening. We're going to go through each

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:43.319
<v Speaker 1>game on the week eleven Slate going to be using

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the consensus odds over at bettingpros dot com. Now, the

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 1>consensus odds are just the aggregation of odds that are

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 1>available in the market, so there are always differences in

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the various sportsbooks. So if you're thinking about betting on

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:56.320
<v Speaker 1>any particular game, and some of the games are going

0:01:56.360 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>to hear, I'm sure Shawn and I are going to

0:01:57.920 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>be like, yeah, get in on that number now, because

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 1>it's probably going to change. You want to look at

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>the various sportsbooks to make sure you're getting the best odds.

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 1>And if you want to see how any of the

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:08.959
<v Speaker 1>top sports betting experts are leaning on any given bet

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:11.480
<v Speaker 1>at any given time, bettingpros dot Com is going to

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:13.359
<v Speaker 1>show you that too. All right, Tom, let's dive in

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 1>here with the Thursday night game. We've got the Steelers

0:02:15.960 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 1>at the Browns. The Browns here laying two and a half,

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the over under at forty and a half, both teams

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>coming off real big wins. Here, the Steelers taking care

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:26.239
<v Speaker 1>of business again at home. They sneak past the Rams,

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:29.360
<v Speaker 1>largely on the strength of their defense. Meanwhile, the Browns

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 1>surprising three point favorites against the Bills and they win

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:37.240
<v Speaker 1>by exactly that amount. There's really one impressive unit I

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>feel like among these two teams, and it's the Steelers defense.

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Since they added Minka Fitzpatrick, they've been a different team.

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Every other unit on both sides of the ball is

0:02:45.680 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 1>just kind of meh in my opinion. So how do

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 1>you feel about this one? Brown's laying just under a

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:52.239
<v Speaker 1>field goal at home on Thursday night two and a

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>half and the over under at forty and a half.

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean this is interesting.

0:02:57.440 --> 0:02:59.959
<v Speaker 3>I mean, this is basically what the Bills Browns gave

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 3>opened up last week. It did get to three. I'm

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:06.919
<v Speaker 3>kind of surprised it wasn't. I guess I thought it

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 3>would be closer to a pick if I was, if

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:12.520
<v Speaker 3>I was grading this game, because yeah, you said, you

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:15.639
<v Speaker 3>nailed it. The one impressive unit is the Steelers defense,

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 3>and it's really impressive. I mean they're creating turnovers, they're

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 3>scoring on defense. Mason Rudolph has really struggled. I think, Yeah,

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:28.399
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's gonna be an interesting game. But I'm

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 3>surprised the Steelers are getting points here. I thought this

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:33.080
<v Speaker 3>would be closer to a pick them. But I guess

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 3>the public is still kind of enjoying backing the Browns.

0:03:36.320 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, that's probably where the two and a half

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 2>comes in.

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I was a little surprised by it too, But

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I'm usually surprised at the Browns lines,

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:47.120
<v Speaker 1>like I feel like they always should be worse, especially

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:49.720
<v Speaker 1>because I feel like the general perception is from the

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 1>public is that they they you know, they were all in.

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I say this pretty much every week, but they were

0:03:54.040 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 1>all in on the Browns preseason and early on, and

0:03:57.160 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you were a public better your heart

0:03:59.200 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 1>just has to be and then you just got to

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 1>be so off the Browns. So they make these lines.

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I guess that make you want to pick

0:04:05.440 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 1>against the Browns, but I feel like the natural inclination

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>of the public would be to pick against the Browns

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 1>at this point, So I'm never sure why they're like this.

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:16.280
<v Speaker 1>And again, you know the fact that the Steelers won. Uh,

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm not all that surprised, necessarily as the

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 1>game unfolded, because again that the Rams offensive line they

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 1>sustained more injuries, so you saw the defense sort of

0:04:25.000 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 1>go after them. But I agree with you, I did

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 1>not expect to see this. It's not a huge deal

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>if it's under you know, the key number of three, necessarily,

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:33.479
<v Speaker 1>but certainly I expected it to be closer to a

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>pick them. Early money is coming in on the Steelers,

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 1>as you might expect, both the number of bets and

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the amount of money being wagered. So I expect that

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 1>will be a popular line, and I think it's probably

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:46.919
<v Speaker 1>going to move towards the Steelers, although it probably won't

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 1>make that big a difference in terms of you know

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:51.400
<v Speaker 1>what it actually means. So long as it stays below

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the key number of three, let's move on. Oh go ahead, sorry, yeah.

0:04:54.400 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I was just gonna say.

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:57.479
<v Speaker 3>It must be everyone who you know has all the

0:04:57.480 --> 0:05:00.280
<v Speaker 3>browns of their fantasy team, like not giving up. I mean,

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 3>if you have Odell Beckham junior, you just have to

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 3>ride the season out and hope he hope he goes off.

0:05:04.720 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, every week I get yelled at. You know

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I rank for Fantasy pros. I'm a ranker, and you

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 1>know I'm in the top ten for the season in accuracy.

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 1>But every week I get people yelling at me about

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:18.360
<v Speaker 1>where I'm ranking Odell Beckham and it's justifiable. I get it. Well,

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:21.360
<v Speaker 1>hopefully this is the beginning of a turnaround, although of

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:24.120
<v Speaker 1>course the Steelers defense is not exactly the easiest matchup.

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's move on to the next game, which I don't

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:28.600
<v Speaker 1>think we can really talk about too much because there

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:30.720
<v Speaker 1>are no lines as far as I'm seeing, neither on

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:33.719
<v Speaker 1>our consensus anywhere or on any book that I've seen,

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 1>which is the Cowboys at the Lions. There's no line

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 1>available because we don't know who's going to be starting

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 1>at quarterback. Right now. You had Jeff Driscoll this past

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:46.720
<v Speaker 1>weekend for the Lions at quarterback in relief of Matthew Stafford,

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>who's dealing with fractures in his back. And all I've

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 1>heard is it's the quote good type of fracture, which

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't really think that anybody who's not suffering from

0:05:55.440 --> 0:05:58.119
<v Speaker 1>a fractured back should be able to say that. But again,

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 1>this is something where he's not ruled out this week,

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and again he was only ruled out on Sunday this

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>past week. It wasn't like coming in, it was like,

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:07.039
<v Speaker 1>oh man, it was all of a sudden. It leaked

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:09.280
<v Speaker 1>on Saturday with an Ian Rappaport tweet that like, oh

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 1>there's serious concern about his availability, and then on Sunday

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 1>it was just like, all right, he's out. So look,

0:06:14.680 --> 0:06:17.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, I guess the the easiest way to analyze

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 1>this is maybe, you know, you think about the Cowboys here,

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 1>coming off a tough loss against the Vikings, as we

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 1>talked about, you've got to win this game for the

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys on the road. I mean, where do you expect

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 1>this line to be. Let's assume Stafford plays at this point,

0:06:30.000 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, where would you expect the line to be

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 1>with the Lions at home against the Cowboys.

0:06:34.760 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think with Stafford in there, it'll probably be

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 3>Cowboys like minus three somewhere around there. But you know,

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 3>once Driscoll gets announced, I wouldn't be surprised if it

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 3>shoots up closer to six. Yeah, and maybe, but yeah,

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 3>I mean the thing is, if Stafford does come back,

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:53.599
<v Speaker 3>he's gonna still be kind of banged up, and you

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:56.280
<v Speaker 3>gotta you gotta be concerned that he finishes the game.

0:06:56.400 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 3>So either way, I I have a feeling a that

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 3>Driscoll's going to be starter later in the week and

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 3>be that the line will probably close closer to six.

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:07.720
<v Speaker 1>If I had a guess, Yeah, I think that's probably right.

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking roughly a field goal. I could see

0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 1>it maybe coming in under. The one thing to monitor,

0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 1>by the way, with the Cowboys is that Zach Martin

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 1>sustained an injury yesterday I think was his elbow. I

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 1>don't know if his availability is going to be impacted here,

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 1>but any injury on that offensive line for the Cowboys

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of right, it drastically affects how they performed. You

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 1>saw it when Tarren Smith was out and Lil Collin,

0:07:27.960 --> 0:07:29.760
<v Speaker 1>so you know you gotta be careful there. But in

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 1>the meantime, it's obviously not a game that you can

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>really go full bore into. But I agree with that.

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 1>I would expect roughly a field goal laying and another

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 1>three points if Driscoll's named the starter. All right, let's

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 1>move on here to the Jaguars that the Colts. Colts

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:43.840
<v Speaker 1>are laying three with the over under at forty four.

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 1>We talked about it earlier. The Colt's coming off an

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>absolutely disastrous loss against the Dolphins. With Brian Hoyer under center,

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 1>he throws three picks. It's unclear if Jacoby Brissett is

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be back for this one. He was trending

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 1>in the right direction with that mcl sprain, and then

0:07:57.120 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 1>he was ruled out on Saturday night, not sort of,

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:01.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, a game time decision, but then it came

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 1>out on Saturday. Now there's sort of rumors that he

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>may not be ready for this one, which frankly I

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 1>expected going. I mean, in mcl strain, no matter what

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 1>it is, it's not something that you can just bounce

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>right back from it, something where it needs to take

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 1>a little time. But anyway, he is up in the air. Meanwhile,

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the Jaguars coming off of bye here they're turning back

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 1>to Nick Foles. There's all this uncertainty at QB. But

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 1>how do you feel about a Colt saying three at

0:08:23.800 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 1>home over under a forty four?

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 3>This is interesting because I think last week, and you know,

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 3>we talked about it on my podcast that the that

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 3>Brian Hoyer laying ten and a half was the craziest

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 3>line I've seen in a long time. I mean, Brian

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:40.600
<v Speaker 3>Hoyer is a huge step down from Jacoby Brissett. And

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:44.320
<v Speaker 3>it's it's interesting because I think at least the public's

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 3>perception or the way they're handicapping these games, they haven't

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 3>really handicapped Jacoby Brissett as the legit starter that the

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 3>guy is. They kind of are still handicapping him. It

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 3>seems as like a backup quarterback. And there's definitely been

0:08:57.160 --> 0:09:00.680
<v Speaker 3>value on the Colts early in the season, and even

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 3>here it doesn't seem again, if Jacoby Brissett isn't playing,

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 3>I think minus three is kind of a weird number.

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 3>I do think it'll probably close at minus three. I

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 3>don't see this moving one way or the other. Because

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 3>you have Nick Foles coming off that injury, and so

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:17.680
<v Speaker 3>I think they're kind of defaulting on like, hey, division game,

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 3>give them the three points. But yeah, I mean Brian

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:24.200
<v Speaker 3>Hoyer as a favorite is that's an interesting bet for sure.

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 1>So do you feel comfortable with the Colts laying three

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:28.680
<v Speaker 1>if it is per set?

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:30.640
<v Speaker 2>Uh? No, I wouldn't.

0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean, just because I'm kind of worried about I mean,

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 3>oh sorry, if it's Jacoby Brissett, yeah, yeah, if it's

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:39.320
<v Speaker 3>pre set, yeah, I mean I haven't broken down the

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:42.199
<v Speaker 3>game completely, but minus three to me makes sense if.

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:44.560
<v Speaker 2>Jacoby Brissett is the startup. But if he's not, I

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:46.600
<v Speaker 2>don't think they're adjusting enough for Brian Hoyer.

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, right now, from what I'm looking at,

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 1>You've got so much money coming in on the Jaguars

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 1>at this point, despite the fact that a majority of

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:58.839
<v Speaker 1>bets are on the Cults. So my guess is that

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:01.560
<v Speaker 1>people in the No Problem think that Brissett is not

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 1>going to suit up. That would actually be what I

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:07.959
<v Speaker 1>think as well. So you know, for me, if I'm

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:09.959
<v Speaker 1>looking at this number and I want to get into

0:10:09.960 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 1>this game, I do it now, because again, if Brissett

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 1>comes in, that bet looks a lot worse for sure.

0:10:16.040 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's move on here to our next game, the Broncos

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 1>at the Vikings. The Vikings here are laying nine and

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:23.679
<v Speaker 1>the over unders pretty low at thirty eight and a half.

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Vikings coming off that huge win against the Cowboys, despite

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 1>being down Adam Thielen, they'll now you know, they come home,

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:31.720
<v Speaker 1>they take on the Broncos before they get their buy

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos meanwhile, or with Brandon Allen last week with

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Joe Flack and I are they get the win against

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the Browns doing very little on offense. Now you know

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>you've got the bye coming up. Of course, as I said,

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 1>with the Vikings, so you know it should be an

0:10:43.679 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 1>easy matchup. You could see this being a letdown game

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 1>right where they're just kind of looking past them. But

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:51.720
<v Speaker 1>we did say the same thing essentially about the Ravens

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of coming in not with the bye coming up

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 1>right off that giant win against the Pats, maybe looking

0:10:57.080 --> 0:10:59.040
<v Speaker 1>past the Bengals. But how do you feel here Vikings

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:00.959
<v Speaker 1>laying nine over on at thirty eight and a half.

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think it kind of makes sense that they

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:07.720
<v Speaker 3>price it here because everyone saw the Vikings take care

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:10.200
<v Speaker 3>of the Cowboys on prime time, so that always gives

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:13.560
<v Speaker 3>you a little bit of added juice. The Broncos coming

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:17.119
<v Speaker 3>off the bye that's kind of interesting. Their defense seemingly

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 3>has kind of come together.

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you nailed it.

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:23.360
<v Speaker 3>Their offense didn't do much, but it did feel like

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 3>Alan came in gave them.

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 2>A little bit of a spark.

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 3>We see that a lot of times, like first time

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 3>Starter comes in and kind of exceeds expectations a little bit,

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 3>then they get some film on them and they kind

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 3>of shut them down. I think they're not factoring in

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 3>the bye week enough for the Broncos because they did

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:41.960
<v Speaker 3>have They're going to have two weeks here to prepare

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 3>for the Vikings, so I think that will help them.

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't be surprised if this gets bet down a

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 3>little bit closer to seven, but it's certainly not gonna

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 3>I think at seven it would get pounded on the Viking,

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 3>so I think it'll definitely stay at two scores.

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I mean, look, it's been trending down sort of,

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 1>so that's a good call. I mean, I think the

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 1>look aheadline might have been ten and a half when

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:06.959
<v Speaker 1>it first done, and even earlier today when I took

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:08.559
<v Speaker 1>a look at the consensus lines. It was nine and

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:10.960
<v Speaker 1>a half, so it's clearly being bet down. I agree,

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's going to get all the way

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:14.120
<v Speaker 1>down there to like a field goal or anything like that.

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 1>It's a tough spot. I don't This is not a

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 1>game that I like, right, It's not a game where

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:19.440
<v Speaker 1>you look at it and you're like, well, you know,

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings they're clearly the superior team. But again you've

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:25.559
<v Speaker 1>got the variables, which is a very easy look ahead

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>spot for the Vikings. A team coming off a bye,

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 1>they get an extra week to prepare, not only defensively,

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:33.079
<v Speaker 1>and their defense remain strong because they wound up keeping

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:36.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, Chris Harris and they wound up keeping vond

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Miller and everything like that. So they're in a good

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 1>spot here. But again, it's really tough because you know,

0:12:41.320 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 1>you don't really want to trust a Brandon Allen lead

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:47.959
<v Speaker 1>offense going in on the road, right, So it's a

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 1>game where you know, I don't really feel comfortable with

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 1>it yet, But I agree, it's something where you know,

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not surprised that it got bet down from a

0:12:56.280 --> 0:12:58.560
<v Speaker 1>probable high of what I'm seeing of the Look headline

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:01.280
<v Speaker 1>of ten and a half on here to the Texans

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 1>at the Ravens Ravens lank four and a half. The

0:13:03.600 --> 0:13:05.680
<v Speaker 1>over under at fifty and a half. Now, this is

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:07.679
<v Speaker 1>up the over under at least from the Look headline

0:13:07.679 --> 0:13:09.319
<v Speaker 1>which was forty nine. So it's up a point and

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 1>a half there. The Ravens, as we discussed, absolutely demolished

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals every facet of the game, and that was

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:18.000
<v Speaker 1>coming off the mantrous win against the Patriots again where

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I kind of felt like this would be a look headline.

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Actually liked the Bengals getting ten. That was a poor decision. Yeah. Meanwhile,

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:27.720
<v Speaker 1>the Texans, you like, they're coming off the by after

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 1>the winning London against the Jaguars. They've been banged up

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 1>on the offensive line. They've also been banged up on

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 1>defense in their secondary, but they're probably going to get

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:38.160
<v Speaker 1>a bit healthier here. Wolf Fuller is already practicing, so

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 1>he may come back. So this is a pretty interesting

0:13:40.520 --> 0:13:42.120
<v Speaker 1>game coming in. How do you feel about the Ravens

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:43.719
<v Speaker 1>lank four and a half with the over under now

0:13:43.720 --> 0:13:45.400
<v Speaker 1>moving up at fifty and a half.

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean this kind of seems like, yeah, probably

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:52.720
<v Speaker 3>the right price here, you got an AFC matchup, you

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:55.080
<v Speaker 3>got the like you said, Texans coming off the by

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 3>neutral field to say the Ravens are a point and

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 3>a half better that that kind of makes sense to me.

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:04.160
<v Speaker 3>Certainly everyone's gonna want a piece of the Ravens, but

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 3>so you have to give the Texans a little bit

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 3>more than the field goal to appetize betters there. Yeah,

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean, this just seems like a great game. I

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:15.439
<v Speaker 3>guess I'd be surprised if you get any crazy movement

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 3>one way or the other. Like, it feels like this

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 3>is probably where the the.

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:20.200
<v Speaker 2>Price is going to close.

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 3>It's definitely not going to get up to a touchdown

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 3>and maybe it gets down to four three and a half,

0:14:25.400 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 3>but nothing, It's definitely not going to get down to

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 3>a field goal.

0:14:29.240 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's gonna be it's going to close between four

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and five. I mean, it's going to be one of

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the dead numbers where you know you're not going to

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 1>really feel all that comfortable with whatever it's going to be.

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 1>But in the end, yeah, this is a tough game.

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 1>It's a really tough game. I mean the Ravens, you know,

0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 1>you want to feel like maybe they're not quite as

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 1>good as they've shown lately. But I think they really are.

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Their defense in particular is really starting to gel as

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 1>they've gotten healthier at cornerback. They're just playing incredibly well.

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 1>And you know, if the Texans, you got to watch

0:14:57.360 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the Texans offensive line right now, because if they are

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:01.320
<v Speaker 1>still banged up, that's gonna make it a tough day

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 1>for Deshaun Watson.

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, I mean really normally, the rule for me

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 3>is what the Texans has just been. If they had

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 3>the team they're playing has a pass rush and is

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:12.520
<v Speaker 3>going to get pressure on Deshaun Watson, then fade them,

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, but it's gonna be interesting. I'll probably wait

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 3>to like make my pick to see, Like you said,

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 3>the offensive line health that could be big and the

0:15:21.760 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 3>Ravens defense seemed a little bit fraudulent early, but again

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 3>they've kind of figured it out lately.

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 2>For sure.

0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they've geled. I mean I keep waiting for that

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 1>letdown game from the Ravens. Like you know, you saw

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 1>that game against the Browns earlier in the year where

0:15:33.680 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 1>you just were like, oh, the Ravens are going to

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 1>demolish them and then they just kind of laid an egg.

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 1>I keep waiting for that game, but I kind of

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 1>now feel like I'm gonna be waiting for a while

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 1>to get there because they are playing incredibly well. So

0:15:44.160 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 1>this is a game where I agree if you do

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 1>want to bet it, it's probably something where you need

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 1>to wait as long as possible because the health of

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the Texans in particular is going to really determine I

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 1>think how I feel about this game. Before we move on,

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I want to tell everybody about the sponsor of today's show,

0:15:57.720 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 1>bet MGM. If you've downloaded the bet mg Sports app,

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 1>and you have used our promo code, and you have

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 1>placed your first bet over any of the last four weeks,

0:16:05.800 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 1>then you are probably a little richer now because I've

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>offered insane boosted bets for each of the last four weeks.

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 1>In Week seven, if your first wager was at least

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 1>a dollar on the forty nine Ers to beat the

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Redskins on the money line, then you won one hundred

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:20.600
<v Speaker 1>dollars in free bets, and we gate if your first

0:16:20.600 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 1>wager was at least a dollar on Aaron Rodgers to

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 1>throw a touchdown pass against the Chiefs, then you wont

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:27.600
<v Speaker 1>one hundred dollars in free bets. In Week nine, if

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 1>your first wager was at least a dollar on the

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Patriots to beat the Ravens on the money line, then

0:16:32.520 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 1>you still want one hundred dollars in free bets even

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 1>though the Patriots lost, because the Patriots scored a point.

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 1>And this past week, if you bet at least a

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:42.680
<v Speaker 1>dollar on either the Jets or the Giants to win,

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 1>then you won one hundred dollars because they did not tie. Legitimately,

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 1>even if you bet a dollar on the Giants, you

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 1>won one hundred dollars in free bets even though the

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Jets won. And bet mgm does stuff like this all

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the time, so you're legitimately just costing yourself free money

0:16:58.040 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 1>if you don't sign up, And if you do sign

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 1>up right now, you can get a free five hundred

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 1>dollars bet. Just download the bet mgm Sports app and

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 1>sign up using our promo code Harris, and your first

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:10.359
<v Speaker 1>bet of up to five hundred dollars is risk free.

0:17:10.400 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 1>If you lose, bet MGM will credit you the amount

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>you lost up to five hundred dollars for future wagers.

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:18.919
<v Speaker 1>So legitimately a bet where you can't lose, and if

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 1>you don't want that, I don't think you need to

0:17:21.040 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 1>be listening to this podcast because you obviously do not

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 1>like gambling. These winnings are paid in free bets. You

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:28.600
<v Speaker 1>must be twenty one years or older, and although you

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 1>can sign up an easily deposit money anywhere, you have

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:32.720
<v Speaker 1>to be in the state of New Jersey to place

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the sports bet, and certain restrictions apply. Visit BETMGM dot

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 1>com for the full list of terms and conditions. And

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:41.360
<v Speaker 1>if you've got a gambling problem, call one eight hundred gambler.

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:45.360
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's move on to the Jets at the Redskins.

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Right now, the Redskins are laying to this opened at

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:50.120
<v Speaker 1>a pick them from what I saw, and the over

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:52.399
<v Speaker 1>under is at thirty seven and a half. But legitimately,

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 1>right as we were recording, we found out that Dwayne

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:58.159
<v Speaker 1>Haskins was named the starting quarterback for not only this

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 1>game but the rest of the season the Redskins, which

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:03.439
<v Speaker 1>certainly colors how I feel about it. But the Jets,

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 1>they come off the big win against the Giants in

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:08.680
<v Speaker 1>the Battle of New Jersey. It's not an overly impressive win.

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:13.359
<v Speaker 1>They're shredded by Daniel Jones. The offense is inconsistent and again,

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:16.360
<v Speaker 1>just coming across the wire. They've lost Chris Herndon for

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:18.919
<v Speaker 1>at least, you know, several games, if not the remainder

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 1>of the season. I know he hasn't played very much,

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 1>but he had started coming back this past week. Meanwhile,

0:18:24.119 --> 0:18:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the Redskins, they're coming off the by. They'll get Darius

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Guys back, but it's still, you know, kind of unclear

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 1>how this offense is going to be able to perform

0:18:31.880 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 1>with Dwayne Haskins starting at quarterbacks. So how do you

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:36.720
<v Speaker 1>feel here right now? Redskins laying two over under a

0:18:36.760 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 1>thirty seven and a half at home to the Jets.

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I just if you've watched Dwayne Haskins at all,

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 3>I don't think you can make him a favorite in

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:48.280
<v Speaker 3>any sort of NFL game. So I pick him actually

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 3>sounds closer to what it should be in my mind,

0:18:51.440 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 3>and I wouldn't be surprised if it gets back down

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 3>two pick. I'm surprised that at pick yeah, that Washington

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:01.880
<v Speaker 3>was getting enough action to move it. I think maybe

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 3>the Haskins news will move it back down to pick

0:19:05.320 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 3>or closer to that. I think if you're if you're

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:11.879
<v Speaker 3>forcing yourself to bet and watch this game, I think

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:13.919
<v Speaker 3>you would talk. It's easier to build a case, I

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:17.960
<v Speaker 3>think probably for the Jets because they've had some semblance

0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 3>of a team. But yeah, both these teams have had serious,

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 3>serious issues.

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean the Redskins really, they're not a terrible team.

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:28.639
<v Speaker 1>They have a decent defensive line, the secondary is not

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the worst in the world. They have some playmakers on offense.

0:19:32.200 --> 0:19:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Adrian Peterson has been running well shockingly. Terry

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 1>McLaurin is certainly a talent. But if you've got Haskins

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 1>that he's just not ready to be an NFL could

0:19:40.960 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 1>be I don't argue with the starting him for the

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:44.360
<v Speaker 1>rest of the year. I think this is a good

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 1>time now to do it, especially against a team like

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 1>the Jets. But in the end, I cannot, in any

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:54.840
<v Speaker 1>circumstance back a Redskins team with Dwayne Askins at quarterback.

0:19:54.840 --> 0:19:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't feel great about the Jets, but I would

0:19:56.480 --> 0:20:00.199
<v Speaker 1>certainly I take them. I think if you know at

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>the line anything where they're getting points, certainly or pick

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:04.600
<v Speaker 1>them or anything like that. I think I'd have to

0:20:04.640 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 1>take them here, because again, the Jets, as bad as

0:20:06.520 --> 0:20:09.440
<v Speaker 1>they are, they're not quite as bad as they looked either.

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:12.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the offensive line is terrible, but you know

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:14.879
<v Speaker 1>they have at least some talent both on offense and

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:17.439
<v Speaker 1>on defense. Jamal Adams, you know, played one best games

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 1>I've ever seen, and you know this past week, So

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 1>they have enough talent there that they can do some damage.

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>So you know, for me, with Haskins going, if it

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:28.480
<v Speaker 1>was case Keenum, I probably would favor the Redskins in

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:30.439
<v Speaker 1>this game because I really do think the downgrade is

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:33.639
<v Speaker 1>that significant. I think Haskins, honestly, it's just not ready.

0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:36.120
<v Speaker 1>So for me, not that you know, when you're below

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:38.119
<v Speaker 1>the key numbers here doesn't matter all that much. But

0:20:38.160 --> 0:20:40.199
<v Speaker 1>I would still get in soon if you do like

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 1>the Jets like I do, before the line moves even

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 1>further towards the Jets.

0:20:44.040 --> 0:20:46.399
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this could be like a seventeen sixteen game and

0:20:46.400 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 3>you're kicking yourself for not getting those three two points.

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and again it's not a huge deal, you know,

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 1>once you're at this point, but certainly at any point,

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:56.439
<v Speaker 1>like look, you'd rather be getting the two than you know,

0:20:56.560 --> 0:20:59.720
<v Speaker 1>a pick them game. Of course, Falcons here at the Panthers.

0:20:59.800 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Right now, the Panthers are favored by five and a half. Now,

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:05.160
<v Speaker 1>This was at six and a half when I checked

0:21:05.160 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 1>earlier today, so the line has moved towards the Falcons.

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:11.199
<v Speaker 1>The over under ad fifty one. Falcons pull off the

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:13.679
<v Speaker 1>shocking upset of the Saints in New Orleans. As we

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:16.080
<v Speaker 1>talked about, their defense suddenly comes to life. They basically

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 1>doubled their season long sack total in Justice one game,

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:22.960
<v Speaker 1>which is crazy considering that it's Drew Brees and the Saints.

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:26.080
<v Speaker 1>They do suffer a few injuries on offense here and

0:21:26.119 --> 0:21:28.760
<v Speaker 1>we don't know the results of the MRIs that both

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 1>players are going for. That's DeVonta Freeman who sustains a

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 1>foot or an ankle injury in Austin Hooper with his knees,

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 1>so that's something you're going to want to monitor. And

0:21:37.280 --> 0:21:40.679
<v Speaker 1>the Falcons are already banged up running back with Edo

0:21:40.760 --> 0:21:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Smith being placed on ir. Meanwhile, the Panthers, they played

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the Packers tough. They gave him a good game, They

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:47.199
<v Speaker 1>came close to tying it in the end, but they

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>ultimately lose in the snowy game in Green Bay. James Bradbury,

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:53.199
<v Speaker 1>who has played very well at corner, did miss this

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:57.119
<v Speaker 1>pass game against Devonte Adams so he's got a groin injury.

0:21:57.160 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about his status coming up, So that

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:01.720
<v Speaker 1>would certainly chings a little bit with Julio Jones on

0:22:01.760 --> 0:22:03.479
<v Speaker 1>tap if you can play. The Panthers have a very

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 1>strong pass defense otherwise, So how do you feel here?

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:07.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, the Falcons kind of change the narrative on

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 1>their season just a tiny bit. Panthers Langford five and

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 1>a half at home in the over under at fifty one.

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, they may as well dump the gatorade

0:22:15.840 --> 0:22:18.320
<v Speaker 3>on Dan Quinn after that game because that was that

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 3>was their super Bowl, right And we see this with

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:23.880
<v Speaker 3>bad teams all the time. You got to find those

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:26.920
<v Speaker 3>couple of games per year where they're really going to

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:27.400
<v Speaker 3>show up.

0:22:27.320 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 2>And it's gonna be you know, it's gonna be their

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:29.640
<v Speaker 2>super Bowl.

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 3>And with the Falcons, in hindsight, it really makes sense

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 3>that that was their super Bowl. They're coming off of

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:38.000
<v Speaker 3>by in a dome against the division rival, and it

0:22:38.040 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 3>made sense that they really got up for this game.

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:42.440
<v Speaker 2>This game against the Panthers.

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 3>I think it's gonna be a lot tougher for them

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:49.639
<v Speaker 3>matchup wise, and again going outdoors in Carolina, the field's

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:53.679
<v Speaker 3>gonna play a little slower, and Carolina is a quality team,

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, I thought they would have. I mean, look

0:22:56.520 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 3>at they came so close to pulling it out in

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 3>Green Bay didn't, but they were certainly in that game

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 3>the entire time. And Christian McCaffrey, I think it's gonna

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:08.000
<v Speaker 3>be a matchup nightmare for this Falcons team.

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:11.920
<v Speaker 2>I think people are talking themselves into the.

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:14.199
<v Speaker 3>Fact that, like, hey, the Falcons won, They're not as

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:17.200
<v Speaker 3>bad as we thought, and that's why it's getting met

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 3>down from six and a half to five and a half.

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:22.080
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't be surprised if it closes closer to four

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:24.800
<v Speaker 3>and a half, maybe even four. It's certainly not gonna

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 3>dip below four, and I'd be surprised. I'd be really

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 3>surprised if it goes the other way and starts going

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 3>up towards seven. So yeah, I think if you like

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:36.480
<v Speaker 3>the Falcons, I would probably get in now. But if

0:23:36.520 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 3>you like the Panthers, I think you can probably wait

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 3>a little bit.

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:41.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for me, I like the Bnthers. I mean I

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 1>liked them at six and a half. Frankly, I mean

0:23:43.440 --> 0:23:45.200
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a spot where, yeah, I mean

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be I mean the Falcon. Look, kudos to them.

0:23:48.320 --> 0:23:51.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm not kidding Dan Quinn. Legitimately, every week for the

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:53.359
<v Speaker 1>past four weeks it's been like, all right, this is

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the week, Quinn goes, this is it, this is it.

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:57.719
<v Speaker 1>And then they come out and they do that against

0:23:57.720 --> 0:23:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the Saints, you know, who were by the way coming

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:02.119
<v Speaker 1>off by you know, so it was really kind of

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:05.160
<v Speaker 1>unexpected there to do that. So for them to do that,

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:07.800
<v Speaker 1>that's great. But you know, they don't have two weeks

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:10.879
<v Speaker 1>to prepare for the Panthers. The Panthers are probably going

0:24:10.960 --> 0:24:13.199
<v Speaker 1>to be angry and ready to go McCaffrey. You know,

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the books have been written about the falcons inability to

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:19.440
<v Speaker 1>cover pass catching running backs over the past several seasons,

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 1>so you know, McCaffrey is certainly a nightmare for them.

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I just think that this is going to be a

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 1>get right spot for the Panthers. So either way, you know, look,

0:24:26.359 --> 0:24:28.119
<v Speaker 1>if you if you like the pan I mean, I

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:29.919
<v Speaker 1>agree in the end it's not getting up to a

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 1>touchdown or anything like that if it does go the

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:33.960
<v Speaker 1>other way. But I agree that this, you know, is

0:24:34.000 --> 0:24:36.359
<v Speaker 1>a public perception type of game where people are going

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:38.480
<v Speaker 1>to be like, oh yeah, the Falcons. Right, Yeah, look

0:24:38.520 --> 0:24:40.880
<v Speaker 1>at that, so I think you're probably safe to wait

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:43.199
<v Speaker 1>it out if like me, you like the Panthers. In

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:46.840
<v Speaker 1>this one, Bill's at the Dolphins. Bill's currently minus six

0:24:46.920 --> 0:24:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and the over under at thirty nine. Dolphins come off

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:50.879
<v Speaker 1>the big win against the Calts. As we mentioned, they

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:53.160
<v Speaker 1>got a little juice now here two games in a row,

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:56.440
<v Speaker 1>playing better fits magic and full effect. Meanwhile, the Bills

0:24:56.440 --> 0:24:58.480
<v Speaker 1>take the tough loss against the Browns. They have trouble

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:01.960
<v Speaker 1>getting the offense going. Josh Allen continues to be inaccurate.

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:05.400
<v Speaker 1>They for some reason kind of abandoned their run game earlier.

0:25:05.560 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, Devin Singletary, I believe only got eight carries

0:25:08.000 --> 0:25:10.160
<v Speaker 1>on the game. So a little bit of a strange game.

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 1>But the Bills have a chance to bounce back here

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:14.960
<v Speaker 1>in Miami laying six over under thirty nine. What are

0:25:15.000 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts?

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:19.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I guess my thoughts are I'm surprised this is

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:20.879
<v Speaker 2>at six.

0:25:21.440 --> 0:25:24.200
<v Speaker 3>I guess I'm The Dolphins have quietly been just they

0:25:24.280 --> 0:25:27.440
<v Speaker 3>dominate against the spread team. They've covered five weeks in

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:30.640
<v Speaker 3>a row after starting out zero to four, and they've

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:33.760
<v Speaker 3>just been continuing to get big numbers.

0:25:34.200 --> 0:25:36.640
<v Speaker 2>And I guess I'm a little surprised.

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:38.959
<v Speaker 3>That the bookmakers or the public in general. I mean,

0:25:38.960 --> 0:25:40.960
<v Speaker 3>the public's kind of been backing them too as a dog.

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm surprised this is at six. I think it'll get

0:25:44.560 --> 0:25:48.960
<v Speaker 3>bet down a little bit maybe, But yeah, I don't know.

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 3>This is a tough game for me to wrap my

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 3>head around as far as like, why you're making Josh

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:56.040
<v Speaker 3>Allen a six point road favorite.

0:25:56.800 --> 0:25:58.520
<v Speaker 2>I get it, the Bills are still a.

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:02.520
<v Speaker 3>Better team, but six points in Miami, I don't know.

0:26:02.560 --> 0:26:05.720
<v Speaker 3>Miami has kind of quietly been a tough place to play.

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:08.920
<v Speaker 3>I feel like they do well against these division opponents

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:13.040
<v Speaker 3>late in the season. Yeah, we'll see, but it feels

0:26:13.040 --> 0:26:13.840
<v Speaker 3>a little high to me.

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:16.879
<v Speaker 1>No, you know, that's interesting because to me this felt

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:20.159
<v Speaker 1>about right. I mean, I get it completely. You know,

0:26:20.200 --> 0:26:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the Dolphins have certainly been playing well on both sides

0:26:22.800 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 1>of the ball the last several weeks. I mean, they

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:28.240
<v Speaker 1>jumped out to that big lead in Pittsburgh on Monday

0:26:28.280 --> 0:26:31.679
<v Speaker 1>Night football. You know, that's before beating the Jets and

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:34.960
<v Speaker 1>then winning this past week against the Colts the Bills.

0:26:35.240 --> 0:26:37.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, in the end, the first time these two

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:39.920
<v Speaker 1>teams played, it was pretty close for the most part,

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 1>and then the Bills kind of ran away at the

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:44.240
<v Speaker 1>end of the game, so I could see something like

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:47.399
<v Speaker 1>that happening. But you know, in the end, this is

0:26:47.440 --> 0:26:50.120
<v Speaker 1>around where I kind of expected it to be, as

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 1>you get these spreads, which are you know, closer to

0:26:52.640 --> 0:26:54.840
<v Speaker 1>normal now with the Dolphins rather than the crazy things

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that we were seeing there. If you're under a touchdown,

0:26:57.040 --> 0:26:59.199
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm fine with it because I think you

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:01.879
<v Speaker 1>know the Bills, you know their defense, you know, as

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:04.119
<v Speaker 1>much as the Dolphins have been able to move the

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:05.720
<v Speaker 1>ball a little bit, I mean they're completely they have

0:27:05.880 --> 0:27:09.200
<v Speaker 1>no running game whatsoever. I mean, you saw Kaylin Blage yesterday,

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, averaging you know, getting twenty carries and averaging

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 1>two yards per carry is basically what you could expect

0:27:14.040 --> 0:27:16.240
<v Speaker 1>from them, you know. And again they lost Preston Williams

0:27:16.280 --> 0:27:19.200
<v Speaker 1>as well, so it's basically Devontae Parker and mikea SICKI

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 1>they just they don't have as many weapons. I feel

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:23.479
<v Speaker 1>like a couple of weeks ago it might have been

0:27:23.480 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 1>a little different, even with you know, Kenyan Drake or

0:27:25.840 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 1>even Mark Walton there and Preston Williams again was playing

0:27:28.400 --> 0:27:31.280
<v Speaker 1>very well, so I think given sort of the lack

0:27:31.280 --> 0:27:33.439
<v Speaker 1>of weapons that they had, the Bills coming off a loss,

0:27:33.440 --> 0:27:35.440
<v Speaker 1>where you know, with the Bills in their playoff push,

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 1>they need to win this game. I'm really six struck

0:27:38.359 --> 0:27:40.520
<v Speaker 1>me as about right. So I'm interested that you felt

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:41.639
<v Speaker 1>like it was a little bit high. So if you

0:27:41.640 --> 0:27:43.200
<v Speaker 1>were making it, what would you think more like four

0:27:43.280 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 1>four and a half something like that.

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:47.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I'm not not like crazy.

0:27:47.240 --> 0:27:50.200
<v Speaker 3>I guess I'm just I you know, I have these

0:27:50.240 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 3>moments where it's just like Ryan Fitz fitsmagic, Like how

0:27:53.000 --> 0:27:54.240
<v Speaker 3>can you bet against this guy?

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:56.520
<v Speaker 2>So in my head that's probably my own kind of

0:27:56.520 --> 0:27:58.160
<v Speaker 2>personal bias. But you're you're right.

0:27:58.200 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean they're much better coach team. Kind of a

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 3>little disappointing performance in Cleveland. They you know, they should

0:28:06.640 --> 0:28:09.240
<v Speaker 3>hit that field goal. You definitely let some points on

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 3>the board. So yeah, I mean they are the better team.

0:28:12.720 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, six six felt a little high. But you're right,

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:19.240
<v Speaker 3>this Dolphins team under if it's under a touchdown is

0:28:19.840 --> 0:28:21.919
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, it's tougher to back when it was

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 3>a lot easier to call these previous weeks when they

0:28:24.280 --> 0:28:25.520
<v Speaker 3>were getting giant spreads.

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Hey, you don't have to abandon your conviction. Man, I mean,

0:28:28.359 --> 0:28:30.120
<v Speaker 1>that's a totally that's a totally no.

0:28:30.119 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 2>No.

0:28:30.359 --> 0:28:32.359
<v Speaker 3>I mean I guess I'm going back and forth in

0:28:32.400 --> 0:28:34.479
<v Speaker 3>my head. I'm like, eh, but yeah, I do think

0:28:34.520 --> 0:28:36.600
<v Speaker 3>it's a little high. I would say I would have

0:28:37.000 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 3>if I was setting the spread, I would have said

0:28:38.520 --> 0:28:39.440
<v Speaker 3>it like four and a half.

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think that's fair. And again, you know, when

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:44.680
<v Speaker 1>you're within you know, when you're above three and below seven,

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 1>it's really not that huge a deal necessarily, regardless of

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 1>which way it moves. But look, in the end, it's

0:28:50.960 --> 0:28:53.320
<v Speaker 1>it's roughly fifty to fifty right here with the money

0:28:53.600 --> 0:28:55.400
<v Speaker 1>and the number of bets that are being placed. So this,

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, seems like right around the right number here

0:28:58.400 --> 0:29:00.720
<v Speaker 1>coming in. So it's gonna be interesting to see how

0:29:00.720 --> 0:29:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the line moves there. Let's move on to the Saints

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 1>at the Bucks. Saints here are laying five and a

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:07.200
<v Speaker 1>half with the over under at fifty one and a half.

0:29:07.280 --> 0:29:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Mentioned earlier, the Saints came out real flat off their

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 1>by their offensive line played terribly, They could not run

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the ball, the defense wasn't great, and now it sounds

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:17.840
<v Speaker 1>like Marshaun Latimore is probably gonna miss at least a

0:29:17.880 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 1>few games with what I believe is a thigh injury. Meanwhile,

0:29:21.760 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks eke out a win against the Cardinals. You

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:27.400
<v Speaker 1>basically you know exactly what the Bucks are gonna do

0:29:27.600 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 1>essentially in a game. It's just a matter of if

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Winston's turnovers are gonna be deep in his own territory

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:35.720
<v Speaker 1>and get like six points for the defense, or whether

0:29:35.800 --> 0:29:38.360
<v Speaker 1>or not they're gonna be enough to not kill the

0:29:38.400 --> 0:29:39.920
<v Speaker 1>game for the Bucks. They're gonna put up a ton

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 1>of points, they're gonna stop the run, they're gonna allow

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:46.000
<v Speaker 1>passing yards up the wazoo, and Winston's gonna have at

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:49.760
<v Speaker 1>least one killer turnover if not too so. Look, these

0:29:49.760 --> 0:29:52.480
<v Speaker 1>two teams know each other well. Thoughts at that number

0:29:52.560 --> 0:29:54.920
<v Speaker 1>five and a half over under a fifty one and

0:29:54.920 --> 0:29:55.840
<v Speaker 1>a half in Tampa.

0:29:57.240 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, uh yeah, that makes sense.

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 3>Maybe goes down a little bit, but yeah, I mean

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:07.080
<v Speaker 3>you nailed the key matchups. Normally I wouldn't factor in

0:30:07.200 --> 0:30:10.320
<v Speaker 3>a cornerback into the spread, but I think this matchup,

0:30:10.360 --> 0:30:12.720
<v Speaker 3>in particular Latimore not being there is.

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:14.800
<v Speaker 2>Huge for the Bucks. I mean, you nailed it. The

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:17.280
<v Speaker 2>way they score points is through the air.

0:30:17.600 --> 0:30:21.080
<v Speaker 3>To Mike Evans and you know, to Godwin and the

0:30:21.080 --> 0:30:23.720
<v Speaker 3>way the other teams score points is also through the

0:30:23.720 --> 0:30:25.959
<v Speaker 3>air when Tampa Bay throws it and they get interceptions

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:28.680
<v Speaker 3>a great field position, So a guy like Latimore not

0:30:28.800 --> 0:30:31.560
<v Speaker 3>being on the field, I think, to me actually is

0:30:31.640 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 3>worth something factoring in the spread, or at least when

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 3>you're thinking about betting this game. The Bucks are an

0:30:37.520 --> 0:30:41.280
<v Speaker 3>interesting team because they played a lot away from Raymond

0:30:41.320 --> 0:30:43.880
<v Speaker 3>James Stadium, so you know, they've had eight games but

0:30:44.160 --> 0:30:46.640
<v Speaker 3>not a ton of ben at home, so it's tough

0:30:46.640 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 3>to kind of get a handle on how this team

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 3>is at home.

0:30:49.200 --> 0:30:51.160
<v Speaker 2>And then the Saints. Yeah, it's one.

0:30:51.120 --> 0:30:53.240
<v Speaker 3>Thing to have kind of a letdown game coming out

0:30:53.240 --> 0:30:56.360
<v Speaker 3>of the by lost their division opponent, but there was

0:30:56.360 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 3>some stuff that was pretty troubling, just Drew Brees's accuracy.

0:31:00.240 --> 0:31:02.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he looked very good in that game before

0:31:02.480 --> 0:31:03.240
<v Speaker 2>the bye.

0:31:02.920 --> 0:31:05.560
<v Speaker 3>But I don't know if they hand has bothered him

0:31:05.560 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 3>the thumb, but he looked pretty inaccurate. And you know,

0:31:10.240 --> 0:31:13.200
<v Speaker 3>Tampa Bay is a much different place to play than

0:31:13.280 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 3>inside at the Dome, so we'll be interesting.

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:16.720
<v Speaker 2>For sure here.

0:31:17.040 --> 0:31:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think part of it was just that Breeze

0:31:19.160 --> 0:31:22.520
<v Speaker 1>was under so much pressure, which you know he isn't often. Again,

0:31:22.560 --> 0:31:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I think they sacked him six times in the game,

0:31:24.640 --> 0:31:28.120
<v Speaker 1>which was pretty shocking. Again, given how little pressure Falcons

0:31:28.200 --> 0:31:30.520
<v Speaker 1>right from the Falcons, it doesn't usually happen for them,

0:31:30.760 --> 0:31:32.560
<v Speaker 1>so you know, it could have been that. But yeah, look,

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:34.880
<v Speaker 1>he didn't look great. I don't know if Kamara looked,

0:31:34.920 --> 0:31:37.240
<v Speaker 1>you know that great. Again. They had trouble running the ball,

0:31:37.280 --> 0:31:39.520
<v Speaker 1>which I'm sure they're going to have trouble this week

0:31:39.560 --> 0:31:41.880
<v Speaker 1>too because the Bucks. That's one thing that the Bucks do.

0:31:41.960 --> 0:31:44.000
<v Speaker 1>But for me, I don't know, man, I could see

0:31:44.000 --> 0:31:46.920
<v Speaker 1>this just I could see Peyton being pissed and Breeze

0:31:46.920 --> 0:31:49.400
<v Speaker 1>being pissed and there being a lot of offense coming out,

0:31:49.440 --> 0:31:52.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the passing game here and again vice versa.

0:31:52.240 --> 0:31:54.959
<v Speaker 1>You know, the Saints they have a great run defense.

0:31:55.080 --> 0:31:57.280
<v Speaker 1>The pass defense is okay, but you take Latimore out

0:31:57.280 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 1>of that game there other cornerbacks are not good. It

0:32:00.440 --> 0:32:03.000
<v Speaker 1>is not something. And especially you've got two elite wide

0:32:03.040 --> 0:32:05.720
<v Speaker 1>receiver with Evans and Godwin, and good to see oj

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Howard finally get back involved now that he was back healthy.

0:32:08.520 --> 0:32:10.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, he's got a missing person's report out him

0:32:10.600 --> 0:32:12.720
<v Speaker 1>all year, so you know, this is a game where

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:14.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, I know the over under is high at

0:32:14.440 --> 0:32:16.200
<v Speaker 1>fifty one and a half. It kind of feels like

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:18.160
<v Speaker 1>to me, and I said the same thing this, you know,

0:32:18.240 --> 0:32:20.680
<v Speaker 1>past weekend where I felt like, man, it's going to

0:32:20.720 --> 0:32:22.640
<v Speaker 1>be tough to find an over under that I'm not

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:24.920
<v Speaker 1>going to like the over even though I usually like unders.

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:27.720
<v Speaker 1>On the Cardinals Bucks game, and again it hit because

0:32:27.760 --> 0:32:29.520
<v Speaker 1>it's just what's going to happen. The Bucks are like

0:32:29.720 --> 0:32:32.480
<v Speaker 1>just a dream for overs because they have the perfect

0:32:32.840 --> 0:32:34.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of set up there, so perfect formula.

0:32:34.680 --> 0:32:37.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you can score at ease and also help the

0:32:37.480 --> 0:32:38.520
<v Speaker 2>other team score.

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:40.560
<v Speaker 1>So right, and even if you're like, well, you know,

0:32:40.640 --> 0:32:42.239
<v Speaker 1>you don't know whether or not it's going to get there,

0:32:42.240 --> 0:32:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Winston will give you a pick six, He'll throw one

0:32:44.040 --> 0:32:45.800
<v Speaker 1>in for you just to just to make sure you

0:32:45.840 --> 0:32:47.560
<v Speaker 1>get there. Let's move on here to the Cardinals at

0:32:47.560 --> 0:32:51.160
<v Speaker 1>the forty nine ers. Forty nine ers are laying thirteen

0:32:51.280 --> 0:32:54.160
<v Speaker 1>and a half points with the over under at forty

0:32:54.160 --> 0:32:56.880
<v Speaker 1>five and a half. Cardinals coming off that tough loss

0:32:56.920 --> 0:32:59.520
<v Speaker 1>we just talked about against the Bucks, and Patrick Peterson

0:32:59.560 --> 0:33:01.160
<v Speaker 1>heard his case. Half in this game, I'm not sure

0:33:01.160 --> 0:33:03.120
<v Speaker 1>if I'll need to miss it or how serious it is.

0:33:03.160 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen anything yet. Today. The running game struggles

0:33:05.880 --> 0:33:08.920
<v Speaker 1>predictably against the Bucks. But you know, in particular, David

0:33:08.960 --> 0:33:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Johnson looks terrible. He barely touches the ball. He can't

0:33:11.880 --> 0:33:14.840
<v Speaker 1>get anything going Kenyan Drake largely, it's the way here. Meanwhile,

0:33:14.880 --> 0:33:16.480
<v Speaker 1>we have not yet seen the forty nine ers play

0:33:16.560 --> 0:33:19.160
<v Speaker 1>this week. They played tonight against the Seahawks, but sounds

0:33:19.160 --> 0:33:21.959
<v Speaker 1>like George Kuittle may miss the game. He's doubtful coming in.

0:33:22.000 --> 0:33:24.680
<v Speaker 1>But they are getting much healthier back on the offensive line,

0:33:24.720 --> 0:33:26.840
<v Speaker 1>and I think Kyle Yuschek is probably going to return here.

0:33:26.840 --> 0:33:28.560
<v Speaker 1>That makes a big difference for them, especially in the

0:33:28.640 --> 0:33:31.520
<v Speaker 1>running game. So they were ten point favorites in Arizona

0:33:31.560 --> 0:33:33.720
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks ago on that Thursday night, thirteen

0:33:33.760 --> 0:33:35.560
<v Speaker 1>and a half here with the over under at forty

0:33:35.560 --> 0:33:36.520
<v Speaker 1>five and a half. How do you feel?

0:33:37.360 --> 0:33:40.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean again, that seems that that line totally

0:33:40.960 --> 0:33:42.959
<v Speaker 3>makes sense. I think they just took that, you know,

0:33:43.040 --> 0:33:45.560
<v Speaker 3>ten points and then kind of threw in three there

0:33:45.640 --> 0:33:47.440
<v Speaker 3>for a home field.

0:33:47.800 --> 0:33:49.680
<v Speaker 2>But it is interesting.

0:33:49.880 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 3>Again, I think if you like the Cardinals, bet is

0:33:52.160 --> 0:33:54.840
<v Speaker 3>at thirteen and a half because it's not gonna it's

0:33:54.880 --> 0:33:58.240
<v Speaker 3>not gonna go over two scores, and there's a I

0:33:58.320 --> 0:34:01.560
<v Speaker 3>think there's a chance that if Seattle beats San Francisco

0:34:01.680 --> 0:34:04.840
<v Speaker 3>or upsets them, this gets knocked down maybe closer to

0:34:04.880 --> 0:34:07.720
<v Speaker 3>ten and a half. I would be shocked if anything

0:34:07.840 --> 0:34:11.520
<v Speaker 3>happens to in tonight's game that would warrant them moving

0:34:11.600 --> 0:34:14.160
<v Speaker 3>the Cardinals over fourteen points.

0:34:14.239 --> 0:34:16.480
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, that's no question. If they come out tonight

0:34:16.680 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and they just blast the Seahawks right and they written

0:34:20.239 --> 0:34:22.279
<v Speaker 1>by like twenty points, do you think you think it

0:34:22.320 --> 0:34:24.200
<v Speaker 1>still wouldn't get over two touchdowns.

0:34:24.719 --> 0:34:27.840
<v Speaker 3>I think they would move it to fourteen because I

0:34:27.840 --> 0:34:29.880
<v Speaker 3>don't know, man this. I think it would take a

0:34:29.880 --> 0:34:31.520
<v Speaker 3>lot to get over fourteen and a half because it's

0:34:31.520 --> 0:34:34.320
<v Speaker 3>a division game and we've seen Kyler Murray in garbage

0:34:34.360 --> 0:34:36.600
<v Speaker 3>time be able to move the ball up and down

0:34:36.640 --> 0:34:40.160
<v Speaker 3>the field, and we're you know, it's in the back

0:34:40.200 --> 0:34:42.560
<v Speaker 3>of Better's minds the Thursday Night game only a few

0:34:42.560 --> 0:34:45.640
<v Speaker 3>weeks ago, where they covered the back door pretty easily

0:34:45.640 --> 0:34:48.319
<v Speaker 3>there late, So I think it would be I'd be

0:34:48.320 --> 0:34:51.640
<v Speaker 3>shocked if they made it over fourteen at any point.

0:34:51.840 --> 0:34:54.120
<v Speaker 3>I think this is probably more inclined to go down

0:34:54.239 --> 0:34:56.719
<v Speaker 3>if they lose, if they if they win by like

0:34:56.800 --> 0:34:59.440
<v Speaker 3>thirty five points, you're right, maybe they do have to

0:35:00.440 --> 0:35:02.440
<v Speaker 3>have to move it. I guess this is also based

0:35:02.480 --> 0:35:04.480
<v Speaker 3>on the fact that I kind of I think Seattle

0:35:04.520 --> 0:35:07.920
<v Speaker 3>hangs around in this Monday night game, so I think

0:35:08.160 --> 0:35:11.200
<v Speaker 3>it'll probably end up closing at thirteen and a half.

0:35:11.239 --> 0:35:12.960
<v Speaker 3>But I could see if Seattle wins out right, I

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:15.400
<v Speaker 3>could see getting closer to ten and a half, eleven

0:35:15.480 --> 0:35:16.080
<v Speaker 3>something like that.

0:35:16.400 --> 0:35:18.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I kind of like the Cardinals here. I

0:35:18.760 --> 0:35:21.560
<v Speaker 1>don't love them, but thirteen and a half, that's just

0:35:21.719 --> 0:35:25.160
<v Speaker 1>so huge. And I mean you kind of pointed out

0:35:25.200 --> 0:35:27.600
<v Speaker 1>with Murray there. I mean, they were pretty dominated in

0:35:27.640 --> 0:35:30.440
<v Speaker 1>that game on Thursday night, and then just at the end,

0:35:30.640 --> 0:35:32.600
<v Speaker 1>you know that you had the really long touchdown to

0:35:32.840 --> 0:35:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Isabelle I believe, and this all of a sudden, it

0:35:35.480 --> 0:35:38.000
<v Speaker 1>was a really tight game going into the end, even

0:35:38.040 --> 0:35:39.880
<v Speaker 1>though it looked like the forty nine ers were just gonna,

0:35:39.920 --> 0:35:43.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, blow the roof off. So it is one

0:35:43.080 --> 0:35:45.080
<v Speaker 1>of these games where you get a point spread that high,

0:35:45.120 --> 0:35:47.160
<v Speaker 1>teams that know each other, you could easily see the

0:35:47.160 --> 0:35:47.759
<v Speaker 1>back door cover.

0:35:47.920 --> 0:35:50.360
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, I mean, if Cliff Kingsbury doesn't ice his

0:35:50.480 --> 0:35:54.080
<v Speaker 3>defense before halftime, Right, what happens in this game?

0:35:54.120 --> 0:35:56.680
<v Speaker 2>It could have been even closer.

0:35:56.760 --> 0:35:59.160
<v Speaker 1>So I actually, you know, not to get off on

0:35:59.200 --> 0:36:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the tangent, but I actually I took a lot out

0:36:01.560 --> 0:36:03.360
<v Speaker 1>of that, the fact that they came out in the

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:06.000
<v Speaker 1>second half and played well, because you do that, and

0:36:06.040 --> 0:36:08.880
<v Speaker 1>that's just like you just feel like you're just the

0:36:08.920 --> 0:36:11.160
<v Speaker 1>whole team. Spur would be broken, right you get a

0:36:11.200 --> 0:36:14.319
<v Speaker 1>big fourth? Yeah, yeah, they rallied. So it did showed

0:36:14.320 --> 0:36:17.320
<v Speaker 1>me a little something both about the team and Kingsbury. Frankly,

0:36:17.400 --> 0:36:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they were able to make the comeback

0:36:19.640 --> 0:36:22.719
<v Speaker 1>despite that awful, awful timeout that he called right at

0:36:22.719 --> 0:36:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the end of the half. Before we finish up with

0:36:24.840 --> 0:36:27.160
<v Speaker 1>our last few games, I want tomind everyone about our

0:36:27.280 --> 0:36:30.160
<v Speaker 1>November giveaway. It is a signed Odell Beckham junior Cleveland

0:36:30.160 --> 0:36:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Brown's helmet. It is running through November thirtieth, so you

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:35.880
<v Speaker 1>can go to bettingpros dot com slash contest for more details.

0:36:36.120 --> 0:36:37.960
<v Speaker 1>But to enter, just leave a review for the show

0:36:38.000 --> 0:36:41.000
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or Stitcher and send a screenshot of

0:36:41.000 --> 0:36:44.520
<v Speaker 1>that review to contest at bettingpros dot com. Now an

0:36:44.640 --> 0:36:47.680
<v Speaker 1>entry into any contest get to automatically entered into all

0:36:47.680 --> 0:36:50.480
<v Speaker 1>future contests. So even if you're mad at Odell Beckham

0:36:50.560 --> 0:36:53.000
<v Speaker 1>for his lack of stats this year, you probably want

0:36:53.000 --> 0:36:55.320
<v Speaker 1>to be entered for our next giveaway anyway. Now, the

0:36:55.320 --> 0:36:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Beckham helmet and all of our signed helmets come from

0:36:58.040 --> 0:37:01.279
<v Speaker 1>Pristine Auction, where they offer a ton of great memorabilia

0:37:01.320 --> 0:37:04.080
<v Speaker 1>with thousands of auctions every day. And when you go there,

0:37:04.160 --> 0:37:06.520
<v Speaker 1>use our promo code Betting Pros and win a free

0:37:06.760 --> 0:37:10.799
<v Speaker 1>five dollars voucher instantly. That's Pristineauction dot com p RI

0:37:10.880 --> 0:37:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I s t I n E Auction dot com. All right,

0:37:14.640 --> 0:37:16.960
<v Speaker 1>let's move on here to the Patriots at the Eagles.

0:37:17.000 --> 0:37:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Patriots currently laying three with the over under at forty

0:37:20.120 --> 0:37:21.759
<v Speaker 1>four and a half. That's dropped, by the way, a

0:37:21.760 --> 0:37:24.319
<v Speaker 1>little bit from the look ahead which was forty six

0:37:24.400 --> 0:37:25.840
<v Speaker 1>and now it's forty four and a half and the

0:37:25.960 --> 0:37:28.400
<v Speaker 1>line was three and a half. It's dropped down to three.

0:37:28.640 --> 0:37:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Patriots coming off their first loss of the season against

0:37:30.920 --> 0:37:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens last week, now they've got to buy to

0:37:32.880 --> 0:37:35.640
<v Speaker 1>lick their wounds. Meanwhile, the Eeles, also off of by

0:37:35.920 --> 0:37:39.160
<v Speaker 1>and their win against the Bears. Things still just don't

0:37:39.200 --> 0:37:42.279
<v Speaker 1>look quite right for the team, especially on offense. It's

0:37:42.320 --> 0:37:45.120
<v Speaker 1>inconsistent without the Sean Jackson stretching the field he use

0:37:45.160 --> 0:37:47.800
<v Speaker 1>now on ir Alshon Jeffery is still a little banged

0:37:47.840 --> 0:37:50.000
<v Speaker 1>up now, I believe with his ankle, but they're getting

0:37:50.000 --> 0:37:51.880
<v Speaker 1>a little healthier in their secondary. So what do you

0:37:51.880 --> 0:37:53.640
<v Speaker 1>think here about the Pats laying three and the over

0:37:53.719 --> 0:37:54.879
<v Speaker 1>under at forty four and a half.

0:37:56.000 --> 0:37:59.160
<v Speaker 3>Uh, yeah, I'm surprised it's three. I thought it would

0:37:59.200 --> 0:38:02.279
<v Speaker 3>be closer to four or four and a half. I mean,

0:38:02.280 --> 0:38:05.160
<v Speaker 3>we certainly saw what happened the last time the Eagles

0:38:05.160 --> 0:38:07.080
<v Speaker 3>were an underdog and both teams had a week to

0:38:07.080 --> 0:38:12.160
<v Speaker 3>prepare Super Bowl fifty two. So this is a is

0:38:12.200 --> 0:38:15.640
<v Speaker 3>a very different team. You nailed it, Like, the offense

0:38:15.719 --> 0:38:19.399
<v Speaker 3>has really struggled to find its identity in the passing game.

0:38:19.840 --> 0:38:20.920
<v Speaker 2>I think they're running game.

0:38:21.000 --> 0:38:23.400
<v Speaker 3>They've really kind of figured that out, and Miles Sanders

0:38:23.400 --> 0:38:26.080
<v Speaker 3>and Jordan Howard are kind of coming along in their

0:38:26.120 --> 0:38:28.560
<v Speaker 3>big wins. They've done it with running the ball and

0:38:28.600 --> 0:38:32.200
<v Speaker 3>being very physical like the did in Green Bay. The

0:38:32.239 --> 0:38:35.879
<v Speaker 3>passing game just hasn't gotten into a great flow. I mean,

0:38:36.600 --> 0:38:39.759
<v Speaker 3>zero production really out of the receivers. Al Sean and

0:38:40.080 --> 0:38:42.640
<v Speaker 3>Nelson Aguilard. Maccollins is just I don't know, he's just.

0:38:42.600 --> 0:38:44.880
<v Speaker 2>Getting his fitbit steps in out there. I don't know

0:38:44.880 --> 0:38:45.560
<v Speaker 2>what he's doing.

0:38:45.719 --> 0:38:48.239
<v Speaker 1>I think he's like setting the record for most snaps

0:38:48.280 --> 0:38:50.880
<v Speaker 1>with combined with least production on the season.

0:38:50.920 --> 0:38:54.000
<v Speaker 2>I think it's insane, like not even targets.

0:38:54.080 --> 0:38:55.800
<v Speaker 3>It's one thing of like, okay, the guy's got a

0:38:55.840 --> 0:38:57.880
<v Speaker 3>case of the drops. They don't even look at them.

0:38:57.960 --> 0:39:00.840
<v Speaker 3>I don't know why they're running three y receiver sets.

0:39:00.880 --> 0:39:03.480
<v Speaker 3>If you're not going to pass to them, just replace

0:39:03.600 --> 0:39:05.719
<v Speaker 3>Goddard or you know. I mean, so just like bring

0:39:05.760 --> 0:39:08.359
<v Speaker 3>Goddard in as the third receiver and just split him out.

0:39:08.719 --> 0:39:10.640
<v Speaker 3>It makes no sense that matt Collins has seen the field.

0:39:10.680 --> 0:39:13.720
<v Speaker 3>Now they bring in Jordan Matthews, who, again not amazing

0:39:13.760 --> 0:39:16.680
<v Speaker 3>by any means, but at least someone that you know

0:39:16.719 --> 0:39:18.680
<v Speaker 3>that Wentz will probably end up throwing the ball to.

0:39:19.360 --> 0:39:20.520
<v Speaker 2>On the other side, the Pats.

0:39:20.719 --> 0:39:24.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, historically you love to take the Pats coming

0:39:24.239 --> 0:39:26.840
<v Speaker 3>off a loss or coming off a bye A certainly

0:39:27.200 --> 0:39:30.359
<v Speaker 3>big game for them. I think they'll be fired up

0:39:30.719 --> 0:39:33.279
<v Speaker 3>for this game as the Eagles are as well. Their

0:39:33.360 --> 0:39:35.759
<v Speaker 3>kind of playoff lives are on the line these next

0:39:35.760 --> 0:39:38.560
<v Speaker 3>few games, So yeah, I thought it would be a

0:39:38.560 --> 0:39:41.200
<v Speaker 3>little bit higher. I thought it would be closer to four.

0:39:41.400 --> 0:39:43.279
<v Speaker 3>So I'm a little surprised that three. If you like

0:39:43.360 --> 0:39:46.799
<v Speaker 3>the Pats, I don't see it getting below a field goal.

0:39:46.840 --> 0:39:48.600
<v Speaker 3>So if you can get a minus three now at

0:39:48.680 --> 0:39:50.200
<v Speaker 3>decent juice, I think bet it now.

0:39:50.560 --> 0:39:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I completely agree with that. I was surprised to see

0:39:53.040 --> 0:39:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the number where it's at. I love them lang three,

0:39:56.200 --> 0:39:58.560
<v Speaker 1>I completely love them. I just don't feel like this

0:39:58.600 --> 0:40:00.960
<v Speaker 1>is really something that the Eagle are going to be

0:40:00.960 --> 0:40:02.520
<v Speaker 1>able to do. They're going to run the ball, which

0:40:02.600 --> 0:40:03.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, you can run a little bit on the

0:40:03.840 --> 0:40:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Patriots if that's if that's the spot to attack them.

0:40:06.520 --> 0:40:08.720
<v Speaker 1>But it's not like they have this dominant rushing attack.

0:40:08.719 --> 0:40:11.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Jordan Howard is good, Miles Sanders is good,

0:40:11.200 --> 0:40:13.320
<v Speaker 1>but it's not like, you know, you don't have Ezekiel

0:40:13.320 --> 0:40:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Elliott or Dalvin Cook or anything back there. And you

0:40:15.719 --> 0:40:17.759
<v Speaker 1>know the Pats, you know, you give them an extra

0:40:17.800 --> 0:40:20.960
<v Speaker 1>week to prepare for that secondary Who cares that they

0:40:20.960 --> 0:40:22.200
<v Speaker 1>are not gonna be able to run the ball. That's

0:40:22.200 --> 0:40:23.880
<v Speaker 1>what the Eagles do. They stop the run. Who cares?

0:40:23.920 --> 0:40:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean the Pats can barely run the ball as

0:40:26.080 --> 0:40:28.200
<v Speaker 1>is anyway, regardless of the matchup. You know, once they

0:40:28.239 --> 0:40:30.640
<v Speaker 1>lost James Devlin, it was all downhill. So they're going

0:40:30.719 --> 0:40:32.000
<v Speaker 1>to pass. They're going to figure out a way to

0:40:32.000 --> 0:40:33.960
<v Speaker 1>beat it. So for me, yeah, I love the Pets.

0:40:34.680 --> 0:40:38.320
<v Speaker 1>At three, I was surprised that the number wasn't higher,

0:40:38.400 --> 0:40:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and certainly I don't see it getting any lower. So

0:40:40.840 --> 0:40:42.600
<v Speaker 1>if you like the Pats, like both of us do,

0:40:43.040 --> 0:40:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I'd get in on it now.

0:40:44.560 --> 0:40:46.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean I would say this.

0:40:46.360 --> 0:40:50.840
<v Speaker 3>I think for the Eagles, their formula to victory I

0:40:50.880 --> 0:40:52.600
<v Speaker 3>think comes through the defensive line in.

0:40:52.560 --> 0:40:53.320
<v Speaker 2>That pass rush.

0:40:53.400 --> 0:40:57.040
<v Speaker 3>It's slowly like Fletcher Cox came into the season banged up,

0:40:57.040 --> 0:40:59.080
<v Speaker 3>and he slowly gotten healthier and healthier.

0:40:58.760 --> 0:41:01.080
<v Speaker 2>And looked more productive and more productive.

0:41:01.800 --> 0:41:03.279
<v Speaker 3>And you saw kind of even what they did to

0:41:03.400 --> 0:41:07.600
<v Speaker 3>Chicago's offensive line. Now, granted, Chicago way worse on offense

0:41:07.680 --> 0:41:10.239
<v Speaker 3>than the New England Patriots, but I think if they

0:41:10.280 --> 0:41:13.200
<v Speaker 3>can get pressure to Brady, you've seen this year that

0:41:13.320 --> 0:41:15.399
<v Speaker 3>he has had trouble dealing with it. So I think

0:41:15.400 --> 0:41:17.000
<v Speaker 3>if they're gonna win this game, it's going to be

0:41:17.040 --> 0:41:18.240
<v Speaker 3>through the defensive line.

0:41:18.600 --> 0:41:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, No, that makes sense. And certainly, you know, hopefully

0:41:21.440 --> 0:41:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Jim Schwartz can you know, hold off his just inclination

0:41:24.760 --> 0:41:27.200
<v Speaker 1>to blitz every single play and just you know, try

0:41:27.239 --> 0:41:29.720
<v Speaker 1>to get pressure with their line without all the blitzing,

0:41:29.719 --> 0:41:31.520
<v Speaker 1>because you know, the one thing that Brady can do

0:41:31.600 --> 0:41:32.880
<v Speaker 1>is he can beat the blitz. But if you can

0:41:32.880 --> 0:41:34.279
<v Speaker 1>get pressure on him, as you know, has been the

0:41:34.280 --> 0:41:36.879
<v Speaker 1>book on him four years, the thirty years that he's

0:41:36.920 --> 0:41:39.879
<v Speaker 1>been you know, torching my jets in this league, it's said,

0:41:39.880 --> 0:41:41.279
<v Speaker 1>if you can get pressure on him with just a

0:41:41.320 --> 0:41:43.440
<v Speaker 1>four man rush, he gets a little, you know, a

0:41:43.440 --> 0:41:45.320
<v Speaker 1>little shaky in the pocket. So we'll see if the

0:41:45.360 --> 0:41:47.319
<v Speaker 1>Eagles can do that. Moving on to the Bengals. At

0:41:47.360 --> 0:41:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders, Raiders here laying ten and a half points,

0:41:50.560 --> 0:41:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the over unders have forty and a half. I mean,

0:41:52.520 --> 0:41:54.640
<v Speaker 1>I still feel like, just to show you kind of

0:41:54.680 --> 0:41:57.360
<v Speaker 1>like the natural kind of bias, I feel like that

0:41:57.400 --> 0:41:59.319
<v Speaker 1>I still have in my head, I'm like, Raiders ten

0:41:59.360 --> 0:42:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and a half favorites, Like why what is that? Without

0:42:02.000 --> 0:42:05.359
<v Speaker 1>realizing that the Raiders are kind of slowly becoming a

0:42:05.400 --> 0:42:07.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty good football team. I mean, their offensive line has

0:42:07.880 --> 0:42:10.920
<v Speaker 1>been dominant. It opens up huge holes for Josh Jacobs

0:42:10.920 --> 0:42:13.200
<v Speaker 1>it allows Derek Carr plenty of time to throw. They've

0:42:13.239 --> 0:42:16.319
<v Speaker 1>got enough playmakers on offense. Tyre Williams not sure if

0:42:16.360 --> 0:42:19.840
<v Speaker 1>he's one hundred percent still battling from that planter fasciatis,

0:42:19.920 --> 0:42:22.640
<v Speaker 1>but Darren Waller is elite hunter Renfro starting to come on.

0:42:22.760 --> 0:42:25.359
<v Speaker 1>Za Jones is a body who's out there and their

0:42:25.400 --> 0:42:27.960
<v Speaker 1>defense kind of just holding their own a bit. You know,

0:42:28.000 --> 0:42:30.600
<v Speaker 1>they're not getting embarrassed, at least unlike the Bengals who

0:42:30.640 --> 0:42:33.719
<v Speaker 1>were completely embarrassed by the Ravens this past week. At

0:42:33.800 --> 0:42:35.680
<v Speaker 1>least Joe Mixon gets a lot of work and he

0:42:35.719 --> 0:42:38.319
<v Speaker 1>gets going there. But it's a little bit unfair to

0:42:38.400 --> 0:42:40.839
<v Speaker 1>judge Ryan Finley off this game. I feel like it's

0:42:40.840 --> 0:42:42.839
<v Speaker 1>a really tough, you know, to just be like, hey,

0:42:42.880 --> 0:42:45.319
<v Speaker 1>here you go, come after a defense that knows us

0:42:45.360 --> 0:42:48.640
<v Speaker 1>really well and that's probably gonna be ready to destroy us.

0:42:48.719 --> 0:42:51.520
<v Speaker 1>So the defense, though, it continues just they can't tackle,

0:42:51.560 --> 0:42:53.440
<v Speaker 1>they continue to be a sieve. So how do you

0:42:53.440 --> 0:42:55.840
<v Speaker 1>feel here a big number, Raiders laying ten and a

0:42:55.920 --> 0:42:57.719
<v Speaker 1>half within over under at forty eight and a half.

0:42:58.239 --> 0:43:01.359
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think I had the same preseason workup that

0:43:01.400 --> 0:43:03.200
<v Speaker 3>you did on the Raiders I was just so out

0:43:03.239 --> 0:43:06.279
<v Speaker 3>on Raiders and Grewdon and I thought it was really

0:43:06.320 --> 0:43:08.880
<v Speaker 3>going to be a disaster, and they've seemingly kind of

0:43:09.360 --> 0:43:13.160
<v Speaker 3>righted the ship. I finally adjusted, you know, kind of

0:43:13.160 --> 0:43:15.640
<v Speaker 3>where I had them at and had them last week

0:43:15.640 --> 0:43:19.560
<v Speaker 3>against the Chargers. Now they're coming off Thursday night rest,

0:43:19.680 --> 0:43:22.160
<v Speaker 3>which I always like to factor that in a little bit,

0:43:22.200 --> 0:43:25.879
<v Speaker 3>because you know that mini buy if you look at

0:43:26.040 --> 0:43:27.359
<v Speaker 3>teams coming off Thursday night.

0:43:27.560 --> 0:43:28.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't have it in front of me.

0:43:28.600 --> 0:43:30.880
<v Speaker 3>But it's usually in that fifty five to sixty percent

0:43:31.360 --> 0:43:33.200
<v Speaker 3>against the spread, so you want to get a little

0:43:33.280 --> 0:43:36.239
<v Speaker 3>point or two there. I wouldn't be surprised that this

0:43:36.320 --> 0:43:39.759
<v Speaker 3>line goes up a little bit because of how bad

0:43:39.800 --> 0:43:42.360
<v Speaker 3>the Bengals looked in a game where they should have

0:43:42.360 --> 0:43:45.040
<v Speaker 3>had a little bit of motivation. They were at home,

0:43:45.280 --> 0:43:47.680
<v Speaker 3>huge dogs, and the Ravens just came in and cleaned

0:43:47.680 --> 0:43:51.640
<v Speaker 3>their clock out. Historically, in the NFL, if your team,

0:43:52.000 --> 0:43:55.279
<v Speaker 3>if you're a team who's underperforming the spread by more

0:43:55.320 --> 0:43:57.960
<v Speaker 3>than twenty one points and then you're getting more points

0:43:58.200 --> 0:44:02.160
<v Speaker 3>the next week, usually there's value on that team. I

0:44:02.160 --> 0:44:05.040
<v Speaker 3>don't know if that's the case with this Bengals team.

0:44:05.520 --> 0:44:08.960
<v Speaker 3>They're gonna go out west non division opponents. I could

0:44:08.960 --> 0:44:12.600
<v Speaker 3>see some motivation issues for this Bengals team and the Raiders.

0:44:12.960 --> 0:44:16.799
<v Speaker 3>They're kind of in the quietly in the AFC West, Yeah,

0:44:16.840 --> 0:44:20.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, running, so don't look now, they're kind of

0:44:20.560 --> 0:44:21.160
<v Speaker 3>in that mix.

0:44:21.640 --> 0:44:24.359
<v Speaker 2>I think, you know, they got a couple of home games.

0:44:24.040 --> 0:44:27.600
<v Speaker 3>Back to back here, so I think they're really in

0:44:27.640 --> 0:44:29.359
<v Speaker 3>a in the driver's seat in a weird way.

0:44:29.760 --> 0:44:30.920
<v Speaker 2>Definitely didn't see that coming.

0:44:31.000 --> 0:44:35.279
<v Speaker 3>So I think the Bengals line could go up. If

0:44:35.320 --> 0:44:37.040
<v Speaker 3>you like the Raiders, I don't know if you're gonna

0:44:37.080 --> 0:44:38.360
<v Speaker 3>do better than ten and a half.

0:44:40.120 --> 0:44:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling you that, when all of a sudden done

0:44:42.640 --> 0:44:45.600
<v Speaker 1>in this game, I'm going to be wind up backing

0:44:45.640 --> 0:44:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals, and I'm going to be really mad at myself,

0:44:48.640 --> 0:44:51.799
<v Speaker 1>like I pretty much am every single time I backed Gongles. Yeah,

0:44:52.000 --> 0:44:54.839
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you. It's hard to say. I mean, look,

0:44:54.840 --> 0:44:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I could see some sharp money because I'm sure you know,

0:44:57.560 --> 0:44:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the some models that people are gonna have are going

0:44:59.560 --> 0:45:03.000
<v Speaker 1>to say this should probably be closer than it necessarily is,

0:45:03.080 --> 0:45:05.600
<v Speaker 1>So I could see some money coming in. But I'm

0:45:05.600 --> 0:45:08.359
<v Speaker 1>inclined to agree that. I don't see this getting back

0:45:08.400 --> 0:45:10.040
<v Speaker 1>down to the key number of ten, and I could

0:45:10.080 --> 0:45:12.120
<v Speaker 1>see it easily going up a point or two. So

0:45:12.640 --> 0:45:14.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm basically going to try to resist the urge to

0:45:14.800 --> 0:45:16.960
<v Speaker 1>take the Bengals as long as I possibly can, and

0:45:17.080 --> 0:45:19.719
<v Speaker 1>hope I get more to like twelve or something like that,

0:45:19.800 --> 0:45:22.320
<v Speaker 1>in which case I'll be like, well, there's too much value.

0:45:22.520 --> 0:45:23.440
<v Speaker 1>I cannot do this.

0:45:23.560 --> 0:45:27.160
<v Speaker 3>But well, yeah, and sorry real quick, Like a couple

0:45:27.239 --> 0:45:29.160
<v Speaker 3>things that jump out of me right away here is

0:45:29.560 --> 0:45:32.800
<v Speaker 3>look at how the Bengals struggled against the tight end.

0:45:32.800 --> 0:45:35.600
<v Speaker 2>And just poor tackling. And if you have poor tackling

0:45:35.600 --> 0:45:38.600
<v Speaker 2>against Josh Jacobs and Waller, I think that's right, you know,

0:45:39.480 --> 0:45:41.839
<v Speaker 2>that's that's the bread and butter for the Raiders team.

0:45:42.160 --> 0:45:45.479
<v Speaker 1>It's really the tackling man. It's so and I've talked

0:45:45.480 --> 0:45:47.600
<v Speaker 1>about this a couple of times, but you know, because

0:45:47.640 --> 0:45:50.160
<v Speaker 1>it hasn't always been terrible, Like it wasn't that terrible,

0:45:50.280 --> 0:45:52.400
<v Speaker 1>like in their first game against the Seahawks, and then

0:45:52.440 --> 0:45:53.960
<v Speaker 1>they came out in the second game against the forty

0:45:54.040 --> 0:45:56.560
<v Speaker 1>nine ers, it was like, do you know how to tackle?

0:45:56.719 --> 0:45:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Right now? What's happening? And it looked like that again

0:45:59.080 --> 0:46:02.680
<v Speaker 1>against the Ravens. So yeah, I completely agree. I get it,

0:46:02.719 --> 0:46:05.360
<v Speaker 1>but you know, look, the Raiders defense is certainly not

0:46:05.800 --> 0:46:09.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, impenetrable by any means. You know, they're pretty

0:46:09.160 --> 0:46:11.880
<v Speaker 1>good against the run, but mixing you know, whether it

0:46:11.920 --> 0:46:13.880
<v Speaker 1>was the Ravens taking their foot off the gas, I mean,

0:46:13.920 --> 0:46:16.359
<v Speaker 1>he certainly at least he got the workload and he's

0:46:16.360 --> 0:46:18.200
<v Speaker 1>a talented back and he was able to you know,

0:46:18.400 --> 0:46:21.600
<v Speaker 1>certainly put up a lot of stats in yesterday's game,

0:46:21.719 --> 0:46:24.440
<v Speaker 1>so you know, and finley, he obviously didn't look good,

0:46:24.440 --> 0:46:25.759
<v Speaker 1>but he was able to move the ball at bit.

0:46:25.800 --> 0:46:27.040
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I do think they'll be able to

0:46:27.040 --> 0:46:29.480
<v Speaker 1>put up points here, but it's certainly something where I

0:46:29.880 --> 0:46:32.319
<v Speaker 1>probably don't want to. But in the end, as long

0:46:32.360 --> 0:46:34.480
<v Speaker 1>as it stays above ten, I'm probably gonna wind up

0:46:34.480 --> 0:46:36.520
<v Speaker 1>holding my nose and taking the Bengals. And then you

0:46:36.560 --> 0:46:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and I are going to talk the next time you're

0:46:38.040 --> 0:46:40.480
<v Speaker 1>on and say, can you believe I'm still looking to

0:46:40.640 --> 0:46:43.120
<v Speaker 1>take the Bengals on a terrible bet. Let's move on

0:46:43.200 --> 0:46:45.200
<v Speaker 1>here to the Bears. At the Rams. Rams are laying

0:46:45.320 --> 0:46:47.879
<v Speaker 1>six and a half. The over under has come down

0:46:47.920 --> 0:46:50.720
<v Speaker 1>from forty two to forty and a half. The Bears

0:46:50.760 --> 0:46:53.839
<v Speaker 1>finally show a little life on offense. After a slow

0:46:53.880 --> 0:46:56.960
<v Speaker 1>start against the lines, yesterday, they lighted up offensively a

0:46:57.000 --> 0:47:00.360
<v Speaker 1>little bit with Mitchell Trubisky throwing for three touchdowns. Defense

0:47:00.400 --> 0:47:04.680
<v Speaker 1>continues to be adequate, not spectacular, but certainly adequate. Meanwhile,

0:47:04.760 --> 0:47:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the Rams they're just an utter disaster offensively. I mean,

0:47:09.239 --> 0:47:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Blake Bortle's played in the game against the Steelers. That

0:47:12.160 --> 0:47:14.120
<v Speaker 1>really should tell you all you need to know about

0:47:14.120 --> 0:47:16.479
<v Speaker 1>where they're at. They've had an injured and a poor

0:47:16.560 --> 0:47:19.480
<v Speaker 1>offensive line all year long. It got worse yesterday with

0:47:19.600 --> 0:47:22.360
<v Speaker 1>some more injuries. They just cannot protect jar Golf and

0:47:22.360 --> 0:47:25.239
<v Speaker 1>that is a worrisome thing with Khalil Mack getting ready

0:47:25.280 --> 0:47:28.040
<v Speaker 1>to play. The defense does continue to play well here.

0:47:28.080 --> 0:47:30.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, since they added Jalen Ramsey especially,

0:47:30.600 --> 0:47:33.960
<v Speaker 1>they've they've been pretty solid. But things are just not

0:47:34.120 --> 0:47:36.080
<v Speaker 1>there right now for the Rams. So it's a pretty

0:47:36.080 --> 0:47:38.120
<v Speaker 1>big spread. I mean, they are at home. I believe

0:47:38.160 --> 0:47:39.880
<v Speaker 1>this is the Sunday night game. So lank six and

0:47:39.880 --> 0:47:41.759
<v Speaker 1>a half with the over under at forty and a half.

0:47:43.040 --> 0:47:47.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, I guess this feels a little high initially,

0:47:47.840 --> 0:47:50.840
<v Speaker 3>and again it's it's we're in a weird spot with Trubisky.

0:47:50.920 --> 0:47:54.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the guy throws three touchdowns and no interceptions.

0:47:54.880 --> 0:47:56.920
<v Speaker 2>But if you have any Bears fan, there's no.

0:47:56.920 --> 0:47:59.680
<v Speaker 3>Way they would be happy if you named Chase Daniel

0:47:59.680 --> 0:48:03.200
<v Speaker 3>to the start for this game and you highlighted a

0:48:03.200 --> 0:48:05.879
<v Speaker 3>great matchup and one I'll probably be looking to dive

0:48:05.920 --> 0:48:09.600
<v Speaker 3>into more on my podcast, and that's the Rams offensive line.

0:48:09.680 --> 0:48:12.600
<v Speaker 3>I was all over Pittsburgh last week because I thought,

0:48:12.640 --> 0:48:14.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, TJ. Watt, he'd be able to get some

0:48:14.640 --> 0:48:17.840
<v Speaker 3>pressure on Golf and Golf doesn't do well with pressure.

0:48:17.920 --> 0:48:22.280
<v Speaker 2>And the offensive line has just really struggled to protect

0:48:22.360 --> 0:48:23.359
<v Speaker 2>him and to give him time.

0:48:23.400 --> 0:48:25.399
<v Speaker 3>I mean like he really needs a lot of time

0:48:25.480 --> 0:48:28.400
<v Speaker 3>to make the throws and to have Sean McVay explain

0:48:28.719 --> 0:48:30.920
<v Speaker 3>what the defense is he needs. He needs a lot

0:48:31.000 --> 0:48:33.200
<v Speaker 3>of time on the offensive side of the ball, and

0:48:33.520 --> 0:48:35.920
<v Speaker 3>the Bears should be able to get some pressure against

0:48:35.960 --> 0:48:36.480
<v Speaker 3>the Rams.

0:48:37.640 --> 0:48:39.800
<v Speaker 2>Chicago fans could show.

0:48:39.680 --> 0:48:43.239
<v Speaker 3>Up there in Los Angeles. I think the I think

0:48:43.280 --> 0:48:45.400
<v Speaker 3>the Bears fans will show up for a game. You know,

0:48:45.440 --> 0:48:48.120
<v Speaker 3>if you're living in Chicago, you're looking for an excuse

0:48:48.160 --> 0:48:50.160
<v Speaker 3>to go out to Los Angeles to watch this game.

0:48:50.280 --> 0:48:54.960
<v Speaker 3>So I think this could get down a little not

0:48:55.080 --> 0:48:56.719
<v Speaker 3>certainly down to a field goal, but I wouldn't be

0:48:56.760 --> 0:48:58.720
<v Speaker 3>surprised if this gets down to four and a half.

0:48:59.520 --> 0:49:02.839
<v Speaker 3>I don't see enough people backing the Rams to move

0:49:02.880 --> 0:49:04.880
<v Speaker 3>this up to seven. If anything, I think it'll go

0:49:04.960 --> 0:49:05.680
<v Speaker 3>down a little bit.

0:49:06.120 --> 0:49:07.520
<v Speaker 1>No, I agree, I don't think it's going to get

0:49:07.520 --> 0:49:09.520
<v Speaker 1>to seven. I just you know, this is a tough

0:49:09.520 --> 0:49:12.160
<v Speaker 1>game because you know, you look at it and you

0:49:12.239 --> 0:49:15.520
<v Speaker 1>really really see that the Rams are going to struggle

0:49:15.560 --> 0:49:18.480
<v Speaker 1>to do anything offensively because Golf is just going to

0:49:18.520 --> 0:49:21.000
<v Speaker 1>be running for his life. And again, I assume Randon

0:49:21.040 --> 0:49:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Cooks is going to be out for this game. Josh

0:49:22.520 --> 0:49:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Reynold's played okay yesterday, but I assume Cooks, who's still

0:49:25.520 --> 0:49:28.160
<v Speaker 1>suffering from the concussions, if he plays it all this year.

0:49:28.920 --> 0:49:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I really would be shocked if he plays this game.

0:49:31.040 --> 0:49:33.160
<v Speaker 1>And you know, the Bears Trubisky, he was kind of

0:49:33.160 --> 0:49:35.759
<v Speaker 1>like a batter in baseball that got really hot for

0:49:35.840 --> 0:49:38.160
<v Speaker 1>like a really brief strift. Right It was like suddenly

0:49:38.200 --> 0:49:40.799
<v Speaker 1>things looked okay, and he he kind of was like, Oh,

0:49:40.880 --> 0:49:42.719
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, I'm comfortable this. I could just

0:49:42.719 --> 0:49:44.520
<v Speaker 1>do this and this and this. But I don't think

0:49:44.560 --> 0:49:46.440
<v Speaker 1>that you can expect that to last. As you mentioned,

0:49:46.480 --> 0:49:49.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure Bears fans are surely looking for someone else

0:49:49.520 --> 0:49:52.320
<v Speaker 1>to take over his quarterback at some point. To me, again,

0:49:52.520 --> 0:49:55.200
<v Speaker 1>with forty two, I liked that over under at forty

0:49:55.200 --> 0:49:58.080
<v Speaker 1>and a half. It's low, but I'm still kind of

0:49:58.120 --> 0:50:00.120
<v Speaker 1>feeling the under on it because I do think the

0:50:00.160 --> 0:50:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Scubia game where neither team is going to be able

0:50:02.040 --> 0:50:05.880
<v Speaker 1>to score, so of either of these lines, you know,

0:50:06.040 --> 0:50:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the spread it seems high to me. I agree, but

0:50:08.200 --> 0:50:10.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I have the intestinal forty two

0:50:10.320 --> 0:50:12.919
<v Speaker 1>to take the Bears. But I do think I still

0:50:12.960 --> 0:50:14.840
<v Speaker 1>like the under, even though it's dropping to forty and

0:50:14.880 --> 0:50:16.879
<v Speaker 1>a half. I still think above forty, I still think

0:50:16.880 --> 0:50:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I like it because I could see this, you know again,

0:50:19.160 --> 0:50:22.239
<v Speaker 1>being a game that's just not particularly high scoring. Let's

0:50:22.280 --> 0:50:24.759
<v Speaker 1>move on here to our final game, the Chiefs at

0:50:24.760 --> 0:50:27.319
<v Speaker 1>the Charters on Monday Night football. The Chiefs here are

0:50:27.360 --> 0:50:29.279
<v Speaker 1>laying three and a half. That's down from four and

0:50:29.320 --> 0:50:31.680
<v Speaker 1>a half and the over unders at fifty three. Really

0:50:31.760 --> 0:50:34.040
<v Speaker 1>tough loss for the Chiefs. Yesterday we talked about it.

0:50:34.120 --> 0:50:36.440
<v Speaker 1>They had that game for the vast majority of it,

0:50:36.640 --> 0:50:38.960
<v Speaker 1>but then the you know, the offense look pretty standard.

0:50:39.000 --> 0:50:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes back under center, running game is still a

0:50:41.560 --> 0:50:44.680
<v Speaker 1>little weird. You had Lashaw McCoy inact of a healthy scratch.

0:50:44.760 --> 0:50:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Damian Williams was final, though he did fumble. The issue

0:50:47.680 --> 0:50:49.799
<v Speaker 1>is really their defense. They can't stop anyone. They had

0:50:49.880 --> 0:50:51.839
<v Speaker 1>success in recent weeks a bit more when they were

0:50:51.840 --> 0:50:54.440
<v Speaker 1>blitzing all the time, but it's certainly not an elite

0:50:54.480 --> 0:50:56.920
<v Speaker 1>unit and far from it. Meanwhile, the Charters come off

0:50:56.920 --> 0:50:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the Thursday night loss to the Raiders probably the worst

0:50:59.560 --> 0:51:01.839
<v Speaker 1>game I've ever seen Philip Rivers played. I said that

0:51:02.000 --> 0:51:05.840
<v Speaker 1>on last night podcast. I mean, he was just brutal

0:51:05.880 --> 0:51:07.920
<v Speaker 1>in that entire game, especially in the last two minutes.

0:51:08.440 --> 0:51:11.319
<v Speaker 1>But you know, their offensive philosophy, they've kind of with

0:51:11.360 --> 0:51:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the switch and coordinators, they've gotten back to what they

0:51:13.560 --> 0:51:15.520
<v Speaker 1>do best, which is running the ball. And now that

0:51:15.560 --> 0:51:18.839
<v Speaker 1>Melvin Gordon has kind of had his quote unquote you know, preseason,

0:51:19.200 --> 0:51:21.560
<v Speaker 1>he kind of looks back to where he was. They

0:51:21.600 --> 0:51:24.120
<v Speaker 1>continue to struggle defensively, though a bit better with Melvin

0:51:24.200 --> 0:51:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Ingram out there, but they have had injuries all year

0:51:26.120 --> 0:51:27.400
<v Speaker 1>that killed them. So how do you feel here the

0:51:27.440 --> 0:51:29.839
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs on the road at the Chargers, Although again there

0:51:29.880 --> 0:51:32.560
<v Speaker 1>really is no home field for the Chargers at all.

0:51:32.800 --> 0:51:34.680
<v Speaker 1>They're laying three and a half with an over under

0:51:34.680 --> 0:51:35.879
<v Speaker 1>really high of fifty three.

0:51:36.680 --> 0:51:39.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, I yeah, this is gonna be all

0:51:39.760 --> 0:51:43.640
<v Speaker 3>Chiefs fans for Monday Night because Chiefs Nation definitely travels,

0:51:44.000 --> 0:51:46.920
<v Speaker 3>so that's always annoying to play, you know, to bet

0:51:46.960 --> 0:51:48.880
<v Speaker 3>on a home dog and then it's not really it

0:51:48.880 --> 0:51:51.040
<v Speaker 3>doesn't really feel like a home game. The Chargers have

0:51:51.160 --> 0:51:54.319
<v Speaker 3>really struggled at home against the spread. You mentioned it

0:51:54.440 --> 0:51:56.760
<v Speaker 3>worst game I've seen out of Philip Rivers.

0:51:56.760 --> 0:51:59.960
<v Speaker 2>But I think Philip Rivers he's been struggling and.

0:52:00.160 --> 0:52:03.080
<v Speaker 3>This could kind of be one of the last seasons

0:52:03.080 --> 0:52:05.319
<v Speaker 3>for Philip Rivers. I mean that two thousand and four

0:52:05.400 --> 0:52:07.399
<v Speaker 3>draft class does feel like it's kind of on its

0:52:07.480 --> 0:52:10.880
<v Speaker 3>last legs. So I don't know how many great games

0:52:10.920 --> 0:52:12.680
<v Speaker 3>he has in the tank. But I think if you're

0:52:12.680 --> 0:52:15.840
<v Speaker 3>a Chargers backer, you're excited at the matchup because you

0:52:15.960 --> 0:52:20.040
<v Speaker 3>have Melvin Gordon and Austin Eckler, and those those are

0:52:20.080 --> 0:52:22.479
<v Speaker 3>two running backs that the Chiefs really I think will

0:52:22.520 --> 0:52:24.680
<v Speaker 3>have trouble handling.

0:52:24.400 --> 0:52:24.560
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:52:24.600 --> 0:52:27.080
<v Speaker 3>I mean that was the Tennessee's game plan is like, hey,

0:52:27.280 --> 0:52:30.000
<v Speaker 3>get Henry involved. And use that running game to set

0:52:30.080 --> 0:52:32.560
<v Speaker 3>up the passing game. I think this could get down

0:52:32.600 --> 0:52:36.840
<v Speaker 3>to three. I would be surprised if it goes below

0:52:36.960 --> 0:52:41.080
<v Speaker 3>three because you still have Tyreek Hill and Patrick Mahomes,

0:52:42.280 --> 0:52:47.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, Andy Reid with a little extra time to prepare. Granted,

0:52:47.120 --> 0:52:49.520
<v Speaker 3>the Chargers also have that, but I think, you know,

0:52:49.640 --> 0:52:52.160
<v Speaker 3>Andy Reid is a much better coach than Anthony Lynn,

0:52:52.920 --> 0:52:55.680
<v Speaker 3>So interesting matchups to kind of look at. I think

0:52:55.680 --> 0:52:58.680
<v Speaker 3>if the Chargers are looking to cover and win, you're

0:52:58.719 --> 0:53:01.040
<v Speaker 3>going to do it through a running the ball. But yeah,

0:53:01.040 --> 0:53:03.040
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't be surprised if this gets down to three

0:53:03.160 --> 0:53:06.320
<v Speaker 3>four and a half, which I saw some places opened

0:53:06.360 --> 0:53:10.719
<v Speaker 3>and up ass that seemed too high to me, And

0:53:10.800 --> 0:53:17.080
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't be completely surprised if it goes under three. Yeah,

0:53:17.239 --> 0:53:19.880
<v Speaker 3>I think if you like the Chiefs, I would wait.

0:53:20.440 --> 0:53:22.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't see it going too much higher for the Chargers.

0:53:23.239 --> 0:53:25.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. This strikes me as something where I think the

0:53:25.280 --> 0:53:27.960
<v Speaker 1>public is probably going to like the Chiefs and the

0:53:28.080 --> 0:53:30.319
<v Speaker 1>sharp beetterers are probably going to like the Chargers at

0:53:30.360 --> 0:53:33.640
<v Speaker 1>anything above a field goal because you know it is

0:53:33.719 --> 0:53:35.960
<v Speaker 1>a matchup here with it sets up pretty well for

0:53:36.000 --> 0:53:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers. Again, they know what they're doing now, they're

0:53:38.040 --> 0:53:39.799
<v Speaker 1>going to run the ball and again, you know, look,

0:53:39.920 --> 0:53:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Rivers has not been good. The only excuse I will

0:53:43.080 --> 0:53:44.680
<v Speaker 1>make for him just you know, whether or not he's

0:53:44.840 --> 0:53:47.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, starting to near the end, which I mean eventually. Well,

0:53:47.400 --> 0:53:49.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean he's in his late thirties. Of course, not

0:53:49.239 --> 0:53:52.279
<v Speaker 1>everybody can be Brady, but their offensive line has been

0:53:52.360 --> 0:53:54.720
<v Speaker 1>terrible and he's running for his life NonStop. But Keenan

0:53:54.760 --> 0:53:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Allen did look healthier at least in this past game.

0:53:57.239 --> 0:54:00.759
<v Speaker 1>Hunter Henry has really really been good since he's been back.

0:54:00.800 --> 0:54:02.959
<v Speaker 1>They still have Mike Williams. So it is a game

0:54:03.160 --> 0:54:05.560
<v Speaker 1>frankly that you know, other than the fact that Patrick

0:54:05.560 --> 0:54:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes can you know, whip off like you know, just

0:54:08.080 --> 0:54:10.840
<v Speaker 1>a short you know past to mcole Hardman who just

0:54:10.880 --> 0:54:13.799
<v Speaker 1>outruns everybody, or Tyreek Hill can just outrun everybody, it

0:54:13.880 --> 0:54:16.279
<v Speaker 1>is a game that I feel like kind of sets up,

0:54:16.320 --> 0:54:19.239
<v Speaker 1>okay for the Chargers coming off the Mini BI with

0:54:19.320 --> 0:54:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the Thursday night game, but it's not I don't really

0:54:21.640 --> 0:54:23.759
<v Speaker 1>know whether or not I'm gonna be able to pull

0:54:23.800 --> 0:54:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the trigger again. I do think that this is probably

0:54:26.680 --> 0:54:29.880
<v Speaker 1>not I could see it maybe going to four, depending

0:54:29.880 --> 0:54:31.600
<v Speaker 1>on how the money comes in, but more likely I

0:54:31.640 --> 0:54:33.520
<v Speaker 1>agree that I think would be more like a field goal.

0:54:33.600 --> 0:54:36.040
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think there's any rush to bet on

0:54:36.040 --> 0:54:38.360
<v Speaker 1>this one. But at three and a half again, I

0:54:38.400 --> 0:54:40.440
<v Speaker 1>think you're going to see more of the public backing

0:54:40.480 --> 0:54:43.239
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs and more of the sharp money probably back

0:54:43.239 --> 0:54:43.880
<v Speaker 1>in the Chargers.

0:54:44.280 --> 0:54:45.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah that makes sense.

0:54:45.719 --> 0:54:48.280
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, I really appreciate you coming back on seoing.

0:54:48.280 --> 0:54:50.279
<v Speaker 1>Remind everyone where they can find more of you and

0:54:50.320 --> 0:54:50.800
<v Speaker 1>your work.

0:54:51.200 --> 0:54:51.560
<v Speaker 2>Awesome.

0:54:51.640 --> 0:54:54.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we'll check us out over at sports Gambling podcast

0:54:54.120 --> 0:54:54.680
<v Speaker 3>dot com.

0:54:54.920 --> 0:54:57.040
<v Speaker 2>We do a weekly DFS.

0:54:56.480 --> 0:55:00.319
<v Speaker 3>Weekly college and weekly NFL picks podcast. And yeah, give

0:55:00.320 --> 0:55:02.160
<v Speaker 3>me a follow on Twitter at Shawn T. Green or

0:55:02.239 --> 0:55:04.480
<v Speaker 3>follow the podcast at gambling Podcasts.

0:55:04.560 --> 0:55:06.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, man, hopefully we can do it at least

0:55:06.239 --> 0:55:09.200
<v Speaker 1>once more and you can be the first four time guest.

0:55:09.440 --> 0:55:12.719
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, oh yeah, you're making history. All right. All right,

0:55:12.760 --> 0:55:13.719
<v Speaker 1>thanks again for coming on.

0:55:14.000 --> 0:55:14.480
<v Speaker 2>Awesome.

0:55:14.920 --> 0:55:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Thanks again to the sponsor of today's show, bet MGM.

0:55:17.120 --> 0:55:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Remember to download the bet MGM Sports app and use

0:55:19.680 --> 0:55:22.360
<v Speaker 1>the promo code Harris to get your risk free first

0:55:22.360 --> 0:55:25.080
<v Speaker 1>wager of up to five hundred dollars, and don't forget

0:55:25.080 --> 0:55:27.239
<v Speaker 1>to rate and review the podcast and send a screenshot

0:55:27.239 --> 0:55:29.680
<v Speaker 1>of that review to contest at bettingpros dot com for

0:55:29.760 --> 0:55:32.800
<v Speaker 1>your chance to win a signed Odell Beckham Junior Brown's helmet.

0:55:33.080 --> 0:55:34.879
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back later this week giving some of our

0:55:34.920 --> 0:55:46.880
<v Speaker 1>best bets for Week eleven. I'll talk to you then