WEBVTT - Prosecutors Chose the "Hard Way" in Giuliani Raid

0:00:03.200 --> 0:00:07.960
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Law with June Brusso from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:09.320 --> 0:00:12.559
<v Speaker 1>Rudy Giuliani has not been charged with any crime yet,

0:00:12.880 --> 0:00:16.560
<v Speaker 1>but could that be changing soon. Prosecutors in the Manhattan

0:00:16.640 --> 0:00:20.239
<v Speaker 1>U s Attorney's Office that Giuliani once headed have been

0:00:20.280 --> 0:00:23.599
<v Speaker 1>investigating the former New York mayor and personal lawyer to

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:27.640
<v Speaker 1>former President Donald Trump. That became evident when they rated

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 1>his apartment in the early morning hours two weeks ago.

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Joining me is Greg Ferrell, Bloomberg Legal reporter. Rudy Giuliani's

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:40.239
<v Speaker 1>lawyer offered to bring his client in for questioning by

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Manhattan federal prosecutors two months ago. Why didn't that happen? Well,

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:48.920
<v Speaker 1>it's this actually goes back a year and a half.

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 1>So Ever since Rudy Giuliani's business associates left Parniss and

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Igor Frewman, the two guys who were charged a couple

0:00:57.000 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>of years ago in November late late nineteen with campaign

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>finance problems. Um it's been reported that Rudy was also

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 1>like a person of interest in that and since then,

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:13.400
<v Speaker 1>since November of Bob Costello, his lawyer, has tried to

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 1>uh get Rudy in there under like either a proper

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 1>agreement or just like, is there anything you guys need

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>to know from us? And it's been kind of like quiet,

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:27.120
<v Speaker 1>uh no response uh from uh, you know, from well, no,

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I shouldn't put it that way. The response from the

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:33.320
<v Speaker 1>federal prosecutors in Manhattan has been, I would love to

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:34.560
<v Speaker 1>have you come in a chat, but we're not going

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>to tell you what we want, you know that what

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:39.679
<v Speaker 1>we're specifically interested in. In other ways, they were treating

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 1>him kind of like he was a suspect um. They

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to give him advanced notice of what they

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 1>are interested in, what their investigation encompassed. So this has

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>been kind of a like a little bit of a

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, a dance between Rudy and his lawyer and

0:01:57.200 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the Feds. Rudy, I think, has wanted to get you know,

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 1>put this behind him and you know, move on, um,

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and the prosecutors in Manhattan are like unwilling to like

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 1>tell him what they're interested in. That's why this become

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 1>a stalemate. And yes, as recently as early March, um,

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, Rudy, Laura once again said why you know,

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 1>why don't we just come in and tell you what

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 1>we were doing in Ukraine? And they're saying, like, no preconditions,

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 1>We just you know, uh, you know, if you want

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:29.640
<v Speaker 1>to come in and talk, come in and talk. And

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:33.959
<v Speaker 1>Giuliani's lawyer who's also in the seventies in very old

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 1>school guy who used to be a prose baby prosecutor

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 1>way back in the seventies at in Manhattan. So why

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 1>are you guys doing this the hard way? So that

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 1>became the theme of the story, the headline and all that.

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Do do prosecutors meet with lawyers and clients when the

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 1>client is the target of the investigation, that's a little different.

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 1>So when they're when they're when you have a target,

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>then they don't want to allow the target, uh, to

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 1>just come in and decide what evidence to put forth.

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:08.800
<v Speaker 1>They want to you know, keep their maximum flexibility, their

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 1>ability to ask any range of questions. They want to

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 1>hold to that and not give any sort of tip

0:03:15.240 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 1>as to what they might ask about because they don't want,

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, otherwise, why not just you know, submit like

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>a series of written questions and you know, rely on

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>written responses, you know, make it easy for defense layers. Know,

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the prosecutors I think want to basically you know, at

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>their own time and choosing decide what they want to

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 1>ask and when they want to ask it. So then

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 1>does that indicate that Juliani might be a target here? Right,

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>they haven't declared it, and of course they don't go

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 1>about declaring that, and um, you know, as of March,

0:03:49.560 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Rudy was not It's clear that as of early March,

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Rudy was a subject, namely like he was involved with

0:03:56.960 --> 0:04:00.160
<v Speaker 1>some characters who were under investigation over issues that were

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 1>under investigation, but he himself was not a target. But

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 1>there's no declaration of this from the Southern District of

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>New York. But the fact that you'd send a bunch

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 1>of FBI agents at six am to collect all his

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 1>electronic devices suggests that, yeah, he like it certainly seems

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 1>like he's a target. They're acting like he's a target.

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 1>And in the court of public opinion, and this is

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:24.360
<v Speaker 1>what's really angering Rudy's lawyer. In the court of public opinion,

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 1>when you see a bunch of FBI agents show up

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 1>at someone's department, the public, you know, can only construe

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:33.479
<v Speaker 1>that as, oh, he must have done something wrong. So basically,

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Rudy's lawyer and Alan Dershowitz has said the same thing

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 1>that Alan dersh wits consulting with them that you know,

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 1>there's a way to do this if you want the devices,

0:04:41.480 --> 0:04:43.840
<v Speaker 1>you can just to issue a grand jury subpoena. It's

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:46.240
<v Speaker 1>all secret. There's no you know, leak of this to

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the public, and we can negotiate as to whether or

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 1>not something is uh falls under attorney client privilege or

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>executive privilege in the case of Rudy's most famous client,

0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:59.839
<v Speaker 1>former President Donald Trump. So now here you have the

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:03.040
<v Speaker 1>former U. S. Attorney from Manhattan, the former mayor of

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 1>New York. How high a bar would it be to

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:10.599
<v Speaker 1>get a search warrant for him? Extremely high? Because yes,

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:13.680
<v Speaker 1>the former U S. Attorney for the Southern District, a

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:16.280
<v Speaker 1>former number three official in the Reagan Justice Department in

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen eighties. Uh, not just a two term New

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 1>York City mayor, but America's mayor who was lauded for

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:25.159
<v Speaker 1>his you know, the valiant performance that he gave after

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:29.279
<v Speaker 1>September eleventh in going to all the firefighter's funerals. He

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 1>was indefatigable, and he became a symbol, you know, of

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 1>a resurge in New York in the wake of those

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>attacks and then the presidential candidate. So for Rudy to

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 1>be being treated like this, not just by the just Department,

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 1>but by the very office which he led, is pretty astonishing.

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:48.360
<v Speaker 1>And so there's this disconnect, like what Rudy's lawyer and

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 1>seemed to know about this doesn't add up to the

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 1>It's almost as other prosecutes went nuclear to take a

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:55.719
<v Speaker 1>step like this. It's what they did with Michael Cohen.

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:59.159
<v Speaker 1>And look what happened to Michael Cohen. Uh, it ended

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 1>badly for Cohen. And so that's not to say it's

0:06:01.680 --> 0:06:03.719
<v Speaker 1>going to end badly for Rudy, but it's there's a

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 1>if you're in Rudy shoes, there's a disturbing parallel to

0:06:07.600 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 1>what happened to the last guy who was Trump's lawyer,

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 1>who had FBI agents come and clean out his house. Now, Um,

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the fact that the raid does that indicate the beginning

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 1>of the investigation, the middle of the investigation, the end

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:27.360
<v Speaker 1>of the investigation where you can't tell. Um, we can't tell,

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 1>but I would guess the middle. So you don't do

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 1>this unless you have enough to justify it to a

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 1>judge that we need to search warrant and we can't

0:06:34.600 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 1>give any advanced notice because things might get cleaned or wiped. Uh,

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:41.360
<v Speaker 1>so that's something. However, it can't be near the end

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 1>because or at least I doubt it, because there's gonna

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:46.760
<v Speaker 1>be so much material that even if you had a

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:51.239
<v Speaker 1>well formed thesis as to you know, allegations about someone

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>doing something wrong, Um, you're gonna have to go through

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:58.159
<v Speaker 1>like a massive amount of material that is contained in

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:01.040
<v Speaker 1>those devices through a defined pure time, not up until

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:03.720
<v Speaker 1>the present day. But I think the search warrant was

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 1>just through basically the end of So this is all

0:07:08.480 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 1>focused on Ukraine, so it's about that. But still, um,

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 1>there's so much material that the Feds are going to

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 1>have to go through that it can't be like right

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 1>at the one yard line. That has to be that

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 1>there's a bit of ways to go before whatever they're

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna file or do they'll do. Do you know exactly

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 1>what they're investigating him about. It's it's Ukraine? But what

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 1>what about Ukraine? So the search warrant that was executed

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>was it I guess ten days ago, twelve days ago

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>on Rudy's apartment. Um, you know, in addition to Rudy's

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 1>electronic devices, it's specified communications with certain individuals. UM a

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 1>lawyer in Washington, Victoria Tenzing, who with her husband Joe Dejenev,

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 1>has been an outspoken proponent and supporter of President Trump

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 1>UH and was also involved with representations of clients in Ukraine.

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 1>And then UM a journalist named John Solomon who wrote

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 1>a number of articles that UM basically criticized or pointed out,

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, allegedly supposed purportedly negative information about the former

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 1>US Ambassador to Ukraine, Marie Giovanovich. UM and then a

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>couple of Ukrainian former Ukrainian officials who are widely believed

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the West to be corrupt, UM who

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 1>met with Rudy Giuliani and gave him, you know, you know,

0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:33.680
<v Speaker 1>purportedly incriminating information about either Hunter Biden or Joe Biden.

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 1>So this all seems to be swirling around the attempt

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 1>in to get rid of Marie Jovanovich as the US

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:48.080
<v Speaker 1>ambassador in Kiev, and also UM It's coincides with an

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 1>attempt to basically, uh, you know, create some kind of

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 1>investigation surrounding the Bidens that you know, would have had

0:08:55.360 --> 0:09:00.080
<v Speaker 1>an impact probably in the election. And did Giuliani and

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 1>his lawyer did Giuliani or his lawyer go to ban

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Justice to present their case or there Yes, So at

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of this um after leave Partisan or Fruman

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:17.559
<v Speaker 1>were charged in the fall with you know, campaign finance

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:22.240
<v Speaker 1>violations UM. That was also at the time that Rudy

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 1>had developed his whole thesis about you know, corruption in

0:09:25.559 --> 0:09:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the Biden family involving Ukraine and this energy company Barisma.

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 1>And basically what it would have done if you were

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:36.320
<v Speaker 1>to believe what Rudy's you know friends, the former and

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:40.560
<v Speaker 1>you know allegedly corrupt Ukrainian officials told him, was that,

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:44.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, a Ukraine was involved in the hacking of

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 1>democratic emails in not Russia, and be uh, you know,

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Biden was protecting his son and blowing up an investigation

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 1>that would have exposed corruption. So it would have been

0:09:55.840 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>a way to undercut the Mueller investigation, which was in

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 1>full force that time and causing Trump a lot of problems,

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 1>and sort of undermine that investigation by claiming and providing,

0:10:06.320 --> 0:10:08.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, some support for the idea that you know,

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Russia never got involved in interfering in the election, was

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:14.679
<v Speaker 1>all Ukraine and it was on behalf of a cabal

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:19.560
<v Speaker 1>of democratic officials, including you know, Joe Biden. So that's

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the sort of alternative theory that Rudy was working on.

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:26.200
<v Speaker 1>And so when he was when it became clear that

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 1>an investigation from the federal prosecutors in Manhattan was involved

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>him or at least a couple of his business associates,

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 1>he wanted to shop this information somewhere. He realized he

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 1>couldn't go to Manhattan with it because they had other interests.

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:43.720
<v Speaker 1>So he went to main Justice, to Attorney General williambar

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>not directly, but it must have been, you know, a

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:50.559
<v Speaker 1>decision must have been made fairly high up in UH

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 1>in late twenty to basically appoint the U S Attorney

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 1>in Pittsburgh, the Western District of Pennsylvania, to basically look

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 1>into Rudy's allegations about corruption by the Bidens in Ukraine.

0:11:04.000 --> 0:11:08.080
<v Speaker 1>And so routine is lawyer flew out to Pittsburgh in January,

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 1>spent several hours before a team of five senior prosecutors

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and five senior FBI agents from that office, and outlined

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the whole theory of surrounding Joe Biden basically you know,

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:23.320
<v Speaker 1>interfering with you know, the Ukraine to protect his his

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 1>son hunter who is getting paid very well as a

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:28.960
<v Speaker 1>to be on the board of directors of this you know,

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:33.559
<v Speaker 1>Dodgy Energy company in Ukraine. So it's not clear that's

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 1>gone anywhere. They made that presentation. There's been some follow ups,

0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 1>some of the investigators in Pittsburgh have since you know,

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>done an interview here or there, but there doesn't it

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:44.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem to have been and you know, the US

0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Attorney's office obviously won't comment on it. But if that

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 1>investigation gained any traction at all, it's not clear. There's

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:53.719
<v Speaker 1>no evidence of that. It seems to be kind of moribund.

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Has Giuliani's attorney said what his defense might be here, Yes,

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 1>actually that Bob Costello has pointed out that if this

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:07.439
<v Speaker 1>is a phara violation, in other words, of violation, if

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 1>you're claiming that Rudi Giuliani violated the law that requires

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:15.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, you register with the Justice Oparment if you're

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:19.440
<v Speaker 1>representing a you know, a foreign agent or basically the

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:23.559
<v Speaker 1>uh you're representing a foreign entity, either individuals from a

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:27.319
<v Speaker 1>foreign country or you know, the sovereign country itself, or

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:30.760
<v Speaker 1>some kind of a company or government, you know, entity

0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:33.320
<v Speaker 1>of a foreign company in the United States, you have

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 1>to file what's known as a PHARAH form f A

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 1>r A. So that has been you know, that was

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:43.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, floated against Mike Flynn that he never registered

0:12:43.320 --> 0:12:47.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, under Farah for his representation of Turkey. And

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:52.319
<v Speaker 1>basically what Juliana's lawyer has maintained is that there is

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 1>an exception to PHARAH. You don't have to you know,

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:59.520
<v Speaker 1>file you know, uh pharah if you're acting in defense

0:12:59.559 --> 0:13:01.960
<v Speaker 1>of your client. In other words, your act really act

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:04.560
<v Speaker 1>me as a lawyer, not a lobbyist. If you're in

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 1>in this case, Rudy, in his investigations in Ukraine, dealing

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of those foreign entities, was just gathering

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 1>evidence in the defense of his client, Donald J. Trump,

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 1>who happened to be the President of the United States.

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:19.720
<v Speaker 1>This is at a time when Trump was, in fact,

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, the subject of Mueller's criminal investigation into Russian

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:27.440
<v Speaker 1>interference in the election. So therefore, any effort to present

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:31.320
<v Speaker 1>a defense for Trump would would constitute you know, the

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 1>type of you know, basically lawyer client activity that does

0:13:35.320 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 1>not require you to file for you know, a Pharaoh registration.

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:43.560
<v Speaker 1>So that's the theory, and you know, uh, you know,

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 1>that's what Rudy's lawyer has maintained. Rudy has quite a team.

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned Alan Dershowitz before, but he has a lot

0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:54.680
<v Speaker 1>of people on his legal team. Yes. So he has

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Bob Costello, who is a former colleague of his from

0:13:57.559 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the U. S. Sterns Officer Manhattan back in the nineteen

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:02.560
<v Speaker 1>seventies and a longtime criminal defense lawyer in the New

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 1>York area. So Costell has been representing him for at

0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 1>least a year and a half. He also just added

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:11.640
<v Speaker 1>a team of prosecutors from a Brooklyn firm mostly known

0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 1>for its local, you know, crime defenses, but it features

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 1>a couple of guys a former tired judge um uh

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 1>included among them, who are experts in search and seizure warrants,

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 1>and also Dershowitz himself. This is one of his you know,

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, strong points, and it's clear from Derschwitz

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 1>is advising them, so he's not really like a lawyer

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 1>for the team. I think that's what a guy like

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Dershwitz does these days is you know, uh, basically advises consults.

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 1>But the fact that Dershwitz and the new guys in

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Brooklyn who have an interest in search and seizure law

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 1>are involved. It indicates that it's pretty clear that they

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 1>want to challenge not just the search warrant that was

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 1>executed in late April, but you know basically the the

0:14:57.280 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 1>eye cloud, the subpoena through which the US government a

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>year and a half ago got basically you know, most

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 1>of the electronic data you know, call information from Rudy's

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 1>electronic devices from Apple Inc. In uh late So that

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 1>will take a lot of money. Does Giuliani have that money? Well,

0:15:18.600 --> 0:15:21.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, I've I've read press reports about that as well.

0:15:21.000 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 1>It will take a lot of money. And that's the

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 1>problem with Rudy having represented the President Trump for free

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 1>basically for a couple of years, as he was not

0:15:28.480 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 1>making a lot of money. Um, and uh, you know

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 1>it's yeah, that's you know, I'm sure these guys are

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 1>coming on board, you know, confident that they'll get paid.

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, you know, money is an object,

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 1>it's not. And Rudy has facing like now this this

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 1>big lawsuit from the dominion. Uh. You know that that

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 1>company that does the election machines that has sued you know,

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Rudy and Sidney Powell and Trump's lawyers who claimed without

0:15:57.880 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 1>any evidence that the dominion machines have been manipulated in

0:16:01.640 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 1>order to produce a victory for Joe Biden a couple

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of months ago. So that's a you know, some people

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 1>might describe that lawsuit is frivolous, but you know that's

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 1>going to cost Rudy money as well. That's a different

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:14.360
<v Speaker 1>representation with a different set of lawyers. So, yes, Rudy

0:16:14.760 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 1>has to be Rudy. Legal bills are are climbing, and

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 1>it's clear from his divorce papers, the part of it

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 1>that was public a few years ago that you know,

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, his his his his financial resources are not infinite.

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Craig. That's Bloomberg Legal reporter Greg Farrell. Derek Chauvin,

0:16:35.160 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 1>and three other former Minneapolis police officers involved in the

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 1>death of George Floyd have been indicted by a federal

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 1>grand jury for violating Floyd's constitutional rights during the arrest

0:16:46.000 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 1>that sparked nationwide protests over police violence against black people.

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 1>The indictment was unsealed Friday and comes less than three

0:16:53.760 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 1>weeks after Chauvin was found guilty on separate state charges

0:16:57.400 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 1>of murder and manslaughter for holding his knee on Floyd's

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 1>neck for more than nine minutes. Joining me is Eric

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Larson Bloomberg Legal reporter. What are the charges that the

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Feds have brought against Chauvin and the three other officers?

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:17.960
<v Speaker 1>So in this case there are three charges. There are

0:17:17.960 --> 0:17:22.600
<v Speaker 1>all civil federal civil rights violations here. The first count

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:27.359
<v Speaker 1>is against Chauvin accuses him of depriving Mr Floyd of

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:30.280
<v Speaker 1>his civil rights is right to be free from improper

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 1>treatment by a police officer um and violating his rights

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:38.639
<v Speaker 1>in resulting in bodily harmon at forth his death. The

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 1>second charge is against two of the assisting officers, and

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 1>they are accused of observing Mr Chauvelin with his knee

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:50.960
<v Speaker 1>on Mr floyd neck and essentially failing to intervene uh

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:54.000
<v Speaker 1>they could say wilfully failing to intervene and resulting in

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Mr Floyd's rights being violated. A third charge is against

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the is against all of the officers, including the fourth officer,

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:08.159
<v Speaker 1>and they're accused of failing to offer medical assistance to

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:12.439
<v Speaker 1>Mr Floyd when he clearly needed it. So we often

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:17.439
<v Speaker 1>hear about federal charges being brought when state charges fail,

0:18:17.920 --> 0:18:20.639
<v Speaker 1>for example in the Ronney King case. But here you

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 1>have Chauvin already convicted of murder. The other officers haven't

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 1>even gone to trial yet. Is it unusual to bring

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:31.440
<v Speaker 1>federal civil rights charges at this stage? Well, I think

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:34.879
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing that this entire case is unique and in

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:37.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of different ways, just because there have been

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 1>so many instances of this kind of interaction between police

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 1>and black men not resulting in this type type of action, right, So,

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:47.400
<v Speaker 1>just the fact that they bought the charges at all

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 1>is very different here, especially when you see these charges

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:54.720
<v Speaker 1>being brought against officers who were not accused of, you know,

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 1>murder the way Chauvin, when they're accused of serious violation

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 1>simply by not taking any action to intervene. So that

0:19:02.119 --> 0:19:04.920
<v Speaker 1>makes it pretty unusual. And I think to your point

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:09.160
<v Speaker 1>about a federal charges being brought on top of successfully

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:13.679
<v Speaker 1>argued state charges, it just shows a signal really from

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:16.919
<v Speaker 1>the Justice Department, from the Biden administration that there is

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 1>a change of tone and how these types of incidents

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 1>are going to be handled by the federal government. I

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:26.400
<v Speaker 1>think it would have been pretty unusual, even though for

0:19:26.480 --> 0:19:30.120
<v Speaker 1>the Biden administration um in in in a case such

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:33.960
<v Speaker 1>as this, to not do anything even after a successful

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:38.120
<v Speaker 1>state case um, you know, as the Attorney General of Minnesota,

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:41.399
<v Speaker 1>Keith Ellison said in a statement last week after these

0:19:41.480 --> 0:19:43.679
<v Speaker 1>charges were brought. He said, the federal government has a

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:47.119
<v Speaker 1>responsibility to protect the civil rights as every American and

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 1>pursue justice to the fullest extent. And I think that

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the point that he was sort of getting at there

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:54.879
<v Speaker 1>the fullest extent means you bring the charges if a

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:58.360
<v Speaker 1>violation has occurred, not just if the state charges failed.

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>And why is there a separate indictment of Chauvin? What

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:07.240
<v Speaker 1>is that for? This stems from a separate incidence between

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 1>a Chauvin and a fourteen year old black boy in

0:20:11.080 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 1>two thousand seventeen. He was the responding officer to a

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 1>dispute between this boy and his mother. When the boy

0:20:19.040 --> 0:20:24.080
<v Speaker 1>did not follow his instructions, Chauvin struck him so violently

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:28.480
<v Speaker 1>that stitches were necessary, essentially choked and strangled until they

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:31.920
<v Speaker 1>passed out, and also had his knee on him to

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:34.720
<v Speaker 1>hold him in place for quite some time, even longer

0:20:34.760 --> 0:20:38.880
<v Speaker 1>than what happened with Mr Floyd. So obviously it would

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 1>be a good question to find out why it has

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:43.640
<v Speaker 1>taken so long while you had to have this much

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:48.120
<v Speaker 1>higher profile murder take place. For this incident to come

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:50.879
<v Speaker 1>to light, clearly, the details around it would have already

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:52.879
<v Speaker 1>been known to a lot of people for several years

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:56.800
<v Speaker 1>now and nothing happened. But at any rate, the charges

0:20:56.960 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 1>have been brought now, um, and he has accused of

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:02.440
<v Speaker 1>violent in the civil rights of that boy as well.

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 1>So what does the Justice Department have to prove in

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:08.879
<v Speaker 1>a case like this? Do they have to prove that

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:11.879
<v Speaker 1>they that the police officers intended to violate the civil

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:16.359
<v Speaker 1>rights of the victims? Sister department have to prove in

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:18.679
<v Speaker 1>a case like this? Do they have to prove that

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:23.360
<v Speaker 1>they intended to that the police officers intended to violate

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the civil rights of the victims? I don't know if

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:30.960
<v Speaker 1>it's intent would work that way in in a case

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 1>like this, because it's the charges are pretty specific in

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:38.719
<v Speaker 1>what they say, Uh, just that they were aware of

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:41.679
<v Speaker 1>what was happening in front of them and chose to

0:21:41.720 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 1>not take action. So UM, you know, when you're in

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Chauvin's case, you know, being accused of murder, Um, you

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 1>know you've had Even even in that case, they didn't

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:56.199
<v Speaker 1>charge him with with first degree murder, which would have required, um,

0:21:56.280 --> 0:22:00.080
<v Speaker 1>some proof of intent. So in a case like this,

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, it's just going to be showing exactly

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:06.639
<v Speaker 1>what happened. I mean, they they are on the video

0:22:06.720 --> 0:22:12.160
<v Speaker 1>observing um this, these actions and failing to intervene. Uh So,

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I think what we'll see is not so much a

0:22:15.160 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 1>question of intent as as the defense lawyers possibly trying

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:23.880
<v Speaker 1>to raise um questions about what what these other officers

0:22:23.880 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 1>were really responsible for, what they were really required to do.

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:30.480
<v Speaker 1>They will point to some evidence that a few of

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:33.440
<v Speaker 1>the officers who were actually training at the time their

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:38.720
<v Speaker 1>rookies um that uh that they were just essentially doing

0:22:38.760 --> 0:22:41.960
<v Speaker 1>what Chauvin was requiring them to do, and that he

0:22:42.600 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't up to them to question him beyond they

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 1>did what they did. Um. Whereas I think the prosecutors

0:22:48.520 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 1>are saying that you need to go beyond this, saying, hey,

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 1>do you think maybe we need to move this man

0:22:54.520 --> 0:22:58.440
<v Speaker 1>around so he's doesn't die. They're gonna need They're going

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 1>to show that they should should have potential physically intervened

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and stopped a murder from happening in front of them.

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 1>But you can see that their defense is probably it

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:09.400
<v Speaker 1>would make sense that they're going to blame it as

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 1>much as they can on Chauvin and say, hey, these

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:16.159
<v Speaker 1>were rookies and they were it wasn't their place to intervene.

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Do you know what what Chauvin's defense to the federal

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 1>charges would be. I don't know what it would be exactly.

0:23:28.600 --> 0:23:32.480
<v Speaker 1>I we did reach out to his lawyer or comments

0:23:32.520 --> 0:23:37.520
<v Speaker 1>after he the grandeury indictment was unfiled. Um, we didn't.

0:23:37.560 --> 0:23:41.920
<v Speaker 1>He declined to comments. UM. I mean, obviously the defense

0:23:42.200 --> 0:23:45.280
<v Speaker 1>strategy didn't work out in the state case with those

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:49.320
<v Speaker 1>much more serious charges. Um. But you can imagine that

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:53.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the defense could translate into this case

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 1>as well, you know, trying to blame Floyd for what happened, uh,

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:01.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, blame his death us on you know, his

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:04.920
<v Speaker 1>less health elements and things like that, like they tried

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:07.880
<v Speaker 1>in in the federal case. When you're looking at these

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:11.680
<v Speaker 1>less you know, serious charges. Obviously, the civil rights violations

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:14.480
<v Speaker 1>are very serious, but they're not as as serious as

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:19.240
<v Speaker 1>as a murder manslaughter. Um. That they might be able

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 1>to push these defenses a little further potentially, who knows.

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:28.200
<v Speaker 1>These new federal charges are separate from the federal civil

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:34.399
<v Speaker 1>investigation into the Minneapolis police Department and its practices. So

0:24:34.480 --> 0:24:39.399
<v Speaker 1>the Attorney General, Merrick Garland, right after the conviction of

0:24:39.520 --> 0:24:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Mr schaubin a parity, announced that the Justice Department was

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:47.880
<v Speaker 1>opening an investigation into the policing practices in Minneapolis, UM,

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:53.480
<v Speaker 1>specifically as a result of the George Floyd George Floyd death. UM.

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 1>He said that the d j is going to be

0:24:55.040 --> 0:24:58.000
<v Speaker 1>reaching out to community groups and members of public to

0:24:58.040 --> 0:25:01.840
<v Speaker 1>try to find out about their experience is with the police. UM.

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:03.960
<v Speaker 1>So this is something that I think a lot of

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:08.040
<v Speaker 1>people were expecting from the Biden administration UM, and not

0:25:08.160 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 1>just Minneapolis specifically. But you know, the Civil Rights Division

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:14.280
<v Speaker 1>of the Justice Department is able to use these so

0:25:14.359 --> 0:25:19.080
<v Speaker 1>called pattern or practice investigations UH to investigate police forces

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 1>in various cities, and they've they've done so in the past,

0:25:21.920 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 1>and and the probes can often end with a consent

0:25:25.400 --> 0:25:29.000
<v Speaker 1>decree between the police departments and the Justice Department where

0:25:29.040 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 1>they agree to various reforms and have to stick to

0:25:31.720 --> 0:25:33.960
<v Speaker 1>those reforms, and the Justice Department will keep track of

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:36.680
<v Speaker 1>that and make sure that they are sticking to that UM.

0:25:36.880 --> 0:25:40.199
<v Speaker 1>So that is something that that has been done before,

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:44.439
<v Speaker 1>but it really dropped off during the Trump administration not

0:25:44.560 --> 0:25:48.440
<v Speaker 1>too surprisingly, and I think it was always expected that

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Um in Biden were elected that the Civil Rights Division

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:55.240
<v Speaker 1>would have a new focus on these types of pattern

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 1>or practice investigations. Schauman is also requesting a new trial.

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Are the grounds that he is claiming for that. So.

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Mr Schauman is requesting a new trial in the state

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:12.240
<v Speaker 1>case following his conviction, arguing that, among other things, that

0:26:12.240 --> 0:26:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the trial never should have taken place in Minneapolis to

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 1>begin with. UH. He argues that the jurors couldn't possibly

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:23.520
<v Speaker 1>have been fair just because of all of the emotion

0:26:23.600 --> 0:26:27.160
<v Speaker 1>underlying everything that happened in the city around these events,

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:30.440
<v Speaker 1>that it should have it should have taken place elsewhere UM.

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:34.160
<v Speaker 1>He also signaled, you know, after the verdict was read out,

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 1>his lawyers signaled that he could potentially appeal UM for,

0:26:38.760 --> 0:26:44.000
<v Speaker 1>among other things, claiming that Representative Maxine Waters had made

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:48.679
<v Speaker 1>inappropriate comments encouraging a guilty verdict um or during a

0:26:48.720 --> 0:26:52.680
<v Speaker 1>protest and that somehow that could have tainted jurors who

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 1>were not sequestered at that time, although there's no evidence

0:26:56.080 --> 0:26:58.959
<v Speaker 1>that they necessarily heard or saw the footage of her

0:26:59.000 --> 0:27:01.359
<v Speaker 1>saying that that that would be something that could potentially

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:06.200
<v Speaker 1>be argued on appeal, and in fact, the judge in

0:27:06.400 --> 0:27:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the state case agreed that those comments were inappropriate and

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:14.040
<v Speaker 1>said that, you know, elected officials should not be commenting

0:27:14.240 --> 0:27:18.680
<v Speaker 1>on trials like that, which was pretty strong words. Um,

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:23.080
<v Speaker 1>but it's far from certain that either of these arguments

0:27:23.080 --> 0:27:26.199
<v Speaker 1>would both go very far, but there's certainly something that

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the courts will consider. Thanks Erk. That's Bloomberg Legal reporter

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Eric Lawson, and that's it for the edition of the

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Law Show. Remember you can always get the latest

0:27:35.840 --> 0:27:38.960
<v Speaker 1>legal news on Bloomberg Lawn podcasts. You can find them

0:27:38.960 --> 0:27:43.680
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or at www dot Bloomberg dot com,

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:47.800
<v Speaker 1>slash podcast, slash Law. I'm June Grosso and you're listening

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg