WEBVTT - The First Monster

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind from how Stuff

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:14.319
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com. Hey you, welcome to Stuff to Blow

0:00:14.360 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>your Mind. My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick.

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:19.319
<v Speaker 1>And of course it's October, so we are still doing

0:00:19.360 --> 0:00:23.160
<v Speaker 1>some of our favorite stuff of the year. Monster content.

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 1>That's right, God, did I just say content. I'm the monster.

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:30.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm the content creating monster. Let's think of it as

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:33.560
<v Speaker 1>its monster cargo. Let's kress cargo. I think that we

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 1>are delivering to the listeners years, yeah, to create a

0:00:36.479 --> 0:00:41.839
<v Speaker 1>cargo cult of our listeners. So I was wondering just recently,

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>you know what is the oldest monster, Because as you

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:50.519
<v Speaker 1>go back in time, monsters become, in a way, they

0:00:50.560 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 1>become less uniquely scary, and they become more elementally scary.

0:00:56.320 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 1>They become less like, I don't know, the girl in

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the Ring and all that kind of recent popular monster

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>fad stuff, and they become more like a dragon or

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:09.280
<v Speaker 1>a beast with a bull's head or something. And so

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I was wondering, like, you know what, what's the earliest

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>thing in recorded history? There there are some things in

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 1>ancient Sumerian, Assyrian, Babylonian texts. I just wanted to read

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:21.760
<v Speaker 1>one sort of monster passage I came across from an

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 1>ancient Assyrian text called the Seven Evil Spirits. This is

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:28.959
<v Speaker 1>translated into English by R. C. Thompson in nineteen o three,

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:34.680
<v Speaker 1>and it's this ancient Assyrian poem. It goes, raging storms,

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>evil gods. Are they ruthless demons who in Heaven's vault

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:42.760
<v Speaker 1>were created? Are they workers of evil? Are they they

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 1>lift up the head to evil every day, to evil destruction,

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>to work of the seven? The first is the south Wind.

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>The second is a dragon whose mouth is opened that

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 1>none can measure. The third is a grim leopard, which

0:01:57.880 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 1>carries off the young. The four is a terrible shibou.

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>The fifth is a furious wolf who knoweth not to flee.

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>The sixth is a rampant thing. This is the illusion

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:14.800
<v Speaker 1>which marches against God and King. The seventh is a storm,

0:02:15.200 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 1>an evil wind, which takes vengeance. Well, that those that

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 1>al sounds remarkable, But I'm instantly thinking some of those

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 1>are just animals. Like the wolf is just like a

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 1>dumb wolf, Like it's just not smart enough to run away, right.

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I wonder about the grim leopard. The grim leopard sounds

0:02:31.560 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of monstrous because it carries off the young grim.

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Seems to that that implies some kind of human affect. Yeah, well,

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, I guess you get into definitions of monster. Right.

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Is a monster something that is a combination of things?

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Is it something that is entirely unreal or is it

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 1>just something real that is exaggerated in size. Yeah, well,

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:55.079
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if it's a an evil creature that works

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:58.119
<v Speaker 1>destruction upon the earth and marches against God and King,

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 1>I'd say that's probably a monster or people. But I

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 1>feel like we're actually already too late, because we're muddling

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:08.800
<v Speaker 1>around in recorded history and you can go much deeper.

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:13.080
<v Speaker 1>So in August of nineteen thirty nine, a group of

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 1>archaeologists were doing field work at a Stone Age cave

0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:19.640
<v Speaker 1>site in southern Germany, and the cave was called Stottlehole,

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:23.119
<v Speaker 1>which means stable cave, and it was at Hollenstein near

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:28.079
<v Speaker 1>vogel Herd. At this cave site, the researchers uncovered this

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 1>massive collection of ivory fragments, broken pieces made from the tusks.

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Tusks of a Pleistocene mammoth and now it's Ice Age

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 1>mammoth of Europe. Wooly mammoth. Unfortunately, something happened. Just a

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 1>matter of days after this initial discovery. World War two

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:48.360
<v Speaker 1>broke out, not a great time to be digging in

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 1>southern Germany, and so the dig had to be quickly

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 1>abandoned and the dig was filled in and the broken

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 1>pieces of the mammoth ivory were laid in storage for decades,

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 1>and then about thirty years or a German archaeologist named

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Joachim Han started trying to fit the ivory shards together

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 1>playing this. You know, if you've ever seen these games,

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the three D jigsaw puzzle game of Artifactor Reconstruction, it

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 1>looks like a nightmare of trying to see how all

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>these things because obviously some pieces are missing. It's like

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:21.600
<v Speaker 1>trying to do a jigsaw puzzle with half half the puzzle. Uh.

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:24.039
<v Speaker 1>And so we had more than two hundred fragments, and

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 1>he discovered that the pieces of ivory were originally part

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 1>of the same Paleolithic figurine. It was a statuette about

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 1>thirty one centimeters long, which is just over a foot,

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:39.720
<v Speaker 1>and it was carbon fourteen dated to somewhere between thirty

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:44.039
<v Speaker 1>five and forty thousand years old. And once the pieces

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:47.360
<v Speaker 1>were put together, it became clear that you could still

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 1>make out representative features, features that appeared to be both

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:56.680
<v Speaker 1>human and non human. And this is the central image

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about in today's episode. This is

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:00.599
<v Speaker 1>the figure that would come to be non and as

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:03.599
<v Speaker 1>the Lowan Lynch, which is German for the lion man.

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 1>And if you want to see an image of the

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Loan Ninch, we will have a picture of it on

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the landing page of this episode at stuff to Blow

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 1>you behind dot com. It Uh, it's it's rather regal looking. Yeah, well,

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I would say it's regal like it's it's got this

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 1>upright posture, and it does look very stately, but also

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 1>in the spirit of the grim leopard of Assyria. It's

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of grim. It's got this kind of like there

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 1>is no pity in the Lionman's face. No, no pity.

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I just looked in closer at it, and I don't

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 1>see I don't see a shred of pity, Like it

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 1>would pass your sentence and and not not heed your tears.

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 1>So after this original reconstruction and the following decades, there

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 1>was this long, multi stage process that led to the

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 1>final reconstruction of the artifact in fuller and fuller detail.

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:50.599
<v Speaker 1>So in the nineteen eighties there was a paleontologist named

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Elizabeth Schmidt who added more pieces from additional re excavations

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:58.920
<v Speaker 1>of the site, and she corrected some errors and previous reconstructions,

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 1>and the clearer pression of this feline head began to emerge.

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 1>And then in the two thousands and other archaeologist named

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Klaus Joachim Kind returned to the Stytle Cave to uncover

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 1>more original pieces and it led to this amazing version

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:15.839
<v Speaker 1>of the artifact that you can go see today. I

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:18.479
<v Speaker 1>think it's usually at the Oom Museum in Germany, but

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I believe it is currently on loan at the British Museum.

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:24.679
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I believe it was the British Museum tweeting

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 1>about the acquisition that or acquisition the loan that made

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:32.720
<v Speaker 1>me think about doing this episode. So the lion man,

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 1>he stands like a human in this two footed, bipedal posture,

0:06:36.880 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>back straight with human arms straped down to the side,

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:44.160
<v Speaker 1>human torso maybe lion ish kinds of legs, but this proud,

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:49.159
<v Speaker 1>menacing head of a big cat, and you've got to wonder.

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:51.599
<v Speaker 1>So this is thirty five to forty thousand years ago there,

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 1>long before recorded history, nobody was writing down what they

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:58.920
<v Speaker 1>were thinking. There apparently was no written language. So what

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 1>did this figure mean to the Stone Age people who

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>made it? Yeah, I mean, for the most part, we

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 1>can only we can only guess. We can certainly look

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>to more to increasingly more complex ideals that came afterwards.

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 1>But you look at it and you think, was this

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Is this a deity? Is this a punishing creature? Is

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:21.240
<v Speaker 1>this a I've seen the term master of animals thrown

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 1>around in interpreting similar alleged figures from cave paintings, and

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:30.880
<v Speaker 1>another ancient remains. Yeah, there is a sort of intuitive

0:07:30.920 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 1>sense in which you could see an ancient person seeing

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 1>an apex predator like a lion or any any kind

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 1>of big cat as some sort of god of the

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 1>wilderness that would have power over other animals because it

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 1>is at the top of the food chain. But it's

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 1>a serious question to imagine why people would make this artifact,

0:07:49.560 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 1>because making an artifact like this would have been an

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>extreme sacrifice. Uh. These would have been people, I think

0:07:56.160 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 1>very likely living not always very far from the edge

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 1>of starvation. Uh. And an artifact like this took resources

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>it took time, it took energy, It wore down your

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 1>sharp flint tools and the carving process. In fact, there

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 1>was a in recent years, there was an experiment by

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 1>a guy named wolf Heine that I watched a video

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:17.680
<v Speaker 1>of online. And this guy specializes in replicating ancient artifacts

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:20.280
<v Speaker 1>using the methods and tools that would have been available

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 1>to the people who made them. And his reconstruction of

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the low and minch using these flint carving tools, he

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 1>says it took more than three hundred and seventy hours.

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:32.439
<v Speaker 1>And in this video, if you sit and watch it,

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:37.680
<v Speaker 1>like the unbelievable laborious nous of the project begins to

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:40.320
<v Speaker 1>sink in. You just watch him going over and over

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 1>this ivory tusk with this piece of flint. And when

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:46.160
<v Speaker 1>you look at the guy's hands, I started to feel

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:49.440
<v Speaker 1>how working this flint rock over the ivory for hours

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:52.640
<v Speaker 1>and hours would just turn your fingers into hot ground beef.

0:08:52.800 --> 0:08:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Just terrible. Yeah. And and to your point, these were

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:59.080
<v Speaker 1>people that lived on the edge. They were they were wanderers.

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 1>They had not reach the point in the ascension of

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 1>human civilization where you had specialists who could set aside

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:09.320
<v Speaker 1>time to create something like this. Uh, and if they

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 1>created something like this, it obviously wasn't going to be

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:13.679
<v Speaker 1>just a toy for a child to play with. It

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:16.200
<v Speaker 1>was something important, right, And there are signs in the

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 1>artifact itself that seemed to signify that it had cultural importance. Right. Yeah.

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 1>The surface of the original artifacts seems to have been

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:26.440
<v Speaker 1>smoothed from excessive handling, as if it were passed around

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 1>in a ritual for instance. Right. So, yeah, so it

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 1>looks like this is something that was handled a lot.

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 1>It's got that worn down feeling to it. Um And

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 1>this is one reason that the lowan mench is often

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:42.720
<v Speaker 1>cited is perhaps the earliest evidence that exists of religious beliefs. Now,

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 1>who would the people that made this artifact have been, Well,

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 1>it was almost certainly modern humans living in the area

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 1>at the time. But but it's also worth noting that

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:58.320
<v Speaker 1>modern humans and neander dolls um lived in this area

0:09:58.440 --> 0:10:00.360
<v Speaker 1>at this at the same time the coexist. This did

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:04.839
<v Speaker 1>And uh I did find a quote from Jeffrey Brantingham,

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:07.920
<v Speaker 1>an archaeologist at the University of California, Los Angeles, and

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 1>he says that he doesn't think it's far fetched to

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 1>think that Neanderthals. Uh you know, could have made similar items.

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 1>But for the most part, everyone seems to be on

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 1>board with the idea that these were modern Homo sapiens

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:25.680
<v Speaker 1>that created these artifacts. Anatomically modern, yes, except not quite

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 1>so hunched over from watching YouTube all day, right, uh yeah,

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 1>But there may be reasons to think that other members

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>of this this ancient culture or this you know, ancient

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 1>what would you call it, sort of a loose idea

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 1>of a culture if it was mostly small bands of

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:44.080
<v Speaker 1>people rather than cities or nations, But that whatever, the

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:47.560
<v Speaker 1>people of this time period were made artifacts like this

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>in general, because this isn't the only one, right, Yeah,

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 1>that's right. In two thousand three, another line was discovered

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>in southwestern Germany or what is now southwestern Germany, and

0:10:57.280 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 1>this one was carbon day to do around the same

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 1>time period. So by by by some estimates, it kind

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 1>of depends who's doing the math and who's you know,

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 1>doing the figure in but by some estimates these are

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 1>the oldest statues and the oldest examples of figurative art. However,

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 1>we do have the venus of the whole fells and

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:21.440
<v Speaker 1>uh and by some estimates this takes the title. But

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the estimates here like thirty five thousand and forty thousand

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:25.840
<v Speaker 1>years ago, so we're kind of placing it in basically

0:11:25.880 --> 0:11:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the same time period. They were just discoveries, key discoveries

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 1>made in two thousand and two thousand and sixteen. If

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:34.200
<v Speaker 1>you've if you've looked at a lot of like really

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 1>ancient human artifacts, you've probably seen images of these. Uh.

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:45.200
<v Speaker 1>The venous images are essentially a feminine figure, like you know, uh,

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:49.319
<v Speaker 1>kind of kind of a round feminine figure with without

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 1>a head or or or very little detail provided outside

0:11:53.440 --> 0:11:57.560
<v Speaker 1>of like breasts and belly. Yeah. Yeah. It's often seen

0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 1>as having the what we're perceived us the feminine figures exaggerated,

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:04.240
<v Speaker 1>so it would be in large spreads, in large tips

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:06.840
<v Speaker 1>and stuff like that. And for that reason, people often

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 1>look at this and say that they think it had

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:12.840
<v Speaker 1>some kind of fertility significance. Now you know where, depending

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 1>you can go back and forth over which one could

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:17.840
<v Speaker 1>be older than the other, it seems like they likely

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 1>existed at the same time. But the key difference here

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 1>is that while the venus is a depiction essentially of

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the feminine form of something that exists of a human being, right, uh,

0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 1>that exists in the real world, the loan mention is

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the human feuged with the beast. And in the words

0:12:33.440 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 1>of Clive Gamble, and archaeologist at the University of Southampton, UK,

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 1>as quoted in Nature quote, they depict the animal world

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 1>in a semi realistic way. It shows early man moving

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 1>from his immediate world to an imaginative world. Now this

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:52.960
<v Speaker 1>is interesting because, yeah, you have to imagine that, I

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know, there's no way to get inside say a

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 1>chimpanzees head or a dog's head, is some other mammal.

0:12:59.559 --> 0:13:04.560
<v Speaker 1>But if these animals have any kind of imaginative capacity,

0:13:04.600 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 1>and there's no proof, really, I guess that they have

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 1>any kind of ability to picture objects that are not

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 1>in front of them. If they do, you kind of

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:14.280
<v Speaker 1>have to assume that they're sort of literal right that

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 1>they'd be, that they would be putting together ideas of

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 1>images that are from their direct experience. Yeah, I mean

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 1>so in this case. I mean one example that comes

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 1>to mind, One possible and perhaps nitpicking idea, is that

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:32.680
<v Speaker 1>what if say thag, the member of your tribe. What

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:36.199
<v Speaker 1>a fag likes to take a deer head or a

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:38.839
<v Speaker 1>or a big cat head, and he likes to just

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of houllow that sucker out or get the skin,

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 1>and they just put it over his own head. And

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:46.079
<v Speaker 1>he's famous for this, and he's so famous for this

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 1>that one decides to create a statue of it. Like,

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:52.520
<v Speaker 1>that's the only scenario I think in which you could

0:13:52.800 --> 0:13:54.840
<v Speaker 1>you could make the argument. I don't see anybody making

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:56.840
<v Speaker 1>that argument, but I feel like that's the only example

0:13:56.960 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 1>you can make an argument for this being an image

0:13:59.280 --> 0:14:01.960
<v Speaker 1>of a thing that was as opposed to an image

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:04.199
<v Speaker 1>of a thing that was not. Let me throw a

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 1>twist on your example, though, So maybe Thag does put

0:14:07.280 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 1>on the headdress or you know, the remains of some

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 1>other predator, and to simulate that in that sense, would

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 1>that not be becoming another kind of creature at least

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 1>in symbol? That's true? Yeah, I mean you can certainly

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 1>make the argument that that if Thag did that and

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 1>bothered to put the beast's skin over his head, that

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, he is pretending to be something else or

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 1>or participating in an experience that makes him feel as

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 1>if he has something else. So yeah, it all kind

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 1>of amounts to the same thing, doesn't it. Right, So,

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:41.040
<v Speaker 1>whether it's Thag inspiring this, this lionman carving, or whoever

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 1>carved it, depicting some kind of being that they had

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>never seen in nature. What's going on is a kind

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 1>of fusion into unreal creatures. And according to Jill Cook,

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:55.520
<v Speaker 1>a curator at the British Museum who has a good

0:14:55.560 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 1>blog post about the Loan Mench for the British Museum's acquisition,

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the loan Mench is the oldest known representation of a

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 1>creature that does not exist in nature, not necessarily the

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 1>oldest piece of art, but the oldest evidence of fantasy.

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Quite literally, the world's oldest monster. Now by monster, of course,

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 1>we've got to clarify the way we use the term.

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean an imaginary creature that does not occur in nature,

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily a bad or evil creature. So this isn't

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 1>to say that the people who imagine the Loewen men

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:28.960
<v Speaker 1>should necessarily would have thought of it as antagonistic. Though

0:15:29.000 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I feel pretty strongly that even if whatever this being

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 1>was was treated with reverence, I suspect it would have

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:38.600
<v Speaker 1>been the kind of awe in the classic sense of awe,

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:41.800
<v Speaker 1>not like oh here's my friend the lionman, but like

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:45.160
<v Speaker 1>a solemn blend of wonder and fear. Well, if you're

0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 1>try and imagine what life was like at the time,

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, every every day would have a certain amount

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:54.920
<v Speaker 1>of uncertainty. You're you're depending upon your ability to find

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the food, to follow the patterns that lead to food,

0:15:57.640 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 1>to to hunt prey that will fee eat and can

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 1>clothe you through the harsh winter months especially, So there's

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 1>a certain amount of uncertainty, there's a certain amount of chaos,

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and therefore we you know, you might expect to find

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 1>those elements in imagine beings. Yeah, I can see that.

0:16:13.360 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 1>So let's look at the ingredients of this imagine being.

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Obviously it is one part human. We know about the

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 1>the upright bipedal human pretty well. But what is the

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 1>head of this creature and possibly the inspiration for the

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 1>muscily legs. Yeah, this is This is a great question

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 1>because I imagine a lot of people are thinking, Okay,

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Southern Germany lions. Lions are in Africa and and or India,

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 1>so what are they doing in Europe. Well, given the

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 1>time frame in the location, experts believe that we're we're

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 1>seeing a human or humanoid body with the with the

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 1>head of a now extinct cave lion cave lion. Yeah. Now,

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that's that's interesting, isn't it though, because you

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 1>have a partial likeness of one extinct animal in the

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:58.600
<v Speaker 1>very tusk of another. Yeah, and it's created by a

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 1>species that probably played a role in the extinction of

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 1>both species. Oh, I hadn't thought about that. Yeah, there's

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:09.320
<v Speaker 1>there's actually there's not a lot of evidence for lion hunting.

0:17:09.359 --> 0:17:12.200
<v Speaker 1>But a two thousand sixteen Spanish study published in p

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Los one they looked at fossilized cave lion toe bones

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 1>and they found human modifications, possibly made with stone tools

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:22.679
<v Speaker 1>that were made for skinning. So they think that, uh,

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:25.240
<v Speaker 1>that ancient peoples might have hunted them for their pelts.

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:28.000
<v Speaker 1>But of course we know even if they didn't directly

0:17:28.119 --> 0:17:31.120
<v Speaker 1>hunt these lions, they could have contributed to their extinction

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 1>by encroaching on their habitats, by competition for large fauna

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:39.360
<v Speaker 1>and food sources. Now, there were different varieties of cave lion.

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:43.119
<v Speaker 1>One was found in America and there were two in Eurasia.

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:47.639
<v Speaker 1>There was Panthera leo fossilus, and this was first. This

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:50.400
<v Speaker 1>one first appeared in Europe seven hundred thousand years ago

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:56.240
<v Speaker 1>and evolved into Panthera leo spellia, and this cave lion

0:17:56.440 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 1>is the one that continued on. That's the one we're

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 1>seeing here, and this is the one that went on

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:05.399
<v Speaker 1>to go extinct, probably by fourteen thousand years ago. But

0:18:05.560 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 1>so thirty five to forty thousand years ago when this

0:18:08.119 --> 0:18:11.000
<v Speaker 1>thing was made, they were still around. Yes. Now I've

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:12.679
<v Speaker 1>also read I don't know how much stock we can

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:15.640
<v Speaker 1>put in this, but I've also read in the past

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 1>that some people think it may have survived in the

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Balkans up to two thousand years ago. But again I

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know to what extent we should buy into that

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 1>that may get into cryptic territory, the grim leopard of

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the Balkan. Yeah, but to be clear, Panthera leo spellia

0:18:32.640 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 1>was probably the largest cat that ever lived. It was

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:39.640
<v Speaker 1>probably twenty larger than modern lions, and also bigger than

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:43.399
<v Speaker 1>today's largest tigers. So we're talking up to eleven feet

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:45.840
<v Speaker 1>six inches or three point five meters in length. That

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:48.879
<v Speaker 1>is a crazy thing, because something you might not have

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:52.199
<v Speaker 1>experienced if you haven't been to a zoo. Recently, I

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:55.960
<v Speaker 1>noticed that I don't really have a correct vision in

0:18:56.040 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 1>my head of how large the big cats are like

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 1>a lion or a tieer. I think of them as

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, like maybe large the size of a

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 1>great Dane or a little bit larger really, But if

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>if you go to a to a zoo and you

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:12.360
<v Speaker 1>get like right up against the glass where these things are,

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:15.360
<v Speaker 1>you realize like, oh, oh man, this is like as

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 1>big as a horse. These things are gigantic. Well they're

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 1>they're I mean, they're smaller than a horse, but but

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 1>it seems like a horse. But it does seem that

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:27.159
<v Speaker 1>big if you're in the right position to observe them.

0:19:27.200 --> 0:19:29.439
<v Speaker 1>For instance, here at Zoo Atlanta, I go to the

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:32.960
<v Speaker 1>zoo a lot with my son, and sometimes we get

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:35.360
<v Speaker 1>there early. And when you get there early, sometimes you're

0:19:35.400 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the only person close to the lion enclosure and they're

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:41.920
<v Speaker 1>still kind of active because it's the morning. And I've

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 1>had some really creepy experiences walking up there with my

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, small snack size child next to me. Delicious, Yeah,

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 1>And the way the lion looks at you, you just

0:19:51.600 --> 0:19:54.119
<v Speaker 1>feel this this primal feeling and you get a sense

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 1>of what this this beast is and how I'm supposed

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:01.399
<v Speaker 1>to view this beast outside of the artificial confines of

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the zoo environment. Isn't it funny that we've got spider

0:20:04.640 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 1>fear but we don't have lion fear. Well, it might

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:09.879
<v Speaker 1>be very different if you live in proximity to lions.

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:12.680
<v Speaker 1>But I feel no natural fear about lions in the

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 1>same way I do when I see the image of

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:17.359
<v Speaker 1>like a spider crawling towards my face. Well, I usually don't,

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 1>but I feel like in these moments, I'm willing to

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:23.480
<v Speaker 1>buy that there's something they're like, like there's something situationally

0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:26.480
<v Speaker 1>and environmentally that has to be in place and such.

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:30.359
<v Speaker 1>It's so standing, you know, beside a small child in

0:20:30.359 --> 0:20:32.920
<v Speaker 1>in a situation where the lions attention is on me,

0:20:33.920 --> 0:20:36.960
<v Speaker 1>it's very creepy, and I can I can buy into

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:40.240
<v Speaker 1>an idea that that there's something ingrained in me to

0:20:40.000 --> 0:20:43.399
<v Speaker 1>to fear them. It is terrifying itself to fear the

0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 1>predatory gaze, like when you when you just see the

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:48.880
<v Speaker 1>eyes of the creature that's large enough to eat you

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:51.680
<v Speaker 1>and maybe wants to. That comes through a lot in

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:53.679
<v Speaker 1>one of our favorite books to talk about in here

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 1>in Blind Site by Peter Watts, where he talks about

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the vampires gaze. Uh, you know, they usually keep their

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:03.480
<v Speaker 1>eyes cover because people like they wear the sunglasses because

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:06.200
<v Speaker 1>if they don't, people can just constantly feel themselves being

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 1>looked at as prey. So it's it's easy for I mean,

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:12.439
<v Speaker 1>it's it's relatively easy for us to lock eyes with

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 1>a predator like the lion, if you go to zoos

0:21:14.640 --> 0:21:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and whatnot. But but try to imagine living in this

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:22.920
<v Speaker 1>ancient time, like the rare situations where you would make

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:25.720
<v Speaker 1>eye contact with this creature and lift to tell about

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:28.400
<v Speaker 1>and how powerful that would be, like that that would

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:31.040
<v Speaker 1>have to play a role in the creation of of

0:21:31.080 --> 0:21:34.240
<v Speaker 1>this lion man. You can imagine it was a religious experience,

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 1>like if you came face to face with a cave

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 1>lion and did not die, that this would make you

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:42.359
<v Speaker 1>feel like you had entered a higher plane of existence,

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:45.159
<v Speaker 1>you had communed with some with the grim leopard of

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the skies. Yeah. Now, of course, it's worth noting that

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 1>this this may have been, this may well have been

0:21:50.320 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 1>the first lion man lion humanoid hybrid in human beliefs,

0:21:56.840 --> 0:21:59.120
<v Speaker 1>but we would go on to have many more. Oh

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 1>of course, some of the some of the key examples

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 1>of the Egyptians had several or at least four may

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Hee's pequette segment and tef nut and then in Hinduism

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 1>you have Nara Sima, which literally means manline in Sanskrit.

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I've seen people online commenting that they believe that the

0:22:18.560 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 1>loan mention is and is a depiction of Nara sema. H. Well,

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:26.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's it's essentially like visually the same idea.

0:22:26.160 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 1>It is that it is a humanoid with the lions head,

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:31.880
<v Speaker 1>and this is in Hinduism, it's an avatar of Vishnu

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:36.400
<v Speaker 1>and it's often seen it's often depicted slaying the demon

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Haran yak a shippo, and it's always a grizzly scene

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 1>in which the lion avatar with its multiple arms is eviscerating,

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:51.720
<v Speaker 1>like ripping this this human oid demon apart at the stomach.

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:53.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at an image right now. It is it

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:57.640
<v Speaker 1>is rough, yeah, in trails flailing and you know their

0:22:57.680 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 1>intrails wrapped around the god's head. It's it's it's wonderful. Now.

0:23:02.200 --> 0:23:05.560
<v Speaker 1>The vision of the lion headed man in the loan

0:23:05.640 --> 0:23:08.480
<v Speaker 1>bench is as we said, it's kind of stately, it's

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:11.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of serene, it's kind of pitiless, but it's not

0:23:11.480 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 1>doing anything overtly threatening. It's more like that that distant

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 1>predatory gaze that makes you uneasy. This depiction is roaring,

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:21.879
<v Speaker 1>it's got the teeth beard, it's ready to bite you

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 1>in half. Now, there of course creatures in the myth

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:29.680
<v Speaker 1>and legend that are the reverse of the lion man.

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:31.959
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, how about the sphinx, Right, it's the exact

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 1>opposite body of a lion with the head of a human. Yeah,

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and you have you also have similar scenarios with of course,

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the manticore, the chimera, and some depictions of of dragons

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:48.439
<v Speaker 1>are are essentially lion headed intoities. Now another creature that

0:23:48.520 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 1>came up for me in my research, and this is

0:23:51.240 --> 0:23:53.439
<v Speaker 1>one I didn't I didn't know much about, and luckily

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 1>this is one that actually nobody knows a whole lot about.

0:23:56.400 --> 0:24:01.560
<v Speaker 1>It's still rather enigmatic. But the Lee onto Cephaline a

0:24:01.640 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>creature of Mythriyism, which is a mystery religion centered around

0:24:05.840 --> 0:24:08.399
<v Speaker 1>the god Mithrists in the Roman Empire from around the

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 1>first of the fourth centuries. Ce Mithraism is great because

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:15.480
<v Speaker 1>it's got all these intriguing artifacts and artistic descriptions, but

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 1>people are not descriptions depictions from the ancient world, but

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:21.280
<v Speaker 1>we don't know that much about it, where there's a

0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:24.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of mystery about what the content of this religion was. Yeah,

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:26.399
<v Speaker 1>and this is a great example of because you have

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:30.440
<v Speaker 1>a naked man with a lion's head. He's winged, has

0:24:30.520 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 1>like four wings. It looks like there's a serpent entwined

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:37.560
<v Speaker 1>around him, much like a caduceus. And it's yeah, it's it's.

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 1>It's also also the lion's head seems like it might

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:44.120
<v Speaker 1>be screaming or crying aloud in anguish. It's it's been

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:48.160
<v Speaker 1>their additional cryptic details in the image as well, but uh,

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 1>it's very poorly understood. Well, whatever it's, it's a lot

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 1>of its secrets have have been lost to time. Can

0:24:54.280 --> 0:24:58.880
<v Speaker 1>you imagine if that happened to existing religions today. So

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 1>like imagine you are an archaeologist of the future and

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:05.560
<v Speaker 1>you're digging through our artifacts of the twentieth century and

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:09.679
<v Speaker 1>you can find some religious art, some religious art, I guess,

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:13.120
<v Speaker 1>and some various depictions and descriptions of what's going on

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:17.440
<v Speaker 1>and say Catholicism or modern Hinduism or something like that,

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:21.480
<v Speaker 1>but you're mostly unable to discern what the like textual

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:24.879
<v Speaker 1>contents of the religion were. Wouldn't that be fascinating, like

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 1>trying to piece it together? Yeah? Yeah, I mean you

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:31.400
<v Speaker 1>could probably are probably various examples of just fashion shoots

0:25:31.440 --> 0:25:34.159
<v Speaker 1>and popular imagery from today. And if you didn't know

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:37.080
<v Speaker 1>what the various icons were, I mean, how would you

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:39.720
<v Speaker 1>figure it out? What's this hand sign that jay Z

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:42.359
<v Speaker 1>is making in this image? What does it mean? You know,

0:25:42.800 --> 0:25:46.240
<v Speaker 1>it must have some kind of religious significance. Now, speaking

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:49.919
<v Speaker 1>of now, earlier you mentioned what happens when Thag puts

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:52.720
<v Speaker 1>on the the like lion head on top of his head,

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:56.320
<v Speaker 1>And does that represent itself as some kind of alternate

0:25:56.359 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 1>creature or are we just looking at Thag wearing his clothes.

0:26:00.359 --> 0:26:03.920
<v Speaker 1>There is some debate about whether other ancient depictions of

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 1>hybrid creatures are in fact hybrids, or whether we're looking

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 1>at somebody wearing an animal garment, right, yeah, yeah, Like

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:15.239
<v Speaker 1>what instantly comes to mind is is something that is

0:26:15.600 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 1>at times referred to as the hornet God, which of

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:22.760
<v Speaker 1>course I like, but also known as the Sorcerer. Nice,

0:26:23.600 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 1>So this one is from the Sorcerer. The most famous

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:30.120
<v Speaker 1>sorcerer here is from a cavern known is the Sanctuary,

0:26:30.920 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and this is from a cave in France, the Cave

0:26:34.640 --> 0:26:38.280
<v Speaker 1>of Troy fresh ri Age, and this is from around

0:26:38.840 --> 0:26:43.520
<v Speaker 1>estimates thirteen thousand BC E. Now the cave itself we discovered,

0:26:43.560 --> 0:26:46.639
<v Speaker 1>was discovered in nineteen fourteen, so it's it's interesting how

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:49.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these discoveries are occurring in the early

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:52.879
<v Speaker 1>part of the twentieth century. And the cave was found

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 1>to feature mostly cave art of animals, but also a

0:26:56.560 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 1>couple of these half human half animal figures. And the

0:27:00.840 --> 0:27:04.080
<v Speaker 1>dominant figure is the small humanoid again that is known

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:06.439
<v Speaker 1>as the Horned God or the Sorcerer, and it's this

0:27:06.560 --> 0:27:10.399
<v Speaker 1>humanoid figure loosely with with with the head of a

0:27:10.520 --> 0:27:12.360
<v Speaker 1>of an animal. It's like with it with the handlers

0:27:12.680 --> 0:27:14.840
<v Speaker 1>with the head of a stagg or an elk or

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 1>something like that. Rob yeah and uh. And the interpretations vary.

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes again there's this masters of animal argument or that

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:30.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a divine figure. Priest and archaeologist Henry Bruel drew

0:27:30.760 --> 0:27:33.479
<v Speaker 1>and the sketch of the figure, and I have to

0:27:33.600 --> 0:27:37.080
<v Speaker 1>say it looks a little bit more elaborate than the

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:41.439
<v Speaker 1>the actual photographs. So I think sometimes you know, a

0:27:41.440 --> 0:27:43.359
<v Speaker 1>lot of it falls to interpretation, you know, how do

0:27:43.400 --> 0:27:46.200
<v Speaker 1>you make sense of this image? And I've also read

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:50.240
<v Speaker 1>some some criticism of of interpretations of the Sorcerer saying

0:27:50.280 --> 0:27:52.919
<v Speaker 1>that look what we could be looking at here just

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:57.399
<v Speaker 1>just it's just the result of overlaps between depicted forms

0:27:57.560 --> 0:28:01.120
<v Speaker 1>or cases where one image was pain it over by another.

0:28:01.600 --> 0:28:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Now that being said, you can you can make those

0:28:04.000 --> 0:28:08.439
<v Speaker 1>kind of criticisms regarding some of these cave paintings. But

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the lion Man is most definitely a line, right. There's

0:28:12.320 --> 0:28:15.199
<v Speaker 1>no room for like, oh goodness, I went to just

0:28:15.840 --> 0:28:19.560
<v Speaker 1>carve this image, to painstakingly spend four hours making this

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:23.240
<v Speaker 1>image of a fag here, and then I accidentally gave

0:28:23.320 --> 0:28:26.880
<v Speaker 1>him a lion's head. It's just not gonna happen, right.

0:28:27.400 --> 0:28:29.919
<v Speaker 1>So when I was reading about this whole thing the

0:28:29.920 --> 0:28:33.359
<v Speaker 1>other day, about the loan manch, I thought, Okay, he

0:28:33.480 --> 0:28:37.080
<v Speaker 1>might be the oldest known evidence of a monster on Earth,

0:28:37.720 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 1>but it's probably not the first monster that ever existed

0:28:40.840 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 1>in somebody's imagination. And then it hit me, at some

0:28:44.840 --> 0:28:48.080
<v Speaker 1>point in time, there had to be a first monster.

0:28:49.000 --> 0:28:51.040
<v Speaker 1>There had to be the first time a human or

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:54.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe some other previous animal human ancestor was able to

0:28:55.000 --> 0:28:59.320
<v Speaker 1>form a mental picture of a horrifying creature that was

0:28:59.440 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 1>not some known predator or even some known predator made

0:29:03.600 --> 0:29:07.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit bigger, but an unholy being that did

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:09.600
<v Speaker 1>not exist in nature, you know, the clause of a

0:29:09.640 --> 0:29:12.160
<v Speaker 1>crab on the body of a lion or something. Yeah,

0:29:12.200 --> 0:29:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's a there's a cognitive step involved here.

0:29:15.520 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 1>This is there's a cognitive first step that is that

0:29:18.800 --> 0:29:22.520
<v Speaker 1>you can't just gloss over, you know, because even you know,

0:29:23.080 --> 0:29:24.959
<v Speaker 1>if you were to drag in say that you know

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the content of the bicameral mind episodes that we did.

0:29:28.440 --> 0:29:30.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, even in that case where you have have

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, something drastically different taking place with the human mind,

0:29:34.520 --> 0:29:36.560
<v Speaker 1>it would still need to draw that image from somewhere

0:29:36.640 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 1>right right, Yeah, they would have to get put together somehow. Yeah,

0:29:39.840 --> 0:29:43.400
<v Speaker 1>So at some point the bicameral mind would have to stop.

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Suddenly it's not just speaking through humans or animals, but

0:29:46.120 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 1>it is speaking through a human animal hybrid. And what

0:29:49.160 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 1>is causing that? Where does that come from? As much

0:29:51.240 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 1>as I love it, we we can't keep coming back

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:54.760
<v Speaker 1>to the bi cameral mind because people are going to

0:29:54.800 --> 0:29:58.960
<v Speaker 1>start to think, yeah, they are. But but I know people, people, listeners,

0:29:58.960 --> 0:30:00.640
<v Speaker 1>minds are going there, so I I had to dip

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 1>in for a second. Well, I appreciate you doing that, Robert,

0:30:03.040 --> 0:30:06.600
<v Speaker 1>but I still hold out my skepticism on the bicameral mind.

0:30:06.760 --> 0:30:08.640
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, so I want to come back to this

0:30:08.800 --> 0:30:11.760
<v Speaker 1>question for the rest of today's episode. Are there any

0:30:11.880 --> 0:30:15.840
<v Speaker 1>clues about where this first monster came from? Obviously it's

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:19.040
<v Speaker 1>lost to prehistory. We can know when that happened and

0:30:19.200 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 1>what the monster consisted of, but we might be able

0:30:21.720 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 1>to look at, or at least suppose some things about

0:30:25.040 --> 0:30:29.000
<v Speaker 1>human monster creation, monster fear that we give us ideas

0:30:29.080 --> 0:30:32.400
<v Speaker 1>about the circumstances in which this monster might have arisen.

0:30:32.880 --> 0:30:34.600
<v Speaker 1>And I guess we'll start on that journey when we

0:30:34.680 --> 0:30:40.040
<v Speaker 1>come back from a break. All right, we're back. So, Robert,

0:30:40.320 --> 0:30:42.880
<v Speaker 1>what is a monster? Well? You know, I love this

0:30:42.960 --> 0:30:46.440
<v Speaker 1>question because the answers tend to vary depending on who's

0:30:46.880 --> 0:30:52.000
<v Speaker 1>thinking hard about monsters. Give me Jessup's answer first, and

0:30:52.120 --> 0:30:56.600
<v Speaker 1>jessep has a more literal interpretation of these things. But uh,

0:30:57.000 --> 0:30:59.320
<v Speaker 1>one example that I love is that the idea that

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the word monstrosity originates from the Latin uh monsterr ary

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 1>which means to show or illustrate a point. This is

0:31:07.880 --> 0:31:09.760
<v Speaker 1>a good point. I mean very often if you think

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:13.000
<v Speaker 1>about monster legends, they come with the moral, don't they. Yeah,

0:31:13.120 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Or there's some idea wrapped up in it, like I'm

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:20.360
<v Speaker 1>afraid of this, but why this thing exists? But why?

0:31:20.880 --> 0:31:23.400
<v Speaker 1>And he can vary, you know, it can involve various symbolism,

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 1>it can involved just very simple metaphorical extrapolations. But yeah,

0:31:30.720 --> 0:31:33.080
<v Speaker 1>very often there is a there's a message, there's an

0:31:33.120 --> 0:31:36.200
<v Speaker 1>idea there, and you know, I think this falls in

0:31:36.360 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 1>line with what St. Augustine had to say about monsters.

0:31:40.160 --> 0:31:43.239
<v Speaker 1>He said that monster is part of God's plan, an

0:31:43.280 --> 0:31:47.080
<v Speaker 1>adornment of the universe that can also teach us about

0:31:47.120 --> 0:31:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the dangers of sin. But other medieval commentators also they

0:31:51.560 --> 0:31:54.680
<v Speaker 1>just defined a monster is a thing that's against nature. Now,

0:31:55.200 --> 0:31:59.000
<v Speaker 1>for people who believe that nature was thoroughly populated with monsters,

0:31:59.640 --> 0:32:02.760
<v Speaker 1>what gave them the like? What made the distinction? Right?

0:32:02.840 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 1>It's against nature? But nature is full of them? Where

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:08.000
<v Speaker 1>did that come from? Well? I mean the other thing,

0:32:08.080 --> 0:32:10.640
<v Speaker 1>of course, is that even how can it be if

0:32:10.640 --> 0:32:12.760
<v Speaker 1>it's it's if it's against nature, but it's also it's

0:32:12.840 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 1>made of nature. I mean, that's one of the whole

0:32:14.880 --> 0:32:17.360
<v Speaker 1>things we've been hitting so far, is it's a cave

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:20.800
<v Speaker 1>lion plus a man. It's a combination of things that exists.

0:32:20.880 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 1>So it's not just whole cloth, you know, because I

0:32:24.080 --> 0:32:28.040
<v Speaker 1>mean virtually no monster out there is completely removed from

0:32:28.320 --> 0:32:33.000
<v Speaker 1>our biological world. Most of them have some analog in

0:32:33.600 --> 0:32:36.560
<v Speaker 1>in the natural world, and there's there's something to be

0:32:36.680 --> 0:32:39.720
<v Speaker 1>said there about our connection with nature. I mean, even

0:32:39.760 --> 0:32:41.760
<v Speaker 1>when people try to come up with monsters from the

0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:44.640
<v Speaker 1>outer dark, some kind of you know, the cosmic kind

0:32:44.680 --> 0:32:46.880
<v Speaker 1>of monsters, there's still it's like, well, it's a human

0:32:46.960 --> 0:32:49.000
<v Speaker 1>with a squid head and it's really big. Yeah, Or

0:32:49.440 --> 0:32:52.040
<v Speaker 1>you're just struggling to come up with something that doesn't

0:32:52.120 --> 0:32:54.120
<v Speaker 1>have an analogy in nature, right, Or if you think

0:32:54.160 --> 0:32:56.560
<v Speaker 1>you've created something that has no analogy in nature, you're

0:32:56.600 --> 0:33:01.040
<v Speaker 1>just recreating like a Cambrian era organism that you just

0:33:01.120 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't know about. Hey, if you haven't listened to our

0:33:03.440 --> 0:33:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Cambrian Monsters episode, you should go back to the I

0:33:06.400 --> 0:33:08.680
<v Speaker 1>guess it was last week or whenever this airs. Check

0:33:08.720 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 1>out the Cambrian Monster mash. Those were some monster with monsters. Now,

0:33:14.000 --> 0:33:18.719
<v Speaker 1>speaking of of monsters, particularly sea monsters. Thirteenth century theologian

0:33:19.040 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Thomas of contemporary he devoted an entire book to see

0:33:22.440 --> 0:33:26.200
<v Speaker 1>monsters and another to the fish of the sea. So

0:33:26.400 --> 0:33:28.560
<v Speaker 1>his dividing line here, But you know what goes in

0:33:28.640 --> 0:33:31.600
<v Speaker 1>which book? This is answering my question. Right, nature is

0:33:31.640 --> 0:33:34.400
<v Speaker 1>full of monsters. How can you tell what the monsters are? Yeah? Yeah,

0:33:34.880 --> 0:33:36.720
<v Speaker 1>his answer would be, what it all comes down to,

0:33:36.960 --> 0:33:39.920
<v Speaker 1>rarity inside, that's what's mad. That's what makes a C monster.

0:33:40.720 --> 0:33:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Um so, so like blue whales would be C monsters. Yeah,

0:33:45.280 --> 0:33:47.840
<v Speaker 1>because they're just so big. It's I mean, it's quite

0:33:47.880 --> 0:33:52.520
<v Speaker 1>literally monstrous, and it's it's essentially rare, especially I guess

0:33:52.560 --> 0:33:54.600
<v Speaker 1>if it's yeah, if it's like an apex predator, so

0:33:55.360 --> 0:33:58.360
<v Speaker 1>like a megalodon would have been a CE monster. They

0:33:58.400 --> 0:34:00.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't exist at the time, right, Or you know, we're

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:03.360
<v Speaker 1>saying a horse is a rather large creature, but it's

0:34:03.400 --> 0:34:05.440
<v Speaker 1>not a rarity, so you know it's not a monster.

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:07.880
<v Speaker 1>But if you had a dog the side of a

0:34:08.040 --> 0:34:09.840
<v Speaker 1>size of a horse, that would be a rarity, that

0:34:09.920 --> 0:34:12.920
<v Speaker 1>would be a monster. I feel like this is a

0:34:13.040 --> 0:34:18.239
<v Speaker 1>really dumb and unimaginative I don't think that's good at all. No,

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:22.080
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't really help us out here. But regardless of

0:34:22.120 --> 0:34:26.240
<v Speaker 1>how you define monsters, we of course have countless monsters,

0:34:26.320 --> 0:34:28.120
<v Speaker 1>and not just of course the ones that we've dreamt

0:34:28.200 --> 0:34:31.520
<v Speaker 1>up to, you know, recently to entertain this though, I

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:34.880
<v Speaker 1>think that in many cases we're we're not simply entertaining

0:34:34.920 --> 0:34:37.840
<v Speaker 1>ourselves with monsters. We are we are creating something that

0:34:38.080 --> 0:34:42.440
<v Speaker 1>speaks to two deeper fears, that speaks to, you know,

0:34:42.600 --> 0:34:45.600
<v Speaker 1>some level of anxiety about our lives or the modern world.

0:34:45.800 --> 0:34:49.560
<v Speaker 1>And of course religion and myth and legend folklore are

0:34:49.680 --> 0:34:53.719
<v Speaker 1>just just totally populated with creatures that are that are

0:34:53.800 --> 0:34:56.919
<v Speaker 1>hybrids of various forms. Yeah, I like what you said

0:34:56.960 --> 0:34:58.799
<v Speaker 1>that we I think I've said this on the show before,

0:34:58.880 --> 0:35:01.840
<v Speaker 1>but one reason times people ask me, like, what, what

0:35:01.960 --> 0:35:04.560
<v Speaker 1>do you like about horror movies? I mean, they're so dumb.

0:35:05.200 --> 0:35:07.800
<v Speaker 1>It's true that the horror genre has a lot of

0:35:07.920 --> 0:35:11.040
<v Speaker 1>really really bad movies in it, But I think horror

0:35:11.080 --> 0:35:14.839
<v Speaker 1>movies are interesting because even when they're bad, they sort

0:35:14.880 --> 0:35:19.400
<v Speaker 1>of show you something. They're instructive about the anxieties of

0:35:19.480 --> 0:35:22.439
<v Speaker 1>the age in which they're produced, and they they tap

0:35:22.520 --> 0:35:26.040
<v Speaker 1>into something primal about what our what our deepest fears

0:35:26.120 --> 0:35:29.200
<v Speaker 1>are what's occupying, occupying our minds when we're in the

0:35:29.360 --> 0:35:32.400
<v Speaker 1>dark alone. And I like that about them. I like

0:35:32.600 --> 0:35:36.160
<v Speaker 1>even when they're not good stories and they're not told well,

0:35:36.320 --> 0:35:39.640
<v Speaker 1>they're still instructive about the society and the people that

0:35:39.800 --> 0:35:42.960
<v Speaker 1>made them. Well. A lot of it comes down to symbols, Right.

0:35:43.360 --> 0:35:45.600
<v Speaker 1>If you can have somebody who has no clue what

0:35:45.680 --> 0:35:48.680
<v Speaker 1>they're doing, and if you're taking existing symbols and you're

0:35:48.719 --> 0:35:52.520
<v Speaker 1>combining them one way or another, you're going to inevitably

0:35:52.800 --> 0:35:55.840
<v Speaker 1>make a statement. You may be completely deaf to that statement,

0:35:56.520 --> 0:35:59.799
<v Speaker 1>completely blind to that statement, but that's often when it's

0:35:59.840 --> 0:36:02.280
<v Speaker 1>the most interesting. Yeah, like, oh my goodness, you accidentally

0:36:02.320 --> 0:36:06.880
<v Speaker 1>created something brilliant. Uh. Like you made that the killer's mask,

0:36:07.200 --> 0:36:09.040
<v Speaker 1>and you you didn't even think about all of the

0:36:09.560 --> 0:36:13.200
<v Speaker 1>ramifications of of that symbol. Yeah, what does it mean

0:36:13.280 --> 0:36:15.400
<v Speaker 1>that the killer wears a hockey mask? Yeah? Or a

0:36:15.520 --> 0:36:18.360
<v Speaker 1>baby mask or a or a you know, an obviously

0:36:18.520 --> 0:36:21.520
<v Speaker 1>store bought ghost face mask. I mean, you can you

0:36:21.560 --> 0:36:24.080
<v Speaker 1>can kind of go wild with any of these these examples,

0:36:24.560 --> 0:36:26.399
<v Speaker 1>and uh and and try and tease out a big

0:36:26.440 --> 0:36:29.000
<v Speaker 1>academic paper on what the what the meaning of the

0:36:29.080 --> 0:36:32.120
<v Speaker 1>film is obviously it's the hockey will kill us all

0:36:32.200 --> 0:36:35.480
<v Speaker 1>in the end, fear of Canadians. I think, yeah, all right, Well,

0:36:35.520 --> 0:36:38.400
<v Speaker 1>to keep chasing this question about where the first monster

0:36:38.560 --> 0:36:40.480
<v Speaker 1>might have come from, I think maybe we should take

0:36:40.480 --> 0:36:43.640
<v Speaker 1>a detour and look at this one paper that I

0:36:43.760 --> 0:36:46.080
<v Speaker 1>found that that I thought was really interesting. It doesn't

0:36:46.160 --> 0:36:49.040
<v Speaker 1>directly answer the question we're talking about, but it comes

0:36:49.120 --> 0:36:52.640
<v Speaker 1>really close. It goes along similar pathways of thinking. And

0:36:52.680 --> 0:36:55.200
<v Speaker 1>it's a paper by a scholar called Stephen T. Asthma,

0:36:55.440 --> 0:36:58.239
<v Speaker 1>and the paper is titled Monsters on the Brain and

0:36:58.400 --> 0:37:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Evolutionary epistem all Legy of Horror published in Social Research

0:37:03.360 --> 0:37:06.520
<v Speaker 1>and International Quarterly, And that's a social science journal that

0:37:07.000 --> 0:37:09.640
<v Speaker 1>has a lot of different social science genres in it.

0:37:09.960 --> 0:37:12.840
<v Speaker 1>And basically, what Asthma is trying to do in this

0:37:13.120 --> 0:37:18.680
<v Speaker 1>article is trace what the biological origins of the experience

0:37:18.800 --> 0:37:21.719
<v Speaker 1>of horror are. And I think if we look at that,

0:37:21.840 --> 0:37:25.520
<v Speaker 1>that might provide some insights about where monsters could emerge

0:37:25.560 --> 0:37:29.720
<v Speaker 1>in our anthropological history. And Asthma starts with an interesting question,

0:37:29.840 --> 0:37:33.040
<v Speaker 1>one that's very common with all kinds of studies about behavior.

0:37:34.000 --> 0:37:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Our fear responses modular or conditioned. In other words, are

0:37:39.600 --> 0:37:43.640
<v Speaker 1>our fear responses and our monster fears instinctual born into

0:37:43.760 --> 0:37:47.759
<v Speaker 1>us or they just learned and conditioned by culture and experience.

0:37:48.520 --> 0:37:51.040
<v Speaker 1>And just to rephrase from the beginning, I think one

0:37:51.080 --> 0:37:53.320
<v Speaker 1>thing we can eliminate is that it's quite obvious that

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:56.360
<v Speaker 1>at least some of our fears are conditioned or learned. Like,

0:37:56.480 --> 0:37:58.399
<v Speaker 1>there is no way you were born with a fear

0:37:58.480 --> 0:38:03.279
<v Speaker 1>of airplanes. That's not part of your revolutionary heritage. So

0:38:03.600 --> 0:38:05.120
<v Speaker 1>though you might have, you know, you might have an

0:38:05.160 --> 0:38:07.160
<v Speaker 1>inborn fear of heights, you could see that could be

0:38:07.280 --> 0:38:10.840
<v Speaker 1>part of evolutionary here, but not like silver machines filled

0:38:10.880 --> 0:38:13.480
<v Speaker 1>with other humans or barreling through the sky. Right, So

0:38:13.560 --> 0:38:16.120
<v Speaker 1>there might be instinctual elements that go into that fear,

0:38:16.160 --> 0:38:19.319
<v Speaker 1>but the fear itself, the content there, is clearly conditioned

0:38:19.440 --> 0:38:22.759
<v Speaker 1>or learned. But the real question is are any of

0:38:22.840 --> 0:38:27.719
<v Speaker 1>our fears modular or instinctual or are they all conditioned

0:38:27.840 --> 0:38:31.799
<v Speaker 1>or learned. So Asthma kicks off this favor by by

0:38:31.840 --> 0:38:35.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty much stating the obvious fear exists in our bodies

0:38:35.160 --> 0:38:40.440
<v Speaker 1>and minds. Fearful stimulized stimulates the sympathetic nervous system, so

0:38:40.600 --> 0:38:43.480
<v Speaker 1>perhaps you'll freeze in the face of fear, maybe you'll flee,

0:38:43.840 --> 0:38:46.359
<v Speaker 1>maybe you'll you'll suddenly have this burst of bravery, you'll

0:38:46.360 --> 0:38:49.239
<v Speaker 1>turn around and fight. But the object of terror gives

0:38:49.320 --> 0:38:52.680
<v Speaker 1>us a physical jolt, and it demands reaction. And he

0:38:52.719 --> 0:38:56.280
<v Speaker 1>also points out that there's a strong hormonal component entailing

0:38:56.320 --> 0:38:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the cortico trope in releasing hormone or c r H,

0:39:00.040 --> 0:39:04.239
<v Speaker 1>cortisol and adrenaline. Asthma points to a study in fact

0:39:04.320 --> 0:39:08.920
<v Speaker 1>in which scientists inserted a gene in mice that makes CRH,

0:39:09.160 --> 0:39:12.879
<v Speaker 1>resulting in more fearful mice, or removing it to make

0:39:13.080 --> 0:39:17.120
<v Speaker 1>quote an extremely fearless mouse. I would I would venture

0:39:17.160 --> 0:39:22.600
<v Speaker 1>to say that both prospects are horrifying. So Asthma argues

0:39:22.640 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 1>that these are all old brain systems. So this is

0:39:25.640 --> 0:39:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the basement of horror, and we advanced organisms. Well, we

0:39:29.680 --> 0:39:32.839
<v Speaker 1>have an entire haunted house built atop these ancient brain

0:39:33.000 --> 0:39:36.200
<v Speaker 1>stem ruins. Like this analogy you're going with, Yeah, you

0:39:36.320 --> 0:39:38.960
<v Speaker 1>have all the limbic emotional circuits here. You can think

0:39:39.000 --> 0:39:43.040
<v Speaker 1>of this neural mammalian haunted house containing seven key rooms.

0:39:43.120 --> 0:39:45.960
<v Speaker 1>You got your fear room, your care room, your lust room,

0:39:46.280 --> 0:39:49.719
<v Speaker 1>your rage room, your panic room, your your seeking room

0:39:49.800 --> 0:39:54.320
<v Speaker 1>in your playroom, and each room commands specific neural pathways

0:39:54.360 --> 0:39:58.040
<v Speaker 1>through the brain pipes wriggling around and diving down into

0:39:58.080 --> 0:40:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the haunted ruins beneath. So we'd be thing that when

0:40:00.520 --> 0:40:03.680
<v Speaker 1>you have these different types of affective reactions, say like

0:40:03.800 --> 0:40:07.280
<v Speaker 1>you're engaged in play behaviors or you're engaged in lust

0:40:07.360 --> 0:40:10.400
<v Speaker 1>behaviors or fear behaviors, they don't look the same in

0:40:10.480 --> 0:40:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the brain. They take different avenues through your different brain

0:40:13.680 --> 0:40:17.719
<v Speaker 1>regions and excite different types of tissue. Right now, the

0:40:17.880 --> 0:40:21.480
<v Speaker 1>million fear is rooted in the amigdola. And we can

0:40:21.520 --> 0:40:23.680
<v Speaker 1>talk about some direct evidence of this later, but this

0:40:23.880 --> 0:40:26.480
<v Speaker 1>is a pretty well evidenced proposition, right, And we can

0:40:26.520 --> 0:40:30.400
<v Speaker 1>think of this is a haunted laboratory, and it's probably

0:40:30.520 --> 0:40:34.400
<v Speaker 1>right next to the memory late and haunted library of

0:40:34.440 --> 0:40:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the hippocampus, and they worked together to enable conditioned learning. Right, So,

0:40:39.160 --> 0:40:43.719
<v Speaker 1>the amygdala is what regulates fear, and the hippocampus supplies

0:40:43.800 --> 0:40:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the information content of the fear uh and the and

0:40:47.280 --> 0:40:50.359
<v Speaker 1>this is conditioned learning. So the simple version is, let's

0:40:50.400 --> 0:40:52.600
<v Speaker 1>say somebody puts you in a lab and they keep

0:40:52.680 --> 0:40:55.120
<v Speaker 1>showing you episodes of TV shows and every time they

0:40:55.160 --> 0:40:57.680
<v Speaker 1>show you an episode of Seinfeld, you get an electric

0:40:57.760 --> 0:41:00.680
<v Speaker 1>shock and it goes for the duration of the episode.

0:41:00.719 --> 0:41:04.680
<v Speaker 1>You will probably develop a conditioned seinfeld phobia, which is

0:41:04.719 --> 0:41:08.880
<v Speaker 1>an avoidance or aversion reaction to Jerry Seinfeld's face. And

0:41:09.160 --> 0:41:11.880
<v Speaker 1>this is this is a standard accounting of how conditioned

0:41:11.920 --> 0:41:15.680
<v Speaker 1>fears are developed. Alright, so we have our haunted house here.

0:41:15.960 --> 0:41:18.880
<v Speaker 1>What's a haunted house without a few ghosts? And the

0:41:19.000 --> 0:41:22.840
<v Speaker 1>ghosts come to us via evolution. This is what ASMA

0:41:22.880 --> 0:41:26.799
<v Speaker 1>refers to as the heritable dispositional levels of fear or timidity. Now,

0:41:26.880 --> 0:41:28.759
<v Speaker 1>refer back to what you mentioned a minute ago, which

0:41:28.960 --> 0:41:32.320
<v Speaker 1>those mice, right, you can you can inherit different levels

0:41:32.520 --> 0:41:35.560
<v Speaker 1>of fear disposition, So you can have these really brave

0:41:35.719 --> 0:41:38.680
<v Speaker 1>mice that you artificially select for, or these really scared

0:41:38.760 --> 0:41:42.200
<v Speaker 1>mice that you artificially select for. But also, could the

0:41:42.440 --> 0:41:45.080
<v Speaker 1>contents of our fears be heritable? That's sort of part

0:41:45.120 --> 0:41:47.640
<v Speaker 1>of the question. We're asking not just how likely you

0:41:47.719 --> 0:41:50.000
<v Speaker 1>are to become afraid, but what you're afraid of? Can

0:41:50.080 --> 0:41:53.520
<v Speaker 1>you get that from your parents through your genes? Well,

0:41:53.560 --> 0:41:56.200
<v Speaker 1>there's some there's some interesting supporting evidence for this, and

0:41:56.239 --> 0:41:59.760
<v Speaker 1>I imagine a number of you have encountered videos online

0:41:59.800 --> 0:42:03.520
<v Speaker 1>of cats reacting to cucumbers. You know, they turn around,

0:42:03.520 --> 0:42:05.719
<v Speaker 1>they see a cucumber, they freak out. The ideas that

0:42:05.800 --> 0:42:09.000
<v Speaker 1>they have this this uh, this ingrained response to something

0:42:09.080 --> 0:42:11.880
<v Speaker 1>that is snake like, and they have been experienced experiments

0:42:11.920 --> 0:42:15.480
<v Speaker 1>to show similar reactions in chimps as well. Uh. We

0:42:15.600 --> 0:42:19.120
<v Speaker 1>also see this along with spider fears in humans. Yeah.

0:42:19.360 --> 0:42:21.560
<v Speaker 1>One example showing this was in the nineteen forties, the

0:42:21.600 --> 0:42:26.560
<v Speaker 1>psychologist Donald Hebb found that even infant chimpanzees were terrified

0:42:26.640 --> 0:42:29.680
<v Speaker 1>of images of snakes, even if they'd never been exposed

0:42:29.719 --> 0:42:33.280
<v Speaker 1>to images of snakes before. Now there's an interesting update

0:42:33.360 --> 0:42:35.880
<v Speaker 1>to that, which is that have found that chimps weren't

0:42:36.080 --> 0:42:38.759
<v Speaker 1>just afraid of snakes, but of any quote. And this

0:42:38.920 --> 0:42:43.840
<v Speaker 1>is Asthma's wording extremely varied morphology, as they encountered so

0:42:44.000 --> 0:42:46.840
<v Speaker 1>like really odd shapes that weren't part of their normal

0:42:46.920 --> 0:42:50.320
<v Speaker 1>day to day life. But for more evidence of of

0:42:50.440 --> 0:42:54.879
<v Speaker 1>the brains conditioning towards reaction to snakes, I found one

0:42:54.960 --> 0:42:57.680
<v Speaker 1>recent study. It was about neural pathways for evolution of

0:42:57.800 --> 0:43:01.560
<v Speaker 1>rapid detection of snakes and it was by uh vanle

0:43:01.800 --> 0:43:05.920
<v Speaker 1>quant at All and it's called pulvinar neurons reveal neurobiological

0:43:05.960 --> 0:43:08.960
<v Speaker 1>evidence of past selection for rapid detection of snakes in

0:43:09.200 --> 0:43:12.640
<v Speaker 1>p n A S. And basically it found that there

0:43:12.680 --> 0:43:17.640
<v Speaker 1>are neurons in the primate medial and dorsolateral pulvinar that

0:43:17.920 --> 0:43:21.919
<v Speaker 1>responds selectively to snakes, seeming to indicate that there's something

0:43:22.080 --> 0:43:25.920
<v Speaker 1>hardwired in the primate brain to cause this rapid detection

0:43:26.040 --> 0:43:29.919
<v Speaker 1>of snakelike shapes as opposed to images of other things

0:43:30.000 --> 0:43:33.600
<v Speaker 1>like monkey faces, monkey hands, and geometric shapes, and so

0:43:33.840 --> 0:43:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Asthma in his paper, he wonders, quote if some of

0:43:37.960 --> 0:43:41.479
<v Speaker 1>our deep seated monster fears may be rooted in real

0:43:41.680 --> 0:43:46.439
<v Speaker 1>predators or environmental threats from our prehistory. So we're talking

0:43:46.800 --> 0:43:53.040
<v Speaker 1>about cognitive model shaped in the Plistocene era, genetically engraved

0:43:53.160 --> 0:43:57.120
<v Speaker 1>archetypes that continue to resonate, uh, you know on up

0:43:57.160 --> 0:43:59.719
<v Speaker 1>into modern times. Now, you can totally see why that

0:43:59.719 --> 0:44:02.400
<v Speaker 1>would the case. Right, It's clear that some types of

0:44:02.480 --> 0:44:06.160
<v Speaker 1>fears could be adaptive. If you are born with a

0:44:06.280 --> 0:44:10.480
<v Speaker 1>natural fear of lion shaped things, you're probably gonna survive

0:44:10.640 --> 0:44:13.080
<v Speaker 1>more often than people not born with the fear of

0:44:13.160 --> 0:44:16.600
<v Speaker 1>lion shaped things, Right, And so The question is, is

0:44:16.719 --> 0:44:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the image of a snake or a spider, or anything

0:44:19.840 --> 0:44:22.760
<v Speaker 1>that conforms to a to a common part of monster

0:44:22.880 --> 0:44:27.120
<v Speaker 1>imagery somehow encoded deeply in your biology. Is it an

0:44:27.280 --> 0:44:30.600
<v Speaker 1>inherited fear response that you get from threats faced by

0:44:30.719 --> 0:44:34.600
<v Speaker 1>your ancestors, or are these all things we learned to

0:44:34.680 --> 0:44:38.040
<v Speaker 1>fear from culture and experience. So Asthma sites some lines

0:44:38.080 --> 0:44:41.680
<v Speaker 1>of thinking against heritable fear content, Like, one thing he

0:44:41.760 --> 0:44:46.560
<v Speaker 1>asks is how does the content itself get transmitted? You know, like,

0:44:46.680 --> 0:44:50.400
<v Speaker 1>if you're afraid of snakes, how could that image of

0:44:50.440 --> 0:44:53.600
<v Speaker 1>a snake literally come down through the generations. Now I'm

0:44:53.640 --> 0:44:57.239
<v Speaker 1>not sure I buy that objection so much, because I

0:44:57.719 --> 0:45:00.880
<v Speaker 1>do think it seems likely that we can inherit some

0:45:01.080 --> 0:45:04.640
<v Speaker 1>types of image re recognition. I mean, here's one example.

0:45:04.760 --> 0:45:08.799
<v Speaker 1>If you can't inherit any kind of image re recognition

0:45:08.960 --> 0:45:13.440
<v Speaker 1>from your parents, how would animals know what visual cues

0:45:13.520 --> 0:45:16.600
<v Speaker 1>to look for in mating? You could say with humans,

0:45:16.680 --> 0:45:19.239
<v Speaker 1>you could say, well, maybe it's all culturally conditioned and

0:45:19.360 --> 0:45:22.680
<v Speaker 1>that's how But what about non human animals, what about

0:45:22.800 --> 0:45:25.440
<v Speaker 1>non social non human animals? There seem to be I

0:45:25.800 --> 0:45:29.720
<v Speaker 1>would think that you can transmit some types of imagery

0:45:29.840 --> 0:45:34.680
<v Speaker 1>across generations through heritable predispositions, and of course it's important

0:45:34.719 --> 0:45:38.600
<v Speaker 1>to wonder what kind of content is actually getting transmitted here. Yeah,

0:45:38.680 --> 0:45:42.759
<v Speaker 1>and that's one objection that Asthma doesn't really go into

0:45:42.960 --> 0:45:46.080
<v Speaker 1>is deeply, but I think actually does matter why snakes

0:45:46.120 --> 0:45:49.200
<v Speaker 1>and spiders, Like I can think of animals that are

0:45:49.239 --> 0:45:52.800
<v Speaker 1>generally much much more dangerous and probably much more dangerous

0:45:52.840 --> 0:45:57.960
<v Speaker 1>to our direct ancestors on the African savannah than spiders

0:45:58.000 --> 0:46:00.600
<v Speaker 1>and snakes, and yet they don't inspire nearly the same

0:46:00.760 --> 0:46:05.120
<v Speaker 1>visual revulsion. Like a hippopotamus is ten thousand times more

0:46:05.239 --> 0:46:08.160
<v Speaker 1>dangerous than the average snake or spider, and yet it

0:46:08.280 --> 0:46:11.200
<v Speaker 1>does not present as a universal phobia. You don't see

0:46:11.480 --> 0:46:14.800
<v Speaker 1>humans all over the world being terrified of hippopotami. Yeah, so,

0:46:14.960 --> 0:46:19.000
<v Speaker 1>or at least certainly not outside of a direct contact

0:46:19.080 --> 0:46:21.640
<v Speaker 1>with them, like environmental contact with them. Yeah, unless you've

0:46:21.920 --> 0:46:25.440
<v Speaker 1>learned to be afraid of them because they're actually dangerous. Otherwise,

0:46:25.480 --> 0:46:27.439
<v Speaker 1>I think we all have that point growing up where

0:46:27.480 --> 0:46:30.359
<v Speaker 1>we're told, oh, actually hippos are exceedingly dangerous and they're

0:46:30.400 --> 0:46:33.920
<v Speaker 1>more dangerous than the crocodiles. Yeah, as always take that

0:46:34.040 --> 0:46:36.280
<v Speaker 1>with the caveat that we don't want to demonize animals

0:46:37.000 --> 0:46:39.160
<v Speaker 1>that are wonderful, right, don't go kill in hippos. I

0:46:39.200 --> 0:46:42.640
<v Speaker 1>can't watch enough hippo videos on life of their of

0:46:42.760 --> 0:46:46.239
<v Speaker 1>what of their their viral explosive defecation. No, well that

0:46:46.480 --> 0:46:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a fabulous topic as well. There's a

0:46:48.680 --> 0:46:52.160
<v Speaker 1>lot to that actually, Um, I've read papers about the

0:46:52.239 --> 0:46:55.600
<v Speaker 1>way that they spin their tails to distribute the fecal

0:46:55.680 --> 0:46:58.320
<v Speaker 1>matter h and the different theories as to why. I

0:46:58.360 --> 0:47:01.920
<v Speaker 1>mean it gets into parricide and leeches. It's fabulous stuff.

0:47:01.960 --> 0:47:04.359
<v Speaker 1>But their babies are super cute, That's what I'm getting at.

0:47:04.760 --> 0:47:09.560
<v Speaker 1>You ever watched the obi with their their their mom's. Yeah,

0:47:09.560 --> 0:47:11.439
<v Speaker 1>they'll grow up to bite your legs off, but they're

0:47:11.719 --> 0:47:14.600
<v Speaker 1>they're very cute as babies. But yeah, no demonization of hippos.

0:47:14.600 --> 0:47:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Don't go killing hippos or anything anyway. But back to Asthma. Okay,

0:47:18.719 --> 0:47:22.520
<v Speaker 1>so we do have these potential pitfalls and the idea

0:47:22.960 --> 0:47:27.080
<v Speaker 1>that our fears are predatory fears are inherited directly and

0:47:27.200 --> 0:47:30.520
<v Speaker 1>biologically from our parents. But Asthma thinks he sort of

0:47:30.680 --> 0:47:34.120
<v Speaker 1>has a solution to this dilemma, right, Yeah, he gets

0:47:34.160 --> 0:47:39.080
<v Speaker 1>into this topic of specific versus generic pattern recognition systems.

0:47:39.800 --> 0:47:42.800
<v Speaker 1>So he points to the universality of snake and spider

0:47:42.840 --> 0:47:45.920
<v Speaker 1>phobias as we've been discussing, but also to studies by

0:47:46.040 --> 0:47:52.200
<v Speaker 1>ethologists Wolfgang Schleet who he carried out these experiments where

0:47:52.200 --> 0:47:54.960
<v Speaker 1>he took bird chicks and he exposed them to fly

0:47:55.200 --> 0:47:59.719
<v Speaker 1>over silhouettes of both hawks and goose and geese. The

0:48:00.160 --> 0:48:04.279
<v Speaker 1>caused fear, but seemingly not the goose. But if they

0:48:04.320 --> 0:48:08.360
<v Speaker 1>were exposed to repeated hawk fly over shapes very earlier

0:48:08.360 --> 0:48:12.640
<v Speaker 1>in the development, they feared the goose but not the hawk.

0:48:13.239 --> 0:48:16.680
<v Speaker 1>So it it's it's curious. So you basically it was

0:48:16.719 --> 0:48:19.400
<v Speaker 1>about what they were exposed to early on. And by

0:48:19.440 --> 0:48:20.839
<v Speaker 1>the way, I have to add the fact these were

0:48:20.880 --> 0:48:26.120
<v Speaker 1>turkey chicks, your your butterballs were being experimented on a

0:48:26.160 --> 0:48:28.640
<v Speaker 1>little bit in infancy. By the way, I love that

0:48:28.800 --> 0:48:30.960
<v Speaker 1>idea of of fearing the goose. I think we should

0:48:31.080 --> 0:48:33.680
<v Speaker 1>we should incorporate that into our discussions of fear. If

0:48:33.680 --> 0:48:35.919
<v Speaker 1>you have an unfounded fear, you can say, oh, you're

0:48:35.920 --> 0:48:38.239
<v Speaker 1>really fearing the goose on that one. So that's like

0:48:38.360 --> 0:48:41.360
<v Speaker 1>when you're afraid of something that isn't really dangerous, but

0:48:41.480 --> 0:48:43.560
<v Speaker 1>it's because you had a bad experience with it as

0:48:43.560 --> 0:48:46.319
<v Speaker 1>a child. Yeah, I mean, but you know, as we're

0:48:46.320 --> 0:48:48.600
<v Speaker 1>discussing the development of fears, like, that's kind of that's

0:48:48.600 --> 0:48:50.600
<v Speaker 1>how we work, That's how you survive in the wild.

0:48:50.800 --> 0:48:53.959
<v Speaker 1>You the person who fears the lion that is not there,

0:48:54.440 --> 0:48:56.359
<v Speaker 1>that has a better chance of surviving than the person

0:48:56.520 --> 0:48:58.919
<v Speaker 1>who does not fear the lions that may be there.

0:48:59.040 --> 0:49:02.120
<v Speaker 1>It's true, you'd rather have false positives than false negatives.

0:49:03.000 --> 0:49:06.200
<v Speaker 1>I should correct myself there, because fearing the goose wouldn't

0:49:06.239 --> 0:49:08.359
<v Speaker 1>be that you had a bad experience with the goose,

0:49:08.400 --> 0:49:10.760
<v Speaker 1>would be that you never had an experience with a goose.

0:49:11.239 --> 0:49:13.239
<v Speaker 1>Un Thus, you're afraid of them because they don't they

0:49:13.320 --> 0:49:16.919
<v Speaker 1>don't fit into your your picture of the world. Maybe

0:49:16.960 --> 0:49:19.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a good expression for like when your kid won't

0:49:19.120 --> 0:49:21.919
<v Speaker 1>try some new food or something's like, stop fearing the goose.

0:49:21.960 --> 0:49:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Don't just go for it, baby, And oh I should

0:49:28.719 --> 0:49:31.760
<v Speaker 1>stop laughing at my own jokes. Okay. Uh So. Slights

0:49:31.800 --> 0:49:35.960
<v Speaker 1>work focused on replications of older experiments originally carried out

0:49:35.960 --> 0:49:39.880
<v Speaker 1>by Lorenz and ten Bergen in the nineteen thirties, and

0:49:40.120 --> 0:49:44.759
<v Speaker 1>to quote from Asthma, this is quote corroborating Hebb's idea.

0:49:44.800 --> 0:49:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Remember Donald Hebb from earlier idea that some discrepancy between

0:49:48.560 --> 0:49:53.400
<v Speaker 1>a new perception and previous background stored experiences causes the

0:49:53.480 --> 0:49:56.200
<v Speaker 1>fearful response. Remember how the chimps were frightened by any

0:49:56.360 --> 0:50:01.640
<v Speaker 1>unfamiliar morphology shapes they weren't familiar with. So, Asthma continues, quote,

0:50:01.840 --> 0:50:05.600
<v Speaker 1>theoretically one could condition an animal to be unresponsive to

0:50:06.000 --> 0:50:10.640
<v Speaker 1>snakes and hawks, but utterly terrified of fluffy bunnies. So

0:50:10.800 --> 0:50:14.600
<v Speaker 1>this is Asthma's position. Um, he's sort of working towards

0:50:14.640 --> 0:50:17.000
<v Speaker 1>this thing. Well, let's let's let's get there on our

0:50:17.000 --> 0:50:19.359
<v Speaker 1>own time. Yeah. He says that all of this makes

0:50:19.400 --> 0:50:21.879
<v Speaker 1>sense though if you look at it in the light

0:50:21.960 --> 0:50:26.160
<v Speaker 1>of Darwin, Right, he's talking about the generic conditioning idea, right, Yeah,

0:50:26.440 --> 0:50:30.960
<v Speaker 1>because he talks about the quote fearful reaction to categorical mismatch. So,

0:50:31.200 --> 0:50:34.240
<v Speaker 1>as Asthma puts it, quote, the local environment will condition

0:50:34.320 --> 0:50:37.799
<v Speaker 1>the infant animal, and then the cognitive development will lock

0:50:37.920 --> 0:50:41.960
<v Speaker 1>in the categories, creating a software program that recognizes some

0:50:42.160 --> 0:50:46.440
<v Speaker 1>animals and mismatches novelties. So Asthma is sort of proposing

0:50:46.480 --> 0:50:49.759
<v Speaker 1>a hybrid model of the origins of fear imagery. Not

0:50:49.920 --> 0:50:54.000
<v Speaker 1>necessarily that it's that it's received imagery from your ancestors,

0:50:54.360 --> 0:50:56.719
<v Speaker 1>and not necessarily that it's all learned in life. But

0:50:56.760 --> 0:50:59.920
<v Speaker 1>it's one that combines elements that are automatic and instinctual

0:51:00.120 --> 0:51:03.400
<v Speaker 1>along with elements that are modifiable and learned. Yeah, he

0:51:03.480 --> 0:51:06.880
<v Speaker 1>calls it a quote content free recognition system. And so

0:51:07.120 --> 0:51:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the basis of this is that we whatever we are

0:51:10.600 --> 0:51:15.120
<v Speaker 1>exposed to an early childhood becomes part of our okay category,

0:51:15.520 --> 0:51:18.120
<v Speaker 1>and whatever we're not exposed to become as part of

0:51:18.200 --> 0:51:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the fear category. Exactly. And in fact, he points to

0:51:21.760 --> 0:51:25.239
<v Speaker 1>a specific study. This is the studies, uh that we're

0:51:25.280 --> 0:51:29.240
<v Speaker 1>conducted by Mary Ainsworth in the nineties seventies, the Strange

0:51:29.360 --> 0:51:34.279
<v Speaker 1>situation experiments, and uh, these these backed up the notion

0:51:34.320 --> 0:51:37.560
<v Speaker 1>that there's a window of opportunity for template formation and

0:51:37.640 --> 0:51:40.160
<v Speaker 1>it closes after six months. This is great. This is

0:51:40.200 --> 0:51:43.960
<v Speaker 1>part of the freaking out your children genre experiments. Everything

0:51:44.120 --> 0:51:46.920
<v Speaker 1>is stored as normal in those first six months, the

0:51:47.040 --> 0:51:50.480
<v Speaker 1>argument goes, and only after that are the new experiences

0:51:50.520 --> 0:51:54.239
<v Speaker 1>initially stored a strange and novel and judged in light

0:51:54.280 --> 0:51:58.480
<v Speaker 1>of existing templates. That's why if you encounter a child

0:51:58.760 --> 0:52:01.160
<v Speaker 1>that is less than six months, they're looking at everything

0:52:01.200 --> 0:52:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the same. You're not going to get those shifty baby

0:52:03.920 --> 0:52:06.600
<v Speaker 1>eyes and a shifty toddler rized till later, you know,

0:52:06.680 --> 0:52:09.279
<v Speaker 1>because we've all encountered those kids that like instantly distrust you.

0:52:09.400 --> 0:52:11.759
<v Speaker 1>They look at you and you can tell they distrust you.

0:52:11.840 --> 0:52:14.160
<v Speaker 1>You're like, what are you doing? Yeah, I just got here.

0:52:14.280 --> 0:52:16.080
<v Speaker 1>What are you basing this on? And they're basing it

0:52:16.160 --> 0:52:17.800
<v Speaker 1>on the template that they have. You were not in

0:52:17.880 --> 0:52:20.120
<v Speaker 1>that template. So this would seem to back up his

0:52:20.360 --> 0:52:23.160
<v Speaker 1>idea of the fact that there's a sort of content

0:52:23.360 --> 0:52:27.120
<v Speaker 1>free recognition system. Uh. And it also would would help

0:52:27.200 --> 0:52:30.239
<v Speaker 1>answer this question of how come infants, if this is

0:52:30.280 --> 0:52:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the case, don't become terrified of every new image they

0:52:33.760 --> 0:52:38.360
<v Speaker 1>encounter right right now. It's it's uh, it's worth noting asthma.

0:52:38.560 --> 0:52:40.320
<v Speaker 1>In all this, he points out some of the obvious

0:52:40.400 --> 0:52:42.960
<v Speaker 1>that many of our monsters or hybrids of threatening creatures,

0:52:43.320 --> 0:52:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and specifically he points out the alien face hugger because

0:52:47.560 --> 0:52:51.840
<v Speaker 1>this is essentially a spider and a snake fused together

0:52:51.960 --> 0:52:56.600
<v Speaker 1>into one awful crab like entity. You know, it's the

0:52:56.680 --> 0:52:58.680
<v Speaker 1>worst parts of the spider and the worst parts of

0:52:58.719 --> 0:53:02.000
<v Speaker 1>a snake and the worst part of an oyster. Well yeah, yeah,

0:53:02.040 --> 0:53:03.919
<v Speaker 1>once you start cutting into it, for sure, but there's

0:53:03.960 --> 0:53:06.239
<v Speaker 1>no worse part of an oyster. It's all good. Uh.

0:53:06.960 --> 0:53:10.480
<v Speaker 1>So Asthma says that this what we have here is uh,

0:53:10.719 --> 0:53:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the phylogenetic memory of ancient danger and monstrous hybrids allow

0:53:15.200 --> 0:53:19.120
<v Speaker 1>us to to further strengthen, augment, and transmit those fears. Right,

0:53:19.160 --> 0:53:21.160
<v Speaker 1>And that would seem to go to this like instinctual

0:53:21.280 --> 0:53:24.920
<v Speaker 1>fear read But Asthma has this other interesting hypothesis. He

0:53:25.040 --> 0:53:29.719
<v Speaker 1>discusses about what what contributes to what makes spiders and

0:53:29.800 --> 0:53:32.480
<v Speaker 1>snakes specifically scary, and this might answer some of my

0:53:33.120 --> 0:53:36.680
<v Speaker 1>problems with why them and not hippopotamus? Is uh, if

0:53:36.880 --> 0:53:40.239
<v Speaker 1>you assume that babies are generally carried and kept off

0:53:40.360 --> 0:53:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the ground outside for their first six months of life,

0:53:43.480 --> 0:53:46.640
<v Speaker 1>they won't be seeing many spiders or snakes, but they

0:53:46.760 --> 0:53:49.480
<v Speaker 1>will be able to see people and other larger, non

0:53:49.560 --> 0:53:53.040
<v Speaker 1>threatening animals. So Asthma seems to think this sort of

0:53:53.160 --> 0:53:56.879
<v Speaker 1>fits the category violation model. That would make sense. Yeah,

0:53:56.880 --> 0:54:01.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't see a lot of ADU even today taking

0:54:01.280 --> 0:54:02.680
<v Speaker 1>their baby. Well, I mean, un once you're taking to

0:54:02.719 --> 0:54:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the zoo, I guess. But even then they're not they're

0:54:06.120 --> 0:54:07.920
<v Speaker 1>encountering them in the zoo. And I've already talked a

0:54:07.920 --> 0:54:10.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit about the differences between encountering an animal in

0:54:10.640 --> 0:54:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the wild and encountering them in an artificial environment right now.

0:54:13.600 --> 0:54:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Of course, another way to violate these categories is to

0:54:16.560 --> 0:54:22.000
<v Speaker 1>present beings with totally nonsensical ontologies, creatures that could never

0:54:22.160 --> 0:54:25.120
<v Speaker 1>be conditioned in a natural environment, or sorry, that you

0:54:25.239 --> 0:54:28.320
<v Speaker 1>could never be conditioned to accept in a natural environment,

0:54:28.600 --> 0:54:32.080
<v Speaker 1>because they don't exist in a natural environment. Here, maybe

0:54:32.160 --> 0:54:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the origin of our hybrid monsters are lion headed humans

0:54:35.800 --> 0:54:39.880
<v Speaker 1>and the grim sentient leopards and other beasts. All right, well,

0:54:39.880 --> 0:54:41.359
<v Speaker 1>on that note, we're going to take a quick break,

0:54:41.440 --> 0:54:43.719
<v Speaker 1>and when we come back we will return to our

0:54:43.760 --> 0:54:51.760
<v Speaker 1>discussion of ancient monsters. Alright, we're back now. Asthma invokes

0:54:51.800 --> 0:54:55.960
<v Speaker 1>a concept in his paper invented by the philosopher Nol Carol,

0:54:56.080 --> 0:54:59.280
<v Speaker 1>which is called category jamming, and in his two thousand

0:54:59.360 --> 0:55:02.600
<v Speaker 1>three book The Philosophy of Horror or Paradoxes of the Heart,

0:55:02.960 --> 0:55:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Carol makes a distinction between what he calls the monsters

0:55:06.239 --> 0:55:08.920
<v Speaker 1>of myth and the monsters of horror I thought this

0:55:09.080 --> 0:55:11.560
<v Speaker 1>was pretty interesting. So he writes about how, you know,

0:55:11.640 --> 0:55:14.080
<v Speaker 1>there might be fearsome creatures in the world of myths,

0:55:14.200 --> 0:55:17.440
<v Speaker 1>but they are not quote unnatural, and they can be

0:55:17.560 --> 0:55:21.719
<v Speaker 1>accommodated by the metaphysics of the cosmology that produced them.

0:55:21.880 --> 0:55:24.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, So this idea is that, say, the Medusa,

0:55:25.320 --> 0:55:27.080
<v Speaker 1>is that if you take them meduce and you put

0:55:27.080 --> 0:55:29.560
<v Speaker 1>it in our real world, yeah, it's breaking all these

0:55:29.680 --> 0:55:33.719
<v Speaker 1>laws of physics and nature. But the Medusa encountered within

0:55:33.960 --> 0:55:36.919
<v Speaker 1>the world of Greek myth, Well, then she's just part

0:55:37.000 --> 0:55:40.400
<v Speaker 1>of this world, Like, she's not breaking any laws exactly.

0:55:40.480 --> 0:55:43.760
<v Speaker 1>But then he says, quote, the monsters of horror breach

0:55:43.880 --> 0:55:48.399
<v Speaker 1>the norms of ontological propriety presumed by the positive human

0:55:48.520 --> 0:55:51.800
<v Speaker 1>characters in the story. That is, in examples of horror,

0:55:51.920 --> 0:55:54.880
<v Speaker 1>it would appear that the monster is an extraordinary character

0:55:55.120 --> 0:55:59.600
<v Speaker 1>in our ordinary world. Yeah. I like this because this

0:55:59.760 --> 0:56:02.040
<v Speaker 1>is a distinction. I feel very much like there are

0:56:02.120 --> 0:56:06.400
<v Speaker 1>different kinds of monsters, and they even the same monster

0:56:06.920 --> 0:56:11.239
<v Speaker 1>could be more or less terrifying given different context. And

0:56:11.360 --> 0:56:13.239
<v Speaker 1>so it makes me think back to the Loan Mench,

0:56:13.920 --> 0:56:17.480
<v Speaker 1>which one was the loan Mench? Was this a monster

0:56:17.640 --> 0:56:21.560
<v Speaker 1>of myth? That existed within some kind of epic poem

0:56:21.680 --> 0:56:24.560
<v Speaker 1>that these people you know, recited orally or something like that,

0:56:24.920 --> 0:56:28.000
<v Speaker 1>something outside the world that could be accommodated by its

0:56:28.040 --> 0:56:32.280
<v Speaker 1>own cosmology. Or was this the monster of horror, something

0:56:32.400 --> 0:56:36.040
<v Speaker 1>that haunted the woods beyond the cave. Yeah. To glimpse

0:56:36.120 --> 0:56:39.080
<v Speaker 1>this creature, or to imagine glimpsinginess creature, is it to

0:56:39.239 --> 0:56:41.520
<v Speaker 1>see something broken in the world or something that is

0:56:42.080 --> 0:56:44.279
<v Speaker 1>just part of its fabric and we have no way

0:56:44.280 --> 0:56:47.200
<v Speaker 1>of knowing. Yeah, though clearly I think if it is

0:56:47.280 --> 0:56:50.600
<v Speaker 1>part of that broken vision of the world, then there

0:56:50.760 --> 0:56:54.279
<v Speaker 1>is a stronger fear element to it. It's not part

0:56:54.360 --> 0:56:58.880
<v Speaker 1>of a fantasy. It is a fantastical deviation from your

0:56:58.960 --> 0:57:02.120
<v Speaker 1>day to day life. But Carol also writes about this

0:57:02.280 --> 0:57:06.000
<v Speaker 1>idea that monsters are jamming of categories. He says, quote

0:57:06.040 --> 0:57:11.560
<v Speaker 1>monsters are repelling because they violate standing categories and another

0:57:11.640 --> 0:57:15.120
<v Speaker 1>quote also elsewhere, um quote. If what is of primary

0:57:15.160 --> 0:57:19.320
<v Speaker 1>importance about horrific creatures is that they're very impossibility visa

0:57:19.440 --> 0:57:22.760
<v Speaker 1>v our conceptual categories is what makes them function so

0:57:22.920 --> 0:57:27.760
<v Speaker 1>compelling lee in dramas of discovery and confirmation. Then their disclosure,

0:57:28.360 --> 0:57:32.200
<v Speaker 1>insofar as they are categorical violations will be attached to

0:57:32.360 --> 0:57:37.840
<v Speaker 1>some sense of disturbance, distress, and disgust. Consequently, the role

0:57:37.960 --> 0:57:41.360
<v Speaker 1>of the horrific creature in such narratives where their disclosure

0:57:41.480 --> 0:57:46.000
<v Speaker 1>captures our interest and delivers pleasure, will simultaneously mandate some

0:57:46.200 --> 0:57:50.320
<v Speaker 1>probable revulsion. That is, in order to reward our interest

0:57:50.480 --> 0:57:54.000
<v Speaker 1>by the disclosure of the putatively impossible beings of the plot.

0:57:54.480 --> 0:57:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Said beings ought to be disturbing, distressing, and repulsive in

0:57:58.360 --> 0:58:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the way that theorists like doug list and there's referring

0:58:01.080 --> 0:58:05.280
<v Speaker 1>to Dame Mary Douglas predict phenomena that ill fit cultural

0:58:05.400 --> 0:58:10.080
<v Speaker 1>classifications will be So the idea is that creatures that

0:58:10.360 --> 0:58:15.040
<v Speaker 1>violate our culturally established categories of existence we will find

0:58:15.160 --> 0:58:19.280
<v Speaker 1>repulsive and distressing. And this is definitely a very common

0:58:19.520 --> 0:58:23.560
<v Speaker 1>way of explaining horrific creatures, right the category confusion model.

0:58:23.960 --> 0:58:25.960
<v Speaker 1>There's a lion, there's a man, but a man with

0:58:26.040 --> 0:58:28.520
<v Speaker 1>a lion's head that just that breaks all the rules.

0:58:28.600 --> 0:58:31.480
<v Speaker 1>It's the thing that should not be exactly Yeah, but

0:58:31.640 --> 0:58:34.760
<v Speaker 1>then again, I have so on one hand, I'm attracted

0:58:34.800 --> 0:58:37.480
<v Speaker 1>to this theory, and I find that lots of horror

0:58:37.560 --> 0:58:40.840
<v Speaker 1>creatures very much seemed to fit this theory. But at

0:58:40.880 --> 0:58:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the same time, I wonder, is it really possible that

0:58:44.160 --> 0:58:48.520
<v Speaker 1>our experience of monster horror could be so thoroughly cognitive,

0:58:48.760 --> 0:58:52.280
<v Speaker 1>because like, comparing these categories like this established by culture,

0:58:52.720 --> 0:58:54.680
<v Speaker 1>that really would seem to be like it takes some

0:58:54.920 --> 0:58:58.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of thought. Right, Do you really have to think

0:58:58.680 --> 0:59:02.720
<v Speaker 1>about a monster to find it scary? No? I mean,

0:59:03.600 --> 0:59:07.280
<v Speaker 1>like we've been discussing with something like like Jason, say,

0:59:07.440 --> 0:59:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Jason Varies from the Friday of their tenth series. You

0:59:11.160 --> 0:59:13.240
<v Speaker 1>don't have to think very hard in those films to

0:59:13.320 --> 0:59:16.400
<v Speaker 1>find Jason terrifying. Though there's there's plenty of stuff going

0:59:16.440 --> 0:59:18.760
<v Speaker 1>on to make you feel terror, right down to the

0:59:18.880 --> 0:59:22.920
<v Speaker 1>music and uh and and and other forms of priming. Uh.

0:59:23.920 --> 0:59:25.800
<v Speaker 1>But if you if you tease it apart, you can say, yes,

0:59:25.880 --> 0:59:29.360
<v Speaker 1>this is an unnatural thing. It's, depending on your interpretation,

0:59:29.480 --> 0:59:32.160
<v Speaker 1>is either a dead person that's walking around killing people,

0:59:32.440 --> 0:59:36.720
<v Speaker 1>or at the very least, it is an unrealistically relentless

0:59:36.800 --> 0:59:41.600
<v Speaker 1>and unstoppable humanoid killer. And it's equally terrifying no matter

0:59:41.640 --> 0:59:43.520
<v Speaker 1>how much thought you put into it. Right, And that

0:59:43.840 --> 0:59:47.800
<v Speaker 1>whenever I feel monster fear, the initial pang of monster

0:59:47.960 --> 0:59:52.960
<v Speaker 1>fear definitely feels deeper than cognitive category analysis, Like I

0:59:53.040 --> 0:59:57.080
<v Speaker 1>don't feel like I'm comparing anything in my mind. It

0:59:57.280 --> 0:59:59.680
<v Speaker 1>hits me on the same level as like, you know,

1:00:00.000 --> 1:00:03.400
<v Speaker 1>being something flying at my face. Anyway, Well, we'll come

1:00:03.440 --> 1:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>back to the cognitive elements in a minute. I wanted

1:00:05.680 --> 1:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>to discuss one other tangent that's really interesting that Asthma

1:00:08.760 --> 1:00:10.880
<v Speaker 1>goes on, that might provide some kind of light on this.

1:00:11.640 --> 1:00:14.720
<v Speaker 1>I loved his section about horror blindness. Oh yeah, I

1:00:15.080 --> 1:00:18.120
<v Speaker 1>don't think I'd ever read about this before. So here's

1:00:18.120 --> 1:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>how to get into it. A question that might help

1:00:20.800 --> 1:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>us understand the origin of monsters is why do we

1:00:23.360 --> 1:00:27.520
<v Speaker 1>keep creating them? Like, why can't we stop making monsters

1:00:27.640 --> 1:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>even if they make us feel the putatively negative emotion

1:00:31.040 --> 1:00:34.600
<v Speaker 1>of fear. Well, I think that they're kind of like cocktails, right,

1:00:34.920 --> 1:00:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Like there's a there's a basic reason that humans consume alcohol,

1:00:39.200 --> 1:00:42.720
<v Speaker 1>and there's a basic reason humans consume various other elements

1:00:42.760 --> 1:00:45.560
<v Speaker 1>that have specific taste. But we can't stop coming up

1:00:45.600 --> 1:00:50.200
<v Speaker 1>with new combinations, a new novel, combinations that will give

1:00:50.320 --> 1:00:54.760
<v Speaker 1>us the same and then in increasingly varied experiences based

1:00:54.800 --> 1:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>on that original. We like to fear and so we're

1:00:57.880 --> 1:01:00.600
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to to tweak what make says feel

1:01:00.680 --> 1:01:03.720
<v Speaker 1>that that tear but do well. Okay, So that's one theory.

1:01:03.800 --> 1:01:07.000
<v Speaker 1>You could say that we like to fear. I think

1:01:07.080 --> 1:01:10.080
<v Speaker 1>there's another possibility, which is that we don't actually like

1:01:10.280 --> 1:01:13.560
<v Speaker 1>to fear. We like something else that comes with fear.

1:01:14.280 --> 1:01:19.120
<v Speaker 1>That fear has sort of a secret, hidden cousin. Whenever

1:01:19.160 --> 1:01:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the fear pathways in the brain are ignited, there's something

1:01:22.400 --> 1:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>that happens along with that, and that's the thing we like,

1:01:25.760 --> 1:01:28.840
<v Speaker 1>and we mistake it for its cousin, the fear the

1:01:28.920 --> 1:01:32.360
<v Speaker 1>main emotion. So let's look at an example and see

1:01:32.400 --> 1:01:35.560
<v Speaker 1>what we think. One way to study the biological roots

1:01:35.600 --> 1:01:38.040
<v Speaker 1>of horror monster or of monster fear would be to

1:01:38.080 --> 1:01:40.400
<v Speaker 1>look at the behavior of a person who's incapable of

1:01:40.520 --> 1:01:44.240
<v Speaker 1>feeling that fear. And strangely enough, such a person does exist,

1:01:44.880 --> 1:01:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Asthma points to the case of this person, known in

1:01:47.040 --> 1:01:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the scientific literature only as s M, who is a

1:01:50.080 --> 1:01:54.400
<v Speaker 1>woman with horror blindness. SM has a brain anomally. She

1:01:54.480 --> 1:01:58.520
<v Speaker 1>has focal bilateral amygdala aleegions, and because the amygdala is

1:01:58.600 --> 1:02:01.360
<v Speaker 1>so bound up so in horton and generating the brain's

1:02:01.400 --> 1:02:05.120
<v Speaker 1>fear response. These lesions mean that SM has an extreme

1:02:05.400 --> 1:02:09.960
<v Speaker 1>fear deficiency, sometimes characterized as the complete inability to fear,

1:02:10.840 --> 1:02:13.320
<v Speaker 1>and researchers have tested her with all kinds of fear

1:02:13.400 --> 1:02:17.960
<v Speaker 1>inducing stimuli like haunted houses, horror movies, snakes and spiders,

1:02:18.640 --> 1:02:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and these experiments showed that for SM what would normally

1:02:21.640 --> 1:02:26.360
<v Speaker 1>be horrifying stimuli were indeed attention grabbing, but did not

1:02:26.600 --> 1:02:31.920
<v Speaker 1>cause avoidance behaviors. In fact, they found that this combination

1:02:32.000 --> 1:02:35.680
<v Speaker 1>of attentional arousal, the attention grabbing nature of it, and

1:02:35.880 --> 1:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the lack of fear response tended to manifest itself as

1:02:39.120 --> 1:02:43.400
<v Speaker 1>something like an attraction. So this study was there's one

1:02:43.440 --> 1:02:46.439
<v Speaker 1>study by Justin S. Feinstein at All called the Human

1:02:46.480 --> 1:02:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Amygdala and the Induction UH and the Induction and Experience

1:02:50.160 --> 1:02:54.240
<v Speaker 1>of Fear in Current Biology INN. And what they what

1:02:54.360 --> 1:02:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the researchers did is they took SM to a haunted

1:02:56.880 --> 1:03:00.600
<v Speaker 1>house put together at the Waverly Hills Sanatorium, which is

1:03:00.640 --> 1:03:04.120
<v Speaker 1>an abandoned medical facility in Louisville, Kentucky. And I want

1:03:04.120 --> 1:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>to read a quote about what happened when they went

1:03:06.520 --> 1:03:09.440
<v Speaker 1>with SM through this facility, which had people addressed as

1:03:09.520 --> 1:03:13.640
<v Speaker 1>monsters jumping out and scaring, they said, quote, the hidden

1:03:13.720 --> 1:03:17.640
<v Speaker 1>monsters attempted to scare sm numerous times, but to no avail.

1:03:18.080 --> 1:03:21.880
<v Speaker 1>She reacted to the monsters by smiling, laughing, or trying

1:03:21.960 --> 1:03:25.880
<v Speaker 1>to talk to them. In contrast, their scare tactics typically

1:03:25.920 --> 1:03:28.800
<v Speaker 1>elicited loud screams of fright from the other members of

1:03:28.840 --> 1:03:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the group. More than showing a lack of fear, sm

1:03:31.960 --> 1:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>exhibited an unusual inclination to approach and touch the monsters. Ironically,

1:03:38.520 --> 1:03:41.120
<v Speaker 1>sm scared one of the monsters when she poked it

1:03:41.200 --> 1:03:44.120
<v Speaker 1>in the head because she was quote curious as to

1:03:44.200 --> 1:03:46.439
<v Speaker 1>what it would feel like. You're not supposed to touch

1:03:46.560 --> 1:03:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the actors that are haunted attraction should have known that, well,

1:03:50.000 --> 1:03:52.960
<v Speaker 1>apparently she didn't. Now I thought this was really interesting

1:03:53.080 --> 1:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>because what they're saying is that in this condition where

1:03:57.200 --> 1:03:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you don't have the normal avoidance behaviors, because you've got

1:04:00.000 --> 1:04:03.080
<v Speaker 1>a deficiency of fear, if you're amygdalas damaged and you

1:04:03.200 --> 1:04:05.880
<v Speaker 1>can't feel fear, things that would normally make you fear

1:04:05.920 --> 1:04:08.520
<v Speaker 1>aren't just neutral. It's not like I don't care about that.

1:04:09.160 --> 1:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>You you find yourself attracted to it. It's like you

1:04:12.160 --> 1:04:15.560
<v Speaker 1>love it, you want to touch it. Well, I mean

1:04:15.640 --> 1:04:17.400
<v Speaker 1>I totally buy into that, because I mean, there are

1:04:17.400 --> 1:04:19.800
<v Speaker 1>plenty of examples, I think in our own lives where

1:04:19.840 --> 1:04:22.480
<v Speaker 1>we see like a really cool monster design in a

1:04:22.600 --> 1:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>film or a book or some art, and yeah, we're

1:04:25.680 --> 1:04:27.800
<v Speaker 1>not thinking, oh my goodness, I'm so afraid right now.

1:04:27.920 --> 1:04:30.480
<v Speaker 1>We think, oh, man, that's pretty gnarly, that's pretty cool. Yeah,

1:04:30.800 --> 1:04:33.240
<v Speaker 1>And so I think that maybe what's going on with

1:04:33.360 --> 1:04:36.640
<v Speaker 1>fear now I I accepted that the opposite could be true.

1:04:36.640 --> 1:04:39.120
<v Speaker 1>It could be true that in some way the fear

1:04:39.200 --> 1:04:43.520
<v Speaker 1>itself is satisfying, is thrilling, is fun. Well, of course

1:04:43.600 --> 1:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>the after effect of the monster not killing you, you

1:04:46.480 --> 1:04:49.920
<v Speaker 1>get that that surge of relief, the endorphin and the

1:04:49.960 --> 1:04:53.560
<v Speaker 1>adrenaline rush. Yeah, there's that hormonal element to it as well.

1:04:54.160 --> 1:04:56.520
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I do think that part of what the

1:04:56.600 --> 1:04:59.360
<v Speaker 1>appeal must be is what's happening with s M here.

1:04:59.800 --> 1:05:02.600
<v Speaker 1>It that she's only getting the good half of the

1:05:02.680 --> 1:05:05.640
<v Speaker 1>horror feeling. She's not feeling the fear. But when we

1:05:05.960 --> 1:05:08.720
<v Speaker 1>experience horror in the good way and the pleasurable way

1:05:08.800 --> 1:05:10.680
<v Speaker 1>that makes us keep returning to it, it's what's a

1:05:10.800 --> 1:05:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Whatever is happening with her, they're except not tempered by

1:05:15.200 --> 1:05:17.760
<v Speaker 1>by the normal kind of avoidance response we would have.

1:05:18.840 --> 1:05:22.000
<v Speaker 1>So essentially what's being proposed is that is that fear

1:05:22.120 --> 1:05:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and arousal are separate things, but they're deeply linked. And

1:05:26.600 --> 1:05:29.400
<v Speaker 1>and in in SMS case, she is attracted to the

1:05:29.520 --> 1:05:31.800
<v Speaker 1>novelty of it. It is the novelty of this thing

1:05:32.000 --> 1:05:35.880
<v Speaker 1>that is a hybrid creation or just an unreal entity

1:05:36.000 --> 1:05:39.840
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't match up with the existing expectations. Right, She's

1:05:39.880 --> 1:05:42.320
<v Speaker 1>being excited by the neural pathway that says, look at this,

1:05:42.600 --> 1:05:45.000
<v Speaker 1>this is worth your attention, You should pay attention to it.

1:05:45.520 --> 1:05:47.760
<v Speaker 1>But she's not getting the part that says, get the

1:05:47.840 --> 1:05:51.320
<v Speaker 1>hell away. Interesting. Now, on the other hand, if you

1:05:51.400 --> 1:05:54.400
<v Speaker 1>think this condition of having a fear deficiency sounds great,

1:05:54.480 --> 1:05:58.480
<v Speaker 1>like like you're like, I wish I had an amygdala religion, Uh,

1:05:59.120 --> 1:06:02.760
<v Speaker 1>think again. ASTHMA reports that researchers have repeatedly had to

1:06:02.840 --> 1:06:06.480
<v Speaker 1>prevent sm from putting herself in actual danger because the

1:06:06.560 --> 1:06:09.320
<v Speaker 1>fear that would have prevented her from endangering herself was

1:06:09.360 --> 1:06:12.680
<v Speaker 1>simply not operative. In the same way, you might not

1:06:13.000 --> 1:06:15.720
<v Speaker 1>enjoy pain, but you wouldn't actually want to have the

1:06:15.800 --> 1:06:18.600
<v Speaker 1>condition that prevents you from feeling pain. Because pain is

1:06:18.680 --> 1:06:21.320
<v Speaker 1>very useful for survival. Well, I mean that matches up

1:06:21.360 --> 1:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>with touching the actors at a haunted attraction, like it

1:06:24.880 --> 1:06:28.560
<v Speaker 1>shows like a lack of boundaries and understanding of those boundaries.

1:06:29.360 --> 1:06:31.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, not that the the actor is going to

1:06:31.200 --> 1:06:34.440
<v Speaker 1>physically attack you, but you know she's she's breaking certain

1:06:34.600 --> 1:06:38.200
<v Speaker 1>rules and expectations there. So yeah, I wonder what role

1:06:38.320 --> 1:06:42.920
<v Speaker 1>these types of arousal play in what led somebody in

1:06:43.200 --> 1:06:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the ice age to create a lionman figuring. I mean,

1:06:47.760 --> 1:06:50.640
<v Speaker 1>assuming that this figure had some kind of fear or

1:06:50.760 --> 1:06:53.920
<v Speaker 1>on inducing uh significance. We don't know that it did,

1:06:53.960 --> 1:06:56.200
<v Speaker 1>but we think you know, monsters usually have some kind

1:06:56.240 --> 1:07:02.160
<v Speaker 1>of fear on inducing properties. If that's what was part

1:07:02.240 --> 1:07:04.600
<v Speaker 1>of the attitude towards this creature, Could it be that

1:07:04.720 --> 1:07:08.080
<v Speaker 1>it was created for this attentional arousal, this feeling of

1:07:08.200 --> 1:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>like this isn't part of what I normally see, you know,

1:07:10.760 --> 1:07:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the stimulation of the imagination. Yeah, I mean what if

1:07:15.200 --> 1:07:17.440
<v Speaker 1>what if this thing was crafted and as it was passed,

1:07:17.440 --> 1:07:21.720
<v Speaker 1>it passed around like they were just feeling the novelty

1:07:21.840 --> 1:07:24.560
<v Speaker 1>of it. They were and maybe you know, engaging with

1:07:24.720 --> 1:07:27.320
<v Speaker 1>with certain feelings of fear that came out of it,

1:07:27.360 --> 1:07:30.280
<v Speaker 1>but they didn't have, say, a whole cosmology built up

1:07:30.320 --> 1:07:32.840
<v Speaker 1>around it. Maybe it didn't have a name or a

1:07:33.560 --> 1:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>purpose in the in the magical world around them, but

1:07:37.480 --> 1:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>it was it was almost like like doing shots of espresso.

1:07:41.280 --> 1:07:44.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's difficulse, it's simplifying here, it's but it's

1:07:45.120 --> 1:07:46.920
<v Speaker 1>it is very difficult to try and put ourselves in

1:07:47.360 --> 1:07:50.240
<v Speaker 1>in the mind of of of such people. Yeah, No,

1:07:50.360 --> 1:07:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think that's worth considering. Like we tend

1:07:53.200 --> 1:07:56.360
<v Speaker 1>to assume it had something like what we would think

1:07:56.400 --> 1:07:59.000
<v Speaker 1>of as a sacred or religious significance right now, where

1:07:59.280 --> 1:08:01.720
<v Speaker 1>you'd you'd ha paid in a ritual with it. But

1:08:01.880 --> 1:08:05.400
<v Speaker 1>what if it was much more like us watching a

1:08:05.520 --> 1:08:08.440
<v Speaker 1>horror movie or going to a haunted house. I think

1:08:08.480 --> 1:08:11.320
<v Speaker 1>that's not impossible. Yeah, I mean, it's kind of like

1:08:11.480 --> 1:08:14.600
<v Speaker 1>say an image of of of the Hindu God that

1:08:14.720 --> 1:08:18.320
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about earlier, Narasima, Like you can look

1:08:18.360 --> 1:08:21.559
<v Speaker 1>at that image without knowing anything about Hinduism, anything about

1:08:21.600 --> 1:08:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the story that's being told, anything about the you know,

1:08:24.920 --> 1:08:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the various symbols that are at play here, and you

1:08:27.920 --> 1:08:30.720
<v Speaker 1>can still have a very this or reaction to it.

1:08:30.760 --> 1:08:33.200
<v Speaker 1>You can have a you feel something when you look

1:08:33.280 --> 1:08:36.599
<v Speaker 1>at it, uh, and then you can you can feel

1:08:36.680 --> 1:08:40.080
<v Speaker 1>something rather different when you have this additional information about it.

1:08:40.240 --> 1:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>So it could be that maybe the Lionman was part

1:08:42.960 --> 1:08:45.840
<v Speaker 1>of a religious ritual or religious belief. But it could

1:08:45.920 --> 1:08:48.360
<v Speaker 1>also just be that for some people who had a

1:08:48.439 --> 1:08:51.479
<v Speaker 1>shallower engagement, it was just a thrill. It was just

1:08:51.800 --> 1:08:55.160
<v Speaker 1>facing the monster again, because how many we have so

1:08:55.240 --> 1:08:57.519
<v Speaker 1>many unreal things in our world. We have so many

1:08:57.600 --> 1:09:00.720
<v Speaker 1>monsters to turn to. But imagine living in a world

1:09:00.800 --> 1:09:05.000
<v Speaker 1>where there's one unreal thing. There's one unreal image, that's it,

1:09:05.040 --> 1:09:06.599
<v Speaker 1>and you get to touch it once a week. That's

1:09:06.640 --> 1:09:10.479
<v Speaker 1>given me the creeps Man. A world with only one monster.

1:09:11.720 --> 1:09:13.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, I want to get on one more

1:09:13.600 --> 1:09:16.400
<v Speaker 1>aspect of Asthma's paper before we finish out today. He

1:09:16.400 --> 1:09:18.439
<v Speaker 1>actually talks about a bunch more stuff in his paper,

1:09:18.520 --> 1:09:22.120
<v Speaker 1>like the second half of it is all about like

1:09:22.360 --> 1:09:26.000
<v Speaker 1>xenophobia and the social implications of monster fear. And I

1:09:26.080 --> 1:09:28.840
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about one more idea that he goes to,

1:09:28.960 --> 1:09:31.640
<v Speaker 1>which is that monster horror is not just cognitive recognition

1:09:31.720 --> 1:09:36.280
<v Speaker 1>but also an affective emotional state. So Asthma writes, quote

1:09:36.720 --> 1:09:40.200
<v Speaker 1>the emotion slash cognition complex, and horror is a Yannis

1:09:40.280 --> 1:09:44.519
<v Speaker 1>faced experience, partly imperative, as in I should run away,

1:09:45.000 --> 1:09:48.840
<v Speaker 1>and partly indicative that creature is part man and part snake.

1:09:49.600 --> 1:09:53.200
<v Speaker 1>According to some philosophers of mine, like Ruth Milliken, this

1:09:53.400 --> 1:09:58.120
<v Speaker 1>yannis faced and representation is strongly coupled together in lower animals. Mice,

1:09:58.240 --> 1:10:02.000
<v Speaker 1>for example, simultaneously recognize cats as a kind of thing

1:10:02.360 --> 1:10:05.679
<v Speaker 1>in a category and as dangerous, so that's the fear

1:10:05.720 --> 1:10:09.040
<v Speaker 1>affect I should run away. Humans, on the other hand,

1:10:09.400 --> 1:10:13.439
<v Speaker 1>can decouple these two pathways indicative and imperative, and fear

1:10:13.520 --> 1:10:17.640
<v Speaker 1>can be reattached to alternative kinds of creatures and perceptions.

1:10:18.280 --> 1:10:22.200
<v Speaker 1>So here's where he's getting into the monster generative capacity.

1:10:22.280 --> 1:10:25.320
<v Speaker 1>It's like, we've got these monster recognition pathways in the brain,

1:10:25.800 --> 1:10:29.280
<v Speaker 1>but they're made for natural predators, and once we've got

1:10:29.320 --> 1:10:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the power to put imaginative content on them, they can

1:10:32.920 --> 1:10:36.800
<v Speaker 1>still be used in the same way. And in this way,

1:10:36.880 --> 1:10:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Asthma seems to think, monster fear is caused by a

1:10:39.280 --> 1:10:43.439
<v Speaker 1>system of what's known as quote somatic markers. Essentially these

1:10:43.520 --> 1:10:47.200
<v Speaker 1>trainable neural pathways that can be filled with emotional content

1:10:47.800 --> 1:10:50.680
<v Speaker 1>based on experience. One more quote of his quote. The

1:10:50.760 --> 1:10:54.439
<v Speaker 1>point is that these emotional responses are not instincts in

1:10:54.520 --> 1:10:58.760
<v Speaker 1>the sense of prewired or genetically engraved responses. The affective

1:10:58.800 --> 1:11:01.160
<v Speaker 1>systems are ancient in the sense that they have many

1:11:01.280 --> 1:11:05.000
<v Speaker 1>homologies with non human animals, but in our individual lives

1:11:05.080 --> 1:11:10.000
<v Speaker 1>their idiosyncratically assigned and have significant plasticity, so you can

1:11:10.120 --> 1:11:13.439
<v Speaker 1>fill them up with whatever monsters happened to catch your fancy.

1:11:14.280 --> 1:11:17.640
<v Speaker 1>And and the idea here is that imaginative monsters have

1:11:17.880 --> 1:11:21.559
<v Speaker 1>this adaptive survival value. I mean, we talked in uh

1:11:21.880 --> 1:11:25.360
<v Speaker 1>not to go again to the bi cameral mind episode,

1:11:25.439 --> 1:11:28.080
<v Speaker 1>but one thing that apart from the whole bi cameral

1:11:28.160 --> 1:11:30.880
<v Speaker 1>mind hypothesis just taking out the whole all of the

1:11:30.920 --> 1:11:34.400
<v Speaker 1>bi camerality, one thing Julian Jaynes talked about was that

1:11:34.560 --> 1:11:38.479
<v Speaker 1>he thought that the primary adaptive benefit of consciousness is

1:11:38.600 --> 1:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>that you could run simulations in your mind. When you've

1:11:42.040 --> 1:11:44.880
<v Speaker 1>got conscious thought, you've got this mind space where you

1:11:44.960 --> 1:11:49.639
<v Speaker 1>can experiment with things. And uh, Ultimately, Asthma talks about

1:11:49.920 --> 1:11:53.120
<v Speaker 1>fear of monsters being a similar thing, monsters in your

1:11:53.160 --> 1:11:57.880
<v Speaker 1>mind can provide a kind of mental training simulator, a

1:11:57.960 --> 1:12:00.960
<v Speaker 1>place to work out emotional and behave yeal responses to

1:12:01.080 --> 1:12:05.759
<v Speaker 1>danger within the safety of the imagination. But because horror

1:12:05.840 --> 1:12:10.240
<v Speaker 1>images have such strong access to our emotional reactions, he says,

1:12:10.479 --> 1:12:13.120
<v Speaker 1>and this is an an interesting bridge. They don't just

1:12:13.240 --> 1:12:17.920
<v Speaker 1>train our behaviors, they train our values, which gives them

1:12:18.000 --> 1:12:21.040
<v Speaker 1>great power for good and ill in conditioning our moral

1:12:21.160 --> 1:12:24.040
<v Speaker 1>judgments and opinions. This takes us back to St. Augustine

1:12:24.160 --> 1:12:27.960
<v Speaker 1>right that monsters instruct a point. Stories about monsters so

1:12:28.200 --> 1:12:31.920
<v Speaker 1>often have a moral or they teach some virtue. They

1:12:32.000 --> 1:12:34.720
<v Speaker 1>tell you what you should do in a certain situation

1:12:34.920 --> 1:12:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and condition your responses to it. And they're much more

1:12:38.160 --> 1:12:42.639
<v Speaker 1>effective than normal teaching and instruction because they get at

1:12:42.720 --> 1:12:45.320
<v Speaker 1>you emotionally. They you know, you don't have to be

1:12:45.520 --> 1:12:47.880
<v Speaker 1>lectured about what you should do. If you see an

1:12:47.920 --> 1:12:51.600
<v Speaker 1>illustration within a monster story, you just feel emotionally what

1:12:51.720 --> 1:12:54.280
<v Speaker 1>you should do. Yeah, Because on one hand, they're simply saying, hey,

1:12:54.400 --> 1:12:58.240
<v Speaker 1>kids don't go swim in that creek without the adults around.

1:12:58.439 --> 1:13:00.439
<v Speaker 1>And then there's hey, kids don't go in that creek

1:13:00.479 --> 1:13:03.320
<v Speaker 1>without the adults around because there's electric turtle man, we

1:13:03.360 --> 1:13:05.840
<v Speaker 1>will drown you, you know. And yet we see that,

1:13:05.920 --> 1:13:08.680
<v Speaker 1>of course time and time again, in folklore's where there

1:13:08.760 --> 1:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>is some sort of foul creature who will drown you

1:13:12.560 --> 1:13:15.840
<v Speaker 1>if you swim unattended. Yeah, and so I think this

1:13:16.000 --> 1:13:19.360
<v Speaker 1>could be a very plausible explanation for the emergence of

1:13:19.479 --> 1:13:23.400
<v Speaker 1>monsters in human history, that they could have emerged around

1:13:23.479 --> 1:13:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the same time as language, as a social cohesion technique

1:13:27.840 --> 1:13:32.080
<v Speaker 1>and as a social value instilling technique. They're they're there

1:13:32.640 --> 1:13:36.080
<v Speaker 1>to get people to believe things that would be hard

1:13:36.160 --> 1:13:38.680
<v Speaker 1>to convince them to believe just by telling them I

1:13:38.800 --> 1:13:41.479
<v Speaker 1>like that, Yeah, I shouldn't go off the path, I

1:13:41.560 --> 1:13:44.880
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't mess around with somebody else's spouse. I shouldn't you

1:13:44.920 --> 1:13:47.599
<v Speaker 1>know all these things? Because why because a monster will

1:13:47.680 --> 1:13:50.040
<v Speaker 1>get you if you do. Yeah. So many monsters are

1:13:50.080 --> 1:13:53.679
<v Speaker 1>tied to boundaries. Cross the boundary and face the monster. Yeah.

1:13:54.080 --> 1:13:56.280
<v Speaker 1>So so, Yeah, I guess that's the end that we

1:13:56.600 --> 1:13:59.360
<v Speaker 1>we don't have ultimately the answer about when the first

1:13:59.439 --> 1:14:02.640
<v Speaker 1>monster rose, But I think it's very plausible that they

1:14:02.760 --> 1:14:08.080
<v Speaker 1>could have their their roots in social teaching. Yeah, I think. So.

1:14:08.360 --> 1:14:11.200
<v Speaker 1>I feel like we've given we've given everybody some tremendous

1:14:11.240 --> 1:14:15.960
<v Speaker 1>food for thought in trying to unravel the meaning of

1:14:16.120 --> 1:14:18.760
<v Speaker 1>that lion headed figure and what what it meant to

1:14:18.840 --> 1:14:21.640
<v Speaker 1>people then and what the idea of monster of the

1:14:21.720 --> 1:14:26.480
<v Speaker 1>monster has continued to mean for people in all subsequent generations.

1:14:26.720 --> 1:14:28.479
<v Speaker 1>So what do you think, mab What what could the

1:14:28.560 --> 1:14:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Lionman have been teaching? Was the loan mens uh a

1:14:31.680 --> 1:14:36.360
<v Speaker 1>story about how don't go in strange caves? Or uh? Yeah,

1:14:36.439 --> 1:14:39.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I guess I'm will based on things I've

1:14:39.360 --> 1:14:43.000
<v Speaker 1>read in the past, I'm more inclined to give it

1:14:43.120 --> 1:14:46.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of a chaotic vibe, you know, like thinking of

1:14:46.280 --> 1:14:49.439
<v Speaker 1>it in terms of ancient gods of the hunt and whatnot,

1:14:49.640 --> 1:14:53.040
<v Speaker 1>that that this is some sort of an entity that represented,

1:14:53.200 --> 1:14:55.519
<v Speaker 1>to whatever extent they were able to really think about it,

1:14:56.000 --> 1:14:58.920
<v Speaker 1>this is a figure that represented the uncertainty of the

1:14:59.040 --> 1:15:01.679
<v Speaker 1>wild world they it in. Now, was it chaotic good,

1:15:01.800 --> 1:15:05.320
<v Speaker 1>chaotic neutral, or chaotic evil? I think just chaotic neutral,

1:15:05.479 --> 1:15:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Like the world has a certain amount of chaos in it,

1:15:08.880 --> 1:15:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and some days you're gonna go into the cave and

1:15:11.000 --> 1:15:15.240
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be and you will face the Lionman and

1:15:15.360 --> 1:15:17.880
<v Speaker 1>then you know, maybe you'll lock eyes with it and

1:15:17.960 --> 1:15:20.120
<v Speaker 1>walk away, but maybe not. Some days you eat the

1:15:20.160 --> 1:15:25.559
<v Speaker 1>loan mench, and some days the loan Mench it's you, amen, partner. Alright. Well,

1:15:25.600 --> 1:15:27.840
<v Speaker 1>on that note, hey, if you want to see an

1:15:27.840 --> 1:15:30.360
<v Speaker 1>image of this fabulous statue and maybe some of these

1:15:30.400 --> 1:15:33.920
<v Speaker 1>other critters we've talked about, head on over to stuff

1:15:33.920 --> 1:15:35.639
<v Speaker 1>to Blow your Mind dot com. That's where you'll find

1:15:35.760 --> 1:15:38.639
<v Speaker 1>the landing page for this episode, along with all past

1:15:38.680 --> 1:15:41.040
<v Speaker 1>episodes of Stuff to Blow Your Mind and links out

1:15:41.080 --> 1:15:45.400
<v Speaker 1>to our various social media accounts such as Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Tumbler,

1:15:45.600 --> 1:15:48.479
<v Speaker 1>and hay on Facebook. We have our main page there,

1:15:48.760 --> 1:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>our main account, but then there's also the Stuff to

1:15:51.680 --> 1:15:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Blow your Mind discussion module that's a closed group that

1:15:54.520 --> 1:15:57.840
<v Speaker 1>you can apply to pretty much here, everybody gets in

1:15:58.320 --> 1:16:02.120
<v Speaker 1>and then you can discuss episodes are unrelated topics with

1:16:02.240 --> 1:16:07.160
<v Speaker 1>other listeners as well as the hosts themselves from time

1:16:07.200 --> 1:16:09.080
<v Speaker 1>to time. And if you want to get in touch

1:16:09.120 --> 1:16:11.599
<v Speaker 1>with us directly to give us feedback on this episode

1:16:11.680 --> 1:16:13.960
<v Speaker 1>or any other, to suggest a future episode topic, or

1:16:14.040 --> 1:16:16.240
<v Speaker 1>just to say hi, you can always email us at

1:16:16.360 --> 1:16:29.280
<v Speaker 1>blow the Mind at how stuff works dot com for

1:16:29.439 --> 1:16:31.760
<v Speaker 1>more on this and thousands of other topics. Does it

1:16:31.840 --> 1:16:32.960
<v Speaker 1>how stuff works dot com