WEBVTT - The U.S. Still a Long Way From Normal

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanibek. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world of business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all furnishing the power of Business

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:19.600
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one and twenty countries. You can

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>download Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. We've got a lot of

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:36.319
<v Speaker 1>stuff going on. Europe continues at least parts of year,

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 1>pushing back on that Astra Zeneca vaccine. You've got Italy,

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:42.199
<v Speaker 1>that country facing a new lockdown one year after the

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:45.919
<v Speaker 1>pandemic started, and then President by last night putting out

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the fourth of July is maybe a moment where we

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 1>can kind of get quote unquote back to normal, as

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>long as you keep it in small groups. Yeah. I

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 1>watched that last night to Carol, and one thing that

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>really stuck out to me was the eligibility of people

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 1>who were are able to get vaccines. Biden administration pushing

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:06.400
<v Speaker 1>for everyone every adult by May one, right, and I

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:08.760
<v Speaker 1>understand the prioritizing earlier on, and I think at this

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 1>point people are like, it's so confusing. Can I go?

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:12.759
<v Speaker 1>Can I not? And just like kind of opening it up,

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 1>let's get into it with one of our go to voices.

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Really when we always get a true gut check. Dr

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Ian LUs Bader, Clinical Professor of Medicine at n y

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:24.679
<v Speaker 1>U Landgown. He is on the phone in New York City.

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 1>How are you hey, They're doing very well. Happy Friday, guys.

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:31.399
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for all your efforts over the past year

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 1>with you know, sticking with the story and encouraging people

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 1>and putting out good, good information. So well likewise to

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:42.480
<v Speaker 1>you as well. I really do mean it when I

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 1>say when you come on, you know, we've thrown so

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>much at you, and you just kind of you often

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>ahead of the curve in terms of things that are

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 1>going to be in the headlines next week and just

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>really giving us again, just like you said to us,

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 1>really smart information. So okay, So one year, first of all,

0:01:57.880 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 1>take me back one year. I like, do you remember

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>it like it was yesterday? I do remember it, and

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 1>I think we uh we we talked about it. It

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:11.359
<v Speaker 1>uh was really devastating. The hospitals were overloaded, and the

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 1>stock market was crashing and stores were closing. Uh the

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:18.240
<v Speaker 1>city was shut down, and you know, you could hit

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 1>a hit a golf full or shoe a cannon down

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Madison Avenue and or Lexington where Bloomberg studios are and

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:28.639
<v Speaker 1>not hit anyone or anything. There wasn't a car or

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 1>truck on the road. There wasn't a person in the street.

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 1>So I think we've come a long long way. I

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:38.520
<v Speaker 1>agree with the President Biden at Hope really does seem brighter,

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and I agree. I think by July four a good

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 1>majority of people will be vaccinated. Maybe we'll have those

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:50.080
<v Speaker 1>COVID passports, so people should feel free to you know,

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 1>be going to restaurants if they've been vaccinated, and being

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 1>in small groups. So I think we've made a lot

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:59.240
<v Speaker 1>of progress. A little concern about the variants. I think

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 1>there is still a small chance of uh, of another wave,

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:05.640
<v Speaker 1>but I think we're making progress. I am just a

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:08.799
<v Speaker 1>little concerned because I still see in some patients some

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 1>vaccine hesitancy, which worries me. Talk a little bit about that.

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is there a pattern emerging that you're seeing,

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think it's very variable. A lot of

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the physicians have had it, and I think um to

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 1>some degree, there may be some socioeconomic issues. I think

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 1>there are some people who are afraid of the vaccine

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:33.800
<v Speaker 1>or afraid of side effects. And every time on the

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 1>news we hear now a little bit about the astros

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Eneca vaccine and in Europe and here with you know,

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:42.920
<v Speaker 1>some potential blood clots. But what I'd help patients for

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 1>all of these vaccines take whatever is available. There's not

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 1>one that's materially better than the other. J and J

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 1>certainly convenient with one vaccine. But whenever you're vaccinating millions

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 1>or hundreds of millions of people, there will always be

0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 1>reports about you know, death or in allergic reaction or

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 1>a blood clot. Very hard to tease that out, because

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 1>when you're vaccinating a lot of people, someone along the

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>way is going to have a complication that's unrelated to

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine. It's just happens to be a day or

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 1>two or three after they got a vaccine. People die,

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:20.480
<v Speaker 1>people get clots, other things happen. So we do need

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:23.040
<v Speaker 1>to look into it. I mean, there may be something there,

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:25.840
<v Speaker 1>but overall, it seems the vaccines have been very safe,

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>very effective. Uh, And I think we need to push

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:31.280
<v Speaker 1>on ahead with it. What about, though, and Tim, what

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>was the data you just were sharing with me about?

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Is it New York City positivity? So Mayor to Blasio

0:04:35.880 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>tweeting this out earlier today. Six positivity rate for a

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 1>seven day average. I mean, compared to January, that's pretty good,

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:46.240
<v Speaker 1>but compared to last fall and over the summer, that's

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:50.279
<v Speaker 1>not a good number. It's not a great number. Um

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:55.840
<v Speaker 1>And again, positivity doesn't that's positive tests doesn't necessarily mean

0:04:56.279 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 1>hospitals are overloaded. They're not. There's a very stable number. Also,

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't necessarily mean kids should not be going back

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 1>to school. I think they should. And a lot of

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:09.839
<v Speaker 1>this is arbitrary. If it's three percent or five percent

0:05:09.920 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 1>or six percent positivity, you know, we need to get

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:15.359
<v Speaker 1>kids back in school. We need to get all the

0:05:15.400 --> 0:05:19.000
<v Speaker 1>teachers vaccinated. There really no no reason not to do that.

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 1>The restaurants are starting to open up. I would certainly say,

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:26.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you go flying these days, the planes

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:29.920
<v Speaker 1>are full, you don't know who's been vaccinated. Certainly, I

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:34.039
<v Speaker 1>think people who have been vaccinated UM should really be

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 1>able to get priority for some of these things like restaurants.

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:39.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you show your card, you know, there

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 1>should be very little hesitancy about going in and sitting down.

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 1>That that's my sense. But I agree the numbers are

0:05:45.839 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 1>slightly um up a bit, but I don't necessarily think

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:53.920
<v Speaker 1>that's translating into hospitalizations. In other words, more people may

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:57.279
<v Speaker 1>be having it, and probably many of them are being treated,

0:05:57.279 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 1>and let's talk about it's maybe in the next segment.

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:03.279
<v Speaker 1>Who was some of the IVY monoclonal antibodies which worked

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:07.040
<v Speaker 1>very well. Dr les Beata. We're monitoring the President expected

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:08.840
<v Speaker 1>to make comments at any moment. We might have to

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:12.480
<v Speaker 1>tear away from this conversation. Having said that there's money

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 1>in that massive COVID relief COVID stimulus package that includes

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 1>money for states to deal with the costs of COVID UM,

0:06:20.880 --> 0:06:22.280
<v Speaker 1>how do you think that might help some of the

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 1>problems that we've seen in terms of the vaccine rollout. Well,

0:06:26.880 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I think you're a number of problems. One is certainly

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 1>for a states that has spent a lot of money

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:34.360
<v Speaker 1>on hospitals, as we have here in the tri state area.

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 1>That will certainly be helpful. You always have to think

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:39.120
<v Speaker 1>about the back end of printing all that money, what

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:42.279
<v Speaker 1>the consequences are. That's a different story. But when it

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:45.719
<v Speaker 1>comes to COVID, we really have to encourage everyone to

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:50.480
<v Speaker 1>get vaccinated. I agree totally with taking away any restrictions.

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:53.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, anyone over eighteen really should have it. And

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:57.600
<v Speaker 1>why because the longer it takes to get to hurt immunity,

0:06:57.920 --> 0:07:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the more likely you're going to have viral application and

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 1>resistant variants. So the idea is to try to get

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:07.720
<v Speaker 1>as many people vaccinated as soon as possible, and that

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>will really prevent these potentially resistant mutations from occurring. Dr

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Let's say go ahead. So we need to do that,

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:19.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, as soon as possible. Now we are seeing

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 1>some patients who are getting COVID sometimes in between their

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>first and second vaccine. They do have to be careful

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 1>and we have some very interesting new UH treatments. For example,

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 1>if you have um COVID and you're in any one

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 1>of the risk groups diabetes, high blood pressure, etcetera, we

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 1>can give you an I V monoclonal antibody. You come

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 1>into the hospital, you get one infusion takes twenty thirty minutes,

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>very effective. That's made by Lily. We're working out some medications.

0:07:47.480 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Mark uh malneu previer is very effective at viral replications.

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 1>So we definitely have treatment options, but the best of

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 1>course is to get those vaccines in and we are

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:03.600
<v Speaker 1>capacity to give vaccines really exceeds the availability, so that's

0:08:03.640 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the limiting supply at the time. I'm really glad you

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 1>brought up treatment because that's exactly where I wanted to

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 1>go with my My next question, how are you seen

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 1>treatment change throughout the pandemic where we were a year ago?

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 1>And do we get to a point where, because we

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 1>are going to be living with this, it's unlikely we're

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 1>going to eradicate it that it becomes just in general

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 1>treatable if somebody comes down with it. Well, absolutely, so

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 1>we talked about it sort of the ideal medication like

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 1>tamiflu also tamifere for the for influenza, or or some

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 1>of the intranasal sprays. Now, Mark with Ridgeback Pharmaceuticals is

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:42.720
<v Speaker 1>working on a Phase two three on an oral anti

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:45.440
<v Speaker 1>viral that seems to be very effective. Originally it was

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:48.199
<v Speaker 1>being looked at for flu, but it seems very effective

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 1>for coronavirus, so that's exciting, and some preliminary studies with

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:55.720
<v Speaker 1>about a patients do show that it's highly effective. So

0:08:55.760 --> 0:08:58.959
<v Speaker 1>I think we are close to an oral medication which

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:02.200
<v Speaker 1>should be revolution very still, get your flu shot, get

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 1>your COVID shot, so that that's great. And we have

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 1>an I V monoclonal antibody that I've sent a number

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 1>of patients for. They they they're symptomatic, they get a

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 1>positive swab, they call I call uh you know NYU

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 1>for example, And this is available in many medical centers. Uh.

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:22.680
<v Speaker 1>It's called ben lamb miview mab, which is great made

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:27.080
<v Speaker 1>by Lily and I V and monoclonal antibody cocktail and

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:31.600
<v Speaker 1>patients often feel better much sooner and prevents hospitalizations. So

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:35.839
<v Speaker 1>we definitely have better options um as opposed to a

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:38.320
<v Speaker 1>year ago, as Carol talked about where people would be

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 1>overwhelming the hospitals, and we were guessing at things like

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:44.600
<v Speaker 1>steroids and REMD svere and you know, a whole host

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:46.680
<v Speaker 1>of things. So I think we've made a lot of progress,

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 1>which is encouraging. Yeah, I feel like we've talked about

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:50.720
<v Speaker 1>all of those things. Hey, one thing going back to

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 1>what the President said, and again we're monitoring for when

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 1>he steps up to the podium at the White House

0:09:55.400 --> 0:10:00.840
<v Speaker 1>and begins talking again. I just wonder the very ends. Uh.

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 1>And you talked about a possible peak again. Could that

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 1>throw off our returning to normalcy by summer in your view,

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:11.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the only thing that could derail a recovery,

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:13.439
<v Speaker 1>and it is a possibility, and I don't think we're

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 1>out of the woods yet. But again, I think getting

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 1>everyone vaccinated because at this point the vaccines do seem

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:23.679
<v Speaker 1>to have some efficacy against the variants, So I would say,

0:10:23.760 --> 0:10:27.200
<v Speaker 1>let's get as many people vaccinated as possible, as soon

0:10:27.240 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 1>as possible. But if we don't, absolutely that could derail

0:10:31.880 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>things with a flare of a resistant variant, that would

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:38.040
<v Speaker 1>really set us back and would be uh, both an

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 1>economic and I think psychologic shock. But so far the

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:44.200
<v Speaker 1>variants haven't shown to be resistant to the vaccines, right,

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:47.719
<v Speaker 1>exactly right. That's why I think it's important to to

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 1>move ahead to reassure people. A bad vaccine hesitancy. People

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 1>see in the news, the reports are from both on

0:10:55.200 --> 0:11:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the Internet and elsewhere about potential complications, clots, etcetera. There's

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:04.200
<v Speaker 1>no data that any of these things are are significant

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 1>or serious. They have to be looked into, and I

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>think people should stop looking for excuses not to go

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:14.439
<v Speaker 1>come on in, let's open it up to everyone. Uh.

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:16.680
<v Speaker 1>And that's really the only way we will be able

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:19.400
<v Speaker 1>to put this behind us and have a relatively normal summer,

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 1>which I think we should at the rate we are going.

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 1>How key is that Alaska already opening up eligibility to

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 1>all adults. New York City expected to do so by

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 1>late April or early May. UM. How crucial is it

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:34.440
<v Speaker 1>that all states do that pretty quickly in order for

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:38.320
<v Speaker 1>us to really get and meet those targets by the President.

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:41.679
<v Speaker 1>I think it's key. I have so many people under

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 1>age sixty five or sixty who are saying, when can

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:46.440
<v Speaker 1>I get it? I would love to get it, and

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:51.440
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately regulations say no. Uh. Some of them have medical issues,

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:53.319
<v Speaker 1>and then we're able to get them online at the

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Javit Center and other vaccination centers. But many are otherwise healthy,

0:11:57.600 --> 0:12:01.320
<v Speaker 1>but they won't be unless they get vaccinated. So I

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 1>think we need to get those vaccines from the government.

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 1>You're from manufacturing to the government to the states, and

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:10.840
<v Speaker 1>for the states that then distributed to those vaccine centers,

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 1>so we can really get people in and out. And

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the more people that are vaccinated and do well, the

0:12:17.640 --> 0:12:21.160
<v Speaker 1>less vaccine hesitancy, because then everyone knows people who have

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:23.440
<v Speaker 1>had a vaccine and did fine, and then they're less

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 1>afraid to go. Where are we now when it comes

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:27.840
<v Speaker 1>to vaccines and kids, Because if we do get to

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the point where everybody who's sixteen or eighteen and over

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 1>can get the vaccine, that still leads a very large

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:36.200
<v Speaker 1>number of people in the US who are under that age,

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 1>and we'll be able to get the vaccine. Great question.

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 1>One of my patients asked me that question just earlier

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 1>today about their kid who was under eighteen. The reason

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:47.720
<v Speaker 1>that we went for the older age group was because

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:50.840
<v Speaker 1>that was the group that had the highest complications, the

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 1>highest death rate older age and symptoms and conditions such

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:59.959
<v Speaker 1>as obesity, hypertension, cop D. Most of the kids below

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 1>eighteen death rates and complications were very, very low, So

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 1>the feeling was look in a worst case if they

0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>get that, you know, they should have minimal post COVID syndrome. Uh.

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Most are not long haulers. Some have lost their smell,

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:17.439
<v Speaker 1>but most bounce back. Well, nevertheless, they are a reservoir

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 1>of virus, So you're exactly right. Ultimately we should vaccinate everyone.

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:26.720
<v Speaker 1>The studies, the viral studies did not really look at

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:29.720
<v Speaker 1>that group, so we can't we can't really report on

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:33.640
<v Speaker 1>the safety data, but I think that group should be included,

0:13:33.679 --> 0:13:36.840
<v Speaker 1>and we do need to to broaden out that. But

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 1>certainly the highest risk groups are above eighteen. But you're

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 1>exactly right. Unless you eventually vaccinate kind of potential reservoirs,

0:13:45.559 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be harder to really eradicate UH, these

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:52.559
<v Speaker 1>quiet pools of the virus. So I agree, eventually it's

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 1>going to have to be opened up to everyone, and

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that will be done probably sometime after the summer.

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I do wonder to any entrees um strategy and getting

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 1>ahead of COVID. It's not just thinking about your nation,

0:14:05.720 --> 0:14:07.720
<v Speaker 1>but it's thinking about the world, right because there's no

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:10.839
<v Speaker 1>real clear borders when it comes to the virus UH,

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and major developed countries need to think about making sure

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:17.640
<v Speaker 1>that there are vaccines for UH, those emerging economies, those

0:14:17.679 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 1>who maybe don't have such quick access to vaccines. You're

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 1>exactly right that, yes, we definitely need to get our

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 1>country vaccinated, that will be protective. But unless the world

0:14:28.560 --> 0:14:33.200
<v Speaker 1>gets immunized, you will have these pockets in isolated areas

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:38.480
<v Speaker 1>that good could potentially have that viral replication and mutations

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 1>which could be resistant. So, yes, this, like smallpox, really

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 1>has to be a worldwide effort. Uh, And I think

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>we did it with smallpox. We should be able to

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:50.520
<v Speaker 1>do it with COVID, but it is taking a bit

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 1>of time. Nevertheless, you know, we've come become a tremendous

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 1>distance in one year, really amazing, from no vaccine and

0:14:58.880 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 1>very few treatments. Uh. We still have a long way

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 1>to go, but I think we've made great progress. And

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 1>you're right, it has to be a global effort. Hey,

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 1>what does that mean for the development of vaccine in

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the future. We were able to do this so quickly,

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 1>I say we as if I had any part to

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 1>do with it. No, I had nothing to do with it.

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 1>The doctors, the scientists, the health care professionals, and I'd

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 1>certainly appreciate them. But what does it mean for how

0:15:21.160 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 1>quickly we're able to do this? Does this bode you know,

0:15:23.880 --> 0:15:28.800
<v Speaker 1>bode well for treatment of cancer and other viruses? Absolutely?

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 1>You know the message your RNA technique, which is the

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Maderna ampviser vaccines. Not that the other ones are not

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 1>very effective. They use a different technique with a with

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 1>a viral vector, other approaches, but the m RNA that

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 1>can be tweaked I think is amazing. And I think

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 1>that technique. And just quickly, because we're gonna have to

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 1>go to the president, just quick wrap up. Huge, great potential, Tim,

0:15:54.120 --> 0:15:57.320
<v Speaker 1>great potential. All right, for great weekend, forgive us, forgive us,

0:15:57.480 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 1>uh Ian last better, Thank you so much. You're listening

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Takes Tim Stinovik on Bloomberg Radio. So here we are

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 1>one year later. Yes, progress since the outbreak, and yet

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the US is still charting the long way back to normal. Tim, Yeah,

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 1>And and charts are the theme of the day or

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the theme of the piece. When it comes to Olivia

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Rockman and colleagues latest piece on the US economy and

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the aftermath of the surges, I won't say the aftermath

0:16:32.640 --> 0:16:34.360
<v Speaker 1>of the pandemic by any means, but where we are

0:16:34.360 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 1>in the recovery. She's Bloomberg News US Economy reporter joins

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 1>us on the phone from New York City. It is

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:42.400
<v Speaker 1>so hard for me, Olivia to choose one single chart

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 1>from this to focus on. So I'm going to ask

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 1>you to do the hard work here. What is one

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:48.880
<v Speaker 1>chart in your piece that tells the story of the

0:16:48.920 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 1>recovery from a year ago? And for a radio folks,

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna put post it so you get a little

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 1>bit of a vision as well, and check it out

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube because some of these pick these charts will

0:16:56.760 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 1>come up. Hi, thanks for having me. In terms of

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the charts that we've covered, I think the jobs market

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:05.840
<v Speaker 1>is maybe the most important, given that it's the one

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:09.720
<v Speaker 1>that still had the most progress to be had last year.

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:12.359
<v Speaker 1>We lost about twenty two million jobs in March and

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 1>April and we're still only halfway back to recovering those

0:17:16.200 --> 0:17:18.439
<v Speaker 1>and that's of course the metric that's lifted up closely

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 1>by both the Treasury and sent Cheer Powell. And so

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:24.359
<v Speaker 1>it's going to continue to be a huge conversation going

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:26.360
<v Speaker 1>into the rest of this year. Okay, so I can

0:17:26.440 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 1>explain this chart for and and do it. Try to

0:17:28.720 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 1>do it justice because we're talking on the radio here,

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 1>But it shows an absolute jump and unemployment when the

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:36.959
<v Speaker 1>pandemic was declared all the way up to a whopping

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty two point nine percent and then coming down to

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:43.639
<v Speaker 1>just about eleven point one percent. Uh. This is the

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the US rate of unemployment and underemployment, so different than UM.

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:51.639
<v Speaker 1>The headline figures that we see what else were you

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 1>focusing on when you think about the recovery here? What

0:17:54.680 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 1>are some important metrics that we need to keep in

0:17:56.560 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 1>mind and also explain a little bit because there's been disconnect,

0:18:00.880 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 1>a huge disconnect between Wall Street in Main Street, right,

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:10.719
<v Speaker 1>so looking at the flip side of the job sector

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:13.880
<v Speaker 1>of the economy. Housing on the other hand, has been

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 1>extremely strong thanks to low borrowing rates, and so we

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 1>see that existing home sales and new home sales as

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 1>well as just mortgage refinancing is skyrocketing and has been

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 1>extremely strong. Now to your point about this K shape

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:32.920
<v Speaker 1>recovery that we often talk about, evictions are up massively

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 1>UM in the last year, and that's mostly because renters

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:39.680
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to homeowners, are having a really hard time.

0:18:39.720 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 1>And again many of the renters are people that have

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:46.119
<v Speaker 1>lost their jobs. Well, and another chart, I mean, listen,

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 1>it all goes back to yeah, I think the jobs

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:50.080
<v Speaker 1>one is such a big one, but you do break

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:52.720
<v Speaker 1>it down restaurants and bars. Listen, Olivia. We have talked

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:56.119
<v Speaker 1>about that so much over the past twelve twelve months,

0:18:56.359 --> 0:18:59.120
<v Speaker 1>talked to a lot of the well known chefs here

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:01.440
<v Speaker 1>in the New York metro area. I mean they were

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 1>just shut down, and you guys have a chart on that. Yeah,

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 1>that's right. So restaurants actually have been, you know, kind

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:13.639
<v Speaker 1>of stagnant since the initial reopenings in the summer. That said,

0:19:13.680 --> 0:19:18.800
<v Speaker 1>many economists are optimistic that restaurant sales will found that quickly,

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 1>especially in the next couple of months as the weather

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:24.880
<v Speaker 1>warms and vaccinations pick up um. But on the other hand,

0:19:24.920 --> 0:19:28.119
<v Speaker 1>we have these COVID variants that remain a risk as

0:19:28.160 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 1>well as just consumer confidence in terms of their health

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 1>concerns about going out. So one of the charts in

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:36.640
<v Speaker 1>here that I think could be familiar to a lot

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:38.920
<v Speaker 1>of people who have been following this story is the

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:42.359
<v Speaker 1>one that shows the rich getting absolutely so much richer

0:19:42.480 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 1>during this pandemic. When the pandemic was declared, the wealth,

0:19:46.080 --> 0:19:51.160
<v Speaker 1>the net worth of the world's wealthiest people absolutely jumped

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 1>in the last year up to two point seven trillion

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:59.159
<v Speaker 1>dollars from just about one point six trillion dollars last March.

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:03.480
<v Speaker 1>What's the story there. Well, we've seen in the stock

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:07.080
<v Speaker 1>market that the you know, stocks that have performed extremely well,

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 1>or in the tech industry, and you know, many of

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the wealthiest people are either videos of those companies or

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:15.400
<v Speaker 1>have stakes in those companies, and so they have done

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:18.879
<v Speaker 1>extremely well. Now, on the other hand, the services sector

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 1>has been extremely hard hit, and so that's why we see,

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:27.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, this extreme amount of job loss and poverty elsewhere. Yeah, listen,

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:29.640
<v Speaker 1>these are charts to tell the story of the past year.

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:31.719
<v Speaker 1>Uh And I just put it up on Twitter. If

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 1>folks want to get a little bit of a deeper

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 1>dive into it and check it out. Olivia, Thank you

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 1>so much, Olivia Rockman. She's Bloomberg News US economy reporter

0:20:38.800 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 1>on the phone in New York City. But you know,

0:20:40.119 --> 0:20:41.880
<v Speaker 1>when you break it down to him, this tells so much.

0:20:42.000 --> 0:20:51.120
<v Speaker 1>It does. I mean, it's a tale of two different economies. Absolutely. Journal. Yeah,

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 1>but you let me drive. No, no, no, please, I

0:20:58.960 --> 0:21:14.920
<v Speaker 1>don't want to drive. Question. Try trying, job. This is

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the drive to the globe coming. Thanks, We'll try us.

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Dawn on Bloomberg Radio. All right, just got about eleven

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:24.639
<v Speaker 1>minutes left in today's trading session, and Charlie was breaking

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 1>down some of those equity numbers. We are just about

0:21:27.800 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>at our hounds of the session after some selling earlier

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:33.320
<v Speaker 1>on up about three one point on the Dow, the

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:35.639
<v Speaker 1>S and p U about just about three. Call it flat,

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:38.879
<v Speaker 1>NAZAC still lower, but definitely off. It's loads of the session.

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:41.359
<v Speaker 1>What a week it has been. Let's get into a

0:21:41.760 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Nancy Prile, she's co CEO and senior portfolio manager at

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Essex Essex Investment Management with us on the phone from Chicago. Nancy,

0:21:49.640 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 1>good to have you here. How are you and what

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:54.080
<v Speaker 1>do you make kind of the trade this week? Because

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:57.040
<v Speaker 1>there's been volatility and yet we're ending up with some

0:21:57.160 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 1>pretty decent gains for the overall equ markets. Exactly well,

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:06.119
<v Speaker 1>we are seeing a much increased level of volatility, although

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:10.359
<v Speaker 1>still you know, not crazy, based on both the very

0:22:10.400 --> 0:22:13.560
<v Speaker 1>sharp rides that we've seen an interest rate as well

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:18.240
<v Speaker 1>as what we think is a rotation away from many

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:20.879
<v Speaker 1>of the names that were big winners last year, the

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:24.840
<v Speaker 1>work from home shelter in place names into those types

0:22:24.880 --> 0:22:28.119
<v Speaker 1>of stocks and names that are more exposed to the

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:32.679
<v Speaker 1>incredible cyclical recovery that we're starting to see the economy

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 1>enter into. And I think the strength that we're seeing

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:40.720
<v Speaker 1>today in particular, is really reflecting the stimulus that's coming

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:44.480
<v Speaker 1>with the signing of the one point nine trillion dollar

0:22:44.640 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 1>package that is ten of US GDP that's going to

0:22:49.040 --> 0:22:52.359
<v Speaker 1>be added to this economy to further drive revenue and

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:55.520
<v Speaker 1>earnings growth as well as jobs and wages. Well, but

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:57.439
<v Speaker 1>do you think you know it's interesting or Dave Wilson

0:22:57.440 --> 0:23:00.760
<v Speaker 1>earlier talked about UM Big of America's research out to

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:03.639
<v Speaker 1>that compared the S and p U cyclical stocks with

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:07.360
<v Speaker 1>defensive shares UM which are of course relatively unaffected by

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:11.440
<v Speaker 1>economic swings, and whether or not we're starting to see

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe the cyclical stocks maybe have kind of run their

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:18.560
<v Speaker 1>course because they've had quite a bounce back off their

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:21.720
<v Speaker 1>lows already. Um, how does that factor into what you

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:26.200
<v Speaker 1>just said? Though, Well, we think that although the cyclical

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 1>stocks have had a big run, and this isn't blanket

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 1>on all cyclical stocks or all growth stocks, but if

0:23:34.840 --> 0:23:38.520
<v Speaker 1>you look at where the revenue growth and earnings growth

0:23:38.680 --> 0:23:40.960
<v Speaker 1>is going to be the greatest over the next couple

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:45.119
<v Speaker 1>of quarters where the margin expansion possibilities and therefore the

0:23:45.200 --> 0:23:50.960
<v Speaker 1>expanse the opportunity for significant earning surprises, as well as

0:23:51.040 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 1>where the ownership lies. In these stocks, cyclicals, more value

0:23:56.119 --> 0:24:00.720
<v Speaker 1>oriented stocks, and smaller top stocks in general are still

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 1>very under owned broadly compared to the large Camp naz

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:09.359
<v Speaker 1>BAC one hundred or the large Camp Fang stocks that

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:13.440
<v Speaker 1>have been driving the averages over really the last ten years.

0:24:13.480 --> 0:24:16.080
<v Speaker 1>So we still think there is significant room to go,

0:24:16.600 --> 0:24:20.040
<v Speaker 1>that this first six months of out performance is just

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:23.679
<v Speaker 1>setting a stage for what could be a multi year period.

0:24:23.720 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Frankly about performance. So Nancy talked to us about some

0:24:26.359 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 1>of the stocks that you like. So what we like

0:24:30.200 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 1>to do, it's find companies that have secular growth trends,

0:24:34.880 --> 0:24:38.879
<v Speaker 1>big total available markets. But we want to find companies

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 1>that are benefiting from those growth trends in a way

0:24:41.800 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 1>that has not yet been fully recognized in the prices

0:24:44.320 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 1>of stock. What that means is sometimes we'll find suppliers

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:51.560
<v Speaker 1>into a growth industry as opposed to investing in the

0:24:51.680 --> 0:24:55.560
<v Speaker 1>name brand players. So everybody knows about tesla an e VS.

0:24:55.560 --> 0:24:58.720
<v Speaker 1>We particularly like a company called Vistia on the ticker

0:24:58.800 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 1>is CC, which is an automobile equipment supplier. They sell

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 1>UM heads up displays that are an important part of

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 1>both autonomous driving as well as infotainment systems. GM is

0:25:13.760 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 1>a big customer of theirs, and they will be integrated

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:22.080
<v Speaker 1>into GM's new autonomous EV vehicles that they're about to

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 1>come out with. And as we know, GM has said

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:27.480
<v Speaker 1>their entire police going to go EV like or they're

0:25:27.480 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 1>about So that's the kind of name that we think

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:32.919
<v Speaker 1>is very exciting. Another hey, wait, wait, they've been on

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:35.440
<v Speaker 1>a tear. They run a tear. Certainly last year big

0:25:35.480 --> 0:25:41.520
<v Speaker 1>bounce back, uh and even the year before up forty

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 1>about in valuations or anything. Everything feels comfortable to you,

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:51.160
<v Speaker 1>we think so. Yeah, we think we are very early

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:54.720
<v Speaker 1>in First of all, we're very early in the use

0:25:54.800 --> 0:25:59.639
<v Speaker 1>of technology and the changing of technology and autobiles. We

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:02.720
<v Speaker 1>know what the automobile company saying about the shortage of

0:26:02.720 --> 0:26:07.000
<v Speaker 1>semi conductors. This is really disruptive. And so the stock

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 1>does not look particularly cheap on this year's earnings. You

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:12.919
<v Speaker 1>think this year's earnings are probably low, but if you

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:15.440
<v Speaker 1>look out a couple of years, the stock is very cheap.

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:18.639
<v Speaker 1>We think it could potentially double from here over the

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:22.120
<v Speaker 1>next couple of years as they continue to gain penetration

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:26.199
<v Speaker 1>and importantly as other players in the e V market

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:28.600
<v Speaker 1>gay market share. So let's talk a little bit about

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:31.840
<v Speaker 1>about the cloud and digital transformation. Domo is a company

0:26:31.880 --> 0:26:34.719
<v Speaker 1>that is on your list as well. Um, why are

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:38.320
<v Speaker 1>you excited about Demo? So we really like Domo here

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:41.159
<v Speaker 1>that actually justin asked their quarter last night. It was

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:46.320
<v Speaker 1>a very strong quarter. They beat, they raised, growth accelerated. Particularly,

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:49.040
<v Speaker 1>they're what they call a r R which is annualized

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:52.280
<v Speaker 1>recurring revenue, which grew twenty eight percent in the quarter.

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:56.879
<v Speaker 1>Domo is a company that provides business analytics software. Now,

0:26:57.000 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of players in that business. You

0:26:59.240 --> 0:27:02.959
<v Speaker 1>like about do Mo is one they're moving from small

0:27:03.000 --> 0:27:07.080
<v Speaker 1>medium sized business up to enterprise. And two, very importantly,

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 1>their products are optimized for mobility and they are designed

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:15.200
<v Speaker 1>so that it pushes the ability to use this business

0:27:15.240 --> 0:27:19.120
<v Speaker 1>analytics software down to a much lower level. So it's

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 1>not just the specialist software. It's really a software that

0:27:22.960 --> 0:27:26.440
<v Speaker 1>generalists can use as well to do the data analysis

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:31.480
<v Speaker 1>and business intelligent work that is so important to companies today.

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 1>This is a part of technology spending that was actually

0:27:34.600 --> 0:27:38.000
<v Speaker 1>under some pressure last year during the pandemic and is

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:40.960
<v Speaker 1>now starting to come on very strong. So the stocks

0:27:41.000 --> 0:27:44.359
<v Speaker 1>put about seven times revenues, maybe not cheap on an

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 1>absolute basis, but extraordinarily Chiefs compared to other high value,

0:27:50.520 --> 0:27:53.200
<v Speaker 1>current revenue software companies, and we're seeing, you know, pretty

0:27:53.200 --> 0:27:56.159
<v Speaker 1>tremendous earnings growth. It's not profitable, but is this a company.

0:27:56.200 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 1>It's a pretty small market cap almost just under two billion.

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Is this a take out for an Oracle or somebody else?

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:05.639
<v Speaker 1>Just quickly? So it could be, but we actually think

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 1>that um, they have such a wide open marketplace in

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:12.639
<v Speaker 1>their own right that this company can grow into a

0:28:12.720 --> 0:28:15.119
<v Speaker 1>ten or fifteen or twenty billion market caps. They can

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:17.320
<v Speaker 1>keep the growth rate up, and so we prefer to

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:21.200
<v Speaker 1>see get not yet taken out on its alright, alright,

0:28:21.240 --> 0:28:23.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna leave it there. Hey, listen, have a good weekend. Nancy,

0:28:23.200 --> 0:28:26.359
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it. Nancy Pryle, she's co chief executive officer and

0:28:26.400 --> 0:28:30.000
<v Speaker 1>senior portfolio manager at Essex Investment Management, joining us on

0:28:30.040 --> 0:28:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the phone from Chicago. That cloud space. I just feel

0:28:32.000 --> 0:28:34.159
<v Speaker 1>like it's a million companies out there. Yeah it is.

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:36.120
<v Speaker 1>And look this is a small one with a relatively

0:28:36.119 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 1>small market cap. Especially when you think of the big players. Yeah, yeah,

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean the ones who dominate the space like Amazon

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and more right, which means maybe, and we know the

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:46.160
<v Speaker 1>clouds growing potential for incredible growth, like she says, but

0:28:46.200 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 1>I do always wonder if there's that take out play

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:50.760
<v Speaker 1>within it. Um, just got a few minutes left in

0:28:50.760 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 1>the training day. Yeah, it's Friday. It's Friday, and we're

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna end on an up note, So a bullish because

0:28:56.360 --> 0:28:58.960
<v Speaker 1>those stocks are gonna pretty much end at their best

0:28:59.040 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 1>levels of this set. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Business Week.

0:29:04.800 --> 0:29:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com,

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:10.080
<v Speaker 1>and you can also listen to our radio show at

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 1>two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on YouTube.

0:29:13.280 --> 0:29:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Search to Bloomberg Global News.