WEBVTT - Listener Mail: Time Passages

0:00:02.960 --> 0:00:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, a production of

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:11.360
<v Speaker 1>My Heart Radio. Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:00:11.720 --> 0:00:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Listener mail. This is Robert Lamb and this is Joe McCormick,

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:17.640
<v Speaker 1>and today we are reading back some of the messages

0:00:17.720 --> 0:00:21.239
<v Speaker 1>that you've sent in over the past week or two. So, Robbi,

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>if you're ready, I think I'll jump right into one

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:32.600
<v Speaker 1>of these messages about our episodes on tears. Right. Okay,

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:34.960
<v Speaker 1>So this one comes from a listener who did share

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 1>her name, but I think I'm gonna keep this one

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 1>anonymous just in case because it gets into some potentially

0:00:40.080 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>dicey territory. But but this was a good one. So

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:46.040
<v Speaker 1>this listener says, Hey, I wanted to share a funny

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 1>story about crocodile tears. My husband and I had only

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:52.879
<v Speaker 1>been dating for a few weeks when he accompanied me

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 1>to a pawn shop. I needed money and decided to

0:00:56.280 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 1>sell my engagement ring from my ex fiance. While haggling

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 1>with the pawn shop employee, who was, of course trying

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 1>to give me as little as possible, I started crying

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:08.760
<v Speaker 1>and giving a sob story about how sad I was

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 1>to part with it, and so on. My husband's jaw

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 1>hit the floor, and he was quietly fuming. He hated

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 1>my ex and had thought I did too. He certainly

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't think I cared a spit about this sad little ring.

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:23.679
<v Speaker 1>I managed to get a few more dollars from the

0:01:23.720 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 1>pawn shop guy, and when we walked outside, my husband

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 1>turned to me, probably ready to break things off, and

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 1>with my cheeks still wet with tears, I just started laughing.

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 1>He stared at me, dumbfounded. You're not upset, he asked me, God, No,

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:39.840
<v Speaker 1>why would I be. I just needed as much as

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:42.400
<v Speaker 1>I could possibly get. I told him, have you ever

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 1>done that to me? He asked, not yet? I told him,

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 1>and we both had a good laugh. He still loves

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to tell that story because he totally fell for it

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>as we stood in the pawn shop. Well, that that's

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 1>that sounds like a scene from a movie. I feel

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 1>like I would see that on a like a drama

0:01:56.560 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>TV show. Yeah, totally, But I have more questions. I

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 1>feel like I'm one to know, like did you plan

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:04.800
<v Speaker 1>to do this or did it just kind of happen spontaneously?

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:08.359
<v Speaker 1>Like what what's the approach on that? I I think

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I can honestly say I have never uh as an

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:18.680
<v Speaker 1>adult at least used tears in an intentionally persuasive manner. Uh.

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know if I would be able to

0:02:20.360 --> 0:02:23.360
<v Speaker 1>do so if I tried. Yeah, I mean, of course,

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean we all do things with our delivery and

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:31.800
<v Speaker 1>our our body language at times to try and influence

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:35.080
<v Speaker 1>these sorts of encounters. I mean, we've all I think

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 1>read about, you know, the supposed benefits, and occasionally I

0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:40.360
<v Speaker 1>think I've seen some criticism of this idea too, of

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 1>of taking on the like the humble brontosaurus pose. Uh

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:49.080
<v Speaker 1>when say, dealing with uh with a with a person

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 1>of sort of bureaucratic authority, or even if you've been like,

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, pulled over that sort of thing. What is

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the humble brontos source pose. It's sort of a I

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:01.360
<v Speaker 1>forget the details of, but it's like, imagine you are

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>a Saara pod uh and one that is humble and

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:07.639
<v Speaker 1>not threatening. It's sort of like taking on this sort

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:13.800
<v Speaker 1>of uh, this this humble body language approach to not

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:16.360
<v Speaker 1>so much too direct conflict, I think, but sort of

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:20.800
<v Speaker 1>these these milder forms of interaction where you could potentially

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 1>be shut down by somebody and you you maybe want

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 1>like a little bit more help, uh than than they

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 1>definitely have to give you. But like I said, if

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:31.680
<v Speaker 1>if memory serves, I think there's been some back and

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:34.360
<v Speaker 1>forth on that, and it's certainly it certainly is not

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 1>something that's gonna be applicable to to every scenario. Okay,

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I just looked it up. I think the phrase you've

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 1>used for this before is the kindly browntosaurus. Okay, kind

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 1>of not humble. Yeah yeah, well maybe humble, maybe not,

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 1>but it's sort of, uh, sort of the the head

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>is bent down a little bit and then the front

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>arms are sort of clasped, the hands are clasped together

0:03:57.120 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>in front of you. Uh, it looks very it looks

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 1>very humble and supplicant. Yeah. Yeah, So I mean, not

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 1>so much to really back up the pros and cons

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 1>of that specifically, but just in general, of course, we

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 1>all do things that are maybe not quite at the

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 1>level of a summoning, uh you know, the orchestrated tears

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 1>of some form or another, but doing things to lean

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:26.840
<v Speaker 1>into creating a certain emotional ambiance that we want someone

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:29.839
<v Speaker 1>else to pick up on. Like what happens Joe if

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 1>you have to go into a hardware store in a

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:37.360
<v Speaker 1>let's say, a small southern town. Do you find things

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 1>happen to your voice? Oh that's a good question. Uh,

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 1>that may indeed be true. I don't know. I've never

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:47.360
<v Speaker 1>consciously monitored myself for that, but I suspect I may

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:50.040
<v Speaker 1>shift back into my East Tennessee roots a little bit

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:53.919
<v Speaker 1>more depending on the context. Yeah. I think I have

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 1>at times caught myself becoming like a little folks here

0:04:57.720 --> 0:05:00.719
<v Speaker 1>in interactions like that. So so basically, what I'm trying

0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 1>to say is, though even though quote unquote fake tears

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:07.600
<v Speaker 1>may seem like an extreme manipulation I mean to to some,

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's really that extreme when you take

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:12.720
<v Speaker 1>into account all the various other ways that we augment

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:22.280
<v Speaker 1>our emotional ambiance for others. Yeah, yeah, totally. Okay, So

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:24.560
<v Speaker 1>if we do this next message from Matthew, I just

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 1>wanted to preface this by saying this touches on some

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 1>of the same Dune content mentioned by a previous listener,

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:32.600
<v Speaker 1>but kind of expands on the idea. So, rob do

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 1>you want to do this one? Sure? Uh, they write, Hey,

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Robert and Joe. One interesting example of cultural meaning of

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 1>tears can be found in the Dune series I guess

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 1>at some point during his initial stay at the taveris

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:46.839
<v Speaker 1>speech or seeched. I never know how to say this.

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:50.480
<v Speaker 1>There's so many words and phrases and dune that they

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of just ricochet through through my brain and I'm

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:57.720
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily using them in everyday conversation anyway. Paul weeps

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:00.559
<v Speaker 1>for the man whom he has recently killed than a duel.

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 1>The Fremen are deeply touched by his tears. In the

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 1>harsh desert environment of Aracus, wasting vital bodily fluid for

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 1>someone or somebody can be seen as an honest signal

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:15.400
<v Speaker 1>of commitment and emotional investment. I was surprised that you

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:17.359
<v Speaker 1>hadn't mentioned it, since I know both of you are

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 1>big fans of Doone. Yeah, so this expands. Another listener

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>wrote in about the scene and Done, where where Paul

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:27.599
<v Speaker 1>cries after he has has killed one of the firm

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 1>in a in a duel um. But Yeah, I like

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the idea that the stakes of the water content of

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:39.799
<v Speaker 1>someone's body being so high in the environment of Done

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 1>makes the tear signal especially important, and you could view

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:48.080
<v Speaker 1>it as consequently honest, like an honest signal to a

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 1>much greater extent because water is so precious in this environment. Uh.

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:55.039
<v Speaker 1>And and this does kind of relate to the idea

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:58.279
<v Speaker 1>I I pondered in one of the Tier episodes. Again,

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:00.479
<v Speaker 1>this is not something that I know of any direct

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:02.360
<v Speaker 1>evidence for. Is just something I was kind of wondering

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:06.159
<v Speaker 1>out loud about, which was, what if adult tears could

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>in part be an adaptation, uh to the complexity of

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>the human capacity for deceit. So because humans can lie

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 1>not only about external matters of fact, but about internal

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 1>subjective states. So for example, you can claim to care

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 1>about someone when in fact you don't. Tears being difficult

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 1>to fake could help serve as an honest signal of

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 1>an internal emotional states that could help bonding and trust

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 1>between humans. And I remember when I was researching tears.

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 1>One one way this occurred to me, I think, was

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I was reading several stories of someone who said they

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:46.239
<v Speaker 1>had been planning to break up with a romantic partner

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and you know, thinking that that partner didn't really care

0:07:49.280 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 1>about them until that partner began to cry during the

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>breakup conversation they were having, and then they changed their mind.

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:58.560
<v Speaker 1>They changed their mind and decided they wanted to stay

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 1>with that person. Uh and you know, you could all

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>argue that there could be all kinds of reasons for that,

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:07.559
<v Speaker 1>But one could be that something about the crying makes

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>it look like their emotional commitment to you is more real,

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 1>you can trust it more m hmm. Interesting, they continue. Also,

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 1>one could argue in favor of the view of the

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 1>function of emotional tears as making us seem more childlike

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 1>on the basis that we are already a highly neotenic

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 1>species compared to our closest relatives like chimpanzees or even

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 1>more archaic subspecies of the genus Homo. We retain many

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 1>juvenile characteristics into adulthood. Shedding emotional tears could be just

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 1>one more such factor, maybe even making a case for

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 1>humans being uniquely high on on the otany in the

0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 1>entire animal kingdom. And then they close up by saying also,

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the expression crocodile tears is also very common in Polish,

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 1>but I had no idea what it meant until I

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:59.439
<v Speaker 1>listened to your episode. Best regards, Matthew. All right, well,

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 1>thank you, matt f you. Um let's see, I'm gonna

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 1>move on to a message about nail biting from a

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 1>listener another Matthew. This one's named Matt uh. And this

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:12.840
<v Speaker 1>is funny because this is Matt responding to a third listener,

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 1>also named Matt. So the Matt we have, Mats have

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:19.200
<v Speaker 1>plenty of cornucopia of Matt's here in the in the

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow your Mind verse. But Matt says Robert

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:29.079
<v Speaker 1>and Joe, Hello, my name is Matt, and I'm writing

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 1>in response to another person named Matt. He had written

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 1>to tell you how he randomly quit biting his nails.

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 1>I also was a nail biter for the first twenty

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 1>five years of my life, but I quit. I can

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 1>point to naval boot camp as the catalyst of my quitting.

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>In boot camp, the drill instructors are always yelling at

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 1>people for touching their faces. This makes a lot of

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 1>sense because of the large numbers of people living in

0:09:53.840 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 1>close proximity to one another. They don't want to spreading disease.

0:09:57.720 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, we were issued nail clippers, and I was

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 1>motivated to use them to keep my nails too short

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:05.080
<v Speaker 1>for me to bite them. I love you guys in

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the show. You've got me into watching old horror movies

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and enjoying them much more than I ever thought I would.

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Science is awesome, and so are you. It was very,

0:10:14.080 --> 0:10:24.960
<v Speaker 1>very very sweet, Matt. Thank you. All right, let's jump

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 1>ahead of some weird house cinema feedback here. This one

0:10:27.240 --> 0:10:29.680
<v Speaker 1>comes to us from Susan. Hey, guys, I just wanted

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:32.959
<v Speaker 1>to write in about Time after Time. I almost didn't

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:35.880
<v Speaker 1>listen to this episode because I remember seeing the movie

0:10:35.920 --> 0:10:38.040
<v Speaker 1>at the cinema with my parents when I was about

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:41.840
<v Speaker 1>eight years old. I had nightmares for months. The scene

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 1>that got me was when Wells goes into an apartment

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's a complete blood bath. Now, more than forty

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 1>years later, I can picture that severed arm and it

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 1>still gives me chills. Of course, after that introduction to horror,

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:56.720
<v Speaker 1>I spent the nineteen eighties watching all the now classic

0:10:56.800 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 1>flasher films. Thanks for a fun travel through time to

0:10:59.800 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the early days of scary movies. Funny, I don't remember

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the love part of that movie, just the blood. No love,

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>only blood. Yeah. I mean, it is kind of a

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>shocking scene when you get that, because there hasn't really

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 1>been much blood in the film at that point, I

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 1>mean a little here and there, but but then suddenly, yes,

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:21.440
<v Speaker 1>severed arm. Uh. I could see where that would definitely

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 1>be a lot of you were eight years old. Yeah, yeah,

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:27.080
<v Speaker 1>well I think we mentioned this in the Time Aftertime episode,

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 1>But it's kind of amazing what could get a PG

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen nine. Yeah, yeah, yeah, it's a it's a

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's in late seventies PG. So it's certainly

0:11:37.120 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 1>anybody looking to pick that up to think about it.

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:42.080
<v Speaker 1>But I guess it follows a trend that you know,

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 1>has been widely observed for a long time that for

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:49.319
<v Speaker 1>some reason, the people who issue ratings classifications for movies

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:53.560
<v Speaker 1>tend to be far more motivated to kick up ratings

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 1>in response to, say, harsh language or sexuality than they

0:11:57.160 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 1>do in response to violence. So you can get away

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 1>with a big, bloody dismemberment as long as people aren't

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:06.719
<v Speaker 1>saying the bad words. Yeah. I'm always I'm always fascinated

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:08.720
<v Speaker 1>when people share their stories about what was like the

0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 1>first or one of the first scary movies to really

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:14.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of you know, get to them when they were kids,

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Because for me, it was it was almost certainly Toby

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Hooper's poulter Geist. I remember seeing part of that when

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:25.400
<v Speaker 1>I was a kid, and uh bathroom mirror scene who

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:29.440
<v Speaker 1>uh I don't know if it was that's and I

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:31.959
<v Speaker 1>don't even know how I was watching it per se um,

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 1>but there was I don't know, just stuff. Some of

0:12:34.559 --> 0:12:36.839
<v Speaker 1>it was probably not even like the really grizzly stuff,

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:40.440
<v Speaker 1>but just like scenes of children being afraid in dark rooms.

0:12:40.520 --> 0:12:43.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, like some of that can really get to

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 1>you at a at a young age. I mean, it's

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 1>it's surprising, how you know, how scary certain concepts and

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:51.200
<v Speaker 1>ideas can be to young children. I was trying to

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:54.679
<v Speaker 1>tell my son about the duck that said that there

0:12:54.679 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 1>were recordings of the duck speaking and saying you bloody fool,

0:12:58.559 --> 0:13:00.280
<v Speaker 1>and he was like, that's too much. He I got

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:02.680
<v Speaker 1>upset that I was telling him this before bed, and

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:05.319
<v Speaker 1>I was like, wow, I didn't think about the speaking

0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 1>ducks saying you bloody fool would be nightmare material. But

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:10.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Maybe so, I mean, who am I

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 1>to argue with this reaction here? What about Billy Bass?

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 1>He'd probably be amused by Billy bass um, but I

0:13:16.320 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 1>have not introduced him to that technology either. Billy Bass

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 1>will haunt your dreams. It's funny what you're talking about.

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:25.240
<v Speaker 1>It makes me remember one movie that I got very

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 1>freaked out by as a kid. I remember was the

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 1>movie Cat's I in which there it's a sort of

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 1>horror anthology film or I don't know if it's all horror.

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 1>At least one of the segments is horror and features

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 1>this little weird, creepy gremlin running around in a bedroom

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 1>that does battle with a cat. Uh. And I remember

0:13:44.040 --> 0:13:46.679
<v Speaker 1>that gremlin really creeped me out. Yeah they had it

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:54.600
<v Speaker 1>was a great design on that critter. Okay, This next

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 1>weird house cinema response comes from Simon. This is a

0:13:57.679 --> 0:14:01.200
<v Speaker 1>very long email, so I'm doing some regiments in editing.

0:14:01.679 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 1>So Simon says, hey, fellas, welcome from the royal town

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 1>of Sutton Coalfield, West Midland's UK birthplace of ken Gt,

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 1>forty miles uh from I guess this is somebody from

0:14:14.640 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Ford versus Ferrati, which which I haven't seen. Um. But

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Simon says it's also mentioned in Shakespeare when fall Staff says,

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Bardolf get thee before to Coventry, fill me a bottle

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 1>of sack. Our soldiers shall march through wheel to Sutton

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 1>coal Field tonight. And then finally Simon says it is

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the location of a shower of Frogs in nineteen fifty four.

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 1>I think to look that one up, but Simon says,

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 1>apologies in advance for the long email. I guess an

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 1>epic podcast deserves epic feedback. I love stuff to blow

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 1>your mind and the content that you provide. I store

0:14:48.880 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 1>up episodes to play while I undertake my artwork at home.

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Weird how cinema is especially my favorite as a long

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 1>term cinephile myself. Beloved movies that I have collected include

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 1>ref Madness from nineteen thirty six, The Outlaw from nineteen

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 1>forty three, the movie for which Howard Hughes designed the

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 1>cantilever bra and Carry On Up the Kaiber from sixty eight,

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the ninety nine greatest British movie of all time and

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 1>one of the funniest. I think. Actually the only one

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 1>of those I've seen is read for Madness, But Simon says,

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm mainly writing a response to your reference to the

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 1>TV movie The Day After in your Weird House Cinema

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 1>episode on Time after Time. Remember that was the another

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>film that was made by Nicholas Meyer, the writer and

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 1>director of Time after Time, which was a television film

0:15:39.240 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 1>about what would happen in the aftermath of a nuclear

0:15:42.360 --> 0:15:45.480
<v Speaker 1>war between the United States and the Soviet Union. Simon

0:15:45.520 --> 0:15:48.920
<v Speaker 1>goes on, you reference the cultural impact of the Day After,

0:15:49.040 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 1>but I guess that you're already aware of the UK

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 1>film that it is constantly compared to Threads from nineteen

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>eighty four, the UK BBC DOCU drama about the horrific

0:15:59.840 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 1>of effects of and after a nuclear war. Scariest movie

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 1>ever made by a country mile directed by the man

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 1>who would later direct The Bodyguard. Um massively well researched,

0:16:11.080 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 1>with input by Carl Sagan. Interesting in its comparison to

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the U S movie The Day After, which, although had

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 1>a higher budget, has nowhere near the nightmare depicted by Threads.

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Plus the latter does tend to eschew drama for information.

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Not an easy watch, perhaps undermined a little by use

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 1>of stock footage and televisual feel, but utterly essential viewing.

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 1>I own both movies, but only Threads keeps me awake

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 1>at night, uh per and then uh Simon includes a

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 1>quote from The New York Times. The film is not

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 1>a balanced discussion about the pros and cons of nuclear armaments.

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 1>It is a candidly biased warning, and it is as calculated,

0:16:49.760 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 1>unsettlingly powerful. I like the New York Times warning you

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 1>that it that it does not reveal the prose of

0:16:57.560 --> 0:17:04.359
<v Speaker 1>nuclear war um. The director of this, Mike I'm sorry,

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Mick Jackson, not a guy I'm that familiar with. But

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 1>he also directed Volcano in and uh The Temple Grand

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 1>and Bio that came out in two thousand ten starring

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Claire Danes. Oh. Okay, well, anyway, Simon goes on to say, obviously,

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the input of Carl Sagan and the almost documentary feel

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 1>of the film make this irrelevant subject for consideration by

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 1>you chaps. Science the Cold War psychology of fear, paranoia,

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:35.399
<v Speaker 1>and mutually sure destruction. The final scene of the birth

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:38.439
<v Speaker 1>of a child born of rape and fallout is beyond

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 1>terrifying and is reminiscent of the effects of depleted uranium

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 1>ordinance on unborn children in recent wars. On a personal note,

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 1>my grandfather was part of the Allied occupation of Japan

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen forty five and experienced firsthand what was left

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:56.960
<v Speaker 1>of Hiroshima. It happened to be the forty anniversary five

0:17:57.080 --> 0:17:59.680
<v Speaker 1>that he began to describe it to me The same year.

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:02.920
<v Speaker 1>I leave that Threads was shown on TV. It took

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 1>me from age fourteen to forty five to summon the

0:18:05.680 --> 0:18:07.720
<v Speaker 1>courage to watch it, and that thirty one years of

0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:12.719
<v Speaker 1>preparation was essential, as I was by now a father's stuff.

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Yes it is. But from here the message gets lighter.

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Simon goes onto list and suggest a bunch of movies

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 1>that he thinks we would be interested in. For weird House,

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to go through the whole list here,

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:25.840
<v Speaker 1>but I'll read one of them that's on the lighter

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:30.199
<v Speaker 1>side of the nuclear cinema uh catalog, he says. On

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 1>a connected theme, can I suggest the fantastic Protect and

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:38.159
<v Speaker 1>Survive UK information films? They are terrifying and hilarious in

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:41.920
<v Speaker 1>their naivety. Don't forget to brush the fallout from your jacket.

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:45.520
<v Speaker 1>It's pure public service nostalgia for Cold War addicts, and

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:48.680
<v Speaker 1>he includes some some links for us to view. I've

0:18:48.680 --> 0:18:51.919
<v Speaker 1>watched at least one of these clips and and the

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the parts that stuck out to me is

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 1>this very dry British radio voice saying, uh, if someone

0:18:57.359 --> 0:19:00.639
<v Speaker 1>has died, move their body to another room. Cover it

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:05.640
<v Speaker 1>in poly eurythene I, I seem to recall that there

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:07.880
<v Speaker 1>was a parody of this on The Young Ones back

0:19:07.920 --> 0:19:11.680
<v Speaker 1>in the day. Oh yeah, I think in fact, even um,

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I think Simon may mention that later in his email. Okay, sorry, Simon,

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:17.720
<v Speaker 1>that is still in your thunder here. But I think

0:19:17.720 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that's all we're doing from Okay, alright, so

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:23.440
<v Speaker 1>well I'm not stealing your thunder then well I'm completely

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 1>stealing it, I guess, because then we're not even reading

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:29.120
<v Speaker 1>where you mentioned that. But um, telepathically you're robbing him

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:33.159
<v Speaker 1>at any rate. Yes, it is my understanding, uh, and

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:37.359
<v Speaker 1>my faint memory that it is lampooned on The Young Ones.

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, the fantasy Bomba Deal casting continues. We heard

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:50.959
<v Speaker 1>from Casey. Casey right right, wrote in and says hello,

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I've been listening to you guys since around the time

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 1>of the Bicameral Mind episodes that have been a regular

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 1>listener ever since. I often think about writing in, but

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 1>usually dissuade myself from it. However, in light of the

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 1>ongoing Bomba Deal debate, I decided I had better speak up.

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:08.199
<v Speaker 1>In general, I think adaptations are a bad idea. The

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:10.720
<v Speaker 1>particular impact of a story is often bound up with

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the specific medium it's told in and something always gets

0:20:14.560 --> 0:20:17.560
<v Speaker 1>lost in translation, no matter how well executed. Because bomba

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Deal is one of my favorite parts of the books,

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad he hasn't been realized on the screen. All

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the same, if I had to pick a human bomba Deal,

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:29.720
<v Speaker 1>one could do worse than the wayfaring stranger himself. Burl Ives.

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:34.360
<v Speaker 1>He's jovial, plump and sings in a friendly, folksy style. Anyway,

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 1>thanks for continuing to deliver interesting, engaging, and eclectic content,

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Casey burl Ives, Okay, interesting option, Yeah, yeah, I mean

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 1>when he's he's in that uh the Rudolph Um animated

0:20:48.840 --> 0:20:52.159
<v Speaker 1>Um show, as I recall, he's the narrator in that

0:20:52.240 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and plays the what the Snowman, So he's already we

0:20:55.119 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 1>already know that he can play a musical elemental force.

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:02.679
<v Speaker 1>This sort of stands outside of the story, so it

0:21:02.680 --> 0:21:05.280
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. I would say, you want to make sure

0:21:05.320 --> 0:21:07.919
<v Speaker 1>that he's not in cat on a hot tin roof mode,

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:11.879
<v Speaker 1>because although bomba Deal maybe a sort of god or elemental,

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:15.160
<v Speaker 1>he is no big Daddy. We'll tell me this, Joe,

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 1>I know you're a big Jim Steinman fan. If Jim

0:21:18.359 --> 0:21:23.119
<v Speaker 1>Steinman had adapted The Fellowship of the Ring. Uh do

0:21:23.160 --> 0:21:25.560
<v Speaker 1>you think you could have seen meat Loaf as bomba

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Deal without a word? Oh that's the sweet spot. Yeah,

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:32.640
<v Speaker 1>I could see that kind of a rock Obomba Deal.

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:40.399
<v Speaker 1>Hey don Mary do? Oh? Yeah? R I p Jim Steinman.

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:42.879
<v Speaker 1>He passed away just earlier this year. The world is

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 1>a less melodramatic place without him. All right, how about

0:21:52.240 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 1>I read this one from Hannah also about Bomba Dill's subject,

0:21:55.880 --> 0:21:59.199
<v Speaker 1>and keep it coming right Bomba dil opinions. I like

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:02.360
<v Speaker 1>how this is the new subgenre of listener mail, Hi,

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Robert and Joe. If I could pluck any actor from

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 1>any point in their career to play Bomba Deal, I'd

0:22:07.600 --> 0:22:11.200
<v Speaker 1>pick top All exactly as he was in Fiddle around

0:22:11.200 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the Roof ninety one. I've always pictured Tom Bomba Dill

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 1>with a similar playfulness and warmth to his character. Uh.

0:22:18.960 --> 0:22:21.639
<v Speaker 1>That's a great idea, Hannah, But then she goes on

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:24.919
<v Speaker 1>along that train of thought. But considering the annoying limitations

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 1>of the passage of time or whatever, I went looking

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:30.399
<v Speaker 1>for some actors who are still currently working and have

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:33.160
<v Speaker 1>tavy on their resumes and came up with two interesting

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 1>but very different possibilities. Alfred Molina and Harvey Firestein thoughts

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:42.720
<v Speaker 1>all the best, Hannah. Uh yeah, both great, both great choices,

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 1>great actors in their own regard. You know, Harvey Fierstein,

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:49.240
<v Speaker 1>uh did a voice of one of the Skexis on

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:53.199
<v Speaker 1>the The Dark Crystal Age of Resistance and I loved it.

0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:56.480
<v Speaker 1>That's right, Yes, he was great in that. Yeah, yeah,

0:22:56.119 --> 0:23:00.200
<v Speaker 1>I've yeah, I like both of those actors. Uh so, yeah,

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:01.639
<v Speaker 1>I could see them now. I'm not sure if if

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Harvey Fierstein is maybe getting a bit of I don't know,

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 1>he's I mean, how old we're Christopher Lee and Ian

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 1>McKellan when they made uh, you know, the Fellowship of

0:23:10.840 --> 0:23:14.159
<v Speaker 1>the Ring. So I don't know. He seems fine. Let

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 1>him do it. We're just talking here anyway. Let him

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 1>do it. I'm not going to stand in the way

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:26.199
<v Speaker 1>of this fantasy casting. Let them bomba dil Alright, Well,

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:28.119
<v Speaker 1>it looks like we're already out of time here. I

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:30.120
<v Speaker 1>really don't know where the time went on this episode

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 1>of feel like we we just started it, but here

0:23:32.280 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 1>we are. We'll have to get to the other bits

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:38.239
<v Speaker 1>of listener mail next time around. In the meantime, if

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:40.320
<v Speaker 1>you would like to listen to other episodes of Stuff

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 1>to Blow Your Mind. Listener mail what airs every Monday.

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:46.160
<v Speaker 1>We got our core episodes on Tuesdays, and Thursday's Artifact

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:49.720
<v Speaker 1>on Wednesday, Weird How Cinema on Friday. That's our time

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:52.639
<v Speaker 1>to set aside most of the science and deeper concerns

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:54.680
<v Speaker 1>and discuss a weird movie. And then over the weekend

0:23:54.800 --> 0:23:57.119
<v Speaker 1>we have a vault episode, which is just a fancy

0:23:57.160 --> 0:23:59.440
<v Speaker 1>way of saying we do a rerun. You just thinks.

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 1>As always to our wonderful audio producer Seth Nicholas Johnson.

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:05.240
<v Speaker 1>If you would like to get in touch with us

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:07.920
<v Speaker 1>with feedback on this episode or any other, to suggest

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 1>a topic for the future, or just to say hello,

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:12.640
<v Speaker 1>you can email us at contact at stuff to Blow

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:22.440
<v Speaker 1>your Mind dot com. Stuff to Blow Your Mind is

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 1>a production of I Heart Radio. For more podcasts for

0:24:25.119 --> 0:24:28.200
<v Speaker 1>my Heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:24:28.280 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.