WEBVTT - 23 ETFs for 2023

0:00:05.920 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Trilliance. I'm Joel Webber and I'm Eric Beljunas. Eric.

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:17.239
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to It's pretty good. It's gonna be It's gonna

0:00:17.239 --> 0:00:20.439
<v Speaker 1>be a lot like or different. Some things the same,

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 1>some things are different. I'm looking forward to it, though

0:00:23.200 --> 0:00:26.200
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to believe. I'm old enough where I just

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>would be like in a movie where they like the

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>future really far in the future, we're Yeah, I think,

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 1>um just hard to believe how how old we're getting.

0:00:35.600 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 1>When you think of that, do you think like Blade

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Runner or do you think like ack me cartoons. I'm

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:42.879
<v Speaker 1>thinking like Escape from New York or Terminator. I think

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:45.839
<v Speaker 1>Escape from New York might have been or something. They're like,

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>we'll wait wait past that. Okay, So we've got some

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:54.840
<v Speaker 1>tickers for the year ahead. Yeah. So we did our outlook,

0:00:54.840 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>which is sort of the more traditional thing that analysts do,

0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 1>especially in Blueberg Intelligence. But one of the not so

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 1>traditional thing we do is a little bit maybe buzz feedish.

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:07.480
<v Speaker 1>We make a listical which is their twenty three e

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 1>t f s we're watching, And this was born out

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:15.319
<v Speaker 1>of we have all of the analysts occasionally do something

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:17.440
<v Speaker 1>called the Money Show, which is an event that is

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 1>all of our different cities, and it's direct retail investors

0:01:20.080 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 1>go to these hotels and just here from experts. There's

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>no middle people, no advisors, no institutions, nothing at these shows.

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 1>These people want to hear about tickers. They don't really

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:32.400
<v Speaker 1>care about your trends or you're you know, four thousand

0:01:32.400 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 1>foot view. They they're just curious about all the new

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 1>gadgets and tickers that they have access to. And E

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:40.679
<v Speaker 1>t F give you access to a lot. So we

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:42.560
<v Speaker 1>do this list not to say these e t F

0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 1>s are going to go up or down. We can't

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:46.680
<v Speaker 1>do that. We don't give investent advice. However, these are

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 1>e t F s that we think about and have

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 1>moved us or that we are watching because they sort

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>of tap into something else going on or one of

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 1>our big themes. And so these are just generally e

0:01:56.280 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 1>t s on our mind that we will be checking

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 1>in too regularly in the new year. So joining us

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:06.280
<v Speaker 1>for this episode James Safer and Athanasios Seraphagus with Bloomberg

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Intelligence as well as Scarlet Food with Bloomberg News. There's

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 1>time on Trilliance for three. James, Athanasios, Scarlett thanks for

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:21.960
<v Speaker 1>joining us on Trillians. Thank you, Yeah, thanks for having me.

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Glad to be back. Okay, James, why don't you kick

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 1>us off? What's your top pick for next year? Yeah?

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:31.800
<v Speaker 1>So in the intra, Eric said, it's sometimes it's a ticker.

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:34.919
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes it's something that's more emblematic if something we're watching. Um,

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 1>so mine is VTV, which is a very boring pick.

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:40.240
<v Speaker 1>It's the Vanguard Value Fund. But the reason I'm picking

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 1>it is because Vanguards has a patent in the way

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 1>that they operate this fund. So VTV is actually a

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 1>share class of the Vanguard Value Mutual Fund Index fund.

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:51.799
<v Speaker 1>That process has patents, so nobody else has been able

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:53.960
<v Speaker 1>to mimic that. Every et F has been a standalone fund.

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:58.959
<v Speaker 1>But in May of three that patent expires. Now, if

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:01.919
<v Speaker 1>this isn't mean yeah, I mean if this was eight

0:03:01.960 --> 0:03:04.480
<v Speaker 1>years ago, I'd be like, we'd be jumping from the rooftops,

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 1>like this could be a huge deal, right, I mean

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 1>right now, because it's a lot of people already converting

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:10.680
<v Speaker 1>e t f s are way bigger than they were

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 1>when this patent was a much bigger deal, So we

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know how big of a deal it's going to

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 1>be but I'd be shocked if we don't see some

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:19.919
<v Speaker 1>sort of asset managers looking at VT things like VTV

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and saying, maybe we can do this rather than converting

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 1>our entire fund, or at least talking about doing it now.

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if we'll see someone do it, Ine,

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:29.960
<v Speaker 1>that'd be very interesting to watch, um, but I think

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>there'll be a lot of people looking at that, that

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:37.120
<v Speaker 1>actual structure and thinking about implementing it themselves. Yeah, um,

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:42.120
<v Speaker 1>this is well. Conversions are huge. There's UM sixty billion

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 1>dollars worth of mutual funds that have converted into e

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 1>t f s from big issuers and Fidelity just not

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>it is a big deal. So this is another option

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>for them potentially that's opened up. However, I ran into

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the woman who was the lawyer on m Guinness Atkinson

0:03:56.080 --> 0:04:00.120
<v Speaker 1>the first conversion. She downplayed it. She says this, um A,

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 1>there's several patents they have that are related to it,

0:04:02.800 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 1>and Vanguard could probably prolong that. So there's some legal

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 1>things that could happen. Also, a lot of these issuers

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 1>have moved on already. They've launched their own ETFs that

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 1>are clones. They're doing conversions. Um. The other thing is

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 1>with e t F share class. It helps if you

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:22.360
<v Speaker 1>have inflows, but if you have outflows, then it can

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 1>sometimes actually mean that the e t F gets capital

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:27.359
<v Speaker 1>gains from the mutual fund seeing outflows, and that that's

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:30.120
<v Speaker 1>like the opposite of what you want. So there's it's

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:32.479
<v Speaker 1>a little trickier than people think. I think it will

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 1>be interesting for sure. Um, but I'm I'm a little

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, i uh skeptical that will see big

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:43.919
<v Speaker 1>money use this route. I think though, I'm I'm with

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Derek for the most part. I think, like I said

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:47.720
<v Speaker 1>eight years ago, this would be I think this would

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:50.479
<v Speaker 1>be a huge talking point. Um. Right now, I think

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:52.440
<v Speaker 1>it's more just like is somebody going to do this?

0:04:52.760 --> 0:04:55.040
<v Speaker 1>And obviously, I mean the same thing was with mutual

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:57.599
<v Speaker 1>fund conversions. We were early in saying that we thought

0:04:57.600 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 1>there was gonna be a mask conversions of mutual funds ETFs.

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people in the industry disagree with us.

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>We're not as bullish on this this trend taking hold,

0:05:05.480 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 1>but um, we'll definitely be watching. Especially give me an

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 1>e t F that we're gonna we should know about

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:16.280
<v Speaker 1>next year. What are you watching? Sure? So one thing

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:19.200
<v Speaker 1>that's on my radar for next year is Russia. Remember

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:22.479
<v Speaker 1>this story for the Russia ets this year, one in

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:26.159
<v Speaker 1>particular rs X, which was the Vanneck Russia e t F.

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 1>It was the biggest one. But I think this story

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 1>has to come to a close next year. These are

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 1>still halted, so a lot of investors are still stuck

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:40.160
<v Speaker 1>with this e t F. There's been some process beginning

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 1>to unwind. Some of the other ones, like I Shares

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:44.359
<v Speaker 1>have said they're going to start liquidating it. There's a

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 1>lot in Europe. Our van Neck hasn't said anything yet,

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 1>but I think this is gonna be a big year

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:52.040
<v Speaker 1>where this starts to unwind and it impacts a lot

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>of other ETF. A lot of emerging market BTF are

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 1>still holding Russia. This is a roach motel. You you

0:05:57.760 --> 0:05:59.719
<v Speaker 1>got in and you can't get out, and people have

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 1>been up there for for months essentially. Yeah, in March

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 1>will be like almost a year. So and it's not

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 1>just RSX. People don't realize that there is still Russia

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 1>stocks splattered all over these random ETFs. So i'd like,

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, I Share has already begun the process, so

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:19.920
<v Speaker 1>it's probably gonna look similar to like a bankruptcy proceeding.

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:22.159
<v Speaker 1>They're going to try to get what they can when

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:24.279
<v Speaker 1>they can and start to pay out investors. So I

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:26.119
<v Speaker 1>think that RSX is going to be a big story

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:28.839
<v Speaker 1>for next year. Is that how this thing gets unwound

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 1>and investors at least get some of their money back.

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:34.159
<v Speaker 1>What happens if it's an emerging market et F and

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:37.279
<v Speaker 1>it has some Russia exposure? Yeah, I think they're gonna try.

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I think would be the same process. But what people

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:42.599
<v Speaker 1>don't realize is the emerging market ones hold way more

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>than even RSX. Our access is just I think a

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:48.160
<v Speaker 1>really good indication of how this might work. But yeah,

0:06:48.200 --> 0:06:50.160
<v Speaker 1>so if you hold like e M or im G,

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 1>there's still Russia stocks stuck in there, even the big

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 1>vanguard once. So I'd be really interesting to see how

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 1>this all gets uh, you know, how will they try

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:00.599
<v Speaker 1>to get some money out of it? Or if there's

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 1>some resolutions of the war next year to start seeing

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:06.480
<v Speaker 1>this onlinding process. If I'm in that fund, I just say,

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>don't do anything. Let me just wait till some resolution

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>or at least hope for that. This could be years,

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 1>because I'd rather I'd rather wait than get nothing now.

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Not as well. I mean, I don't think RUSH is

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 1>going to exclude itself from the global world, you know,

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 1>capital markets forever. Yeah, I think at some point to

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 1>be a resolution. Um, but maybe I'm wrong. But it

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter. It's like a tire or win if you

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:33.280
<v Speaker 1>if you wait, you can't lose anymore. It's already nothing, Okay, okay, next, next,

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 1>unless you need the cash eric next. Yeah, So you

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 1>know how it used to be like all about growth

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 1>and work from homestocks and ARC and everything. Well, obviously

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:47.239
<v Speaker 1>when the Fits started hiking, everything changed and fundamentals became

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:53.680
<v Speaker 1>cool again, right, became essential essential. Yes, as Bogel says

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 1>in the End, reality rules, and so ARC is taken

0:07:57.080 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 1>to quoting Jack Bogel, like spend it two years living

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 1>book in his world. Yeah, so cows. And obviously this

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:09.840
<v Speaker 1>is one that had a big year this year. Curious

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 1>to see if this maintains this year next year. This

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 1>basically is NETF that looks at free cash flow and

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 1>free cash flow rules. In this kind of environment, it matters. Now, Yeah,

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 1>if you have cash, you have there's stuff you can do.

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Having cash gives you protection from these horrible markets. And

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 1>so this is an ETF that wasn't up really, but

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:33.280
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't down, and so just to tread water, you

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:35.200
<v Speaker 1>outperform the market by a lot. This thing was in

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the top twenty of flows and it spawned a bunch

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:43.080
<v Speaker 1>of little sequels. Calf bull bull is half as a

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 1>small cap version of cows, right, that's right, So what's

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:50.320
<v Speaker 1>bull bull is the cash cows? But growth like a

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:52.600
<v Speaker 1>growth version of the cash cow. Interesting, so you can

0:08:52.679 --> 0:08:55.720
<v Speaker 1>find growth and cash flow yep, and the cow is

0:08:55.800 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the emerging market cash cow. So this, this firm Pacer

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:01.199
<v Speaker 1>locked in on is hit. And every time you have

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 1>an indie blockbuster, they launched the sequels just like movies

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 1>A sudden, it's your franchise Rocky seven. Yeah, like this

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 1>is it. So it's interesting to see how this will

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>keep up. But overall I am watching fundamentally driven e

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:16.840
<v Speaker 1>t F s. I think they're gonna have actor Now.

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 1>By the way, is it is fundamental as a factor.

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 1>You could like throw that in with momentum and value

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:26.679
<v Speaker 1>and both audmental factors are built on fundamentals. So but

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 1>like momentum is not really fundamentals. Yeah, I mean, oh yeah,

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 1>you're right, that's just on price movement alright, value though,

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 1>is priced to earning different ways to define it. I

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:38.560
<v Speaker 1>would say that factors are within the larger world of

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:43.839
<v Speaker 1>fundamental ETFs. Factors are a slice of that big tent, James.

0:09:45.840 --> 0:09:47.680
<v Speaker 1>So I'm going to go to one that I talked

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:50.199
<v Speaker 1>about every time I'm on trillions. I feel like, but

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:53.320
<v Speaker 1>this is warranted, for there's a lot of news around GBTC,

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 1>which is the Great Scale Bitcoin truss Um. So this

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:59.079
<v Speaker 1>thing closed at a record discount. In your day, we

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 1>see a trade and a fifty percent discount, which basically

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 1>means the price of the shares of this trust are

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 1>trading at a fifty percent discount to the underlying value

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:09.560
<v Speaker 1>of the bitcoin it holds. So yeah, So basically, if

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 1>bitcoins at twenty, this thing is trading at ten. Yeah, roughly,

0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 1>So you basically get a gigantic hair cut off the

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 1>price of bitcoin if you're investing in this. But but

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 1>right now, there's no way to arbitrage that difference, right,

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 1>But the benefit is if you buy this now, like

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 1>you said, we'll use the twenty thousand number you used.

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 1>If you go from ten to twenty, A lot of

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>people think fifty percent discount. I'm going to get a

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:32.839
<v Speaker 1>fifty percent return, but that's a hundred percent return, ten thousand,

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent returns. So this is big money and we're

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:38.560
<v Speaker 1>seeing that come out in lawsuits. So part of what's

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 1>happening is Grayscale wants to convert this to an ETF.

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 1>They've been died by the SEC, as we've covered here

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:45.679
<v Speaker 1>many times. They have now sued the SEC after the

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 1>last denial. We're expecting oral arguments. There's written arguments going

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 1>on right now. Oral arguments like actual core cases going

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:53.920
<v Speaker 1>to happen in February and March. We'll get a decision,

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 1>likely before likely at some point in in the second quarter,

0:10:57.640 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 1>possibly in the third quarter. Then we can see a

0:10:59.800 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 1>PELS but who knows. We're gonna be watching that very closely.

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 1>The other thing is what happens when you sue the SEC.

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:09.120
<v Speaker 1>What kind of likelihood of success do you have? YEA.

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:12.080
<v Speaker 1>So we actually have litigation analysts here in Bloomberg Intelligence

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:14.840
<v Speaker 1>who are covering this from the litigation standpoint, and you'll

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:16.839
<v Speaker 1>see if you go on Twitter or social media, you'll

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:18.439
<v Speaker 1>see people talk about this like this is a frivolous

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 1>lawsuit to sue the SEC a regulator but there's a

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:22.959
<v Speaker 1>process set up for this. It's called an AP a

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:25.960
<v Speaker 1>procedural act. Basically you're supposed to treat like situations alike.

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Elliot Stein is our litigation analyst, and he gives them

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:31.839
<v Speaker 1>an odds around probably closer to thirty than fifty in that.

0:11:32.440 --> 0:11:38.400
<v Speaker 1>But it's not a frivolous situation. On the gp GBPC lawsuit,

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:41.079
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the option is you can. You can it

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:43.200
<v Speaker 1>would be buying GBDC in some way, right, I mean,

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:45.360
<v Speaker 1>there's this some way you can short bitcoined by GBDC,

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:46.679
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that. People have been doing that for a

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 1>long time. It has not worked out in the last

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 1>four years. Um, So that not only is that lawsuit

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 1>going on, now we have an investor for Tree Capital,

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 1>which is an activist they run hedge funds or an

0:11:56.280 --> 0:12:00.160
<v Speaker 1>activist investor special situation, and now they've sued grace Al

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 1>to get more information. So there's so many different things

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 1>happened lawsuit. And then we just had a letter from

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Michael Snison I might be pronounced his last name wrong.

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:09.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry. He's the he's the CEO of Gray Scale

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 1>and he basically says, if we failed to convert this

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:13.640
<v Speaker 1>to an e t F. We're going to do a

0:12:13.720 --> 0:12:16.959
<v Speaker 1>tender offering of the shares Virtue wants to owe them

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:19.559
<v Speaker 1>to open redemption program. I mean, there are so many things.

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:20.959
<v Speaker 1>We could do a whole show on this. There's a

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 1>whole so it's it's gonna be a lot happening in

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 1>this product. Yeah. No, GBTC is endlessly FAST's funny. It's

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 1>not even an ETF, but it's like, yeah, but it

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 1>attracted money because it seemed like an e t F

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 1>too many people and it was just the convenient way

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:40.439
<v Speaker 1>to get exposure. That said. What I'm also watching with

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:43.080
<v Speaker 1>crypto is how many filings are we going to see?

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:47.839
<v Speaker 1>Did the SPF drama scare away the market? But we've

0:12:47.920 --> 0:12:50.560
<v Speaker 1>seen already one filing here in the US to actually

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:53.719
<v Speaker 1>for crypto products that are going to come out, And

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:56.240
<v Speaker 1>in Hong Kong they launched their first two and they've

0:12:56.320 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 1>gotten decent money. So there's been a couple rays of

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:03.480
<v Speaker 1>light that this is going to carry on after SPF

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:05.960
<v Speaker 1>and the thrill of watching him go to jail is gone.

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 1>What do you got next? Deeric? One of the ones

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm watching next year is s t r V, which

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people don't know, but it's the Strive

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:17.839
<v Speaker 1>five ETF. And this is part of a theme that

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 1>I've been writing about, which is the cultural wars bleeding

0:13:20.679 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 1>into the E t F world. Strive basically came out

0:13:23.520 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and said, you know, basically in a reaction to black Rock, Look,

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 1>we're going to track the market like Beta, just like

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 1>a regular index fune. We're gonna track all different areas

0:13:32.000 --> 0:13:35.120
<v Speaker 1>of the market like black Rock does, except we're just

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:37.439
<v Speaker 1>going to vote for companies to make profits. We're not

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna do anything that's E s G. That's what I

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:41.560
<v Speaker 1>guess the name comes from, like, we want with them

0:13:41.600 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 1>to strive for excellence, not for these E s G programs.

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 1>So for the anti e s G crab, it's supposed

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:49.839
<v Speaker 1>to appeal to them. They have some big backers. This

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 1>thing already has a decent amount of assets. The company

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:55.439
<v Speaker 1>itself has half a billion in assets. Pretty good start.

0:13:56.040 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 1>This is also just interesting in that black Rock and

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Vanguard have started to look at programs where they're going

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:05.439
<v Speaker 1>to let their own their investors have a say and

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 1>how their shares are voted. Be interesting to see if

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:10.160
<v Speaker 1>that sort of steal some of the thunder of this

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 1>idea because if black Rock and Vanguard are going to

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of just turn over the voting, do you need

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 1>to Strive. Um, I'm sure Strive would make a case

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 1>while they're still important. But that is a big thing

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 1>that this is a big issue because black Rock and

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Vanguard owns so much of the stock market and how

0:14:26.320 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 1>they vote has a powerful position, and so this decentralization

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 1>of that voting is going to be interesting. Strives in

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 1>here basically saying we'll do it this one way, and

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 1>then E s G concerns Are they legit? Are they not?

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 1>So there's this whole area of the E t F

0:14:42.760 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>world that sort of become a political football, and so

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>it would be interesting to see if any big real

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 1>money moves over there or if this just becomes something

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 1>that we spend ten percent of our time talking about

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 1>but makes up like point five percent of the assets um,

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:00.040
<v Speaker 1>which is generally what E s G is like. And

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 1>also interesting to launch with Drill, the first E t

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:05.800
<v Speaker 1>F that they had, and then follow up with something

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 1>that's much more mainstream. So be curious to see where

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 1>they go. Okay, James, next, Yeah, so I'm gonna go

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 1>with one that a lot of people probably aren't talking

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 1>about or don't even know of. It's gonna be the

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Matthews China Active E t F m H and they

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 1>are just a hard traditional active manager. They tend to

0:15:28.640 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 1>be relatively concentrated in their picks. They have a bunch

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>of mutual funds. So m c h f X is

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the mutual fund that this is basically UM a clone of,

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 1>and they put in the E t F rapper. But

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 1>why I'm watching it has to do with a similar

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:42.480
<v Speaker 1>thing of what we talked about vanguards UH fund structure.

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 1>M c h f X pays out massive capital gains

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 1>every year because they're very active. The mutual fund structure

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 1>is not great because you often end up having to

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 1>pay capital gains. The E t F structure is efficient

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 1>because you can wash those gains out. So this thing

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 1>launched in April of last year, I believe UM, and

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 1>it we're watching see one if it's gonna have any

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 1>capital gains this year, which it doesn't look like it's

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 1>going to. But also it's gonna have a full year

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the following year. So this could be literally the poster

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:09.320
<v Speaker 1>child for why you should have an E T F rapper,

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 1>especially for something side by side, like, this is why

0:16:12.600 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 1>you want this one and not the other one exactly.

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean in a taxed advantage account, capital gains really

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 1>don't make that much of a difference. But if you're

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:20.560
<v Speaker 1>in a taxable account, and E t F can really

0:16:20.600 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 1>be a vastly more efficient vehicle than a mutual fund. Okay, Athanasios,

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 1>what do you got? Yeah? So on the team, you know,

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 1>we all follow basketball ericsivic basketball fans. So one theme

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:33.480
<v Speaker 1>we had for next year was just sort of back

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 1>to basics, right, and you know one was you know,

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 1>half court shots and Ali you sent a lot of

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:43.800
<v Speaker 1>like fanfare. I think we're gonna go back to basics,

0:16:43.920 --> 0:16:48.000
<v Speaker 1>more focused on fundamentals, focused on quality companies. So the

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 1>one I'm picking is the dimensional US High Profitability Company,

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 1>do you e t F? Which is d u HP.

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Now this is gonna sound crazy, but you know, member

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 1>companies that would like make stuff and make money Like

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I like these companies, and this is what this focus

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:06.880
<v Speaker 1>is on, Like companies that make stuff and are highly

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:09.879
<v Speaker 1>profitable and have good cash flow. Uh, and it's a

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 1>it's been a really good performers. This is outrageous. Yeah,

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 1>it sounds people would imagine being like, Okay, yeah, let's

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:20.119
<v Speaker 1>just pick companies that have money and make stuff, and

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 1>so I probably put this onto like a quality factor.

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 1>So it's just trying to pick out these So when

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:28.359
<v Speaker 1>you look at it at the surface, you're like, no,

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:30.680
<v Speaker 1>this is just the S and P five, But it

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 1>only hast overlap with the index. It's twenty two basis points.

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:37.720
<v Speaker 1>D f A is really specialized in this, so I

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 1>think they found a really good spot where it's just

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:43.840
<v Speaker 1>different enough. But it's got a lot of names in

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:46.120
<v Speaker 1>there that I think people will recognize, but they really

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 1>seem to excel in their overweights and underweights. But I

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 1>think this really big theme for next year is just

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:53.359
<v Speaker 1>going to be focused, go back to fundamentals, just focus

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:57.440
<v Speaker 1>on high quality companies. Yeah, by the way, that is

0:17:57.560 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 1>a companies that have money and make stuff. E t

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:06.359
<v Speaker 1>breaking news, breaking news. So Eric, how do you follow

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:07.959
<v Speaker 1>that up? Yeah, I mean I have one that's similar

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:11.480
<v Speaker 1>to that, Athanasios, And that's the advantis E t F

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Really all of their E t F. So I'm watching

0:18:14.200 --> 0:18:16.439
<v Speaker 1>this company. A lot of people don't know who they are,

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:19.480
<v Speaker 1>but they're an active manager and the main person used

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:22.920
<v Speaker 1>to work at d f A. So I believe they've

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:24.879
<v Speaker 1>come out and said, hey, we're like d f avorite,

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 1>we're cheaper and it's definitely worked. Um people should be

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:31.119
<v Speaker 1>looking at. So the one I really pointed out was

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:34.359
<v Speaker 1>a vu V, which is the small cap value e

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:37.720
<v Speaker 1>t F. This is an interesting product because in the

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 1>small cap value category there are e t s from

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 1>black Rock and Vanguard multiple but this e t F

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 1>a v u V took in four times more flows

0:18:46.600 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 1>than any of the other ones. That's hard to believe.

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 1>You rarely see a category with Vanguard and black Rock

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 1>where someone else wins, and you look into this, their

0:18:55.000 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 1>whole product line is taken in flows in like one month,

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:01.399
<v Speaker 1>one year, year to date, like just Green look like

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:04.399
<v Speaker 1>ARC maybe three years ago. And the reason these are

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:07.960
<v Speaker 1>interesting is a that they do focus on fundamentals, which

0:19:08.000 --> 0:19:10.560
<v Speaker 1>is back in vogue, and be their low cost uh

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 1>these are funds that are priced that the one I

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 1>just mentioned was basis points. Their U S fund is

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:18.399
<v Speaker 1>fifteen UH e M is thirty three, and they're all

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:21.119
<v Speaker 1>within that range. So this is what I would call,

0:19:21.280 --> 0:19:25.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, I frequently say dirt cheap or shiny objects

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 1>or where most of the flows go. This would be

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>dirt cheap. It happens to be active, So active I

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:33.639
<v Speaker 1>think can find a home either getting very active or

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe lowering their fee and being much more moderately priced

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 1>and advantas I feel has has shown that. And this

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:43.679
<v Speaker 1>company UM again it's probably one of the fastest growing

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:47.159
<v Speaker 1>on a percentage basis. But these kind of winds in

0:19:47.200 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 1>these categories like beating black Rock and Vanguard is no

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 1>easy feat. So uh, this is um an E T

0:19:53.240 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 1>F Small Cat Value. I also just wonder is that

0:19:56.240 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna rain for a while and you're in the two

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:00.959
<v Speaker 1>thousands Small Cat Value. You had a great run when

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:03.720
<v Speaker 1>the SMP was flat, and I wonder if Small Cat

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Value will have that decade long run again. I don't know,

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:08.800
<v Speaker 1>we'll see. That's another reason I pick that specific. One

0:20:08.840 --> 0:20:11.680
<v Speaker 1>of the event is lineup. Okay, interesting, Athanasia, what do

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 1>you got for us? Okay? One word? Bonds? So the

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:22.399
<v Speaker 1>year of the bond, right, so this is a rough year, kidding,

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 1>bonds are great. Um This is where I think most

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's fun to talk about a lot

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:29.920
<v Speaker 1>of the other products have been coming up, but I

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:32.359
<v Speaker 1>think where there's a lot of room for innovation isn't

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 1>bond ETFs. I think they've already they proved themselves that

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:39.639
<v Speaker 1>last year, what year is this? Now? What year? This

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 1>like three years running? Like hear me out bonds? So

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 1>you ten is the ticker. It's got a pretty generic name,

0:20:47.320 --> 0:20:50.960
<v Speaker 1>just the US Treasury Tenure nod TF. But well, I

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 1>this one, this one's a single bond ETF. So I

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:56.119
<v Speaker 1>think we saw the single stock ETFs come out this

0:20:56.280 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 1>year where I think this makes more senses with single bonds,

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:02.400
<v Speaker 1>so it's it's basically like you're holding a ten year bond.

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:05.879
<v Speaker 1>So what I like about this this issue where and

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the products they come out with they're very precise, and

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:11.639
<v Speaker 1>they're focusing on the most liquid parts of the of

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the bond market. So this is just treasuries that tend

0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to be liquid anyways. But I think this is gonna

0:21:16.000 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 1>open the door for a lot of innovation next year

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:21.880
<v Speaker 1>on target on slicing up the bond market, having more precision,

0:21:21.960 --> 0:21:25.400
<v Speaker 1>more efficientially, more liquidity. Uh So that's something that I'm

0:21:25.440 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 1>definitely keeping an eye on for next year. We'll see

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:30.000
<v Speaker 1>if you try and sneak this one past this next

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 1>year again too, making making a note to self here,

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:36.520
<v Speaker 1>what I actually wanted to use another one from this

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:40.440
<v Speaker 1>same company, FM Acceleration, You too, um so at Eighthan

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:42.880
<v Speaker 1>claimed it for his twenty three one of the ts,

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:44.920
<v Speaker 1>so I couldn't use it, But I'm also fascinated to

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:46.880
<v Speaker 1>watch these. They're launching a whole suite of these things

0:21:46.960 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 1>that only invest in on the run treasury securities, so

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be interesting to see how many how

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 1>advisors take to this. And they're they're basically trading vehicles

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:56.640
<v Speaker 1>for for treasury e t s, which sounds like it's

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:58.440
<v Speaker 1>not needed, but it really is niche because of the

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 1>way that on the run treasuries trade more than um

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the basket of treasuries that aren't necessarily just the on

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the run versions, Eric, what else you go for us? Yeah,

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I have one from fixed income. I can do a

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 1>little bonds. UM. The one I am looking at is

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the bond blocks triple C rated high yield corporate bond

0:22:15.160 --> 0:22:20.200
<v Speaker 1>e TF, which interesting x C c c UM for

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:24.520
<v Speaker 1>triple C obviously, um, this is interesting because uh, you know,

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 1>junk bond ETFs first of all had always been like

0:22:26.840 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 1>the canary in the coal mine for like liquidity mismatch concerns,

0:22:30.840 --> 0:22:33.399
<v Speaker 1>and so here comes one that goes really far in

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 1>terms of uh poorly rated junk. Right, So triple C

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:41.920
<v Speaker 1>would be like bad, right, And this has almost allocated

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 1>to it. For context, the next E t F with

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the most triple C is thirty, so it's triple the

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:52.680
<v Speaker 1>biggest one to the point, and H, Y, G and

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:55.639
<v Speaker 1>J and K only have about nine two triple C.

0:22:55.840 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 1>So this really is interesting in a couple of ways. A,

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 1>this thing is gonna yield a lot, and so will

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 1>people be attracted to that yield? At some point you're

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:06.960
<v Speaker 1>going to get people looking at that indicated yield. It's

0:23:06.960 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be pretty high, easily double digits, I'm guessing. Then.

0:23:10.359 --> 0:23:13.760
<v Speaker 1>The other question is junk bond ETFs have survived many

0:23:13.840 --> 0:23:16.040
<v Speaker 1>tests for sure, and I've been a defender of them.

0:23:16.080 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 1>They work fine, they see some discounts, but they trade

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:21.239
<v Speaker 1>on and largely it's because the bonds themselves haven't been

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 1>updated to the N A V s a little stale.

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:26.480
<v Speaker 1>But we haven't seen defaults. Like if we have a

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:29.720
<v Speaker 1>wave of defaults, this thing could could have some issues. Right,

0:23:29.800 --> 0:23:32.680
<v Speaker 1>If some of these junk companies here with these junk

0:23:32.720 --> 0:23:37.439
<v Speaker 1>bonds have default problems, this could have some structural issues.

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:41.480
<v Speaker 1>I hope it doesn't, but it's one to watch Goodwood

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:45.680
<v Speaker 1>if they're okay, okay, James. Next, Yeah, So I'm gonna

0:23:45.760 --> 0:23:49.359
<v Speaker 1>go with T s l Q, which is one of it.

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:52.640
<v Speaker 1>We just talked about single single bond ETFs. Now I'm

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:57.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna talk about single single stock and it's happen with Yeah.

0:23:57.359 --> 0:23:59.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this thing is. I mean it has sixty

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:01.440
<v Speaker 1>five million dollars an assis. It trades more than that

0:24:01.560 --> 0:24:05.680
<v Speaker 1>perfect year for this two So you know though, Yeah,

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 1>T s l Q is. It's an inverse tesla et

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:09.280
<v Speaker 1>F It's the it was. It was one of the

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:11.639
<v Speaker 1>first ones launched that too. It's an e t F.

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:13.560
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of an oxy moron to call on et

0:24:13.680 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 1>F and invest in a single equity. Some are like

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:18.360
<v Speaker 1>one point to five levered long summer one to two

0:24:18.520 --> 0:24:21.000
<v Speaker 1>leverage short. There's about twenty five of them on the

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 1>on the exchange right now. Um, there's been like eighty

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 1>to nine file. There's a couple now that are filing

0:24:26.400 --> 0:24:29.560
<v Speaker 1>that are basically uh leverage versions of e t f s.

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:31.959
<v Speaker 1>But I'm focused on the single security ones we were

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I was very bullish on this personally when we were

0:24:33.960 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 1>talking if we talked about in Q one of twenty

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:38.440
<v Speaker 1>two Q two of twenty two. But basically the SEC

0:24:38.640 --> 0:24:39.879
<v Speaker 1>we thought these were going to come out, but the

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:42.119
<v Speaker 1>SEC has vastly limited the amount of leverage that you

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:43.639
<v Speaker 1>can use. You can get way more leverage in these

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:46.199
<v Speaker 1>single security e t s in Europe than you can

0:24:46.440 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 1>here in the States, and I think traders just aren't

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:50.879
<v Speaker 1>going to be that attractive. What the what do they

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 1>happen to that? So it depends, it depends on the

0:24:53.640 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 1>volatility of the underlying stock that you're investing in. So

0:24:56.680 --> 0:24:58.680
<v Speaker 1>if you ever really volatile stock, you're not gonna go

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 1>beyond one x inverse. Same so t SLQ you can

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 1>only get one one x inverse. There's also another one

0:25:04.359 --> 0:25:07.119
<v Speaker 1>that has some decent assets is the the the Apple

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 1>inverse from direction A A p D, So that is

0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:12.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty million assets, but it doesn't trade as nearly as much,

0:25:12.680 --> 0:25:14.879
<v Speaker 1>and everything else like really doesn't trade much at all,

0:25:15.000 --> 0:25:16.920
<v Speaker 1>has very minimal assets. We think they could be used

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:19.399
<v Speaker 1>maybe around earnings time, but we just they're just not

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:21.560
<v Speaker 1>gaining a lot of traction, partially because they don't have

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:24.000
<v Speaker 1>that extra leverage. And also I mean I think I

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of people thought these were gonna be

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:27.639
<v Speaker 1>very successful, like I said, Like I said, so did

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I UM, and it's just not turning out to be.

0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:31.639
<v Speaker 1>So I'll be watching this whole space to see how

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:33.680
<v Speaker 1>many of them close or how many of them try

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:36.399
<v Speaker 1>to launch and then ultimately closed within a short time period.

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:40.960
<v Speaker 1>I will say, test test loa Q is unbelievable. I

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 1>mean it's trading now regularly over a hundred million dollars

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 1>a day. That's like big boy level, and it's got

0:25:46.119 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 1>it's up eighty eight percent in the past three months.

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:51.159
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's gonna You're gonna find some buyers with

0:25:51.359 --> 0:25:54.360
<v Speaker 1>that kind of performance, perfect perfect, perfect timing. Yeah, yeah,

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 1>this is um. This is a legit hit and this

0:25:57.960 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 1>will keep people coming and trying as long as you

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:03.160
<v Speaker 1>have one or two of these. But to James's point,

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:06.480
<v Speaker 1>I think they're gonna limit it to really high profile,

0:26:06.680 --> 0:26:10.240
<v Speaker 1>controversial stocks and not just blanket every stock with a

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 1>inverse and leverage version because who really needs to change

0:26:14.560 --> 0:26:16.879
<v Speaker 1>like one point five x fisor I mean, who do

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:20.760
<v Speaker 1>we really need that? What do you got for us? Okay,

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:25.760
<v Speaker 1>K pop, which is the well this is I got

0:26:25.840 --> 0:26:29.160
<v Speaker 1>bad news for you. Because I think this is gonna

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:33.440
<v Speaker 1>close and well, it's not K pop per se. I

0:26:33.600 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 1>think this is indicative of how crazy and niche some

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:41.479
<v Speaker 1>of the launches have gotten over the last couple of years. Right.

0:26:41.520 --> 0:26:45.439
<v Speaker 1>It was the byproduct of this really strong bull market.

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Launches were coming rapid place. Yeah, and they were getting

0:26:50.320 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 1>really niche. It's not against K pop. I think it's

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:55.119
<v Speaker 1>just gonna be indicative of a theme that we are

0:26:55.240 --> 0:26:58.520
<v Speaker 1>tracking for next year, and that's a lot more closures,

0:26:58.920 --> 0:27:00.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think that these ones are going to be

0:27:00.840 --> 0:27:03.400
<v Speaker 1>at higher risk, not a lot of the other ones

0:27:03.600 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 1>for closures, because they're going to be they're smaller, they're

0:27:06.560 --> 0:27:08.560
<v Speaker 1>more niche and focused. They're not gonna be able to

0:27:08.640 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 1>appeal to like a bigger investor base. So, you know,

0:27:12.160 --> 0:27:15.840
<v Speaker 1>any type of thematic or niche play like this, it's

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:17.640
<v Speaker 1>just been tough. A lot of them have been underwater.

0:27:17.840 --> 0:27:20.160
<v Speaker 1>And then, like Eric had mentioned, one of our themes

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:23.119
<v Speaker 1>just you know, focus on fundamentals. Next year, I think

0:27:23.160 --> 0:27:25.399
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be a purging of some of these strategies.

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:28.879
<v Speaker 1>So K pop is just one I'm watching to unfortunately

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:32.240
<v Speaker 1>be added to the graveyard for next year. He wanted

0:27:32.280 --> 0:27:34.920
<v Speaker 1>to do this headline, k pop is gonna k flop,

0:27:36.440 --> 0:27:39.960
<v Speaker 1>That's why. Just but it was Catchy's New York post stuff.

0:27:40.320 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, we could do a TikTok off of that.

0:27:42.000 --> 0:27:43.359
<v Speaker 1>We had the K pop guy on, and these are

0:27:43.440 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 1>real people with you know, thoughts, hopes and dreams, and

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:49.120
<v Speaker 1>so I don't want to totally like crap on people's ideas.

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:52.280
<v Speaker 1>But this is pretty out there and it's seventy basis

0:27:52.320 --> 0:27:55.399
<v Speaker 1>points and it's launched into a really rough market. I

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:57.960
<v Speaker 1>agree with Tom. It's just, you know, timing might have

0:27:58.000 --> 0:28:09.120
<v Speaker 1>helped this thing, but the timing was not there. Announcers,

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:13.080
<v Speaker 1>you got another one I do. And it's maybe even

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:16.280
<v Speaker 1>like the whole reason we're here, right, And the ETF

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:19.040
<v Speaker 1>has always been there, but we never realized that. And

0:28:19.119 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 1>it's just, well, how do we track the growth of

0:28:22.200 --> 0:28:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the E t F industry? Right? There's podcasts and shows

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:30.119
<v Speaker 1>and now there's flows are still really strong, there's product

0:28:30.200 --> 0:28:36.040
<v Speaker 1>that's coming, there's conversions. Yeah, you're you're you're totally trying

0:28:36.040 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 1>to blow our mind for next year. So who you know?

0:28:38.960 --> 0:28:41.120
<v Speaker 1>And it's this et F We sort of talk about

0:28:41.160 --> 0:28:43.880
<v Speaker 1>it all. We know who who the big players are,

0:28:44.280 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 1>all the issuers, the asset managers. But there's a whole

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 1>ecosystem behind that, right, there's market makers, index providers, exchanges administrators.

0:28:54.080 --> 0:28:56.720
<v Speaker 1>They're all benefiting from it. You're killing me, You're you're

0:28:56.840 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 1>killing me. What are you talking about? So the ticker

0:29:00.160 --> 0:29:04.080
<v Speaker 1>is k C, which is the spider SMP Capital Markets

0:29:04.120 --> 0:29:06.680
<v Speaker 1>e t F. Now, there used to be an e

0:29:06.800 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 1>t F that tracked It was called the ETF Industry

0:29:10.000 --> 0:29:13.320
<v Speaker 1>e t F by Torosso, but they closed it unfortunately.

0:29:13.960 --> 0:29:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I remember I was looking in the past and it's

0:29:18.240 --> 0:29:21.480
<v Speaker 1>not well, it's not marketed like that. It's almost identical

0:29:21.560 --> 0:29:25.320
<v Speaker 1>to the performance of the Tarrosto product. So this is

0:29:25.400 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of a backdoorway into play the growth of the industry,

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and you're getting exposure. It's a lot of the other

0:29:30.840 --> 0:29:33.840
<v Speaker 1>firms that maybe you don't necessarily think about when everyone

0:29:34.000 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 1>is moving over and converting into E t S. Thet

0:29:36.560 --> 0:29:38.760
<v Speaker 1>F industry is like the media industry. They love talking

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:47.760
<v Speaker 1>about themselves. Oh yeah, Eric and Jack Bogel, I guess so,

0:29:47.840 --> 0:29:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, well, this is an e t F podcast.

0:29:50.480 --> 0:29:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Should we talk about you know, eighties metal bands, I'm

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:56.960
<v Speaker 1>fine with it, Oh yeah, and nineties basketball, which I

0:29:57.000 --> 0:29:59.160
<v Speaker 1>know you're also fine with Yeah, let's talk. Let's talk,

0:29:59.200 --> 0:30:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Michael Jordan, come on, um, good good. Also, you basically

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:07.760
<v Speaker 1>made Eric fall silent. The other thing is ETFs are

0:30:07.800 --> 0:30:10.120
<v Speaker 1>going to trade about fifty trillion dollars with the shares

0:30:10.160 --> 0:30:12.160
<v Speaker 1>this year, and this has a lot of the firms

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:15.640
<v Speaker 1>that do the market making and exchanges and so ETFs

0:30:15.720 --> 0:30:17.560
<v Speaker 1>may not make as much money as mutual funds and

0:30:17.600 --> 0:30:19.400
<v Speaker 1>expense ratio, but they trade a ton and that's a

0:30:19.520 --> 0:30:21.600
<v Speaker 1>revenue generator for You're gonna need to change the name

0:30:21.600 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 1>of the podcast to tens of trillions, not just trillions.

0:30:24.720 --> 0:30:26.480
<v Speaker 1>The beauty of trillions is that the accounts for tens

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 1>of trillions. Yeah, and yeah, and you you were good. Yeah, well,

0:30:30.280 --> 0:30:33.960
<v Speaker 1>no cruise control. Rebecca sin And who does our Asian research,

0:30:34.040 --> 0:30:36.160
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to she's gonna start a podcast and we

0:30:36.240 --> 0:30:37.720
<v Speaker 1>were thinking of what's the name, and I was like,

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:42.520
<v Speaker 1>you should probably go to the next step with gazillions. Eric,

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:45.440
<v Speaker 1>you got another. Yeah, this one is really This one

0:30:45.560 --> 0:30:47.720
<v Speaker 1>is a very small ETF and I'm not sure to

0:30:47.960 --> 0:30:51.680
<v Speaker 1>even last, but the top gun ETF. Wait, what's the

0:30:51.720 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 1>ticker first t g n Okay, when did it launch?

0:30:55.080 --> 0:30:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Like two months ago. It's called the A X S.

0:30:57.880 --> 0:31:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Brendan Woods Top Gun Index CTF. And look, besides the

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:06.240
<v Speaker 1>whole top gun reference, which is you know, ets like

0:31:06.320 --> 0:31:08.600
<v Speaker 1>to have fun for sure, what I what's interesting is

0:31:08.640 --> 0:31:13.160
<v Speaker 1>it's only twenty seven stocks are I'll give you some example.

0:31:13.840 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 1>MasterCard is in it, Bate and Switch, United Health, and

0:31:20.000 --> 0:31:23.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of stuff I don't recognize. There's somefing top

0:31:23.400 --> 0:31:27.600
<v Speaker 1>gun be well, best in category exactly. This is a

0:31:27.720 --> 0:31:29.800
<v Speaker 1>big thing I think. I think you're going to see

0:31:29.880 --> 0:31:33.000
<v Speaker 1>a future where active managers come in with their best ideas.

0:31:33.400 --> 0:31:36.200
<v Speaker 1>They're not going to launch, you know, three hundred stocks

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and moves a lot like okay, so they're playing off

0:31:38.200 --> 0:31:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Tom Scarrett saying that you're the best of the best. Yeah,

0:31:40.840 --> 0:31:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the best of the best exactly of you know, according

0:31:43.680 --> 0:31:46.360
<v Speaker 1>to this manager. Think about it. If you have a

0:31:46.440 --> 0:31:49.000
<v Speaker 1>cheap beta core like you use Vanguard and black Rock

0:31:49.080 --> 0:31:52.680
<v Speaker 1>for like your vast majority of your core portfolio, and

0:31:52.760 --> 0:31:55.240
<v Speaker 1>he'd spend three basis points on it, you know, you

0:31:55.360 --> 0:31:57.960
<v Speaker 1>want something very convicted. Again, this is a little bit

0:31:58.000 --> 0:32:01.600
<v Speaker 1>of the cathy would affect highly concentrated, but that's what

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:06.160
<v Speaker 1>people want because people now have of their portfolio available

0:32:06.160 --> 0:32:09.520
<v Speaker 1>for hot sauce. How much is this fund? How much

0:32:09.560 --> 0:32:12.200
<v Speaker 1>the expense ratio? Let me look, because it's active, right

0:32:13.960 --> 0:32:16.560
<v Speaker 1>basis points that is a little price, even Cathy would

0:32:17.640 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 1>The point of this is, I think we're going to

0:32:19.920 --> 0:32:21.440
<v Speaker 1>see more of this. We're going to see even bigger

0:32:21.480 --> 0:32:24.960
<v Speaker 1>managers come out with more concentrated active portfolios. And the

0:32:25.080 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 1>reason for that again is because it can compliment jee

0:32:28.040 --> 0:32:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Beta and not competing with it. Is there a mutual

0:32:31.280 --> 0:32:33.640
<v Speaker 1>fund based on this or is this an offshoot of

0:32:33.680 --> 0:32:35.800
<v Speaker 1>a mutual fund or not? It's a totally brand new

0:32:35.960 --> 0:32:41.600
<v Speaker 1>totally what is the sequel called Maverick going to invest in?

0:32:41.920 --> 0:32:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Maverick is going to hold the children, the children? Yeah,

0:32:45.040 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. It's gonna help the children, and the

0:32:47.800 --> 0:32:49.880
<v Speaker 1>children will save him and everybody will have their art

0:32:49.960 --> 0:32:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and there's gonna be a portion there that'll that will

0:32:52.040 --> 0:32:57.160
<v Speaker 1>be enough fund you. But you got you gotta wait years. Yeah,

0:32:57.680 --> 0:33:02.560
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of a pandemic again, right, Yeah, I

0:33:02.720 --> 0:33:07.719
<v Speaker 1>like that. You were your aviators for that. He's got

0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 1>his leather bomber jackets. That's right. I am dangerous. No, no,

0:33:12.600 --> 0:33:16.160
<v Speaker 1>but I agree on the concentration. Um, I think it's

0:33:16.200 --> 0:33:19.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, top gun. But you probably see top ideas yep, yes,

0:33:19.360 --> 0:33:21.600
<v Speaker 1>coming out next year. So I like it. That's that's

0:33:21.600 --> 0:33:24.840
<v Speaker 1>a great pick. Who comes up with the ticker up?

0:33:25.280 --> 0:33:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Who proposes tickers? Is that the marketing side or is

0:33:27.480 --> 0:33:29.240
<v Speaker 1>it the fun manager? But it could be anybody, could

0:33:29.280 --> 0:33:31.640
<v Speaker 1>be anybody. Um, we were just talking about that a

0:33:31.640 --> 0:33:34.640
<v Speaker 1>little bit like t g N a little underwhelming. I

0:33:34.680 --> 0:33:36.400
<v Speaker 1>think you could have done better with this ticker gun

0:33:36.880 --> 0:33:43.600
<v Speaker 1>No mav ice are there four letter yes r r K. Yeah.

0:33:44.280 --> 0:33:46.120
<v Speaker 1>This guy might might not have wanted to be so,

0:33:47.000 --> 0:33:48.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean old than why would he name a top gun?

0:33:48.760 --> 0:33:50.880
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know anyway, Um he chose it, but

0:33:51.880 --> 0:33:54.160
<v Speaker 1>like approximately what his vintage is? We know how old

0:33:54.200 --> 0:33:58.120
<v Speaker 1>he is? Last one? Yeah, so the last one I'm

0:33:58.120 --> 0:34:00.200
<v Speaker 1>going to tell about his v x U S, which

0:34:00.280 --> 0:34:02.800
<v Speaker 1>is kind of boring. It's just the global stock market

0:34:02.840 --> 0:34:07.560
<v Speaker 1>without the us UM. Yeah, yeah, it isn't believe it,

0:34:07.600 --> 0:34:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I believe it or not. Some people might want to

0:34:09.120 --> 0:34:12.319
<v Speaker 1>invest not in the us UM. So this thing, it's

0:34:12.320 --> 0:34:14.719
<v Speaker 1>a it's a massive fundage from Vanguard. But why it

0:34:14.840 --> 0:34:16.719
<v Speaker 1>draws so much interest from me is because this thing

0:34:16.800 --> 0:34:19.399
<v Speaker 1>has seen three days of outflows in its history since

0:34:19.440 --> 0:34:22.560
<v Speaker 1>it launched in three days of outflows. That's it, No

0:34:22.760 --> 0:34:25.279
<v Speaker 1>nothing else. Part of the reason is because, as most

0:34:25.320 --> 0:34:28.880
<v Speaker 1>people likely know, the US market has trounced the international

0:34:29.000 --> 0:34:32.360
<v Speaker 1>market over the last decade um. But if that starts

0:34:32.400 --> 0:34:34.440
<v Speaker 1>to change, we might see some outflows here. So I'm

0:34:34.440 --> 0:34:36.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna be watching for that because essentially, if you have

0:34:36.600 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 1>like a set allocation, you want to have a certain

0:34:38.200 --> 0:34:40.640
<v Speaker 1>percentage to to your domestic stocks. If you're in the US,

0:34:40.840 --> 0:34:43.880
<v Speaker 1>you want have a certain percentage international. As US continually

0:34:43.920 --> 0:34:47.080
<v Speaker 1>outperforms the international, you're gonna sell the US and buy international.

0:34:47.200 --> 0:34:50.239
<v Speaker 1>So we that's my theory on why this thing consistently

0:34:50.280 --> 0:34:52.600
<v Speaker 1>sees inflows day in and day out and doesn't see

0:34:52.640 --> 0:34:55.560
<v Speaker 1>a single day of outflow. Um. So I'm gonna be

0:34:55.640 --> 0:34:58.560
<v Speaker 1>watching basically to see, uh if if we can see

0:34:58.600 --> 0:35:01.680
<v Speaker 1>international stocks keep up. They've actually if you look in

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:05.680
<v Speaker 1>two they kept pace roughly with with domestic stocks. So

0:35:06.640 --> 0:35:08.640
<v Speaker 1>if we see a outperformance of international stocks, I'll be

0:35:08.640 --> 0:35:11.200
<v Speaker 1>watching to see if this things these outflows. Okay, there

0:35:11.200 --> 0:35:14.200
<v Speaker 1>are a couple of Bloomberg intelligence analysts who couldn't join

0:35:14.280 --> 0:35:18.240
<v Speaker 1>our recording, Henry Jim and Europe and Rebecca's in in Asia,

0:35:18.280 --> 0:35:22.919
<v Speaker 1>But we do want to go through some of their picks. Athanasius,

0:35:23.000 --> 0:35:27.040
<v Speaker 1>you wanna kick us off with with some of Henry's Uh, sure,

0:35:27.239 --> 0:35:30.520
<v Speaker 1>so I wanna. Eric doesn't like acronyms, so just no,

0:35:30.760 --> 0:35:32.760
<v Speaker 1>all of them has you sits in the name already,

0:35:32.840 --> 0:35:36.000
<v Speaker 1>so I won't repeat it every time. I'm just trying

0:35:36.080 --> 0:35:40.120
<v Speaker 1>to keep the audience and falling asleep European regulatory acronyms.

0:35:40.160 --> 0:35:41.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you're listening right now, do you want

0:35:41.840 --> 0:35:46.399
<v Speaker 1>him to just like sort of spellt s about those off? Okay,

0:35:46.400 --> 0:35:49.759
<v Speaker 1>go ahead for another good but sure, it's a lot

0:35:49.800 --> 0:35:52.560
<v Speaker 1>of the similar themes that we've seen in the US,

0:35:52.640 --> 0:35:55.600
<v Speaker 1>so like dividends, you know, people want income. It's actually

0:35:55.640 --> 0:35:58.239
<v Speaker 1>probably a bigger focus in Europe. So one of his

0:35:58.360 --> 0:36:01.560
<v Speaker 1>picks was the smp US David and E t F

0:36:01.960 --> 0:36:03.760
<v Speaker 1>U D v D, which is one of the tickers.

0:36:03.840 --> 0:36:06.600
<v Speaker 1>And then inflation. You know, the U S isn't the

0:36:06.640 --> 0:36:09.520
<v Speaker 1>only place in inflation, it's it's you know that's going

0:36:09.640 --> 0:36:12.359
<v Speaker 1>up in Europe too. There's some interesting etf that are

0:36:12.440 --> 0:36:16.239
<v Speaker 1>tracking European inflation expectations. This one's by Licks or the

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Licks or your year two tenure inflation Expectations et f

0:36:20.239 --> 0:36:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I NFL is a ticker there and uh, Henry is

0:36:23.800 --> 0:36:27.240
<v Speaker 1>pretty bullish on active ets. They haven't really penetrated that market,

0:36:27.560 --> 0:36:30.279
<v Speaker 1>uh as much as they have here. So he's looking

0:36:30.320 --> 0:36:33.360
<v Speaker 1>at some by JP Morgan, who I think now is

0:36:33.440 --> 0:36:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the largest active shop in the US. They've got a

0:36:36.960 --> 0:36:40.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty big or they're trying to increase that of fall

0:36:40.280 --> 0:36:42.560
<v Speaker 1>hold in Europe. So he's got one j R e U,

0:36:42.640 --> 0:36:46.400
<v Speaker 1>which is a JP Morgan US Research Enhanced Index Equity

0:36:46.800 --> 0:36:49.200
<v Speaker 1>e s G. Oh my god, e t F. That

0:36:49.360 --> 0:36:53.640
<v Speaker 1>is a long name. Uh, did I get you a

0:36:53.719 --> 0:36:58.080
<v Speaker 1>niner in there? And James, you got one more for

0:36:58.239 --> 0:37:00.560
<v Speaker 1>us from from Henry. Yeah, it's just r M a U.

0:37:00.719 --> 0:37:02.640
<v Speaker 1>It's a gold et F. It's listed on the London

0:37:02.719 --> 0:37:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Stock Exchange. Henry is interested in looking at precious metals

0:37:06.200 --> 0:37:09.160
<v Speaker 1>ets and specifically gold because he's watching there was a

0:37:09.239 --> 0:37:11.239
<v Speaker 1>lot of bitcoin and crypto et f s that launched

0:37:11.280 --> 0:37:13.560
<v Speaker 1>in Europe and people have been burned pretty badly. There

0:37:13.640 --> 0:37:16.640
<v Speaker 1>was actually an f t T or FTX token e

0:37:16.760 --> 0:37:18.320
<v Speaker 1>t F in Europe. There's a few of them that

0:37:18.400 --> 0:37:20.160
<v Speaker 1>have closed. There's been a few things that have been

0:37:20.239 --> 0:37:22.279
<v Speaker 1>hit really hard. So he thinks people are going to

0:37:22.320 --> 0:37:27.759
<v Speaker 1>go back to the tangible tangible. Yeah, exactly. Uh and

0:37:28.040 --> 0:37:32.160
<v Speaker 1>and Eric, you've got some from Rebecca uh and from Asia. Yeah. Um,

0:37:32.520 --> 0:37:36.080
<v Speaker 1>she's really watching the tech, the tech scene over in

0:37:36.200 --> 0:37:38.719
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong and China. I mean some of these are

0:37:39.239 --> 0:37:43.520
<v Speaker 1>like the c SAW three oh three three. The tickers

0:37:43.560 --> 0:37:46.160
<v Speaker 1>in Asia are like so they're just numbers basically, but

0:37:46.719 --> 0:37:49.960
<v Speaker 1>generally speaking, she's looking at tech because you know, China

0:37:50.040 --> 0:37:51.840
<v Speaker 1>has been beat up in the tech sector in particular.

0:37:52.160 --> 0:37:54.719
<v Speaker 1>So she's watching some tech ETFs over there. So looking

0:37:54.719 --> 0:37:57.719
<v Speaker 1>at the crypto et FUM. She was covering the Hong

0:37:57.800 --> 0:38:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Kong cover the first ether and bitcoin ETFs, so she's

0:38:00.560 --> 0:38:02.719
<v Speaker 1>following them. They already have I believe somewhere in the

0:38:02.719 --> 0:38:05.719
<v Speaker 1>neighborhood eighty million right off the bat. It's really good.

0:38:06.040 --> 0:38:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Eighty million over there is like that would be like

0:38:07.880 --> 0:38:09.800
<v Speaker 1>if it was a billion dollars in the US in

0:38:09.960 --> 0:38:12.040
<v Speaker 1>terms of how big that et F market is versus ours.

0:38:12.680 --> 0:38:14.520
<v Speaker 1>She also like semi conductor. She's looking at a semi

0:38:14.560 --> 0:38:18.680
<v Speaker 1>conductor et F. The Samsung Bloomberg Global Semiconductor three one

0:38:18.800 --> 0:38:22.600
<v Speaker 1>three two h K is the ticker UM. This track

0:38:22.760 --> 0:38:25.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty companies. Her point is that semi is obviously used

0:38:25.920 --> 0:38:29.080
<v Speaker 1>in industrial shows, but also electric vehicles, so they can

0:38:29.120 --> 0:38:32.080
<v Speaker 1>be an e V play as well. And then our

0:38:32.160 --> 0:38:38.480
<v Speaker 1>final one, she's looking at Indonesia and Thailand, so if

0:38:38.520 --> 0:38:41.040
<v Speaker 1>you look at Southeast Asia, she likes those two countries,

0:38:41.080 --> 0:38:43.520
<v Speaker 1>or at least thinks good things may happen there. And

0:38:43.680 --> 0:38:46.840
<v Speaker 1>so she's looking at the premier Dow Jones Emerging a

0:38:47.000 --> 0:38:51.040
<v Speaker 1>can Titans one Dred which cut two tracks the top

0:38:51.120 --> 0:38:56.560
<v Speaker 1>one hundred companies in Indonesia, Malaysia, it's in Vietnam. Interest. Yeah,

0:38:56.680 --> 0:38:58.719
<v Speaker 1>so that's like, um, you know again, sort of like

0:38:59.480 --> 0:39:03.000
<v Speaker 1>a cont and traded Southeast Asia et F. Given that

0:39:03.120 --> 0:39:05.360
<v Speaker 1>there's again a lot of Asia is really just like

0:39:05.520 --> 0:39:07.680
<v Speaker 1>can we please rebound because they've been beat up even

0:39:07.719 --> 0:39:09.880
<v Speaker 1>worse than us. And that's sort of I think the

0:39:09.960 --> 0:39:13.920
<v Speaker 1>thread through a lot of her her t s James

0:39:14.239 --> 0:39:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Athanasios Scarlett, thanks for joining us on Trillions. Thanks for

0:39:17.440 --> 0:39:19.719
<v Speaker 1>having me back. I was happy to be here, was

0:39:19.760 --> 0:39:22.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of fun. Happy New Year, Happy New Year.

0:39:27.200 --> 0:39:29.719
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to Trillions. Until next time. You can

0:39:29.760 --> 0:39:34.080
<v Speaker 1>find us on the Bloomberg Terminal, Bloomberg dot com, Apple Podcast, Spotify,

0:39:34.320 --> 0:39:36.560
<v Speaker 1>and wherever else you like to listen. We'd love to

0:39:36.600 --> 0:39:39.719
<v Speaker 1>hear from you. We're on Twitter. I'm at Joel Weaper Show.

0:39:39.880 --> 0:39:43.960
<v Speaker 1>He's at Eric Faltinas. This episode of Trillions was produced

0:39:44.000 --> 0:39:45.800
<v Speaker 1>by Magnus Hindrances but