WEBVTT - How Profiling Works

0:00:00.440 --> 0:00:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Dude, do do what was that? That is a heraldic announcement? Yes,

0:00:08.640 --> 0:00:11.200
<v Speaker 1>before we get going. Uh. I know people on social

0:00:11.240 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>media already know this stuff, but I wanted to announce

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:18.480
<v Speaker 1>on the podcast that Chuck here has adopted a baby. Girl.

0:00:18.920 --> 0:00:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Chuck has a baby, A beautiful baby. Yeah she is.

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:25.159
<v Speaker 1>She's cuteie. She she was ten days late, so she

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 1>came out not looking like one of those little alien

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:31.640
<v Speaker 1>creatures fully formed. Yes, what's her name, Chuck? Her name

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 1>is Ruby Rose Bryant Man. She's so cute and she

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 1>was born on your birthday. Yeah, isn't that crazy? One

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:40.839
<v Speaker 1>of the better days of the year. Duly take but

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>isn't that remarkable? I think it is remarkable out of

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:46.919
<v Speaker 1>all the days. And I was literally I was just like, well,

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 1>let me scroll through the celebrity birthday it's just you know,

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>for giggles to see what you know, who shares your birthday?

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 1>About three course the way down it's all your face.

0:00:55.800 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>And I had forgotten it was your birthday because I

0:00:57.480 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 1>was just in another planet. And I like, immediately I

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 1>was like, dimly, you got to see this. You'll never

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:06.199
<v Speaker 1>guess whose birthday she shares. So I think that's really neat. Um.

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, uh, thank you everybody for the support. Stop

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 1>stop chuck, yes on behalf of every stuff you should know.

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 1>A listener out there, congratulations to you and Emily. Do

0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:21.120
<v Speaker 1>you feel like you can speak for them, Yes, of course,

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 1>because there might be like one guy out there he's like,

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't care, he can stop listening right now. But

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 1>I do have some people to thank. Um. This happened

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>in Tulsa, Oklahoma, and um, we stayed in this little

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:37.320
<v Speaker 1>area called East Village. It was literally like a block

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:42.640
<v Speaker 1>in this loft and airbnb loft and above pizza place

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 1>and across the street from a bar. And I'll bet

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:46.640
<v Speaker 1>you have some people to think. Yeah, these people like

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 1>took us in as family. It was like literally every day,

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:52.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, for ten days late. We're out there two

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:54.600
<v Speaker 1>days early, so for like two weeks they were like,

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 1>what's going on? You know, where's this baby? So I

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 1>want to thank I've just been which you would love

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>to do. This cocktail bar right up your alley. It

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:07.280
<v Speaker 1>sounds like you said cocktail bar. Yeah, And not only

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:09.680
<v Speaker 1>do they make like fresh you know, fresh ingredients, but

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:11.960
<v Speaker 1>they don't have like a thing of cucumber sliced stuff.

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>They cucumber as needed and you know the jalapeno you

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 1>would have. They were doing it right there. So Jamie

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:22.919
<v Speaker 1>and Nate and Nicole and Ian the chef at I've

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:24.360
<v Speaker 1>just been. It was the stuff you should know. Man.

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah. He came out and he was like, is

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:28.919
<v Speaker 1>it who I think it is? How fortuitous? How fortuitous?

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 1>And then uh, East Village Bohemian Pizzeria. We stayed above

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 1>this place and they were great. Did the smell drive

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:37.800
<v Speaker 1>you nuts all the time? But we ate a lot

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:41.639
<v Speaker 1>of people. Uh So Pat there and my boy Max,

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Max and I really hit it off. We're like genuine

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 1>life pals now. Uh and he at the end I

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 1>go to leave and I just give him a letter

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:54.639
<v Speaker 1>saying thank you and here's my contact info. And then like, ps,

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 1>by the way, I have a podcast. He's an ornithologist,

0:02:56.840 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>he has his master's, but he's not doing that right

0:02:59.880 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 1>now out you know, he's running this pizza point and

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:04.239
<v Speaker 1>just a really smart guy. Was like, I think you

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 1>might like this podcast. I do. He comes up and

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:10.920
<v Speaker 1>tells me afterwards, this is like our parting words. He

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 1>was like, dude, your chuck. It's like really I had

0:03:14.200 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>a weird like thing. He said, I knew that you

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:18.960
<v Speaker 1>seem familiar, but I didn't want to say anything, like

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>even watched the TV show. Oh wow. So Max was like,

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:27.640
<v Speaker 1>that's probably why I didn't want to say anything. Yeah,

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 1>he didn't want to bring it up. So huge thanks

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:33.800
<v Speaker 1>to those guys. And then um our caseworker Jessica Um

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 1>also a stuff you should know fan. That is amazing

0:03:36.320 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 1>because at the end of our first call, like a

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>month ago, she went, all right, we've got business done.

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I have something I have to admit. It's like I'm

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 1>a huge man man. So it was weird. It was

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 1>like the stuff you should Know nation sort of caring

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>for me. Yeah, and all of the people like you.

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:53.840
<v Speaker 1>You put a picture of Ruby rose up. Yeah, and

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 1>like broke the internet. It was it was people love

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the new Bores. Well yeah, but people love Chuck's newborn.

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 1>But you know it could have been a puppy and

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 1>probably gotten. Don't think I don't do that was very sweet. Yeah,

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 1>so that meant a lot to me. But Jessica and

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 1>her two sons, Hugh and Henry, I know they are

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 1>listeners to They are awesome boys. And she really took

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:16.840
<v Speaker 1>care of us, So I'm glad it worked out. Like man,

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 1>three weeks in Tulsa, it was a weird and stressful

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and but it sounds wonderful. Yeah, good start though. Yeah,

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean we were in there. Emily helped deliver this baby,

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 1>and I was in the man zone right behind. I

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 1>am so proud of you guys. Yeah, I'm so happy

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:33.599
<v Speaker 1>for you guys. I also want to say Jerry is

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:37.560
<v Speaker 1>not allowed to talk. Jerry feels the exact same way. She's, well,

0:04:37.600 --> 0:04:40.359
<v Speaker 1>we could take the duck table today maybe, Jerry, how

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 1>do you feel? Yes, yeah, she agreed. She just spelled

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 1>out on the speaking spelled him anyway. This is not

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna become the New Baby Show. Um, she will probably

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:56.720
<v Speaker 1>disappear from uh your lives, but just know that we're

0:04:56.760 --> 0:04:59.479
<v Speaker 1>all doing great and thank you for the support. Good

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>all right, yep, nice job, Chuck, thanks man, congratulies, Thank you, sir.

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff you should Know from House Stuff Works

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:17.599
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark.

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 1>There's Charles W. Chuck Bryant, and Jerry, which means it's

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:27.480
<v Speaker 1>time for listener mail. Oh wait, wow about that. I'm

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:29.839
<v Speaker 1>brain to start. That's why we leave that in there.

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to yeah, or maybe I should just

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:36.599
<v Speaker 1>read listener mail. We can go home. Okay, it's a

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:40.840
<v Speaker 1>build your own episode. Yeah, it's a mad Lives, just

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 1>fill it in. I'm profiling, Yeah, styling and profiling. I'm

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty excited. Are you styling and profile? Well this is

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:51.359
<v Speaker 1>a great that's a different thing this yeah, okay, I

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 1>think that has to do with um, like photography. No, thanks,

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 1>styling and profile and just means you're living large. Yeah,

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 1>you're fashionable and oh gotcha. Yeah, no, this is different

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:08.800
<v Speaker 1>and this is a grabst article, which is the mark

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 1>of quality as we all know it is. It's refreshing

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 1>to see and it is Um, we should just say

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 1>right off the bat, profiling is a super divisive topic.

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, um, there are many ways to look at it,

0:06:22.480 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 1>and all they make sense sometimes on both sides. It's

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>a tough one. Yeah, so that's my cadiat. It's divisive.

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 1>So um. One thing that Grabster immediately points out is like,

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 1>not all profiling is profiling, like you think of Sure,

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:42.840
<v Speaker 1>we're going to talk about all the different ways, right,

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 1>There's plenty of accepted forms of profiling. And the first one,

0:06:47.760 --> 0:06:50.720
<v Speaker 1>um is the standard all points bulletin or be on

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:53.320
<v Speaker 1>the lookout, right, that's the kind that no one has

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:56.359
<v Speaker 1>a problem with. No one does because that you you

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 1>know what that is. That's uh silver Toyota to come

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 1>on with spy today and white male in his mid

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 1>forties with spiky hair and uh sort of chubby with

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>a big gross gray black beard has committed a crime

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>and he's wearing cargo shorts and flip flops. Oh, I

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 1>see you're describing yourself profiler, but you put in their

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 1>white male. And the reason that's what I am, the

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 1>reason why people don't have a problem with this is

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 1>twofold one. A crime has already been committed. Yeah, okay,

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:33.280
<v Speaker 1>I committed a crime. So the police work is finding

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>a perpetrator that has already committed a crime. And secondly,

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 1>that profile is based on eyewitness accounts descriptions of the person.

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 1>That's right, So that profile is being used to to

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 1>track down a specific person. Has nothing to do with

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 1>anybody else. Who's white, has nothing to do with anybody else,

0:07:55.640 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 1>who drives a silver Tacoma, has nothing to do with

0:07:58.760 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>any of that jazz. It's just this guy is suspected

0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 1>of having committed this crime, and he looks like this.

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah you hear you see it on the news every night. Yes,

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 1>you know it's not just cops that use this. The

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:17.000
<v Speaker 1>news will say the suspect is, you know, wearing a handsome,

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 1>checkered Oxford button down, whispy hair, and white, straight teeth. Exactly,

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 1>so they're describing you. Oh you think my teeth are nice?

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I didn't say that. I said they were white and straight.

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 1>That's nice if that's what you're into. This is coming

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:37.760
<v Speaker 1>from a guy who just found out he's about to

0:08:37.840 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 1>have to lose his front tooth all over again. Start over. Yeah, man,

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>that sucks. Which I know there are some fans out

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:48.200
<v Speaker 1>there that are laughing. Aaron Cooper, that toothless Chuck is

0:08:48.240 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 1>coming back in the house for It's it's really just him. Yeah,

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 1>he's the only one whould be jerky enough to laugh

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 1>at that. That kind of misfortune, you know, I know,

0:08:57.480 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry to bring that up. I'm just still reeling

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:02.560
<v Speaker 1>from that discovery. It stinks. You think you get an

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:06.960
<v Speaker 1>implant and it's for life, Yeah, especially when they sell

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 1>you a lifetime implant. Yea, yeah, exactly, alright. So, uh,

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:16.440
<v Speaker 1>like you said, including descriptions and skin color is not

0:09:16.559 --> 0:09:20.320
<v Speaker 1>controversial in this case. No, it's in. Everybody from the

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 1>FEDS to the local police are okay with that. Yeah,

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 1>they're all in on it, and and not just completely

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 1>like everybody's like, yeah, this is fine, this makes sense. Sure,

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:33.439
<v Speaker 1>not a thing that's right. The next one is psychological profiling.

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 1>And this is when you don't have a lot of

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 1>physical evidence or you don't have an eyewitness, and you're

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 1>trying to fill in the blanks and make some good

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:45.960
<v Speaker 1>guesses billy blanks based on I remember that guy. Uh,

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:48.840
<v Speaker 1>some good guesses based on like the crime scene or

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 1>just the circumstances of the crime. Yes, again, a crime

0:09:52.160 --> 0:09:54.080
<v Speaker 1>has already taken place, and you're trying to figure out

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:58.200
<v Speaker 1>who solved it, and you're taking salt who committed it.

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:02.080
<v Speaker 1>You're trying to figure out who's gonna solve it, all right,

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:05.679
<v Speaker 1>all right, which you figure out the same moment when

0:10:05.720 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 1>as you do when you figure out who committed it.

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:10.680
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting in mind bending, Right twice you've jumped to

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the end of something. It's so weird. I don't know

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:17.040
<v Speaker 1>what that means. I think you know what it means. Uh,

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:20.679
<v Speaker 1>sometimes they are vague. But wait, I hadn't finished my thought. Okay,

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 1>I didn't mess it up that bad. Let me go

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 1>back and finish. Um. The point is it's drawn from

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 1>available evidence. Yeah, clues, clues that you're bringing together to

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:35.440
<v Speaker 1>try to draw them up an idea of who did

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:39.560
<v Speaker 1>this right exactly? Okay, So sometimes it can be vague,

0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:42.959
<v Speaker 1>but if you watch TV and movies, um, it is

0:10:43.240 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 1>probably not how it really goes down, but it's super

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:49.200
<v Speaker 1>specific when you see it in fiction, right, you know,

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 1>like I think this, uh as a man who was

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:55.959
<v Speaker 1>beating as a child and he probably lives alone or

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Sherlock Holmes was really good at that kind of thing.

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:03.079
<v Speaker 1>So a good point of Sherlock Holmes. Yeah, that's good stuff. Uh.

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Did you know he was a morphine and cocaine addict? Yeah,

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:10.559
<v Speaker 1>well I guess you need both in like the original stories? Really? Yeah?

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh like in the books. Wow, not the real guy, right,

0:11:17.400 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>as I think, Yeah, are you sure you're not just

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:23.320
<v Speaker 1>thinking of Robert Downey Jr. I mean I've read the

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Originals and he like does he shoots morphine in it?

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 1>And and Watson is not very happy with the whole thing.

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah he's straight edge. No he's not straight edge, but

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:38.560
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't he's not a junkie, you know. But he

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't care. He was like Watson washed my toes. I

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 1>can alright, moving on to predictive profiling. Well, yeah, this

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 1>is where it starts to get a little messy. Yeah,

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:54.599
<v Speaker 1>I can get a little controversial. Even psychological profiling is

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:56.520
<v Speaker 1>a little controversial. I have to say, chuck, like, it's

0:11:56.559 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 1>not a proven, tried and true thing. It's as much

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 1>a guessing game is anything else. Um, But it's not

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:09.320
<v Speaker 1>nearly still as controversial as predictive profiling, because now you're

0:12:09.320 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 1>trying to say, these people will probably commit a crime,

0:12:14.520 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 1>right not not not? Civil rights are it issue? Big time?

0:12:18.880 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Big time? Um. Police officers do great work. Ideally they're

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:28.439
<v Speaker 1>not just reacting to committed crimes, but they are um

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 1>driving around the neighborhood looking for a suspicious person that

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 1>might be about to commit a crime, to prevent crime,

0:12:35.280 --> 0:12:37.120
<v Speaker 1>to prevent a crime, which is stuff to do. You know,

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 1>it's right place, right time in most cases. And you

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 1>use the word ideally right ideally okay, yes, Um, So

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 1>even when this happens, this Supreme Court is roundly um

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 1>sided with police officers. UM as profiling for justification. So

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:58.560
<v Speaker 1>it's legally speaking, Okay, it's on the books. It's on

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:02.319
<v Speaker 1>the books. So so give an example of the kind

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 1>of profiling that's okay to be used. UM, the one

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 1>of the articles. Great. UM, let's say you're in uh,

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 1>South Florida and you're you're traveling up and you're in

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 1>a it's four a m. And you're in a rented

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 1>black suv with tinted windows, and you have the spare

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:26.559
<v Speaker 1>tire in the back seat removed. UM, I'm sorry, it's

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:29.559
<v Speaker 1>removed from the trunks area. It's in the backseat, just

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:33.640
<v Speaker 1>sitting in the back seat. Might be might be a

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:38.320
<v Speaker 1>drug trafficker, right, And the cop is basing this on

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 1>something like, um, a profile, Yeah, but a profile based

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:46.679
<v Speaker 1>on previous experiences with other drug dealers in the same area.

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Because that's a really big one right there. Like UM.

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:54.320
<v Speaker 1>One of the things for using profiles successfully is it

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 1>has it's it has it has to be over a

0:13:57.679 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>certain period of time and associated with a certain place.

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:07.720
<v Speaker 1>So you use Miami and say Miami in right, if

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 1>you saw that person and you would say, well, this

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:12.680
<v Speaker 1>is probably a cocaine trafficker based on all the other

0:14:12.760 --> 0:14:16.960
<v Speaker 1>dealings with cocaine traffickers who who used the same transportation

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 1>m O. Yeah, and we should point out the tires

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 1>removed because you can then hide the drugs where the

0:14:21.240 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 1>spare tire went, and then that's why the tires in

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the back seat. Yes, so these are red flags. But

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 1>if you're like in um Wyoming in two thousand fifteen

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:36.120
<v Speaker 1>and you read an article about how that held true

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 1>in Miami, that is not necessarily a justifiable transference of

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 1>profiling because it exists in a different time, in a

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:48.600
<v Speaker 1>different place. That's so, like you said, this can be

0:14:48.800 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 1>a this can be high level policy, UM, it can

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 1>be unofficial policy. It can be just merely experienced as

0:14:57.760 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 1>a police officer. That's something you've can countered from time

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 1>to time and basically to determine if this profile justifies

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 1>a search warrantless search, that is, in other words, you

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 1>haven't gone to the judge and as applied for a

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 1>warrant and had them review it and all that stuff

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 1>or rubber stamp it, which we'll get to. UM, it's

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 1>got a stand up in court, right, and so you

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 1>gotta be careful as a cop. You do. Um, you

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>have to have what's called an articulable suspicion, which was

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 1>established by a nineteen case or Supreme Court ruling Terry

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 1>versus Ohio. And the Supreme Court said, and this is

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 1>actually from a Matt ti ab Um article. It's really

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 1>really worth reading. It's called Why Baltimore Blew Up. It

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 1>was in Rolling Stone like a month or two ago.

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 1>It's a very good article. Um. But he talks about

0:15:50.320 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 1>this Terry case led to what it called Terry stops.

0:15:54.120 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Whereas if a cop has a suspicion that they can

0:15:57.320 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>put into words, meaning it's not just a hunch, right, um,

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 1>that somebody is is either just committed a crime or

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 1>going to commit a crime, that that is probable cause

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's bounds for as search. Yeah, and here's a

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 1>had a great example here, like let's say the cop

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 1>and court would say this the suspect of pure nervous

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 1>made several contradictory statements. In the back seat, I saw

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 1>a shoebox full of old film canisters, which drug carriers

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 1>commonly use. The car smelled like air freshener spray, which

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 1>is used to cover up the smell of drugs, and

0:16:31.920 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 1>I spotted them driving slowly up and down a block

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 1>that I know is frequented by drug dealers. That's called

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 1>good police work in court. Right, that's called like a

0:16:41.160 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 1>prosecutor's dream cop. Yeah. Um, and if you if you

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 1>go back and you notice all of that stuff, all

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 1>of these things are based on. So a block that

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 1>he knows to be frequented by drug dealers, thirty five

0:16:53.800 --> 0:16:59.160
<v Speaker 1>millimeter canisters. Maybe he read a Police Benevolent Association newsletter

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 1>article about that. Um, all of this stuff together, um

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 1>becomes what's called cumulative similarities. And supposedly a Florida Highway

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:12.680
<v Speaker 1>patrolman named Bob Vogel is the first guy to put

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 1>this down on paper. He was very controversial, which is,

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:18.919
<v Speaker 1>you take all of these different things and put them together,

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:21.200
<v Speaker 1>and you can form a profile, and you can use

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:25.440
<v Speaker 1>that to pull somebody over and then you know, eventually

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:30.159
<v Speaker 1>search their car if you're a Florida Highway patrolman. Right, So, um,

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>you've got you've got all of these. Uh. You have

0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the terry stops, which are used for broken windows policing

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:40.679
<v Speaker 1>and just for pulling people over, but they require an

0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:45.160
<v Speaker 1>articulable suspicion. But they can be based on where called

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:49.120
<v Speaker 1>cumulative similarities, which is a profile either like that your

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 1>police department is saying be on the lookout for people

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:56.920
<v Speaker 1>driving with their spare tire in the backseat, um at

0:17:56.960 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 1>this time of night. So far, this has all been

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:04.960
<v Speaker 1>upheld by the Supreme Court. That's right. But there's a

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:10.919
<v Speaker 1>very very fine line um that is frequently crossed, and

0:18:11.280 --> 0:18:13.919
<v Speaker 1>we will talk about how that runs a foul of

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the Constitution right after this. All right, Josh, before we

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:37.720
<v Speaker 1>took a break, you mentioned something called the Constitution, and

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:39.760
<v Speaker 1>there are a couple of amendments that come into play

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 1>when you're talking about search and seizure, probable cause, profile ancure,

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:48.879
<v Speaker 1>and they are the fourth and fourteenth Amendments. The fourth

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:51.919
<v Speaker 1>reads and whole the right of the people to be

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:56.320
<v Speaker 1>secure in their persons. The JFK I went into him

0:18:56.359 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Winston Churchill. Sure, it's both houses papers and effects against

0:19:00.920 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 1>unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated, and no

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 1>warrant shall issue, but upon probable costs, supported by oath

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 1>of affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and the persons of things to be seized. So there's

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 1>some big words in there. That's right, big, big like

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 1>money words like Uh, it's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures,

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:28.680
<v Speaker 1>which means, as far as the Supreme Court's concerned, some

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:31.919
<v Speaker 1>cops just can't say I'm gonna push you up against

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the wall and pat you down for no reason whatsoever. Yeah,

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Or I'm gonna pull you over for no reason, and

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna search your car on the side of the

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:45.480
<v Speaker 1>road for no reason. Um, does not happen, right of course?

0:19:45.520 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Not sure? So, Um, that's the Fourth Amendment, right, And uh,

0:19:50.960 --> 0:19:54.520
<v Speaker 1>there's another big term in there. It's called probable cause,

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 1>like you have to have And if a lot of

0:19:58.040 --> 0:20:02.680
<v Speaker 1>people say that that versus Ohio ruling is just too

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:07.960
<v Speaker 1>broad in articulable suspicion, like what is that you know? Um?

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:12.399
<v Speaker 1>But even still there's there's so there has to be

0:20:12.600 --> 0:20:15.880
<v Speaker 1>some sort of probable cause. And a lot of the times,

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:20.199
<v Speaker 1>as we'll see, it's just from uh, some something out

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:22.359
<v Speaker 1>in plain side or something like that. But there's a

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 1>big struggle over what constitutes probable cause. But the point

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:28.640
<v Speaker 1>is the Fourth Amendment says you have to have probable

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 1>cause or else it's an unreasonable search. That's right. And uh,

0:20:32.880 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 1>a police officer in most cases has to go get

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:38.880
<v Speaker 1>a warrant for like the search of a home or something. Um,

0:20:38.960 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 1>And there's a whole issue of rubber stamping warrants these

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:43.920
<v Speaker 1>days of course that like the judge may not even

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:47.439
<v Speaker 1>really review that. It's just a formality. Or for anybody

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 1>who's watched enough Law and Order episodes, all you have

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to do is go, I smell pot. Do you smell pot?

0:20:52.560 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Wink wink, and then kick the door in. Yeah, exactly,

0:20:56.000 --> 0:20:58.160
<v Speaker 1>because that's you can't prove that the cop didn't think

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:01.920
<v Speaker 1>you smell pot exactly. You know, was the threat of perjury,

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:06.160
<v Speaker 1>of perjuring himself on the stand. But I imagine at

0:21:06.200 --> 0:21:08.919
<v Speaker 1>least as far as like Briscoe and Green are concerned,

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:12.720
<v Speaker 1>they're hoping that they're gonna find such gang buster overwhelming

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:17.959
<v Speaker 1>evidence that everybody's gonna forget about the fake smell of pot. Um. So,

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:21.399
<v Speaker 1>there was actually a case which relates to probable calls

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:26.280
<v Speaker 1>called the US v. Sokolow that made it all the

0:21:26.280 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 1>way to the Scotus And um, did you read about

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:33.679
<v Speaker 1>that case? I did? It's um it was well that

0:21:33.720 --> 0:21:36.119
<v Speaker 1>was when the ruling was right. Yeah, so what happened

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:39.440
<v Speaker 1>was the d A arrested a guy at the Honolulu

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:42.840
<v Speaker 1>airport found over a thousand grams of cocaine and his

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:44.639
<v Speaker 1>carry on. It was a key, he had a kilo

0:21:44.880 --> 0:21:48.479
<v Speaker 1>and he paid uh. They the agents knew all this

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:50.399
<v Speaker 1>going into it. This is why they arrested him. He

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 1>paid bucks for round trip tickets with a roll of

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:57.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty dollar bills. He traveled under a name that did

0:21:57.960 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 1>not match the name under which is telephone was listed. Um.

0:22:02.359 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 1>He was originally going to Miami, and in this because

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 1>lad flag at the time, he only stayed Miami for

0:22:10.560 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 1>two days, even though a round trip flight from Honolulu

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:16.359
<v Speaker 1>takes twenty hours, so a very quick trip, and the

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:18.480
<v Speaker 1>others he was almost flying as long as he was there.

0:22:18.800 --> 0:22:23.600
<v Speaker 1>In Miami, he met up with a man named Tony Montana.

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Apparently he appeared nervous and he did not check his baggage,

0:22:27.920 --> 0:22:32.879
<v Speaker 1>and the district court denied motion to suppress the evidence,

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:36.520
<v Speaker 1>said it was justifiable. The Court of Appeals disagreed and

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:39.200
<v Speaker 1>overturned that, and then eventually it went to the Supreme

0:22:39.200 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Court and they said no, it's okay because they had

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:46.600
<v Speaker 1>what was quote a totality of evidence. So Here's the

0:22:46.680 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 1>thing though, the thing that makes that so groundbreaking and nowadays,

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean we were raised under so clow right, it

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:55.159
<v Speaker 1>seems like this is just the norm. But it was

0:22:55.200 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 1>a ground break in case of the time, because nothing

0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 1>none of that. It's not against the law to pay

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 1>your plane ticket with cash, It's not against the law

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 1>to not check your bags at the time. It wasn't

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 1>against the law to travel under an assumed name. Yeah,

0:23:08.320 --> 0:23:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think at the time it was against

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 1>a law to go to Miami just for two days, right, exactly,

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:16.040
<v Speaker 1>None of this is against the law. And so if

0:23:16.080 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 1>you if if you just followed the strict interpretation a

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:21.639
<v Speaker 1>law up to that point there was they couldn't bust

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 1>this guy, even though when they busted him they found

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 1>a kilo of coke, like they knew they would in

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:29.719
<v Speaker 1>his bag. Um, there wasn't enough there. In the Supreme

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Court said, you know what, we we think that when

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:35.200
<v Speaker 1>you put all that stuff together, there is enough there.

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Now what constitutes that totality? Is it two pieces of evidence?

0:23:39.920 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Is that one thing? Um? You know, how much does

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 1>it take to profile? But what they were saying in

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:50.240
<v Speaker 1>so Colo was, yes, the the stuff that you've seen

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 1>from other proven criminals applied to somebody else who you

0:23:54.800 --> 0:23:57.520
<v Speaker 1>don't yet fully know as a criminal, is enough for

0:23:57.560 --> 0:24:02.840
<v Speaker 1>you to bust them and see if you're right. Yeah. Again,

0:24:02.880 --> 0:24:05.680
<v Speaker 1>it's not like the groundbreaking He didn't go straight to jail.

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:09.399
<v Speaker 1>They looked in his bag, yes, but it's do you

0:24:09.440 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 1>have the right to look in the bag? That is

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 1>what it comes down to. Yeah, and they were saying

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 1>that there. The Supreme Court interpretation is this stands up

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 1>to the Fourth Amendment. Yeah, and I met the guy

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:21.880
<v Speaker 1>went to Miami for two days, gets your civil rights goodbye?

0:24:22.800 --> 0:24:25.639
<v Speaker 1>Uh So with the fourteenth Amendment UM it states in

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 1>part that no State shall make or enforce any law

0:24:28.320 --> 0:24:31.359
<v Speaker 1>which will abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of

0:24:31.400 --> 0:24:35.159
<v Speaker 1>the U. S H. I think everybody wants the Kennedy

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:38.440
<v Speaker 1>voice against U. I think any time you read amendments

0:24:38.480 --> 0:24:39.960
<v Speaker 1>from the Bill of Rights, you have to do it

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:43.680
<v Speaker 1>like that. Nah shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty,

0:24:43.760 --> 0:24:47.399
<v Speaker 1>or property without due process of law, nor deny to

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:50.679
<v Speaker 1>any person within its jurisdiction equal protection of the laws.

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:54.680
<v Speaker 1>So this one applies. You might say, well, we've got

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:58.440
<v Speaker 1>the fourth we don't need. The fourteenth fourteen says, look, man,

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:03.200
<v Speaker 1>you can't just bust somebody without this, again, due process

0:25:03.240 --> 0:25:05.880
<v Speaker 1>of law. And we have a due process of law.

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 1>And what the Supreme Court did with cases like Soklo

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:12.560
<v Speaker 1>and with cases like Terry versus Ohio, UM, is they

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:17.160
<v Speaker 1>said profiling is part of the due process of law.

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:21.960
<v Speaker 1>That's right. So one thing that they have gone back

0:25:22.000 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 1>to again and again and again and again is that

0:25:25.840 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 1>if race is factored in and almost any circumstances, there

0:25:29.640 --> 0:25:34.359
<v Speaker 1>are circumstances that is where racial profiling is allowed in

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 1>police work. But for the most part, if you're basing

0:25:38.560 --> 0:25:43.359
<v Speaker 1>your suspicions of criminal wrongdoing on race largely or in part,

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:47.520
<v Speaker 1>then that is not That runs a foul of the

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 1>fourth and the fourteenth amendments, and you're not allowed to

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:52.880
<v Speaker 1>do that. Yeah. The grabs Her points out that cops,

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:56.359
<v Speaker 1>unless you are have an a p b out on

0:25:56.720 --> 0:26:00.119
<v Speaker 1>a Hispanic mail or a black male, then you are

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:04.960
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be color blind as a cop. Exactly you're

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:08.679
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be. So you know, um, the Eric Garner

0:26:08.720 --> 0:26:11.879
<v Speaker 1>case to Michael Brown case, um, all of these cases

0:26:12.160 --> 0:26:16.639
<v Speaker 1>where you know black mails were basically stopped from either

0:26:16.720 --> 0:26:20.960
<v Speaker 1>doing a petty offense or just stop based on suspicion

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:25.200
<v Speaker 1>because they were black in their neighborhood. UM. It prompted

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the executive branch to release a new set of guidance,

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:33.639
<v Speaker 1>like an updated set of guidelines for racial profiling, and

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:37.400
<v Speaker 1>they were they basically spelled out examples. UM I posted

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:39.919
<v Speaker 1>to it on the podcast page for this episode, but

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:43.920
<v Speaker 1>they spelled out examples for when that when it's appropriate,

0:26:44.040 --> 0:26:46.879
<v Speaker 1>and they said if it's an all points bulletin for

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 1>any police yes, um, if you're traffic or if you're

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 1>patrolling and looking for criminals and you're basing it on race,

0:26:57.280 --> 0:27:00.320
<v Speaker 1>absolutely not allowed. But they said they gave an example

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:04.920
<v Speaker 1>where like, um, if for example, you are looking for

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:08.159
<v Speaker 1>somebody who carried out a hit on a gang leader,

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:11.480
<v Speaker 1>and you know there's this rival gang and this rival

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:14.840
<v Speaker 1>gang is probably the ones who carried out this hit,

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 1>and every member of this rival gang is Hispanic, that

0:27:20.400 --> 0:27:22.960
<v Speaker 1>you could use that as part of the profile and

0:27:23.000 --> 0:27:26.959
<v Speaker 1>searching for your suspect. It just makes sense in that case, right,

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:29.160
<v Speaker 1>because I don't look for the little old white lady

0:27:29.320 --> 0:27:33.520
<v Speaker 1>right exactly because it's that specific. But you wouldn't cast

0:27:33.560 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 1>a dragnet over all Hispanics. It would be Hispanic men

0:27:37.119 --> 0:27:40.040
<v Speaker 1>related to this gang. You see what I'm saying. I

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:41.880
<v Speaker 1>think the lesson here is get the little old white

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 1>lady to do the hit. It's been done before, and

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:48.880
<v Speaker 1>you're golden. It has been done before, which is one

0:27:48.920 --> 0:27:51.359
<v Speaker 1>of the one of the problems with racial profiling is

0:27:51.400 --> 0:27:53.879
<v Speaker 1>it's distracting. Yeah, you know, we'll get to that. But

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:58.280
<v Speaker 1>that's definitely true. Um. And you know when you watch cops,

0:27:58.320 --> 0:28:02.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not always like it's sometimes that I will see

0:28:03.000 --> 0:28:05.359
<v Speaker 1>on the TV show they will pull over. They'll stop

0:28:05.359 --> 0:28:08.119
<v Speaker 1>a white kid, like suburban white kid that's in a

0:28:08.160 --> 0:28:11.160
<v Speaker 1>bad neighborhood, because they'll be like, well, he's he didn't

0:28:11.160 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 1>belong here. He's probably buying drugs because this is a

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 1>street where people buy drugs. There's a crackhouse down there.

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:20.120
<v Speaker 1>And this guy is from the county. Uh, you know,

0:28:20.359 --> 0:28:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the white suburban county out in the suburbs. Let's pull

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:26.320
<v Speaker 1>him over. That's racial profile. That's the same same thing

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:29.919
<v Speaker 1>but different. Well it's the same thing, yeah, but you

0:28:29.960 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 1>know what I mean. Um, all right, so let's talk

0:28:33.280 --> 0:28:37.200
<v Speaker 1>about probable cause analysis. This is good. There's, um, during

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:39.959
<v Speaker 1>a traffic stop, there's there's several things a cop can do,

0:28:40.040 --> 0:28:44.800
<v Speaker 1>and each one requires different kinds of cause in order

0:28:44.920 --> 0:28:50.760
<v Speaker 1>for it to be legal. Um. Yeah. Again, they aren't

0:28:50.800 --> 0:28:53.520
<v Speaker 1>supposed to just pull you over for no reason. They're

0:28:53.560 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 1>not supposed to. You're supposed to fit some sort of

0:28:56.920 --> 0:29:00.719
<v Speaker 1>either you broke a traffic law or you fit a

0:29:00.760 --> 0:29:04.840
<v Speaker 1>profile that that has been agreed upon. Is okay. Yeah,

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:06.960
<v Speaker 1>But a cop can pull over for and again we're

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:11.160
<v Speaker 1>not knocking police officers hard work, and mostly they do

0:29:11.280 --> 0:29:14.720
<v Speaker 1>great work. But a cop can pull someone over for

0:29:14.760 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 1>anything and say, like when you made that turn, you

0:29:18.960 --> 0:29:21.400
<v Speaker 1>swung a little too wide, or you hit that yellow line,

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and um, so I'm suspicious that you're drunk, like you know.

0:29:27.400 --> 0:29:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Like that, you can almost invent a reason to pull

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 1>someone over and under any circumstances. So let's just start

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:38.160
<v Speaker 1>with that. When you pull over a car, UM, Supposedly,

0:29:38.200 --> 0:29:40.160
<v Speaker 1>to pull someone over legally, you need to have witnessed

0:29:40.440 --> 0:29:43.959
<v Speaker 1>a violation. UM. Or you can run the plates and

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:46.360
<v Speaker 1>see if their cars stolen or if there's a warrant

0:29:46.360 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 1>out for the owner. That's a big thing you see

0:29:48.440 --> 0:29:52.240
<v Speaker 1>on cops all the time. Um. And the cop can

0:29:52.280 --> 0:29:55.960
<v Speaker 1>make a stop as long as they can describe specific

0:29:56.000 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 1>factors that fit the profile. Right car, car full of

0:29:59.800 --> 0:30:02.880
<v Speaker 1>black kids. Not okay to just pull that car over,

0:30:03.040 --> 0:30:06.960
<v Speaker 1>not for that reason. But if they say, like I

0:30:07.000 --> 0:30:10.760
<v Speaker 1>saw um smoke coming out the windows. Um, they were

0:30:10.840 --> 0:30:15.040
<v Speaker 1>driving erratically and it smelled like pot smoke from the road,

0:30:15.560 --> 0:30:20.520
<v Speaker 1>then that is a reason number two when you go

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:24.040
<v Speaker 1>to a question the suspect. That's moving things up a notch. Uh.

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:25.320
<v Speaker 1>You don't have to get a ticket when you get

0:30:25.320 --> 0:30:29.480
<v Speaker 1>pulled over. You might just get questioned if you seem suspicious. Um,

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 1>and they can you know, they'll shine that light in

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the car and they'll look at everything that they can

0:30:33.080 --> 0:30:36.760
<v Speaker 1>see without actually searching the car. Yeah, and that well

0:30:36.800 --> 0:30:40.320
<v Speaker 1>within their right what's called plane view exactly. So if

0:30:40.360 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 1>you have like a bag of pots sitting out on

0:30:42.120 --> 0:30:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the front seat with you and the cops sees it,

0:30:44.840 --> 0:30:47.520
<v Speaker 1>that just opened your entire car and your person up

0:30:47.560 --> 0:30:49.440
<v Speaker 1>to a search. Yes, and you that means you are

0:30:49.480 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 1>super high because now now there's probable cause. But if

0:30:54.600 --> 0:30:57.320
<v Speaker 1>you have long hair and you have an open half

0:30:57.320 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 1>gallon of ice cream next to you, still not enough

0:31:00.840 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 1>my racist suspicions, But that still should not be enough

0:31:04.080 --> 0:31:07.160
<v Speaker 1>to give him probable cause to search your car. Well,

0:31:07.200 --> 0:31:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I got profiled in Texas. Me and my best friend

0:31:10.040 --> 0:31:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Brett many years ago after college did a big out

0:31:12.480 --> 0:31:16.720
<v Speaker 1>west trip for two months, and the cops said he

0:31:16.760 --> 0:31:18.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't put He said he pulled us over because I

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:21.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't have my seat belt on. Um. Why he really

0:31:21.520 --> 0:31:24.440
<v Speaker 1>pulled us over us because we were too scruffy looking

0:31:24.480 --> 0:31:29.320
<v Speaker 1>guys with tattoos and beards in a Volkswagen van. Um.

0:31:29.360 --> 0:31:32.080
<v Speaker 1>And he searched the van. He asked if he could,

0:31:32.080 --> 0:31:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and we said he could, and he searched the van

0:31:34.640 --> 0:31:36.400
<v Speaker 1>for like an hour on the side of the road.

0:31:36.720 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Long story short, chucked in five years, five hard ones. No,

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:44.040
<v Speaker 1>we didn't get taught with anything, and we got away,

0:31:44.080 --> 0:31:46.880
<v Speaker 1>and he basically was mad at us that he wasted

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 1>his time and the last thing he said was to

0:31:48.200 --> 0:31:50.960
<v Speaker 1>get out of Texas. So and I said, I'm trying

0:31:51.000 --> 0:31:53.959
<v Speaker 1>to sir. But the point is that that cop asked

0:31:54.000 --> 0:31:57.520
<v Speaker 1>you if he could search your car, right he did,

0:31:57.600 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 1>and that if you give consent then you are waving

0:32:00.920 --> 0:32:03.560
<v Speaker 1>your Fourth Amendment rights. But you don't have to give consent.

0:32:04.200 --> 0:32:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Not many people know this, and there's some states that

0:32:07.000 --> 0:32:10.320
<v Speaker 1>make the cop tell you you are allowed to refuse

0:32:10.360 --> 0:32:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the search of your car, um, but not all states do.

0:32:14.160 --> 0:32:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I've never heard it either, um. Instead, the cop just says,

0:32:17.840 --> 0:32:20.800
<v Speaker 1>can I search your car in the most intimidating voice possible,

0:32:21.360 --> 0:32:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and most people will just fold like a house of cards, um,

0:32:25.200 --> 0:32:27.560
<v Speaker 1>because they're scared of the cop or whatever. Even if

0:32:27.600 --> 0:32:30.000
<v Speaker 1>they do have something in there, they're not gonna be like, Nope,

0:32:30.080 --> 0:32:32.840
<v Speaker 1>you're not allowed to search the car. So the point

0:32:32.840 --> 0:32:35.120
<v Speaker 1>where the cop asks if he can search the car

0:32:35.600 --> 0:32:39.920
<v Speaker 1>is usually in the absence of something that nothing in

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:45.040
<v Speaker 1>plain sight, but also that cops suspicious suspicions are raised,

0:32:45.600 --> 0:32:47.960
<v Speaker 1>but he just can't quite prove it. So I'll ask

0:32:48.000 --> 0:32:50.280
<v Speaker 1>you if you can search your car. If you say no,

0:32:51.120 --> 0:32:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the cop can say, well, I'm I'm going to detain

0:32:54.440 --> 0:32:58.920
<v Speaker 1>you temporarily. Right Basically, I can go, I will wait

0:32:58.960 --> 0:33:00.760
<v Speaker 1>it out, I can get a war it I'm gonna

0:33:00.800 --> 0:33:03.760
<v Speaker 1>search that car, right, Okay. If he wants to get

0:33:03.760 --> 0:33:06.160
<v Speaker 1>a warrant, that's different. Like what he's doing now is

0:33:06.160 --> 0:33:08.600
<v Speaker 1>trying to do everything he can to search your car

0:33:08.880 --> 0:33:11.000
<v Speaker 1>without having to go to the trouble of getting a

0:33:11.040 --> 0:33:14.880
<v Speaker 1>warrant without probable cause, like seeing a bag of pot

0:33:14.920 --> 0:33:19.120
<v Speaker 1>in the front seat. Right time was that they could

0:33:19.120 --> 0:33:21.520
<v Speaker 1>detain you for up to like ninety minutes while they

0:33:21.560 --> 0:33:24.080
<v Speaker 1>called the canine unit out. And the canine unit has

0:33:24.120 --> 0:33:27.280
<v Speaker 1>been shown to if it the canine unit sniffs around

0:33:27.320 --> 0:33:30.520
<v Speaker 1>your car, that's not an unreasonable search. And if the

0:33:30.600 --> 0:33:33.520
<v Speaker 1>canine smells something or indicates that there are drugs present,

0:33:33.720 --> 0:33:37.040
<v Speaker 1>then that does provide probable cause for a full search

0:33:37.120 --> 0:33:41.720
<v Speaker 1>under the Fourth Amendment. Right they change that, yeah, Um.

0:33:41.760 --> 0:33:45.280
<v Speaker 1>In April this past April, the Supreme Court had decision

0:33:45.360 --> 0:33:48.800
<v Speaker 1>that said, now you really can't make people wait around

0:33:48.800 --> 0:33:51.320
<v Speaker 1>while the drug dog comes out. They're like, we're not

0:33:51.400 --> 0:33:53.560
<v Speaker 1>a post to that, but the point of a traffic

0:33:53.680 --> 0:33:58.520
<v Speaker 1>stop is to promote and encourage traffic safety, not to

0:33:58.600 --> 0:34:02.960
<v Speaker 1>cast a drug drag. That for drug couriers. Um, and

0:34:03.200 --> 0:34:09.000
<v Speaker 1>you you cannot detain people without a reasonable suspicion to

0:34:09.080 --> 0:34:10.960
<v Speaker 1>wait for the drug dog to come out. If they

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:13.680
<v Speaker 1>tell you can't, they you're not allowed to search their car.

0:34:14.120 --> 0:34:15.920
<v Speaker 1>That's good. I wonder if it had anything to do

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:19.120
<v Speaker 1>with um. If you look up online, there are ways

0:34:19.160 --> 0:34:23.399
<v Speaker 1>that cops can make a drug dog signal basically by

0:34:23.400 --> 0:34:27.440
<v Speaker 1>how they're handling the dog. And there's a lot of suspicion,

0:34:27.640 --> 0:34:29.399
<v Speaker 1>and they'll play him side by side, like you see

0:34:29.400 --> 0:34:31.560
<v Speaker 1>this cops doing it, right, And if you see this cop,

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:34.280
<v Speaker 1>watch this little thing he does. Then the dog barks.

0:34:35.000 --> 0:34:38.319
<v Speaker 1>And basically there was a lot of speculation that bad

0:34:38.400 --> 0:34:42.120
<v Speaker 1>cops would use the dog tail. Well not that, but yeah,

0:34:42.239 --> 0:34:44.880
<v Speaker 1>essentially making the dog signal a false alert just to

0:34:44.880 --> 0:34:47.239
<v Speaker 1>give them reason. Well, the dog barked, So now I

0:34:47.239 --> 0:34:51.040
<v Speaker 1>can I can search your car or and maybe it

0:34:51.040 --> 0:34:52.759
<v Speaker 1>all started because I meant to bring this up a

0:34:52.800 --> 0:34:58.279
<v Speaker 1>second ago. Suspicion can be now they seem nervous, right like,

0:34:58.320 --> 0:35:00.960
<v Speaker 1>everyone's nervous when a cop pulls him a sure, even

0:35:01.000 --> 0:35:03.680
<v Speaker 1>if you haven't done anything. It's just nerve wracking. It's

0:35:03.680 --> 0:35:06.279
<v Speaker 1>like white coat blood pressure. I like a lot of

0:35:06.320 --> 0:35:08.640
<v Speaker 1>people's blood pressure is high at the doctor because they're

0:35:08.640 --> 0:35:11.239
<v Speaker 1>nervous about, you know, being at the doctor. There's someone

0:35:11.360 --> 0:35:15.000
<v Speaker 1>standing at my window with a gun, right Like, it's

0:35:15.080 --> 0:35:18.080
<v Speaker 1>nerve wracking. Yeah. So the Supreme Court said, no, you guys,

0:35:18.239 --> 0:35:20.800
<v Speaker 1>you have to have a reasonable suspicion to detain somebody

0:35:20.800 --> 0:35:23.640
<v Speaker 1>on the side of the road that they've committed another crime.

0:35:24.360 --> 0:35:26.960
<v Speaker 1>It can't just be I'm pulling you over. You have

0:35:27.040 --> 0:35:29.080
<v Speaker 1>to wait for ninety minutes while the drug dog comes

0:35:29.080 --> 0:35:31.400
<v Speaker 1>out so I can bust you or try to bust

0:35:31.400 --> 0:35:33.600
<v Speaker 1>you or whatever. That was. That was a big deal

0:35:33.640 --> 0:35:36.120
<v Speaker 1>that they came up with that. Yeah, we didn't in Texas.

0:35:36.200 --> 0:35:37.839
<v Speaker 1>We didn't have the drug dog come out, but we

0:35:37.840 --> 0:35:40.560
<v Speaker 1>were I felt like we were on the side of

0:35:40.560 --> 0:35:42.279
<v Speaker 1>the road for an hour while he dug through that

0:35:42.440 --> 0:35:47.279
<v Speaker 1>entire van. Um just you could tell he was he

0:35:47.400 --> 0:35:51.480
<v Speaker 1>really wanted to find something. Yeah, all right, let's open

0:35:51.480 --> 0:35:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the cannib worms, my friend. Racial profiling, it's a big,

0:35:55.560 --> 0:36:00.120
<v Speaker 1>big deal in this country. It's a problem, and and

0:36:00.280 --> 0:36:04.759
<v Speaker 1>um let's talk about it. Okay, that's good. Uh. So

0:36:04.840 --> 0:36:08.680
<v Speaker 1>that is basically it's a form of predicted profiling, uh

0:36:08.760 --> 0:36:12.120
<v Speaker 1>where one of, if not the only factor, is skin color.

0:36:12.680 --> 0:36:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Right that like, um oh, let's say that, um, Mexican

0:36:18.000 --> 0:36:23.520
<v Speaker 1>people are way more um prone to sell meth. So

0:36:23.600 --> 0:36:26.920
<v Speaker 1>let's go hang out at that Hispanic neighborhood. Right, But

0:36:27.080 --> 0:36:31.359
<v Speaker 1>there's a couple of things wrong with that, um, and

0:36:31.680 --> 0:36:37.880
<v Speaker 1>that is racial profiling. Some people actually defend it, saying, well,

0:36:38.040 --> 0:36:42.680
<v Speaker 1>if you look at prison statistics, Hispanics are far more

0:36:42.760 --> 0:36:46.960
<v Speaker 1>likely to be imprisoned for drug crimes than say, white people,

0:36:47.320 --> 0:36:52.040
<v Speaker 1>So that makes sense, right, right, Okay, the other saying

0:36:52.120 --> 0:36:54.360
<v Speaker 1>right right, I'm playing along here. The other side of

0:36:54.400 --> 0:36:58.759
<v Speaker 1>the coin is that you can use those same statistics

0:36:58.760 --> 0:37:02.759
<v Speaker 1>to point to the idea that Hispanics and blacks are

0:37:02.800 --> 0:37:08.600
<v Speaker 1>disproportionately targeted for drug busts than other people, right, and

0:37:08.680 --> 0:37:11.040
<v Speaker 1>so the same This is an Ed points out. This

0:37:11.120 --> 0:37:15.040
<v Speaker 1>is one of the problems with this debate is both

0:37:15.080 --> 0:37:19.799
<v Speaker 1>sides used the same statistics differently to prove their point. Yeah.

0:37:19.840 --> 0:37:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Another thing he points out is that people that say

0:37:24.320 --> 0:37:27.360
<v Speaker 1>some people will say that it is institutionalized racism and

0:37:27.400 --> 0:37:31.600
<v Speaker 1>its harassment of minority straight up. People who defend against

0:37:31.640 --> 0:37:35.359
<v Speaker 1>it say, cops harassed criminals, and if those criminals happen

0:37:35.400 --> 0:37:39.200
<v Speaker 1>to be minorities t s. That's not our fault. And

0:37:39.239 --> 0:37:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that's just the reality of the world we

0:37:41.160 --> 0:37:45.400
<v Speaker 1>live in. Even further, there's people who say, yes, racial

0:37:45.440 --> 0:37:47.640
<v Speaker 1>profiling is the thing, and it's an effective tool of

0:37:47.719 --> 0:37:53.560
<v Speaker 1>law enforcement. Sorry, welcome to reality. Um. Those people usually

0:37:53.560 --> 0:37:56.920
<v Speaker 1>have their arguments demolished pretty quickly, including by professionals. I

0:37:56.920 --> 0:38:01.560
<v Speaker 1>read this um, this interview, or well an article about

0:38:01.760 --> 0:38:05.759
<v Speaker 1>the former chief chief of police of Palo Alto around

0:38:05.800 --> 0:38:10.879
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco area, and um, he also grew up as

0:38:11.000 --> 0:38:14.080
<v Speaker 1>an Oakland cop, and he was talking about that kind

0:38:14.080 --> 0:38:16.040
<v Speaker 1>of racial profiling that you were where they would just

0:38:16.040 --> 0:38:18.399
<v Speaker 1>sit out and like, um, high crime neighborhoods and pull

0:38:18.440 --> 0:38:21.399
<v Speaker 1>over anybody white. And they were doing like that for

0:38:21.440 --> 0:38:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the same reasons, and he was saying it almost never worked.

0:38:24.800 --> 0:38:27.279
<v Speaker 1>He said that, um, they also would have like long

0:38:27.360 --> 0:38:30.840
<v Speaker 1>dragnets on stretches of highway and they would target Hispanic

0:38:30.880 --> 0:38:34.080
<v Speaker 1>people in like low riders, and he said, almost never worked.

0:38:34.560 --> 0:38:39.440
<v Speaker 1>And he said that it's ineffective. Right, it's also lazy policing,

0:38:39.800 --> 0:38:43.640
<v Speaker 1>because he said the better alternative is to forget who

0:38:43.880 --> 0:38:47.400
<v Speaker 1>who's what color, but just watch for somebody leaning in

0:38:47.440 --> 0:38:50.560
<v Speaker 1>a car that's just pulled over under the curb, or

0:38:50.600 --> 0:38:55.000
<v Speaker 1>somebody making furtive moment movements. Right, look for behavior that

0:38:55.120 --> 0:38:57.439
<v Speaker 1>is actually linked to crime. Not there's a white person

0:38:57.480 --> 0:39:00.160
<v Speaker 1>in a black high crime neighborhood, so therefore their there,

0:39:00.320 --> 0:39:05.440
<v Speaker 1>um they're buying drugs, or even even worse than that,

0:39:05.840 --> 0:39:09.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a black person who lives in a high crime neighborhood,

0:39:09.320 --> 0:39:12.120
<v Speaker 1>they must be a drug dealer. Let me go stop

0:39:12.120 --> 0:39:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and frisk them, um that that is just lazy policing.

0:39:15.719 --> 0:39:20.720
<v Speaker 1>It's it's shorthand policing. Whereas if you look for actual

0:39:20.760 --> 0:39:23.600
<v Speaker 1>criminal behaviors you're going to have, you're gonna be far

0:39:23.640 --> 0:39:26.520
<v Speaker 1>more successful in busting the bad guys. But even worse

0:39:26.560 --> 0:39:29.480
<v Speaker 1>than it being like lazy policing and ineffective in a

0:39:29.480 --> 0:39:31.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of ways. This guy pointed out like, and I've

0:39:32.000 --> 0:39:35.160
<v Speaker 1>seen this in many different places. If you want to

0:39:35.320 --> 0:39:41.040
<v Speaker 1>encourage mistrust and animosity toward the police, scoop up every

0:39:41.080 --> 0:39:43.719
<v Speaker 1>member in the community and take him to jail just

0:39:43.800 --> 0:39:46.360
<v Speaker 1>on the off chance that you might find something that sticks.

0:39:46.880 --> 0:39:49.919
<v Speaker 1>If you want to set a town off or any

0:39:49.960 --> 0:39:53.160
<v Speaker 1>population off, do that for a few years and see

0:39:53.160 --> 0:39:55.719
<v Speaker 1>what happens. And that's what we've been seeing time and

0:39:55.760 --> 0:39:59.319
<v Speaker 1>time again. It's systematic. Yes, it's systematic targeting and then

0:39:59.320 --> 0:40:03.520
<v Speaker 1>a systematic reactions. Uh. And I've mentioned cops a lot.

0:40:03.560 --> 0:40:05.880
<v Speaker 1>If you're out there saying, well, yeah, but on cops

0:40:06.400 --> 0:40:09.960
<v Speaker 1>every time they pull over that's a shady black guy

0:40:10.000 --> 0:40:12.280
<v Speaker 1>in the neighborhood he has something on him and gets arrested.

0:40:12.360 --> 0:40:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Or that white kid in the bad neighborhood he's there

0:40:15.040 --> 0:40:18.359
<v Speaker 1>to buy drugs, it's a TV show that's edited. Right.

0:40:18.520 --> 0:40:21.080
<v Speaker 1>They don't show you the twenty five stops where there

0:40:21.120 --> 0:40:23.319
<v Speaker 1>is no crime because it would not be a fun

0:40:23.360 --> 0:40:26.480
<v Speaker 1>TV show exactly, all right. So I think people use

0:40:26.520 --> 0:40:29.680
<v Speaker 1>that as like dummies use that as proof sometimes, like

0:40:29.719 --> 0:40:33.879
<v Speaker 1>watch Cops Man every single time, right, Like yeah, exactly right,

0:40:33.920 --> 0:40:38.279
<v Speaker 1>Like all all matthe Users are scrawny and white. So

0:40:38.320 --> 0:40:40.960
<v Speaker 1>if you see a scrawny white guy, Matthewuser, that's right.

0:40:41.120 --> 0:40:47.279
<v Speaker 1>Or marathon runner, right, you know. Uh So obviously there

0:40:47.280 --> 0:40:51.720
<v Speaker 1>can be uh rogue cops, racist cops that are doing

0:40:51.760 --> 0:40:53.799
<v Speaker 1>their thing on a on a singular level or with

0:40:53.840 --> 0:40:57.920
<v Speaker 1>their partner. But it becomes a real real problem. That's

0:40:57.920 --> 0:40:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a problem. It becomes a super real problem when it

0:41:00.120 --> 0:41:03.759
<v Speaker 1>is part of the system. Uh. In which was the

0:41:03.800 --> 0:41:06.440
<v Speaker 1>case with the New Jersey State Troopers in the late nineties,

0:41:06.960 --> 0:41:09.439
<v Speaker 1>they did a ten year study and found out that

0:41:09.800 --> 0:41:14.040
<v Speaker 1>eighty percent of all traffic stops were minorities over a

0:41:14.080 --> 0:41:17.520
<v Speaker 1>ten year period, and they found that there was a

0:41:17.600 --> 0:41:21.799
<v Speaker 1>quote macho elitist culture within the state trooper ranks end

0:41:21.840 --> 0:41:27.960
<v Speaker 1>quote and um. Basically, even though they officially said racial

0:41:27.960 --> 0:41:32.560
<v Speaker 1>profiling isn't right, there was a system in place where

0:41:32.640 --> 0:41:36.480
<v Speaker 1>veterans would really coach and teach the younger cops, like

0:41:36.520 --> 0:41:41.520
<v Speaker 1>this is how we're doing it, and they were basically outed. Um.

0:41:41.560 --> 0:41:45.719
<v Speaker 1>The authorities assigned federal monitors to those troopers, and evidently

0:41:45.719 --> 0:41:48.760
<v Speaker 1>by two thousand six they had um a report suggested

0:41:48.800 --> 0:41:53.239
<v Speaker 1>they had eliminated that profiling completely. Yeah, which is good

0:41:53.280 --> 0:41:56.040
<v Speaker 1>if that's the case. You know, and I'm sure it is.

0:41:57.280 --> 0:41:59.720
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey state troopers are intimidating. You ever seen those guys.

0:42:00.080 --> 0:42:03.399
<v Speaker 1>They're the ones that look like the military uniforms, which

0:42:03.400 --> 0:42:05.880
<v Speaker 1>is a whole other issue altogether. Well, I mean not

0:42:05.960 --> 0:42:11.400
<v Speaker 1>like M sixty, like like the dress, blues, boots and

0:42:11.400 --> 0:42:14.719
<v Speaker 1>all that. Um. It turns out twenty two states have

0:42:14.880 --> 0:42:18.840
<v Speaker 1>lawns that band racial profiling of motorists, which is great

0:42:18.960 --> 0:42:22.440
<v Speaker 1>until you think that that also means that states don't.

0:42:23.520 --> 0:42:27.200
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of weird if you ask me. Um and uh.

0:42:27.280 --> 0:42:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I found a study also from Illinois that found that

0:42:31.640 --> 0:42:35.240
<v Speaker 1>in Illinois, black and Hispanic drivers were two times likelier

0:42:35.280 --> 0:42:39.000
<v Speaker 1>to be stopped and searched, but white drivers were two

0:42:39.040 --> 0:42:45.040
<v Speaker 1>times likelier to have contraband on them. Weird, not only weird,

0:42:45.120 --> 0:42:50.920
<v Speaker 1>it's it's startling. How like it's it's not effective like there,

0:42:50.920 --> 0:42:54.480
<v Speaker 1>it's not leading to stopping crime, yeah, which is sort

0:42:54.480 --> 0:42:58.719
<v Speaker 1>of the point. Well. And then another very controversial a

0:42:58.760 --> 0:43:01.239
<v Speaker 1>bout of racial prof aisling that this country went through

0:43:01.320 --> 0:43:05.799
<v Speaker 1>came after September eleven, of course, and in the aftermath

0:43:05.840 --> 0:43:08.680
<v Speaker 1>of that, you would remember every every month or two

0:43:09.040 --> 0:43:14.240
<v Speaker 1>you'd hear about someone who sometimes seeks who aren't even Arab,

0:43:14.719 --> 0:43:17.000
<v Speaker 1>would get kicked off of like a plane or something

0:43:17.040 --> 0:43:20.839
<v Speaker 1>like that because they made the pilot nervous just being there. Yeah,

0:43:21.000 --> 0:43:24.239
<v Speaker 1>or T s A would would like pat down. Um.

0:43:24.840 --> 0:43:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Just proportionately more Arab people than white people. Um. And

0:43:29.760 --> 0:43:33.080
<v Speaker 1>now supposedly they based it on your behavior rather than

0:43:33.120 --> 0:43:36.200
<v Speaker 1>your race, so they're not rachel profiling any longer, supposedly,

0:43:36.400 --> 0:43:38.560
<v Speaker 1>and it is. I have to say, I haven't heard

0:43:38.560 --> 0:43:40.120
<v Speaker 1>of one of those cases in a while, but it

0:43:40.160 --> 0:43:42.279
<v Speaker 1>seemed like for a while we're hearing about it all

0:43:42.320 --> 0:43:44.959
<v Speaker 1>the time. Yeah, I think there was a heightened sense

0:43:45.000 --> 0:43:48.080
<v Speaker 1>of everything back then. Of course, right after. But so

0:43:48.200 --> 0:43:51.120
<v Speaker 1>this guy who used to manage the Ben Gurion Airport

0:43:51.239 --> 0:43:55.600
<v Speaker 1>in Um Israel, Rafael Ron, he pointed out that that

0:43:55.640 --> 0:43:58.080
<v Speaker 1>was the exact opposite of what you want to do yeah,

0:43:58.120 --> 0:43:59.600
<v Speaker 1>he said, the worst tech in the history of this

0:43:59.640 --> 0:44:03.279
<v Speaker 1>airport was carried out by Japanese in the early seventies.

0:44:03.800 --> 0:44:06.200
<v Speaker 1>And he said, if we're focusing on an ethnic group,

0:44:06.239 --> 0:44:09.640
<v Speaker 1>then we're we're potentially missing someone that's about to do

0:44:09.680 --> 0:44:12.040
<v Speaker 1>something bad, right, which is exactly what happened in nine

0:44:12.680 --> 0:44:15.200
<v Speaker 1>two at that airport. Three members of the Japanese Red

0:44:15.320 --> 0:44:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Army walked in with machine guns and violin cases and

0:44:19.560 --> 0:44:22.680
<v Speaker 1>just opened them up and started opening fire on the

0:44:22.719 --> 0:44:27.000
<v Speaker 1>crowd and killed I think, um twenty six people. And

0:44:27.040 --> 0:44:29.719
<v Speaker 1>they were hired by the PLO. Pl O knew that

0:44:29.760 --> 0:44:33.560
<v Speaker 1>they could never walk into the the Israeli airport, but

0:44:33.760 --> 0:44:36.759
<v Speaker 1>the Japanese people would unnoticed. And so this guy is

0:44:36.800 --> 0:44:38.360
<v Speaker 1>saying the same thing like if you're really on the

0:44:38.360 --> 0:44:42.520
<v Speaker 1>lookout for your enemy, like again, watch for behavior, like

0:44:42.600 --> 0:44:45.879
<v Speaker 1>do actual police work. Don't just use this lazy shorthand stuff,

0:44:45.920 --> 0:44:48.640
<v Speaker 1>because it's gonna it's going to take off this entire

0:44:48.680 --> 0:44:51.560
<v Speaker 1>population and it's gonna cause in you to miss the

0:44:51.600 --> 0:44:55.000
<v Speaker 1>real crime. Well, yeah, you've got like it sounds like

0:44:55.000 --> 0:44:58.000
<v Speaker 1>a movie. Them the cops are at the airport and

0:44:58.040 --> 0:45:00.880
<v Speaker 1>they detained this, uh, this air of guy who's like

0:45:01.000 --> 0:45:03.400
<v Speaker 1>late for a business meeting. And then in the in

0:45:03.480 --> 0:45:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the same shot, the white dude who was a Timothy McVey,

0:45:08.640 --> 0:45:10.560
<v Speaker 1>just walks right behind them with the with the bomb

0:45:10.560 --> 0:45:13.880
<v Speaker 1>on his body. You realize you just described the subplot

0:45:13.960 --> 0:45:20.520
<v Speaker 1>to Airplane Too, did Yeah, remember Sonny Bono had the bomb.

0:45:20.880 --> 0:45:23.480
<v Speaker 1>It's a little mild mannered, weasily dude. Yeah, that's right.

0:45:23.840 --> 0:45:26.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think he walks through while they're jacking up

0:45:26.080 --> 0:45:32.160
<v Speaker 1>some like I think plo dudes. Maybe that was subconscious. Wow,

0:45:32.280 --> 0:45:35.759
<v Speaker 1>so that's a profiling tip of the iceberg. I would

0:45:35.800 --> 0:45:39.080
<v Speaker 1>call that. Oh, sure, there's we could do a series

0:45:39.120 --> 0:45:42.279
<v Speaker 1>of shows on this, I'm sure. Uh. And if you

0:45:42.320 --> 0:45:45.520
<v Speaker 1>want to know more about profiling in the meantime, uh,

0:45:45.840 --> 0:45:48.800
<v Speaker 1>type that word into the search bar of your favorite

0:45:48.800 --> 0:45:52.120
<v Speaker 1>search engine and I'm sure we'll bring up all manner

0:45:52.160 --> 0:45:54.920
<v Speaker 1>of terrible stuff. You can also type in the search

0:45:54.960 --> 0:45:56.719
<v Speaker 1>bart how stuff works dot com and it will bring

0:45:56.800 --> 0:45:59.200
<v Speaker 1>up this article by the Crabs or And since I

0:45:59.280 --> 0:46:03.839
<v Speaker 1>said grabs or time for a listener mail, I'm gonna

0:46:03.840 --> 0:46:07.480
<v Speaker 1>call this wee f us, which is short for water

0:46:07.600 --> 0:46:11.480
<v Speaker 1>enema from a water slide or from a slide. And

0:46:11.560 --> 0:46:15.960
<v Speaker 1>this is from Tiffany last name withheld, She says. Uh.

0:46:16.120 --> 0:46:17.960
<v Speaker 1>As a kid, I remember being a chubby eleven year

0:46:17.960 --> 0:46:20.640
<v Speaker 1>old girl excited for her first trip to Disney World

0:46:20.640 --> 0:46:23.600
<v Speaker 1>in the water park then known as Typhoon Lagoon, had

0:46:23.640 --> 0:46:26.560
<v Speaker 1>a brand new neon green with black polka up bathing suit.

0:46:27.000 --> 0:46:30.319
<v Speaker 1>It was all excited and UH to go down the Cowabunga,

0:46:30.360 --> 0:46:33.240
<v Speaker 1>a two fourteen foot tall water slide on a steep

0:46:33.280 --> 0:46:36.920
<v Speaker 1>sixty degree angle. They tell you to keep your ankles crossed.

0:46:36.920 --> 0:46:39.160
<v Speaker 1>But as a little chubby eleven year old girl, my

0:46:39.239 --> 0:46:41.520
<v Speaker 1>brain comprehended, but my little legs did not have the

0:46:41.560 --> 0:46:44.560
<v Speaker 1>strength for all two d and fourteen feet. Thank you

0:46:44.600 --> 0:46:47.640
<v Speaker 1>see where this is headed. After plumbing the bottom, immediately

0:46:47.719 --> 0:46:50.399
<v Speaker 1>knew something was not right. I clenched my thighs as

0:46:50.400 --> 0:46:54.840
<v Speaker 1>tightly as I could, pulling out the massive water slide wedgie.

0:46:55.280 --> 0:46:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Not two steps from exiting the slide, though, a different

0:46:58.000 --> 0:47:00.840
<v Speaker 1>type of waterfall began to trick al down my legs.

0:47:01.800 --> 0:47:04.040
<v Speaker 1>No matter how tightly I clinched, I couldn't stop it.

0:47:04.440 --> 0:47:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I waddled up to a gorgeous Australian teenager employee and explain,

0:47:08.080 --> 0:47:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I need a restroom right away. Uh, with a smug smile.

0:47:11.640 --> 0:47:13.880
<v Speaker 1>He pointed all the way to the other side of

0:47:13.960 --> 0:47:16.440
<v Speaker 1>the lagoon, which was a long walk. Just as I

0:47:16.560 --> 0:47:19.080
<v Speaker 1>entered the bathroom with all the force of the water

0:47:19.360 --> 0:47:22.800
<v Speaker 1>that had entered my body, it exited, and I single

0:47:22.800 --> 0:47:26.000
<v Speaker 1>handedly shut down a small portion of Disney that day.

0:47:26.840 --> 0:47:28.719
<v Speaker 1>As embarrassing as this was, I was more upset than

0:47:28.719 --> 0:47:31.440
<v Speaker 1>my new bathing suit was ruined. My parents were furious

0:47:31.680 --> 0:47:33.400
<v Speaker 1>because they had to show out fifty dollars for a

0:47:33.400 --> 0:47:36.000
<v Speaker 1>new one Toronto. I hope I didn't gross you out

0:47:36.000 --> 0:47:40.399
<v Speaker 1>too bad. I think of it as a cautionary lesson

0:47:40.440 --> 0:47:43.920
<v Speaker 1>for your listeners. Thanks for all your hard work. Um,

0:47:44.080 --> 0:47:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I hope to see you guys sometime in Detroit. And

0:47:46.680 --> 0:47:50.800
<v Speaker 1>hey October, Tiffany last name with eld. We're just gonna

0:47:50.800 --> 0:47:56.040
<v Speaker 1>call you Tiffany poopy pants. We're coming to Detroit in October, yes,

0:47:56.200 --> 0:47:59.880
<v Speaker 1>ostensibly ostensibly, and also we want to stay Detroit in

0:48:00.000 --> 0:48:02.560
<v Speaker 1>advance of us coming. We're sorry for all the jokes

0:48:02.600 --> 0:48:05.320
<v Speaker 1>we made about you. It'll all come home to roost.

0:48:05.680 --> 0:48:08.120
<v Speaker 1>See you in October. If you want to tell us

0:48:08.160 --> 0:48:11.759
<v Speaker 1>a gross story that happened when you were a kid, like, yeah,

0:48:11.960 --> 0:48:14.360
<v Speaker 1>don't just tell us something else and tweet to us

0:48:14.360 --> 0:48:16.960
<v Speaker 1>at s y s K podcast, join us on Facebook

0:48:17.000 --> 0:48:19.120
<v Speaker 1>dot com, slash stuff you Should Know, send us an

0:48:19.120 --> 0:48:21.759
<v Speaker 1>email to Stuff Podcast at how stuff Works dot com,

0:48:21.800 --> 0:48:23.960
<v Speaker 1>and join us out at home on the web Stuff

0:48:24.000 --> 0:48:30.960
<v Speaker 1>you Should Know dot com. For more on this and

0:48:31.040 --> 0:48:41.000
<v Speaker 1>thousands of other topics, is that how stuff Works dot com.