WEBVTT - What's a Time Crystal?

0:00:08.680 --> 0:00:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Katie, did you know that if you stick any

0:00:11.440 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>two science worse together you get a great science fiction

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:17.480
<v Speaker 1>movie title. Really? Is it really that easy? Oh yeah,

0:00:17.520 --> 0:00:22.439
<v Speaker 1>just give it a shot. Okay, let's see Quantum Hamster Boom.

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 1>I can see that whole movie in my mind alway, Yeah, okay, okay,

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 1>what about Alligator Crystal? I love it? Want to see

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 1>that one. Let's do time, Pump. I'm calling Netflix and

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 1>set up a pitch meeting right now. Hi. I'm Daniel.

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm a particle physicist, and I really would like to

0:00:57.760 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 1>write a science fiction movie someday. And I am Katie.

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:06.240
<v Speaker 1>I am a science podcaster, and I am already writing

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 1>dialogue for Quantum Hamster in my head. And Welcome to

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the podcast Daniel and Jorge Explain the Universe, a production

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:16.679
<v Speaker 1>of I Heart Radio in which we take you on

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 1>a tour of everything that's amazing in the universe, everything

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:23.319
<v Speaker 1>that's out there doing crazy stuff you couldn't imagine, and

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:26.760
<v Speaker 1>all the weird quantum stuff happening at the particle level

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 1>and everything in between. But we want you to come

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:32.559
<v Speaker 1>away from our podcast not just hearing about the crazy

0:01:32.600 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 1>stuff in the universe, but actually understanding it. And as

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 1>you might have guessed, Orge isn't with us today, but

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 1>instead we have a wonderful guest podcast host, Katie introduce

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>yourself to everybody. Hi, guys, I am Katie Golden. I'm

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the host of Creature Feature, a podcast about animal and

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 1>human behavior. I studied psychology and evolutionary biology, so I

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 1>am very excited to take a journey into the physics

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 1>realm of things. I hope I can fill Jorges shoes

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 1>a little bit temporarily. Do you know what his shoe sizes.

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:09.960
<v Speaker 1>He's a cartoonist, so he just draws really big, floppy

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 1>clown shoes and that'll be perfect for me. Well, you

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 1>guys should all check out. Creature Feature is a super

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 1>fun podcast, and Katie's a lot of fun, which is

0:02:19.240 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 1>why we invite her here as a guest host. And

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, today's episode is all about how we understand

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:28.360
<v Speaker 1>the universe and how we understand things like time, which

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:30.960
<v Speaker 1>makes me wonder since you're an expert on creatures and

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:35.840
<v Speaker 1>evolutionary behavior, do animals understand time? Katie? That's a really

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:39.240
<v Speaker 1>good question. I'd say it depends on the animal, and

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>it depends on what you mean by understand a lot

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 1>of animals can kind of mark the passage of time

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 1>without possibly really understanding it. Like there's a great migration

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:54.920
<v Speaker 1>of plankton that happens every day with the rising and

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:57.079
<v Speaker 1>setting of the sun. But could you say that as

0:02:57.240 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 1>little zooplankton really understands time. I'm gonna say no, that's

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 1>a bold, controversial take. But yeah, it's really hard to

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:07.960
<v Speaker 1>get inside of the heads of animals. That's a problem

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 1>talk about on my podcast. Well, I wouldn't be surprised

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:14.360
<v Speaker 1>if animals like crows understood time. There's a group of

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 1>crows that seem to always gather outside my window, right

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:19.640
<v Speaker 1>or like I'm two o'clock in the afternoon when I

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:23.839
<v Speaker 1>have a big zoom meeting. Yeah, I think patterns are

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>really easy for animals to understand, especially the smart ones crows.

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 1>If you feed them, they'll come back and visit you

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 1>whenever you feed them, so they will learn your patterns,

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:36.040
<v Speaker 1>much like a cat. You know how your cat wakes

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 1>you up just in time early in the morning for

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 1>you to feed them. They understand patterns. They will memorize

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 1>your rhythms and patterns for the best snacking opportunities. Well,

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, I was wondering if you were going to

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 1>ask whether any animal understands time, even humans, because as

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 1>you might know, time is a slippery topic and it's

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>something a lot of our listeners ask us to talk

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 1>about because it's not something that even human physicists can

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 1>get our minds around. Why do we remember the past

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 1>and not the future? Why is there now? Is the

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 1>now actually real? Or is time just an illusion? All

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 1>of these really simple basic questions about time haven't yet

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 1>been answered. So wait is time? When we're talking about

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:23.159
<v Speaker 1>time though, is it just a human invention? Like we

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 1>made clocks, we have one o'clock to twelve o'clock, you know,

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:29.560
<v Speaker 1>we kind of have this concept of time, like is

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:32.800
<v Speaker 1>it not just our human invention or is there actually

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>a real thing of time outside of our little mickey

0:04:37.760 --> 0:04:40.160
<v Speaker 1>mouse watches. Yeah, it's a great question. There's a lot

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>of it that is invented by humanity, like units, you know,

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:46.799
<v Speaker 1>one second, one minute, that's totally arbitrary, and an alien

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:50.359
<v Speaker 1>species might invent something totally different. But in our understanding

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:53.360
<v Speaker 1>of physics, time seems to be real, and we will

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:56.000
<v Speaker 1>dig into that later in the podcast about the concept

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:58.840
<v Speaker 1>of time in quantum mechanics. And the concept of time

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 1>in general relativity, which turned out to be totally fundamentally

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 1>different ideas of what time is. But yeah, we do

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:08.159
<v Speaker 1>think the time is a feature of the universe. We

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 1>think it's something out there and real, but we won't

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:13.479
<v Speaker 1>really know until we one day get to talk to

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 1>alien physicists and see if they even understand the concept

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 1>of time. That's so interesting. So there is an actual

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 1>cosmic time that is occurring that we sort of view

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 1>through our own little human lens, our sun dials and

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:32.599
<v Speaker 1>our watches and our appointments, but that may not really

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>capture the whole truth about what time is. Yeah, or

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:37.400
<v Speaker 1>it could be an illusion. It could be the time

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:40.479
<v Speaker 1>is not something deep and fundamental to the universe. It

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 1>could be that it's sort of emerges that it's like

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:46.680
<v Speaker 1>a special condition that only happens under certain circumstances, you know,

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the way like ice forms sometimes in the universe, but

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 1>not always. You could have a universe without ice. That's

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 1>not a big deal. It might be the time isn't fundamental.

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:58.479
<v Speaker 1>But we'll dig into all that on today's podcast. We

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 1>actually want to focus today on something even weirder than

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 1>just the question of time, which is a big puzzle

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:06.480
<v Speaker 1>for physicist. We want to talk about something which has

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 1>been bopping around the Internet and creating a lot of

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:13.839
<v Speaker 1>buzz recently. That's this topic of time crystals. Oh, that

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 1>sounds beautiful. What comes into your mind when I said it?

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:20.840
<v Speaker 1>For his time crystals a bunch of clocks floating around

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:25.919
<v Speaker 1>in a crystalline structure. All right, And so today on

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the program we'll be asking and hopefully answering the question

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:39.040
<v Speaker 1>what is a time crystal? So, Daniel, you asked people

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 1>on the internet what they thought. That's right. Folks out

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 1>there volunteered to speculate baselessly on the topic of the day,

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 1>just to give us a sense for what they knew

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:51.479
<v Speaker 1>and what they didn't know. And so if you would

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:55.480
<v Speaker 1>like to submit your baseless speculations for future podcast episodes,

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:58.679
<v Speaker 1>please write to me two questions at Daniel and Jorge

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 1>dot com. And so here is what people had to say.

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:06.320
<v Speaker 1>My only thought is that there are these points in

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 1>space that maybe our time markers, or there are certain

0:07:12.360 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 1>blocks of crystals that hold elements or signatures of certain

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:21.480
<v Speaker 1>time events that you can look back on. That's easy.

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Um made a whole Rick and Morty episode about those.

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what time crystals are. Well, I know

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 1>about Courts is a crystal, and we use courts to

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 1>get precision timing and watches and things like that. Maybe

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 1>there's other crystals that can do the same thing. So

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 1>what do you think about those answers, Katie? I do

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 1>like the call back to Rick and Morty. They definitely

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 1>have a scientific approach to time with all of their

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 1>time travel episodes, do they? Though? Are you a Rick

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>and Morty fan? I like it it's a loaded question

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 1>to ask if you're a Rick and Morty fan, because

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that there are some really hardcore fans out

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 1>there who will contends that you have to really understand

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:05.280
<v Speaker 1>science to understand the show, and I just think it's

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 1>a fun show. Yeah, well, you know, I watch Rick

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 1>and Morty sometimes, but I'm a real stickler for getting

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>the science right when you're doing time travel, and that's

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 1>really hard. It's very difficult to have a narrative that

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 1>makes sense if you're also going backwards in time and

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 1>jumping all around, and so that sometimes gets the way

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 1>of me enjoying Rick and Morty. I see, you're real

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:32.120
<v Speaker 1>stickler for those time travel plot holes that always pop up. Yeah, exactly.

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of time, the focus of today's episode is this question,

0:08:36.040 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 1>what is a time crystal? I like some of these answers.

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:42.599
<v Speaker 1>You know, we do use a crystal in watches sometimes

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:45.200
<v Speaker 1>to tell time, right, crystals are at the heart of

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of watches on people's risks. How do they

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:50.679
<v Speaker 1>work to tell time? Do you have just a little

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:53.720
<v Speaker 1>crystal man in your watch going like it's about two thirty?

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly how it works. You crack it open, you'll

0:08:56.920 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 1>spot we're writing a Rick and Morty episode. But that's

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 1>not actually the kind of time crystal that we're talking

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 1>about today. Today's episode is about something totally different. So

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:11.559
<v Speaker 1>what kind of time crystal are we talking about? If

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:14.199
<v Speaker 1>it's not a little crystal telling you what time it is.

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>The idea of a time crystal basically is an extension

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 1>of the idea of a space crystal. So let's first

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 1>talk about what a space crystal is, remind ourselves about

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:26.080
<v Speaker 1>like the basic idea there, and then we'll try to

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 1>apply that concept to time crystals. Now, I'm imagining a

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 1>crystal floating through space, but I'm going to guess that's

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:36.720
<v Speaker 1>probably not what it is. No, exactly that's exactly what

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 1>it is for a space crystal, right, A space crystal

0:09:39.760 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 1>is what it's just like a regular pattern and a

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 1>crystal like the kind of thing that you see like

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:46.599
<v Speaker 1>a shiny gem or something else you would call a

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 1>crystal is if you zoom down into it and understood

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:52.720
<v Speaker 1>it like at the molecular or the atomic level. The

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:55.960
<v Speaker 1>way it's built is like a bunch of Lincoln logs

0:09:56.080 --> 0:10:00.439
<v Speaker 1>or something. You have regularly spaced atoms all end up

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:03.200
<v Speaker 1>in like a three dimensional pattern. Right, It's that kind

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of grid like structure. I always think of a sort

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 1>of a wafer kind of treat, maybe just because I'm hungry,

0:10:09.960 --> 0:10:13.400
<v Speaker 1>but it's those layers and layers of interlocking wafer like

0:10:13.960 --> 0:10:17.719
<v Speaker 1>molecular structures. Right, Yeah, exactly. You have wafer and then

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:20.200
<v Speaker 1>you have caramel, then you have another wafer, then you

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 1>have chocolate. That's exactly the recipe for building your crystal.

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Just making me hungrier, Katie's crystal cookies, I love it. Well.

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Sugar is a crystal. Yes, sugar is a crystal. And

0:10:30.440 --> 0:10:33.559
<v Speaker 1>basically anything that's a crystal that has a regular pattern.

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>And that's the core concept that we have to understand

0:10:36.040 --> 0:10:39.600
<v Speaker 1>when we're talking about crystals. Basically, you're building a lattice.

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:43.959
<v Speaker 1>You're taking a continuous symmetry right like space in itself

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:46.680
<v Speaker 1>is the same everywhere. It doesn't really matter if you

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 1>take one step forward or a half step forward. The

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:52.080
<v Speaker 1>same laws of physics reply, everything works the same way.

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 1>If you're gonna like juggle balls here, then you took

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 1>a step sideways, the same rules should apply, the same

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:01.560
<v Speaker 1>juggling should work. A crystal takes that and sort of

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:05.560
<v Speaker 1>breaks that symmetry into something discreet. So now the universe

0:11:05.800 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 1>has a symmetry still, but it's not like smooth. You

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>have to take like exactly the right size step in

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 1>order to see the universe the same way. So if

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:16.960
<v Speaker 1>you're like inside a big crystal is a huge lattice

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>and you're sitting on an atom, you have to take

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 1>a step exactly the size of the lattice so that

0:11:21.640 --> 0:11:24.559
<v Speaker 1>you're still sitting on an atom. It's chess rules, except

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:28.000
<v Speaker 1>you're all ponds. Yeah, exactly, take space and break it

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:30.679
<v Speaker 1>up into chessboards, and you can only move one square

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 1>or two squares. You can't move one and a half

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 1>or two and a half squares. And so that's the

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:37.319
<v Speaker 1>idea of a space crystal, and like do you think

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:39.000
<v Speaker 1>of a crystal is a big shiny thing, But when

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 1>you zoom down into it, the reason that it's shiny,

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the reason it has those properties that reflect LFE that way,

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:48.600
<v Speaker 1>is because it has this regular structure in space. So

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:51.280
<v Speaker 1>when we say crystal here, we generally just mean like

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 1>a regular, discrete structure. That's so interesting. I mean, crystal

0:11:55.360 --> 0:12:00.160
<v Speaker 1>structures are really interesting and evolutionary biology because they are

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:05.320
<v Speaker 1>surprisingly sometimes used in eyeballs, like in the eyes of

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:10.560
<v Speaker 1>mollusks will have these guanting crystal structures that help them

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 1>reflect light. You don't think of organic material as something

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 1>you can turn into a crystal, but yeah, you can

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:21.439
<v Speaker 1>take guanting form a guanting crystal form an eyeball. That's fascinating.

0:12:21.600 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 1>So most eyeballs don't have crystals in them. It's a

0:12:24.080 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 1>special situation. Yeah, we have lenses in most eyeballs, but

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 1>those guanting crystals that form in certain eyeballs, like in

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the eyes of scalps, will have this characteristic that helps

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:38.319
<v Speaker 1>them reflect light in such a way that gives them

0:12:38.320 --> 0:12:43.480
<v Speaker 1>really interesting vision. And scallops have eyes, yes they do.

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:46.800
<v Speaker 1>You wouldn't think so, I'll think about that. Next time

0:12:46.800 --> 0:12:50.720
<v Speaker 1>i'm biting into one, I'm tasting crystalline eyeballs. They're actually

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 1>beautiful blue eyes and they have a whole mess of them,

0:12:53.400 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 1>like two hundred of them. Oh my gosh, Well that

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:58.199
<v Speaker 1>makes me feel better. That's why I don't eat scalops

0:12:58.200 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 1>because I don't like crystalline eyeballs. And instead of using

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:05.440
<v Speaker 1>lenses like a human or mammal eye or most animals eyes,

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:09.719
<v Speaker 1>they actually use mirrors inside of their eyes as kind

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 1>of a miniature telescope by using that guanting crystal structure. Wow, amazing. Well,

0:13:14.880 --> 0:13:17.719
<v Speaker 1>the other important thing to understand about these kinds of

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:20.440
<v Speaker 1>crystals that we're talking about space crystals is that they

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:23.720
<v Speaker 1>are stable. So like those crystals in the eyes of scallops,

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 1>or that diamond that comes up out of the ground

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 1>is stable as the regularly repeating pattern, but it doesn't

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:32.080
<v Speaker 1>fall apart. It is in its lowest energy state, and

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 1>so we can hang out basically for a long time.

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>It needs to be broken up if you want those

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 1>atoms back. Is that why diamonds are so tough because

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 1>of that crystalline structure. Yeah, because the crystalline structure makes

0:13:44.440 --> 0:13:46.679
<v Speaker 1>them really hard to break. And also that's why they

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 1>last a long time because they're in a stable state.

0:13:49.280 --> 0:13:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Like the atoms, they're very happy to be in that situation.

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 1>They're not going to relax into some other lower ground

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:57.960
<v Speaker 1>state and then break up into something else energetically. They're

0:13:58.080 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 1>very comfortable. That's so interesting. It's something like an ice

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 1>cube forms a lot of structure, but it does melt.

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 1>So is that an example of like an unstable crystal structure. Yeah.

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Ice is actually super fascinating because it can form lots

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 1>of different kinds of structures. And we're gonna do a

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:17.440
<v Speaker 1>whole podcast episode about all the different weird kinds of ice.

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 1>It's like one that's not transparent black ice, and it's

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 1>like nine other kinds of ice. So it can form

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 1>lots of weird crystal structures, but actually is in a

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 1>stable state. The only reason it melts is because you're

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 1>adding energy to it. Right. Melting means you're like heating

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:33.680
<v Speaker 1>it up from the outside. Same with diamonds. You put

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 1>diamonds in hot enough temperatures, they will melt. That actually happens.

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 1>We think sort of like on the surface of Jupiter,

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 1>which rains diamonds into the interior, which might form like

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 1>a big liquid diamond ocean. So Jupiter is really rich,

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about Kardashian levels of rich. Absolutely, absolutely, So now

0:14:52.560 --> 0:14:55.240
<v Speaker 1>we understand, like the idea of a crystal, it's like

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 1>a regular structure, but that's a crystal structure in space.

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 1>So now it's turned to the topic we're trying to

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:03.000
<v Speaker 1>talk about today, which is time crystals. Right, take that

0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 1>same idea and apply it to time. Okay, but how

0:15:06.000 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 1>do you put time in a crystal? Because time is

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 1>not physical matter. You can't arrange it in a lott

0:15:12.800 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 1>of structure. So what are you trying to say here?

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:18.440
<v Speaker 1>So take the same idea you're applying to a lattice

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:21.120
<v Speaker 1>in space, where you say, all right, the thing looks

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the same if I take one step to the right,

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 1>or one step forward or one step backwards. And now

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:28.800
<v Speaker 1>say what happens if I take a step forwards in time?

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:32.359
<v Speaker 1>So a time crystals some kind of object or substance

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 1>which has a regular repeating pattern in time, which means

0:15:36.760 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 1>like it looks the same now and then in a second,

0:15:39.520 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 1>and then in two seconds, and then in three seconds

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 1>and in between. It doesn't have to look the same,

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 1>but it's going through some transformation so regularly returns to

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the same position. So this is like four dimensional chess

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 1>where it's like you're playing this chess game where you're

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:58.080
<v Speaker 1>only allowed to move one space at a time in

0:15:58.120 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 1>a certain direction, but it through time and not through

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 1>physical space necessarily, Yes, exactly. And so what you want

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 1>is something which returns to the same configuration, but after

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 1>discrete units of time, right, not like it's in that

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 1>same state all the time. That would just be a

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 1>space crystal. You want a time crystal which is in

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 1>a certain configuration, then moves out of it and comes back,

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and then moves out of it and then comes back.

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 1>So you wanted to sort of break this continuous time

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 1>symmetry where things always look the same into a discrete symmetry,

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:32.720
<v Speaker 1>so that it looks the same and then it doesn't,

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 1>and then it comes back and it looks the same again.

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 1>That's the property you have in a space crystal, right,

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 1>you have this distance between points in space. Now we

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 1>want distance between configurations in time. Kind of sounds like

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 1>a dance to me. You have to do your dance

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 1>movements through not just space, but through time, and it

0:16:50.680 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 1>has to synchronize in a specific way. Yes, exactly, And

0:16:54.760 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 1>the other critical thing is that it has to be stable,

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 1>meaning it has to be in its grounds eight. That

0:17:00.640 --> 0:17:04.200
<v Speaker 1>means that basically it's doing this forever. So you need

0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:07.879
<v Speaker 1>something which is both in motion but also in the

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 1>most relaxed, lowest energy state, and that's a really unusual combination.

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 1>You have to imagine something basically moving forever that sounds

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 1>like a perpetual motion, which I didn't realize is something

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 1>you could do. Well, my mind is blown, so I'm

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:26.240
<v Speaker 1>going to try to recollect my brain back into pieces.

0:17:26.280 --> 0:17:28.639
<v Speaker 1>But before we do that, let's take a quick break.

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:45.000
<v Speaker 1>And we're back and Daniel is trying to reassemble the

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 1>pieces of my brain that exploded. Because we were talking

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>about how there is something where with a time crystal

0:17:54.200 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 1>you can remain in emotion forever at a low energy state,

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:02.879
<v Speaker 1>which sounds like perpetual motion to me, which I thought

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:06.360
<v Speaker 1>was just science fiction. So how could this possibly happen? Yeah,

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:08.879
<v Speaker 1>it's a really awesome question. And it's for this reason

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:11.679
<v Speaker 1>that people thought forever like this is a silly idea.

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Nobody should even talk about it. It's obviously impossible, and

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:18.720
<v Speaker 1>it's only recently that people thought maybe there's a way

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:21.400
<v Speaker 1>to make this happen. Maybe there's a way to configure

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:25.160
<v Speaker 1>a system that can be in motion through time where

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:28.119
<v Speaker 1>regularly returns to a specific state that's one of the

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:31.199
<v Speaker 1>lattest point and yet is stable. So we could like

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 1>do this forever. And this started in about twenty twelve

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 1>when a famous physicist named Frank Wilcheck. He's at m

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I T and he won the Nobel Prize for understanding

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:44.439
<v Speaker 1>the strong interaction, which is a thing that like binds

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:47.679
<v Speaker 1>quirks together into protons and neutrons. So he's generally a

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 1>smart guy, and he's also kind of famous for coming

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:53.359
<v Speaker 1>out of left field with a crazy idea that turns

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:55.679
<v Speaker 1>out to be pretty good. He's the guy, for example,

0:18:55.680 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>who coined the term axons to describe that hypothetical particle,

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:02.359
<v Speaker 1>and in he put out this kind of crazy paper saying,

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:05.720
<v Speaker 1>you know what, here's a situation where time crystals might

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:10.200
<v Speaker 1>be possible. He constructed an example of a quantum system,

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:14.160
<v Speaker 1>a ring of particles that sort of rotates and every

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of clock cycle returns to a similar configuration and

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 1>repeats the same pattern in time. So exploded into like

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the community of theoretical physics blowing everybody's mind. So is

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 1>this something that would happen on the quantum level. Are

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 1>we talking about entire like star systems doing this like

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 1>time crystal thing, or are we talking about something on

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:39.919
<v Speaker 1>a very small scale. This is something a very small scale.

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:42.399
<v Speaker 1>This would definitely be a quantum effect. It's not the

0:19:42.480 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing that you can have happened from macroscopic systems.

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:48.439
<v Speaker 1>And the reason you can only do it potentially for

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:51.679
<v Speaker 1>quantum systems is that quantum systems have a really weird

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 1>relationship with zero energy. Right. Things that the quantum scale

0:19:55.840 --> 0:19:59.200
<v Speaker 1>can never have exactly zero energy, so when you force

0:19:59.280 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 1>them into their howest energy state, it's not actually down

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:05.919
<v Speaker 1>to zero energy. But a whole fun podcast episode recently

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:09.560
<v Speaker 1>about zero point energy in the Casimir effect, which basically

0:20:09.600 --> 0:20:12.760
<v Speaker 1>says if you look into empty space, it's actually filled

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:16.440
<v Speaker 1>with an infinite number of photons because all the fields

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:19.240
<v Speaker 1>that are out there in space can never really relax

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 1>down to zero energy. So time crystals, if you think

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 1>they're possible, could only be possible for tiny, little microscopic

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 1>quantum particles. This is like when my car battery drained

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:32.879
<v Speaker 1>down to quote unquote zero and the mechanics that I

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:35.440
<v Speaker 1>need a new one, But hey, guess what, I got

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more out of that battery. So maybe

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:42.679
<v Speaker 1>it was some quantum time crystals at work there. Or

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:45.119
<v Speaker 1>when your iPhone battery says it's at zero but it's

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 1>still running, and you're like, am I using the Casimir

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 1>effect to charge my bode? And you might also be imagining,

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:54.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, obvious examples of like larger physical systems, not

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 1>just stars, that seem to have this property that they

0:20:57.600 --> 0:21:00.359
<v Speaker 1>could spin, for example, and return to the same state.

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Like think about a wheel with spokes. As it rotates,

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 1>it returns to basically the same configuration. The problem is

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 1>that bicycle wheels, a macroscopic object, could never actually spin forever.

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 1>And that's also not its ground state. It's not the

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 1>most lowest energy state. Lowest energy state for a bicycle

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 1>wheel is when it's stopped right, And so that's why

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 1>we aren't able to actually make a perpetual motion machine

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 1>out of bicycle wheels and water and marbles and so

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:28.760
<v Speaker 1>on and so forth. But Frank will Check wrote this

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 1>paper and said, you know what, it might be possible

0:21:30.720 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 1>for quantum objects, basically like a little quantum wheel. He

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:37.160
<v Speaker 1>tried to show this thing could spin forever and actually

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>be in its ground state. Now. Of course this set

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 1>off like a lot of conversations in the theoretical physics community.

0:21:43.520 --> 0:21:46.520
<v Speaker 1>And there's another theorist, Patrick Bruno, who actually found a

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 1>mistake in well checked paper tattletale. I know this, but

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 1>this is a good lesson, like Nobel Prize winners make mistakes.

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:56.800
<v Speaker 1>I feel like a lot of times people quote Nobel

0:21:56.800 --> 0:21:58.879
<v Speaker 1>Prize winners and if they said it and they want

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 1>a Nobel Prize in must be the truth, right, But

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:04.560
<v Speaker 1>like they're just people. You know, Yes, they're smart and

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:07.760
<v Speaker 1>they got lucky, but they're also people and sometimes they

0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:11.919
<v Speaker 1>make mistakes. Ye take that, you Nobel Prize winning smarty pants.

0:22:13.560 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 1>I especially love it when they interview a Nobel Prize

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:18.760
<v Speaker 1>winner on a topic they're like, not an expert in

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, you'll hear like a Nobel Prize winning physicist

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 1>commenting on economic policy and you're like, you don't know

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:27.200
<v Speaker 1>anything more about that than anybody else, Like just because

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:31.480
<v Speaker 1>he won the Nobel Prize, Yeah, you know, I'm as

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:34.119
<v Speaker 1>much a Nobel Prize winner in a field you didn't

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:38.160
<v Speaker 1>study as you are Nobel Prize winner in physics. So they're, yeah,

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:42.160
<v Speaker 1>exactly what was this mistake and how did that change

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:44.600
<v Speaker 1>this whole concept of being able to have these little,

0:22:45.119 --> 0:22:48.480
<v Speaker 1>little tiny time crystals. Yeah. So Patrick Bruno showed that

0:22:48.520 --> 0:22:52.199
<v Speaker 1>the example that will Check proposed, this idea of a

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:55.760
<v Speaker 1>ring of particles rotating was actually more similar to a

0:22:55.840 --> 0:22:58.400
<v Speaker 1>bicycle wheel spinning than we thought that he would only

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:01.200
<v Speaker 1>rotate if it was actually in a more energetic state,

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 1>and he showed that the example that will Check suggested

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 1>had the possibility to decay into a ground state which

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be rotating, and so it wouldn't actually qualify as

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:13.159
<v Speaker 1>a time crystal. But you know, once the idea is

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:16.400
<v Speaker 1>out there, then people started working on They thought, that's interesting,

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:19.400
<v Speaker 1>let's reinvestigate a lot of times you have an area

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 1>in physics where people are like, oh, we already know

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the answer there, that's totally impossible, and it takes one

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:28.159
<v Speaker 1>brave person like dig into again and ask the question anew,

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:30.239
<v Speaker 1>and then a lot of people will follow and be like, oh,

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:33.080
<v Speaker 1>that's interesting, I wonder if we could actually crack this problem.

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:35.639
<v Speaker 1>And so Frank will Checks credit with like cracking this

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 1>problem open again, and then a huge number of people

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:40.200
<v Speaker 1>started writing papers, and there were a lot of people

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:42.520
<v Speaker 1>that said, oh no, it turns out of time crystals

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:45.720
<v Speaker 1>completely impossible. They wrote all these no go papers that

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:48.959
<v Speaker 1>proved under various conditions. You could never have a time crystal.

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:52.119
<v Speaker 1>You can never have a quantum mechanical arrangement of particles

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:55.399
<v Speaker 1>that repeats in time and is at its ground state.

0:23:55.680 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Wet blankets trying to make it so that I can't

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 1>make a little quantum circus with a little merry go round,

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:06.080
<v Speaker 1>and I'm thinking about cork on a unicycle just going

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:07.919
<v Speaker 1>on forever, and I don't like it. I want to

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 1>hear some optimism. Well, we'll talk about the actual experiments

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 1>in a minute, because this also inspired a bunch of

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:16.120
<v Speaker 1>folks to say, well, let's go see if we can

0:24:16.160 --> 0:24:19.360
<v Speaker 1>make one. You know, sometimes the theorists say that's as possible,

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:22.119
<v Speaker 1>this is impossible, but it's up to the universe to

0:24:22.200 --> 0:24:25.480
<v Speaker 1>decide whether it actually happens. And so I like when

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 1>experimentalists sort of don't listen to the theorists and just

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:32.240
<v Speaker 1>go out there and explore. But it's actually really interesting

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and important question about time crystals because it gets to

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:37.639
<v Speaker 1>the heart of how we think about time. And this

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 1>is something you were bringing up earlier, like is time

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:43.200
<v Speaker 1>or real thing? If time crystals are really really would

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:46.199
<v Speaker 1>tell us something fundamental about the nature of like time

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:49.560
<v Speaker 1>and the universe. Yeah, because I feel like we don't

0:24:49.600 --> 0:24:53.399
<v Speaker 1>really have a frame of reference outside of our human

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 1>invention of We mark the minutes, we mark the seconds.

0:24:57.160 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 1>We pick sort of these units of time, probably based

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:03.719
<v Speaker 1>on our ability to like the time it takes us

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:06.359
<v Speaker 1>to think about a second, is about how long a

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:09.880
<v Speaker 1>second is, So you know, it's based very much on

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:13.480
<v Speaker 1>our human brains. But it's interesting. I guess I've never

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:17.280
<v Speaker 1>really thought too much about finding empirical evidence for their

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:20.119
<v Speaker 1>being time. Well, it's also really interesting to sort of

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:24.160
<v Speaker 1>dig into it theoretically and ask, like our fundamental picture

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:27.439
<v Speaker 1>of the universe, what does that tell us about time?

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 1>And we have two pictures of the universe the way

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:33.480
<v Speaker 1>things work sort of at the deepest level in the universe,

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 1>quantum mechanics and general relativity. And as listeners the podcast know,

0:25:38.440 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 1>these two don't often agree, and that's also the case

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:45.200
<v Speaker 1>about the nature of time. Have very different opinions about

0:25:45.280 --> 0:25:49.960
<v Speaker 1>what time is, and quantum mechanics says that space and

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 1>time are very different, and according to quantum mechanics, you

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:55.399
<v Speaker 1>have like a description of the universe. It says like,

0:25:55.640 --> 0:25:58.679
<v Speaker 1>here's your quantum particle, there's your quantum particle, whatever. And

0:25:58.720 --> 0:26:01.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, quantum mechanics tells us what's likely to happen

0:26:01.520 --> 0:26:04.320
<v Speaker 1>to those particles in the future, and all that crazy

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:07.000
<v Speaker 1>stuff that we can dig into another episode. But the

0:26:07.040 --> 0:26:10.240
<v Speaker 1>important thing is that quantum mechanics tells us how those

0:26:10.320 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 1>quantum states evolved, like the Shortinger equation, the most famous equation,

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:16.679
<v Speaker 1>and quantum mechanics, that's what it does. It tells us,

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 1>if you have a quantum state, here's what it's going

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:21.680
<v Speaker 1>to look like in the future. And also you can

0:26:21.680 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 1>turn that equation around and you can say, here's how

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 1>you got to now, here's how the past must have

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 1>looked if the present looks this way. And there's a

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 1>concept we often talk about called quantum information, and that's

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:35.960
<v Speaker 1>what this means. It says that if you know how

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the universe looks now, you can figure out how we

0:26:38.760 --> 0:26:42.720
<v Speaker 1>got here because quantum information is never destroyed. And that's

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:44.800
<v Speaker 1>a deep and fundamental statement about the nature of the

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:48.560
<v Speaker 1>universe because it means, according to quantum mechanics, the time

0:26:48.720 --> 0:26:51.840
<v Speaker 1>is eternal time like goes on forever into the future

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:56.439
<v Speaker 1>and into the past. So that's true of quantum mechanics,

0:26:56.440 --> 0:26:59.679
<v Speaker 1>like in the quantum miniature universe, but like when we

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:03.400
<v Speaker 1>look at the larger universe, once we scale it up,

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 1>those ideas don't hold true. Yeah, exactly. This is relevant

0:27:06.560 --> 0:27:09.080
<v Speaker 1>to the rules of tiny little particles. But you're right,

0:27:09.080 --> 0:27:11.040
<v Speaker 1>when we scale up to the rest of the universe,

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:13.440
<v Speaker 1>things do look a little different. And this is when

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 1>general relativity comes in, because when it comes to like

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the shape of the universe and the age of the universe,

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the thing that matters most is gravity, and general relativity

0:27:23.359 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 1>is the best theory we have that describes how gravity works.

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 1>And the most important concept in general relativity that's relevant

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:33.440
<v Speaker 1>for today's conversation is this notion that space and time

0:27:33.480 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 1>are very deeply connected, or quantum mechanics says space time

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:40.359
<v Speaker 1>are separate. Time is just like the way that things

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:44.600
<v Speaker 1>in space evolve one step to the other. General relativity says, no, no, no,

0:27:45.000 --> 0:27:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Time is like just one part of this thing we

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 1>call space time, and there's a deep symmetry between space

0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 1>and time, and they evolve together and they get twisted

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:57.440
<v Speaker 1>together and they really closely connected. And if you think

0:27:57.440 --> 0:28:00.119
<v Speaker 1>about what general relativity says about time even more deeply,

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, general relativity says that the universe is expanding

0:28:04.000 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and that it used to be denser, and as you

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:08.679
<v Speaker 1>look backwards in time, time doesn't go on forever. It

0:28:08.760 --> 0:28:11.320
<v Speaker 1>comes back to some sort of like singularity in the

0:28:11.400 --> 0:28:14.600
<v Speaker 1>early universe. And according to general relativity, is very natural,

0:28:14.640 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 1>for example, to have a beginning of time, for time

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:21.359
<v Speaker 1>to have started rum zero in the early universe. So

0:28:21.480 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 1>quantum mechanics says space and time very different and time

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:28.160
<v Speaker 1>has lasted forever. General relativity says, no, no no, no, These

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:30.520
<v Speaker 1>are just two different sides of the same coin. And

0:28:30.560 --> 0:28:32.720
<v Speaker 1>it makes perfect sense for time to have started in

0:28:32.720 --> 0:28:35.679
<v Speaker 1>the early universe. So two very different pictures about this

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:38.959
<v Speaker 1>very basic piece of the universe. Well, the universe is

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:43.080
<v Speaker 1>made out of quantum particles, and so the bigger aspects

0:28:43.080 --> 0:28:46.600
<v Speaker 1>of the universe are made up of the quantum aspects

0:28:46.600 --> 0:28:49.239
<v Speaker 1>of the universe. So it's very interesting that you have

0:28:49.400 --> 0:28:54.719
<v Speaker 1>this disagreement ostensibly between basically the some of the parts

0:28:54.760 --> 0:28:58.160
<v Speaker 1>and the parts themselves. Yeah, you're absolutely right, And one

0:28:58.240 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons they disagree is that usually they play

0:29:00.840 --> 0:29:04.560
<v Speaker 1>in different fields. When we talk about tiny little particles,

0:29:04.600 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 1>gravity is so weak that it's basically irrelevant, and we

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:10.120
<v Speaker 1>can ignore what general relativity says. And then when we

0:29:10.200 --> 0:29:13.080
<v Speaker 1>zoom up to talk about stars and planets, all those

0:29:13.120 --> 0:29:15.920
<v Speaker 1>tiny little particles are so small they get just averaged out.

0:29:15.920 --> 0:29:19.360
<v Speaker 1>All the quantum effects basically disappear. So general relativity is

0:29:19.440 --> 0:29:22.960
<v Speaker 1>dominant for really big heavy stuff, and quantum mechanics are

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:26.440
<v Speaker 1>dominant for really tiny, very low mass stuff. And it's

0:29:26.560 --> 0:29:29.239
<v Speaker 1>very rare for the two to be important, so we

0:29:29.280 --> 0:29:32.479
<v Speaker 1>can't tell like who wins when they're both important. The

0:29:32.480 --> 0:29:34.000
<v Speaker 1>only way to figure that out is to do things

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:36.920
<v Speaker 1>like look inside of a black hole, where things are

0:29:36.920 --> 0:29:40.800
<v Speaker 1>so small but so dense that both of them are important.

0:29:41.000 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 1>And that's not something we've been able to do yet,

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:46.840
<v Speaker 1>not yet. Maybe in a few years. Well, I want

0:29:46.840 --> 0:29:50.560
<v Speaker 1>to hear about how this disagreement impacts whether or not

0:29:50.640 --> 0:29:55.080
<v Speaker 1>I can have my tiny time crystal Carnival. But maybe

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:57.440
<v Speaker 1>we should take a quick break first of while I

0:29:57.560 --> 0:30:14.840
<v Speaker 1>draw up some little quantum merrigo rounds schematics. We are back.

0:30:14.960 --> 0:30:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to decide whether to sell cotton candy at

0:30:18.960 --> 0:30:22.640
<v Speaker 1>my little quantum Carnival with the time crystal Dance, the

0:30:22.760 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 1>time crystal Carousel, And so Daniel is going to explain

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 1>to me how quantum mechanics and general relativity, the small

0:30:33.920 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 1>side of the universe, the quantum side, and the big side,

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the US and stars and everything else can disagree so

0:30:40.000 --> 0:30:43.440
<v Speaker 1>much about time and space. Yeah, well, I wish we

0:30:43.520 --> 0:30:45.680
<v Speaker 1>knew the answer to that. But one way that we

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:48.360
<v Speaker 1>might be able to probe it is to look inside

0:30:48.400 --> 0:30:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the core of a black hole and understand, you know,

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:53.719
<v Speaker 1>who's right about the nature of the universe, or go

0:30:53.800 --> 0:30:55.880
<v Speaker 1>back in time to the Big Bang. But you know

0:30:55.960 --> 0:30:59.440
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of inaccessible. So we're excited anytime we can

0:30:59.520 --> 0:31:02.280
<v Speaker 1>probe thing that we think gets near this question that

0:31:02.360 --> 0:31:05.840
<v Speaker 1>lets us like understand around the edges of these questions

0:31:05.880 --> 0:31:08.800
<v Speaker 1>about the fundamental nature of the universe. And that's why

0:31:08.880 --> 0:31:12.960
<v Speaker 1>time crystals are super fascinating because they explore this connection

0:31:13.280 --> 0:31:17.760
<v Speaker 1>between space and time. Like if time crystals can actually

0:31:17.840 --> 0:31:21.000
<v Speaker 1>be made, it's really a strong argument that there's a

0:31:21.000 --> 0:31:24.000
<v Speaker 1>close connection between space and time, that this thing that

0:31:24.080 --> 0:31:27.600
<v Speaker 1>exists in space space crystals can also be made in time,

0:31:27.640 --> 0:31:29.960
<v Speaker 1>that time can be seen sort of like as another

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 1>dimension of space. It adds sort of like a check

0:31:33.680 --> 0:31:36.560
<v Speaker 1>in the column of general relativity. And so that would

0:31:36.600 --> 0:31:41.240
<v Speaker 1>mean that quantum mechanics is actually behaving in a way

0:31:41.400 --> 0:31:45.800
<v Speaker 1>that is following the rules of general relativity. It would

0:31:45.840 --> 0:31:48.880
<v Speaker 1>mean that we need to adapt somehow quantum mechanics to

0:31:48.960 --> 0:31:51.400
<v Speaker 1>play along nicely with this concept that space and time

0:31:51.440 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 1>are deeply connected. And you know, we know already that

0:31:55.120 --> 0:31:58.680
<v Speaker 1>quantum mechanics can't really be right about time being eternal

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:02.080
<v Speaker 1>in every direction, like we think the universe had a beginning,

0:32:02.360 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 1>So it doesn't really make sense to hold tightly to

0:32:04.720 --> 0:32:07.920
<v Speaker 1>this concept that time must be eternal. On the other hand,

0:32:08.280 --> 0:32:10.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a pretty big thing to get rid of, to

0:32:10.360 --> 0:32:14.320
<v Speaker 1>let go of this concept of quantum unitarity, that quantum

0:32:14.360 --> 0:32:18.040
<v Speaker 1>information is not ever lost. That's something we really think

0:32:18.120 --> 0:32:20.560
<v Speaker 1>is that the foundation of quantum mechanics. So one of

0:32:20.600 --> 0:32:23.640
<v Speaker 1>these theories has to get torn up basically and start again.

0:32:23.960 --> 0:32:26.800
<v Speaker 1>And the question is which. And we're hoping that time

0:32:26.840 --> 0:32:29.960
<v Speaker 1>crystals give us like a glimmer of understanding as to

0:32:30.000 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 1>how to begin that process. But even if we knew

0:32:33.000 --> 0:32:35.960
<v Speaker 1>right for example, that general relativity was correct, doesn't tell

0:32:36.000 --> 0:32:39.280
<v Speaker 1>us exactly how to start on quantum mechanics, and before

0:32:39.280 --> 0:32:42.280
<v Speaker 1>we put too many nails in the coffin of quantum mechanics, like,

0:32:42.520 --> 0:32:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anybody out there in physics believes general

0:32:45.520 --> 0:32:48.680
<v Speaker 1>relativity is correct. It's got to be wrong because it

0:32:48.760 --> 0:32:52.480
<v Speaker 1>assumes that the universe is smooth and continuous in a

0:32:52.520 --> 0:32:55.840
<v Speaker 1>way that quantum mechanics we know our experiments tell us

0:32:55.920 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 1>just can't be true. So my money is on both

0:32:59.120 --> 0:33:00.760
<v Speaker 1>of them are wrong. And we kind of come up

0:33:00.800 --> 0:33:03.120
<v Speaker 1>with a whole new theory that combines the two or

0:33:03.280 --> 0:33:06.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of cross checking these two rule books that were

0:33:06.760 --> 0:33:11.080
<v Speaker 1>writing based on the quantum information and then the larger

0:33:11.120 --> 0:33:15.960
<v Speaker 1>scale general relativity information. And it sounds like you physicists

0:33:16.000 --> 0:33:19.720
<v Speaker 1>have to cross check them and figure out where which

0:33:19.800 --> 0:33:22.320
<v Speaker 1>things make sense and then kind of get rid of

0:33:22.320 --> 0:33:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the things that don't as you cross check them, and

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:27.280
<v Speaker 1>time crystals might help you do that. Yeah, exactly, And

0:33:27.320 --> 0:33:30.160
<v Speaker 1>you're right, we're sort of trying to weave these threads together.

0:33:30.200 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, people have been working on quantum mechanics for

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:33.920
<v Speaker 1>a while, people have been working on job relativity for

0:33:33.960 --> 0:33:36.080
<v Speaker 1>a while, and the goal, of course, is to come

0:33:36.120 --> 0:33:39.400
<v Speaker 1>up with a single holistic explanation from the whole universe

0:33:39.440 --> 0:33:42.640
<v Speaker 1>or how everything fits together, and that requires like trying

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:45.760
<v Speaker 1>to weave these threats together. And in the past we've succeeded,

0:33:45.760 --> 0:33:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Like we figured out that electricity and magnetism are really

0:33:48.800 --> 0:33:51.400
<v Speaker 1>just two sides of the same coin, and neither theory

0:33:51.560 --> 0:33:53.360
<v Speaker 1>was wrong. They just sort of fit together in an

0:33:53.400 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 1>unexpected way. And then we added the weak force, and

0:33:56.080 --> 0:33:59.480
<v Speaker 1>now we have like a theory of the electromagnetic weak forces.

0:33:59.520 --> 0:34:03.000
<v Speaker 1>These three things sort of woven together into one common understanding.

0:34:03.240 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 1>The goal is to make progress by pulling these things together,

0:34:06.120 --> 0:34:08.920
<v Speaker 1>by getting our understanding from various bits of physics and

0:34:08.960 --> 0:34:11.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of putting it together to make a holistic picture.

0:34:11.760 --> 0:34:14.080
<v Speaker 1>And there's one more part of that thread that we

0:34:14.160 --> 0:34:17.040
<v Speaker 1>might try to pull in, and this this idea about

0:34:17.040 --> 0:34:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the connection between time and energy. Right the time crystal,

0:34:21.320 --> 0:34:24.160
<v Speaker 1>if it exists, is a weird thing because it's in motion,

0:34:24.200 --> 0:34:27.040
<v Speaker 1>but it's also like at its lowest energy state. Well,

0:34:27.040 --> 0:34:31.080
<v Speaker 1>there's another deep theorem about physics, Nother's theorem that tells

0:34:31.200 --> 0:34:35.080
<v Speaker 1>us why we have energy conservation in our universe. It

0:34:35.160 --> 0:34:38.479
<v Speaker 1>says that energy is conserved in our universe because there's

0:34:38.520 --> 0:34:41.439
<v Speaker 1>some symmetry with time that the laws of physics should

0:34:41.480 --> 0:34:44.320
<v Speaker 1>work the same now as they do in ten seconds

0:34:44.400 --> 0:34:46.719
<v Speaker 1>or in a million years. And we've talked in the

0:34:46.719 --> 0:34:49.680
<v Speaker 1>program before how we're not actually sure whether energy is

0:34:49.680 --> 0:34:52.799
<v Speaker 1>conserved because the universe is not actually static in time.

0:34:52.840 --> 0:34:56.160
<v Speaker 1>It's growing with time, it's expanding. So all these questions

0:34:56.200 --> 0:34:58.520
<v Speaker 1>are all mixed up in the very nature of time

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:01.080
<v Speaker 1>and the meaning of it, and the conservation of energy

0:35:01.160 --> 0:35:03.920
<v Speaker 1>and general relativity versus quantum mechanics, which is why I

0:35:03.960 --> 0:35:08.319
<v Speaker 1>was so excited to see experimental tests of time crystals, Like,

0:35:08.600 --> 0:35:11.800
<v Speaker 1>all right, put the theoretical questions aside, can somebody actually

0:35:11.800 --> 0:35:14.160
<v Speaker 1>make one of these things? Right? How do you? I mean,

0:35:14.200 --> 0:35:17.239
<v Speaker 1>it seems like you need really tiny pliers and a

0:35:17.320 --> 0:35:21.840
<v Speaker 1>really powerful microscope to be able to make a time crystal.

0:35:22.000 --> 0:35:25.080
<v Speaker 1>How do you go about doing those experiments? So the

0:35:25.120 --> 0:35:28.080
<v Speaker 1>original idea of this ring of atoms didn't work because

0:35:28.080 --> 0:35:30.840
<v Speaker 1>people showed that it was not actually in its ground state.

0:35:31.160 --> 0:35:33.120
<v Speaker 1>But then a bunch of smart people got together and

0:35:33.160 --> 0:35:36.160
<v Speaker 1>came up with, you know, other ideas, and you're exactly right,

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:39.560
<v Speaker 1>you need really tiny pliers. And usually in physics, when

0:35:39.560 --> 0:35:42.640
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about tiny players were talking about photons, we're

0:35:42.680 --> 0:35:45.719
<v Speaker 1>talking about like shooting little beams of light at individual

0:35:45.760 --> 0:35:48.719
<v Speaker 1>atoms to try to make them do something interesting. And

0:35:48.719 --> 0:35:51.160
<v Speaker 1>so that's exactly what they did here. They put a

0:35:51.160 --> 0:35:55.160
<v Speaker 1>bunch of atoms together and then they zapped them with lasers.

0:35:55.239 --> 0:35:58.399
<v Speaker 1>And atoms, you know, have various ways that they can sit.

0:35:58.840 --> 0:36:02.120
<v Speaker 1>These atoms, for example, have a particular quantum spin. They

0:36:02.160 --> 0:36:04.920
<v Speaker 1>can spin up or they can spin down. And remember

0:36:04.920 --> 0:36:07.400
<v Speaker 1>we're not talking about atoms spinning the way like a

0:36:07.440 --> 0:36:09.920
<v Speaker 1>basketball spins on the tip of your finger. This is

0:36:09.960 --> 0:36:13.200
<v Speaker 1>some weird quantum mechanical property. And so it either has

0:36:13.239 --> 0:36:16.080
<v Speaker 1>spin up or it has spin down. It's very difficult

0:36:16.120 --> 0:36:18.480
<v Speaker 1>for it to be sort of in between. So you

0:36:18.719 --> 0:36:21.440
<v Speaker 1>arrange a bunch of these atoms in a row, and

0:36:21.480 --> 0:36:23.600
<v Speaker 1>then the atoms like to either be spin up or

0:36:23.680 --> 0:36:26.040
<v Speaker 1>spin down, and then you zap them with a laser,

0:36:26.160 --> 0:36:30.200
<v Speaker 1>which makes those spins flip. I see, so you're zapping them,

0:36:30.239 --> 0:36:33.640
<v Speaker 1>they have a certain spin preference, and then they start

0:36:33.760 --> 0:36:36.480
<v Speaker 1>to go the other direction. Yeah, So you have them

0:36:36.480 --> 0:36:39.120
<v Speaker 1>in some arrangement like the spin up, spin up, spin down,

0:36:39.160 --> 0:36:41.800
<v Speaker 1>spin up, whatever, and then you zap them with a laser.

0:36:41.920 --> 0:36:45.279
<v Speaker 1>And the laser is basically just photons, right, This is

0:36:45.280 --> 0:36:48.600
<v Speaker 1>an oscillating electromagnetic field, and so it can flip the

0:36:48.640 --> 0:36:52.239
<v Speaker 1>spins because these atoms all have electric charges. So the

0:36:52.320 --> 0:36:54.640
<v Speaker 1>laser comes in and it can flip the spins in

0:36:54.640 --> 0:36:57.800
<v Speaker 1>a certain pattern. Because the laser is an electromagnetic field

0:36:57.800 --> 0:37:00.480
<v Speaker 1>that cannot oscillate up and flip spins up and then

0:37:00.480 --> 0:37:03.799
<v Speaker 1>as laid down and flip spins down. So what we see,

0:37:03.880 --> 0:37:07.000
<v Speaker 1>this is super interesting in these experiments, is that they

0:37:07.080 --> 0:37:09.960
<v Speaker 1>arrange these atoms in a random pattern. The laser comes

0:37:10.000 --> 0:37:13.000
<v Speaker 1>in and it makes these spins flip. They oscillate, right,

0:37:13.280 --> 0:37:15.120
<v Speaker 1>you might think, all right, well, that's no big deal,

0:37:15.239 --> 0:37:17.840
<v Speaker 1>but you're slapping them around exactly, you're slapping them around.

0:37:18.120 --> 0:37:20.760
<v Speaker 1>But then what happens when you turn off the laser.

0:37:21.160 --> 0:37:24.360
<v Speaker 1>You turn off the laser and these atoms keep flipping.

0:37:24.960 --> 0:37:28.120
<v Speaker 1>You keep flipping in exactly the same pattern as when

0:37:28.120 --> 0:37:32.040
<v Speaker 1>you had the laser on. So they remember how they're

0:37:32.040 --> 0:37:36.080
<v Speaker 1>supposed to flip, even after the laser that's been smacking

0:37:36.120 --> 0:37:39.720
<v Speaker 1>them around stops doing that. Exactly, they're in some weird

0:37:40.120 --> 0:37:44.120
<v Speaker 1>stable configuration where they're in motion and they're returning to

0:37:44.160 --> 0:37:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the same state over and over again, and they're not

0:37:47.000 --> 0:37:49.960
<v Speaker 1>just static, right, they're in motion. This is some ground

0:37:50.040 --> 0:37:54.400
<v Speaker 1>state configuration that's above zero, so it has continuous energy.

0:37:54.640 --> 0:37:57.640
<v Speaker 1>So how long do they do this? Because you know,

0:37:57.840 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 1>someone might think of like that Newton's Cradle office toy

0:38:01.640 --> 0:38:04.000
<v Speaker 1>where you started going and it goes for a while

0:38:04.040 --> 0:38:07.000
<v Speaker 1>even without you doing the initial thing, but with the

0:38:07.040 --> 0:38:10.320
<v Speaker 1>conservation of momentum and eventually breaks down and stops moving.

0:38:10.640 --> 0:38:14.200
<v Speaker 1>So what happens with these atoms? Yeah, that's a great question,

0:38:14.440 --> 0:38:16.920
<v Speaker 1>and this is an experimental issue, right. In order to

0:38:16.960 --> 0:38:18.960
<v Speaker 1>do this, you need to like isolate these atoms, so

0:38:19.000 --> 0:38:20.960
<v Speaker 1>you need to put them in some sort of larger trap,

0:38:21.040 --> 0:38:23.279
<v Speaker 1>like use magnets or something to keep the rest of

0:38:23.320 --> 0:38:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the world from like messing it up. If you were

0:38:25.480 --> 0:38:28.239
<v Speaker 1>in an empty universe where it's just these atoms and

0:38:28.280 --> 0:38:31.200
<v Speaker 1>a laser, then we think it could last essentially forever

0:38:31.360 --> 0:38:34.360
<v Speaker 1>if it really is a time crystal. But it's difficult

0:38:34.360 --> 0:38:37.200
<v Speaker 1>to keep these things sort of isolated forever. People can

0:38:37.239 --> 0:38:39.440
<v Speaker 1>do it for minutes at a time, but that's the

0:38:39.480 --> 0:38:42.360
<v Speaker 1>longest that's been achieved. But we think that's just because

0:38:42.360 --> 0:38:44.560
<v Speaker 1>of this question of like, you know, isolating it from

0:38:44.560 --> 0:38:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the universe. We think that probably if it was totally separated,

0:38:48.320 --> 0:38:50.880
<v Speaker 1>you could just keep going, right, because even in a vacuum,

0:38:51.080 --> 0:38:54.240
<v Speaker 1>there's not nothingness. There's still stuff going on in that vacuum.

0:38:54.320 --> 0:38:57.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah exactly. It's impossible to separate anything from the rest

0:38:57.800 --> 0:39:00.799
<v Speaker 1>of the universe because there's always like qual fields and

0:39:00.840 --> 0:39:03.560
<v Speaker 1>fluctuations and all this kind of stuff. And so that's

0:39:03.560 --> 0:39:06.319
<v Speaker 1>why it's fun to explore these things at a theoretical level,

0:39:06.360 --> 0:39:09.160
<v Speaker 1>like is this possible? And then it's a totally separate

0:39:09.239 --> 0:39:12.279
<v Speaker 1>question of like could you actually build these things? One

0:39:12.320 --> 0:39:15.840
<v Speaker 1>of the experimental obstacles to actually making this existing reality.

0:39:16.239 --> 0:39:18.640
<v Speaker 1>But there's this team at University of Maryland that put

0:39:18.719 --> 0:39:21.080
<v Speaker 1>this thing together and it kind of looks like they

0:39:21.160 --> 0:39:22.719
<v Speaker 1>did it, you know, it kind of looks like the

0:39:22.760 --> 0:39:26.160
<v Speaker 1>time crystal is real. That's so interesting. So this proof

0:39:26.200 --> 0:39:31.680
<v Speaker 1>of concept by being able to create these oscillating atoms

0:39:31.719 --> 0:39:33.880
<v Speaker 1>that you smack once and they're like all right, I

0:39:33.920 --> 0:39:36.319
<v Speaker 1>get it, I get it. I'll keep doing that, and

0:39:36.320 --> 0:39:40.120
<v Speaker 1>then you can use that information to maybe do more

0:39:40.239 --> 0:39:44.400
<v Speaker 1>work sort of in terms of like theoretical physics. Yeah exactly,

0:39:44.760 --> 0:39:47.480
<v Speaker 1>And that gives us some like understanding of you know,

0:39:47.560 --> 0:39:49.799
<v Speaker 1>what is the nature of time? Now that we know

0:39:49.880 --> 0:39:52.840
<v Speaker 1>that time crystals. We think the time crystals are a reality.

0:39:53.239 --> 0:39:56.160
<v Speaker 1>We can go back and use that to like help

0:39:56.280 --> 0:39:59.719
<v Speaker 1>guide us in building a deeper, more fundamental theory of

0:39:59.760 --> 0:40:03.319
<v Speaker 1>like quantum gravity that has the right respect for time,

0:40:03.360 --> 0:40:06.320
<v Speaker 1>that treats time more like an element of space time.

0:40:06.800 --> 0:40:09.480
<v Speaker 1>We think that the existence of time crystals points in

0:40:09.480 --> 0:40:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the direction that the general relativity concept of time is correct.

0:40:13.640 --> 0:40:16.240
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't mean that general relativities are right about everything

0:40:16.280 --> 0:40:19.400
<v Speaker 1>we know. It breaks down as singularities, but this basic

0:40:19.520 --> 0:40:22.879
<v Speaker 1>concept that space and time are deeply interwoven is more

0:40:22.920 --> 0:40:26.280
<v Speaker 1>likely to be true because time crystals exist. Right, Maybe

0:40:26.280 --> 0:40:30.640
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing a little more agreement between quantum mechanics and

0:40:30.680 --> 0:40:33.640
<v Speaker 1>general relativity than there was before. Can't we all just

0:40:33.680 --> 0:40:38.240
<v Speaker 1>get along? Community? Right? Community is the name of the day,

0:40:38.480 --> 0:40:41.680
<v Speaker 1>And also it's fun experimentally, like this is a really

0:40:41.680 --> 0:40:45.840
<v Speaker 1>important thing that might actually be useful technologically, imagine like

0:40:45.920 --> 0:40:50.160
<v Speaker 1>storing information. One thing that's difficult about building quantum computers

0:40:50.680 --> 0:40:52.839
<v Speaker 1>is that it's hard for them to have memories because

0:40:52.920 --> 0:40:56.520
<v Speaker 1>quantum objects these tiny little particles. They often like decay

0:40:56.640 --> 0:40:58.640
<v Speaker 1>and they don't last very long in the state that

0:40:58.680 --> 0:41:01.759
<v Speaker 1>you want. Well, time crystals might be a gray way

0:41:01.760 --> 0:41:05.799
<v Speaker 1>to build memory circuits for quantum computers because they are

0:41:05.880 --> 0:41:08.600
<v Speaker 1>stable in their lowest state and sort of remember the

0:41:08.640 --> 0:41:11.120
<v Speaker 1>configuration that you put them in. The pattern that you

0:41:11.160 --> 0:41:14.239
<v Speaker 1>put them in lasts through time. This is great for

0:41:14.280 --> 0:41:17.880
<v Speaker 1>our quantum hamster script because now we can get teeny

0:41:17.920 --> 0:41:22.799
<v Speaker 1>tiny computers for teeny tiny quantum hamsters. So that whole

0:41:22.800 --> 0:41:25.920
<v Speaker 1>scene where they're breaking into the quantum mainframe, that's gonna work.

0:41:26.480 --> 0:41:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Feeling good about this? Are they powered by tiny little

0:41:30.160 --> 0:41:33.120
<v Speaker 1>quantum cotton candies? That what gives the quantum hamster its power.

0:41:33.239 --> 0:41:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they got to keep up their carbs so

0:41:35.040 --> 0:41:38.439
<v Speaker 1>they can run in those tiny quantum wheels, keeping going.

0:41:38.600 --> 0:41:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Or maybe they should eat like scalloped crystal eyeballs. Now

0:41:43.480 --> 0:41:46.839
<v Speaker 1>we're getting into a horror movie. Oh yeah, that's right.

0:41:47.040 --> 0:41:50.120
<v Speaker 1>That's the Dark TV spinoff that will will sell after

0:41:50.200 --> 0:41:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the future. So this team in Maryland did this, and

0:41:53.239 --> 0:41:56.160
<v Speaker 1>then there's a team at Harvard that did something different.

0:41:56.200 --> 0:41:58.720
<v Speaker 1>They took a diamond, right, which is a space crystal,

0:41:59.160 --> 0:42:01.839
<v Speaker 1>and they put a bunch of nitrogen atoms inside that

0:42:01.880 --> 0:42:05.000
<v Speaker 1>diamond and then they turned those nitrogen atoms into a

0:42:05.160 --> 0:42:07.840
<v Speaker 1>time crystal by zapping it with a laser in a

0:42:07.960 --> 0:42:10.640
<v Speaker 1>very similar way. That's truly got to be a girl's

0:42:10.640 --> 0:42:14.799
<v Speaker 1>best friend. A diamond, and inside the diamond is a

0:42:14.800 --> 0:42:19.520
<v Speaker 1>time diamond. Yeah, exactly, a time diamond inside a space diamond.

0:42:19.840 --> 0:42:22.080
<v Speaker 1>That or it's like the taco bell version, you know,

0:42:22.400 --> 0:42:24.400
<v Speaker 1>take a burrito and wrap it in a taco and

0:42:24.400 --> 0:42:26.799
<v Speaker 1>then dip the whole thing in cheese. Either would be

0:42:26.800 --> 0:42:32.560
<v Speaker 1>good engagement gaps, I think exactly. So it's a really

0:42:32.600 --> 0:42:36.520
<v Speaker 1>exciting time sort of theoretically, like is this possible? There

0:42:36.560 --> 0:42:39.200
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of discussion. People fought for many years

0:42:39.200 --> 0:42:42.200
<v Speaker 1>that this was totally impossible. All the theorem suggested couldn't

0:42:42.239 --> 0:42:44.759
<v Speaker 1>be done, and then people found few loopholes, and then

0:42:44.800 --> 0:42:47.000
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of experimentalists when out there, said hey, we're

0:42:47.000 --> 0:42:48.840
<v Speaker 1>just gonna try to make this thing, and it looks

0:42:48.880 --> 0:42:51.759
<v Speaker 1>like they might have. So it's really fun for me

0:42:51.800 --> 0:42:54.080
<v Speaker 1>to see like a whole area of signs that people

0:42:54.360 --> 0:42:58.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't even consider as possible suddenly explode with activity and

0:42:58.680 --> 0:43:02.080
<v Speaker 1>ideas and in vation. That's the great thing about sciences.

0:43:02.160 --> 0:43:07.480
<v Speaker 1>You're always finding new things. Like you take old information,

0:43:08.000 --> 0:43:09.960
<v Speaker 1>you shake it up, and you find new things you

0:43:10.000 --> 0:43:13.520
<v Speaker 1>previously thought was impossible and now when I'm late to

0:43:13.600 --> 0:43:15.520
<v Speaker 1>an appointment, I can say, well, have you heard the

0:43:15.520 --> 0:43:18.399
<v Speaker 1>news about time crystals? Our whole concept of time might

0:43:18.400 --> 0:43:21.319
<v Speaker 1>not be right. That's right. Maybe I'm not late, maybe

0:43:21.360 --> 0:43:28.080
<v Speaker 1>you're late to Daniel says time can't be eternal. Anyway,

0:43:28.160 --> 0:43:31.680
<v Speaker 1>I've got a note from my physicist who says it's okay.

0:43:32.520 --> 0:43:35.920
<v Speaker 1>The larger motivation is that there are still really basic

0:43:36.040 --> 0:43:39.960
<v Speaker 1>questions out there, really big puzzles that haven't been solved

0:43:40.040 --> 0:43:42.759
<v Speaker 1>because nobody asked the right question or had the right

0:43:42.840 --> 0:43:46.480
<v Speaker 1>first idea. And so Frank Wilcheck is a little cookie,

0:43:46.520 --> 0:43:48.040
<v Speaker 1>but I love that he goes out there and tries

0:43:48.080 --> 0:43:50.800
<v Speaker 1>to tackle something that people think is impossible and actually

0:43:50.920 --> 0:43:54.480
<v Speaker 1>makes progress and makes a mistake, but along the way,

0:43:54.719 --> 0:43:57.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, breaks open a whole area of research. And

0:43:57.160 --> 0:43:59.719
<v Speaker 1>so somebody out there listening, hoping to grow up to

0:43:59.760 --> 0:44:02.040
<v Speaker 1>be a is just to make some big discovery. Don't

0:44:02.080 --> 0:44:04.200
<v Speaker 1>think that we figured it all out. We are far

0:44:04.400 --> 0:44:07.080
<v Speaker 1>from understanding the nature of the universe around us. There

0:44:07.120 --> 0:44:10.279
<v Speaker 1>are lots of really basic questions out there for you

0:44:10.520 --> 0:44:12.920
<v Speaker 1>to find the answers to. And if you're too afraid

0:44:13.000 --> 0:44:15.400
<v Speaker 1>to ask a question because you think it will be

0:44:15.480 --> 0:44:18.759
<v Speaker 1>stupid or wrong, you may never open up some really

0:44:18.760 --> 0:44:23.080
<v Speaker 1>interesting research avenues. Yeah, exactly, and remember even Nobel Prize

0:44:23.080 --> 0:44:26.319
<v Speaker 1>winners make mistakes. Take that Nobel Prize winner is not

0:44:26.480 --> 0:44:32.439
<v Speaker 1>so fancy now, are we? Well? Thank you guys so

0:44:32.520 --> 0:44:35.959
<v Speaker 1>much for listening. I hope you enjoyed our little time

0:44:35.960 --> 0:44:39.359
<v Speaker 1>Crystal time, and we will see you next time time

0:44:39.360 --> 0:44:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Crystal or not, we don't know, it's hard to say.

0:44:42.680 --> 0:44:52.840
<v Speaker 1>All right, thanks for listening everyone, Thanks for listening, and

0:44:52.880 --> 0:44:55.600
<v Speaker 1>remember that Daniel and Jorge Explain the Universe is a

0:44:55.640 --> 0:44:59.080
<v Speaker 1>production of My Heart Radio for More podcast for my

0:44:59.200 --> 0:45:02.759
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio at the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:45:02.880 --> 0:45:06.200
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows. H