WEBVTT - Bloomberg Surveillance TV: January 21st, 2026

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:11.680 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Jonathan Ferrow, along

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:18.440
<v Speaker 2>with Lisa Bromwitz and a Marie Hortenn. Join us each

0:00:18.520 --> 0:00:21.440
<v Speaker 2>day for insight from the best in markets, economics, and

0:00:21.440 --> 0:00:24.759
<v Speaker 2>geopolitics from our global headquarters in New York City. We

0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:27.479
<v Speaker 2>are live on Bloomberg Television weekday mornings from six to

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 2>nine am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:33.519
<v Speaker 2>or anywhere else you listen, and as always on the

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:35.880
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Terminal and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:00:36.360 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 3>We have the wonderful lineup of guests today, starting with

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:41.280
<v Speaker 3>the very own CEO of the Royal Bank of Canada,

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:43.000
<v Speaker 3>Dave Mackay, who joins us here.

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Dave, wonderful to see you. Thank you for being with us.

0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 4>It's great to be back.

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:48.239
<v Speaker 5>It's amazing at youears gone by already.

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:50.160
<v Speaker 3>Right, I mean, what's your impression so far of this jobos?

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:51.840
<v Speaker 3>It feels very different than previous ones.

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 5>It's more intense. There's more leaders here than I think

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 5>there's ever been. Over eight hundred and fifty CEOs, four

0:00:57.360 --> 0:01:01.800
<v Speaker 5>hundred ministers, sixty five heads of state, so there's been

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 5>a lot of dialogue already in the first kind of

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 5>forty eight hours, a lot of joint business government leader dialogue,

0:01:08.000 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 5>a run investment to your point, looking at making deals,

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:14.560
<v Speaker 5>looking at co investment, every country, looking at diversifying trade,

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 5>bringing business leaders with them to talk about co investment

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:21.840
<v Speaker 5>or whether it's manufacturing investment, defense spend in Europe and Canada's

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:24.039
<v Speaker 5>going up, a lot of discussions about how do we

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:27.560
<v Speaker 5>spend eighty billion dollars in Canada on defense? You know

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 5>what partners are we looking at?

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 4>How do we use that.

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 5>Defense spending lever to attract manufacturing investment, in automotive energy investment.

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 5>So there's a lot of grand bargain discussions going on

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 5>with business leaders with and haven't seen that before, and

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:47.559
<v Speaker 5>so it's different. It feels different. It's transactional to you said,

0:01:47.600 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 5>but it's exciting. At the same time, there's opportunity here.

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 3>Well you're talking about the excitement, and yet you are

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 3>Royal Bank of Canada. You are expanding in the United States,

0:01:56.400 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 3>and right now there is a breakdown in the relationship

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 3>between these two trees.

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 1>How problematic is that for you at.

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 3>A time where you have been expanding in the United

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 3>States and you do see flows at least in travel

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 3>going me other direction a little bit.

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 5>No, I think we're in this temporary world where we're

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 5>trying to figure out how we're going to trade going forward.

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:20.640
<v Speaker 5>But I come back to the core of USMCA. Canada

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 5>really helps America with affordability. We make things in Canadian dollars,

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:26.480
<v Speaker 5>we sell it to the US. The US buy is

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:28.800
<v Speaker 5>it that a thirty percent discount, but it's automotive parts,

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 5>whether it's steel, aluminum, food, and a lot of our

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 5>Canolagos the United States, and therefore we help keep prices

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:36.080
<v Speaker 5>down in the US. And if the US were to

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 5>bring all of that back, it's inflationary, you shortage of

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 5>labor in the United States. So as you look at

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 5>the core of USMCA, it's good for America, and I

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 5>think that gives me comfort that we will come to

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 5>an arrangement going forward recognizing this is good for America.

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 5>It's good for Canada obviously, but it's good for America

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 5>and that's important to the President. There will be change,

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 5>I don't think it will be the same agreement going forward,

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 5>but the core of it, I think is so important

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:03.639
<v Speaker 5>to both sides, and that gives me comfort that we

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:06.359
<v Speaker 5>will continue to trade Canada, and you heard our Prime

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 5>minister's message. I'm sure we'll talk about that has to

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 5>diversified trade. I think we've relied on trade to the

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:14.919
<v Speaker 5>US substantially a big part of our economy. And I

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 5>think that the conversations that are happening before Davos after Davos.

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 5>In Davos are very much about here's what we're good at.

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 5>Can we find a grand bargain deal. Can we expand

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 5>trade across multiple countries where that's Europe, A lot of

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 5>discussion with South Asia and Asia, and a lot of

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 5>discussion with the Middle East, and investing in Canada. And

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 5>what's different about Davos this year? Honestly, Lisa, it's risk

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:37.960
<v Speaker 5>on Canada.

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about the Prime minister speech.

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 6>The sharpest tone I've ever heard from Mark Carney about

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 6>Donald Trump without mentioning Trump's name, He's talking about a

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 6>new world order, saying these middle countries, if you're at

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 6>the table prepared to get eaten. Does that make it

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 6>harder when you're talking about things like watching the USMCA

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 6>trade deal. Do you think that the relationship is going

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 6>to become more challenging in Canada and the United States.

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 5>I think relationships are about value exchange, and if there's

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 5>good value exchange and you both see a benefit to that,

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 5>then you're going to find the right place. So when

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 5>just as I said, there's great value exchange, four hundred

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 5>billion dollars go back and forth across the border every

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 5>year because there's value. We're the number one trade relationship

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:24.800
<v Speaker 5>with thirty six states. Most of those are red states

0:04:24.839 --> 0:04:26.040
<v Speaker 5>at the end of the day, So when we think

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:30.239
<v Speaker 5>about the importance of that relationship just beyond a federal

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:33.599
<v Speaker 5>level into the state level, it's really important. So I

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 5>think you come back and you say it's good for America,

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 5>it's good for Canada. That's the basis for exchange of

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:41.919
<v Speaker 5>value and going forward. Having said that, I think the

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 5>Prime Minister is very clear that we haven't done our

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 5>role in defending ourselves. We haven't invested enough of our

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 5>GDP in defense, and you've seen that commitment to spend

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 5>that money.

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 4>We have to do that.

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:56.279
<v Speaker 5>We have to increasingly defend ourselves and are not just

0:04:56.320 --> 0:04:58.799
<v Speaker 5>our economic security, it's our physical security.

0:04:58.839 --> 0:04:59.840
<v Speaker 4>We have to play a bigger role.

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:01.719
<v Speaker 5>We have to defend the Arctic and we have to

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 5>invest in the Arctic, and it's a big part of

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:05.360
<v Speaker 5>the commitment we've made to NATO and we've made to

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 5>the United States that you'll see a greater investment from Canada.

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:12.279
<v Speaker 5>And we have to have dual use investments, not just military,

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:15.599
<v Speaker 5>but commercial and economic investments in the Arctic in Canada

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:18.000
<v Speaker 5>should play a role in doing that. So you're seeing

0:05:18.040 --> 0:05:20.480
<v Speaker 5>that a big part of his speech yesterday. And we

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:23.359
<v Speaker 5>have to create scale. We're in a world of scale.

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:26.160
<v Speaker 5>Businesses needs scale, countries need scale, and I think the

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:29.600
<v Speaker 5>Prime Minister's message was we have to continue to diversify,

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:32.160
<v Speaker 5>but diversify in a way that you continue to build

0:05:32.200 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 5>scale and what you need.

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 4>So I think that's what I took away when he.

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:37.920
<v Speaker 6>Says diversify, does it mean maybe a new strategic partnership

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 6>with China?

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:40.040
<v Speaker 4>Is that what you take from the Prime minister?

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:42.719
<v Speaker 5>You know, the Prime Mister was just in China a

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 5>week ago and it was a very important delegation that

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 5>he led to China to kind of reset the relationship

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:51.720
<v Speaker 5>after a better part of a decade where the relationship

0:05:51.760 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 5>had separated, and part of it was to renew economic

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 5>ties and to agree on areas where we definitely agree

0:05:57.880 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 5>and to say these are areas where we might not agree,

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 5>but let's focus on where we agree and where we

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 5>can build a future together.

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:04.719
<v Speaker 4>And I think that was a very positive step.

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 5>You saw China make a commitment to resume buying our

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 5>canola oil, and that's very important market for Canola. The

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 5>United States and China of big markets. We ceded a

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 5>small part of our automotive market three percent to Chinese imports.

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 5>That's an affordability issue. China will bring in affordable electric vehicles,

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 5>So I think that's good for Canadians at the end

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:28.239
<v Speaker 5>of the day. So I think there's more to build

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:31.480
<v Speaker 5>on and I think it's part of diversifying across multiple countries.

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so we've gone all this time without talking about

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 3>what you actually have done.

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 1>You just had a year that's phenomenal. You had record.

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:41.600
<v Speaker 3>Revenues for any Canadian bank ever and you have grown tremendously.

0:06:41.720 --> 0:06:42.920
<v Speaker 1>You beat all of your targets.

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm just wondering, when you're talking about diversifying businesses, does

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:47.240
<v Speaker 3>it go to your business as well?

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Are you expanding in places like China? Are you still

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 1>planning to expand in the United States?

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:57.279
<v Speaker 5>Our second home markets, the United States. We've grown wonderfully

0:06:57.279 --> 0:06:59.159
<v Speaker 5>in the United States. We just launched a whole new

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 5>treasury management platform, the United States RBC clear that's had

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:05.479
<v Speaker 5>a great reception. Technology leaf we brought in twenty five

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:09.280
<v Speaker 5>billion dollars of new money from US senior corporate's fortune

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 5>kind of five hundred. So the United States is our

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 5>second home market and we continue to invest there. We

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 5>lend significantly to US corporates, We lend in the mid

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 5>corporate space, in the commercial space, and we have the

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 5>fifth largest high net worth platform in the United States.

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 5>So the US is very important to US, serving Americans,

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:28.680
<v Speaker 5>helping Americans grow. And I told the administration already yesterday

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 5>that we've invested significant in the US economy and we're

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 5>part of the solution, and we.

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 4>Feel very welcome in the United States. So it's a

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 4>big part of our strategy.

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 5>To your point, our strategy has not included China up

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 5>until now for all the reasons where we didn't have

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 5>significant diplomatic ties. We didn't see the basis for that investment,

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 5>and now we have to review that. I can't say

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 5>how we would go back in, but if the trade

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:56.920
<v Speaker 5>continues to diversify and Canadian corporates invest in China, then

0:07:57.040 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 5>we will have to be part of that. What I'm

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 5>focused on now is the least significant investment commitments from

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 5>the Middle East of Canada. I think one of the

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 5>themes of Davos is Middle East is a great place

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 5>to invest. Abu Dhabi, Dubai u Ate on that side,

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:16.000
<v Speaker 5>Riad and Saudi Arabia significant commitments on both sides, and

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 5>you'll see a greater presence from RBC in the Middle

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 5>East as well. So yes, to your point, it's a

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 5>great question. You're seeing RBC become a more globally connected

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 5>bank because Canada is going to become a more globally

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 5>connected country. In the US is already incredibly globally connected country.

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us, Mulbloomberg. Savannah's coming up after this. We

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 2>begin this out with stocks slightly lower following the biggest

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 2>slide in three months of investors search for direction. The

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 2>Morgan Stanley chairman and see Ted pick has Sino and

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 2>he joined Usnaphomore.

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:52.600
<v Speaker 7>Ted, good to see.

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:55.520
<v Speaker 4>You guys, Thanks for having me. I'll like your mom

0:08:55.880 --> 0:08:57.600
<v Speaker 4>like fading good, feeling pretty good.

0:08:57.600 --> 0:08:58.760
<v Speaker 7>You're not going to be in the speech in about

0:08:58.800 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 7>twenty eight minutes time. Avoid that.

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'll be with you, guys.

0:09:03.440 --> 0:09:05.559
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about how things are set up for twenty six.

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 2>We've drawn a big distinction between the energy that's coming

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:11.199
<v Speaker 2>from European officials and the emotion they have about a

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:13.559
<v Speaker 2>place like Greenland, and the optimism that people have for

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 2>the broader US economy, particularly from bankers regarding the pipeline

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:19.280
<v Speaker 2>and the amount of debt issuance we've seen over the

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 2>past few months. The debt end to writing that you've

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 2>really benefited from that's going to fund a lot of

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 2>the transition. How ammed up are you about the year ahead?

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 4>Well, thanks for having me, guys, great to see you.

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 8>I'm pretty amped up. You know, we had several years

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 8>where the emin ACTIVI who's going to get going? And

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 8>then COVID happen and then retrooved, and it's taken a

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 8>while for a tongue glue. But this kind of in

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 8>this case literal noise speaks to c suite need to act,

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 8>whether it's to reglobalize or reorient where your operations are,

0:09:50.040 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 8>who you want to do business with, and as long

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:54.320
<v Speaker 8>as there's activity, we're busy. So cross border M and

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:57.120
<v Speaker 8>a large cap M and a going to be important

0:09:57.679 --> 0:09:59.720
<v Speaker 8>AI access an accelerant to that too. If you want

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 8>to act, you get after their productivity gains and embedded

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 8>in AI. You have to have the wherewithal to do it.

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:06.560
<v Speaker 8>And if your market cap is thirty or forty billion,

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:08.560
<v Speaker 8>that's tough. You know, how do you take a couple

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 8>of points off your income statement to do that year

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:13.319
<v Speaker 8>after year? But if you're two three hundred billion, maybe

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 8>you got a shot. So people are thinking bigger. And

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:18.440
<v Speaker 8>then the sponsors, as you know, a couple thousand companies

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:19.960
<v Speaker 8>that have been sitting there that have a billion dollar

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 8>market caps implied they need to come. And then very

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 8>importantly have these great companies that have been private. And

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 8>over the last fifteen years we've seen companies go public

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:31.079
<v Speaker 8>to defase options or effectively be secondaries.

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 4>You may actually see great companies that.

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 8>Are growth companies, some of them in the AI ecosystem,

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:38.040
<v Speaker 8>that want to go tap capital. So for the investment bank,

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 8>a great period and for a wealth manager, leading wealth

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:42.719
<v Speaker 8>manager in the US and the world, you want to

0:10:42.720 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 8>allocate your capital efficiently, so very exciting.

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 2>Some pank some of those business lines. So let's just

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 2>pick up on the IPO pipeline. The activity we could

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:53.079
<v Speaker 2>see later this year SpaceX open AI. We're talking about

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 2>some absolute monsters. Even the team have been historically quite

0:10:55.800 --> 0:10:58.320
<v Speaker 2>dominant in the tech sector. What are you doing right

0:10:58.360 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 2>now to prepare for that moment that might be an.

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:04.080
<v Speaker 8>Office Well, these companies, you know, you bank them for

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:06.720
<v Speaker 8>a whole bunch of years and you get to know them.

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 8>So there's a process, obviously the formal bakeoff process and

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:12.320
<v Speaker 8>then the go or no go decision.

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 4>But typically the company has.

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 8>A pretty good idea of what it wants to do

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:19.200
<v Speaker 8>ahead of time because it's selected its group. And the

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 8>stakes are really high this round because as you say,

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 8>these the implied market caps these companies are enormous, but

0:11:25.400 --> 0:11:28.880
<v Speaker 8>also they are paradoxically they are very large but also

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:30.960
<v Speaker 8>mega growers. They have, you know, some of them have

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:33.400
<v Speaker 8>a little bit of a change the world field to them,

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 8>so they could become must own. I mean, one of

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:37.079
<v Speaker 8>the things that you guys have talked a lot about

0:11:37.160 --> 0:11:39.320
<v Speaker 8>is so much of the equity base has become either

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 8>beta or it's become kind of the seven or eight names.

0:11:42.679 --> 0:11:44.959
<v Speaker 8>What if there's some additional companies that three, four, or

0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:47.599
<v Speaker 8>five hundred billion dollar market caps and trillion and a

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 8>half dollars market cap. The active management community say is

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 8>I want to own that. I want to own that

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 8>from the time of the IPO. So I think it's

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 8>not just Wall Street getting to know these companies. It's

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:57.680
<v Speaker 8>a whole bunch of investors who have either backed into

0:11:57.720 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 8>early rounds or want to be there when the IPO.

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:02.480
<v Speaker 3>When we were speaking with you a year ago in

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 3>these seats, you were talking about how it is going

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 3>to be a great year for IPOs and M and A,

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 3>and it was for your bottom line.

0:12:08.880 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 1>You had an incredible year.

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:12.679
<v Speaker 3>There was, though, a lot of IPOs and a lot

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:16.720
<v Speaker 3>of deals that got stymied by Liberation Day and policy uncertainty.

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 3>What has to go right for some of these deals

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:23.839
<v Speaker 3>to come to fruish and open ay anthropic SpaceX Well, I.

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:25.440
<v Speaker 8>Think part of the reason that these companies are so

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:31.440
<v Speaker 8>interesting to investors is they are not rushed to go public,

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 8>So there has to be an element of being patient.

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:36.440
<v Speaker 8>If you're in and around the ecosystem. They don't have

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:38.319
<v Speaker 8>to come in the first half of twenty six I

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 8>think come in the second half of twenty sixth. They

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 8>could even come in twenty seven, but they are drawing

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:45.719
<v Speaker 8>a whole bunch of interest to names like them, derivative

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 8>plays and the ecosystem. As you sort of disaggregate the

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:51.080
<v Speaker 8>entire AI daisy chain, where do you want to play?

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:54.439
<v Speaker 8>So the anticipation of the company going public almost is

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 8>as important as the company itself coming. But whether they

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:00.679
<v Speaker 8>come LEASA in twenty six or twenty seven, they're going

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 8>to come.

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 4>They're going to come.

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 3>It's sort of a dissonance right now when you talk

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 3>to business leaders about how much enthusiasm there is for

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 3>deals and for energy in the US economy, and then

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:12.680
<v Speaker 3>when you hear the policymakers, you hear uncertainty and you

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:16.079
<v Speaker 3>hear sell America. How do you square those two narratives

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 3>at a time where you do hear a growing number

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:21.079
<v Speaker 3>of investors say they are diversifying away from US assets.

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 8>I hear you guys talking about this a lot. I

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:27.680
<v Speaker 8>think there are two separate phenomena, but they're not exclusive.

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:29.960
<v Speaker 4>One is we got the arca history.

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 8>You know, I've gone on about the end of the

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:34.319
<v Speaker 8>end of history and that things would get going again

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 8>and the Nation States would be battling for a Gemini

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:39.960
<v Speaker 8>and kind of trying to you know, win out on

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:42.679
<v Speaker 8>the rise and fall nations. That's just a historical fact

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:45.960
<v Speaker 8>that kind of got there was an interregnum between Berlin,

0:13:46.000 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 8>Wall and COVID. We're actually back to the balance of

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:51.320
<v Speaker 8>human history as we've all studied, and that means there's

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 8>going to be the kind of stuff that we are

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:56.319
<v Speaker 8>living through right now. It's just been a while and

0:13:56.880 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 8>I don't know necessarily that that is something we should

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 8>expect to go away anytime soon. There's going to be renationalizing, nationalizing,

0:14:04.960 --> 0:14:06.840
<v Speaker 8>and that means in some case they'll be higher country risk,

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:10.679
<v Speaker 8>they'll be maybe pockets of liquidity. There may be opportunistic

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:15.439
<v Speaker 8>transactions or allocations that happened. But after twenty years of

0:14:15.480 --> 0:14:18.199
<v Speaker 8>financial oppression, we're back to live markets and.

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 4>Live nation states. That's here.

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 8>But at the same time, you have US capital markets

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 8>which are more than half the capital stock.

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 4>And the reality is very.

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:30.440
<v Speaker 8>Basically as we know, corporate health is excellent, consumer health

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 8>at the top end is excellent, and obviously the administration

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:36.520
<v Speaker 8>is getting after housing for the bottom half of the

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 8>k earnings as you know, grew eight percent this year,

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 8>that could grow in the mid teams next year, that's

0:14:42.760 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 8>double the long term average.

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 4>That's pretty good. So good corporate, good.

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 8>Consumer, excellent, capital markets, an easier FED the lowered by

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 8>seventy five.

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 4>Maybe there's more to go.

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 8>Maybe it's a demand driven twenty twenty six, in which

0:14:56.720 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 8>case the Fed doesn't have to move.

0:14:58.120 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 4>We have good.

0:14:58.560 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 8>Inflation, we keep on powering forwar growth. Or maybe it's

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 8>supply side where they're spending, but there isn't the same

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 8>kind of job creation and the federal help out, so

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 8>they're downside cases. But just in the main oh, and

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 8>the tailwinds of deregulation and the bill are kicking in.

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 8>It kind of is hard to argue against the twenty

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 8>six US led growth case.

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 4>Now we can get a.

0:15:21.480 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 8>Debate about where ASID prices should be, but in terms

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 8>of just two years ago were talking about recession. Last

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:28.800
<v Speaker 8>year we weren't sure. Because the administrations come in, we're

0:15:28.800 --> 0:15:31.840
<v Speaker 8>not talking about that today. So for our business, very simply,

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 8>we write tickets to kind of two times GDP nominal,

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 8>and so if you think about our Wealth and Investment Bank,

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 8>if we're going to grow you know, five ten percent

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 8>on a two times basis nominally, that should be pretty

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 8>good for our business for doing our job.

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 2>Culporate health is very good, it's excellent. Software in health

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 2>is questionable. Right, can we talk about that.

0:15:49.800 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:51.400
<v Speaker 2>The move in the last twenty four hours, the live

0:15:51.440 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 2>market stuff, let's get into that. The move in Japan

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 2>at the long end of the curve, is that a

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 2>warning shot, is that the start of something bigger?

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 8>Well, I mean this Japan trade has been talked about

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 8>forever and uh and I would expect then in a

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 8>lot of you know, highly indebted countries, you know off

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:16.560
<v Speaker 8>the Liz Trust moment, where the demographics are poor and

0:16:16.600 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 8>you don't have the wherewithal our FIAT to kind of

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:21.240
<v Speaker 8>work your way through that, there could.

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 4>Be some vulnerability. So what does that mean?

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 8>That means if we're sort of do our economics meets

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 8>you know, poly side thing. I think that means you

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 8>want to get closer to places where you can act

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 8>in your joint economic interest. And I think the Japanese

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 8>examples one that we should continue to pay attention to.

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 8>I wouldn't be surprised that we see pockets of that

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 8>now and then when you know, there's a little talk

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:47.480
<v Speaker 8>of the bounty looks lousy, but we're going to inject

0:16:47.520 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 8>a little stimulus and let's see I anyone notices, Yeah,

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 8>they noticed, so you know you sort of have to

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 8>you know, then then you just it's you know, it's

0:16:54.760 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 8>a triballoon. It gets pulled back, and that's probably healthy

0:16:57.840 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 8>for markets. You know, you see a lot of that's

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 8>been bought act today. But that's different than the US

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 8>Treasury phenomenon. Yeah, that's that's been hugely overblown. The reality

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:09.320
<v Speaker 8>is that when we did this a year ago, the

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 8>Treasury Secretary is you know of anyone was talking about

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 8>the ten year being so important to keep an eye on.

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:16.160
<v Speaker 8>I think the ten years around four fifty seven, four

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 8>fifty five for sixty now it's a four twenty five

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 8>four to thirty, so the ten years doing his job,

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 8>there's some steepening. Yes, it's probably healthy. So I do

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 8>think there's a conflation between kind of US Treasury phenomenon

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:30.280
<v Speaker 8>and the world, and I think there's a difference, and

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:32.439
<v Speaker 8>you know, we just have to continue to highlight the.

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Difference very quickly.

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:37.080
<v Speaker 6>Ten you spend time you grew up in Venezuela, New world.

0:17:37.119 --> 0:17:39.639
<v Speaker 6>Now are you planning to maybe help facilitate companies go

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:40.120
<v Speaker 6>back in.

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:45.159
<v Speaker 4>Not prep for that question you lived in. Thank you

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 4>so much.

0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:48.720
<v Speaker 6>Interested because you have a different take, probably than every

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:50.679
<v Speaker 6>other CEO walking around this forum.

0:17:51.160 --> 0:17:54.680
<v Speaker 8>Well that as well as an extraordinary place, has a

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:59.639
<v Speaker 8>proud but now in recent decades, very troubled history. But

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:04.120
<v Speaker 8>is you know, if you know your Monroe doctrine critical

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 8>and has albeit as you've talked about it at length,

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 8>it's it's it's more sulphuric, but very high, vast quantities

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:16.200
<v Speaker 8>of oil beneath the ground. So do I think Venezuela

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 8>is going to be relevant? I think Latin America is

0:18:18.080 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 8>going to be relevant. I think the Hemisphere is going

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:24.239
<v Speaker 8>to be relevant in its sort of thinking around how

0:18:24.359 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 8>wants to get closer while maintaining its own, you know,

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:30.680
<v Speaker 8>political and social independence from the US. But I think

0:18:30.960 --> 0:18:34.159
<v Speaker 8>coming together of some places may make some sense and

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:36.159
<v Speaker 8>maybe in the broader economic interest.

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:37.720
<v Speaker 4>Back to the previous question, it.

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:39.639
<v Speaker 2>Was a fantastic counts, thank you so much. I've got

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 2>one more. Yes, it's not a land of mind. There

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:44.159
<v Speaker 2>was some news about Deutschebank, and I just want to

0:18:44.200 --> 0:18:46.919
<v Speaker 2>breathe some life into that story, and essentially the Treasury

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:49.919
<v Speaker 2>Secretary came out there was some research that he didn't

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 2>like and according to him, the Deutsche Bank CEO has

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:56.400
<v Speaker 2>turned around and said, I don't stand by that research.

0:18:56.440 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 7>That's basically the point.

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:00.679
<v Speaker 2>Is it difficult for the research apartment of Milk and

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 2>Stanley to say what they think in an environment like

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:05.720
<v Speaker 2>this one? And I asked this question because I know

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:10.439
<v Speaker 2>some tremendous individuals at Molke and Stanley in research, and

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 2>they are all highly intelligent, capable and have their own

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:15.399
<v Speaker 2>thoughts about where they think we are.

0:19:15.240 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 7>In this moment right now.

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:18.480
<v Speaker 2>But is it difficult in the C suite to allow

0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:20.800
<v Speaker 2>them just to go out their full throat, full throttle,

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 2>full blooded and just say what they really think about

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:24.040
<v Speaker 2>this moment.

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely not.

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 8>I'm not at a piece of research at my desk

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 8>for a yellow light or a no go. I think

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 8>what gets a little tricky is these institutions.

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 4>Also are desk analysts.

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:36.240
<v Speaker 8>So I don't know if this one came out of

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:39.439
<v Speaker 8>the research department or maybe a desk analyst sitting in

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 8>one of the divisions.

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 4>But to answer your question.

0:19:42.080 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 8>Directly, we want we celebrate broad opinion, I do think,

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 8>but to give not kind of the standard answer.

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:53.200
<v Speaker 4>Part of the reason you're like our research.

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 8>Is because it's not just regurgitation, because we all have

0:19:56.760 --> 0:20:00.119
<v Speaker 8>a lumber terminal, okay, So it has to have some

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 8>kind of value add but it doesn't have to just

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:06.919
<v Speaker 8>be provocation for its own sake. So we have industry leaders,

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:10.440
<v Speaker 8>we have sector leaders. We have Seth Carpenter, who you

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:13.679
<v Speaker 8>pointed out. I was watching you talk to him, and

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 8>I was and that was quite a moment when I.

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:20.920
<v Speaker 4>Looked Starbucks all over my sue. So thanks for that.

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:21.440
<v Speaker 4>That was excellent.

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:23.480
<v Speaker 8>You had at least one viewer that day, and that

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 8>was me, so and Seth. But the answer is the

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:31.320
<v Speaker 8>independence of research is important.

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:33.480
<v Speaker 4>We've invested in it for all these years.

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:37.480
<v Speaker 8>That having been said, sort of writing research to just

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 8>sort of provoke and kind of get your Warhol moment,

0:20:41.880 --> 0:20:44.800
<v Speaker 8>I mean that is not really fair to the institution either,

0:20:45.119 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 8>and it puts it puts the particular government or whomever

0:20:48.400 --> 0:20:50.879
<v Speaker 8>in an awkward spot because they read the research. So

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:53.680
<v Speaker 8>I think there's got to be a balance between independent

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:56.160
<v Speaker 8>integrity and what you're writing and writing something that actually

0:20:56.200 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 8>is meant to add value and bring intellectual capital to

0:20:58.760 --> 0:20:59.280
<v Speaker 8>the fore.

0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:01.440
<v Speaker 7>Seven of the Drunk and Bill I saw that out

0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:01.679
<v Speaker 7>for you.

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 4>I didn't actually split it up. I just swallowed wild.

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 7>Thank you, sir, Thank you very much.

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:06.919
<v Speaker 4>Thank you.

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 7>Stay with us.

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:10.440
<v Speaker 2>More Bloomberg surveillance coming up after this.

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 7>Joining us now.

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 2>The Republican Senator Tom tillis at the epicent of some

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:25.919
<v Speaker 2>of the conversations down in Washington, d C. Regarding the

0:21:25.920 --> 0:21:28.159
<v Speaker 2>Federal Reserve Sena, it's good to see you. Great to

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:30.480
<v Speaker 2>see you. So you're like the human roadblock now to

0:21:30.600 --> 0:21:32.919
<v Speaker 2>getting anyone confirmed. So let's get into that. Is it

0:21:32.960 --> 0:21:34.920
<v Speaker 2>about the individual or the process?

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:36.000
<v Speaker 4>It's about the process.

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:38.200
<v Speaker 9>Look, I made the statement that I did when the

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 9>news broke about the investigation on Chair Powell because I

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 9>felt like, leading up to the markets, I was on

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 9>a Sunday night that I want to send a signal

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:49.520
<v Speaker 9>to the market so the Fed is independent and will

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:52.120
<v Speaker 9>be independent, and this legal process needs to play itself out.

0:21:52.440 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Your signal to.

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:55.399
<v Speaker 6>The market is actually potentially why we saw the market

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:56.160
<v Speaker 6>shrug off.

0:21:56.280 --> 0:21:56.960
<v Speaker 1>That's a PENA.

0:21:56.960 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 9>Well, yeah, And I think also you have to look

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:02.679
<v Speaker 9>at people light Chair french Hill and others who weigh in.

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:07.560
<v Speaker 9>I think that it made a simple fact obvious. The

0:22:07.600 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 9>Senate does have control over who gets.

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:09.920
<v Speaker 4>On the board.

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 6>The Jump administration definitely doesn't like slow processes. So how

0:22:13.080 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 6>long do you think this is actually going to take.

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:17.119
<v Speaker 9>Well, it's up to the Department of Justice at this point.

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:19.119
<v Speaker 9>I didn't get us here. They got us here, So

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:21.159
<v Speaker 9>they need to go through this process either prevent the

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:23.359
<v Speaker 9>facts fully adjudicated or determine.

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:24.920
<v Speaker 4>What to do with the investigation.

0:22:25.280 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 1>So, in other words, and tell Us is dismissed. There

0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 1>there's no new FED chair.

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:32.080
<v Speaker 9>Well until it's the semester three hundred and forty seven days,

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 9>that's the expiration of my term.

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:37.879
<v Speaker 3>Okay, right now, we're here where you are diverging quite

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:40.119
<v Speaker 3>a bit from some of the members of your own party,

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 3>including President Trump.

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 1>You've gone back and forth. You're not running for reelection.

0:22:44.640 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 3>What do you tell people who try to get a

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:49.359
<v Speaker 3>sense of what the American people are going to do

0:22:49.480 --> 0:22:51.159
<v Speaker 3>or what Congress is going to do. What do you

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:53.400
<v Speaker 3>tell them when they approach you here at Davos looking

0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 3>for direction.

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 9>Well, I remind them that the United States two hundred

0:22:57.240 --> 0:22:59.440
<v Speaker 9>and fifty years old now this year our happy birthday.

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:03.920
<v Speaker 9>But where a very complex democracy. It's very difficult to understand.

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:07.040
<v Speaker 9>It's difficult to understand the institution of the Senate and

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 9>why one Senate member in this particular Congress can control

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:14.359
<v Speaker 9>processes on committees. You know, we're the deciding where the

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:15.240
<v Speaker 9>cloture maker.

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:16.840
<v Speaker 4>Where the deciding votes.

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 9>So I think it's an opportunity for us to demonstrate

0:23:19.320 --> 0:23:21.880
<v Speaker 9>democracy at its best in the United States. I support

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:24.480
<v Speaker 9>the vast majority of the President's policies, a lot of

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:26.360
<v Speaker 9>the Watts, but some of the House to me, make

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 9>no sense to me. Greenland the what makes a lot

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 9>of sense to me? Project power in Greenland? Why would

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 9>any fiscal conservative want to spend billions of dollars to

0:23:36.520 --> 0:23:39.960
<v Speaker 9>buy something that we already have access to. Greenland has

0:23:40.000 --> 0:23:42.680
<v Speaker 9>offered us a base for a dollar, folks, we could

0:23:42.680 --> 0:23:45.680
<v Speaker 9>get seventeen bases if you extend that for seventeen dollars

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 9>versus fifty seven billion dollars or whatever it would cost.

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:51.720
<v Speaker 9>Not to mention the Danes pay about a half a

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:54.399
<v Speaker 9>billion dollars a year to just keep the infrastructure running

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:58.760
<v Speaker 9>for some fifty seven hundred and fifty seven thousand indigenous

0:23:58.760 --> 0:24:00.920
<v Speaker 9>people on the island. Why do we want to take

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:03.720
<v Speaker 9>on that overhead? Is it really about projecting power in

0:24:03.720 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 9>the Arctic.

0:24:04.200 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 4>Or something else.

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:07.160
<v Speaker 9>If it's something else, maybe I look at the business case,

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 9>but ostensibly it's about projecting power in the Artic and

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:13.199
<v Speaker 9>the best way to project power in the Arctic is

0:24:13.200 --> 0:24:17.400
<v Speaker 9>through the NATO forces using their Arctic skills, their ice

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 9>breaking skills. The projection of power that we come together,

0:24:20.840 --> 0:24:23.359
<v Speaker 9>the synergy of the NATO alliance is far greater than

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 9>anything in the United States could do.

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:25.560
<v Speaker 4>On its own.

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 2>Do you know any fiscal conservatives in Washington.

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:33.080
<v Speaker 9>Well, starting with one, no, I think there are several looks,

0:24:33.880 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 9>and we've got to start thinking about these other structural

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:38.560
<v Speaker 9>decisions that we make. The run up the debt already

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:42.200
<v Speaker 9>to unacceptable highs, with the fraud that we're seeing here,

0:24:42.240 --> 0:24:45.879
<v Speaker 9>with the uncertainty, with the increasing debt, I worry about

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:49.840
<v Speaker 9>almost a level of irrational exuberance. We've somehow been able

0:24:49.920 --> 0:24:54.440
<v Speaker 9>to withstand some of the uncertainty, but there's a proverbial

0:24:54.480 --> 0:24:57.439
<v Speaker 9>straw out there, and these sorts of decisions could get

0:24:57.480 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 9>us closer to breaking the camels better.

0:24:59.080 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 7>What does corrective action actually look like?

0:25:01.240 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 4>Corrective action?

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:04.159
<v Speaker 7>What's doable in Washington at the moment.

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 9>Well, you know, presumably even if we were to move

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:08.840
<v Speaker 9>forward and there was some deal offered to Greenland, and

0:25:09.080 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 9>and to Denmark that would require congressional approval. The president

0:25:13.880 --> 0:25:17.359
<v Speaker 9>doesn't have a blank check that he can continue to

0:25:17.400 --> 0:25:20.679
<v Speaker 9>run up debt. That would require a process and raizor

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:21.480
<v Speaker 9>thin margins.

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:23.080
<v Speaker 4>And if it's a process.

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:24.919
<v Speaker 9>That doesn't play out until next year, it's post election.

0:25:25.040 --> 0:25:27.200
<v Speaker 9>We've got to know what Congress looks like next year,

0:25:27.359 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 9>or they've got to know what Congress looks like next year.

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:32.440
<v Speaker 6>The President's fairly focused on November third and this affordability push.

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 6>Do you expect him to make more phone calls to

0:25:34.200 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 6>Senator Elizabeth Warren, another senior member on the Banking Committee,

0:25:37.800 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 6>than to you.

0:25:38.440 --> 0:25:42.800
<v Speaker 9>I actually, Elizabeth Warre and our friends, we're not political friends,

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:43.879
<v Speaker 9>personal friends.

0:25:44.240 --> 0:25:46.399
<v Speaker 4>I got on the floor, no the well at the house.

0:25:46.480 --> 0:25:51.880
<v Speaker 9>I said, Elizabeth, remarkable, you've sold the president on your

0:25:52.200 --> 0:25:55.800
<v Speaker 9>arbitrary caps on credit. We're no longer going to rate

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:58.760
<v Speaker 9>for risk. We're just going to be rating basically what's

0:25:58.760 --> 0:26:00.879
<v Speaker 9>going to happen. We're going to under or unbank a

0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:03.760
<v Speaker 9>lot of people, and we're going to stabilize the asset

0:26:03.800 --> 0:26:07.440
<v Speaker 9>backed secure asset backed securities market along the way. I said,

0:26:07.440 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 9>Don't get me wrong, it's extraordinary that you've solved the

0:26:10.320 --> 0:26:12.679
<v Speaker 9>President on this idea, but you know, I'm going to

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 9>do everything I can to kill it.

0:26:14.560 --> 0:26:16.439
<v Speaker 6>But do you think something will be done when it

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:17.439
<v Speaker 6>comes to credit cards?

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's the other bill.

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:24.119
<v Speaker 9>That's why would we want to repeat a bad idea.

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:26.400
<v Speaker 9>If you're taking a look at MasterCard and BS, they're

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:26.960
<v Speaker 9>working with.

0:26:27.000 --> 0:26:27.840
<v Speaker 4>The small retailer.

0:26:27.960 --> 0:26:32.440
<v Speaker 9>The retailers have a legitimate concern and the credit card

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:34.800
<v Speaker 9>companies are working that out. We don't need a big

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:38.480
<v Speaker 9>government arbitrary solution. We've seen credit card competition acts in

0:26:38.520 --> 0:26:42.720
<v Speaker 9>Europe and they've been abject failures. Seventy percent of all

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:45.920
<v Speaker 9>of the travel to Alaska, for example, are through rewards.

0:26:46.400 --> 0:26:48.399
<v Speaker 9>Do you the money's got to come from somewhere? Do

0:26:48.440 --> 0:26:49.879
<v Speaker 9>you think that that travel is going to be funded

0:26:49.880 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 9>in the future. Are those sorts of rewards and programs

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:55.360
<v Speaker 9>going to be cut? It makes no sense. It's not sustainable,

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:57.600
<v Speaker 9>and I think that we have the votes and the

0:26:57.640 --> 0:26:58.880
<v Speaker 9>Congress to hold it off.

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:01.960
<v Speaker 3>This Congress States has been known for process. That's one

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:04.159
<v Speaker 3>reason why a lot of businesses have invested in the

0:27:04.240 --> 0:27:06.639
<v Speaker 3>United States and the capital markets that we've created. And

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:10.520
<v Speaker 3>I just wonder, as you are here with global business leaders.

0:27:10.840 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 3>Does it worry you that you hear more investors, more

0:27:13.880 --> 0:27:17.439
<v Speaker 3>businesses looking to diversify away from the United States because

0:27:17.480 --> 0:27:19.879
<v Speaker 3>of a lack of predictability of process of policy.

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:20.480
<v Speaker 4>We have to do that.

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 9>I spent nearly twenty years at Price Waterhouse Coopers and

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:26.400
<v Speaker 9>how Bey on global business services. I would I would

0:27:26.400 --> 0:27:28.400
<v Speaker 9>have to tell every client I advised at that time,

0:27:28.840 --> 0:27:31.160
<v Speaker 9>this is a risk. You've got to reduce your bybox

0:27:31.200 --> 0:27:35.240
<v Speaker 9>for any sorts of high risk ventures. And that freezes capital,

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 9>that that tamper's growth. That's the last thing we need

0:27:38.359 --> 0:27:38.680
<v Speaker 9>right now.

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:39.920
<v Speaker 7>Are you going to be in the room in thirty

0:27:39.960 --> 0:27:40.680
<v Speaker 7>six minutes time?

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:41.600
<v Speaker 4>One hundred percent?

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:42.920
<v Speaker 7>What are you expecting to hear?

0:27:43.400 --> 0:27:46.719
<v Speaker 9>I'm expecting to here President Trump, you give a speech?

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:50.359
<v Speaker 4>What content? So one thing I'm certain of.

0:27:50.480 --> 0:27:53.359
<v Speaker 7>Have you got to read on the content of seid speech?

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:56.440
<v Speaker 9>No, No, I'll hear it when everybody else here is it.

0:27:57.600 --> 0:27:59.440
<v Speaker 9>But you know, I will tell you the raison. Everybody's

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:02.520
<v Speaker 9>probably what still has got the bling on for this

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:05.320
<v Speaker 9>says from we had a new tribe. The largest tribe

0:28:05.320 --> 0:28:07.800
<v Speaker 9>east of the Mississippi is Columbia Indians. They got recognized

0:28:07.840 --> 0:28:10.440
<v Speaker 9>after one hundred and thirty seven years of abuse and neglect.

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:14.440
<v Speaker 9>Interestingly enough, they're about the same sized tribe, fifty five

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 9>thousand of the indigenous people in Greenland. I heard a

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:20.640
<v Speaker 9>very important comment when I was in Denmark. They say

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 9>people can trade, but you can't trade people. We need

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:26.040
<v Speaker 9>to make everyone understand that those people on the ground

0:28:26.040 --> 0:28:28.400
<v Speaker 9>have been there for forty five hundred years. They want

0:28:28.480 --> 0:28:30.920
<v Speaker 9>us there, but they want us there in their territory,

0:28:30.960 --> 0:28:34.800
<v Speaker 9>non American territory, and it can be accomplished much more conservatively,

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:37.400
<v Speaker 9>much more sustainably, by cooperation.

0:28:38.640 --> 0:28:42.200
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Survnmonts podcast, bringing you the best

0:28:42.200 --> 0:28:45.280
<v Speaker 2>in markets, economics, an gio politics. You can watch the

0:28:45.320 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 2>show life on Bloomberg TV weekday mornings from six am

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:51.640
<v Speaker 2>to nine am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple,

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 2>Spotify or anywhere else you listen, and as always on

0:28:54.760 --> 0:28:57.240
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg Terminal and the Bloomberg Business Amp.