WEBVTT - Admiral Stavridis: It's Good Time For The Space Force

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Penel podcast. I'm Paul swing you.

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Brahma Wicks. Each day

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you and your money. Whether at the grocery store or

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor, find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:17.959
<v Speaker 1>Podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. For the first time since nineteen

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:26.040
<v Speaker 1>when the Air Force was created out of what was

0:00:26.079 --> 0:00:28.680
<v Speaker 1>then the Army Air Corps, which my father was in

0:00:28.760 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 1>at the time, the US has created a new military branch,

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the Space Force. At first I thought it was a

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:38.640
<v Speaker 1>really odd idea, but after reading a particular column from

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:43.239
<v Speaker 1>UH Admiral James Stravitis, who was a columnist for Bloomberg Opinion,

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:45.840
<v Speaker 1>I kind of changed my tune here a little bit. So, Admiral,

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for UH joining us. Really to appreciate it.

0:00:48.800 --> 0:00:51.560
<v Speaker 1>You're a Bloomberg Opinion UH commissary, also a US Navy

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 1>admiral and former military commander of NATO. Talk to US

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Admiral if you will about this Space Force, because I

0:00:57.360 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of people don't really understand Dan what

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>it is and what it's supposed to do. I Ken, Paul,

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:06.479
<v Speaker 1>and happy holidays. Let's start with, Uh, what most people

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 1>have in their mind are the voyages of the starship Enterprise.

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 1>And how soon are we can be in manned space

0:01:13.040 --> 0:01:16.839
<v Speaker 1>flight and have massive warships going into space? Listen, that's

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:19.399
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and fifty to two hundred years away, I

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:22.959
<v Speaker 1>would estimate. But what do we do now? We operate

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>a complex, highly complex and very large constellation of satellites

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 1>as well as a rising number of very small, manned

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>operations of space station. All of those have military aspects

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:41.399
<v Speaker 1>to it. So the idea here, much as you just

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>alluded to, Paul about the foundation of the US Air

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Force back in the forties, we wanted a group of

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 1>people who would focus specifically on aviation and the operations

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>of military activities in the air. Now we realize we

0:01:57.120 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 1>need that same thing in space. So that's the idea here.

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it makes sense. Going to be small. It'll

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 1>start with a few thousand people. I don't think it

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 1>will ever get bigger than fifteen to twenty thousand folks,

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:12.720
<v Speaker 1>which is of course a drop in the bucket in

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 1>the big one point two million people that are in

0:02:15.200 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Defense. It's a good idea whose time

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 1>has come. Add well, as someone who grew up a

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of a space kid, my dad worked on a

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of the early space programs. I think when I

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 1>first heard about, you know, a sixth branch of the

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Armed Forces, I'm thinking, like what to like, you know,

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>have folks on the moon or appen space. But but

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 1>when you think about what our world has become in

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:39.000
<v Speaker 1>terms of data and information moving around the world, if

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 1>you knocked out a nation's satellite system, you could really

0:02:42.960 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 1>cripple them in a big way. And that's really what

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 1>it's about, whether it's on a military angle or you know,

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:51.040
<v Speaker 1>pick your angle right, because there's so much floating out

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:55.520
<v Speaker 1>there in space that is exactly right. And so what

0:02:55.680 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the Space Force, these few thousand people that start off

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 1>are going to be doing is operating ground stations that

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 1>control those satellites. Are going to move the satellites around.

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 1>They're going to make sure our satellites are not attacked

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 1>by anti satellite weapons from Russia and China, both of whom,

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:17.080
<v Speaker 1>by the way, already have space forces. They will build

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and launch new satellites. So think of it as a

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:25.640
<v Speaker 1>way to operationalize what is already happening in space, but

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:29.519
<v Speaker 1>assign a very specific group of young men and women

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:31.520
<v Speaker 1>to it. And I'll tell you the response within the

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 1>military has been fantastic. People really want to join the

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 1>space force and be part of it. And ultimately, to

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 1>pick up your point, there will also be a heavy

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 1>cyber and cyber security component in this, so I could

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 1>see this evolving into a space and cyber force over time. Admiral,

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>can you give us just kind of a sense of

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the competitive landscape of space? Where is the US relative

0:03:55.760 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 1>to other countries? I guess we're talking about China and Russia,

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 1>but this gives a sense of how you think the

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:06.520
<v Speaker 1>theater of space is playing out. UM at the moment

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:09.920
<v Speaker 1>of the United States still enjoys I would say, a

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 1>lead overall in our ability to construct, launch, and operate

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 1>UM massive satellites in space that are capable of high

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:25.159
<v Speaker 1>end communication. The drive the Global Positioning System GPS, and

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:32.040
<v Speaker 1>also monitors and provides intelligence functions, collecting everything from communications

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:35.800
<v Speaker 1>to taking photographs of the Earth to looking at infrared signatures.

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 1>For example, if North Korea launches this Christmas surprise and

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:43.719
<v Speaker 1>decides to launch a long range ballistic missile. The first

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:47.919
<v Speaker 1>indication will be our constellation of satellites seeing a heat

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 1>signature when that launch goes off on the North Korean peninsula.

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>So we are the leader. I'd say number two is

0:04:56.240 --> 0:05:00.160
<v Speaker 1>probably Russia, although number three is China, and they are

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 1>gaining fast as you would think. Um. All of this

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of parallels the standings, if you will, in cyber

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and cyber security, where the US has a lead. Uh,

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Russia's quite good. China coming up behind. Next tier down

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 1>are the European nations. France operates capable satellites, Japan does, UM,

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the Australians have a small capability, but it's really the

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:26.920
<v Speaker 1>big three in space at the moment um. You know,

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting and I'm curious when I think about, I

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know fiscal policy, what would it cost to put

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 1>this into place, because you say it doesn't need to

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 1>be a huge um force, at least not initially. Indeed, UM,

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it will be tens of billions of dollars,

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 1>which sounds like a lot, but hold on, the US

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:50.599
<v Speaker 1>defense budget overall is seven hundred billion dollars, and I

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:53.840
<v Speaker 1>think that the estimates for this space force will be

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 1>in the initially ten twenty thirty billion, it might at

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 1>some point get up to be eight to ten of

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:05.719
<v Speaker 1>the overall defense budget. And I want to make a

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:09.240
<v Speaker 1>very important point here, UM, None of that money and

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:12.920
<v Speaker 1>none of the people involved here are new additions. This

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 1>is simply repurposing, at least at the moment, repurposing principally

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:21.040
<v Speaker 1>air force, but also some army, some navy will go

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 1>out of their current service and go into this space force.

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 1>And the funding is already locked in place, UM. And

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 1>it is in the range as I mentioned, of tens

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 1>of billions of dollars to think of it as a

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 1>six percent of the defense budget. Now perhaps trekking upward,

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 1>which would make sense. And we'll just want to switch

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 1>gears real quickly. In the last question here China Navy.

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>We understand the China recently launched its first I guess

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 1>home built aircraft carrier. To tell us what you know

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>about that carrying what you believe the future of naval

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 1>UH forces for China will be indeed very significant. UM.

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 1>China has previously purchased UM older used platforms from Russia

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>and re engineered them into their carriers. This is the

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 1>first their third aircraft carrier coming off the ways. It's

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 1>about two thirds of the size of our US hundred

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 1>thousand ton Forward class carrier, so it'll be immediately one

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 1>of the largest in the world. Um, and they already

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 1>have here's the important point, three more carriers under construction,

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the sixth of which is going to be nuclear powered.

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 1>The previous ones are conventional powered. So clearly China is

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 1>stepping up its maritime operations. They want to interact globally

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 1>and not just operate locally in the South China Sea. Well,

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 1>I have to say this is a fascinating column and

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 1>so great to check in with you. Admiral James Stavida

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 1>is he is calumnist at Bloomberg Opinion of course, um,

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 1>former military commander of Nada, retired U S. Navy Admiral,

0:07:57.160 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 1>And I do want to point out he's got a

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 1>new book that came out this year, Sailing True North

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 1>ten Admirals and the Voyage of Characters. So something Christmas

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 1>right for the holiday shopping list, right for those gifts

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 1>you still need. Definitely check it out. You want to

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>get into one of the most red stories on the

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg today. It's about China's bite Um Bye Dance. I

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 1>believe it is weighing a sale of its addictive video

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 1>app TikTok. We've got that story. We're watching. We're also

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 1>watching Uber's co founder Travis Kalanak to parting from the

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 1>company's board at the end of the year. There's a

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:37.440
<v Speaker 1>lot going on when it comes to the world of text.

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 1>So let's get around up with Shara of a day.

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:42.320
<v Speaker 1>She's Bloomberg Opinion technology columnists. She joins Paul and Me

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio. So much for a

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:48.679
<v Speaker 1>quiet day, huh, never a bloing dance technology. So talk

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 1>to us about Bye Dance. First of all, I feel

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:52.400
<v Speaker 1>like there is folks out there who might not be

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:55.199
<v Speaker 1>familiar with what Bye dances. But it's pretty big in China.

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:58.559
<v Speaker 1>It is very big in China. It owns two at

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:01.440
<v Speaker 1>least two popular apps in China. There's kind of a

0:09:01.520 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 1>news feed kind of app called Totio and then what

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:08.839
<v Speaker 1>is called in the rest of the world, uh TikTok

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 1>goes by a different name in China, but TikTok is

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:14.880
<v Speaker 1>basically a short video app that lets people set sort

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:19.079
<v Speaker 1>of skits or dance routines to music, and it has

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 1>gotten very popular quite quickly in the US and in

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 1>India and some other places outside of China. So the

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:30.720
<v Speaker 1>issue is the US federal government has some concerns about TikTok,

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:35.440
<v Speaker 1>and that's that's making Bye Dance maybe rethink. Maybe it's ownership. Yes,

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 1>so there have been some concerns I would say on

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:42.960
<v Speaker 1>both sides of the political aisle in Congress about TikTok,

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:46.679
<v Speaker 1>and the concerns are basically they stem from the ownership

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 1>of TikTok by a Chinese internet company. So the worries

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 1>are twofold. One is that TikTok, again because it's owned

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 1>by a Chinese company, is collecting data about users in

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the United States that can be used or misused by

0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese government. The second worry is that, again because

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 1>of TikTok's ownership by a Chinese internet company, that it

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 1>engages in censorship of content outside of China. That um

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:20.080
<v Speaker 1>would be that is relatively common inside of China, right,

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:24.479
<v Speaker 1>that Chinese internet companies are expected to scrub their services

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 1>for content that is generally not prohibited by the Chinese government,

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 1>whether it's talking about Hong Kong protests, in a certain

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 1>way or other things. Um TikTok and Bite Dance, for

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 1>for their parts, say that they segregate data about Chinese

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 1>about non Chinese internet users from what's happening in China,

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 1>and that they do not engage with censorship, engage in

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 1>censorship outside of China in the same way they engage

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 1>inside of China. It seems kind of extreme, now, is it, like,

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:56.440
<v Speaker 1>is this a kin to like Google selling I don't know,

0:10:56.679 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 1>YouTube or you know what I mean, one of its properties,

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Like it just seems like stream And yeah, I agree,

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:03.319
<v Speaker 1>we should say that. Our callings in Bloomberg News said

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 1>that this is one option under consideration by Byte Dance

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:10.199
<v Speaker 1>to calm some of the anxiety in in u s

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 1>political circles about the Bite Dance ownership of TikTok. That

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe they'll sell a majority steak or some portion of

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 1>TikTok to presumably to a US financial player. It does

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 1>seem extreme. We'll see if that happens, and we'll see, honestly,

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:30.200
<v Speaker 1>even if they sell all or a majority steak of TikTok,

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:33.560
<v Speaker 1>whether that actually changes how some of the hardliners feel

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 1>about Bite Dance ownership of this popular dagus Internet service,

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:38.400
<v Speaker 1>did they pretend who do they sell it to? And

0:11:38.400 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 1>do they potentially sell it like forgive me? And I'm

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 1>always suspicious when it comes to some of this stuff,

0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 1>but I mean, I do wonder do they sell it

0:11:45.840 --> 0:11:49.520
<v Speaker 1>to an entity that is still somehow Chinese owned? Yeah,

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 1>fair enough. I think that the question will always be,

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 1>even if TikTok is sold or a majority of TikTok

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>is sold to a US company, if that really means

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 1>that a Bye Dance will be completely hands off. I

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>think if I'm just gonna put my investment banker hat

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 1>on here, my advice to them would be, if you

0:12:07.280 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 1>think there is some kind of risk coming from the U. S. Government,

0:12:10.960 --> 0:12:13.199
<v Speaker 1>you better sell now before that becomes apparent because that

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 1>can impact valuation. Is that maybe some other thinking? Certainly,

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a legitimate concern that Look, Byte Dance

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 1>is now, by by most accounts, the most highly valued

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:27.839
<v Speaker 1>UM private technology company in the world. The valuation that's

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:31.440
<v Speaker 1>something like seventy billion dollars, and the company wants, at

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 1>least by news reports, wants to go public relatively soon.

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 1>And I think there's an open question about whether UM

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Bye Dance can go public if it has all of

0:12:41.520 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 1>these questions hanging over its head about being whether TikTok

0:12:46.160 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 1>is allowed in the United States and also whether the

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 1>US government it will become kind of a standard center

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 1>for governments elsewhere in the world. Also questioning the Chinese

0:12:57.520 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 1>ownership of TikTok. Is that this this go to that,

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Cold War for technology, that people are

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:07.079
<v Speaker 1>concerned that they'll be technology for the West and that

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:09.960
<v Speaker 1>technology for China. This would be another I guess brick

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>in that wall. Yeah, and look, I think this is

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 1>somewhat new ground for the United States. This is really

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the first time that the US government and US citizens

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:21.319
<v Speaker 1>honestly have had to reckon with the idea that there

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:23.840
<v Speaker 1>is now a very popular internet service that is not

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 1>run by an American company. And what does that mean? Yeah?

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 1>And I do think back going back to if they

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 1>want to go public and right, they've got some interesting

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:33.719
<v Speaker 1>investors in terms of Bye Dance, I think is soft Bank,

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:37.319
<v Speaker 1>Sequoia Capital, Right, Is that correct? Those are some companies

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 1>that I think maybe potential buyers or buyers of it.

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 1>But I do wonder if they do want to go public, right,

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:45.679
<v Speaker 1>what they need to do in order to make that

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:47.960
<v Speaker 1>happen and to kind of clean it up, clean up

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the business. Well, look, there are internet companies in China

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:54.280
<v Speaker 1>that have gone public and they have done very well.

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Met you On, which is a sort of mostly a

0:13:57.120 --> 0:14:01.679
<v Speaker 1>food delivery and travel services company, and Nina there's companies

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:04.719
<v Speaker 1>like Ali Baba and Tencent that again their operations are

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 1>largely in China that are public companies and have done

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 1>very very well. So there's a precedent for being a

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:14.720
<v Speaker 1>China focused internet company. Byte dances a little bit of

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 1>a different animal again because it's one of the very

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>very few Chinese internet companies that has successfully proven popular

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 1>outside of its home country. Carol, you were absolutely correct.

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Early investors into calling Bloo Bloomberg reporting early investors include

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 1>soft Bank, Sequoia Capital in Susquehannan, and National So some big,

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 1>big players. And I just do wonder about right investors

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>who are saying, Okay, now we want to see you know,

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 1>make our money, right we investor, and you know at

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 1>some point you want to take this company public. So

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I just do wonder, you know, the kind of pressure

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 1>on them to kind of do something and do something soon.

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 1>And look, there are also pedestrian business questions, big business

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 1>questions about Bye Dance as well, whether it's at particularly TikTok,

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 1>can prove lasting outside of China, and also whether it

0:14:57.880 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 1>can generate enough money enough and to justify it's very

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 1>large evaluation. We have too because we have you here

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 1>just really quickly, Uber Travis Kalinak like goodbye. Yeah, I

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 1>mean this this has been coming for a long time,

0:15:09.600 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 1>right that Travis Kalenik was forced out of his company

0:15:12.240 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 1>two and a half years ago and he's been selling

0:15:15.440 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 1>apparently he has now sold his entire stake. We've been

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 1>arding for billions of dollars, and so I think it

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 1>was inevitable. This has been a long divorce. It's interesting.

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's right. So he was forced out and

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:27.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, just a couple of years ago, and now

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:28.920
<v Speaker 1>he's selling, you know, over I guess most of his

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 1>stock over two billion dollars now stepping off the board officially.

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 1>So it seems like it's a clear break here from

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the one of the co founders and the company. Sure,

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:38.360
<v Speaker 1>over Day, thanks so much for joining us us here

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 1>is a technology columns for Bloomberg Opinion. Joining us here

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 1>on Christmas eat in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio. I

0:15:44.760 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 1>tak there's usually so much buzz in the Bloomberg building,

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 1>particularly on the sixth floor. It is like a beehive.

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Nobody there, nobody here, so but we're here at Bloomberg

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Radio and here is here working hard. Uh. And I

0:15:57.080 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 1>always say, you know, her coms are great. You should

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 1>check out all the work opinion columns. They're great stuff.

0:16:02.360 --> 0:16:04.160
<v Speaker 1>You can find out on the website Bloomberg dot com,

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 1>slash Opinion or on the terminal O P I n go.

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 1>You know. One of the fastest growing areas that it

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:21.320
<v Speaker 1>just amazes me in finit financial services is whole eke

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 1>F issue. That seems like there's an e t F

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:26.240
<v Speaker 1>for just about everything out there. I love to get

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 1>up to dated on what's going on with the et

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 1>F world. Denise Chrisco can help us. She is president

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:34.160
<v Speaker 1>and co founder of Vident Investment Advisory. She joins us

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 1>on the phone from New Jersey. Denise, thanks so much

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. One thing I want to start with

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:43.320
<v Speaker 1>is something I have no idea how it works, is

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 1>what is an active e t F. Good morning, Thanks

0:16:46.840 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 1>for having me right and active ETF is essentially an

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 1>active open end investment fund that is in and within

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the e t F rapper. So unlike a passive or

0:16:57.200 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 1>an index fund where you're very tightly acting a specific

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:05.639
<v Speaker 1>index which is being calculated every day. UM, active incorporates

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the strategy investment philosophy and quite honestly, UM I p

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 1>of a specific asset manager. So denise why an active

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 1>e t F versus a mutual fund? And I know

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 1>there's differences in terms of when they trade, when they price,

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 1>and I guess tax implications, But tell me why would

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:26.359
<v Speaker 1>I choose that over a mutual fund? Sure? Well you

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:28.879
<v Speaker 1>know right now, you you um, you know, hit the

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:32.400
<v Speaker 1>hit the nail on the head. The biggest differences are

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 1>with the e t f s. Of course, our tax

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:38.920
<v Speaker 1>advantages and ability to trade UM with active e t

0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:42.560
<v Speaker 1>F UH, the tax advantages have really been very limited

0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:46.119
<v Speaker 1>until more recently. UM. Recently, the SCC past what has

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 1>been referred to as the e t F rule Rules

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:51.880
<v Speaker 1>six C eleven UM, which really has created a much

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 1>more consistent and even playing field across you know, all

0:17:55.359 --> 0:17:58.159
<v Speaker 1>e t f s and potential ETF sponsors and so

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:00.480
<v Speaker 1>active et f s will also be able to take

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 1>advantage of some of the tax advantages of the E

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:07.720
<v Speaker 1>t F structure. UM. That's why we believe here invite

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 1>into that active ETFs are going to very likely become

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>more popular as we go into and beyond, because until

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:18.920
<v Speaker 1>now you've had a number of active mutual fund managers

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 1>or active managers with other product types, for example, that

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:24.720
<v Speaker 1>would be interested perhaps in an e t F, but

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 1>realizing that UM the tax advantages weren't really equivalent for

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:32.400
<v Speaker 1>active ETFs, UM weren't so inclined to launch a product.

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:34.440
<v Speaker 1>As well as the fact that you know, E t

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 1>f s also required daily transparency of holdings, which UM

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:41.399
<v Speaker 1>was something that many asset managers were not interested in.

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:44.399
<v Speaker 1>UM that's also changed recently as well. So there's a

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 1>lot on the horizon for so then it gives a

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:51.000
<v Speaker 1>sense of the cost structure cost advantages of active ETFs

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 1>versus mutual funds right so to the retail investor that

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the cost savings can be significant. UM with the e

0:18:58.040 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 1>t F the expense ray shows are typically lower than

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 1>with mutual funds UM, although you know you do have

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:08.720
<v Speaker 1>to weigh that against brokerage cost, commissioned fees and importantly

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:10.920
<v Speaker 1>the bitest spread of course on any h t F

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:14.800
<v Speaker 1>UM notably active ETF. So you know, the costs UM

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 1>could be UH advantageous to the retail investor, UM definitely

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 1>to the asset manager. UH costs are are generally lower

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:26.640
<v Speaker 1>to to run such a vehicle, and so that would

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:29.480
<v Speaker 1>be another reason why they may be attractive. Denise, I

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 1>do wonder too that if I'm going to do an

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 1>active e t F and I think about funds, about

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:37.040
<v Speaker 1>some of the fees and so on and so forth.

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, why would I do anybody but the biggest,

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 1>whether it's Vanguard or State Street, right, because I'm assuming

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:45.359
<v Speaker 1>they're going to have the lowest feeds, That's right. I

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:48.399
<v Speaker 1>mean they'll have the lowest explicit fees, the lowest expense ratio.

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:51.159
<v Speaker 1>And you know the majority of assets are flowing to

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 1>the largest etf issuers UM. These days, we work you

0:19:55.720 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 1>know with numerous smaller and mid sized firms and some

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:04.400
<v Speaker 1>larger firms as well, UM who you know, have unique ideas,

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 1>have very you know, different perspectives. UM have really innovated

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:11.640
<v Speaker 1>UM to create strategies UM that really can't be found

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 1>anywhere else. We we manage almost four and a half

0:20:14.680 --> 0:20:18.159
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars of assets and it's all almost exclusively to

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:21.600
<v Speaker 1>customized indicies. And so it's these types of products investors

0:20:21.640 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 1>that are looking for something maybe different than what they

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 1>offer now, and you know, I respect that. I just

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:27.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, what's what's interesting about the E t F

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:29.680
<v Speaker 1>L I kind of said to Paul coming in, Oh man,

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the E t F world kind of drives me crazy,

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:34.640
<v Speaker 1>because I do feel like it's, you know, every month,

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:37.160
<v Speaker 1>every week we have somebody new, you know, coming on

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 1>with a new E t F idea, and I feel

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:41.680
<v Speaker 1>like until you have some history, you know, a few

0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 1>years in to get an idea of how these performs,

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:45.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think for investors they have to be

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:49.440
<v Speaker 1>very careful. It is. It is a challenge, especially from

0:20:49.680 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, some of the smaller firms that many investors

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:54.480
<v Speaker 1>may not be as familiar with. UM. They're looking for

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 1>longer term track records UM. You know. We have had

0:20:57.359 --> 0:21:01.160
<v Speaker 1>a number of funds also that have formed really very well,

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 1>funds that we have subadvised for our clients that have

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 1>really had excellent performance, but unfortunately weren't able to garner

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 1>those assets and you know, ultimately closed, you know, which

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 1>has really been a phenomenon we've seen industry wide. I

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:14.679
<v Speaker 1>think that will continue as well, you know, as we're

0:21:14.680 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 1>going too we see additional launches. There's gonna be a

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of excitement potentially to launch active ets, especially now

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 1>that there's options available for non transparent and semi transparent

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:29.959
<v Speaker 1>active ETFs. UM you know that that to me, I

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:33.639
<v Speaker 1>want transparency. What is semi are non transparent? Forgive me?

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean? Yeah? So essentially, you know, the

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:42.680
<v Speaker 1>SEC has approved programs that have been created um to

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 1>uh not necessarily fully disclosed the holdings of the e

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:50.160
<v Speaker 1>t F subject to as you can imagine, numerous other

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:55.200
<v Speaker 1>restrictions as well. UM. In the non transparent option, for example, UM,

0:21:55.320 --> 0:21:57.880
<v Speaker 1>they would the holdings are actually traded in and out

0:21:57.920 --> 0:22:01.399
<v Speaker 1>of a blind trust so that those positions aren't known

0:22:01.520 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 1>publicly and the asset manager can you know, retain um

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:08.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, the i P I suppose and not be

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 1>divulging you know, their active management strategy and the semi

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:14.560
<v Speaker 1>transparent it's a bit of a hybrid. Um there is

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:17.280
<v Speaker 1>there are you know, holdings that are released on a

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 1>daily basis, although those don't look exactly like the true

0:22:20.880 --> 0:22:23.600
<v Speaker 1>underlying portfolio, with the idea being that it is hard

0:22:23.640 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 1>for someone to maybe copycat or you know, try to

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 1>trade that strategy on their own on the side. All right,

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't leave it on that note. He did. He's

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:33.440
<v Speaker 1>happy holidays. Denise Chris, president and co founder of Ident

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Investment Advisory, joining us on the phone, say, there's a great,

0:22:46.680 --> 0:22:49.480
<v Speaker 1>great story on the Bloomberg today, and I love the

0:22:49.480 --> 0:22:53.040
<v Speaker 1>opening paragraph. China last week commissioned it's first home built

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:56.639
<v Speaker 1>aircraft carrier to protect it's military minded. It's now on

0:22:56.680 --> 0:22:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a mission to create quote aircraft carrier sized investment bank

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:03.119
<v Speaker 1>to take on Wall Street. Chiants surely not rotch and

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 1>joins us He's from Bloomberg News. He covers all things

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 1>financial joints us here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio.

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:11.879
<v Speaker 1>So that's just a great view of how China is

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 1>thinking about the investment banking business. And I spent most

0:23:14.800 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 1>of my life investment banking, and I hadn't really thought

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:20.360
<v Speaker 1>about that. There isn't a China size investment bank out

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:23.240
<v Speaker 1>there to compete against the goverment sacks and the Morgan Stanleys.

0:23:23.440 --> 0:23:25.760
<v Speaker 1>What are they thinking these days? And then that's the

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:28.160
<v Speaker 1>reason they're possibly thinking about it at this stage, right,

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:30.359
<v Speaker 1>and this is a fabulous story when you look at

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 1>some of the stats in this piece, China has about

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:36.880
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and thirty one securities films all of their

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:39.840
<v Speaker 1>assets combined is equal to one Goldman Sacks the trillion

0:23:39.880 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 1>dollar balance shee the Goldman Sacks as it takes about

0:23:42.200 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and thirty Chinese investment banks to get there.

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:48.440
<v Speaker 1>China has large scale commercial banks right I CBC has

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:51.440
<v Speaker 1>a much bigger balance sheet than even JP Morgan uh

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 1>north of four trillion dollars. But when it comes to

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 1>investment banks, they never really had a large scale player,

0:23:57.280 --> 0:24:00.080
<v Speaker 1>and that is critical, especially if you look at a

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 1>global view of the big financial players, who think, especially

0:24:03.760 --> 0:24:06.720
<v Speaker 1>inside the Chinese market, you're closer to the starting block

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 1>rather than having a fully developed market. So as the

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:12.399
<v Speaker 1>market opens up, as more and more international players come in,

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the local banks have to figure out a way to

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:18.880
<v Speaker 1>compete with them, and you possibly have to consolidate, possibly

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:21.199
<v Speaker 1>have to think about mergers to be able to go

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 1>to to toe with them. So surely is the goal

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 1>here about creating this massive global bank that ultimately will

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 1>be funding and working with companies around the Global's just

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 1>really about helping out Chinese companies and building Chinese industry.

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:37.639
<v Speaker 1>I guess two things there. If you look at Ali Baba,

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:40.680
<v Speaker 1>the one thing you've learned from that is you don't

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 1>necessarily have to be a loge scale global player to

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:47.680
<v Speaker 1>be a successful Chinese company. Uh, that market is big enough.

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:50.320
<v Speaker 1>There are enough people then the markets developed enough to

0:24:50.400 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 1>make a lot of money just focused on China. But

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, do your question. I am interested in finding

0:24:56.560 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 1>out if part of their goal is also to make

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 1>sure that these firms can also go across the globe

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 1>and compete with the governments and the Morgan Stanleys of

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:07.119
<v Speaker 1>the world. And there's an interesting cautionary tale there if

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:08.840
<v Speaker 1>you look at it. If you if you go back

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:11.680
<v Speaker 1>to late eighties, early nineties, at that time, you had

0:25:11.720 --> 0:25:16.199
<v Speaker 1>a uh, smallish Deutsche Bank that was looking outside a

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 1>sleepy industrial German economy, trying to take itself across the world.

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Through the nineties and the two thousand's, Deutsche Bank did

0:25:24.359 --> 0:25:28.639
<v Speaker 1>become a Wall Street powerhouse, a massive fix income shop,

0:25:28.880 --> 0:25:30.600
<v Speaker 1>made a ton of money. But look at where we

0:25:30.640 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 1>are right now. They're on the retreat and saw a

0:25:33.280 --> 0:25:36.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of their European peers and the ones who are

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 1>benefiting from that are the large US banks that seem

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:42.639
<v Speaker 1>to be beefing up. So if they want to plot

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of this global expansion, they have to make sure

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:49.200
<v Speaker 1>that they can careful steps. So I have to ask

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:52.640
<v Speaker 1>a question, why haven't Why hasn't China created a much

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:56.360
<v Speaker 1>more vibrant investment banking industry as it has for say,

0:25:56.400 --> 0:25:59.679
<v Speaker 1>the commercial banking side. Is there something structural there? Or

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:02.960
<v Speaker 1>if you're just focusing internally in Chinese don't necessarily need

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 1>these big investment banks. My guests would be perhaps more structural.

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:10.440
<v Speaker 1>You probably don't have an economy that has the full

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 1>time requirements of a lode scale investment bank. Even the

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:16.920
<v Speaker 1>securities films that we talked about in this story, they

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:19.160
<v Speaker 1>say a lot of them are not full service investment bank.

0:26:19.320 --> 0:26:21.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're small, they're not full service investment. A

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of them seem to be doing business with the uh,

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:26.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, your mom and pop retail customers, which which

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 1>is not a way to compete with the government's accent.

0:26:28.560 --> 0:26:30.399
<v Speaker 1>The Morgan Stanley is the world. But now as the

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:33.399
<v Speaker 1>economy opens up, now as they're looking to deepen the

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:38.680
<v Speaker 1>footprint of their you know, capitalistic economy, even even under

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the control of the government. If you're looking to sort

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:45.640
<v Speaker 1>of strengthen the pillars of what drive modern business. If

0:26:45.680 --> 0:26:48.440
<v Speaker 1>you do that, you definitely need a lot scale investment

0:26:48.440 --> 0:26:51.400
<v Speaker 1>bank to service that, to raise money, to help companies

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 1>go public, to do trading, everything that comes with the

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:57.480
<v Speaker 1>full service investmentank. But is it really opening up It's

0:26:57.640 --> 0:27:01.200
<v Speaker 1>what forty five trillion dollar financial industry. Is China truly

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 1>opening it up so that any global bank, and I

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:06.399
<v Speaker 1>think about the US big players, will they really be

0:27:06.480 --> 0:27:09.120
<v Speaker 1>able to kind of set up shop there and operate

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:11.720
<v Speaker 1>like they do around the rest of the world. That's

0:27:11.720 --> 0:27:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the goal. By the end of next year, the number

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:14.920
<v Speaker 1>of the U s from the number of the large

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:17.679
<v Speaker 1>international banks will be able to take dent controls of

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 1>their subsidiaries. Some of them already are in the process.

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:23.359
<v Speaker 1>Others have applied for it. They have been waiting on

0:27:23.359 --> 0:27:26.680
<v Speaker 1>it for a while. The Chinese promise has always been there.

0:27:26.720 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 1>You almost feel like these banks have been knocking at

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:31.439
<v Speaker 1>the door for a while, but you really haven't gotten

0:27:31.440 --> 0:27:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the fruits out of it yet. And you have to remember,

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 1>with the backdrop of the trade war, maybe some of

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:38.400
<v Speaker 1>that has also delayed the process and there's some level

0:27:38.400 --> 0:27:40.680
<v Speaker 1>of nervousness when you talk to the CEOs of the

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 1>U S investment banks as to when that promise will materialize.

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:46.280
<v Speaker 1>But it is a promise they believe in, and it

0:27:46.400 --> 0:27:49.480
<v Speaker 1>is a promise that they're willing to invest in. That's interesting.

0:27:49.520 --> 0:27:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I think the yes, I think about some of the

0:27:51.400 --> 0:27:53.439
<v Speaker 1>U S firms. They've been knocking on the door in

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:57.480
<v Speaker 1>China for a long time. Um, did they view that

0:27:57.560 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 1>as a big, big growth opportunity. Absolutely, they're ready and

0:28:01.440 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 1>eager to jump in. What has stopped them is not

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:08.000
<v Speaker 1>their hesitation or trapodition on their part. What to stop

0:28:08.080 --> 0:28:11.040
<v Speaker 1>them is their ability to jump in the market. There's,

0:28:11.560 --> 0:28:14.879
<v Speaker 1>if not in no entry sign, at least a bobbed

0:28:14.960 --> 0:28:17.399
<v Speaker 1>wire gate that sort of makes sure that you can't

0:28:17.400 --> 0:28:20.439
<v Speaker 1>really jump into the market full time. But the banks

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 1>are eager to get in there as they look just

0:28:22.720 --> 0:28:25.160
<v Speaker 1>quickly about forty seconds, or as they look to expand tree.

0:28:25.320 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is their government support behind it or is

0:28:27.800 --> 0:28:30.439
<v Speaker 1>this truly a private enterprise and as private as it

0:28:30.480 --> 0:28:33.280
<v Speaker 1>can be in China. Well, if you have to create

0:28:33.280 --> 0:28:37.000
<v Speaker 1>an aircraft carrier sized rival to government zacks alongstly, you

0:28:37.119 --> 0:28:40.160
<v Speaker 1>better hope there is a government will behind that. But

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:43.400
<v Speaker 1>we have seen that in the past, especially in a

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:47.640
<v Speaker 1>system like the Chinese economy the way it operates. If

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 1>there's government bill will a lot can get done and

0:28:51.600 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 1>they will need a lot of it to make sure

0:28:53.440 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 1>that they can create an institution like that. Right, but

0:28:55.680 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 1>then you see how the world use it because there

0:28:57.720 --> 0:29:00.640
<v Speaker 1>is government involvement. Sure, thank you so much. Always appreciate

0:29:00.640 --> 0:29:03.240
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it. Tree not Rody, and he is finance reporter

0:29:03.240 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg News, joining us in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio.

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Fascinating story. I'm in the most read and I'll put

0:29:08.960 --> 0:29:11.920
<v Speaker 1>it out on our Twitter feeds because it definitely is

0:29:11.960 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 1>something you should check out. Thanks for listening to the

0:29:14.160 --> 0:29:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can subscribe and listen

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:20.120
<v Speaker 1>to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:29:20.400 --> 0:29:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm Paul Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. I'm

0:29:23.080 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Lisa bram Woyds. I'm on Twitter at Lisa bram Woyds.

0:29:25.840 --> 0:29:28.640
<v Speaker 1>One before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide.

0:29:28.680 --> 0:29:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bloomberg Radio