WEBVTT - Beating the Book: The 2023 NFL Draft Betting Preview

0:00:03.560 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Take it down, Man, Now Down Man.

0:00:11.360 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 2>Monday morning, April twenty fourth, twenty twenty three is Beating

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 2>the Book podcast NFL Draft Special Skill Alexander and then

0:00:20.120 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 2>what has become a tradition around here from the Deep

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:25.760
<v Speaker 2>Dive at NBC Sports bet the Edge podcast, Drew Dinsick

0:00:25.920 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 2>joins us, how you doing, Drew's kay.

0:00:28.040 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm well, great to talk to you, Great to see

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 3>you again. I haven't seen talked to Matt in a while,

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 3>So fired up for today's pod. NFL Draft betting maybe

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:38.840
<v Speaker 3>kind of the closest niche betting market to my heart.

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 4>So this is a great, great opportunity.

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:42.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, man, and Matt Brown, who you just referred to

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:46.160
<v Speaker 2>from the handle at Vson, former host of Primetime Action

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:49.960
<v Speaker 2>and a man who loves himself some NFL drafts as well.

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Yes, you in Primetime, the greatest show to ever get

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 1>canceled on the greatest show ever get canceled on Vison to.

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 5>Ever get canceled. I'm just on Vson. I think anywhere else?

0:00:57.480 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 2>Ye?

0:00:57.760 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Maybe? Anywhere?

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:03.279
<v Speaker 2>Okay, pretty I did the analysis, Drew. Anywhere on Earth

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:05.840
<v Speaker 2>I think is what I can Anywhere on Earth? Yeah, sure, okay,

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 2>So here we are a little more than seventy two hours.

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 2>This is when we're recording it Monday morning, little more

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 2>than seventy two hours before the twenty twenty three NFL Draft.

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:15.480
<v Speaker 5>There's so many ways to go here.

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 1>You.

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 2>By the way, Drew with Luke swayin Vegas Refund did

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:22.039
<v Speaker 2>a great job on the latest Deep Dive podcast. You

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:24.720
<v Speaker 2>had a great rumor that's out there that I actually

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 2>bet because you were so convincing about it. We'll get

0:01:28.080 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 2>into that as well, just how these things are being

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 2>allowed at sports books, Who's who's booking them, who's not.

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:35.959
<v Speaker 2>But I just want to start with the macro statement

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 2>of it, whether you guys agree with this or not,

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 2>modern history. Three days before the NFL Draft, are you

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 2>as uncertain about how this is going to go as

0:01:46.680 --> 0:01:48.000
<v Speaker 2>any draft you can remember?

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? I mean for me for sure. I mean the

0:01:50.480 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 1>last three drafts. I was really confident heading into the

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 1>last three drafts, you know, I mean it was everything

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 1>seemed to kind of have at least some different ways

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 1>you could draw. Straight line to this happened, and straight

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 1>line to this happened, and straight line this happening, And

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 1>then as long as the odds matched up right, I mean,

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>is this gonna happen one x amount of times, then

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 1>it was a good bet for me, and less of

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 1>those this year up in that way, less of those

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>yes this year for me. For sure.

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 5>You'd go with that too.

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:18.800
<v Speaker 3>Drue, Yeah, one hundred percent. You know, the uncertainty at

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 3>two is enormous still. You know, usually you wake up

0:02:22.560 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 3>the Monday morning before the draft and you kind of

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 3>go through the NFL insiders, pods, articles, whatever, and there's

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:32.800
<v Speaker 3>like lots of confirmatory stuff in there, and today this

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 3>morning was the oppo. It was like all it was

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 3>everybody sort of has the same sentiment, which is, we

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:40.799
<v Speaker 3>don't really know what's going to happen, and I think

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 3>at all because you know then this is cliches can be.

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:45.520
<v Speaker 3>But the draft starts at two with the Texans, and

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 3>whether they ultimately decide to take a quarterback, trade the

0:02:51.000 --> 0:02:54.320
<v Speaker 3>pick for presumably someone taking a quarterback or draft a

0:02:54.360 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 3>defender really sends the draft in two different directions, because

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, we know that at three the Ardinals would

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:04.400
<v Speaker 3>most like to trade down. But if you know, if

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 3>there's not demand for the quarterback market because Houston takes

0:03:07.600 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 3>the defender, then all of a sudden, they're not going

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:12.520
<v Speaker 3>to get an offer that's worthy, you know, and you know,

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 3>so you can definitely see a situation kind of a

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 3>where quarterbacks go early, early, early, and then b where

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 3>you know, they slide because it's just defense at the top.

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 3>And you know, right now, I would put it something

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:29.520
<v Speaker 3>like seventy ish percent that the two second overall pick

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 3>is a quarterback. But even that is still not anywhere

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 3>close to as likely as what we would know in

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 3>years past.

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so let's let's repeat that because you said it

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 2>up beautifully. So the one thing we think we do know,

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 2>and for the purpose of this discussion, I guess we

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 2>have to go with this, is that the Panthers are

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 2>taking Bryce Young at one. We'll put that at ninety

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 2>one percent. Ninety nine point five percent. Yes, yeah, that

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 2>sounds good. Okay, so it does start it too, And

0:03:55.720 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 2>you laid out the three snario So Texans keep choose quarterback, which, again,

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 2>by their franchise, you would think logically they should Texans

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 2>keep and they pick defense if in fact, Bryce Young

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 2>is so highly tiered by them and everybody else is

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 2>so far below that that they're just not interested in

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 2>anybody else and they're unwilling to trade to one, because

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 2>that would be double the mistake after the old Davis

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:23.800
<v Speaker 2>Mills fourth and twelve, fourth and twenty lovey going for

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:26.839
<v Speaker 2>two game to end less seas in which, by the way,

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:28.719
<v Speaker 2>Matt Matt said it best just now in a numbers

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:30.119
<v Speaker 2>game could go down.

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 5>How did you say it as the most egregious winn.

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I agreegious win, at least in recent memory. Because if

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 1>if the whole thing was we're not actually we're not

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:38.840
<v Speaker 1>going to take a quarterback now because we we had

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 1>a heart set on Bryce Young And if that, if

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 1>that's the case, you win this meaningless game. You go

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 1>for two with a minute thirty seven, All these different

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:49.840
<v Speaker 1>all these different things to point to just an egregious

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 1>win for sure.

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 2>And then the third option is Houston trades, right, and

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:55.920
<v Speaker 2>a team that would trade in would obviously be trading

0:04:55.920 --> 0:04:59.839
<v Speaker 2>in for a quarterback. So all right, let's go with

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 2>each one of those scenarios. So, because you were just

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:05.039
<v Speaker 2>alluding to it, which which I find interesting, as you said,

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 2>if they decided to go defense, this is sort of

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:11.160
<v Speaker 2>the counterintuitive thing. You said, if they decide to go defense,

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't make the run on quarterbacks more hairy. It

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 2>does the opposite in your.

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:19.159
<v Speaker 4>Opinion, Yeah, I mean, I really think so.

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 3>The idea because is, you know, this is all about

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 3>the AFC South, right, there are three there are three

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 3>teams in the a FC South that don't have a

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 3>quarterback of the future, and they all have draft assets

0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:35.720
<v Speaker 3>at the top eleven picks of this year's draft, and

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 3>those three teams kind of jockeying for position in terms

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:42.719
<v Speaker 3>of who's taking who, when you know it's the Titans

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 3>really only have to give up the future to move

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:49.280
<v Speaker 3>up to three in order to keep the you know,

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 3>the Colts from getting their guy. If you know, the

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:56.159
<v Speaker 3>Texans take a quarterback or a quarterback goes to I

0:05:56.200 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 3>should say so it's you know, to me, at least

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:03.479
<v Speaker 3>Titans and anyone else kind of in the mix for

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 3>a quarterback in the top eleven picks of the draft

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 3>can stand pat and see who falls to them if

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 3>quarterback do not go two and three.

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:14.279
<v Speaker 2>So if a defensive player goes two and by the way,

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:16.280
<v Speaker 2>on your podcast, you were saying you and Luke were

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:20.279
<v Speaker 2>saying Vegas refund that it appears that if the Texans

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:25.359
<v Speaker 2>went defense, they prefer they prefer Tyree Wilson now over

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:28.680
<v Speaker 2>will Anderson. That seems to be the thing, and that

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 2>if they went defense, the Cardinals would be more likely

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 2>to go Stan Patten go defense because the trade offers

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:36.839
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't come pouring in, and then the Colts would have

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 2>Levis fall into their laps at four. That would be

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 2>that scenario Stroud Anderson fall. The scenario where the scenario

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:47.520
<v Speaker 2>and this is what Matt was saying, Now I turn

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:51.560
<v Speaker 2>a mat you have a scenario where you believe that

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:54.480
<v Speaker 2>you have not eliminated the possibility of this going quarterback

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:56.280
<v Speaker 2>quarterback quarterback quarterback.

0:06:57.920 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Just I've not removed that from a possibility here, because,

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:02.920
<v Speaker 1>like you know, we all do this. I'm sure whenever

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:05.480
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to we're trying to go through like three

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 1>or four likely scenarios and then we can at least

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:08.840
<v Speaker 1>try and figure out, Okay, is there a bet to

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:10.680
<v Speaker 1>be made if this scenario plays out? If this scenario

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 1>plays I have this scenario plays out. I mean again,

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I said this on your show just just a little

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 1>bit earlier. It is very hard to tank in the NFL.

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I thought Seattle was going to be one of the

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 1>worst teams in the NFL. Last year a better an

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 1>all under on that team, and then you stumble into

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 1>wins and teams underperform and things happen. So, if you're

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the Texans as a franchise, just to assume that you're

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 1>going to have one of the top two picks next

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:33.360
<v Speaker 1>year to get one of these guys that, by the way,

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 1>we've all heard this can't miss prospect and all the

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:37.320
<v Speaker 1>greatest guys.

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 5>They said this about this group last.

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Year, right right, It's like, yeah, don't draft a quarterback

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 1>last year because this year and then we get to

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 1>this year, it's kind of like, all of these guys

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 1>aren't that good. It'll be the same thing next year,

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 1>you know. And so to think that you're going to

0:07:49.280 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 1>be in the scenario to get may or to get

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Williams next year, you have to have one of the

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 1>top two picks, and if not, you're going to trade

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:56.920
<v Speaker 1>in to one of those top two picks, and they

0:07:57.000 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 1>might not whoever has those picks might not want to

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 1>trade with you, and they might one of those two guys.

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 1>And so I don't know, you find yourself in a

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty nique scenario right here, in which I don't know

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 1>if you pass on a quarterback. And if that's the case,

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 1>then I think there is a Then it starts to

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 1>get the other teams out there that are quarterback needed

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>to start calling that Cardinal squad and say, hey man, look,

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 1>you need a bunch of players. And even if we

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 1>give you an extra couple of mid round picks or

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 1>something like that, for us to do a little swapperoo

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 1>right here, it makes a lot of sense for you

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 1>because you are dead in the water. You're not gonna

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 1>win any games in twenty twenty four, twenty twenty three,

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:29.400
<v Speaker 1>so let's go ahead and start building that roster up.

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 2>All right, Drew, So, but I asked you to put

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:33.600
<v Speaker 2>a percentage chance. I think you started to do this

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:37.560
<v Speaker 2>on which of these scenarios happens at two. Who's the

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 2>favorite right now, three days before the draft?

0:08:39.800 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 5>What's the favorite?

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 3>Yes, a quarterback going second has to be the favorite

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 3>for me for a lot of reasons. And I think

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 3>that kind of spelled it out.

0:08:48.240 --> 0:08:49.440
<v Speaker 5>But quarterback either.

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 3>Way, quarterback either way? Right, I'll give you sixty. Okay,

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 3>So again, you're kind of reading all the tea leaves

0:08:56.760 --> 0:08:58.959
<v Speaker 3>and getting all the info from the insiders across the

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:01.439
<v Speaker 3>NFL today, being like we don't know what's happening at two.

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 3>Like that to me may mean that the Texans have

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:07.960
<v Speaker 3>a deal in principle, assuming that Bryce Young actually goes on,

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:10.920
<v Speaker 3>they may have a deal in principle. That's entirely possible.

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 3>But I would put that at maybe ten percent. I

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 3>would put sixty percent that the type the Texans kind

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:18.959
<v Speaker 3>of just get over there, you know, the feeling of

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:22.840
<v Speaker 3>disappointment of losing out on Bryce Young and take the

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:25.199
<v Speaker 3>top quarterback on their board, who I think is love us.

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 3>I think that's probably like sixty percent chance. And then

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:31.200
<v Speaker 3>I would have about a thirty percent chance that they

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 3>actually do punt on quarterback entirely and take a defender

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 3>there because you know, to Matt's point, like the idea

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 3>of walking, you know, you're going to sell tickets to

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:45.080
<v Speaker 3>your fanbase. So we're running it back with Davis Mills

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:48.840
<v Speaker 3>in case keenum like what, I don't realize. I don't

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 3>really know how you can, you know, make that play

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 3>out eventually. And you know, there's been a lot of

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 3>speculation that they've done a ton of due diligence on

0:09:57.320 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 3>Hended Hooker. But if you're taking him at like twelve

0:10:01.160 --> 0:10:03.080
<v Speaker 3>or even trading back in or taking him at the

0:10:03.080 --> 0:10:06.800
<v Speaker 3>top of the second round, that's a tough sell. So

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 3>you know, I think ultimately I think they kind of

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:11.680
<v Speaker 3>cooler heads prevail and they come around and they just

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:14.800
<v Speaker 3>take their top QB available, who I think is love Us.

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 3>And you know, the ten percent chance that they have

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:21.840
<v Speaker 3>a deal in principle with some other team coming up,

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm assuming it is for leve Us because you know,

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 3>the only thing that you can say with the kind

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:31.720
<v Speaker 3>of you know, not cloak and dagger speculatory stuff, but

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 3>you know pretty clearly the Cults are in a situation

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 3>where they need a quarterback who can start relatively soon.

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 3>They've been very candid and they always are about who

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:44.960
<v Speaker 3>they like, and it's love Us. And you know, I

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:48.959
<v Speaker 3>think the idea of any team trading into the top

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 3>two or three is to jump the Colts for that player.

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 3>So you know, I would guess that there is a

0:10:57.160 --> 0:10:59.319
<v Speaker 3>realistic chance that somebody trades into the two to take

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:02.439
<v Speaker 3>love Us, And then I would say that there's probably

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 3>the most likely I'll come as the Texans.

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 4>Just chill out and do the right thing.

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:10.679
<v Speaker 2>This has nothing to do with anything in terms of

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 2>a bet, but it does deserve repeating here where it's like,

0:11:14.000 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 2>and it seems like whatever happened in the college football

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 2>season matters not at all. So like every time Will

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:21.679
<v Speaker 2>Levis had a big moment, he came up small this

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:23.960
<v Speaker 2>last year in college football and CJ Stroud last night

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:27.880
<v Speaker 2>looked was crushing George's defense at Ohio State. So like,

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 2>and none of that seems to matter, right, like we

0:11:29.920 --> 0:11:33.439
<v Speaker 2>just forget. It's like, whatever happened, it doesn't matter. But

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:35.719
<v Speaker 2>by the way, the random story also, I happened to

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 2>live in a building. It's a pair of buildings in

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 2>the middle of the strip here. Antonio Pierce, the Raiders

0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 2>linebacker coach, lives in the other building, but we share

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 2>a parking area, and so the Valets are always talking

0:11:48.720 --> 0:11:51.240
<v Speaker 2>to him. I happen to be there. We leave at

0:11:51.280 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 2>the same time in the morning. Antonio Pierce is just

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:56.840
<v Speaker 2>gushing about Will Levis. He's like, oh yeah, he's like

0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 2>he's like, he's like, he's a linebacker rose at seventy

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 2>yards downfield. So all of these teams become so fixated

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 2>on this pro type, right, it's amazing.

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:09.960
<v Speaker 3>I think you know what's kind of funny. Last time,

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you and Matt did a draft pod. I

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 3>think your colleague Lombardi was part of the picture as well,

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:20.960
<v Speaker 3>and he was just steadfastly anti Justin Fields in that podcast,

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 3>to the point where going back and listening to it

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:26.679
<v Speaker 3>would probably be funny, fun and funny, right. And this

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 3>cycles as little as Lombardi saw I saw eye with

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 3>him in that moment, this cycle. Almost everything he said

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 3>as lined up exactly with what I'm hearing from NFL insiders,

0:12:38.080 --> 0:12:40.719
<v Speaker 3>and the Levis stuff is, you know, like the linebacker

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:43.559
<v Speaker 3>coaches might like the Levis from the physical side of things,

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:46.760
<v Speaker 3>but it's almost all the mental that's kind of given

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:49.080
<v Speaker 3>him the leg up on a lot of draft boards,

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 3>like teams that are not even at all really seriously

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 3>considering quarterbacks in the draft. I've seen and heard what

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 3>they're you know, how they rate ranked quarterbacks. And Levis's

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 3>QB two almost unanimously after Bryce Young. And it comes

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 3>down to the way he scored on the cognition test.

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:07.600
<v Speaker 3>It comes down to the fact that he was running

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 3>a more pro style system.

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:13:09.520 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 3>And the idea that Ohio State you know has, you know,

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:18.840
<v Speaker 3>just is putting quarterbacks into into the NFL without as

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:21.679
<v Speaker 3>much preparation as they would need to be able to,

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 3>you know, to to to play the position well on

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:27.600
<v Speaker 3>day one. I think is sort of the kind of

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:31.199
<v Speaker 3>common mindset among the NFL, you know, front offices right now, but.

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 5>We don't say we don't say that about Alabama quarterbacks though.

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 1>I always think it's funny with because we have the

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:39.440
<v Speaker 1>same talking point with the two quarterbacks, but it just

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:41.960
<v Speaker 1>goes in the opposite directions, which is so CJ. Stroud

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 1>they're like, yeah, but look at all the guys around him,

0:13:43.760 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like that's why I say. And then with

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Will Levis, they're like, yeah, but look at all the

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:49.080
<v Speaker 1>guys around him. They were terrible. So it's like we're

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 1>just assuming he's going to be better because he had

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 1>no talent around him, and with c J. Stroud, we're

0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:54.360
<v Speaker 1>assuming he's going to be worse because he had all

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:56.560
<v Speaker 1>this talent around him. So it's like the same talking

0:13:56.600 --> 0:13:58.600
<v Speaker 1>point just goes in opposite directions with the two guys.

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 2>So so you and you and and you and Luke

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 2>alluded to this, redid more than allude to it. You

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 2>think there's a scenario where like CJ. Stroud could fall

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:09.679
<v Speaker 2>into Aaron Rodgers draft mode, which is that this guy

0:14:09.720 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 2>who at one point was a four dollars favorite to

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 2>be the number one pick. Yeah, if he gets past Tennessee,

0:14:15.679 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 2>Let's say Tennessee holds their pick at eleven, he could

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:20.440
<v Speaker 2>be in free fall at that point. Like that scenario

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 2>is possible.

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:26.160
<v Speaker 3>You always always always run into this where a player

0:14:26.320 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 3>who is available when he was not expected to be available,

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 3>teams will by default already you know, they've they've already

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 3>kind of they've already kind of drawn a red line

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 3>through that player when they go through their preparation.

0:14:39.680 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 4>We're not even going to vet him. We're not going

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 4>to do our due.

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 3>Diligence, and so you know, they may just pass out

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 3>of like, well, we didn't really think that he was

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 3>going to be here, so we didn't even really consider it.

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 3>And that's definitely what happened with Aaron Rodgers and a

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 3>handful of teams that otherwise you know, were in the

0:14:56.640 --> 0:14:59.240
<v Speaker 3>market to improve their quarterback situation. They just they didn't

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 3>think he was going to be there because people thought

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 3>he was going to go one. And so yeah, Stroud

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 3>could very well find himself there. You know, I've heard

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 3>this is a little cloak and dagger. But you know,

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 3>it seems pretty clear that Stroud's visit with the Colts

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 3>went poorly, and you know, I think.

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 5>How did not do a run up to the draft?

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 3>And Yeah, and honestly, like the outcome that I'm most

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 3>excited to see how it plays out by far is

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:33.040
<v Speaker 3>if it goes too you know, Bryce young one Levis

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 3>goes to to the Texans, and then Tennessee trades into

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 3>the three to take Richardson, and then the Colts are

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 3>now on the decision point of we need a quarterback?

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 4>What is our plan be here?

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 3>Because I would, honestly, at least from what I've heard,

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 3>the likelihood of being Stroud or being you know, just

0:15:51.760 --> 0:15:53.920
<v Speaker 3>kind of them just capitulating and taking a guy that

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 3>they didn't have a great, great on is going to

0:15:57.600 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 3>be fascinating to see. Ball is kind of steadfastly. You know,

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 3>he's not a guy that's going to trade up draft equity,

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 3>like he's not. He's not trading up even if you know,

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 3>the worst case scenario plays out. And so I'd be

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 3>fascinated to see if Plan B for them is do

0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 3>they make another run at Lamar Jackson, do they make

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 3>a take, do they take a swing on Trey Lance, Like,

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 3>there's definitely sort of a lot of other plan b's

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 3>there that may kind of create true unknown with that

0:16:24.880 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 3>fourth pick as opposed to just automatically taken Stroud.

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 1>But with with the four quarterbacks, would we do are

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 1>we all in agreement here that like the dead floor

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 1>for the four that we assume are going to the

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 1>first round, they're all gone by twenty right? Like that

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 1>that's like the dead floor because then at that point

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 1>you would have to make it through Tennessee, you'd have

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 1>to make it through New England, you have to make

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 1>it through washingtonsh So they say that's given. They say, Sam,

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 1>how if someone's there? And then and then you get

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:54.120
<v Speaker 1>through Tampa who can't be loving their their situation either,

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 1>And then and then you have that luxury pick for Seattle,

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 1>which is their second pick in the first round.

0:16:57.560 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, what you're both alluding to is in that free fall,

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 2>if the free fall of Stroud happened, it would be

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:05.320
<v Speaker 2>it would be multiple teams right that would be shocked

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:07.399
<v Speaker 2>that he was there and would have to all of

0:17:07.440 --> 0:17:09.679
<v Speaker 2>a sudden throw out everything they've talked about, be like

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:11.920
<v Speaker 2>are we taking this guy? Yeah, Like we have to

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:13.880
<v Speaker 2>we kind of have to take him, right. We can't

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 2>not take him until the fans were going with Sam Howel.

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Right, That's why I have put like, even if even

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:23.360
<v Speaker 1>if the craziest scenario quarterback plays out, I still think

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty is the like dead floor for the four to

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>go because it would be several several teams that need

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks who then would have to just pass on these

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 1>guys like in just over and over and over again.

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:37.679
<v Speaker 5>Okay, I Drew is not liking that.

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:39.159
<v Speaker 3>You don't like that, Drew, Well, no, I just mean

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:41.879
<v Speaker 3>the command the commanders have already, they already have to

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 3>kind of explain why Sam Howel's the choice over Lamar Jackson's.

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 5>You don't know, he threw eleven completed forward passes. What

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:48.720
<v Speaker 5>are you talking about?

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:53.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, yeah, I like, like, uh uh yeah, I yeah.

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:55.919
<v Speaker 3>I really am excited to see how it plays out. Surely,

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:58.919
<v Speaker 3>like this could all be, you know, kind of hollow

0:17:59.000 --> 0:18:02.920
<v Speaker 3>speculation because we know, you know, the likes of the

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 3>Seahawks and the Lions, who were always dark horses to

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 3>take quarterbacks. They could have a higher grade on Stroud

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:10.919
<v Speaker 3>than any of us realized. I definitely don't know that

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:12.120
<v Speaker 3>for sure, that's true.

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Again, I didn't even mention tit at eighteen, like that's

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 1>a that's a luxury. Again, that's the second first round pick, right.

0:18:17.160 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, oh yeah yeah, so yeah, to that point, the

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 3>idea of Detroit passing on him, Seattle passing on him

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 3>twice is really, really, really really a stretch.

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:27.240
<v Speaker 4>So I agree, I think.

0:18:27.200 --> 0:18:29.639
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, yeah, I think I think realistically him making

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:32.920
<v Speaker 3>it past the Seahawks a second time is a is

0:18:32.960 --> 0:18:35.719
<v Speaker 3>a stretch. They're kind of in that mix too, so yeah, yeah,

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 3>So I think C. J. Strouds floor is probably eighteen

0:18:37.920 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 3>nineteen twenty.

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 2>Anthony Richardson, as you guys pointed out, has to has

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 2>to be drafted by a team with a quote unquote

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:53.359
<v Speaker 2>bridge quarterback, right, so Seattle that five could maybe, right, sure,

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:56.879
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, there's so many scenarios here, but it

0:18:56.920 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 2>can't be.

0:18:57.440 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 5>But the Colts wouldn't because they don't have him, right,

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:00.920
<v Speaker 5>So the Colts would not be.

0:19:00.880 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 3>It, right, Yeah, Yeah, I think I think Seattle at

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:07.679
<v Speaker 3>five is probably Richardson's floor. That's my that's my gut.

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:09.720
<v Speaker 3>And part of the reason is because they were so

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 3>enamored with Josh Allen and like like that's a real story,

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 3>Like that's not made up. They were so enamored with

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:17.680
<v Speaker 3>Josh Allen they were considering him moving on from prime

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:20.399
<v Speaker 3>Russell Wilson to take a swing on Josh Allen as

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:24.680
<v Speaker 3>a developmental piece. And the similarities between Alan and Richardson

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:28.440
<v Speaker 3>are pretty unmistakable, like you can't miss it. And so

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:30.679
<v Speaker 3>Seattle having a higher grade than I think a lot

0:19:30.680 --> 0:19:32.960
<v Speaker 3>of people realize. On Richardson, I think is pretty likely.

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:35.720
<v Speaker 3>And if he's available at five, I would expect that's

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 3>his floor. But he may not be available at five

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 3>because again, if you had to say, like hold my

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:43.640
<v Speaker 3>feet to the fire, what's the most likely thing that's

0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 3>going to happen on Thursday right now? I think it's

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 3>young Levis Wilson, Richardson, Anderson.

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:55.200
<v Speaker 5>Young Levis Wilson, Richardson four.

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah to the Colts.

0:19:57.880 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 5>Richardson, Yeah, Richardson to the Colts.

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. I think they take Richardson Overstroud. Certainly. If there's

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:06.399
<v Speaker 4>those those.

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:08.800
<v Speaker 2>Guys are done, you still think they would go rid Wow,

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 2>and then who goes five? Anderson Anderson because they don't

0:20:13.000 --> 0:20:15.359
<v Speaker 2>want Carter at all. They don't do the Seahawks do

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:16.480
<v Speaker 2>not want Jalen.

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 4>Carter, that's my gut.

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:21.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Well Will Anderson, who's been available in the NFL

0:20:21.160 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 2>draft I think for three straight seasons now just cannot

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 2>buy a break and now he's falling. Okay, I want

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:29.680
<v Speaker 2>I want to get to all of like, sure, what

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 2>bets you think are available now that people can bet?

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:34.199
<v Speaker 2>And I want to get to what bets you have

0:20:34.280 --> 0:20:36.199
<v Speaker 2>in pocket that you like the most, that you like

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:37.680
<v Speaker 2>the least. I have tons that I don't like it

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:42.120
<v Speaker 2>all anymore. But can you just tell that because you

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 2>you alluded to it here before before we get into

0:20:44.040 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 2>all that, sure you said that there might be ten

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:49.880
<v Speaker 2>percent chance that there's a trade in pocket.

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:51.720
<v Speaker 5>Could you give that ruler?

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 2>Because I think it's of all the things, this might

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 2>be the most fascinating scenario.

0:20:55.520 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because you know, you think basically where and again

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:03.639
<v Speaker 3>we're speculating on sort of the plan that Texans have

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 3>for what they're going to sell their fans as far

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:09.560
<v Speaker 3>as quarterback for this season, and if they pass on

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 3>a quarterback of two, if they take a d you know,

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 3>if they're even considering it, then they have to have

0:21:14.280 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 3>a plan B in place, Like what's our plan B here?

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 3>And I would say plan B. You know, it could

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:23.440
<v Speaker 3>include you know, taking a quarterback later in the draft,

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:27.119
<v Speaker 3>which isn't as sexy, or it could be as you know,

0:21:27.280 --> 0:21:29.240
<v Speaker 3>it could be trading for another player who's in a

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 3>disgruntled situation. And Trey Lance is obviously the one that

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:36.159
<v Speaker 3>was floated, presumably by San Francisco, by the way, who

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:40.720
<v Speaker 3>is like desperate for an offer rock Yeah, and I'm

0:21:40.760 --> 0:21:42.639
<v Speaker 3>excited to see your San Francisco forty nine ers and

0:21:42.680 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 3>brock Purty week one with his uh uh, you know,

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:48.120
<v Speaker 3>his rook is Tommy John elbow. Maybe the noodle arm

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 3>isn't an issue anymore. Maybe now he's thrown at one

0:21:50.040 --> 0:21:53.439
<v Speaker 3>hundred yards over the mountains. But you know, but you know,

0:21:53.440 --> 0:21:55.560
<v Speaker 3>brock perty is the future in San Francisco. Trey Lance

0:21:55.600 --> 0:21:57.160
<v Speaker 3>is on the ounce. There was a lot of buzz that,

0:21:57.640 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, that's that the teams are going to get

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:02.880
<v Speaker 3>small for Trey Lance, and that could be the Texans plan.

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 3>But I like I circle Mac Jones as kind of

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:10.920
<v Speaker 3>a more likely guy to be moved on draft day

0:22:12.200 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 3>because I just I don't see that being a long term,

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:18.639
<v Speaker 3>you know, viable relationship with everything that's happened in the

0:22:18.680 --> 0:22:21.719
<v Speaker 3>last year now between Belichick and mac Jones, and I

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:24.719
<v Speaker 3>know certainly the Patriots are kicking the tires on some

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:27.080
<v Speaker 3>of these quarterbacks in this draft class, which to me

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 3>means that mac Jones may be on the move.

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 2>Will Levis did come in for an interview or a

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 2>day there on Wednesday, the last day that you could

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:38.520
<v Speaker 2>sneak somebody into your camp. So one of the things

0:22:38.560 --> 0:22:41.520
<v Speaker 2>behind that Mac Jones rumor. And I heard this too

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 2>before I heard you and Luke talking about it. I

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:45.720
<v Speaker 2>can't tell you where I heard it because I don't

0:22:45.720 --> 0:22:48.880
<v Speaker 2>remember anymore. What was this whole thing about when Matt

0:22:48.880 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 2>Patricia became the offensive guy at New England One of

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:56.879
<v Speaker 2>the weirdest decisions ever by Belichick that mac Jones is realizing, oh,

0:22:56.920 --> 0:22:58.960
<v Speaker 2>this is gonna be a shit show, goes to his

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 2>alma mater, Alabama, and ask for help, And that gets

0:23:02.040 --> 0:23:03.919
<v Speaker 2>back to Belichick. Now, I don't know, Drew where I

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:06.160
<v Speaker 2>heard that, but I heard that in the last few

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 2>weeks also, and so that's where the beginning of their

0:23:10.840 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 2>sort of bad relationship begins. Do you believe that Do

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 2>you believe that a trade could happen like that at all?

0:23:16.359 --> 0:23:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? I mean, I certainly believe that Belichick would take

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 1>offense to that. He seems like the type of guy

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:23.880
<v Speaker 1>that would. Yes, that is that I buy a hundred

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 1>percent where it's kind of like whoa, whoa, whoa. Do

0:23:26.359 --> 0:23:29.160
<v Speaker 1>you know who I am? Yes? I am God? So yes,

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 1>you don't go ask God. You already have God. You

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 1>don't go ask Buddha, right, I mean like you got

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:34.440
<v Speaker 1>God right here.

0:23:35.520 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 2>I told everybody on a numbers game this morning. I

0:23:37.640 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 2>told the Drew's mac Jones scenario, and the couple people

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:44.960
<v Speaker 2>the feedback was, oh, Belichick, he never trades up, he

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 2>never does it. Do we really know what Belichick post

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:48.240
<v Speaker 2>Tom Brady would do on any.

0:23:48.160 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 5>Of this stuff?

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:52.320
<v Speaker 2>If really, By the way, so just to let you know, Drew,

0:23:52.400 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 2>based on that story, that was enough for me to

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 2>take the Patriots first election as a quarterback at eight

0:23:56.119 --> 0:23:56.440
<v Speaker 2>to one.

0:23:56.480 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 5>Thank you very much. That happens, that happens'll be.

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 3>It'll be fun, all right. I think that I think

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 3>we're talking. You know, maybe ten percent sounds insanely high,

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:09.639
<v Speaker 3>but I just in the back of my head because again,

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 3>like I heard that story in the moment, you know,

0:24:12.320 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 3>during camp last year, and I laughed it off from

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:18.119
<v Speaker 3>like Patriots insider that there was like bad blood all

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:20.520
<v Speaker 3>of a sudden between Belichick and Jones, and I was

0:24:20.560 --> 0:24:24.359
<v Speaker 3>like what And then I heard it separately second source

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:27.359
<v Speaker 3>to completely different orbits. So now I pretty much assume

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 3>it's true. And you know, the idea that Belichick is

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:35.360
<v Speaker 3>not going into camp this year with Mac Jones's QB

0:24:35.480 --> 0:24:38.240
<v Speaker 3>one I think is you know, starting to look more

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:39.359
<v Speaker 3>and more likely in my mind.

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 5>Do you imagine that happens?

0:24:42.440 --> 0:24:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay?

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 3>So, I mean, the Patriots are going to be fourth

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:47.199
<v Speaker 3>favorite and division even with me, right, so why not

0:24:47.480 --> 0:24:49.720
<v Speaker 3>why not try to get the next, you know, the

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:50.360
<v Speaker 3>next best thing?

0:24:50.400 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 5>And he had a terrible year, I mean terrible year

0:24:52.520 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 5>when you're expected to improve off your you know, the

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 5>rookie year that everybody loves so much.

0:24:56.760 --> 0:24:58.920
<v Speaker 4>So okay, good point.

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 2>There's multiple to win on an NFL draft information based

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:05.639
<v Speaker 2>betting vehicle. You pointed out a couple of these on

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 2>your podcast, which is, you know, one you go with

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:13.119
<v Speaker 2>a long shot play and you have enough conviction to

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 2>make the bet and then somehow it manifests over time. Sure,

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:19.399
<v Speaker 2>some people hit Derek Stingley and third pick last year

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 2>at one hundred to one. My number wasn't quite that high,

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:25.719
<v Speaker 2>but hit that as well. Then there's the opposite of that,

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 2>which is something is so obvious to happen that you're

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:33.960
<v Speaker 2>willing to lay juice even though even though it's a

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:36.680
<v Speaker 2>lot of juice, because you're thinking this is a virtual certainty,

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 2>it's still not high enough.

0:25:38.160 --> 0:25:38.720
<v Speaker 5>Let me lay that.

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:41.359
<v Speaker 2>For instance, over five and a half offensive Lineman, I

0:25:41.520 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 2>laid minus two eighty one because I think it's going

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:47.439
<v Speaker 2>to be six or seven now.

0:25:48.000 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 1>And I'm on the opposite side of you on that one.

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:54.960
<v Speaker 5>Okay, So but those are the two biggest ways.

0:25:55.000 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 2>The other one is you have some inside information and

0:25:57.080 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 2>you just you know this is going to happen because

0:25:59.080 --> 0:26:02.440
<v Speaker 2>you know somebody from some So it's great. It's information based.

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:05.359
<v Speaker 2>And just to give a just sort of broad backdrop

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:08.760
<v Speaker 2>on this, in Las Vegas, Christy Andrews, who runs the

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:11.199
<v Speaker 2>South Point Hotel Casino, which is where we're broadcasting this

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:13.920
<v Speaker 2>podcast from Christy Andrews. Last year, after the draft, the

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:15.680
<v Speaker 2>draft was in Vegas last year, he came on the show.

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:17.160
<v Speaker 2>He's like, I don't think I'm gonna book this again.

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:20.440
<v Speaker 2>Sixteen days before the draft, so that's thirteen days ago

0:26:20.480 --> 0:26:21.440
<v Speaker 2>he came on a numbers game.

0:26:21.440 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 5>He said, I'm not going to book it. But at

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 5>least he was.

0:26:24.440 --> 0:26:26.439
<v Speaker 2>Honest about it, right, because some of these other like

0:26:26.480 --> 0:26:27.639
<v Speaker 2>Westgate's not booking it.

0:26:28.720 --> 0:26:30.960
<v Speaker 1>There's one bet at betam GM or in Novater.

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:34.880
<v Speaker 2>That MGM has one bet one number one pick one. Yeah,

0:26:34.960 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 2>number one pick, which is like unbettable. They haven't stations

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:42.600
<v Speaker 2>was the big. They were the big, sort of one

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:45.640
<v Speaker 2>that gets applause here. Yeah, they had twenty seven props up.

0:26:45.960 --> 0:26:47.320
<v Speaker 2>They've had them up for a while. They're taking a

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:51.359
<v Speaker 2>dime on everything. Circa's doing the We're gonna put this

0:26:51.480 --> 0:26:53.439
<v Speaker 2>up for three or four days and then act like

0:26:53.480 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 2>we had them up forever, but they're taking a dime

0:26:55.320 --> 0:26:55.720
<v Speaker 2>all day.

0:26:55.720 --> 0:26:57.600
<v Speaker 1>It was Johnny Come Lately for them. Billy Hill to

0:26:57.600 --> 0:26:58.919
<v Speaker 1>give the them credit, had.

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 2>Up five for a good for a good one, five

0:27:01.840 --> 0:27:06.400
<v Speaker 2>different props and that's it. Yeah, BOYD has a few

0:27:06.440 --> 0:27:08.480
<v Speaker 2>boys limited but oh well.

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and they close, they close, and they close, they close.

0:27:11.760 --> 0:27:13.240
<v Speaker 1>So I got last night to look and I was

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:15.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna try to make it be like they just at

0:27:15.400 --> 0:27:18.120
<v Speaker 1>ten pm. They just close. All the all the numbers

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:22.399
<v Speaker 1>are turned a little locks and they're like business is off. Yeah,

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:24.240
<v Speaker 1>business is closed. You can come back in the morning

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:25.120
<v Speaker 1>if you want a felt.

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:27.840
<v Speaker 2>So that's that's the state of affair in affairs in Nevada.

0:27:28.000 --> 0:27:30.160
<v Speaker 2>It's like getting You would think it would grow and grow.

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 2>It's the opposite direction here.

0:27:32.440 --> 0:27:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

0:27:32.680 --> 0:27:35.560
<v Speaker 2>You were saying Drew before the show that there's some

0:27:35.600 --> 0:27:36.480
<v Speaker 2>other weird things that.

0:27:36.440 --> 0:27:37.119
<v Speaker 5>Are happening with it.

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:42.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, yeah, it's just a it's it's been

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:45.400
<v Speaker 3>tougher to get liquidity into this draft pool than any

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 3>you're I've been betting it. There are some funny wrinkles

0:27:49.320 --> 0:27:51.359
<v Speaker 3>where if you find a long shot you like and

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:53.119
<v Speaker 3>you want to get more down at a legal shop,

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:55.360
<v Speaker 3>you can parlay it with some stuff that's very very

0:27:55.400 --> 0:27:58.440
<v Speaker 3>likely to be graded between now and then, like nuggets

0:27:58.480 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 3>to beat the Wolves and Celtics to beat the Hawks,

0:28:00.560 --> 0:28:05.120
<v Speaker 3>like the limit parling. Yeah, if you put together multiple

0:28:05.119 --> 0:28:07.400
<v Speaker 3>parlay legs, you basically are allowed that bet on every

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 3>leg more or less, and that just you know, it's

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:12.720
<v Speaker 3>it's silly, but it's a fun way around the some

0:28:12.800 --> 0:28:16.640
<v Speaker 3>of the the headaches of getting money down here. But yeah,

0:28:16.640 --> 0:28:17.920
<v Speaker 3>I know, it's it's been very tough.

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:19.880
<v Speaker 5>How did you how did you find that out? By

0:28:19.920 --> 0:28:22.359
<v Speaker 5>the way, were you like, I'll parlay this with EGA, Like,

0:28:22.359 --> 0:28:22.960
<v Speaker 5>what did you do?

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:26.840
<v Speaker 3>I was just trying you try it. You know, it's

0:28:26.880 --> 0:28:29.400
<v Speaker 3>just just testing raptors. Raptors testing the fence skill.

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:28:31.080 --> 0:28:33.719
<v Speaker 3>That's that's why they lock them at Boyd overnight because

0:28:33.720 --> 0:28:35.760
<v Speaker 3>that's what people like me get up and start testing

0:28:35.760 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 3>the fence and you know, you don't want to walk

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:40.160
<v Speaker 3>in in the morning and say, what in the heck

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:40.720
<v Speaker 3>what happened?

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:41.520
<v Speaker 4>What just happened here?

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:44.280
<v Speaker 3>Like we didn't want this position and now we've got it,

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:47.480
<v Speaker 3>and uh, you know, I I think I think it's

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:51.600
<v Speaker 3>silly to be precious about booking the draft personally, because

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:53.800
<v Speaker 3>I you know, this year, if you were doing a

0:28:53.840 --> 0:28:58.600
<v Speaker 3>good job of managing risk, you're sitting on massive plus

0:28:58.600 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 3>ev bets that you wrote for CJ Stroud to go

0:29:01.480 --> 0:29:03.960
<v Speaker 3>first overall, Like those were those.

0:29:03.760 --> 0:29:06.160
<v Speaker 4>Are dead, those tickets are dead. That that's that's your

0:29:06.200 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 4>money you want.

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 3>If you were you were booking aggressively, if you were

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:11.040
<v Speaker 3>taking big limits at the time when everybody was so

0:29:11.040 --> 0:29:13.240
<v Speaker 3>sure that they traded up for CJ. Stroud, you should

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:15.920
<v Speaker 3>be You should have a good day regardless of what.

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:17.000
<v Speaker 4>Happens on the rest of the board.

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:19.600
<v Speaker 3>And you know, you know, I think if you if

0:29:19.600 --> 0:29:22.200
<v Speaker 3>you're writing more action, you know, in that in the

0:29:22.240 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 3>truly speculative part of the cycle, which is February March,

0:29:25.840 --> 0:29:27.320
<v Speaker 3>then you know you're going to come out ahead on

0:29:27.360 --> 0:29:30.000
<v Speaker 3>a book. And that the more dangerous thing is what

0:29:30.040 --> 0:29:32.480
<v Speaker 3>they actually did this cycle, which is opening a bunch

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:34.480
<v Speaker 3>with high liquidity right at the end when it's a

0:29:34.480 --> 0:29:38.920
<v Speaker 3>lot more known, because now anything that goes is going

0:29:39.000 --> 0:29:41.200
<v Speaker 3>one one way, Like there's not going to be any

0:29:41.280 --> 0:29:44.120
<v Speaker 3>kind of, uh, you know, huge swings between now and

0:29:44.160 --> 0:29:46.880
<v Speaker 3>the draft, unless you know something that we're all assuming

0:29:46.960 --> 0:29:49.960
<v Speaker 3>is likely just becomes completely you know, blown up out

0:29:49.960 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 3>of the water, like some team trades up into the

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 3>two and is like we love CJ. Stroud, Like that

0:29:55.080 --> 0:29:57.720
<v Speaker 3>doesn't seem like it's happening. But you know, that would

0:29:57.720 --> 0:30:02.000
<v Speaker 3>be the only sort of chaotic, you know, chaotic event

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:02.880
<v Speaker 3>that could swing things.

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'd like to give my annual disclaimer on the

0:30:04.960 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 1>podcast here, which is, please, I welcome the opportunity to

0:30:08.080 --> 0:30:12.600
<v Speaker 1>get limited on these these markets and whatever. I welcome

0:30:12.640 --> 0:30:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity like if if, if you only are gonna

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:17.479
<v Speaker 1>let me get two hundred down. I don't care. Let

0:30:17.560 --> 0:30:19.520
<v Speaker 1>me get two hundred down. But we don't even have

0:30:19.560 --> 0:30:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the options, right, Like, that's that's the biggest thing for me.

0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:24.400
<v Speaker 2>Right, Like this is we talked about this on Primetime

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:27.000
<v Speaker 2>Action all the time. We are in many ways way

0:30:27.000 --> 0:30:27.840
<v Speaker 2>too close to the sun.

0:30:28.080 --> 0:30:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:30:28.280 --> 0:30:31.640
<v Speaker 2>We deal with a very small subset of people who

0:30:31.760 --> 0:30:32.880
<v Speaker 2>love to bet lots of.

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:37.440
<v Speaker 5>Money on things. We're all that person. Okay, most people

0:30:37.440 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 5>are not like that, right, And I'm with you.

0:30:40.080 --> 0:30:41.800
<v Speaker 2>Like for all the chirping that get the book on

0:30:41.920 --> 0:30:44.800
<v Speaker 2>book crime that we hear from one book here where

0:30:44.840 --> 0:30:46.880
<v Speaker 2>it's like, ah, those guys that don't take anything, only.

0:30:46.840 --> 0:30:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Take two hundred and fifty. I'm like, I can get zero.

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:51.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, get me to fifty. I can get zero.

0:30:52.000 --> 0:30:55.479
<v Speaker 1>Like the mine is zero, like my max is zero. Totally,

0:30:55.520 --> 0:30:55.760
<v Speaker 1>you know.

0:30:55.880 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So three days the other real quick on disclaimer

0:30:58.680 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 3>and annual disclaimer stuff.

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:01.480
<v Speaker 4>I will say it again for the million of the

0:31:01.520 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 4>year in a row.

0:31:02.560 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 3>Like offer offer as much as you possibly can on

0:31:05.680 --> 0:31:07.960
<v Speaker 3>the draft to your players. Because there are there is

0:31:08.000 --> 0:31:11.960
<v Speaker 3>a huge class of betters, particularly new betters, that only

0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:14.080
<v Speaker 3>bet the NFL or they only bet football. And you

0:31:14.120 --> 0:31:17.040
<v Speaker 3>know what those guys have been doing sitting around since

0:31:17.080 --> 0:31:19.120
<v Speaker 3>the Super Bowl. They've been thinking, God, I wish I

0:31:19.120 --> 0:31:21.120
<v Speaker 3>could bet on the NFL or something. And now here

0:31:21.160 --> 0:31:23.160
<v Speaker 3>you have an opportunity for all those guys to go

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:25.480
<v Speaker 3>and run and deposit into their accounts, make a bunch

0:31:25.480 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 3>of bets. Some of them are gonna win, some of

0:31:26.760 --> 0:31:28.640
<v Speaker 3>them are gonna be stupid. Even if you get beat

0:31:28.720 --> 0:31:31.320
<v Speaker 3>on the draft those players are, then they're not gonna

0:31:32.080 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 3>Nobody has the discipline to immediately withdraw all those winnings

0:31:35.040 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 3>and then go on the summer vacation. They're going to

0:31:37.000 --> 0:31:40.600
<v Speaker 3>donk a bunch of that on NBA playoffs, NHL playoffs, Baseball.

0:31:40.600 --> 0:31:43.080
<v Speaker 3>It's all coming back. Don't have to wait a week.

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:49.440
<v Speaker 3>The Kentucky Tucky in a week.

0:31:50.280 --> 0:31:52.640
<v Speaker 4>It might not last a week exactly.

0:31:55.560 --> 0:31:58.160
<v Speaker 3>They should treat this like a betting event and make

0:31:58.200 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 3>it like a bonus for the players.

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:02.200
<v Speaker 4>Get all that money back. You're gonna engender good will.

0:32:02.240 --> 0:32:04.520
<v Speaker 2>Since we're in the disclaimer moment, let me just put

0:32:04.520 --> 0:32:08.080
<v Speaker 2>this one into. None of this, whether it's this draft

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:10.120
<v Speaker 2>special or any draft special that we've ever done here

0:32:10.160 --> 0:32:12.600
<v Speaker 2>in Beating the Book podcast, has anything to do with

0:32:12.760 --> 0:32:17.160
<v Speaker 2>our talent evaluation of these players. Just because I think

0:32:17.200 --> 0:32:20.000
<v Speaker 2>that CJ. Stroud is better than these players, That's not

0:32:20.040 --> 0:32:23.440
<v Speaker 2>what I'm betting. I couldn't care less. And no point

0:32:23.600 --> 0:32:25.640
<v Speaker 2>have we, the three of us, ever talked about all

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:27.920
<v Speaker 2>this guy. The reason is is this guy's better than

0:32:27.960 --> 0:32:30.920
<v Speaker 2>that guy. I know, we're just betting what we think

0:32:31.000 --> 0:32:34.760
<v Speaker 2>is going to happen, and that needs to be stated

0:32:34.840 --> 0:32:38.600
<v Speaker 2>over and over again. Apparently if I may say, okay,

0:32:38.640 --> 0:32:42.000
<v Speaker 2>so Matt, yes, we're three days before the draft before

0:32:42.000 --> 0:32:43.520
<v Speaker 2>we get to what you've bet, what you like, and

0:32:43.600 --> 0:32:45.920
<v Speaker 2>what you don't like about what you've bet. If someone

0:32:45.960 --> 0:32:50.120
<v Speaker 2>were landing on this right now, what's the best bet

0:32:50.160 --> 0:32:53.840
<v Speaker 2>on the board that currently exists, I think.

0:32:53.600 --> 0:32:56.680
<v Speaker 1>You can go in and if you look, a lot

0:32:56.680 --> 0:32:58.840
<v Speaker 1>of people like to bet a little to win a lot,

0:32:58.920 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 1>right more than what they're betting. They don't like to

0:33:01.520 --> 0:33:03.000
<v Speaker 1>lay big juice. And so if you're more of a

0:33:03.040 --> 0:33:06.320
<v Speaker 1>casual better I think that we are getting to the

0:33:06.360 --> 0:33:08.680
<v Speaker 1>point where, like the over two and a half tight

0:33:08.800 --> 0:33:12.480
<v Speaker 1>ends is over two dollars now, and Darnell Washington continues

0:33:12.520 --> 0:33:15.000
<v Speaker 1>to get an incredible amount of buzz and a credible

0:33:15.040 --> 0:33:16.720
<v Speaker 1>amount of steam, and you start to look at some

0:33:16.720 --> 0:33:18.960
<v Speaker 1>of these teams at the bottom of the draft that, look,

0:33:19.320 --> 0:33:22.320
<v Speaker 1>they need pass catchers, but that doesn't necessarily mean wide receivers, right,

0:33:22.360 --> 0:33:24.040
<v Speaker 1>And like you look at a guy like Darneld Washington,

0:33:24.040 --> 0:33:26.560
<v Speaker 1>who's six foot seven, who's you know, runs a four

0:33:26.640 --> 0:33:28.480
<v Speaker 1>or five five. Maybe it's just a freak of nature.

0:33:28.560 --> 0:33:30.600
<v Speaker 1>And if you kind of start to look comparatively to

0:33:30.640 --> 0:33:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the other guys that are the no brainer tight ends,

0:33:33.120 --> 0:33:37.160
<v Speaker 1>then he leads them in yards per target, yards per catch,

0:33:37.600 --> 0:33:41.200
<v Speaker 1>explosive play percentage, and yards per catch after the reception.

0:33:41.400 --> 0:33:44.560
<v Speaker 1>He's better than Mary Kinkaid and all of those categories

0:33:44.600 --> 0:33:47.240
<v Speaker 1>and stuff. He just wasn't utilized as much there because

0:33:47.280 --> 0:33:50.480
<v Speaker 1>you had all those different weapons at Georgia. So I

0:33:50.520 --> 0:33:54.040
<v Speaker 1>mean over a couple bills for over two and a

0:33:54.040 --> 0:33:55.880
<v Speaker 1>half tight ends. I think once you get towards the bottom,

0:33:55.920 --> 0:33:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you really start to link some of these

0:33:57.760 --> 0:33:59.760
<v Speaker 1>teams to pass catchers. And maybe that pass catcher doesn't

0:33:59.760 --> 0:34:02.280
<v Speaker 1>necessly mean wide receiver. It could mean it could mean

0:34:02.320 --> 0:34:02.719
<v Speaker 1>tied end.

0:34:03.480 --> 0:34:05.440
<v Speaker 2>And of course the other two being Kinkaid and Mayor

0:34:05.680 --> 0:34:06.880
<v Speaker 2>being the sort of done deal.

0:34:08.600 --> 0:34:12.960
<v Speaker 3>I heard too many spooky things about red flags medically

0:34:13.000 --> 0:34:16.120
<v Speaker 3>with Washington to get involved with that, but I agreed

0:34:16.760 --> 0:34:22.920
<v Speaker 3>generally that there's a philosophy you can apply and make

0:34:22.960 --> 0:34:25.319
<v Speaker 3>a good bet and have a fun draft night. And

0:34:25.360 --> 0:34:28.120
<v Speaker 3>it's over offensive players sixteen and a half.

0:34:29.800 --> 0:34:30.160
<v Speaker 4>Right now.

0:34:30.200 --> 0:34:32.160
<v Speaker 3>The guys that are sneaking into the bottom around one

0:34:32.280 --> 0:34:35.680
<v Speaker 3>based on all of the you know, based on all

0:34:35.719 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 3>of the buzz, potentially a second running back, potentially a

0:34:39.600 --> 0:34:40.440
<v Speaker 3>fifth quarterback.

0:34:41.000 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 4>I agree with.

0:34:41.560 --> 0:34:45.520
<v Speaker 3>Gil about offensive lineman could easily see six or seven

0:34:46.920 --> 0:34:48.680
<v Speaker 3>not hearing a lot of buzz that there's going to

0:34:48.719 --> 0:34:51.799
<v Speaker 3>be some big push to go, you know, to reach

0:34:51.920 --> 0:34:54.280
<v Speaker 3>for an edge rusher because they're just not that good

0:34:54.400 --> 0:34:56.600
<v Speaker 3>once you get to the second tier. Not no, you know,

0:34:56.640 --> 0:34:59.200
<v Speaker 3>the cornerbacks are a little spooky because there's a very

0:34:59.239 --> 0:35:02.920
<v Speaker 3>deep cornerback class and they're very talented, and you know,

0:35:02.960 --> 0:35:06.080
<v Speaker 3>you could see you know, a decent amount of dbs

0:35:06.120 --> 0:35:09.279
<v Speaker 3>go in the twenties and thirties. But I think right

0:35:09.280 --> 0:35:11.920
<v Speaker 3>now over sixteen and a half, offensive players should be

0:35:11.960 --> 0:35:14.840
<v Speaker 3>more like minus three hundred and it's like minus one fifteen.

0:35:15.120 --> 0:35:17.279
<v Speaker 5>Did you mention this that there's thirty one picks in

0:35:17.320 --> 0:35:19.319
<v Speaker 5>this in this first round as well? Did you mention

0:35:19.400 --> 0:35:20.040
<v Speaker 5>that that's true?

0:35:20.120 --> 0:35:21.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's that's no, I didn't mention it, but that

0:35:22.000 --> 0:35:22.319
<v Speaker 4>is true.

0:35:22.360 --> 0:35:24.680
<v Speaker 3>But they didn't. They didn't. They didn't bottle that one.

0:35:24.800 --> 0:35:26.720
<v Speaker 3>They got that right when they add up the offense

0:35:26.800 --> 0:35:27.440
<v Speaker 3>in the defense.

0:35:27.520 --> 0:35:29.640
<v Speaker 4>So's free money there.

0:35:29.920 --> 0:35:32.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna say it's the Will Anderson over three and

0:35:32.640 --> 0:35:34.880
<v Speaker 2>a half, which you can still get at minus one seventy.

0:35:34.880 --> 0:35:37.760
<v Speaker 2>I know it's not the sexiest juice in the world

0:35:37.800 --> 0:35:39.040
<v Speaker 2>to delay minus one seven?

0:35:39.160 --> 0:35:39.920
<v Speaker 5>Is that for everybody?

0:35:40.360 --> 0:35:42.759
<v Speaker 2>But that should be way higher, shouldn't it, Like, is

0:35:42.760 --> 0:35:44.640
<v Speaker 2>there any scenario where he goes top three?

0:35:44.680 --> 0:35:45.160
<v Speaker 5>At this point?

0:35:45.320 --> 0:35:47.040
<v Speaker 1>It's one out right, it seems like it's one out

0:35:47.880 --> 0:35:50.200
<v Speaker 1>like it seems like because like we don't assume that

0:35:50.280 --> 0:35:52.000
<v Speaker 1>two A and three are going to both go without

0:35:52.040 --> 0:35:54.080
<v Speaker 1>being a quarterback being taken. So it's kind of like

0:35:54.160 --> 0:35:56.719
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's it's a one out bet, and so

0:35:56.760 --> 0:35:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't like making one out bet, so I always

0:35:59.200 --> 0:35:59.759
<v Speaker 1>go to the over them.

0:35:59.800 --> 0:36:01.520
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, yeah, I will.

0:36:01.560 --> 0:36:05.239
<v Speaker 3>I will say the The only hard intel that I

0:36:05.320 --> 0:36:09.120
<v Speaker 3>have is that Wilson is over Anderson on Arizona's board.

0:36:10.520 --> 0:36:13.719
<v Speaker 3>So if they it goes QBQB, I think Wilson is

0:36:13.840 --> 0:36:17.759
<v Speaker 3>very very likely the third pick if Arizona can't trade,

0:36:18.680 --> 0:36:20.440
<v Speaker 3>which is I think by the most that's the most

0:36:20.480 --> 0:36:24.680
<v Speaker 3>likely one two three. But yeah, I mean if if

0:36:24.880 --> 0:36:27.600
<v Speaker 3>if the Texans were so sold on taking a defensive player,

0:36:27.640 --> 0:36:30.360
<v Speaker 3>and if that player was Will Anderson, there's no reason

0:36:30.400 --> 0:36:33.200
<v Speaker 3>that they wouldn't be getting the fan base pipe hyped

0:36:33.200 --> 0:36:36.240
<v Speaker 3>about that, right like they should. The pr campaign should

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:40.000
<v Speaker 3>already be in motion that this is guy's generational defensive player,

0:36:40.080 --> 0:36:42.200
<v Speaker 3>is going to be the quarterback of our defense under

0:36:42.239 --> 0:36:43.640
<v Speaker 3>DeMeco Ryans for the next.

0:36:43.480 --> 0:36:44.319
<v Speaker 4>Ten years, right Like.

0:36:44.880 --> 0:36:48.240
<v Speaker 3>I don't have heard intel that Wilson is over Anderson

0:36:48.280 --> 0:36:50.759
<v Speaker 3>on the Texans board, but it seems pretty likely.

0:36:50.840 --> 0:36:52.160
<v Speaker 4>And I think there are you know, there are.

0:36:52.120 --> 0:36:55.160
<v Speaker 3>Just enough general boards that I've heard now across the

0:36:55.280 --> 0:37:00.239
<v Speaker 3>NFL that have Wilson as the first defensive player that, yeah,

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:02.040
<v Speaker 3>I think Anderson over is a fair bedup.

0:37:02.080 --> 0:37:03.320
<v Speaker 4>He said minus one seventy.

0:37:03.120 --> 0:37:05.200
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, minus one seventy. That doesn't sound too bad.

0:37:05.560 --> 0:37:05.840
<v Speaker 1>What's that?

0:37:05.880 --> 0:37:06.920
<v Speaker 5>What's the deal with Anderson?

0:37:06.960 --> 0:37:09.200
<v Speaker 2>Is he just considered they'll be this really good, solid

0:37:09.280 --> 0:37:12.440
<v Speaker 2>pro He's just not going to be that fantastic or

0:37:12.440 --> 0:37:12.799
<v Speaker 2>what I mean?

0:37:12.840 --> 0:37:16.000
<v Speaker 4>What is high high flor low ceiling high flora.

0:37:15.719 --> 0:37:17.120
<v Speaker 5>Low ceiling, which you don't pick high.

0:37:18.080 --> 0:37:18.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah.

0:37:19.200 --> 0:37:23.799
<v Speaker 3>Basically, the the the read I get from people who

0:37:23.840 --> 0:37:27.120
<v Speaker 3>are connected on Anderson is he could if he can

0:37:27.160 --> 0:37:30.080
<v Speaker 3>put on fifteen pounds, he could be a Khalil mac

0:37:30.120 --> 0:37:35.240
<v Speaker 3>type contributor. Okay, that's so that's conditional, and his ceiling

0:37:35.320 --> 0:37:38.280
<v Speaker 3>is Khalil Mack. If he adds fifteen pounds is probably

0:37:38.320 --> 0:37:43.239
<v Speaker 3>a little scary. He doesn't have elite bend, depending on

0:37:43.280 --> 0:37:47.440
<v Speaker 3>what you think bend means, but apparently apparently he doesn't

0:37:47.440 --> 0:37:50.759
<v Speaker 3>have it, And you know, for those reasons, I think

0:37:50.800 --> 0:37:54.080
<v Speaker 3>he's you know, he's he's if his contributions are largely

0:37:54.080 --> 0:37:55.960
<v Speaker 3>in the run game and you know he's not going

0:37:56.000 --> 0:37:59.040
<v Speaker 3>to be able to beat offensive tackles regularly with his

0:37:59.120 --> 0:38:01.480
<v Speaker 3>bend at the NFL, then I think for those reasons,

0:38:01.480 --> 0:38:03.799
<v Speaker 3>he's like a he's a guy you can count on

0:38:03.840 --> 0:38:05.360
<v Speaker 3>to start for ten years, but he's not going to

0:38:05.360 --> 0:38:06.759
<v Speaker 3>ever win you a Super Bowl.

0:38:06.920 --> 0:38:08.319
<v Speaker 1>The one other one that's not in my account yet

0:38:08.360 --> 0:38:10.719
<v Speaker 1>that I'm really considering is just that you can have

0:38:10.719 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 1>the team to draft player and you can get those

0:38:12.680 --> 0:38:14.160
<v Speaker 1>at super long odds, and it's just kind of more

0:38:14.200 --> 0:38:15.840
<v Speaker 1>of a fun sweat type than anything else, and like

0:38:16.920 --> 0:38:19.799
<v Speaker 1>Seattle Seahawks for Hendon Hooker at like ten eleven to

0:38:19.800 --> 0:38:21.680
<v Speaker 1>one is still out there, and I think you have

0:38:21.719 --> 0:38:23.880
<v Speaker 1>two outs with that, because the thing is is if

0:38:23.920 --> 0:38:27.439
<v Speaker 1>they don't take him at twenty, they actually have via

0:38:27.480 --> 0:38:30.440
<v Speaker 1>trade with Denver they pick at thirty seven in the

0:38:30.480 --> 0:38:32.839
<v Speaker 1>second round as well. Right, so they're at the top

0:38:32.880 --> 0:38:35.000
<v Speaker 1>of the second round, and the teams in front of

0:38:35.040 --> 0:38:38.439
<v Speaker 1>them in the second round or Pittsburgh not Houston, well

0:38:38.520 --> 0:38:41.080
<v Speaker 1>we assume not if they what are Arizona not in

0:38:41.120 --> 0:38:44.520
<v Speaker 1>an Indianapolis not? So like you have Seattle there at

0:38:44.520 --> 0:38:46.239
<v Speaker 1>the top of the second round as well to where

0:38:46.280 --> 0:38:50.000
<v Speaker 1>if Hendon Hooker is still around, I can't imagine them

0:38:50.000 --> 0:38:52.520
<v Speaker 1>passing again at thirty seven, right, if they don't take

0:38:52.600 --> 0:38:54.279
<v Speaker 1>him at twenty, then you have the out there again

0:38:54.320 --> 0:38:56.400
<v Speaker 1>at thirty seven again, so at ten eleven to one

0:38:56.480 --> 0:38:57.920
<v Speaker 1>something like that. I think that that again, if you

0:38:57.920 --> 0:38:59.760
<v Speaker 1>want kind of a fun bet that pays off a lot, can.

0:38:59.600 --> 0:39:02.120
<v Speaker 5>We talk of that you alluded to there for a second.

0:39:02.320 --> 0:39:04.360
<v Speaker 2>So there was the four and a half quarterbacks prop

0:39:04.400 --> 0:39:07.280
<v Speaker 2>first round, which at one point at DraftKings was plus

0:39:07.320 --> 0:39:09.120
<v Speaker 2>five point fifty to the over, which I said on

0:39:09.160 --> 0:39:11.000
<v Speaker 2>the air, I'm like, you gotta bet that it's plus

0:39:11.080 --> 0:39:13.520
<v Speaker 2>five to fifty. Do you think we're not going to

0:39:13.560 --> 0:39:14.759
<v Speaker 2>get five in the first round.

0:39:15.040 --> 0:39:16.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it's pretty live. We see people reach for

0:39:17.000 --> 0:39:19.320
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks all the time. Man Like, we see people reach

0:39:19.680 --> 0:39:22.120
<v Speaker 1>all the time. They get nervous and they come back

0:39:22.160 --> 0:39:24.960
<v Speaker 1>in and they take that quarterback and.

0:39:24.840 --> 0:39:26.200
<v Speaker 5>It's it's minus money.

0:39:26.200 --> 0:39:29.239
<v Speaker 1>Now though it's yes, not a bet that I would make.

0:39:29.719 --> 0:39:31.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm just on the general. Do I think it could

0:39:31.480 --> 0:39:34.520
<v Speaker 1>possibly happen here? I mean, everyone keeps talking about the age, right,

0:39:34.560 --> 0:39:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Will Evis is gonna be twenty four, Like you know,

0:39:36.640 --> 0:39:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Dalton kin K's gonna be twenty four.

0:39:38.080 --> 0:39:40.600
<v Speaker 5>It is amazing how hypocritical.

0:39:40.080 --> 0:39:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Like everyone keeps bringing up the age, like hen Hooker's

0:39:43.040 --> 0:39:45.359
<v Speaker 1>twenty five. He would play in his year twenty six season. Right,

0:39:45.360 --> 0:39:47.399
<v Speaker 1>if you get eight good years out of quarterback, he's

0:39:47.440 --> 0:39:50.919
<v Speaker 1>thirty four, that's very normal, that's very like what team,

0:39:51.000 --> 0:39:53.560
<v Speaker 1>what franchise is going to be like freaking out, like

0:39:53.680 --> 0:39:55.440
<v Speaker 1>be like, we only got eight good years out of

0:39:55.440 --> 0:39:57.319
<v Speaker 1>a starting quarterback. Most teams are like trying to redo

0:39:57.320 --> 0:40:00.200
<v Speaker 1>their quarterback situation every two years, you know, So I

0:40:00.200 --> 0:40:00.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know, I.

0:40:01.040 --> 0:40:03.400
<v Speaker 5>Yourews getting ready to explode. I think I can tell.

0:40:03.440 --> 0:40:05.360
<v Speaker 4>But no, no, no, no, no, I'm laughing. I think this

0:40:05.520 --> 0:40:07.319
<v Speaker 4>is very very valid. Yeah.

0:40:07.400 --> 0:40:09.400
<v Speaker 3>The idea of can't take a guy we're only going

0:40:09.440 --> 0:40:11.040
<v Speaker 3>to get eight years out of is pretty funny.

0:40:12.120 --> 0:40:15.279
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So that's why I bet it meant very low

0:40:15.320 --> 0:40:16.960
<v Speaker 2>plus money. I think we didn't have the plus five

0:40:17.040 --> 0:40:19.160
<v Speaker 2>fifty here, but good lord, if plus five fifty, I

0:40:19.200 --> 0:40:20.960
<v Speaker 2>was like, you gotta bet that and see what happens.

0:40:21.960 --> 0:40:24.800
<v Speaker 2>Is the offensive lineman in terms of the position ones,

0:40:24.840 --> 0:40:26.319
<v Speaker 2>that's the one you're most confident in.

0:40:26.440 --> 0:40:28.359
<v Speaker 5>Drew the over to five and a half, you're going

0:40:28.360 --> 0:40:28.799
<v Speaker 5>the other way.

0:40:29.200 --> 0:40:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let me see what the numbers is. That was

0:40:30.880 --> 0:40:32.480
<v Speaker 1>just because that was because the number swung all the

0:40:32.520 --> 0:40:36.160
<v Speaker 1>way to plus three twenty on on the under, and

0:40:36.200 --> 0:40:38.560
<v Speaker 1>for me, I think that there's four dead for sure,

0:40:38.840 --> 0:40:41.640
<v Speaker 1>five very likely, and then I think the six is

0:40:41.760 --> 0:40:44.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of teetering a little bit. And certainly if we

0:40:44.200 --> 0:40:46.400
<v Speaker 1>go over on the tight end type deal, then that's

0:40:46.400 --> 0:40:48.480
<v Speaker 1>a lineman that's probably taken off the board. If we

0:40:48.520 --> 0:40:50.399
<v Speaker 1>go over on the wide receivers is three and a half,

0:40:50.400 --> 0:40:52.440
<v Speaker 1>then that's the lineman that would probably be taken off,

0:40:52.480 --> 0:40:54.000
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know. It was just more of the

0:40:54.200 --> 0:40:57.279
<v Speaker 1>over three to one type number play there for me

0:40:57.400 --> 0:41:00.600
<v Speaker 1>than it was anything else. I think Scronsky John Jones

0:41:00.680 --> 0:41:03.520
<v Speaker 1>right for sure. I think Torrents probably goes as well.

0:41:03.520 --> 0:41:06.399
<v Speaker 1>I think those five, but the sixth one, I think

0:41:06.480 --> 0:41:08.120
<v Speaker 1>is still kind of a coin toss. And so that's why.

0:41:08.320 --> 0:41:10.759
<v Speaker 5>What about the people who wants the title, they'll they'll

0:41:10.800 --> 0:41:12.719
<v Speaker 5>want the tight ends to be counted as offensive linemen,

0:41:12.760 --> 0:41:14.640
<v Speaker 5>and they last for a refund. What about that.

0:41:14.560 --> 0:41:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Crowd, it's happening, it's happen.

0:41:16.520 --> 0:41:17.400
<v Speaker 5>Where's my refund?

0:41:17.480 --> 0:41:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:41:18.080 --> 0:41:20.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think over five and a half offensive lineman

0:41:20.880 --> 0:41:24.680
<v Speaker 3>should be more like minus five hundred dish I like.

0:41:24.760 --> 0:41:28.879
<v Speaker 3>And that's really the reason is just I've heard enough

0:41:28.920 --> 0:41:35.600
<v Speaker 3>now that how many Round one players are graded this year?

0:41:35.640 --> 0:41:36.919
<v Speaker 3>This year's class is how deep?

0:41:37.000 --> 0:41:37.160
<v Speaker 5>Is it?

0:41:37.239 --> 0:41:37.439
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:41:37.440 --> 0:41:37.560
<v Speaker 5>Like?

0:41:37.640 --> 0:41:38.120
<v Speaker 4>Is it good?

0:41:38.440 --> 0:41:41.840
<v Speaker 3>And most teams I think are in the fifteen to

0:41:41.880 --> 0:41:44.200
<v Speaker 3>twenty five range in terms of players they have a

0:41:44.239 --> 0:41:47.600
<v Speaker 3>first round great on And if you're picking in the

0:41:47.760 --> 0:41:52.520
<v Speaker 3>late twenties low thirties this year and you need a

0:41:52.640 --> 0:41:56.120
<v Speaker 3>starting center or guard, you know, or you you want

0:41:56.120 --> 0:41:58.960
<v Speaker 3>to swing tackle, like, that's kind of the you know,

0:41:59.040 --> 0:42:03.400
<v Speaker 3>the the players that all sit there right out, you know,

0:42:03.680 --> 0:42:06.640
<v Speaker 3>right lower than a first round grade, who you would

0:42:06.640 --> 0:42:10.240
<v Speaker 3>potentially use your capital on if you're in that range.

0:42:10.640 --> 0:42:13.640
<v Speaker 3>There are a couple of Yeah, I think at least

0:42:13.640 --> 0:42:16.560
<v Speaker 3>Anton is more likely than it sounds like Matt thinks

0:42:16.640 --> 0:42:19.800
<v Speaker 3>to go in round one. And then yeah, a couple

0:42:19.800 --> 0:42:26.239
<v Speaker 3>of these guards Tipman jms Avola all realistically possible to

0:42:26.280 --> 0:42:28.160
<v Speaker 3>get snapped up at the end around one.

0:42:28.880 --> 0:42:32.600
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I asked this of I asked this of Kelly

0:42:32.640 --> 0:42:36.239
<v Speaker 2>earlier on the show. Because of the uncertain nature of

0:42:36.239 --> 0:42:37.879
<v Speaker 2>this draft, I'm gonna get I'm gonna guess I'm gonna

0:42:37.880 --> 0:42:39.960
<v Speaker 2>get a no from both of you. But I asked

0:42:40.000 --> 0:42:41.840
<v Speaker 2>this of Kelly, which is, if you could take a

0:42:42.000 --> 0:42:45.640
<v Speaker 2>net positive gain right now of any amount, even if

0:42:45.640 --> 0:42:47.839
<v Speaker 2>it's just a modest one on this on all your

0:42:47.960 --> 0:42:51.120
<v Speaker 2>NFL draft bets, would you take the modest gain right now?

0:42:52.120 --> 0:42:55.120
<v Speaker 2>Because I know we're used to crushing this probably probably,

0:42:55.320 --> 0:42:56.239
<v Speaker 2>I mean, but on.

0:42:56.160 --> 0:42:58.000
<v Speaker 5>This one, would you just take it right now and

0:42:58.040 --> 0:42:58.759
<v Speaker 5>call it to day ill?

0:42:58.760 --> 0:43:01.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean, for one, I have about half of the

0:43:01.800 --> 0:43:03.960
<v Speaker 1>money in play that I I've had the last three

0:43:04.040 --> 0:43:06.040
<v Speaker 1>years as well, and that's just because again as I've

0:43:06.040 --> 0:43:08.200
<v Speaker 1>gotten older and more mature, like, I don't just fire

0:43:08.280 --> 0:43:10.080
<v Speaker 1>to fire, right, like, I'm only trying to make bets

0:43:10.080 --> 0:43:12.200
<v Speaker 1>that I think I can win. And so I didn't

0:43:12.239 --> 0:43:13.680
<v Speaker 1>just make bets to make sure that I have the

0:43:13.680 --> 0:43:15.239
<v Speaker 1>same amount of action this year as I've had in

0:43:15.600 --> 0:43:18.479
<v Speaker 1>previous years. And with all that, I mean you mentioned

0:43:18.480 --> 0:43:20.239
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna run through our bet. There's a couple that

0:43:20.280 --> 0:43:23.319
<v Speaker 1>I bet early on that I don't love anymore, and

0:43:23.360 --> 0:43:25.520
<v Speaker 1>there's this all that. So yeah, I mean if somebody

0:43:25.560 --> 0:43:26.839
<v Speaker 1>came in and said, hey, you can get a steak

0:43:26.880 --> 0:43:29.000
<v Speaker 1>dinner out of this, I'd bet pretty good.

0:43:29.200 --> 0:43:31.000
<v Speaker 5>You want to two years, go through years?

0:43:31.400 --> 0:43:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, look, so number one is going to

0:43:34.520 --> 0:43:36.759
<v Speaker 1>work out well for me. And that's why I can't

0:43:36.760 --> 0:43:39.960
<v Speaker 1>really lose. I don't think really on this because so

0:43:40.000 --> 0:43:42.839
<v Speaker 1>I did lose. I did the whole thing where, you know,

0:43:43.400 --> 0:43:45.480
<v Speaker 1>in the off season, right, so I had I had

0:43:45.520 --> 0:43:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Levis at forty to one and forty five to one,

0:43:48.000 --> 0:43:49.799
<v Speaker 1>I had a Oker at ninety to one. I had

0:43:49.840 --> 0:43:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Richardson at thirty to one. Because I just took all

0:43:51.600 --> 0:43:53.319
<v Speaker 1>those guys before the season even started and thought that

0:43:53.360 --> 0:43:54.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe they could rock it. Well, that put me in

0:43:54.960 --> 0:43:57.160
<v Speaker 1>a good position when it started kind of looking more

0:43:57.200 --> 0:44:00.359
<v Speaker 1>and more like Bryce shung, so then got Bryce got

0:44:00.360 --> 0:44:02.800
<v Speaker 1>bright showing. And then when the thing swung all the

0:44:02.840 --> 0:44:04.600
<v Speaker 1>way to him at like plus two seventy five, I

0:44:04.719 --> 0:44:07.040
<v Speaker 1>just came in and got more right at plus two

0:44:07.040 --> 0:44:09.680
<v Speaker 1>seventy five. So at least first overall is going to

0:44:09.719 --> 0:44:12.400
<v Speaker 1>get me pretty good. So that's kind of where I

0:44:12.400 --> 0:44:14.560
<v Speaker 1>am with that. The over will Anderson over three and

0:44:14.600 --> 0:44:17.040
<v Speaker 1>a half, which was sweaty there for a while.

0:44:17.840 --> 0:44:19.600
<v Speaker 5>I remember, you got nervous.

0:44:19.960 --> 0:44:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Sweaty that because as soon as that hit, it was

0:44:22.480 --> 0:44:24.279
<v Speaker 1>like bet it, bet it, bet it, bet it, bet it.

0:44:24.280 --> 0:44:26.000
<v Speaker 1>And then and then then I was like, oh boy,

0:44:26.200 --> 0:44:28.480
<v Speaker 1>this was this is going to be bad news for me. Yeah,

0:44:28.560 --> 0:44:31.279
<v Speaker 1>real early in the draft. But at least that's not

0:44:31.320 --> 0:44:33.440
<v Speaker 1>as bad anymore. They put up a bad number on

0:44:33.520 --> 0:44:35.319
<v Speaker 1>Levis at seven and a half, the opened is over

0:44:35.400 --> 0:44:38.120
<v Speaker 1>under at that was able to get in on the

0:44:38.200 --> 0:44:39.359
<v Speaker 1>under at seven and a half.

0:44:39.400 --> 0:44:41.719
<v Speaker 2>But even that, even that, like a week or two ago,

0:44:41.760 --> 0:44:44.439
<v Speaker 2>didn't seem that outlandish, right, I didn't think he'd.

0:44:44.320 --> 0:44:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Get past the raiders. Then, you know, I don't know,

0:44:46.719 --> 0:44:49.160
<v Speaker 1>I you know, it's I don't know. I thought the

0:44:49.200 --> 0:44:50.160
<v Speaker 1>under was a pretty good bet there.

0:44:50.200 --> 0:44:50.320
<v Speaker 5>That was.

0:44:50.360 --> 0:44:53.279
<v Speaker 1>It was pretty juicy. Mounts on sixty bit still took that.

0:44:54.000 --> 0:44:55.399
<v Speaker 1>I this is the one where I said I bet

0:44:55.440 --> 0:44:57.359
<v Speaker 1>it early. I don't really love anymore. I have over

0:44:57.400 --> 0:44:59.640
<v Speaker 1>three and a half receivers. It seems like Smith and

0:44:59.719 --> 0:45:02.000
<v Speaker 1>jib Go, Flowers and Addison are are going to go

0:45:02.160 --> 0:45:04.640
<v Speaker 1>at some point. But it seems like Johnston's fallen out

0:45:04.640 --> 0:45:06.479
<v Speaker 1>of favor with a lot of people. I thought people

0:45:06.560 --> 0:45:08.400
<v Speaker 1>might fall in love with Jalen Hyatt just from like

0:45:08.440 --> 0:45:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the kind of hey, there's not really that O take

0:45:11.160 --> 0:45:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the top off guy, and like, hey, could we add that.

0:45:13.920 --> 0:45:15.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's out of play, even for the

0:45:15.320 --> 0:45:17.239
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs at the last pick of the first round, where

0:45:17.320 --> 0:45:19.479
<v Speaker 1>if you go to Patrick Mahomes and say, hey, dude,

0:45:19.480 --> 0:45:21.360
<v Speaker 1>do you want a burner? Like this is this a

0:45:21.360 --> 0:45:23.320
<v Speaker 1>guy you like? We invested a half a billion dollars

0:45:23.360 --> 0:45:24.759
<v Speaker 1>in you, so do you like this guy?

0:45:24.880 --> 0:45:26.520
<v Speaker 2>It does seem like, you know, for a league that's

0:45:26.520 --> 0:45:28.759
<v Speaker 2>so pass happy and for as many wide receivers that

0:45:28.760 --> 0:45:31.480
<v Speaker 2>are panning out that this draft seemed weird in that

0:45:31.520 --> 0:45:33.319
<v Speaker 2>it seems weird in that respect, like it's not like

0:45:33.360 --> 0:45:34.600
<v Speaker 2>this super wide receiver.

0:45:35.040 --> 0:45:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's dead, but I don't like it

0:45:37.320 --> 0:45:39.200
<v Speaker 1>as much as when I made it, you know, kind

0:45:39.239 --> 0:45:41.080
<v Speaker 1>of the first go around with everything I thought people.

0:45:41.120 --> 0:45:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I thought Josh downs would actually start to get some

0:45:43.600 --> 0:45:45.520
<v Speaker 1>buzz too. I thought maybe people start to like him.

0:45:45.520 --> 0:45:48.920
<v Speaker 1>That hasn't really manifested, So that one I don't love

0:45:48.960 --> 0:45:50.560
<v Speaker 1>near as much. I do like Jackson, Swift and Jig.

0:45:50.560 --> 0:45:51.960
<v Speaker 1>But over eleven and a half. They opened that number

0:45:52.000 --> 0:45:53.520
<v Speaker 1>to eleven and a half and I took the over

0:45:53.600 --> 0:45:55.480
<v Speaker 1>on that. It looks like that is going to probably

0:45:56.320 --> 0:45:58.160
<v Speaker 1>pan out, So do like that one. Like I said,

0:45:58.160 --> 0:45:59.720
<v Speaker 1>I have the under five and a half offensive lineman.

0:45:59.800 --> 0:46:01.880
<v Speaker 1>That one is again, it's just a more of a

0:46:01.960 --> 0:46:03.759
<v Speaker 1>number play. The over two and a half tight ends

0:46:04.000 --> 0:46:06.279
<v Speaker 1>as it got over two dollars came in and made

0:46:06.320 --> 0:46:09.240
<v Speaker 1>that one as well, and I took Paris Johnson over Skronsky.

0:46:09.280 --> 0:46:10.360
<v Speaker 1>I know you have Skronsky over.

0:46:10.200 --> 0:46:13.160
<v Speaker 5>Paris john We're I think you're right about that now.

0:46:13.400 --> 0:46:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so I took Paris Johnson over Skronsky in this one.

0:46:17.320 --> 0:46:19.759
<v Speaker 1>It's probably a coin flip at this point, so I

0:46:19.800 --> 0:46:22.120
<v Speaker 1>don't feel super confident in that one. I think it's

0:46:22.120 --> 0:46:24.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be just what people decide that they like.

0:46:24.120 --> 0:46:26.200
<v Speaker 1>I know, Skronsky seems to be more versatile. They're saying

0:46:26.200 --> 0:46:27.919
<v Speaker 1>he could play guard or tackle, and if you want,

0:46:28.000 --> 0:46:29.919
<v Speaker 1>if teams value that, I don't, you know, I don't

0:46:29.920 --> 0:46:32.160
<v Speaker 1>really know. But uh so those are the ones that

0:46:32.200 --> 0:46:33.919
<v Speaker 1>I kind of have in right now, and I said

0:46:33.920 --> 0:46:36.040
<v Speaker 1>a few other ones that I'm eyeing if we get

0:46:36.040 --> 0:46:38.399
<v Speaker 1>at least a little bit more information, but just not

0:46:38.440 --> 0:46:40.319
<v Speaker 1>a not a huge, huge, huge card.

0:46:40.400 --> 0:46:43.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, young Gill would take the plus money right now

0:46:43.320 --> 0:46:45.600
<v Speaker 2>because I got a bunch of stinkers here at the top.

0:46:47.440 --> 0:46:48.520
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I really would.

0:46:48.600 --> 0:46:51.160
<v Speaker 4>I mean, just being honest, you're holding some poison.

0:46:51.280 --> 0:46:53.600
<v Speaker 2>Well here's the thing. All of mine seemed like, oh

0:46:53.680 --> 0:46:55.799
<v Speaker 2>what a great bet I just made. Four days later,

0:46:55.840 --> 0:46:57.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, I'm the smartest person in the room, and

0:46:58.000 --> 0:46:59.960
<v Speaker 2>then it just goes the other way. So I had

0:47:00.120 --> 0:47:02.960
<v Speaker 2>CJ strauted plus six ' eighty two and plus three

0:47:03.080 --> 0:47:05.719
<v Speaker 2>forty to go number one. So those are let's take

0:47:05.760 --> 0:47:08.400
<v Speaker 2>two units off the top right there. Uh then I

0:47:08.440 --> 0:47:11.480
<v Speaker 2>have Jackson Smith Jigba, which my best bet is first

0:47:11.480 --> 0:47:14.000
<v Speaker 2>wide out drafted. I have at plus three fifty, he's

0:47:14.000 --> 0:47:16.320
<v Speaker 2>like minus three fifty now, so that's one that I

0:47:16.360 --> 0:47:18.360
<v Speaker 2>could get Ahole bunch back on. But then I have

0:47:18.480 --> 0:47:20.520
<v Speaker 2>him under twelve and a half at plus two hundred,

0:47:20.560 --> 0:47:22.719
<v Speaker 2>and I have him under fourteen and a half under

0:47:22.800 --> 0:47:26.920
<v Speaker 2>fourteen and a half also at plus one twenty. And

0:47:26.960 --> 0:47:30.160
<v Speaker 2>then I have Zay Flowers with a lot of juice

0:47:30.360 --> 0:47:34.000
<v Speaker 2>over twenty one and a half. So I don't know, Like,

0:47:34.040 --> 0:47:36.800
<v Speaker 2>if Jay Flowers goes before the twenty, you know, twenty

0:47:36.840 --> 0:47:38.160
<v Speaker 2>one and down, I'm in trouble.

0:47:39.160 --> 0:47:40.439
<v Speaker 5>Hopefully he goes along.

0:47:40.520 --> 0:47:43.520
<v Speaker 2>Now the other ones, I have Lucas van Ness to

0:47:43.520 --> 0:47:47.360
<v Speaker 2>be a top ten pick at plus two sixty and

0:47:47.520 --> 0:47:50.359
<v Speaker 2>under eleven and a half at plus two fifteen. If

0:47:50.360 --> 0:47:53.400
<v Speaker 2>the Eagles grab him at ten, I could be okay,

0:47:54.520 --> 0:47:57.160
<v Speaker 2>that's the rumor. There's also maybe the Falcons at eight,

0:47:57.160 --> 0:47:58.799
<v Speaker 2>but the Eagles at ten, and the Eagles have been

0:47:58.880 --> 0:48:00.520
<v Speaker 2>rumored to be picking tons.

0:48:00.280 --> 0:48:03.319
<v Speaker 4>Of different people. Yeah.

0:48:03.440 --> 0:48:05.680
<v Speaker 2>Then I have Broderick Jones over thirteen and a half

0:48:05.719 --> 0:48:09.880
<v Speaker 2>from Georgia plus money. I do have Scarronsky over Paris Johnson.

0:48:09.880 --> 0:48:11.400
<v Speaker 2>That does appear to be a loser. I think you're

0:48:11.440 --> 0:48:13.120
<v Speaker 2>gonna win that. I have the over five and a

0:48:13.160 --> 0:48:15.719
<v Speaker 2>half offensive lineman lank a lotta juice mineus to eighty one.

0:48:15.760 --> 0:48:17.640
<v Speaker 2>I did take the over four and a half quarterbacks

0:48:17.640 --> 0:48:19.800
<v Speaker 2>at even money, and then the position of the Patriots

0:48:19.840 --> 0:48:22.040
<v Speaker 2>first selection at quarterback at eight to one, which if

0:48:22.080 --> 0:48:23.759
<v Speaker 2>that hits you can forget about it.

0:48:23.840 --> 0:48:25.799
<v Speaker 5>I have a winning draft and everybody can go to hell.

0:48:27.200 --> 0:48:30.680
<v Speaker 2>So anyway, there's a lot of those that suck, right,

0:48:30.719 --> 0:48:33.759
<v Speaker 2>there's a good handful of those that are sucking, and

0:48:33.800 --> 0:48:35.839
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to need to hit a couple of those

0:48:35.920 --> 0:48:38.279
<v Speaker 2>plus money ones to make up for them and maybe

0:48:38.320 --> 0:48:39.640
<v Speaker 2>get into positive territory.

0:48:40.239 --> 0:48:41.719
<v Speaker 5>Drew, you, what do you got?

0:48:42.360 --> 0:48:45.279
<v Speaker 4>Uh? I?

0:48:46.120 --> 0:48:48.719
<v Speaker 3>When we talked last Wednesday, I was live or die

0:48:48.760 --> 0:48:52.600
<v Speaker 3>with Levice going in the top seven because I nuked

0:48:52.640 --> 0:48:56.840
<v Speaker 3>that under for him that no longer is now. I

0:48:57.080 --> 0:49:02.200
<v Speaker 3>basically am assuming that that's cash. I'm assuming basically top anything,

0:49:02.200 --> 0:49:06.839
<v Speaker 3>top four for Levis's cash. Too many connected people putting

0:49:06.920 --> 0:49:10.319
<v Speaker 3>him four to the colts this morning to think that

0:49:10.360 --> 0:49:14.279
<v Speaker 3>he slides past four if he's even available. Right, So

0:49:14.600 --> 0:49:16.800
<v Speaker 3>Levis is still going to make or break my day, probably,

0:49:16.840 --> 0:49:18.880
<v Speaker 3>but I'm almost certainly going to come out ahead on

0:49:18.920 --> 0:49:20.080
<v Speaker 3>those plays.

0:49:20.160 --> 0:49:20.840
<v Speaker 1>And then.

0:49:22.280 --> 0:49:25.480
<v Speaker 3>I have some wild, wild, wild ones like Tyree Wilson

0:49:25.480 --> 0:49:28.560
<v Speaker 3>to go to in the twenty to one range. Oh,

0:49:28.640 --> 0:49:32.120
<v Speaker 3>that's good, I could Yeah, I think right now, I

0:49:32.160 --> 0:49:34.120
<v Speaker 3>think it's Levis. Levis two would pay me the most.

0:49:34.160 --> 0:49:36.759
<v Speaker 3>What I ended up getting a pretty decent chunk down

0:49:36.800 --> 0:49:39.840
<v Speaker 3>at Circa on the exact number two there. I think

0:49:40.200 --> 0:49:43.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm kind of in the to win ten k Is

0:49:43.600 --> 0:49:48.600
<v Speaker 3>range across those bets. The so Levis going too would

0:49:48.600 --> 0:49:49.600
<v Speaker 3>be the best for me by far.

0:49:51.800 --> 0:49:53.760
<v Speaker 4>CJ. Stroud going fourth.

0:49:53.960 --> 0:49:56.960
<v Speaker 3>I got that at thirty five to one back when

0:49:57.000 --> 0:49:58.880
<v Speaker 3>there was still some uncertainty whether he was going to

0:49:58.960 --> 0:50:00.640
<v Speaker 3>go one or not, because I was like, man, what

0:50:00.719 --> 0:50:04.359
<v Speaker 3>if if they take Bryce young and and then two

0:50:04.400 --> 0:50:05.640
<v Speaker 3>and three aren't even quarterbacks?

0:50:05.640 --> 0:50:06.960
<v Speaker 4>CJ. Stroud could go forth.

0:50:07.480 --> 0:50:11.239
<v Speaker 3>This is before his quote unquote catastrophic visit with the Colts.

0:50:12.080 --> 0:50:14.960
<v Speaker 5>But he walked in and started cursing at him. Hey,

0:50:14.960 --> 0:50:15.600
<v Speaker 5>fuck you guys.

0:50:15.680 --> 0:50:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they're they're like, we don't like your test scores,

0:50:20.360 --> 0:50:21.640
<v Speaker 1>like you, Let me tell you what I think about

0:50:21.680 --> 0:50:23.200
<v Speaker 1>those test scores, buddy.

0:50:23.040 --> 0:50:25.160
<v Speaker 2>Way those test scores were referring Those test scores were

0:50:25.160 --> 0:50:28.360
<v Speaker 2>referring to leaked You can choose to believe that the

0:50:28.440 --> 0:50:33.080
<v Speaker 2>leak is accurate from these s two cognitive scores, which

0:50:33.080 --> 0:50:35.520
<v Speaker 2>I guess is a it's a cognition it's not an

0:50:35.520 --> 0:50:37.760
<v Speaker 2>IQ test like wondered, like, but it's like this cognition

0:50:37.840 --> 0:50:41.520
<v Speaker 2>test of quarterbacks sit down and they like remove players

0:50:41.520 --> 0:50:43.520
<v Speaker 2>from the screen and you have to like tell them, oh,

0:50:43.600 --> 0:50:45.400
<v Speaker 2>these players ought to be these people, they ought to

0:50:45.400 --> 0:50:47.480
<v Speaker 2>be here whatever it is, like a football IQ thing.

0:50:47.880 --> 0:50:51.240
<v Speaker 5>And he got eighteenth percentile according to the league.

0:50:51.280 --> 0:50:51.960
<v Speaker 4>That's not very good.

0:50:52.040 --> 0:50:54.799
<v Speaker 2>Where's Bryce Young was ninety ninth or ninety eight, So

0:50:55.200 --> 0:50:58.719
<v Speaker 2>that's good. Yeah, that's Drew has done the math that

0:50:58.880 --> 0:50:59.200
<v Speaker 2>is good?

0:51:00.040 --> 0:51:03.960
<v Speaker 4>Are Yeah, honestly whether or not that matters, who cares.

0:51:03.960 --> 0:51:04.479
<v Speaker 4>It's in vogue.

0:51:04.520 --> 0:51:06.839
<v Speaker 3>It's in vogue the cycle. We're predicting what people are

0:51:06.840 --> 0:51:09.279
<v Speaker 3>going to, you know, how are they're how they're coming

0:51:09.320 --> 0:51:11.640
<v Speaker 3>up with their boards. They're using it right, This is

0:51:11.640 --> 0:51:13.800
<v Speaker 3>not speculative, not wonder anymore.

0:51:14.800 --> 0:51:18.799
<v Speaker 5>I don't think I don't think we are. But if

0:51:18.800 --> 0:51:19.880
<v Speaker 5>we are, we're not leaking.

0:51:20.239 --> 0:51:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Okay, we don't want to look at but is out.

0:51:23.520 --> 0:51:25.520
<v Speaker 2>The counter argument to that would be for the cognitive

0:51:25.520 --> 0:51:27.640
<v Speaker 2>for the anti cognition, But like does that does that

0:51:27.680 --> 0:51:31.120
<v Speaker 2>cognitive cognition test make him six does make it Bryce Young?

0:51:31.160 --> 0:51:32.680
<v Speaker 5>Does he make Bryce Young sixty three?

0:51:33.400 --> 0:51:33.640
<v Speaker 1>You know?

0:51:33.760 --> 0:51:36.480
<v Speaker 2>So I don't know, but apparently, but David Tepper, like

0:51:36.520 --> 0:51:39.080
<v Speaker 2>if all things were equal, David Tepper, for instance, an

0:51:39.080 --> 0:51:42.160
<v Speaker 2>analytics guy, he might take that and say, that's why

0:51:42.160 --> 0:51:43.200
<v Speaker 2>we're drafting Bryce Young.

0:51:43.040 --> 0:51:46.080
<v Speaker 3>That's why we're drafting him. No, it is, and just

0:51:46.160 --> 0:51:48.680
<v Speaker 3>on that note, like it is hysterical. Now that twice

0:51:49.239 --> 0:51:52.840
<v Speaker 3>in reason memory a team made traded up an enormous

0:51:53.040 --> 0:51:55.840
<v Speaker 3>amount of equity to go get a specific player and

0:51:55.880 --> 0:51:59.160
<v Speaker 3>then ultimately drafted a different player like that happened with

0:51:59.160 --> 0:52:02.120
<v Speaker 3>the Niners too. Every single report Niners went up to

0:52:02.160 --> 0:52:04.279
<v Speaker 3>go get mac Jones. If they had not traded up,

0:52:04.440 --> 0:52:06.560
<v Speaker 3>Mac Jones would have been available with them at that pick,

0:52:06.760 --> 0:52:10.080
<v Speaker 3>it turns out. And similarly c J. Stroud, if they

0:52:10.120 --> 0:52:12.400
<v Speaker 3>had stuck at nine, c J. Stroud probably going to

0:52:12.440 --> 0:52:15.640
<v Speaker 3>be available for them at that pick. And so ultimately,

0:52:15.719 --> 0:52:18.279
<v Speaker 3>like two times this has happened now, which is just hysterical.

0:52:18.960 --> 0:52:21.759
<v Speaker 3>But the yeah, best outcome for me for by far

0:52:21.920 --> 0:52:23.280
<v Speaker 3>Leve is going two to whoever.

0:52:23.320 --> 0:52:25.359
<v Speaker 4>I don't care, and then if CJ.

0:52:25.400 --> 0:52:28.560
<v Speaker 3>Stroud ultimately gets picked forth because the Colts did a

0:52:28.600 --> 0:52:32.439
<v Speaker 3>great job at kind of disguising their true interest in him.

0:52:32.560 --> 0:52:34.640
<v Speaker 3>Then thirty five to one coming home for me would

0:52:34.640 --> 0:52:37.880
<v Speaker 3>be pretty sweet. That's kind of it that I have.

0:52:37.960 --> 0:52:40.120
<v Speaker 3>That's sort of live in the really really really long

0:52:40.160 --> 0:52:41.200
<v Speaker 3>shot markets.

0:52:41.760 --> 0:52:42.800
<v Speaker 4>Everything else I got.

0:52:43.680 --> 0:52:45.680
<v Speaker 3>I laid a bunch of juice on a bunch of things,

0:52:45.760 --> 0:52:49.040
<v Speaker 3>the Levis unders, the will Anderson overs. Actually I didn't

0:52:49.080 --> 0:52:50.719
<v Speaker 3>lay a ton of juice on that. Most of my

0:52:51.320 --> 0:52:54.600
<v Speaker 3>Andrews will Anderson over I'm in like minus one twelve.

0:52:54.600 --> 0:52:57.160
<v Speaker 3>Minus one twenty was where I stopped going over three

0:52:57.160 --> 0:53:00.880
<v Speaker 3>and a half. There I stopped. I stopped Levis under

0:53:01.040 --> 0:53:04.120
<v Speaker 3>four and a half at minus two seventy two. That

0:53:04.280 --> 0:53:11.400
<v Speaker 3>was the heaviest I laid on Levis Under the offensive

0:53:11.400 --> 0:53:13.399
<v Speaker 3>lineman we talked about, I laid up to I think

0:53:13.440 --> 0:53:16.920
<v Speaker 3>about minus two eighty and it's it's in like the

0:53:16.920 --> 0:53:20.640
<v Speaker 3>minus four hundred dish range. Now I think again, I

0:53:20.680 --> 0:53:22.759
<v Speaker 3>do think there's plus ev to be had on over

0:53:22.960 --> 0:53:27.040
<v Speaker 3>sixteen and a half offensive players, just because offensive lineman count,

0:53:27.160 --> 0:53:29.960
<v Speaker 3>running backs count tight ends, even if there happened to

0:53:30.000 --> 0:53:32.400
<v Speaker 3>be three quarterbacks, even if they happened to be five, like,

0:53:32.480 --> 0:53:35.359
<v Speaker 3>all of that counts. I don't get any sense that

0:53:35.640 --> 0:53:38.359
<v Speaker 3>there's going to be a late push to use your

0:53:38.400 --> 0:53:43.200
<v Speaker 3>draft capital to take defensive linemen or linebackers or safeties

0:53:43.239 --> 0:53:44.879
<v Speaker 3>or any of that stuff late in the first round.

0:53:44.920 --> 0:53:47.160
<v Speaker 3>So it's going to be all offensive players late as

0:53:47.160 --> 0:53:47.920
<v Speaker 3>far as I can tell you.

0:53:48.080 --> 0:53:49.680
<v Speaker 4>So sixteen and a half it's like a good.

0:53:49.600 --> 0:53:52.600
<v Speaker 2>Number thinking about your scenario about quarterbacks, teams training up

0:53:52.600 --> 0:53:54.680
<v Speaker 2>for quarterbacks. I'm sure I can't remember where the Bears

0:53:54.680 --> 0:53:56.919
<v Speaker 2>traded from, but Mitch t Bisky would have been available.

0:53:56.600 --> 0:53:59.239
<v Speaker 3>Wherever they they picked as well. Yeah, that's true. And

0:53:59.280 --> 0:54:01.280
<v Speaker 3>you know, kind of kind of other kind of funny

0:54:01.280 --> 0:54:03.840
<v Speaker 3>notes for you guys. So you mentioned the Eagles have

0:54:03.880 --> 0:54:06.640
<v Speaker 3>been linked to everyone depending on who you listen to.

0:54:07.080 --> 0:54:10.120
<v Speaker 3>They have done an outstanding job at the misinformation game

0:54:10.120 --> 0:54:10.480
<v Speaker 3>this year.

0:54:10.520 --> 0:54:13.880
<v Speaker 5>For sure, What team do you believe the most and

0:54:13.920 --> 0:54:15.319
<v Speaker 5>what team do you believe.

0:54:14.960 --> 0:54:20.480
<v Speaker 3>The least this year? Believe the least is Bears number one.

0:54:20.640 --> 0:54:23.879
<v Speaker 3>I think the Bears were only really ever. I think

0:54:23.920 --> 0:54:26.680
<v Speaker 3>that Panthers were negotiating against themselves to get up to

0:54:26.680 --> 0:54:29.799
<v Speaker 3>the one I really think that that's likely. I don't

0:54:29.840 --> 0:54:31.759
<v Speaker 3>know that they had any other good offers for the

0:54:31.760 --> 0:54:34.719
<v Speaker 3>one pick. And then the Bears now are kind of.

0:54:35.400 --> 0:54:38.000
<v Speaker 3>They have seem to have a strategy where everyone tells

0:54:38.000 --> 0:54:41.680
<v Speaker 3>someone someone different and then we'll see if that drives

0:54:41.719 --> 0:54:43.320
<v Speaker 3>interest in the nine because I think they want to

0:54:43.360 --> 0:54:45.960
<v Speaker 3>continue to trade down and accumulate assets as opposed to

0:54:46.400 --> 0:54:48.120
<v Speaker 3>take an offensive.

0:54:47.680 --> 0:54:48.760
<v Speaker 4>Tackle ninth or whatever.

0:54:49.800 --> 0:54:53.319
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, I think the Bears have been sort of

0:54:53.360 --> 0:54:57.319
<v Speaker 3>the most effective at misinformation Eagles second this year.

0:54:58.400 --> 0:55:00.480
<v Speaker 4>And you know, crazy stuff happens, like some of the

0:55:00.560 --> 0:55:01.200
<v Speaker 4>rumors that were.

0:55:01.080 --> 0:55:04.640
<v Speaker 3>Floated around about Kevon Thibodeau last year all came from

0:55:04.680 --> 0:55:07.840
<v Speaker 3>the Giants and then they ultimately took him forth. You know,

0:55:07.880 --> 0:55:09.440
<v Speaker 3>so teams are getting a little bit better at the

0:55:09.480 --> 0:55:10.000
<v Speaker 3>lion game.

0:55:10.360 --> 0:55:14.160
<v Speaker 5>I think Giants a totally yeah that oh.

0:55:14.040 --> 0:55:16.120
<v Speaker 3>Man, they get the They got the Lyning Award for

0:55:16.200 --> 0:55:18.160
<v Speaker 3>the for last year's draft by a long shot. I

0:55:18.200 --> 0:55:20.600
<v Speaker 3>think they were also probably behind floating the injury stuff

0:55:20.600 --> 0:55:22.320
<v Speaker 3>about Evid Deal that slid him to seven.

0:55:22.480 --> 0:55:23.040
<v Speaker 4>They took him.

0:55:23.560 --> 0:55:26.560
<v Speaker 3>Uh so yeah, there was they. They they were kind

0:55:26.600 --> 0:55:28.880
<v Speaker 3>of the masters of the disinformation game last year. So

0:55:28.920 --> 0:55:32.480
<v Speaker 3>far this year, I think it's the Bears and uh,

0:55:32.800 --> 0:55:34.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, they may end up with Jalen Carr out

0:55:34.640 --> 0:55:36.560
<v Speaker 3>of it all, and he may be a true blue

0:55:36.600 --> 0:55:38.920
<v Speaker 3>chip player for them for the foreseeable future, and you know,

0:55:38.960 --> 0:55:39.719
<v Speaker 3>congrats to them.

0:55:39.760 --> 0:55:43.640
<v Speaker 2>But meanwhile, the the Colts are super straightforward. They're like,

0:55:43.680 --> 0:55:45.480
<v Speaker 2>we're taking Levis, that's our Yes.

0:55:45.400 --> 0:55:49.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, they yeah, they at least in history they've been

0:55:49.520 --> 0:55:50.360
<v Speaker 4>the least deceptive.

0:55:51.320 --> 0:55:53.719
<v Speaker 1>The The other thing, just as a disclaimer as we

0:55:53.880 --> 0:55:56.480
<v Speaker 1>get off of here, Gil is that be sure and

0:55:56.560 --> 0:55:59.840
<v Speaker 1>click around in the different markets because there's ways to

0:56:00.000 --> 0:56:01.160
<v Speaker 1>make the exact same bet.

0:56:01.239 --> 0:56:01.600
<v Speaker 5>That's great.

0:56:01.640 --> 0:56:04.799
<v Speaker 1>Points that are that the odds are different. So like,

0:56:04.880 --> 0:56:07.960
<v Speaker 1>so before you make something that seems just crow like,

0:56:08.280 --> 0:56:10.760
<v Speaker 1>do a couple of other clicks and just see because

0:56:10.760 --> 0:56:14.840
<v Speaker 1>there's you know, the draft position of of uh Hennen Hooker,

0:56:14.840 --> 0:56:16.480
<v Speaker 1>for example, said at thirty one and a half and

0:56:16.480 --> 0:56:18.640
<v Speaker 1>it's like minus one thirty one way or but then

0:56:18.680 --> 0:56:20.239
<v Speaker 1>like him to be a first rounder is even money.

0:56:20.280 --> 0:56:22.719
<v Speaker 1>So there's just there's like different ways if you just

0:56:22.760 --> 0:56:25.320
<v Speaker 1>click in the different markets because they're not moving in locksteps,

0:56:25.320 --> 0:56:27.480
<v Speaker 1>so like you can actually kind of save yourself a

0:56:27.480 --> 0:56:29.520
<v Speaker 1>few pennies here and there by making the exact same

0:56:29.520 --> 0:56:30.719
<v Speaker 1>bet just in a different tab.

0:56:31.320 --> 0:56:34.040
<v Speaker 2>Literally you see that every day with different ones. And

0:56:34.280 --> 0:56:36.200
<v Speaker 2>Drew's point also like a lot of people who are

0:56:36.239 --> 0:56:37.880
<v Speaker 2>first time draft betters are gonna hear like, oh he's

0:56:37.960 --> 0:56:40.799
<v Speaker 2>laying minus two sevens, My sweetie, this is not This

0:56:40.840 --> 0:56:43.600
<v Speaker 2>does not translate to other sports, right, Like, we're not

0:56:43.719 --> 0:56:46.720
<v Speaker 2>doing this for a basketball game tonight on the money line,

0:56:46.840 --> 0:56:49.960
<v Speaker 2>right like this is just about an information based Well

0:56:50.000 --> 0:56:51.400
<v Speaker 2>maybe that's right.

0:56:51.400 --> 0:56:53.400
<v Speaker 5>Maybe I should buy a serious press series.

0:56:53.440 --> 0:56:54.319
<v Speaker 4>Press look great to you.

0:56:54.400 --> 0:56:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I don't know.

0:56:56.560 --> 0:56:59.560
<v Speaker 2>Oh, speaking of that, how are the Warriors still this big?

0:56:59.800 --> 0:57:02.520
<v Speaker 2>Still still like a minus one eighty favorite?

0:57:02.680 --> 0:57:04.600
<v Speaker 5>I mean, and I love the Warriors.

0:57:04.239 --> 0:57:06.320
<v Speaker 3>But come on, I'll be I'll be one hundred percent honest.

0:57:06.680 --> 0:57:09.239
<v Speaker 3>It felt like the entire side of the bracket was

0:57:09.280 --> 0:57:11.359
<v Speaker 3>decided with that Harrison Barnes miss last night.

0:57:12.040 --> 0:57:13.440
<v Speaker 5>Oh you fit? I felt that way too.

0:57:14.080 --> 0:57:15.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, like that's the series.

0:57:15.920 --> 0:57:18.360
<v Speaker 3>They probably are winning the second round, Like start start

0:57:18.400 --> 0:57:20.720
<v Speaker 3>figuring out Warriors versus the Sons or the Nuggets.

0:57:20.760 --> 0:57:23.840
<v Speaker 5>Let's go Dubs by the way them. It's all another thing.

0:57:24.040 --> 0:57:27.640
<v Speaker 5>But like ESPN just completely botched that Steph Curry time

0:57:27.680 --> 0:57:30.520
<v Speaker 5>out there esterd Mark Jones had no idea, Doris Burke

0:57:30.560 --> 0:57:31.000
<v Speaker 5>had no idea.

0:57:31.080 --> 0:57:33.600
<v Speaker 2>Milke Anders didn't follow up on it. Jalen Rose only

0:57:33.640 --> 0:57:34.960
<v Speaker 2>mentioned it five minutes into the studio.

0:57:35.000 --> 0:57:36.200
<v Speaker 5>Show was a total botch.

0:57:37.080 --> 0:57:39.720
<v Speaker 4>Okay, real quick, good again, good series, great series.

0:57:39.840 --> 0:57:40.960
<v Speaker 5>We got to run out of here on this. But

0:57:40.960 --> 0:57:42.320
<v Speaker 5>I had a couple of rapid fire questions.

0:57:42.360 --> 0:57:46.040
<v Speaker 2>One also, okay, because I know you like doing this,

0:57:46.800 --> 0:57:49.960
<v Speaker 2>the scenario that takes place that will make your draft,

0:57:50.760 --> 0:57:52.919
<v Speaker 2>then you'll be like, doesn't matter what else happens, I'm good.

0:57:53.280 --> 0:57:55.160
<v Speaker 2>And the scenario that will destroy your.

0:57:55.080 --> 0:57:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Draft, destroy for sure, as if as if Will Anderson

0:57:58.240 --> 0:58:01.160
<v Speaker 1>goes in the top three picks, that's it. Sure. Yeah.

0:58:01.280 --> 0:58:03.440
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was almost a zero percent chance when

0:58:03.440 --> 0:58:06.000
<v Speaker 1>they opened that number. I was like, look, these quarterbacks

0:58:06.000 --> 0:58:08.720
<v Speaker 1>are too heavily coveted that someone's gonna take. It's gonna

0:58:08.720 --> 0:58:10.960
<v Speaker 1>be he's gonna get pushed out, and there's other defensive

0:58:10.960 --> 0:58:12.439
<v Speaker 1>players that could push him out as well. I thought

0:58:12.440 --> 0:58:15.200
<v Speaker 1>that was a lock. If he goes three, it's gonna

0:58:15.240 --> 0:58:18.200
<v Speaker 1>be a not great. Yeah, it's gonna be a not Yeah,

0:58:18.200 --> 0:58:20.280
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be a not great. It's that's that's what

0:58:20.400 --> 0:58:22.440
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be hoping to push like break even, Like

0:58:22.480 --> 0:58:25.680
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be a a break even scenario. I mean,

0:58:25.720 --> 0:58:27.760
<v Speaker 1>I guess for me at this point, I stand to

0:58:27.800 --> 0:58:32.680
<v Speaker 1>make the most money on the on if if there's

0:58:32.720 --> 0:58:35.800
<v Speaker 1>actually over three and a half receivers taking because like

0:58:35.800 --> 0:58:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I said, I bet that super early. I thought it

0:58:37.680 --> 0:58:40.240
<v Speaker 1>was like a bad number. It seemed like Johnston was

0:58:40.280 --> 0:58:42.320
<v Speaker 1>certainly going in the first round. I thought other guys

0:58:42.360 --> 0:58:45.000
<v Speaker 1>would make it in as well. So if four receivers

0:58:45.080 --> 0:58:46.440
<v Speaker 1>end up going in the first round, then it'll be

0:58:46.440 --> 0:58:48.200
<v Speaker 1>a it'll be a pretty nice draft for sure.

0:58:48.480 --> 0:58:53.120
<v Speaker 3>Same worst case as will Anderson gets drafted second by

0:58:53.320 --> 0:58:56.080
<v Speaker 3>by by an absolute country mile that.

0:58:56.040 --> 0:58:59.800
<v Speaker 5>Well, I will be specific second, specifically.

0:58:59.360 --> 0:59:03.480
<v Speaker 3>Second, it would because that sets up almost surely Wilson

0:59:03.520 --> 0:59:06.400
<v Speaker 3>goes three, and then I am literally just pouring sweat

0:59:06.400 --> 0:59:08.479
<v Speaker 3>that the Colts walk up and take will love is Forth,

0:59:09.080 --> 0:59:13.120
<v Speaker 3>like just in like just miserable fifteen minutes of that

0:59:13.320 --> 0:59:16.520
<v Speaker 3>clock counting down to know what the Colts pick is

0:59:16.560 --> 0:59:19.160
<v Speaker 3>because I don't want to count on you know, you know,

0:59:19.240 --> 0:59:21.720
<v Speaker 3>Colts having to take loves Forth if it comes to that.

0:59:23.040 --> 0:59:26.760
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, the best case scenario by far is young Levice,

0:59:27.600 --> 0:59:31.640
<v Speaker 3>Titans trade up to three, take Richardson, Colts begrudgingly takes Stroud.

0:59:32.120 --> 0:59:35.000
<v Speaker 3>I think I think almost everything is green in my account.

0:59:35.080 --> 0:59:37.560
<v Speaker 4>If that happens first four picks.

0:59:38.400 --> 0:59:40.720
<v Speaker 5>I'm just trying to break even at this point, I

0:59:40.760 --> 0:59:41.160
<v Speaker 5>really am.

0:59:41.200 --> 0:59:42.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm just trying to break you because I have enough

0:59:42.960 --> 0:59:44.440
<v Speaker 2>stinkers in there that I'm just going to have to

0:59:44.560 --> 0:59:46.560
<v Speaker 2>hit some of these others. It could definitely be a

0:59:46.600 --> 0:59:48.959
<v Speaker 2>winning draft. Every one of these drafts has been winner.

0:59:49.000 --> 0:59:51.760
<v Speaker 2>But at some point all of us are going to

0:59:51.760 --> 0:59:53.400
<v Speaker 2>have a losing draft. And the irony, as we talked

0:59:53.400 --> 0:59:55.160
<v Speaker 2>about earlier, is this is the one they least want

0:59:55.160 --> 0:59:55.520
<v Speaker 2>a book.

0:59:55.680 --> 0:59:57.360
<v Speaker 5>This could have been it for you as you got live.

0:59:57.600 --> 0:59:59.360
<v Speaker 1>The worst case scenario would be Stroud to go one

0:59:59.480 --> 1:00:01.360
<v Speaker 1>for me because he's the only guy that I'm I

1:00:01.400 --> 1:00:04.200
<v Speaker 1>have no exposure to because I have I mean, I

1:00:04.240 --> 1:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>have Levis, I have Richardson, I have Hooker, I have Young,

1:00:07.240 --> 1:00:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I have no Stroud, like I never bought into the

1:00:09.360 --> 1:00:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Stroud thing. And so if he goes one out of nowhere,

1:00:12.160 --> 1:00:14.640
<v Speaker 1>then yes, y'all will not hear from me for a

1:00:14.680 --> 1:00:16.680
<v Speaker 1>week after that, Like then we're just out of here.

1:00:16.720 --> 1:00:19.400
<v Speaker 2>If Stroud goes number one, my draft is over. I'm

1:00:19.440 --> 1:00:21.960
<v Speaker 2>a winter and Deuce is all of you.

1:00:22.040 --> 1:00:24.640
<v Speaker 5>I will drop the mic again on everybody I'd be like,

1:00:24.680 --> 1:00:29.760
<v Speaker 5>I all, do we I mean, let's let's end on that.

1:00:30.080 --> 1:00:36.960
<v Speaker 2>Do we hold a small inkling that that could possibly happen?

1:00:38.120 --> 1:00:41.000
<v Speaker 2>That that the Panthers are the biggest bullshitters of everybody.

1:00:41.080 --> 1:00:43.840
<v Speaker 1>The reason I didn't believe it from the get go

1:00:44.160 --> 1:00:46.920
<v Speaker 1>was because I thought the off season moves but that

1:00:46.960 --> 1:00:49.919
<v Speaker 1>the Panthers made weren't of a were of a team

1:00:49.960 --> 1:00:52.200
<v Speaker 1>that thinks that they can win the division like this year,

1:00:52.280 --> 1:00:54.640
<v Speaker 1>and you just plug in Gryce Young and like they

1:00:54.680 --> 1:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>think they mean, you don't go get Adam Thielen and

1:00:57.600 --> 1:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Miles Sanders and Hayden Hurst and like all these guys

1:01:00.760 --> 1:01:03.120
<v Speaker 1>that got like two or three good years left maybe

1:01:03.480 --> 1:01:06.040
<v Speaker 1>tops Like that's not building for the future. That's like

1:01:06.240 --> 1:01:08.400
<v Speaker 1>we we think we can win today, right Like we're

1:01:08.440 --> 1:01:11.320
<v Speaker 1>making signings that we think we can win right now.

1:01:11.400 --> 1:01:14.120
<v Speaker 1>And so that's why I just kind of thought DJ Chark,

1:01:14.240 --> 1:01:16.200
<v Speaker 1>they go signed, you know, all these guys that it

1:01:16.240 --> 1:01:18.240
<v Speaker 1>seems like, no, let's make a run at this pretty

1:01:18.240 --> 1:01:20.920
<v Speaker 1>poor division right like this year. So that was kind

1:01:20.920 --> 1:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>of that's kind of I don't think I think it's

1:01:22.840 --> 1:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it's too Yeah.

1:01:23.640 --> 1:01:25.240
<v Speaker 5>I don't think so either, as much as I would

1:01:25.280 --> 1:01:27.000
<v Speaker 5>like to. I don't think so either. Dr I'm guessing

1:01:27.080 --> 1:01:27.800
<v Speaker 5>you don't think so either.

1:01:28.760 --> 1:01:31.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean every year is a little different.

1:01:31.760 --> 1:01:32.120
<v Speaker 4>I was.

1:01:32.600 --> 1:01:35.480
<v Speaker 3>I had less confidence last year that Trayvon Walker was

1:01:35.520 --> 1:01:37.480
<v Speaker 3>going to go one, and we had a very good

1:01:37.520 --> 1:01:40.600
<v Speaker 3>source that said that that was I forget the GM.

1:01:41.200 --> 1:01:44.640
<v Speaker 3>What's what's the jack's GM guy, Charl Balki. We had

1:01:44.680 --> 1:01:49.280
<v Speaker 3>every a very good info that Balki's pick was Trayvon Walker.

1:01:49.680 --> 1:01:53.800
<v Speaker 3>The coach wanted an alignment, The owner leaned the Hutchinson

1:01:53.840 --> 1:01:56.000
<v Speaker 3>and they hashed it all out in the hours before

1:01:56.080 --> 1:01:59.920
<v Speaker 3>the you know, the draft. There could be something like that,

1:02:00.040 --> 1:02:01.720
<v Speaker 3>but from what I understand, at least, this is the

1:02:01.720 --> 1:02:04.840
<v Speaker 3>owner's decision. He's you know, he's kind of driving the

1:02:04.840 --> 1:02:08.120
<v Speaker 3>boat here and young is his guy, so you know.

1:02:08.120 --> 1:02:10.080
<v Speaker 4>He could be talked out of it, but I doubt it.

1:02:10.160 --> 1:02:12.960
<v Speaker 2>Oh, randomly, I lied randomly. Have you ever heard a

1:02:13.040 --> 1:02:18.760
<v Speaker 2>player connected to more teams than Bijon Robinson has been

1:02:18.800 --> 1:02:19.320
<v Speaker 2>connected to?

1:02:21.560 --> 1:02:24.600
<v Speaker 4>No, that's pretty he's every year. This is pretty unique.

1:02:24.840 --> 1:02:25.800
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I have no idea.

1:02:26.480 --> 1:02:30.320
<v Speaker 3>You want an insane long shot. I don't hate Jon

1:02:30.440 --> 1:02:34.320
<v Speaker 3>Robinson's second running back at like fifty to one there

1:02:34.360 --> 1:02:38.160
<v Speaker 3>was a bunch of weird buzz for Gibbs out of Georgia.

1:02:37.960 --> 1:02:40.160
<v Speaker 5>Today out of Alabama, Alabama.

1:02:40.440 --> 1:02:43.320
<v Speaker 3>A yeah, Junior Gibbs out Alabama. A bunch of weird

1:02:43.360 --> 1:02:47.640
<v Speaker 3>buzz on Gibbs today. And if some like the idea

1:02:47.680 --> 1:02:51.960
<v Speaker 3>that some teams actually have him RB one on their board, Kelly.

1:02:51.800 --> 1:02:53.920
<v Speaker 2>Called us weeks ago at four to one, and he

1:02:53.960 --> 1:02:55.080
<v Speaker 2>never bet it.

1:02:56.040 --> 1:02:58.160
<v Speaker 3>Well you can get you can get b Jon Robinson

1:02:58.240 --> 1:03:02.240
<v Speaker 3>RB two at fifty to one, now, which I do

1:03:02.320 --> 1:03:06.760
<v Speaker 3>think is wow, probably about right, but it's close.

1:03:07.440 --> 1:03:07.760
<v Speaker 5>Okay.

1:03:07.920 --> 1:03:11.480
<v Speaker 2>Last thing, I lot again, team most associated with, Like

1:03:11.560 --> 1:03:15.680
<v Speaker 2>what team and position is in most lockstep?

1:03:16.960 --> 1:03:18.840
<v Speaker 5>Like what's the what team? Like is it the Jets

1:03:18.880 --> 1:03:19.680
<v Speaker 5>offensive line?

1:03:19.800 --> 1:03:21.360
<v Speaker 2>Like what is it where you're like that team is

1:03:21.400 --> 1:03:25.640
<v Speaker 2>absolutely drafting this position, period, no matter how it goes.

1:03:26.560 --> 1:03:28.240
<v Speaker 1>I think the Bengals are taking one of the two

1:03:28.240 --> 1:03:32.760
<v Speaker 1>tight ends, like like it just seems they're just so

1:03:33.080 --> 1:03:37.120
<v Speaker 1>much pointing to that that they don't have anyone at

1:03:37.160 --> 1:03:40.120
<v Speaker 1>that position. They lost everybody they go in, they give

1:03:40.160 --> 1:03:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Burrow like this dream offense and then they make this

1:03:44.160 --> 1:03:48.200
<v Speaker 1>run for whatever. I mean, it's everybody has them taking

1:03:48.200 --> 1:03:50.120
<v Speaker 1>a tight end. Everyone has them taking one of the

1:03:50.120 --> 1:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>guys that's available there. It seems just too obvious. It's

1:03:53.480 --> 1:03:56.320
<v Speaker 1>like the Nashi hairt you know, It's just like the

1:03:56.720 --> 1:03:59.080
<v Speaker 1>this is so obvious, it's probably just going to happen.

1:03:59.120 --> 1:04:01.360
<v Speaker 1>It seems so credibly obvious that.

1:04:01.280 --> 1:04:03.800
<v Speaker 2>The Steelers are super obvious too. They're they're super honest

1:04:03.800 --> 1:04:06.320
<v Speaker 2>about stuff. We're drafting Najie Harrison. That's all there is too.

1:04:08.080 --> 1:04:08.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

1:04:08.480 --> 1:04:10.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think Steelers probably in the offensive line market

1:04:10.960 --> 1:04:12.800
<v Speaker 3>this year, although I've heard buzz that they may or

1:04:12.800 --> 1:04:14.720
<v Speaker 3>at least they explored the idea of trading up for

1:04:14.760 --> 1:04:17.520
<v Speaker 3>Gonzalez to cornerback. But I think they just end up

1:04:17.520 --> 1:04:20.880
<v Speaker 3>taking best tackle available in their spot. I think your

1:04:20.880 --> 1:04:23.240
<v Speaker 3>commanders probably are going to go offensive line Gill, so,

1:04:23.360 --> 1:04:24.640
<v Speaker 3>I think they're going to take a tackle.

1:04:25.360 --> 1:04:26.360
<v Speaker 4>I think they've been smoked.

1:04:26.480 --> 1:04:28.640
<v Speaker 3>They've been smoke screening a lot of other stuff that

1:04:29.000 --> 1:04:31.360
<v Speaker 3>to me, and but but actually doing the most due

1:04:31.360 --> 1:04:38.040
<v Speaker 3>diligence on tackles. I think Raiders cornerback would be my

1:04:38.360 --> 1:04:42.400
<v Speaker 3>would be pretty strong link there. I think Giants wide

1:04:42.440 --> 1:04:43.800
<v Speaker 3>receiver is a pretty strong link.

1:04:46.440 --> 1:04:48.000
<v Speaker 5>It's about all it was the last time they had

1:04:48.040 --> 1:04:52.200
<v Speaker 5>a good wide receiver. Yeah, Well, Washington could do all

1:04:52.320 --> 1:04:53.200
<v Speaker 5>kinds of things.

1:04:53.080 --> 1:04:55.480
<v Speaker 2>Bijon c J. Strat there available. By the way, my

1:04:55.520 --> 1:04:58.080
<v Speaker 2>best case scenario this is ridiculous. My best case scenarios

1:04:58.120 --> 1:05:00.280
<v Speaker 2>come is if c J. Stroud goes one and then

1:05:00.320 --> 1:05:01.800
<v Speaker 2>the Patriots trade up and get.

1:05:02.000 --> 1:05:05.680
<v Speaker 5>LEVI Us at two. If those two things happen, y'all

1:05:05.680 --> 1:05:06.240
<v Speaker 5>can go to hell.

1:05:07.040 --> 1:05:09.040
<v Speaker 1>You can just turn the draft off. That's right. See

1:05:09.040 --> 1:05:09.320
<v Speaker 1>you later.

1:05:10.080 --> 1:05:14.280
<v Speaker 2>I figured out everything thanks to Jews rumor. All right, guys,

1:05:14.480 --> 1:05:16.040
<v Speaker 2>we got to run because they got a heart out here.

1:05:16.080 --> 1:05:19.360
<v Speaker 2>I appreciate it. Good luck man, good luck to both

1:05:19.360 --> 1:05:21.760
<v Speaker 2>of you, Good luck to everybody who's betting this. And

1:05:21.920 --> 1:05:23.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, this is one of these things I just

1:05:23.160 --> 1:05:24.960
<v Speaker 2>have to say, like when we plan when we have

1:05:25.000 --> 1:05:27.400
<v Speaker 2>a draft podcast, it's one of the more difficult things

1:05:27.400 --> 1:05:28.760
<v Speaker 2>to decide when to do one.

1:05:29.320 --> 1:05:30.520
<v Speaker 5>You're nodding Drew.

1:05:30.400 --> 1:05:34.400
<v Speaker 2>As well, because it's like stuff is happening so quickly,

1:05:34.480 --> 1:05:37.160
<v Speaker 2>especially now it's all changing, that you can't do it

1:05:37.200 --> 1:05:40.320
<v Speaker 2>too soon because then it becomes stupid, and you can't

1:05:40.320 --> 1:05:42.600
<v Speaker 2>do it too late because then there's no bets whatsoever.

1:05:42.880 --> 1:05:45.480
<v Speaker 2>So there is kind of this very small pocket I

1:05:45.480 --> 1:05:48.880
<v Speaker 2>think between like a week before and five days before

1:05:49.520 --> 1:05:53.320
<v Speaker 2>and you just try to thread the needle on both

1:05:53.320 --> 1:05:55.360
<v Speaker 2>of those things, but there is no exact time to

1:05:55.400 --> 1:05:58.200
<v Speaker 2>do it, and we'll see how valid this is three

1:05:58.280 --> 1:06:01.280
<v Speaker 2>days from now. Drew Densick Dive podcast and the Bety

1:06:01.360 --> 1:06:05.120
<v Speaker 2>Edge podcast from NBC Sports at Whale Underscore Capper, and

1:06:05.160 --> 1:06:07.000
<v Speaker 2>Matt Brown, who is the co host of The Handle,

1:06:07.000 --> 1:06:09.280
<v Speaker 2>which he does with Dave Ross right here at v

1:06:09.440 --> 1:06:09.919
<v Speaker 2>SIN as.

1:06:09.840 --> 1:06:12.480
<v Speaker 5>Well at what is It? M Brown two?

1:06:12.480 --> 1:06:12.800
<v Speaker 1>What is it?

1:06:12.840 --> 1:06:14.680
<v Speaker 5>What is your Matt Brown too? What is your Matt Brown?

1:06:14.800 --> 1:06:15.040
<v Speaker 1>M two?

1:06:16.040 --> 1:06:16.480
<v Speaker 5>You don't even know?

1:06:16.600 --> 1:06:20.560
<v Speaker 2>Yes Brown, M two, Gil Alexander, good luck with all

1:06:20.600 --> 1:06:23.080
<v Speaker 2>your bets in the National Football League you're at.

1:06:23.080 --> 1:06:23.800
<v Speaker 5>Thanks for listening.