WEBVTT - The 10 Defining Golf Courses of the Past 15 Years

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Here's the thought experiment. You're a golf nerd and it's

0:00:04.600 --> 0:00:08.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty fifty five. When you look back on the years

0:00:08.280 --> 0:00:12.600
<v Speaker 1>between twenty ten and twenty twenty five, what are the

0:00:12.680 --> 0:00:16.439
<v Speaker 1>ten golf courses that define that period for you? What

0:00:16.480 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>are the really great ones, or the influential ones, or

0:00:20.079 --> 0:00:23.120
<v Speaker 1>just the ones that represent the era in some way.

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 1>In this episode, we're trying to figure out what those

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>courses will be the ten defining golf courses of the

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:40.559
<v Speaker 1>past fifteen years. I'm Garrett Morrison and this is designing golf,

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:45.559
<v Speaker 1>all right. So I'm here with my colleagues Andy Johnson

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 1>and Matt Ruschius, Andy, founder of Frida Egg Golf. How

0:00:49.440 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 1>you doing today?

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:53.159
<v Speaker 2>I'm doing great, Excited to do this. This is I

0:00:53.600 --> 0:00:56.160
<v Speaker 2>have to say, I'm a little jealous that I didn't

0:00:56.160 --> 0:01:00.080
<v Speaker 2>think of this topic for the Fried Egg Pod. So

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 2>this is a fun thought experiment.

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:04.680
<v Speaker 1>And Matt you're here as well. How are you doing

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:06.319
<v Speaker 1>doing well?

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 3>Excited to hear what you guys have to say, because

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 3>I feel like you can kind of take the word

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:16.280
<v Speaker 3>defining in very many different directions. So I'm curious to

0:01:16.280 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 3>see you guys's point of view and see how it

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 3>differs from mine.

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Well, first of all, before we get into the

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>discussion of what constitutes defining, I should address the timeframe

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 1>that we've chosen here, twenty ten to twenty twenty five.

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:32.200
<v Speaker 1>First of all, I need to acknowledge that that is

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 1>in fact sixteen years. The time from the beginning of

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty ten to the end of twenty twenty five is

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 1>in fact sixteen years, But I'm calling it the past

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:45.919
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years because I just really don't feel like calling

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 1>it the past sixteen years. In any case. The idea

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 1>behind this timeframe is that what we're dealing with here

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>is the post recession era, and the recession was a

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 1>major shock to golf course development and golf course architecture.

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 1>It changed the way that things had to be done.

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>And so what we're talking about is this is this

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:13.640
<v Speaker 1>odd little time period from about twenty ten to to

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the current day where the golf course industry had to

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 1>reinvent itself in some ways. And then there was another

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 1>shock in the middle of it in COVID. And of

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:27.080
<v Speaker 1>course things have changed big time once again during the

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:29.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenties. So I thought it was a good moment

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 1>here at the end of twenty twenty five to kind

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 1>of reflect on what this period has meant in the

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:37.960
<v Speaker 1>golf course industry and talk about some of the courses

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 1>that have stood out in some way. But yeah, I've

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>chosen this adjective defining for the episode. There are a

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>number of other you know, there are various various adjectives

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:49.360
<v Speaker 1>I could have gone with here. I did not go

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 1>with best for a reason. You know, this is not

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:56.079
<v Speaker 1>a list of the best courses that we're going to

0:02:56.120 --> 0:02:57.959
<v Speaker 1>do because I was a little bit less interested in

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 1>speaking in those terms. Yeah, when you guys think of

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:06.639
<v Speaker 1>what constitutes a defining course, what do you think of, Andy,

0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 1>what comes to mind when you think of a defining

0:03:09.480 --> 0:03:10.080
<v Speaker 1>golf course?

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 2>I think one of the keys here is you're prompt

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 2>of is twenty fifty five, and you're thinking back to

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 2>this period of time, and it would be the courses

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:25.080
<v Speaker 2>that jumped your mind, and I kind of think of

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 2>defining into different superlative buckets. This is not the best

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 2>they are to me, golf courses that that they could

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 2>be the best, Like you're going to have like what

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 2>you think is the best of that period, but also

0:03:43.320 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 2>there are other bins that you could put it in

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 2>as most influential things that changed the way people thought

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 2>of certain types of golf. And I think that's the

0:03:56.360 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 2>premise here which makes this a really fun discussion, because

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:03.559
<v Speaker 2>it isn't necessarily the.

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 4>Best golf courses.

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 2>It is the ones that kind of changed the way

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 2>that the general public thought about a certain type of golf.

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 2>Is my kind of way I'm I'm approaching this or

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:21.359
<v Speaker 2>the way that maybe it possibly influenced and changed the

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 2>way golf courses were built, or how it changed the

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 2>trends in golf course architecture. Like that's the way I'm

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 2>thinking about it a little bit.

0:04:32.640 --> 0:04:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Yes, and these can be changes for better for worse. Yes,

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:39.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think most of the courses that we'll

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 1>talk about we would probably argue for better. We're not

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:47.719
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about many, if any straight up bad courses.

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:52.279
<v Speaker 1>But these are not necessarily, as you say, the best courses.

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:55.599
<v Speaker 1>They are there, they just loom large in the historical period.

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 1>They are historically important in some way, Matt, anything to

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 1>add to that with this you task of trying to

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 1>define what defining means?

0:05:05.680 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think Andy summed up kind of what I immediately

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 3>thought to of when you kind of gave this prompt

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 3>to us. One thing that I kind of like keyed

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 3>in on was trying to identify golf courses from this

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:23.160
<v Speaker 3>era that like set a precedent and then kind of

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:26.599
<v Speaker 3>like were these trailblazers for a new model of golf

0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:30.840
<v Speaker 3>or like a kind of radical way of thinking, So

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 3>trying to pinpoint like that origin golf course that kind

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 3>of like paved this way for other courses to come

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:41.919
<v Speaker 3>from behind it. So that was one thing that I

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 3>kind of used to try and target, like one that's

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:47.160
<v Speaker 3>more defining than another, because a lot of them can

0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:50.600
<v Speaker 3>fall in the same buckets when you go through the list.

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, which course first of all came first and which

0:05:54.839 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 1>course actually brought about the change, you know, because sometimes

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:02.320
<v Speaker 1>some courses come first, but they don't have quite the

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 1>effect that the second effort has. I think we'll talk

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 1>about a couple of those examples in this episode. But

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting how history works sometimes where something might be first,

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't necessarily change everything right away. It is

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the second thing in that genre or in that vein

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:25.280
<v Speaker 1>that really pushes it. But being first is important, and

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the things that are that come the earliest will we'll

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 1>definitely get some priority here. So yeah, I mean when

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I think of defining, I break it down into a

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:39.120
<v Speaker 1>few different buckets. A course can be defining in like

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 1>a number of different ways, and it doesn't necessarily have

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>to be any one of these things. It doesn't have

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:47.920
<v Speaker 1>to be all of these things. So a course can

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:51.560
<v Speaker 1>be defining just by being really great. So that's one thing,

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:54.360
<v Speaker 1>right when we think of the defining courses of the

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 1>of the nineteen teams in the US, those are National

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:01.599
<v Speaker 1>Golf Links and Pine Valley, maybe a couple others, but

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 1>they're the really great courses. And so that's one thing

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:08.600
<v Speaker 1>that you certainly need to consider. But you don't necessarily

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 1>need greatness to be defining. You can also have influence.

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 1>It can be an influential course, which is a lot

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 1>of what you guys are speaking to. A course that

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 1>changes something, changes the way that people view architecture or development.

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 1>You can have a course that's sort of representative of

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 1>a larger trend. That's another way a course can be defining.

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>A course that kind of embodies a broader historical dynamic

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>that is going on in the period in which the

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>course was built. And then finally there's there's you know

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 1>another category that I want to consider here, and that

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 1>is uniqueness. And so this is almost sort of opposed

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 1>to being representative of a larger historical trend, right because

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>if you're representative, you're by definition not not unique. But

0:07:55.640 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I think courses can be defining by by having some

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 1>thing about them that is just different, and they can

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 1>stand out for that reason. So I think really any

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 1>of those factors can be can be at play here.

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:14.120
<v Speaker 1>So all right, so's those are our general criteria. I

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 1>want to dive now into actually picking some courses, and

0:08:17.960 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 1>as we as we pick courses, we can kind of

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 1>talk about some of the broader macro trends of golf

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 1>architecture and development over the past fifteen years, which I

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 1>think are very interesting. But the way we're going to

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 1>do this is kind of draft style. But it's not

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:38.320
<v Speaker 1>a competitive draft necessarily. We're not selecting courses so that

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:42.200
<v Speaker 1>we have the best three courses or whatever. We're trying

0:08:42.240 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 1>to sort of collaborate here to come up with the

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:48.880
<v Speaker 1>best list of ten courses, and we'll alternate choosing one

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 1>course at a time until we get to nine, and

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 1>then at the end we'll, you know, together, we'll kind

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 1>of choose a tenth course that we really think should

0:08:56.960 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 1>be on the list. So that's kind of the method

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:02.320
<v Speaker 1>that we'll use here, and I will, you know, make

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 1>a note before we start picking courses that, you know,

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:10.640
<v Speaker 1>for our international listeners, we are three Americans here. We

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>all live in the US. We are most familiar with

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 1>US courses. Now, we we aren't necessarily going to be

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:21.880
<v Speaker 1>choosing all courses that we have seen. We can select

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:24.679
<v Speaker 1>courses that we haven't been to but we know to

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 1>be defining in some way. But just the fact that

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:32.079
<v Speaker 1>we live in the US and have been involved in

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 1>a golf World discussion that that kind of revolves around us,

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, talking to other Americans and seeing American courses,

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:42.079
<v Speaker 1>that's going to put an idea in our minds that

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:46.600
<v Speaker 1>American courses kind of are are maybe a bigger deal

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:48.960
<v Speaker 1>than they would be to somebody who lives in South

0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Africa or somebody who lives in New Zealand. So we'll

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:55.839
<v Speaker 1>try to be we'll try to make some gestures toward

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:59.600
<v Speaker 1>international news, but this is our list. We are three Americans,

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:01.720
<v Speaker 1>and just take it. Take it in that spirit. We're

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>not trying to be We're not trying to be defining

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 1>with our defining list. All right, why don't we start

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:12.720
<v Speaker 1>with Andy's pick? Andy, I'm gonna give you the first pick.

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 2>And you're being so deferential giving me the first pick here.

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 1>It's it's very kind of me. I know that we

0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 1>all really wanted to have the first pick. Andy. What

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 1>do you? What do you? What are you gonna? Where

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 1>are you gonna go with for our first defining golf

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 1>course of this period?

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:29.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:33.319
<v Speaker 4>I this is this is hard to pick first.

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 1>I know. I looked at it myself and I tried

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 1>to figure out which course I would pick first, and

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I could not figure it out.

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna go with Terry d number one.

0:10:44.200 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Going international right off the bat. That's great.

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:50.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I I just am picking this because it this

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:54.720
<v Speaker 2>golf course and the the success of it, leading to

0:10:55.440 --> 0:11:01.559
<v Speaker 2>the tri I golf courses being built, has thrust the

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 2>North Island of New Zealand into like dream trip for

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:13.960
<v Speaker 2>ardent golf fans, golf travelers. It has made New Zealand

0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 2>a you know, extremely you know, desired golf destination. And

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 2>there were great golf courses on New Zealand, you know,

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:29.720
<v Speaker 2>in New Zealand before Terry Dy there were but Terry

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 2>Edy and the level of that it's reached on I

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 2>think on one of the world lists it's in.

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 4>The top ten.

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:42.679
<v Speaker 2>The impact that it then that then followed with the

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 2>building of a world class resort that's open to the public.

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 2>I think this you're talking about lifting an entire country's

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:57.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, tourism economy and making it a world class

0:11:57.400 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 2>golf destination.

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 4>To me, if i'm you know.

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 2>Comes down to it, I think it completely changed the

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 2>golf landscape in New Zealand and will continue to change

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 2>the golf landscape in New Zealand.

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 4>We're seeing more.

0:12:10.960 --> 0:12:13.840
<v Speaker 2>And more development there and I think we will continue

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:16.720
<v Speaker 2>to see more and more development there and New Zealand.

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:21.160
<v Speaker 2>You know, if it's the year twenty fifty, I think

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 2>New Zealand will be among you know, the most sought

0:12:24.080 --> 0:12:28.319
<v Speaker 2>after golf vacations as people have more time and travel

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:29.480
<v Speaker 2>becomes easier.

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Matt Any thoughts about this course.

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:34.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the one thing that kind of jumped to my mind,

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 3>and this is sort of a recency bias take here,

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 3>but there's a lot of people talking about Children's Hall

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 3>course getting into golf dot COM's top one hundred world

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:48.800
<v Speaker 3>rankings at seventy third, and I looked back and when

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 3>Tera Edy debuted in their same rankings, it was twenty ninth. Yeah,

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:58.840
<v Speaker 3>so nearly like forty places higher than all this like

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 3>talk came about out with Children's Hall joining in at

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:05.840
<v Speaker 3>like seventy fourth or whatever it was. So it had

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:10.199
<v Speaker 3>this like enormous splash in kind of the modern golf

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 3>ecosystem when it was debuted, and it continues to climb

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:18.560
<v Speaker 3>in like every publishing ranking. I know when I was

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 3>like younger, and I was like I created a list

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 3>of like courses I wanted to visit at some point

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 3>in my life when I was probably like fifteen or

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:29.079
<v Speaker 3>sixteen years old, when I was starting to get into

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 3>golf architecture, and Tara Edie was like one of the

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 3>first that I wrote down on my list. So like,

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 3>I feel like that kind of puts it in perspective

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:40.080
<v Speaker 3>someone who doesn't really know that much and is getting

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:43.960
<v Speaker 3>into it as already like pinpointing this golf course is

0:13:44.000 --> 0:13:47.199
<v Speaker 3>something notable, and it seems to be like kind of

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 3>a consensus that it's it's the best modern golf course

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 3>since since essentially like Sandhills that fits in this time

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 3>zone that we're talking about Matt.

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Just the fact that you were fifteen or sixteen and

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 1>tara Edy existed is kind of blowing my mind right

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 1>now because this course opened in twenty fifteen. So that's yeah,

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:12.319
<v Speaker 1>I'll just I'll just leave that behind. But yes, it is.

0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:15.080
<v Speaker 1>It has to be said that tara Ed is the

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 1>highest ranked golf course in this period that we're talking about,

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:23.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's not really that close. I don't think when

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 1>you look at the world top one hundred rankings, and

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 1>of course you know, put whatever stock you want to

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 1>in these rankings, I don't personally put a ton, but

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:38.720
<v Speaker 1>it is representative of influence and definingness. Right ta Ed

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 1>is blowing away the twenty ten to twenty twenty five

0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 1>competition right now, and I think that's probably because one,

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the golf course is really really excellent, wonderfully designed in

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 1>an incredible location. And also I think a factor here

0:14:59.520 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 1>is the model of Tara Edy. This is a destination

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 1>private club that is connected now to a destination resort.

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 1>And if we're talking about what the broader historical trend

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 1>is that Tera Edy represents between twenty ten and twenty

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty five the rise of the destination private club and

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 1>the continuing predominance of the destination resort is a big,

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 1>big story. I think tera Edy fits right into the

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 1>middle of that. It is relatively remote, not easy for

0:15:39.000 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 1>many people across the world to get to, but it

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 1>is attracting people because of how spectacular it is and

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 1>because of what people are saying about the course after

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 1>they play it.

0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 2>I you know, I would agree with all of that.

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:57.840
<v Speaker 2>But I think when you're looking at this, you know,

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 2>twenty five years from now, you're talking about the creation

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 2>of a royal county down a La hinch A, you know,

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 2>Sunningdale in a country, a royal Melbourne of New Zealand.

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 2>And to me, that's the thing, is like, there are

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 2>a lot of courses, great courses in New Zealand that

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 2>I want to go see, but nothing of the world

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:28.359
<v Speaker 2>class caliber. And I think to be a great golf destination,

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:32.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, to be one where you know, loads of

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 2>tourists are coming to and flocking to, you have to

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:39.600
<v Speaker 2>have the top of the top, the top shelf, and

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:42.400
<v Speaker 2>at that, no matter what else do you want to say,

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 2>it could have any model in the world, it could

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 2>be daily fee, it would still be at this point,

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, A good question would be is it Would

0:16:50.840 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 2>it be as highly rated if it was a daily fee.

0:16:53.960 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 1>That's that's what I sort of sort of doubt it

0:16:56.440 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 1>because the experience would be different, but you know it

0:17:00.640 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be I don't think it would drop out of

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:04.439
<v Speaker 1>the top one hundred.

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:08.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but this is a golf course that literally will

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 2>define New Zealand golf for the next one hundred years.

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 2>And that's why, like I when you know, you put

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 2>the gun to my head, number one pick, this is it, Like,

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't think anything else can touch it, because no

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:26.880
<v Speaker 2>other golf course that has been built in the last

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 2>fifteen years will have a cultural impact on an entire

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 2>country the way that Terry is having on New Zealand.

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Okay, very persuasive, Matt. I'm going to give you the

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:42.120
<v Speaker 1>second pick. What are you going with?

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:45.720
<v Speaker 3>I thought this one was going to maybe be the

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 3>first pick, so shocked to that it's still here. But

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:53.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to go with the Lido at Sand Valley.

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 2>This was, in my purview, was probably.

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Toward the top of all of our lists. Second Tom

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:04.399
<v Speaker 1>Doak course in a row, though this one was a

0:18:04.440 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 1>collaboration between Tom Doak, Brian Schneider and C. B McDonald.

0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I guess, I guess you can put it that way.

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 3>I feel like it's a very hard one to pinpoint

0:18:16.000 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 3>who's is the true true the.

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Robots built it, maybe, yeah, maybe Peter Floory built it.

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:23.879
<v Speaker 4>Brian Zeger would be.

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Brian Zager is very important, Yeah.

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:29.520
<v Speaker 2>Peter Floory, Yeah, They're all important in this.

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:33.360
<v Speaker 3>But this is a golf course that was built at

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:38.640
<v Speaker 3>one period of time and essentially lost from its original location.

0:18:39.600 --> 0:18:47.119
<v Speaker 3>With tons of historical research, data collection, creativity, and some

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 3>brilliant golf architects and golf mines came together and essentially

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 3>recreated a golf course that is nearly over one hundred

0:18:56.800 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 3>years old and lost and created it in what seems

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 3>like near like as close as you possibly could with

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 3>the information that was present and the style that they

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:15.920
<v Speaker 3>did it using GPS bulldozers where you're essentially plugging in

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:22.600
<v Speaker 3>data and essentially elevations on the ground and these bulldozers

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 3>are just spitting out what that data is telling it to.

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:30.359
<v Speaker 3>It was sort of a revolutionary way to build a

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:37.160
<v Speaker 3>golf course and certainly a trail blazing style of golf

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:41.400
<v Speaker 3>course construction. And we've already now seen more golf courses

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 3>using the same technology, even just this year building a

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:49.200
<v Speaker 3>new golf course in Florida. So I think you have

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:53.200
<v Speaker 3>to include this golf course of this era for defining.

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 1>This any thoughts about the Lido and its position in history, Andy.

0:19:58.040 --> 0:19:59.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think Matt hit on it at the end.

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:03.119
<v Speaker 2>This is a golf course that's going to revolutionize the

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 2>way golf courses are built. That's going to be it's

0:20:06.520 --> 0:20:10.160
<v Speaker 2>a lasting impact. It's a great it's super fun golf

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 2>course to play, It's a great golf course. It it

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:17.439
<v Speaker 2>has a super interesting model which I think will be

0:20:17.760 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 2>a similar model to you know how some more courses,

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 2>like we saw Forest Dunes is something doing something very similar,

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:28.119
<v Speaker 2>uh in terms of model with Skyfall. But to me,

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 2>we're going to see so many golf courses built in

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 2>similar fashion with GPS, do dozers and the idea of mimicking.

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 4>You know, some.

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 2>Features of famous golf courses, and I think we've already

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:49.640
<v Speaker 2>seen it. Sand Glass is a new course that's would

0:20:49.680 --> 0:20:53.959
<v Speaker 2>be on this list that use that technology and a

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:57.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, and it's a much different version of this.

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 2>The twenty one Club is another course that is opening.

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:05.720
<v Speaker 2>I think next year you know they're doing some some

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:08.160
<v Speaker 2>preview play now, but you know they'd be a twenty

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 2>twenty six course that uses this type of technology. And

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 2>I think, like what it's long term effect will be,

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:21.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, as we go forward, is it's going to

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 2>change the definition of what a great site is because

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 2>of how wonderful this technology is is that you don't

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:33.960
<v Speaker 2>necessarily have to have a site with like the most

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 2>sensational natural gifts where you have that like rolling dramatic

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:42.440
<v Speaker 2>sand dunes. I think what the bigger you know, kind

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:47.439
<v Speaker 2>of pull out here will be if you have deep sand,

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 2>it can be flat and you can build a great

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:54.440
<v Speaker 2>golf course. Because you see with the Lido, it is

0:21:54.520 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 2>not a naturally blessed site, but there is a great

0:21:57.800 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 2>golf course on it. Sand glass from what I have

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:05.480
<v Speaker 2>not been on site, from what I've been told, you know,

0:22:05.680 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 2>not a naturally gifted site, but very deep sand which

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:15.639
<v Speaker 2>allowed them to create elevation by going both down and

0:22:16.080 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 2>putting that stuff up. So I think the big thing

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 2>here is those GPS, GPS dozers and the you know,

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 2>the ability to punch in that is going to really

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:32.119
<v Speaker 2>change the golf construction world. And that's going to be

0:22:32.119 --> 0:22:35.480
<v Speaker 2>something you know, twenty years from now, where that is

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 2>going to probably be pretty normal in golf course construction.

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:43.480
<v Speaker 1>There could be a historical shift in a couple of

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 1>ways with the LIDO. I think this point that you

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 1>make andy about it potentially redefining what makes a good

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:55.960
<v Speaker 1>site for golf is an important one because a major

0:22:56.760 --> 0:23:01.720
<v Speaker 1>overall narrative of the twenty ten to twenty twenty five period,

0:23:01.760 --> 0:23:05.199
<v Speaker 1>and you could extend this period before that, is the

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:09.920
<v Speaker 1>search for great sandy rolling sites, the search for great

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 1>golf land that isn't enormously expensive, and so that has

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 1>really driven a lot of development and a lot of

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:26.400
<v Speaker 1>the best architecture of the past fifteen years. Maybe that

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:29.720
<v Speaker 1>might be starting to change. We can start to look

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 1>at sites that are a little bit closer to population

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:39.640
<v Speaker 1>centers potentially and do something interesting with them. Now, I'm

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 1>not suggesting that this will be cheap or that this

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:47.400
<v Speaker 1>will be an accessible way to do architecture for every

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:51.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of client an architect and client base, but it

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:55.640
<v Speaker 1>certainly would be a very interesting shift. The other thing

0:23:55.640 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 1>about the LEADO that's kind of representative of the period

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:02.280
<v Speaker 1>that we're talking about. You know, we've talked about the

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:06.120
<v Speaker 1>ways in which the Lido is changing how things will

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:10.440
<v Speaker 1>be done. But it also represents kind of the culmination

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 1>of this love for Golden Age architecture, and more specifically

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the love for the architecture of CB McDonald and Seth Rayner.

0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 1>As of thirty years ago, or even twenty five years ago,

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:29.760
<v Speaker 1>CB McDonald and Seth Rayner were not the most highly

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:35.640
<v Speaker 1>respected Golden Age architects. Their profile was starting to increase

0:24:35.920 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit among golf course architecture officionados, but in

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the general golfing public, I don't think that they were

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:47.760
<v Speaker 1>nearly as well regarded as your Alistair McKenzie's or your

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Harry Colt's or your William Flynn's. Right, they were considered

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:54.719
<v Speaker 1>sort of a relics of a previous era to an

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:59.400
<v Speaker 1>extent that has changed a lot in the past twenty

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:03.240
<v Speaker 1>years or so, and the Lido really shows how far

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:07.200
<v Speaker 1>advanced that that trend is now, where we're literally we're

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:10.879
<v Speaker 1>trying to recreate with as much accuracy as possible. The

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:14.120
<v Speaker 1>work of these architects, who, you know, thirty to forty

0:25:14.200 --> 0:25:19.679
<v Speaker 1>years ago were not probably considered worth this effort, and

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:21.960
<v Speaker 1>so that's that's one way in which the Leedo kind

0:25:22.000 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 1>of is a sign of the times that we live.

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:31.520
<v Speaker 2>In when you when you look ahead. Also, there's going

0:25:31.560 --> 0:25:35.400
<v Speaker 2>to be bad actors. Well I'll call them bad actors,

0:25:35.640 --> 0:25:41.720
<v Speaker 2>but you could say they aren't bad actors. With this technology,

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 2>are we going to see let's just say, a Augusta

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 2>National remake it built in Saudi Arabia or Vietnam. I

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:54.919
<v Speaker 2>don't think that's a crazy thought that that might happen,

0:25:55.240 --> 0:25:58.760
<v Speaker 2>or you know, maybe not Augustin National, but other famous courses.

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:02.520
<v Speaker 2>Does someone have to find a really sandy site and

0:26:02.560 --> 0:26:06.400
<v Speaker 2>build a t a pine valley remake to as much

0:26:06.480 --> 0:26:09.639
<v Speaker 2>just back as possible in a far flung country. The

0:26:09.800 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 2>number you know, the why you know a lot of

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:15.400
<v Speaker 2>regarded as the greatest golf course in the world. That

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:19.640
<v Speaker 2>could happen with this and that it will be fascinating

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 2>if that happens. To see how it is received. I

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:26.479
<v Speaker 2>think there will be a lot of people that'll be

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:29.320
<v Speaker 2>like this sucks. I think there will also be a

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 2>lot of people that are very happy, especially if it's

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:34.040
<v Speaker 2>accessible to the public.

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Could be a Pandora's Box moment for sure. Yes, all right,

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:41.720
<v Speaker 1>so we have got Terry Edy and the Leado I'm

0:26:41.720 --> 0:26:45.080
<v Speaker 1>going to give my third pick here. I'm just going

0:26:45.720 --> 0:26:51.439
<v Speaker 1>right across the street in Nikusa, Wisconsin. I'm choosing Mammoth Dunes.

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:56.200
<v Speaker 2>Oh wow, I was I was gonna I My pick

0:26:56.240 --> 0:26:58.720
<v Speaker 2>was San Valley from from there, but now I'm going

0:26:58.800 --> 0:27:00.240
<v Speaker 2>to scratch that from my.

0:27:01.760 --> 0:27:04.159
<v Speaker 1>So there were a couple of options that I was

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:09.320
<v Speaker 1>considering here, aside from just totally different golf courses which

0:27:09.320 --> 0:27:13.679
<v Speaker 1>are also in contention. I think for me Gamble Sands.

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I could have gone with Gamble Sands here, and I'd

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:19.120
<v Speaker 1>like to discuss that I'd be willing to be swayed

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:22.480
<v Speaker 1>off of Mammoth Dunes and toward Gamble Sands. I do

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:25.200
<v Speaker 1>like Gamble Sands better as a golf course. Gamble Sands

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:27.879
<v Speaker 1>was a David McLay kid course that was built a

0:27:27.880 --> 0:27:31.760
<v Speaker 1>couple of years before Mammoth Dunes and really represented the

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:39.600
<v Speaker 1>shift in kids' philosophy toward maximal playability. And Mammoth Dunes

0:27:39.760 --> 0:27:44.679
<v Speaker 1>I think confirmed that philosophy and pushed it even further.

0:27:45.359 --> 0:27:48.000
<v Speaker 1>But the reason Mammoth Dunes might be to pick here

0:27:48.560 --> 0:27:51.240
<v Speaker 1>is that I think it probably is going to be

0:27:51.760 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 1>more influential ultimately than Gamble Sands more people have seen

0:27:56.800 --> 0:28:00.440
<v Speaker 1>this golf course. It's in a location that is easier

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:02.840
<v Speaker 1>to get to for most people, and it's at a

0:28:02.840 --> 0:28:06.240
<v Speaker 1>resort that does a lot, a lot, a lot of business.

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Gamble Sands is relatively remote. It does a good business

0:28:11.640 --> 0:28:13.640
<v Speaker 1>as well, but it's got two courses and a short course.

0:28:13.680 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 1>At this point, Sand Valley is a mecca and Mammoth

0:28:17.040 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Dunes is an example of David Kidd's refreshed philosophy of

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:28.680
<v Speaker 1>golf architecture. In the middle of his career, Kid went

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:35.360
<v Speaker 1>more towards difficulty and kind of extreme features. With Gamble Sands,

0:28:35.840 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 1>he returned to what he characterized as his kind of

0:28:38.960 --> 0:28:44.880
<v Speaker 1>original principles of playability and fun. He also is trying

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to rethink this idea of visual intimidation visual deception. Since

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the Golden Age, golf architects have generally believed that visual

0:28:55.720 --> 0:28:58.600
<v Speaker 1>deception is a good thing, that you should fool golfers

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:01.520
<v Speaker 1>into thinking that a shot is more difficult than it

0:29:01.560 --> 0:29:05.720
<v Speaker 1>actually is through visual trickery. David Kidd is saying no, no, no.

0:29:06.200 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 1>What we should be doing is giving golfers confidence when

0:29:09.400 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 1>they stand on the tee. They should pull out a

0:29:11.840 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 1>driver and feel confident that they can whale away at

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the ball. We want to encourage golfers to play well,

0:29:18.360 --> 0:29:21.960
<v Speaker 1>to have fun, to rip driver, and to shoot their

0:29:21.960 --> 0:29:25.320
<v Speaker 1>lowest scores. Ever, we want them to hit approaches that

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:29.320
<v Speaker 1>end up closer to the whole than they thought they would,

0:29:29.840 --> 0:29:35.680
<v Speaker 1>not farther away than they thought they would. And you

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:39.960
<v Speaker 1>can argue against this philosophy, and I definitely would, but

0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:44.280
<v Speaker 1>there's no doubt that it is a highly original way

0:29:44.320 --> 0:29:50.520
<v Speaker 1>to approach golf architecture. And the reason why it's important

0:29:50.800 --> 0:29:54.959
<v Speaker 1>is that architects and developers now have to react to it,

0:29:56.000 --> 0:29:59.320
<v Speaker 1>whether they disagree with it or agree with it, because

0:29:59.320 --> 0:30:02.719
<v Speaker 1>of what Kid did at Gamble Sands and then at

0:30:02.760 --> 0:30:06.960
<v Speaker 1>a higher profile at Mammoth dunees because of what he

0:30:07.000 --> 0:30:11.560
<v Speaker 1>did at those courses, now everybody else has to react.

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:15.000
<v Speaker 1>And it should be said that Mammoth Dunes is an

0:30:15.040 --> 0:30:20.800
<v Speaker 1>extremely popular and beloved course by the average golfer, and

0:30:20.920 --> 0:30:26.240
<v Speaker 1>certainly as the years unfold and golfers continue to react

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:29.600
<v Speaker 1>that way, probably to Mammoth Dunes and to Gamble Sands,

0:30:30.800 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 1>developers and architects are going to think, well, maybe this

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:38.520
<v Speaker 1>is a good idea. And I suspect that we'll see

0:30:38.560 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 1>more courses along these lines.

0:30:41.440 --> 0:30:46.400
<v Speaker 2>I think an interesting component to this one is that

0:30:47.760 --> 0:30:52.320
<v Speaker 2>this was the pushing of the width trend, which really

0:30:53.240 --> 0:30:57.920
<v Speaker 2>started in I would say the early two thousands, you know,

0:30:58.200 --> 0:31:02.520
<v Speaker 2>really started in the late nineties with with like sand Hills,

0:31:03.320 --> 0:31:07.880
<v Speaker 2>the idea of giving space, and you know, Tom Doak

0:31:08.000 --> 0:31:12.840
<v Speaker 2>and Bill cor and we're really you know, fundamental to

0:31:12.920 --> 0:31:16.440
<v Speaker 2>this idea. And I think what happened this was like

0:31:16.600 --> 0:31:22.160
<v Speaker 2>the Big Mac era of golf courses, where David Kidd

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:28.440
<v Speaker 2>builds Gamble Sands, builds Mammoth Dunes, Gil Hants builds a

0:31:28.840 --> 0:31:32.680
<v Speaker 2>stream Song Black, which is also very much in this

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:37.880
<v Speaker 2>one of the things that and this is just an anecdote.

0:31:38.040 --> 0:31:41.800
<v Speaker 4>I've never I never hear someone say that.

0:31:43.600 --> 0:31:49.000
<v Speaker 2>Mammoth Dunes is like Goofy Golf for tricked up or

0:31:49.400 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, I hear people love stream Song Black. I

0:31:53.480 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 2>hear people say that, but I also hear people come

0:31:57.440 --> 0:32:01.520
<v Speaker 2>off frustrated by stream Song Black. She tells me that

0:32:01.680 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Gil Hans executed the really big wide golf better than

0:32:06.400 --> 0:32:09.479
<v Speaker 2>David Kid. The job of in my opinion, and this is,

0:32:09.600 --> 0:32:13.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, the whole debate about Mammoth Uns is the

0:32:13.280 --> 0:32:16.160
<v Speaker 2>job of the golf course to be a defender, an

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:19.320
<v Speaker 2>active and willing defender to the golf golfer.

0:32:20.080 --> 0:32:21.480
<v Speaker 4>You know, that is to me.

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:26.360
<v Speaker 2>The underlying tension and golf and what we love about

0:32:26.360 --> 0:32:30.120
<v Speaker 2>golf and what makes it different than bowling in darts

0:32:30.880 --> 0:32:35.600
<v Speaker 2>and and this is what makes general sports really fun,

0:32:35.680 --> 0:32:39.960
<v Speaker 2>whether it's tennis or or you know, playing basketball, is

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:43.240
<v Speaker 2>you have an opponent that you're playing against in golf.

0:32:43.640 --> 0:32:47.440
<v Speaker 2>You know from your youngest ages, if you're playing competitive golf,

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:51.000
<v Speaker 2>you're not playing the other golfers. You're playing the golf course.

0:32:51.760 --> 0:32:57.200
<v Speaker 2>And and this type of golf that David Kidd had

0:32:57.320 --> 0:33:01.400
<v Speaker 2>introduced with the gamble sands kind of took the defender

0:33:01.480 --> 0:33:04.959
<v Speaker 2>out of play and it's more of a shoot around

0:33:05.280 --> 0:33:09.000
<v Speaker 2>the course is a helper, Yeah.

0:33:08.560 --> 0:33:10.720
<v Speaker 1>The golf courses your is your fluffer.

0:33:11.120 --> 0:33:17.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's like playing baseball with a t so, you

0:33:17.920 --> 0:33:23.400
<v Speaker 2>know ball. And I think that there's been a reaction

0:33:23.920 --> 0:33:28.200
<v Speaker 2>in the golf industry that is pushed back on this,

0:33:28.320 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 2>and we're seeing more narrow golf courses since this. I

0:33:32.400 --> 0:33:36.120
<v Speaker 2>think there was a general reaction after Mammoth Dunes that

0:33:36.280 --> 0:33:39.640
<v Speaker 2>said we've gone too far on this.

0:33:40.640 --> 0:33:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I found it interesting that as soon as Mammoth Dunes opened,

0:33:45.000 --> 0:33:47.880
<v Speaker 1>you saw Tom Doaks start talking about how maybe width

0:33:47.960 --> 0:33:51.160
<v Speaker 1>had gone too far, yes, and start talking about his

0:33:51.360 --> 0:33:55.480
<v Speaker 1>interest in building some narrower golf courses. And so certainly

0:33:55.520 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 1>it's something that's on the minds of architects, and that

0:33:58.160 --> 0:34:01.280
<v Speaker 1>is that is basically my argument for why this course

0:34:01.640 --> 0:34:03.120
<v Speaker 1>is going to end up being defining.

0:34:03.800 --> 0:34:07.120
<v Speaker 2>What I find fascinating is the difference between Mammoth and

0:34:07.560 --> 0:34:08.520
<v Speaker 2>stream Song Black.

0:34:08.760 --> 0:34:09.440
<v Speaker 4>For example.

0:34:09.840 --> 0:34:14.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, stream Song Black has very severe greens. You know,

0:34:15.520 --> 0:34:18.880
<v Speaker 2>they're big, they're huge, but they have these different pockets.

0:34:19.520 --> 0:34:24.239
<v Speaker 2>So where Mammoth Dunes, most of the greens I think

0:34:24.280 --> 0:34:28.400
<v Speaker 2>twelve of the eighteen greens have are basically punch bowls,

0:34:30.000 --> 0:34:32.960
<v Speaker 2>which you know, they corral of the ball in. So

0:34:33.000 --> 0:34:35.680
<v Speaker 2>you have these big helping fairways that a lot of

0:34:35.680 --> 0:34:40.120
<v Speaker 2>them are also punchable fairways where you have like helping

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:46.200
<v Speaker 2>slopes that corral balls in, and then you also have corralling.

0:34:47.320 --> 0:34:47.960
<v Speaker 4>Greens.

0:34:48.480 --> 0:34:54.439
<v Speaker 2>There is no real defense at stream Song I think

0:34:54.760 --> 0:34:58.840
<v Speaker 2>is an interesting blend where they might be as severe

0:34:58.880 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 2>of greens as gill Is built, but he's giving you

0:35:03.120 --> 0:35:05.719
<v Speaker 2>all the room in the world off off the tee

0:35:06.120 --> 0:35:09.120
<v Speaker 2>and what you can do with those severe greens is

0:35:09.239 --> 0:35:11.040
<v Speaker 2>work yourself into positions.

0:35:11.640 --> 0:35:13.000
<v Speaker 4>And this is the one.

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:14.840
<v Speaker 2>Of the things that I've thought about, and I'd be

0:35:14.880 --> 0:35:16.120
<v Speaker 2>curious your guys thoughts.

0:35:16.719 --> 0:35:18.399
<v Speaker 4>You know, I'll finish this thought real quick.

0:35:18.440 --> 0:35:22.040
<v Speaker 2>But you can work yourself into positions that create those

0:35:22.120 --> 0:35:27.680
<v Speaker 2>bulls that Mammoth has, but they aren't all easily discernible

0:35:27.960 --> 0:35:32.839
<v Speaker 2>on first play or just like completely laid out for you.

0:35:33.040 --> 0:35:34.200
<v Speaker 4>This is just a big bull.

0:35:37.360 --> 0:35:42.240
<v Speaker 2>A question I have is should architects is the best

0:35:42.320 --> 0:35:45.800
<v Speaker 2>architecture at resources where the vast majority of people only

0:35:45.840 --> 0:35:50.680
<v Speaker 2>play at once or maybe once every three years. Should

0:35:50.680 --> 0:35:56.080
<v Speaker 2>it be really fascinatingly intricate? And this is the thing.

0:35:56.320 --> 0:36:00.160
<v Speaker 2>Mammoth Uns is the most popular golf course at at

0:36:00.320 --> 0:36:03.799
<v Speaker 2>Sand Valley, and I would say, of all, almost every

0:36:03.840 --> 0:36:07.560
<v Speaker 2>golf course that I've played on this list the least intricate.

0:36:07.760 --> 0:36:12.040
<v Speaker 3>That's a really interesting question because something I thought about.

0:36:12.080 --> 0:36:14.719
<v Speaker 3>I had Mammoth Dunes as the number two course on

0:36:14.760 --> 0:36:18.160
<v Speaker 3>my list, and the reason I got there is because

0:36:18.200 --> 0:36:22.839
<v Speaker 3>for so long golf has been about difficulty in trying

0:36:22.880 --> 0:36:27.319
<v Speaker 3>to challenge the golfer and creating difficult golf courses. And

0:36:27.360 --> 0:36:31.080
<v Speaker 3>then you have like the USGA rating system of slope

0:36:31.120 --> 0:36:33.960
<v Speaker 3>and rating, and it seems like it seemed like there

0:36:34.040 --> 0:36:36.160
<v Speaker 3>was a period of time where people were seeing how

0:36:36.200 --> 0:36:39.960
<v Speaker 3>hard of golf courses we could build, and then David

0:36:40.000 --> 0:36:44.839
<v Speaker 3>McLay kid comes along and essentially flips that question on

0:36:44.880 --> 0:36:47.480
<v Speaker 3>top of itself and says, how easy of a golf

0:36:47.520 --> 0:36:51.440
<v Speaker 3>course can I build? And in turn, the way I

0:36:51.480 --> 0:36:57.120
<v Speaker 3>see this is if golf courses are puzzles. We're building

0:36:57.160 --> 0:37:00.920
<v Speaker 3>these very complex, intricate puzzles that were very difficult and

0:37:00.960 --> 0:37:04.319
<v Speaker 3>you had to think in many different ways to solve them,

0:37:04.520 --> 0:37:07.400
<v Speaker 3>and then this is a much more straightforward puzzle, Like

0:37:08.280 --> 0:37:10.040
<v Speaker 3>you could say that this is like the two x

0:37:10.120 --> 0:37:13.760
<v Speaker 3>two Rubiks cube compared to the three y three Rubik's cube.

0:37:14.200 --> 0:37:18.080
<v Speaker 3>It's like there's this exponential difficulty in solving from one

0:37:18.120 --> 0:37:22.040
<v Speaker 3>to the other. And I just think it's fascinating that

0:37:22.120 --> 0:37:25.719
<v Speaker 3>it took so long in golf history to like kind

0:37:25.760 --> 0:37:29.040
<v Speaker 3>of come to this moment where we're actively trying to

0:37:29.080 --> 0:37:32.760
<v Speaker 3>make a golf course fun and easier for the average

0:37:32.800 --> 0:37:35.560
<v Speaker 3>golfer to play. Because everyone always talks about golf is like,

0:37:35.560 --> 0:37:38.080
<v Speaker 3>oh I suck at golf, No one's good at golf.

0:37:38.120 --> 0:37:42.160
<v Speaker 3>Everyone's always degrading their own game. And maybe that's because

0:37:42.239 --> 0:37:45.440
<v Speaker 3>we've just been building difficult golf courses for the past

0:37:45.440 --> 0:37:48.240
<v Speaker 3>one hundred years, and now finally we have a golf

0:37:48.280 --> 0:37:51.640
<v Speaker 3>course that seems to be one of the first. At least,

0:37:51.840 --> 0:37:53.600
<v Speaker 3>if I had to pick one out, this has to

0:37:53.600 --> 0:37:56.360
<v Speaker 3>be the first golf course that was built with the

0:37:56.400 --> 0:38:00.319
<v Speaker 3>sole purpose of being fun, which in turn makes it

0:38:00.440 --> 0:38:02.520
<v Speaker 3>easier for most people to play.

0:38:02.719 --> 0:38:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Kid was turning a lot of long held assumptions among

0:38:06.760 --> 0:38:11.600
<v Speaker 1>golf architects, specifically, not among players necessarily, but among golf architects.

0:38:11.600 --> 0:38:14.520
<v Speaker 1>He was turning a lot of those assumptions on their head.

0:38:15.400 --> 0:38:20.920
<v Speaker 1>The idea, since again the Golden Age, has been that

0:38:21.120 --> 0:38:25.919
<v Speaker 1>intricate golf architecture is better. Golf architecture should be intellectually

0:38:26.040 --> 0:38:33.720
<v Speaker 1>engaging for the educated gentlemen and gentlewomen. Golf courses should

0:38:34.120 --> 0:38:39.399
<v Speaker 1>engage their minds at a high level. And Kidd came

0:38:39.440 --> 0:38:41.960
<v Speaker 1>in and said, well, actually, I think the most important

0:38:41.960 --> 0:38:45.919
<v Speaker 1>thing is that people have fun and that they come

0:38:45.960 --> 0:38:51.320
<v Speaker 1>away from their round with confidence and a sense of elation.

0:38:52.160 --> 0:38:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Now Andy kind of gestured at the potential problem with

0:38:55.239 --> 0:38:58.600
<v Speaker 1>this approach to golf courses is that it wears thin

0:38:59.320 --> 0:39:02.399
<v Speaker 1>after a few Once you figure out that the golf

0:39:02.440 --> 0:39:06.480
<v Speaker 1>course is helping you, you don't really have a motivation

0:39:06.960 --> 0:39:09.640
<v Speaker 1>to play it again and again and again. So I

0:39:09.680 --> 0:39:14.279
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of the architectural philosophy established by the

0:39:14.320 --> 0:39:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Golden Age was based on the idea that we were

0:39:16.960 --> 0:39:21.520
<v Speaker 1>building member courses. We were building courses that people would

0:39:21.520 --> 0:39:23.880
<v Speaker 1>play over and over again, and we had to build

0:39:23.880 --> 0:39:28.319
<v Speaker 1>sufficiently interesting and intricate courses for members to like them

0:39:28.760 --> 0:39:33.919
<v Speaker 1>for a long time to come. But Sand Valley Golf

0:39:33.960 --> 0:39:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Resort is a different context. This is dream golf. This

0:39:37.840 --> 0:39:42.840
<v Speaker 1>is a couple of times in your lifetime usually golf,

0:39:43.680 --> 0:39:48.360
<v Speaker 1>and perhaps that requires a different approach. Now, again, I

0:39:48.440 --> 0:39:52.560
<v Speaker 1>have my issues with this philosophy of golf course design,

0:39:53.400 --> 0:39:59.280
<v Speaker 1>but it's hard to say that it's dumb. It's not dumb.

0:40:00.120 --> 0:40:04.719
<v Speaker 1>Actually a really smart shift of priorities. And so I

0:40:04.800 --> 0:40:06.760
<v Speaker 1>think that's what's interesting about Mammoth dudes.

0:40:07.360 --> 0:40:09.879
<v Speaker 2>You know, like, at the end of the day, and Matt,

0:40:09.920 --> 0:40:13.800
<v Speaker 2>you're an architecture major, Garrett, you're a You're an English major,

0:40:13.880 --> 0:40:16.400
<v Speaker 2>so you're much more men of the arts than me

0:40:17.360 --> 0:40:18.880
<v Speaker 2>an environmental science major.

0:40:19.080 --> 0:40:21.840
<v Speaker 4>You know, very much more men of the arts.

0:40:21.880 --> 0:40:27.080
<v Speaker 2>But I mean at a certain level, golf architecture as

0:40:27.120 --> 0:40:30.160
<v Speaker 2>an art form is it's an art form. What you're

0:40:30.200 --> 0:40:34.640
<v Speaker 2>trying to do with art is evoke reactions. And I

0:40:34.680 --> 0:40:38.440
<v Speaker 2>think one of the greatest achievements of Mammoth Dunes is

0:40:38.480 --> 0:40:42.200
<v Speaker 2>it evokes a very wide range of reactions. And I

0:40:42.239 --> 0:40:46.080
<v Speaker 2>think that has a lot of merit and and I

0:40:46.280 --> 0:40:48.279
<v Speaker 2>you know, there are a lot of courses on this

0:40:48.360 --> 0:40:52.200
<v Speaker 2>list that we have that don't do that and when

0:40:52.400 --> 0:40:54.719
<v Speaker 2>and I think this one might evoke, you know, like

0:40:54.800 --> 0:40:59.160
<v Speaker 2>you either love it or hate it. And I appreciate

0:40:59.239 --> 0:41:03.040
<v Speaker 2>that now. It's what's interesting. And you know, I'm not

0:41:03.120 --> 0:41:05.040
<v Speaker 2>going to pick this one as my next one. Is

0:41:05.080 --> 0:41:08.160
<v Speaker 2>I had Sand Valley, you'd be at three golf courses

0:41:08.200 --> 0:41:11.120
<v Speaker 2>at the Sand Valley Golf Resort if you pick Sand Valley.

0:41:11.480 --> 0:41:13.920
<v Speaker 2>And my point with San Valley would be it's the kaiser,

0:41:14.640 --> 0:41:15.359
<v Speaker 2>you know, kind of.

0:41:17.560 --> 0:41:18.719
<v Speaker 4>Expansion beyond me.

0:41:20.960 --> 0:41:23.840
<v Speaker 1>It's like we can do it outside abandon And.

0:41:23.760 --> 0:41:28.480
<v Speaker 2>We're seeing now with with wild Spring Dunes, Rodeo Dunes,

0:41:29.360 --> 0:41:34.360
<v Speaker 2>their project in Florida, that this is that Sand Valley

0:41:34.719 --> 0:41:37.840
<v Speaker 2>was the start of something else. And I think, but

0:41:38.480 --> 0:41:42.759
<v Speaker 2>that being said, maybe Sand Valley is just the epicenter

0:41:43.120 --> 0:41:47.719
<v Speaker 2>of this era in terms of of development, and what

0:41:47.800 --> 0:41:51.759
<v Speaker 2>I find fascinating is at its core. You know, I

0:41:51.760 --> 0:41:54.919
<v Speaker 2>don't think I don't think that anybody would take Sand

0:41:55.000 --> 0:41:59.959
<v Speaker 2>Valley and Mammoth Dunes are not the greatest golf course

0:42:00.160 --> 0:42:02.319
<v Speaker 2>is of this era, but they might end up being

0:42:02.680 --> 0:42:05.800
<v Speaker 2>some of the most influential, and I think that's interesting.

0:42:06.719 --> 0:42:10.400
<v Speaker 2>I guess this takes it to my next pick and

0:42:10.920 --> 0:42:16.200
<v Speaker 2>I I'm gonna go here with Sweeten's Cove.

0:42:18.160 --> 0:42:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that was high on my list as well.

0:42:21.719 --> 0:42:28.560
<v Speaker 2>This is this is the first internet golf course. This

0:42:28.680 --> 0:42:35.160
<v Speaker 2>is the golf course that proved that a if you

0:42:35.239 --> 0:42:41.400
<v Speaker 2>build something interesting and people like it, that that will

0:42:41.440 --> 0:42:45.320
<v Speaker 2>break the mold and can be the model, the standalone model.

0:42:45.520 --> 0:42:48.120
<v Speaker 2>It is a field of you know, people say Bandon

0:42:48.200 --> 0:42:51.960
<v Speaker 2>Dunes is a field of dreams type situation. I'm sorry,

0:42:52.200 --> 0:42:58.560
<v Speaker 2>it's sand On on an ocean. It is not South Pittsburgh, Tennessee.

0:42:59.360 --> 0:43:02.680
<v Speaker 2>Nine holes, which you know a long standing like you

0:43:02.719 --> 0:43:05.680
<v Speaker 2>can't there can't be a nine hole destination golf course.

0:43:05.920 --> 0:43:08.439
<v Speaker 2>The people didn't believe you could have an eighteen hole

0:43:08.520 --> 0:43:12.399
<v Speaker 2>destination golf course. But this golf course was really pre

0:43:12.640 --> 0:43:16.000
<v Speaker 2>golf Internet. And what I mean by Internet is I

0:43:16.080 --> 0:43:19.080
<v Speaker 2>mean social media, you know, pre social media, and you

0:43:19.120 --> 0:43:22.000
<v Speaker 2>could say social media, maybe it's better as a social

0:43:22.040 --> 0:43:27.400
<v Speaker 2>media course pre social media and golf and like really golf,

0:43:27.440 --> 0:43:32.319
<v Speaker 2>Instagram and Twitter explosion. This golf course was basically going

0:43:32.360 --> 0:43:36.879
<v Speaker 2>to close. It was not going to exist. They were

0:43:36.960 --> 0:43:41.680
<v Speaker 2>on the brink it. I remember having so many conversations

0:43:41.719 --> 0:43:45.279
<v Speaker 2>with Rob Collins as I started my business and he

0:43:45.440 --> 0:43:49.600
<v Speaker 2>was in the Sweetens Cove business about like how we

0:43:49.640 --> 0:43:51.680
<v Speaker 2>didn't know how long either of us were going to

0:43:51.760 --> 0:43:55.040
<v Speaker 2>make it, and the and the golf business. But this

0:43:55.239 --> 0:44:00.280
<v Speaker 2>is where, you know, the the world of the internet world,

0:44:00.320 --> 0:44:04.040
<v Speaker 2>the social media world took a golf course and completely

0:44:04.160 --> 0:44:08.200
<v Speaker 2>changed its business trajectory and business model. And I think

0:44:08.560 --> 0:44:12.560
<v Speaker 2>it shows that if you build something interesting for public golf,

0:44:14.280 --> 0:44:18.880
<v Speaker 2>there is a great market there. And what happens is

0:44:18.920 --> 0:44:22.120
<v Speaker 2>that all the people, the influencers in the social media

0:44:22.160 --> 0:44:25.840
<v Speaker 2>accounts go and their followers go, and Sweeten's Cove became

0:44:25.920 --> 0:44:30.240
<v Speaker 2>this pilgrimage and really changed the way people thought about

0:44:30.280 --> 0:44:33.760
<v Speaker 2>the business of golf at a public level.

0:44:34.719 --> 0:44:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Matt thoughts about Sweeten's Cove.

0:44:37.520 --> 0:44:39.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I don't have a ton to add to that

0:44:39.120 --> 0:44:42.400
<v Speaker 3>I think Andy summed it up pretty well. But the

0:44:42.400 --> 0:44:45.120
<v Speaker 3>one thing I think about, uh with Sweeten's Cove is

0:44:45.160 --> 0:44:49.320
<v Speaker 3>how like everything is going against it. Essentially, it's in

0:44:49.360 --> 0:44:53.360
<v Speaker 3>a floodplane, it's not the best soils, it's in a

0:44:53.520 --> 0:44:59.560
<v Speaker 3>very odd location, and above all else, it somehow made

0:44:59.600 --> 0:45:02.840
<v Speaker 3>it through through all of these difficulties. And the reason

0:45:02.880 --> 0:45:06.440
<v Speaker 3>because of that is social media and people posting pictures

0:45:06.480 --> 0:45:09.200
<v Speaker 3>of it and people saying how amazing it was to

0:45:09.239 --> 0:45:11.680
<v Speaker 3>go there with their buddies and loop around this nine

0:45:11.680 --> 0:45:14.200
<v Speaker 3>hole course four or five six times in a day.

0:45:15.120 --> 0:45:17.359
<v Speaker 3>And that's all it was. There's nothing else to it.

0:45:17.360 --> 0:45:20.400
<v Speaker 3>It's just go play golf and there's a shed up

0:45:20.400 --> 0:45:22.920
<v Speaker 3>at the top with a porta potty behind it if

0:45:22.920 --> 0:45:25.480
<v Speaker 3>you need to use the bathroom. So that's like my

0:45:25.560 --> 0:45:29.480
<v Speaker 3>biggest takeaway is how it's literally just a golf course

0:45:29.800 --> 0:45:34.080
<v Speaker 3>in a floodplain in this valley, and social media is

0:45:34.120 --> 0:45:36.640
<v Speaker 3>able to prop it up on this pedestal because it

0:45:36.680 --> 0:45:40.200
<v Speaker 3>is an interesting golf course and it got people to

0:45:40.239 --> 0:45:42.680
<v Speaker 3>go there and travel and be a successful business.

0:45:43.320 --> 0:45:47.840
<v Speaker 2>I've said this before on the Friday Egg Pod, but

0:45:48.760 --> 0:45:51.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, and there were a handful of people that

0:45:51.640 --> 0:45:56.839
<v Speaker 2>went probably before I went, but I went. I think

0:45:56.880 --> 0:46:00.719
<v Speaker 2>they had three hundred Instagram followers at the time. And

0:46:00.760 --> 0:46:06.400
<v Speaker 2>I went on a Saturday morning in late May and

0:46:06.719 --> 0:46:11.480
<v Speaker 2>it was a beautiful day, beautiful like seventy five and sunny.

0:46:12.360 --> 0:46:15.200
<v Speaker 2>And I got there, I wanted to say, at eight

0:46:15.239 --> 0:46:20.080
<v Speaker 2>am I was the only car. Maybe seven thirty, I

0:46:20.120 --> 0:46:23.280
<v Speaker 2>can't remember with the time change, I was the only

0:46:23.360 --> 0:46:27.440
<v Speaker 2>person there. I teed off before anybody was there, played alone.

0:46:28.080 --> 0:46:31.319
<v Speaker 2>I got back. Patrick Boyd was sitting there. There's one

0:46:31.360 --> 0:46:35.600
<v Speaker 2>other group on the golf course. Nobody was there. This was,

0:46:37.400 --> 0:46:41.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, pre it really hitting the thing. It was

0:46:41.800 --> 0:46:49.040
<v Speaker 2>a failing business. Nobody played it. And I think if

0:46:49.040 --> 0:46:52.480
<v Speaker 2>you talk to the original people, they had a small

0:46:52.560 --> 0:46:57.399
<v Speaker 2>contingent of people that knew this golf course was provocative

0:46:57.520 --> 0:47:01.280
<v Speaker 2>and had substance that no other course in the area

0:47:01.600 --> 0:47:04.319
<v Speaker 2>really possessed of, Like it had a lot of this

0:47:04.480 --> 0:47:07.719
<v Speaker 2>modern this with these greens that required you to be

0:47:07.800 --> 0:47:11.959
<v Speaker 2>in certain places. And they had this legion of believers

0:47:12.200 --> 0:47:17.839
<v Speaker 2>that were very powerful, and they added to the experience

0:47:18.040 --> 0:47:22.359
<v Speaker 2>of people like me and others that showed up that

0:47:22.520 --> 0:47:27.200
<v Speaker 2>there was the Sweetens Cove mafia. Really is the way

0:47:27.239 --> 0:47:30.560
<v Speaker 2>I would describe it that that helped push this golf

0:47:30.600 --> 0:47:36.040
<v Speaker 2>course into it because it is a thing of cultural relevance.

0:47:36.160 --> 0:47:39.360
<v Speaker 2>I think it's less so today than maybe, you know,

0:47:39.760 --> 0:47:42.839
<v Speaker 2>eight year or seven years ago. Seven years ago, it

0:47:42.960 --> 0:47:46.000
<v Speaker 2>was like have you been to Sweeten's Cove? People talked

0:47:46.000 --> 0:47:49.800
<v Speaker 2>about the pilgrimage to go to Sweeten's Cove, and I think,

0:47:50.680 --> 0:47:54.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, from that standpoint, it will change the way

0:47:54.520 --> 0:48:00.200
<v Speaker 2>it has already and you know it is it incredible

0:48:00.239 --> 0:48:02.759
<v Speaker 2>story in terms of a golf course making it.

0:48:03.280 --> 0:48:06.279
<v Speaker 1>But Sweeten's Cove also proved that that is a hard

0:48:06.320 --> 0:48:10.120
<v Speaker 1>way to do things, because eventually what they needed to

0:48:10.160 --> 0:48:14.359
<v Speaker 1>do was bring in some money and recently bring in

0:48:14.400 --> 0:48:19.680
<v Speaker 1>private equity to turn the property into something that feels

0:48:19.800 --> 0:48:24.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe a little bit more like a conventional destination golf resort,

0:48:24.320 --> 0:48:27.520
<v Speaker 1>though still hanging on to a lot of the quirks

0:48:27.520 --> 0:48:29.759
<v Speaker 1>that it had originally. I think the spirit of the

0:48:29.760 --> 0:48:33.040
<v Speaker 1>place is probably still intact, but there's no doubt that,

0:48:33.360 --> 0:48:35.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, the days of the of the shed and

0:48:36.200 --> 0:48:39.279
<v Speaker 1>the sense that you were out in the middle of

0:48:39.320 --> 0:48:43.640
<v Speaker 1>nowhere at this random, miraculous golf course. I think those

0:48:43.719 --> 0:48:47.200
<v Speaker 1>days have passed. And the reason they've passed is that

0:48:47.760 --> 0:48:49.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a tough it's a tough business model, right, The

0:48:49.960 --> 0:48:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Little Course that Could is a tough business model.

0:48:52.880 --> 0:48:55.560
<v Speaker 2>I think that there's a lot of different playbooks that

0:48:55.600 --> 0:48:59.040
<v Speaker 2>could have gone down at different paths. And you know,

0:49:00.320 --> 0:49:02.560
<v Speaker 2>I think like one of the challenges was, you know,

0:49:02.640 --> 0:49:05.800
<v Speaker 2>one of the owners is one of the hottest architects

0:49:05.840 --> 0:49:08.520
<v Speaker 2>in the world at this point, Rob.

0:49:08.360 --> 0:49:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Collins, he can't be there everything, can't be.

0:49:11.480 --> 0:49:12.600
<v Speaker 4>An operator anymore.

0:49:12.960 --> 0:49:16.840
<v Speaker 2>And I think there, you know, there's there's pathways to

0:49:17.000 --> 0:49:20.719
<v Speaker 2>where if somebody wanted to make that business work as

0:49:20.760 --> 0:49:25.319
<v Speaker 2>a single owner, totally feasible. And yeah, you might not

0:49:25.400 --> 0:49:29.640
<v Speaker 2>get to the fullest returns that private equities. You know

0:49:29.719 --> 0:49:32.520
<v Speaker 2>that that's what private equity is looking to do. How

0:49:32.520 --> 0:49:37.120
<v Speaker 2>do we maximize the returns? You know, And you could

0:49:37.160 --> 0:49:39.520
<v Speaker 2>have gone a lot of different directions, but at the

0:49:39.560 --> 0:49:42.360
<v Speaker 2>time I think they it went the right direction. And

0:49:42.400 --> 0:49:47.040
<v Speaker 2>I think people can criticize or anything, but it went

0:49:47.120 --> 0:49:51.640
<v Speaker 2>the right direction for the course at the moment in

0:49:51.719 --> 0:49:54.320
<v Speaker 2>time that the person that ran the course and needed

0:49:54.360 --> 0:49:54.799
<v Speaker 2>it to go.

0:49:55.680 --> 0:49:59.319
<v Speaker 1>Don't get me wrong, I'm very very happy for the

0:49:59.320 --> 0:50:02.760
<v Speaker 1>fact that the that paid off. Rob Collins put everything

0:50:02.800 --> 0:50:07.400
<v Speaker 1>on the line and it worked. And that's massive credit

0:50:07.400 --> 0:50:09.480
<v Speaker 1>to him. I also wanted one last thing I want

0:50:09.480 --> 0:50:12.040
<v Speaker 1>to mention about Sweeten's Cove is I think it's probably

0:50:12.640 --> 0:50:16.759
<v Speaker 1>architecturally influential as well. Right, what we saw with Sweeten's

0:50:16.760 --> 0:50:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Cove was King Colin's absorbing influences not just from the

0:50:21.239 --> 0:50:27.000
<v Speaker 1>usual suspects, but also from Fazio and Gary Mark Strants

0:50:27.040 --> 0:50:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and Gary Player, right whom Rob Collins worked for earlier

0:50:30.520 --> 0:50:34.799
<v Speaker 1>in his career. You know, King and Collins were very

0:50:34.800 --> 0:50:39.440
<v Speaker 1>familiar with the trendy influences. They love Donald Ross, they

0:50:39.480 --> 0:50:45.000
<v Speaker 1>love Golden Age architecture, loves loves Pinehurst number two. They

0:50:45.000 --> 0:50:47.920
<v Speaker 1>think that Corn Crenshaw are the best in the world.

0:50:48.080 --> 0:50:52.799
<v Speaker 1>So they have They had all of the usual influences,

0:50:52.800 --> 0:50:57.319
<v Speaker 1>but they mixed them with something a little bit less fashionable,

0:50:58.480 --> 0:51:01.439
<v Speaker 1>the kind of Fazio Play or Strants end to things,

0:51:01.760 --> 0:51:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and produced something really interesting out of that, strategically interesting

0:51:06.400 --> 0:51:09.640
<v Speaker 1>golf with features that just looked a little bit different.

0:51:10.040 --> 0:51:11.560
<v Speaker 1>And I think that you see in a lot of

0:51:11.600 --> 0:51:15.239
<v Speaker 1>new courses, especially courses that are trying to capture some

0:51:15.320 --> 0:51:19.319
<v Speaker 1>attention visually, the influence of Sweeten's Cove. I think you

0:51:19.320 --> 0:51:22.080
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of architects trying to to kind of

0:51:22.160 --> 0:51:25.600
<v Speaker 1>do what King and Collins did at Sweeten's Cove, and

0:51:25.920 --> 0:51:29.080
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be that's going to be a trend

0:51:29.120 --> 0:51:32.160
<v Speaker 1>that I would expect to continue because part of what

0:51:32.239 --> 0:51:35.240
<v Speaker 1>made Sweeten's Cove pop is that the features were so bold.

0:51:35.680 --> 0:51:38.319
<v Speaker 1>You saw a picture on Instagram and you're like, well,

0:51:38.360 --> 0:51:41.920
<v Speaker 1>I got to go there, right, that looks that looks incredible.

0:51:42.000 --> 0:51:43.960
<v Speaker 1>So I just wanted to note that we do have

0:51:44.040 --> 0:51:47.359
<v Speaker 1>to keep moving through the courses here. Why don't we

0:51:47.480 --> 0:51:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Why don't we have the discussions? Yeah, go ahead.

0:51:50.000 --> 0:51:53.720
<v Speaker 2>The other thing is the idea of like pre selling

0:51:54.239 --> 0:51:59.759
<v Speaker 2>and selling out your tea times right like they're all day.

0:52:00.880 --> 0:52:04.719
<v Speaker 2>They did some like very revolutionary I you know, concepts

0:52:04.800 --> 0:52:10.120
<v Speaker 2>with the experience, the lo Fi shed experience that became like,

0:52:10.760 --> 0:52:13.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, a cultural thing like they did some stuff

0:52:14.000 --> 0:52:16.960
<v Speaker 2>of like if we strip away everything and make it

0:52:17.719 --> 0:52:18.279
<v Speaker 2>just about the.

0:52:18.239 --> 0:52:19.600
<v Speaker 4>Golf, this can succeed.

0:52:19.880 --> 0:52:25.360
<v Speaker 2>Now private equity gets involved, be'st no more you know

0:52:25.480 --> 0:52:29.879
<v Speaker 2>in the long range plans. But the idea of some

0:52:29.960 --> 0:52:35.680
<v Speaker 2>of the business ideas of them actually being a real scrappy,

0:52:36.040 --> 0:52:39.880
<v Speaker 2>lean startup in golf leads to innovation and then you

0:52:39.960 --> 0:52:43.680
<v Speaker 2>see that with Landman later with this pre sale time

0:52:44.160 --> 0:52:47.560
<v Speaker 2>and they've had massive success selling out their t sheet.

0:52:48.080 --> 0:52:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, that's a good note. All right, Matt, what

0:52:50.719 --> 0:52:52.399
<v Speaker 1>is your next pick? I'm gonna go.

0:52:53.160 --> 0:52:57.480
<v Speaker 3>So this is more so of a holistic kind of

0:52:57.480 --> 0:53:00.360
<v Speaker 3>golf course. But the one that I'll pin point that

0:53:00.400 --> 0:53:03.560
<v Speaker 3>I think is kind of the genesis of this is

0:53:03.600 --> 0:53:08.000
<v Speaker 3>the Cradle at Pinehurst. I think the Cradle was one

0:53:08.040 --> 0:53:13.280
<v Speaker 3>of the first most popular short courses or alternate styled

0:53:13.320 --> 0:53:17.520
<v Speaker 3>golf courses that aren't you know, two par three's, two

0:53:17.560 --> 0:53:21.160
<v Speaker 3>par fives and the rest par fours eighteen hole golf courses,

0:53:22.760 --> 0:53:25.400
<v Speaker 3>and a few predecessors to this would be banned preserve.

0:53:26.200 --> 0:53:30.080
<v Speaker 3>And then also even before that is the horse Course

0:53:30.280 --> 0:53:34.440
<v Speaker 3>at the Prairie Club in Nebraska, which was actually even

0:53:34.440 --> 0:53:38.320
<v Speaker 3>more revolutionary I think than some of these short courses

0:53:38.320 --> 0:53:42.600
<v Speaker 3>that have followed. But I mean, you look in the

0:53:42.680 --> 0:53:45.719
<v Speaker 3>last ten years and the amount of short courses that

0:53:45.760 --> 0:53:50.080
<v Speaker 3>are getting built at resorts and private golf clubs and

0:53:50.120 --> 0:53:54.880
<v Speaker 3>even just like there's short courses being built standalone, and

0:53:54.920 --> 0:53:58.360
<v Speaker 3>I think that's primarily because of the popularity of the Cradle,

0:53:58.920 --> 0:54:02.040
<v Speaker 3>and I did so I did mentioned Bandon Preserve and

0:54:02.120 --> 0:54:05.080
<v Speaker 3>the horse Course, which were before the Cradle. But I

0:54:05.080 --> 0:54:11.000
<v Speaker 3>think because Pinehurst is such a more accessible resort than

0:54:11.040 --> 0:54:14.520
<v Speaker 3>Bandon Dune's and the Prairie Club is the reason that

0:54:14.560 --> 0:54:17.759
<v Speaker 3>it had more of an impact. They built it, what

0:54:17.960 --> 0:54:23.040
<v Speaker 3>right after the US Open was held there, and it

0:54:23.200 --> 0:54:26.759
<v Speaker 3>just became this central hub of activity at the Pinehurst

0:54:26.840 --> 0:54:31.040
<v Speaker 3>resort and it kind of yalvinized the idea that short

0:54:31.040 --> 0:54:35.239
<v Speaker 3>courses are great for resort business models and getting more

0:54:35.320 --> 0:54:38.000
<v Speaker 3>rounds in a day that don't take four hours long,

0:54:38.840 --> 0:54:42.560
<v Speaker 3>and then also just unconventional styles of golf. And I

0:54:42.560 --> 0:54:47.360
<v Speaker 3>think it's absolutely exploded since the popularity of the Cradle.

0:54:47.520 --> 0:54:49.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this is something that we didn't touch on at

0:54:49.880 --> 0:54:53.840
<v Speaker 1>length in that Sweeten's Cove discussion. Part of why Sweeten's

0:54:53.840 --> 0:54:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Cove is important is that it's a nine hole golf

0:54:56.680 --> 0:55:01.440
<v Speaker 1>course and it's really an experimentation with models other than

0:55:01.480 --> 0:55:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the regulation eighteen hole golf course. And I think this

0:55:04.680 --> 0:55:06.759
<v Speaker 1>is something that you really saw pop up in that

0:55:06.800 --> 0:55:10.400
<v Speaker 1>post recession era. What are the different forms of golf

0:55:10.440 --> 0:55:13.200
<v Speaker 1>that we can have other than this kind of old

0:55:13.280 --> 0:55:17.759
<v Speaker 1>model of this somewhat expensive to build and maintain regulation

0:55:17.960 --> 0:55:21.640
<v Speaker 1>eighteen hole golf course. Now, the promise of the short

0:55:21.680 --> 0:55:26.080
<v Speaker 1>course maybe hasn't really come to fruition in the twenty

0:55:26.120 --> 0:55:32.000
<v Speaker 1>twenties because we've seen them primarily pop up at resorts

0:55:32.440 --> 0:55:36.480
<v Speaker 1>as kind of an additional amenity. That's sort of how

0:55:36.480 --> 0:55:39.480
<v Speaker 1>these a lot of these courses function. They are the

0:55:39.480 --> 0:55:42.160
<v Speaker 1>place that you go in the afternoon after playing one

0:55:42.200 --> 0:55:45.440
<v Speaker 1>of the big courses earlier in the day. But certainly

0:55:45.480 --> 0:55:48.680
<v Speaker 1>it's been a very very important trend, especially in the

0:55:48.719 --> 0:55:52.680
<v Speaker 1>destination sector. It's almost like a requirement at this point

0:55:52.960 --> 0:55:57.600
<v Speaker 1>that you have one of these par three courses or unconventional,

0:55:58.239 --> 0:56:05.880
<v Speaker 1>non standard short courses at your facility as as something

0:56:05.960 --> 0:56:10.160
<v Speaker 1>for people to do when it's four o'clock in the

0:56:10.200 --> 0:56:12.800
<v Speaker 1>evening and you want to get in a quick fun round,

0:56:13.160 --> 0:56:16.280
<v Speaker 1>drink a couple of beers, and hit some golf shots.

0:56:16.640 --> 0:56:22.280
<v Speaker 1>So's it's definitely been a key shift in these past

0:56:22.320 --> 0:56:24.640
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years. I'm glad you shouted out the horse Course

0:56:25.160 --> 0:56:29.880
<v Speaker 1>because they really were first, and then Band and Preserve

0:56:30.400 --> 0:56:34.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of confirmed the trend, and the Cradle is probably

0:56:34.520 --> 0:56:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the most broadly recognized example of it. It's the one

0:56:39.160 --> 0:56:43.960
<v Speaker 1>that most probably the most people have experienced.

0:56:44.200 --> 0:56:47.399
<v Speaker 2>The last piece of the cradle that I don't think

0:56:47.440 --> 0:56:52.239
<v Speaker 2>should go untalked about is that it it was the

0:56:52.280 --> 0:56:55.480
<v Speaker 2>signal the risk. It was a big risk from the

0:56:55.520 --> 0:56:58.920
<v Speaker 2>resort to do something different. And they had done the

0:56:58.960 --> 0:57:02.719
<v Speaker 2>Pinehers number two restoration, but that was just you know,

0:57:02.800 --> 0:57:06.960
<v Speaker 2>brushing up their you know, existing course. The cradle was

0:57:07.080 --> 0:57:13.080
<v Speaker 2>the signal and the start of the effective redesign of

0:57:13.560 --> 0:57:18.560
<v Speaker 2>Pinehurst as a golf facility, which I would say, along

0:57:18.600 --> 0:57:23.600
<v Speaker 2>with Bandon and sand Valley now entering the ring, these

0:57:23.640 --> 0:57:28.920
<v Speaker 2>are the pillars of accessible high end golf in America,

0:57:29.680 --> 0:57:34.600
<v Speaker 2>and and the cradle would be the If the cradle failed,

0:57:35.400 --> 0:57:37.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't think we would have Pinehurst ten and now

0:57:37.800 --> 0:57:41.760
<v Speaker 2>Pinehurst eleven under construction. I don't know if Pinehurst four

0:57:41.840 --> 0:57:46.560
<v Speaker 2>gets redone. So you're also talking about a huge moment

0:57:46.840 --> 0:57:51.160
<v Speaker 2>in the redefining of a you know, of America's I

0:57:51.200 --> 0:57:54.240
<v Speaker 2>would probably say, the most recognized resort in America.

0:57:55.200 --> 0:57:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, absolutely, all right, Now, before I move on to

0:57:59.320 --> 0:58:01.640
<v Speaker 1>my pick, I want to give a shout out to

0:58:02.280 --> 0:58:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Friday Egg Golf Club. Friday Golf Club is the sponsor

0:58:06.200 --> 0:58:09.360
<v Speaker 1>for this episode of Designing Golf, and of course it's

0:58:09.400 --> 0:58:12.760
<v Speaker 1>a project and a community that's close to all of

0:58:12.800 --> 0:58:13.520
<v Speaker 1>our hearts here.

0:58:13.920 --> 0:58:16.320
<v Speaker 4>You could shout out the book too. It just got mine.

0:58:16.520 --> 0:58:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Andy's if you're watching us on video, Andy's holding up

0:58:19.120 --> 0:58:23.040
<v Speaker 1>our new book, which Frida Egg Golf New Friday Golf

0:58:23.080 --> 0:58:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Club members got a good deal on. That book contains

0:58:27.600 --> 0:58:31.520
<v Speaker 1>course profiles that we've been writing for the past few years.

0:58:31.800 --> 0:58:34.640
<v Speaker 1>A lot of courses that have been important to our

0:58:34.760 --> 0:58:38.760
<v Speaker 1>lives in golf are featured in that book, so that

0:58:38.760 --> 0:58:41.960
<v Speaker 1>that has been an amenity that some members have really enjoyed.

0:58:42.000 --> 0:58:44.479
<v Speaker 1>And also, if you've been a member of Friday Golf

0:58:44.480 --> 0:58:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Club since the beginning, then you've already seen a lot

0:58:47.520 --> 0:58:51.200
<v Speaker 1>of these course profiles show up in digital form as

0:58:51.320 --> 0:58:55.440
<v Speaker 1>part of your membership. So Friday Golf Club, go to

0:58:55.440 --> 0:58:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the fridagg dot com slash membership and see what it's

0:58:58.600 --> 0:59:00.920
<v Speaker 1>all about. We have a new disc Russian forum in

0:59:01.240 --> 0:59:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Friday Golf Club that's been a lot of fun. Is

0:59:03.520 --> 0:59:06.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of bringing our community closer and closer together, So

0:59:07.240 --> 0:59:11.560
<v Speaker 1>come join us. It's really great. It's been a very

0:59:11.600 --> 0:59:14.280
<v Speaker 1>fun feature of our lives for the past few years here,

0:59:14.600 --> 0:59:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and now that the holiday season is approaching, maybe it's

0:59:18.480 --> 0:59:21.200
<v Speaker 1>a good time to join yourself or to give the

0:59:21.240 --> 0:59:25.720
<v Speaker 1>gift of membership. All right, So my next pick is

0:59:25.760 --> 0:59:31.560
<v Speaker 1>going to be Old Barnwell, a recent pick designed by

0:59:32.600 --> 0:59:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Brian Schneider and Blake Conan in Aiken, South Carolina. A

0:59:37.680 --> 0:59:40.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of action in Aiken. Old Barnwell's not the only

0:59:40.720 --> 0:59:44.680
<v Speaker 1>achin course that has been significant. But the reason I'm

0:59:44.720 --> 0:59:48.280
<v Speaker 1>picking Old Barnwell here is that I think it is

0:59:48.520 --> 0:59:52.360
<v Speaker 1>part of an answer, maybe maybe a full fledged answer

0:59:52.800 --> 0:59:56.640
<v Speaker 1>to a big question that a lot of architects and

0:59:56.680 --> 1:00:00.640
<v Speaker 1>golfers have been asking for the past fifteen years. And

1:00:00.720 --> 1:00:06.120
<v Speaker 1>that question is is there a world beyond Corn Crenshaw,

1:00:06.320 --> 1:00:09.919
<v Speaker 1>Tom Doak, Gill Hans. Is there a place to go

1:00:10.600 --> 1:00:16.280
<v Speaker 1>beyond neo classical quote unquote minimalist. I'm putting minimalist in

1:00:16.480 --> 1:00:19.840
<v Speaker 1>very heavy scare quotes, but is there a place to

1:00:19.880 --> 1:00:24.520
<v Speaker 1>go beyond this kind of naturalist, neoclassical minimalist architecture that

1:00:24.600 --> 1:00:29.800
<v Speaker 1>has held sway at the top of the profession for

1:00:30.160 --> 1:00:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the past thirty years, basically since sand Hills. Now, of course,

1:00:34.240 --> 1:00:36.240
<v Speaker 1>there has been a lot more going on in the

1:00:36.240 --> 1:00:41.760
<v Speaker 1>golf course development industry than just the work done by

1:00:41.840 --> 1:00:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the likes of Bill Krer, Tom Doak and Gil Hans.

1:00:44.840 --> 1:00:48.240
<v Speaker 1>But if we're talking about what's really representative of the

1:00:48.280 --> 1:00:53.240
<v Speaker 1>cutting edge of golf architecture, that's really what we're talking about.

1:00:53.400 --> 1:00:57.080
<v Speaker 1>If we're talking about the kind of architect that most

1:00:57.240 --> 1:01:01.840
<v Speaker 1>young architects aspire to be, we are talking about those firms.

1:01:02.560 --> 1:01:06.760
<v Speaker 1>And so a lot of people have been wondering for

1:01:07.600 --> 1:01:12.000
<v Speaker 1>at least a decade maybe more, is it time to

1:01:12.040 --> 1:01:16.440
<v Speaker 1>move beyond that? Are we out of innovations? Is it

1:01:16.640 --> 1:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>necessary to find a new style, a new way of

1:01:20.960 --> 1:01:24.800
<v Speaker 1>doing things? Is it part of the responsibility of the

1:01:24.800 --> 1:01:29.960
<v Speaker 1>golf architect to to continually push into new territory. And

1:01:30.000 --> 1:01:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that Old Barnwell is a really interesting answer

1:01:33.080 --> 1:01:36.400
<v Speaker 1>to that, because to me, the design represents a lot

1:01:36.440 --> 1:01:41.440
<v Speaker 1>of what's great about the previous couple of decades of

1:01:42.080 --> 1:01:44.960
<v Speaker 1>high end golf architecture from the likes of Bill Core

1:01:45.040 --> 1:01:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and Tom Duck. But it also shows some new way

1:01:49.160 --> 1:01:55.800
<v Speaker 1>forwards with this incorporation of Golden Age influences, but different

1:01:55.880 --> 1:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Golden Age influences, These features that are just built stylized

1:02:01.480 --> 1:02:05.520
<v Speaker 1>in a different way, new ideas being incorporated into the

1:02:05.520 --> 1:02:09.160
<v Speaker 1>golf course. And so I think that's that's what Old

1:02:09.200 --> 1:02:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Barnwell is doing. That's why it's one of the defining courses,

1:02:13.000 --> 1:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's also just probably one of the

1:02:15.280 --> 1:02:18.760
<v Speaker 1>best courses that has been built in recent years, and

1:02:18.800 --> 1:02:23.920
<v Speaker 1>that's one reason why it'll, you know, endure as a

1:02:24.120 --> 1:02:27.520
<v Speaker 1>significant course. What are our thoughts on Old Barnwell, you.

1:02:27.520 --> 1:02:30.080
<v Speaker 3>Hit on a lot of what I was thinking about.

1:02:30.080 --> 1:02:34.840
<v Speaker 3>It is this like conjunction of minimalists and built and

1:02:35.520 --> 1:02:39.040
<v Speaker 3>not trying to blend it into to nature so much.

1:02:40.200 --> 1:02:44.280
<v Speaker 3>One thing that I really appreciate about it is some

1:02:44.360 --> 1:02:47.600
<v Speaker 3>of like the ditches they built on hillsides to catch

1:02:47.640 --> 1:02:54.880
<v Speaker 3>water and to keep valleys dry, like overtly building things

1:02:55.240 --> 1:03:02.160
<v Speaker 3>that are unnatural and more so utilitarian and just going

1:03:02.240 --> 1:03:05.360
<v Speaker 3>with all of the same I guess trends that golf

1:03:05.480 --> 1:03:09.640
<v Speaker 3>architecture was going for in the last twenty years.

1:03:10.160 --> 1:03:11.680
<v Speaker 1>So those are just a.

1:03:11.600 --> 1:03:14.560
<v Speaker 3>Few things that I admire most about that design.

1:03:14.480 --> 1:03:16.080
<v Speaker 1>And any additional thoughts there.

1:03:16.560 --> 1:03:21.200
<v Speaker 2>Uh yeah, I I added this to the sheet right

1:03:21.240 --> 1:03:26.640
<v Speaker 2>when we started recording. Do Brian Schneider and Blake Konick

1:03:26.720 --> 1:03:28.240
<v Speaker 2>get hired without Lanark?

1:03:29.360 --> 1:03:29.760
<v Speaker 4>Maybe not?

1:03:31.360 --> 1:03:33.840
<v Speaker 2>That would be one that I would I would say,

1:03:33.920 --> 1:03:39.720
<v Speaker 2>is the real introduction of this style, which is a

1:03:39.720 --> 1:03:42.480
<v Speaker 2>fascinating course that flies under everybody's radar.

1:03:43.160 --> 1:03:45.640
<v Speaker 4>It's outside Philly, and this is.

1:03:45.840 --> 1:03:49.920
<v Speaker 2>Like the the birth of the Brian Schneider, you know,

1:03:50.000 --> 1:03:54.360
<v Speaker 2>Blake style that that you're talking about at Old Barnwell.

1:03:54.560 --> 1:03:59.440
<v Speaker 2>I would have had Tree Farm in this location, and

1:03:59.480 --> 1:04:02.520
<v Speaker 2>it would have been around the idea of the ache

1:04:02.560 --> 1:04:09.880
<v Speaker 2>and golf explosion and this previously rather sleepy, cool golf

1:04:09.920 --> 1:04:15.280
<v Speaker 2>town with Palmetto and Aichn and Sage valleys there near

1:04:15.400 --> 1:04:18.600
<v Speaker 2>augusta kind of a if you know, no place to

1:04:19.400 --> 1:04:24.640
<v Speaker 2>on the map golf golf locale for the ardent golf traveler.

1:04:25.040 --> 1:04:28.880
<v Speaker 2>And I think like Tree Farm in Old Barnwell is

1:04:29.040 --> 1:04:33.480
<v Speaker 2>its own fascinating. We never get this type of situation.

1:04:33.920 --> 1:04:36.600
<v Speaker 2>They're friends, I know, they just had their holiday matches

1:04:36.640 --> 1:04:39.960
<v Speaker 2>where they play each other. They're friends, friendly with each other,

1:04:40.520 --> 1:04:44.120
<v Speaker 2>but inherent rivals in the sense that they had, you know,

1:04:44.800 --> 1:04:48.160
<v Speaker 2>two golf courses being built in the same small town

1:04:48.440 --> 1:04:51.720
<v Speaker 2>at the same relatively the same time. I think Tree

1:04:51.760 --> 1:04:54.280
<v Speaker 2>Farm beat them to the punch on terms of like

1:04:54.800 --> 1:04:57.560
<v Speaker 2>we're doing this project in Aiken, but they were so

1:04:57.840 --> 1:05:01.560
<v Speaker 2>closely mirrored. I don't I think you could go either way,

1:05:02.720 --> 1:05:06.080
<v Speaker 2>but just you know, I had it here as a

1:05:06.160 --> 1:05:09.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, I had those two courses here less So

1:05:10.000 --> 1:05:13.520
<v Speaker 2>for the architectural style, I think there's merit to.

1:05:13.640 --> 1:05:15.960
<v Speaker 4>The the Brian Schneider, Blake Conant.

1:05:16.240 --> 1:05:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Hey.

1:05:17.200 --> 1:05:20.479
<v Speaker 2>This might be what you know, the next architecture wave

1:05:20.560 --> 1:05:24.640
<v Speaker 2>looks like, or one facet of the next architecture wave

1:05:24.680 --> 1:05:28.000
<v Speaker 2>looks like. But this is an area that's been put

1:05:28.040 --> 1:05:31.200
<v Speaker 2>on the map as a great golf area that otherwise

1:05:31.360 --> 1:05:34.960
<v Speaker 2>was a very you know, small group of people knowing

1:05:35.240 --> 1:05:38.200
<v Speaker 2>you have you know yet to come online. Twenty one Club,

1:05:38.520 --> 1:05:43.560
<v Speaker 2>New Holland Golf Club, the Jeff Warren project. So and

1:05:43.600 --> 1:05:46.440
<v Speaker 2>that's gonna be done by Brian Schneider and Blake, I

1:05:46.440 --> 1:05:49.440
<v Speaker 2>think as well. So I think it's I think I

1:05:49.440 --> 1:05:51.880
<v Speaker 2>don't have a problem with with going old Barnwell here

1:05:52.080 --> 1:05:56.200
<v Speaker 2>over tree Farm. But it's that's the other aspect to this,

1:05:56.520 --> 1:05:59.360
<v Speaker 2>beyond what you said, is that the idea of this

1:05:59.480 --> 1:06:04.080
<v Speaker 2>small town in South Carolina that has become a must

1:06:04.160 --> 1:06:07.360
<v Speaker 2>visit area for golf golf golf nerds.

1:06:08.120 --> 1:06:10.360
<v Speaker 1>All right, Andy, what's your next pick back to you?

1:06:10.400 --> 1:06:13.720
<v Speaker 2>All Right, I'm surprised it's still here. I'm taking a

1:06:13.760 --> 1:06:17.280
<v Speaker 2>hoopy match club. I think that a lot of these

1:06:17.360 --> 1:06:22.000
<v Speaker 2>courses on this list probably don't happen if it wasn't

1:06:22.040 --> 1:06:23.240
<v Speaker 2>for a Hoopye match club.

1:06:24.440 --> 1:06:28.560
<v Speaker 4>Is Hoopie the greatest golf course built on this list?

1:06:28.640 --> 1:06:28.760
<v Speaker 3>Now?

1:06:29.800 --> 1:06:32.600
<v Speaker 2>Is it the golf course that has become kind of

1:06:32.640 --> 1:06:36.040
<v Speaker 2>the gold standard in terms of models.

1:06:37.120 --> 1:06:37.960
<v Speaker 4>Atmosphere?

1:06:38.040 --> 1:06:43.160
<v Speaker 2>It introduced a whole new way to experience a destination

1:06:43.280 --> 1:06:48.160
<v Speaker 2>golf club with their all inclusive day rate. Most importantly,

1:06:49.520 --> 1:06:53.600
<v Speaker 2>Michael Walrath what he developed this golf course was young,

1:06:54.160 --> 1:06:56.800
<v Speaker 2>a young person who had had a lot of success

1:06:56.840 --> 1:07:00.040
<v Speaker 2>in life, and I think he brought a level we

1:07:00.560 --> 1:07:04.560
<v Speaker 2>talk about like how golf has become so cool in

1:07:05.160 --> 1:07:08.439
<v Speaker 2>pop culture. I think he brought a level of it's

1:07:08.520 --> 1:07:12.800
<v Speaker 2>really cool if you've got hundreds of, if not billions

1:07:12.800 --> 1:07:16.680
<v Speaker 2>of dollars to own a golf course. And people saw

1:07:17.280 --> 1:07:22.240
<v Speaker 2>how how Michael Wallrath has has become, you know, within

1:07:22.440 --> 1:07:25.520
<v Speaker 2>golf circles. Most people probably don't know Michael Wallrath, but

1:07:25.840 --> 1:07:29.920
<v Speaker 2>within golf circles, Michael ware Wrath is you know, golf

1:07:30.040 --> 1:07:32.480
<v Speaker 2>Royalty because he built this really cool place.

1:07:33.080 --> 1:07:34.080
<v Speaker 4>And I think.

1:07:33.920 --> 1:07:37.000
<v Speaker 2>That's led to a lot of more golf courses being

1:07:37.400 --> 1:07:40.320
<v Speaker 2>built by wealthy people that look at this as hey,

1:07:41.080 --> 1:07:43.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, I have a friend Colin Shean. He talks

1:07:43.240 --> 1:07:46.000
<v Speaker 2>about he's behind a lot, He's developed a lot of

1:07:46.000 --> 1:07:51.000
<v Speaker 2>these great golf courses. He talks about how you could

1:07:51.080 --> 1:07:53.640
<v Speaker 2>spend hundreds of millions of dollars and be a minority

1:07:53.680 --> 1:07:58.760
<v Speaker 2>sports sports owner, sports franchise owner, and if the team sucks,

1:07:58.800 --> 1:08:03.120
<v Speaker 2>people hate you, or be the majority owner and people

1:08:03.160 --> 1:08:06.080
<v Speaker 2>hate you. Or you can spend you know, one hundred

1:08:06.120 --> 1:08:08.920
<v Speaker 2>million dollars and build one of the greatest golf courses

1:08:08.960 --> 1:08:11.640
<v Speaker 2>in the world and everybody will love you. And I

1:08:11.680 --> 1:08:16.880
<v Speaker 2>think that a Hoopie has had just a massive cultural

1:08:17.320 --> 1:08:20.880
<v Speaker 2>impact on Destination Private golf club, which has been the

1:08:21.000 --> 1:08:27.000
<v Speaker 2>defining trend of this era. It is it is a

1:08:27.040 --> 1:08:29.680
<v Speaker 2>place that a lot of people talk about, if we

1:08:29.720 --> 1:08:32.720
<v Speaker 2>could build this could be like a hoopie when you're

1:08:32.720 --> 1:08:36.760
<v Speaker 2>talking about building a new place. So I think a

1:08:36.800 --> 1:08:40.400
<v Speaker 2>Hoopie has to be on this list for many, many reasons.

1:08:40.439 --> 1:08:44.360
<v Speaker 2>And I know people built destination Private golf before a hoopie,

1:08:44.560 --> 1:08:48.599
<v Speaker 2>but a Hoopie had a special sauce that made this

1:08:48.800 --> 1:08:53.280
<v Speaker 2>appear appear very, very, very appealing to a lot of

1:08:53.320 --> 1:08:57.080
<v Speaker 2>wealthy people who have since built Destination private golf.

1:08:57.520 --> 1:09:00.679
<v Speaker 1>It's so interesting with the history of the destination private

1:09:00.680 --> 1:09:07.400
<v Speaker 1>golf club that really the the you know, originating modern

1:09:07.479 --> 1:09:10.559
<v Speaker 1>example is sand Hills Golf Club, right, and sand Hills

1:09:10.560 --> 1:09:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Golf Club is the is the origin point for so

1:09:13.360 --> 1:09:17.000
<v Speaker 1>many different trends in modern golf architecture. But that too,

1:09:17.600 --> 1:09:20.759
<v Speaker 1>that the idea is that it's a destination private club,

1:09:21.080 --> 1:09:25.240
<v Speaker 1>and yet a hoopie is the one that everybody talks

1:09:25.280 --> 1:09:28.759
<v Speaker 1>about now when they're building a new destination private club.

1:09:29.160 --> 1:09:33.040
<v Speaker 1>After a hoopie, we saw a wave of these start

1:09:33.120 --> 1:09:37.760
<v Speaker 1>being built and and so I think there's there are

1:09:37.760 --> 1:09:39.800
<v Speaker 1>a number of reasons for that. There are some economic

1:09:39.880 --> 1:09:44.479
<v Speaker 1>trends that underlie this incoming inequality is probably probably a

1:09:44.479 --> 1:09:47.559
<v Speaker 1>big deal here. The fact that there there are people

1:09:47.680 --> 1:09:51.200
<v Speaker 1>who can build these courses and buy these memberships and

1:09:51.479 --> 1:09:55.240
<v Speaker 1>are looking for these kinds of experiences and have the

1:09:55.320 --> 1:09:58.040
<v Speaker 1>money to do it. That's that's a huge factor here.

1:09:58.439 --> 1:10:03.120
<v Speaker 1>But also it's just it's one of the surest ways

1:10:03.400 --> 1:10:06.760
<v Speaker 1>to make a golf course successful these days. If you're

1:10:06.880 --> 1:10:11.040
<v Speaker 1>committed to creating a golf course that is going to

1:10:11.120 --> 1:10:18.320
<v Speaker 1>survive and be successful, then a hoopye is sort of

1:10:18.320 --> 1:10:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the example to follow, and that that's a major major

1:10:24.240 --> 1:10:28.040
<v Speaker 1>change of these past fifteen years that we've been talking about.

1:10:28.400 --> 1:10:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Mad any additional thoughts There.

1:10:30.040 --> 1:10:32.800
<v Speaker 3>Something I just thought of when Andy was kind of

1:10:32.840 --> 1:10:36.600
<v Speaker 3>talking about this special sauce at a hoopie. This is

1:10:36.600 --> 1:10:39.880
<v Speaker 3>probably pretty insignificant in the grand scheme of things, but

1:10:39.960 --> 1:10:43.439
<v Speaker 3>I think their logo also has had an influence on

1:10:43.560 --> 1:10:47.200
<v Speaker 3>a lot of golf courses that followed, as it's kind

1:10:47.240 --> 1:10:52.599
<v Speaker 3>of mysterious, it has no relationship to golf whatsoever. It's

1:10:52.640 --> 1:10:55.479
<v Speaker 3>an onion if you've never seen it. Their logo is

1:10:56.040 --> 1:11:00.240
<v Speaker 3>like a little yellow onion, and I think I think

1:11:00.240 --> 1:11:03.600
<v Speaker 3>there's been an influence in logo design of trying to

1:11:03.640 --> 1:11:09.360
<v Speaker 3>create really unique, eye catching logos that make people question, hey,

1:11:09.360 --> 1:11:10.559
<v Speaker 3>what is that on your shirt?

1:11:10.600 --> 1:11:12.200
<v Speaker 1>There? What's that on your hat?

1:11:12.520 --> 1:11:17.799
<v Speaker 3>And it's sort of driven this kind of I guess

1:11:18.160 --> 1:11:21.400
<v Speaker 3>notion that having a great logo attached to your golf

1:11:21.439 --> 1:11:27.040
<v Speaker 3>course is not necessarily essential, but it's a great way

1:11:27.200 --> 1:11:30.879
<v Speaker 3>to drive a lot more revenue in merchandise sales and whatnot.

1:11:30.960 --> 1:11:33.920
<v Speaker 3>So that's just a little note that I think is

1:11:33.960 --> 1:11:37.519
<v Speaker 3>pretty funny and potentially, Like I mean, there's probably other

1:11:37.600 --> 1:11:42.120
<v Speaker 3>examples of really unique, cool logos like this, But when

1:11:42.160 --> 1:11:45.000
<v Speaker 3>I think back of courses in this era, it feels

1:11:45.040 --> 1:11:47.400
<v Speaker 3>like a Whoopie is kind of one that that stands

1:11:47.479 --> 1:11:48.080
<v Speaker 3>out for sure.

1:11:48.640 --> 1:11:53.479
<v Speaker 1>Maybe MacArthur is kind of a significant one there too. Yes,

1:11:54.280 --> 1:11:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's recognition clouds and it has become kind

1:11:57.000 --> 1:11:58.720
<v Speaker 1>of an essential for a lot of these clubs. They

1:11:58.800 --> 1:12:01.800
<v Speaker 1>put a lot of effort into this now that may

1:12:01.800 --> 1:12:04.400
<v Speaker 1>not have been put into the same thing before. All right,

1:12:05.000 --> 1:12:06.720
<v Speaker 1>let's go to Matt. What's your next pick here?

1:12:06.840 --> 1:12:10.519
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to go with another Tom dop design in

1:12:10.840 --> 1:12:15.639
<v Speaker 3>the Loop at Forest Dunes. I guess my main reason

1:12:15.680 --> 1:12:19.280
<v Speaker 3>for picking this is number one. I think it's a

1:12:19.320 --> 1:12:22.800
<v Speaker 3>brilliant design if you're unfamiliar with it. It is a

1:12:22.920 --> 1:12:27.439
<v Speaker 3>fully reversible golf course. So there's eighteen greens and you

1:12:27.479 --> 1:12:31.559
<v Speaker 3>can play into these greens from two different directions, So

1:12:31.720 --> 1:12:37.679
<v Speaker 3>essentially you have thirty six different unique golf holes across

1:12:37.720 --> 1:12:42.760
<v Speaker 3>the footprint of one eighteen whole golf course. And I

1:12:42.800 --> 1:12:48.040
<v Speaker 3>think I know that the course at Sylvie's Valley Ranch,

1:12:48.320 --> 1:12:51.360
<v Speaker 3>I believe kind of claims being one of the first

1:12:51.600 --> 1:12:55.240
<v Speaker 3>reversible golf courses. Obviously, the old course at Saint Andrew's

1:12:56.720 --> 1:13:00.400
<v Speaker 3>is famous for having this same style but I feel

1:13:00.439 --> 1:13:04.479
<v Speaker 3>like the loop is the first fully realized example of

1:13:04.520 --> 1:13:10.559
<v Speaker 3>a reversible golf course. It's truly eighteen holes, eighteen greens

1:13:10.560 --> 1:13:12.920
<v Speaker 3>that are reversible and you can play from two different ways,

1:13:13.800 --> 1:13:18.000
<v Speaker 3>and I just think that it opens up this kind

1:13:18.040 --> 1:13:22.920
<v Speaker 3>of can of worms for different concepts, like picking a

1:13:23.000 --> 1:13:25.960
<v Speaker 3>concept for a golf course and going all in one

1:13:26.320 --> 1:13:31.280
<v Speaker 3>percent and kind of exploring all different ways of doing that.

1:13:32.280 --> 1:13:34.679
<v Speaker 3>And I'm just going to be curious to see how

1:13:35.520 --> 1:13:42.840
<v Speaker 3>other concepts like this formulate afterwards. Is there other styles

1:13:42.880 --> 1:13:49.400
<v Speaker 3>of reversibility or multiple greens, multiple roots, similar to like

1:13:49.680 --> 1:13:51.760
<v Speaker 3>the horse course at Prairie Club where it's to choose

1:13:51.760 --> 1:13:55.080
<v Speaker 3>your own adventure. It's essentially a field with golf holes

1:13:55.120 --> 1:13:57.880
<v Speaker 3>and you can pick where you want to go. So

1:13:57.920 --> 1:14:01.519
<v Speaker 3>I think it's really influential in that point of view.

1:14:02.080 --> 1:14:07.400
<v Speaker 3>And then also it helps out a lot specifically at

1:14:07.400 --> 1:14:10.000
<v Speaker 3>that resort, the goal was to get people to stay

1:14:10.600 --> 1:14:13.760
<v Speaker 3>on their property in their beds for more than just

1:14:14.280 --> 1:14:17.280
<v Speaker 3>one or two nights. They wanted people to stay for

1:14:17.400 --> 1:14:21.240
<v Speaker 3>longer than that, and this was sort of Tom Dokes's

1:14:21.280 --> 1:14:24.639
<v Speaker 3>answer to that question is, Oh, if you can only

1:14:24.680 --> 1:14:27.880
<v Speaker 3>play the reversible golf course one direction each day.

1:14:28.320 --> 1:14:29.360
<v Speaker 1>It forces people to.

1:14:29.320 --> 1:14:34.680
<v Speaker 3>Come here and stay and experience the design in both directions.

1:14:35.160 --> 1:14:37.920
<v Speaker 3>So I think it was revolutionary in that sense of

1:14:38.040 --> 1:14:40.040
<v Speaker 3>driving more revenue to the resort as well.

1:14:40.160 --> 1:14:44.160
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to see the loop become more influential than

1:14:44.160 --> 1:14:48.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it has been strangely for the past several years. Yes,

1:14:48.360 --> 1:14:52.880
<v Speaker 1>we've seen people attempt various different iterations of a reversible

1:14:53.080 --> 1:14:58.160
<v Speaker 1>golf course, but it's still kind of relatively rare. And

1:14:58.600 --> 1:15:00.760
<v Speaker 1>one reason I like it so much is that there

1:15:00.840 --> 1:15:06.200
<v Speaker 1>is such an efficiency of maintenance and footprint with a

1:15:06.280 --> 1:15:10.400
<v Speaker 1>reversible course. You really get two courses in one. And

1:15:10.479 --> 1:15:13.760
<v Speaker 1>so I think, as we're thinking about in this new,

1:15:14.120 --> 1:15:18.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe slightly scary era of the world's environment

1:15:19.040 --> 1:15:22.160
<v Speaker 1>that we're entering into, if you can have a course

1:15:22.200 --> 1:15:25.360
<v Speaker 1>that is efficient like that, then that's got to be

1:15:25.400 --> 1:15:29.000
<v Speaker 1>appealing and it would be great to see more innovation

1:15:29.280 --> 1:15:32.160
<v Speaker 1>on this front. But definitely the loop is the result

1:15:32.240 --> 1:15:36.040
<v Speaker 1>of Tom Doak thinking through this question that I was

1:15:36.120 --> 1:15:40.679
<v Speaker 1>talking about when we were discussing Old barnwell, where can

1:15:40.720 --> 1:15:44.679
<v Speaker 1>golf architecture go next? But at the same time basing

1:15:44.760 --> 1:15:47.880
<v Speaker 1>that on the oldest source possible, which is the old

1:15:47.920 --> 1:15:51.320
<v Speaker 1>course at Saint Andrew's right. We've seen Tom Doak really

1:15:52.840 --> 1:15:55.679
<v Speaker 1>build three different courses in this twenty ten to twenty

1:15:55.720 --> 1:16:00.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty five period that are simultaneously something that something very

1:16:00.439 --> 1:16:05.880
<v Speaker 1>new and based on the old course in Old MacDonald,

1:16:06.240 --> 1:16:11.360
<v Speaker 1>The Loop and the Lido. These three courses take such

1:16:11.439 --> 1:16:17.520
<v Speaker 1>inspiration from the old course, oftentimes direct template style inspiration

1:16:17.600 --> 1:16:21.719
<v Speaker 1>from the old course, and yet all of them feel fresh,

1:16:22.040 --> 1:16:25.840
<v Speaker 1>like they're introducing new ideas into the bloodstream of modern

1:16:25.880 --> 1:16:28.840
<v Speaker 1>golf architecture. And so it just shows how kind of

1:16:28.840 --> 1:16:33.519
<v Speaker 1>the oldest influence can still produce something something new.

1:16:33.800 --> 1:16:37.719
<v Speaker 2>I am a huge, huge fan of the Loop.

1:16:37.760 --> 1:16:39.760
<v Speaker 4>It's one of my favorite modern designs.

1:16:41.320 --> 1:16:44.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's had as much influence as it

1:16:44.720 --> 1:16:47.880
<v Speaker 2>should have had to date. I think, like if you

1:16:48.360 --> 1:16:52.960
<v Speaker 2>said purely concept based, this would jump to the top

1:16:53.000 --> 1:16:58.759
<v Speaker 2>of my list, but I think it's hamstrung by its

1:16:59.280 --> 1:17:04.200
<v Speaker 2>location right now and it's type of golf. I think

1:17:04.200 --> 1:17:08.120
<v Speaker 2>if this was a golf course that was close to

1:17:08.200 --> 1:17:11.920
<v Speaker 2>a metro area and open accessible, you know, accessible to

1:17:11.920 --> 1:17:14.559
<v Speaker 2>the public like it is now. If it was close

1:17:14.600 --> 1:17:17.880
<v Speaker 2>to a metro area, people would rave about this course

1:17:17.960 --> 1:17:21.920
<v Speaker 2>being as ingenious as any course in the world. But

1:17:22.000 --> 1:17:26.200
<v Speaker 2>I think it is a you know, it's in an

1:17:26.240 --> 1:17:30.000
<v Speaker 2>area the Midwest with a lot of golf resorts, and

1:17:30.040 --> 1:17:33.720
<v Speaker 2>what happens is people go try different resorts. They go

1:17:33.760 --> 1:17:36.599
<v Speaker 2>to Sand Valley, they go to Forest Dunes, they go

1:17:36.680 --> 1:17:40.080
<v Speaker 2>to Lasnia, they go to Boyne, they go to these

1:17:40.200 --> 1:17:44.040
<v Speaker 2>different they go to Arcadia, and what happens is people

1:17:44.080 --> 1:17:48.240
<v Speaker 2>do not play this with as much regularity to under

1:17:48.479 --> 1:17:53.200
<v Speaker 2>the amount of regularity they need to to understand the sheer.

1:17:53.320 --> 1:17:54.160
<v Speaker 4>Brilliance of it.

1:17:54.600 --> 1:17:58.040
<v Speaker 2>And I think this is my where I didn't have.

1:17:58.200 --> 1:18:00.719
<v Speaker 2>I would say it's on in terms of just pure

1:18:00.840 --> 1:18:08.840
<v Speaker 2>design as influential and it, but in its current application

1:18:09.600 --> 1:18:12.240
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't get there for me because I don't think.

1:18:12.880 --> 1:18:14.439
<v Speaker 4>I think if this had been a.

1:18:16.160 --> 1:18:20.479
<v Speaker 2>Private country club that redesigned this course, this course would

1:18:20.479 --> 1:18:24.760
<v Speaker 2>be lauded as more so, many more courses have gone

1:18:24.800 --> 1:18:29.920
<v Speaker 2>reversible because of this golf course if it was daily fee, similarly,

1:18:30.320 --> 1:18:34.320
<v Speaker 2>but because it's a resort, very remote resort.

1:18:34.000 --> 1:18:34.759
<v Speaker 4>It hasn't.

1:18:35.280 --> 1:18:39.920
<v Speaker 2>It hasn't broken through into cultural society, into the cultural

1:18:39.960 --> 1:18:44.559
<v Speaker 2>golf society as brilliance. When I would say that, if

1:18:44.560 --> 1:18:47.920
<v Speaker 2>you said just sheer design, it might be number one

1:18:47.960 --> 1:18:48.240
<v Speaker 2>for me.

1:18:49.439 --> 1:18:50.559
<v Speaker 4>In this period of time.

1:18:50.840 --> 1:18:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, let's give it some time, because.

1:18:54.520 --> 1:18:57.400
<v Speaker 2>Because it's twenty forty the year is twenty forty nine, right.

1:18:57.320 --> 1:19:00.679
<v Speaker 1>These things work in funny ways, you know. Sometimes sometimes

1:19:00.720 --> 1:19:04.000
<v Speaker 1>golf courses, just like any other kind of cultural product,

1:19:04.320 --> 1:19:07.200
<v Speaker 1>have their day, and sometimes that day comes comes a

1:19:07.240 --> 1:19:09.519
<v Speaker 1>little bit later than you expect. But I think you're

1:19:09.600 --> 1:19:12.680
<v Speaker 1>right on that that it's it's almost the opposite of

1:19:12.720 --> 1:19:19.559
<v Speaker 1>Mammoth Dunes, where it's an extremely intricate, worthy golf course

1:19:20.120 --> 1:19:24.240
<v Speaker 1>that is just kind of in the wrong place and

1:19:24.520 --> 1:19:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the wrong kind of resort right now for as many

1:19:28.280 --> 1:19:31.479
<v Speaker 1>people to appreciate it as possible, and that that is

1:19:31.520 --> 1:19:35.479
<v Speaker 1>a shame because it is clearly brilliant. So I'm going

1:19:35.520 --> 1:19:38.799
<v Speaker 1>to kind of it's my pick. Now, we've picked eight courses,

1:19:39.280 --> 1:19:41.720
<v Speaker 1>and I'm just gonna sort of send me punt a

1:19:41.760 --> 1:19:44.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit, or at least ask for some assistance because

1:19:44.040 --> 1:19:47.439
<v Speaker 1>we've got two more spaces on this list. And I

1:19:47.479 --> 1:19:49.519
<v Speaker 1>think that there are a couple of contingents that at

1:19:49.520 --> 1:19:51.360
<v Speaker 1>this point are going to be mad at us. One

1:19:51.439 --> 1:19:54.160
<v Speaker 1>is anybody who lives outside of the US, So you know,

1:19:54.200 --> 1:19:58.880
<v Speaker 1>your Australians, your Canadians. Yeah, well, we started with We

1:19:59.200 --> 1:20:04.639
<v Speaker 1>started with Terry. Ye'll, maybe that'll please, maybe that'll placate

1:20:04.680 --> 1:20:07.280
<v Speaker 1>some people, but it's been all American courses since then.

1:20:07.600 --> 1:20:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Cabot Links is just kind of sitting there. Obviously an

1:20:10.080 --> 1:20:12.799
<v Speaker 1>important course in the sense that it launched the Cabot

1:20:12.840 --> 1:20:16.120
<v Speaker 1>brand and it and it again. It likes Sand Valley.

1:20:16.240 --> 1:20:18.800
<v Speaker 1>It was sort of a proof of concept, but this

1:20:18.920 --> 1:20:22.240
<v Speaker 1>time beyond the Dream Golf brand, that this kind of

1:20:22.280 --> 1:20:26.360
<v Speaker 1>thing could work, not outside of Dream Golf, because Mike

1:20:26.439 --> 1:20:30.479
<v Speaker 1>Kiser is obviously an important investor in in Cabot Links initially,

1:20:31.000 --> 1:20:35.040
<v Speaker 1>but it proved that that other, you know, outside of

1:20:35.040 --> 1:20:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the Kaiser family, there were developers who could pursue this

1:20:38.960 --> 1:20:42.160
<v Speaker 1>type of model, and since then Cabot has become extremely important.

1:20:42.720 --> 1:20:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Now another contingent who might be rightfully mad at us

1:20:45.840 --> 1:20:50.280
<v Speaker 1>at this point is the muni golf lovers. I don't

1:20:50.280 --> 1:20:52.920
<v Speaker 1>believe we have any municipal golf courses on our list yet.

1:20:53.400 --> 1:20:56.679
<v Speaker 1>And a really important set of trends in the past

1:20:56.680 --> 1:21:03.759
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years has been experimentation and innovation, new kinds of stuff,

1:21:04.560 --> 1:21:09.920
<v Speaker 1>surprising amount of development at certain municipal golf courses. So

1:21:11.000 --> 1:21:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the ones that come to mind immediately from the period

1:21:13.840 --> 1:21:17.240
<v Speaker 1>that we're talking about. For me are Winter Park, which

1:21:17.240 --> 1:21:21.479
<v Speaker 1>I would categorize as a redesign, even though they maintained

1:21:21.600 --> 1:21:24.799
<v Speaker 1>the pre existing routing, they turned that into a different

1:21:24.800 --> 1:21:29.519
<v Speaker 1>golf course. Yeah, Keith reb and Riley Johns did. They

1:21:29.800 --> 1:21:33.400
<v Speaker 1>turned it into a new golf course through what they did,

1:21:33.439 --> 1:21:38.520
<v Speaker 1>and it was a very very affordable type of renovation

1:21:38.680 --> 1:21:41.960
<v Speaker 1>that I wish we saw more of. So certainly that

1:21:42.040 --> 1:21:47.639
<v Speaker 1>one is on the list for me and maybe hasn't

1:21:47.680 --> 1:21:50.360
<v Speaker 1>been as influential as it should have been. The other

1:21:50.600 --> 1:21:53.360
<v Speaker 1>municipal candidate I have in mind would be the Park,

1:21:54.120 --> 1:21:58.800
<v Speaker 1>which is a completely different way of approaching a municipal renovation,

1:21:59.240 --> 1:22:02.599
<v Speaker 1>where you is a great deal of money to do

1:22:02.720 --> 1:22:08.240
<v Speaker 1>something very impressive for the community. You charge a healthy

1:22:08.320 --> 1:22:11.800
<v Speaker 1>rate for out of towners, but provide affordable services to

1:22:12.240 --> 1:22:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the people who live around the course, and in the

1:22:15.160 --> 1:22:19.599
<v Speaker 1>bargain you get a terrific gill Hants golf course. So

1:22:19.920 --> 1:22:22.479
<v Speaker 1>those are some candidates there. We have two slots left.

1:22:22.760 --> 1:22:24.200
<v Speaker 1>What do you guys think? Where do you think we

1:22:24.240 --> 1:22:24.560
<v Speaker 1>go with this?

1:22:25.040 --> 1:22:27.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? I mean I had the Park on my list,

1:22:27.400 --> 1:22:31.280
<v Speaker 3>and I also was like really considering Winter Park because

1:22:31.320 --> 1:22:35.559
<v Speaker 3>I think Winter Park was sort of a genesis for

1:22:36.479 --> 1:22:40.160
<v Speaker 3>taking a golf course that is close to a population

1:22:40.360 --> 1:22:47.760
<v Speaker 3>center that is vastly underutilized and I guess not interesting

1:22:48.120 --> 1:22:51.160
<v Speaker 3>in very many ways. And we're starting to see it

1:22:51.240 --> 1:22:54.439
<v Speaker 3>more like the park was a golf course that was

1:22:54.520 --> 1:22:59.479
<v Speaker 3>just sitting there. It was abandoned. It wasn't necessarily a

1:22:59.520 --> 1:23:03.360
<v Speaker 3>great golf golf course in the town. But I think

1:23:03.400 --> 1:23:06.800
<v Speaker 3>Winner Park set this precedent of, oh, if you have

1:23:07.240 --> 1:23:11.200
<v Speaker 3>a golf course, you can do a relatively affordable renovation,

1:23:12.160 --> 1:23:15.680
<v Speaker 3>have really smart golf course architecture, and make it a

1:23:15.800 --> 1:23:21.840
<v Speaker 3>really interesting, engaging golf course that becomes this almost invaluable

1:23:21.840 --> 1:23:26.479
<v Speaker 3>community asset. Another course that has recently, like literally just

1:23:26.600 --> 1:23:29.960
<v Speaker 3>opened that did this exact same thing as Miami Lakes

1:23:30.520 --> 1:23:34.080
<v Speaker 3>in Florida. It was a golf course that was essentially

1:23:34.280 --> 1:23:38.160
<v Speaker 3>sitting in a swamp, had little to no interest. And

1:23:38.240 --> 1:23:43.080
<v Speaker 3>now Bruce Heppner comes in, builds some interesting greens, some

1:23:43.120 --> 1:23:46.880
<v Speaker 3>smart bunkering. And now I haven't been back yet, but

1:23:46.960 --> 1:23:49.960
<v Speaker 3>I was there during construction and by all means what

1:23:50.040 --> 1:23:51.760
<v Speaker 3>I saw it seems like it's going to be a

1:23:51.880 --> 1:23:55.360
<v Speaker 3>very very interesting golf course. So that's what I think.

1:23:55.920 --> 1:24:00.960
<v Speaker 3>Winter Park did so well is sort of show all

1:24:01.000 --> 1:24:04.240
<v Speaker 3>these courses that have followed that you can take these

1:24:05.680 --> 1:24:09.080
<v Speaker 3>underutilized golf sites and turn them into something that's really

1:24:09.160 --> 1:24:13.280
<v Speaker 3>interesting and then begins to start to attract people from

1:24:13.680 --> 1:24:16.120
<v Speaker 3>outside of that community or outside of that city.

1:24:16.720 --> 1:24:20.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'd throw Golden Gate Park into the mix as

1:24:20.400 --> 1:24:21.479
<v Speaker 2>something that's followed this.

1:24:22.360 --> 1:24:22.800
<v Speaker 4>I think the.

1:24:24.439 --> 1:24:28.120
<v Speaker 2>Story of Winter Park and what followed, even though some

1:24:28.760 --> 1:24:32.080
<v Speaker 2>end up being really high priced projects, but the idea

1:24:32.520 --> 1:24:37.080
<v Speaker 2>that golf architecture good golf architecture doesn't have to be

1:24:37.160 --> 1:24:42.080
<v Speaker 2>more expensive and doesn't have to be inaccessible to the public,

1:24:42.760 --> 1:24:48.120
<v Speaker 2>that I think is a very important aspect of this.

1:24:48.360 --> 1:24:52.360
<v Speaker 2>And I think I think Winter Park probably deserves to

1:24:52.400 --> 1:24:54.800
<v Speaker 2>be there because it was the trailblazer.

1:24:55.720 --> 1:24:58.599
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so that's our number nine. Winter Park. I think

1:24:58.640 --> 1:25:02.800
<v Speaker 1>it richly deserves and that story really blew up too.

1:25:03.160 --> 1:25:06.799
<v Speaker 1>That story had an effect on people, and the Miami

1:25:06.920 --> 1:25:10.639
<v Speaker 1>Lakes project actually was very much inspired by Winter Park.

1:25:10.680 --> 1:25:12.800
<v Speaker 1>The owners there looked at Winter Park and said, hey,

1:25:13.200 --> 1:25:14.160
<v Speaker 1>why can't we do this.

1:25:14.640 --> 1:25:18.280
<v Speaker 2>I think the Golf Channel coverage of it was huge

1:25:18.320 --> 1:25:20.040
<v Speaker 2>in Winter Park success.

1:25:20.640 --> 1:25:22.160
<v Speaker 4>They were regularly there.

1:25:22.360 --> 1:25:25.200
<v Speaker 2>I know some of the producers at Golf Channel or

1:25:25.280 --> 1:25:26.840
<v Speaker 2>former producers.

1:25:26.640 --> 1:25:27.840
<v Speaker 4>Live on the golf course.

1:25:28.040 --> 1:25:33.519
<v Speaker 2>Matchinello was there regularly, and I think that it led to,

1:25:34.040 --> 1:25:37.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, they and the PGA Show. Honestly, the PGA

1:25:37.400 --> 1:25:41.479
<v Speaker 2>Show being there every year. The Winter Park was the

1:25:41.640 --> 1:25:45.360
<v Speaker 2>hub starting in like twenty fifteen, twenty sixteen of the

1:25:45.360 --> 1:25:48.280
<v Speaker 2>PGA shows where everybody played golf around there.

1:25:49.040 --> 1:25:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, And it's so it's an influential project and

1:25:52.400 --> 1:25:56.960
<v Speaker 1>at the same time something that hasn't been fully replicated yet,

1:25:57.240 --> 1:25:59.400
<v Speaker 1>and that's there are a lot of reasons for that.

1:26:00.040 --> 1:26:03.600
<v Speaker 1>But I guess Park Golden Gate Park is a good example. Yes, absolutely,

1:26:03.640 --> 1:26:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I think Golden Gate Park maybe gets pretty it gets

1:26:07.400 --> 1:26:09.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty close, and and Miami Lakes has has a lot

1:26:09.960 --> 1:26:15.120
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of those those features as well in it.

1:26:15.640 --> 1:26:18.439
<v Speaker 1>But uh yeah, I mean, I guess I was you know,

1:26:19.600 --> 1:26:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I was hoping for an explosion of these kinds of

1:26:22.240 --> 1:26:25.200
<v Speaker 1>projects in the wake of Winter Park. We haven't seen

1:26:25.240 --> 1:26:28.640
<v Speaker 1>an explosion. We've seen we've seen a trickle rather than

1:26:28.680 --> 1:26:31.840
<v Speaker 1>a flood. But uh but that's that's slotting in at

1:26:31.880 --> 1:26:34.960
<v Speaker 1>number nine. Now for number ten, I'm going to open

1:26:34.960 --> 1:26:38.519
<v Speaker 1>this up to discussion. I've already mentioned Cabot links as

1:26:38.560 --> 1:26:41.680
<v Speaker 1>a possibility. What are the others that are in the

1:26:41.720 --> 1:26:44.400
<v Speaker 1>mix for you guys and the ones that don't get

1:26:44.400 --> 1:26:49.400
<v Speaker 1>that number ten spot we can consider honorable mentions. So Andy,

1:26:49.400 --> 1:26:51.320
<v Speaker 1>why don't you go ahead and give us what the

1:26:51.320 --> 1:26:53.960
<v Speaker 1>rest of what is? Uh? What is rattling around in

1:26:54.000 --> 1:26:54.320
<v Speaker 1>your head?

1:26:54.320 --> 1:27:00.960
<v Speaker 2>For these I already put sand Valley for more reasons.

1:27:01.000 --> 1:27:06.480
<v Speaker 2>I also have Rodeo Dunes. I think the the closeness

1:27:06.760 --> 1:27:11.320
<v Speaker 2>of that site to to Denver and the Denver Airport

1:27:11.640 --> 1:27:16.760
<v Speaker 2>is going to really I that thing is going to

1:27:16.800 --> 1:27:19.200
<v Speaker 2>be a popular or popular.

1:27:18.800 --> 1:27:21.639
<v Speaker 1>Place U The twenty golf course though.

1:27:21.840 --> 1:27:24.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it is, it is, That's true. I just I

1:27:24.720 --> 1:27:27.679
<v Speaker 2>put it down technically they.

1:27:27.600 --> 1:27:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Are preview loop open in twenty twenty five.

1:27:30.320 --> 1:27:33.719
<v Speaker 2>But for other ones that I have on my list,

1:27:34.960 --> 1:27:38.760
<v Speaker 2>I think I think Brambles is a going to be

1:27:39.040 --> 1:27:45.600
<v Speaker 2>a massively influential golf design for any golf course in

1:27:45.640 --> 1:27:49.800
<v Speaker 2>the western half of the United States in terms of

1:27:49.840 --> 1:27:52.799
<v Speaker 2>its use of Zosia grass that even though the joyste

1:27:52.800 --> 1:27:56.800
<v Speaker 2>of grass wasn't really recommended to use, and they dealt

1:27:56.800 --> 1:28:00.519
<v Speaker 2>with the the the challenge of growing it in, but

1:28:00.800 --> 1:28:05.880
<v Speaker 2>they've created something that provides a supreme playing service without

1:28:05.920 --> 1:28:08.519
<v Speaker 2>a lot of water, which is going to be you know,

1:28:08.640 --> 1:28:11.680
<v Speaker 2>kind of the name of the game in water restricted

1:28:12.080 --> 1:28:17.360
<v Speaker 2>and what in places with water issues, So brambles would

1:28:17.400 --> 1:28:19.440
<v Speaker 2>be in my consideration.

1:28:20.880 --> 1:28:22.240
<v Speaker 4>I think.

1:28:23.920 --> 1:28:27.040
<v Speaker 2>I would say that the golf course I think is

1:28:27.120 --> 1:28:31.000
<v Speaker 2>the best American golf course that I have seen in

1:28:31.040 --> 1:28:39.160
<v Speaker 2>the last fifteen years is probably Childress Hall. So I

1:28:39.160 --> 1:28:43.160
<v Speaker 2>would put this in the discussion if we're talking about

1:28:43.160 --> 1:28:47.400
<v Speaker 2>twenty forty nine. I think I said this on fried

1:28:47.439 --> 1:28:52.240
<v Speaker 2>Egg with all the ranking outrage, that's the lowest it's

1:28:52.280 --> 1:28:57.400
<v Speaker 2>going to be. So I think that deserves some sort of.

1:29:00.080 --> 1:29:00.599
<v Speaker 4>Know highlight.

1:29:00.640 --> 1:29:03.479
<v Speaker 2>I haven't seen every golf course built in the last

1:29:03.560 --> 1:29:08.120
<v Speaker 2>fifteen sixteen years, but I've seen most, so that would

1:29:08.200 --> 1:29:12.559
<v Speaker 2>be my my kind of ones that are in the running.

1:29:12.600 --> 1:29:17.240
<v Speaker 2>I also think like Medina three has a chance in

1:29:17.360 --> 1:29:21.880
<v Speaker 2>terms of the renovation. I like it more than some

1:29:22.040 --> 1:29:26.760
<v Speaker 2>of the other kind of modern renovations. And here you know,

1:29:27.439 --> 1:29:30.640
<v Speaker 2>and I think that one has a chance of like

1:29:30.720 --> 1:29:36.320
<v Speaker 2>this is what we do with all these big, outdated

1:29:36.439 --> 1:29:38.200
<v Speaker 2>championship golf courses.

1:29:38.840 --> 1:29:41.280
<v Speaker 1>All right, Matt, any any others to throw in the mix?

1:29:41.439 --> 1:29:45.160
<v Speaker 3>Interesting? Early enough, I had all three of those kind

1:29:45.160 --> 1:29:50.120
<v Speaker 3>of on on my list left Media number three Rambles

1:29:50.520 --> 1:29:53.400
<v Speaker 3>and then also Childress Hall. I wanted to hit on because,

1:29:53.439 --> 1:29:56.880
<v Speaker 3>like Andy said, I think Childress Hall is probably the

1:29:56.920 --> 1:29:59.720
<v Speaker 3>best golf course that I've seen built in the last

1:29:59.760 --> 1:30:02.799
<v Speaker 3>fIF teen years, and it feels like by a wide margin.

1:30:03.560 --> 1:30:03.760
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

1:30:05.240 --> 1:30:08.240
<v Speaker 3>I was really I really like the idea of Madna

1:30:08.320 --> 1:30:11.320
<v Speaker 3>number three because it feels like it's almost the first

1:30:12.000 --> 1:30:17.200
<v Speaker 3>course to take a very historically significant golf course in

1:30:17.240 --> 1:30:23.000
<v Speaker 3>the grand scheme of things. And it's not a holistic,

1:30:23.120 --> 1:30:26.720
<v Speaker 3>like complete redesign, but they took away like some of

1:30:26.760 --> 1:30:31.080
<v Speaker 3>the most famous holes to seventeenth kind of became this

1:30:31.200 --> 1:30:34.679
<v Speaker 3>Darling part three over the water and they completely eliminated it.

1:30:34.800 --> 1:30:38.439
<v Speaker 3>They changed the routing and it's essentially a new golf

1:30:38.479 --> 1:30:41.400
<v Speaker 3>course from what was there. So it'll be really really

1:30:41.400 --> 1:30:47.240
<v Speaker 3>interesting to see if other big name clubs go this direction,

1:30:47.800 --> 1:30:50.240
<v Speaker 3>and it almost feels like Medna number three could be

1:30:50.320 --> 1:30:55.040
<v Speaker 3>could be the trailblazer for that type of change in

1:30:55.040 --> 1:30:55.559
<v Speaker 3>the future.

1:30:56.160 --> 1:30:59.160
<v Speaker 1>And it's an OCM golf course. I think OCM are

1:30:59.200 --> 1:31:02.679
<v Speaker 1>going to be one of the most prominent firms of

1:31:02.760 --> 1:31:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the next twenty years, very likely, and.

1:31:05.680 --> 1:31:08.519
<v Speaker 2>So they have a lot of projects right now.

1:31:08.840 --> 1:31:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yeah, and they're they're they're going to continue to

1:31:11.880 --> 1:31:14.120
<v Speaker 1>get projects because they're very good at what they do,

1:31:14.600 --> 1:31:17.439
<v Speaker 1>and they also have Jeff Ogilvie on their side, and

1:31:17.439 --> 1:31:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and Jeff is is just going to be one of

1:31:19.720 --> 1:31:22.240
<v Speaker 1>those one of those people who's able to get jobs

1:31:22.240 --> 1:31:24.640
<v Speaker 1>because he's so thoughtful and of course he has he

1:31:24.720 --> 1:31:27.840
<v Speaker 1>has his profile as as a professional golfer. A couple

1:31:27.880 --> 1:31:31.360
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to uh to shout out would be I

1:31:31.400 --> 1:31:33.559
<v Speaker 1>think Seven Mile Beach has a chance of being a

1:31:33.640 --> 1:31:36.880
<v Speaker 1>very significant golf course from this era, but it's very

1:31:36.960 --> 1:31:39.360
<v Speaker 1>very new, so it's so it's hard to say exactly

1:31:39.400 --> 1:31:42.040
<v Speaker 1>what its profile is going to be. It's basically just

1:31:42.120 --> 1:31:45.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of tentatively opening up right now out in Tasmania,

1:31:45.840 --> 1:31:48.280
<v Speaker 1>but it's right next to the Hobart International Airport on

1:31:48.320 --> 1:31:51.240
<v Speaker 1>an amazing piece of land Mike Clayton and Mike Devreeese

1:31:51.240 --> 1:31:54.719
<v Speaker 1>design that looks like it's going to really impress people.

1:31:55.400 --> 1:31:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Ocum's project at Peninsula Kingswood was a very big deal

1:31:59.439 --> 1:32:03.040
<v Speaker 1>in transfer forming that golf course, adding something to one

1:32:03.080 --> 1:32:05.960
<v Speaker 1>of the world's great golf regions in the Melbourne sand Belt,

1:32:06.240 --> 1:32:09.920
<v Speaker 1>and also setting Ocum on the path that they're on now.

1:32:10.960 --> 1:32:11.920
<v Speaker 4>One other thing with that.

1:32:13.640 --> 1:32:21.639
<v Speaker 2>Fascinating case study of sell your really valuable land by

1:32:21.760 --> 1:32:26.120
<v Speaker 2>new land that might be better for golf, and the

1:32:26.160 --> 1:32:29.960
<v Speaker 2>idea of cash like you you don't you're not just

1:32:30.040 --> 1:32:32.440
<v Speaker 2>selling off like the Frail family.

1:32:33.600 --> 1:32:36.439
<v Speaker 4>And taking away. You're selling off.

1:32:36.360 --> 1:32:40.880
<v Speaker 2>And maybe upgrading the entire club like which is I thought,

1:32:40.920 --> 1:32:45.080
<v Speaker 2>I think that is a pretty interesting proposition for some

1:32:45.120 --> 1:32:47.320
<v Speaker 2>of these some of these clubs that sit on really

1:32:47.400 --> 1:32:52.480
<v Speaker 2>valuable land. We've seen it before. This happened the Hermitage

1:32:53.560 --> 1:32:57.120
<v Speaker 2>Club in Richmond. The original the you know course was

1:32:57.160 --> 1:33:01.280
<v Speaker 2>the Belmont was Belmont, which got redesigned by or renovated

1:33:01.280 --> 1:33:04.679
<v Speaker 2>by Davis Love's group, the you know, tilling Hass course

1:33:05.200 --> 1:33:09.240
<v Speaker 2>in Henrico County. But they the story of that course

1:33:09.360 --> 1:33:14.320
<v Speaker 2>was they effectively sold their original course and bought land

1:33:14.400 --> 1:33:17.520
<v Speaker 2>further outside because they wanted thirty six holes like expansion.

1:33:17.880 --> 1:33:20.760
<v Speaker 2>So it used to be something that happened, you know.

1:33:21.200 --> 1:33:24.759
<v Speaker 2>San Francisco had this happen with so many courses at

1:33:24.840 --> 1:33:31.240
<v Speaker 2>Old CITYO was basically four different clubs or really yeah,

1:33:31.280 --> 1:33:33.920
<v Speaker 2>so I think this is this is something that's happened

1:33:33.960 --> 1:33:36.520
<v Speaker 2>over time. We haven't really seen it happen in America.

1:33:36.920 --> 1:33:41.639
<v Speaker 2>But it's an interesting kind of proposition where you could

1:33:41.840 --> 1:33:43.559
<v Speaker 2>you know, and I don't know if the economic how

1:33:43.560 --> 1:33:46.200
<v Speaker 2>the economics would work on some of these, but you know,

1:33:46.280 --> 1:33:48.880
<v Speaker 2>you talk about like you know, the ultimate one would

1:33:48.880 --> 1:33:50.400
<v Speaker 2>be you know, and they would never do it because

1:33:50.439 --> 1:33:53.600
<v Speaker 2>it's on such a divine golf land, but like you know,

1:33:53.680 --> 1:33:57.880
<v Speaker 2>the the appraisal value of LACC if they sold and

1:33:58.000 --> 1:34:00.920
<v Speaker 2>what they could build, you know, turn it wouldn't be

1:34:00.960 --> 1:34:03.200
<v Speaker 2>anywhere near where it is now and they would never

1:34:03.280 --> 1:34:05.720
<v Speaker 2>do it. But like that type of idea of like

1:34:05.760 --> 1:34:08.759
<v Speaker 2>you always hear how valuable that real estate is, well,

1:34:09.120 --> 1:34:11.599
<v Speaker 2>can we take it build something you know, a little

1:34:11.600 --> 1:34:15.080
<v Speaker 2>bit further away, but have it be maybe better because

1:34:15.120 --> 1:34:16.040
<v Speaker 2>we you know.

1:34:17.840 --> 1:34:21.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so it's an interesting model.

1:34:21.600 --> 1:34:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, that's a good point. So Peninsula Kings would

1:34:25.040 --> 1:34:28.320
<v Speaker 1>definitely in the mix for me. The Rio Olympic golf course,

1:34:28.880 --> 1:34:32.719
<v Speaker 1>uh is one that was this really interesting and definitely

1:34:32.720 --> 1:34:34.320
<v Speaker 1>significant to Gil Hanson's career.

1:34:35.080 --> 1:34:38.800
<v Speaker 2>I think that one too, if they if it, if

1:34:38.840 --> 1:34:42.040
<v Speaker 2>it hadn't been, if it doesn't have just just like

1:34:42.120 --> 1:34:45.080
<v Speaker 2>this dark cloud of like what's really happening there hanging

1:34:45.160 --> 1:34:48.280
<v Speaker 2>over it. I think this one, like if they had

1:34:49.320 --> 1:34:53.519
<v Speaker 2>if they had created tournaments that continued to go back. Yes,

1:34:53.840 --> 1:34:57.960
<v Speaker 2>but it's just this though it had this thing and

1:34:58.120 --> 1:35:02.559
<v Speaker 2>we don't really hear about it ever because it had

1:35:02.640 --> 1:35:05.479
<v Speaker 2>such a great debut in that in that Olympics, but

1:35:05.640 --> 1:35:08.960
<v Speaker 2>there's no This is where golf in a way as

1:35:09.000 --> 1:35:13.519
<v Speaker 2>a professional sport has failed the global game, is that

1:35:13.600 --> 1:35:19.080
<v Speaker 2>its use has not you know, met up with you know, yeah,

1:35:19.120 --> 1:35:20.160
<v Speaker 2>it's purpose.

1:35:20.439 --> 1:35:24.000
<v Speaker 1>It's it's it would be such a wonderful regular tournament course,

1:35:24.080 --> 1:35:27.920
<v Speaker 1>but it just hasn't become that. So very unfortunate. Yeah.

1:35:27.960 --> 1:35:31.000
<v Speaker 1>A couple others to mention would be Scottsdale National, a

1:35:31.360 --> 1:35:35.719
<v Speaker 1>pretty stunning effort by Jackson con Design that takes desert

1:35:35.760 --> 1:35:39.680
<v Speaker 1>golf architecture in what feels like a new direction. And

1:35:39.720 --> 1:35:43.880
<v Speaker 1>then I've heard great things about Saint Patrick's Lynx, another

1:35:43.920 --> 1:35:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Tom Doak course, but that's one that's extremely highly rated

1:35:47.280 --> 1:35:50.439
<v Speaker 1>and will probably be regarded as, if not one of

1:35:50.479 --> 1:35:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the defining courses of the era, definitely one of the

1:35:52.960 --> 1:35:56.120
<v Speaker 1>best courses of the era. And then I should mention

1:35:56.240 --> 1:36:01.439
<v Speaker 1>Cape Wickham as well along those those lines. That's also

1:36:01.479 --> 1:36:06.000
<v Speaker 1>an extremely highly rated but fairly remote golf course. All right,

1:36:06.280 --> 1:36:09.160
<v Speaker 1>So those are the honorable mentions. What do you guys

1:36:09.200 --> 1:36:14.360
<v Speaker 1>think goes in number ten? I'm Cabot Links is a possibility.

1:36:14.680 --> 1:36:18.240
<v Speaker 1>You guys both mentioned Brambles and Childress Hall and Madna

1:36:18.320 --> 1:36:20.639
<v Speaker 1>number three. How does it feel at this point?

1:36:21.120 --> 1:36:24.320
<v Speaker 4>I'll let Matt vote first. I had to pick first.

1:36:24.400 --> 1:36:27.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I kind of like my Dina number three because

1:36:27.160 --> 1:36:30.599
<v Speaker 3>it feels like an outlier from all the other ones

1:36:30.640 --> 1:36:35.680
<v Speaker 3>we picked. I could very easily just go with Childres

1:36:35.680 --> 1:36:38.560
<v Speaker 3>because of how incredible the golf course is. But I

1:36:38.560 --> 1:36:41.599
<v Speaker 3>think we already kind of selected one in that vein

1:36:41.760 --> 1:36:46.559
<v Speaker 3>with Terry Dy. So my vote would be MDNA number three,

1:36:46.640 --> 1:36:52.000
<v Speaker 3>and it's kind of redesigning a historically significant golf course.

1:36:52.240 --> 1:36:55.559
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we don't have We don't really have one of

1:36:55.600 --> 1:37:00.200
<v Speaker 1>those kind of complete overhauls of a historically significant golf

1:37:00.240 --> 1:37:03.080
<v Speaker 1>course on our list. I mean Winter Park was a renovation, obviously,

1:37:03.800 --> 1:37:07.840
<v Speaker 1>but Medina was on a completely different scale. How does

1:37:08.320 --> 1:37:09.519
<v Speaker 1>how does that strike you? Andy?

1:37:10.160 --> 1:37:10.880
<v Speaker 4>That works for me?

1:37:13.400 --> 1:37:17.240
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, Canada, I think you know I I yeah, I

1:37:17.640 --> 1:37:22.960
<v Speaker 2>do think Tree Farm deserves deserves thought because I think

1:37:23.000 --> 1:37:26.640
<v Speaker 2>it's one of the more unique how I built this

1:37:26.760 --> 1:37:30.760
<v Speaker 2>golf course thing in the sense of we picked a

1:37:30.800 --> 1:37:33.839
<v Speaker 2>lot of courses that were built by very wealthy people.

1:37:34.160 --> 1:37:37.360
<v Speaker 2>Or you know Zach Blair. Yeah he plays on the

1:37:37.360 --> 1:37:40.719
<v Speaker 2>PGA Tour, but he the way in which he built

1:37:40.720 --> 1:37:43.160
<v Speaker 2>the golf course completely revolutionary.

1:37:43.760 --> 1:37:47.240
<v Speaker 1>M okay and yeah, so we think maybe maybe the

1:37:47.240 --> 1:37:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Tree Farm should replace Old Barnwell or else all I

1:37:50.439 --> 1:37:54.600
<v Speaker 1>mean you put a mention of it in there.

1:37:54.680 --> 1:37:59.120
<v Speaker 2>I just think the Tree Farm being grossly overlooked because

1:37:59.760 --> 1:38:03.519
<v Speaker 2>it was the first and Aiken and the manner in

1:38:03.560 --> 1:38:06.920
<v Speaker 2>which it was built is unlike any other golf course

1:38:07.640 --> 1:38:10.040
<v Speaker 2>in that we have talked about today and the way

1:38:10.640 --> 1:38:15.920
<v Speaker 2>the course was financed, the way you know it. It

1:38:16.080 --> 1:38:19.000
<v Speaker 2>was the public version of it, and I know that

1:38:19.120 --> 1:38:23.280
<v Speaker 2>like drawed, iire of people. You know, it bothers people

1:38:23.520 --> 1:38:26.200
<v Speaker 2>the way that it went down. But guess what he

1:38:26.320 --> 1:38:31.360
<v Speaker 2>made everything like transparent from this get go. And ideas change.

1:38:31.479 --> 1:38:33.599
<v Speaker 2>They have to change, they have to evolve to get

1:38:33.680 --> 1:38:37.439
<v Speaker 2>things done. You know, my original idea for Friday Golf

1:38:37.640 --> 1:38:40.599
<v Speaker 2>is not what it is today. Wasn't It didn't follow

1:38:40.640 --> 1:38:43.720
<v Speaker 2>the exact path that I thought it would follow. But

1:38:44.560 --> 1:38:49.439
<v Speaker 2>I think that that project, like and I've been on

1:38:49.479 --> 1:38:51.880
<v Speaker 2>the record, I like Old barn Wall as a course

1:38:51.960 --> 1:38:56.080
<v Speaker 2>more but I think that project is like so so

1:38:56.439 --> 1:38:59.160
<v Speaker 2>unique in the way it was built, and I think

1:38:59.200 --> 1:39:01.439
<v Speaker 2>it's been overlooked, honestly.

1:39:02.280 --> 1:39:06.799
<v Speaker 1>Probably because of its location and because Old Barnwell has,

1:39:07.200 --> 1:39:11.080
<v Speaker 1>for whatever combination of reasons, kind of caught the hype train.

1:39:11.520 --> 1:39:13.679
<v Speaker 1>I think for good reasons. I'm not saying the hype

1:39:13.720 --> 1:39:17.519
<v Speaker 1>is unjustified. I think it's an absolutely terrific and kind

1:39:17.560 --> 1:39:22.920
<v Speaker 1>of pathbreaking work of golf course architecture, but it's it

1:39:23.000 --> 1:39:26.639
<v Speaker 1>has loomed a bit large in the discourse about Achen,

1:39:26.720 --> 1:39:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and maybe the tree Farm will will eventually have its

1:39:29.400 --> 1:39:33.559
<v Speaker 1>day here, all right. So that is basically the list

1:39:33.800 --> 1:39:38.559
<v Speaker 1>we have Terry Edie, the Lido, Mammoth Dunes, Sweeten's Cove,

1:39:39.120 --> 1:39:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the Cradle at Pinehurst, Old Barnwell Slashed, the Tree Farm,

1:39:44.920 --> 1:39:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the Hoopy Match Club, the Loop Winter Park, and Medina

1:39:49.080 --> 1:39:51.760
<v Speaker 1>number three. I think that's a really good list. I

1:39:51.840 --> 1:39:57.080
<v Speaker 1>think that's a that's a pretty strong ten defining courses

1:39:57.560 --> 1:40:01.120
<v Speaker 1>of the past fifteen years. Thank you guys for joining

1:40:01.200 --> 1:40:05.480
<v Speaker 1>me for this exercise. This was really fun and appreciate

1:40:05.800 --> 1:40:08.000
<v Speaker 1>your time and your thought that you put into this.

1:40:09.640 --> 1:40:10.360
<v Speaker 4>Thanks Garrett.

1:40:10.720 --> 1:40:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Thanks This episode of Designing Golf was produced by Will Balsam.

1:40:22.280 --> 1:40:25.759
<v Speaker 1>Thank you Will. If you've been enjoying Designing Golf, then

1:40:25.800 --> 1:40:29.160
<v Speaker 1>go leave us a review in iTunes or wherever it

1:40:29.200 --> 1:40:31.479
<v Speaker 1>is that you're listening to us, Not for really any

1:40:31.479 --> 1:40:34.400
<v Speaker 1>particular reason. I just like hearing feedback from time to time.

1:40:34.479 --> 1:40:38.280
<v Speaker 1>So if you've listened to the podcast this year, enjoyed

1:40:38.280 --> 1:40:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the podcast, if you have thoughts about the podcast, then

1:40:41.040 --> 1:40:44.120
<v Speaker 1>then leave a rating and review. Thank you for listening.

1:40:44.439 --> 1:40:47.519
<v Speaker 1>Have a wonderful holiday. We'll be back on I think

1:40:47.560 --> 1:40:49.920
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be January eighth, but we're taking this

1:40:50.080 --> 1:40:54.040
<v Speaker 1>holiday season off, so a couple of blank weeks here

1:40:54.080 --> 1:40:57.439
<v Speaker 1>and then we're gonna start up with a Vengeance in

1:40:57.479 --> 1:41:00.639
<v Speaker 1>the new year. So again, thanks for listening. We'll see

1:41:00.680 --> 1:41:02.800
<v Speaker 1>you next year. Twenty twenty six