WEBVTT - SpaceX Kicks Off High-Grade Bond Sale

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is live

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 1>from the heart of Silicon Valley with ed la Though

0:00:18.160 --> 0:00:19.240
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco.

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:23.800
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up.

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 3>SpaceX is selling investment grade bonds for the first time

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 3>following its record breaking IPO.

0:00:29.480 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 2>We'll have the details.

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:34.879
<v Speaker 3>Plus Micron strikes an AI infrastructure agreement with Anthropics to

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:38.199
<v Speaker 3>drive enterprise AI adoption and a lot more. And Chevron

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:41.879
<v Speaker 3>signs a twenty year deal with Microsoft to power a

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 3>West Texas data center could be one of the biggest

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 3>in US.

0:00:46.520 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 2>Good Morning, Monday.

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:53.559
<v Speaker 3>June twenty second, twenty twenty six, SpaceX's inaugural bond sale.

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 3>This is about repaying their existing debt funding corporate needs,

0:00:58.400 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 3>and Bloomberg's reporting has been spot on. What we understand

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 3>is that right now you have the same banks they've

0:01:03.680 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 3>been working with on their existing financing going out, holding

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:12.240
<v Speaker 3>investor meetings, gauging appetite. But we believe that they'll look

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 3>at maybe raising around twenty billion dollars through this mechanism.

0:01:15.360 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 3>By the way, the stock is down for a third

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:21.399
<v Speaker 3>straight session, down ten percent this Monday, trading below one

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:24.039
<v Speaker 3>hundred and seventy dollars a share. Remember this is an

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 3>IPO that priced on June twelfth, June eleventh Trader June twelve,

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and thirty five dollars a share. Now, why

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 3>would a company sitting on one hundred billion dollars and

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:39.679
<v Speaker 3>more of cash need to tap the corporate debt market?

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Intelligence writing that quote, despite operational questions and considerable

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 3>key man risk, they expect SpaceX's debt issue to be

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 3>very warmly received.

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:51.440
<v Speaker 2>There's only one man for the job.

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Intelligence senior credit analyst, Robert Schiffman. That's the story, right,

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 3>Why would a company that has one hundred billion dollars

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 3>of cash on hand and do this?

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 2>Explain?

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 4>Well, I didn't think I could be more bullish, but

0:02:04.440 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 4>every day I wake up and show up at Bloomberg,

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 4>I'm more and more bullish on AI, and I think

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 4>this deal is just going to support that. You know,

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 4>why do they need to raise more money. It's because

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:16.680
<v Speaker 4>over the next handful of years they're probably going to

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:19.839
<v Speaker 4>spend a lot more than one hundred billion dollars. In fact,

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 4>the free cash flow is probably going to be a

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:25.520
<v Speaker 4>lot more than one hundred billion dollars. On the negative side.

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 4>So they're going to need money because they're building the

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:30.920
<v Speaker 4>next hyperscaler business in space.

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:34.800
<v Speaker 3>Let's go to the investor demand or appetite for this.

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 3>We had reported even prior to the IPO that SpaceX

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 3>had managed to get investment grade ratings from the three

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:45.840
<v Speaker 3>main agencies, and in your react you basically say, this

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 3>is how we think they'll stack up relative to their

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:52.079
<v Speaker 3>hyperscale piers. You have a greater rating. Still, why does

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 3>all of that matter?

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:56.080
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think listen, nobody owns SpaceX right now from

0:02:56.120 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 4>the bond side, so there's going to be enormous demand

0:02:58.800 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 4>when you have an inaugural offering like this, it's going

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:03.679
<v Speaker 4>to be a feeding frenzy. And quite frankly, I think

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 4>three quarters of the people that are going to buy

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:07.400
<v Speaker 4>the bonds aren't even going to know what this company does.

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 4>It's going to be very much of a buy now,

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 4>ask questions later. But what do they have supporting them?

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:17.360
<v Speaker 4>They've got very strong, stable investment grade ratings. You do

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 4>not have to worry about this name going to jump.

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 4>You've got perhaps the greatest investor of our generation, Elon Musk,

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 4>who I think has replaced Warren Buffett, and you have

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 4>one hundred billion dollars of cash sitting on the books,

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 4>plus tremendous upside across a diversity of businesses. My sense is,

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 4>if they raise twenty odd billion dollars, you're going to

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 4>have a book size that's well north of one hundred

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 4>billion dollars.

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 3>You mean the demand, the one hundred billion dollars demand

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 3>for twenty billion dollars of supply, just real quick like,

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 3>trying to compare and contrast.

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 2>The equity story.

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 3>This stocks down nine percent one hundred and sixty seven

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 3>dollars a share for the equity investor. They read the prospectives,

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 3>they listen to Elon Musk, and everything that's being pitched

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 3>is very far into the future, but is the kind

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 3>of common denominator between the equity investors' approach and the

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 3>credit investors approach to SpaceX. Trying to understand the path

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 3>of CAPEX. Does it work the same way?

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:16.719
<v Speaker 4>Listen? Equity and credit are different. Equity is based on

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:20.360
<v Speaker 4>hope and future cash flows. Credit generally is based upon

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:24.359
<v Speaker 4>present cash flows and what leverage looks like right now.

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 4>I actually do think that those are going to somewhat

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 4>come together over time. This company is committed to reasonably

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:33.119
<v Speaker 4>low leverage below three times. They're committing to having twenty

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:35.800
<v Speaker 4>five billion dollars of cash on the books for the

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:40.239
<v Speaker 4>foreseeable future, and there's a hope of just absolute tremendous growth.

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 4>Quite frankly, it's not so different than what Microsoft or

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 4>Alphabet or Amazon is doing. And just remember in the

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:48.280
<v Speaker 4>early days of names like Amazon, they lost a lot

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 4>of money too. You have to spend money to make money.

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:52.680
<v Speaker 4>This is what this company is doing. I think the

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 4>bond market's going to be there to fund it, and

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:57.839
<v Speaker 4>I think the equity market when you start thinking about valuations,

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:01.279
<v Speaker 4>all these AI revenues in particular come in. Remember this

0:05:01.360 --> 0:05:05.800
<v Speaker 4>company is going to transition from what is a satellite

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 4>data business and aerospace and defense business to what's going

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 4>to be a hyperscaler in the sky. I think there's

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 4>nothing but upside when it comes to revenues and casualows

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:19.560
<v Speaker 4>for this business. So bondholders and credit holders will sort

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 4>of all be looking at the same thing a few

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 4>years from now.

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:23.040
<v Speaker 2>Doing both.

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 3>Robert Schiffman, senior credit analysts of Bloomberg Intelligence, thank you

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 3>very much. We talked a lot about SpaceX so far,

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 3>this morning, But the bigger market story is this return

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:35.480
<v Speaker 3>of tech leadership. Right, chip stocks outperforming and leading again.

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:38.719
<v Speaker 3>Software continues to lag. There's a lot of focus on

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:42.599
<v Speaker 3>lower energy prices, what's happening in the golf, and that's

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 3>supporting the growth trade.

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:45.240
<v Speaker 2>Joining US senior.

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:48.920
<v Speaker 3>Portfolio manager Tiffany Wade at Columbia Frednedle, there's a lot

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:51.919
<v Speaker 3>to kind of put together in this morning session. But

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:55.480
<v Speaker 3>again technology continues to be the story in this market.

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:56.599
<v Speaker 2>Is that true for you?

0:05:57.120 --> 0:05:59.600
<v Speaker 5>Yes, that's absolutely true. We did see tech stocks take

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 5>a bit of a breather, including semi stocks last week,

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 5>but they're after the races again this week and that

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:06.200
<v Speaker 5>continuously the market higher.

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 3>Of course, for investors of all types, the outlook for

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:14.839
<v Speaker 3>monetary policy and rates is important. It was really interesting

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 3>Noria Rabini on Bloomberg Television earlier basically saying, nah, it's

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 3>still tech.

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 2>Just listen to this real quick. People obsessed with the FED.

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 2>Whether there's fifty businesspose higher, where's al right? Now, what's

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:29.719
<v Speaker 2>the difference. The key story is tech boom and that's

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:31.720
<v Speaker 2>going to be the most important first order I feel

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:32.360
<v Speaker 2>anything else.

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 3>You know, Tiffany, I grew up in the Bloomberg Newsroom

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:39.640
<v Speaker 3>school of Well, you got to understand the rate environment

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:42.839
<v Speaker 3>because higher rates discount the present value of future cash flows,

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 3>and future cash flows are one way that we measure

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 3>the health and valuation of technology companies big and small.

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 2>Does the FED really matter at all?

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:52.479
<v Speaker 5>I think the FED still matters a lot, and it

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 5>matters a lot for tech stocks as well. It matters

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:57.039
<v Speaker 5>a lot for high growth stocks. We did see a

0:06:57.080 --> 0:07:01.039
<v Speaker 5>slightly more hawkish FED meeting last week, Kevin Worsh's first

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:04.160
<v Speaker 5>FED meeting. However, you know, quite a bit has changed

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:06.359
<v Speaker 5>since the data they were looking at last week, including

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 5>the MoU between the US and Iran. So I think

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 5>we might see, you know, potentially some different news coming

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 5>out of the next FED meeting. Off oil prices continue

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 5>to normalize, and.

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 3>In the background, of course, for the Bloomberg Tech audience,

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:20.240
<v Speaker 3>you know that there are headlines coming from the Vice

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 3>President and his participation in the talks between the United

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 3>States in Iran. We're very soon going to start talking

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 3>about earnings again, and I just wondered Tipany from Columbia

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 3>thread Neils perspective, how important earning's momentum is going to

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 3>be for a market where technology continues to dominate.

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 5>We're going to get a first read on that from

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:43.960
<v Speaker 5>Micron this Wednesday. I think that's going to be very

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 5>important to see if the momentum from these stocks can continue.

0:07:47.480 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 5>We're going to want to see continued revenue upside from

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 5>a lot of the semiconductor stocks, and we're also probably

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 5>going to want to see continued CAEPEX positive capex comments

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 5>from all of the hyperscalers. That will help keep the

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 5>spending party going. For all of the ass cated infrastructure

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 5>names related to AI build out.

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 3>It's really hard in aggregate to kind of say where's

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 3>the beginning, middle, and end here? You know, I think

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 3>you'd note right, tiffanyed it last week some of the

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 3>chip stocks, the picks and shovels, took a bit of

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 3>a breather, and off we are again today with the

0:08:15.760 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 3>Philadelphia Semiconductor Index outperforming and engauge that's up ninety percent

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 3>year to date.

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 2>How long can that carry on for?

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 5>I think we're going to see this continue for another

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 5>couple of quarters. The outlook for these stocks related to

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:34.040
<v Speaker 5>AI infrastructure spending is tremendous, and the revenue and earning

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 5>estimates continue to be revised higher, and I think as

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 5>long as that continues, you'll continue to see these stocks working.

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 5>And some of the announcement we've seen, you know, with

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:46.320
<v Speaker 5>Micronanthropic and then also around you know, Microsoft and you

0:08:46.360 --> 0:08:51.840
<v Speaker 5>know more data center spending in Texas continues to reinforce

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:54.079
<v Speaker 5>the story that this spending is going to continue for

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 5>another couple of years and probably continue at a faster

0:08:56.440 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 5>pace than it has been for the last one or

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 5>two years. So I think we'll cantinue to see those

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 5>positive earnings revisions that will continue to push the stockshire.

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:09.720
<v Speaker 3>We started the program today talking about SpaceX's inaugural bond sale,

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 3>but I just use that as a case study that

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 3>with Capex, both in equity, the market's being flooded, right,

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 3>Alphabet doing its offering, the use of corporate credit to

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:27.079
<v Speaker 3>fund what's going on. How closely are you tracking these

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 3>companies going to market to get the capital.

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 2>They need to fund these big commitments.

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 5>We're certainly focused on the outcome of these bond sales

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 5>because I think it's an indicator of the appetite for

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 5>the market for the amount of Capex spending that the

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:41.320
<v Speaker 5>companies are doing.

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 2>It's also non.

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:46.320
<v Speaker 5>Indicator of future capex expectations. So as those bond sales

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 5>continue to increase in size, it can you know, it

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 5>means that capex spending intentions continue to rise. So it's

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 5>certainly something that we're watching to indicate the health of

0:09:55.840 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 5>the capex spending cycle and also the intention of a

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 5>lot of the large companies around additional spending for AI infrastructure.

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:05.840
<v Speaker 3>Tiffany, real quick, what's the next thing you're watching for

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:06.640
<v Speaker 3>on your calendar?

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 5>I think it's probably earnings Micron this Wednesday is certainly

0:10:10.280 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 5>a big one that we'll be keeping an eye out for.

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:14.680
<v Speaker 3>And there's been some news this morning about Micron and

0:10:14.679 --> 0:10:16.360
<v Speaker 3>a deal with Anthropic, which we'll get to you later

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 3>in the program. Tiffany Wade of Columbia, Fred needle Back on.

0:10:18.960 --> 0:10:20.559
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Tech, thank you very much.

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 3>Now coming up, Meta invests nine hundred million dollars into

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:27.959
<v Speaker 3>an Indian fintech startup called Cred, with plans to appoint

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 3>its founder as the new leader of WhatsApp. We've got

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 3>more on that story next, and sticking with big tech names,

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 3>also taking a look at shares of Alphabet, parent of Google,

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:42.119
<v Speaker 3>down six percent in the session, biggest drop since February,

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:44.719
<v Speaker 3>as it stands, a lot in the newsflow has been

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:48.960
<v Speaker 3>about the departures from various parts of Google's AI initiatives,

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 3>the latest being a prominent AI research or Google DeepMind.

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:57.599
<v Speaker 3>Vice president John Jumper said Friday he was leaving for Anthropic.

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:00.679
<v Speaker 3>That seems to be weighing on this stock. Keep tracking it.

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Tech, all right. Some headlines have just

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:12.560
<v Speaker 3>crossed the Bloomberg terminal. SpaceX appears to have signed a

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:16.760
<v Speaker 3>deal with Reflection AI worth about six point three billion dollars.

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 2>That's according to some reports out there.

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:21.080
<v Speaker 3>I think the company is also just put headlines out

0:11:21.200 --> 0:11:24.560
<v Speaker 3>of its own. SpaceX can end the deal after three months,

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:27.440
<v Speaker 3>and Reflection is set to pay SpaceX one hundred and

0:11:27.440 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 3>fifty million dollars per month for that compute as part

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 3>of the deal. It didn't really do much to ease

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 3>the pressure on the stock, which is again down for

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 3>a third straight day, but still above its IPO price

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and thirty five dollars a share. Big Tech

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:45.360
<v Speaker 3>is turning to big oil to meet the electricity demand

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:48.440
<v Speaker 3>of the AI boom. Microsoft has signed a twenty year

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 3>deal with Chevron to build a massive natural gas fire

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 3>generating station for a proposed data center in West Texas,

0:11:57.000 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 3>dubbed Project Kilby. The power once expected to power up

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:04.440
<v Speaker 3>by twenty twenty eight. Bloomers Kevin Crowley joins US for

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 3>more from Houston. The scale of this is on paper

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 3>pretty big, right, So they're talking about ramping up to

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 3>about two point six two point seven gigawatts.

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 2>What do we need to know about this?

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 3>And like the natural gas part of it, the Permian

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:21.080
<v Speaker 3>West Texas very interesting.

0:12:22.040 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 2>Yes, exactly. Well, that's the key part of this.

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 6>It's a huge power power plant to fund an enormous

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:30.319
<v Speaker 6>data center. But the really important part is it's right

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 6>in the middle of the Permian Basin, which which many

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:33.560
<v Speaker 6>people know is the.

0:12:34.280 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 2>Biggest oil field here in the US.

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:38.960
<v Speaker 6>But with all the oil that comes up, there's an

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:41.840
<v Speaker 6>enormous amount of natural gas that also comes and there's

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 6>so much natural gas within the basin that it actually

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:48.079
<v Speaker 6>often overwhelms pipeline capacity and has to be either burned

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 6>off or companies have to pay people to take it away.

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:54.520
<v Speaker 6>So there is abundance of natural gas and that is

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 6>what Chevron and Microsoft and they're partner Engine Number one,

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 6>are looking to take advantage of here got incredibly cheap

0:13:01.080 --> 0:13:05.079
<v Speaker 6>natural gas that can that can fuel the power station

0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 6>that will then power this this big data center that

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:10.199
<v Speaker 6>Microsoft plans to build.

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 3>Discuss in your report the bigger picture of what Microsoft's

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:18.559
<v Speaker 3>trying to do right. Microsoft has said it wants to

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:20.959
<v Speaker 3>double data center capacity of its own over the next

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 3>two years, and in aggregate, that's the direction that the

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 3>United States is going in over the next decade. But

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 3>they'd also had these like prior commitments to match the

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 3>sourcing of their power in terms of their commitments from

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 3>renewable sources, this is natural gas. So how are they

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:39.319
<v Speaker 3>managing all of that?

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:43.560
<v Speaker 6>Microsoft have said that they're they're pursuing kind of a

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:48.960
<v Speaker 6>diversification strategy, So they want they want diversification both in

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 6>terms of geography but also in terms of fuel sources

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 6>to renewables and natural gas. And I think they're pursuing

0:13:57.440 --> 0:14:00.160
<v Speaker 6>nuclear as well. I mean, obviously the natural gas as

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 6>is on is on the fossil fuel side, so it

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:05.359
<v Speaker 6>does does create a lot more a lot more emissions.

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 6>We are seeing some of these big tech companies UH

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 6>sort of diluting or walking away some of these prior

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 6>commitments to two one hundred percent renewable energy, just because

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 6>of the sheer scale of the of the demand and

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 6>the ambitions that AI in AI that they have.

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 2>There is in this project.

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 6>There are there are guardrails to mitigate the emissions, and

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 6>they do have plans to to maybe build in some

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 6>build in some solar, maybe some batteries at some point

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 6>in the in the future. But but the end of

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 6>the day, it's an enormous natural gas plants, so the

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 6>emissions are going to are going to be sizable associated

0:14:48.880 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 6>with that.

0:14:50.600 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 3>Chevron's shares modestly higher. Microsoft shares modestly lower after still

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:57.000
<v Speaker 3>was announced. Bloombers Kevin Crowley in Houston, thank you well.

0:14:57.120 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 2>Modestly so.

0:14:57.640 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 3>Misoft down two percent, turning out to news in big tech,

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 3>Meta is shaking up the executive suite at WhatsApp and

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 3>is in part a massive nine hundred million dollar investment

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 3>into an Indian fintech startup, Cred. So Meta is tapping

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 3>Cred's founder Canal Shah to step in is the new

0:15:18.440 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 3>global chief of WhatsApp to build out new revenue streams

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 3>for the mesaging platform. Ms Kat Wagner joins us with

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 3>the story, it's not straightforward, this okay, so basically the

0:15:28.480 --> 0:15:31.840
<v Speaker 3>news is there's a new head of WhatsApp. But the

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 3>mechanism that Metas used to get there is also interesting.

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:38.880
<v Speaker 7>It is and you're right, there's two parts of this,

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 7>the investment part in credit. There's the new executive for

0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:47.280
<v Speaker 7>WhatsApp in Kunal Shah. And this is a strategy that

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 7>you may be somewhat familiar with from Meta. With this

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 7>sort of like invest in recruit at the same time.

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 7>This is how they got Alexander Wang from Scaleai.

0:15:57.000 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 2>Last summer.

0:15:57.680 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 7>They invested heavily in Scale and recruited alex Wang at

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 7>the same time. This is a very similar approach smaller scale.

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 7>This is a smaller investment than last summers, but this

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 7>is sort of their way of bringing entrepreneurs who have

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 7>their own businesses, who have you know, a financial stake

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:17.880
<v Speaker 7>in a startup and enticing them to come work at

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 7>a more established company like Meta.

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 2>How's Meta sort of explaining this.

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 3>You know, we put a lot of emphasis on the

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 3>idea that WhatsApp can monetize in different ways future revenue streams.

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 2>Is there any kind of hint of what that looks like.

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 7>Well, they're doing a handful of things right now, including ads, subscriptions,

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:40.480
<v Speaker 7>and business messaging. Those are sort of the three things

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 7>that are going for revenue. What I think is important

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 7>here is that Khunaalshab being from India and having an

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 7>Indian startup is not a coincidence.

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 2>WhatsApp is huge in India.

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 7>They see a ton of potential there from a business standpoint,

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 7>and I think they thought that it was important to,

0:16:58.320 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 7>you know, have someone very familiar with market and very

0:17:00.880 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 7>familiar with how WhatsApp is used in that region coming

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:06.400
<v Speaker 7>in and taking over. And so the hope is certainly

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:09.439
<v Speaker 7>that he can take those revenue streams that are sort

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 7>of already in place but grow them considerably in India,

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 7>but also in other markets outside of North America.

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:20.640
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg text cut Wagner with the meadow WhatsApp story, thank

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 3>you very much. I want to go to China's battery

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 3>metals market. Chinese lithium futures have plunged nearly nine percent

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:32.360
<v Speaker 3>over the last two days over speculation that caatl could

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:35.879
<v Speaker 3>soon restart, one of the world's largest lithium mines. A

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:40.199
<v Speaker 3>preliminary provincial land notice has some investors' bedding that the

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:43.440
<v Speaker 3>site may reopen in the second half of twenty twenty six.

0:17:43.520 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 2>Now that supply.

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:50.360
<v Speaker 3>Volatility comes as Beijing tries to sharpen its geopolitical leverage

0:17:50.440 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 3>over other critical minerals integral to making everything from iPhones

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:59.679
<v Speaker 3>to missiles. China has imposed new export controls on major

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:04.200
<v Speaker 3>US rare earth producers, MPEd Materials and USA rare Earth.

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 3>The retaliatory move comes off to the Pentagon blacklisted some

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:12.719
<v Speaker 3>of China's biggest firms earlier this month. Okay, coming up,

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 3>Apple's design revival incoming, CEO John Turnas looks to restore

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 3>the creative edge that defined the iPhone era.

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 2>That's sex, this is Bloomberg tech.

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 8>I mean hara anod, and it's time now for talking tech.

0:18:34.680 --> 0:18:38.200
<v Speaker 8>First up, ten Cents is giving we Chat an AI upgrade.

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:41.199
<v Speaker 8>The company is testing a new assistant called Shaowei with

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:44.359
<v Speaker 8>a small group of users, allowing them to complete tasks

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:47.359
<v Speaker 8>through text or voice. The move could bring AI to

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:50.200
<v Speaker 8>weed Chat more than one billion users and help ten

0:18:50.240 --> 0:18:53.359
<v Speaker 8>cents compete with rivals like Ali Baba and byte Edance

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:55.200
<v Speaker 8>in China's AI race.

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 2>Plus.

0:18:56.119 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 8>Robinhood is looking to raise two billion dollars through a

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 8>convertible bond off, tapping into a booming market for corporate fundraising.

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:06.199
<v Speaker 8>The company says about three hundred million dollars of the

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:10.680
<v Speaker 8>proceeds will go towards share buybacks, with additional funds earmarks

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:14.719
<v Speaker 8>for hedging transactions tied to the deal end. Climb is

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 8>gearing up for its Wall Street debut. The electric bike

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 8>and scooter rental company is looking to raise up to

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:24.360
<v Speaker 8>one hundred and eighty one million dollars in its USIPO,

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:28.400
<v Speaker 8>offering six point seven million shares at between twenty four

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 8>and twenty six dollars a piece. At the top end

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 8>of that range, that uberbacked company would be valued at

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 8>about one point seven billion dollars ed.

0:19:37.800 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 2>Thank you very much, you hire right now.

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 3>Apple built its reputation on iconic product design, but the

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 3>influence of the team behind the iPhone and iPad has

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 3>faded over the past decade. Bloombo's Mark German writes in

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 3>this week's power On newsletter that the incoming CEO knows

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:57.439
<v Speaker 3>a major design shakeup is needed and is getting ready

0:19:57.480 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 3>to put his firm imprint on the tea. Mark joins us, now,

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 3>and this is about the industrial design studio that in

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 3>the era of first Steve Jobs and then Johnny Ive

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 3>for a very long time held a lot of power

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:16.520
<v Speaker 3>within the organization at Apple. What are you writing about

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:19.359
<v Speaker 3>empower on that's changed and why do you think that

0:20:19.680 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 3>the incoming CEO takes us back to that place of power.

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:23.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:20:23.960 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 9>Over the past decade or so, you've seen the industrial

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 9>design studio go from where exactly the future products are

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:33.399
<v Speaker 9>is dreamed up, where the whole company would come in

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:36.200
<v Speaker 9>to rally around the next big thing, leading to products

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:39.960
<v Speaker 9>like the iPhone, the iPad, the iMac, the iPod, the

0:20:40.000 --> 0:20:42.159
<v Speaker 9>Apple Watch, you name it. And it's now more of

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:47.320
<v Speaker 9>a service organization where different teams, operations, engineering, they come in,

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:49.480
<v Speaker 9>they get what they need, and they get out. It's

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 9>no longer the central hub, the influential center of innovation

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 9>for the company, and John Turnus knows that things need

0:20:56.800 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 9>to be shaken up there. The head of the industrial

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 9>design team Molly Anderson. She's known as a great individual designer.

0:21:05.160 --> 0:21:08.119
<v Speaker 9>She's known as someone who's beloved by her team. But

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:10.640
<v Speaker 9>it's not like Apple went out to look for the

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:14.400
<v Speaker 9>best industrial design leader in the world to take that position.

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 9>They made that choice from a place of defense, not

0:21:18.280 --> 0:21:21.679
<v Speaker 9>wanting more people to leave the team. Versus the perspective

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 9>of a company that's worth three trillion dollars plus that

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 9>could go out and get anyone they want to lead

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:29.719
<v Speaker 9>design in this post Johnny ive era that's already been

0:21:29.760 --> 0:21:31.160
<v Speaker 9>going on for nearly a decade.

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:35.879
<v Speaker 3>Mark you've detailed recently the kind of roadmap on the

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 3>hardware side for not just the rest of this year,

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 3>but beyond that. Is there a case study of where

0:21:41.119 --> 0:21:43.840
<v Speaker 3>this kind of return to design focus plays out.

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 2>We just have about thirty seconds.

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I mean we would like to see bigger design changes,

0:21:49.080 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 9>right for the first time in twenty years. You're going

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:55.560
<v Speaker 9>to have a meaningful shakeup to the iPhone over the

0:21:55.600 --> 0:21:58.360
<v Speaker 9>next few months with the fold wall phone, which I'm

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:01.399
<v Speaker 9>calling the iPhone Ultra. But there's a lot more to

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:05.399
<v Speaker 9>be done. There's more product categories. Major changes are necessary

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 9>to freshen up the AirPods and the album watch. Those

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:12.479
<v Speaker 9>are categories that have essentially looked the same since twenty sixteen.

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:16.200
<v Speaker 3>Right, Blue Moos Mark German who puts power on out

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 3>on Sunday mornings and then comes on Bloomberg Tech Monday

0:22:19.240 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 3>to go through it.

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:20.480
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much.

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:23.880
<v Speaker 3>Now, coming up, Micron lands a key deal with anthropic

0:22:24.160 --> 0:22:28.520
<v Speaker 3>as AI demand keeps surging. It's so interesting to see

0:22:28.800 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 3>Micron and Memory name go direct to a frontier lab.

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 2>We're going to go through that. This is what your

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 2>markets look like.

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 3>Kind of muted, but outperformance in chips, which has been

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:40.120
<v Speaker 3>the story of the year.

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:45.720
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech.

0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:50.360
<v Speaker 3>Our top stories today, SpaceX's bond sale and Micron striking

0:22:50.359 --> 0:22:54.520
<v Speaker 3>a partnership with Anthropic. Bloomberg executive reporter Kim Ragki here

0:22:54.640 --> 0:22:55.680
<v Speaker 3>with details.

0:22:55.240 --> 0:22:55.920
<v Speaker 2>On both coming.

0:22:56.440 --> 0:22:58.360
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, thanks, Ed. So we're seeing a lot of red

0:22:58.359 --> 0:23:00.440
<v Speaker 10>on the screen today here with SpaceX share the are

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:02.960
<v Speaker 10>down about eight percent off the lows of the day.

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 10>But if this continues, this will notch a third straight

0:23:05.880 --> 0:23:09.160
<v Speaker 10>day of selling and the name after its record breaking IPO.

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:11.960
<v Speaker 10>So what we're seeing here this morning is that investors

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:14.159
<v Speaker 10>might be reacting to a few different things. One is

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:17.640
<v Speaker 10>this investment grade bond sale the company looking to raise

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 10>even more money to spend on AI funded sort of

0:23:20.840 --> 0:23:24.280
<v Speaker 10>future growth after raising a record seventy five billion in

0:23:24.320 --> 0:23:26.919
<v Speaker 10>an IPO. The other thing we're seeing here is, you know,

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:30.840
<v Speaker 10>classic volatility that we see from IPOs, especially ones that

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 10>have low float, like we know is the case here

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 10>for SpaceX. We also are looking today at shares of Micron,

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:39.920
<v Speaker 10>so this stock is looking a little bit better today,

0:23:40.000 --> 0:23:43.920
<v Speaker 10>up about four point four percent. It's bucking the broader

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 10>trend down in the market today. What's happening this morning

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 10>is that the company said that it has a strategic

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:54.159
<v Speaker 10>agreement with Anthropic, so it's going to work together on

0:23:54.240 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 10>things like memory and storage architecture for AI, and also

0:23:59.119 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 10>gave some money to to one of the Anthropics funding rounds.

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:06.240
<v Speaker 10>This company has been on an absolutely massive stock rally.

0:24:06.240 --> 0:24:07.879
<v Speaker 10>The shares are up more than two hundred and sixty

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 10>percent from a March thirtieth trough here, and we're going

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:13.640
<v Speaker 10>to be watching this one really closely because it reports

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 10>earnings on Wednesday after market.

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 3>Clothes the most common rhinicky, Thank you very much, Let's

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:23.719
<v Speaker 3>stay with Micron. Jake Silverman of Bloomberg Intelligence says Micron's

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 3>new supply deal with Anthropic highlights just how tight memory

0:24:27.800 --> 0:24:30.680
<v Speaker 3>chip capacity has become. He says major AI data center

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 3>customers are increasingly locking in long term agreements to secure

0:24:34.880 --> 0:24:37.440
<v Speaker 3>that supply, and Jake joins us, now, this is the thing, though,

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:43.119
<v Speaker 3>it's a deal between Micron and a frontier lab direct right,

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:47.760
<v Speaker 3>not not the middleman that we call hyperscale. How unusual

0:24:47.840 --> 0:24:49.719
<v Speaker 3>is that? How surprised were you to see it?

0:24:50.480 --> 0:24:53.480
<v Speaker 11>It's definitely not typical for memory makers themselves to sign

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 11>these kind of deals, but it's not necessarily uncommon for

0:24:58.119 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 11>big customers to look for supply assurances. Hyperscalers themselves have

0:25:02.720 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 11>often done this in terms of how you think about

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 11>wayfer allocation from someone like TSMC, for.

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 3>Example, in your react, you're talking about it being reflective

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 3>of the situation, the state of play, and how tight

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 3>supply is. But this is good news for Micron, right

0:25:18.960 --> 0:25:21.119
<v Speaker 3>if you just go on the sheer reaction alone.

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:23.639
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, this is good for Micron in the sense that

0:25:23.680 --> 0:25:25.720
<v Speaker 11>it gives them a little bit more visibility into the

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:29.000
<v Speaker 11>actual downstream demand, at least theoretically based on what we're

0:25:29.000 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 11>seeing from the agreement that they actually put out in

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:36.280
<v Speaker 11>their press release. So you know, Micron needs to build

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:40.120
<v Speaker 11>out capacity, right, The entire industry is supply constrained, and

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:42.960
<v Speaker 11>this allows them to potentially build it out in a

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:46.720
<v Speaker 11>responsible way so that when Anthropic is serving their customers,

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 11>increasing their capacity not specifically of memory, but the chips

0:25:50.920 --> 0:25:55.119
<v Speaker 11>to allow people to use their models. So now theoretically

0:25:55.840 --> 0:25:59.000
<v Speaker 11>Micron can get an idea of exactly how much chip

0:25:59.000 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 11>demand there actually is.

0:26:01.160 --> 0:26:04.840
<v Speaker 3>You write in the react note that this sets them

0:26:04.920 --> 0:26:09.119
<v Speaker 3>up well for the next down cycle situation. You know,

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:13.680
<v Speaker 3>historically memory markets have been cyclical, right, boom and bust.

0:26:13.760 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 3>We talk about that a lot on the show, But

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 3>there are loads of people that don't think there'll be

0:26:17.560 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 3>a downcycle, you know, in the traditional sense, because of

0:26:21.560 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 3>the trajectory of data center building an investment. Just explain

0:26:25.920 --> 0:26:27.400
<v Speaker 3>your point of view on that.

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:30.159
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I think just if you look at historical trends,

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:33.439
<v Speaker 11>Having covered memory for a while, we've always seen up

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:36.199
<v Speaker 11>cycles and down cycles, and I don't think that just

0:26:36.240 --> 0:26:39.240
<v Speaker 11>because we're seeing very robust demand right now, it doesn't

0:26:39.280 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 11>mean that we won't see price declines on say a

0:26:41.840 --> 0:26:44.640
<v Speaker 11>sequential or you're over your basis in the future. What

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:46.879
<v Speaker 11>these agreements might do, though, on the other hand, is

0:26:46.920 --> 0:26:49.920
<v Speaker 11>it might reduce some of the volatility. We've seen massive

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 11>price decreases in the past during down cycles, such as

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 11>you know, fifty percent or so quarter over quarter, So

0:26:56.840 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 11>we might see a reduction in some of that volatility.

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:02.440
<v Speaker 11>And at the same time, if you look at past

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:06.040
<v Speaker 11>cloud cycles, there are periods where capex if flattens or

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:09.160
<v Speaker 11>declined slightly, and so that might be an opportunity for

0:27:09.800 --> 0:27:12.920
<v Speaker 11>hyperscalers to get slightly better deals on the actual memory

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:15.600
<v Speaker 11>that they're purchasing. So we don't necessarily think that the

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 11>cycle is not going to happen again or downcycle, but

0:27:19.400 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 11>we do think that we might see less volatility, more

0:27:22.960 --> 0:27:26.000
<v Speaker 11>of a straightforward idea of what the demand levels will

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:27.480
<v Speaker 11>be over the next say five years.

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 3>Jacob, As you know, Micro reports fiscal third quarter earnings

0:27:31.600 --> 0:27:32.960
<v Speaker 3>after market closed Wednesday.

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:35.120
<v Speaker 2>What are your expectations got.

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:39.400
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, yeah, yeah, we think they're definitely going to offer

0:27:40.000 --> 0:27:43.879
<v Speaker 11>guidance results that are above consensus right now.

0:27:44.119 --> 0:27:44.800
<v Speaker 2>We do think that.

0:27:44.760 --> 0:27:47.359
<v Speaker 11>They'll talk a little bit about some of their contracts.

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:50.000
<v Speaker 11>But I think one of the reasons that they make

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:52.520
<v Speaker 11>this announcement today with Anthropic is it's something that they

0:27:52.520 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 11>can highlight to investors to give everyone idea of what

0:27:56.400 --> 0:28:00.600
<v Speaker 11>types of customers that they're signing to these agreements. But

0:28:00.880 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 11>we don't necessarily think that they're going to give a

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:04.720
<v Speaker 11>lot of details in terms of you know, we don't

0:28:04.720 --> 0:28:06.640
<v Speaker 11>think they're going to give anything in terms of pricing.

0:28:06.800 --> 0:28:08.560
<v Speaker 11>They might not say anything in terms of the length

0:28:08.600 --> 0:28:11.919
<v Speaker 11>of these contracts or a lot of the very intricate details.

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:16.119
<v Speaker 11>But that said, I think they'll probably give a longer

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 11>term view of how they see the market, given the

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:21.199
<v Speaker 11>fact that there are more of these contracts being signed

0:28:21.720 --> 0:28:24.240
<v Speaker 11>and memory prices continue to be very strong, and the

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:27.040
<v Speaker 11>environment is very favorable for them at least through this year,

0:28:27.040 --> 0:28:29.720
<v Speaker 11>and we think at least into next year as well.

0:28:29.920 --> 0:28:31.960
<v Speaker 3>And to recap micro on not four percent on this

0:28:32.080 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 3>supply agreement with Anthropic, but up more than three hundred percent.

0:28:36.040 --> 0:28:39.440
<v Speaker 3>Here today Jake Silverman of Bloomberg Intelligence, with the analysis

0:28:39.480 --> 0:28:42.160
<v Speaker 3>now coming up. The CEO of Base ten and one

0:28:42.200 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 3>of its lead investors, is coming on the show to

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:48.840
<v Speaker 3>talk about the inference startup's latest one point five billion

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:51.640
<v Speaker 3>dollar fundraise. But this is really a conversation about the

0:28:51.680 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 3>economics of AI, and particularly as we transition increasingly to inference,

0:28:57.840 --> 0:29:01.120
<v Speaker 3>the use of open source and getting the best cost

0:29:01.640 --> 0:29:02.479
<v Speaker 3>dollar per token.

0:29:03.080 --> 0:29:05.680
<v Speaker 2>Really really looking forward to this one. It's next. Swim

0:29:05.800 --> 0:29:06.400
<v Speaker 2>Bog Tech.

0:29:21.440 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 3>In Video is developing chips and software that will make

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:28.720
<v Speaker 3>humanoid robots safer around people. Humanoid robotics are expected to

0:29:28.760 --> 0:29:31.720
<v Speaker 3>generate two hundred billion dollars in revenues by twenty thirty five,

0:29:32.000 --> 0:29:35.680
<v Speaker 3>according to Barkley's estimates, but current safety systems can make

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:39.440
<v Speaker 3>the machines less productive. In Vidia's Halo software will give

0:29:39.520 --> 0:29:42.400
<v Speaker 3>robots a much better sense of their surroundings so they

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:45.240
<v Speaker 3>can interact and even make contact with people.

0:29:45.280 --> 0:29:46.600
<v Speaker 2>We're going to talk with a little bit more about

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:47.400
<v Speaker 2>that later in the week.

0:29:48.080 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 3>Aim ferance startup Base ten has raised one point five

0:29:51.120 --> 0:29:54.800
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars across two tranchers, one an eleven billion dollar valuation,

0:29:54.920 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 3>the other at thirteen billion dollars. Base ten specializes in

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:02.880
<v Speaker 3>delivering software and computing capacity to companies tapping open source,

0:30:03.160 --> 0:30:07.040
<v Speaker 3>typically lower cost AI models. The firm's co founder and

0:30:07.160 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 3>CEO two instead of US that joins along with one

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:13.760
<v Speaker 3>of its investors, Ultimated Capital partner Paul of Agrowaile, who's

0:30:13.800 --> 0:30:16.600
<v Speaker 3>firm co led the round and actually was really interesting

0:30:16.640 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 3>the list of participants that back to you. Let's start

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:24.240
<v Speaker 3>with the basic questions that the audience always has, which is, wow,

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, one point five billions doll a round to

0:30:26.040 --> 0:30:28.600
<v Speaker 3>a lot of funds, but the stories seem to not

0:30:28.760 --> 0:30:32.719
<v Speaker 3>change right. Compute as a constraint talent is a competitive

0:30:32.720 --> 0:30:36.080
<v Speaker 3>marketplace and assuming that's where those those proceeds go.

0:30:36.280 --> 0:30:39.480
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, absolutely, Look we're with inference right now. What we

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 12>are seeing is there's a lot of demand for inserting

0:30:42.800 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 12>intelligence everywhere we possibly can, because open source models are

0:30:46.320 --> 0:30:49.880
<v Speaker 12>getting very good, right and post training techniques to specialize

0:30:49.880 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 12>those models for specific tasks are getting very good. And

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:55.600
<v Speaker 12>as the app player comes online, you know, there's an

0:30:55.760 --> 0:30:59.560
<v Speaker 12>enormous surge of demand for us. What that means is, look,

0:30:59.600 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 12>when you're procure a lot of compute to be able

0:31:02.960 --> 0:31:08.000
<v Speaker 12>to fulfill that demand and also hire amazing infrastructure engineers

0:31:08.040 --> 0:31:10.920
<v Speaker 12>and research engineers to be able to build the software

0:31:11.000 --> 0:31:11.840
<v Speaker 12>later on top of that too.

0:31:12.040 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 3>Just real quick, what's that like trying to acquire that

0:31:16.160 --> 0:31:19.680
<v Speaker 3>the compute? Like, do you have any leverage in that market?

0:31:19.680 --> 0:31:23.959
<v Speaker 3>If everyone is supply constrained? How is the experience of

0:31:24.000 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 3>being a company of base tends, age and size going

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:29.520
<v Speaker 3>to in video as an example, saying we kind of

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:29.920
<v Speaker 3>need this.

0:31:30.240 --> 0:31:32.120
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, Look, we have a very strong relationship with the

0:31:32.200 --> 0:31:34.600
<v Speaker 12>Video and you know, they've been very supportive of us

0:31:34.640 --> 0:31:38.760
<v Speaker 12>over the years. Look, we one thing that we realize

0:31:38.800 --> 0:31:41.280
<v Speaker 12>is that you cannot be reliant on one compute lost.

0:31:41.720 --> 0:31:45.880
<v Speaker 12>You have to, you know, work to diversify, not necessarily

0:31:45.920 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 12>from a chip perspective, from a cloud perspective. So you know,

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:52.080
<v Speaker 12>we acquire compute from eighteen different clouds. Now we sit

0:31:52.400 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 12>in around nineteen different clusters, and that's the flexibility we

0:31:56.160 --> 0:31:58.600
<v Speaker 12>need to be able to acquire compute and fulfill the demand.

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:01.280
<v Speaker 3>I posted on x that you're both coming on the

0:32:01.280 --> 0:32:03.080
<v Speaker 3>show and poor I kind of put this quession out

0:32:03.080 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 3>there that if you could only invest in one part

0:32:05.920 --> 0:32:08.040
<v Speaker 3>of the five layer cake, as Jensen calls it, what

0:32:08.040 --> 0:32:12.280
<v Speaker 3>would it be? But Altimus has been so busy, you know,

0:32:12.520 --> 0:32:16.080
<v Speaker 3>with the frontier labs at one end and other parts

0:32:16.120 --> 0:32:19.479
<v Speaker 3>of the five layer cake at the other end. What

0:32:19.600 --> 0:32:22.400
<v Speaker 3>was the thesis around base ten and why you wanted

0:32:22.440 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 3>to get in here to co lead the.

0:32:24.120 --> 0:32:26.560
<v Speaker 2>Round ed It's good to be here.

0:32:27.200 --> 0:32:29.880
<v Speaker 13>Some troops cannot be said enough times, and one of

0:32:29.880 --> 0:32:32.040
<v Speaker 13>those is that Inference is going to be one of

0:32:32.080 --> 0:32:35.120
<v Speaker 13>the largest, if not the largest markets not an AI

0:32:35.360 --> 0:32:38.120
<v Speaker 13>in the world. And why is that the case? You know,

0:32:38.640 --> 0:32:41.960
<v Speaker 13>the early innings of AI were Q and A tell

0:32:41.960 --> 0:32:44.680
<v Speaker 13>me about my trip. We've come a long way since then.

0:32:44.920 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 13>You know, it's multi agent they've gotten longer context. You

0:32:47.680 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 13>go retrieve, analyze, synthesize, verifying, then you go again, and

0:32:51.920 --> 0:32:54.440
<v Speaker 13>each request is kicking off hundreds, if not thousands of

0:32:54.440 --> 0:32:58.160
<v Speaker 13>inference requests. The second thing is, you know I might

0:32:58.200 --> 0:33:01.960
<v Speaker 13>correct something you said ed. It's not just it's capability

0:33:02.840 --> 0:33:08.640
<v Speaker 13>control and cost frontier models. The open s post train

0:33:08.680 --> 0:33:11.400
<v Speaker 13>open source model comes very close to frontier model performance,

0:33:11.400 --> 0:33:15.240
<v Speaker 13>sometimes even better for specific workflows control. As satan Adilla

0:33:15.280 --> 0:33:18.040
<v Speaker 13>said last weekend, you know, you've got to compound your

0:33:18.240 --> 0:33:21.240
<v Speaker 13>unique advantages as an enterprise, your data, your knowledge or

0:33:21.280 --> 0:33:23.800
<v Speaker 13>know how in a way that you're not giving away

0:33:23.840 --> 0:33:27.880
<v Speaker 13>your intelligence to on rent. And that's what BASM allows.

0:33:28.400 --> 0:33:30.240
<v Speaker 13>And so to your question from this morning is like

0:33:30.280 --> 0:33:32.120
<v Speaker 13>where does value your crew? Is it at the app layer?

0:33:32.200 --> 0:33:33.480
<v Speaker 13>Is it at the model air? You know, the way

0:33:33.520 --> 0:33:35.640
<v Speaker 13>I like to frame it is, Look, the model air

0:33:35.880 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 13>is a phenomenal business for very few people. It's a

0:33:39.040 --> 0:33:41.360
<v Speaker 13>game of emperors. You've got to be at the frontier

0:33:41.520 --> 0:33:43.400
<v Speaker 13>to accrue a lot of value. And it's it's a

0:33:43.480 --> 0:33:46.000
<v Speaker 13>knife fight. As you know, I've started joking, there's four

0:33:46.040 --> 0:33:49.920
<v Speaker 13>seasons to the year. It's anthropic open EI SpaceX Google

0:33:50.040 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 13>with an evergreen of open source, and.

0:33:52.200 --> 0:33:55.120
<v Speaker 3>So that's that part's so fascinating, right, if we could

0:33:55.400 --> 0:33:58.760
<v Speaker 3>just go to open source. When this story started for us,

0:33:58.880 --> 0:34:02.160
<v Speaker 3>let's say twenty two, but for you guys probably before that,

0:34:02.680 --> 0:34:06.360
<v Speaker 3>it was this idea that it was only the model,

0:34:06.440 --> 0:34:09.680
<v Speaker 3>the largest models with the hundreds of billions of parameters

0:34:09.719 --> 0:34:12.840
<v Speaker 3>that mattered, and in the world of open source that

0:34:12.880 --> 0:34:17.400
<v Speaker 3>the issue was that that just didn't work. People couldn't

0:34:17.400 --> 0:34:20.000
<v Speaker 3>make any real use of them. I go back to

0:34:20.000 --> 0:34:23.200
<v Speaker 3>what Paul just said. You know, you are making utility

0:34:23.239 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 3>out of open source models, but probably also a slightly

0:34:26.719 --> 0:34:27.880
<v Speaker 3>smaller scale of model.

0:34:28.239 --> 0:34:29.319
<v Speaker 2>Is that fair? Yes?

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:32.319
<v Speaker 12>Look, I think if you look at you know, when

0:34:32.320 --> 0:34:34.120
<v Speaker 12>you think about open source has kind of gone through

0:34:34.280 --> 0:34:36.520
<v Speaker 12>a bit of a journey. You know, there's LAMA three,

0:34:37.600 --> 0:34:39.799
<v Speaker 12>maybe two two and a half years ago, and then

0:34:39.840 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 12>there was a bit of a winter, and then I

0:34:41.680 --> 0:34:44.000
<v Speaker 12>think the deep Seek moment last year really put it

0:34:44.040 --> 0:34:46.400
<v Speaker 12>back on the map, and there was definitely the capability

0:34:46.400 --> 0:34:50.040
<v Speaker 12>gap shrunk. I think this is happening again just over

0:34:50.080 --> 0:34:52.239
<v Speaker 12>the last couple of weeks with GLM five Print two,

0:34:52.960 --> 0:34:56.600
<v Speaker 12>which is i'd say a frontier level model that is

0:34:56.680 --> 0:34:59.319
<v Speaker 12>actually usable and it isn't just doing well on the benchmarks.

0:34:59.480 --> 0:35:02.840
<v Speaker 12>When people we're using it, they are feeling that, you know,

0:35:02.960 --> 0:35:05.920
<v Speaker 12>at the frontier capability. For us, it's just like, how

0:35:05.920 --> 0:35:07.960
<v Speaker 12>do we make these models very very easy to use it?

0:35:08.000 --> 0:35:10.160
<v Speaker 12>And it doesn't really matter what size they are that

0:35:10.280 --> 0:35:14.080
<v Speaker 12>we work with small models, big models, massive models. What

0:35:14.200 --> 0:35:17.000
<v Speaker 12>we are trying to give our customers the ability to

0:35:17.040 --> 0:35:20.279
<v Speaker 12>run these models when they don't necessarily have access to

0:35:20.320 --> 0:35:23.279
<v Speaker 12>the infrastructured teams of the frontier labs.

0:35:23.040 --> 0:35:23.840
<v Speaker 2>Doing it for them.

0:35:24.000 --> 0:35:26.720
<v Speaker 3>So let's go back to what we were talking about cost,

0:35:26.840 --> 0:35:32.040
<v Speaker 3>but also giveability and capability. You know, the other case

0:35:32.080 --> 0:35:34.160
<v Speaker 3>study in this open source debate was Meta kind of

0:35:34.239 --> 0:35:38.120
<v Speaker 3>changing its narrative saying, well, actually, we are committed to

0:35:38.160 --> 0:35:40.360
<v Speaker 3>open source, but we you know, at some point we

0:35:40.440 --> 0:35:44.120
<v Speaker 3>need to be realistic about about the benefit of closed models.

0:35:45.840 --> 0:35:49.040
<v Speaker 3>Is what is the point on the capability part and

0:35:49.600 --> 0:35:52.560
<v Speaker 3>actually take a moment explain what base ten does, why

0:35:52.600 --> 0:35:55.520
<v Speaker 3>it's why it is such an important player in that respect.

0:35:55.680 --> 0:36:01.000
<v Speaker 13>Sure, look at yesterday it was Deepseek, today it's GLM.

0:36:01.160 --> 0:36:02.280
<v Speaker 2>It'll be something tomorrow.

0:36:02.400 --> 0:36:06.120
<v Speaker 13>And as I said, it's seasonal, and that battle at

0:36:06.120 --> 0:36:09.040
<v Speaker 13>the model here is not we're nowhere near the endgame.

0:36:09.320 --> 0:36:12.520
<v Speaker 13>What base tend does is it helps customers like cursor,

0:36:12.719 --> 0:36:15.600
<v Speaker 13>like a bridge, like open evidence, harness the power of

0:36:16.280 --> 0:36:19.640
<v Speaker 13>the model underneath, combine that with your unique advantage as

0:36:19.680 --> 0:36:23.240
<v Speaker 13>an enterprise, your workflow, and deliver something that is best

0:36:23.280 --> 0:36:24.360
<v Speaker 13>for that specific workflow.

0:36:24.360 --> 0:36:25.520
<v Speaker 2>Now it's not just one model.

0:36:25.840 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 13>It's typically a collection of portfolio of models that are

0:36:28.200 --> 0:36:31.440
<v Speaker 13>fine tuned to deliver that and that compounds over time,

0:36:32.120 --> 0:36:35.399
<v Speaker 13>and so based in is successful. As these models get better,

0:36:35.680 --> 0:36:38.000
<v Speaker 13>it benefits us and ultimately in the service of the

0:36:38.000 --> 0:36:40.520
<v Speaker 13>app layer, which is you know, the customers that we discussed,

0:36:41.760 --> 0:36:43.960
<v Speaker 13>who are delivering AI to the customer.

0:36:44.760 --> 0:36:48.080
<v Speaker 3>Jensen's been repeating a lot recently, just among the CEO

0:36:48.120 --> 0:36:50.840
<v Speaker 3>of Nvidia. Sometimes you have to remind the audience testing case.

0:36:52.040 --> 0:36:56.280
<v Speaker 3>You know, he wants to see his teams burning tokens.

0:36:58.680 --> 0:37:00.840
<v Speaker 3>How does that apply to your custom is right? So

0:37:01.600 --> 0:37:05.120
<v Speaker 3>pouls just explain really clearly the value that you're adding.

0:37:05.200 --> 0:37:09.759
<v Speaker 3>But the economics are really really important to some of

0:37:09.760 --> 0:37:10.480
<v Speaker 3>these companies.

0:37:11.360 --> 0:37:13.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Look, I think.

0:37:14.800 --> 0:37:18.759
<v Speaker 12>Using tokens is obviously just what's synonymous with, Hey, I

0:37:18.800 --> 0:37:21.400
<v Speaker 12>want us to be using AI everywhere.

0:37:22.040 --> 0:37:24.080
<v Speaker 2>It's in their interest for that to be the story

0:37:24.160 --> 0:37:24.560
<v Speaker 2>right now.

0:37:25.000 --> 0:37:27.479
<v Speaker 12>And I think for us, you know, what we see

0:37:27.560 --> 0:37:29.960
<v Speaker 12>is that customers kind of go through the same curve

0:37:30.040 --> 0:37:32.600
<v Speaker 12>over and over again. Is that, you know, they go

0:37:32.800 --> 0:37:35.920
<v Speaker 12>very aggressively, they start using AI everywhere, they start to

0:37:35.960 --> 0:37:39.680
<v Speaker 12>see gains, but they don't necessarily do it profitably, and

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:41.640
<v Speaker 12>then they need to figure out how to do it profitably,

0:37:42.040 --> 0:37:43.920
<v Speaker 12>and that's when they come to open source models. That's

0:37:43.920 --> 0:37:45.520
<v Speaker 12>when they come to Base ten. That's when they come

0:37:45.560 --> 0:37:48.960
<v Speaker 12>to you know, post train models on Base ten to

0:37:49.000 --> 0:37:51.359
<v Speaker 12>be able to do it better, faster and cheaper. And

0:37:51.400 --> 0:37:55.400
<v Speaker 12>that's when you decide to get both you know, intelligence everywhere,

0:37:55.600 --> 0:37:58.000
<v Speaker 12>but also unit economics that makes sense for your business.

0:37:58.680 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 2>What I've been trying to reconcile is.

0:38:03.360 --> 0:38:06.680
<v Speaker 3>Ultimita is invested in in the big frontier labs as well,

0:38:07.600 --> 0:38:10.320
<v Speaker 3>and those big frontier labs plus S FACEX, depending on

0:38:10.360 --> 0:38:11.640
<v Speaker 3>how you define what they are.

0:38:11.880 --> 0:38:14.279
<v Speaker 2>Would also say that they have a role to play

0:38:14.320 --> 0:38:15.080
<v Speaker 2>in that market.

0:38:15.880 --> 0:38:18.040
<v Speaker 3>Where are we in this cycle of where they're just

0:38:18.080 --> 0:38:20.160
<v Speaker 3>in the NBA, very big players.

0:38:20.280 --> 0:38:22.480
<v Speaker 2>Where does Space ten fit in that? Look?

0:38:22.520 --> 0:38:25.360
<v Speaker 13>A lot of ink has been spilled on this debate

0:38:25.400 --> 0:38:26.480
<v Speaker 13>of open versus closed.

0:38:26.920 --> 0:38:28.120
<v Speaker 2>Let me just take that head on.

0:38:28.719 --> 0:38:31.680
<v Speaker 13>The closed models of Frontier models are very very good,

0:38:32.040 --> 0:38:34.680
<v Speaker 13>and they're very good for the use case that require

0:38:34.760 --> 0:38:39.319
<v Speaker 13>highest intelligenced, highest reasoning, new use case discovery. If you

0:38:39.320 --> 0:38:41.280
<v Speaker 13>didn't want to think about just one model as a service,

0:38:41.400 --> 0:38:43.800
<v Speaker 13>they're very good and they will always be very good.

0:38:43.719 --> 0:38:47.920
<v Speaker 2>For that for a class of customers. That's not a

0:38:47.920 --> 0:38:48.440
<v Speaker 2>long list.

0:38:48.480 --> 0:38:50.520
<v Speaker 13>You know, as Jonathan Ross said, there's about thirty five

0:38:50.560 --> 0:38:53.640
<v Speaker 13>companies that drive ninety nine percent of all inference. The

0:38:53.680 --> 0:38:56.360
<v Speaker 13>top five are the labs that you just listed, top four, top.

0:38:56.160 --> 0:38:57.760
<v Speaker 2>Five, the next thirty.

0:38:57.800 --> 0:39:00.120
<v Speaker 13>You know, that's people like Cursor, like open Evidence, like

0:39:00.160 --> 0:39:04.200
<v Speaker 13>a bridge, like Harvey, and for them, if you if

0:39:04.200 --> 0:39:05.839
<v Speaker 13>you're not playing the game of the Emperors and you're

0:39:05.840 --> 0:39:08.680
<v Speaker 13>you know, you're thinking about how do I deliver something

0:39:08.719 --> 0:39:11.440
<v Speaker 13>that is not rented from somebody else but mine that

0:39:11.480 --> 0:39:15.160
<v Speaker 13>I can compound with. That's where that's where post trained,

0:39:15.200 --> 0:39:18.000
<v Speaker 13>open source can help. And so you know, we posted

0:39:18.000 --> 0:39:21.400
<v Speaker 13>this start this morning about how you know, Harvey, for example,

0:39:21.480 --> 0:39:25.880
<v Speaker 13>delivery achieved Frontier capabilities post training and open source model,

0:39:26.320 --> 0:39:29.520
<v Speaker 13>but obviously with a much better cost and control. Frontier

0:39:30.000 --> 0:39:32.840
<v Speaker 13>as an example of what the next thirty are thinking about.

0:39:32.880 --> 0:39:34.840
<v Speaker 13>And then the next thousand were thinking.

0:39:34.640 --> 0:39:40.000
<v Speaker 3>About two hinges for Vestava back on Bloomberg Tech, found

0:39:40.000 --> 0:39:43.320
<v Speaker 3>a CEO based ten and Paul Varruaal of Ultimata. Back

0:39:43.760 --> 0:39:45.480
<v Speaker 3>again on Bloomberg Tech. It's really great to have you

0:39:45.560 --> 0:39:48.160
<v Speaker 3>here in person. Thank you very much. Indeed, coming up

0:39:48.160 --> 0:39:52.960
<v Speaker 3>on the show, Amazon is pairing Prime Day with pizza delivery.

0:39:53.600 --> 0:39:55.760
<v Speaker 3>We're going to talk about what's behind the e commerce giants,

0:39:55.840 --> 0:39:56.800
<v Speaker 3>fast food pivot.

0:39:56.840 --> 0:39:58.760
<v Speaker 2>Next, this is Bloomberg Tech.

0:40:03.680 --> 0:40:07.080
<v Speaker 3>Today's big number, twenty six point three billion dollars. That's

0:40:07.080 --> 0:40:10.560
<v Speaker 3>how much US consumers are expected to spend on Amazon

0:40:10.680 --> 0:40:13.400
<v Speaker 3>and other retailers during the four day sale that we

0:40:13.480 --> 0:40:16.759
<v Speaker 3>all know as Prime Day. That figure comes from Adobe.

0:40:16.960 --> 0:40:21.080
<v Speaker 3>Amazon's facing headwinds though consumer confidence to competition for the

0:40:21.080 --> 0:40:23.200
<v Speaker 3>e commence giant has a few tricks up its sleeve

0:40:23.280 --> 0:40:28.399
<v Speaker 3>to encourage shoppers to spend, including pizza delivery, Bluebog'spenser Sofa

0:40:28.520 --> 0:40:31.600
<v Speaker 3>here with the latest. Okay, we're getting ready for Prime Day.

0:40:31.920 --> 0:40:35.120
<v Speaker 3>Adobe Analytics always puts out numbers like this. Put that

0:40:35.160 --> 0:40:38.000
<v Speaker 3>twenty six point three billion into context for us. That's big,

0:40:38.040 --> 0:40:40.000
<v Speaker 3>it's small, it's growth, it's not.

0:40:41.680 --> 0:40:42.200
<v Speaker 2>It's big.

0:40:42.239 --> 0:40:45.359
<v Speaker 14>I mean Adobe's predicting nine percent growth from the four

0:40:45.440 --> 0:40:48.520
<v Speaker 14>day Prime Day period last year, which was July. You know,

0:40:48.760 --> 0:40:51.960
<v Speaker 14>it's always tricky to compare Prime Day to the year

0:40:52.000 --> 0:40:54.080
<v Speaker 14>earlier because the date moves around, and this is going

0:40:54.120 --> 0:40:55.520
<v Speaker 14>to be the second year that they do a four

0:40:55.600 --> 0:40:59.120
<v Speaker 14>day sale. But Adobe is predicting a nine percent lift,

0:40:59.120 --> 0:41:01.279
<v Speaker 14>which is pretty size bull and a lot of that

0:41:01.320 --> 0:41:05.000
<v Speaker 14>can be not you know, it's counterintuitive. Even though there's

0:41:05.000 --> 0:41:07.480
<v Speaker 14>a lot of things weighing on consumers, sometimes that compels

0:41:07.520 --> 0:41:10.080
<v Speaker 14>them to kind of save up money and hold off

0:41:10.080 --> 0:41:13.000
<v Speaker 14>a big ticket purchase for a big deal, big deal period,

0:41:13.360 --> 0:41:14.840
<v Speaker 14>which can which can raise spending.

0:41:14.880 --> 0:41:15.759
<v Speaker 2>And Walmart and.

0:41:15.760 --> 0:41:18.920
<v Speaker 14>Target both have overlapping sales, so there's going to be

0:41:19.000 --> 0:41:20.920
<v Speaker 14>just a lot of a lot of deals going on

0:41:20.960 --> 0:41:21.720
<v Speaker 14>those four days.

0:41:22.560 --> 0:41:25.879
<v Speaker 3>Okay, the latest tech in depth, Amazon offers.

0:41:25.560 --> 0:41:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Pizza in Prime Day experiment. Explain So this is the

0:41:32.520 --> 0:41:33.480
<v Speaker 2>first year I've seen this.

0:41:33.640 --> 0:41:38.880
<v Speaker 14>The Amazon's offering five dollars pizza from Little Caesars. So basically,

0:41:38.920 --> 0:41:41.040
<v Speaker 14>if you go to the site, you'll see this pretty

0:41:41.040 --> 0:41:45.120
<v Speaker 14>prominently a Little Caesar's emblem on the site. You can

0:41:45.120 --> 0:41:47.839
<v Speaker 14>click over there to get to redeem a five five

0:41:47.880 --> 0:41:50.839
<v Speaker 14>dollars pizza. And they're running that every day of Prime Day,

0:41:50.840 --> 0:41:54.080
<v Speaker 14>even a couple of days before it, and it seems

0:41:54.120 --> 0:41:56.040
<v Speaker 14>to be something to you know, get people to come

0:41:56.040 --> 0:41:59.040
<v Speaker 14>to the site, you know, just another another sweetener to

0:41:59.040 --> 0:42:00.480
<v Speaker 14>get people that come to the site and check out

0:42:00.520 --> 0:42:03.520
<v Speaker 14>the deals. Because Amazon really doesn't have anything in hot

0:42:03.520 --> 0:42:07.160
<v Speaker 14>food delivery. You know, they had an Amazon Restaurants thing

0:42:07.239 --> 0:42:09.719
<v Speaker 14>years ago that they shuddered. They now have kind of

0:42:09.719 --> 0:42:12.600
<v Speaker 14>a tie in with grub Hub. But you know, when

0:42:12.640 --> 0:42:15.560
<v Speaker 14>you think about grocery and Amazon really is its eye

0:42:15.560 --> 0:42:18.320
<v Speaker 14>on the grocery business. A lot of people couple grocery

0:42:18.360 --> 0:42:21.120
<v Speaker 14>and dinner, you know, especially when it's hot in the summer,

0:42:21.160 --> 0:42:23.239
<v Speaker 14>you don't get the kitchen hot. So this might be

0:42:23.280 --> 0:42:25.960
<v Speaker 14>a way to just you know, get people to check

0:42:25.960 --> 0:42:27.799
<v Speaker 14>out their deals and also cross something off the list

0:42:27.800 --> 0:42:30.600
<v Speaker 14>that they got to get done done that night.

0:42:31.880 --> 0:42:35.200
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg'spenser Sopa with a look ahead to Prime Day. But

0:42:35.280 --> 0:42:36.879
<v Speaker 3>go and read the Tech in depth that went out

0:42:36.880 --> 0:42:39.400
<v Speaker 3>this morning as well, Thank you very much, before you go.

0:42:39.760 --> 0:42:44.000
<v Speaker 3>Disney's Toy Story five has gone to infinity and beyond.

0:42:44.160 --> 0:42:47.479
<v Speaker 3>On its opening weekend, Woody Buzz and their friends brought

0:42:47.480 --> 0:42:50.000
<v Speaker 3>in one hundred and sixty million dollars in US box

0:42:50.000 --> 0:42:53.880
<v Speaker 3>office sales, marking the best launch in that franchise's history,

0:42:54.239 --> 0:42:57.080
<v Speaker 3>and lastly, the title of best twenty twenty six debut

0:42:57.440 --> 0:42:59.880
<v Speaker 3>from the Super Mario Galaxy movie The Whole Was It.

0:43:00.000 --> 0:43:03.319
<v Speaker 3>The low end of Bloomberg Intelligence is lofty expectations for

0:43:03.400 --> 0:43:07.560
<v Speaker 3>the film and enthusiasm for blockbusters including Toy Story Spider

0:43:07.600 --> 0:43:11.160
<v Speaker 3>Man The Odyssey is anticipated if you're a ten percent

0:43:11.239 --> 0:43:14.360
<v Speaker 3>year over year growth rate and the best summer for

0:43:14.440 --> 0:43:19.239
<v Speaker 3>cinemas since the pandemic. All right, that does it for

0:43:19.280 --> 0:43:21.839
<v Speaker 3>this addition of Bloomberg Tech. From here in San Francisco,

0:43:21.880 --> 0:43:24.320
<v Speaker 3>this is what markets look like. A little soft on

0:43:24.360 --> 0:43:27.000
<v Speaker 3>than has that one hundred down a percentage point, half

0:43:27.000 --> 0:43:30.440
<v Speaker 3>a percentage point, but still outperformance in semiconductors that socks

0:43:30.520 --> 0:43:33.560
<v Speaker 3>up almost percent, a lot of that being the newsflow

0:43:33.560 --> 0:43:36.600
<v Speaker 3>around micron and Anthropics deal. SpaceX down for a third

0:43:36.640 --> 0:43:40.000
<v Speaker 3>straight session, but well above it's IPO price as it

0:43:40.040 --> 0:43:42.520
<v Speaker 3>goes to the bomb market for the first time. Check

0:43:42.520 --> 0:43:44.839
<v Speaker 3>out the pod. You know where to find it. This

0:43:44.880 --> 0:43:45.680
<v Speaker 3>is Bloomberg Tech.