WEBVTT - Jack Is Going To Transition

0:00:01.930 --> 0:00:05.810
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio at the

0:00:05.830 --> 0:00:07.830
<v Speaker 1>George Washington Broadcast Center.

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:10.070
<v Speaker 2>Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty.

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:18.540
<v Speaker 3>Armstrong and Getty. And now, here's Armstrong and Getty.

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 4>Families complained about Nevada's behavior on the field and his

0:00:27.460 --> 0:00:30.540
<v Speaker 4>mom's behavior on the sidelines. So what did the youth

0:00:30.620 --> 0:00:33.629
<v Speaker 4>soccer director do? He called 911.

0:00:33.630 --> 0:00:37.589
<v Speaker 3>There's a parent here that's really, really disruptive. Nevada's mom

0:00:37.650 --> 0:00:38.810
<v Speaker 3>tells a different story.

0:00:38.909 --> 0:00:42.099
<v Speaker 5>They're literally kicking him out of this way because he's.

0:00:42.020 --> 0:00:42.900
<v Speaker 3>Good at soccer.

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:46.620
<v Speaker 4>Nevada's mom told CBS News the coach told Nevada he

0:00:46.659 --> 0:00:49.240
<v Speaker 4>could stay in if he passed the ball. But about

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:52.600
<v Speaker 4>halfway through the game, he got the cops involved.

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 6>So the cops got called on the three-year-old who was

0:00:56.480 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 6>not passing the ball in soccer, who was really good

0:00:58.700 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 6>and kept scoring goals.

0:00:59.970 --> 0:01:04.330
<v Speaker 7>And his mom, his disruptive mom. Look, before you get

0:01:04.370 --> 0:01:06.330
<v Speaker 7>into people are angry at us, and no, I didn't

0:01:06.350 --> 0:01:09.270
<v Speaker 7>spend a lot of time doing your research, researching this

0:01:09.370 --> 0:01:10.090
<v Speaker 7>stupid story.

0:01:10.130 --> 0:01:13.320
<v Speaker 3>I did no research other than these texts I got. Exactly.

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:17.619
<v Speaker 6>There was an enormous leap there. How did we go

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 6>from A to B? Why were the, specifically, the cops

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:25.370
<v Speaker 6>were called for what reason? What did the people say online?

0:01:25.590 --> 0:01:27.850
<v Speaker 3>Why did the police show up? All that's left out

0:01:27.870 --> 0:01:28.530
<v Speaker 3>of the story.

0:01:28.810 --> 0:01:29.150
<v Speaker 2>True.

0:01:29.190 --> 0:01:31.850
<v Speaker 6>The news coverage is horrible there. Well, you know why

0:01:31.890 --> 0:01:33.810
<v Speaker 6>they did it that way. They wanted people to click

0:01:33.890 --> 0:01:35.730
<v Speaker 6>on a story of outrage. If you put in all

0:01:35.750 --> 0:01:39.500
<v Speaker 6>the details, sometimes the outrage gets less, which might be

0:01:39.660 --> 0:01:42.780
<v Speaker 6>after I read the text. But here's a little audio

0:01:42.860 --> 0:01:44.300
<v Speaker 6>of the actual mom and cop, I guess.

0:01:45.270 --> 0:01:47.570
<v Speaker 8>I guess one of the coaches advised that they don't

0:01:48.030 --> 0:01:49.650
<v Speaker 8>want you guys here anymore, okay?

0:01:50.350 --> 0:01:52.500
<v Speaker 3>If you guys don't mind leaving. What is the real

0:01:52.540 --> 0:01:54.340
<v Speaker 3>reason that he called the police?

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:56.460
<v Speaker 2>So I guess he's just calling because I guess he

0:01:56.500 --> 0:01:58.780
<v Speaker 2>believes that you guys are causing a disturbance that was

0:01:58.820 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 2>interfering with the game play.

0:01:59.980 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 5>They're mad at my son because he actually plays soccer.

0:02:03.470 --> 0:02:06.630
<v Speaker 5>So I'm a little confused and I'm a little, like,

0:02:06.690 --> 0:02:09.290
<v Speaker 5>baffled because I signed my kid up for soccer. So

0:02:09.350 --> 0:02:12.530
<v Speaker 5>they're literally kicking him out of this place because he's.

0:02:12.430 --> 0:02:13.230
<v Speaker 4>Good at soccer.

0:02:13.930 --> 0:02:16.550
<v Speaker 6>So her three-year-old must be a really good soccer player

0:02:16.570 --> 0:02:20.250
<v Speaker 6>because he's playing in the five-year-old league and dominating.

0:02:21.010 --> 0:02:22.570
<v Speaker 3>Three is really young.

0:02:23.669 --> 0:02:26.470
<v Speaker 6>You're practically a prodigy just for your ability to run

0:02:26.510 --> 0:02:29.799
<v Speaker 6>up and down the field. Well, or like be able

0:02:29.820 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 6>to tell a three-year-old, I want you to run to

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:32.820
<v Speaker 6>the end of the field and back and have them

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:34.800
<v Speaker 6>do it and not go like 10 feet and get

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 6>distracted and walk off.

0:02:36.740 --> 0:02:37.500
<v Speaker 3>Start picking flowers.

0:02:37.910 --> 0:02:40.290
<v Speaker 7>So am I allowed to guess at what I think

0:02:40.370 --> 0:02:42.989
<v Speaker 7>happened or would you rather do what you have first?

0:02:43.169 --> 0:02:43.790
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead and guess.

0:02:43.830 --> 0:02:44.870
<v Speaker 6>And then I'm going to read this text so that

0:02:44.889 --> 0:02:46.130
<v Speaker 6>I don't know if it's accurate or not, because I've

0:02:46.150 --> 0:02:48.410
<v Speaker 6>spent zero time looking into this and I'm not going to.

0:02:48.930 --> 0:02:52.619
<v Speaker 7>So I'm guessing this is a three-year-old who, again, miraculously

0:02:52.660 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 7>was just dominating the game. I mean, he was just

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:56.100
<v Speaker 7>running up and down the field with the ball and

0:02:56.139 --> 0:02:58.740
<v Speaker 7>kicking it in the goal over and over again. The

0:02:58.800 --> 0:03:00.660
<v Speaker 7>coach was like, all right, we got to take him

0:03:00.700 --> 0:03:03.359
<v Speaker 7>out because nobody else is playing. Nothing else is happening.

0:03:03.820 --> 0:03:06.740
<v Speaker 7>And the mom was pissed off because her son was benched,

0:03:06.820 --> 0:03:11.990
<v Speaker 7>quote unquote, for being better than everybody else at soccer.

0:03:12.570 --> 0:03:15.149
<v Speaker 7>And she and the coach had what I suspected was

0:03:15.210 --> 0:03:20.240
<v Speaker 7>a loud and animated disagreement during the game. And the

0:03:20.260 --> 0:03:21.820
<v Speaker 7>coach said, you got to go. And she said, I

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:25.260
<v Speaker 7>won't go. I would guess having coached many, many games

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:27.079
<v Speaker 7>and dealt with many, many parents.

0:03:27.100 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 3>It was something like that. Probably. But here's a text

0:03:31.780 --> 0:03:32.079
<v Speaker 3>we got.

0:03:33.500 --> 0:03:35.140
<v Speaker 6>I know I'm not the first person to respond to

0:03:35.180 --> 0:03:37.380
<v Speaker 6>this because a number of people said our coverage was

0:03:37.430 --> 0:03:42.180
<v Speaker 6>horrible yesterday. Regarding the three-year-old soccer prodigy, the kid was

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:44.340
<v Speaker 6>pushing other players in the league to ask him and

0:03:44.380 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 6>his family to get him to stop. The kid's parents

0:03:46.780 --> 0:03:49.030
<v Speaker 6>got upset and started making a scene, arguing with the

0:03:49.060 --> 0:03:51.470
<v Speaker 6>league representatives and other parents. Because of that, they were

0:03:51.550 --> 0:03:53.130
<v Speaker 6>asked to leave. They refused.

0:03:53.230 --> 0:03:54.250
<v Speaker 3>Then the cops were called.

0:03:54.770 --> 0:03:58.630
<v Speaker 6>Now the parents and the kid have a GoFundMe for

0:03:58.670 --> 0:04:02.150
<v Speaker 6>their experience. Oh, my. Somehow strangers are giving this family

0:04:02.170 --> 0:04:07.410
<v Speaker 6>money to make things all the better. Wow, because I

0:04:07.790 --> 0:04:11.790
<v Speaker 6>am on your side in this now public online spat,

0:04:11.810 --> 0:04:13.350
<v Speaker 6>so I'm going to give you money.

0:04:13.810 --> 0:04:15.850
<v Speaker 3>Here's $ 20.

0:04:15.170 --> 0:04:17.810
<v Speaker 7>That'll show the other side, which I'm against in this

0:04:17.950 --> 0:04:18.789
<v Speaker 7>online spat.

0:04:18.870 --> 0:04:21.130
<v Speaker 6>I know barely anything about this story other than a

0:04:21.150 --> 0:04:22.390
<v Speaker 6>couple of things I saw on Twitter.

0:04:22.410 --> 0:04:23.550
<v Speaker 3>Here's $ 20. The whole.

0:04:24.870 --> 0:04:27.620
<v Speaker 6>GoFundMe thing around these stories is just, I don't know

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:28.140
<v Speaker 6>what that is.

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:31.360
<v Speaker 7>I can't remember, was it the New York Post that

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:34.360
<v Speaker 7>had that story? I mean, hell, they left everything out

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:34.630
<v Speaker 7>of it.

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 3>That's suck. Well, and then.

0:04:39.260 --> 0:04:44.260
<v Speaker 6>Arguing with the coach and league representatives is a little

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:46.800
<v Speaker 6>closer to nail down. But the whole the kid was

0:04:46.900 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 6>pushing other players. Soccer is a pretty physical game. You know,

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:53.820
<v Speaker 6>I don't know. You know, you had to have been there.

0:04:53.870 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 3>Exactly.

0:04:54.230 --> 0:04:56.750
<v Speaker 6>You'd absolutely have had to have been there to see

0:04:56.810 --> 0:04:59.670
<v Speaker 6>if he's just a really good, aggressive soccer player or

0:04:59.710 --> 0:05:01.450
<v Speaker 6>it was the sort of thing you'd think. Well, that

0:05:01.470 --> 0:05:05.159
<v Speaker 6>ain't If he was pushing them enough that it affected play,

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:06.780
<v Speaker 6>there's no way you would let that go in a

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 6>game at that age level, just having coached at that

0:05:10.380 --> 0:05:10.770
<v Speaker 6>age level.

0:05:10.790 --> 0:05:12.010
<v Speaker 3>Well, and there'd be a whole bunch of kids on

0:05:12.029 --> 0:05:13.190
<v Speaker 3>the field be like, why are you pushing me? I

0:05:13.190 --> 0:05:15.920
<v Speaker 3>don't even know what we're doing out here. Right, exactly.

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:18.930
<v Speaker 7>I'm just standing here picking daisies. This ball rolls by

0:05:18.970 --> 0:05:20.869
<v Speaker 7>me and you're pushing me all of a sudden.

0:05:20.930 --> 0:05:22.730
<v Speaker 6>I'm just waiting for a bunch of people to say

0:05:22.950 --> 0:05:25.510
<v Speaker 6>inexplicably we're done now because I have no idea of

0:05:26.089 --> 0:05:28.690
<v Speaker 6>time or the fact that this is being timed or

0:05:28.730 --> 0:05:29.870
<v Speaker 6>what a halftime is.

0:05:30.410 --> 0:05:31.429
<v Speaker 3>I'm told there are.

0:05:31.330 --> 0:05:33.050
<v Speaker 7>Juice boxes in like three minutes.

0:05:33.110 --> 0:05:35.580
<v Speaker 3>So I'm just standing here. Right.

0:05:37.020 --> 0:05:39.859
<v Speaker 6>Again, that was always the most amazing thing to me

0:05:39.900 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 6>about the youth sports thing is the kids that knew

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:44.239
<v Speaker 6>what they were supposed to be doing.

0:05:45.690 --> 0:05:47.770
<v Speaker 3>And did it. And the ones who just have no

0:05:47.870 --> 0:05:50.170
<v Speaker 3>idea what is even the point of this.

0:05:51.790 --> 0:05:53.810
<v Speaker 7>You know, I've been sitting on this Wall Street Journal

0:05:53.850 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 7>article about how baseball has changed so much. Now it's

0:05:57.000 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 7>a rich person's sport. Because, for reasons we can get

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:04.340
<v Speaker 7>into at another time, but it talks about these six-year-olds.

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 7>with their own bat and their uniform and paying hundreds

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:11.390
<v Speaker 7>or a thousand dollars to play at an age they

0:06:11.450 --> 0:06:15.050
<v Speaker 7>should not be playing organized baseball at all. And it's

0:06:15.270 --> 0:06:16.850
<v Speaker 7>become this money grab.

0:06:17.110 --> 0:06:19.150
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, our executive producer, whose kid is a really good

0:06:19.190 --> 0:06:21.390
<v Speaker 6>baseball player, has talked about how, oh yeah, everybody's got

0:06:21.410 --> 0:06:23.430
<v Speaker 6>to have their own bat, and the bats are really expensive,

0:06:23.470 --> 0:06:25.210
<v Speaker 6>and then changes every year and all that sort of stuff,

0:06:25.230 --> 0:06:25.920
<v Speaker 6>the new technology.

0:06:25.940 --> 0:06:29.820
<v Speaker 3>You've got eight-year-olds with hitting coaches? Good lord. Yeah, yeah, yeah.

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 4>Ugh.

0:06:32.730 --> 0:06:35.100
<v Speaker 3>Um, I was going to transition to another thing, but

0:06:35.130 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 3>it feels awkward.

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:39.940
<v Speaker 7>Jack's going to transition is the title for this segment

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 7>of the podcast. After a word from our friends at

0:06:43.620 --> 0:06:47.739
<v Speaker 7>SimpliSafe Home Security, 6 million.

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:48.460
<v Speaker 3>People in America, is that right?

0:06:48.540 --> 0:06:51.320
<v Speaker 7>I got to make sure that's right, have trusted SimpliSafe

0:06:51.350 --> 0:06:57.630
<v Speaker 7>Home Security with their home security, their stuff, their loved ones,

0:06:57.930 --> 0:07:01.770
<v Speaker 7>because it's different. You got smart AI-powered cameras that watch

0:07:01.790 --> 0:07:05.530
<v Speaker 7>for potential threats and alert a live U.S.-based security specialist.

0:07:05.190 --> 0:07:06.510
<v Speaker 3>To Ready to intervene.

0:07:06.850 --> 0:07:10.530
<v Speaker 7>The agent intervenes in under 30 seconds, speaking through the

0:07:10.550 --> 0:07:13.790
<v Speaker 7>camera to stop an intruder in their tracks, calling for

0:07:13.790 --> 0:07:16.690
<v Speaker 7>911 dispatch when it's needed most. And it's not, you know,

0:07:16.750 --> 0:07:18.810
<v Speaker 7>you get a message, you're in the shower or something,

0:07:18.930 --> 0:07:22.410
<v Speaker 7>or somebody at your door. No, SimpliSafe takes control and

0:07:22.470 --> 0:07:25.030
<v Speaker 7>prevents that break-in. Yeah, it is more than 6 million

0:07:25.070 --> 0:07:27.510
<v Speaker 7>people who use SimpliSafe. And you know what's interesting about that?

0:07:27.570 --> 0:07:30.170
<v Speaker 7>They're all doing it voluntarily because you're not locked into

0:07:30.190 --> 0:07:32.890
<v Speaker 7>a contract. So that's more than 6 million people, like me,

0:07:33.380 --> 0:07:36.020
<v Speaker 7>who still... You simply save and pay for it on

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:37.820
<v Speaker 7>a monthly basis because you like it and you want

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:38.550
<v Speaker 7>to keep using it.

0:07:38.790 --> 0:07:40.290
<v Speaker 3>And right now is a good time to sign up.

0:07:41.310 --> 0:07:44.070
<v Speaker 7>And our insurance company told us, hey, you want a

0:07:44.090 --> 0:07:46.050
<v Speaker 7>good rate, you got to have a home security system.

0:07:46.090 --> 0:07:49.610
<v Speaker 3>We said, well, we're SimpliSafe people. They said, perfect. Love it.

0:07:50.050 --> 0:07:53.430
<v Speaker 7>Go to SimpliSafe.com slash Armstrong. You get 60% off with

0:07:53.490 --> 0:07:58.790
<v Speaker 7>professional monitoring when you visit SimpliSafe.com slash Armstrong. SimpliSafe ahead

0:07:58.810 --> 0:08:00.490
<v Speaker 7>of crime in real time.

0:08:01.010 --> 0:08:04.940
<v Speaker 6>Are we living in the last man era of history?

0:08:05.020 --> 0:08:07.140
<v Speaker 6>We'll explain what that is coming up a little bit

0:08:07.180 --> 0:08:09.220
<v Speaker 6>later because I think that's really interesting. We clearly are

0:08:09.540 --> 0:08:11.060
<v Speaker 6>based on the definition of this author.

0:08:12.510 --> 0:08:12.890
<v Speaker 9>Or woman.

0:08:13.450 --> 0:08:14.250
<v Speaker 3>Women are included, too.

0:08:14.710 --> 0:08:16.190
<v Speaker 7>You know, I want to get to my favorite story

0:08:16.210 --> 0:08:19.650
<v Speaker 7>of the day. It has brought delight to my soul.

0:08:21.110 --> 0:08:23.630
<v Speaker 7>Wouldn't that be nice? I mean, generally, you follow the news,

0:08:24.170 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 7>it brings vomit to your lips. This has brought delight

0:08:28.620 --> 0:08:29.250
<v Speaker 7>to my soul.

0:08:29.330 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 3>And that's coming up next? That's coming up. Well, it

0:08:31.690 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 3>could be, sure.

0:08:32.980 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 6>Two quick texts I want to get on before we

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:36.940
<v Speaker 6>take a break, and then Joe delights us.

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:37.620
<v Speaker 3>Yes.

0:08:39.650 --> 0:08:42.540
<v Speaker 6>Mentioned earlier that NPR was making a big deal out

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:46.319
<v Speaker 6>of the fact that 15% of Americans are using AI

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:48.580
<v Speaker 6>to search candidates for this election, and then they got

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:48.940
<v Speaker 6>into hell.

0:08:49.530 --> 0:08:51.550
<v Speaker 3>Awful that is or the information could be wrong or

0:08:51.590 --> 0:08:52.630
<v Speaker 3>whatever when people.

0:08:52.410 --> 0:08:56.589
<v Speaker 6>Have been googling oh my god for decades now and

0:08:56.630 --> 0:08:58.850
<v Speaker 6>there's all kinds of crap out of there or you

0:08:58.870 --> 0:09:00.050
<v Speaker 6>get your information from ads.

0:09:02.410 --> 0:09:05.569
<v Speaker 7>Or maybe you get your information from npr in which

0:09:05.650 --> 0:09:09.830
<v Speaker 7>case you're getting absolute crap or your union we got

0:09:09.870 --> 0:09:11.980
<v Speaker 7>this text i never used ai but i used to

0:09:12.010 --> 0:09:14.630
<v Speaker 7>work a union job in every voting season they would

0:09:14.650 --> 0:09:16.720
<v Speaker 7>send a card telling you how to vote on every

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:19.940
<v Speaker 7>issue i would do the opposite But so, hey, NPR,

0:09:20.460 --> 0:09:24.720
<v Speaker 7>unions been telling people how to vote for decades.

0:09:25.520 --> 0:09:27.500
<v Speaker 6>Do you do a story about how awful that might be?

0:09:27.580 --> 0:09:30.010
<v Speaker 6>Or just, you know, if anybody's doing independent research on

0:09:30.030 --> 0:09:33.709
<v Speaker 6>their own, you know, whatever. And then one more about

0:09:33.730 --> 0:09:36.930
<v Speaker 6>the whole election. Kind of about the election. Jack and

0:09:36.970 --> 0:09:38.470
<v Speaker 6>Joe won't talk about Epstein.

0:09:39.870 --> 0:09:44.380
<v Speaker 3>Oh, shut up. Oh, you know what? Unless you have

0:09:44.420 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 3>more on that topic.

0:09:45.660 --> 0:09:45.730
<v Speaker 6>No.

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:51.660
<v Speaker 7>You remember yesterday we were posing the question, passing along

0:09:51.700 --> 0:09:55.230
<v Speaker 7>the question posed by Eric Erickson on the right and

0:09:55.290 --> 0:10:01.020
<v Speaker 7>a different bloke on the left for whether, a Republican,

0:10:01.070 --> 0:10:04.569
<v Speaker 7>for instance, should vote for an awful candidate like a

0:10:04.690 --> 0:10:08.559
<v Speaker 7>Ken Paxton, for instance. Or send the message that, no,

0:10:08.580 --> 0:10:10.650
<v Speaker 7>we're not going to vote for awful candidates. Do better,

0:10:10.710 --> 0:10:13.790
<v Speaker 7>Republican Party. We need a better primary system. And on

0:10:13.830 --> 0:10:18.250
<v Speaker 7>the left, they cited Al-Sayed. What a miserable, abhorrent vote

0:10:18.330 --> 0:10:20.860
<v Speaker 7>that would be for Democrats in Michigan.

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:22.300
<v Speaker 3>Are you better off?

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 7>Rejecting your party's abhorrent candidate and letting the other party

0:10:27.620 --> 0:10:29.880
<v Speaker 7>hold power for a while as a message. And we

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:32.979
<v Speaker 7>asked for your thoughts, and we received quite a few

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:36.460
<v Speaker 7>thoughtful and thought-provoking emails.

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:38.590
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I would like to get into that, because my

0:10:38.610 --> 0:10:43.330
<v Speaker 6>philosophy has always been that the whole not voting is

0:10:43.390 --> 0:10:47.189
<v Speaker 6>like being a pacifist. It just maybe makes you feel good,

0:10:47.230 --> 0:10:49.150
<v Speaker 6>but there is going to be a result. Would you

0:10:49.190 --> 0:10:50.790
<v Speaker 6>like to play a role in it or not?

0:10:51.770 --> 0:10:51.890
<v Speaker 9>So.

0:10:53.210 --> 0:10:55.350
<v Speaker 6>That's the way I've always felt about voting me. I

0:10:55.630 --> 0:10:57.689
<v Speaker 6>just won't vote because I don't like my candidate. Okay,

0:10:57.730 --> 0:10:59.450
<v Speaker 6>so you're going to let other people make the decision.

0:10:59.490 --> 0:11:01.370
<v Speaker 6>A smaller number of people may be choosing.

0:11:01.390 --> 0:11:03.830
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. I don't quite get that, but I'll

0:11:03.850 --> 0:11:04.589
<v Speaker 3>be interested to hear.

0:11:04.610 --> 0:11:06.670
<v Speaker 6>Okay, well, I'm not going to get into it now

0:11:06.700 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 6>because we generally disagree about this somewhat.

0:11:10.220 --> 0:11:12.500
<v Speaker 3>Most of my favorite people disagree with me on this,

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 3>but I just, I don't know.

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:17.680
<v Speaker 6>You're going to delight us coming up. That's what I'm

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:20.300
<v Speaker 6>excited about. Well, specifically your soul.

0:11:21.270 --> 0:11:26.030
<v Speaker 7>Not like momentary delight. This will make you happier than

0:11:26.070 --> 0:11:27.330
<v Speaker 7>you were prior.

0:11:27.510 --> 0:11:30.410
<v Speaker 3>Wow. It certainly did to me. Cool. At the risk

0:11:30.470 --> 0:11:33.900
<v Speaker 3>of overselling it. Whoops, too late. My soul needs delighted.

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:34.420
<v Speaker 3>That's next.

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong and Getty.

0:11:40.300 --> 0:11:42.020
<v Speaker 6>I have a lot of friends and family in the

0:11:42.059 --> 0:11:44.200
<v Speaker 6>little Kansas town where Trump is going to be doing

0:11:44.220 --> 0:11:49.210
<v Speaker 6>a rally on Saturday. And everybody, I was just texted

0:11:49.250 --> 0:11:51.930
<v Speaker 6>by a friend of mine there, everybody's losing their mind.

0:11:51.950 --> 0:11:54.450
<v Speaker 6>This is a pretty small town, and Trump's actually going

0:11:54.470 --> 0:11:55.050
<v Speaker 6>to come to town.

0:11:55.429 --> 0:11:56.350
<v Speaker 3>I'll bet, yeah.

0:11:56.370 --> 0:11:58.450
<v Speaker 6>Land and traffic, and where are they going to park

0:11:58.490 --> 0:12:00.230
<v Speaker 6>the plane at this tiny airport and all that sort

0:12:00.250 --> 0:12:00.489
<v Speaker 6>of stuff.

0:12:01.170 --> 0:12:03.710
<v Speaker 7>All right, so if this was tagged, some of the

0:12:03.809 --> 0:12:09.530
<v Speaker 7>tags would be the horrifying lack of free speech in

0:12:09.550 --> 0:12:14.120
<v Speaker 7>a lot of the Western world, including Britain, and the

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:15.260
<v Speaker 7>Streisand effect.

0:12:16.070 --> 0:12:19.370
<v Speaker 6>You familiar with the Streisand effect? Barbara Streisand became aware.

0:12:19.410 --> 0:12:22.240
<v Speaker 6>Sang a duet with Neil Diamond in the Streisand effect.

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:24.700
<v Speaker 3>It really has nothing to do with it. No, although

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:27.199
<v Speaker 3>that was a good song. I mean, come on. It

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 3>makes me cry. I can't even think about it.

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:29.380
<v Speaker 10>I know.

0:12:29.660 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 7>So the Streisand effect, Barbara Streisand back in the day

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:36.190
<v Speaker 7>became aware that a picture of her house had emerged online,

0:12:36.530 --> 0:12:38.689
<v Speaker 7>and she sued to get it taken offline, even though

0:12:38.750 --> 0:12:40.469
<v Speaker 7>it had only been viewed.

0:12:40.510 --> 0:12:45.110
<v Speaker 3>Like six times. I remember. All right, stop it.

0:12:45.490 --> 0:12:49.170
<v Speaker 6>So then that turned into a big deal, and it

0:12:49.230 --> 0:12:53.730
<v Speaker 6>was downloaded hundreds of thousands of times because she'd drawn

0:12:53.770 --> 0:12:54.630
<v Speaker 6>attention to it.

0:12:54.970 --> 0:12:58.730
<v Speaker 7>Okay, so that's one of your tags. Your final tag

0:12:58.990 --> 0:13:03.580
<v Speaker 7>is that a lot of my heroes, my intellectual heroes,

0:13:04.580 --> 0:13:08.439
<v Speaker 7>are people who've tried to speak truth through humor.

0:13:09.059 --> 0:13:16.670
<v Speaker 3>Not surprisingly. Mark Twain... Hunter Thompson, P.J. O'Rourke, H.L. Mencken,

0:13:16.890 --> 0:13:17.990
<v Speaker 3>so many greats.

0:13:18.330 --> 0:13:20.370
<v Speaker 6>Carrot Top, who tried to kill himself a couple weeks ago.

0:13:20.429 --> 0:13:23.710
<v Speaker 3>All right, I just need you to stop.

0:13:24.290 --> 0:13:30.179
<v Speaker 7>So, apparently, some politicians across the pond in Britain.

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:32.060
<v Speaker 3>are not aware of this effect.

0:13:32.500 --> 0:13:36.990
<v Speaker 7>Take Britain's Simon Bennett, a politician with a seat in Wolverhampton,

0:13:37.010 --> 0:13:39.610
<v Speaker 7>which is a not very big city near Birmingham. But

0:13:39.929 --> 0:13:43.010
<v Speaker 7>so this 15-year-old boy, and this is the state of

0:13:43.050 --> 0:13:47.699
<v Speaker 7>affairs in our freaking papa country, this kid's name is Fraser.

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:52.780
<v Speaker 7>He'd used Facebook to post an AI-altered photo of Bennett,

0:13:52.860 --> 0:13:57.440
<v Speaker 7>the politician, as a bunny rabbit. With whiskers and bunny

0:13:57.559 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 7>ears and buck teeth. Like Bugs Bunny, okay? An appointed

0:14:02.780 --> 0:14:06.300
<v Speaker 7>caption jabbing him for nibbling at his conservative party's last

0:14:06.370 --> 0:14:10.450
<v Speaker 7>remaining shreds of credibility. The counselor didn't laugh it off.

0:14:10.790 --> 0:14:14.210
<v Speaker 7>He called the police. What's up, doc?

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:17.160
<v Speaker 3>And that one I will permit.

0:14:17.620 --> 0:14:21.670
<v Speaker 7>The West Midlands police incredibly didn't just visit the young man,

0:14:21.730 --> 0:14:25.130
<v Speaker 7>the teenager. They arrested him. They seized his devices and

0:14:25.190 --> 0:14:32.870
<v Speaker 7>took him in for questioning. I could rant powerfully about

0:14:33.150 --> 0:14:36.510
<v Speaker 7>our First Amendment and how incredibly powerful it is and

0:14:36.550 --> 0:14:39.410
<v Speaker 7>how sickened I am by the state of British crackdowns

0:14:39.470 --> 0:14:42.090
<v Speaker 7>on free speech, especially against government figures, but I won't.

0:14:44.380 --> 0:14:50.420
<v Speaker 7>The Politico, what's his name, Bennett, apparently unaware of the

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:57.550
<v Speaker 7>Streisand effect. So when, before the police action, the original

0:14:57.590 --> 0:15:00.270
<v Speaker 7>Facebook post was only seen by a very few people

0:15:00.290 --> 0:15:03.770
<v Speaker 7>that follow this kid on Facebook. Now that the picture

0:15:03.830 --> 0:15:08.350
<v Speaker 7>of Bunny Rabbit Bennett has been, the kid got busted.

0:15:08.030 --> 0:15:11.450
<v Speaker 3>For it, millions have seen the picture.

0:15:12.030 --> 0:15:12.690
<v Speaker 2>Millions. Of course.

0:15:13.150 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 7>The image has been produced in news coverage, has gone

0:15:15.860 --> 0:15:20.220
<v Speaker 7>viral on social media. One post on Polymarket's X account

0:15:20.620 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 7>has had more than 6.8 million views.

0:15:23.820 --> 0:15:24.100
<v Speaker 3>Wow.

0:15:24.380 --> 0:15:27.120
<v Speaker 6>Free speech advocates like David Atherton posted the pic in

0:15:27.140 --> 0:15:30.820
<v Speaker 6>solidarity in Britain, adding, come and get me, West Midlands police.

0:15:31.330 --> 0:15:36.190
<v Speaker 6>And a memefied, I'm sorry, memefied variations of Fraser's manipulated

0:15:36.250 --> 0:15:37.330
<v Speaker 6>photo now abound.

0:15:37.650 --> 0:15:40.090
<v Speaker 3>It's everywhere, everywhere, everywhere.

0:15:40.530 --> 0:15:44.770
<v Speaker 6>And the damage to Bennett's reputation could be permanent. Any

0:15:44.810 --> 0:15:49.050
<v Speaker 6>Google search for Simon Bennett counselor produces endless pages about

0:15:49.090 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 6>the rabbit picture. Oh, I'll bet you're right. I'll bet

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 6>for the rest of his life, any search includes the rabbit.

0:15:56.020 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 3>Right, right.

0:15:57.940 --> 0:16:02.740
<v Speaker 6>Meanwhile, over in Germany, Chancellor Friedrich Merz has reportedly filed

0:16:02.940 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 6>hundreds of police reports against online critics for calling him

0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:12.540
<v Speaker 6>Pinocchio and other petty insults. The German police apparently took

0:16:12.580 --> 0:16:17.260
<v Speaker 6>his report seriously. But then they also launched a criminal

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:21.410
<v Speaker 6>investigation against the citizen for calling another politician fat.

0:16:22.330 --> 0:16:23.230
<v Speaker 3>Richard Lang.

0:16:23.890 --> 0:16:27.590
<v Speaker 7>Lang complained, of course, which ensured that search engines will

0:16:27.650 --> 0:16:30.750
<v Speaker 7>pair the words Richard Lang and fat for the rest

0:16:30.790 --> 0:16:35.700
<v Speaker 7>of his life. Andy Grote, another German politician, sent police

0:16:35.780 --> 0:16:38.970
<v Speaker 7>after a Twitter user who called him a a pimmel,

0:16:39.270 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 7>which is street slang for a penis in Germany. The

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:46.420
<v Speaker 7>charges were dropped after a public outcry, but the incident

0:16:46.500 --> 0:16:49.860
<v Speaker 7>undoubtedly led to a lot more Germans thinking of Groot

0:16:49.900 --> 0:16:52.370
<v Speaker 7>as a pimmel for making such a fuss about it.

0:16:52.780 --> 0:16:57.930
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to start using the term pimmel. I love this.

0:16:58.030 --> 0:17:00.290
<v Speaker 6>I wonder if this is going to fix the free

0:17:00.330 --> 0:17:03.690
<v Speaker 6>speech problem and that people will eventually figure out, you know,

0:17:03.710 --> 0:17:06.210
<v Speaker 6>I hate that he calls me fat, but If I complain,

0:17:06.270 --> 0:17:07.870
<v Speaker 6>it's going to make it worse, so I better just

0:17:07.930 --> 0:17:08.629
<v Speaker 6>let him do it.

0:17:09.250 --> 0:17:10.730
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I wish I had the quotes in front of me.

0:17:10.770 --> 0:17:13.820
<v Speaker 7>Both Abraham Lincoln and Thomas Jefferson said some really powerful

0:17:13.859 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 7>things to the effect of the Constitution is nothing without

0:17:19.100 --> 0:17:19.820
<v Speaker 7>the love.

0:17:19.619 --> 0:17:21.440
<v Speaker 3>Of the people, the will of the people, the support

0:17:21.460 --> 0:17:23.200
<v Speaker 3>of the people. It's just a piece of paper.

0:17:24.619 --> 0:17:27.220
<v Speaker 7>And if the will of the people says something else,

0:17:27.290 --> 0:17:29.610
<v Speaker 7>it doesn't really matter what the Constitution says. We have

0:17:29.630 --> 0:17:32.409
<v Speaker 7>to love our system and understand why it's so good.

0:17:32.430 --> 0:17:38.149
<v Speaker 7>The The trampling of the First Amendment in Great Britain

0:17:38.190 --> 0:17:41.050
<v Speaker 7>and Germany, for instance, in the name of eliminating hate

0:17:41.090 --> 0:17:44.790
<v Speaker 7>speech or insulting speech or offending Muslims or whatever the

0:17:44.830 --> 0:17:47.949
<v Speaker 7>hell is the sacred cow at the particular time we're

0:17:47.970 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 7>talking about. If the will of the people is we

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:55.020
<v Speaker 7>will not accept that and we're going to mock it

0:17:55.140 --> 0:17:57.980
<v Speaker 7>to death, I can die happy.

0:17:58.380 --> 0:17:59.260
<v Speaker 3>I love this.

0:17:59.680 --> 0:18:02.419
<v Speaker 6>Imagine a world where you call the police if someone

0:18:02.460 --> 0:18:03.300
<v Speaker 6>calls you fat.

0:18:04.940 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 3>Wow. Or worse yet, a fat pimmel.

0:18:08.140 --> 0:18:08.480
<v Speaker 9>Ooh.

0:18:09.100 --> 0:18:10.419
<v Speaker 3>Fat rabbit looking pimmel.

0:18:10.690 --> 0:18:11.070
<v Speaker 6>Ooh.

0:18:11.690 --> 0:18:16.109
<v Speaker 3>It's the worst fate. Any thoughts on that? Text line 415295KFTC.

0:18:16.150 --> 0:18:18.869
<v Speaker 3>Get the podcast. Armstrong and Getty.

0:18:20.550 --> 0:18:23.650
<v Speaker 8>The Wall Street Journal reports that the United States has

0:18:23.710 --> 0:18:26.889
<v Speaker 8>warned Gulf allies about a potential wave of strikes against

0:18:27.020 --> 0:18:30.960
<v Speaker 8>Iran just after the midterm elections. Now, the report points

0:18:31.060 --> 0:18:34.360
<v Speaker 8>to internal communications that are both military.

0:18:33.900 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 3>And diplomatic in nature.

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:38.980
<v Speaker 8>And indicate the United States and Israel are preparing a

0:18:39.060 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 8>new round of heavy combat operations against Iran.

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:42.340
<v Speaker 2>The U.S.

0:18:42.380 --> 0:18:45.389
<v Speaker 8>Is also sending an additional Patriot missile defense battery to

0:18:45.530 --> 0:18:47.649
<v Speaker 8>Israel to prepare for incoming.

0:18:47.330 --> 0:18:48.490
<v Speaker 3>Iranian missile fire.

0:18:48.790 --> 0:18:51.470
<v Speaker 8>This does come as the Qataris are proposing a seven-day

0:18:51.510 --> 0:18:54.449
<v Speaker 8>timeline to address the negotiation concerns.

0:18:54.090 --> 0:18:54.570
<v Speaker 3>Of the U.S.

0:18:54.630 --> 0:18:57.550
<v Speaker 8>And Iran, a move that could avoid further escalation. Now,

0:18:57.570 --> 0:18:59.980
<v Speaker 8>the Iranians are expected to respond by the end of

0:19:00.020 --> 0:19:00.340
<v Speaker 8>the week.

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 9>This election is hugely consequential, and Prime Minister Netanyahu has

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:09.379
<v Speaker 9>promised that if he is re-elected, he will ramp up

0:19:09.500 --> 0:19:13.540
<v Speaker 9>the war with Iran and partner with President Trump to, quote,

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:18.270
<v Speaker 9>finish the job, meaning more fighting and continued high gas

0:19:18.330 --> 0:19:19.430
<v Speaker 9>prices in the U.S.

0:19:19.690 --> 0:19:21.470
<v Speaker 3>So what are all these stories?

0:19:21.550 --> 0:19:24.670
<v Speaker 6>Why are we hearing all these stories about the timing

0:19:24.890 --> 0:19:29.010
<v Speaker 6>of attacking Iran? Since when is this the sort of

0:19:29.050 --> 0:19:33.090
<v Speaker 6>thing that It's announced like we now know who the

0:19:33.130 --> 0:19:35.650
<v Speaker 6>Super Bowl halftime show is. We now know when we're

0:19:35.670 --> 0:19:37.980
<v Speaker 6>going to attack a country. It's scheduled for now. I

0:19:38.020 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 6>also don't get why there's not more conversation around. Isn't

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:44.820
<v Speaker 6>the scheduling an attack for after the election just as

0:19:44.900 --> 0:19:47.129
<v Speaker 6>bad as having one before the election to influence?

0:19:47.150 --> 0:19:49.950
<v Speaker 3>I mean, why the election shouldn't be announced?

0:19:50.090 --> 0:19:54.859
<v Speaker 6>It yeah well uh you shouldn't be timing attacks around

0:19:54.930 --> 0:19:58.159
<v Speaker 6>elections should you you either need to do it or

0:19:58.180 --> 0:20:00.639
<v Speaker 6>you don't based on fighting a war and when's the

0:20:00.660 --> 0:20:01.740
<v Speaker 6>best time to attack.

0:20:01.500 --> 0:20:05.330
<v Speaker 7>Them maybe I mean, it might be next week or

0:20:05.369 --> 0:20:06.430
<v Speaker 7>this week is about the same.

0:20:07.310 --> 0:20:07.669
<v Speaker 6>I don't know.

0:20:07.690 --> 0:20:11.650
<v Speaker 7>I'm just trying to get to your original question, why

0:20:11.690 --> 0:20:16.419
<v Speaker 7>the leaks. My best guess is that the perception is

0:20:16.460 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 7>pretty widespread that Iran is really squeezed. They are out

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:23.190
<v Speaker 7>of the oil that they had parked offshore and that

0:20:23.230 --> 0:20:26.470
<v Speaker 7>they are definitely in a spot where they might have

0:20:26.530 --> 0:20:31.390
<v Speaker 7>to give. And so we're reminding them on multiple fronts,

0:20:31.450 --> 0:20:35.190
<v Speaker 7>including Bibi, that, all right, here comes another big fat whacking.

0:20:35.330 --> 0:20:36.729
<v Speaker 7>I mean, we're really going to give it to you

0:20:36.750 --> 0:20:39.180
<v Speaker 7>good this time, unless you want to come to the table.

0:20:39.300 --> 0:20:40.120
<v Speaker 7>That's the best I got.

0:20:40.300 --> 0:20:43.440
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:47.060
<v Speaker 6>80% turnout in Israel for the election. Highest turnout in

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:50.940
<v Speaker 6>half a century. Could be a while before they know

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:53.169
<v Speaker 6>who the new prime minister is, but either Bibi or

0:20:53.210 --> 0:20:55.170
<v Speaker 6>that other guy, whose name escapes me off the top

0:20:55.190 --> 0:20:59.180
<v Speaker 6>of my head, are both hardcore. Hamas has to be finished.

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:01.119
<v Speaker 6>And so I think the other guy would be on

0:21:01.180 --> 0:21:02.190
<v Speaker 6>board with a U.S.

0:21:02.210 --> 0:21:05.730
<v Speaker 3>Attack also. Yeah, Gadi Eisenkot. There you go.

0:21:06.850 --> 0:21:10.010
<v Speaker 7>The headline out of Israel from an Israeli correspondent is,

0:21:10.470 --> 0:21:13.330
<v Speaker 7>it's noon in Israel, Bibi hasn't won, but the opposition

0:21:13.369 --> 0:21:18.360
<v Speaker 7>has lost. So now it's the weeks-long process of trying

0:21:18.380 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 7>to cobble together a coalition government.

0:21:20.500 --> 0:21:24.220
<v Speaker 6>Wow, so Netanyahu's been in prime minister for almost 20 years.

0:21:26.630 --> 0:21:28.230
<v Speaker 3>Israel's only existed.

0:21:28.130 --> 0:21:33.350
<v Speaker 6>For 80, 20 years. Longest serving prime minister. He could

0:21:33.510 --> 0:21:34.830
<v Speaker 6>continue to be prime minister.

0:21:35.109 --> 0:21:35.409
<v Speaker 9>Wow.

0:21:35.490 --> 0:21:37.590
<v Speaker 3>That'd be something. Yeah.

0:21:37.630 --> 0:21:41.010
<v Speaker 7>Well, that's going to drive the college kids crazy. You

0:21:41.050 --> 0:21:43.790
<v Speaker 7>want to talk about something I know very little about.

0:21:45.910 --> 0:21:48.429
<v Speaker 7>I read one piece of analysis where it's still up

0:21:48.510 --> 0:21:52.440
<v Speaker 7>to the president to to choose who gets the first

0:21:52.540 --> 0:21:55.780
<v Speaker 7>shot at forming a government. Why do you have a president?

0:21:55.820 --> 0:21:57.420
<v Speaker 7>Is that what they do? Is that the only thing

0:21:57.440 --> 0:21:59.619
<v Speaker 7>they do? What else do they do? Ribbon cuttings and

0:21:59.660 --> 0:22:01.400
<v Speaker 7>that sort of thing? And wait a minute, wait a minute,

0:22:01.420 --> 0:22:03.480
<v Speaker 7>wait a minute. So the party that got the second

0:22:03.540 --> 0:22:05.359
<v Speaker 7>most might get his nod to see if.

0:22:05.420 --> 0:22:07.180
<v Speaker 3>They can form a coalition.

0:22:07.210 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 4>Why?

0:22:07.590 --> 0:22:10.310
<v Speaker 3>Who's in charge? I don't know. If somebody knows, feel

0:22:10.330 --> 0:22:12.090
<v Speaker 3>free to drop us a note. I like to learn.

0:22:13.050 --> 0:22:18.190
<v Speaker 3>Different topic. Different conflagration, I guess.

0:22:19.390 --> 0:22:24.109
<v Speaker 6>Jennifer Griffin reporting on Fox about people prepping for war.

0:22:24.170 --> 0:22:25.850
<v Speaker 3>What's this all about? Clip 80, Michael.

0:22:26.230 --> 0:22:29.350
<v Speaker 1>The UK and Japan are urging households to prepare for

0:22:29.390 --> 0:22:33.250
<v Speaker 1>at least three days without essential services. Germany is advising

0:22:33.410 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 1>its citizens to stockpile 10 days of food and water

0:22:37.190 --> 0:22:40.639
<v Speaker 1>due to potential Russian sabotage of critical infrastructure.

0:22:40.940 --> 0:22:44.940
<v Speaker 4>The shadow war, as it is being waged today, has

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:48.399
<v Speaker 4>an objective that goes far beyond anything we saw during

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 4>the Cold War.

0:22:50.109 --> 0:22:50.570
<v Speaker 3>Wow.

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:57.300
<v Speaker 6>I think this is a scary positive. Here's the positive part.

0:22:58.140 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 7>Europe has been so soft and useless and dependent for

0:23:03.380 --> 0:23:04.880
<v Speaker 7>so long, as Donald J.

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:06.860
<v Speaker 3>Has made clear. It's one of the best things he's done.

0:23:06.900 --> 0:23:10.940
<v Speaker 7>I think he's been unnecessarily Richard about it, but what

0:23:11.220 --> 0:23:13.250
<v Speaker 7>a pimmel about it, as we learned in the last segment.

0:23:14.190 --> 0:23:14.730
<v Speaker 3>But he's right.

0:23:15.510 --> 0:23:18.389
<v Speaker 7>Um, so now they're saying, Hey, the world is dangerous.

0:23:18.830 --> 0:23:23.470
<v Speaker 7>You know, we need to be prepared both, uh, nationally,

0:23:23.530 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 7>our defenses and citizens that, Hey, ugly stuff is going

0:23:27.140 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 7>on in the world.

0:23:28.100 --> 0:23:30.140
<v Speaker 3>We've got to be ready. I think that's a positive.

0:23:30.580 --> 0:23:33.179
<v Speaker 7>The fact that the wolf is close enough to the

0:23:33.220 --> 0:23:35.680
<v Speaker 7>door for them to be saying that that's sobering.

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:39.480
<v Speaker 6>I think I've become a Tampa Bay race fan. More

0:23:39.510 --> 0:23:41.510
<v Speaker 6>on that later. Uh, back to Jennifer Griffin.

0:23:42.550 --> 0:23:46.550
<v Speaker 1>And now the Pentagon is updating its doomsday plan, preparing

0:23:46.609 --> 0:23:49.930
<v Speaker 1>for a new nightmare scenario, a global war that knocks

0:23:50.030 --> 0:23:54.290
<v Speaker 1>out America's power grids, cripples supply chains, and leaves U.S.

0:23:54.369 --> 0:23:58.830
<v Speaker 1>military bases cut off from essential services. It's more widespread

0:23:58.869 --> 0:24:02.510
<v Speaker 1>than past Cold War preparations to move the top military

0:24:02.570 --> 0:24:06.149
<v Speaker 1>command into Cheyenne Mountain in the event of a nuclear attack.

0:24:06.670 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Under this new initiative, dubbed Fortress, every major military installation

0:24:11.380 --> 0:24:14.919
<v Speaker 1>in the U.S. should prepare to operate independently for at

0:24:14.980 --> 0:24:16.100
<v Speaker 1>least 90 days.

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 7>Wow, so every, like, Fort What's-Its in America needs to

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:26.159
<v Speaker 7>be its own commander for at least 90 days.

0:24:27.600 --> 0:24:30.100
<v Speaker 3>What if they declare war on Iowa or something?

0:24:34.380 --> 0:24:38.530
<v Speaker 6>So, is this just, like, the sort of thing maybe

0:24:38.570 --> 0:24:42.369
<v Speaker 6>we should have done several years ago? Finally getting around

0:24:42.410 --> 0:24:45.290
<v Speaker 6>to it? Is this, holy crap, the S is about

0:24:45.310 --> 0:24:47.570
<v Speaker 6>to hit the fan? How are you supposed to respond

0:24:47.590 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 6>to this? Why are we announcing this?

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:52.420
<v Speaker 7>The fact that these things are being reported together, I think,

0:24:52.500 --> 0:24:56.380
<v Speaker 7>is not insignificant. On the other hand, the flip side,

0:24:56.480 --> 0:25:00.219
<v Speaker 7>imagine the opposite. Sometimes this is a useful exercise. The

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:03.580
<v Speaker 7>Pentagon refuses to update its doomsday plan and won't.

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:06.220
<v Speaker 3>Right, right, right. Come on, of course.

0:25:06.619 --> 0:25:11.940
<v Speaker 7>It's like the Pentagon has prepared a plan for invading Greenland. Well, yeah,

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 7>they have a plan for everything. That's what planners do

0:25:14.100 --> 0:25:16.220
<v Speaker 7>in the Pentagon. I happen to be related to one

0:25:16.270 --> 0:25:18.990
<v Speaker 7>of them, or was. I'm still related. He's no longer

0:25:19.010 --> 0:25:19.770
<v Speaker 7>a military planner.

0:25:19.869 --> 0:25:23.050
<v Speaker 3>As long as planes don't include portable nuclear reactors. Oh, wait,

0:25:23.090 --> 0:25:23.390
<v Speaker 3>they do.

0:25:24.430 --> 0:25:28.990
<v Speaker 1>Documents obtained by Fox reveal plans for portable nuclear reactors.

0:25:29.380 --> 0:25:33.870
<v Speaker 1>backup power grids, and massive reserves of ammunition, critical minerals,

0:25:34.250 --> 0:25:39.250
<v Speaker 1>medical supplies, spare parts, and communications capable of functioning even

0:25:39.310 --> 0:25:43.850
<v Speaker 1>if GPS and satellites are disrupted, including survivable satellites and

0:25:43.930 --> 0:25:48.919
<v Speaker 1>jam-resistant communication networks. The Pentagon wants civilian factories ready to

0:25:49.020 --> 0:25:53.340
<v Speaker 1>switch to wartime weapons production, with alternative supply chains in

0:25:53.380 --> 0:25:55.719
<v Speaker 1>place if foreign suppliers are cut off.

0:25:56.700 --> 0:25:59.230
<v Speaker 3>I love this. That's how you prevent war. I love, love,

0:25:59.250 --> 0:25:59.590
<v Speaker 3>love this.

0:26:00.070 --> 0:26:02.550
<v Speaker 7>And the nuclear reactor thing got my attention, too. It

0:26:02.609 --> 0:26:07.730
<v Speaker 7>is so clearly the future. Small nuclear reactors in the

0:26:07.770 --> 0:26:09.909
<v Speaker 7>United States. We need to forge ahead as fast as

0:26:09.930 --> 0:26:14.790
<v Speaker 7>we can, you stupid guitar players with your no-nukes crap. Oh,

0:26:15.150 --> 0:26:17.850
<v Speaker 7>I know what we'll do in the late 70s, early 80s.

0:26:18.410 --> 0:26:19.190
<v Speaker 2>No nukes.

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 3>Yay, fossil fuel. Yay.

0:26:21.980 --> 0:26:24.639
<v Speaker 6>We'll hold a giant demonstration to make sure you use

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 6>fossil fuels and not nuclear power.

0:26:27.020 --> 0:26:27.900
<v Speaker 3>Okay, morons.

0:26:28.300 --> 0:26:32.020
<v Speaker 7>Anyway, so I happen to be talking to a friend,

0:26:32.080 --> 0:26:34.080
<v Speaker 7>a good friend who is an engineer and one of

0:26:34.140 --> 0:26:37.120
<v Speaker 7>his best friends. has been in the nuclear power world

0:26:37.350 --> 0:26:40.730
<v Speaker 7>as an engineer. And he has spent his life working

0:26:40.850 --> 0:26:46.090
<v Speaker 7>on a project where nuclear power plant one uses the fuel,

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:49.980
<v Speaker 7>it's depleted or whatever the terminology is, but that fuel

0:26:50.020 --> 0:26:53.899
<v Speaker 7>is still useful for a different technology. And they're working

0:26:53.960 --> 0:26:59.270
<v Speaker 7>on a design of step-by-step use of fuels that in

0:26:59.410 --> 0:27:04.859
<v Speaker 7>multiple sorts of nuclear reactors that'll be incredibly efficient. And

0:27:05.100 --> 0:27:07.680
<v Speaker 7>not too many years ago, this guy was telling my friend,

0:27:07.700 --> 0:27:10.139
<v Speaker 7>I'm never going to live to see this. And now

0:27:10.180 --> 0:27:11.560
<v Speaker 7>he's saying, we're full speed ahead.

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:12.220
<v Speaker 3>This is great.

0:27:13.580 --> 0:27:15.510
<v Speaker 6>And the idea that we don't have to worry about

0:27:15.530 --> 0:27:18.369
<v Speaker 6>the damn electric grid because there's a data center opening.

0:27:18.650 --> 0:27:22.109
<v Speaker 3>It'll have its own little nuclear reactor before too terribly long.

0:27:22.369 --> 0:27:23.109
<v Speaker 3>Clearly the future.

0:27:24.190 --> 0:27:24.330
<v Speaker 10>Hmm.

0:27:26.960 --> 0:27:32.379
<v Speaker 3>Anyway, back to war, mayhem, and pestilence. No, that's it.

0:27:32.420 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 3>That's a report. That's interesting, though.

0:27:34.060 --> 0:27:35.740
<v Speaker 6>I would like to know what's driving that.

0:27:40.290 --> 0:27:44.010
<v Speaker 3>All the chaos in the world? Any specific chaos, though?

0:27:44.170 --> 0:27:45.610
<v Speaker 3>Anything China did or Russia did? Oh, there's so much

0:27:45.630 --> 0:27:46.350
<v Speaker 3>chaos to choose from.

0:27:47.520 --> 0:27:47.690
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:27:48.060 --> 0:27:50.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, this is a short clip. I want to hear

0:27:50.080 --> 0:27:51.160
<v Speaker 3>this one, Michael83.

0:27:52.320 --> 0:27:55.780
<v Speaker 10>China particularly has been doing operational preparation of battlefield exercises.

0:27:56.180 --> 0:27:57.550
<v Speaker 3>Against our critical infrastructures.

0:27:57.930 --> 0:28:01.210
<v Speaker 10>What that means is they've been putting malware, malicious software,

0:28:01.410 --> 0:28:07.220
<v Speaker 10>or determined flaws where they can penetrate our critical infrastructures.

0:28:09.580 --> 0:28:11.460
<v Speaker 3>Was that audio as bad for everybody else as it

0:28:11.500 --> 0:28:13.310
<v Speaker 3>was for my headphones? Yeah, I don't know what that

0:28:13.330 --> 0:28:13.889
<v Speaker 3>guy said.

0:28:13.990 --> 0:28:17.369
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, so China's been building, you know, malware, et cetera,

0:28:17.410 --> 0:28:20.300
<v Speaker 7>to screw our infrastructure. That's why the Pentagon is so

0:28:20.340 --> 0:28:23.240
<v Speaker 7>intent on saying, Hey, we've got to be independent.

0:28:25.260 --> 0:28:29.959
<v Speaker 3>I don't think you could, uh, overestimate.

0:28:30.820 --> 0:28:35.100
<v Speaker 6>The degree to which we would lose our S like

0:28:35.300 --> 0:28:38.380
<v Speaker 6>just have all the cell phones shut down. If only

0:28:38.420 --> 0:28:43.210
<v Speaker 6>that happened, people would go crazy because we're just so

0:28:43.310 --> 0:28:45.130
<v Speaker 6>used to being in contact with everybody all the time.

0:28:45.690 --> 0:28:45.830
<v Speaker 10>Hmm.

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:48.000
<v Speaker 6>If you couldn't text your wife or your kids or

0:28:48.060 --> 0:28:51.670
<v Speaker 6>they couldn't text you or whatever, people would go nuts.

0:28:52.510 --> 0:28:55.630
<v Speaker 7>I would take out a large knife, remove my own heart,

0:28:55.910 --> 0:28:58.050
<v Speaker 7>and stab it to death so I didn't have to

0:28:58.090 --> 0:29:02.660
<v Speaker 7>live in that world. See, you said we couldn't overestimate

0:29:03.060 --> 0:29:04.560
<v Speaker 7>how crazy people would go.

0:29:04.880 --> 0:29:05.900
<v Speaker 3>Don't you challenge me.

0:29:09.510 --> 0:29:09.730
<v Speaker 10>Funny.

0:29:09.930 --> 0:29:13.200
<v Speaker 3>No, you're so right though. Oh, people would lose their ass.

0:29:13.850 --> 0:29:15.070
<v Speaker 3>Oh my God.

0:29:15.300 --> 0:29:17.470
<v Speaker 6>We'd be in such a panic over the, over the,

0:29:17.700 --> 0:29:20.100
<v Speaker 6>which is funny because if you're old enough, people would

0:29:20.140 --> 0:29:21.920
<v Speaker 6>be in a panic over the way we used to

0:29:21.980 --> 0:29:23.250
<v Speaker 6>live like 30 years ago.

0:29:24.900 --> 0:29:25.860
<v Speaker 3>And everything was fine.

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:28.239
<v Speaker 6>My dad went off to work every single day with

0:29:28.320 --> 0:29:30.290
<v Speaker 6>no ability to be in contact with me or me

0:29:30.310 --> 0:29:33.150
<v Speaker 6>with him or him with my mom or vice versa.

0:29:33.690 --> 0:29:37.650
<v Speaker 3>And every night at 545, hey, look, he's home. Everything

0:29:37.690 --> 0:29:42.940
<v Speaker 3>went great. Yeah, that is so true. A word from

0:29:42.980 --> 0:29:44.160
<v Speaker 3>our friends at Incogni.

0:29:44.180 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 7>Speaking of the modern world and the things we depend on,

0:29:47.290 --> 0:29:49.430
<v Speaker 7>I've actually heard of this happening in real life. The

0:29:49.490 --> 0:29:52.550
<v Speaker 7>phone rings, it's your bank. They know everything about you.

0:29:52.570 --> 0:29:54.350
<v Speaker 7>I mean, clearly it's your bank. They got the last

0:29:54.430 --> 0:29:55.150
<v Speaker 7>four years socially.

0:29:55.170 --> 0:29:58.229
<v Speaker 3>They got Your address and your name, your middle initial, blah, blah, blah. No,

0:29:58.250 --> 0:30:00.970
<v Speaker 3>it's not your bank. It's a scammer. They bought everything

0:30:01.010 --> 0:30:03.110
<v Speaker 3>from a damned data broker. What do you do?

0:30:03.170 --> 0:30:06.250
<v Speaker 6>How do you get that stuff offline? You get with Incogni. Yep,

0:30:06.310 --> 0:30:08.770
<v Speaker 6>that's why we are using Incogni. I got an update

0:30:08.790 --> 0:30:12.740
<v Speaker 6>from Incogni yesterday with their removal request to the 420

0:30:12.740 --> 0:30:14.980
<v Speaker 6>plus data brokers and people search sites and where they've

0:30:15.020 --> 0:30:18.280
<v Speaker 6>gotten my info off the site. And then they keep

0:30:18.560 --> 0:30:21.420
<v Speaker 6>watch so that the info doesn't get added back in

0:30:21.440 --> 0:30:22.120
<v Speaker 6>because that can happen.

0:30:22.740 --> 0:30:24.940
<v Speaker 3>Yep, yep. If you tried to do this yourself, it

0:30:24.960 --> 0:30:26.180
<v Speaker 3>would take you hundreds of hours.

0:30:26.560 --> 0:30:29.720
<v Speaker 6>Why not go to Incogni.com slash Armstrong? You get 60% off.

0:30:29.780 --> 0:30:30.620
<v Speaker 6>It's super affordable.

0:30:31.000 --> 0:30:35.940
<v Speaker 7>Incogni.com slash Armstrong. One more time, get that data broker

0:30:36.000 --> 0:30:40.640
<v Speaker 7>crap offline. Incogni.com slash Armstrong. You would take out your

0:30:40.780 --> 0:30:43.300
<v Speaker 7>own heart and stab it to death. That's right, so

0:30:43.340 --> 0:30:44.880
<v Speaker 7>I didn't have to live in that world.

0:30:45.510 --> 0:30:45.740
<v Speaker 10>Well.

0:30:46.540 --> 0:30:51.330
<v Speaker 3>And it's quite a reaction. In particularly. In particularly.

0:30:51.720 --> 0:30:56.050
<v Speaker 7>Speaking of matters military, I thought this was so interesting,

0:30:56.090 --> 0:30:59.350
<v Speaker 7>the New York Times writing about the new era of war,

0:30:59.790 --> 0:31:06.310
<v Speaker 7>a nine-ton U.S. helicopter versus a cheap drone. And how

0:31:07.410 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 7>you've got to train personnel and the systems and all

0:31:09.860 --> 0:31:13.620
<v Speaker 7>for these giant attack helicopters to deal with this, you know...

0:31:14.190 --> 0:31:17.830
<v Speaker 7>Practically shelves of target adapted, although now they're being churned

0:31:17.870 --> 0:31:24.130
<v Speaker 7>out of factories, drones, unmanned aerial vehicles, and how everything

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:26.140
<v Speaker 7>is changing.

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:31.460
<v Speaker 3>In terms of warfare from the human to the.

0:31:32.800 --> 0:31:36.500
<v Speaker 7>Operations on the battlefield to the manufacturing to everything based

0:31:36.560 --> 0:31:41.280
<v Speaker 7>on drones. And what's the next thing around the corner?

0:31:41.300 --> 0:31:43.340
<v Speaker 3>Is it going to be micro drones? What do we

0:31:43.360 --> 0:31:48.240
<v Speaker 3>do then? Something AI related. Oh, yeah.

0:31:48.260 --> 0:31:48.540
<v Speaker 6>Oh, yeah.

0:31:48.560 --> 0:31:49.400
<v Speaker 3>That's guaranteed.

0:31:49.460 --> 0:31:49.720
<v Speaker 10>Yeah.

0:31:50.220 --> 0:31:53.260
<v Speaker 6>Kamala Harris has come out and said the Democrats should

0:31:53.360 --> 0:31:54.680
<v Speaker 6>not impeach Trump if.

0:31:54.640 --> 0:31:57.430
<v Speaker 3>They take the House. I'll have to look into that story.

0:31:57.470 --> 0:32:00.730
<v Speaker 3>That's interesting. I think she might be right. And lots

0:32:00.770 --> 0:32:01.510
<v Speaker 3>of other stuff on the way.

0:32:01.530 --> 0:32:01.830
<v Speaker 10>Stay here.

0:32:03.350 --> 0:32:04.370
<v Speaker 3>Armstrong and Getty.

0:32:04.390 --> 0:32:05.590
<v Speaker 6>Kamenero off the hands to third.

0:32:05.610 --> 0:32:08.190
<v Speaker 4>Long throw for Ortiz.

0:32:08.310 --> 0:32:15.850
<v Speaker 2>Oh, it's in the dark. Browns won left side and through.

0:32:15.910 --> 0:32:18.630
<v Speaker 2>Browns won through.

0:32:18.710 --> 0:32:20.450
<v Speaker 6>Johnny on the spot.

0:32:20.550 --> 0:32:24.610
<v Speaker 3>He's tied game four. He swings it over. Center field.

0:32:24.670 --> 0:32:26.780
<v Speaker 2>Burt has stopped at third.

0:32:26.820 --> 0:32:29.880
<v Speaker 3>Bouncing ball. We'll see you later tonight.

0:32:33.340 --> 0:32:35.540
<v Speaker 6>Man, what advantage living on the West Coast is late

0:32:35.580 --> 0:32:38.480
<v Speaker 6>games because I ended at 930 for me and those

0:32:38.500 --> 0:32:40.240
<v Speaker 6>of you on the East Coast, it was this morning.

0:32:40.260 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 7>As the play-by-play guy said, see you later tonight for

0:32:44.560 --> 0:32:45.340
<v Speaker 7>game five.

0:32:45.540 --> 0:32:47.780
<v Speaker 6>Rays came back and beat the Brewers last night. That

0:32:47.800 --> 0:32:50.360
<v Speaker 6>was very exciting. I picked it up in the eighth inning.

0:32:50.860 --> 0:32:56.700
<v Speaker 6>Those last four innings were awesome. And as you mentioned yesterday,

0:32:56.880 --> 0:33:01.209
<v Speaker 6>there are so many Milwaukee fans there that It's like

0:33:01.250 --> 0:33:03.520
<v Speaker 6>when you have Super Bowls on. There's many fans from

0:33:03.580 --> 0:33:07.260
<v Speaker 6>each team. So the crowd roars no matter which team

0:33:07.320 --> 0:33:08.240
<v Speaker 6>is doing well.

0:33:08.780 --> 0:33:09.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:33:09.320 --> 0:33:11.740
<v Speaker 3>Very exciting. Very exciting baseball. That was all singles, too,

0:33:11.800 --> 0:33:14.420
<v Speaker 3>in the 12th inning. That was a scrappy win. I

0:33:14.440 --> 0:33:15.840
<v Speaker 3>think I'm going to root for the Rays at this point.

0:33:16.440 --> 0:33:19.910
<v Speaker 3>Go right ahead. This is America.

0:33:23.610 --> 0:33:29.720
<v Speaker 6>So mentioned this earlier. Data centers, hot topic all around

0:33:29.740 --> 0:33:34.380
<v Speaker 6>the country. Ohio has the most things to vote on.

0:33:34.420 --> 0:33:38.660
<v Speaker 6>They have 21 local ballot measures related to data centers

0:33:38.680 --> 0:33:44.110
<v Speaker 6>that are on the ballot in six days. Varying from

0:33:44.230 --> 0:33:48.170
<v Speaker 6>communities voting on just outright bans. There's a whole bunch

0:33:48.210 --> 0:33:50.490
<v Speaker 6>of towns that just ain't going to happen.

0:33:50.590 --> 0:33:51.090
<v Speaker 3>You don't get it.

0:33:51.170 --> 0:33:54.270
<v Speaker 6>Nobody's putting a data center in our town. Then bans

0:33:54.330 --> 0:33:57.470
<v Speaker 6>on especially large data centers that are over 25 megawatts.

0:33:58.070 --> 0:34:01.760
<v Speaker 6>Then rules that we have to have a local vote

0:34:01.840 --> 0:34:04.730
<v Speaker 6>on it before they get to build it, which that seems, man,

0:34:04.780 --> 0:34:08.680
<v Speaker 6>that seems like a minimum. Zoning and development restrictions and

0:34:08.700 --> 0:34:10.219
<v Speaker 6>where you can have it, all that different sorts of stuff.

0:34:10.280 --> 0:34:13.500
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's good governance right there, that last one. That's fine.

0:34:13.660 --> 0:34:15.640
<v Speaker 7>There's zoning for everything. If you want to make a

0:34:15.660 --> 0:34:17.660
<v Speaker 7>special provision for data centers, that's fine.

0:34:17.860 --> 0:34:18.040
<v Speaker 6>Great.

0:34:18.200 --> 0:34:18.400
<v Speaker 3>Do it.

0:34:19.390 --> 0:34:23.850
<v Speaker 6>Um, the eyesore question is silly to me in that

0:34:24.090 --> 0:34:26.660
<v Speaker 6>all kinds of eyesores pop up all over the place.

0:34:27.090 --> 0:34:32.540
<v Speaker 6>There's giant, giant warehouses with a hundred truck bays that

0:34:32.719 --> 0:34:35.000
<v Speaker 6>show up and then they have the target symbol somewhere

0:34:35.060 --> 0:34:37.060
<v Speaker 6>or Walmart or Costco or whatever the hell it is,

0:34:37.100 --> 0:34:39.080
<v Speaker 6>or it's UPS or Amazon.

0:34:39.239 --> 0:34:39.939
<v Speaker 3>All over the place.

0:34:39.980 --> 0:34:42.420
<v Speaker 6>And you didn't think twice about voting for it or what,

0:34:42.840 --> 0:34:45.540
<v Speaker 6>but I was looking into the electricity differences. For instance,

0:34:45.580 --> 0:34:50.700
<v Speaker 6>if a Costco opens up on the, um, edge of

0:34:50.739 --> 0:34:57.759
<v Speaker 6>town a one large I AI center data center not

0:34:57.840 --> 0:35:05.670
<v Speaker 6>the massive but the large version consumes hundreds of times

0:35:05.750 --> 0:35:08.270
<v Speaker 6>as much electricity as a Costco on the edge of

0:35:08.290 --> 0:35:11.719
<v Speaker 6>town hundreds for a large for a for a for

0:35:11.760 --> 0:35:14.600
<v Speaker 6>one of the massive ones which sometimes they build it's

0:35:14.739 --> 0:35:17.020
<v Speaker 6>it's like a thousand times as much so the electricity

0:35:17.060 --> 0:35:21.250
<v Speaker 6>thing is not even close And then for water, it's

0:35:21.290 --> 0:35:25.049
<v Speaker 6>about 20 times. So like a large data center showing

0:35:25.090 --> 0:35:27.350
<v Speaker 6>up would use 20 times the amount of water as

0:35:28.350 --> 0:35:34.219
<v Speaker 6>a Costco would. But then you got the whole revenue, taxes,

0:35:34.660 --> 0:35:38.299
<v Speaker 6>all that sort of thing. Well, yeah, and what would

0:35:38.320 --> 0:35:41.820
<v Speaker 6>be my question to both of those statistics? If the

0:35:42.060 --> 0:35:46.460
<v Speaker 6>reasonable nonpartisan studies show that electric rates will go up

0:35:46.600 --> 0:35:49.680
<v Speaker 6>either inconsequentially or not at all, then why do I

0:35:49.739 --> 0:35:50.360
<v Speaker 6>give a damn?

0:35:51.260 --> 0:35:54.060
<v Speaker 7>It's the industry of the future. The water thing depends

0:35:54.120 --> 0:35:58.799
<v Speaker 7>entirely on where you are. Are you in Kentucky or

0:35:58.860 --> 0:36:02.960
<v Speaker 7>in Nevada in this discussion? Because they got, you know,

0:36:03.000 --> 0:36:04.989
<v Speaker 7>they got rivers and lakes full of the stuff in

0:36:05.010 --> 0:36:06.799
<v Speaker 7>the eastern third of the U.S., not so much in

0:36:06.820 --> 0:36:08.840
<v Speaker 7>the west where it's becoming more and more of a crisis.

0:36:09.050 --> 0:36:11.910
<v Speaker 6>Some of this, I wonder, well, some of what we

0:36:11.969 --> 0:36:17.219
<v Speaker 6>know is the hatred of data centers just exploding out

0:36:17.260 --> 0:36:19.740
<v Speaker 6>of nowhere is Russian and Chinese bots.

0:36:19.840 --> 0:36:23.719
<v Speaker 3>That is a known fact. Search on the New York Times.

0:36:23.739 --> 0:36:24.770
<v Speaker 3>They've done bunches of articles.

0:36:25.640 --> 0:36:28.080
<v Speaker 7>China wants to rule the world of data centers and

0:36:28.100 --> 0:36:29.180
<v Speaker 7>data and AI.

0:36:29.440 --> 0:36:31.399
<v Speaker 6>Some of this is the hatred of AI in general, though.

0:36:31.420 --> 0:36:33.120
<v Speaker 6>I was talking to my kids about this the other day. Man,

0:36:33.160 --> 0:36:36.500
<v Speaker 6>the young people hate AI. Now, we saw in the

0:36:36.620 --> 0:36:40.009
<v Speaker 6>spring all the college graduations. Anybody mentioned AI? It was

0:36:40.050 --> 0:36:42.290
<v Speaker 6>just roundly booed, just a mention of it. I brought

0:36:42.310 --> 0:36:44.109
<v Speaker 6>this up to my kids the other day. We were

0:36:44.150 --> 0:36:46.190
<v Speaker 6>watching some video or something like that, and I said,

0:36:46.210 --> 0:36:48.649
<v Speaker 6>so what do people in your school think about?

0:36:48.710 --> 0:36:51.720
<v Speaker 3>Before I even finished my sentence, oh, God, we hate it.

0:36:51.750 --> 0:36:55.570
<v Speaker 3>We all hate it. They just like... Hate, hate, hate,

0:36:55.670 --> 0:36:57.509
<v Speaker 3>hate it. I totally get that.

0:36:58.610 --> 0:37:00.890
<v Speaker 6>And that's going to be a political problem for the

0:37:00.969 --> 0:37:03.819
<v Speaker 6>AI companies. The fact that you've got a generation coming

0:37:03.880 --> 0:37:06.660
<v Speaker 6>up that their initial thought is it's awful.

0:37:07.480 --> 0:37:08.419
<v Speaker 3>Right, right.

0:37:08.820 --> 0:37:11.480
<v Speaker 7>You are ushering in a world that we find terrifying

0:37:11.520 --> 0:37:12.200
<v Speaker 7>and don't want.

0:37:13.410 --> 0:37:16.100
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how that's going to play out. I

0:37:16.120 --> 0:37:20.750
<v Speaker 3>don't either. That's a great question. Politically. Isn't that interesting though? Economically, socially.

0:37:20.870 --> 0:37:23.760
<v Speaker 6>Internet, iPhones, all that sort of stuff. Young people loved it.

0:37:23.820 --> 0:37:24.960
<v Speaker 6>Young people hate AI.