WEBVTT - Future of Canada - January 7th, Hour 2

0:00:00.640 --> 0:00:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Height our two Sean Hannity Show toll free. Here is

0:00:03.320 --> 0:00:05.280
<v Speaker 1>our number. It's eight hundred and nine point one, Shawn,

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:08.559
<v Speaker 1>if you want to be a part of the program. So,

0:00:08.840 --> 0:00:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the issue of Canada being the fifty first state Panama,

0:00:13.440 --> 0:00:16.720
<v Speaker 1>whether or not they are allowing Chinese control over the

0:00:16.760 --> 0:00:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Panama Canal without which, without the help of the United

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:24.320
<v Speaker 1>States would not exist, certainly one of the worst deals

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>ever made by an American president and ratified by the

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:32.240
<v Speaker 1>US Senate, I think in history has taken center stage

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:37.839
<v Speaker 1>and Donald Trump Junior arriving in Greenland saying well, it's

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>time to make Greenland great again. And this is what

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 1>he said, pins in.

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:51.559
<v Speaker 2>You love and I can go up there with his

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 2>two very talented friends.

0:00:53.760 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>And the other the other gred blood of other people.

0:00:56.720 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 2>So I just want to say that we're very it's

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 2>a very special place. It's need security for itself, but

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 2>it also needs security very much for the world.

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 3>The location really you see the people that the ships

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 3>sailing around.

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:13.120
<v Speaker 1>And then not the right chans and then not the

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>ships you want to know about. So we need security

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>in the car country.

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 2>Deson and all the world desent.

0:01:20.200 --> 0:01:33.400
<v Speaker 1>So strategically, look, thank you everybody. Yeah, we're learning a lot.

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 1>It's been great, actually, incredibly beautiful place. The people are incredible, the.

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:39.760
<v Speaker 4>Welcome was uh spectacular.

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Uh, it's pretty amazing.

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:43.560
<v Speaker 4>Well last break.

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:46.039
<v Speaker 2>Were you got a good time everybody, and we're going

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 2>to treat you well and you know that and just

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 2>take care of yourself.

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, Oliver.

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 1>You anyway, So that was the trip, Don Junior Maid

0:01:56.880 --> 0:02:00.160
<v Speaker 1>and President Trump calling into it. It seems to have

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>some people just it's a little shock and awe, which

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>we told you was going to happen. A lot of

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 1>people didn't listen to us, Like a lot of people

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't listen to the lead up of the election. I've

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 1>made the argument that I think that legacy media is dead.

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Those people ABC, NBC, CBS, MSDNC, Fake New, CNN, The

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Washington Post, New York Times, LA Times, they're all dead

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 1>because they spent nine long years and they had one mission,

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:34.600
<v Speaker 1>one fixation, one focus, and that was to hate all

0:02:34.760 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 1>things Donald Trump and to basically be an extension of

0:02:39.080 --> 0:02:45.080
<v Speaker 1>all things liberal, radical democrat. Their press office, and they

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't tell people the truth. They didn't tell people the

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:50.640
<v Speaker 1>truth about what was happening at our borders. They didn't

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 1>tell people the truth about the economy. They didn't tell

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 1>people the truth about why you were paying a buck

0:02:55.680 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 1>buck fifty more per gallon per gasoline. They just moving

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 1>forward with their woke agenda. They were not exactly transparent

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:08.520
<v Speaker 1>when it came to Joe's cognitive decline. They weren't transparent

0:03:08.600 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 1>about the war in Ukraine. And they're sending billions and

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:16.359
<v Speaker 1>billions of dollars rather than de escalating that situation, or

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:19.239
<v Speaker 1>the lack of support for Israel for that matter, and

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 1>they paid a very dear price. You know, people ask

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 1>me all the time, what about the future of media.

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:27.519
<v Speaker 1>I was on the ground floor of a transformation, which

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:31.519
<v Speaker 1>was talk radio and then the Fox News Channel, which

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 1>continues to do well thanks to all of you. And

0:03:35.120 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 1>I think now with social media and the developments with

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 1>meta in particular today, I think they're very relevant. The

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>President addressed that in his press conference, as I mentioned earlier,

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>and social media in general, podcasting in general. It's a

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 1>new world out there, and I think those people that

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>will survive and thrive are going to be people that

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 1>tell the truth. Such person that was bucking that trend

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 1>throughout the entire twenty twenty four election cycle and saying

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 1>things that his former colleagues, former friends at Big Networks

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't particularly like. Is Mark Cowpert. And he's the editor

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:17.840
<v Speaker 1>in chief of this new interactive video platform. It's called

0:04:17.880 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 1>two Way, and it's growing by leaps and bounds. And

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 1>it's great to have you back.

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:24.799
<v Speaker 3>How are you, Sean, Thank you for the kind words,

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:26.600
<v Speaker 3>Happy new year. Great to be back with you.

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 1>One thing that we did, the two of us individually,

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:35.720
<v Speaker 1>and then we compared notes on every single day. And

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 1>this is what I never understood about the media in

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 1>this election is we were getting early voting numbers and

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 1>there were nowhere near the numbers that Democrats had had

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty. For example, on election Day, I went

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:53.479
<v Speaker 1>on I went on with with Dana Perino and Bill

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Hemmer at nine o'clock in the morning that morning, and

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 1>I said, starting out today, Kamala Harris has a math problem.

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:01.720
<v Speaker 1>He's down set one hundred thousand votes from where Joe

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Biden was in twenty twenty. She need a massive turnout,

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 1>a historic turnout in Philly Alleghany County for her to

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:12.040
<v Speaker 1>catch up. He's down forty five percent in Wisconsin and

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 1>she would need a massive turnout in cities like Milwaukee

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 1>for her to make up background, it would have to

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:20.480
<v Speaker 1>be a historic turnout. All day long, I was calling

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:24.679
<v Speaker 1>my friends and sources and all these locations and finding

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:28.279
<v Speaker 1>out they were not getting historic turnout. And we saw

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:30.840
<v Speaker 1>it coming. And I remember even writing you once or

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:34.400
<v Speaker 1>texting you and saying, am I missing something here? And

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 1>you told me I was not.

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 3>Now I mean election day. You're right, it was emphatic.

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 3>But even two weeks out when early voting started, I said,

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 3>about three days into the sort of the first trons

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:49.040
<v Speaker 3>of early voting, I said, if things stay like this,

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:51.840
<v Speaker 3>we won't need election night. Well know, on the morning of,

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:55.920
<v Speaker 3>And as you say, our colleagues, for some reason, just

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 3>decided to ignore the data. This isn't about rooting for

0:05:58.800 --> 0:06:02.280
<v Speaker 3>Trump or having a gut feeling about Mega. It was

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 3>just the mass, and for some reason they wanted to

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:08.480
<v Speaker 3>buy the Democratic spin that well, the late deciders were

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 3>going to go decisively for Harris. No evidence of that

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 3>either during the campaign or on election day, or you know,

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 3>these are not votes that matter because they're just Republicans

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 3>voting early who would have voted on election day. I

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 3>found it all very confusing. Because again it was just

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 3>straight reporting and it wasn't hard to find. You could

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:31.880
<v Speaker 3>even find Democrats who said, we're super worried because what

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:34.600
<v Speaker 3>makes everybody think we're going to have a superhuman turnout

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 3>on election day?

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Well they would have, they would have. That would need

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 1>to be historic. And the interesting thing, if you want

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 1>to say it's interesting, is the madness continues even to

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:50.720
<v Speaker 1>this day. I mean, yesterday was January sixth, and if

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 1>you turn on a lot of legacy media, all they

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 1>wanted to do, like on ABC and that hard hitting

0:06:56.640 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 1>news show, the view, they're comparing January sixth to the cost,

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:04.360
<v Speaker 1>and they're doing it on you know, pretty much every

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 1>single channel. And they seem to have doubled down on

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 1>stupid and they learned nothing from this campaign. And I

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:16.000
<v Speaker 1>assumed that the American people will continue to distrust them

0:07:16.040 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 1>because they've given them no reason to trust them.

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:23.280
<v Speaker 3>Well, the ongoing story that I find the most just

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 3>sort of incredible from the press point of view is

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 3>the Biden mental acuity issue. You read piece after piece

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 3>about Joe Biden's final days, Joe Biden's legacy, Joe Biden's

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 3>you know, maneuvering to make certain decisions in the final Fortnite,

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 3>and the articles don't mention his cognitive decline or the

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 3>fact that he was unable to he was forced to

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 3>give up the nomination because he had no chance to win.

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 3>And I said, since election day, if the press doesn't

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 3>come clean on not just the failure to cover it,

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:56.680
<v Speaker 3>but its role in the conspiracy to cover it up,

0:07:57.560 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 3>how could they possibly expect to have credibility going forward?

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 3>And yet that continues, it continues, It's barely mentioned, and

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 3>when it is mentioned, it's mentioned as a political issue,

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 3>as opposed to the national security issue and the credibility

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 3>issue of a White House, which to this day says

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 3>Joe Biden has no cognitive decline. Joe Biden is perfectly

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 3>capable of doing the job. Joe Biden didn't give up

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 3>the nomination because he had a cognitive decline. He gave

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 3>it up for unspecified their reasons about the good of

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:32.240
<v Speaker 3>the country.

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:36.480
<v Speaker 1>It was before the twenty twenty election, correct me if

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:39.079
<v Speaker 1>I'm wrong. Wasn't it before then when Joe said, we

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:41.199
<v Speaker 1>hold these truth to be self evident, that all men

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 1>and women, his words, not mine, were created by all

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, Oh, the thing, the thing you know God,

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Joe the creator of everything, endowed by their creator Joe

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the Creator of everything. But I was they ignored moments

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:00.160
<v Speaker 1>like that, and when I criticized them, and I'm I'm

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:02.960
<v Speaker 1>a conservative. I don't even know where you stand politically.

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 1>To be honest with you, I've never asked you. But

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:11.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I was excoriated for pointing out something's wrong here.

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'm just an old fashioned reporter. I'm for the

0:09:15.320 --> 0:09:19.440
<v Speaker 3>public interest. Look, you're right, there were things leading up

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:22.520
<v Speaker 3>to twenty twenty. He couldn't have won with that COVID.

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 3>COVID allowed him to hide. But in twenty seventeen, I've

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 3>told this story before. In twenty seventeen, I saw him

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 3>to a book tour event, and this is after he

0:09:32.800 --> 0:09:35.199
<v Speaker 3>left the office as vice president, well before he announced

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 3>he was running. And I said, after the book event

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:40.720
<v Speaker 3>to my wife, I'm so glad he's out of public life.

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:42.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm so glad he'll never be asked to do anything

0:09:43.040 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 3>again that involves speaking in public, because he was exactly

0:09:48.080 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 3>the way he is now. He'd lost his train of thought.

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:53.320
<v Speaker 3>It was a book event, he was being questioned by

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:56.760
<v Speaker 3>a very friendly interviewer, and he could barely get through it.

0:09:56.880 --> 0:09:59.600
<v Speaker 3>He was glassy eyed, he was lethargic, as I said,

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:03.599
<v Speaker 3>lost train of thought. This was three years before he

0:10:03.720 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 3>ran the first time. So the notion that this is

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 3>some sort of secret, you know, you read these stories now.

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 3>And Wall Street Journal wrote the story that got a

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 3>lot of attention that say, behind the scenes, people say,

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:17.840
<v Speaker 3>you know this was happening to seventy. You don't need

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 3>behind the scenes. It was all happening in public. And

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 3>yet again, not only did the media not write about it,

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 3>they covered it up, and then they still having something

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:28.200
<v Speaker 3>clean about their role in the cover up.

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 1>It's so true. Did you see Meet the Press this

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 1>weekend and Chuck Schumer's questioning on this very topic, he

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:41.719
<v Speaker 1>got very defensive when asked about whether he knew that

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:44.959
<v Speaker 1>Joe was incognitive decline. The answer is we know for

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 1>a fact they all did, and that they all covered

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:50.680
<v Speaker 1>it up. They all lied about it. New York Post

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:53.599
<v Speaker 1>has a piece today, Well, what about the people that

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 1>covered this up? Don't they have didn't they have an

0:10:57.080 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 1>obligation of the country to tell us. New York Post

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 1>had an editorial today, Stop lying, Chuck.

0:11:04.760 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 3>It was unfortunate. You know, he's a skillful guy, and

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 3>he finessed his way through. I give credit to the

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 3>interviewer for asking, but she let him get away with

0:11:15.240 --> 0:11:19.079
<v Speaker 3>giving an answer that makes no sense. You know, George Clooney,

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 3>to his credit, belatedly acknowledged what he saw at a

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 3>fundraiser late in the campaign that led him to call

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:26.560
<v Speaker 3>join them.

0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, was it really to his credit or do you

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:30.679
<v Speaker 1>suspect as I do that I got a call from

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:34.079
<v Speaker 1>his friend and I know their friends, Barack Obama, and

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 1>was asked to do this as part of this coalition

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 1>that was created to basically kick Joe out of Obama

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Pelosi and Schumer.

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 3>Was it was part of that effort. But but you know,

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 3>I like to give credit for effort, and he spoke

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 3>out before others were still unwilling to speak out.

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:55.840
<v Speaker 1>You know what it was weeks after he had praised

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:58.079
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden. I don't give him as much credit as

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:00.319
<v Speaker 1>you do. He had been with Joe Biden that some

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 1>fundraiser praising. Yeah, now, so I think it was the

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 1>expediency part of a plan. They didn't think he could win,

0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and it was all about winning at that point.

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:13.440
<v Speaker 3>I agree, and I was going to make that point

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:17.079
<v Speaker 3>which is those who did it did it not because

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 3>they suddenly said, you know what, the country deserves a

0:12:19.960 --> 0:12:23.200
<v Speaker 3>president who can do the job. It was because they

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:25.199
<v Speaker 3>thought not only that he would lose. And this is

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 3>a particular concern to Speaker Pelosi that it would drag

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 3>other Democrats down. But they're politicians, right, and Biden's politician.

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:35.839
<v Speaker 3>They're going to act out of self interest. It's the

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 3>press whose obligation is not to hurt Donald Trump and

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 3>prop up Joe Biden. Their obligation is to sakeguard the

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:45.560
<v Speaker 3>public interest and to tell the truth to the American people.

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:49.679
<v Speaker 3>It's the press whose behavior, to me is more outrageous

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 3>and more requiring of explanation than the politicians. The politician said,

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 3>this guy's got impairment, but we don't want Trump to win,

0:12:58.200 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 3>and if he steps aside, it will probably be here

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:03.720
<v Speaker 3>and she can't win, So we're going to prop him up. Irresponsible,

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:06.120
<v Speaker 3>but again political behavior.

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, quick freak. We'll come back more with Mark

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Calpern on the other side. Your calls coming up. Eight

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:13.080
<v Speaker 1>hundred and nine to four one, Shawn our number if

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 1>you want to be a part of the program. As

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:18.080
<v Speaker 1>we roll along this busy News Tuesday, and we continue

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 1>now with our friend Mark Halpert is with us. In

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:24.040
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and seven, I declared journalism is dead, and

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 1>now I officially have declared legacy media is dead. How

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 1>do your former colleagues at these major networks treat you?

0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm just curious.

0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 3>I mean the one where my friends treat me fine.

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 3>I don't have tons of interaction with just kind of

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 3>the rank and file, but they a lot of them

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 3>watch two Way and they like to Way because they

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 3>recognize that that it's not it's the ideology is part

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 3>of it, but it's also just quality. It's it's authenticity,

0:13:55.960 --> 0:13:57.679
<v Speaker 3>it's journal You were telling.

0:13:57.559 --> 0:14:00.679
<v Speaker 1>Truth that they were not willing to step forward and

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:02.680
<v Speaker 1>tell themselves on that stuff.

0:14:03.440 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 3>They ignore it because very few of them are willing

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 3>to even confront it. They pretend it doesn't exist. They

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:13.439
<v Speaker 3>pretend there's not liberal media buys. It's bizarre. I've doubted

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 3>in my whole career. I worked with a few people

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 3>like Peter Jennings who acknowledge it existed. You know, Michael

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 3>Jordan used to say he didn't endorse Democrats because Republicans

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 3>buy sneakers too. I don't understand the place that's in

0:14:25.400 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 3>the business of selling news that says, you know what,

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 3>We're not interested in selling it to half the country.

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 3>We're gonna We're gonna cut our market share in half.

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 3>I don't get that.

0:14:35.760 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, more liberals watch that watch cable news, watch

0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Fox News than any other cable channel.

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:44.200
<v Speaker 3>The Fox numbers are so big. More of everything watches

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 3>Fox News.

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Well no, but I mean it's it is interesting and

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 1>oh I know, uh, but they do allow conservative voices

0:14:52.200 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 1>like mine. But I'm also a truth seeker and I

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 1>tell truth and sometimes I have to tell truth that

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't even want to tell about, uh, Conservatives and Republicans.

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 1>But I just you know, I owe it to my

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 1>audience to always be truthful. But anyway, Mark Alprin, Happy

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:09.720
<v Speaker 1>new year, my friend, God bless you and keep up

0:15:09.760 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the good work. We're going to pay very close attention

0:15:11.760 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 1>to your work throughout the year.

0:15:14.840 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, sir. Good to talk to you.

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Take care all right, it's getting very interesting what is

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 1>happening with Canada and Little Justin now being out? There

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 1>was an interesting National Review Canada's Financial Post article on

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 1>how Canada and their economy has gone to hell under

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Little Justin Trudeau not a fan of his. It looks

0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:44.640
<v Speaker 1>like Canada is on track to move dramatically to the center.

0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump addressed it today. I thought it was very

0:15:48.240 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 1>very interesting that he would literally be very interested in

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 1>in joining forces with Canada. And anyway, here's what the

0:15:58.640 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 1>President said earlier today and what he said about justin.

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Trudeau said, you're considering military force to acquire anima in Greenland?

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Are you also considering military force to.

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 2>Annex acquire no economic force? Because Canada and the United States,

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 2>that would really be something. You get rid of that

0:16:20.160 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 2>artificially drawn line and you take a look at what

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 2>that looks like, and it would also be much better

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 2>for national security. You don't forget. We basically protect Canada.

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:32.960
<v Speaker 2>But here's the problem with Canada. So many friends up there.

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 2>I love the Canadian people, They're great. We're spending hundreds

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 2>of billions a year to take care of Canada. We

0:16:41.360 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 2>lose in trade deficits, we're losing mass. We don't need

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:46.920
<v Speaker 2>their cars. You know, they make twenty percent of our cars.

0:16:46.960 --> 0:16:48.880
<v Speaker 2>We don't need that. I'd rather make them in Detroit.

0:16:49.760 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 2>We don't need anything, So why are we losing two

0:16:52.120 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 2>hundred billion dollars a year and more to protect Canada.

0:16:56.440 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 2>And I said that too, as I called them Governor Trudeau,

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:03.640
<v Speaker 2>I said, listen, what would happen if we didn't subsidize you,

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:05.840
<v Speaker 2>if we didn't because we give them a lot of money.

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:06.399
<v Speaker 4>We help them.

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:10.280
<v Speaker 2>As an example, we're buying icebreakers, and Canada wants to

0:17:10.400 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 2>join us in the buying of icebreakers.

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:12.960
<v Speaker 4>I said, you know, we.

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 2>Don't really want to have a partner in the buying

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 2>of icebreakers. We don't need a partner.

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:22.920
<v Speaker 1>It's over fifty three billion more dollars in goods and

0:17:23.040 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 1>services that come into Canada each year then we export

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 1>to Canada. That's how big the trade deficit is. On

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 1>top of that, you can really make the argument that

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:37.119
<v Speaker 1>but for the United States and its military might, Canada

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 1>would not be doing as well. The US provides millions

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 1>of dollars in foreign assistance to Canada every year, and

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 1>we now have seen in just the last number of years,

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:53.359
<v Speaker 1>for example, on the issue of the border, the border

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:58.160
<v Speaker 1>patrol chief at the Northern Border has said they've apprehended

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:02.479
<v Speaker 1>nearly twenty thousand illegals from ninety seven countries in fiscal

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:05.200
<v Speaker 1>year twenty twenty four. That is higher than the prior

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 1>seventeen years combined, which is unheard of. They're not doing

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:12.639
<v Speaker 1>their part in terms of controlling the border. On the

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 1>local front. If you go before the pandemic, the Canada's

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:19.960
<v Speaker 1>national income per head, which was the equivalent to about

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 1>eighty percent of America's in the decade before the pandemic,

0:18:23.200 --> 0:18:26.399
<v Speaker 1>is will be just seventy percent this year, according to

0:18:26.480 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the economists, and it further goes on to say the

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 1>gap between the Canadian and American economies has now reached

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 1>its widest point in nearly a century. The US continues

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:39.120
<v Speaker 1>to be on track to produce nearly fifty percent more

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:43.360
<v Speaker 1>per person than Canada will, and the Financial Post goes

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 1>on to say nearly three million people living in Canada

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 1>have some type of temporary immigration status, with two point

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:53.240
<v Speaker 1>two million arriving in just the past two years, and

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 1>temporary residents now represent a wopping six point eight percent

0:18:56.800 --> 0:19:00.720
<v Speaker 1>of the country's total population of forty one point three million,

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 1>up you know, from three point five percent in twenty

0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:06.359
<v Speaker 1>twenty two. They do nothing to control their borders and

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 1>they have a problem there anyway. Joining us now is

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 1>John Baird. He's the former Canadian Foreign Minister John Welcome

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:15.400
<v Speaker 1>to the program. Glad you're on board.

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:17.119
<v Speaker 4>Great to be with you. Sean.

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 1>First of all, we love our friends to the north.

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 1>We love Canada like you. I have a shared passion

0:19:23.359 --> 0:19:25.639
<v Speaker 1>for a hockey Every Canadian that I know does, I

0:19:25.720 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 1>assume you do. I hope I'm right in my assumption.

0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 1>But on so many levels, I would argue that the

0:19:33.880 --> 0:19:38.159
<v Speaker 1>problems that Canada is facing our self induced based on

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:42.199
<v Speaker 1>the policies that Justin Trudeau espoused in the country. Am

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I wrong?

0:19:43.440 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 4>Well, Canada is not a broken country, but we've got

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:49.560
<v Speaker 4>a broken government. Everything. Everything is going wrong here, whether

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 4>it's incompetent, macroeconomic policies, high taxes, big get woke and

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:58.879
<v Speaker 4>put the correct leadership, cost of living going out of control.

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 4>That's why we in Canada need a change into the government.

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:04.960
<v Speaker 4>And it all started to accelerate on Monday when True

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 4>threw in the towel. He did not retire because he

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 4>wanted to. He retired because of the Conservative Party here

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:12.680
<v Speaker 4>and we have a five party system, Sean at five

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:15.720
<v Speaker 4>party system with first past the post, the Conservative parties

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 4>leading by ten or twenty five percent and just about

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:20.920
<v Speaker 4>every public opinion poll in the last eighteen months. So

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 4>the change will be coming to Canada. We can rebuild

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:29.720
<v Speaker 4>the rebuild the economy and make it give it the

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:30.679
<v Speaker 4>government that it deserves.

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:34.159
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about and do you understand President

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Trump's position about the trade deficit which is massive, the

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:42.840
<v Speaker 1>problem at our northern border, which you're also experiencing internally

0:20:42.920 --> 0:20:46.879
<v Speaker 1>in Canada, and your military reliance on the US.

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, let me say the number of things. One is,

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 4>obviously the United States is our closest friend. We think

0:20:54.080 --> 0:20:56.880
<v Speaker 4>that we consider each other almost like family. We can

0:20:57.080 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 4>step up and do a better job. Let's look at

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 4>those trade I mean, the trades surplus is almost entirely

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 4>oil and gas, which goes to US refineries, which creates

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 4>literally tens of thousands and hundreds of thousands of jobs.

0:21:10.840 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 4>Not a good thing for the United States is it

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 4>gives the United States power with respect to energy and

0:21:14.880 --> 0:21:18.360
<v Speaker 4>oil and gas. But on defense, we've done our share

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:21.880
<v Speaker 4>of the heavy lifting. You know, during the war in Afghanistan,

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:25.080
<v Speaker 4>we suffered more casualties and just about any other country

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:27.480
<v Speaker 4>out of the United States and the United Kingdom because

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:30.160
<v Speaker 4>we were doing our share of the heavy lifting. In Canada,

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 4>Heart Province the toughest area within the United States, within

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 4>the Afghanistan. When the President Obama was targeting ISIS, Canada

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:38.399
<v Speaker 4>was one of the only countries that was in the

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:42.199
<v Speaker 4>United Kingdom to bomb IIS targets in both Syria and Iraq.

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 4>But we can do better. We can step up our

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 4>game and be a better partner on security and defense.

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 4>And that includes obviously doing our part to raise our

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:53.359
<v Speaker 4>defense spending. And that's where the United States can help us.

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:56.480
<v Speaker 4>You know, obviously the US is like Canada, has a

0:21:56.520 --> 0:22:00.159
<v Speaker 4>lot of has a lot of military procurement economy, and

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:01.639
<v Speaker 4>there's a lot we can get. You know, when I

0:22:01.760 --> 0:22:03.800
<v Speaker 4>was in government, we got the and I was a conservative.

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:05.680
<v Speaker 4>By the way, just so your viewers that your listeners know,

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:09.040
<v Speaker 4>we bought C seventeen heavy lift aircraft and made in

0:22:09.040 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 4>the United States. We brought Chinock calicopters made the United States.

0:22:12.200 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 4>And there's a lot of help that the United States

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:16.639
<v Speaker 4>can provide us when we valley up to the bar

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:19.080
<v Speaker 4>and start to pay our fair share on defense spending.

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 4>There's no argument in this country but that.

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:25.240
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about the idea? I mean, the

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 1>President made a good point in his press conference today.

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I thought he made a good point. I mean, the

0:22:29.840 --> 0:22:33.760
<v Speaker 1>idea that maybe we should think about joining forces. I mean,

0:22:33.800 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 1>if you just look at the apps, just the pure

0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:39.879
<v Speaker 1>land mass alone, how amazing that would be. I mean,

0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 1>that's he's obviously you know, it's an offer, it's an opportunity,

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a thought. Would that be something that the Canadian

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:50.359
<v Speaker 1>people would ever consider?

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 4>No, I don't think joining the US is on the table.

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:55.399
<v Speaker 4>It's a non starter. Let's be a clear on that.

0:22:55.760 --> 0:22:57.600
<v Speaker 4>But we are a family. We can we have a

0:22:57.720 --> 0:23:01.480
<v Speaker 4>fairly integrated economy. If we have the open markets, free

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:04.159
<v Speaker 4>markets between the two countries, we can both economically boom.

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:07.479
<v Speaker 4>We can't step up on defense. One of the things too,

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 4>The things that the President has been very clear on

0:23:11.000 --> 0:23:14.479
<v Speaker 4>since the election are the need to step up illegal

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 4>border crossings from Canada United States. Obviously it's minuschool compared

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 4>to Mexico, but we're a good neighbor and we should

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:21.920
<v Speaker 4>be there to ensure that we stop. And there's a

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 4>lot of Canadians going through illegally Mexicans and even from India,

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:29.720
<v Speaker 4>and we can step up our border enforcement to ensure

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 4>that that we do job. Nothing would make me happen

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 4>in the United States to look at canadon and say,

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:36.440
<v Speaker 4>why can't Mexico be more like Canada in terms of

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 4>protecting the border. And the President's made a very compelling

0:23:39.840 --> 0:23:43.720
<v Speaker 4>case on Sentinel where security services need to step up

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 4>their effort to stop the flow of sentanel from Canada

0:23:47.960 --> 0:23:50.879
<v Speaker 4>into the United States. Frankly, I think President Trump is

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:52.920
<v Speaker 4>the one who made most Canadians aware that that was

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 4>a problem and this is something we should do as

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 4>as as a good neighbor to protect the United States.

0:23:59.840 --> 0:24:01.640
<v Speaker 4>The numbers I have are actually even worse than.

0:24:01.680 --> 0:24:05.280
<v Speaker 1>The number you gave Vishan Well, the numbers in terms

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:08.879
<v Speaker 1>of illegal immigration. I'm giving you the updated numbers that

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I have, and I'm not surprised that they would be worse,

0:24:12.359 --> 0:24:14.880
<v Speaker 1>nor are we aware because we don't have as much

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 1>border patrol uh as much of border patrol presence in

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the north as we do down in the south. Why,

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:25.119
<v Speaker 1>for example, and the President brought this up at his

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 1>press conference today, why is Canada charging these tariffs for

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:33.240
<v Speaker 1>American automobiles to go into Canada. I would think that

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:35.760
<v Speaker 1>that's something we should have free and fair trade and

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 1>it should go both ways. Why why does Canada put

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:41.119
<v Speaker 1>those tariffs on US car manufacturers.

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonnaware of a single tariff on the US cars. Uh,

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:48.680
<v Speaker 4>you know. I think the some parts of a car

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 4>made in can the United States can go back and

0:24:50.680 --> 0:24:53.640
<v Speaker 4>forth as many as six times in the production assembly

0:24:53.640 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 4>of an automobile. I'm not aware of any tariff that

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:57.440
<v Speaker 4>we have on the US auto sector.

0:24:58.080 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 3>Set.

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:00.240
<v Speaker 4>We manufacture a lot of cars in Canvas sell the

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:03.920
<v Speaker 4>United States, manufactur a lot of cards United States to

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:06.399
<v Speaker 4>sell in Canada, and let's have no tariff and that

0:25:06.440 --> 0:25:09.000
<v Speaker 4>it'd be completely open with the free market, that the

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:10.280
<v Speaker 4>free market operates.

0:25:10.520 --> 0:25:12.920
<v Speaker 1>All right, quick break, We'll come right back more with

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 1>former Canadian Foreign Minister John baird Is with US as

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:20.679
<v Speaker 1>President Trump mentioning Canada at length, maybe being the fifty

0:25:20.720 --> 0:25:22.880
<v Speaker 1>first state. More on the other side, your calls also

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:24.960
<v Speaker 1>coming up eight hundred and ninety four one. Shawn is

0:25:24.960 --> 0:25:35.680
<v Speaker 1>on number. As we continue broadcasting on great radio stations

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:47.359
<v Speaker 1>all over the USA, hits the Sean Hannity Show. Are

0:25:47.440 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 1>we continue now with former Canadian Foreign Minister John baird

0:25:50.480 --> 0:25:53.879
<v Speaker 1>Is with US while Trudeau was weak and even prior

0:25:54.000 --> 0:25:57.439
<v Speaker 1>to Donald Trump's victory. Do you believe Donald Trump's victory

0:25:57.520 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 1>played a role in him being finally pushed.

0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:03.159
<v Speaker 4>I think that it's funny his team are all, you know,

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:07.120
<v Speaker 4>his team was beginning to to to pre massively move

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:08.720
<v Speaker 4>on pushing him out of power. And I think there's

0:26:08.720 --> 0:26:11.040
<v Speaker 4>only one reason on that is that he was He's

0:26:11.200 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 4>been trailing in the polls for eighteen months and instead

0:26:14.480 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 4>of the Rats leaving a leaving a sinking ship, they

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:19.920
<v Speaker 4>threw the captain overboard. And I think that's probably what

0:26:20.359 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 4>one had to do with It's just it's this government

0:26:23.359 --> 0:26:25.959
<v Speaker 4>for the last nine years, Canada's GDP per capita has

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:28.600
<v Speaker 4>not grown in nine years. We we used to have

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:34.480
<v Speaker 4>a consensus on competent macroeconomic policy, but this government has

0:26:34.520 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 4>been a high tax, high spend government and you know,

0:26:39.320 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 4>not tough on crime and uh and very woke in

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 4>political corrupt and I think Todadi it's had enough of it.

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 4>That's why I'm so excited about the next election. Trudo resigning.

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:49.720
<v Speaker 4>We should go to the We should go to the

0:26:49.880 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 4>polls in May and Canada, and I'm pretty confident we're

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 4>going to see a return of a conservative government who

0:26:55.600 --> 0:26:58.119
<v Speaker 4>will be a better partner for the United States and

0:26:58.359 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 4>Frank Elephant, we have.

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:02.800
<v Speaker 1>A lot of calls from Canada for this radio show.

0:27:03.040 --> 0:27:06.919
<v Speaker 1>It's actually, you know, surprises me how many people from

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Canada actually listen to the show. And I'm glad that

0:27:09.080 --> 0:27:13.960
<v Speaker 1>they do. And one interesting side note, many Americans have

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:17.399
<v Speaker 1>how did the single payer system healthcare system that you

0:27:17.480 --> 0:27:21.639
<v Speaker 1>have in Canada as an example of what America should adopt.

0:27:21.720 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 1>But meanwhile, I can give you example after example of

0:27:25.359 --> 0:27:30.800
<v Speaker 1>wealthy and politically connected individuals that need you know, major

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:34.359
<v Speaker 1>health care services that end up spending their own money

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 1>and crossing the border and coming to the US and

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:39.720
<v Speaker 1>some of the finest hospitals in the US to get

0:27:39.760 --> 0:27:41.159
<v Speaker 1>their treatment. What does that tell you?

0:27:41.800 --> 0:27:43.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's a dirty little secret that we have a

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:46.359
<v Speaker 4>single pair of system in Canada. Healthcare system in Canada

0:27:46.720 --> 0:27:50.120
<v Speaker 4>that you know, has its drawbacks, it has its successes

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:52.000
<v Speaker 4>as well. If you're really sick, you get the treatment

0:27:52.040 --> 0:27:55.879
<v Speaker 4>you need. But people, I say, the biggest private healthcare

0:27:55.880 --> 0:27:58.240
<v Speaker 4>operator in Canada probably Air Canada because the view of

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:01.719
<v Speaker 4>the economic means you can justly Detroit or Chicago or Florida,

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:06.360
<v Speaker 4>the Mayo Clinic in Minnesota and get better care. So's

0:28:06.359 --> 0:28:08.920
<v Speaker 4>there's advantages definitely to the saying system, but there is

0:28:09.200 --> 0:28:10.720
<v Speaker 4>obviously rationing which is a concern.

0:28:11.600 --> 0:28:14.600
<v Speaker 1>So your next Prime Minister, how confident are you that

0:28:14.720 --> 0:28:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the government will move to the right and what will

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:20.199
<v Speaker 1>that mean practically for the people of Canada.

0:28:20.920 --> 0:28:22.919
<v Speaker 4>I don't think it's a writer left continuum. I think

0:28:22.960 --> 0:28:28.320
<v Speaker 4>what it is is a elite, woke based effort by

0:28:28.400 --> 0:28:32.879
<v Speaker 4>Trudeau to a more common sense, competence policy with Septier

0:28:32.960 --> 0:28:35.320
<v Speaker 4>Poli of the Conservative leader. I've known this guy for

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:39.720
<v Speaker 4>twenty five years. He's smart as hell, he's tough as nails,

0:28:39.800 --> 0:28:42.760
<v Speaker 4>He's got experience in government, experience in parliament. I think

0:28:42.800 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 4>he could become the he could become a consequential He

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 4>will become a consequential leader for Canada. And I think

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:50.440
<v Speaker 4>one of the things he can do is rebuild our

0:28:50.480 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 4>foreign relations with our friends and our foes and our

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:57.000
<v Speaker 4>allies alike. I look back at the days when Brian

0:28:57.040 --> 0:28:58.920
<v Speaker 4>o'vererney was the Prime Ministry. He had such a great

0:28:59.040 --> 0:29:02.840
<v Speaker 4>partnership with President Reagan and President Bush. Stephen Harper worked

0:29:03.080 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 4>very well with Bush and Obama. I think I think

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 4>Stephen Harp, I think Per Pauly have the Conservative leader.

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:10.000
<v Speaker 4>What is elected Prime Minister will be a great Now

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 4>here's a great partner for the United States.

0:29:12.520 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 1>We do appreciate you being with us, John, We wish

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:16.600
<v Speaker 1>you the best. We love our friends in Canada. God

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:21.000
<v Speaker 1>bless you, and God bless Canada as well. And hopefully

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 1>we can repair whatever differences we may have and move

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:26.760
<v Speaker 1>on as the friends and allies we should be. We

0:29:26.840 --> 0:29:33.000
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it, we work together. Amen. We need it desperately.