WEBVTT - What is Betrayal Blindness? With Dr. Jennifer Freyd

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>How did I not see it? It's the haunting question

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:09.800
<v Speaker 1>all abused survivors have asked themselves. On this episode of

0:00:09.920 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Navigating Narcissism, I've invited the world's leading expert on betrayal,

0:00:16.280 --> 0:00:19.400
<v Speaker 1>who has dedicated her life to finding the answer to

0:00:19.440 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>this tormenting question. I can't remember the last time I

0:00:23.680 --> 0:00:28.240
<v Speaker 1>was this excited to talk to someone. After decades of research,

0:00:28.960 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 1>doctor Jennifer Fried has coined the term betrayal blindness to

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:41.519
<v Speaker 1>describe our inability to recognize betrayal, especially when the perpetrator

0:00:41.600 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 1>is someone or something we trust, for example, a parent

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 1>who abuses a child, or a partner that cheats, or

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:56.160
<v Speaker 1>a church that hides abuse. If you've been listening to

0:00:56.280 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Navigating Narcissism for a while, you've heard me talk about

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:04.959
<v Speaker 1>doctor Fried time and again. Her work is key to

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 1>understanding what happens to survivors of narcissistic abuse. It is

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 1>my honor to speak with the legendary doctor Jennifer Fried.

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:19.480
<v Speaker 1>This podcast should not be used as a substitute for

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 1>medical or mental health advice. Individuals are advised to seek

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:31.479
<v Speaker 1>independent medical advice, counseling, and or therapy from a healthcare

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 1>professional with respect to any medical condition, mental health issue,

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>or health inquiry, including matters discussed on this podcast. This

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 1>episode discusses abuse, which may be triggering to some people.

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>The views and opinions expressed are solely those of the

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 1>podcast author or individuals participating in the podcast, and do

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>not represent the opinions of Red Table Talk productions, iHeartMedia,

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 1>or their employees. So, first of all, doctor Jennifer Fried, Welcome.

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:12.919
<v Speaker 1>Every so often we have a guest where again I'm

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:15.640
<v Speaker 1>a bit starstruck, and this is one of those days.

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>I've been reading your work throughout my career and it's

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 1>actually been really influential in shaping my work in the

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>area of narcissistic abuse. So not only am I so

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:29.680
<v Speaker 1>happy you're here, I'm so deeply honored, in a little

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:32.200
<v Speaker 1>bit awestruck. So welcome and thank you.

0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:33.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'm delighted to be here.

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, doctor Fried. And I want to talk about

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>what is betrayal? Everyone uses the word, but you have

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 1>a really, really great comprehensive definition.

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 2>What is it Betrayal is when somebody that you depend upon,

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:52.960
<v Speaker 2>you're close to, your trust, doesn't have your back in

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 2>an important situation and in some way harms you. So

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:01.920
<v Speaker 2>it can be what we might call on every day betrayal,

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 2>like somebody tells a secret that you ask them to hold,

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:08.920
<v Speaker 2>or it can be a traumatic betrayal what I call

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 2>betrayal trauma when the thing that's being done to you

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 2>is deeply harmful, such as marital rape or child abuse

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:21.680
<v Speaker 2>by a caregiver, and in those cases, the very person

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:24.919
<v Speaker 2>that you have a reason to trust and depend upon

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 2>is the perpetrator of a harm.

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:31.840
<v Speaker 1>One thing that struck me about betrayal is that most

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>people think of betrayal as lying, cheating, or stealing. That's it.

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Your work has broadened this definition into this idea of

0:03:46.240 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>really being harmed by someone that you presumed yourself to

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 1>be in a trusting relationship with.

0:03:52.120 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 2>Yes, the betrayal trauma theory is a theory that I originally

0:03:56.120 --> 0:03:59.120
<v Speaker 2>actually started to work on to make sense of one

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 2>particular kind of betrayal blindness, and that in the devising

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 2>this theory, I began to start to measure betrayal trauma

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 2>and found that betrayal traumas, which are defined as significant

0:04:12.120 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 2>mistreatment by somebody that the victim is dependent upon trusts

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 2>and is close to that, they are very toxic that

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 2>they have negative effects on almost every system we looked at,

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 2>so people's mental health, physical health, substance misuse, behavioral problems.

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:32.360
<v Speaker 2>It's very toxic stuff.

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 1>In order to better understand betrayal trauma, doctor Fried developed

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:44.600
<v Speaker 1>which she calls the Brief Betrayal Trauma Survey. This twelve

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 1>question form can help someone recognize the amount of betrayal

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:55.480
<v Speaker 1>trauma they've encountered based on their personal experiences. This survey

0:04:55.680 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 1>is available in the show notes and on our Instagram

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 1>page at Navigating Narcissism Pod.

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:07.600
<v Speaker 2>It's very relational, and you know what we've learned over

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 2>time is it's relational even if the entity harming you

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 2>is bigger than a person, such as an institution. But

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 2>where we started was one on one kind of betrayal

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 2>and betrayal trauma, where it was one person hurting another person,

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 2>and the harm exists in some sense, well sometimes just

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 2>by the very act as part of the harm. But

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 2>another part of the harm is this huge discrepancy between

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:37.279
<v Speaker 2>what you trust and what has happened to you.

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Okay, can you talk more about that, that discrepancy between

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 1>what you trust and what has happened to you?

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, part of The reason it's so harmful is it

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:50.920
<v Speaker 2>creates a real world bind. What people do when they've

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:54.479
<v Speaker 2>been harmed, and you know, a healthy reaction is to

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 2>seek support and shelter from those who have your back,

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 2>those you trust. But when the harm comes from that

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:06.719
<v Speaker 2>very person or people, what are you going to do

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 2>if you seek shelter from those who are harming you.

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 2>Often that is actually what people end up doing, but

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 2>it comes at a big cost. I mean, the other

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:19.360
<v Speaker 2>thing people do is they run away, but that comes

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 2>at a big cost. It's a true buying. There is

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:24.359
<v Speaker 2>not an you're stuck in some sense and you're going

0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 2>to pay a price even though it wasn't your fault.

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:29.360
<v Speaker 1>There's two paths you've talked about, right. You either confront

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 1>the betrayer, which is in some ways dangerous, right, and

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 1>then there's the running away then not confronting it. But

0:06:36.720 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>then one could argue there's a third path, which is

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 1>tell yourself a story so that you don't even have

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 1>to view this person as betraying your trust. And that's

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 1>where we get into your really important work on betrayal blindness.

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Can you describe what betrayal blindness is?

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 2>Betrayal blindness is a survival mechanism for a person who's

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:01.839
<v Speaker 2>being mistreated by somebody that they must depend upon. But

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 2>it is a survival mechanism that comes with a big cost,

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 2>and that cost is both in the short run in

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 2>the sense they can't stop the mistreatment, and in the

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 2>long run that they've lost some ability to assess who's trustworthy.

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 2>People who cannot respond to betrayal trauma with betrayal blindness,

0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 2>and not everybody can. Some people are better out of

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 2>than others often find themselves in the situation where the

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 2>abuse just gets worse and worse, and you know, they

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 2>may die from that abuse. So there's other ways betrayal

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 2>trauma can be toxic, and one of them comes from

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 2>not being able to have betrayal blindness, that it is

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 2>inherently a bad thing that is happening to a person.

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:50.600
<v Speaker 2>I can mean, for instance, a child who cannot use

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 2>betrayal blindness may end up actually getting kicked out of

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 2>the house because their awareness is intolerable.

0:07:57.160 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Let me ask you this then, because the way you're

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:02.559
<v Speaker 1>saying a child who can't use betrayal blindness, a person

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 1>in a relationship who can't use betrayal blindness, the way

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 1>you're describing it, it sounds like a conscious process.

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't mean it to be. It's really hard to

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 2>use it consciously because it's hard to control the attachment

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 2>system that right well, and sort of our feelings tend

0:08:18.640 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 2>to leak and it takes a lot of effort to

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 2>deceive the hide feelings. So most of the time the

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 2>betrayal blindness happens outside of consciousness, and it makes it

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 2>much more effective. And then you can engage in all

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 2>the behaviors that are positive for a relationship. So if

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:38.200
<v Speaker 2>you don't know you're doing it, that is, you don't

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:41.200
<v Speaker 2>know you're blocking out some mistreatment, you can continue to

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 2>be friendly and loving and all the things that keep

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 2>that relationship going. So it's actually better to have it

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 2>outside of consciousness. But you know, I've talked to people

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:56.680
<v Speaker 2>who consciously try to use it, Like they say, like, yeah,

0:08:56.720 --> 0:09:01.319
<v Speaker 2>I know my partner is cheating on me and doing

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 2>these other harmful things, but I don't want to lose

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:10.319
<v Speaker 2>that person, And besides, I need their income, don't want

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:12.320
<v Speaker 2>them have to move out of my house. And you'll

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:14.520
<v Speaker 2>give you a host of reasons. They don't want to

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 2>confront that person because they realize how risky it is,

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 2>and so they try with all their might to put

0:09:21.960 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 2>it out of their mind. And you know, some people

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 2>are better at that than others, but I'm sure we've

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 2>all tried it at some point, so you know they're

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 2>really I think three pass. And they have an interesting

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 2>analogy to the terms fight, flight, and freeze, because these

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 2>are survival responses to threat. So when somebody betrays you

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 2>and you are fully empowered, it actually is in your

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 2>interest to either fight or flee because you don't want

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:56.440
<v Speaker 2>to continue to be harmed by this person. So you

0:09:56.520 --> 0:09:59.440
<v Speaker 2>go to a store where you keep getting that product

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:02.680
<v Speaker 2>and you getting ripped off, Well, either you demand the

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 2>store give you your money back, which would be fight,

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:07.720
<v Speaker 2>or you decide not to shop there anymore, which would

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 2>be flight. You can think about that with relationships too.

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:13.839
<v Speaker 2>A friend betrays you in a certain way and you

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 2>are empowered to pick different friends, well, you may well

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 2>leave that friend or give them an ultimatum you either

0:10:21.520 --> 0:10:26.320
<v Speaker 2>correct this behavior or this relationship's over. However, that's great

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:30.080
<v Speaker 2>if you have that empowerment, but it's destabilizing and you

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 2>are risking the continuation of the relationship and your status.

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:38.680
<v Speaker 2>If you're not fully empowered. That can be very dangerous.

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 2>So a child doesn't have the option really right. And

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:49.200
<v Speaker 2>when a child, say, fights against mistreatment, it's often going

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:52.440
<v Speaker 2>to escalate the mistreatment. And when a child tries to

0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 2>flee from this treatment in a real world sense, like

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 2>maybe you know, hide in their room, or stop talking

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 2>to their parents or withdraw, they risk the person, their

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:06.319
<v Speaker 2>parent or whoever it is not taking care of them

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:09.480
<v Speaker 2>and meeting their needs. Because relationships we cry are this

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:13.600
<v Speaker 2>active involvement. So this is where that third path comes

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:17.440
<v Speaker 2>in that I call betrayal blindness, which is the not

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:21.360
<v Speaker 2>seeing to some degree what's going on in order to

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:25.320
<v Speaker 2>stay engaged in a relationship that you feel and may

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 2>truly be necessary to your survival, and it can keep

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 2>a child or an adult alive. You see a similar

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 2>dynamic in the workplace when somebody really needs a job

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 2>and they have a boss who's bullying them or sexually

0:11:40.640 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 2>harassing them. If they confront that by complaining or they

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 2>withdraw from that boss in some way, they may lose

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 2>their status, they may lose their job, and they may

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:57.319
<v Speaker 2>feel that that's an existential threat. They really need that job.

0:11:58.240 --> 0:12:02.559
<v Speaker 2>So in that case, people can also use betrayal blindness

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 2>to keep the job by not seeing fully the mistreatment.

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 1>You said here that if a person feels empowered, then

0:12:11.559 --> 0:12:14.680
<v Speaker 1>they may be able to face down the betrayal situation.

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 1>In your experience, what do you believe drives this sense

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:23.800
<v Speaker 1>of a person feeling sufficiently empowered to be able to

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:26.200
<v Speaker 1>address betrayal in a relationship.

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 2>That's a great question, and a complication is sometimes people

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:35.000
<v Speaker 2>are actually empowered and they don't feel it. Sometimes people

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 2>are not empowered but they think they are, so people

0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 2>are not empowered when there is a vast power difference

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 2>between the two sides. If you're a small child, you're

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 2>not empowered in your relationship with your parents in a

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:58.120
<v Speaker 2>kind of physical sense. They can just overpower you. In

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 2>a really healthy parent child relationship, the parent will try

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:05.200
<v Speaker 2>to provide a kind of power to the child that

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:08.040
<v Speaker 2>for instance, the child can complain and the parent will listen.

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:12.080
<v Speaker 2>But it's a resource the parent's giving the child. Inherently,

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 2>the situation is very asymmetric. The parent holds the power well.

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:19.599
<v Speaker 2>Often in our society we have that kind of asymmetry,

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:22.960
<v Speaker 2>So you know, it can show up. Suppose a traffic

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 2>violation and uses all their social position, whether it's racial

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:33.319
<v Speaker 2>or their gun in their holster, to overpower the person

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:37.680
<v Speaker 2>that they've just stopped. What's really tragic is when somebody

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:41.160
<v Speaker 2>is in fact empowered and they don't see it. And

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:46.240
<v Speaker 2>one way that comes about is through childhood mistreatment as

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:49.559
<v Speaker 2>well as societal messages. So we'll know, some people are

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:55.840
<v Speaker 2>socialized to believe, whether due to gender other dimensions, that

0:13:56.120 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 2>they are supposed to succumb to other people's wishes and demands,

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:04.920
<v Speaker 2>and may feel that they don't have the power to

0:14:04.960 --> 0:14:08.600
<v Speaker 2>stand up for themselves when even in some sort of

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 2>more objective sense, they do. But you know, some people

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:17.439
<v Speaker 2>have learned betrayal blindness so well that they just immediately

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 2>jump to the not seeing the problem, even when they've

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:23.400
<v Speaker 2>grown up and have some choices.

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that the issues with child and parent, child

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and teacher, even child and coach, anyone who could potentially

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 1>betray a child, right, that makes sense. A child is

0:14:33.760 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 1>inherently disempowered. It does start getting money, though, doctor Fried

0:14:38.200 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 1>when we talk about the interpersonal context, like you said,

0:14:42.280 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 1>people who are empowered but don't even know it is.

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:48.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, my work is in these narcissistic relationships where

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 1>in fact, you might even have two people who might

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 1>even hold relatively similar levels of societal power, and yet,

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 1>like you said, through chronic blindness in the relationship, they

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 1>don't feel empowered, They don't feel they can step up

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 1>to this person. And this is where we get into

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 1>terms like gaslighting, because even if they do front up

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 1>and say, hey, I just saw these inappropriate text messages

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 1>or I just heard from someone in your office that

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 1>you're behaving badly, or I saw how you behave whatever

0:15:18.320 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 1>it is that they're pointing out, that that betrayer as

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:25.120
<v Speaker 1>it were, will say to them, no, I didn't, or

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 1>what's wrong with you? And so, while there's no difference

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:33.000
<v Speaker 1>in power one person being willing to engage in that

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of abuse of psychological warfare, it makes the other

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 1>person less empowered. Does that make sense?

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 2>It totally does. And you know I've seen this play out.

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if the person who's being betrayed had times

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 2>in their life, and we all did, because we were

0:15:50.320 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 2>all children where they didn't have power, and if in

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 2>those situations there was any kind of abuse of that

0:15:57.160 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 2>power and they learned to cope with it with betrayal blindness,

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:03.360
<v Speaker 2>then they're going to be very vulnerable to that system

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:09.280
<v Speaker 2>being exploited. Again. Another factor here is that we are

0:16:09.720 --> 0:16:13.360
<v Speaker 2>wired and built to form attachments to other people to love,

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 2>and we do that from the earliest days with people

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 2>who have so much more power than us, because we

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 2>love our parents, and that love is how we experience

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 2>the attachment system that keeps us alive. And a baby

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 2>that can't express love in the way babies can gets

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 2>into trouble with a parent because parents need this to

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 2>reinforce all that caregiving. Well, given this, that love then

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 2>gets wrapped up in how betrayal works. Basically, if you

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 2>are in a situation where you love somebody but they

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:52.320
<v Speaker 2>are manipulating you, it's kind of like you are a

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 2>bit in that dependent relationship because of that love that

0:16:56.920 --> 0:17:00.840
<v Speaker 2>you feel. It puts you in auation where you're going

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:05.919
<v Speaker 2>to have some motivation to protect that attachment, even if

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 2>you don't need it for your bread and butter, but

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 2>you need it emotionally or you think you do, and

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:16.199
<v Speaker 2>that can be weaponized, that can be played on. So

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 2>these are good systems, the attachment systems good, but then

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 2>these systems can be used in other contexts against people.

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:27.679
<v Speaker 1>In your book, blind to Betrayal, which every one of

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:29.919
<v Speaker 1>you needs to go out there and read immediately. This

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:31.880
<v Speaker 1>is one of the best books I've ever read. Every

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:34.959
<v Speaker 1>survivor of narcissistic abuse needs to read this book. On

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:39.480
<v Speaker 1>this show, we're talking about narcissistic abuse, right We're talking

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:43.480
<v Speaker 1>about people who are in relationships that are almost It's

0:17:43.520 --> 0:17:46.400
<v Speaker 1>a given that these are betraying relationships. At the core

0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 1>of it, the person with that personality organization who's in

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the relationship and motivated by power, dominance, control and their

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:58.360
<v Speaker 1>own insecurity, plus the traits of lack of empathy, entitlement

0:17:58.400 --> 0:18:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and all of that, is attempting to basically subjugate another person.

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 1>You know that the other person is acting entirely in

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:09.240
<v Speaker 1>their service, and that is sometimes to me, that inherently

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 1>is a betrayal. There's an inherent betrayal in somebody who

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:18.240
<v Speaker 1>doesn't treat you as an equal psychological player in a relationship.

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:22.200
<v Speaker 1>So do you agree with that framing that betrayal blindness

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 1>may be basically an element of every single narcissistic relationship.

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:29.720
<v Speaker 2>I think that's a very reasonable hypothesis. What you're saying

0:18:29.840 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 2>makes complete sense, and certainly you know it makes particularly

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 2>makes sense if you think about narcissistic relationships that persist

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 2>over time, right that, how could that persist over time

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:43.720
<v Speaker 2>without some amount of betrayal blindness?

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 1>I'd argue they cannot. And I think that blindness to

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 1>me fits this so well, because a narcissistic relationship is

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 1>a relationship with somebody whose personality organization is such that

0:18:54.400 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 1>they cannot be in a healthy, balanced, equitable relationship, and

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:02.439
<v Speaker 1>so they are going to betray to get their needs met. Right, So,

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 1>using that as a framework, do you think betrayal blindness

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 1>is what would make somebody vulnerable to getting stuck in

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:18.879
<v Speaker 1>a relationship characterized by these dynamics of gas lighting, manipulation, invalidation,

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:24.120
<v Speaker 1>chronic lying, could be cheating, could be financial abuse. Do

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:26.640
<v Speaker 1>you think that that isn't connected to people either staying

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:29.639
<v Speaker 1>in these relationships or getting sucked back in even when

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>they try to step away from them.

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I do, And you know, if I'm correct, then

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:41.640
<v Speaker 2>helping people not respond with betrayal blindness will help them

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:46.400
<v Speaker 2>not stay in such relationships and protect themselves and have

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 2>healthy boundaries so that they're not being mistreated in this way.

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:51.879
<v Speaker 2>And I think one of the things you're saying that

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:55.200
<v Speaker 2>I think is really important is that abuse can occur

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 2>in the emotional and psychological sphere. And it's much easier

0:19:59.800 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 2>for us to identify abuse when it's physical or sexual,

0:20:03.320 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 2>but for emotional and psychological abuse, which are so powerful

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:11.720
<v Speaker 2>in some ways at the heart of all abuse, are

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 2>not always as easy to identify and to label and

0:20:15.560 --> 0:20:18.679
<v Speaker 2>to know. And part of that is the way we're taught,

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:21.199
<v Speaker 2>and you know, we don't necessarily have the skills, But

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:24.679
<v Speaker 2>part of it is that emotional and psychological abuse really

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:29.360
<v Speaker 2>occurs over time in a relationship context. It's not usually

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 2>in the moment, whereas you know physical and sexual abuse

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 2>there is in the moment's sense of it. But everybody

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 2>can have a bad like if you're in a long

0:20:37.640 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 2>term relationship with somebody, you're going to say something harmful sometimes.

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:46.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's human. So what makes it abusive is

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:51.919
<v Speaker 2>this pattern over time, and I think that's just harder

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:54.399
<v Speaker 2>to recognize. And so yeah, I think it's harder for

0:20:54.440 --> 0:20:58.400
<v Speaker 2>people to say this is abusive, to understand it's abusive,

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:02.239
<v Speaker 2>whether you're the victim or even watching a relationship. I mean,

0:21:02.280 --> 0:21:06.720
<v Speaker 2>how many times do we say in this world that

0:21:07.240 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 2>this harmful relationship at the psychological level is abusive.

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that in narcissistically abusive relationships too. From the

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:18.480
<v Speaker 1>world at large, Like you said, these are long term relationships,

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:21.119
<v Speaker 1>and I'm really glad you made that distinction, because I

0:21:21.160 --> 0:21:23.400
<v Speaker 1>think what happens is that there's a real risk of

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 1>like everybody has a bad day, you know, it's not

0:21:26.080 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 1>that big a deal. This isn't about a bad day.

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 1>These are bad lifetimes. Like these are thirty forty fifty

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 1>year marriages. These are relationships that have been characterized by

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 1>this kind of emotional and psychological hijacking since pretty much infancy.

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:42.440
<v Speaker 1>So this is the only reality that this person really

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:45.720
<v Speaker 1>really knows. But the pushback from the world, and honestly,

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:48.720
<v Speaker 1>even I think the psychological community is sometimes like, oh,

0:21:48.760 --> 0:21:51.480
<v Speaker 1>that's just someone who's a jerk. It's a larger scale

0:21:51.840 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 1>psychological issue that is actually doing significant harm to an individual.

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 1>We will be right back with this conversation. So going

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 1>back then to betrayal blindness, I want to connect it

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:16.439
<v Speaker 1>to a really common phenomenon we see in survivors is

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:21.560
<v Speaker 1>that people in these relationships blame themselves. This has got

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:24.119
<v Speaker 1>to be me. I've got to be doing something wrong.

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 1>How do you see betrayal blindness connecting to the self

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 1>blame we see that people experience when they're in emotionally

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 1>abusive relationships.

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:35.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think they're quite connected. In Another sort of

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:38.680
<v Speaker 2>related concept here, I think is shame. If you can

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:42.399
<v Speaker 2>take some or even all of the blame of what's

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:47.720
<v Speaker 2>not working onto yourself, it actually supports the betrayal blindness,

0:22:47.800 --> 0:22:51.119
<v Speaker 2>right because you are no longer going to see the

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:54.280
<v Speaker 2>other person as responsible, so you're not going to see

0:22:54.280 --> 0:22:57.639
<v Speaker 2>that they're betraying you. And you know, one way people

0:22:58.000 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 2>take on the blame is through the emotion of shame,

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 2>where they get mistreated by somebody else and then they

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:09.160
<v Speaker 2>feel shamed, and that shame has it sort of implicit

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 2>in it that there's something I've done or could do

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 2>differently to have prevented or in the future prevent this mistreatment,

0:23:18.680 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 2>and therefore it's not the fault of the person who's

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:24.119
<v Speaker 2>doing it. It's something about me, and therefore I can

0:23:24.240 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 2>stay in relationship with this person because I'm the one

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:30.919
<v Speaker 2>who's the problem. So it's part of that very dynamic

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 2>of betrayal blindness, right.

0:23:32.600 --> 0:23:35.680
<v Speaker 1>But the driver then, ultimately, going back to the attachment model,

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:38.400
<v Speaker 1>is to maintain the relationship that we're still going back

0:23:38.560 --> 0:23:42.040
<v Speaker 1>to that sort of home base as it were, Right, It's.

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 2>Not that people want to be masochistic. It's that people

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:48.680
<v Speaker 2>are trying to protect something they feel is essential.

0:23:48.800 --> 0:23:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Yep. And to everyone listening to this who's going through

0:23:52.480 --> 0:23:55.159
<v Speaker 1>narcissistic abuse, I hope you can sit with that that

0:23:55.240 --> 0:23:59.480
<v Speaker 1>you are trying to preserve something, an attachment that feels

0:23:59.600 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 1>so essential to you. This is not you being foolish.

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 1>This is about you actually trying to safeguard something that

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 1>feels important to you. And I think where survivor struggle

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:12.919
<v Speaker 1>is exactly where you're talking about, doctor Fried. Is this

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:15.920
<v Speaker 1>idea of this shame like what kind of fool am

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I that I'm okay with this. But the much more

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 1>primal drum beat to that is the attachment need. That

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 1>inherent human need for love, connection, relation, and attachment is

0:24:28.400 --> 0:24:32.240
<v Speaker 1>so strong that this entire cognitive process is a way

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 1>to keep the primal need met. Does that make sense?

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:37.199
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? And I mean part of that primal need is

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 2>to us, so to love, it's to be loved, but

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:42.800
<v Speaker 2>it's too love too, and so it's a good thing

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:47.240
<v Speaker 2>about us. I mean, I think that people's eagerness to

0:24:47.359 --> 0:24:50.399
<v Speaker 2>love is one of the best things about us, and

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:53.640
<v Speaker 2>the fact that it can make us vulnerable to mistreatment,

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 2>to betrayal that comes hand in hand with this good

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 2>thing will to love. So it does hurt my heart

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:08.200
<v Speaker 2>to see people blaming themselves for staying in a relationship

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:12.480
<v Speaker 2>where they love the person. Yeah, the person may be

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:15.720
<v Speaker 2>hurting them, and that's a terrible thing, but that you know,

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:20.199
<v Speaker 2>isn't fundamentally something they've done wrong. And although you and

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 2>I from the outside might want them to get out

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 2>of that relationship because we see it's harming them, their

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 2>impulse to make it work and to stay in it

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:31.520
<v Speaker 2>comes from a good place.

0:25:31.640 --> 0:25:34.600
<v Speaker 1>You've put it more clear than anyone I've spoken to

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 1>about this, that the impulse to want to stay in

0:25:38.880 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 1>this kind of let's call it, toxic relationship actually comes

0:25:43.320 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 1>not from a good place. I'd say from the best place,

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:48.439
<v Speaker 1>which is our drive to love. And I think that

0:25:48.520 --> 0:25:51.880
<v Speaker 1>when people can see themselves through that compassionate a lens,

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:56.600
<v Speaker 1>that it actually can foster healing and growth. Rather than

0:25:56.800 --> 0:25:59.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm a damaged soul who's willing to settle for bread

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 1>cross is, rather I am a healthy human being who

0:26:02.880 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 1>wants to love, and this is what comes of loving

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:10.119
<v Speaker 1>somebody who's engaging in chronically betraying patterns.

0:26:10.320 --> 0:26:13.200
<v Speaker 2>I think a place where I also see this happen

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:16.840
<v Speaker 2>is when the person being hurt isn't being hurt by say,

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:22.480
<v Speaker 2>an organization, their church, their team, their school, and they

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 2>also love that organization and a very human desire and

0:26:27.920 --> 0:26:32.800
<v Speaker 2>need an impulse to love extends not only to other people,

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:35.640
<v Speaker 2>but to the groups of people the organizations that were

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:37.879
<v Speaker 2>in particularly when you know we're in some sense its

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:40.840
<v Speaker 2>dependent on them, and so people will be like, why

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 2>did I stay? You know, how did I first of

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 2>all not see that there was this abuse going on

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:49.200
<v Speaker 2>in my church? And then why didn't I leave the church? Well,

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 2>because they loved that organization and it was serving some

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:57.960
<v Speaker 2>important needs for them too, And so it is coming

0:26:58.080 --> 0:27:01.639
<v Speaker 2>from the best place in us to love other people

0:27:01.760 --> 0:27:07.040
<v Speaker 2>as well as other kinds of human things like whole organizations.

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Right, And people also trust these organizations. It's not even

0:27:10.119 --> 0:27:13.400
<v Speaker 1>about loving these organizations. I actually think we're more likely

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 1>to trust organizations sometimes than individual people because it is

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 1>an organization, it is bigger than us, and a person

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:24.040
<v Speaker 1>did trust this, you know, this takes me to think about,

0:27:24.080 --> 0:27:26.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, taking it into a larger scale of like

0:27:26.840 --> 0:27:30.719
<v Speaker 1>massive betrayal by an institution, not just an individual. I

0:27:30.760 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 1>think of major betrayals like, let's use the US gymnastics scandal,

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:40.360
<v Speaker 1>where so many young women were betrayed by an organization.

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Even when they were bringing concerns up, they were being silenced,

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:47.399
<v Speaker 1>and so they were saying, well, the organization can't we

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 1>love gymnastics, We love the sport. This is the governing body.

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 1>We have to believe in it. It's almost implicit that

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 1>they do trust these kinds of organizations, whether they be

0:27:57.080 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 1>churches or guild organizations, or even employers or even institutions

0:28:01.040 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 1>like the justice system.

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:05.280
<v Speaker 2>Yes, absolutely we see that. And you know, to some extent,

0:28:05.320 --> 0:28:10.960
<v Speaker 2>the organizations also foster this emotional reaction. So the organizations

0:28:11.000 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 2>will say, you know, we're your family, We're here for you.

0:28:14.560 --> 0:28:18.679
<v Speaker 2>They will use the language of trust and dependence and

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 2>care that builds upon our impulse to trust these organizations.

0:28:23.760 --> 0:28:26.399
<v Speaker 2>I see this as related to the trust we have

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 2>in our families. If we don't just have an individual

0:28:29.880 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 2>we trust and love. Our earliest groups are families, and

0:28:34.200 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 2>we have a term family betrayal in my lab which

0:28:39.440 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 2>capture some of the ways that the group can betray people,

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:47.080
<v Speaker 2>and we find that it can be even sort of

0:28:47.120 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 2>in sometimes more powerful than individual one on one betrayal,

0:28:51.120 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 2>which makes sense because if a whole group is hurting you, like,

0:28:54.760 --> 0:28:56.760
<v Speaker 2>that's pretty bad, that's pretty scary.

0:28:57.040 --> 0:28:59.200
<v Speaker 1>One thing you've wrote about in Blind to Betrayal you

0:28:59.240 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 1>talk about leak cosmodes work on the social contract, this

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 1>idea and evolutionary psychology that we actually are as human

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:11.800
<v Speaker 1>beings quite good at detecting betrayal, right, which is interesting

0:29:11.800 --> 0:29:13.880
<v Speaker 1>because then that bangs up this idea of the social

0:29:13.920 --> 0:29:16.600
<v Speaker 1>contract that there is a trust that comes into our

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:20.120
<v Speaker 1>relationships with individuals or group. Does that relate then into

0:29:20.160 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 1>our inherent trust of big organizations, is that it's part

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:25.680
<v Speaker 1>of this trusting social contract that we have that we

0:29:25.760 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 1>have to trust.

0:29:26.720 --> 0:29:32.600
<v Speaker 2>This, right. What's really important in both cosmuities ideas and

0:29:32.720 --> 0:29:36.240
<v Speaker 2>mine is that we continue to interact with the same

0:29:36.960 --> 0:29:42.840
<v Speaker 2>people or organizations over and over, and so if they

0:29:43.400 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 2>mistreat us, then what we should do is detect that

0:29:49.440 --> 0:29:52.280
<v Speaker 2>and then take protective action, and that brings us back

0:29:52.320 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 2>to fight and flight. Yeah yeah, so that it doesn't

0:29:54.680 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 2>happen again. Yeah yeah, But you know, when we're dependent,

0:29:57.440 --> 0:29:59.880
<v Speaker 2>we don't have that option in the same way.

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:02.120
<v Speaker 1>No, we don't use this term in the book that

0:30:02.240 --> 0:30:05.600
<v Speaker 1>really stayed with me, which is this concept of the whoosh.

0:30:05.800 --> 0:30:08.000
<v Speaker 1>We see the betrayal, We can even see the betrayal

0:30:08.040 --> 0:30:11.000
<v Speaker 1>happening in real time. We're very aware that our trust

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:14.080
<v Speaker 1>is being betrayed, whether we catch someone in an infidelity

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 1>or a lie. But this idea of the whoosh, could

0:30:18.200 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 1>you talk about that?

0:30:19.240 --> 0:30:22.960
<v Speaker 2>So this is something that some people experience more than others,

0:30:23.080 --> 0:30:24.960
<v Speaker 2>and I think it has to do with the timing

0:30:25.080 --> 0:30:28.960
<v Speaker 2>of when one's betrayal blindness sort of kicks in. So

0:30:29.160 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 2>for some people, their betrayal blindnessabilities are so powerful they

0:30:34.040 --> 0:30:37.160
<v Speaker 2>don't ever consciously see it, like they really don't. They

0:30:37.200 --> 0:30:40.040
<v Speaker 2>can just not see it from the get go. For

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 2>other people, they first catch a glimmer of something's just

0:30:46.840 --> 0:30:50.400
<v Speaker 2>happened to me, and it's really not okay, And then

0:30:50.920 --> 0:30:54.720
<v Speaker 2>there's a process that's going this is not safe to know,

0:30:55.400 --> 0:30:57.880
<v Speaker 2>this is not at all safe to know, and that's

0:30:57.920 --> 0:31:02.080
<v Speaker 2>when the woosh comes in and when they reflect back

0:31:02.200 --> 0:31:05.600
<v Speaker 2>on the situation years later, some people are able to

0:31:05.680 --> 0:31:11.840
<v Speaker 2>introspect and remember that progression from perceiving the problem to

0:31:12.160 --> 0:31:15.440
<v Speaker 2>whushing it away just in time before they behave in

0:31:15.480 --> 0:31:17.160
<v Speaker 2>a way that's going to get them into trouble.

0:31:17.360 --> 0:31:19.040
<v Speaker 1>When you say behave in a way that's going to

0:31:19.040 --> 0:31:20.360
<v Speaker 1>get them into trouble, what do you mean.

0:31:20.320 --> 0:31:24.600
<v Speaker 2>By that, like confront the person, Okay, show you know

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:27.400
<v Speaker 2>some way, rock the boat, right, because that's what they're

0:31:27.440 --> 0:31:30.840
<v Speaker 2>really trying to avoid. They're trying to avoid destabilizing something

0:31:30.880 --> 0:31:34.040
<v Speaker 2>they need. And you know, I think rocking the boat's

0:31:34.080 --> 0:31:36.960
<v Speaker 2>just a great metaphor because if you rock the boat

0:31:37.000 --> 0:31:40.320
<v Speaker 2>too much, the boat tips. I mean, you're really in trouble.

0:31:40.680 --> 0:31:43.040
<v Speaker 2>So there's a reason we don't want to rock the boat.

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Right, right, That's exactly right. And I often call it

0:31:45.880 --> 0:31:48.640
<v Speaker 1>also maintaining the status quo. I'm married to someone, we

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:51.720
<v Speaker 1>have kids, we have an extended family, we have a home,

0:31:51.800 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 1>we have a life. That the woosh is getting that

0:31:55.080 --> 0:31:57.719
<v Speaker 1>information out of the way just before you blow it

0:31:57.760 --> 0:32:01.040
<v Speaker 1>all up, you know. And that what's not happening, though,

0:32:01.080 --> 0:32:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Fried, is that there is not this secondary attention

0:32:04.600 --> 0:32:07.360
<v Speaker 1>to the toll it's taking on the person who remains

0:32:07.360 --> 0:32:10.480
<v Speaker 1>in the relationship. The focus becomes so heavily on the

0:32:10.520 --> 0:32:13.960
<v Speaker 1>attachment on the status quo, on not rocking the boat.

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 1>That what's getting missed is that inherent harm that is

0:32:18.520 --> 0:32:23.800
<v Speaker 1>just happening under the radar and often then contributing to anxiety,

0:32:24.360 --> 0:32:31.560
<v Speaker 1>mood symptoms like depression, helplessness, hopelessness, powerlessness, confusion, self blame,

0:32:31.880 --> 0:32:36.000
<v Speaker 1>self doubt. So the person is psychologically getting destabilized and

0:32:36.040 --> 0:32:39.160
<v Speaker 1>there's almost a false sense of safety. Status quo remains.

0:32:39.440 --> 0:32:42.960
<v Speaker 1>But I'm falling apart, and that, to wit is the

0:32:43.000 --> 0:32:46.640
<v Speaker 1>struggle of every survivor of narcissistic abuse. Maintain the status

0:32:46.760 --> 0:32:49.320
<v Speaker 1>quo as I psychologically erode.

0:32:49.600 --> 0:32:52.280
<v Speaker 2>You put that so well, and I think what's a

0:32:52.320 --> 0:32:56.880
<v Speaker 2>really important factor there is what happens if they don't

0:32:56.880 --> 0:33:00.800
<v Speaker 2>maintain the status quo, And that then is hardly on

0:33:01.080 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 2>the rest of us, right, It's what happens depends on

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:08.520
<v Speaker 2>the social context the person finds themselves in. If they're

0:33:08.600 --> 0:33:12.640
<v Speaker 2>in a setting where rocking the boat on that relationship

0:33:12.680 --> 0:33:16.120
<v Speaker 2>means they lose everything, truly, they lose their home, they

0:33:16.120 --> 0:33:21.000
<v Speaker 2>lose all their other relationships, that's an untenable risk. But

0:33:21.080 --> 0:33:23.360
<v Speaker 2>if they're in a situation where there's a safety net

0:33:23.360 --> 0:33:25.560
<v Speaker 2>out there, there's going to be people that say here,

0:33:25.680 --> 0:33:28.760
<v Speaker 2>come stay at my house, or you know, here's something

0:33:28.880 --> 0:33:32.760
<v Speaker 2>for you. We will hold you through this period. That

0:33:32.920 --> 0:33:36.480
<v Speaker 2>changes the equation. Then the cost and risk of staying

0:33:36.680 --> 0:33:40.360
<v Speaker 2>is actually higher than the cost and risk of leaving.

0:33:41.320 --> 0:33:45.320
<v Speaker 2>But which way that equation works out so depends on

0:33:45.440 --> 0:33:47.880
<v Speaker 2>this larger context a person is in.

0:33:48.280 --> 0:33:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, have you looked at betrayal blindness as sort of

0:33:51.320 --> 0:33:54.720
<v Speaker 1>a cultural phenomenon as well, that even if we can

0:33:54.840 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 1>clear out safety nets and all of that, that ultimately

0:33:58.560 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the cultural reject or the cultural shame around, for example,

0:34:02.520 --> 0:34:05.440
<v Speaker 1>getting a divorce or becoming a strange from a family

0:34:05.960 --> 0:34:09.719
<v Speaker 1>is so overwhelming that it then makes more sense to

0:34:09.760 --> 0:34:13.080
<v Speaker 1>remain in blindness. What has your work taught you about that?

0:34:13.239 --> 0:34:17.879
<v Speaker 2>I haven't myself directly examined that so much, but some

0:34:17.960 --> 0:34:21.680
<v Speaker 2>of my former students have taken that up, and one

0:34:21.680 --> 0:34:25.400
<v Speaker 2>of the things that they have found is that especially

0:34:25.440 --> 0:34:29.160
<v Speaker 2>for groups of people who are oppressed by mainstream culture,

0:34:29.760 --> 0:34:35.280
<v Speaker 2>there's this need to have a protective sort of group

0:34:35.920 --> 0:34:38.840
<v Speaker 2>with interracultural trust, and this is largely the work of

0:34:39.320 --> 0:34:45.200
<v Speaker 2>Jennifer Gomez, and that then adds additional pressure to maintain

0:34:45.400 --> 0:34:48.839
<v Speaker 2>the status quo when there's any kind of disruption within

0:34:48.920 --> 0:34:55.680
<v Speaker 2>that group. So that adds to the cultural pressure to

0:34:56.080 --> 0:34:59.640
<v Speaker 2>have betrayal blindness, and in that situation, it's coming in

0:34:59.680 --> 0:35:02.680
<v Speaker 2>some sense from the fact that that's an oppressive larger

0:35:02.719 --> 0:35:07.319
<v Speaker 2>context around that group. There's also cultural issues like is

0:35:07.320 --> 0:35:12.240
<v Speaker 2>a society more collective or individualistic, and the pressure to

0:35:12.280 --> 0:35:17.480
<v Speaker 2>maintain the collective harmony can be another component to betrayal blindness.

0:35:17.520 --> 0:35:20.359
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, and I agree that the betrayal blindness is going

0:35:20.400 --> 0:35:24.520
<v Speaker 1>to happen when it is a collective situation in which

0:35:25.000 --> 0:35:28.080
<v Speaker 1>familial disruption or estrangement. There's just absolutely no space that

0:35:28.120 --> 0:35:30.160
<v Speaker 1>could be held, and there would almost be greater harm

0:35:30.200 --> 0:35:33.160
<v Speaker 1>through ostracism that would happen if a person did that,

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:34.680
<v Speaker 1>as well as a shame that it would bring upon

0:35:34.719 --> 0:35:38.319
<v Speaker 1>the entire family. Yeah, this connects to one of the

0:35:38.400 --> 0:35:41.080
<v Speaker 1>stories that was in your book, the story of someone

0:35:41.200 --> 0:35:45.120
<v Speaker 1>you called Kevin in your book, and the story of

0:35:45.200 --> 0:35:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Kevin hit me profoundly. I grew up in the nineteen

0:35:48.400 --> 0:35:51.120
<v Speaker 1>seventies in the United States as well. What you captured

0:35:51.160 --> 0:35:54.200
<v Speaker 1>in his story is that somebody who's not of majority race,

0:35:54.200 --> 0:35:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and especially at that time in history, I still think

0:35:56.600 --> 0:35:58.840
<v Speaker 1>it's an issue, but it was even more pronounced In

0:35:58.920 --> 0:36:01.959
<v Speaker 1>Kevin's case, he was told that if he assimilated, good

0:36:02.000 --> 0:36:05.600
<v Speaker 1>things would happen. But he played by all those rules

0:36:05.640 --> 0:36:08.880
<v Speaker 1>in this larger system of the culture, of school, of education,

0:36:09.160 --> 0:36:13.319
<v Speaker 1>all of that, and he was still ostracized, and that

0:36:13.640 --> 0:36:16.279
<v Speaker 1>the betrayal blindness for him is this is fair, this

0:36:16.440 --> 0:36:19.120
<v Speaker 1>is all fine. Yes, I can assimilate, and I'll play

0:36:19.160 --> 0:36:21.360
<v Speaker 1>the sports that the other kids play, and I won't

0:36:21.360 --> 0:36:24.879
<v Speaker 1>speak with an accent. I'll do all of that. And

0:36:25.000 --> 0:36:28.520
<v Speaker 1>then he wakes up and realizes that, no, I'm still

0:36:28.520 --> 0:36:31.720
<v Speaker 1>being ostracized. Could you reflect on that story of Kevin.

0:36:31.920 --> 0:36:36.719
<v Speaker 2>What Kevin does is he takes on what's essentially prejudice

0:36:36.760 --> 0:36:41.120
<v Speaker 2>and discrimination. He takes it on as if it's his

0:36:41.239 --> 0:36:44.640
<v Speaker 2>own individual failing. So if he doesn't get invited to

0:36:44.680 --> 0:36:48.240
<v Speaker 2>a birthday party, it's because in some way he's failed

0:36:48.239 --> 0:36:52.080
<v Speaker 2>to be popular, or if he's not selected for the

0:36:52.120 --> 0:36:55.200
<v Speaker 2>sports team, it's because he's not a good enough athlete.

0:36:55.560 --> 0:36:59.600
<v Speaker 2>And this taking it on as an individual problem as

0:36:59.600 --> 0:37:04.879
<v Speaker 2>opposed to seeing it as a societal problem. In his case,

0:37:04.920 --> 0:37:09.279
<v Speaker 2>he's an Asian American in a very white context where

0:37:09.320 --> 0:37:14.839
<v Speaker 2>he doesn't understand and won't let himself understand that he's

0:37:14.880 --> 0:37:17.960
<v Speaker 2>being mistreated on the basis of the fact that he's

0:37:18.080 --> 0:37:23.600
<v Speaker 2>not white, and he's being othered and ostracized for being

0:37:23.920 --> 0:37:27.560
<v Speaker 2>Asian American. If he were to see it that way,

0:37:28.320 --> 0:37:33.200
<v Speaker 2>that would then put him in a conflictual relationship with everybody.

0:37:33.640 --> 0:37:37.560
<v Speaker 2>He would be a victim of discrimination, and that's a

0:37:37.680 --> 0:37:41.080
<v Speaker 2>very hard position to be in while also trying to

0:37:41.120 --> 0:37:45.080
<v Speaker 2>maintain all those relationships and friendships. If it's his fault,

0:37:45.320 --> 0:37:48.239
<v Speaker 2>if he's just not good enough student or athlete or

0:37:48.280 --> 0:37:51.480
<v Speaker 2>whatever it is, then he can maintain those relationships.

0:37:51.560 --> 0:37:53.719
<v Speaker 1>We're going to be so give a personal sort of

0:37:53.719 --> 0:37:56.600
<v Speaker 1>disclosure here. My parents were actually told in the nineteen

0:37:56.640 --> 0:37:59.080
<v Speaker 1>sixties when I was born, a pediatrician took them aside

0:37:59.120 --> 0:38:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and said, still stop speaking Teluguta Teluguza language my parents

0:38:02.680 --> 0:38:06.400
<v Speaker 1>speak from India. And they asked why because obviously I

0:38:06.400 --> 0:38:08.920
<v Speaker 1>was picking up the language that was happening around and

0:38:08.960 --> 0:38:11.160
<v Speaker 1>they said, well, because she'll have an accent and you

0:38:11.239 --> 0:38:13.600
<v Speaker 1>need her to assimilate. They wanted me to be able

0:38:13.640 --> 0:38:16.160
<v Speaker 1>to assimilate. That was the doctor setting out as a goal.

0:38:16.480 --> 0:38:19.640
<v Speaker 1>So my parents stopped speaking that language directly to me.

0:38:19.680 --> 0:38:22.240
<v Speaker 1>They would stop me when I'd respond, so I wouldn't

0:38:22.280 --> 0:38:25.160
<v Speaker 1>have an accent, but they continued having their conversations. I

0:38:25.200 --> 0:38:28.000
<v Speaker 1>just wasn't allowed to respond in that language, and over time,

0:38:28.080 --> 0:38:30.480
<v Speaker 1>my comprehension of the language is one hundred percent. It's

0:38:30.480 --> 0:38:33.080
<v Speaker 1>still the language they speak to me in primarily, but

0:38:33.200 --> 0:38:35.920
<v Speaker 1>my responses are all in English and I don't speak

0:38:35.920 --> 0:38:38.200
<v Speaker 1>with an accent. That was sort of the endgame, But

0:38:38.280 --> 0:38:40.839
<v Speaker 1>that was sort of the sacrifice of assimilation. I lost

0:38:40.840 --> 0:38:43.440
<v Speaker 1>a massive part of my culture. That still makes it

0:38:43.480 --> 0:38:46.040
<v Speaker 1>difficult for me to communicate with family members. But to

0:38:46.080 --> 0:38:48.239
<v Speaker 1>your point, when I tried to try out for the

0:38:48.400 --> 0:38:51.400
<v Speaker 1>high school choir, I was discouraged from doing so because

0:38:51.400 --> 0:38:54.360
<v Speaker 1>I sort of didn't look the part. When I didn't

0:38:54.400 --> 0:38:57.520
<v Speaker 1>fit in, I just assumed that it's because I'm an unskilled,

0:38:57.880 --> 0:39:00.759
<v Speaker 1>unpopular person, something that I still well. Again, so what

0:39:00.800 --> 0:39:03.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying, these tentacles go deep. It's a way I

0:39:03.440 --> 0:39:07.000
<v Speaker 1>still view myself. And so you really had to give

0:39:07.080 --> 0:39:09.400
<v Speaker 1>up what would have been an incredibly important part of

0:39:09.400 --> 0:39:11.960
<v Speaker 1>your history. You know, I wasn't able to communicate with

0:39:12.000 --> 0:39:15.319
<v Speaker 1>my grandmother as well as I wanted to because of this,

0:39:15.400 --> 0:39:17.799
<v Speaker 1>And it was all that what we're assimilating and isn't

0:39:17.840 --> 0:39:20.680
<v Speaker 1>that wonderful, but it didn't work out. I even tried

0:39:20.719 --> 0:39:23.000
<v Speaker 1>to pursue a career in the media when I graduated

0:39:23.080 --> 0:39:25.480
<v Speaker 1>from college, and I was telling absolutely not people like

0:39:25.520 --> 0:39:27.640
<v Speaker 1>you are back of camera. You're not front of camera.

0:39:27.920 --> 0:39:29.880
<v Speaker 1>So I even think to myself, I brought food for

0:39:29.960 --> 0:39:32.239
<v Speaker 1>lunch as a little kid, Indian food, and the kids

0:39:32.280 --> 0:39:35.160
<v Speaker 1>would actually mock it or take it or bully around it.

0:39:35.400 --> 0:39:36.960
<v Speaker 1>And I said to my mother and then it was

0:39:37.000 --> 0:39:39.080
<v Speaker 1>all peanut butter and jelly from that point forward. But

0:39:39.120 --> 0:39:41.719
<v Speaker 1>the other lunch was healthier and more palatable. But so

0:39:41.920 --> 0:39:44.560
<v Speaker 1>how much of one's sense of self get stolen by this?

0:39:44.920 --> 0:39:47.719
<v Speaker 1>And instead of making it about this is a racist system.

0:39:47.920 --> 0:39:50.320
<v Speaker 1>My parents were so desperate to make it successful in

0:39:50.320 --> 0:39:52.799
<v Speaker 1>the United States they did were like no, no, no, no,

0:39:52.880 --> 0:39:55.480
<v Speaker 1>we're just not doing it right. So we internalized it.

0:39:55.560 --> 0:39:58.200
<v Speaker 1>So Kevin's story hit me hard, and I never ever

0:39:58.440 --> 0:40:01.319
<v Speaker 1>ever thought of that through a life of betrayal blindness.

0:40:01.480 --> 0:40:03.920
<v Speaker 1>So I find this to be a really useful you know,

0:40:03.960 --> 0:40:05.680
<v Speaker 1>it was really useful. I have to thank you more

0:40:05.719 --> 0:40:07.880
<v Speaker 1>than anything. The gift that this book gave me was

0:40:08.000 --> 0:40:10.160
<v Speaker 1>a personal one that it actually gave me a very

0:40:10.200 --> 0:40:13.319
<v Speaker 1>different frame of reference. I thank you. Now I want

0:40:13.320 --> 0:40:15.560
<v Speaker 1>to hit another story you had shared in the book,

0:40:15.680 --> 0:40:17.440
<v Speaker 1>because I think it was such a powerful story that

0:40:17.480 --> 0:40:19.600
<v Speaker 1>you open Blind to Betrayal with, which is the story

0:40:19.600 --> 0:40:22.800
<v Speaker 1>of Julie, who is a successful attorney. Can you share

0:40:22.840 --> 0:40:24.120
<v Speaker 1>that story from the book.

0:40:24.200 --> 0:40:28.280
<v Speaker 2>Julie was a woman who had, on the surface, totally

0:40:28.320 --> 0:40:32.560
<v Speaker 2>succeeded in life. She had a really thriving profession and

0:40:33.160 --> 0:40:36.319
<v Speaker 2>lived in a beautiful home, and you know, appeared to

0:40:36.360 --> 0:40:38.640
<v Speaker 2>be a very happy person, and in a lot of

0:40:38.680 --> 0:40:42.359
<v Speaker 2>ways was. But she told me about her past, and

0:40:42.400 --> 0:40:46.240
<v Speaker 2>clearly she was still disturbed by this. In her past,

0:40:46.280 --> 0:40:50.960
<v Speaker 2>she was in a different relationship where her spouse was

0:40:51.760 --> 0:40:57.000
<v Speaker 2>cheating on her and abusing her. I believe financially she

0:40:57.120 --> 0:41:00.000
<v Speaker 2>was utterly dependent on him and trapped in the house

0:41:00.120 --> 0:41:03.920
<v Speaker 2>with him when she walked in on him one time

0:41:05.480 --> 0:41:08.160
<v Speaker 2>kissing another woman. She was the first one to use

0:41:08.160 --> 0:41:13.000
<v Speaker 2>that word woosh with me. She described seeing the kiss

0:41:13.960 --> 0:41:17.240
<v Speaker 2>and somehow managing to wosh it out of her mind

0:41:17.880 --> 0:41:19.920
<v Speaker 2>so that it wasn't there anymore. And it was in

0:41:19.960 --> 0:41:22.400
<v Speaker 2>a public place too. I mean, it was kind of

0:41:22.400 --> 0:41:28.520
<v Speaker 2>a remarkable feat of betrayal blindness, but it allowed her

0:41:29.560 --> 0:41:35.040
<v Speaker 2>in this highly dependent situation to stay in relationship with

0:41:35.080 --> 0:41:39.160
<v Speaker 2>her husband, who she believed in arguably really did need

0:41:39.200 --> 0:41:42.799
<v Speaker 2>to stay with given her total lack of resources. She

0:41:42.840 --> 0:41:45.839
<v Speaker 2>had no car, she had no money, she had no

0:41:46.560 --> 0:41:51.000
<v Speaker 2>way to exist as far as she knew without him.

0:41:51.560 --> 0:41:55.640
<v Speaker 2>And what's remarkable is that eventually she did find her

0:41:55.680 --> 0:41:58.120
<v Speaker 2>way out. She had a young child, so it was

0:41:58.200 --> 0:42:02.040
<v Speaker 2>particularly difficult, but she did find her way out and

0:42:02.120 --> 0:42:07.439
<v Speaker 2>then managed to pursue her own goals and dreams, which

0:42:07.480 --> 0:42:09.239
<v Speaker 2>is why by the time I talked to her she

0:42:09.320 --> 0:42:12.120
<v Speaker 2>was this highly successful person.

0:42:12.480 --> 0:42:15.759
<v Speaker 1>It's remarkable because I think that that framework of she

0:42:15.920 --> 0:42:19.480
<v Speaker 1>literally saw her husband kissing another woman and still managed

0:42:19.520 --> 0:42:21.919
<v Speaker 1>to wooh it out. You know, we often think like, Okay,

0:42:22.040 --> 0:42:24.359
<v Speaker 1>there may be innuendo, there may be suspicion, but this

0:42:24.560 --> 0:42:27.200
<v Speaker 1>was really happening in her face. One are the pieces

0:42:27.200 --> 0:42:30.040
<v Speaker 1>that struck me about Julie's story was also that she

0:42:30.120 --> 0:42:33.200
<v Speaker 1>went on into another relationship where this kind of betrayal

0:42:33.239 --> 0:42:36.000
<v Speaker 1>happened again. So I mean, betrayal blindness is a mechanism

0:42:36.040 --> 0:42:38.280
<v Speaker 1>that stays within us, so when it does happen again,

0:42:38.560 --> 0:42:41.719
<v Speaker 1>we're likely to experience it again and repeat this in

0:42:41.800 --> 0:42:45.279
<v Speaker 1>relational cycles. In her case though, and this is where

0:42:45.280 --> 0:42:48.080
<v Speaker 1>it really coalesces with what we know about narcissistic abuse,

0:42:48.120 --> 0:42:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Fried is this idea that as she became more autonomous,

0:42:52.080 --> 0:42:54.560
<v Speaker 1>she actually came into her own as an attorney, she

0:42:54.719 --> 0:42:58.920
<v Speaker 1>cultivated sources of support that actually was the path to

0:42:58.960 --> 0:43:01.600
<v Speaker 1>healing and growth for her, which is exactly what we

0:43:01.640 --> 0:43:06.280
<v Speaker 1>tell survivors of narcissistic abuse. My conversation will continue after

0:43:06.320 --> 0:43:06.880
<v Speaker 1>this break.

0:43:12.440 --> 0:43:14.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and it makes sense that once somebody has used

0:43:14.880 --> 0:43:18.440
<v Speaker 2>betrayal blindness to survive a situation, they'd be vulnerable to

0:43:18.480 --> 0:43:23.880
<v Speaker 2>it again because there's an ability to detect betrayal that develops,

0:43:24.480 --> 0:43:27.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, in childhood, when the child's in a situation

0:43:27.640 --> 0:43:30.680
<v Speaker 2>in a context where they're allowed to develop that, and

0:43:30.800 --> 0:43:34.759
<v Speaker 2>it's a very healthy ability. It lets the child know

0:43:34.960 --> 0:43:37.360
<v Speaker 2>when the person that they're interacting with is safe or

0:43:37.360 --> 0:43:40.279
<v Speaker 2>not safe. But if you have to suppress that to

0:43:40.360 --> 0:43:44.239
<v Speaker 2>preserve a relationship, when you meet somebody new and they

0:43:44.280 --> 0:43:47.520
<v Speaker 2>are they're not safe, they're a betrayal, you don't have

0:43:47.640 --> 0:43:50.759
<v Speaker 2>the same ability as a person who's been allowed to

0:43:50.800 --> 0:43:54.880
<v Speaker 2>freely develop it. So one of the things that happens

0:43:54.880 --> 0:44:01.320
<v Speaker 2>when people heal is to redevelop that skill to learn

0:44:01.440 --> 0:44:04.760
<v Speaker 2>how to make good decisions about who had to trust,

0:44:04.880 --> 0:44:07.680
<v Speaker 2>how to hone in on the red flags, and to

0:44:07.800 --> 0:44:10.600
<v Speaker 2>know when it's time to leave a relationship well.

0:44:10.760 --> 0:44:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I often call it the privilege of not having had

0:44:13.680 --> 0:44:16.960
<v Speaker 1>a betraying childhood, because it is a privilege if you

0:44:17.080 --> 0:44:20.160
<v Speaker 1>have a childhood that is not emotionally abusive. It's a

0:44:20.400 --> 0:44:24.480
<v Speaker 1>privilege that cuts across anyone, even if they're unprivileged or underprivileged.

0:44:24.520 --> 0:44:27.160
<v Speaker 1>In other areas. It's a huge privilege because it allows

0:44:27.160 --> 0:44:30.560
<v Speaker 1>you to maintain that critical intuition that you can take

0:44:30.600 --> 0:44:33.920
<v Speaker 1>into adult relations. So blessed are those who are not betrayed,

0:44:34.160 --> 0:44:37.080
<v Speaker 1>because they really really do get to hold on to

0:44:37.200 --> 0:44:40.600
<v Speaker 1>something so so important. It's also interesting in the story

0:44:40.600 --> 0:44:43.319
<v Speaker 1>you told of Julie in your book, was that yes,

0:44:43.440 --> 0:44:45.440
<v Speaker 1>he was sleeping with other women, he was sleeping with

0:44:45.480 --> 0:44:48.840
<v Speaker 1>her friends, all of that, but her husband also she

0:44:48.880 --> 0:44:51.200
<v Speaker 1>had a new baby at home, and he was electing.

0:44:51.320 --> 0:44:54.439
<v Speaker 1>After all week away, his first stop when he came

0:44:54.440 --> 0:44:56.640
<v Speaker 1>back into a town wasn't to go to see his

0:44:56.840 --> 0:44:59.360
<v Speaker 1>new baby and his wife. He'd stop and have drinks

0:44:59.360 --> 0:45:02.640
<v Speaker 1>with his friends that bar. We don't typically think of

0:45:02.680 --> 0:45:05.160
<v Speaker 1>that as a betrayal, but that is also a betrayal.

0:45:05.560 --> 0:45:09.319
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I mean, I think this is something that you're identifying.

0:45:09.400 --> 0:45:13.160
<v Speaker 2>Is so important that we have duties in relationships, Yes,

0:45:13.200 --> 0:45:20.440
<v Speaker 2>and for close intimate relationships there are particular responsibilities and duties,

0:45:20.560 --> 0:45:24.240
<v Speaker 2>and so it's a betrayal to not fulfill those duties.

0:45:24.320 --> 0:45:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Correct. Correct, Thank you for putting it that way, because

0:45:26.960 --> 0:45:29.719
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's it. There are duties in a relationship,

0:45:29.800 --> 0:45:32.439
<v Speaker 1>and you know, to not that is the betrayal. As

0:45:32.480 --> 0:45:34.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, my work, doctor Fried is in the area

0:45:34.840 --> 0:45:38.200
<v Speaker 1>of narcissism. And if you have developed an acronym that

0:45:38.360 --> 0:45:44.560
<v Speaker 1>perfectly sums up the most damaging sort of interpersonal pivot

0:45:45.040 --> 0:45:49.000
<v Speaker 1>that happens in any kind of toxic relationship, can you

0:45:49.120 --> 0:45:51.919
<v Speaker 1>talk about your acronym and tell us where you came

0:45:52.000 --> 0:45:54.759
<v Speaker 1>up with this, because this to me, when I use this,

0:45:54.880 --> 0:45:55.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a game changer.

0:45:56.040 --> 0:46:01.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. DARVO stands for deny attack and reverse victim an offender.

0:46:02.440 --> 0:46:06.960
<v Speaker 2>So it's an acronym that connects to when a person's

0:46:07.040 --> 0:46:12.000
<v Speaker 2>being held accountable for a misdeed, how they respond, and

0:46:12.080 --> 0:46:15.720
<v Speaker 2>it is a destructive kind of response. Not all people

0:46:15.760 --> 0:46:18.600
<v Speaker 2>respond with DARVO, but when they do respond with darvo.

0:46:19.160 --> 0:46:23.680
<v Speaker 2>It can deflect the blame and responsibility because first of all,

0:46:23.680 --> 0:46:25.920
<v Speaker 2>they deny, they say, no, I didn't do that thing

0:46:25.960 --> 0:46:29.720
<v Speaker 2>you're saying. Then they attack the credibility of the person

0:46:29.840 --> 0:46:33.080
<v Speaker 2>making the accusation, so they say, you know you are

0:46:33.160 --> 0:46:35.960
<v Speaker 2>just doing this for attention, or you're just doing this

0:46:36.000 --> 0:46:39.160
<v Speaker 2>for money, or you know there's something wrong with your memory,

0:46:39.160 --> 0:46:41.799
<v Speaker 2>you have false memories. This didn't really happen to you.

0:46:42.360 --> 0:46:47.120
<v Speaker 2>And then the most insidious part is reversing victim and offender.

0:46:47.239 --> 0:46:51.160
<v Speaker 2>So now the person being accused puts him or herself

0:46:51.239 --> 0:46:54.120
<v Speaker 2>into the victim role and says, you know you're harming

0:46:54.200 --> 0:46:57.880
<v Speaker 2>me by this accusation, and therefore you're the offender in

0:46:57.880 --> 0:47:02.680
<v Speaker 2>this situation. So it's this very powerful reversal, and we

0:47:02.760 --> 0:47:06.040
<v Speaker 2>know from the research that darba tends to work. It

0:47:06.160 --> 0:47:10.239
<v Speaker 2>does confuse people, and that's why perpetrate just do it.

0:47:10.320 --> 0:47:13.640
<v Speaker 2>I experienced it in my own life, so in some sense,

0:47:13.680 --> 0:47:17.200
<v Speaker 2>I really deeply understood it, but didn't have that kind

0:47:17.239 --> 0:47:20.920
<v Speaker 2>of analytic intellectual understanding. And I'd seen it happen to

0:47:20.960 --> 0:47:24.839
<v Speaker 2>other people because it's pretty common until I saw it

0:47:24.920 --> 0:47:28.960
<v Speaker 2>happening on TV in a very dramatic way. And in

0:47:29.000 --> 0:47:31.480
<v Speaker 2>a situation where I could just really pinpoint it, and

0:47:31.520 --> 0:47:37.359
<v Speaker 2>that was the Anita Hill Clarence Thomas' hearings. Yes, and

0:47:37.400 --> 0:47:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Clarence Thomas was at that point considered for being appointed

0:47:41.000 --> 0:47:43.560
<v Speaker 2>to the Supreme Court. And Anita Hill had brought forth

0:47:44.160 --> 0:47:47.839
<v Speaker 2>an accusation that Clarence Thomas had sexually harassed her at

0:47:47.840 --> 0:47:53.120
<v Speaker 2>work back when he was running the EEOC, and Clarence

0:47:53.200 --> 0:47:57.839
<v Speaker 2>Thomas denied it. He attacked her credibility, and he very

0:47:57.920 --> 0:48:01.600
<v Speaker 2>much put himself in the victim world, and people around

0:48:01.640 --> 0:48:05.560
<v Speaker 2>him enabled that. And I remember sitting there thinking, this

0:48:05.760 --> 0:48:10.720
<v Speaker 2>is so striking because he's not just any old person.

0:48:11.120 --> 0:48:14.880
<v Speaker 2>He was head of the EEOC. And if there's anyone

0:48:14.920 --> 0:48:19.000
<v Speaker 2>who would know how important it is to be able

0:48:19.000 --> 0:48:21.480
<v Speaker 2>to talk about sexual harassment, how hard it is to

0:48:21.520 --> 0:48:24.600
<v Speaker 2>talk about, how important it is not to attack the

0:48:24.640 --> 0:48:26.640
<v Speaker 2>person who brings it up, it would be the head

0:48:26.640 --> 0:48:29.680
<v Speaker 2>of the EOC. So he had the knowledge, he had

0:48:29.680 --> 0:48:34.080
<v Speaker 2>the professional awareness to respond in a constructive way. But

0:48:34.160 --> 0:48:38.200
<v Speaker 2>it's not what he did. He did this conversation stopping response,

0:48:38.760 --> 0:48:41.799
<v Speaker 2>and it was so bad for everybody, was so bad

0:48:41.800 --> 0:48:43.399
<v Speaker 2>for Anita Hill, and it was so bad for all

0:48:43.480 --> 0:48:47.239
<v Speaker 2>the people watching this who might have had stories to

0:48:47.320 --> 0:48:51.160
<v Speaker 2>tell but saw what happened if anyone dared to say so.

0:48:51.440 --> 0:48:55.160
<v Speaker 2>It was somehow clicked for me watching that that this

0:48:55.360 --> 0:49:00.000
<v Speaker 2>was a pattern, and it was a particularly destructive pattern.

0:49:00.440 --> 0:49:02.800
<v Speaker 1>When you bring it up in terms of the Clarence

0:49:02.840 --> 0:49:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Anita Hill situation, absolutely makes sense. But we see

0:49:06.600 --> 0:49:08.919
<v Speaker 1>people do this all the time. I think we're living

0:49:08.920 --> 0:49:11.640
<v Speaker 1>in the era of DARVO now. I mean, in some ways,

0:49:12.200 --> 0:49:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the Clarence Thomas and Anita Hill story, that almost feels

0:49:16.120 --> 0:49:18.360
<v Speaker 1>like a throwback to the early days. Now DARVO is

0:49:18.400 --> 0:49:22.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty four to seven. It's happening all the time. Political leaders,

0:49:23.160 --> 0:49:26.759
<v Speaker 1>business leaders. I mean, I would almost challenge anyone out

0:49:26.800 --> 0:49:29.920
<v Speaker 1>there to watch the news or read news sites for

0:49:29.960 --> 0:49:31.520
<v Speaker 1>one day and tell me you don't see at least

0:49:31.520 --> 0:49:35.160
<v Speaker 1>one darvau story coming out. I mean, there's a universality,

0:49:35.600 --> 0:49:38.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, to this. But what I love about DARVO

0:49:38.760 --> 0:49:41.600
<v Speaker 1>is I think it takes gaslighting and it gives it

0:49:41.640 --> 0:49:45.759
<v Speaker 1>the final punctuation point, right, because when we think about gaslighting,

0:49:45.800 --> 0:49:48.799
<v Speaker 1>it's denial, right that I never said that, I never

0:49:48.840 --> 0:49:51.680
<v Speaker 1>did that. It's attack. There's something wrong with you. What

0:49:51.719 --> 0:49:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the heck is wrong with you? But that last piece

0:49:54.640 --> 0:49:58.160
<v Speaker 1>of reversing victim and offender. I think that that still

0:49:58.200 --> 0:50:00.520
<v Speaker 1>remains in that second part of gaslighting, which is to

0:50:00.600 --> 0:50:04.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of undermine the person being abused. But I think

0:50:04.040 --> 0:50:06.719
<v Speaker 1>it puts it in very stark focus because what it

0:50:06.800 --> 0:50:09.919
<v Speaker 1>does is it plays on the empathy and the compassion

0:50:10.360 --> 0:50:14.960
<v Speaker 1>and the equanimity of the person being abused. So they'll say, oh,

0:50:15.000 --> 0:50:17.640
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, maybe I am wrong. And there's not

0:50:17.719 --> 0:50:21.160
<v Speaker 1>a case out there where we have not seen darvaux use.

0:50:21.200 --> 0:50:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean any of the big cases of perpetration Weinstein,

0:50:24.840 --> 0:50:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Bill Cosby, R Kelly, I mean, think of Harvey Weinstein

0:50:28.520 --> 0:50:31.120
<v Speaker 1>rolling into the courtroom in the wheelchair. Look what you've

0:50:31.160 --> 0:50:33.439
<v Speaker 1>all done to me. I can't believe this is being

0:50:33.520 --> 0:50:36.480
<v Speaker 1>done to me. I mean, after over one hundred women

0:50:36.880 --> 0:50:40.400
<v Speaker 1>that we know of were perpetrated against. That was darvo

0:50:40.520 --> 0:50:43.520
<v Speaker 1>happening at the highest levels. But this framework, whether if

0:50:43.520 --> 0:50:47.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a massive news story involving hundreds of people or

0:50:47.640 --> 0:50:52.480
<v Speaker 1>it's simply happening in somebody's interpersonal relationship, it takes gaslighting

0:50:52.719 --> 0:50:55.640
<v Speaker 1>and it creates a much more holistic model of what

0:50:55.719 --> 0:50:57.120
<v Speaker 1>happens in these relationships.

0:50:57.280 --> 0:51:01.560
<v Speaker 2>I think it's awesome, more specific now got measurement instruments

0:51:01.600 --> 0:51:06.439
<v Speaker 2>for DARVA experiences like being darvout, as well as DARVO use,

0:51:07.040 --> 0:51:10.120
<v Speaker 2>like your tendency to use DARVO when you're acused of something.

0:51:10.280 --> 0:51:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I have copies of those scales here, and doctor Fried's

0:51:14.400 --> 0:51:19.399
<v Speaker 1>DARVO use scale is available in our show notes and

0:51:19.680 --> 0:51:26.719
<v Speaker 1>on our Instagram at Navigating Narcissism Pod. This fantastic resource

0:51:27.040 --> 0:51:32.600
<v Speaker 1>lists common DARVO phrases like your delusional and I'm the

0:51:32.640 --> 0:51:37.239
<v Speaker 1>real victim here and can be used to check yourself

0:51:37.640 --> 0:51:40.880
<v Speaker 1>to see if you're likely to use DARVO as a

0:51:40.960 --> 0:51:46.359
<v Speaker 1>tactic or you're experiencing it. We're actually starting to use

0:51:46.360 --> 0:51:49.160
<v Speaker 1>them in some of my own research on narcissistic abuse.

0:51:49.200 --> 0:51:53.040
<v Speaker 1>We're bringing in your DARVA long form questionnaire. It's magnificent

0:51:53.120 --> 0:51:56.919
<v Speaker 1>how this is now so measurable, because I do think

0:51:56.960 --> 0:51:59.600
<v Speaker 1>that there's a real value even for clinicians to use

0:51:59.640 --> 0:52:03.080
<v Speaker 1>with INDIVI visual clients so they can explore this in

0:52:03.120 --> 0:52:06.040
<v Speaker 1>their clients. It's a phenomenal resource. Could you talk a

0:52:06.120 --> 0:52:09.439
<v Speaker 1>little bit about your research connecting DARVO and narcissism, because

0:52:09.480 --> 0:52:11.680
<v Speaker 1>I can see them as being inherently connected.

0:52:11.840 --> 0:52:14.439
<v Speaker 2>We knew from prior research that has been published that

0:52:14.960 --> 0:52:19.319
<v Speaker 2>there are certain things that relate to the probability that

0:52:19.360 --> 0:52:22.520
<v Speaker 2>you get darvoed, so gender is one of them. So

0:52:22.680 --> 0:52:26.960
<v Speaker 2>women appear to be more likely to receive a DARVA response.

0:52:27.640 --> 0:52:31.440
<v Speaker 2>What we were curious about was who does the darvoing

0:52:32.120 --> 0:52:35.520
<v Speaker 2>and can we figure out who's more likely to darvo.

0:52:35.960 --> 0:52:40.080
<v Speaker 2>So we included some personality scales. One of them was

0:52:40.280 --> 0:52:45.680
<v Speaker 2>the dark Triad scale, used to measure three constellations of

0:52:45.719 --> 0:52:50.520
<v Speaker 2>sort of personality traits. One is psychopathy, one is machia

0:52:50.520 --> 0:52:55.759
<v Speaker 2>of alienism, and one is narcissism. And we found that

0:52:56.239 --> 0:53:00.359
<v Speaker 2>the tendency to use DARVO was actually associated with each

0:53:00.400 --> 0:53:04.960
<v Speaker 2>of those three sub scales, and that people who are

0:53:05.000 --> 0:53:08.319
<v Speaker 2>more likely to respond with DARVO are also more likely

0:53:08.400 --> 0:53:13.920
<v Speaker 2>to show traits of narcissism as well as psychopathy and machiavelianism.

0:53:14.360 --> 0:53:17.680
<v Speaker 2>And this is not at all surprising to us, but

0:53:17.840 --> 0:53:21.520
<v Speaker 2>it does allow us to begin to document the function.

0:53:21.760 --> 0:53:23.799
<v Speaker 2>Darvo is a tool for people.

0:53:23.680 --> 0:53:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Right, and it goes back to the driving of these

0:53:25.560 --> 0:53:30.040
<v Speaker 1>antagonistic relationships is domination, power and control. That's it. It's

0:53:30.080 --> 0:53:34.160
<v Speaker 1>not intimacy, it's not closeness, it's not even attachment or love.

0:53:34.239 --> 0:53:37.320
<v Speaker 1>It's really power domination and control. And if one person

0:53:37.360 --> 0:53:40.280
<v Speaker 1>in a relationship is being driven by power and control

0:53:40.400 --> 0:53:43.560
<v Speaker 1>and the other person is actually seeking for attachment, love

0:53:43.600 --> 0:53:47.200
<v Speaker 1>and connection, they're singing different songs, they're dancing different dances,

0:53:47.280 --> 0:53:50.120
<v Speaker 1>and tremendous harm comes to that person who is being

0:53:50.239 --> 0:53:53.120
<v Speaker 1>darvoed and who is being subjugated. You know one thing

0:53:53.160 --> 0:53:55.440
<v Speaker 1>that is so important for people to know and is

0:53:55.480 --> 0:53:59.000
<v Speaker 1>a takeaway. I think that many survivors will say, Wow,

0:53:59.000 --> 0:54:02.680
<v Speaker 1>this stuff has a name betrayal blindness, betrayal trauma, darvo

0:54:02.880 --> 0:54:04.920
<v Speaker 1>But then they want to know what to do. What

0:54:05.000 --> 0:54:08.800
<v Speaker 1>are some things that people can do to address betrayal blindness.

0:54:08.960 --> 0:54:11.480
<v Speaker 2>I tend to think about this both in terms of

0:54:11.520 --> 0:54:14.680
<v Speaker 2>what can you do for yourself to protect yourself and

0:54:14.760 --> 0:54:16.919
<v Speaker 2>also what can you do for the world to sort

0:54:16.960 --> 0:54:18.800
<v Speaker 2>of make this a better world that we're going to

0:54:18.960 --> 0:54:23.720
<v Speaker 2>all share for the self. You probably you have lots

0:54:23.760 --> 0:54:26.040
<v Speaker 2>of wisdom here, but one of the things we wrote

0:54:26.040 --> 0:54:30.839
<v Speaker 2>about in Blind to Betrayal was really getting very intentional

0:54:31.000 --> 0:54:35.879
<v Speaker 2>about relationships and actually taking stocks. So we talk about

0:54:35.920 --> 0:54:39.000
<v Speaker 2>the use of a particular measurement called the Relational Health

0:54:39.000 --> 0:54:43.600
<v Speaker 2>Indices that has some scales and for relational health and

0:54:43.719 --> 0:54:46.440
<v Speaker 2>we provide one of them in the book, where you

0:54:46.480 --> 0:54:49.400
<v Speaker 2>can ask yourself, you know, is this what I am

0:54:49.440 --> 0:54:53.040
<v Speaker 2>experiencing in these relationships? And it's not just for the

0:54:53.080 --> 0:54:56.239
<v Speaker 2>intimate relationship, it's for all the important relationships in a

0:54:56.280 --> 0:55:00.040
<v Speaker 2>person's life. They can go through this, and if the

0:55:00.200 --> 0:55:05.960
<v Speaker 2>relationship is not healthy, then it's very beneficial for the

0:55:06.040 --> 0:55:11.400
<v Speaker 2>person to either require it become healthy by getting an

0:55:11.440 --> 0:55:16.160
<v Speaker 2>agreement from the person their relationship with, or to leave

0:55:16.200 --> 0:55:20.800
<v Speaker 2>that relationship and find other relationships. And for some people

0:55:20.920 --> 0:55:24.960
<v Speaker 2>that's going to be easier for them to do with

0:55:26.520 --> 0:55:30.400
<v Speaker 2>maybe not their closest relationships, like start there and start

0:55:30.440 --> 0:55:35.720
<v Speaker 2>to build healthy relationships around them, and then maybe tackle

0:55:36.200 --> 0:55:40.319
<v Speaker 2>that most central relationship, which can be very scary to

0:55:40.480 --> 0:55:42.120
<v Speaker 2>start with that one.

0:55:42.320 --> 0:55:45.200
<v Speaker 1>That's great. Yes, what are other thoughts you have on

0:55:45.400 --> 0:55:47.960
<v Speaker 1>ways that people can sort of get ahead, if you will,

0:55:48.040 --> 0:55:50.640
<v Speaker 1>or at least use the understanding of betrayal blindness to

0:55:50.719 --> 0:55:53.920
<v Speaker 1>inform them as they go forward into other relationships or

0:55:53.920 --> 0:55:55.520
<v Speaker 1>manage the relationships in their lives.

0:55:55.640 --> 0:56:00.360
<v Speaker 2>So looking for signs that the person themselves might be

0:56:00.440 --> 0:56:04.920
<v Speaker 2>using betrayal blindness, you know, asking themselves, am I safe

0:56:04.920 --> 0:56:09.000
<v Speaker 2>in this relationship? Do I need to space out in

0:56:09.120 --> 0:56:11.320
<v Speaker 2>order to stay in it, which would be a really

0:56:11.920 --> 0:56:14.759
<v Speaker 2>big red flag that something's not right if you need

0:56:14.760 --> 0:56:17.880
<v Speaker 2>to space out. And to know that this is something

0:56:17.880 --> 0:56:22.200
<v Speaker 2>that can happen and why it happens can help people

0:56:22.360 --> 0:56:25.480
<v Speaker 2>be empowered when they otherwise don't feel empowered. I mean,

0:56:25.520 --> 0:56:28.600
<v Speaker 2>we see this too with darva, where if we tell

0:56:28.680 --> 0:56:34.080
<v Speaker 2>people about the concept, they're less susceptible to being swayed

0:56:34.200 --> 0:56:36.480
<v Speaker 2>when they see it. So if somebody doesn't know the

0:56:36.520 --> 0:56:40.799
<v Speaker 2>concept and they see darvo happening, they tend to in

0:56:40.800 --> 0:56:44.880
<v Speaker 2>some sense believe the perpetrator who's using it. And so

0:56:45.120 --> 0:56:47.560
<v Speaker 2>if you educate people and they go, oh, you know,

0:56:47.760 --> 0:56:51.240
<v Speaker 2>they're essentially able to say I'm being kind of manipulated here,

0:56:51.680 --> 0:56:55.560
<v Speaker 2>and I'm not interested in being manipulated, then they're safer.

0:56:55.640 --> 0:56:58.840
<v Speaker 2>So there's a certain amount of grounds you get from

0:56:58.880 --> 0:57:02.840
<v Speaker 2>being able to identify and label a problematic pattern.

0:57:03.120 --> 0:57:05.600
<v Speaker 1>And both of these things very much resonate with what

0:57:05.680 --> 0:57:09.200
<v Speaker 1>I consider to be central tenets of working clinically with

0:57:09.320 --> 0:57:13.840
<v Speaker 1>survivors of narcissistic relationships, the first being fostering other supports.

0:57:14.280 --> 0:57:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Fried. Not everyone can leave, you know that, I

0:57:16.880 --> 0:57:19.280
<v Speaker 1>know that, So if they're not going to we have

0:57:19.360 --> 0:57:22.080
<v Speaker 1>to help them cultivate. It might even be therapy as

0:57:22.120 --> 0:57:25.880
<v Speaker 1>another safe relational space, but some place where they can

0:57:25.960 --> 0:57:28.400
<v Speaker 1>be open and feel that there's a sense of trust

0:57:28.440 --> 0:57:30.960
<v Speaker 1>in that social contract, if you will, is safe and

0:57:31.000 --> 0:57:34.280
<v Speaker 1>trusting and loving. The second piece of awareness, we call

0:57:34.360 --> 0:57:37.240
<v Speaker 1>this just straight up psycho education. This is it. There's

0:57:37.240 --> 0:57:39.440
<v Speaker 1>an architecture to this, and if there's a model for this,

0:57:39.520 --> 0:57:41.720
<v Speaker 1>it means it's not just happening to you. You said

0:57:41.720 --> 0:57:43.880
<v Speaker 1>that there are things that using people can do for

0:57:43.920 --> 0:57:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the world, not just to protect themselves. Could you share that,

0:57:46.560 --> 0:57:48.400
<v Speaker 1>because I think that's such an important perspective.

0:57:48.640 --> 0:57:51.800
<v Speaker 2>It's because I believe this so strongly that I'm spending

0:57:51.800 --> 0:57:55.360
<v Speaker 2>most of my time these days nurturing a nonprofit called

0:57:55.400 --> 0:57:59.320
<v Speaker 2>the Center for Institutional Courage, And in the work we're

0:57:59.320 --> 0:58:03.000
<v Speaker 2>doing at the Center Institutional Courage, we're particularly focused on

0:58:03.040 --> 0:58:05.960
<v Speaker 2>the harm and betrayal that occurs at the institutional level,

0:58:06.000 --> 0:58:09.320
<v Speaker 2>which by the way, includes institutional darvo and coming up

0:58:09.400 --> 0:58:13.280
<v Speaker 2>with an alternative way for people and organizations to be

0:58:13.360 --> 0:58:16.040
<v Speaker 2>in the world to not do all this harm. And

0:58:16.080 --> 0:58:19.560
<v Speaker 2>that's what we call institutional courage. So you know, what

0:58:19.560 --> 0:58:23.560
<v Speaker 2>people can do for the world is to learn about

0:58:23.600 --> 0:58:30.520
<v Speaker 2>these things and get involved with organizations and groups that

0:58:30.560 --> 0:58:33.480
<v Speaker 2>are attempting to fix and address them as well as,

0:58:33.720 --> 0:58:37.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, being good friends to other people who are victims.

0:58:37.480 --> 0:58:41.000
<v Speaker 2>It's being pro social and the irony is that one

0:58:41.040 --> 0:58:43.160
<v Speaker 2>of the best ways in the long run to help

0:58:43.200 --> 0:58:47.680
<v Speaker 2>one's own healing is to use what we've learned through

0:58:47.720 --> 0:58:51.800
<v Speaker 2>mistreatment to help other people. That's a very rewarding and

0:58:51.920 --> 0:58:54.240
<v Speaker 2>ultimately empowering place to be.

0:58:54.640 --> 0:58:56.480
<v Speaker 1>It really is thank you for seeing that. That's so

0:58:56.560 --> 0:58:59.440
<v Speaker 1>beautifully put, and I think that's also a context survivors

0:58:59.480 --> 0:59:01.880
<v Speaker 1>will appreciate in terms of how they can also do

0:59:01.920 --> 0:59:03.880
<v Speaker 1>good in the world. Many of them feel like they've

0:59:03.880 --> 0:59:06.320
<v Speaker 1>lost their voices, and to know that that's a place

0:59:06.360 --> 0:59:09.120
<v Speaker 1>of sort of healing and gross for them will be profound.

0:59:09.680 --> 0:59:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Is there any other words of wisdom you'd like to

0:59:11.880 --> 0:59:17.320
<v Speaker 1>leave with survivors of relationships that are characterized by betrayal, trauma, betrayal, blindness,

0:59:17.360 --> 0:59:18.280
<v Speaker 1>and darvo.

0:59:18.280 --> 0:59:21.920
<v Speaker 2>I do believe very strongly in self compassion. It takes

0:59:21.960 --> 0:59:25.240
<v Speaker 2>a lot of energy to beat yourself up and blame

0:59:25.320 --> 0:59:28.680
<v Speaker 2>yourself when really you are doing the best you could

0:59:28.880 --> 0:59:33.080
<v Speaker 2>that the situation was and maybe still is not fair

0:59:33.120 --> 0:59:37.800
<v Speaker 2>and destructive, and that loving yourself and taking care of yourself.

0:59:37.840 --> 0:59:40.400
<v Speaker 2>It's sort of trite, but it is true that it

0:59:41.120 --> 0:59:45.080
<v Speaker 2>just is hugely beneficial. It is a good thing you love.

0:59:45.240 --> 0:59:46.640
<v Speaker 2>It is a good thing you're vulnerable.

0:59:47.240 --> 0:59:49.320
<v Speaker 1>I love that. I really love the frame you put

0:59:49.320 --> 0:59:51.240
<v Speaker 1>on this, that it's a good thing to love. We

0:59:51.320 --> 0:59:54.280
<v Speaker 1>tend to lose that in the conversation about toxic relationships,

0:59:54.520 --> 0:59:56.480
<v Speaker 1>So thank you for bringing it home to that. So,

0:59:56.600 --> 0:59:59.480
<v Speaker 1>doctor Fried, I cannot tell you what an amazing conversation

0:59:59.560 --> 1:00:04.080
<v Speaker 1>this was. Here are my takeaways for my conversation with

1:00:04.240 --> 1:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>doctor Jennifer Fried. In my first takeaway after listening to

1:00:09.560 --> 1:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>doctor Fried talk about betrayal blindness, it seems that almost

1:00:13.960 --> 1:00:17.640
<v Speaker 1>everyone who is in or has ever been in a

1:00:17.720 --> 1:00:24.920
<v Speaker 1>narcissistic relationship has experienced some level of betrayal blindness. These

1:00:25.000 --> 1:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>are relationships where trust is betrayed regularly. As a psychologist

1:00:30.720 --> 1:00:34.240
<v Speaker 1>who has worked with people in these situations and with

1:00:34.320 --> 1:00:38.200
<v Speaker 1>people who stay in the relationships for years, I have

1:00:38.480 --> 1:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>witnessed them not seeing or acknowledging what happens, but that

1:00:44.360 --> 1:00:49.160
<v Speaker 1>not seeing it while it allows them to stay, takes

1:00:49.160 --> 1:00:52.880
<v Speaker 1>a toll on their health and behavior. In many ways.

1:00:52.960 --> 1:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Doctor fried has given us a blueprint for understanding narcissistic abuse,

1:00:58.600 --> 1:01:02.959
<v Speaker 1>what happens, why people stay, and how it takes such

1:01:03.000 --> 1:01:07.200
<v Speaker 1>a toll on health and well being. For my next takeaway,

1:01:07.720 --> 1:01:13.120
<v Speaker 1>an important observation is this idea of being empowered enough

1:01:13.560 --> 1:01:16.959
<v Speaker 1>to not only be able to see it, but do

1:01:17.000 --> 1:01:21.120
<v Speaker 1>something about it. A real struggle for people in any

1:01:21.200 --> 1:01:25.720
<v Speaker 1>relationship characterized by betrayal trauma is that they are not

1:01:25.880 --> 1:01:30.320
<v Speaker 1>empowered for any number of reasons. They may be children,

1:01:30.760 --> 1:01:35.040
<v Speaker 1>they may have less power for societal reasons ethnicity, gender,

1:01:35.200 --> 1:01:39.800
<v Speaker 1>social status, or they may simply be in a relationship

1:01:39.960 --> 1:01:45.000
<v Speaker 1>that is characterized by imbalance and inequity, which, by the way,

1:01:45.240 --> 1:01:49.840
<v Speaker 1>is what we see in narcissistic relationships. She calls this

1:01:50.160 --> 1:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>relational asymmetry, and this is really important to understand because

1:01:55.120 --> 1:01:59.080
<v Speaker 1>we can pay attention to this dynamic in our relationships.

1:02:00.080 --> 1:02:04.120
<v Speaker 1>As you heal from a toxic relationship and may even

1:02:04.160 --> 1:02:08.040
<v Speaker 1>be angry at yourself for not fighting back, it seems

1:02:08.120 --> 1:02:13.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty likely that you were in an asymmetric relationship where

1:02:13.600 --> 1:02:19.000
<v Speaker 1>fighting back may have felt too risky. In this next takeaway,

1:02:19.640 --> 1:02:24.160
<v Speaker 1>doctor Fryed points out that betrayal blindness tends to become

1:02:24.320 --> 1:02:27.440
<v Speaker 1>our normal, and if you had to learn to use

1:02:27.480 --> 1:02:31.040
<v Speaker 1>it as a child, you are more likely to use

1:02:31.080 --> 1:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>it as a go to as an adult. This is

1:02:33.920 --> 1:02:38.240
<v Speaker 1>an important pattern for survivors to explore and lines up

1:02:38.320 --> 1:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>with what we observe as the legacy pattern of people

1:02:42.280 --> 1:02:48.640
<v Speaker 1>who experienced childhood narcissistic abuse also finding themselves in similar

1:02:48.880 --> 1:02:56.120
<v Speaker 1>relationship cycles in adulthood. Next, betrayal blindness and its effects

1:02:56.240 --> 1:02:59.120
<v Speaker 1>remind us that there is no way to win in

1:02:59.160 --> 1:03:04.360
<v Speaker 1>these relationships. These are relationships with people we trust or

1:03:04.720 --> 1:03:10.480
<v Speaker 1>need to trust, like parents. Seeing betrayal feels harmful because

1:03:10.520 --> 1:03:14.680
<v Speaker 1>we may not be able to safely do anything about it,

1:03:15.240 --> 1:03:19.040
<v Speaker 1>But not seeing the betrayal takes a toll on our health.

1:03:19.880 --> 1:03:24.240
<v Speaker 1>As doctor Fried said, this is a survival mechanism that

1:03:24.320 --> 1:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>comes with a cost. The process of betrayal blindness allows

1:03:29.120 --> 1:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>us to maintain the status quo and our lives the

1:03:32.880 --> 1:03:36.920
<v Speaker 1>way we may want them to be. But this process

1:03:37.040 --> 1:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>of wishing, as doctor Fried calls it, takes a real

1:03:42.000 --> 1:03:42.960
<v Speaker 1>toll on us.

1:03:43.200 --> 1:03:43.480
<v Speaker 2>For this.

1:03:43.680 --> 1:03:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Next takeaway, self blame is the pattern that most survivors

1:03:48.280 --> 1:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>struggle with. Betrayal blindness can help take some of that

1:03:52.320 --> 1:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>apart by not acknowledging the betrayal, and then if you

1:03:57.600 --> 1:04:01.800
<v Speaker 1>take the blame for the betrayals, you won't see the

1:04:01.960 --> 1:04:07.040
<v Speaker 1>other person as responsible, which is where shame comes in.

1:04:07.960 --> 1:04:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Most survivors feel ashamed that they got mistreated, and this

1:04:13.120 --> 1:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>brings up the idea that you could have done something

1:04:16.800 --> 1:04:20.480
<v Speaker 1>to stop the betrayal from happening. All of this means

1:04:20.480 --> 1:04:25.200
<v Speaker 1>that survivors then think this is my fault, which then

1:04:25.320 --> 1:04:30.680
<v Speaker 1>means you can stay in the relationship. Self blame then

1:04:30.920 --> 1:04:37.640
<v Speaker 1>tragically fosters attachment, which is essential in our next takeaway.

1:04:38.200 --> 1:04:41.200
<v Speaker 1>One of the most important things that doctor Fried shared

1:04:41.240 --> 1:04:44.720
<v Speaker 1>with us is something we already knew, but she put

1:04:44.760 --> 1:04:49.520
<v Speaker 1>a finer point on it. Love is good. Wanting to

1:04:49.640 --> 1:04:53.880
<v Speaker 1>love and be loved is good in a trusting, close

1:04:53.960 --> 1:04:58.000
<v Speaker 1>relationship with a parent, or a partner, or even an institution.

1:04:58.840 --> 1:05:02.800
<v Speaker 1>We are trying to protec something good and necessary and

1:05:02.920 --> 1:05:08.240
<v Speaker 1>attachment and love. Our healthy drive to love also explains

1:05:08.560 --> 1:05:12.080
<v Speaker 1>some of the why of betrayal blindness and also the

1:05:12.120 --> 1:05:16.600
<v Speaker 1>why of why we stay. Many survivors view themselves as

1:05:16.640 --> 1:05:20.440
<v Speaker 1>weak or needy or ridiculous for staying, but perhaps you

1:05:20.520 --> 1:05:24.600
<v Speaker 1>can tap into recognizing that you are a person who

1:05:24.640 --> 1:05:30.400
<v Speaker 1>wants to love and be loved and that is healthy. Next,

1:05:31.040 --> 1:05:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the concept of DARVO is not only the architecture of

1:05:36.040 --> 1:05:41.240
<v Speaker 1>every narcissistic relationship out there, but also rounds out our

1:05:41.400 --> 1:05:47.800
<v Speaker 1>understanding of gaslighting, because not only are our reality, perception,

1:05:48.200 --> 1:05:53.040
<v Speaker 1>and experience denied, we are dismantled and told there is

1:05:53.120 --> 1:05:56.560
<v Speaker 1>something wrong with us, and then have to carry the

1:05:56.600 --> 1:06:00.360
<v Speaker 1>burden of believing that we are the offenders and the

1:06:00.400 --> 1:06:05.240
<v Speaker 1>abusers when they reverse victim and offender, and that is

1:06:05.440 --> 1:06:09.120
<v Speaker 1>one more piece of how we get stuck in the

1:06:09.160 --> 1:06:16.040
<v Speaker 1>cycles of self blame. And finally, once we understand betrayal blindness,

1:06:16.320 --> 1:06:23.880
<v Speaker 1>we recognize that healing means discernment, the ability to detect betrayal.

1:06:24.640 --> 1:06:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Learning about the mechanics of betrayal blindness and DARVO, then

1:06:30.000 --> 1:06:33.320
<v Speaker 1>you can see the betrayals and call them what they are.

1:06:34.320 --> 1:06:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Foster support and healthy relationships with a foundation of trust,

1:06:39.320 --> 1:06:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Support other people who are going through these experiences, and

1:06:43.920 --> 1:06:49.320
<v Speaker 1>practice self compassion. Remember the very best part of you,

1:06:49.920 --> 1:06:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the part of you that simply wanted to love and

1:06:52.600 --> 1:06:58.240
<v Speaker 1>be loved, was played upon and manipulated, But you can

1:06:58.240 --> 1:07:02.640
<v Speaker 1>still hold on to that as a healthy part of yourself.