WEBVTT - The New Social Media: Video Games 

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets podcast

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>called Apple Podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.640
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com Slash Podcast. Paul Matt Miller is

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:25.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be really bummed he's not here today because

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>I know for a fact that he is a big

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Call of Duty Slash video game fan, and we're going

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:32.879
<v Speaker 1>to talk about video games. Now. Joining us as Adrian Montgomery.

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 1>He is CEO of Enthusiast Gaming, which is a gaming

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:39.880
<v Speaker 1>company that is based in Toronto, Canada. Adrian, it's great

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>to talk to you, and I just want to talk

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 1>about the video gaming industry broadly because clearly it got

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 1>a big boost during the pandemic because, let's face it,

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 1>over the last year, there wasn't much else better to

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 1>do than sit on your couch and play video games.

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Right now that the world is reopening and you can

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:56.680
<v Speaker 1>go out to bars, you can travel, are we about

0:00:56.720 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>to see a significant pullback in demand? Uh? The short

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>answer to that question is no. Uh. And the good

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 1>news for people like me and companies like Enthusiast Gaming

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:13.679
<v Speaker 1>is you needn't um believe me. Just ask any parents.

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Ask any parents if their children's love of their smartphone

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 1>and love of their video games has anything to do

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 1>with the weather or anything to do with the pandemic,

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:26.959
<v Speaker 1>And the answer is is ten times that attend. No.

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 1>This is a visceral connection that young people have with

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:34.039
<v Speaker 1>video games. Um. It is their favorite sport, it is

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>their favorite pastime. It is how they connect with their friends,

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 1>it is how they spend their money, it's how they

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>spend their parents money. So um, yes, we saw a

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 1>surge during the pandemic, but but that is not going

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 1>to going to claw backwards. Adrian, give us a sense

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 1>of kind of the future as you see it of

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 1>video games, whether it's you know, the mobility of it,

0:01:57.320 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of the platform agnostic kind of how do you

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 1>think about that? Well, first of all, the thing that

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:09.359
<v Speaker 1>needs to be understood among people who perhaps didn't grow

0:02:09.440 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 1>up with video games is that video games is the

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:16.799
<v Speaker 1>new social network. Yeah, you, you and me both video

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:20.520
<v Speaker 1>games is the new social network. Young people are staying

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>in touch, making new friends, my CFO. He had two

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>people at his wedding last year he only ever met

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 1>over the Xbox console. This is this is real, This

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:34.600
<v Speaker 1>is this is and and try telling him those relationships

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 1>aren't worthy of a wedding invitation. Um, this is how

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 1>people connect with each other. And so, as you know,

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:46.079
<v Speaker 1>three out of four gen zears don't watch television, they

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 1>don't listen to the radio, they don't read things called newspapers.

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 1>But they they watch video games and they congregate in

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 1>communities to discuss them. And so as we move forward,

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 1>video games will be the nexus for fashion, for music,

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 1>for pop culture. Um, they're going to be pervasive for politics.

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:14.839
<v Speaker 1>Adrian certainly m our company Enthusiast Gaming played UM an

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:17.920
<v Speaker 1>interesting role with the Biden Harris campaign in the fall

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>of two thousand and twenty. Um, they had aggressively targeted

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 1>the gen Z vote. Um. Alongside them, you had you know,

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Congresswoman AOC gaining lots of traction and attention by playing

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:36.120
<v Speaker 1>video games with famous gamers. The Biden campaign took took

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>ads out in Animal Crossing and yes, seventy two hours

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 1>before the vote. Believe it or not, the Biden campaign

0:03:44.120 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>did a customized map in the game of Fortnite four

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:49.720
<v Speaker 1>years ago, if you had extra money to burn for

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 1>four days before a vote, you'd take out an hour

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>of primetime on NBC. This time, they took over a

0:03:57.200 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 1>map in Fortnite, and I think that just shows you, um,

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:03.280
<v Speaker 1>where this is going. So, Adrian, I'm looking at a

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 1>chart of your stock and again the symbol for your

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>company e g l X is the ticker kind of

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 1>over the trillion, twelve months, not much going on until

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 1>November and then it goes from you know, roughly a

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 1>dollar up to eight. Did you guys get caught up

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 1>in that meme trading kind of frenzy? I don't think so. Um, certainly,

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 1>much to artist's appointment, we don't seem to have a

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:28.279
<v Speaker 1>whole lot of followers yet in those US based reddit forums,

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:31.480
<v Speaker 1>like like the other memes stocks do. I think people

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 1>we were telling people for the longest time we have

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 1>three hundred million monthly visitors to our platform, um, and

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 1>I think at some point that started to register and

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 1>people started to understand the power and the rarity of

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:51.120
<v Speaker 1>our platform. And then shortly thereafter, Enthusiast Gaming was added

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 1>to the list of the calm score one hundred, which

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:56.680
<v Speaker 1>is the list of the hundred largest Internet properties in America.

0:04:57.279 --> 0:04:59.919
<v Speaker 1>And alongside Twitch, which is owned by Amazon, as you know,

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:04.039
<v Speaker 1>it's it's the only gaming platform to be on that list.

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:06.039
<v Speaker 1>So I think people kind of woke up and said,

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe what these guys are telling us is is the

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 1>real deal. And of course last week you had that

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 1>share offering eight million shares price a little lower than

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:17.599
<v Speaker 1>where your stockrustrating at the time. Do you plan to

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 1>continue to raise capital or issue shares in that way

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 1>going forward? Yeah, we see in front of us, we

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:30.279
<v Speaker 1>see an incredible opportunity to aggregate and consolidate more and

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 1>more of these fan communities, the digital fan communities um

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:37.359
<v Speaker 1>AND and fan communities in all shapes and sizes are

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:39.280
<v Speaker 1>are going to be, in our opinion, are going to

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 1>be more valuable. Uh, certainly as as third party data

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:47.160
<v Speaker 1>becomes harder and harder to access and privacy revolution uh

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:50.280
<v Speaker 1>sweeps the Internet. And so we want to aggregate as

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:53.279
<v Speaker 1>many of these fan communities and in many ways were

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 1>looked at because we're a gaming company as as an

0:05:56.800 --> 0:05:59.599
<v Speaker 1>acquirer of choice. So we want to press that advantage

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 1>um AND and continual access to capital from great shareholders.

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Helps us do that, Adrian, give us a sense for

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:10.279
<v Speaker 1>people don't know kind of how you guys generate revenue.

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Is it advertising as it events? Is I know e

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 1>sports are going part of the business. Give us a

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 1>sense of how you guys at your company generate revenue. Sure. Well, again,

0:06:19.920 --> 0:06:23.040
<v Speaker 1>very difficult. Corporate America of the corporate world is pulling

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:24.880
<v Speaker 1>their hair out trying to figure out how to get

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:27.160
<v Speaker 1>in front of gen Z's and how to get gen

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:29.680
<v Speaker 1>zs to pay attention to them. So when you when

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:32.359
<v Speaker 1>you reach three million of them, sixty million in the

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 1>US alone. UM. We we sell a lot of advertising,

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of digital advertising UM. And we were encouraged

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 1>today to read in the journal that that's expected to

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:45.359
<v Speaker 1>increase this year. So so that's a good sign. But

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 1>we sell a lot of advertising UM. And the other thing,

0:06:48.880 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 1>we're starting to sell more and more and more of

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:55.480
<v Speaker 1>his subscriptions and freemium content. UM. We've built a business

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>around avid video gamers, and avid gamers will pay extra

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 1>for extra content, and so these premium offerings, we've seen

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>our subscribers double year over year UH, and we're looking

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 1>at more and more subscription packages to offer UH content

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 1>licensing is starting to become a significant growth area for us.

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>It seems every O T T platform in the world

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 1>wants more and more gaming content. So we're putting our

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>channel channels on SAM some of the smart TVs UM

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 1>and then we're going to migrate to e commerce and

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>social networking and all those sorts of things. Lots of

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 1>areas to grow. It's a fast growing segment of consumer

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 1>spending for Shore. Adrian Montgomery, CEO of Enthusiast Gaming, they

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 1>have the largest gaming media platform in North America. This

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:53.320
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg. Let's dive into the high yield market. Ken Monahan,

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 1>He's co had a global high yield for a MUNDI

0:07:56.000 --> 0:08:00.120
<v Speaker 1>about two trillion dollars in assets under management. So they

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 1>do a treat or too, I think every day. Ken,

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much for joining us here. Looking at the

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 1>high old market, it's been a risk on market for

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 1>a long time. Is there any juice left there? Or

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 1>am I just clipping coupons on my high yield piece

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 1>of paper? You know, Paul, it's a good question. I

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 1>think the answer is you're right. Is it has been

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:21.119
<v Speaker 1>a risk on market for a year plus now, after

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 1>obviously a big fade in uh In in March of

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 1>last year. UM, so we're up quite substantially and spreads

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 1>her back to pretty close to tight levels. UM. You know,

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:33.680
<v Speaker 1>I think we think they can get a little tighter

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:36.440
<v Speaker 1>from here, not dramatically, um, but they can still get

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 1>a little tighter from where they are UM. And I

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 1>think that there's a couple of reasons for that. In particular,

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 1>if you have to recognize that the marketplaces, even over

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the last eighteen months, has become increasingly double B centric.

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 1>A lot of that came from downgrades, but the quality

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 1>of the markets improved, and that would argue that spreads

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:57.600
<v Speaker 1>a little tighter, tighter than two basis points for high yield,

0:08:57.679 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 1>that that is something right there. But of worse, what

0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 1>has driven spreads in part to be this tight from

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 1>where they blew out last March was the FED and

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the fact that the FED said, hey, I got your back.

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:12.600
<v Speaker 1>We're going to have this corporate credit facility that's unwinding. Now,

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 1>what's the impact of that. You know, I think that

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the Fed's decision just stepped into the high yield market

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:22.080
<v Speaker 1>was important at that point in time and obviously provided

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:24.320
<v Speaker 1>a flora not only for high yield but for other

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:27.320
<v Speaker 1>asset classes at the same time. Um, So that was

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 1>critical at that juncture, but I don't think it's been

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 1>critical for the last hand, for the months or even quarters.

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that the economy is momentum on its own,

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:39.839
<v Speaker 1>is supporting in the direction of spreads. So can again,

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the FED has been supporting, you know, providing liquidity for

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:47.560
<v Speaker 1>this marketplace, and I guess that's resulted in credit quality.

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's been much better than I would have expected. Certainly,

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, fifteen months into this pandemic, is it potentially

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 1>masking Is the FED support potentially masking credit quality issues

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:01.080
<v Speaker 1>that the high market's going to have to deal with

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 1>at some point? You know, there's there's a there's an

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 1>ideal here there that's coming to marketplace that you kind

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 1>of raise your eyebrows at. Um. You can see that

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:12.360
<v Speaker 1>there's maybe a little bit more coming to market and

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:15.440
<v Speaker 1>triple cs, but it's on the margin. It's I would

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:17.560
<v Speaker 1>tell you, by and large, most of the credit quality

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:19.439
<v Speaker 1>of the things that have been coming to market are

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty reasonable. Now, we could argue about pricing whether you're

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:24.080
<v Speaker 1>getting paid for the risk, but in terms of the

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 1>credit risk itself, it's not all that it's not it's

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:29.319
<v Speaker 1>not all that sour UM And the other thing I

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>think you need to look at is um and we've

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:34.199
<v Speaker 1>had an explosion of issuance this year. We're running in

0:10:34.200 --> 0:10:37.520
<v Speaker 1>a record pace and a lot of that relates to refinancing.

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:40.400
<v Speaker 1>So companies are making use of the low rates for

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:43.560
<v Speaker 1>treasuries and then the low spreads for credit to to

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:47.200
<v Speaker 1>refinance their debt, even refinancing their term loans. Yeah, and

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:49.800
<v Speaker 1>just borrow because it's cheap to do so. So why not,

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:54.079
<v Speaker 1>right exactly, you were talking about triple cs there in

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the issue as we've seen, but we've also seen outperformance

0:10:56.679 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 1>in that risky is debt. What do you chalk that

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 1>up to? Way, I like to think if you look

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 1>at it was obviously on its on its rear end

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 1>last year and particular in the first quarter and to

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 1>a certain extent in the second quarter as well, so

0:11:08.520 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a recovery from that. In addition, I

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>think that there's been a level of of cleansing that's

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:18.080
<v Speaker 1>taken place in the triple V space, particularly if you

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 1>look at energy um SO, a lot of the more

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:24.559
<v Speaker 1>problematic companies in the energy sector UM filed last year

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:27.440
<v Speaker 1>and I think so that cleansing process really allowed spreads

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 1>to tighten and gave the triple sea markets winded. It's

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 1>back can talk to us about the funds flows into

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the high yield space. Our investors still keen that they

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:41.080
<v Speaker 1>can get some return in hiotas or is money going

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 1>perhaps even farther out on the re spectrum. Well, you know,

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that's interesting to look at because if you look at

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the high yield marketplace, you would see then as it

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 1>relates to mutual funds, which is let's say about a

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:54.439
<v Speaker 1>quarter of the market high yield funds, whether you're looking

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:57.679
<v Speaker 1>at actively managed ones which we're focused on, or ets,

0:11:57.760 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 1>there's been outflows, um, not in warm as outflows, but

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 1>there's been outlaws pretty much eaching every week this year.

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Um and uh it amounts to not insignificant amount. But

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 1>I would argue if you look what's happening on the

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:14.120
<v Speaker 1>other side, is it's clear that there are other buyers

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>in the market. So who's buying I think that their

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:19.839
<v Speaker 1>crossover investors in particular that are coming in and that's

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:22.240
<v Speaker 1>really been the big support of the market. And I

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 1>think the reason for that is if you look at

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 1>where triple bees are. They're trading at very tight levels.

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:30.199
<v Speaker 1>And if you look at the spread relationship between triple

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 1>bes and double bes in particular, those are much closer

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 1>to historic averages than they are historic tights, and I

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:38.840
<v Speaker 1>think that that's been very supportive of flows. Can we

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 1>only have about thirty seconds left, but if we get

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:43.200
<v Speaker 1>a hawkish surprise from the Fed on Wednesday, what's the

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:48.320
<v Speaker 1>read through to credit? Well, let's let's recognize that, you know,

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:51.160
<v Speaker 1>the the on the high yill side, we're talking about

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 1>bonds with a duration that's half of that of an

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:57.440
<v Speaker 1>investment grade, So does it not um the investment grade

0:12:57.440 --> 0:13:00.160
<v Speaker 1>market on its rear end? Potentially it has much more

0:13:00.200 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 1>negative impact though on i G. Than it does on

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:05.080
<v Speaker 1>high yields. So that I think that that's our viue

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:07.520
<v Speaker 1>as to what moment if that in fact happens. That's

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:11.560
<v Speaker 1>very ratrically all right, Ken, Thanks, We appreciate you coming

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:13.719
<v Speaker 1>on as always giving us the latest on the high

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 1>yield market. Ken Monahan, co head of Global high Yield

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 1>at a mundy U s Uh, that's interesting question because

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have you know, is a market you think

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 1>expecting anything like that? It's not priced for it right now,

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at a ten year yield at one point

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 1>for eight percent. That to me looks like it's expecting

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 1>a devish. That's right, right, that would be consistent what

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess the rhetoric we're certainly getting from the FED historically. Well,

0:13:38.600 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 1>during the pandemic, it just seems like we're all buying

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 1>more online Amazon boxes. As far as the hi can see.

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 1>You see the Amazon Prime trucks all over the place. Um,

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 1>but that raises the issue not just for Amazon, but

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 1>for all e tailing, and that's counterfeit. It's been big

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 1>in the luxury market. What's happened here during the pandemic?

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Ronya set Home, she's managing partner I've set Home Law Group.

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 1>She joins us here. Ronnie, thanks so much for joining us, UM,

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:10.320
<v Speaker 1>talk to us about counterfeit luxury goods. I know it's

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:13.959
<v Speaker 1>always been an issue for e commerce. Kind of where

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 1>are we today? First? Thank you so much for having

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 1>me on the show today. Well, the luxury space is

0:14:21.520 --> 0:14:26.239
<v Speaker 1>quite fascinating when it comes to counterfeiting, particularly on Amazon.

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:31.360
<v Speaker 1>And what I find of particular interest is that the

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:35.920
<v Speaker 1>counterfeit items on Amazon are sometimes double the M S

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 1>R P. In the store. So I just think that

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 1>UH is very fascinating and someone should study why individuals

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 1>are purchasing items for more money on Amazon. Is it

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:55.080
<v Speaker 1>just convenience or is it something else? I have no idea. Well,

0:14:55.120 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 1>I Ranya must summit. I am a convenience shopper and

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I probably get six Amazon packages a week. How would

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I know if I'm buying something counterfeit? That is a

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:08.240
<v Speaker 1>great question. So there are two things that consumers can do.

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:12.520
<v Speaker 1>And I do purchase some items on Amazon, but not

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 1>all items on Amazon. And this is what I do.

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Whether I want to buy a luxury good or I

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:20.800
<v Speaker 1>want to buy a consumer good like christ tooth taste

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 1>or whichever tooth taste you like. The first thing I

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 1>do is determine whether or not those items are actually

0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 1>for sale on the Amazon site. UM with the permission

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 1>of the brand. At the bottom of several UM brand

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 1>name websites, there's something called stockists or find us, and

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 1>it'll lift it out for you. So, for example, HP,

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 1>very well known brand, if you go to the HV website,

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 1>it does tell you that there are real Amazon products,

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 1>real products of Amazon Amazon, and that might give you

0:15:56.760 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 1>some comfort, and it should but the biggest problem them

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 1>with buying anything on Amazon is that if it is

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 1>fulfilled by Amazon, it means that the legitimate product is

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>sitting in a warehouse with fake products, and you don't

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 1>know which product you're going to get. Even worse, when

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:19.640
<v Speaker 1>you see, uh the reviews for the product, it's for

0:16:19.720 --> 0:16:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the product, not for the product from this particular seller.

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 1>So consumers are at a disadvantage. What I customarily tell

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 1>people is, first check the price doesn't make sense in

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 1>comparison to the brand name that you know. Secondarily, you know,

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 1>check the reviews. If everyone loves the review and it's

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 1>thousands of people, you're probably buying an authentic product. And

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 1>then third you know, ask yourself, does it make sense

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:52.600
<v Speaker 1>that this product would be on Amazon? So run you.

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 1>When someone finds themselves the victim of counterfeit, what recourse

0:16:57.440 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 1>do they have to say Amazon? Well, Amazon does have

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:07.639
<v Speaker 1>a very generous refund policy, and I think that's what

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 1>they've been hanging their hat on as that term is

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 1>used to them. I think, again, this is just an

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:16.880
<v Speaker 1>educated guess. If you can get a refund, the really

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:19.720
<v Speaker 1>really isn't that much of an issue. But the problem

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 1>is that some of the items that you're purchasing, not

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the luxury ones, but the consumer good products. Some of

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>them can harm you, and the refund may not be enough,

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, depending on what it is you're suffering from

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the purchase of the counterfeit good So it's just refunding

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:39.119
<v Speaker 1>isn't enough. How can Amazon get a better handle on this?

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 1>What do they need to do? I think it would

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:45.639
<v Speaker 1>be a very helpful if there was an easy way

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 1>for consumers to report UH fake goods or counterfeit goods

0:17:50.320 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 1>to Amazon. Right now, they are listening to the brands,

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 1>which means you would have to call the brand and

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 1>you'd have to tell the brand as a consumer, oh,

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I purchased a fraudulent item from Ammazon, and then they

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:03.360
<v Speaker 1>need to investigate, and then the brand needs to work

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 1>with Amazon. That UH takes a lot of effort. It

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 1>would be great if there was a mechanism for consumers

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:13.000
<v Speaker 1>to go directly to Amazon and have their voice heard. That's,

0:18:13.080 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, the first thing. The second thing would be

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 1>UH allow us to purchase items that are not just

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:23.480
<v Speaker 1>fulfilled by Amazon. So we know if ABC seller is

0:18:23.480 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 1>selling this, and we've had you know, good experience with

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:30.199
<v Speaker 1>ABC seller, we know, we're getting ABC sellers product as

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 1>opposed to a random product in the warehouse. So ron

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:35.320
<v Speaker 1>you just give us a sense of Like on the

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:37.960
<v Speaker 1>luxury side, I'm always shocked at people would buy a

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:40.720
<v Speaker 1>luxury item, you know, worth thousands or tens of thousands

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:43.399
<v Speaker 1>of dollars without actually seeing it. But is this a

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 1>growing part of e commerce? I think that it is,

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 1>And I think what's happening is that some of the

0:18:49.920 --> 0:18:53.680
<v Speaker 1>luxury brands are so well known that the consumer likely

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:57.359
<v Speaker 1>already saw the product at some point in time, and

0:18:57.560 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 1>they remember it and they're still pining for it, and

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 1>then there it is on Amazon and they purchase it.

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 1>There's no need to to look any further. Fascinating story, Ronna,

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:11.439
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. Really appreciate that this

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:14.800
<v Speaker 1>is a I guess a big issue, Kaylene. People spend

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:17.879
<v Speaker 1>more and more time online shopping online, and you know

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 1>online has just grown dramatically over the past fifteen months,

0:19:20.760 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of pool maybe three years of growth forward that

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 1>this can be a bigger issue. Yeah. Now I'm going

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 1>to go home and check all the products on Amazon

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:31.200
<v Speaker 1>over the last six months or so exactly, Ronne said,

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:33.719
<v Speaker 1>Home managing partner for said, Home Wall Group joining us there,

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:36.919
<v Speaker 1>and we appreciate that. Again, Uh, we've seen this at

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, the e commerce traffic just skyrocket and as

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 1>everybody when they were forced to stay at home, buying

0:19:42.920 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 1>more and more uh products, different types of products than

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:49.359
<v Speaker 1>perhaps they were comfortable buying in the past, all because

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 1>of the pandemic, but a big change to retail. We'll

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:59.880
<v Speaker 1>have more coming up. This is Bloomberg when the pandemic hit.

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 1>One of the areas of the economy that was hit,

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:06.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, probably just so hard and so brutally was

0:20:06.880 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the real estate market what we had. Obviously, if we

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:13.159
<v Speaker 1>can all remember back, people leaving cities looking for the burbs,

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 1>looking for more room, uh, looking just to get away

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 1>from the congestion and the uh, you know, the density

0:20:19.680 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 1>of the cities. The question is how long term uh

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:24.679
<v Speaker 1>is that. Let's check in with Brad Dillman. He's a

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 1>chief economist for the real estate firm Courtland. Brad, thanks

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:30.200
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us here. Again here in New

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 1>York City, we saw it firsthand, people leaving uh the

0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 1>city for the suburbs. Rents plunged. If you want to

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:41.680
<v Speaker 1>get an apartment in the city, it was a good time, uh,

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:43.639
<v Speaker 1>to be a renter. Give us a sense of how

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 1>you think this market is going to play out as

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 1>we come out to the other side of this pandemic. Yeah, definitely,

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:52.480
<v Speaker 1>and I'm glad to be here. You know. I think

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 1>we need to first recognize that this is a trend

0:20:54.320 --> 0:20:57.399
<v Speaker 1>that was occurring prior to the pandemic. The pandemic, of course,

0:20:57.440 --> 0:21:00.520
<v Speaker 1>accentuated it. It is something that we see across markets.

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 1>We see a migration from more expensive markets too cheaper

0:21:04.000 --> 0:21:06.480
<v Speaker 1>metropolitan areas, and then also within these markets from the

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:09.560
<v Speaker 1>core out to the geographic periphery. So in many ways,

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:12.359
<v Speaker 1>it's trends been underway since two thousand twelve. If you

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:15.000
<v Speaker 1>look at pricing, it really is kind of compressing across

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:16.879
<v Speaker 1>the spectrum in some ways. And I mean that between

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 1>markets and also within markets. So when we look ahead,

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:21.440
<v Speaker 1>some people would say, hey, you know, maybe this is

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:23.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna reverse. People are going to come back into the city.

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:27.040
<v Speaker 1>The reality is there doesn't seem to be that much supply.

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:29.919
<v Speaker 1>The bulk of multifamily supply, as an example, is in

0:21:29.960 --> 0:21:31.359
<v Speaker 1>the urban core. But if you look at it in

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 1>terms of units, it's really not enough to really move

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:36.720
<v Speaker 1>the needle in an under house market. Again, You've got

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 1>estimates that the US is under built to the tune

0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 1>of about a million housing units are more? Are we

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:43.919
<v Speaker 1>going to see that supply and demand gap narrow at

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:47.159
<v Speaker 1>any point? I think we will if we were to.

0:21:47.240 --> 0:21:49.640
<v Speaker 1>If we look at our gauges of of cumulative under

0:21:49.680 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 1>supply right now, it does look like we hit peak

0:21:51.640 --> 0:21:53.679
<v Speaker 1>under supply a few years ago. And then as we

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 1>see these excellent prints and things like housing starts, uh,

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, particularly on the single family side, that this

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:02.000
<v Speaker 1>country's housing situation and will slowly right size from a

0:22:02.040 --> 0:22:05.960
<v Speaker 1>supply demand perspective. You know. One of the things Brad,

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:08.040
<v Speaker 1>that I think I've learned over the last several years,

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:11.680
<v Speaker 1>and we talked to folks in the home business, is yes,

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:13.639
<v Speaker 1>new homes are getting built, but they're not getting built

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 1>for the entry buyer, the first time buyer, and that's

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:20.399
<v Speaker 1>really where the supply issues are. Is that changing at

0:22:20.400 --> 0:22:23.000
<v Speaker 1>all or a builders still going for them the higher

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:27.639
<v Speaker 1>margin McMansion. Well, builders are always going to switch their strategies,

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, based on on short term fluctuations. Believe it

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 1>or not. They are actually little more nimble than we

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:34.720
<v Speaker 1>would think. I think if We're looking at millennials, for example,

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:36.520
<v Speaker 1>and just the age that they already are with the

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:39.720
<v Speaker 1>vast bulk over thirty. Um, you know, the buyer the

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the home builders are going to have to shift their

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:45.440
<v Speaker 1>strategy at different times based on where where not only

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 1>costs are coming in, but also where mortgage rates are

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 1>going for where and when these millennials are able to buy.

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:52.959
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know if I would call it make

0:22:52.960 --> 0:22:54.879
<v Speaker 1>a systematic call on that kind of shift. I do

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:58.240
<v Speaker 1>think you look at smaller oscillations that define that kind

0:22:58.280 --> 0:23:01.439
<v Speaker 1>of uh strategy on the part of homebuilders. Yeah, I'm

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 1>in here guiltily raising my hand as a millennial who

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 1>is nowhere close to buying my first home. So how

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:08.919
<v Speaker 1>if I'm a builder, how would you play me? Do

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I need to build for renters? So you do have

0:23:12.760 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 1>home builders building four renters. This was really an opportunity

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 1>that emerged called it five six years ago, but really

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:21.960
<v Speaker 1>only got steam in the last two years. And uh,

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:23.919
<v Speaker 1>I do think there's a strategy there for home builders.

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 1>But I think what they're gonna find is that rather

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 1>than building single filming attached you're gonna slowly actually migrate

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 1>more towards a traditional multi family structure. That's to say,

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:35.440
<v Speaker 1>something like a town home style community where you can

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 1>fit more housing units onto the same into the same

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:40.920
<v Speaker 1>geographic area of the community. I do think there's a

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:42.679
<v Speaker 1>strategy there. I think we're going to see more of it.

0:23:43.119 --> 0:23:44.919
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, when you have really low mortgage

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 1>rates like we do now, we've had very low mortgage

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 1>rates the last two years. It's priced off of a

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:52.400
<v Speaker 1>ten year Treasury rate that's negative and real terms, there

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 1>is the occasional opportunity to deliver in scale to first

0:23:56.080 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 1>time home buyers or just you know, new buyers in general.

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:01.679
<v Speaker 1>You know, out here in the New York metro market,

0:24:01.720 --> 0:24:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the story is Florida, Florida, Florida. It seems like everybody

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:08.640
<v Speaker 1>is leaving for Florida. What are some of the other

0:24:09.480 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 1>I guess hot areas of the country that you're seeing

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 1>in terms of demand both for rentals and ownership. Yeah,

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:19.119
<v Speaker 1>Florida flags well for US UM also. But you know,

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:21.200
<v Speaker 1>an area that's been a little bit overlooked has actually

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 1>been the Northwest, and not just the Seattle Cascadia, but

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:29.200
<v Speaker 1>really the peripheral northwest Idaho. So you've got Spokane, Washington,

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and Eastern Washington, You've got Boise. These are markets that

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:34.200
<v Speaker 1>are looking really attractive right now. So I think we're

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna see a little bit more focused on that area.

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 1>I do know that there's some smaller homebuilders really focusing

0:24:38.640 --> 0:24:40.919
<v Speaker 1>on places like Cort Lane. Uh. And of course these

0:24:40.960 --> 0:24:44.399
<v Speaker 1>areas are supported by excellent migration out of California. But

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:47.520
<v Speaker 1>if we get that migration and more people are going there,

0:24:47.560 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 1>how long is the cost of living that makes it

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:54.120
<v Speaker 1>so attractive actually going to stay relatively lower. That's exactly

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the point. It really is converging very quickly. If you're

0:24:57.119 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 1>a local in those markets. This is in many respects

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:01.960
<v Speaker 1>that does us or four years as people bring kind

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:05.440
<v Speaker 1>of California purchasing power, you know to Boise, Idaho, it's

0:25:05.440 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>a it's a bit tough tough if you've been, you know,

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:09.639
<v Speaker 1>living and working in Boise on a Boise income and

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:12.960
<v Speaker 1>saving a Boise rates. So we don't know. I think

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:15.359
<v Speaker 1>that the clearest indication that we do have is just

0:25:15.400 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 1>how long it's going to take to right size the

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:21.159
<v Speaker 1>overall supply environment in this country. If we're undersupplied by

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:24.119
<v Speaker 1>about a million units, that's my estimate. There's other estimates

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 1>out there. It's going to take about four or five

0:25:26.119 --> 0:25:29.360
<v Speaker 1>years to right size the overall market, and until that happens,

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:31.480
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna see a continued flight of people to the

0:25:31.520 --> 0:25:34.959
<v Speaker 1>periphery until such times that things like you know, energy

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:36.920
<v Speaker 1>shocks or things like this drive them back into the

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:38.879
<v Speaker 1>city when commute to become too arduous. But if we

0:25:38.920 --> 0:25:41.159
<v Speaker 1>can see right now, commute truly aren't the issue, as

0:25:41.160 --> 0:25:43.200
<v Speaker 1>people can work from home more and that kind of

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:45.880
<v Speaker 1>trend is only going to support movement to the periphery.

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, Bratt, thanks so much for joining us to

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 1>really appreciate getting your perspective on the residential real estate market. Renters, buyers, worthy,

0:25:54.800 --> 0:25:58.159
<v Speaker 1>growth is um and you know, interesting to see how

0:25:58.160 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 1>this plays out as would come out on the other

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:04.159
<v Speaker 1>side of this pandemic. Uh, what will the market look like?

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 1>And Uh, it's gonna be interest to see which markets

0:26:06.119 --> 0:26:07.920
<v Speaker 1>do well and which lag Brad Delman, he's a chief

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 1>economist for Courtland giving us an update there. This is Bloomberg.

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 1>subscribe and listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller I'm on Twitter

0:26:24.359 --> 0:26:27.840
<v Speaker 1>at Matt Miller three. Put on fall Sweeney I'm on

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at pt Sweeney Before the podcast. You can always

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:32.920
<v Speaker 1>catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio