WEBVTT - 2018 Open Championship Preview

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to the Fridagg Podcast and Open Championship Week.

0:00:05.960 --> 0:00:08.799
<v Speaker 1>This week's podcast and open coverage is brought to you

0:00:08.840 --> 0:00:12.040
<v Speaker 1>by our friends at Greater Than. Greater Than is the

0:00:12.080 --> 0:00:15.080
<v Speaker 1>healthiest sports drink on the market and delivers two times

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>of electrolytes with half the sugars of their leading competition.

0:00:19.520 --> 0:00:22.759
<v Speaker 1>It's my favorite sports drink to have while on or

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:26.239
<v Speaker 1>off the course. Check out Greater Than at drinkgt dot

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 1>com and use the promo code the fried Egg with

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 1>no Spaces to get twenty percent off your first order.

0:00:33.040 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>The easiest way to get Greater Than and the way

0:00:35.440 --> 0:00:37.880
<v Speaker 1>I get it is to sign up for their subscription

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 1>service gets delivered monthly and if you sign up this week,

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>you will get a free Fridagg hat with your subscription.

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:49.240
<v Speaker 1>That's drinkgt dot com and without any further delay, here's

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:52.479
<v Speaker 1>our open preview with Sean Martin and Brendan Porath.

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 2>The fried Egg requires a different technique. What you need

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 2>to do is actually square face, so they'll dig down

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 2>underneath that bad lie and propel that mall right out

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 2>onto the green.

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:07.320
<v Speaker 3>Here's the thing.

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 4>Playing out of a buried lion of bunker is completely

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 4>different than playing out of a nice clean lion of

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 4>green side bunker. You need to be aggressive on any

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:19.399
<v Speaker 4>show weather it's sitting cleanly for its Friday Egg. Well

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:23.039
<v Speaker 4>we've all faithd it redreaded Frida Egg not to be

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:25.280
<v Speaker 4>feared though it's actually a pretty easy shot to hit.

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Ladies and gentlemen, Welcome back to another edition of the

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Friday Egg Podcast. Today I am joined by Brendan Porath

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 1>of esp Nation and Sean Martin of the PGA Tour

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:53.840
<v Speaker 1>to break down this week's Open Championship. Welcome on, guys, Andy,

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Am I having us back?

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 4>Am I your first international guest in Friday history?

0:01:58.560 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Sean Martin coming from Live on the ground. But now

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 1>we've had international guests. We've had Mike Clayton from Australia.

0:02:08.080 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, that's Richie rams Richie Ramsey from from Scotland.

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So nice to you to be able to get

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:16.959
<v Speaker 3>out of an airport terminal for this one.

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:23.359
<v Speaker 4>Sure, yeah, you know, have it fit you in. I've

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:28.639
<v Speaker 4>been here for nine days so I'm well Scottish life,

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:29.680
<v Speaker 4>ask me anything.

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, you're you're respecting audio, you know this is

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:39.800
<v Speaker 1>this is a rare appearance for you, not in an

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 1>either a media center or airport.

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I hate the.

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 4>Sound on my own voice, so I haven't listened back

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 4>to the shinnacog one, but I definitely kind of want

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 4>to just to hear what that that airport sounded like

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 4>in that podcast.

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:56.639
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, only psychotic thinge people listen to the podcasts they're

0:02:56.680 --> 0:02:57.959
<v Speaker 3>on or a video.

0:02:58.520 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 4>I don't know how people do it.

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:02.079
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you have to have a be psychotic.

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 1>So Sean, how is it as baked out as everybody's saying?

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 1>What to give us some reporting from the ground? What

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:14.840
<v Speaker 1>can you tell us it is?

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:17.079
<v Speaker 4>And we got some little sprinkles this morning, so I

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 4>think and Tiger kind of talked about that we're we're

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 4>not quite at the point where we were. There was

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:26.240
<v Speaker 4>talk of like DJ driving it into the burn on eighteen,

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:28.360
<v Speaker 4>which is four hundred and fifty yards, but you're still

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 4>you're getting guys talking about hitting three three thirty. I

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 4>mean it's rolling outever, I mean it's gonna be the

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 4>story of this open. There should be if you're having

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 4>your open bingo or open drinking game. I think hoy

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 4>Lake or Liverpool definitely has to feature prominently on the board.

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 4>There's gonna be tons of comparisons to that, A lot

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 4>of hope for people who want to see Tiger Wayne

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 4>that he can kind of repeat that performance, and so

0:03:52.120 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 4>there are a lot of similarities there. I think that

0:03:54.040 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 4>you can see a lot of irons off the t's.

0:03:56.240 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 4>You might see you guys not hit driver at all

0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 4>for the week. Definitely a lot depends on the wind too.

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 4>Of sharing the train home with a caddy, and he

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 4>was talking about how downwin the Paul just it does

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 4>launch once it hits the faraway, but really, if you're

0:04:09.960 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 4>into even a little bit of wind, it really holds

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 4>it up pretty well and it doesn't roll nearly as much.

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:17.039
<v Speaker 4>And I don't have my exact wind gauge on me,

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 4>but I feel like walking around some days in the

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 4>morning and the afternoon, the wind does switching up where

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:24.160
<v Speaker 4>holes can play down win in the morning and into

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 4>win in the afternoon. So it's just there's a lot

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 4>of variables. Of players are always are of the Open Championship,

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 4>and I think that's definitely gonna be part of it

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:31.839
<v Speaker 4>this week.

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the weather looks pretty good for the week, so

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:37.919
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't I mean, from what I've seen, it doesn't

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 1>look like there's going to be one of those crazy

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:44.479
<v Speaker 1>Open Championship days yet, but with you know, pretty good

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:49.680
<v Speaker 1>weather conditions, it you might escape that possibility of one

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:54.479
<v Speaker 1>side of a draw getting like an unbelievably huge advantage

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>over the other side.

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we don't have a lot of win in the forecast.

0:04:57.720 --> 0:05:00.120
<v Speaker 4>I think like fifteen miles an hours the most, and

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:03.840
<v Speaker 4>then Friday a little like occasional rain as they put

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:05.599
<v Speaker 4>it in the mornings about the extent of the rain.

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 4>So it's gonna be good for ice cream sales, it's

0:05:07.880 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 4>gonna be good for equity of the draw, so it

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 4>should be a pretty good, well runded Open Championship.

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:16.600
<v Speaker 1>So Brendan, what are you what are you watching for?

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:19.599
<v Speaker 1>Do you have any random facts you remember from the

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 1>last time they open was at Carnoustie.

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 3>Also, huh, I don't know. I'm trying to think you

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 3>want like random drama or random beefs. I think the

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:33.919
<v Speaker 3>thing I loved most about the last time at carnelis

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 3>do is Rory's outfit. You know, I got the scripting,

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 3>but he was, you know, amateur the time. He's doing

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:45.839
<v Speaker 3>the deep V neck button up cardigan, you know, with

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 3>the floppy hair. It's just interesting. To think about how

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 3>far we've come in only eleven years and now he's

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 3>kind of the ripped guy and the the Nike blade

0:05:57.160 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 3>collars and the assortment of athletic gear.

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:03.559
<v Speaker 1>That was your favorite version of Rory Fat Rory.

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:07.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it was like he was like pudgy Rory, kind

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:10.359
<v Speaker 3>of on his way out of fat Rory. Really a

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:15.280
<v Speaker 3>nice medium, happy medium there so hadn't quite hadn't quite

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, he hadn't turned pro yet and made the

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:19.600
<v Speaker 3>money to kind of plump up, you know. It was

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 3>just kind of innocent, pudgy, amateur Rory.

0:06:23.160 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 1>So while we're talking about Rory, what do you guys think,

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 1>do you think he's got got majors? And I mean,

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:32.919
<v Speaker 1>is the putter that big of a problem?

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:40.719
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, man, I still have a little bitk

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 4>was so jarring. I mean, he was out the USA

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 4>was basically over for him at like am Thursday. We

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 4>were all riding that high of he wins at bay

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 4>Hill and he plays the fund group with the Masters

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 4>and obviously very heartbreaking loss, but uh had played well

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:58.440
<v Speaker 4>for the most part and then just comes out at

0:06:58.480 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 4>Chinnacock and it's just I mean, was he nine over

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 4>after nine ten over after ten, it was he was jarring,

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 4>and you know, I mean the Rory story is always

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 4>always plays well in soft conditions, and I just feel

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 4>like that exacerbated that storyline because it was firm as

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 4>fast and it was a very early ejection that I

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 4>just I can't recover from it yet, and I can't

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 4>quite take him this week.

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 1>His his putter at Travelers now two years in a

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 1>row has been insane how poor it has been. It

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:32.600
<v Speaker 1>must be something about those greens, because like, what was

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 1>it last year he went through three putter changes in

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 1>a week, and then this year he was I think

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 1>seventy second in strokes gain putting for the week, and

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 1>you know he's by far, like I think he was

0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 1>three shots clear the next person in strokes gain tee

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 1>to green. So I don't know, it's it's just a

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 1>matter everything kind of coming together. But if he puts

0:07:56.400 --> 0:07:59.239
<v Speaker 1>field average, he's going to be in the top five,

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:03.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, yep, it's just getting him to put field average.

0:08:04.880 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I don't know. I guess my discussion of his

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 3>sweater brought us here, But yeah, I just think he's

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 3>kind of a I don't know, not a bit player.

0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 3>He never is, but he's just like a part of

0:08:15.760 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 3>the crowd this week, I would say, I'm not like

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 3>I think, you know, obviously there's always he's one of

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 3>the top ten players in the world, there's always the

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 3>potential for him to contend.

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 5>I just I don't know that he's putting well enough.

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 3>He seems like he's working through a lot of different

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 3>things and trying to go back to a there's like

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:38.200
<v Speaker 3>more natural swaying. He talks about oh nine, you know

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 3>fat Rory Sway. You know, things aren't always bad when

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 3>he got some extra weight on you. So yeah, it

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:47.319
<v Speaker 3>seems like he's just kind of trying to figure out

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:49.680
<v Speaker 3>some things. So I think he's just kind of part

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:53.320
<v Speaker 3>of a larger group that's worth talking. Maybe maybe not

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:55.680
<v Speaker 3>sticking out as much as he does that you know,

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 3>the Masters where we have that natural storyline we always

0:08:58.160 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 3>want to talk about and some of the others.

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:05.840
<v Speaker 1>What storyline are you guys watching, Like, what storyline are

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:09.560
<v Speaker 1>you buying most this week? Which is your favorite one?

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:11.439
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead?

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 4>Sol non Hideki division. I do love that that Hideki

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:24.680
<v Speaker 4>Tiger Rueknox pairing. I'm all in on Russell Knox. The

0:09:24.760 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 4>last Scottish win in the Open came at Carnoustie in

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 4>nineteen ninety nine. Two of the last three Scottish winners

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 4>were at Carnoustie. I just think a guy who is

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:34.680
<v Speaker 4>playing very well, is on a good run of form,

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:37.240
<v Speaker 4>he hits it dead straight and the course is going

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:41.960
<v Speaker 4>to play short. I just have high hopes for Rude Knox.

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 4>I know it's not like one of the major storylines.

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:46.960
<v Speaker 4>We're getting pretty off topic here. We're gonna start talking

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:50.839
<v Speaker 4>about probably the Eastern Amateur next or something. But I'm

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 4>in on that, and I think I've been on Brooks.

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 4>I think, I mean Shinnacock was firm and fast, and

0:09:55.040 --> 0:09:57.840
<v Speaker 4>I think winning at Shinnacock. I don't know that Brooks

0:09:57.840 --> 0:10:00.319
<v Speaker 4>ever doubted his ability, is full of confidence, but I

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 4>think winning at Shinnecock I think showed all of us

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 4>a lot, and I would think showed him a lot

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 4>too that I mean, he already knew he could play majors.

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 4>It's now eleven straight majors, where twenty first are better.

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 4>But I mean, I feel like, if it's really firm,

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:14.240
<v Speaker 4>really fast, we saw what Brooks did at Shinnacock, I

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:15.680
<v Speaker 4>think it's gonna be all about iron and play, and

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:19.439
<v Speaker 4>I think, you know, I think Brooks is a name

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 4>to watch, and if he did, that'd be three majors.

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:27.400
<v Speaker 1>I feel like the firm conditions might mitigate distance a little.

0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 1>In the distance advantage, I think you'll see. I mean,

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:35.960
<v Speaker 1>guy like Zach Johnson all of a sudden has a chance.

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I love Molinari with the way he's playing. But what

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:45.119
<v Speaker 1>about Hideki No no top ten since Hawaii.

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Caddy changed this week apparently too. According to my

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 4>friends in the Japanese media, it's a little shake up

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 4>in Campadecki trying to mix things up a little bit.

0:10:56.200 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, I you know, he had the heartbreaking

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:02.319
<v Speaker 4>loss of the PGA. Any of the wrist injury risk

0:11:02.360 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 4>injuries are hard to come back from, shaking confidence from

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:08.080
<v Speaker 4>the PGA, and I could see, I could just see,

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 4>you know. It's just it's been a dark time in

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 4>Hideki land. But I do. I like Molinari a lot

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 4>and knocks. Both those guys hated so dead straight, but

0:11:17.960 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 4>as firm as is too. Any sidesman on the ball

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:24.199
<v Speaker 4>and the ball's gonna bounce anywhere. So Rue and Francesco

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:26.120
<v Speaker 4>to the hottest players in the world, and really to

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:28.320
<v Speaker 4>the straightest players in the world, so I'm also all

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 4>in on those picks.

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think the biggest story, you know we're

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:36.080
<v Speaker 3>sitting here on Tuesday, is gonna be the course and

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:37.680
<v Speaker 3>is the course. And it's hard to say that with

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 3>Tiger in the field too, but I just I think,

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 3>like in all the lead up days, this is just

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 3>so extreme and different from what we're used to, even

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 3>for the Open and and like I hate to play

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 3>into the line of baked out. Baked out. Yeah, you're

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 3>gonna hear that every three minutes, and you're gonna hear

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 3>every synonym for it used throughout the weekend.

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:00.560
<v Speaker 5>I just I'm like fast by it.

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm fascinated by seeing the best in the world try

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 3>and play it, figure out how to play it. Seems

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 3>like we're getting. For me, like the biggest storyline is

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 3>that there seems to be a really clear cut, like

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 3>divergence of strategies. We hear Rory and DJ and Ron

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:19.080
<v Speaker 3>and some of these other big hitters saying like, well,

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 3>it's burned out. The burned out effect for them is

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 3>that the rough is now whispy and they could they

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 3>feel like they can play out of it. That may

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:31.679
<v Speaker 3>be kind of a I don't know, a poor strategy,

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:34.839
<v Speaker 3>but that's the way they're thinking. So they're gonna vomit

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 3>over everything, and and they're not worried about missing, you know,

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:41.480
<v Speaker 3>the fairway. You know, of course there are different parts

0:12:41.520 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 3>of missing miss fairways that are worse than others, but

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:46.840
<v Speaker 3>they just feel like the burned outness of it has

0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:52.559
<v Speaker 3>has made it more of a bomber's a bomber's paradise,

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 3>I guess this week. And then there's the other other

0:12:56.320 --> 0:13:00.200
<v Speaker 3>track of you know, strategy, like a speed saying I'm

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:02.439
<v Speaker 3>just gonna you know, growler thinks I can just hit

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 3>floor irons all day, and you know, I just really

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 3>find that so fascinating. We don't we don't see this.

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 3>We don't see a course deliberately like this so often

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:15.320
<v Speaker 3>and the way it's really and there seems to be

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:18.040
<v Speaker 3>no uniform response to how to play it.

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think Carnousti's been known as the toughest Open

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Championship course for a long time, one of the toughest

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:28.960
<v Speaker 1>venues in all of golf in it and it kind

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 1>of is that way because of how narrow it is.

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:35.080
<v Speaker 1>But you know, with the distance thing in it being

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 1>thinner in the in the wispy long stuff that actually

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:41.839
<v Speaker 1>might you know, take some of the teeth out of

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 1>the the golf course where I you know, remember growing

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:49.319
<v Speaker 1>up watching at Carneuci like ninety nine, like yeah, that

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:52.560
<v Speaker 1>if you missed the fairway was just dead. And and

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:55.559
<v Speaker 1>if it's a little bit thinner and it's going to

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 1>be a little more unpredictable. But at the end of

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the day, I think when you've got a wedge in

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:02.360
<v Speaker 1>your hand, is going to I mean, it's a lot

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 1>less you know, challenging, and it's the longest golf course

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 1>in the open rod to and obviously the firm conditions

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 1>will make it play much much much shorter. So I mean,

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 1>I imagine with the with what I've been seeing, the course

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 1>is you know, seventy four hundred yards probably playing sixty

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 1>eight sixty seven hundred yards and if you you know,

0:14:23.200 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 1>adjusted it for how firm and fast it is, right Sean, Yeah.

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 4>The thing that kind of helps with the whole bomb

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 4>and Gouge mentality is that the greens are very green.

0:14:33.120 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 4>They've kept them very healthy. You know, I think we

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 4>saw St. Andrews in twenty fifteen. What happens if they

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 4>get the greens a little too speedy, then all of

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 4>a sudden, you know, twenty twenty five miles wind ghost

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 4>comes and which isn't too uncommon here and you got

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 4>to stop play. So that'll take out some of the

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:53.040
<v Speaker 4>necessity to play to angles. But I talked to Russell today,

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 4>Russell Knox, and he said he thinks that angles are

0:14:57.520 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 4>going to be big this week, and that Carnousti, you know,

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 4>walking around today, it's the way it's bunkered. There's always

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 4>seems to be two A lot of times there's two

0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 4>sets of bunkers that you might be able to carry one,

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 4>but then you're bringing the other one into play, and

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 4>guys might be able to do what Speed did last year,

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 4>where you're intentionally aiming at the rough because you know,

0:15:16.120 --> 0:15:18.680
<v Speaker 4>the rough is maybe a quarter shot penalty, maybe even less,

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 4>while as a pop bunker, especially here where they seem

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 4>to be the deepest pop bunkers I've ever seen at

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:25.800
<v Speaker 4>a links course, is maybe a one shot penalty or

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 4>at least three quarters of a shot. But I don't know.

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 4>You just you can't roll around this place without abandon

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 4>even with the rough being wispy, you know, Russell talked

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 4>about a really experienced links player. He thinks he is

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 4>going to win here when you look. You know podrig

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:45.160
<v Speaker 4>One here, he's a links player. Paul Lourie from Scotland

0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 4>one here. I think four of the seven winners here

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 4>have been from the British Isles. Tom Watson won here.

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 4>He was a master of links. So I think that

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 4>I don't know. I don't think Carnoustie, even in these conditions,

0:15:57.800 --> 0:16:00.480
<v Speaker 4>allows guys to just kind of play with a punity.

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 4>I think that you'll see a lot of driving irons

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:07.240
<v Speaker 4>and I don't know, I just it seem it seemed

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 4>hard for me. I'm not one of the top players

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 4>in the world. It seems hard for me to walking

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 4>around today to just see opportunities for guys to just

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 4>blow it all over the place.

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, what I'm kind of watching and

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 1>what I've been thinking about a little bit is you know,

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 1>we've had all the slew of first time major winners,

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:26.600
<v Speaker 1>and obviously Brooks has been kind of the first of

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 1>that crop to get the second major title, like we

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 1>have Dustin john You look at down the world rankings,

0:16:33.320 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Dustin Johnson, Justin Thomas, Justin Rose, top three players all

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:40.440
<v Speaker 1>only have one major championship. Then you go, you know,

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 1>you've got Jason Day, You've got Patrick Reid, you've got

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Henrik Stenson, Sergio all all first time you know, one

0:16:50.640 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 1>time major winners. And I think there's a big, you know,

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for these guys to you know, separate themselves and

0:16:57.280 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 1>put them into another pantheon with a second major win.

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 1>And what you were just describing made me kind of

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:04.919
<v Speaker 1>think of like, you know, great links player that has

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:06.800
<v Speaker 1>won an Open Championship is Sergia.

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, uh, Sergio a little runner up here, you know,

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:16.400
<v Speaker 4>seven little heartbreak. But also to go like go back

0:17:16.400 --> 0:17:19.359
<v Speaker 4>to the stats, Uh, five of the seven winners here

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:20.919
<v Speaker 4>in the Hall of Fame, and that doesn't include pottery

0:17:20.920 --> 0:17:22.879
<v Speaker 4>who's going to get in? So basically six of the

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:26.400
<v Speaker 4>seven players who've won here Hall of famers. I think,

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:27.800
<v Speaker 4>I think when we had a class winner. So I

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 4>think that kind of falls into what you're saying.

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:33.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm a big Copka kopka guy. Again, I can't you know,

0:17:33.720 --> 0:17:35.400
<v Speaker 3>I don't know that I'll pick him back to back,

0:17:35.440 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 3>but uh, from from a Link standpoint, I kind of

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:42.679
<v Speaker 3>like Fleetwood. He seems, you know, based on what we

0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 3>saw at Shinnecock. I don't know if he's like as linksy.

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 1>A player, as like a course record holder at yep yep,

0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:54.400
<v Speaker 1>but obviously a different, different kind of course that keep

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:56.240
<v Speaker 1>saying that you'll hear that once or twice.

0:17:56.800 --> 0:18:00.240
<v Speaker 3>Uh yeah, I think of the euro group, fleet was

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:02.720
<v Speaker 3>kind of that's not really a trendy ear of a

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:04.600
<v Speaker 3>dark horse pick, but he's the.

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:06.639
<v Speaker 5>One guy like on the English side.

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:09.399
<v Speaker 3>And Knox, I mean, I've seen you've been tweeting all

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 3>week about Russell Knox Sean and they took you, you know,

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:14.879
<v Speaker 3>less than ten minutes to get into him today, but

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 3>you know, it's kind of hard to ignore his form

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 3>really through that like role X Series Ron and and everything,

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, the links the links portion of the schedule.

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:27.159
<v Speaker 3>So I think I think Knox and Fleetwood are my

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 3>two favorite Euros.

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:33.199
<v Speaker 1>So we got a question from Kyle Davis, who who's

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:37.359
<v Speaker 1>asked is the Open the best overall major when you

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 1>take into consideration TV coverage, road of courses, the RNA

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:45.159
<v Speaker 1>setup and you know, just links golf all that comes

0:18:45.160 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 1>with it. What do you guys think about that?

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 3>It is for me and I wrote this a couple

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:54.399
<v Speaker 3>of years ago and kind of reheat it and update

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 3>it every year. I don't know what what I think

0:18:58.560 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 3>the modern Open, and.

0:18:59.800 --> 0:19:03.400
<v Speaker 5>I'll i'll say maybe the last decade.

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 3>Has really branded itself really well. I just think it's

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:11.159
<v Speaker 3>really distinct and my and this is this is a

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:14.440
<v Speaker 3>personal opinion. So my personal interaction with this championship just

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 3>seems more meaningful than others. I don't know why. Like

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:20.480
<v Speaker 3>I just feel like I remember more often of like

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:23.360
<v Speaker 3>where I was and remember taking it in more when

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:26.359
<v Speaker 3>it was whatever Tiger in two thousand and five, or

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 3>Tiger in two thousand, or you know Phill in twenty thirteen,

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 3>Rory in twenty fourteen. I just remember more about My

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:38.840
<v Speaker 3>personal interaction with this tournament just feels extra special. I

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:41.919
<v Speaker 3>like all the others too. I love the Masters, I

0:19:42.000 --> 0:19:44.359
<v Speaker 3>love the US Open for a very different reason than this.

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:49.639
<v Speaker 3>But I don't I don't. I think just there's so

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 3>many things about this that TV coverage, this time change,

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:55.440
<v Speaker 3>which I think is really really fun for a US

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 3>audience for one week a year, it's not fun. This

0:19:58.080 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 3>isn't something we want to do, right Liarly. I think

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 3>it's that's I think that actually plays into the identity

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:08.679
<v Speaker 3>of the tournament for US audience, and then obviously just

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:11.919
<v Speaker 3>a style of golf. It's so refreshing. We're going to

0:20:11.960 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 3>Bellery in three weeks or whatever. It's just it's nice

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:17.919
<v Speaker 3>to know that you can rely on this and this

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 3>may be a kind of a you know this, this

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:25.399
<v Speaker 3>may be even an extreme case for firm and fast,

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:28.879
<v Speaker 3>but you just know the visual of it is going

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:30.919
<v Speaker 3>to be so different from from what we're used to

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 3>and and I just think like the way it's really

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:36.880
<v Speaker 3>the RNA has branded it over the last decade. They're

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:41.439
<v Speaker 3>very very consistent and specific and clean, and I just

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 3>think that they put on the best championship.

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:46.639
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. I mean I grew up in California, so I

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:48.959
<v Speaker 4>think you know, your final group was teamed off at

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:52.679
<v Speaker 4>like seven am, and so it was pretty awesome. It

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:54.280
<v Speaker 4>was so early. I mean, you can watch the whole

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 4>thing and then you know it's over by like before

0:20:56.560 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 4>noon you go play golf. So I always have fond

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 4>memories of of that kind of it's cool too because

0:21:02.480 --> 0:21:05.359
<v Speaker 4>you can get up early and just watch the golf

0:21:05.400 --> 0:21:07.199
<v Speaker 4>and kind of curl up on the couch. And I

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:09.879
<v Speaker 4>definitely have a lot of fun memories of that, and

0:21:10.560 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 4>at least golf is so unique. Tiger today was like

0:21:13.080 --> 0:21:17.359
<v Speaker 4>beaming talking about how he played Carnoustie when he played

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 4>as an amateur in the Scottish Open, and talking about

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:22.720
<v Speaker 4>how he spent two hours just hitting all these different

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 4>clubs to the one hundred yards sign and he putted

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 4>from eighty yards and I mean it was like the

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:29.480
<v Speaker 4>biggest smile I mean that I've seen on his face

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:32.200
<v Speaker 4>and maybe ever. I think part of that was just

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:34.440
<v Speaker 4>kind of recalling his youth and time with his dad

0:21:34.480 --> 0:21:37.720
<v Speaker 4>and back when golf was a more innocent pursuit and

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:40.840
<v Speaker 4>he wasn't being hounded by everyone and everyone's snapping photos

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 4>of him with cell phone cameras and stuff. But I

0:21:43.600 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 4>think also just you know, you tweeted the thing that

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:49.199
<v Speaker 4>he had from Chronicles of an Open Champion, and I

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 4>think people like just like seeing that challenge and like

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 4>playing in that challenge. It's just so different. It's so

0:21:56.880 --> 0:21:59.480
<v Speaker 4>unique that Yeah, I think the uniqueness of it, I

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 4>think it's awesome.

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:05.359
<v Speaker 3>I'd strongly recommend going and finding that clip of Tiger.

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:07.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure it's on like golf channel dot com or

0:22:07.760 --> 0:22:12.200
<v Speaker 3>someplace like that that has the press conferences. The Tiger

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:14.880
<v Speaker 3>talking about that was first time at Carnoustie, which is

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:20.680
<v Speaker 3>what ninety five no, yeah, yeah, in an amateur event.

0:22:20.760 --> 0:22:23.000
<v Speaker 3>It just hitting too that one hundred meters sign. He's like,

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:25.120
<v Speaker 3>I just stayed there for two hours. I hit nine

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:28.280
<v Speaker 3>irons to it, I hit five irons, I hit wedges

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:30.560
<v Speaker 3>to it. It's just and my dad is like, are

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:32.680
<v Speaker 3>you ever going to hit it past one hundred meters sign?

0:22:32.680 --> 0:22:35.159
<v Speaker 3>He's like, no, this is so much fun. And he

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 3>was just smiling the whole time. And I think he

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:39.359
<v Speaker 3>went on a soliloquy for I don't know, like three

0:22:39.400 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 3>minutes just talking about it. I just would strongly recommend.

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 3>I know I'm kind of restating what Sean said, but

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:46.679
<v Speaker 3>I would strongly recommend, just just because there was so

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:50.600
<v Speaker 3>much context. It's like facial expressions and smiling around it was.

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:53.640
<v Speaker 3>It was really cool to hear him talk about the style. Yeah.

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 1>I think the Open is another example of why variety

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 1>is so important for off like whether it be the

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:04.240
<v Speaker 1>type of golf you're playing, or you know, the type

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:06.680
<v Speaker 1>of players on a leader board, or you know, even

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:09.199
<v Speaker 1>a golf course within a golf course having variety, but

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 1>you know the Open Championship gives us a completely different

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:17.119
<v Speaker 1>look and feel from every other tournament that we, you know,

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:21.640
<v Speaker 1>as Americans are conditioned to watch. And if you look

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:24.360
<v Speaker 1>at the last you know, I was talking with Will

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Knights too, who writes for the site, and he does

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:31.200
<v Speaker 1>these you know, ranking the last ten, you know, ranking

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the last decade pieces for majors, and we were talking

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:37.200
<v Speaker 1>about the Open Championship and just like how many memorable

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 1>ones there have been. I mean last year you had

0:23:39.119 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, Jordan yelling at Grell or go get that.

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:45.119
<v Speaker 1>But then the year before you had this Stinton Michelson Duel.

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:48.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean you have like, you know, Zach Johnson, Leishman

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and Oustaysan in a playoff the year before that at

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:54.359
<v Speaker 1>Saint Andrews. But then you had like Stuart Sink and

0:23:54.440 --> 0:23:57.879
<v Speaker 1>Tom Watson going at it well you know, like maybe

0:23:57.880 --> 0:24:00.439
<v Speaker 1>one of the most memorable Opens, and you know you

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:03.959
<v Speaker 1>had Philip Mirfield that was a great Open. Like in

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the last decade, you know, there have been so many

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:10.399
<v Speaker 1>great Open Championships, and I think more so than every

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 1>other tournament, they've been the most memorable tournament and memorable

0:24:14.080 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 1>tournament of recent memory.

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:20.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I just and for like different reasons. I feel like,

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:24.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, the last decade, they's just like I was saying,

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:25.399
<v Speaker 3>my personal interaction with it.

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:27.160
<v Speaker 5>I just remember so much about each one.

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:30.959
<v Speaker 3>Like Phil, there was like that triumphalism of just feeling

0:24:31.000 --> 0:24:32.640
<v Speaker 3>like I just played the best round of my golf,

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:34.680
<v Speaker 3>the best round of my life, and it kind of

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:37.000
<v Speaker 3>came out of nowhere. That wasn't like a ton of hype.

0:24:37.080 --> 0:24:39.040
<v Speaker 3>He was in, you know, one of the last four

0:24:39.080 --> 0:24:41.359
<v Speaker 3>or five groups and it just happened and then all

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:43.160
<v Speaker 3>of a sudden it was over. You know, he wasn't

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 3>even in the coverage until like the like ninth hole,

0:24:46.920 --> 0:24:48.640
<v Speaker 3>and all of a sudden, you know, two hours later

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 3>he played the round of his life. And so often

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:52.639
<v Speaker 3>with Phil, there's so much hype and build up in

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:56.639
<v Speaker 3>a full day. And Rory was different. You know, Rory

0:24:56.720 --> 0:24:59.240
<v Speaker 3>was great, you know more because of like it was

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:02.680
<v Speaker 3>the full pack of Rory. He was hitting freaking lasers,

0:25:02.720 --> 0:25:05.399
<v Speaker 3>you know, five irons into par five and making eagle,

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 3>and it was so different, Like it was the dominance

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:10.159
<v Speaker 3>of Rory that we thought was going to be like

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:14.199
<v Speaker 3>the number one, you know, the post Tiger player. I

0:25:14.240 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 3>just feel like this and you're talking about sink first

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:19.960
<v Speaker 3>time Watson or the year after, its speed kind of

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 3>challenging for the Slam, and somehow Zack Johnson went, there's

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:26.440
<v Speaker 3>just like it's memorable for a lot of different reasons,

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:29.120
<v Speaker 3>and it's been on kind of an incredible run, which

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 3>kind of scares me also that we're due for kind

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:34.520
<v Speaker 3>of a dud or a flop winner.

0:25:34.680 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 1>So so from r J tapist, could we see the

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:45.359
<v Speaker 1>firmness that Carnussie make it play to point where minus

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 1>fifteen is a winning score? You know, we all know

0:25:48.960 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 1>power doesn't matter, but could it make Carnoussie easier.

0:25:55.680 --> 0:25:56.240
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:25:56.880 --> 0:26:00.479
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I'm still over the mindset that it's going

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:02.119
<v Speaker 4>to be a higher winning score.

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:03.240
<v Speaker 3>I don't.

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:06.919
<v Speaker 4>I mean Pottery shots seven under, when the place was

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:10.960
<v Speaker 4>basically almost winless, it was damp, it was playing about

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:12.879
<v Speaker 4>as easy as it can in seven under one. I

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:15.560
<v Speaker 4>just think, I mean, this is a very unique set

0:26:15.600 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 4>of circumstances, but the layout is just tough enough that

0:26:19.320 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 4>I think even with this it's it'll stand up.

0:26:24.880 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think I saw it today. The over under

0:26:32.160 --> 0:26:35.120
<v Speaker 3>for low round is what sixty three and a half? Yeah?

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:36.920
<v Speaker 4>I think you tweeted those and immediately want to reply

0:26:37.000 --> 0:26:40.240
<v Speaker 4>over in all caps on everything, just over everything.

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:45.160
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I saw them an email. I think people are expecting,

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:49.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, someone to go super low. I don't know

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 3>if you can back that up to two days in

0:26:52.320 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 3>a row or post you know, four mid sixties und

0:26:56.359 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 3>high sixties rounds. I say that, but it just seems

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:03.159
<v Speaker 3>like everyone's expecting this to be ani.

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the fact that the greens are kind of soft.

0:27:06.160 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 1>But I think I feel like those greens could bake

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 1>out real quick. I mean, and actually one of the

0:27:12.000 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 1>difficult things is if if those fairways are as firm

0:27:16.840 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 1>as everybody's saying, so they're really firm fairways. If the

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:22.399
<v Speaker 1>greens are soft, those are actually really tough conditions to

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 1>play in. Is when you've got a lot of inconsistency

0:27:25.359 --> 0:27:29.040
<v Speaker 1>between the faraway and the green, and I think, yeah,

0:27:29.119 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I have a hard time seeing you know, sixteen seventeen under.

0:27:33.160 --> 0:27:37.960
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, if anything with the low wind, sunny,

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:41.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, good conditions like this would be the year

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:46.280
<v Speaker 1>that that would happen. Granted part doesn't really matter, you know, right,

0:27:46.960 --> 0:27:52.480
<v Speaker 1>So what about the burn naming water features? Do you

0:27:52.520 --> 0:27:56.960
<v Speaker 1>know this comes from Barry W You guys think it's overrated, underrated,

0:27:57.000 --> 0:28:01.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, the barry Burn Rays Creek.

0:28:00.880 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 4>Mean I'm in I mean just because it's not like

0:28:03.600 --> 0:28:06.359
<v Speaker 4>someone came along and like named these for like a postcard,

0:28:06.520 --> 0:28:09.120
<v Speaker 4>like they're historical bodies of water. It's not like they

0:28:09.240 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 4>just this wasn't like a branding exercise. There's a town

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:17.320
<v Speaker 4>of Bury nearby the Burry Mill. It's water wheel is

0:28:17.400 --> 0:28:19.879
<v Speaker 4>powered by the Barry Burn. So it's not like, you know,

0:28:20.080 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 4>just some marketer came by and it was like, all right,

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:26.720
<v Speaker 4>we need to name this burn after Manilo or Bonds

0:28:26.840 --> 0:28:30.359
<v Speaker 4>or Sanders. It's just I don't know, I don't You

0:28:30.400 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 4>can't criticize a historic water monument that was probably around

0:28:33.359 --> 0:28:34.160
<v Speaker 4>before the golf course.

0:28:34.760 --> 0:28:37.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think it's it's it's fine, it's underrated if

0:28:38.240 --> 0:28:42.160
<v Speaker 3>the thing's been there forever. It's not you know, some

0:28:42.200 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 3>sort of you know, live under par activation or something

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 3>like that.

0:28:46.680 --> 0:28:48.480
<v Speaker 4>Plus how good is it that the thing is twelve

0:28:48.520 --> 0:28:51.600
<v Speaker 4>feet wide and it just it messes with people so much,

0:28:51.680 --> 0:28:53.800
<v Speaker 4>like it's you feel like you could jump across it

0:28:53.880 --> 0:28:56.400
<v Speaker 4>if you've got a running start, and yet it plays

0:28:56.440 --> 0:29:00.120
<v Speaker 4>a huge, a huge part and you're thinking on on

0:29:00.320 --> 0:29:02.920
<v Speaker 4>several holes and a lot of great golf courses do that.

0:29:03.000 --> 0:29:05.840
<v Speaker 4>I think Cal Club has a great creek on one

0:29:05.880 --> 0:29:07.520
<v Speaker 4>of the holes and just shows you don't need a

0:29:07.560 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 4>giant pond with a fountain. You can have a great

0:29:09.600 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 4>hazard that's twelve feet wide.

0:29:11.680 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 3>So how many times does it cross?

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it's three times on eighteen alone, right.

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:24.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So it kind of first, the course kind of

0:29:24.160 --> 0:29:25.880
<v Speaker 4>goes along the perimeter of the property. This is not

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:29.160
<v Speaker 4>like a traditional out and back linx. It goes around

0:29:29.240 --> 0:29:31.200
<v Speaker 4>basically the square of the property for the most part,

0:29:31.240 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 4>and then on the inside is the other course, the

0:29:32.880 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 4>burn side, And so you kind of see it on ten.

0:29:36.760 --> 0:29:38.920
<v Speaker 4>It's not really in play. Ten's a pretty short hole

0:29:40.320 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 4>and it's short, it's short enough from the green that's

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:44.239
<v Speaker 4>not really be in play, but you basically see it.

0:29:44.560 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 4>You first see it kind of left of sixteen, which

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:47.960
<v Speaker 4>is a two hundred and fifty yard par three that

0:29:48.000 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 4>you're trying to squeeze like a ferry wood in between

0:29:50.040 --> 0:29:53.720
<v Speaker 4>two huge bunkers that are fifteen yards apart, and the

0:29:53.760 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 4>hole just looks impossible, but really as seventeen when comes

0:29:56.440 --> 0:30:00.320
<v Speaker 4>into play, it the thing is like a snake goes

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 4>up the left it goes in front of the seventeenth

0:30:02.560 --> 0:30:06.040
<v Speaker 4>tee right before the landing area. Then it goes up

0:30:06.080 --> 0:30:08.120
<v Speaker 4>the left side, then it crosses again, and so really

0:30:08.640 --> 0:30:10.800
<v Speaker 4>the hole if you go down the left side, I mean,

0:30:10.800 --> 0:30:12.880
<v Speaker 4>the burn's right there and there's basically no rough, and

0:30:12.920 --> 0:30:14.840
<v Speaker 4>you can go in it pretty easily if you want

0:30:14.840 --> 0:30:16.720
<v Speaker 4>to try to hit it up on the hole. The

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:19.240
<v Speaker 4>burn crosses like kind of a diagonal left to right,

0:30:19.280 --> 0:30:21.000
<v Speaker 4>so you can try to squeeze up the right side,

0:30:21.040 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 4>but if you pull it or hook it trying to

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:24.680
<v Speaker 4>squeeze it into that right corner, you can easily go

0:30:24.680 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 4>in the burn. And then eighteen. It's not really in

0:30:28.720 --> 0:30:30.560
<v Speaker 4>play off the tee. You have to really snipe one

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 4>because the rough left of eighteen is really really thick.

0:30:33.400 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 4>It's the by far of the thickest part of the

0:30:34.760 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 4>golf course. I saw Adam Hadwin lose a ball in

0:30:36.840 --> 0:30:41.280
<v Speaker 4>the rough, and so it isn't playing in front of

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:43.320
<v Speaker 4>the green. I forgot. I was watching Golf Channel documentary

0:30:43.360 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 4>on ninety nine that Laurie bounced it over the burn

0:30:47.120 --> 0:30:49.680
<v Speaker 4>and regulation like we talk about Vandervelt and all that stuff,

0:30:49.680 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 4>but Laurie got this humongous break just to get in

0:30:52.800 --> 0:30:53.400
<v Speaker 4>that playoff.

0:30:55.160 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, you know smart and you're on site, so you're

0:30:58.680 --> 0:31:03.720
<v Speaker 1>adjusted to Scottish time. Brendan, what's your what's your schedule? What?

0:31:03.400 --> 0:31:06.360
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about adjusting your schedule this year?

0:31:06.400 --> 0:31:06.560
<v Speaker 4>How?

0:31:06.800 --> 0:31:09.600
<v Speaker 1>I know we we did last year the stay up

0:31:09.640 --> 0:31:12.080
<v Speaker 1>all night thing and that was pretty crazy. But what

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 1>are you planning on this this week?

0:31:14.480 --> 0:31:16.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'm gonna stay out. I mean, I'm gonna be

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:18.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna be ready locked in one thirty a m.

0:31:19.120 --> 0:31:23.959
<v Speaker 3>Eastern on Thursday. But there are many, many, many different

0:31:25.360 --> 0:31:30.840
<v Speaker 3>energy drinks. The strategy, well, that's certainly an aid. There's

0:31:30.920 --> 0:31:33.720
<v Speaker 3>many strategies on how to flip into open time for

0:31:34.640 --> 0:31:38.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, unemployed or oddly employed people who don't have

0:31:38.680 --> 0:31:42.720
<v Speaker 3>any obligations Thursday or Friday. I think the thing to

0:31:42.760 --> 0:31:44.360
<v Speaker 3>do is one of these nights you just have to

0:31:44.400 --> 0:31:48.040
<v Speaker 3>power through and kind of stay up all night and

0:31:48.080 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 3>then like flip and go to bed at like eight

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:56.280
<v Speaker 3>eight pm Scottish time. So like I think usually it's

0:31:56.360 --> 0:31:58.480
<v Speaker 3>usually the thing. Or if you don't have to be working,

0:31:58.600 --> 0:32:01.880
<v Speaker 3>darn it. You know, Wednesday night you pick like you

0:32:02.280 --> 0:32:04.360
<v Speaker 3>go out to late dinner, like ten o'clock.

0:32:04.720 --> 0:32:07.000
<v Speaker 5>Obviously nothing crazy. You don't like go out for.

0:32:07.600 --> 0:32:10.080
<v Speaker 3>Ribs or a bunch of you know pasta that's going

0:32:10.120 --> 0:32:14.000
<v Speaker 3>to knock you out. Uh, go out for light dinner,

0:32:14.040 --> 0:32:19.440
<v Speaker 3>maybe light seafood late Wednesday night, maybe maybe you have

0:32:19.480 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 3>a cocktail or two kind of like you know, start

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:27.600
<v Speaker 3>feeling good and then you just power through Thursday and crash.

0:32:27.920 --> 0:32:30.960
<v Speaker 3>You know, you can switch from cocktails to coffee at

0:32:31.040 --> 0:32:33.640
<v Speaker 3>some point, usually like four or five. You know, you

0:32:33.680 --> 0:32:36.080
<v Speaker 3>get that star power group coming in around four. I

0:32:36.080 --> 0:32:40.720
<v Speaker 3>think this year it's Beef coming on at four. Yeah.

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I think there's another one right behind them too. You

0:32:43.360 --> 0:32:46.800
<v Speaker 1>gotta yeah and uh no Rom and.

0:32:46.920 --> 0:32:52.040
<v Speaker 3>Ricky, Okay, Phil's pretty early phills like at three am.

0:32:52.440 --> 0:32:54.680
<v Speaker 3>You like switch to coffee kind of around that time,

0:32:54.800 --> 0:32:58.880
<v Speaker 3>and you just power through t like early afternoon. So

0:32:59.360 --> 0:33:01.479
<v Speaker 3>here's my just you nap a little when you get

0:33:01.520 --> 0:33:05.320
<v Speaker 3>home from Wednesday, Wednesday work, late dinner Wednesday, A couple

0:33:05.320 --> 0:33:09.960
<v Speaker 3>of cocktails power through you flipped coffee about like four

0:33:10.000 --> 0:33:13.400
<v Speaker 3>o'clock as those big groups come on and you get

0:33:13.480 --> 0:33:17.520
<v Speaker 3>to you know where this is headed. You don't eat heavy.

0:33:17.560 --> 0:33:19.440
<v Speaker 3>You can't be eating heavy. You can't be having this

0:33:19.520 --> 0:33:20.960
<v Speaker 3>big breakfast and all that crap.

0:33:21.360 --> 0:33:24.120
<v Speaker 1>When when do you pop in a monster and what

0:33:24.240 --> 0:33:25.360
<v Speaker 1>flavor do you go with?

0:33:27.320 --> 0:33:34.000
<v Speaker 3>I've been waiting like a casual sipping that's just ever present.

0:33:34.360 --> 0:33:37.240
<v Speaker 3>I think like you you should shotgun on at ten

0:33:37.280 --> 0:33:41.680
<v Speaker 3>am basically like inhale it inhale it at ten am,

0:33:42.000 --> 0:33:44.680
<v Speaker 3>chase it with like an espresso, and then you're good

0:33:44.680 --> 0:33:48.640
<v Speaker 3>to go, man, And then go have a light lunch

0:33:49.120 --> 0:33:52.640
<v Speaker 3>maybe like a like a grilled cheese or something, something light,

0:33:53.000 --> 0:33:56.040
<v Speaker 3>not too heavy on the bread or cheese, and you're good.

0:33:56.120 --> 0:33:58.640
<v Speaker 3>You get to like four or five o'clock, you crash

0:33:58.680 --> 0:34:01.240
<v Speaker 3>around five pm, and you're good for the next three days.

0:34:01.360 --> 0:34:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Do you say goodbye to your wife and kids before

0:34:04.000 --> 0:34:04.479
<v Speaker 1>you do this?

0:34:05.040 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 3>That's understood.

0:34:05.920 --> 0:34:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's Now that we've gotten Brendan's breakdown of his

0:34:10.440 --> 0:34:14.200
<v Speaker 1>recipe for Open Championship success, it's important to point out

0:34:14.239 --> 0:34:17.560
<v Speaker 1>one major flaw, a lack of hydration. One of the

0:34:17.640 --> 0:34:20.840
<v Speaker 1>keys to having energy is staying hydrated, and there's no

0:34:20.960 --> 0:34:23.680
<v Speaker 1>better way to do that than with our Open Championship

0:34:23.719 --> 0:34:27.120
<v Speaker 1>sponsor Greater Than It's a healthy and delicious sports drink

0:34:27.200 --> 0:34:30.760
<v Speaker 1>with two times the electrolytes of his competition buy Greater

0:34:30.840 --> 0:34:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Than at drinkgt dot com and use the promo code

0:34:34.280 --> 0:34:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the fried Egg with No Spaces to get twenty percent

0:34:37.120 --> 0:34:43.800
<v Speaker 1>off your order. Now back to the podcast. And I

0:34:43.840 --> 0:34:46.240
<v Speaker 1>don't know what I'm gonna do this year. I'm probably

0:34:46.280 --> 0:34:49.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna do a super early wake up, probably like a

0:34:50.360 --> 0:34:52.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm probably gonna clock in at four am. You know,

0:34:52.920 --> 0:34:56.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna I'm not gonna go through the all

0:34:56.760 --> 0:35:00.200
<v Speaker 1>night thing. And you know, to be honest, I'm not

0:35:00.239 --> 0:35:03.640
<v Speaker 1>that excited to watch like Sandy lylety Off like doesn't

0:35:03.640 --> 0:35:04.200
<v Speaker 1>do it for me.

0:35:04.560 --> 0:35:08.400
<v Speaker 3>And that's a dirty secret about this. It's it's uh

0:35:08.880 --> 0:35:11.440
<v Speaker 3>like that first year they started it at one thirty,

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:14.440
<v Speaker 3>which is like insanely early even for Scotland, you know,

0:35:14.600 --> 0:35:17.480
<v Speaker 3>like it's insanely early in the actual time zone where

0:35:17.480 --> 0:35:21.279
<v Speaker 3>the Turkey being played, and it was Colin Montgomery at

0:35:21.280 --> 0:35:23.640
<v Speaker 3>truon and all that, you know stuff.

0:35:24.080 --> 0:35:28.200
<v Speaker 5>But like it's kind of quiet until like three or four, like.

0:35:28.400 --> 0:35:31.200
<v Speaker 3>ESP would come on at four o'clock on Thursday and Friday.

0:35:31.320 --> 0:35:33.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm pretty excited about the two to eight

0:35:33.680 --> 0:35:40.680
<v Speaker 1>pairing of Mark Calcavecchia, Dante Boomna and Sean Newis is

0:35:40.719 --> 0:35:42.200
<v Speaker 1>that Norris or newis.

0:35:43.680 --> 0:35:45.560
<v Speaker 4>I think it's Norris, Isn't it?

0:35:45.680 --> 0:35:48.200
<v Speaker 3>Is it?

0:35:48.400 --> 0:35:50.239
<v Speaker 1>I've gotten in front of me. It's spelled with two

0:35:50.280 --> 0:35:55.040
<v Speaker 1>oh's and in one r oh. Really yeah, maybe miss spelled.

0:35:55.080 --> 0:35:55.800
<v Speaker 3>I gotta be honest.

0:35:56.280 --> 0:35:59.080
<v Speaker 4>I might need. They have a different energy drink for

0:35:59.080 --> 0:36:01.760
<v Speaker 4>sale in the in the meat center. It's one sponsored

0:36:01.800 --> 0:36:05.600
<v Speaker 4>by a top ten player in the world. Won't name names,

0:36:05.640 --> 0:36:06.839
<v Speaker 4>but I may need what. I haven't had a good

0:36:06.920 --> 0:36:09.920
<v Speaker 4>night sleep since I got here, the whole not getting

0:36:10.000 --> 0:36:13.279
<v Speaker 4>dark until past ten and then getting lighted at four am.

0:36:14.120 --> 0:36:15.799
<v Speaker 4>It really messed with you. And I'm going about nine

0:36:15.840 --> 0:36:18.800
<v Speaker 4>days now without quality sleep. So I may have to

0:36:18.840 --> 0:36:20.879
<v Speaker 4>follow your own your own plane there.

0:36:21.320 --> 0:36:23.560
<v Speaker 1>What what do you guys think about the pairings for

0:36:23.640 --> 0:36:24.359
<v Speaker 1>the open they?

0:36:24.440 --> 0:36:24.719
<v Speaker 4>What do you?

0:36:25.040 --> 0:36:29.840
<v Speaker 3>Let's see it? I lost you there, Yeah.

0:36:29.680 --> 0:36:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I lost everybody there.

0:36:31.320 --> 0:36:31.560
<v Speaker 3>I was.

0:36:31.680 --> 0:36:33.840
<v Speaker 1>I said, what do you guys think about the pairings

0:36:33.960 --> 0:36:37.040
<v Speaker 1>with the non You know they're kind of stacked but

0:36:37.120 --> 0:36:39.440
<v Speaker 1>not super stacked. Do you like Do you like this?

0:36:42.239 --> 0:36:44.480
<v Speaker 4>I'll go. I liked Kyle's take. I thought Kyle, our

0:36:44.480 --> 0:36:46.839
<v Speaker 4>friend Kyle Porter of CBS, of course, was spot on.

0:36:46.920 --> 0:36:50.959
<v Speaker 4>I think that the kind of two thirds groups where

0:36:50.960 --> 0:36:54.120
<v Speaker 4>it's like two big names, and you know the third

0:36:54.200 --> 0:36:55.960
<v Speaker 4>name that they really could slot in there to make

0:36:56.000 --> 0:37:00.480
<v Speaker 4>it just a super group. They don't go there. Uh,

0:37:01.080 --> 0:37:03.359
<v Speaker 4>they just have two really big names and a lesser one.

0:37:03.400 --> 0:37:05.480
<v Speaker 4>I like that for just the overall flow, especially if

0:37:05.480 --> 0:37:08.320
<v Speaker 4>you're someone like Brendan or you know, you guys getting

0:37:08.360 --> 0:37:10.319
<v Speaker 4>up at like two in the morning. They're kind of

0:37:10.360 --> 0:37:13.480
<v Speaker 4>just sprinkled throughout the tea times. And you know, I

0:37:13.520 --> 0:37:15.320
<v Speaker 4>was going through I did our feature groups file for

0:37:16.520 --> 0:37:20.359
<v Speaker 4>pere dot com and I did like ten groups because

0:37:20.360 --> 0:37:22.880
<v Speaker 4>there were so many that you had to pay attention to.

0:37:22.920 --> 0:37:25.960
<v Speaker 4>And I think that's good for viewing, because yeah, they're sprinkled,

0:37:26.320 --> 0:37:29.680
<v Speaker 4>sprinkled throughout. It's not just really solid, these two solid

0:37:29.680 --> 0:37:31.480
<v Speaker 4>blocks of every big name you can think of.

0:37:31.719 --> 0:37:35.040
<v Speaker 1>What's what's your favorite one, Sean Cintia, Since you went

0:37:35.080 --> 0:37:37.280
<v Speaker 1>through that, I just actually wrote something.

0:37:38.080 --> 0:37:39.839
<v Speaker 4>I've already let my feelings be known. I think it's

0:37:39.840 --> 0:37:41.960
<v Speaker 4>it's definitely Tiger Hideki Knox. Uh.

0:37:42.920 --> 0:37:47.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you know who I'm gonna love watching is read

0:37:47.280 --> 0:37:48.640
<v Speaker 3>Usti Louis.

0:37:49.040 --> 0:37:52.200
<v Speaker 4>And Paul case It's a very classy group.

0:37:53.200 --> 0:37:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Paul Paul Casey something else. I mean I feel

0:37:57.200 --> 0:38:00.080
<v Speaker 1>like he I mean when you start talking about, you know,

0:38:00.880 --> 0:38:03.640
<v Speaker 1>best player without a major, I think he's got to

0:38:03.640 --> 0:38:08.000
<v Speaker 1>be in the mix in the conversation. He's still consistent,

0:38:08.280 --> 0:38:13.320
<v Speaker 1>and I think he's got fifteen top fifteens and majors

0:38:13.520 --> 0:38:14.760
<v Speaker 1>over the course of his career.

0:38:15.120 --> 0:38:15.319
<v Speaker 5>You know.

0:38:15.400 --> 0:38:17.720
<v Speaker 1>The one thing is he's never had like a really

0:38:17.760 --> 0:38:20.319
<v Speaker 1>close close call in a major, like you'd never have

0:38:20.400 --> 0:38:22.920
<v Speaker 1>felt like, well, you know, Paul Casey should have won

0:38:23.040 --> 0:38:26.920
<v Speaker 1>that major like you do with like where Ricky's had

0:38:27.120 --> 0:38:29.600
<v Speaker 1>what he's they had three runner ups, four runner ups

0:38:29.640 --> 0:38:34.080
<v Speaker 1>now and Ousti's had you know, four runners up and

0:38:34.280 --> 0:38:37.279
<v Speaker 1>one in each major, which is pretty incredible. Do you

0:38:37.280 --> 0:38:40.960
<v Speaker 1>guys have any any sleepers outside of Russell Knox Sean

0:38:41.360 --> 0:38:47.120
<v Speaker 1>that you're looking at?

0:38:47.760 --> 0:38:48.920
<v Speaker 4>What do you consider a sleep? Right?

0:38:51.360 --> 0:38:58.040
<v Speaker 3>Sander Showtley is eighty to one? How about I got one?

0:38:59.440 --> 0:39:03.919
<v Speaker 3>Who else is the one? Lee Westwood? Is that a sleep?

0:39:05.160 --> 0:39:06.600
<v Speaker 3>He's barely a golfer anymore.

0:39:07.600 --> 0:39:09.160
<v Speaker 4>Hasney flashed a little form recently?

0:39:09.239 --> 0:39:11.440
<v Speaker 3>Yes, Yes, he's been andy.

0:39:12.320 --> 0:39:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean I I re purchased my foreclothes property on

0:39:17.320 --> 0:39:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Westwood Island recently because he's been really playing well. I

0:39:20.160 --> 0:39:24.239
<v Speaker 1>mean you can see, yeah, since I mean I'm I'm

0:39:24.280 --> 0:39:27.279
<v Speaker 1>working on a sponsorship deal to get some airwest He's

0:39:27.280 --> 0:39:32.040
<v Speaker 1>sent directly to me. But you look at you know,

0:39:32.440 --> 0:39:34.719
<v Speaker 1>you watch his Instagram, you can tell he's been. He's

0:39:34.760 --> 0:39:36.960
<v Speaker 1>been in the gym. He's still eating a ton, he's

0:39:37.000 --> 0:39:39.680
<v Speaker 1>still eating and drinking a ton. But you know he's been.

0:39:39.960 --> 0:39:42.160
<v Speaker 1>He's been practicing a little bit more and he's been

0:39:42.200 --> 0:39:43.960
<v Speaker 1>in the gym a lot. You know, I think there's

0:39:44.000 --> 0:39:47.800
<v Speaker 1>a resurgence here at in the late forties here for Westy,

0:39:48.200 --> 0:39:51.640
<v Speaker 1>And to be honest, this could be the spot for him.

0:39:51.960 --> 0:39:55.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, baked out. You know, he's got he can,

0:39:55.239 --> 0:39:58.200
<v Speaker 1>he's so good tea to green. It's just like a

0:39:58.239 --> 0:40:03.360
<v Speaker 1>matter of just putting okay, you know, just not missing

0:40:03.480 --> 0:40:06.840
<v Speaker 1>so many short putts. You know, I feel like my

0:40:07.800 --> 0:40:11.440
<v Speaker 1>life's been haunted by Lee Westwood missing four footers on

0:40:11.600 --> 0:40:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Saturdays and Sundays. Like I mean, it's just like a

0:40:14.680 --> 0:40:17.920
<v Speaker 1>vivid memory of like, you know how he stands. You know,

0:40:18.120 --> 0:40:23.600
<v Speaker 1>he he's got a distinct posture over a putt. But

0:40:23.680 --> 0:40:26.239
<v Speaker 1>then when he would just shove him right, you know,

0:40:26.320 --> 0:40:29.000
<v Speaker 1>like they'd immediately off the club face, be like right

0:40:29.040 --> 0:40:30.600
<v Speaker 1>of the hole, and you'd be like, oh you missed

0:40:30.640 --> 0:40:32.879
<v Speaker 1>it again, but like the way he would stand over

0:40:32.920 --> 0:40:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the putt like after you know, rolls by the hole

0:40:36.040 --> 0:40:38.760
<v Speaker 1>like you know, it's like the look of a guy

0:40:38.800 --> 0:40:41.240
<v Speaker 1>that knew he had no chance of making that putt,

0:40:41.600 --> 0:40:45.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's, uh, you know, if he could somehow get

0:40:45.200 --> 0:40:47.719
<v Speaker 1>around that, I mean we'd be talking about probably, you know,

0:40:47.880 --> 0:40:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the second best player of this generation.

0:40:51.239 --> 0:40:56.160
<v Speaker 4>Oh wow, what about the big Kiwi Ryan Fox?

0:40:57.360 --> 0:40:58.520
<v Speaker 1>That guy pounds the ball.

0:40:59.160 --> 0:41:01.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think he's like the son of a rugby

0:41:01.760 --> 0:41:02.680
<v Speaker 4>player or something.

0:41:03.040 --> 0:41:06.120
<v Speaker 3>He's built like a rick ship house.

0:41:07.680 --> 0:41:13.000
<v Speaker 4>He's one hundred the Irish Open obviously, uh so, and

0:41:13.040 --> 0:41:15.400
<v Speaker 4>then t six at Scottish Opens, so playing the links.

0:41:15.400 --> 0:41:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, what about Paul Dunn, Yeah, I didn't even is

0:41:20.200 --> 0:41:23.560
<v Speaker 1>in the field that. Yeah, he's kind of d like

0:41:23.600 --> 0:41:26.719
<v Speaker 1>a sneaky like really good year. You know, I know

0:41:26.800 --> 0:41:29.680
<v Speaker 1>he's on on the bubble of Ryder Cup team. But

0:41:29.719 --> 0:41:31.440
<v Speaker 1>then I mean you're talking about a guy that was

0:41:31.440 --> 0:41:35.360
<v Speaker 1>in the final group as an amateur and an open,

0:41:35.480 --> 0:41:37.680
<v Speaker 1>So I think he could be a sleeper.

0:41:38.200 --> 0:41:41.080
<v Speaker 3>I think you Lion's one hundred and fifty to one.

0:41:41.080 --> 0:41:42.799
<v Speaker 5>What do you think of him?

0:41:42.800 --> 0:41:45.759
<v Speaker 4>Class player? I like it. Actually, I was like, I'm

0:41:45.800 --> 0:41:47.919
<v Speaker 4>shocked at eighty to one. Is Rafa carbrera.

0:41:47.640 --> 0:41:51.640
<v Speaker 3>Bao too high.

0:41:51.680 --> 0:41:53.440
<v Speaker 4>I think that's it. I would I'd hop on that

0:41:53.480 --> 0:41:54.040
<v Speaker 4>in a second.

0:41:54.280 --> 0:41:55.759
<v Speaker 3>That's why. Yeah, he's like the.

0:41:55.920 --> 0:41:57.560
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah, I'm not a big odds guy. I've only

0:41:57.600 --> 0:41:59.239
<v Speaker 4>hopped on golf odds for the first time. We've done

0:41:59.280 --> 0:42:00.880
<v Speaker 4>all this, so, uh.

0:42:02.000 --> 0:42:07.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, I kind of like as the resurgent Danny Willett. Yeah,

0:42:07.440 --> 0:42:12.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, everybody left him for dead. He's he's back busy.

0:42:12.680 --> 0:42:14.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I don't I feel like he falls

0:42:14.680 --> 0:42:17.479
<v Speaker 1>into this bucket of like guys that, like really good

0:42:17.480 --> 0:42:20.600
<v Speaker 1>players that have gone through like the doul Drums, one

0:42:20.640 --> 0:42:23.600
<v Speaker 1>of which is Westy. I mean Westy went through like

0:42:23.680 --> 0:42:26.319
<v Speaker 1>a two year period where he completely lost it in

0:42:26.360 --> 0:42:29.040
<v Speaker 1>like the what was it the early two thousands, and

0:42:29.080 --> 0:42:32.880
<v Speaker 1>then Henrik Stenson, I mean Stenson had the legit Shanks

0:42:32.880 --> 0:42:36.120
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years ago, and uh and will It's

0:42:36.160 --> 0:42:38.680
<v Speaker 1>just the latest of it. I mean, I don't think

0:42:38.760 --> 0:42:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Smiley Kauffman's coming back from it, but I think, you know,

0:42:41.400 --> 0:42:45.480
<v Speaker 1>will it will It is coming back. He's not He's

0:42:45.560 --> 0:42:46.520
<v Speaker 1>a great player.

0:42:47.320 --> 0:42:49.799
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he was number one amateur in the world at

0:42:49.800 --> 0:42:50.719
<v Speaker 3>one point, he just.

0:42:50.719 --> 0:42:54.040
<v Speaker 5>Had injury and you know, swing changes and all sorts

0:42:54.080 --> 0:42:54.719
<v Speaker 5>of issue.

0:42:54.960 --> 0:42:55.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:42:55.239 --> 0:42:58.440
<v Speaker 4>I think the barn Rat the Barbara's kind of advancing

0:42:58.520 --> 0:43:00.960
<v Speaker 4>past just being like an internet nomenon, Like he's not

0:43:01.040 --> 0:43:03.560
<v Speaker 4>just a giant who babes and drives porsches. Like he's

0:43:03.560 --> 0:43:06.319
<v Speaker 4>actually played pretty well at some big events this year.

0:43:07.400 --> 0:43:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I like that. I like the barn Rat too.

0:43:09.600 --> 0:43:11.920
<v Speaker 1>He's he's he's got a tough pairing though, I just

0:43:12.080 --> 0:43:14.799
<v Speaker 1>I I like the barn Rat, but I don't like

0:43:14.880 --> 0:43:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the high profile pairing he's in. I feel like that

0:43:17.480 --> 0:43:21.880
<v Speaker 1>that hinders his chances. Sure, it's a I like olisen

0:43:22.000 --> 0:43:27.160
<v Speaker 1>to the Thunderbear. Yeah, he's uh, you know, the only

0:43:27.200 --> 0:43:29.839
<v Speaker 1>reason I know how to do those the lines through

0:43:29.880 --> 0:43:33.600
<v Speaker 1>an oh is because of him and on a keyboard.

0:43:34.120 --> 0:43:36.640
<v Speaker 1>But I like him. He's been I think he's got

0:43:36.760 --> 0:43:40.680
<v Speaker 1>top tens and three of his last five events and

0:43:40.920 --> 0:43:41.759
<v Speaker 1>one of them is a win.

0:43:42.239 --> 0:43:44.200
<v Speaker 4>So that's like a quarter of the field. Now we're

0:43:44.239 --> 0:43:45.879
<v Speaker 4>really I mean, we'll pretty much just pick a winner

0:43:45.880 --> 0:43:46.640
<v Speaker 4>if we just keep going.

0:43:46.800 --> 0:43:50.240
<v Speaker 1>I do who's so, who's your winner? If you ships

0:43:50.239 --> 0:43:50.680
<v Speaker 1>her down?

0:43:52.760 --> 0:43:55.200
<v Speaker 4>I was huge on Hendrick until the report came out

0:43:55.360 --> 0:43:58.480
<v Speaker 4>this Yeah, thel the elbow thing really killed it. I

0:43:58.520 --> 0:44:02.080
<v Speaker 4>was huge on Hendrick, I was very big on strops

0:44:02.120 --> 0:44:04.359
<v Speaker 4>gained approach. The green is kind of the determinant of

0:44:06.120 --> 0:44:10.839
<v Speaker 4>what to pick based off of. But not being said,

0:44:11.080 --> 0:44:13.560
<v Speaker 4>I'm not sure who I think Brooks, I'm gonna go Brooks.

0:44:13.600 --> 0:44:15.040
<v Speaker 4>I'm all in on Brooks. I loved some of the

0:44:15.080 --> 0:44:17.200
<v Speaker 4>things he said at Shinnacock when things out of the

0:44:17.280 --> 0:44:19.160
<v Speaker 4>hand and people asked him why he didn't complain. He

0:44:19.239 --> 0:44:21.400
<v Speaker 4>just said, you know, when you complained, you're just allowing

0:44:21.400 --> 0:44:23.520
<v Speaker 4>yourself to make excuses. I'm not gonna make excuses. And

0:44:23.560 --> 0:44:25.840
<v Speaker 4>then he also said that I love golf where you

0:44:25.880 --> 0:44:27.440
<v Speaker 4>have to aim away from the flagstick. I feel like

0:44:27.440 --> 0:44:29.560
<v Speaker 4>it tests my discipline. Like you don't hear a lot

0:44:29.560 --> 0:44:31.600
<v Speaker 4>of twenty eight year olds say that, like readily admit

0:44:31.719 --> 0:44:35.200
<v Speaker 4>that they're readily welcome aiming away from the stick. So

0:44:35.239 --> 0:44:38.560
<v Speaker 4>he just he has that kind of maturity, And yeah,

0:44:38.560 --> 0:44:40.239
<v Speaker 4>I don't know have a problem anyway from flag sticks.

0:44:40.280 --> 0:44:42.160
<v Speaker 4>I feel like so many guys do have a problem

0:44:42.160 --> 0:44:43.600
<v Speaker 4>with that.

0:44:43.600 --> 0:44:47.959
<v Speaker 3>That's a fascinating interview with Joey d Earlier, she's talking

0:44:48.000 --> 0:44:51.960
<v Speaker 3>about how Kopka loves like the punishing workout I was

0:44:51.960 --> 0:44:56.120
<v Speaker 3>supposed to it. Likes to be like beat up. Maybe

0:44:56.160 --> 0:44:58.279
<v Speaker 3>that's where he gets his discipline, just throwing out the

0:44:58.320 --> 0:45:03.720
<v Speaker 3>middle of the green my winner. I loved Koepka again,

0:45:03.960 --> 0:45:07.439
<v Speaker 3>but you know, he came through for me last time.

0:45:08.480 --> 0:45:12.880
<v Speaker 3>I am picking Patrick Reid. I think he's a different,

0:45:13.040 --> 0:45:16.319
<v Speaker 3>different player since he won the Masters. I think, you know,

0:45:16.360 --> 0:45:20.720
<v Speaker 3>we've seen him compete pretty consistently after an underwhelming major

0:45:20.800 --> 0:45:25.319
<v Speaker 3>start to his major's career. You know, he's around the green.

0:45:25.400 --> 0:45:27.600
<v Speaker 3>He's maybe the best, one of the best in the world.

0:45:27.840 --> 0:45:33.000
<v Speaker 3>That's back that up. He's pretty good, above average approaching

0:45:33.040 --> 0:45:37.120
<v Speaker 3>the green. You know. His one weakness is technically distanced,

0:45:37.320 --> 0:45:40.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, off the tee, and I think that'll be

0:45:40.640 --> 0:45:42.560
<v Speaker 3>mitigated of it this week. I think it's more of

0:45:42.600 --> 0:45:45.839
<v Speaker 3>like a control and plotting game. And I just think

0:45:45.880 --> 0:45:50.239
<v Speaker 3>he's uh. I think he's a really different confident Like

0:45:50.440 --> 0:45:53.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean, he's obviously confident, but he talked to himself

0:45:54.000 --> 0:45:55.800
<v Speaker 3>about how he was really nervous.

0:45:56.400 --> 0:45:58.120
<v Speaker 5>He used to get nervous in Majors and he was

0:45:58.160 --> 0:45:59.719
<v Speaker 5>nervous to Masters.

0:45:59.239 --> 0:46:02.759
<v Speaker 3>And how different it felt at Shinnecock. Since you know,

0:46:02.880 --> 0:46:06.440
<v Speaker 3>the post Masters win and we saw him con Don

0:46:06.520 --> 0:46:08.920
<v Speaker 3>there again. I just think he's like a different player

0:46:08.960 --> 0:46:11.839
<v Speaker 3>now the masters want to do that, and I think

0:46:11.840 --> 0:46:13.799
<v Speaker 3>he's got the kind of game, certainly around the Green

0:46:13.840 --> 0:46:15.200
<v Speaker 3>to win this week.

0:46:15.800 --> 0:46:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he's been on a run T second at the

0:46:18.520 --> 0:46:22.120
<v Speaker 1>PGA win and what do he finished fourth or third

0:46:22.280 --> 0:46:26.040
<v Speaker 1>at at Shinnacock fourth, I think, so, man, that's a

0:46:26.040 --> 0:46:29.439
<v Speaker 1>pretty good three major run. And this in the course

0:46:29.440 --> 0:46:33.320
<v Speaker 1>of this podcast, I have talked myself into Sergio.

0:46:34.400 --> 0:46:35.200
<v Speaker 4>So wow.

0:46:35.600 --> 0:46:38.239
<v Speaker 1>You know, I know he hasn't had the best year

0:46:38.440 --> 0:46:42.480
<v Speaker 1>he's but he's got top top ten and then at T.

0:46:42.480 --> 0:46:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Twelfth in his last two starts, and I just I

0:46:46.120 --> 0:46:49.359
<v Speaker 1>think some experience. He's had so many close goals. I mean,

0:46:49.480 --> 0:46:52.320
<v Speaker 1>the Open Championship is the one that you expected Sergio

0:46:52.400 --> 0:46:55.360
<v Speaker 1>to get. I mean they did. It fits it fits

0:46:55.400 --> 0:46:58.719
<v Speaker 1>his game more so than any other major championship. So

0:46:59.239 --> 0:47:03.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm rolling with the experienced guy, and Sergio move moves

0:47:03.840 --> 0:47:06.520
<v Speaker 1>himself a nottchup and you know, the greatest players of

0:47:06.560 --> 0:47:08.440
<v Speaker 1>all time with with another major win.

0:47:10.160 --> 0:47:11.600
<v Speaker 3>We talked real quick about Cat.

0:47:12.200 --> 0:47:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we got to talk about Cat quickly.

0:47:15.360 --> 0:47:16.480
<v Speaker 5>I don't know if that's possible.

0:47:18.120 --> 0:47:21.320
<v Speaker 3>So I heard now this has become a big talking point.

0:47:21.760 --> 0:47:25.160
<v Speaker 3>This is the best chance. The Open is the best

0:47:25.239 --> 0:47:28.200
<v Speaker 3>chance for him to win another major rest of his career,

0:47:28.239 --> 0:47:31.160
<v Speaker 3>and this specific one is the best of the best

0:47:31.640 --> 0:47:35.080
<v Speaker 3>chance of the Open to win this week this week.

0:47:35.640 --> 0:47:38.799
<v Speaker 1>So I think I think I got to disagree with

0:47:38.920 --> 0:47:41.480
<v Speaker 1>this week being the best chance. But the Open I

0:47:41.560 --> 0:47:44.760
<v Speaker 1>think is the best chance for anybody because the weather

0:47:44.840 --> 0:47:47.640
<v Speaker 1>can just knock out half the field and given the

0:47:47.760 --> 0:47:51.839
<v Speaker 1>draw and the weather or not, well, that's that's why

0:47:51.880 --> 0:47:54.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying that it can't be this year. Yeah, so

0:47:54.960 --> 0:47:56.840
<v Speaker 1>this year, it can't be that year because if the

0:47:56.880 --> 0:48:00.279
<v Speaker 1>weather is the way it's forecasted, you know the draw

0:48:00.360 --> 0:48:02.360
<v Speaker 1>is going to be equal, so you're gonna have a

0:48:02.400 --> 0:48:05.960
<v Speaker 1>whole field to contend with. So I think with regards

0:48:06.000 --> 0:48:08.040
<v Speaker 1>to like the ability to hit irons and plot his

0:48:08.120 --> 0:48:10.520
<v Speaker 1>way around the course, that's that's great. Like that's it.

0:48:10.560 --> 0:48:13.080
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, like the last time we saw him

0:48:13.080 --> 0:48:15.440
<v Speaker 1>at quicken Loans, he was, he was, he was great

0:48:15.480 --> 0:48:19.080
<v Speaker 1>t to Green, I mean it. I think it definitely

0:48:19.160 --> 0:48:22.919
<v Speaker 1>plays his hands where he can hit irons. I think

0:48:22.920 --> 0:48:25.080
<v Speaker 1>he's got a good shot this week. I would put

0:48:25.160 --> 0:48:27.920
<v Speaker 1>him probably outside the top ten in favors right.

0:48:29.080 --> 0:48:31.239
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he's kind of under the radar. It's crazy he's

0:48:31.280 --> 0:48:32.360
<v Speaker 3>twenty five to one.

0:48:32.640 --> 0:48:36.160
<v Speaker 4>It's a huge ever under the radar. It is a

0:48:36.160 --> 0:48:37.000
<v Speaker 4>lot of that is big.

0:48:36.840 --> 0:48:40.799
<v Speaker 3>Odds though we're talking about relative Tiger, Like he's just

0:48:41.360 --> 0:48:44.480
<v Speaker 3>he's under the radar for Tiger, and that's an enormous

0:48:44.560 --> 0:48:47.800
<v Speaker 3>number for a guy who's like, in effect then a top.

0:48:47.640 --> 0:48:49.600
<v Speaker 5>Twenty player in the world this year, right, I mean

0:48:49.640 --> 0:48:50.040
<v Speaker 5>he's not.

0:48:50.239 --> 0:48:53.960
<v Speaker 3>His ranking says something different, but his play is out

0:48:53.960 --> 0:48:55.239
<v Speaker 3>of like a top twenty player in.

0:48:55.160 --> 0:48:58.200
<v Speaker 5>The world and for him to you know, he's not.

0:48:58.719 --> 0:49:01.040
<v Speaker 3>He had much lower numbers. He was like his back

0:49:01.160 --> 0:49:03.600
<v Speaker 3>was a mess, he had no chance, like he has

0:49:03.640 --> 0:49:06.000
<v Speaker 3>a chance this week. Twenty five to one just seems

0:49:06.000 --> 0:49:08.840
<v Speaker 3>really high for a Tiger and the realm of Tiger.

0:49:11.719 --> 0:49:14.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I was. I mean, I agree with all of it.

0:49:14.440 --> 0:49:17.960
<v Speaker 4>I think the Open, for so many reasons that we've

0:49:17.960 --> 0:49:20.879
<v Speaker 4>talked about, fits him so well and fits him well

0:49:20.920 --> 0:49:24.080
<v Speaker 4>for years, because, like he talked about, you can even

0:49:24.120 --> 0:49:26.800
<v Speaker 4>when he gets you know, older, you can you know,

0:49:26.920 --> 0:49:28.480
<v Speaker 4>have to hit as far you can run it up.

0:49:28.520 --> 0:49:31.279
<v Speaker 4>And I was trying to prepare this contrarian take where

0:49:31.280 --> 0:49:32.879
<v Speaker 4>it's like, yeah, he's won three Opens, but two were

0:49:32.960 --> 0:49:36.000
<v Speaker 4>Saint Andrew's. And then I pulled up his record and

0:49:36.040 --> 0:49:38.360
<v Speaker 4>he has nine top tens in nineteen starts, and that

0:49:38.560 --> 0:49:42.359
<v Speaker 4>I mean really nine top tens basically in fifteen starts

0:49:42.360 --> 0:49:44.799
<v Speaker 4>where he had a chance, discounting the amateur starts, and

0:49:44.840 --> 0:49:50.240
<v Speaker 4>then twenty fifteen I think anominallyes so he basically three

0:49:50.320 --> 0:49:53.200
<v Speaker 4>quarters of his starts he's finishing top ten at the Open.

0:49:53.960 --> 0:49:57.120
<v Speaker 4>H it's I think it is. It's a great reform.

0:49:57.120 --> 0:49:59.160
<v Speaker 4>I think it just it kind of gets the gears flowing.

0:49:59.160 --> 0:50:02.560
<v Speaker 4>And I think maybe because there's so much enthusiasm for

0:50:02.600 --> 0:50:04.279
<v Speaker 4>it and so much creativity, it maybe takes away a

0:50:04.280 --> 0:50:07.520
<v Speaker 4>little bit of the nerves. I think it's a very

0:50:07.520 --> 0:50:10.360
<v Speaker 4>amateur psychology take, but I think that I don't know.

0:50:10.400 --> 0:50:12.759
<v Speaker 4>I think that he feels more comfortable there maybe than

0:50:13.000 --> 0:50:18.160
<v Speaker 4>anywhere else because he knows that he can do things differently,

0:50:18.239 --> 0:50:20.319
<v Speaker 4>he can be creative and he doesn't have to you know,

0:50:20.400 --> 0:50:22.720
<v Speaker 4>you don't play perfect the Open, you have to play smart.

0:50:23.680 --> 0:50:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think the Open is a much more like

0:50:26.000 --> 0:50:31.279
<v Speaker 1>instinctual golf. It's not a you know, there's this this

0:50:31.400 --> 0:50:35.080
<v Speaker 1>ongoing debate between you know, is golf science or is

0:50:35.120 --> 0:50:37.880
<v Speaker 1>it art? And I think when you're out in the

0:50:38.080 --> 0:50:42.319
<v Speaker 1>Open Championship with the conditions, the weather, you know, the firmness,

0:50:42.360 --> 0:50:45.399
<v Speaker 1>like it becomes so much less scientific and so much

0:50:45.440 --> 0:50:48.879
<v Speaker 1>more about feel and and just you know, knowing how

0:50:48.880 --> 0:50:51.360
<v Speaker 1>to play and just you know, proper golf. And I

0:50:51.440 --> 0:50:55.240
<v Speaker 1>think that's why you see, you know, the list of players.

0:50:55.520 --> 0:50:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Obviously you get some some flukey winners just because of

0:50:58.440 --> 0:51:01.839
<v Speaker 1>weather and stuff, but you get you know, a real

0:51:01.920 --> 0:51:05.600
<v Speaker 1>class leaderboard and class players almost every time out with

0:51:05.640 --> 0:51:08.440
<v Speaker 1>it with the Open. And I think, uh, you know

0:51:08.520 --> 0:51:10.840
<v Speaker 1>that's how it fits Tiger so well. Is that when

0:51:11.000 --> 0:51:13.200
<v Speaker 1>when the trips are down and you know, like we

0:51:13.280 --> 0:51:15.359
<v Speaker 1>saw it so much through his career, is like when

0:51:15.360 --> 0:51:18.000
<v Speaker 1>he you know, when when his back's up against the wall,

0:51:18.040 --> 0:51:20.640
<v Speaker 1>but it's all about just hitting that shot. He was

0:51:20.760 --> 0:51:23.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of the class players and always came

0:51:23.200 --> 0:51:24.960
<v Speaker 1>up with the shot because it was like you know,

0:51:25.000 --> 0:51:26.680
<v Speaker 1>he was you know, it's kind of like golf in

0:51:26.719 --> 0:51:29.200
<v Speaker 1>your childhood when you're you know, playing and you're racing

0:51:29.239 --> 0:51:32.080
<v Speaker 1>against darkness, like you can't see anything. You're just you're

0:51:32.120 --> 0:51:35.080
<v Speaker 1>just swinging and hitting the shot. It's not uh you know,

0:51:35.160 --> 0:51:38.400
<v Speaker 1>you you kind of I think you lose that a

0:51:38.440 --> 0:51:40.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit when it's just you know, kind of point

0:51:40.200 --> 0:51:43.480
<v Speaker 1>and shoot and all numbers based, and with the green books,

0:51:43.480 --> 0:51:46.960
<v Speaker 1>like it's become so scientific and going somewhere where it's

0:51:46.960 --> 0:51:48.759
<v Speaker 1>so firm and you can get a bad bounce out

0:51:48.800 --> 0:51:51.239
<v Speaker 1>of the blue, brings back the art of it a

0:51:51.239 --> 0:51:51.959
<v Speaker 1>little bit more.

0:51:53.280 --> 0:51:54.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think there's something a couple of years ago

0:51:54.920 --> 0:51:57.840
<v Speaker 4>that it was really telling. And when Phil switched to

0:51:57.840 --> 0:52:00.480
<v Speaker 4>Andrew gets and he was talking about how like he

0:52:00.560 --> 0:52:04.240
<v Speaker 4>really basically felt he had the genesis, like the bulk

0:52:04.239 --> 0:52:05.800
<v Speaker 4>of what they were trying to do down like he

0:52:05.840 --> 0:52:07.320
<v Speaker 4>had that part of swing and now he tried to

0:52:07.400 --> 0:52:10.160
<v Speaker 4>learn kind of and get back into the finer hand

0:52:10.200 --> 0:52:12.800
<v Speaker 4>motions to create a little you know, different shots and

0:52:12.880 --> 0:52:14.600
<v Speaker 4>hit a little bit higher, cut it a little bit,

0:52:14.920 --> 0:52:16.799
<v Speaker 4>draw it a little bit. And you know, we look

0:52:16.800 --> 0:52:19.000
<v Speaker 4>at golf swings as like this macro thing. We break

0:52:19.040 --> 0:52:21.560
<v Speaker 4>down swing plane and we look at the big motions

0:52:22.239 --> 0:52:25.000
<v Speaker 4>because that's what you can catch on camera. But you know,

0:52:25.080 --> 0:52:29.080
<v Speaker 4>impact of the freshmous second and so much of it

0:52:29.400 --> 0:52:31.319
<v Speaker 4>and what talent, I think what a lot of it

0:52:31.360 --> 0:52:34.719
<v Speaker 4>is is just that little bit extra ability to you know,

0:52:34.840 --> 0:52:37.440
<v Speaker 4>control it and manipulate it and save it sometimes and

0:52:37.880 --> 0:52:40.080
<v Speaker 4>work it sometimes with the hands. And so I think

0:52:40.360 --> 0:52:42.840
<v Speaker 4>you get over here, and you know Tiger's working on that,

0:52:42.880 --> 0:52:46.600
<v Speaker 4>and Tiger's he got trying to hit fine shots to

0:52:46.640 --> 0:52:49.080
<v Speaker 4>take this little you know, extra hand motion that kind

0:52:49.080 --> 0:52:51.120
<v Speaker 4>of like you were saying, put the artistry back in it.

0:52:51.160 --> 0:52:55.560
<v Speaker 4>And so he's been so swing centric. You know, he's

0:52:57.000 --> 0:52:59.759
<v Speaker 4>changing things up the past few years. And and I

0:52:59.760 --> 0:53:03.440
<v Speaker 4>think that you know, going back to maybe just playing

0:53:03.480 --> 0:53:06.040
<v Speaker 4>golf again, I think helps him get out of that,

0:53:06.320 --> 0:53:08.600
<v Speaker 4>you know, basically the whole thing of playing golf versus

0:53:08.600 --> 0:53:09.919
<v Speaker 4>playing golf swing type deal.

0:53:11.080 --> 0:53:14.760
<v Speaker 1>So Will Knights, Uh, you know Ben Curtis, Hunter, Mayhanan

0:53:14.840 --> 0:53:16.520
<v Speaker 1>and Mike where we're all in the top ten the

0:53:16.600 --> 0:53:19.960
<v Speaker 1>last time the Open was at Carnal State. Of these three,

0:53:20.000 --> 0:53:23.520
<v Speaker 1>who would you be most surprised if they want another major?

0:53:25.400 --> 0:53:28.280
<v Speaker 3>Was it Ben Curtis, Mayhan and Weird.

0:53:28.440 --> 0:53:30.719
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean it has me.

0:53:30.800 --> 0:53:33.960
<v Speaker 4>Ben Curtis, I don't think we're.

0:53:33.920 --> 0:53:37.000
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna we're gonna count We're gonna count senior major

0:53:37.080 --> 0:53:38.239
<v Speaker 1>wins in this.

0:53:39.080 --> 0:53:43.239
<v Speaker 3>I think it's still Ben Curtis, no way, But any boy,

0:53:43.360 --> 0:53:44.759
<v Speaker 3>I mean he came out of nowhere to win the

0:53:44.800 --> 0:53:46.680
<v Speaker 3>first time he come out of nowhere again.

0:53:46.920 --> 0:53:49.160
<v Speaker 4>That was that was offends me. He was the no

0:53:49.239 --> 0:53:51.319
<v Speaker 4>more'n amateur in the world at Kent State for a while,

0:53:51.400 --> 0:53:53.200
<v Speaker 4>and then everyone's like, oh, he came out of nowhere.

0:53:53.520 --> 0:53:56.320
<v Speaker 5>I'm from Northeast Ohio. I know, I know about his roots.

0:53:56.320 --> 0:53:56.520
<v Speaker 5>I know.

0:53:57.719 --> 0:54:00.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm just telling you he'd come out of north where again.

0:54:01.120 --> 0:54:03.359
<v Speaker 3>He just he was what was he ranked in the world,

0:54:03.480 --> 0:54:07.560
<v Speaker 3>like six hundred or something. Mike Weir has no chance

0:54:07.760 --> 0:54:14.360
<v Speaker 3>to wait, and I'm for a major, you know, a

0:54:14.760 --> 0:54:19.279
<v Speaker 3>club championship. Mike Weir, God bless the guy. You know,

0:54:19.920 --> 0:54:22.920
<v Speaker 3>he seems like a very nice individual, was a Hall

0:54:22.960 --> 0:54:25.960
<v Speaker 3>of Famer, maybe incredibly you know great at one point

0:54:26.480 --> 0:54:31.080
<v Speaker 3>he hits like a wounded duck were five yards. He's

0:54:31.239 --> 0:54:38.080
<v Speaker 3>hot except to the US Senior Women's Oh geez. He

0:54:38.360 --> 0:54:40.680
<v Speaker 3>I think of those three, I like him. I'm a

0:54:40.680 --> 0:54:44.840
<v Speaker 3>big fan, you know, I just I when it's gone,

0:54:44.920 --> 0:54:47.680
<v Speaker 3>it's gone. He just I think he would be the

0:54:47.719 --> 0:54:48.400
<v Speaker 3>most unlikely.

0:54:48.680 --> 0:54:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I agree, Mike Weir has no chance.

0:54:53.320 --> 0:54:56.919
<v Speaker 4>Also, Hunter May had the original Monster ambassador on tour.

0:54:57.440 --> 0:54:57.879
<v Speaker 3>That's right.

0:54:58.400 --> 0:55:01.960
<v Speaker 1>You always have to wonder about that underlying motives of

0:55:02.040 --> 0:55:05.440
<v Speaker 1>for Yeah, you know this comes out after his rant

0:55:05.440 --> 0:55:10.680
<v Speaker 1>about we're trying to take all the spotlight off Mayhew. Hey,

0:55:11.000 --> 0:55:13.439
<v Speaker 1>I think I could see Ben Curtis becoming an icon

0:55:13.520 --> 0:55:16.080
<v Speaker 1>on the senior tour, you know, becoming the guy that

0:55:17.040 --> 0:55:19.960
<v Speaker 1>you know it just just has a research and at

0:55:20.040 --> 0:55:21.080
<v Speaker 1>age fifty.

0:55:21.920 --> 0:55:23.440
<v Speaker 4>Do we know if he plays golf anymore?

0:55:25.000 --> 0:55:25.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure he does.

0:55:26.719 --> 0:55:28.040
<v Speaker 4>Are we really? Are you sure?

0:55:28.840 --> 0:55:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm sure he goes out and plays golf,

0:55:31.040 --> 0:55:35.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, might not play played for money in a while.

0:55:37.400 --> 0:55:40.600
<v Speaker 4>His last start was a two thousand seven tex w D.

0:55:41.120 --> 0:55:43.960
<v Speaker 4>He played two events played nowhere in twenty eighteen.

0:55:44.680 --> 0:55:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Hey, he's just getting primed, just just starting like a rocky,

0:55:48.080 --> 0:55:53.359
<v Speaker 1>like a you know, training for the senior tour.

0:55:54.120 --> 0:55:56.960
<v Speaker 4>So so Ben ben Curtis won three more tour events.

0:55:57.040 --> 0:56:00.760
<v Speaker 4>He finished runner up in a PGA Championship and a players.

0:56:00.160 --> 0:56:01.120
<v Speaker 3>Like I had a career.

0:56:01.640 --> 0:56:04.239
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you had a good little career there for sure.

0:56:04.760 --> 0:56:09.000
<v Speaker 1>So we got overrated. Uh, let's go with it. Van

0:56:09.040 --> 0:56:13.239
<v Speaker 1>Derveld's collapse. Is it overrated or underrated? And this is

0:56:13.239 --> 0:56:15.919
<v Speaker 1>from Ernesto mm hmm.

0:56:18.160 --> 0:56:21.520
<v Speaker 3>I think it's become overrated. I think it's become mythologized

0:56:21.680 --> 0:56:25.319
<v Speaker 3>in a way that we just that's how we do.

0:56:25.480 --> 0:56:27.840
<v Speaker 3>We kind of get carried away with things. Of course,

0:56:27.880 --> 0:56:30.560
<v Speaker 3>it's I think incredible.

0:56:32.480 --> 0:56:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Turn.

0:56:32.880 --> 0:56:35.920
<v Speaker 3>It just finishes to a turn. But I think it's

0:56:35.920 --> 0:56:38.520
<v Speaker 3>been mythologized a little too much, just because like it

0:56:38.680 --> 0:56:41.480
<v Speaker 3>had the taking your shoes off and socks off and

0:56:41.480 --> 0:56:43.080
<v Speaker 3>getting in the burn. There's just like a lot of

0:56:43.160 --> 0:56:47.040
<v Speaker 3>visuals with it that have just added. I don't know,

0:56:47.120 --> 0:56:49.759
<v Speaker 3>I think I think it's it's I think it's overrated,

0:56:50.880 --> 0:56:53.160
<v Speaker 3>or maybe I'm just fatigued by it all this week.

0:56:53.960 --> 0:56:56.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's pretty interesting walking around here, you I mean

0:56:56.520 --> 0:56:58.840
<v Speaker 4>still when people are walking around eighteen you constantly just

0:56:58.880 --> 0:57:01.200
<v Speaker 4>hear people like going okay, and then he was there,

0:57:01.719 --> 0:57:03.160
<v Speaker 4>and then he hit it to there and then it

0:57:03.200 --> 0:57:06.239
<v Speaker 4>bounced off this thing, you know, and it's still the

0:57:06.239 --> 0:57:09.120
<v Speaker 4>big top point. But I agree with the overrated. Like

0:57:09.480 --> 0:57:11.360
<v Speaker 4>you still see the photo of him in the burn

0:57:11.400 --> 0:57:13.239
<v Speaker 4>with his pant rolled up, you know, every time we

0:57:13.320 --> 0:57:17.919
<v Speaker 4>come to Carnoustie and I'm going overrated. I appreciate it.

0:57:17.920 --> 0:57:21.880
<v Speaker 4>In Bryan Latner's Oral History the whole thing van de

0:57:21.960 --> 0:57:23.560
<v Speaker 4>Veldt for the first time I had seen it. Finally

0:57:23.600 --> 0:57:25.520
<v Speaker 4>admitt that, like when the night was over, he went

0:57:25.560 --> 0:57:30.920
<v Speaker 4>into his hotel room and I believe that he was

0:57:30.960 --> 0:57:33.600
<v Speaker 4>in his closet, he said, bawling, and like the whole.

0:57:33.600 --> 0:57:35.720
<v Speaker 4>I never bought the whole, Like, oh, I'm French, It's

0:57:35.720 --> 0:57:37.360
<v Speaker 4>just a game. It does not matter. I was like,

0:57:37.760 --> 0:57:39.920
<v Speaker 4>there's no way, man, And so I was so glad

0:57:39.920 --> 0:57:42.560
<v Speaker 4>to finally hear him admit that he just broke down

0:57:42.600 --> 0:57:44.560
<v Speaker 4>after the man was over. I mean, I feel bad

0:57:44.560 --> 0:57:47.280
<v Speaker 4>for him that he did, but I just it it

0:57:47.440 --> 0:57:48.960
<v Speaker 4>had to be. I mean, there's no way that it

0:57:49.000 --> 0:57:51.000
<v Speaker 4>wasn't a big deal. But it's overrated.

0:57:51.560 --> 0:57:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm going underrated. There's it was the mean, it's the

0:57:56.400 --> 0:57:59.960
<v Speaker 1>craziest collapse and in any championship golf his.

0:58:00.680 --> 0:58:02.880
<v Speaker 4>I mean, yeah, but now we're going on like revisionist

0:58:02.960 --> 0:58:04.520
<v Speaker 4>history on it tore like, well, actually he was really

0:58:04.600 --> 0:58:07.440
<v Speaker 4>unlucky because like if he hit this pole and the

0:58:07.480 --> 0:58:09.280
<v Speaker 4>ball and the pole, and I'm like, yeah, but you

0:58:09.280 --> 0:58:11.480
<v Speaker 4>know how you're not unlucky. You hit seven ron into

0:58:11.520 --> 0:58:14.240
<v Speaker 4>the fairway he needed to.

0:58:14.160 --> 0:58:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Make a I mean it, I'll never forget it. It's

0:58:17.600 --> 0:58:20.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the you know, whether you like it or not,

0:58:20.760 --> 0:58:23.520
<v Speaker 1>like one of the most vivid memory golf memories I've

0:58:23.560 --> 0:58:25.440
<v Speaker 1>ever had, you know.

0:58:27.040 --> 0:58:28.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but it was kind of a goofy into a

0:58:28.920 --> 0:58:32.560
<v Speaker 4>goofy week because the setup was crazy. I mean it

0:58:32.840 --> 0:58:35.040
<v Speaker 4>was like, I mean, the setup was an abomination to

0:58:35.120 --> 0:58:38.360
<v Speaker 4>the with an angle school. There was zero of both

0:58:38.880 --> 0:58:42.080
<v Speaker 4>the fairways were four yards wide, So I don't know,

0:58:42.160 --> 0:58:44.320
<v Speaker 4>I think that's what kind of what sours on me.

0:58:44.360 --> 0:58:46.160
<v Speaker 4>It was almost like the deserving ending to the week

0:58:46.160 --> 0:58:47.040
<v Speaker 4>that they had there.

0:58:48.960 --> 0:58:49.320
<v Speaker 3>All right.

0:58:49.520 --> 0:58:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Overrated, underrated Adam Scott's career, and that says given the

0:58:56.840 --> 0:59:07.280
<v Speaker 1>expectations from Tommy Goofano, I think we ooh his career.

0:59:07.480 --> 0:59:09.120
<v Speaker 4>So like his resume, I guess.

0:59:09.160 --> 0:59:13.000
<v Speaker 3>His career number one in the world, the players and

0:59:13.040 --> 0:59:15.200
<v Speaker 3>the masters, it's pretty good.

0:59:15.520 --> 0:59:17.200
<v Speaker 5>But what was he number one in the world for

0:59:17.280 --> 0:59:19.000
<v Speaker 5>like a month less.

0:59:19.160 --> 0:59:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Maybe an hour?

0:59:20.560 --> 0:59:23.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think I'm gonna go underrated just because I

0:59:23.680 --> 0:59:25.480
<v Speaker 4>mean we based so much on like what the swing

0:59:25.520 --> 0:59:27.560
<v Speaker 4>looks like, and he's a good looking guy. Like if

0:59:27.600 --> 0:59:30.800
<v Speaker 4>he was twenty pounds heavier and he had a hitch

0:59:30.800 --> 0:59:33.120
<v Speaker 4>in his swing, you'd be like, oh my gosh, what

0:59:33.240 --> 0:59:35.840
<v Speaker 4>an amazing you know, like there's so much more to

0:59:35.880 --> 0:59:37.960
<v Speaker 4>golf than just what your swing looks like I mean,

0:59:38.000 --> 0:59:40.400
<v Speaker 4>I know two handicaps that have good looking swings, but

0:59:40.440 --> 0:59:42.960
<v Speaker 4>they're not going to crack an egg on tour. And

0:59:43.000 --> 0:59:45.840
<v Speaker 4>so I think we just like the poor guy because

0:59:45.840 --> 0:59:50.720
<v Speaker 4>he's ridiculously good looking and his swing is on perfectly

0:59:50.800 --> 0:59:53.480
<v Speaker 4>on plane throughout, like we expect him to win everything.

0:59:53.600 --> 0:59:59.919
<v Speaker 4>So I just think that it's just the visuals are there,

1:00:00.080 --> 1:00:01.800
<v Speaker 4>so we think, oh, he should win so much. But

1:00:01.840 --> 1:00:03.360
<v Speaker 4>in really I think it's been a good career. I

1:00:03.360 --> 1:00:07.120
<v Speaker 4>think just the expectations is so high because again the

1:00:07.480 --> 1:00:08.600
<v Speaker 4>looks in the swing.

1:00:09.400 --> 1:00:12.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, i'd probably say I'd probably say for the same reason,

1:00:12.240 --> 1:00:15.080
<v Speaker 3>it's overrated. I think like he just gets too much

1:00:15.080 --> 1:00:17.120
<v Speaker 3>credit for being good, lucky and have a great swing.

1:00:18.760 --> 1:00:21.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but no more in the world of major of players.

1:00:21.800 --> 1:00:22.200
<v Speaker 4>I don't know.

1:00:24.800 --> 1:00:25.640
<v Speaker 3>It's a good question.

1:00:25.840 --> 1:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go he's underrated. I think I just did

1:00:30.800 --> 1:00:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the math real quick. In his professional career, he's top

1:00:35.720 --> 1:00:41.840
<v Speaker 1>ten to thirty five percent of his starts.

1:00:39.600 --> 1:00:41.400
<v Speaker 3>So you get you throw us to the walls first

1:00:41.440 --> 1:00:44.800
<v Speaker 3>and get out the calculator. While we're talking, Yeah, he come.

1:00:44.640 --> 1:00:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Back, come back, you know, do quick, some quick math.

1:00:47.800 --> 1:00:51.320
<v Speaker 1>And third, I mean that's pretty damn good in the

1:00:51.360 --> 1:00:53.840
<v Speaker 1>longevity of his career. I think is other thing is

1:00:53.880 --> 1:00:57.120
<v Speaker 1>like he's been a force in the game and a favorite,

1:00:57.200 --> 1:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>like I mean, how many how many I think right

1:00:59.760 --> 1:01:02.520
<v Speaker 1>now is where we're getting, like even until last year,

1:01:02.520 --> 1:01:06.960
<v Speaker 1>but this year he's obviously he's he's underperformed compared to

1:01:07.000 --> 1:01:10.120
<v Speaker 1>what we're used to. But you know where he was

1:01:10.200 --> 1:01:14.520
<v Speaker 1>like every single major he was a top ten favorite

1:01:14.560 --> 1:01:18.400
<v Speaker 1>for you know, maybe twelve thirteen years.

1:01:18.600 --> 1:01:22.040
<v Speaker 3>It's a pretty good careering. What do you care about

1:01:22.040 --> 1:01:24.560
<v Speaker 3>the anchoring thing kind of changing career.

1:01:25.320 --> 1:01:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't know. I think he had a lot

1:01:27.600 --> 1:01:31.600
<v Speaker 1>of good years post anchoring. I mean he had you know,

1:01:32.320 --> 1:01:34.040
<v Speaker 1>he was the end of the year in twenty sixteen,

1:01:34.120 --> 1:01:36.320
<v Speaker 1>ranks seventh in the in the world, and he won

1:01:36.760 --> 1:01:38.240
<v Speaker 1>twice that year, so.

1:01:39.040 --> 1:01:43.440
<v Speaker 3>Back to back, right, yeah, or almost so.

1:01:43.520 --> 1:01:45.440
<v Speaker 1>I think I think one of the things that I mean,

1:01:45.480 --> 1:01:47.640
<v Speaker 1>we might look back eventually on the anchoring role and

1:01:47.680 --> 1:01:49.560
<v Speaker 1>say it was like the worst role ever made, because

1:01:49.560 --> 1:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>they might you know, pull back, who knows, but the

1:01:54.280 --> 1:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I think, uh, I think he was underrated and when

1:01:57.280 --> 1:02:00.040
<v Speaker 1>you look at it from like a uh and and

1:02:00.440 --> 1:02:05.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, he gift wrapped a open championship for my

1:02:05.120 --> 1:02:07.760
<v Speaker 1>boy big earned you know that.

1:02:08.040 --> 1:02:10.040
<v Speaker 4>I mean there were a few years there where he

1:02:10.080 --> 1:02:12.120
<v Speaker 4>was like a consistent major. I mean, like what Brooks

1:02:12.120 --> 1:02:13.520
<v Speaker 4>is doing right now. We talk about like he was

1:02:13.520 --> 1:02:15.600
<v Speaker 4>doing that for a little bit, sure, and I think

1:02:15.720 --> 1:02:17.760
<v Speaker 4>everyone's like, oh, if only he could put, he'd win

1:02:17.840 --> 1:02:19.880
<v Speaker 4>so much. It's like, yeah, if you took any player

1:02:20.360 --> 1:02:22.320
<v Speaker 4>and made their weakest part of their game of strength,

1:02:22.320 --> 1:02:25.520
<v Speaker 4>they'd win a ton. But that's why they don't, because

1:02:25.520 --> 1:02:27.920
<v Speaker 4>golf is hard, and nobody except Tiger is good at

1:02:27.920 --> 1:02:29.840
<v Speaker 4>everything for an extended period of time.

1:02:31.160 --> 1:02:38.840
<v Speaker 1>So overrated, underrated, The Irish and Scottish Open, underrated.

1:02:40.520 --> 1:02:44.880
<v Speaker 3>I think they're fantastic as what as like prep for

1:02:44.920 --> 1:02:45.440
<v Speaker 3>the Open?

1:02:46.240 --> 1:02:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah sure, oh, I don't know, whatever you want it

1:02:50.080 --> 1:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>to be.

1:02:50.800 --> 1:02:53.800
<v Speaker 3>I think they're underrated. I think they're amazing. They're part

1:02:53.840 --> 1:02:56.720
<v Speaker 3>of what makes July the best month of golf, and

1:02:56.760 --> 1:03:00.720
<v Speaker 3>I love getting up, having coffee and having stuff resolved

1:03:00.760 --> 1:03:05.080
<v Speaker 3>by Nune. I think they're awesome. I love both events

1:03:05.640 --> 1:03:07.600
<v Speaker 3>and the same reason I love the Open. It's just

1:03:07.680 --> 1:03:10.480
<v Speaker 3>a different look. I think we tend to kind of

1:03:10.560 --> 1:03:15.320
<v Speaker 3>overweight you know, any results in show of form and

1:03:15.360 --> 1:03:17.520
<v Speaker 3>all this stuff like as soon as Ricky hits a

1:03:17.560 --> 1:03:20.080
<v Speaker 3>good shot, people are always winning the British Open. Yeah,

1:03:20.240 --> 1:03:22.840
<v Speaker 3>as he you know, rolls into pludd it all and

1:03:22.880 --> 1:03:26.080
<v Speaker 3>it's like, oh he's winning. It's like, I don't know,

1:03:26.200 --> 1:03:30.000
<v Speaker 3>I just I think we might overweight the effects of

1:03:30.240 --> 1:03:31.120
<v Speaker 3>playing well there.

1:03:31.200 --> 1:03:33.640
<v Speaker 5>But I love them as tournaments on their own.

1:03:35.080 --> 1:03:36.720
<v Speaker 4>I think this will got me in trouble last time

1:03:36.720 --> 1:03:40.240
<v Speaker 4>with our controversial overrated, underrated episode a few months ago,

1:03:40.360 --> 1:03:42.959
<v Speaker 4>but because I was making my take based on the

1:03:43.000 --> 1:03:47.080
<v Speaker 4>golf hipster crowd, which I'm I don't know, I'm not cool,

1:03:47.120 --> 1:03:48.439
<v Speaker 4>so I don't think I'm part of but.

1:03:48.520 --> 1:03:49.160
<v Speaker 1>You're part of it.

1:03:49.280 --> 1:03:53.520
<v Speaker 4>I think there's a I think just I think the

1:03:53.680 --> 1:03:57.320
<v Speaker 4>I think it's more getting to the the flavor of

1:03:57.320 --> 1:03:59.760
<v Speaker 4>the age. We just with social media, we just take

1:03:59.840 --> 1:04:02.680
<v Speaker 4>some thing great and just beat it to death and

1:04:02.840 --> 1:04:05.400
<v Speaker 4>just try to wring every last bit of content out

1:04:05.400 --> 1:04:09.120
<v Speaker 4>of it. And there's that always that danger. But that

1:04:09.200 --> 1:04:13.280
<v Speaker 4>being said, I think it is great to be able

1:04:13.320 --> 1:04:15.840
<v Speaker 4>to get up early and watch golf. Unfortunately I don't

1:04:15.880 --> 1:04:17.919
<v Speaker 4>have cable, so I can't. I don't watch them because

1:04:17.960 --> 1:04:20.360
<v Speaker 4>I can't, but if I did have cable, I would

1:04:20.400 --> 1:04:23.880
<v Speaker 4>watch them, and it would be quite enjoyable, so I'll

1:04:23.920 --> 1:04:26.760
<v Speaker 4>say under There's no way I can say overrated, so

1:04:26.800 --> 1:04:29.800
<v Speaker 4>I'll say underrated. But I don't know. I do think

1:04:29.960 --> 1:04:33.080
<v Speaker 4>they're in danger of just us just beating them to

1:04:33.080 --> 1:04:35.080
<v Speaker 4>death because they are so good, and that's just what

1:04:35.120 --> 1:04:36.520
<v Speaker 4>we do with anything that's good.

1:04:37.040 --> 1:04:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I wish they I wish they weren't back to back,

1:04:39.400 --> 1:04:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and I know it's scheduled that way for a reason

1:04:41.600 --> 1:04:43.720
<v Speaker 1>and for prep, but it would be nice to just

1:04:43.760 --> 1:04:46.320
<v Speaker 1>get it every I don't know. I'm a big fan

1:04:46.360 --> 1:04:48.720
<v Speaker 1>of the idea of like this World Tour, because like

1:04:48.760 --> 1:04:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I think the Irish and the Scottish Open are so

1:04:51.000 --> 1:04:54.760
<v Speaker 1>cool and I think you should. But like having them,

1:04:54.880 --> 1:04:57.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, two weeks in a row, it diminished it,

1:04:57.320 --> 1:04:57.680
<v Speaker 1>I guess it.

1:04:57.760 --> 1:04:58.280
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it.

1:04:58.280 --> 1:05:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely kills the PGA Tour of those two weeks because

1:05:00.960 --> 1:05:03.120
<v Speaker 1>they get all the best players playing in them. But

1:05:03.240 --> 1:05:05.680
<v Speaker 1>it would be cool to have it more, you know,

1:05:05.800 --> 1:05:08.600
<v Speaker 1>like it. I mean, if I was, if I was

1:05:08.680 --> 1:05:10.640
<v Speaker 1>running golf, I feel like we should have a monthly

1:05:10.680 --> 1:05:12.720
<v Speaker 1>tournament in the British Islands, you know.

1:05:12.840 --> 1:05:14.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but I think it's okay for the European Tour

1:05:14.680 --> 1:05:16.680
<v Speaker 4>to win like certain stretches of the calendar. I mean

1:05:16.760 --> 1:05:19.480
<v Speaker 4>that I'm okay with that. I think that's I think

1:05:19.520 --> 1:05:21.040
<v Speaker 4>it's good. I think it's healthy for the game. I

1:05:21.040 --> 1:05:24.040
<v Speaker 4>think it's healthy for both tours. Like I think it's

1:05:24.080 --> 1:05:27.160
<v Speaker 4>okay for them to win a couple of weeks just

1:05:27.160 --> 1:05:29.800
<v Speaker 4>because it makes so much sense because after the US opened,

1:05:29.840 --> 1:05:33.440
<v Speaker 4>most most European guys are headed back to Europe anyways.

1:05:33.480 --> 1:05:35.880
<v Speaker 4>So I don't know, I'm totally cool with like the

1:05:35.880 --> 1:05:38.400
<v Speaker 4>European Tour winning those weeks because it makes sense to

1:05:38.440 --> 1:05:41.360
<v Speaker 4>have Irish and Scottish opens on least courses right before

1:05:41.400 --> 1:05:42.800
<v Speaker 4>the Open Championship.

1:05:43.520 --> 1:05:53.840
<v Speaker 1>All right, last overrated, underrated kilt overage.

1:05:55.280 --> 1:06:03.160
<v Speaker 3>I have respect for you know, Native Scots who you

1:06:03.160 --> 1:06:05.440
<v Speaker 3>know that's part of their history wearing them. I just

1:06:05.440 --> 1:06:07.600
<v Speaker 3>think you get a lot of idiots that are trying to,

1:06:08.640 --> 1:06:12.800
<v Speaker 3>you know, show off wearing them. I think like it's

1:06:12.840 --> 1:06:15.600
<v Speaker 3>just become like a thing for like people to like

1:06:15.640 --> 1:06:19.000
<v Speaker 3>put a sign look at me, and there's a lot

1:06:19.080 --> 1:06:21.920
<v Speaker 3>of people who are like faking it and wearing skills

1:06:22.040 --> 1:06:24.400
<v Speaker 3>wearing kilts just to kind of for the show and

1:06:24.440 --> 1:06:26.160
<v Speaker 3>the attention. So overrated.

1:06:27.320 --> 1:06:29.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's kind of like with Saint I know they're

1:06:29.600 --> 1:06:36.000
<v Speaker 4>different kind it's kind of what or like seeking pushing

1:06:36.040 --> 1:06:38.680
<v Speaker 4>a national holiday of like some pride for the country

1:06:38.840 --> 1:06:42.000
<v Speaker 4>or originated into just an American drinking festival because we

1:06:42.040 --> 1:06:45.200
<v Speaker 4>bastardize it. I think that kind of what happens with kills.

1:06:46.000 --> 1:06:48.840
<v Speaker 1>You over Huh. Yeah.

1:06:48.880 --> 1:06:51.440
<v Speaker 4>It's nothing against kilts. It's just that if you're not

1:06:51.520 --> 1:06:54.160
<v Speaker 4>wearing them because you come from a Scottish heritage and

1:06:54.200 --> 1:06:56.440
<v Speaker 4>it's like a point of cultural pride for you, then

1:06:56.480 --> 1:06:57.920
<v Speaker 4>you're you shouldn't be wearing it.

1:06:59.360 --> 1:07:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm go overrated, not not in on them. Yeah,

1:07:04.880 --> 1:07:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I think I yeah, they're overrated.

1:07:07.040 --> 1:07:07.240
<v Speaker 3>You know.

1:07:07.560 --> 1:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>You know what what gets me is like when people

1:07:09.880 --> 1:07:11.720
<v Speaker 1>are like, oh, look at that guy in a kilt.

1:07:12.080 --> 1:07:17.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, Yeah, howpen does that happen in Chicago? I

1:07:17.160 --> 1:07:19.400
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I just feel like it's like if somebody's

1:07:19.400 --> 1:07:21.840
<v Speaker 1>wearing a kilt, everybody's like, oh, look at that guy

1:07:21.880 --> 1:07:24.280
<v Speaker 1>in a kill. It's like, you know, what's the big deal.

1:07:24.320 --> 1:07:25.120
<v Speaker 1>He's wearing a kilt.

1:07:25.320 --> 1:07:28.520
<v Speaker 4>You know, Well, that's why that reaction, that's why he's

1:07:28.560 --> 1:07:29.920
<v Speaker 4>doing it. He was playing in his hands.

1:07:30.000 --> 1:07:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well that's I'm not one like that. I just

1:07:33.200 --> 1:07:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I just take it for what it's worth, and I

1:07:34.840 --> 1:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>don't pay him any more attention than I would somebody

1:07:37.720 --> 1:07:41.160
<v Speaker 1>wearing pants or shorts, right.

1:07:42.120 --> 1:07:44.440
<v Speaker 4>All right, I'm I'm always just a little bit nervous

1:07:44.480 --> 1:07:48.800
<v Speaker 4>that he's actually not wearing anything under there, because there

1:07:48.840 --> 1:07:51.280
<v Speaker 4>was a there was a rowdy group of probably guys

1:07:51.280 --> 1:07:53.800
<v Speaker 4>that fit in the category that Brendan and I were

1:07:53.800 --> 1:07:56.840
<v Speaker 4>discussing who were in an Irish bar that DJ Paiouski

1:07:56.840 --> 1:07:59.400
<v Speaker 4>and I used to frequent in Orlando, and they were

1:07:59.400 --> 1:08:01.560
<v Speaker 4>getting rowdy and we found out the hard way that

1:08:02.360 --> 1:08:04.280
<v Speaker 4>he was not wearing anything under his killed. So that

1:08:04.680 --> 1:08:06.600
<v Speaker 4>soured me as well to the whole killed situation.

1:08:06.960 --> 1:08:09.720
<v Speaker 3>Orlando's natural place to wear a kilt. It's like, it

1:08:09.720 --> 1:08:12.320
<v Speaker 3>seems like a natural habitat. And that's what I'm talking about.

1:08:12.320 --> 1:08:15.040
<v Speaker 1>That that's why you should put It's the same reason

1:08:15.080 --> 1:08:17.679
<v Speaker 1>you put Spaniards in big text, where.

1:08:17.960 --> 1:08:23.799
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly what they're overrated. It's dump and the people

1:08:23.840 --> 1:08:25.880
<v Speaker 3>you know who wear cilts are you generally going to

1:08:25.920 --> 1:08:29.400
<v Speaker 3>be terrible people? Now, I apologize for all that kind

1:08:29.400 --> 1:08:31.600
<v Speaker 3>of This is a part of Scottish hairt you know,

1:08:31.680 --> 1:08:33.559
<v Speaker 3>I'm not lumping in the Scots.

1:08:33.560 --> 1:08:34.919
<v Speaker 5>That's a part of their heritage.

1:08:35.040 --> 1:08:36.559
<v Speaker 4>No, you're you're defending the Scots.

1:08:36.840 --> 1:08:40.920
<v Speaker 3>Yes, yeah, I'm saying it's been cops though co opted

1:08:41.000 --> 1:08:42.759
<v Speaker 3>by a bunch of d bags.

1:08:43.360 --> 1:08:46.720
<v Speaker 4>Actually, a lot of Canada is. There's a large Scottish

1:08:46.720 --> 1:08:49.640
<v Speaker 4>Canadian connection. Nova Scotia means New Scotland because a lot

1:08:49.680 --> 1:08:51.719
<v Speaker 4>of them moved to Scotland, I think, or to Canada.

1:08:51.720 --> 1:08:53.959
<v Speaker 4>I think during the Potato fanine, which also hates Scotland,

1:08:54.439 --> 1:08:57.760
<v Speaker 4>and so you have. I don't know you offended one

1:08:57.760 --> 1:08:59.960
<v Speaker 4>people while defending another, but there's me a lot of overlap.

1:09:01.200 --> 1:09:02.839
<v Speaker 3>Had a good five minutes on Kilts.

1:09:02.960 --> 1:09:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's uh. I have to acknowledge this because it

1:09:06.200 --> 1:09:09.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, we talked about Fleetwood. Tommy Pelto also wanted

1:09:09.320 --> 1:09:12.639
<v Speaker 1>to know, what's what's your favorite Fleetwood Mac song?

1:09:14.080 --> 1:09:14.880
<v Speaker 4>I don't have one.

1:09:15.160 --> 1:09:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh, very sad.

1:09:19.120 --> 1:09:19.720
<v Speaker 3>Landslide.

1:09:19.920 --> 1:09:21.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah it was good. Actually, what I know?

1:09:22.240 --> 1:09:26.320
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm going going dreams, dreams, dreams good.

1:09:26.680 --> 1:09:27.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

1:09:28.200 --> 1:09:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I like that second Anti song too.

1:09:31.240 --> 1:09:34.920
<v Speaker 5>I had a Fleetwood Mac that's no longer.

1:09:34.840 --> 1:09:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Fleetwood Mac overrated, underrated, overrated.

1:09:39.360 --> 1:09:41.599
<v Speaker 4>I'm not qualified to take part in this. I really

1:09:41.640 --> 1:09:42.040
<v Speaker 4>don't know.

1:09:42.439 --> 1:09:47.440
<v Speaker 1>I guess stop having non music fans on hipods.

1:09:48.160 --> 1:09:49.599
<v Speaker 3>I know that's smart.

1:09:49.880 --> 1:09:55.639
<v Speaker 1>Smart, i'd say underrated on over table doesn't.

1:09:55.680 --> 1:09:56.759
<v Speaker 3>Let's listen to music.

1:09:58.920 --> 1:10:01.799
<v Speaker 4>I mean listen to music, not fleewood back, I tell.

1:10:01.680 --> 1:10:05.240
<v Speaker 1>You, all right, all right, all right, well that's disappointing

1:10:05.280 --> 1:10:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Sean popping on Spotify when you can't sleep tonight us.

1:10:10.160 --> 1:10:13.800
<v Speaker 4>I will, all right, guys, So no Pandora in the

1:10:13.840 --> 1:10:15.679
<v Speaker 4>U cannot do it matters, No Pandora in the UK

1:10:16.400 --> 1:10:18.439
<v Speaker 4>very just pointing to find out, not allowed.

1:10:19.520 --> 1:10:21.320
<v Speaker 1>That's that's rough, like.

1:10:21.360 --> 1:10:22.439
<v Speaker 4>Why the Brexit happens.

1:10:22.439 --> 1:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, alrighty, all right, all right, we'll enjoy

1:10:27.600 --> 1:10:30.519
<v Speaker 1>an open and uh may talk to you guys on

1:10:30.960 --> 1:10:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Sunday or Monday.

1:10:32.720 --> 1:10:34.960
<v Speaker 3>Sounds good, thanks, guys, all right, get.

1:10:34.880 --> 1:10:38.879
<v Speaker 1>Some sleep, Sean, all right, you've.

1:10:38.680 --> 1:10:40.960
<v Speaker 3>Been listening to the fried Egg podcast.

1:10:41.400 --> 1:10:42.960
<v Speaker 1>We do the digging for you.