WEBVTT - US Hiring Surges, Bolstering Case for Another Fed Rate Hike

0:00:01.360 --> 0:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Wait inside from the reporters and

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:09.520 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>global business, finance and tech news. The Bloomberg Business Week

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Podcast with Carol Messer and Tim Stenebeck from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:20.920 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 2>What's so while you like, all right, it is all

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:31.120
<v Speaker 2>about that big jobs report. Just talking about a little

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 2>bit with our TV team here. But you know, Jess,

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:36.360
<v Speaker 2>you take a look at some of the headlines that

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 2>are among the most read in the Bloomberg yep US

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:42.200
<v Speaker 2>hiring surges, bolstering the case for another FED rate hike.

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 2>You got the five percent bond market, meaning more pain

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 2>is heading everyone's way. We just talked about that with

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:51.240
<v Speaker 2>remaining Katie, and then treasuries sliding as jobs beat makes

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 2>another hike a coin to us. I feel like we

0:00:54.240 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 2>keep going back and forth, right when it comes to

0:00:56.080 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 2>what's the Fed do next?

0:00:57.240 --> 0:01:00.640
<v Speaker 3>Right, and whether or not we're headed for ace landing

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 3>or hard landing.

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:03.959
<v Speaker 2>Carol, exactly, all right, So to talk about it all

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 2>the day's trade, the week's trade, and the news. Bloomberg

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:10.199
<v Speaker 2>Intelligence Chief US Interest rates strategist Iri Jersey on ZUM

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 2>New Jersey and also with us Bloomberg News Economics editor

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 2>Mollie Smith and Molly just quickly we talked about a

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 2>little bit with our TV colleagues Bloomberg, TV, Radio, online, everywhere.

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 2>The terminal have been all over today's jobs report. But

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:26.319
<v Speaker 2>what are some of the highlights and what you think

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:28.959
<v Speaker 2>the street and the Fed is paying most attention to.

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 4>I mean, yeah, the headline number obviously was kind of frightening.

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:35.840
<v Speaker 4>You know, when we first saw it was like, wait,

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:38.959
<v Speaker 4>did I see us ride three thirty six, you know,

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 4>above well above all estimates in the Bloomberg survey and

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:46.039
<v Speaker 4>also the sizeable revisions to the prior two months, So

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 4>that was really just a bullish line across the board,

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 4>especially seeing so many of the recent jobs reports have

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 4>been the opposite. We've seen big, big downward revisions in

0:01:56.360 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 4>prior months, and I think it was just really impressive

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 4>in terms of like the base nature of hiring. You know,

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 4>it wasn't particularly concentrated anywhere, seeing the unemployment rate held

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 4>at the same level, and wages also not so exciting,

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 4>So it was yeah, I think just like the payrolls

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:14.959
<v Speaker 4>number was really by far and away the big story here.

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:19.080
<v Speaker 3>I wanted to bring you into this conversation because, especially

0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 3>when we're looking at what's happening in the bond market,

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 3>what do you make of this as far as the

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 3>speed in which we've continued to see bond year olds

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:28.240
<v Speaker 3>climb from here.

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:32.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, liquidity is not great, but you know, really a

0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:34.520
<v Speaker 5>lot of this was positioning. So you had a lot

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 5>of people back in the summer, you know, talk about

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 5>June July August timeframe when a lot of strategists and

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 5>then real money managers were getting long duration, so they

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 5>were buying ten year notes, thirty year bonds and those

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 5>sectors in the anticipation that the FED was going to

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:53.520
<v Speaker 5>be done. And usually when the FED is done hiking,

0:02:54.360 --> 0:02:57.079
<v Speaker 5>the long end of the market does really well from

0:02:57.120 --> 0:03:00.639
<v Speaker 5>a total return perspective. But what's happened now is that

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 5>with the turn in the data the last six or

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:06.240
<v Speaker 5>eight weeks, you've seen and haven't seen the slowing that

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 5>I think most people had been anticipating. You have a

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 5>lot of people in bad positions and then you so

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:14.080
<v Speaker 5>they wind up stopping themselves out. There were some really

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 5>important technical levels that got broken last week, and as

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 5>those got broken, you then had stops that got hit.

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 5>So a lot of this move was part of this

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 5>move was technical in the positioning piece of it. But

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:29.840
<v Speaker 5>I think a big piece is just a reimagination. Imagining

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 5>of what the Federal Reserve is going to do and

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 5>what the FED does next. I don't think matters very much.

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 5>It's more what is the FED going to do next, next, next?

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 5>So what is it going to do in late twenty

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 5>twenty four, twenty twenty five, We've now priced out a

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 5>lot of the cuts that had been priced into the market,

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 5>you know, even after you had still had about sixty

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 5>base points of cuts priced in after the FED meeting

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 5>last month. Now those are you know, now people are saying, well, hey,

0:03:55.000 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 5>maybe they won't actually cut interest rates.

0:03:57.440 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 2>So at this point, if I've bled's futures, are saying

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 2>no cuts next year.

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 5>Just about yeah. So you know, it depends on if

0:04:05.280 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 5>there's a hike or not. Right, so, good things. If

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 5>they hike again and then yes, there's a cut priced end.

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 5>If they don't. If they don't hike, then there's no

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 5>price a cut price end.

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 5>So but basically you're talking about interest rates not doing

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:18.040
<v Speaker 5>very much in the very front end of the curve

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 5>over the next fifteen months. Or so, and because of that,

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 5>the whole yield curve has had to reprice, so you have,

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:27.359
<v Speaker 5>you know, five year notes need to be closer to

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 5>five percent, and so do ten year notes, just because

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 5>if you average out what the policy rate's going to

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:37.240
<v Speaker 5>be over the next ten years, that's come up quite

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:40.159
<v Speaker 5>a bit. Interestingly, Carol, I was just looking at this

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:43.599
<v Speaker 5>earlier today. If you look at what the market thinks

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 5>the ten year notees going to be, so you look

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:49.840
<v Speaker 5>at the fifteen month forward tenure rate, that is exactly

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 5>where we are today, four point eight percent. So the

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 5>market seems to think now right now that there's going

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 5>to be very little movement in the long end of

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 5>the curve. Is that going to happen? No, it's not.

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 6>So.

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:02.279
<v Speaker 5>That means that there's going to be a lot of

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:04.919
<v Speaker 5>relative value and trades to do. But it might be

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 5>a little bit early to try to think about exactly

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 5>getting long because of the full momentum in the market

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:11.600
<v Speaker 5>and the good economic data.

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 2>Molly, I want to bring you back in here, because

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 2>the economic data from day to day can can re

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 2>create or you know, it's like a whole new think

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:25.359
<v Speaker 2>among the investing public or traders about what happens, and

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 2>I just wonder, you know, here we are digesting an

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 2>important data point, but I do wonder we've got inflation

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 2>next week. Could could sentiment change much, you know from

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:38.600
<v Speaker 2>what we heard from IRA Oh absolutely.

0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 4>I mean, take a look at what happened this week.

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:42.040
<v Speaker 4>You know, there was a bit of a relief rally

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:45.280
<v Speaker 4>on Wednesday after the ADP data showed a really weak

0:05:45.400 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 4>private payrolls print, and then two days later, you know,

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 4>gangbusters on the government shops reports. So you can see

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 4>it's really a very pickle environment right now, and it

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 4>doesn't take a whole lot to move the needle. I

0:05:56.720 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 4>mean in terms of next week coming up. Obviously CP

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 4>is going to be the big highlight later in the week.

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:07.760
<v Speaker 4>We also have producer price index before that, you know,

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:10.800
<v Speaker 4>maybe you know you miss inflation expectations if that loves

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 4>the needle in anything. And of course we get the

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 4>Fed minutes as well, so all of those some good

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 4>data points. Look go ahead to hey.

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 3>Mollie when it comes to what we're seeing with the

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 3>wage pressures ease in here, how much of that today

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:25.679
<v Speaker 3>was part of offsetting maybe some of the labor market

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:29.040
<v Speaker 3>strength that people maybe would have been concerned about there.

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:33.159
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it's it's a little bit tough because like

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:35.920
<v Speaker 4>you can't really compare this with the Jewel support because

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:38.279
<v Speaker 4>it's not the same month. But if you were to

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:40.680
<v Speaker 4>look at it at the value of you know, you know,

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 4>job openings going up by a ton and then wages

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 4>coming down a little bit, like that would make sense, right,

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:49.840
<v Speaker 4>you know, like that workers like maybe you don't have

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:54.840
<v Speaker 4>as much leverage here, you know that there's that there's

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 4>so many job openings right now, or that they can

0:06:58.040 --> 0:06:59.840
<v Speaker 4>they do have a lot of choice actually in that

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:02.600
<v Speaker 4>So it's I mean, but yeah, like I said, it's

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 4>you know, it's two different months. It's a little tough

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:07.560
<v Speaker 4>to square the two here. But I mean, at least,

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 4>like I think the FED will probably you know, if

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 4>there is some positive takeaway from this report to see

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 4>a more modest number on the wage side, that is

0:07:15.680 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 4>certainly a good one for them.

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 2>We've talked a lot about five percent, but we've also heard,

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, various individuals talk about six percent or seven

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 2>percent when it comes to US yields. Is that Are

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 2>you ruling that out yet? In terms of your analysis

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 2>and research, a.

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 5>Seven percent would be pretty astounding six. See, I can

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:38.640
<v Speaker 5>create a realistic scenario where we get to six percent,

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 5>but I think that would require a reacceleration of inflation

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 5>and the Federal Reserve to start hiking rates more. It's

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 5>hard to see at this point how the market is

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 5>going to price for a steeper yield curve. So let's

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 5>say that the Fed does nothing right now, a significantly

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 5>upward sloping yield curve in an environment where you don't

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 5>have accelerating inflation. So I could see a flat yield curve, right.

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:05.239
<v Speaker 5>I can see a scenario where we wind up getting

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 5>a completely flat yield curve at five and a quarter percent,

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 5>But the market's always going to be pricing for the

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 5>Fed snacks move at some point, right, So it could

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 5>be that the market prices for the Fed not to

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 5>cut interest rates until twenty twenty six. But even if

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 5>it does, then that still means that you're going to

0:08:20.920 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 5>have ten year yields need to be below the overnight rate,

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:25.560
<v Speaker 5>and so it's going to be hard I think, to

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:29.160
<v Speaker 5>get tenure yields up to six percent without the Fed hiking.

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 5>But that being said, you know, oil goes back to

0:08:31.360 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 5>over one hundred and you wind up with a reacceleration

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 5>in the labor market, and the next thing, you know,

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 5>you could wind up with the market pricing for interest

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 5>rate hikes and that could certainly push yields more than

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:44.320
<v Speaker 5>nowhere near my base case scenario for sure. But that's

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 5>but there is a realistic scenario where we get there.

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 3>What do you think ira would be the make or

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 3>break level in the tenure treasury yield to really see

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 3>asset correct classes basically having to reprice, especially in the

0:08:55.400 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 3>stock market collapse.

0:08:56.880 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 5>Right, Well, I guess well that's a better question for

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 5>Geena Martin Adams are equity strategists, right, because I think

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 5>that comes more down to valuation. Right, So, if if

0:09:06.280 --> 0:09:08.959
<v Speaker 5>you look at what's been moving this market, though, it

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:11.679
<v Speaker 5>is there are tighter financial conditions. I think you mentioned

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 5>that a little bit earlier in this in the segment

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:19.280
<v Speaker 5>where if this whole entire move has not been on

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 5>higher inflation expectations. So even though we had this blowout

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:25.959
<v Speaker 5>jobs report, it wasn't that that inflation break evens and

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 5>the market's expectation of inflation moved up. It's all been

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 5>in real yields, and real yields tend to move because

0:09:31.520 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 5>of tighter monetary policy, market volatility, and fiscal deficits, so

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 5>that that's in fact our model. Those are the three

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 5>inputs to our model for ten year tips shields. Ten

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 5>year tips shields approaching two and a half percent, our

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 5>model says two point six percent, so reasonably close. But

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 5>it's because in large part because of the expectations of

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 5>what the Fed's going to do as well as the

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 5>just the massive volatility we've had in treasury yields, and

0:09:57.760 --> 0:10:00.439
<v Speaker 5>investors want to be compensated for that volatiley and that

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 5>shows up in tips yields for sure.

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 2>Hey, can you in thirty seconds your call him on

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:08.560
<v Speaker 2>the six trillion dollars title wave in the treasury market.

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:10.080
<v Speaker 2>What do we need to keep on our radar just

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 2>quickly if you could.

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, So that's all about tea bills. There's still tee

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:16.440
<v Speaker 5>bill The amount of tea bills are going to need

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 5>to be issued over the next quarter is still going

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 5>to rise. So there's going to be plenty for money

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 5>market investors to supply for them to invest in.

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 2>That's good because there's demand out there anyway, as we know. Hey, guys,

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:28.960
<v Speaker 2>thank you so much. I really appreciate it and have

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 2>a great weekend, Bloomberg Intelligence Chief US interest rates strategist

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 2>Ari Jersey out there on zoom in New Jersey, and

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 2>of course Bloomberg News Economics editor Molly Smith joining us

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 2>on the phone in New York City. Can find Molly

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 2>at Molly Smith News on Twitter, and you can certainly

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:45.839
<v Speaker 2>catch Ira in his research and his team's research on

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:48.880
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg. You are listening and watching Bloomberg Business Week

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 2>on this Friday, Carol Master along with just metten In

0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:53.559
<v Speaker 2>for Tim Stanevik, and this is Bloomberg.

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:59.559
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 1>live weekday afternoons from three to six Eastern Listen on

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, the iHeartRadio app, and the Bloomberg Business app,

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 2>Nonfarm payrolls increased three hundred and thirty six thousand last month.

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:15.839
<v Speaker 2>I feel like we shall get like headbands and caps

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:18.080
<v Speaker 2>and T shirts because it really was a shocking number.

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:20.080
<v Speaker 2>It's the most since the start of the year, after

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 2>sizeable upward revisions to the prior two months, so that's

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:26.080
<v Speaker 2>it's not just this past month, it was the prior

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:30.560
<v Speaker 2>months to September as well. A Bureau Labor Statistics Report

0:11:30.559 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 2>of course coming out with all of this earlier today,

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 2>the unemployment rate, by the way, holding it three point

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:36.720
<v Speaker 2>eight percent, wages rising at a modest pace, and maybe

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 2>that was some of what Colm folks down. So let's

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 2>get to it. Back with us on a Job's Day,

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:44.320
<v Speaker 2>Becky Frankwitz, she's Chief Commercial Officer in president North America

0:11:44.320 --> 0:11:48.440
<v Speaker 2>at Manpower Group. On zoom from Durham, North Carolina. Becky,

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:50.720
<v Speaker 2>it is good to have you here with jessin myself.

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 2>So it was quite a strong report, kind of a

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 2>shocker when it first crossed. Was it a surprise to you?

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 7>Okay, it's a blockbuster report. I mean, Carol, what we're

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 7>seeing as employers as we go into the holiday season,

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 7>they really want to enter the first of the year

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 7>fully staffed. And so when you think about what Jobs

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:14.479
<v Speaker 7>Report Friday really is, it's the match between open opportunities

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 7>and people and what they want to do, and so

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 7>we're seeing that match increase. So it just shows the

0:12:20.080 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 7>resilience of an increasingly cost conscious American consumer. We saw

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 7>that because we saw services, leisure and hospitality go significantly

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 7>up almost one hundred thousand jobs out of all the

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 7>jobs created over two hundred thousand. We're in services versus

0:12:35.240 --> 0:12:38.440
<v Speaker 7>durable goods, and so Americans are wanting to continue to

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:42.319
<v Speaker 7>experience experiences and eating out, and that's why we're seeing

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 7>you know, companies like Dominoes fall into a top employer

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:50.319
<v Speaker 7>from cost consciousness, Walmart, Dollar General following in the top employers,

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 7>and so, you know, a very resilient yet cost conscious

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:55.080
<v Speaker 7>American consumer.

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 3>So what industries are seeing the highest demand for labor

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:01.679
<v Speaker 3>at this point versus those that are seeing the weakest.

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:05.320
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, so this is a headline that hasn't necessarily been

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 7>covered today if you think about in real time data Jess,

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:11.320
<v Speaker 7>and that's usually the view that we bring because we

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 7>can track bisector by day what's happening versus looking just

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:17.840
<v Speaker 7>back at BLS as we look ahead. What we're seeing

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 7>today is warm up in holiday hiring and the heavyweight

0:13:22.200 --> 0:13:25.720
<v Speaker 7>holiday heroes is going to be operations and logistics. So

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:29.360
<v Speaker 7>for the first time in three years we saw it

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 7>jobs fall out of the top three sectors. So it's

0:13:32.520 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 7>been medical sales. It now it is medical sales, and

0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:40.079
<v Speaker 7>think about sales is getting ready for the recovery in

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:42.720
<v Speaker 7>the economy. So companies want to have a full sales team.

0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:46.080
<v Speaker 7>And now in the number three position is operations and logistics.

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 7>And how that's tied to holiday is we are seeing

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:51.959
<v Speaker 7>more clicks than bricks from Americans as we go into

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 7>the holiday hiring period, and so Americans are shopping more online.

0:13:55.920 --> 0:13:58.079
<v Speaker 7>You know a little bit they recovered from covid went

0:13:58.080 --> 0:14:01.679
<v Speaker 7>out into retail last year. Thish we're seeing American shop online.

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:04.920
<v Speaker 7>That's evidence by big headlines from Amazon, you know, hiring

0:14:04.960 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 7>one hundred thousand more workers than last year target hiring

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 7>one hundred thousand workers given their click and collect program.

0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:15.079
<v Speaker 7>So we have some optimism in the upcoming months. So

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 7>I'd say that's one of the standouts is logistics, and

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 7>again medical continues to be in number one and number

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 7>two sales for the reasons I mentioned.

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting. I mean, I don't know. Do you talk

0:14:26.360 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 2>to some of the companies that are posting or that

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 2>you're that are looking to hire. Is it because they

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 2>are doing more business there's demand out there? Is it

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 2>again that labor hoarding story at Becky? What is it?

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 2>Because it's interesting to hear what you say about that

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 2>they want to kind of be stocked with workers heading

0:14:42.000 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 2>into the new year.

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, so it's really I mean, Carol, it's actually not

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 7>very complicated. What's fueling our economy today is the confidence

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 7>of the American consumer. We continue to spend, and as

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 7>long as we continue to spend, that generates demand. Again,

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 7>we're spending on services much more than good so keep

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 7>that in mind. But as long as we continue to spend,

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 7>it generates demand and companies are going to seek to

0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 7>fill their open positions. Now, I want to be clear,

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 7>as we look at the job demand, which is what

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 7>fuels ultimately BLS, we have seen a little moderation month

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 7>over month, Carol. It came down about five percent month

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 7>over month in terms of overall jobs created in the economy.

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 7>But you know, people say, hey, the fall weather's here,

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 7>the labor market's cooling, But I would tell you it's

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 7>not winter yet.

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 8>Hence the holiday hiring optimism.

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 3>So what's really driving some of that optimism when it

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 3>does come to the holidays.

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:38.400
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, it again, we as Americans now are are buying

0:15:38.400 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 7>more online. So in COVID, we didn't really have the

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 7>optionality we had to buy online, so you saw a

0:15:43.800 --> 0:15:47.560
<v Speaker 7>significant increase in option logistics to fuel that During Covid.

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 7>Then we got to go back to stores, and so

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:54.480
<v Speaker 7>last holiday season people went back into you know, shopping

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:57.360
<v Speaker 7>malls and retail stores. And now we're seeing that moderate

0:15:57.440 --> 0:16:00.440
<v Speaker 7>again to more click you know, and you also know

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 7>when you click, you tend to spend more. It's hard

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 7>to keep up with your basket if you will, across

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 7>multiple providers.

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 8>And so it's giving some optimism.

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 7>And we're seeing the traditional retailers again, I said, Amazon,

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:13.840
<v Speaker 7>but Target again with their click and collect program. They're

0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 7>hiring as well, so it's not limited just to the

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 7>online retailers.

0:16:17.240 --> 0:16:20.120
<v Speaker 2>Probably my husband's like slayer well babe with Amazon, right,

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 2>it's so easy. It's terrible because it's just like, oh

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:25.320
<v Speaker 2>I want, I think I do. It's like crazy. But

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 2>it is interesting when you talk about logistics and getting

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 2>kind of gearing up for the holiday season. That makes

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 2>me think, though, they'll get through the holiday season and

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 2>let some of those folks go. I mean, are these

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 2>full time positions. Are they getting all the benefits and

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:39.360
<v Speaker 2>everything or is it temp.

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, Carol, so this is seasonal. It happens every year,

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:44.880
<v Speaker 7>you know, if you're call Last year, you and I

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 7>talked about the fact that we weren't seeing the increase

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 7>that we thought we would, so last year was a

0:16:49.760 --> 0:16:53.160
<v Speaker 7>little bit of a different from the past. But this

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 7>year we're seeing holiday hiring come back with strength, and

0:16:56.960 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 7>it usually is people who want to get a second

0:16:58.920 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 7>income to out their holiday shopping or someone who just

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 7>wants to go to work part time to get their

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:06.479
<v Speaker 7>holiday shopping. So this is a fairly normal cadence for

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 7>the American economy. Again, last year was abnormal though, so

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:13.719
<v Speaker 7>it's very nice to feel some normalcy come back into

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 7>the patterns.

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:15.680
<v Speaker 2>So, Beck, if you had to use a word or

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:19.199
<v Speaker 2>two words to describe the labor market right now, what

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:19.720
<v Speaker 2>would it.

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 8>Be, I'd say very tight.

0:17:23.119 --> 0:17:25.600
<v Speaker 7>It's very tight, and so we're seeing you know, it's

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 7>taking forty four days on average, Carol to fill a job.

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:31.399
<v Speaker 8>That's very long.

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 7>That that's why employers get anxious because by the time

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:37.120
<v Speaker 7>I get somebody through the process, if I can't speed that.

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 8>Up, they may make another choice. And so, you know

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:39.680
<v Speaker 8>when you.

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:42.520
<v Speaker 7>Said labor hoarding, it's different than it was where I'm

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:44.880
<v Speaker 7>scared I can't hire people, but the time to hire

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:50.119
<v Speaker 7>is taking so long, and it's causing employees to possibly

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:53.200
<v Speaker 7>have other options and so that it's still a very

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:54.000
<v Speaker 7>tight labor market.

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:55.280
<v Speaker 8>You saw unemployment not move.

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:55.640
<v Speaker 4>Oh.

0:17:55.640 --> 0:17:57.399
<v Speaker 7>In one highlight that I want to point out that

0:17:57.480 --> 0:18:00.199
<v Speaker 7>is a little bit concerning is we did see for

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 7>the first time in a long time, female participation drop

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 7>only two tenths of a point. It's not alarming, but

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:09.679
<v Speaker 7>it's the first time and it's very concerning. And if

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:13.159
<v Speaker 7>you think about ops and logistics roles, they're over represented

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:16.679
<v Speaker 7>by men, and we cannot have another sheet session on

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:19.800
<v Speaker 7>our hands, and so I really want to watch that.

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:20.960
<v Speaker 8>I'll be watching that closely.

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:24.480
<v Speaker 7>Hopefully the retail in store is that comes back a

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 7>bit offset some of that, But that's a little bit concerning.

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:28.720
<v Speaker 8>I don't like to see that number.

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:30.639
<v Speaker 3>Any indication as to why we are seeing that.

0:18:31.880 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, so it's you know, there's a lot of headlines

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 7>around the childcare situation and what's going to happen the

0:18:37.119 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 7>cliff that could possibly happen there.

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:39.680
<v Speaker 8>That's concerning.

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:42.159
<v Speaker 7>But I also think the mix and the economy is

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 7>changing a bit as we see this growth in OPS

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:47.719
<v Speaker 7>and logistics, and so that something for all of us

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 7>to keep a close eye on.

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:50.879
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Becky, you mentioned forty four days on average to

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 2>fill a job. You said, that's very long. Is that

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:55.560
<v Speaker 2>kind of where we were twenty nineteen. Give me a

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:56.399
<v Speaker 2>little perspective.

0:18:57.160 --> 0:18:59.680
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, so no, it's taking much longer now to fill

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:01.359
<v Speaker 7>a job, you know it is.

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:03.919
<v Speaker 2>So it's above what it was back in twenty nineteen,

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 2>just before the pandemic shutdown.

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, it's a labor market's tighter, Carol. So it's it's

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:12.199
<v Speaker 7>above what it was in twenty nineteen. And again it's flattened.

0:19:12.240 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 7>We had seen it increasing, which is definitely not a

0:19:15.000 --> 0:19:17.160
<v Speaker 7>good thing. Now it's kind of flattened. So I'm hoping

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 7>there's stabilization there and then we'll see that come back down.

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 2>Interesting, like we keep hearing it. We talked with a

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:26.920
<v Speaker 2>CEO over at Omni Hotels. You can check it out

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:28.639
<v Speaker 2>on our podcast view. But he talked about strength in

0:19:28.640 --> 0:19:30.640
<v Speaker 2>the labor market, but he said it wasn't as bad

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:32.960
<v Speaker 2>as it was kind of coming out of the pandemic,

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 2>but nonetheless also seeing some strength there. Hey, Becky, great

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 2>color on the US jobs picture, so so appreciate it.

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 2>She's Chief Commercial Officer, President of North America at Manpower Group.

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:45.399
<v Speaker 2>Joining us on Zoom from Dorham, North Carolina. And this

0:19:45.760 --> 0:19:48.399
<v Speaker 2>you know, I feel like job's data strong good shows

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 2>the economy. If you have a job, right, you're going

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:52.160
<v Speaker 2>to spend, You're going to go places you just travel.

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:56.719
<v Speaker 2>But it does it, you know, continue to provide a

0:19:56.760 --> 0:19:58.400
<v Speaker 2>predicament a little bit for the fed right.

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:01.440
<v Speaker 3>And hey, we are seeing some of those wheach pressures ease.

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:04.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, interesting, all right, so something for us to continue

0:20:04.320 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 2>them all over.

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:14.080
<v Speaker 1>live weekday afternoons from three to six Easter on Bloomberg Radio,

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business app, and YouTube. You can also listen

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:20.760
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 2>Hey, it's the fourth day in the fraud trial of

0:20:27.600 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 2>FTX co founder Sam Makmin Freed. FTX co founder Gary

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:35.640
<v Speaker 2>Wang on the stand again. The Cryptocurrency Exchange is other

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 2>co founder and he did plead guilty in December. Green

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:44.200
<v Speaker 2>to cooperate in this case against SBF. Keep in mind,

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 2>Wong Bankmin Freed's MIT roommate, is the first of three

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:50.400
<v Speaker 2>star witnesses testifying for the government. In our weekly look

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 2>at the world of crypto, let's get an update on

0:20:52.640 --> 0:20:55.040
<v Speaker 2>the trial back with US and following all the details.

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:57.960
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg News legal reporter Ava Benny Morrison, She's on the

0:20:57.960 --> 0:21:01.440
<v Speaker 2>phone from Manhattan Federal Courthouse. Talk about the day, Ava,

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:02.720
<v Speaker 2>what went on and what did you hear?

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 6>So it was a big day today We heard from

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 6>Gary Wong. He continued giving his testimony. Much of it

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:14.879
<v Speaker 6>was a sort of painstaking description of how Alameda and

0:21:15.280 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 6>FTX operated, but towards the end of the day he

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:24.680
<v Speaker 6>gave a description of the final frantic days at FTX,

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 6>talking about how he was in the Bahamas with Sam

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 6>and some of the other top executives as ftx's financial

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:36.440
<v Speaker 6>situation was getting worse and worse. He talks about when

0:21:37.320 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 6>bankruptcy and then him and Sam went on a drive

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 6>to the Securities Commission in the Bahamas and Sam instructed

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 6>him to transfer the remaining assets of FTX to the

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:51.120
<v Speaker 6>Bahamas regulators. This was at a time when the US

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:53.679
<v Speaker 6>was trying to get a hand on it, and he

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 6>said that Sam wanted him to do that because he

0:21:57.200 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 6>thought the Bahamas were more friendly and they might be

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 6>inclined to keep him as CEO of the company.

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:06.960
<v Speaker 3>Will we continue to have more testimony from him.

0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:12.080
<v Speaker 6>Yes. So the prosecutor finished his direct examination of Gary

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:15.720
<v Speaker 6>today and now we're in cross examination. We only got

0:22:15.720 --> 0:22:19.400
<v Speaker 6>to hear a little bit of what Sam's lawyer had

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:22.760
<v Speaker 6>to say. He was sort of questioning Gary on whether

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:27.680
<v Speaker 6>changing the FTX code really gave Alameda special privileges or

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:29.680
<v Speaker 6>if it was just a bolster of their role as

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:34.399
<v Speaker 6>a market maker on FTX. Gary's cross examination will continue

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:36.680
<v Speaker 6>into next week, and then we're expecting to hear from

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:40.600
<v Speaker 6>Caroline Ellison, who was the CEO of Alameda Research.

0:22:40.680 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 2>It feels damaging. So far, everything you've been hearing and

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:43.640
<v Speaker 2>listening to.

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:48.720
<v Speaker 6>It's been pretty compelling. We've been wanting to hear from

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 6>these cooperating witnesses ever since we heard they pleaded guilty

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:55.680
<v Speaker 6>and admitted to committing afford with Sam Bateman freed. They

0:22:55.680 --> 0:22:59.920
<v Speaker 6>have a very rare and valuable insight into what was

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:02.679
<v Speaker 6>going on inside the company and inside that in a circle.

0:23:02.800 --> 0:23:05.400
<v Speaker 6>Sam's in a circle. So it's been very interesting.

0:23:05.400 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 4>To say the.

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:10.120
<v Speaker 2>Least, Sam's in the room right, I assume what can

0:23:10.160 --> 0:23:14.440
<v Speaker 2>we any inside or anything about, you know, as people

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 2>are testifying what he's doing.

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:21.359
<v Speaker 6>It was interesting He and Gary have been friends since

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:24.280
<v Speaker 6>high school. They went to mathcamp together, they lived together

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 6>when they're in college. Despite that history, there was no

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:33.119
<v Speaker 6>acknowledgment when Gary walked in the court of Thursday and today.

0:23:33.240 --> 0:23:36.040
<v Speaker 6>They didn't look at each other. And Sam has just

0:23:36.080 --> 0:23:38.400
<v Speaker 6>been sort of staring straight ahead when he's been giving

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:42.359
<v Speaker 6>evidence or talking to his lawyers and taking notes on

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:43.440
<v Speaker 6>our laptops as well.

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 3>What's the timetable for this trial and as far as

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 3>when there could be a verdict reached.

0:23:50.240 --> 0:23:52.399
<v Speaker 6>We're expecting the trial to the last for up to

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:57.200
<v Speaker 6>six weeks, so a verticte could be a while away yet.

0:23:57.359 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 6>And we're getting through a couple of the key witnesses

0:24:01.040 --> 0:24:04.880
<v Speaker 6>this week next week, and then we'll expect to hear

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:08.640
<v Speaker 6>the Sam Bagmand Freed's case maybe in a few weeks time.

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:11.480
<v Speaker 2>So cross examination just real quickly. We're not seeing that

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:12.680
<v Speaker 2>yet or it is happening.

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 6>It is happening. Sam's lawyer started cross examining Gary this afternoon,

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:20.160
<v Speaker 6>but it was less than an hour before the court

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 6>was due to finish, So I think he's really going

0:24:22.160 --> 0:24:25.160
<v Speaker 6>to get into the swing and things next Tuesday.

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 2>All right, So it'll be interesting to see that line

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:28.680
<v Speaker 2>of questioning as well, hey, Ava, thank you so much.

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 2>You've just kept us up to speed all week on

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 2>this Bloomberg News legal reporter Ava Betty Morrison on the

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 2>phone from the Manhattan Federal Courthouse, where, of course that

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 2>fraud trial against FTX co founder Sam Magmin Freed is underway.

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Let's get more on the trial and oversight of the

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:46.200
<v Speaker 2>crypto industry with us as Rory Doyle, head a financial

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 2>crime policy at Fernurgo, which provides financial institutions. So we're

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 2>talking about the likes of P and C and Santander

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 2>with compliance and regulatory and risk applications. Rory joining us

0:24:56.680 --> 0:25:00.679
<v Speaker 2>on zoom from the UK. Rory, you've been listening, I

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:05.600
<v Speaker 2>assume too, our Evin Benny Morrison talk about the SBF case,

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 2>the ft X case. When you think about oversight and

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:15.199
<v Speaker 2>compliance and risk, certainly among the financial establishment, there's a

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 2>lot at stake when it comes still to the crypto world,

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:19.320
<v Speaker 2>and is still a lot to be known.

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:24.159
<v Speaker 9>There is indeed, and I suppose you know listening to

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:27.440
<v Speaker 9>the feedback there that I mean something that that comes

0:25:27.480 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 9>straight away to what we're seeing is the immaturity and

0:25:31.080 --> 0:25:35.639
<v Speaker 9>the inexperience of the C suite involved in ft X

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 9>as that the legendary genre from the famous Enron case,

0:25:42.440 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 9>who's now the liquidator for FTX, has explained he's never

0:25:46.840 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 9>seen a more inexperienced and a more and c suite

0:25:55.800 --> 0:25:58.960
<v Speaker 9>that that does not, you know, take any advice around

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:02.920
<v Speaker 9>you know, risk application or you know business risk assessments.

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:07.159
<v Speaker 9>So there's a lot to have learned, you know, in

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 9>the fintepech world and in the crypto world.

0:26:09.800 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 3>Talk to us about the compliance risks in solutions that

0:26:13.320 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 3>you give to your clients that typically are financial institutions.

0:26:18.800 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 9>So we provide a suite of applications that it's an

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 9>ecosystem for client lifecycle management. So I'm ahead of financial crime.

0:26:28.800 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 9>So I look after making sure that when a client

0:26:32.160 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 9>takes our suite systems, they are able to harmonize their

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 9>policies and procedures and let let them integrate with one

0:26:42.359 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 9>hundred and twenty jurisdictions around the world. So essentially our

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 9>clients obviously are worldwide, so they're able to onboard a

0:26:51.840 --> 0:26:56.359
<v Speaker 9>client efficiently and compliantly from one location, and they may

0:26:56.400 --> 0:26:58.200
<v Speaker 9>be able to want to book their trades out of France,

0:26:58.200 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 9>and they want to book their trades out of Spain

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:03.119
<v Speaker 9>book trades at the US, and we give them a

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:05.960
<v Speaker 9>one stop shop to be able to do that both

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:08.240
<v Speaker 9>efficiently and compliantly.

0:27:08.400 --> 0:27:11.800
<v Speaker 3>And we're any of them impacted by ftx's collapse.

0:27:13.000 --> 0:27:16.440
<v Speaker 9>And not that I'm aware enough, So we just build

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 9>the systems for them. Then it's totally housed within the cloud.

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:25.119
<v Speaker 9>But then our clients themselves are the only people who

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:26.680
<v Speaker 9>have visibility of their accounts.

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:29.639
<v Speaker 2>I mean, but isn't part of the problem that compliance

0:27:29.680 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 2>and oversight is different around the world at this point,

0:27:34.280 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 2>there's not really any clear set of rules. And if

0:27:36.600 --> 0:27:39.880
<v Speaker 2>you think about the established financial world. I'm not saying

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 2>everything's exactly the same, whether it's Europe or Asia or

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:46.320
<v Speaker 2>the United States. We know it's not, but there is

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:49.600
<v Speaker 2>kind of an acceptance of a certain level of rules

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:54.399
<v Speaker 2>and oversight, and that's what enables global financial markets to

0:27:54.400 --> 0:27:57.800
<v Speaker 2>actually work right, or financial global financial transactions to work.

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:00.480
<v Speaker 2>Isn't that the big problem right now with crypto?

0:28:01.920 --> 0:28:05.720
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, you're absolutely right. But we are seeing around the

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:09.720
<v Speaker 9>world jurisdictions catching up with the fat F recommendations on crypto,

0:28:10.000 --> 0:28:13.200
<v Speaker 9>so seeing very good laws and regulations coming out of Singapore.

0:28:13.560 --> 0:28:18.479
<v Speaker 9>We've got the financial and Innovation Technology Act coming, you know,

0:28:19.200 --> 0:28:23.960
<v Speaker 9>passing into Congress this this this quarter. Now obviously Congress

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:26.800
<v Speaker 9>is that a bit of a bit of a ponder

0:28:26.800 --> 0:28:29.400
<v Speaker 9>at the moment, so there may be a delay on that.

0:28:29.840 --> 0:28:32.560
<v Speaker 9>We're seeing the EU Single Rule Book coming into place,

0:28:32.960 --> 0:28:35.439
<v Speaker 9>and that's addressing the use of al anonymous instruments such

0:28:35.480 --> 0:28:41.320
<v Speaker 9>as crypto assets. Australia published a consultation i believe last

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 9>last quarter which gives coverage to various digital currency exchange services,

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:51.800
<v Speaker 9>so that makes them regulated entities. And your near neighbors

0:28:51.840 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 9>Canada they produced a consultation paper there last quarter as well,

0:28:57.880 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 9>and they're harmonizing their transactions reporting rules so for air, crypto,

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:04.000
<v Speaker 9>in line cash.

0:29:04.040 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 2>So more's coming fifteen seconds Rory. So does that mean

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:10.160
<v Speaker 2>you are seeing increased uptick in demand for your services?

0:29:10.280 --> 0:29:12.120
<v Speaker 2>Can you quantify it and just very quickly?

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, absolutely, especially since we've seen there's a dearth of

0:29:17.480 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 9>financial crime professionals around the world. There's been an increase

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:25.000
<v Speaker 9>in screening and sanctions due to the war in the Ukraine,

0:29:25.280 --> 0:29:28.479
<v Speaker 9>and therefore something needs to bridge that gap. All right,

0:29:28.480 --> 0:29:30.320
<v Speaker 9>well we believe we have the solution for it.

0:29:30.360 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, good to check in with you and get the

0:29:32.200 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 2>playoff of certainly the latest on that trial downtown. Here

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:38.240
<v Speaker 2>Rory Doyle, thank you, head of financial crime policy at Ennergo,

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:40.000
<v Speaker 2>joining us from the UK.

0:29:42.040 --> 0:29:45.200
<v Speaker 5>Mark the journal.

0:29:46.200 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 2>Now about you let me drive?

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:52.920
<v Speaker 10>Oh no, no, no, no, honey, please out of the gravels.

0:29:53.360 --> 0:29:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Let's I want to drive.

0:29:57.000 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 6>It's a good question.

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 1>This is the drive to the clothes Well on Bloomberg Radio.

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:11.440
<v Speaker 2>All right, everybody, just about eighteen minutes left in today's session.

0:30:11.640 --> 0:30:13.600
<v Speaker 2>Carol Master along, we've just met and Jess of course

0:30:13.680 --> 0:30:16.720
<v Speaker 2>in for Tim Stanovik on this job's Friday, and we've

0:30:16.720 --> 0:30:19.360
<v Speaker 2>got to rally underway. One point nine percent higher on

0:30:19.400 --> 0:30:22.000
<v Speaker 2>the NAZAC. Charlie was just talking about amazing the trades.

0:30:22.000 --> 0:30:24.800
<v Speaker 2>So we're seeing buying into the clothes not you know,

0:30:25.000 --> 0:30:27.000
<v Speaker 2>we're almost getting ready to wrap it up. How do

0:30:27.080 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 2>you make sense of it as somebody who is constantly

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:30.400
<v Speaker 2>reporting on the market.

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:32.280
<v Speaker 3>Well, I look at a lot of different corners. I

0:30:32.320 --> 0:30:36.320
<v Speaker 3>brought up earlier about the shorted basket, most shortage stocks

0:30:36.320 --> 0:30:39.680
<v Speaker 3>in Goldman stacks basket, as well as those nonprofitable techs.

0:30:39.680 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 3>So you're seeing those corners of the market actually higher

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:44.760
<v Speaker 3>than the broader market. So I think there's some things

0:30:44.880 --> 0:30:47.880
<v Speaker 3>underlying surface there, so it's not just more broadly in

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:49.960
<v Speaker 3>the equity market, but then also trying to figure out.

0:30:49.960 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so does it mean it's a strong trade this

0:30:51.840 --> 0:30:52.520
<v Speaker 2>buying or no?

0:30:52.880 --> 0:30:53.760
<v Speaker 3>Not necessarily?

0:30:53.920 --> 0:30:56.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So let's see what Alan Zaffron has to say about.

0:30:57.520 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 2>Let's if he's been doing some buying or telling others

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:02.880
<v Speaker 2>to do. He's founding partner co CEO at IQ Capital.

0:31:02.920 --> 0:31:06.120
<v Speaker 2>He's on zoom from Foster City, California. Hey, Alan, always

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:07.160
<v Speaker 2>get to get some time with you.

0:31:07.240 --> 0:31:07.720
<v Speaker 3>How are you.

0:31:08.720 --> 0:31:12.280
<v Speaker 10>I'm doing great, and it is blazing hot here on

0:31:12.320 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 10>the West Coast.

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:14.920
<v Speaker 5>It's blaking out today in the market.

0:31:15.680 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 2>So do you buy it? Do you buy this trade?

0:31:19.800 --> 0:31:23.360
<v Speaker 10>This is a technical snap back from an over sold condition,

0:31:23.960 --> 0:31:28.440
<v Speaker 10>but fundamentally I don't really buy it in the short run. Basically,

0:31:28.480 --> 0:31:30.520
<v Speaker 10>this is the goldilocks trade. If you think you're going

0:31:30.600 --> 0:31:34.200
<v Speaker 10>to get strong economic growth in moderating inflation, this is

0:31:34.200 --> 0:31:38.239
<v Speaker 10>what you're looking for. On our perception is when the

0:31:38.280 --> 0:31:41.800
<v Speaker 10>Fed has raised rates these many times, inevitably you get

0:31:41.840 --> 0:31:45.840
<v Speaker 10>an economic slowdown that coupled with wage pressures. When you

0:31:45.880 --> 0:31:50.480
<v Speaker 10>see strikes taking place of autoworkers, people in Hollywood. When

0:31:50.480 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 10>you see the healthcare system Kaija permanente, it's telling you

0:31:53.920 --> 0:31:55.840
<v Speaker 10>wages are going to go up, margins are going to

0:31:55.840 --> 0:31:56.320
<v Speaker 10>get hurt a.

0:31:56.240 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 5>Bit next year.

0:31:56.920 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 10>So we're a bit skeptical about the projected twelve percent

0:32:00.920 --> 0:32:03.120
<v Speaker 10>of earnings growth and for the S and P five

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 10>hundred next year, and therefore we're a bit cautious.

0:32:06.040 --> 0:32:10.240
<v Speaker 11>We think equities remain just a bit ahead of themselves,

0:32:10.280 --> 0:32:13.880
<v Speaker 11>not egregiously overvalued, but we wouldn't be surprised if for

0:32:13.880 --> 0:32:16.960
<v Speaker 11>a year from now equities we're trading at about eighteen

0:32:17.000 --> 0:32:19.800
<v Speaker 11>times forward earnings, which gets you to write about where

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:20.560
<v Speaker 11>we are today.

0:32:21.160 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 3>You brought up earnings. Clearly, we'll have GP Morgan and

0:32:24.080 --> 0:32:26.480
<v Speaker 3>other banks kicking things off at the end of next

0:32:26.560 --> 0:32:29.480
<v Speaker 3>week for the third quarter earning season. What's your view

0:32:29.680 --> 0:32:31.760
<v Speaker 3>as far as when the S and P five hundred

0:32:31.800 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 3>looks poised to potentially be coming out of an earnings

0:32:34.360 --> 0:32:36.800
<v Speaker 3>recession in the fourth quarter, how do you think that

0:32:36.840 --> 0:32:40.120
<v Speaker 3>would bode well potentially for the broader equity market At

0:32:40.160 --> 0:32:42.200
<v Speaker 3>a time when people are debating a soft landing or

0:32:42.200 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 3>a hard landing, boy.

0:32:44.080 --> 0:32:46.680
<v Speaker 10>Bode wealth really going to get that earnings growth? So

0:32:46.760 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 10>if you you know, this year's entire move up, which

0:32:49.840 --> 0:32:51.920
<v Speaker 10>is at this point about fourteen percent on the index,

0:32:51.960 --> 0:32:55.280
<v Speaker 10>is entirely multiple expansion. We're going to see no earnings

0:32:55.320 --> 0:32:57.280
<v Speaker 10>growth this year. So if you really do buy into

0:32:57.280 --> 0:33:00.600
<v Speaker 10>that twelve percent earnings growth next year, next here, and

0:33:00.640 --> 0:33:03.200
<v Speaker 10>people really believe the Fed is finally on pause and

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:05.360
<v Speaker 10>we're going to have a more stable and clear environment

0:33:05.400 --> 0:33:10.360
<v Speaker 10>and uncertainty goes away, great markets go higher from there. Again,

0:33:10.400 --> 0:33:12.840
<v Speaker 10>we're just going to try and issue an element of

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:16.880
<v Speaker 10>skepticism that it's uncommon for a yield treasure yield crip

0:33:16.960 --> 0:33:20.840
<v Speaker 10>to be inverted, for the Fed have raised so quickly

0:33:21.160 --> 0:33:24.440
<v Speaker 10>and meaningfully, and for that to be a real economic impact.

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:28.080
<v Speaker 10>And therefore we're not quite as bullish as the way

0:33:28.120 --> 0:33:29.280
<v Speaker 10>you phrased that question.

0:33:29.360 --> 0:33:32.200
<v Speaker 2>To make you know, there's a lot of individuals weighing in.

0:33:32.960 --> 0:33:36.080
<v Speaker 2>Michael Hartnett over at b of A saying that the

0:33:36.080 --> 0:33:38.480
<v Speaker 2>bond market is going to rally big in twenty twenty four.

0:33:38.680 --> 0:33:42.640
<v Speaker 2>He said, amid a recession, I saw another Wall Street

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:44.880
<v Speaker 2>house talking about I think this was a buying opportunity

0:33:45.400 --> 0:33:47.720
<v Speaker 2>for equities. I mean, it's kind of like all over

0:33:47.760 --> 0:33:52.080
<v Speaker 2>the place, allan so what's the major risk right here

0:33:52.200 --> 0:33:55.200
<v Speaker 2>and getting and making kind of the wrong decision.

0:33:56.440 --> 0:33:59.560
<v Speaker 10>Well, I think among the major risks, are you think

0:33:59.560 --> 0:34:02.360
<v Speaker 10>about it, the American economy goes to go back to

0:34:02.400 --> 0:34:06.640
<v Speaker 10>basic economy on it's consumption and investments and government spending.

0:34:06.680 --> 0:34:10.000
<v Speaker 10>With exports minus imports, consumption is seventy percent of the economy.

0:34:10.360 --> 0:34:12.960
<v Speaker 10>Guess what COVID did. They made everybody decide they were

0:34:12.960 --> 0:34:15.320
<v Speaker 10>going to eat into their savings and go travel abroad

0:34:15.360 --> 0:34:17.160
<v Speaker 10>and spend all their money and go watch the tailor

0:34:17.160 --> 0:34:21.160
<v Speaker 10>swift concert and savings are cleaning. And if consumption can't

0:34:21.239 --> 0:34:23.960
<v Speaker 10>keep up at this pace next year, and if interest

0:34:24.040 --> 0:34:26.759
<v Speaker 10>rates are higher, which is slowing down investing, and if

0:34:26.800 --> 0:34:31.680
<v Speaker 10>we have chaos in Senate and fiscal spending isn't going

0:34:31.680 --> 0:34:33.960
<v Speaker 10>to bail us out, the C and the I and

0:34:34.000 --> 0:34:36.239
<v Speaker 10>the G the makeup economic growth are all going to

0:34:36.239 --> 0:34:39.680
<v Speaker 10>be less strong than we wish. It doesn't bode well

0:34:39.719 --> 0:34:42.520
<v Speaker 10>for an exceptionally strong equity market. It doesn't mean it

0:34:42.560 --> 0:34:47.240
<v Speaker 10>has to plummet, but earnings growth is going to be challenged.

0:34:47.280 --> 0:34:49.680
<v Speaker 10>We think a bit more than what is current consent.

0:34:49.880 --> 0:34:53.720
<v Speaker 10>This wisdom in the typical tailings of driving economic growth

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:56.200
<v Speaker 10>aren't going to be as prevalent next year, and therefore

0:34:56.200 --> 0:34:57.320
<v Speaker 10>it's gonna be a little more challenging.

0:34:58.160 --> 0:35:01.200
<v Speaker 3>What about the consumer in our when we're thinking about

0:35:01.239 --> 0:35:04.359
<v Speaker 3>how strong the labor market has held up, how does

0:35:04.400 --> 0:35:07.080
<v Speaker 3>this really signal that a recession is eminent in the

0:35:07.120 --> 0:35:08.120
<v Speaker 3>next couple of quarters.

0:35:09.640 --> 0:35:13.799
<v Speaker 10>It doesn't signal recession is terribly imminent. We would argue,

0:35:13.840 --> 0:35:18.680
<v Speaker 10>it's quite possible we've already been in this kind of bizarre, slowing,

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:22.480
<v Speaker 10>rolling recession, hitting different sectors at different points in the

0:35:22.520 --> 0:35:24.840
<v Speaker 10>Remember all the tech collayouts that are happening much earlier.

0:35:24.960 --> 0:35:28.640
<v Speaker 10>It's particularly here on the West coast. But what it

0:35:28.680 --> 0:35:33.160
<v Speaker 10>does bode is when wage pressures go up meaningfully, companies'

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:36.440
<v Speaker 10>margins begin to get crimped. Coupled with higher borrowing costs,

0:35:36.440 --> 0:35:40.359
<v Speaker 10>their propensity to invest in their businesses gets hurt a bit,

0:35:40.719 --> 0:35:43.320
<v Speaker 10>and it's hard to push on all those price increases

0:35:43.880 --> 0:35:47.239
<v Speaker 10>back to the consumers. You get lower profits and less

0:35:47.239 --> 0:35:50.480
<v Speaker 10>profit growth as a result. It may not mean a recession,

0:35:50.800 --> 0:35:53.640
<v Speaker 10>but as you know, the inverted yield curve has yet

0:35:53.800 --> 0:35:58.000
<v Speaker 10>to fail signaling a recession. So either this time is different,

0:35:58.120 --> 0:36:00.279
<v Speaker 10>or at least we're going to see somewhat of a

0:36:00.360 --> 0:36:03.399
<v Speaker 10>slowdown from the rapid economic growth we had seen over

0:36:03.440 --> 0:36:07.360
<v Speaker 10>the past twelve to eighteen months, which has frankly defied

0:36:07.400 --> 0:36:10.719
<v Speaker 10>a lot of the conventional economic models. As a consequence

0:36:10.800 --> 0:36:13.920
<v Speaker 10>partly of COVID and everybody changing their behavior about how

0:36:13.920 --> 0:36:16.960
<v Speaker 10>they intend to spend their dollars, they're accelerating spending at

0:36:17.000 --> 0:36:20.240
<v Speaker 10>the expense of savings. It's not clear that can persist

0:36:20.280 --> 0:36:23.399
<v Speaker 10>for another twelve to eighteen months without some slow down

0:36:23.440 --> 0:36:24.480
<v Speaker 10>in consumption.

0:36:24.280 --> 0:36:26.120
<v Speaker 2>Right, And we've been lucky because the job market has

0:36:26.160 --> 0:36:28.560
<v Speaker 2>been so tight, so people, whether or not their savings

0:36:28.600 --> 0:36:31.399
<v Speaker 2>are being pared down, they're continuing to spend because they've

0:36:31.440 --> 0:36:33.239
<v Speaker 2>got a job and they feel confident about that. And

0:36:33.280 --> 0:36:35.800
<v Speaker 2>I do wonder Allan, as you look at the market,

0:36:35.880 --> 0:36:40.759
<v Speaker 2>and I think about how quickly things can turn. And

0:36:41.120 --> 0:36:44.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, we keep saying about these kind of reinversions

0:36:44.040 --> 0:36:47.239
<v Speaker 2>or signs that are saying, okay, our recession certainly is near.

0:36:48.520 --> 0:36:50.839
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what is the sign that you kind

0:36:50.840 --> 0:36:52.640
<v Speaker 2>of are what is the Is there a data point

0:36:52.719 --> 0:36:56.520
<v Speaker 2>a metric that you really focus on to kind of

0:36:56.520 --> 0:36:58.600
<v Speaker 2>get an indication of where to go next and that

0:36:58.760 --> 0:37:00.879
<v Speaker 2>also guide you and how you invest and got about

0:37:00.880 --> 0:37:01.880
<v Speaker 2>forty seconds left.

0:37:02.520 --> 0:37:05.200
<v Speaker 10>Well, typically the unemployment payroll figures are more of a

0:37:05.400 --> 0:37:09.000
<v Speaker 10>coincident figure, not a leading or backward looking figure. So

0:37:09.040 --> 0:37:11.000
<v Speaker 10>when you see payrolls not going up three hundred and

0:37:11.000 --> 0:37:14.320
<v Speaker 10>thirty six thousand, twice the pace at which consensus expected today,

0:37:14.760 --> 0:37:17.400
<v Speaker 10>but a real drop in payrolls, that tells you the

0:37:17.400 --> 0:37:19.759
<v Speaker 10>party is about to end. And so we saw it.

0:37:19.840 --> 0:37:21.400
<v Speaker 10>Also if you go back to the last time we

0:37:21.440 --> 0:37:24.200
<v Speaker 10>had a recession where payrolls was two thousand and seven

0:37:24.280 --> 0:37:26.640
<v Speaker 10>came down pretty sharply in the fourth quarter, and it

0:37:26.719 --> 0:37:28.600
<v Speaker 10>led to the recession we saw in two thousand and

0:37:28.600 --> 0:37:31.520
<v Speaker 10>eight and nine. At some point when payrolls come down

0:37:31.560 --> 0:37:34.320
<v Speaker 10>pretty sharply, that's the sign that we're in the recession.

0:37:34.360 --> 0:37:37.719
<v Speaker 10>The issue is stocks typically are in front of that

0:37:37.960 --> 0:37:40.239
<v Speaker 10>just a bit, and so the ability for that to

0:37:40.440 --> 0:37:43.080
<v Speaker 10>lead to your decision making is a little flawed because

0:37:43.640 --> 0:37:45.440
<v Speaker 10>it will already dropping by the time you see that

0:37:45.440 --> 0:37:46.120
<v Speaker 10>payroll drop.

0:37:46.440 --> 0:37:49.799
<v Speaker 2>It's a really good point, right Marcus Kinner, certainly read

0:37:49.840 --> 0:37:52.759
<v Speaker 2>into things. Earnings will maybe be really helpful. We'll see

0:37:52.800 --> 0:37:55.920
<v Speaker 2>what CEOs have to say, especially how much guidance we

0:37:55.920 --> 0:37:58.880
<v Speaker 2>get in terms of outlook alan great stuff, have a

0:37:58.920 --> 0:38:01.200
<v Speaker 2>great weekend. Alan Zaffron, jounting partner and co CEO at

0:38:01.239 --> 0:38:04.480
<v Speaker 2>IQ Capital on Zoom from Foster City, California. Don't go anywhere.

0:38:04.800 --> 0:38:06.439
<v Speaker 2>We're going to wrap up the trading day. In the week,

0:38:06.640 --> 0:38:08.359
<v Speaker 2>you're listening and watching Bloomberg Radio.

0:38:09.480 --> 0:38:14.239
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Week podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:38:14.280 --> 0:38:17.960
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcast. Listen live weekday

0:38:18.000 --> 0:38:21.640
<v Speaker 1>afternoons from three to six Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:38:21.680 --> 0:38:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:38:25.040 --> 0:38:28.120
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:38:28.200 --> 0:38:30.440
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg journalone