WEBVTT - Walgreens Rolling Out Covid-19 Saliva Home Tests

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanibek. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world of business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all furnising the power of Business

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:19.600
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one and twenty countries. You can

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>download Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio, or watch us on

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:34.880
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. Well, Anthony Faucci, President Biden's

0:00:34.920 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>chief medical advisers suggesting that the U S may soon

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:39.519
<v Speaker 1>as you guidance, easing public health protocols where people are

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>fully vaccinated. US definitely stepping up at S effort to

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:46.320
<v Speaker 1>track virus variants with genetic sequencing. Tim There is so

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:48.560
<v Speaker 1>much going on right now. Yeah, we're watching this play

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 1>out in real time right now, and we have Robert Thompson,

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:54.600
<v Speaker 1>chief executive Officer of Clinical Reference Laboratory, joining us on

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>the phone from Lennox to Kansas. UM, thanks so much

0:00:57.920 --> 0:01:00.080
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. On this Bob, how you do and

0:01:01.160 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 1>very well, thanks for having me. Good Um, what do

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:06.120
<v Speaker 1>you make of where we are right now when it

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 1>comes to COVID, Because we've gotten some really good news

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 1>in recent days, as we've seen number of new cases

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:17.440
<v Speaker 1>and hospitalizations down. But at the same time, when we

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 1>think about this in the context of where we were

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 1>a few months ago. You know, where we are now

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:24.840
<v Speaker 1>is where we were in October and November and things

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:29.679
<v Speaker 1>weren't so great then. So our cases the nationwide have

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:34.560
<v Speaker 1>dropped from the peak, which was only seven weeks ago. UM,

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:38.400
<v Speaker 1>and the positive rate has dropped from to last week.

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I think we were at four point eight percent, So indeed,

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 1>that is really good news. UM. I think everyone's watching

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 1>to see if the variance, particularly the UK variant, is

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>going to have an impact on the numbers. It's not

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>visible yet. I mean, even if you look at Florida

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>in isolation, which has the greatest number of the UK

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:04.120
<v Speaker 1>variant cases, they're still dropping pretty fast. So UM, I

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 1>really feel like, you know, we are an inflection point, UM,

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and I think we're going to continue to see cases

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 1>decline in the positive rates decline, largely as a result

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 1>of the natural immunity and that we've built up over time.

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's twenty seven million diagnosed positive cases. Most

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>of the estimates say that it's really three times that

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 1>many that have actually been exposed. So that gets you to,

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, somewhere around eighty million people that have been

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:35.959
<v Speaker 1>exposed and have natural immunity, and you throw in forty

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 1>million that have had the vaccine, then you get to

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:42.239
<v Speaker 1>a third of the US population. And I think that's

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 1>really what we're seeing here in these numbers declining this quickly.

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 1>So we've you know, obviously this has been kind of

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>a path that we've all been on, dealing with the virus,

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:55.919
<v Speaker 1>understanding the virus, getting a vaccine, getting a vaccine out,

0:02:56.320 --> 0:02:59.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of testing along the way. Um, that's what

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:01.680
<v Speaker 1>you guys are right, you're involved in testing, and you've

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:05.799
<v Speaker 1>got a new saliva test out of COVID nineteen saliva test,

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:10.399
<v Speaker 1>rapid response test. Tell us about that and um, how

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:13.359
<v Speaker 1>it works, what it costs, and what you think this

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:15.720
<v Speaker 1>role or these kinds of tests will have the role

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:19.679
<v Speaker 1>in terms of us getting COVID under control. So our

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:23.400
<v Speaker 1>our test is the saliva based test, which is much

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:27.440
<v Speaker 1>easier to collect and more accurate than other at home

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 1>nasal swap tests. UM. It's not technique depend on anybody

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 1>can spit in a tube. So UM, I've done it,

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 1>done it well. So you know, we're really uh trying

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>to take that test and expand access to it. So

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 1>we've been dealing with universities and employers UM and today

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 1>we launched a program with Walgreens where if you go

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 1>to the Walgreens Finecare app, where one of the options

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 1>for COVID based testing UM and it's a hundred nineteen dollars.

0:03:58.120 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>It's the gold standard testing methodology, the rt PCR tests

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 1>UM and you know, we're really excited about it. I

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 1>think in this next phase of of the testing market

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 1>is going to be less of these mass you know,

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:16.919
<v Speaker 1>five people drive through sites and I think much more

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 1>of sort of near patient physician office or at home

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 1>testing as we migrate to the next phase of managing

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 1>this pandemic. What's the cost of it? So do you

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 1>see this as in terms of the reopening here, Let's

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 1>say we do get the majority of people vaccinated here

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:41.720
<v Speaker 1>in the United States this summer, do you still see

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:45.920
<v Speaker 1>a need for a testing product such as this? If

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:50.920
<v Speaker 1>why if people are vaccinated on a widespread basis. Yes,

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 1>and let me explain why. So to begin with, we're

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:58.880
<v Speaker 1>already seeing test drop. We're we're down in this country

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:02.040
<v Speaker 1>from the peak, and that's just less symptomatic people showing

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 1>up for testing. I believe that trend is going to continue,

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 1>so we're gonna see less and less of sort of

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:12.359
<v Speaker 1>mass screening, but we're still going to have that thirty

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 1>whatever the current estimates are about of the population that

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 1>is not a muni that is declined to take the

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:21.360
<v Speaker 1>vaccine vaccine, and you're going to have all the under

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:24.919
<v Speaker 1>eighteen year olds who right now are not authorized to

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 1>take the vaccine. So we're still going to have a

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:31.039
<v Speaker 1>pretty big chunk of the population that does not have immunity.

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:33.600
<v Speaker 1>And as a result of that, I think we're going

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:36.560
<v Speaker 1>to on a much smaller scale, have to continue to

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 1>test again near patient testing. Um, you know, well into

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 1>into next year. Hey, Robert, I am curious the variants

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 1>will be able to pick up variants. So our test

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:50.159
<v Speaker 1>targets a piece of the of the viral RNA that's

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:52.920
<v Speaker 1>very stable. So every week we look at the new

0:05:53.000 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 1>variants and we see where the mutations have occurred. None

0:05:56.240 --> 0:05:59.479
<v Speaker 1>of them have occurred at our target piece of the RNA,

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 1>so we pick up all of the variants to South African,

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the Brazilian, and the UK variants. Very briefly, how long

0:06:07.040 --> 0:06:09.839
<v Speaker 1>do you envision COVID stays with us? I mean from

0:06:09.839 --> 0:06:12.800
<v Speaker 1>a business perspective, how long are you planning on this

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:17.719
<v Speaker 1>test being a product? Um? I think we're gonna see,

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, it'll continue into next year, but just on

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:24.880
<v Speaker 1>a smaller scale. So we've we've done an enormous number

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 1>of tests, five thousand plus so far, and you know,

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of those were for universities, a lot of

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 1>those were for state and local health departments. I think

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:38.719
<v Speaker 1>that piece of the business is going to gradually UM

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:42.839
<v Speaker 1>fade or maybe not so gradually fade UM. And what

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 1>will happen is place is is this kind of testing

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Walgreen's CVS that sort of thing. Hey, gonna re leave

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 1>it there, Hey, Bob, thank you so much. Bob Thompson,

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 1>he's chief executive officer at Clinical Reference Laboratory. On the

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:57.920
<v Speaker 1>phone from Lenexa, Kansas. This is Bloomberg Business Week with

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Carol Masser and Bloomberg Quick Eggs. Tim Stinovich from Bloomberg

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Radio but Tessa down more than since the January high

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 1>after a seven four year percent gain back in We know, tim,

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 1>it was one of the high flyers last year and

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 1>it was doing really well and then we've seen it

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 1>pulled back this year. Yeah, it's been doing really well.

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 1>As a Day is equity markets reporter at Bloomberg News,

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 1>and she joins us on the phone from New York City.

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 1>The big question is why has it been doing so

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 1>well over the last couple of weeks, um, why why

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:32.040
<v Speaker 1>are we seeing this pullback in Tesla? And I should

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 1>say it's now down only about four percent, so really

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 1>off those loads from earlier today, Hi, and thanks for

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 1>having me so yes, that's a great question. And flashes

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:46.800
<v Speaker 1>have you know, recovered somewhat since all year today, But

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 1>they did dive pretty sharply today, extending their losses from yesterday.

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 1>And that was mainly triggered by a tweet from Elon

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Musk over the weekend saying the price of cryptocurrencies bitcoin

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 1>anitarium seemed to be high. So given Tesla itself announced

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 1>a one point five billion dollar investment in which coin

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 1>earlier this month, Masks comments may have heard Tesla's own

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 1>investment all right, So it's a word part but but

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 1>and that you know, it's interesting it's a one and

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>a half billion dollar investment in bitcoin, but I mean

0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:22.080
<v Speaker 1>this is a massive company, a six hundred fifty seven

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 1>and six hundred fifty eight billion dollar market cap. So

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 1>put in perspective the bitcoin exposure versus the Tesla business,

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>that's a great question. Um. You know, as you said,

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a you know, one point five billion dollars sounds

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 1>like a significant amount of money, but in the grand

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:42.680
<v Speaker 1>scheme of things, especially when it's Tesla, it's really small

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:45.080
<v Speaker 1>change for the company. I mean, this is a company

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 1>that ended twenty twenty with almost nineteen billion dollars in cash,

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 1>had an annual adjust and I didn't come off around

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 1>two and a half billion dollars. So when I speak

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 1>to Bord Street analysts, they say that, you know, rather

0:08:57.080 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 1>than seeing it as an investment, we should rather see

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:02.680
<v Speaker 1>this as a signal from Tesla that it is willing

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 1>to push new boundaries and you know, try out you

0:09:05.440 --> 0:09:08.560
<v Speaker 1>and brave things as it tries to transform the vey

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:11.959
<v Speaker 1>cars are bottom so and given that exposure is so

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>small relative to the company's side, they are not really

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 1>worried about the short term Volati literates. But that said, uh,

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, it still has that investor sentiment attached to

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 1>it and kind of given muskets. Uh, you know, has

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:28.959
<v Speaker 1>its really big cult following that is definitely playing into

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the weakness today. Our analysts on Wall Street thinking about

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Tesla right now, are they still saying that in general,

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 1>that it's a by or are they saying, hey, wait

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 1>a second, this thing went really high, really quickly. We're

0:09:41.880 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 1>taking a step back here. Well, Um, Testa is an

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 1>unusual company, and that I think it's reflected in the

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 1>fact that Walsted and this just cannot seem to agree on,

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, whether this company is majorly overvalued or still

0:09:57.000 --> 0:10:01.200
<v Speaker 1>significantly undervalued whilst it is and at this point pretty

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 1>much split on whether it's a buy or a cell.

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Some say, you know, it's a cell. It's they overvalued.

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:12.200
<v Speaker 1>The stock has run up too soon, too fast. Um,

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 1>And you know at this point there are better opportunities

0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 1>elsewhere in the eavy slate. Um. But that said, there

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:21.320
<v Speaker 1>are some who also say that Tesla has only has

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:26.320
<v Speaker 1>gotten started the ev transformation that we think will take

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 1>hold of the auto industry over the next decade or

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 1>so has only gotten started, and the stock has very

0:10:33.360 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 1>hired to go well. And that's what I wanted to

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 1>ask you, Esha, because if I look, if I got

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 1>pull up the f A function on Tesla on the

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg and take a look. I mean, as I mentioned,

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a six hundred almost six hundred fifty eight billion

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:48.080
<v Speaker 1>dollar market cap company. Revenues are expected to be in

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:53.199
<v Speaker 1>this one year about forty eight billion, and that's up

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:56.720
<v Speaker 1>fifty four percent year over year. I mean, earnings growth

0:10:56.760 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 1>is expected to be up fourty four percent. It's still

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 1>this massive growth story growth company. Are these expectations realistic

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:11.559
<v Speaker 1>for this company? UM? I would say that the overall

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>walls it consensus expectations UM do not seem out of

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the place at this point. Yes, you know, no, it's possible.

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:23.439
<v Speaker 1>I know other auto company has done something like this before,

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:27.320
<v Speaker 1>but but Tesla is a very different kind of auto company.

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 1>That's its main play of you know, you know on

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Mascas also said that, you know, even if the growth

0:11:33.400 --> 0:11:36.840
<v Speaker 1>comes a little slow, when it really takes off, it's

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 1>expected to write in an in an exponential fashion. UM.

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Tesla is expanding in different geographies China, as we know,

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 1>is a huge market. No one has had expected the

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>easy space to explode the way it has exploded over

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the past couple of years. So um, from from what

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 1>we understand, you know, these are unusual numbers, but Tesla

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:04.400
<v Speaker 1>has delivered orles whatever promised so far. Right, Yeah, it

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 1>comes down to those fundamentals. Esha, thank you so much.

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Day Equity Markets reporter at Bloomberg News. Tesla shares they

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 1>have erased their game for the year, though as a

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 1>result of some of the pullback, it's now down three

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:17.880
<v Speaker 1>percent year to date. This is Bloomberg Business Week with

0:12:17.960 --> 0:12:22.679
<v Speaker 1>Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes. Tim Stinovich from Bloomberg Radio.

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Well in the magazine this week and excerpt from a

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 1>new book out on the secretive world of commodity traders

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 1>and how they link consumers and investors to global hotspots.

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 1>And maybe it's a bit of a surprise to those

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 1>investors to say the least, Tim, Yeah, to say the least,

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 1>especially for a group of teachers in Pennsylvania exactly. This

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 1>is the subject of a new book. It's called The

0:12:42.040 --> 0:12:44.560
<v Speaker 1>World for Sale, Money, Power and the traders who barter

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the Earth's resources. It's written by Javier Blass and Jack Farchie.

0:12:49.320 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 1>It's out in the UK, now out in the US

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 1>come March. Javier is Bloomberg News Chief Energy correspondent, joining

0:12:55.120 --> 0:12:57.440
<v Speaker 1>us on the phone from London, along with Bloomberg Business

0:12:57.440 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Week editor Joe Weber on the access line in brook Again,

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:04.560
<v Speaker 1>this is going straight to Netflix. I'm just saying, Joel, Yeah, well,

0:13:04.600 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 1>we we try, and I'm sure Javier would be very

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 1>pleased with that outcome, as as our colleague Will Kennedy

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:13.679
<v Speaker 1>said yesterday to me, he said, just in case you

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't know um and don't follow Javier on on Twitter,

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 1>he's a book for sale and it's literally called for sale,

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:23.680
<v Speaker 1>and so we were we were really pleased that we

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:26.679
<v Speaker 1>got to excerpt it. And it is sort of an

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:29.839
<v Speaker 1>example of of, you know, like I think with the

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 1>book will accomplish is we pull back the curtain in

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 1>many ways on on many markets that you just don't

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:38.120
<v Speaker 1>don't even know about. And Javier tell us more about

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 1>um UM pensioners who found that they had a little

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 1>something something in their portfolios that they may not have expected. Well,

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:49.679
<v Speaker 1>you know that pension funds are very, very conservative. They

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 1>usually buy the kind of US speciery that are not

0:13:54.720 --> 0:13:56.840
<v Speaker 1>yielding a lot, but you know that you you will

0:13:56.840 --> 0:14:00.320
<v Speaker 1>never lose money. You do not expect to see US

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:05.440
<v Speaker 1>pension funds like teachers in Pennsylvania, or police offices in

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 1>South Carolina, or firefighters in West Virginia investing in something

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 1>that will go via the Kaiman Island into doubling the

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 1>capital of Ireland, into a community trader in Switzerland, and

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 1>from there into northern Iraq. And that's exactly what they

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 1>were putting their money, because they were financing glenn or

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the world's largest commodity trader, and what they were financing

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 1>in particular was a deal to buy oil in Kurdistan

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 1>in northern Iraq and to ship that crew into the

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 1>global market. When I was reading this, however, I kept

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 1>thinking to myself over and over again, E. S G.

0:14:44.880 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 1>S G. S G, Like, what about all these pension

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 1>funds who are saying, we're not making investments that that

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 1>violate you know, the terms of how we're thinking about E.

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 1>S G. So, So how do his investments get made

0:14:57.000 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 1>in these large pensions. Well, usually they get hold it

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 1>into an outside manager in this case was frankin Talventone,

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:09.720
<v Speaker 1>and they usually get folded into emerging market debt. I

0:15:09.760 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 1>mean in many of the prospectuses of of UM de

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 1>pensions fans that will review, this was disclosed as an

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 1>oil note linked to Iraq. It didn't even say that

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 1>it was not actually the government, the central government in

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Iraqi in back back, but just an autonomous province in

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the north of the country. UM. I just simply think

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 1>that sometimes there are a small investment. This was only

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 1>a five or only quote unquote only five hundred million dollars,

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think that sometimes they just flow under the

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 1>rather just bundle into American market debt. So have your

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Glencore obviously plays an important role in here and and

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 1>also elsewhere in the book. What did you learn about

0:15:54.440 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Glencore in reporting this that you didn't already know? Well,

0:15:58.640 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's interesting because we need these Commority traders

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:06.520
<v Speaker 1>everything that we buy coins from natural resources, and you

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 1>need the commoity traders to buy and and and tell

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 1>to you. What you learn when you get very close

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 1>to these companies is that it's a very strange combination

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:20.360
<v Speaker 1>that they are incredibly hard working and willing to go

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 1>to no one else goes um and at the same

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 1>time they have that kind of profit minded only mixed

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:33.320
<v Speaker 1>with a bit of all old fashioned commercial banking, probably

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>a hundred years ago of of my worries, my bone

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 1>and handshakes. And I'm personal personally busy in every client

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:43.800
<v Speaker 1>every year and be on the road or on the

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 1>air for two hundred and fifty or three hundred days

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 1>a year. But what it's more amazing is that they

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 1>are willing to go literally everywhere. I mean, you look

0:16:53.760 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 1>at the list of countries that the State Department will

0:16:56.760 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 1>tell everyone, do not go there. The commoity traders go there.

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 1>And and they also play big roles in politics that

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:10.080
<v Speaker 1>sometimes we do not realize because for many of these countries,

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:12.440
<v Speaker 1>think about the Middle East or some countries in Africa,

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:16.919
<v Speaker 1>well that word resources, morning and power go together. How

0:17:16.960 --> 0:17:18.240
<v Speaker 1>do you what do you think is that the most

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:22.600
<v Speaker 1>striking this whole idea that commodity traders can influence history

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 1>or and or I guess I should say that you've

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:29.159
<v Speaker 1>got these what are thought to be pretty safe investors

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:32.679
<v Speaker 1>are hoping that they're safe investors, and conservative investors pension

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:36.719
<v Speaker 1>investors that they don't exactly understand maybe what they're investing in.

0:17:37.840 --> 0:17:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that both are very important. I mean, one

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:43.119
<v Speaker 1>thing that Jack and I were writing the book we

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>were goying to achieve. We think that the commoity traders

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 1>played a big role in the global economy. They play

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 1>a big role in politics, and because on institutional investors

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:58.640
<v Speaker 1>be pension funds or other kinds of institutional investors are

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:03.680
<v Speaker 1>investing than providing funds with them. They are also very

0:18:03.680 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 1>important to all of us. But prices Jack and me

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:11.359
<v Speaker 1>writing this and researching it is that very few people

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:15.680
<v Speaker 1>know anything about the commodity traders. There are hardly any

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 1>books about them. Their accounts on most cases are secret

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:23.400
<v Speaker 1>because they have probably owned companies. And also they are

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 1>controlled by a very few people. I mean most promotive

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 1>traders are controlled by the staff or or a family

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 1>that owns them. So any money that they make, any

0:18:33.600 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 1>profit that they may go in the pockets of a

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 1>few selected the individuals. Like I said, I think it

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 1>has good to a Netflix so or something, because it's

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:45.120
<v Speaker 1>just really explaining how these markets work and peeling back

0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:48.400
<v Speaker 1>some of the layers. Um great stuff. Thank you so much.

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:52.479
<v Speaker 1>Have your blast. Chief Energy correspondent Bloomberg News from London.

0:18:52.600 --> 0:18:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Check out his new book The World for Sale. Money

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:57.879
<v Speaker 1>power and the traders who barter the Earth's resources in

0:18:57.920 --> 0:19:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the UK and coming to us in March. And of

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 1>course our thanks to the editor Bloomberg Business Week, Joel Webber.

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and Bloomberg

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:12.159
<v Speaker 1>Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. The economy is

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 1>a long way from our employment and inflation goals, and

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:17.200
<v Speaker 1>it is likely to take some time for substantial further

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 1>progress to be achieved. We will continue to clearly communicate

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:23.400
<v Speaker 1>our assessment of progress toward our goals well in advance

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 1>of any change in the case of purchases. A nice

0:19:26.800 --> 0:19:30.120
<v Speaker 1>double dose Federal Reserve Chairman J Powell Charlie Pellet, of course,

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 1>some highlights from his testimony earlier today. J Powell's testimony

0:19:35.040 --> 0:19:37.400
<v Speaker 1>of course, in that semi annual testimony that he does

0:19:37.440 --> 0:19:40.479
<v Speaker 1>before Congress on the state of the US economy, and

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:44.359
<v Speaker 1>Tim really giving some you know, reminder that he thinks

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:46.360
<v Speaker 1>there's progress being made, but we still have a long

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 1>way to go until we get to kind of a

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:57.200
<v Speaker 1>pre pandemic economy. Akka, we're not raising rates anytime. Be patient, everyone, relax, relax.

0:19:57.520 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Joining us with more on J. Powell and FED policy

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:03.359
<v Speaker 1>really the overall US economy. Danny blanche Flower, professor of

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 1>economics at Dartmouth College, former Bank of England Monetary Policy

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:09.879
<v Speaker 1>Committee member. He joins us on the phone from Florida. Danny,

0:20:09.880 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 1>how are you. I'm great, Always good to talk to

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 1>you guys on a very interesting day. Well interesting, how

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 1>was saying very sensible things? I mean, this is the

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 1>reality that we're in. It's the right thing to do.

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:25.239
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk to us about that. Tell us what was

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 1>what struck you as being very very sensible from J. Powell? Well,

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I think I think the uncertainty is is very high here. Um,

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing the economy recover, but there's clearly, clearly the

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:40.919
<v Speaker 1>number of people that are claiming benefits remembers slack in

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the economy, and of course the uncertainty going forward about

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 1>how quickly the vaccinations are going to go, how effective

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be, how how firms bounds back. And

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I think the other one is what kind of long

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 1>run changes in behavior are they going to beat? Are

0:20:55.760 --> 0:20:58.520
<v Speaker 1>people going to commute the same as they did, are

0:20:58.520 --> 0:21:01.199
<v Speaker 1>they going to go back to cruise ship? All of that,

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 1>but particularly are they going to save more. And I

0:21:04.000 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 1>thought what was interesting because you have a sort of

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:10.960
<v Speaker 1>conservative message which has often not happened between the Central

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:13.919
<v Speaker 1>Bank and the Treasury, which perhaps not a surprise, and

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 1>also from the thing from the Council of Economic Advice

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 1>from cc ROUS. So you're having a thirsted views and

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 1>a consistent view across all the parts and so often

0:21:24.000 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 1>in the past we've seen working against each other. So

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:28.960
<v Speaker 1>now what we're seeing are the two branches, if you like,

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:32.359
<v Speaker 1>a monetary and fiscal policy essentially saying the same thing,

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 1>a bit different than in the UK, where we're actually

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:37.640
<v Speaker 1>on the NPC members are actually disagreeing with each other

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 1>about whether they should go to negative breaks and we

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>haven't really heard that in the US, but that's a

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:44.840
<v Speaker 1>clear thing that's going on in Britain. How do you

0:21:44.880 --> 0:21:48.760
<v Speaker 1>think that the FED and particularly FED share Powell is

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 1>or should be paying attention to the sharp increase in

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 1>bond yields that we've seen in recent weeks. Well, I mean,

0:21:56.000 --> 0:21:59.800
<v Speaker 1>obviously that's that relevant and to think about it, but

0:21:59.840 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the scale of that rise, I don't think it's that significant.

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 1>But what else should they do? What other alternatives do

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 1>they have other than trying to get America back to

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:13.040
<v Speaker 1>work and try to kind of overcome the difficulties that

0:22:13.080 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 1>have been caused by this this this terrible pandemic. So

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I think the answer is, you know, you can't do everything,

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:21.200
<v Speaker 1>you do what you can do. I mean, think about

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the story of Easy If we could talk about what's

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the impact of what the FED has done to inequality?

0:22:26.119 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 1>And Janet Yellen talked about that much he was the chair.

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 1>But their answer was, you can't do much about it.

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:33.119
<v Speaker 1>You've probably got to go ahead with this worry about

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:35.679
<v Speaker 1>what's going ahead in the future. If you have to

0:22:35.680 --> 0:22:38.359
<v Speaker 1>do something, then you change and you adapt. The same

0:22:38.359 --> 0:22:41.200
<v Speaker 1>thing with inflation. If you see inflation starting to in

0:22:41.720 --> 0:22:44.480
<v Speaker 1>deal with it when you get there. But at the moment,

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:47.679
<v Speaker 1>you keep doing what they're saying. And I think that's right.

0:22:47.760 --> 0:22:49.520
<v Speaker 1>And we've learned from the past. We learned from the

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:53.480
<v Speaker 1>past that actually everybody was too are too optimistic about

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:56.879
<v Speaker 1>what was coming, too worried about inflation, too optimistic about

0:22:56.880 --> 0:22:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the growth parts of the economy, And they don't want

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 1>to make that error again. Danny, does it feel like

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the bond market is playing a little bit of catch

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:05.640
<v Speaker 1>up from what the equity markets were seeing a few

0:23:05.640 --> 0:23:07.959
<v Speaker 1>months ago when we bounce back, you know, from our

0:23:08.040 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 1>lows because of the health crisis. Well, well maybe, I

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:16.200
<v Speaker 1>mean I'm a I'm a believer. That's basically what we're

0:23:16.240 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 1>seeing in these markets is just um being everything being

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:23.440
<v Speaker 1>pushed by what the central banks are doing. When I

0:23:23.680 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 1>voted from hundreds of billions of dollars of quantity bay

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:31.200
<v Speaker 1>and in my head, I have I have sentially thoughts

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:34.200
<v Speaker 1>to myself, I'm doing this to raise assets, right, So

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:36.840
<v Speaker 1>what we have a market following what the Fed is doing.

0:23:36.840 --> 0:23:40.479
<v Speaker 1>They obviously listen carefully to Powel's you about you know,

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 1>our rate is going to go to negative, but really,

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:44.439
<v Speaker 1>are we going to do more? QUEI are we going

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 1>to push those markets up? And I think the answer

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:50.760
<v Speaker 1>is for now that the story is keep on keeping on.

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:52.920
<v Speaker 1>But we just don't really know. I mean, the best

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:56.119
<v Speaker 1>answer to what coming is it depends, right, So maybe

0:23:56.200 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe the bond markets are are getting bit a bit nervous,

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:02.280
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I think the course is said, I mean,

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the course is absolutely the course he's gonna follow. Well,

0:24:06.840 --> 0:24:08.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's going to have to understand that there's

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:11.879
<v Speaker 1>a headline that just crossed the Bloomberg, the SMPI of racing.

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:15.119
<v Speaker 1>It's one drop to trade, little change. I mean, we're

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:18.400
<v Speaker 1>now at our highs of the day, and I feel

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:21.680
<v Speaker 1>like Danny, we have seen this trade over and over

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and over again the last decade, where we get a

0:24:24.480 --> 0:24:27.200
<v Speaker 1>bit of a pullback sytimes, we get an official close

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 1>to tempers and correction or an official tempers and correction,

0:24:30.080 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 1>and then everybody comes back in. Um, who's right though

0:24:33.920 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 1>in terms of our market players. Are equity investors right

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:41.720
<v Speaker 1>to continue to purse this market higher? Well? I think, well,

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I think consist of what I've just said. I think

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:47.439
<v Speaker 1>equity markets are right in the sense that the sn't

0:24:47.480 --> 0:24:50.959
<v Speaker 1>think if I'm right, which I think I am, the

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:53.960
<v Speaker 1>central banking is queuing is what's driving the equity market.

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:56.399
<v Speaker 1>Then you say, well, how good is the economy? How

0:24:56.480 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 1>much time is there going to be a risphistical package

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 1>it will take time to come in? Is the FED

0:25:00.640 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 1>going to go negative? Probably not? Well what else can

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 1>you do? The only thing you can do is start

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:08.479
<v Speaker 1>is back to queueing again, and then they're not going

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:10.159
<v Speaker 1>to take But they're not gonna They're not going to

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:12.960
<v Speaker 1>start pulling out monkeyst in with this. So every time

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 1>that story comes, the equity markets say okay, I'm with that,

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:19.240
<v Speaker 1>and that's when you see the surge again. So I

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 1>think for now the story continues, and you know it's

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 1>good to be bullish on equalities for the reason we've

0:25:25.040 --> 0:25:28.200
<v Speaker 1>just said for how long though? That's the question? Yeah,

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:30.560
<v Speaker 1>of course. I mean I don't know the answer to that,

0:25:30.640 --> 0:25:32.959
<v Speaker 1>so I don't think anybody else does. But you know,

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:35.120
<v Speaker 1>to this point, we're now you know, we're not We're

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 1>a long way in and I think, but I don't

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:40.160
<v Speaker 1>see anything in the in the short medium term that's

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:42.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be persuade us from that message, because we

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:45.240
<v Speaker 1>have so many people out there who are claiming benefits

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:47.720
<v Speaker 1>and are on short time work. And you know that

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:50.160
<v Speaker 1>that the the economy move needs to move to small

0:25:50.200 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 1>input And I've argued for a very long time, but

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:54.879
<v Speaker 1>we were nowhere near full employments in two thousand fifteen

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 1>to two thousand and eighteens at the room to maneuvers hard.

0:25:57.800 --> 0:25:59.400
<v Speaker 1>So I just want to ask you again, sing, you're

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:05.199
<v Speaker 1>not worried at all about inflation? No, I not, not

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:07.720
<v Speaker 1>one bit. I mean I think I was while we

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:09.600
<v Speaker 1>were while we were on break, I actually went and

0:26:09.800 --> 0:26:12.080
<v Speaker 1>looked at a number that I liked, which is the

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:17.119
<v Speaker 1>employment rate, which today is now back to the level

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 1>that it was in the first quarter century since the

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Second World War. We're at fifty seven. We were at

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:27.119
<v Speaker 1>sixty four point seven and two thousand and the US

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 1>had the worst, the only advanced countries between two thousand

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:34.439
<v Speaker 1>and two thousand twenty, but the only country that had

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 1>a declining employment rate. So we're so far essentially, we're

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:41.479
<v Speaker 1>so start and full employment forget, and I'm plowing its

0:26:41.520 --> 0:26:44.919
<v Speaker 1>focused on this. So the potential slack in the economy

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:51.000
<v Speaker 1>is in men so inflation arises when when there's when

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the economy is tight, there's no sign of that. Obviously,

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 1>people might say that this is about what's coming, is

0:26:57.560 --> 0:27:00.679
<v Speaker 1>about structural things, but all the other of economies in

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the world have been faced by the same structural things

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:08.440
<v Speaker 1>that technology and globalization and so on, so they've all

0:27:08.520 --> 0:27:11.280
<v Speaker 1>done much better. So I think the potential for the

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 1>UK at US to grow in a non inflationary environment

0:27:14.400 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 1>is is strong, and in many senses that's what power

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:20.600
<v Speaker 1>has been reflecting. And he reflected back to two thousand,

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:23.359
<v Speaker 1>fifteen to eighteen, when the FED had a wrong view

0:27:23.359 --> 0:27:25.880
<v Speaker 1>of the economy saying that capacity was less than that

0:27:26.359 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 1>and raised rates and shouldn't have done and killed growth

0:27:28.840 --> 0:27:31.560
<v Speaker 1>off that they've now it says, come to the position

0:27:31.600 --> 0:27:34.240
<v Speaker 1>that I've that I've put forward. The unemployment rate doesn't

0:27:34.280 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 1>tell us much of what's going on. The employment rate

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 1>looks terrible fifty five, fifty four and fifty seven point

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:44.560
<v Speaker 1>five and overestimated because all these weirdnesses in the labor

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:48.639
<v Speaker 1>market about people wrongly being classified. But that's a disastrous numbers.

0:27:48.640 --> 0:27:52.000
<v Speaker 1>There's huge amounts of black Inflation doesn't rise. And I've

0:27:52.000 --> 0:27:55.240
<v Speaker 1>probably been on Blumber fifty times over the last decade

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:57.840
<v Speaker 1>when people say to me inflation is coming, isn't it?

0:27:57.880 --> 0:28:00.200
<v Speaker 1>And I've always said, no, it isn't, and it's you're

0:28:00.200 --> 0:28:02.960
<v Speaker 1>not coming from wage inflation. But even though the weirdness

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:05.080
<v Speaker 1>is in the data, does it does it come from

0:28:05.440 --> 0:28:09.400
<v Speaker 1>a one point nine trillion dollar spending package that could

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:13.320
<v Speaker 1>could be deployed very soon. Well, the answer to the

0:28:13.359 --> 0:28:16.320
<v Speaker 1>answer is that we clearly all the stimulus that we

0:28:16.440 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 1>thought and the and the cutting in rates and the

0:28:19.200 --> 0:28:22.679
<v Speaker 1>doing of the quee was meant to create inflation. But

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:25.920
<v Speaker 1>it was meant to create inflation against the deflationary shock.

0:28:26.400 --> 0:28:28.560
<v Speaker 1>So if you end up yes, the answer is that

0:28:28.680 --> 0:28:32.360
<v Speaker 1>the potential deflationary shock that we're seeing pulls prices into

0:28:32.440 --> 0:28:36.200
<v Speaker 1>negative territories, so this simply restores it. Of course, there's

0:28:36.200 --> 0:28:38.720
<v Speaker 1>a point that's the point of the stimulus. But the

0:28:38.800 --> 0:28:42.040
<v Speaker 1>issue is two percent teams a goal that's very much

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:47.000
<v Speaker 1>way off. And the story actually is we know very

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 1>well what to do if inflation rises in a significant way,

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:56.000
<v Speaker 1>but it hasn't. But the point of is to create inflation.

0:28:56.200 --> 0:28:58.560
<v Speaker 1>But the question is to what extent do we have

0:28:59.040 --> 0:29:01.680
<v Speaker 1>a major deflation shot going on in the answer is

0:29:01.720 --> 0:29:03.920
<v Speaker 1>we do. Hey, Danny, let me just go back to

0:29:03.960 --> 0:29:05.640
<v Speaker 1>what you talked about the labor market. You talked about

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:07.720
<v Speaker 1>all the slack in the labor market, right, and I

0:29:07.760 --> 0:29:09.920
<v Speaker 1>think they've fed and certainly j Pal has been very

0:29:09.920 --> 0:29:11.960
<v Speaker 1>clear about you know, we've got to improve those numbers,

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:15.239
<v Speaker 1>get people back to work. Will we need all of

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:18.280
<v Speaker 1>those workers? And I just think about the increased and

0:29:18.400 --> 0:29:22.160
<v Speaker 1>ramped up digitization of our society, and I just wonder

0:29:22.760 --> 0:29:26.920
<v Speaker 1>will all of those workers ultimately be needed in our

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:31.800
<v Speaker 1>post pandemic economy. Well, a couple of things. The first

0:29:31.800 --> 0:29:34.480
<v Speaker 1>thing is both joanet. Helen and Ross talked about the

0:29:34.520 --> 0:29:38.920
<v Speaker 1>imports of jobs, and we know that capital, We know

0:29:39.120 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 1>that capital intensive industries and technological change can actually be

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:47.560
<v Speaker 1>labor enhancing. Think of all the the people who now

0:29:47.680 --> 0:29:52.120
<v Speaker 1>sell iPhones and laptops and involved in that kind of technology.

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:54.600
<v Speaker 1>So that's the first thing. The second thing is that

0:29:55.520 --> 0:29:58.320
<v Speaker 1>we can actually and Janet's maybe clere that she's interested

0:29:58.320 --> 0:30:00.760
<v Speaker 1>in that, you can actually think of femilists where you

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:05.080
<v Speaker 1>try and encourage jobs. And so the issue is what's

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the I mean for people in Plumberg to think about.

0:30:08.720 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 1>What you basically are going to always think about is

0:30:11.520 --> 0:30:14.440
<v Speaker 1>what's the relative price of labor compared to the relative

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 1>price of capital? And if in a Biden administration, and

0:30:17.960 --> 0:30:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Janet's made it clear they're interested in giving a subsidy

0:30:21.440 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 1>to encourage the use of people of workers and make

0:30:25.440 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the relative price of workers low. And now obviously you

0:30:27.920 --> 0:30:30.000
<v Speaker 1>could debate about the minimum wage, and it's of it.

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:32.800
<v Speaker 1>There's an issue about can you encourage people to be

0:30:32.840 --> 0:30:34.960
<v Speaker 1>more productive all of that sort of stuff. So I

0:30:34.960 --> 0:30:38.400
<v Speaker 1>think the answer is that, um, we can make capital

0:30:38.640 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 1>labor enhancing as well. UM and if and in a

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:44.560
<v Speaker 1>way I like to sort of pose this question in

0:30:44.640 --> 0:30:46.840
<v Speaker 1>two thousand, then you ask me this question, where are

0:30:46.840 --> 0:30:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the new jobs going to come from? Don't think I

0:30:49.080 --> 0:30:51.320
<v Speaker 1>would have had a possible clue of saying it. But

0:30:51.400 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 1>if you look where of most many of those jobs

0:30:53.640 --> 0:30:57.400
<v Speaker 1>come from, they've come from technologically advanced places as Tesla

0:30:57.480 --> 0:31:00.560
<v Speaker 1>and as electric cars and I and all of uh. So,

0:31:00.600 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 1>I think the answer is the digital age made well

0:31:03.960 --> 0:31:07.640
<v Speaker 1>and the green jobs. You can make green jobs very

0:31:07.720 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 1>labor intensive. You can have people going out insulating houses.

0:31:11.440 --> 0:31:13.800
<v Speaker 1>So the answer is, with a bit of thought and

0:31:13.920 --> 0:31:17.800
<v Speaker 1>interesting care, you can actually make the future labor in

0:31:17.960 --> 0:31:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Hampsting not laborhood. Right. It's something that I've talked about

0:31:21.880 --> 0:31:23.920
<v Speaker 1>that with the president of the Rockefeller Foundation. We've got

0:31:23.920 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 1>all these you know, countries spending so much on COVID

0:31:26.800 --> 0:31:28.960
<v Speaker 1>relief and pumping a lot of money into economies. We

0:31:29.040 --> 0:31:31.120
<v Speaker 1>could do that and create green jobs at the same

0:31:31.200 --> 0:31:34.560
<v Speaker 1>time and deal with two massive problems. Um good stuff.

0:31:34.880 --> 0:31:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Danny B. Well Danny Blanche Flower, professor of economics at Dartmouth,

0:31:37.840 --> 0:31:41.520
<v Speaker 1>former Bank of England Monetary Policy Committee member, joining us

0:31:41.600 --> 0:31:44.680
<v Speaker 1>from Florida. I'm assuming it was warm there. I don't know. Yeah,

0:31:44.880 --> 0:31:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean yesterday we learned it was seventy degrees there

0:31:47.520 --> 0:31:49.720
<v Speaker 1>in the afternoon from one of our guests. But hey,

0:31:49.880 --> 0:31:57.440
<v Speaker 1>that's better than New Hampshire, right mac a journal now,

0:31:57.520 --> 0:31:59.400
<v Speaker 1>but you let me drive? Oh no, no, no no, no,

0:32:00.440 --> 0:32:05.680
<v Speaker 1>rug home an night please, I'll do vel. I want

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:21.520
<v Speaker 1>to drive, just drive. The question trying. This is the

0:32:21.600 --> 0:32:25.880
<v Speaker 1>drive to the globe. Thanks, we'll try us down on

0:32:26.000 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. All right, you are listening to Bloomberg Business Week.

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Just about eleven minutes left in today's trading session, Carol Master,

0:32:33.280 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stanovic, and as Charlie mentioned, the snp U S

0:32:36.600 --> 0:32:39.960
<v Speaker 1>stocks in general roaring back after J. Powell of the

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve basically saying, listen, folks, slow down, slow down.

0:32:44.280 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not too worried. I'm not going to take, you know,

0:32:46.880 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 1>my foot off the gas. Things are gonna do. It's

0:32:49.600 --> 0:32:51.680
<v Speaker 1>all good, it's all It's gonna still take a little

0:32:51.720 --> 0:32:55.320
<v Speaker 1>while to get back to normal. So stocks are pretty

0:32:55.400 --> 0:32:57.720
<v Speaker 1>much just off their best levels of the session. We

0:32:57.760 --> 0:33:01.640
<v Speaker 1>have seen quite move back. Yeah, we really have. Ryan

0:33:01.680 --> 0:33:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Dietrich is chief market strategist at LPL Financial. He joins

0:33:04.880 --> 0:33:07.080
<v Speaker 1>us on the phone right now from Charlotte, North Carolina.

0:33:07.200 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 1>LPL Financial has just about billion dollars under management. M Ryan,

0:33:12.240 --> 0:33:15.000
<v Speaker 1>what do you make of today's trade? Yeah, Tim, how

0:33:15.040 --> 0:33:18.440
<v Speaker 1>about that reversal? Right? As back down nearly four percent

0:33:18.520 --> 0:33:20.240
<v Speaker 1>at the lows, and it has a shot of being

0:33:20.240 --> 0:33:22.200
<v Speaker 1>green and we can say goodbye to the five day

0:33:22.240 --> 0:33:24.760
<v Speaker 1>losing streak on the SMP five Right, what got us

0:33:24.760 --> 0:33:26.640
<v Speaker 1>when you looked at that five day losing streak, we're

0:33:26.680 --> 0:33:29.040
<v Speaker 1>in the midst of stocks are only down about one

0:33:29.080 --> 0:33:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and a half percent during those five days. There's a

0:33:31.560 --> 0:33:35.160
<v Speaker 1>relatively modest five day losing streak. For instance, last year

0:33:36.640 --> 0:33:39.800
<v Speaker 1>five separate days saw a worst drop of one and

0:33:39.840 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 1>a half percent um. So it's just kind of all

0:33:41.640 --> 0:33:44.600
<v Speaker 1>about context, right, And again, what did J Pal say?

0:33:44.640 --> 0:33:46.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anything that we didn't expect. He's still

0:33:46.840 --> 0:33:48.920
<v Speaker 1>quite dubbish. Low rates are here to stay, and that's

0:33:48.920 --> 0:33:50.800
<v Speaker 1>what the market wanted to hear. And now the losing

0:33:50.840 --> 0:33:52.640
<v Speaker 1>streak come, like I said on the SMP, looks like

0:33:52.680 --> 0:33:55.240
<v Speaker 1>it's over. Was it all J Powell in your view?

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Or was it people all of a sudden saying oh wow,

0:33:57.800 --> 0:34:00.240
<v Speaker 1>that stuck that I've been interested in is now a

0:34:00.240 --> 0:34:03.600
<v Speaker 1>few percentage points cheaper or you know, in the case

0:34:03.680 --> 0:34:06.280
<v Speaker 1>of some of those high flyers, a lot cheaper and

0:34:06.520 --> 0:34:09.160
<v Speaker 1>that was a buying opportunity. Yeah, you're right, Carol, I

0:34:09.160 --> 0:34:10.920
<v Speaker 1>mean I think it was with j Pal kind of

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:12.759
<v Speaker 1>sparked it. Right. You think about a beach ball. You

0:34:12.760 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 1>put it under the water. Once you let go, it

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:16.759
<v Speaker 1>gets moving. Once it gets moving, it really pops up.

0:34:16.760 --> 0:34:18.759
<v Speaker 1>And that's you know, j Pal kind of released the

0:34:18.800 --> 0:34:21.120
<v Speaker 1>beach ball effects, so to speak. But at the same time,

0:34:21.440 --> 0:34:23.640
<v Speaker 1>what have we been seeing, right, I mean, just continued

0:34:23.719 --> 0:34:27.360
<v Speaker 1>strong manufacturing numbers, services numbers. We just had a really

0:34:27.360 --> 0:34:30.120
<v Speaker 1>strong earning season that's wrapping up and all. By the way,

0:34:30.160 --> 0:34:32.480
<v Speaker 1>now j Pal said that, you know, monetary policy is

0:34:32.520 --> 0:34:35.120
<v Speaker 1>still here, and we all know there's probably another fiscal

0:34:35.120 --> 0:34:36.880
<v Speaker 1>plan coming in March of at least one and a

0:34:36.880 --> 0:34:40.239
<v Speaker 1>half trillion dollars. So all those things combined kind of

0:34:40.239 --> 0:34:42.400
<v Speaker 1>said that, you know, hey, stocks just don't feel like

0:34:42.440 --> 0:34:45.080
<v Speaker 1>going down, and it's something that we should not ignore. Okay,

0:34:45.080 --> 0:34:47.440
<v Speaker 1>But but there are signs of froth in the market

0:34:47.560 --> 0:34:50.520
<v Speaker 1>right from a technical from a technical perspective, what are

0:34:50.560 --> 0:34:52.840
<v Speaker 1>those signs? Where are you seeing them? Yeah, well, you know,

0:34:53.040 --> 0:34:55.720
<v Speaker 1>when you look at market technicals, they're honestly pretty strong,

0:34:55.760 --> 0:34:57.799
<v Speaker 1>Tim But I kind of say a cousin the technicals

0:34:57.880 --> 0:34:59.799
<v Speaker 1>is sentiment, right, that's kind of in the price and

0:35:00.120 --> 0:35:03.840
<v Speaker 1>and we've seen just huge flows coming into equity funds.

0:35:03.880 --> 0:35:07.319
<v Speaker 1>We've seen very historically low put to call ratios. You know,

0:35:07.320 --> 0:35:10.319
<v Speaker 1>there are clearly some signs that there's a little too

0:35:10.360 --> 0:35:12.839
<v Speaker 1>much excitement that's out there, and that's okay, right, I mean,

0:35:12.840 --> 0:35:15.480
<v Speaker 1>after seventy six percent rally, given where we were this

0:35:15.520 --> 0:35:17.480
<v Speaker 1>time about a year ago, I think it makes sense

0:35:17.520 --> 0:35:20.080
<v Speaker 1>people a little excited, but it makes sense to us

0:35:20.160 --> 0:35:23.160
<v Speaker 1>also if you've just overlay this bull market that started

0:35:23.239 --> 0:35:25.799
<v Speaker 1>last March with the one that started in two thousand nine.

0:35:25.840 --> 0:35:29.200
<v Speaker 1>They almost trekk perfectly with each other, but that one

0:35:29.239 --> 0:35:31.000
<v Speaker 1>in early two thousand ten you had a ten per

0:35:31.000 --> 0:35:34.799
<v Speaker 1>cent correction, some sideways consolidation for good part of the

0:35:34.800 --> 0:35:36.680
<v Speaker 1>middle of two thousand ten. We think that could play

0:35:36.680 --> 0:35:38.800
<v Speaker 1>out once again here. So Ryan, how much of the

0:35:38.840 --> 0:35:41.799
<v Speaker 1>trade that we're seeing and the comeback, how much of

0:35:41.840 --> 0:35:43.799
<v Speaker 1>that is banking on what we see in the second

0:35:43.840 --> 0:35:46.200
<v Speaker 1>half of this year. Yeah, Well, if you look at

0:35:46.200 --> 0:35:47.640
<v Speaker 1>who's been leading, I think you have to say a

0:35:47.680 --> 0:35:49.759
<v Speaker 1>lot it's those cyclicals. Right. Look at today, I mean

0:35:49.880 --> 0:35:52.760
<v Speaker 1>energy stocks once again are doing well. The cyclical value

0:35:52.800 --> 0:35:56.160
<v Speaker 1>your energy financials is the yield curve keeps deepening. What's

0:35:56.160 --> 0:35:58.440
<v Speaker 1>the ten you're doing ten years up a little bit today,

0:35:58.440 --> 0:36:00.799
<v Speaker 1>but the yield curve to tin keeps the opening. Those

0:36:00.800 --> 0:36:03.480
<v Speaker 1>are all telling us that, hey, the market is betting

0:36:03.480 --> 0:36:06.839
<v Speaker 1>on a very significant reopening and that's why the cyclical value.

0:36:06.880 --> 0:36:08.000
<v Speaker 1>But coming on with you guys for a couple of

0:36:08.040 --> 0:36:10.080
<v Speaker 1>months saying, you know, last year we liked growth a

0:36:10.080 --> 0:36:12.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of lpill research. This year we've kind of changed

0:36:12.600 --> 0:36:14.919
<v Speaker 1>our tune a little bit, saying, listen, cyclical value makes

0:36:14.920 --> 0:36:17.759
<v Speaker 1>sense finally to maybe get some strength, and that is

0:36:17.760 --> 0:36:20.719
<v Speaker 1>exactly what's happened. But before everyone gets way excited about financials,

0:36:20.760 --> 0:36:23.399
<v Speaker 1>for instance, Carol, they've got nowhere for fourteen years. Okay,

0:36:23.360 --> 0:36:25.080
<v Speaker 1>they're where they were in two thousand seven, so let's

0:36:25.080 --> 0:36:27.759
<v Speaker 1>not get too excited here. But that's bolish from a

0:36:27.800 --> 0:36:30.239
<v Speaker 1>longer term point of view, because hey, they haven't gone

0:36:30.280 --> 0:36:32.480
<v Speaker 1>awhere for fourteen years. We know text up a ton,

0:36:32.719 --> 0:36:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and we don't have a problem with technology, but if

0:36:34.600 --> 0:36:36.239
<v Speaker 1>you look for something that's kind of still beating up

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:39.239
<v Speaker 1>and hadn't gone anywhere. Oh my financial still look pretty

0:36:39.239 --> 0:36:41.359
<v Speaker 1>good to us here. I get the value argument, but

0:36:41.400 --> 0:36:44.560
<v Speaker 1>if the growth is in the growth players or the

0:36:44.600 --> 0:36:48.520
<v Speaker 1>momentum players, why wouldn't you continue to make your bets there. Yeah, well,

0:36:48.560 --> 0:36:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the way we're constructing our portfolios far more than seventeen

0:36:51.280 --> 0:36:54.120
<v Speaker 1>thousand advisors, we are kind of doing a two pronged approach, right.

0:36:54.160 --> 0:36:57.680
<v Speaker 1>We We don't have a problem with technology and communication services.

0:36:57.680 --> 0:36:59.560
<v Speaker 1>They kind of got us to the party. But we're

0:36:59.640 --> 0:37:01.520
<v Speaker 1>much more open to the idea of taking a little

0:37:01.560 --> 0:37:04.200
<v Speaker 1>bit of profits there and adding to your your your

0:37:04.320 --> 0:37:08.200
<v Speaker 1>cyclical value names industrials, materials, and financials. I mean, what materials.

0:37:08.200 --> 0:37:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I come on you guys for a while talking about copper.

0:37:09.880 --> 0:37:12.040
<v Speaker 1>That sounds kind of boring. Coppers up, you know, another

0:37:12.080 --> 0:37:14.760
<v Speaker 1>three percent today, nine year highs. If copper is strong

0:37:14.840 --> 0:37:17.239
<v Speaker 1>like it's been for several months, that tells us a

0:37:17.239 --> 0:37:21.040
<v Speaker 1>few things, mainly the global economies on firm footing and

0:37:21.239 --> 0:37:24.640
<v Speaker 1>likely higher rates, and those the cyclical values should probably

0:37:24.680 --> 0:37:26.880
<v Speaker 1>do well. And coppers just blowing up again today. How

0:37:26.880 --> 0:37:30.799
<v Speaker 1>are you looking at the rise in the tenure? Yeah? Yeah,

0:37:30.880 --> 0:37:33.279
<v Speaker 1>that's that story of the weekend. And everybody's wondering where

0:37:33.280 --> 0:37:35.279
<v Speaker 1>does a tenure go to get too high to knock

0:37:35.360 --> 0:37:37.319
<v Speaker 1>stocks off their rally. We think there's still a ways

0:37:37.320 --> 0:37:39.000
<v Speaker 1>to go. I mean, the bottom line, is this a

0:37:39.000 --> 0:37:41.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit of inflation be okay? I mean the Fed

0:37:41.120 --> 0:37:43.160
<v Speaker 1>share person Pale just said that today, right, a little

0:37:43.200 --> 0:37:45.640
<v Speaker 1>bit of inflation, he's okay. With the tenure yield to

0:37:45.760 --> 0:37:49.440
<v Speaker 1>us is suggesting again a likely stronger economy, more stimulus.

0:37:49.600 --> 0:37:51.840
<v Speaker 1>So we've got a target about one seventy five on

0:37:51.880 --> 0:37:53.479
<v Speaker 1>the tenure by the end of this year, which would

0:37:53.480 --> 0:37:55.200
<v Speaker 1>be a little a little bit higher where forty basis

0:37:55.239 --> 0:37:56.759
<v Speaker 1>points higher than where it is. But we think that'd

0:37:56.800 --> 0:37:59.279
<v Speaker 1>be perfectly normal. And let's not forget it wasn't that

0:37:59.360 --> 0:38:01.400
<v Speaker 1>long ago that in years up around three percent. I know,

0:38:01.440 --> 0:38:03.680
<v Speaker 1>it feels like a lifetime ago in a lot of ways,

0:38:03.719 --> 0:38:06.000
<v Speaker 1>but a little higher trending ten your yield does suggest

0:38:06.080 --> 0:38:08.359
<v Speaker 1>again of probably improving economy in our view. Where don't

0:38:08.360 --> 0:38:11.200
<v Speaker 1>you want to be right now? Yeah? This well, great question.

0:38:11.200 --> 0:38:13.880
<v Speaker 1>They are those defensives, you know, your utilities and your

0:38:13.920 --> 0:38:15.600
<v Speaker 1>reads kind of some of those areas that are that

0:38:15.640 --> 0:38:18.640
<v Speaker 1>are that's as pharmaceuticals that are just more defensive by nature.

0:38:18.680 --> 0:38:21.160
<v Speaker 1>They haven't done quite as well. Um, that's kind of

0:38:21.160 --> 0:38:23.439
<v Speaker 1>where we see. Also, I've been an LPIL for five years.

0:38:23.440 --> 0:38:25.440
<v Speaker 1>We haven't liked Europe for the five years i've been here.

0:38:25.440 --> 0:38:28.480
<v Speaker 1>We're still a little bit underway Europe. We like emerging markets,

0:38:28.480 --> 0:38:31.880
<v Speaker 1>and we like Japan first, little more international flavor, but

0:38:31.960 --> 0:38:33.560
<v Speaker 1>a Europe in an area we still think is probably

0:38:33.560 --> 0:38:35.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna underperform. We did see their travel stocks over in

0:38:35.880 --> 0:38:38.399
<v Speaker 1>the UK as UK economy is opening up, you don't

0:38:38.440 --> 0:38:40.960
<v Speaker 1>see a play there. Yeah, I mean there're always potentially

0:38:40.960 --> 0:38:42.800
<v Speaker 1>could be some type of a play, but the overall

0:38:42.920 --> 0:38:45.279
<v Speaker 1>dynamics as we look at Europe are still slowing. There's

0:38:45.280 --> 0:38:48.120
<v Speaker 1>still some some demographic issues and earning scrowth. I mean,

0:38:48.120 --> 0:38:50.120
<v Speaker 1>we're going at thirty five percent earning growth this year

0:38:50.160 --> 0:38:53.480
<v Speaker 1>in emerging markets, leading the overall global resurgence that we're

0:38:53.480 --> 0:38:55.040
<v Speaker 1>seeing in earning. So we just think e M is

0:38:55.080 --> 0:38:58.200
<v Speaker 1>still probably the better place from a diversified global portfolio

0:38:58.280 --> 0:39:00.200
<v Speaker 1>point of view. All Right, gotta ron, Ryan, think you

0:39:00.239 --> 0:39:02.480
<v Speaker 1>so much? Trying. D Church, chief market strategist at LPL

0:39:02.520 --> 0:39:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Financial with us from Charlotte, North Carolina, and this tim

0:39:06.480 --> 0:39:08.880
<v Speaker 1>on a day when quite a big swing when it

0:39:08.920 --> 0:39:11.200
<v Speaker 1>comes to those major equity averages. Yeah, NAZAC was down

0:39:11.200 --> 0:39:13.360
<v Speaker 1>as much as three point nine percent, down half a

0:39:13.400 --> 0:39:18.880
<v Speaker 1>percentage point. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download

0:39:18.880 --> 0:39:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com, and

0:39:22.200 --> 0:39:23.880
<v Speaker 1>you can also listen to our radio show at two

0:39:23.920 --> 0:39:26.840
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on YouTube.

0:39:26.960 --> 0:39:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Search to Bloomberg Global News