WEBVTT - America: Is it only a dream?

0:00:12.360 --> 0:00:20.120
<v Speaker 1>One nation under the great divide in American politics shows

0:00:20.120 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 1>no sign of closing. We are going to fight like

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:28.720
<v Speaker 1>hell against the tyrannical Democrats. Republicans in Congress are spreading

0:00:28.760 --> 0:00:33.839
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy theories, denying reality, and poisoning the well of our

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>percent of Republicans and Democrats agreed that the country would

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 1>be better off if large numbers of the opposing party

0:00:42.280 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>just die. Welcome to Calling Bullshit, the podcast about purpose washing,

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the gap between what companies say they stand for and

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 1>what they actually do, and what they would need to

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:09.959
<v Speaker 1>change to practice what they preach. I'm your host, Time Montague,

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 1>and I've spent over a decade helping companies define what

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:16.679
<v Speaker 1>they stand for, their purpose and then help them to

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 1>use that purpose to drive transformation throughout their business. Unfortunately,

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:24.479
<v Speaker 1>at a lot of organizations today, they're still a pretty

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:28.559
<v Speaker 1>wide gap between word and deed. That gap has a name.

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:34.480
<v Speaker 1>We call it bullshit. But, and this is important, we

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 1>believe that bullshit is a treatable disease. So when the

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>BS detector lights up, we're going to explore things that

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:53.640
<v Speaker 1>a company should do to fix it. Today we're examining

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the biggest and most powerful organizations in the world,

0:01:57.720 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 1>and it became big and powerful, at least in part

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 1>because of a great story and an aspirational purpose. I'm talking,

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 1>of course, about the United States of America. It's tough

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 1>to pin down a succinct purpose statement for America. Is

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:20.080
<v Speaker 1>it in the Declaration of Independence or in the Constitution?

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Is it in a president's speech or on a coin.

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Elements of America's purpose can be found in all of

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:30.359
<v Speaker 1>these artifacts. But to me, there's one thing that truly

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:34.360
<v Speaker 1>captures the spirit of this country's purpose the best. Let's

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 1>call it the American Dream, which goes something like this,

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:42.080
<v Speaker 1>no matter who you are or where you come from,

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:45.800
<v Speaker 1>if you live here, work hard, and generally operate as

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:49.399
<v Speaker 1>a good citizen, there is no end to how far

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:54.520
<v Speaker 1>you can go. America is a true meritocracy, a land

0:02:54.520 --> 0:03:02.359
<v Speaker 1>of opportunity that is open to all. But is this

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 1>even true? Is our current polarization assign that the dream

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:12.639
<v Speaker 1>is just a bunch of bullshit? Get out your BS

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 1>detector and join me and special guest Andrew Yang on

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:24.680
<v Speaker 1>a quest to find out. As we prepped this episode,

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 1>it became clear that even as a tight knit podcasting team,

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:32.400
<v Speaker 1>we had differing opinions about the whole idea of the

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 1>American Dream, and so we hit the record button on ourselves.

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Can I ask you, um so, when I say the

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 1>words the American Dream to both of you, like, what

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 1>what do those words mean to you? I just felt

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 1>like a struggle with the term because I wouldn't be

0:03:55.600 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 1>here if it weren't for my Jamaican parents coming from

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 1>their native country and trying to find a better life

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 1>for their family here in America, having access to jobs

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:11.119
<v Speaker 1>and medical care that they might not have had in Jamaica.

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 1>So I'm definitely thankful that I'm able to be a

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:19.920
<v Speaker 1>first generation American. That's MICHAELA Read, a producer on Calling BS.

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:23.039
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I feel like to call it a dream

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 1>makes it sounds better than what it is. Everyone should

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:32.119
<v Speaker 1>have access to housing like that shouldn't necessarily be a dream.

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 1>It should be a requirement. Everyone should have the ability

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>if they're sick, to go to a hospital and have

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the right amount of care for their illnesses, regardless of

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 1>their income. Yeah, that makes sense. The story I thought

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I saw unfolding in America previously was people who wanted

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 1>to improve their lot in life decided to leave their

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:04.559
<v Speaker 1>home country a totally non trivial decision and come here

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and use that motivation to advance themselves on their own cause.

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 1>And what I was taught in school was this was

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:17.839
<v Speaker 1>the strength of America, the fact that motivated people came

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:23.279
<v Speaker 1>because we opened that door. We became a country of

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:27.240
<v Speaker 1>motivated people. We benefited from that, and we fed off

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>one another energy and created something exceptional. So I'm a

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 1>more nuanced person than to say that I blanketly don't

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 1>agree that nothing good has ever come out of people

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>coming here from other countries. And that's basil super producer

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 1>and researcher. It's complicated, but I do think that there's

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 1>a reason that people want to be here. Who knows

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 1>why they're doing it. Are they doing it because they're

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:56.120
<v Speaker 1>fed the idea of an American dream? Or is it

0:05:56.200 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 1>like because it's it's really dire and and it doesn't

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:03.920
<v Speaker 1>matter how bad it is here, right, Yeah, I'm just thinking, like,

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe America just has really good marketing. America does have

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:15.040
<v Speaker 1>really good marketing, and that's because it tells an irresistible story.

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 1>From revolution to independence, from freedom to wild financial success.

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>The American legend has been undeniably inspiring and on this show,

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:30.839
<v Speaker 1>we explore how well organizations actually honor the narrative they're

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 1>crafting for themselves. So the question is do we still

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 1>believe that story and how much of that story has

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 1>been conveniently left out in order to keep the brand strong.

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that we became a successful country and like

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:52.039
<v Speaker 1>the powerhouse of the economy of globally, you know, through

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:56.599
<v Speaker 1>exploiting workers of all kinds, and that goes back to

0:06:56.640 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 1>like children and women and people of color. So for me,

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 1>when we talk about America being great, I don't think

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 1>it was ever really. Yeah, I mean I definitely feel

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I guess some elements of bitterness when talking about American

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:22.240
<v Speaker 1>what it was founded upon, like mass genocide of indigenous

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 1>peoples and how it was built upon the backs of

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 1>enslaved people. It's just difficult to think of a country

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 1>that is viewed as something that is a place for opportunity,

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>and the opportunities that they're providing aren't exactly accessible to

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 1>all Americans. Yeah, I hear that both of those perspectives.

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I guess it raises some questions for me, Like you know,

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 1>from my perspective, and again mine is a perspective of privilege,

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>but there is some good to have set up in

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 1>view a country that is supposed to be and certainly

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:07.640
<v Speaker 1>has not been in every case, but it's supposed to

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:10.480
<v Speaker 1>be a meritocracy, and we did open a door for

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>people to come here and make their own way, rise

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 1>to the level of their own abilities, and so there's

0:08:18.640 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 1>got to be some value to that. I don't think

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 1>that's the truth. I think even if people did come

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 1>from worse off countries, they came here as immigrants and

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:34.559
<v Speaker 1>lived in tenements and just made the rich richer. That's frustrating,

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:36.360
<v Speaker 1>you know. It's not like they just came here and

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:38.319
<v Speaker 1>like we're like middle class. You know, someone who grew

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 1>up in poverty. When we talk about things like people

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:44.840
<v Speaker 1>not be able to make a living wage, or like

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 1>some people being shocked by how we've responded to COVID

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 1>as a country doesn't shock me as someone who couldn't

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 1>get health care, growing up as a trans person who

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:56.839
<v Speaker 1>can't get trans healthcare, you know, in an accessible way.

0:08:57.360 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 1>So for me, like I've seen the this this isn't new.

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 1>This conversation got me really curious. There are so many

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 1>ways to interpret the American dream. How many Americans still

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 1>believe that the country has a higher purpose. Is the

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 1>dream still worth believing in? Or is it dying? To

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 1>try and understand all of this, the team decided to

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:26.319
<v Speaker 1>fan out and speak with a wide variety of Americans,

0:09:26.360 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 1>some of them in our own families, and we asked

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 1>them for their definitions of the American dream. First up,

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Basil's brother in law, Jonathan Craig, a pool technician in

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Myrtle Beach, South Carolina. American Dream. M hm. So you

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:47.520
<v Speaker 1>come from a third world country as they come from Afghanistan.

0:09:47.640 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 1>You don't speak of Lake English. You got your whole

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 1>family here with you. You come here and pretty much

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:54.560
<v Speaker 1>you can be whatever you know and do whatever you

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 1>want and sky Athalna. Here you can get a good education.

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 1>We got a good American system, you know, as far

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:04.359
<v Speaker 1>as helping people get on their feet, you know, programs

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:07.240
<v Speaker 1>for school. And you come here from anywhere and you

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 1>can get the help you need and shoot just like

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 1>you a guy down the road. They come from Saudi Arabia,

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't speak hardly in English three or four years ago.

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Now they got freaking four or five stores. You know,

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 1>that's the American dream right there. You come here and

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>then make a living, raised a family. The American dream

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:34.840
<v Speaker 1>you can achieve whatever you set out to do. Because

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm Jamaican, it meant that I could be here and

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 1>opportunities would be available, not so much for myself, but

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 1>for my children. That's Michaelis grandmother, Yvonne Clark, a former

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 1>law secretary in New York. And I am so proud

0:10:56.800 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 1>to be an American and for them to be Americans

0:11:01.080 --> 0:11:06.680
<v Speaker 1>and for the avenues for growth it has afforded them.

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:11.080
<v Speaker 1>And one of Yvan's children is Michaela's aunt and Dream Clark,

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 1>a public school teacher in North Carolina. But the American

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:17.560
<v Speaker 1>dream is a pursuit of happiness, and really that's what

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:21.960
<v Speaker 1>so many Americans want to do. For so many, the

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:25.439
<v Speaker 1>American dream is about the pursuit of happiness and opportunity.

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:29.840
<v Speaker 1>But as entrepreneur, cultural critic Queens New York resident and

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:34.680
<v Speaker 1>first generation Korean American J. K. Cho points out, there's

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 1>a dark side to that pursuit. I feel like when

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 1>people say American dream is often associated with abundance, right

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 1>buying the necessary ship in Bolke, Like you know, we

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 1>have a hundred pairs of sneakers at home, Like when

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 1>we're never going to run that much Black Friday holiday shopping.

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:54.840
<v Speaker 1>It's a flawed narrative that's like too often perpetrated by

0:11:54.880 --> 0:12:00.679
<v Speaker 1>the imperialistic American agenda. This concept of consumerism is interweaved

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:06.080
<v Speaker 1>with the American dream, and it's also connected with democracy,

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 1>this thought of freedom of choice. But in reality, we

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:14.839
<v Speaker 1>really live in like a politocracy, government controled by those

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:17.760
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of wealth, which is continuously part of

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:23.680
<v Speaker 1>this pipeline that essentially served those in upper economic realms

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>with our labor meager wages, which we used to buy

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 1>more ship, watch more content to entertainers. And you know,

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't really believe in this concept of an American dream,

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 1>per se. I believe in American survival. For some Americans,

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the tough part of survival is economic. But for my

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 1>next guest, survival means holding onto an entire way of

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 1>life despite centuries of systemic oppression. What to the words

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the American dream mean to you? For me? Those words

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:02.720
<v Speaker 1>as a mama response to ta we means? Is a

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Stanford educated attorney who leads Thunder Valley, an indigenous not

0:13:07.559 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>for profit organization that advocates for the liberation of Lakota people.

0:13:12.640 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 1>She is the only person we spoke to who doesn't

0:13:15.400 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 1>identify as an American. I am from the Ogala La

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Kota and cistertan Wapatan Da Kota people nations, and we

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 1>are a part of the Ocheti shakoe Um larger nation

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:32.440
<v Speaker 1>and currently reside in what is now called South Dakota,

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:37.079
<v Speaker 1>where the original caretakers and stewards of this land long

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:43.359
<v Speaker 1>before Columbus lost his way and inflicted years of European

0:13:43.880 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 1>genocide upon the people of this land. And so that

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 1>is a trauma response for a lot of Indigenous people

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:53.559
<v Speaker 1>and other communities of color because of the the colonization

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 1>and the genocide that was associated with the development of

0:13:57.280 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 1>this land base into what is now called the United

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:04.960
<v Speaker 1>States of America. The conversation with tatewe really brought home

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the terrible price that millions of people have paid to

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 1>create the country that we live in today. How you

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:15.840
<v Speaker 1>feel about the American dream really depends on your vantage

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 1>point and the version of American history that you've been taught.

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:24.360
<v Speaker 1>So many people have sacrificed for this country against their will,

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 1>while others volunteer their lives to defend it. Next is

0:14:29.240 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Adrian Bonnenberger, a writer and veteran who served two tours

0:14:33.120 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 1>of duty in Afghanistan. One of the extraordinary things of

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 1>America and the American Dream, I think, is that you

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 1>can come to America from anywhere on Earth. You can

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:46.600
<v Speaker 1>start a business, you can get a job somewhere, and

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:48.880
<v Speaker 1>you will be the author of your own destiny. And

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that far more than um, you know, the

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 1>ability to to get rich or whatever some people say

0:14:56.160 --> 0:15:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the American dream is, is actually what makes America a

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 1>place that people look to a place where they can

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 1>live um with dignity. And you get your American citizenship,

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 1>You've got that passport in your hand. Only a real

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 1>jerk is going to say you're not a real American.

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 1>To me, the American dream means equal opportunity. That's David Sefabian,

0:15:18.160 --> 0:15:21.760
<v Speaker 1>the current General counsel for the American Conservative Union, who

0:15:21.800 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 1>has also held senior positions in the Bush White House.

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 1>The ability for folks to follow their passion to work

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 1>hard to achieve success, regardless of how you define success.

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Having a system that not only makes it possible but

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 1>encourages individual success, I think is what I would view

0:15:43.960 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the pathway to the American Dream. And Penelope super nine

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 1>what would you say America's purpose actually is shoo, comes

0:15:57.080 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 1>here and be yourself. Do you think America is actually

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 1>achieving this? Uh? Sometimes no, because they are treating people differently,

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 1>like gay people, by people, um and like Indian Americans,

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 1>black people and other people like that. Why do you

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 1>think that is because they think that they're since they're different,

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 1>that they could just treat them different. How do you

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:32.720
<v Speaker 1>How does that make you feel? That makes me feel sad?

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Is it because you love LGBT people and black people? Yeah?

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't care if they're any condition people. Yeah, they're rude.

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't want them. I'm with Penelope, I don't like

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 1>rude people either. Nearly all of the people that I

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 1>spoke with identified as either Democrat or Republican. I'll leave

0:16:57.080 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 1>it to your imagination to decide who is who. But

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 1>no matter their affiliation, there seemed to be a common

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 1>understanding of what the American dream was supposed to be.

0:17:07.320 --> 0:17:11.240
<v Speaker 1>The difference in perspective stemmed from whether we're actually living

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 1>up to it or not. America's bs score a conversation

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:20.119
<v Speaker 1>with Andrew Yang and an exploration into why we're so polarized.

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Right after this, before you head to the break. We'd

0:17:23.760 --> 0:17:26.399
<v Speaker 1>love to hear what you think about the show. Maybe

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:29.399
<v Speaker 1>you were inspired to take action, maybe you disagree with

0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:33.160
<v Speaker 1>today's bullshit rating. Either way, we want to hear about it.

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Leave us a message at two one two five oh

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:39.639
<v Speaker 1>five to Zo five, or send a voice memo to

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 1>CBS podcast at co collective dot com. You might even

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 1>be featured on an upcoming episode. It is a joke

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:57.679
<v Speaker 1>when Republicans say that the urgency around this bill, the

0:17:57.840 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 1>only folk of the ads is that what they wanted.

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Opublican doesn't want you to know. Media the welcome back

0:18:12.320 --> 0:18:16.159
<v Speaker 1>on this unique episode of calling Bullshit. We've applied the

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 1>idea of an organization's purpose to an entire nation, the

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:24.160
<v Speaker 1>United States of America, and for the sake of this experiment,

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:29.440
<v Speaker 1>we've identified the American Dream as that purpose. Now we

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:33.720
<v Speaker 1>continue these conversations by exploring America's mission, in other words,

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:36.720
<v Speaker 1>the steps that we can take as citizens and governing

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:40.920
<v Speaker 1>bodies to actually put the purpose into practice, and debating

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:45.640
<v Speaker 1>how or even if Americans can achieve this dream amidst

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:52.119
<v Speaker 1>so much division. Here's school teacher Andrean Clark opportunity for all.

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 1>That's America's mission statement that's I think what the founding

0:18:56.320 --> 0:18:59.880
<v Speaker 1>fathers wanted, And if they wanted it any other way,

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 1>they would have said equality for white men who own

0:19:04.119 --> 0:19:09.720
<v Speaker 1>land and freedom for specific people. But they had a

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 1>bigger dream, and they're bigger dream was equality and opportunity

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 1>and freedom for all these systems in this country was

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 1>not built for people that look like me, sound like me,

0:19:22.640 --> 0:19:25.720
<v Speaker 1>or grew up like me. Once again, the leader of

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Thunder Valley to tay we means you hear that it's

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:31.600
<v Speaker 1>a land of opportunity, but you have to really question

0:19:31.640 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 1>for who. From my perspective as an Indigenous woman, the

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:41.400
<v Speaker 1>mission state of America is really exclusionary and genocidal, harmful.

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 1>What could America be doing better to live its mission?

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:49.399
<v Speaker 1>In other words, if you were going to change some

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 1>things about the country, what would you change? I would

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 1>change its mission? You have to you have to start

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:58.120
<v Speaker 1>at those rotten roots. The seeds of this country are

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:02.919
<v Speaker 1>rotten because of the these you know, initial ideologies and

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 1>beliefs about the people that did not look like white

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 1>men that were already here, and our view about what

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:14.919
<v Speaker 1>it meant to be inhabitants and occupants of this land.

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Army veteran Adrian Bonnenberger. I would say our mission has

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 1>been to expand that definition of citizen and citizenship as

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 1>being something that's dependent on the individual's willingness to take

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:34.920
<v Speaker 1>part in community and not defined based on something that

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 1>one of their ancestors did eight hundred years ago. It

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be defined based on religion, it shouldn't be defined

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 1>based on race, it shouldn't be defined based on class.

0:20:43.680 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 1>It was a revolutionary idea. We we we had to,

0:20:46.200 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, stage a revolution over it, uh towards Washington,

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:52.920
<v Speaker 1>when people said you ought to be king, he said,

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:55.199
<v Speaker 1>that's not what I'm doing here. You know, I'm going

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:57.879
<v Speaker 1>to be president and you're going to keep electing. So

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:02.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a process that is both durative and also it's

0:21:02.320 --> 0:21:05.679
<v Speaker 1>a process that requires people to buy into it actively.

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 1>And if you buy into it actively, then that's your

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 1>stake and you own a piece of it, and nobody

0:21:10.560 --> 0:21:13.639
<v Speaker 1>can tell you different. I think America's mission statement is

0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 1>to be a beacon of freedom to the world. General

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:21.159
<v Speaker 1>Counsel for the American Conservative Union David sa Fabian and

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I personally view the American model, the American experiment as

0:21:27.280 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 1>something that I know so many millions of other people

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 1>see and go, That's where I want to be, That's

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:37.720
<v Speaker 1>what I want for my family. So I think our

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:44.440
<v Speaker 1>mission is not just too continue the concept of American exceptionalism,

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:49.639
<v Speaker 1>but to make sure that we continue with American exceptionalism

0:21:49.720 --> 0:21:53.119
<v Speaker 1>as a way to show the path to other governments,

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:56.879
<v Speaker 1>other countries, other cultures. How do you think about the

0:21:56.920 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 1>polarization that's going on in the country right now. I

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 1>things coming out of the left and the right that

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 1>just nauseate me, to be honest, and there is very

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:09.639
<v Speaker 1>little open communication and honest communication between the sides. I

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:13.280
<v Speaker 1>think what we've come to as a point where we

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 1>are both so convinced of our righteousness that we have

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:22.640
<v Speaker 1>to condemn people that have opposing points of view. There

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:24.719
<v Speaker 1>is some sense that there was kind of an original

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:29.879
<v Speaker 1>sin in America and that that sin keeps coming back,

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:34.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, like once it's in you, it it's really

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:38.800
<v Speaker 1>hard to to get it out. How do you think

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:41.639
<v Speaker 1>about that? I guess, you know, you really hit it

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:44.200
<v Speaker 1>when you called it original sin, And this is the

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:46.240
<v Speaker 1>first time I've really thought about it in this context

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 1>or this frame. So I think that our past is

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:55.239
<v Speaker 1>something we all have to recognize but to carry it

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:59.480
<v Speaker 1>forward and say we are somehow less of an exceptional

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:05.160
<v Speaker 1>nation and truly believe America is exceptional. Um to carry

0:23:05.160 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 1>it forward as a scarlet, a scarlet s for slavery

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 1>tattooed on our collective foreheads is neither going to fix

0:23:16.359 --> 0:23:19.920
<v Speaker 1>any problem, nor does it reflect reality that we are

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 1>a generous country. We are by and large a kind

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:27.399
<v Speaker 1>and welcoming country, and we are the one that should

0:23:27.440 --> 0:23:30.159
<v Speaker 1>be the beacon of the world. So right now, I

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 1>think we're in a crisis, in a moment of self

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:39.240
<v Speaker 1>realization or self actualization for America. What does America really

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 1>stand for? Are we free to pursue our own happiness

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and not harm others? Are we still living up to

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the ideals of the Constitution, which is freedom, opportunity, and equality?

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:55.800
<v Speaker 1>And I would say not. I think we're on the

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 1>threat right now. There's a group of people who have

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 1>been misled thirty years about America just being for white,

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Anglo Saxon Protestants, and they are afraid of the demographic

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:14.480
<v Speaker 1>shift that is going on there. Are really terrified that

0:24:14.560 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 1>they won't be able to pursue happiness again, won't be

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:24.440
<v Speaker 1>able to have their freedom door somehow they're opportunities being

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:29.479
<v Speaker 1>curtailed because the demographics of America shifting to be more brown.

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Everything's race related now, I mean it. You know, there's

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:37.879
<v Speaker 1>a serious thing Pool technician Jonathan Craig, you know, police

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:41.840
<v Speaker 1>brutality all that. You know, it's crappy that properly does

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 1>happened to black people, more African Americans, more than does most.

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:49.120
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, you ain't nothing. And then then needs

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 1>to go with defund the police. Well, if you want

0:24:51.320 --> 0:24:54.040
<v Speaker 1>to go that rat, well just let's just abolish to

0:24:54.080 --> 0:24:56.879
<v Speaker 1>hold them system and everything. No police, no, none of that.

0:24:56.920 --> 0:24:58.400
<v Speaker 1>And then we'll see whe're at in a year from

0:24:58.400 --> 0:24:59.680
<v Speaker 1>now and see if you want to go to bring

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the baby. But we've definitely gotten away from our core

0:25:02.720 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 1>principles I believe. I mean, just as far as like

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:08.920
<v Speaker 1>to say, you know, everybody created equal. I mean even

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:11.600
<v Speaker 1>you know women, I mean they still get you know,

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:13.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not as bad as I'm sure it was, you know,

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:15.919
<v Speaker 1>thirty or forty years ago. But I mean that that

0:25:15.960 --> 0:25:19.160
<v Speaker 1>could get a little better too. But uh, I mean

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:26.600
<v Speaker 1>it's I regret to say that at the current moment,

0:25:27.280 --> 0:25:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I think the the experiment is is in danger. It's

0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:36.639
<v Speaker 1>in danger mostly because of complacency. We've become victims of

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:39.960
<v Speaker 1>our own success and our own privilege. And I think

0:25:40.040 --> 0:25:43.439
<v Speaker 1>this is this, more than anything, is going to ruin us.

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Entrepreneur j Cho, So what would I change about America?

0:25:48.040 --> 0:25:53.399
<v Speaker 1>Like stop pushing American military might to control resources and

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:59.000
<v Speaker 1>have you know, young people died for old people's selfish agendas,

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:03.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, hoologize to the indivigenous people and respect nature,

0:26:03.880 --> 0:26:06.720
<v Speaker 1>all of that ship, you know, Like I would change

0:26:06.720 --> 0:26:09.679
<v Speaker 1>all of that, But I think the root of it

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:14.840
<v Speaker 1>all really comes from being willing to try to learn

0:26:14.880 --> 0:26:17.840
<v Speaker 1>more about people that might not look like you. And

0:26:17.880 --> 0:26:21.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that America is a social experiment that can

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:26.040
<v Speaker 1>progress towards them because, like, how many societies do you

0:26:26.119 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 1>know where an Asian kid growing up on hip hop

0:26:31.000 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 1>and queens could naturally flow and have friends from all

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 1>parts of the world, eat each other's food, make love

0:26:39.640 --> 0:26:43.239
<v Speaker 1>with each other, and you know, eventually have kids and

0:26:43.280 --> 0:26:47.919
<v Speaker 1>build families and basically create a whole new paradigm of

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:51.960
<v Speaker 1>what a community could look like. Because I reflect on

0:26:52.240 --> 0:26:54.919
<v Speaker 1>what I've learned in these conversations, it occurs to me

0:26:55.000 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 1>that over the past several decades, we've become two nations.

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:03.400
<v Speaker 1>One nation actively pushing for us to remember and to reconcile,

0:27:03.880 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 1>to acknowledge some of the flaws and mistakes in our

0:27:06.400 --> 0:27:10.320
<v Speaker 1>history and to address them, and a second nation that

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:13.520
<v Speaker 1>fears the future and wants things to return to the

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 1>way it always was, to return to a time of forgetting.

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Maybe the way forward here is to remember something else.

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:26.560
<v Speaker 1>America has never feared the future and has never feared change.

0:27:26.960 --> 0:27:30.240
<v Speaker 1>In fact, the founders knew we'd need to change and

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:35.440
<v Speaker 1>adapt to new and unforeseen circumstances. That's what the Constitution

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and the Amendments are for. As long as we respect

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:43.920
<v Speaker 1>one another, actively participate, and have the ability to agree

0:27:43.920 --> 0:27:49.400
<v Speaker 1>to disagree civilly and respectfully, that America will find its way.

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:55.359
<v Speaker 1>Andreane Clark says it best America is for all people

0:27:55.640 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 1>if you believe in those ideals of freedom for all,

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:05.240
<v Speaker 1>opportunities for all, and harm none, And that is possible.

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:09.840
<v Speaker 1>And I'm extremely patriotic. I say, uh, the Pledge of

0:28:09.880 --> 0:28:13.560
<v Speaker 1>allegiance at schools and some of my students wonder why

0:28:13.920 --> 0:28:17.360
<v Speaker 1>when opportunities aren't there for them, And I say, well,

0:28:17.400 --> 0:28:19.560
<v Speaker 1>then you've got to grab the bull by the horn.

0:28:19.680 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 1>And wrestle with it and make it work for you.

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:26.840
<v Speaker 1>If you believe in those ideals of freedom for all,

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:30.160
<v Speaker 1>be an American and be a good citizen, which means

0:28:30.520 --> 0:28:34.800
<v Speaker 1>to participate and not let a certain segment of society

0:28:34.880 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 1>take it from you or destroy it because they don't

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:42.040
<v Speaker 1>want to share in the dream of pursuit of happiness

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:47.680
<v Speaker 1>or equality. And so governments must work for the greater good,

0:28:48.120 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 1>for the greatest many, for the greatest pursuit. Folks, it's

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 1>time to make the call. Is the American dream still real?

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Is America a place where all people are created equal,

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:05.600
<v Speaker 1>a place that welcomes people from all walks of life

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:10.080
<v Speaker 1>with open arms and opens the door to whatever future

0:29:10.200 --> 0:29:15.240
<v Speaker 1>they want to create. Or has America itself become a bullshitter?

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Based on what I've heard today, I think we have

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 1>to call bs. But remember, bullshit is a treatable disease,

0:29:23.680 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and so after the diagnosis, we always discuss a cure.

0:29:27.560 --> 0:29:31.360
<v Speaker 1>America is a place that reinvents itself, and the Framers

0:29:31.360 --> 0:29:33.440
<v Speaker 1>were wise enough to leave us with the tools we

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:37.640
<v Speaker 1>need to drive that reinvention. I think it's also worth

0:29:37.680 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 1>remembering we've come back from worse places before this after

0:29:42.320 --> 0:29:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the break, we'll hear some concrete solutions from a special guest,

0:29:46.320 --> 0:30:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Yang. Stick with us, Welcome back. We've decided that

0:30:09.240 --> 0:30:12.120
<v Speaker 1>there is a gap between the dream that America is

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 1>selling and the actions that America is taking. So we're

0:30:16.800 --> 0:30:20.680
<v Speaker 1>calling BS. But on this show, we believe BS is

0:30:20.720 --> 0:30:23.920
<v Speaker 1>a treatable condition. So next, we're gonna talk about some

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 1>potential cures with someone who has firsthand experience participating in

0:30:27.760 --> 0:30:31.760
<v Speaker 1>our political system, Andrew Yang. You might know him as

0:30:31.800 --> 0:30:35.200
<v Speaker 1>the person who introduced the country to universal basic income

0:30:35.280 --> 0:30:39.600
<v Speaker 1>back in the last presidential Democratic primary. Running for office

0:30:39.640 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 1>gave Andrew a critical vantage point to see what's wrong

0:30:42.800 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 1>with a major part of our system, and he has

0:30:45.280 --> 0:30:49.200
<v Speaker 1>some fascinating ideas to fix it. No matter where you

0:30:49.240 --> 0:30:51.880
<v Speaker 1>fall on the political spectrum, I think you'll find his

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 1>perspective as interesting as I did. Hey, Andrew, welcome to

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 1>UH calling Bullshit, and thank you so much for joining

0:31:00.840 --> 0:31:04.000
<v Speaker 1>us today. We really appreciate it, no problem, my friend,

0:31:04.080 --> 0:31:08.320
<v Speaker 1>happy to be here. So you recently made two exciting

0:31:08.320 --> 0:31:12.040
<v Speaker 1>announcements a new book, Forward and a new political party,

0:31:12.080 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the Forward Party, And we're going to get into those

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:16.680
<v Speaker 1>in just a second. But before we get into that.

0:31:16.720 --> 0:31:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I want to continue down the path that I've been

0:31:19.600 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 1>on for this episode, which is to try to figure

0:31:22.080 --> 0:31:25.960
<v Speaker 1>out whether America is living up to its mission at

0:31:25.960 --> 0:31:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the moment. So I've asked a handful of Americans to

0:31:29.280 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 1>answer three questions, and I want to start the interview

0:31:32.080 --> 0:31:35.840
<v Speaker 1>by asking you the same questions. The first one is

0:31:37.000 --> 0:31:39.920
<v Speaker 1>what to the words the American Dream mean to you?

0:31:40.800 --> 0:31:44.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm the child of immigrants myself, so the American dream

0:31:44.320 --> 0:31:48.280
<v Speaker 1>is that you can come here and build a life,

0:31:48.480 --> 0:31:52.520
<v Speaker 1>and your children will have opportunities greater than the opportunities

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:54.920
<v Speaker 1>that you've had, that each generation is going to do

0:31:54.960 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 1>better than the one before. Second question, what would you

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:02.959
<v Speaker 1>say America's mission in statement or purpose? Statement? Actually is

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 1>the first things that came to mind for me are life, liberty,

0:32:05.880 --> 0:32:07.960
<v Speaker 1>and the pursuit of happiness. I mean, I think that's

0:32:08.000 --> 0:32:13.280
<v Speaker 1>in the charter. Yeah, no, I think that's right. And

0:32:13.280 --> 0:32:16.440
<v Speaker 1>and then the third question is how are we doing

0:32:16.720 --> 0:32:20.400
<v Speaker 1>at living up to that mission right now? I believe

0:32:20.440 --> 0:32:23.120
<v Speaker 1>we are doing very very poorly. If you stack up

0:32:23.120 --> 0:32:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the United States relative to other countries, we are approximately

0:32:26.720 --> 0:32:33.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight across measurements of education, mortality, equity, freedom, of expression,

0:32:33.920 --> 0:32:38.960
<v Speaker 1>life expectancy with a down arrow like and declining, and

0:32:39.240 --> 0:32:41.800
<v Speaker 1>that I believe is driving a lot of the anger

0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:44.400
<v Speaker 1>and frustration where our quality of life is sinking into

0:32:44.440 --> 0:32:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the mud. And then if you look up and say, okay, well,

0:32:47.440 --> 0:32:51.120
<v Speaker 1>what's happening in terms of measures to correct this, Uh,

0:32:51.160 --> 0:32:55.360
<v Speaker 1>it's really very little. Yeah, the statistics are are shocking.

0:32:55.440 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, let's let's get into the book Forward, which,

0:32:59.080 --> 0:33:02.640
<v Speaker 1>among other things, really lays out the rationale for a

0:33:02.680 --> 0:33:05.840
<v Speaker 1>third political party. What what inspired you to write this book?

0:33:07.200 --> 0:33:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I ran for president, and after I came up the trail,

0:33:10.120 --> 0:33:11.560
<v Speaker 1>I tried to figure out what the heck guy has

0:33:11.560 --> 0:33:15.000
<v Speaker 1>been through and what I've learned. So I wrote down

0:33:15.240 --> 0:33:17.960
<v Speaker 1>not just my own experiences, but also trying to pin

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:22.360
<v Speaker 1>down why we feel so stuck and why polarization is

0:33:22.360 --> 0:33:25.719
<v Speaker 1>getting worse, and why it doesn't seem like big solutions

0:33:25.760 --> 0:33:30.240
<v Speaker 1>are imminent. And I concluded that our system is working

0:33:30.280 --> 0:33:33.360
<v Speaker 1>exactly as it's designed. It's just not designed to succeed.

0:33:34.800 --> 0:33:39.480
<v Speaker 1>It's in many ways it's designed for polarization and stasis

0:33:39.520 --> 0:33:43.560
<v Speaker 1>and increasing frustration, which at a national scale will result

0:33:43.560 --> 0:33:47.360
<v Speaker 1>eventually in unrest and political violence, which we're already seeing

0:33:48.120 --> 0:33:52.480
<v Speaker 1>so in that environment, I thought, well, someone needs to

0:33:52.480 --> 0:33:57.160
<v Speaker 1>do something to try and moderate the polarization and change

0:33:57.200 --> 0:34:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the incentives. And I ound a genuine solution where Alaska

0:34:03.520 --> 0:34:07.000
<v Speaker 1>adopted open primaries and ranked Troy's voting last year, which,

0:34:07.000 --> 0:34:09.960
<v Speaker 1>among other things, freed up Senator Lisa Murkowski to be

0:34:10.040 --> 0:34:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the only Republican senator to impeach Donald Trump. So, realizing

0:34:13.880 --> 0:34:18.799
<v Speaker 1>that there's actually a structural fix too, uh these incentives

0:34:18.800 --> 0:34:21.800
<v Speaker 1>and are increasing polarization, I then thought, well, we should

0:34:21.800 --> 0:34:25.240
<v Speaker 1>definitely do that. And if you're going to support ballad

0:34:25.280 --> 0:34:28.360
<v Speaker 1>initiatives in red and blue states around the country, it

0:34:28.440 --> 0:34:32.520
<v Speaker 1>certainly is, in my mind, almost impossible to do so

0:34:32.640 --> 0:34:35.120
<v Speaker 1>as a member of one party or another, because then

0:34:35.160 --> 0:34:38.920
<v Speaker 1>obviously if you showed up to UH a state where

0:34:39.360 --> 0:34:41.000
<v Speaker 1>it was governed by the other party, they'd be like,

0:34:41.040 --> 0:34:44.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're problem. They're playing into their hands in

0:34:44.280 --> 0:34:46.480
<v Speaker 1>a way. So I want to talk. I want to,

0:34:46.800 --> 0:34:48.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, for for the listeners, sort of ease into

0:34:48.880 --> 0:34:51.560
<v Speaker 1>it a little bit and say, um, you know, there

0:34:51.560 --> 0:34:55.400
<v Speaker 1>were some stunning statistics about economic inequality. You know, it's

0:34:55.440 --> 0:34:58.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of the roots of this polarization in the book,

0:34:58.120 --> 0:34:59.759
<v Speaker 1>And I wondered if you could talk a little bit

0:34:59.760 --> 0:35:02.400
<v Speaker 1>more about those. One of the things you said, for instance,

0:35:02.480 --> 0:35:05.080
<v Speaker 1>is we're in the midst of the most extreme winner

0:35:05.080 --> 0:35:07.239
<v Speaker 1>take all economy in the history of the world. The

0:35:07.239 --> 0:35:10.880
<v Speaker 1>bottom eight percent of Americans own only eight percent of

0:35:10.880 --> 0:35:15.759
<v Speaker 1>the stock market, and the bottom owned zero. What are

0:35:15.800 --> 0:35:18.239
<v Speaker 1>some other data points that you would consider to be

0:35:18.280 --> 0:35:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the sources of this polarization. Well, one thing I've seen

0:35:22.719 --> 0:35:27.400
<v Speaker 1>very consistently is that mindset of scarcity ends up impeding

0:35:28.000 --> 0:35:32.600
<v Speaker 1>your executive functioning by a measurable degree. One study had

0:35:32.640 --> 0:35:36.560
<v Speaker 1>it at thirteen i Q points, so that's one standard deviation. Um.

0:35:36.600 --> 0:35:38.279
<v Speaker 1>The simplest way to think about it is that if

0:35:38.280 --> 0:35:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I put you in a situation where you're not sure

0:35:40.000 --> 0:35:43.240
<v Speaker 1>how you're gonna pay next month's rent, uh, it doesn't

0:35:43.239 --> 0:35:45.880
<v Speaker 1>just stress you out. It consumes your bandwidth to a

0:35:45.920 --> 0:35:49.000
<v Speaker 1>point where you're more susceptible to bad ideas, You're more

0:35:49.000 --> 0:35:52.520
<v Speaker 1>susceptible to negative impulses. And so we're doing that to

0:35:52.800 --> 0:35:55.400
<v Speaker 1>a bulk of the American population at this point. I

0:35:55.480 --> 0:35:58.239
<v Speaker 1>had dinner with a friend yesterday who said that what

0:35:58.320 --> 0:36:01.600
<v Speaker 1>he figured out was that used to think about problems

0:36:01.640 --> 0:36:04.920
<v Speaker 1>among the bottom of Americans and now he's realized that

0:36:05.200 --> 0:36:07.359
<v Speaker 1>he had it in reverse. It's actually the bottom eight

0:36:07.440 --> 0:36:13.040
<v Speaker 1>percent of Americans that are in tough straits. And there

0:36:13.200 --> 0:36:16.840
<v Speaker 1>is a pattern where if you eliminate a middle class

0:36:16.840 --> 0:36:20.480
<v Speaker 1>of a country, it becomes much more susceptible to, for example,

0:36:20.480 --> 0:36:24.320
<v Speaker 1>authoritarian impulses. So this has been happening by the numbers

0:36:24.400 --> 0:36:27.680
<v Speaker 1>for two to three generations in the United States, right,

0:36:27.840 --> 0:36:30.600
<v Speaker 1>And as you just said, it has this huge blast

0:36:30.680 --> 0:36:35.200
<v Speaker 1>radius on our culture. You know, unbelievable levels of anxiety

0:36:35.239 --> 0:36:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and depression and epidemic of suicide and drug overdoses out

0:36:40.000 --> 0:36:43.840
<v Speaker 1>there in the world. So this sense of slipping behind

0:36:44.040 --> 0:36:48.040
<v Speaker 1>that to your friends point of Americans at some level

0:36:48.080 --> 0:36:52.239
<v Speaker 1>are experiencing has led us to this sense of kind

0:36:52.239 --> 0:36:56.680
<v Speaker 1>of impending doom, which partially is creating this polarization. You

0:36:56.719 --> 0:37:00.480
<v Speaker 1>talk about the concept of political stress as well, and

0:37:00.560 --> 0:37:02.640
<v Speaker 1>this was an eye opener for me. You you reference

0:37:02.680 --> 0:37:06.480
<v Speaker 1>a study that compares the level of animosity between the

0:37:06.560 --> 0:37:10.319
<v Speaker 1>left and the right just before the Civil War and today,

0:37:10.400 --> 0:37:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and I found that to be pretty disturbing. We should

0:37:15.560 --> 0:37:17.759
<v Speaker 1>be disturbed and tie one of the messages I'm trying

0:37:17.760 --> 0:37:20.120
<v Speaker 1>to convey to people is that everything is on the

0:37:20.160 --> 0:37:23.320
<v Speaker 1>table in America now and by that what I generally

0:37:23.320 --> 0:37:26.520
<v Speaker 1>mean the bad stuff, like whatever kind of dark dystopian

0:37:27.040 --> 0:37:30.080
<v Speaker 1>scenario you can conjure, it's on the table. Uh. And

0:37:30.280 --> 0:37:33.279
<v Speaker 1>this political stress index is measured by a scholar named

0:37:33.320 --> 0:37:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Peter Urchin and his colleague. He goes through various variables

0:37:36.960 --> 0:37:39.880
<v Speaker 1>mapping out the levels of political stress and different historical

0:37:39.920 --> 0:37:43.840
<v Speaker 1>time periods. And we are apparently right now at Civil

0:37:43.880 --> 0:37:49.480
<v Speaker 1>war levels of political stress by his measurements, which you

0:37:49.520 --> 0:37:51.839
<v Speaker 1>can probably see and feel. I mean, right now, forty

0:37:51.920 --> 0:37:57.080
<v Speaker 1>two of partisans regard their political opponents as evil or

0:37:57.360 --> 0:38:02.720
<v Speaker 1>their mortal enemies. Uh. And that lead to again unimaginable

0:38:02.760 --> 0:38:06.560
<v Speaker 1>scenarios becoming real. And we saw an example of this

0:38:06.600 --> 0:38:09.960
<v Speaker 1>on January six, right exactly. And you point out that

0:38:10.040 --> 0:38:15.080
<v Speaker 1>this is particularly dangerous simply because so many people in

0:38:15.120 --> 0:38:19.520
<v Speaker 1>America are armed, like to the teeth three million firearms,

0:38:19.600 --> 0:38:21.640
<v Speaker 1>most heavily armed society in the history of the world.

0:38:21.880 --> 0:38:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Lest listeners think that this is all doom and gloom,

0:38:25.160 --> 0:38:27.240
<v Speaker 1>or that the book was all about doom and gloom,

0:38:27.280 --> 0:38:30.080
<v Speaker 1>that is far from the case. It bristles with new

0:38:30.120 --> 0:38:33.319
<v Speaker 1>ideas to attack these problems. Too many actually to go

0:38:33.400 --> 0:38:36.000
<v Speaker 1>into today. But I want to get to the main

0:38:36.080 --> 0:38:39.399
<v Speaker 1>set of ideas that you have for solving this. You're

0:38:39.440 --> 0:38:42.640
<v Speaker 1>proposing a new political party, the Forward Party. What are

0:38:42.640 --> 0:38:46.440
<v Speaker 1>you trying to accomplish? The Forward Party is a popular

0:38:46.520 --> 0:38:52.399
<v Speaker 1>movement that consists of registered Democrats, independents, and registered Republicans

0:38:52.440 --> 0:38:55.040
<v Speaker 1>who want our system to work better. And what we're

0:38:55.040 --> 0:38:59.040
<v Speaker 1>trying to do is improve the incentives and enable genuinely

0:38:59.160 --> 0:39:01.839
<v Speaker 1>resilient to my oocracy moving forward. So I just want

0:39:01.840 --> 0:39:04.359
<v Speaker 1>to go back to first principles for a second. If

0:39:04.360 --> 0:39:06.560
<v Speaker 1>you look at the U s Constitution, there's nothing about

0:39:06.560 --> 0:39:09.920
<v Speaker 1>a political party anywhere. It turns out the founding fathers

0:39:09.920 --> 0:39:13.600
<v Speaker 1>were quite anti partisan. John Adams said, the biggest nightmare

0:39:13.600 --> 0:39:15.919
<v Speaker 1>would be if you had two parties just clashing all

0:39:15.920 --> 0:39:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the time. And and and I know it's pretty funny.

0:39:20.000 --> 0:39:23.560
<v Speaker 1>And it turns out that if you're trying to avoid authoritarianism,

0:39:23.840 --> 0:39:26.239
<v Speaker 1>duopoly is one of the worst types of structure as

0:39:26.280 --> 0:39:29.440
<v Speaker 1>you could erect, because then you have a one party.

0:39:29.880 --> 0:39:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's say it succumbs to bad leadership, and then everyone's

0:39:32.800 --> 0:39:35.120
<v Speaker 1>political and seidim sort of followed that leader, and they

0:39:35.120 --> 0:39:37.680
<v Speaker 1>can cast the other one side as the as the

0:39:38.120 --> 0:39:40.920
<v Speaker 1>you know the worst of two evils, and then you

0:39:40.960 --> 0:39:44.520
<v Speaker 1>have virtually no institutional safeguards. Um, if you look around

0:39:44.520 --> 0:39:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the world, the UK has five parties, Germany has seven parties,

0:39:48.360 --> 0:39:51.719
<v Speaker 1>Sweden has eight parties, Netherlands has eight teen parties. And

0:39:51.760 --> 0:39:54.000
<v Speaker 1>so in that system, if you have a party sucome

0:39:54.080 --> 0:39:56.000
<v Speaker 1>to bad leadership, then it's a problem. But it's not

0:39:56.040 --> 0:39:58.520
<v Speaker 1>an existential threat. Is not authoritarians. It's like, oh, that

0:39:58.560 --> 0:40:00.799
<v Speaker 1>party has a real lack of at the helm, Like,

0:40:00.880 --> 0:40:03.080
<v Speaker 1>let's just wait for them to figure that that out.

0:40:03.440 --> 0:40:06.359
<v Speaker 1>But a do apply is actually uniquely vulnerable. It's very

0:40:06.440 --> 0:40:10.040
<v Speaker 1>very poorly designed. And and so what the Forward Party

0:40:10.320 --> 0:40:15.080
<v Speaker 1>is trying to do is one reduced polarization by installing

0:40:15.520 --> 0:40:19.200
<v Speaker 1>mechanisms of open primaries matrois voting, and to give rise

0:40:19.239 --> 0:40:23.719
<v Speaker 1>to a genuinely multipolar system where not about us the

0:40:23.840 --> 0:40:26.279
<v Speaker 1>third party. I hope there are five or seven or

0:40:26.560 --> 0:40:29.880
<v Speaker 1>nine parties, because that would just be a much more resilient,

0:40:29.960 --> 0:40:34.200
<v Speaker 1>dynamic system that would be resistant to authoritarianism to a

0:40:34.239 --> 0:40:39.799
<v Speaker 1>much higher degree. Right, like a lot of regular Americans,

0:40:40.680 --> 0:40:45.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't really understand how the party system works or

0:40:46.160 --> 0:40:49.799
<v Speaker 1>why it is the way it is today. People have

0:40:49.880 --> 0:40:53.040
<v Speaker 1>tried to start new parties in the past. Why has

0:40:53.120 --> 0:40:58.279
<v Speaker 1>that not worked to date and why will this one work? Oh?

0:40:58.360 --> 0:41:01.399
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, ty, this is a very good question. So

0:41:01.560 --> 0:41:04.839
<v Speaker 1>our current version of this duopoly has been up and

0:41:04.920 --> 0:41:08.000
<v Speaker 1>running for let's call it a hundred fifty years, give

0:41:08.040 --> 0:41:10.319
<v Speaker 1>or take. And so the political parties just kind of

0:41:10.360 --> 0:41:13.120
<v Speaker 1>came up and made their own rules and then debeat

0:41:13.160 --> 0:41:15.279
<v Speaker 1>it up. We're like, okay, we're gonna have just you

0:41:15.400 --> 0:41:17.680
<v Speaker 1>and us, and then if there is another party that emerges,

0:41:18.360 --> 0:41:22.520
<v Speaker 1>d apply. Makes it very, very difficult. And part of

0:41:22.520 --> 0:41:25.120
<v Speaker 1>it is the voting system, but it's also ballot access,

0:41:25.200 --> 0:41:31.080
<v Speaker 1>it's access to resources. So the single biggest change really

0:41:31.120 --> 0:41:33.520
<v Speaker 1>needs to be open primaries and ranked choice voting because

0:41:33.520 --> 0:41:35.719
<v Speaker 1>in a closed party primary system you really have next

0:41:35.719 --> 0:41:37.920
<v Speaker 1>to no chance. I can use New York City as

0:41:37.960 --> 0:41:40.719
<v Speaker 1>an example. So there's a Democratic Party primary and it's

0:41:40.760 --> 0:41:46.640
<v Speaker 1>closed and Democrats out number Republicans in this environment something

0:41:46.680 --> 0:41:49.480
<v Speaker 1>like five to one. So the Democratic primaries where all

0:41:49.560 --> 0:41:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the real action is or the decision making is um

0:41:53.760 --> 0:41:56.200
<v Speaker 1>and that's the norm. So it does turn out that

0:41:56.239 --> 0:41:59.200
<v Speaker 1>there are there's an independent running from air, there's a

0:41:59.239 --> 0:42:02.040
<v Speaker 1>libertarian running mayor that that probably like all these people,

0:42:02.120 --> 0:42:06.239
<v Speaker 1>but their their chances are next to nothing. So if

0:42:06.280 --> 0:42:09.680
<v Speaker 1>you had open primaries and rank choices voting, then people

0:42:09.760 --> 0:42:13.799
<v Speaker 1>can make their own case to everybody. Um. And then

0:42:13.880 --> 0:42:17.200
<v Speaker 1>even if you'd still have Democrats win, because of the numbers,

0:42:17.600 --> 0:42:20.360
<v Speaker 1>they would be much more likely to integrate aspects of

0:42:20.400 --> 0:42:23.480
<v Speaker 1>other people's platform. You'd have different candidates emerge, and some

0:42:23.560 --> 0:42:26.520
<v Speaker 1>of them would actually, in my opinion, not just influence policy,

0:42:26.560 --> 0:42:28.560
<v Speaker 1>but some of them might pull up sets and win. UM.

0:42:28.840 --> 0:42:32.080
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of it's a mechanics problem where if

0:42:32.120 --> 0:42:34.359
<v Speaker 1>in the absence of open primaries and rank choice voting,

0:42:34.400 --> 0:42:36.920
<v Speaker 1>it would be very, very difficult for any third party

0:42:36.960 --> 0:42:39.399
<v Speaker 1>to emerge. And if you look at the numbers right now,

0:42:39.440 --> 0:42:43.279
<v Speaker 1>six of Americans want a third party sixty percent. Thing

0:42:43.360 --> 0:42:46.920
<v Speaker 1>both sides are out of touch. Independence out number Democrats

0:42:46.960 --> 0:42:49.840
<v Speaker 1>or Republicans by almost two to one. So if you

0:42:49.880 --> 0:42:54.440
<v Speaker 1>look at those numbers, there's a massive void to be filled,

0:42:54.719 --> 0:42:57.480
<v Speaker 1>a massive vacuum. But the reason why the vacuum is

0:42:57.480 --> 0:43:00.719
<v Speaker 1>so big is because the two parties have made it

0:43:00.719 --> 0:43:03.680
<v Speaker 1>almost impossible for a third party to meaningfully emerge. You know,

0:43:03.840 --> 0:43:06.120
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of circular, so you have to have a

0:43:06.160 --> 0:43:10.920
<v Speaker 1>mechanism switch in the primary system understood and rank choice

0:43:11.000 --> 0:43:15.160
<v Speaker 1>voting and open primaries, as I understand it, are kind

0:43:15.160 --> 0:43:18.160
<v Speaker 1>of two great tastes that go great together. Could you

0:43:18.400 --> 0:43:21.279
<v Speaker 1>unpack those a little bit for listeners, just explain how

0:43:21.280 --> 0:43:24.920
<v Speaker 1>those two things work. Right now, Congress has a national

0:43:24.920 --> 0:43:29.240
<v Speaker 1>approval rating of but the re election rate for individual

0:43:29.280 --> 0:43:32.640
<v Speaker 1>members is you're almost assured of getting your job back

0:43:32.680 --> 0:43:34.400
<v Speaker 1>if you want your job back, which most of them do.

0:43:34.680 --> 0:43:38.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's that's just crazy, that's in't that's unbelievable. Yeah,

0:43:39.000 --> 0:43:40.839
<v Speaker 1>So then you look at the structures and say, how

0:43:40.920 --> 0:43:44.120
<v Speaker 1>is this possible? And it turns out that three of

0:43:44.200 --> 0:43:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the seats are safely democratic or safely Republican. If you

0:43:46.960 --> 0:43:49.640
<v Speaker 1>get to the general you win. And so the entire

0:43:49.719 --> 0:43:53.320
<v Speaker 1>name of the game for these three percent of representatives

0:43:53.320 --> 0:43:55.520
<v Speaker 1>is just to avoid getting primaried. So how do you

0:43:55.560 --> 0:43:59.200
<v Speaker 1>avoid getting primaried. You have to remain ideologically pure. You

0:43:59.239 --> 0:44:01.880
<v Speaker 1>can't compromise is with the other side. If you do

0:44:02.000 --> 0:44:04.760
<v Speaker 1>reach across the island compromise, you're more likely to get

0:44:04.800 --> 0:44:08.400
<v Speaker 1>a challenger. So these incentives then push people into their

0:44:08.440 --> 0:44:12.960
<v Speaker 1>corners and say working together is wrong and evil. So

0:44:13.000 --> 0:44:16.200
<v Speaker 1>that's the system in part because if I am a

0:44:16.239 --> 0:44:19.040
<v Speaker 1>member of Congress, I'm not taking my case to the

0:44:19.080 --> 0:44:22.160
<v Speaker 1>general public. I'm taking my case to the ten or

0:44:22.200 --> 0:44:25.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty most extreme voters in my district who are going

0:44:25.200 --> 0:44:28.120
<v Speaker 1>to vote in the primary, either on the Republican side

0:44:28.160 --> 0:44:31.279
<v Speaker 1>or the Democratic side. So the first step is to say, look,

0:44:31.680 --> 0:44:34.680
<v Speaker 1>how about we have open primaries where anyone can vote

0:44:35.239 --> 0:44:38.520
<v Speaker 1>uh when you're up a reelection, and that way immediately,

0:44:38.560 --> 0:44:41.960
<v Speaker 1>instead of just having to appeal to the seventeen percent

0:44:42.040 --> 0:44:45.040
<v Speaker 1>most extreme voters, you have to appeal to the general public,

0:44:45.320 --> 0:44:49.240
<v Speaker 1>which would be an enormous moderating influence. Now, the mechanics

0:44:49.320 --> 0:44:51.080
<v Speaker 1>of it are such that if you had open primaries

0:44:51.080 --> 0:44:54.200
<v Speaker 1>without rank choice voting, then a scenario could occur where

0:44:54.239 --> 0:44:56.760
<v Speaker 1>you have two Republicans and one Democrat, or two Democrats

0:44:56.800 --> 0:44:59.399
<v Speaker 1>and Republican and you kind of cannabalize each other's votes.

0:44:59.440 --> 0:45:02.600
<v Speaker 1>And that's the spoiler effect that everyone gets so upset about.

0:45:03.000 --> 0:45:05.000
<v Speaker 1>So if you have ranked choice voting, then it eliminates

0:45:05.000 --> 0:45:08.080
<v Speaker 1>a spoiler effect. You can vote for multiple candidates. If

0:45:08.120 --> 0:45:11.040
<v Speaker 1>your top choice doesn't go through, then your vote flows

0:45:11.080 --> 0:45:13.800
<v Speaker 1>through to the second person until someone gets a majority.

0:45:14.239 --> 0:45:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Like you said, there to taste that taste great together,

0:45:16.760 --> 0:45:18.760
<v Speaker 1>where if you have open primaries and ranked choice voting,

0:45:18.920 --> 0:45:22.760
<v Speaker 1>they're actually both kind of moderating impulses because to succeed

0:45:22.760 --> 0:45:24.680
<v Speaker 1>in a ranked choice voting field, you have to get

0:45:24.719 --> 0:45:26.920
<v Speaker 1>a majority of people to at least be okay with you,

0:45:27.400 --> 0:45:32.440
<v Speaker 1>and that tends to reward the coalition builders and punish

0:45:32.480 --> 0:45:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the extremes. Yeah, incredibly important. So one of the other

0:45:38.000 --> 0:45:42.120
<v Speaker 1>um planks I guess of this party is something that

0:45:42.160 --> 0:45:45.960
<v Speaker 1>you term human centered capitalism. That's a topic that is

0:45:46.000 --> 0:45:47.839
<v Speaker 1>near and dear to my heart. You know, we're not

0:45:47.920 --> 0:45:50.560
<v Speaker 1>trying to throw capitalism out, we're just trying to evolve it.

0:45:50.920 --> 0:45:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Can you talk about you know, the way that you

0:45:53.200 --> 0:45:56.160
<v Speaker 1>think about that. Right now, you have these economic indicators

0:45:56.200 --> 0:45:59.879
<v Speaker 1>that are GDP and stock market prices, and they're going

0:46:00.080 --> 0:46:03.040
<v Speaker 1>been up even as more people are sinking into the dirt.

0:46:04.000 --> 0:46:07.319
<v Speaker 1>So what I believe we should do is take our

0:46:07.400 --> 0:46:09.319
<v Speaker 1>human well being and look at it the same way

0:46:09.320 --> 0:46:11.279
<v Speaker 1>we do stock market prices and say, Okay, how are

0:46:11.320 --> 0:46:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the kids doing, you know, how how are people doing,

0:46:14.440 --> 0:46:16.360
<v Speaker 1>how are communities doing? And then if you saw that,

0:46:16.400 --> 0:46:19.040
<v Speaker 1>you would see we're doing very poorly. And then you'd

0:46:19.040 --> 0:46:21.560
<v Speaker 1>look up to our leaders and say, hey, you know,

0:46:21.880 --> 0:46:26.320
<v Speaker 1>still bad this year, Like, maybe you should focus on

0:46:26.320 --> 0:46:29.040
<v Speaker 1>on how we're doing as opposed to um, you know,

0:46:29.160 --> 0:46:33.279
<v Speaker 1>scoring political points. And so as someone who's run organizations,

0:46:33.320 --> 0:46:35.759
<v Speaker 1>if you have the wrong measurements, you'll head in a

0:46:35.880 --> 0:46:39.560
<v Speaker 1>very specific direction, right, And and so that is that

0:46:39.640 --> 0:46:43.360
<v Speaker 1>leads to that that question you've you've long maintained that

0:46:43.480 --> 0:46:47.040
<v Speaker 1>GDP is absolutely the wrong thing to be measuring. What

0:46:47.160 --> 0:46:50.160
<v Speaker 1>should we be measuring. We should be measuring our health,

0:46:50.239 --> 0:46:53.360
<v Speaker 1>our mental health, our kids ability to learn, our environmental

0:46:53.440 --> 0:47:00.200
<v Speaker 1>quality are affordability and access to healthcare and education. And

0:47:00.400 --> 0:47:02.320
<v Speaker 1>when I went around the country and I asked people

0:47:02.480 --> 0:47:05.400
<v Speaker 1>about how they're feeling and doing, I mean it's pretty

0:47:05.400 --> 0:47:08.720
<v Speaker 1>tough for for a lot of folks. Anxiety, depression, deaths

0:47:08.719 --> 0:47:11.200
<v Speaker 1>of despair, or substance abuse. I mean, like those are

0:47:11.200 --> 0:47:14.360
<v Speaker 1>the things they're seeing more and more. Right, One of

0:47:14.360 --> 0:47:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the other ideas that jumped out to me beyond universal

0:47:17.480 --> 0:47:22.439
<v Speaker 1>basic income, which obviously you got this into the national conversation,

0:47:22.719 --> 0:47:27.160
<v Speaker 1>and it does appear to be slowly gaining traction, particularly

0:47:27.200 --> 0:47:30.920
<v Speaker 1>during the pandemic. For instance, you also bring in the

0:47:30.960 --> 0:47:35.239
<v Speaker 1>idea of grace and tolerance. One of the things that

0:47:35.280 --> 0:47:37.759
<v Speaker 1>you say on the on the Forward Party website is

0:47:37.840 --> 0:47:41.120
<v Speaker 1>most parties need an enemy. Our enemy is those who

0:47:41.120 --> 0:47:45.200
<v Speaker 1>would cast our fellow Americans as enemies and as an

0:47:45.200 --> 0:47:49.319
<v Speaker 1>existential threat. And I just wondered if you could talk

0:47:49.360 --> 0:47:54.160
<v Speaker 1>more about that, because that that seems like the hardest

0:47:54.440 --> 0:47:57.240
<v Speaker 1>thing to do. In a way, it's the softest language,

0:47:57.320 --> 0:48:00.000
<v Speaker 1>grace and tolerance, but it's it's the thing that seemed

0:48:00.120 --> 0:48:04.239
<v Speaker 1>to be most important, is to just stop demonizing each other.

0:48:04.600 --> 0:48:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Grace and and tolerance, to me, is what's missing in

0:48:06.719 --> 0:48:10.200
<v Speaker 1>American political life, and part because our incentives are all

0:48:10.200 --> 0:48:13.799
<v Speaker 1>around getting people upset and angry. Where if I want

0:48:13.800 --> 0:48:16.120
<v Speaker 1>to raise money for a cause, I'll talk about, hey,

0:48:16.160 --> 0:48:18.360
<v Speaker 1>these people are trying to take away this. These people

0:48:18.520 --> 0:48:22.560
<v Speaker 1>are wrong, immoral, and we need money to fight them,

0:48:23.120 --> 0:48:29.319
<v Speaker 1>and that that's typically more successful than Look, they're human

0:48:29.360 --> 0:48:32.320
<v Speaker 1>beings like us, they're Americans. You know, we we disagree,

0:48:32.400 --> 0:48:35.120
<v Speaker 1>but let's try and find common ground. But you need

0:48:35.160 --> 0:48:39.840
<v Speaker 1>a positive, unifying voice and force in American politics to

0:48:39.920 --> 0:48:42.719
<v Speaker 1>try and tamp down the polarization that's just getting worse

0:48:42.760 --> 0:48:45.440
<v Speaker 1>and worse. And part again, because all the incentives are

0:48:45.520 --> 0:48:49.960
<v Speaker 1>driving us into corners where we'll attack the other side. Yeah,

0:48:50.000 --> 0:48:52.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean on this topic of grace and tolerance, some

0:48:52.960 --> 0:48:57.520
<v Speaker 1>would say that, you know, in quote, the other side,

0:48:58.239 --> 0:49:00.640
<v Speaker 1>no matter which side we're talking about, is so far

0:49:00.760 --> 0:49:05.880
<v Speaker 1>gone that they're irredeemable. What do you say to folks

0:49:05.880 --> 0:49:08.239
<v Speaker 1>who feel that way? I think if you feel that way,

0:49:08.280 --> 0:49:10.240
<v Speaker 1>you really need to get down and talk to folks

0:49:10.320 --> 0:49:13.839
<v Speaker 1>who might represent the tribe or group you're thinking of.

0:49:14.239 --> 0:49:17.319
<v Speaker 1>Seventy five million people voted for Donald Trump. Like trying

0:49:17.360 --> 0:49:21.440
<v Speaker 1>to categorize seventy million in one ideological bucket, or like

0:49:21.520 --> 0:49:25.200
<v Speaker 1>having certain attitudes I think is impossible, really, you know,

0:49:25.239 --> 0:49:28.160
<v Speaker 1>and like I have family members who voted for Trump,

0:49:28.239 --> 0:49:30.600
<v Speaker 1>and so you could take any group of people and

0:49:30.640 --> 0:49:33.799
<v Speaker 1>as long as you start humanizing them, you realize that

0:49:33.840 --> 0:49:36.520
<v Speaker 1>we're being played and said against each other. One of

0:49:36.520 --> 0:49:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the big lessons I learned and I tried to present

0:49:38.440 --> 0:49:41.799
<v Speaker 1>in my book is that all politics is now tribal um.

0:49:42.080 --> 0:49:45.040
<v Speaker 1>You think it's about policy, it's not. The correlation between

0:49:45.520 --> 0:49:48.160
<v Speaker 1>what someone does politically or the way they identify and

0:49:48.200 --> 0:49:50.480
<v Speaker 1>what they think about policy is actually very low. It's

0:49:50.520 --> 0:49:55.240
<v Speaker 1>point to five according to one study. So in that context,

0:49:55.280 --> 0:49:58.839
<v Speaker 1>you think Okay, it turns out we agree on let's

0:49:58.880 --> 0:50:03.439
<v Speaker 1>call it lower drug prices or maybe even basic income. Now, um,

0:50:03.520 --> 0:50:06.640
<v Speaker 1>so what is it we're disagreeing about? And we're disagreeing

0:50:06.719 --> 0:50:11.000
<v Speaker 1>because we've been tribalized and trained to feel like the

0:50:11.000 --> 0:50:14.160
<v Speaker 1>other tribe has lost it? Now. Are there dark and

0:50:14.239 --> 0:50:18.480
<v Speaker 1>unsavory elements, uh, and extremes in any large group? Yes,

0:50:18.840 --> 0:50:22.479
<v Speaker 1>but you don't want to characterize like a massive group

0:50:22.560 --> 0:50:24.680
<v Speaker 1>or in this case literally tens of millions of people

0:50:24.680 --> 0:50:28.719
<v Speaker 1>are half the country in a way that really erases

0:50:28.760 --> 0:50:31.480
<v Speaker 1>their humanity. And that's what I think we're in danger

0:50:31.480 --> 0:50:34.800
<v Speaker 1>of doing. Yeah. Some would argue that grace and tolerance

0:50:34.840 --> 0:50:37.919
<v Speaker 1>have always been scarce in America, basically depending on who

0:50:37.920 --> 0:50:42.080
<v Speaker 1>you are. And you opened by talking about the fact

0:50:42.160 --> 0:50:45.760
<v Speaker 1>that you're a child of immigrants, Immigrants, people of color,

0:50:45.840 --> 0:50:50.400
<v Speaker 1>indigenous people haven't experienced a lot of grace and tolerance

0:50:50.719 --> 0:50:55.000
<v Speaker 1>from the beginning. What would you say to them? Well,

0:50:55.040 --> 0:50:58.520
<v Speaker 1>what I would say is that, Uh, this country has

0:50:58.560 --> 0:51:00.799
<v Speaker 1>a promise and this country he has not lived up

0:51:00.800 --> 0:51:04.759
<v Speaker 1>to its promise in many, many historical circumstances. And there

0:51:04.840 --> 0:51:07.160
<v Speaker 1>is an unfairness to ask someone who has been put

0:51:07.160 --> 0:51:10.719
<v Speaker 1>in that position to embrace grace in tolerance if it

0:51:10.719 --> 0:51:14.080
<v Speaker 1>has not been shown to you. But that is our

0:51:14.440 --> 0:51:18.680
<v Speaker 1>better bet really in my view. You know, and because

0:51:18.719 --> 0:51:22.040
<v Speaker 1>it's more difficult or even unfair, it does not make

0:51:22.080 --> 0:51:25.200
<v Speaker 1>it any less necessary or powerful and actually makes it

0:51:25.280 --> 0:51:29.400
<v Speaker 1>more powerful in my opinion. Yeah, and the alternative is unthinkable.

0:51:29.560 --> 0:51:31.680
<v Speaker 1>So the alternative is going to lead us to ruin,

0:51:31.800 --> 0:51:33.600
<v Speaker 1>and I don't believe that's going to lead us where

0:51:33.600 --> 0:51:36.000
<v Speaker 1>we want to go. I mean that that leads me

0:51:36.040 --> 0:51:39.960
<v Speaker 1>to another question I had, which is, you know, you

0:51:40.040 --> 0:51:43.319
<v Speaker 1>launched on October fourth, so it's still pretty recent, but

0:51:43.360 --> 0:51:46.319
<v Speaker 1>how do you feel about the reaction so far? The

0:51:46.320 --> 0:51:48.400
<v Speaker 1>action has been tremendous, and one of the things that

0:51:48.480 --> 0:51:51.120
<v Speaker 1>most encouraged by is that groups of independent voters and

0:51:51.120 --> 0:51:53.080
<v Speaker 1>third parties have actually already reached out to the Forward

0:51:53.080 --> 0:51:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Party to say, hey, let's make common cause and work

0:51:55.560 --> 0:52:01.040
<v Speaker 1>together because they see that this is something that everyone

0:52:01.080 --> 0:52:05.160
<v Speaker 1>who wants to modernize the duopoly should be behind. I

0:52:05.200 --> 0:52:07.839
<v Speaker 1>think if you're you know, like a partisan, you should

0:52:07.840 --> 0:52:10.000
<v Speaker 1>behind this too, because you're like, look like the system

0:52:10.080 --> 0:52:13.560
<v Speaker 1>is just really really vulnerable. You know, this is not

0:52:13.680 --> 0:52:17.279
<v Speaker 1>very smart. Right, So in terms of you and and

0:52:17.440 --> 0:52:20.040
<v Speaker 1>your plans. You know, you've You've run for president, You've

0:52:20.120 --> 0:52:24.040
<v Speaker 1>run for the the mayor of New York. Are you

0:52:24.080 --> 0:52:26.840
<v Speaker 1>going to run again in the future? Do you? Or

0:52:26.920 --> 0:52:30.080
<v Speaker 1>do you feel like you Your job is to concentrate

0:52:30.080 --> 0:52:33.080
<v Speaker 1>on coalition building and get this party off the ground.

0:52:33.320 --> 0:52:38.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm determined to try to lighten up this polarization that's

0:52:38.520 --> 0:52:41.520
<v Speaker 1>really threatening to destroy us. And so that means these

0:52:41.560 --> 0:52:45.200
<v Speaker 1>balt initiatives, elevating like minded candidates. He'll be endorsing candidates

0:52:45.200 --> 0:52:48.680
<v Speaker 1>and campaigning for them. So that's where my attention is.

0:52:48.680 --> 0:52:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Is this democracy reform package, this structural incentive fix. It's

0:52:53.640 --> 0:52:56.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna keep me very busy for the time being, but

0:52:57.040 --> 0:52:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm fired up about it. I don't know what my

0:52:59.120 --> 0:53:01.239
<v Speaker 1>future holds in terms of my running for office as

0:53:01.239 --> 0:53:04.359
<v Speaker 1>a candidate, genuinely, you know, like I'm not playing coy,

0:53:04.480 --> 0:53:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Like I really don't know what that looks like. Awesome, Andrew,

0:53:09.440 --> 0:53:12.120
<v Speaker 1>last question, I asked this of every guest on the show.

0:53:12.400 --> 0:53:14.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, our thesis is that we're trying to point

0:53:14.920 --> 0:53:19.720
<v Speaker 1>out companies or organizations or countries in this case where

0:53:19.800 --> 0:53:24.920
<v Speaker 1>there maybe a delta between the mission and the current

0:53:24.960 --> 0:53:29.239
<v Speaker 1>state of affairs. And we've created a scale. We call

0:53:29.280 --> 0:53:33.200
<v Speaker 1>it the bullshit scale. So zero is the best scores

0:53:33.360 --> 0:53:37.040
<v Speaker 1>zero bullshit. There is no delta between word indeed, and

0:53:37.200 --> 0:53:44.800
<v Speaker 1>one hundred is total total. So in on that scale,

0:53:45.160 --> 0:53:48.160
<v Speaker 1>if our mission is life, liberty in the pursuit of happiness,

0:53:48.840 --> 0:53:52.520
<v Speaker 1>how are we doing right now? Wow, that it's tough

0:53:52.560 --> 0:53:54.680
<v Speaker 1>to throw a number on this. What what what I've

0:53:54.920 --> 0:53:56.680
<v Speaker 1>said in my book and what I feel and believe

0:53:57.520 --> 0:53:59.600
<v Speaker 1>is that right now we're not going to come close

0:53:59.640 --> 0:54:02.120
<v Speaker 1>to full feeling the promise of America because our system

0:54:02.239 --> 0:54:05.279
<v Speaker 1>is not set up for success. So if you were

0:54:05.320 --> 0:54:07.399
<v Speaker 1>to say to me, hey, like, how are we doing

0:54:07.400 --> 0:54:09.839
<v Speaker 1>on the BS meter? Unfortunately, the BS meter is going

0:54:09.880 --> 0:54:13.279
<v Speaker 1>off when it comes to the United States and it's

0:54:13.320 --> 0:54:15.719
<v Speaker 1>ability of fulfilled probs. It's one reason why we're all

0:54:15.800 --> 0:54:19.240
<v Speaker 1>feeling like we're in deep trouble. I mean, like the

0:54:19.239 --> 0:54:22.719
<v Speaker 1>promises not being fulfilled by a long shot. And so

0:54:22.800 --> 0:54:25.000
<v Speaker 1>that that's what we have to change, and it's going

0:54:25.040 --> 0:54:28.200
<v Speaker 1>to require very significant systemic change like that. This is

0:54:28.200 --> 0:54:30.719
<v Speaker 1>not like an incremental type situation, you know what I mean?

0:54:30.840 --> 0:54:33.279
<v Speaker 1>We can all feel that. That's like the energy and

0:54:33.320 --> 0:54:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the anger is building up, it's it's hitting in very

0:54:36.160 --> 0:54:39.359
<v Speaker 1>very nasty directions, and so we need to try and

0:54:39.400 --> 0:54:42.440
<v Speaker 1>get that BS meter closer to zero as quickly as possible.

0:54:42.480 --> 0:54:46.040
<v Speaker 1>But right now it's it's running into the danger zone. Yeah,

0:54:46.200 --> 0:54:50.960
<v Speaker 1>I would have to agree, unfortunately. But the future is

0:54:50.960 --> 0:54:53.239
<v Speaker 1>a big place and you're going to play a big

0:54:53.280 --> 0:54:55.919
<v Speaker 1>part in it. So I wanna thank you for being

0:54:55.920 --> 0:54:58.680
<v Speaker 1>here today. Andrew's been great talking with you, and I

0:54:58.719 --> 0:55:01.239
<v Speaker 1>really wish you the best for the Forward Party. Thank you,

0:55:01.280 --> 0:55:04.719
<v Speaker 1>TI really grateful and again everyone listening to this. At

0:55:04.760 --> 0:55:07.719
<v Speaker 1>this point, everything is on the table, so we might

0:55:07.760 --> 0:55:09.520
<v Speaker 1>as well make good stuff on the table as well

0:55:09.520 --> 0:55:11.560
<v Speaker 1>as bad stuff. So let's get some more good stuff

0:55:11.600 --> 0:55:22.800
<v Speaker 1>on the table. Amen. Brother. One of the emerging themes

0:55:22.800 --> 0:55:26.200
<v Speaker 1>of this season is purpose led organizations that have lost

0:55:26.239 --> 0:55:30.120
<v Speaker 1>their way for one reason or another. America is one

0:55:30.160 --> 0:55:33.680
<v Speaker 1>of them. To find our way back, we have to

0:55:33.760 --> 0:55:38.520
<v Speaker 1>rejuvenate our shared purpose because a shared purpose is the

0:55:38.560 --> 0:55:42.759
<v Speaker 1>glue that holds people together. That's true for companies and

0:55:42.800 --> 0:55:46.319
<v Speaker 1>it's true for countries too. Making sure that you have

0:55:46.440 --> 0:55:49.320
<v Speaker 1>a great purpose and that you are living that purpose

0:55:49.719 --> 0:55:52.880
<v Speaker 1>is a way to make sure that the glue remains strong,

0:55:53.600 --> 0:55:57.239
<v Speaker 1>and it makes organizations of all sizes, resilient over the

0:55:57.280 --> 0:56:00.400
<v Speaker 1>long haul. I'd like to end the show it today

0:56:00.440 --> 0:56:05.080
<v Speaker 1>by giving America an official Bullshit score based a lot

0:56:05.120 --> 0:56:09.959
<v Speaker 1>I've heard today. I'm giving America a sixty two. That's

0:56:09.960 --> 0:56:12.799
<v Speaker 1>pretty high, and I'm sure we all want to see

0:56:12.840 --> 0:56:16.240
<v Speaker 1>it come down. To weigh in with your own score,

0:56:16.640 --> 0:56:18.959
<v Speaker 1>or to leave us an audio message with your take

0:56:19.000 --> 0:56:22.040
<v Speaker 1>on this episode that could be played in our season

0:56:22.160 --> 0:56:27.560
<v Speaker 1>wrap up, visit our website Calling Bullshit Podcast dot com.

0:56:27.760 --> 0:56:30.799
<v Speaker 1>We'll also track America's behavior over time to see if

0:56:30.840 --> 0:56:33.960
<v Speaker 1>we can bring that score down, and you'll also be

0:56:34.040 --> 0:56:37.680
<v Speaker 1>able to see where America ranks on BS compared to

0:56:37.719 --> 0:56:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the other companies and organizations we feature on the show.

0:56:41.719 --> 0:56:44.560
<v Speaker 1>And if you're running a purpose led organization or you're

0:56:44.680 --> 0:56:47.879
<v Speaker 1>thinking of beginning the journey of transformation to become one,

0:56:48.440 --> 0:56:52.640
<v Speaker 1>here are three things you should take away from this episode. One,

0:56:53.680 --> 0:56:56.680
<v Speaker 1>A powerful and unique purpose can give you a major

0:56:56.719 --> 0:57:00.400
<v Speaker 1>advantage over your competitors by helping you attract more time, haunted,

0:57:00.520 --> 0:57:04.839
<v Speaker 1>and more motivated people. There is no better example of

0:57:04.880 --> 0:57:08.840
<v Speaker 1>that than America. Our purpose, when it was first expressed

0:57:08.880 --> 0:57:13.319
<v Speaker 1>over two years ago, attracted so much motivated talent that

0:57:13.400 --> 0:57:18.160
<v Speaker 1>we quickly moved to a leadership position in the world. Two,

0:57:18.800 --> 0:57:22.600
<v Speaker 1>A great purpose invites people to not only join, but

0:57:22.800 --> 0:57:27.120
<v Speaker 1>also to participate. A smart question to ask yourself is

0:57:27.720 --> 0:57:31.400
<v Speaker 1>how can people actively participate in helping us to achieve

0:57:31.560 --> 0:57:36.080
<v Speaker 1>our purpose? In America's case, Andrew Yang talked about some

0:57:36.240 --> 0:57:40.200
<v Speaker 1>great ideas today for making our system easier to participate

0:57:40.280 --> 0:57:46.880
<v Speaker 1>in open primaries and rank choice voting. And Three, a

0:57:47.040 --> 0:57:50.720
<v Speaker 1>great purpose is only as good as the actions you

0:57:50.800 --> 0:57:54.720
<v Speaker 1>take to make it real. In America's case, no matter

0:57:54.760 --> 0:57:57.840
<v Speaker 1>how many times we say we're the land of opportunity

0:57:58.040 --> 0:58:01.480
<v Speaker 1>and that all of us are created equal, if we

0:58:01.520 --> 0:58:04.840
<v Speaker 1>don't make those things true for more people through action,

0:58:05.680 --> 0:58:09.959
<v Speaker 1>they'll lose faith. A lot of us already have. Your

0:58:10.000 --> 0:58:13.800
<v Speaker 1>purpose will undoubtedly be different than America's, as will the

0:58:13.880 --> 0:58:17.240
<v Speaker 1>actions you'll need to take to make it real. Just

0:58:17.360 --> 0:58:28.640
<v Speaker 1>remember doing is believing. I'd like to thank everyone who

0:58:28.720 --> 0:58:35.760
<v Speaker 1>joined us today, Adrian Bonnenberger, Andrean Clark, Yvan Clark, Jonathan Craig,

0:58:36.320 --> 0:58:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Jaki cho Today we means, MICHAELA. Read, David Safabian, Basil Soaper,

0:58:44.880 --> 0:58:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Penelope Soaper, and Andrew Yang. Find out more about our

0:58:49.800 --> 0:58:53.560
<v Speaker 1>guests today, including their social handles on our website Calling

0:58:53.600 --> 0:58:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Bullshit Podcast dot com and check out Andrew's latest book,

0:58:58.880 --> 0:59:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Forwards on the future of our democracy. If you have

0:59:03.920 --> 0:59:07.960
<v Speaker 1>ideas for companies organizations we should consider for future episodes,

0:59:08.520 --> 0:59:11.480
<v Speaker 1>you can submit them on the site too, And if

0:59:11.520 --> 0:59:15.080
<v Speaker 1>we made you feel like pledging allegiance today, subscribe to

0:59:15.120 --> 0:59:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the Calling Bullshit Podcast on the I Heart Radio app,

0:59:19.000 --> 0:59:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. And thanks

0:59:24.320 --> 0:59:29.720
<v Speaker 1>to our production team Hannah Beale, Amanda Ginsburg, Andy Kim

0:59:29.840 --> 0:59:37.080
<v Speaker 1>d s Moss, Hailey Pascalites, MICHAELA. Reid, Parker Silzer, Basil

0:59:37.200 --> 0:59:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Soaper and me John Zulu. Calling Bullshit was created by

0:59:42.040 --> 0:59:45.560
<v Speaker 1>co Collective and is hosted by Me Time onto you.

0:59:46.320 --> 0:59:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening before you go, we'd love to hear

0:59:55.360 --> 0:59:58.320
<v Speaker 1>what you think about the show. Maybe you were inspired

0:59:58.360 --> 1:00:01.760
<v Speaker 1>to take action. Maybe you' disagree with today's bullshit rating.

1:00:02.040 --> 1:00:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Either way, we want to hear about it. Leave us

1:00:05.000 --> 1:00:09.360
<v Speaker 1>a message at two one two five oh five zero five,

1:00:09.480 --> 1:00:12.320
<v Speaker 1>or send a voice memo to CBS podcast at co

1:00:12.360 --> 1:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Collective dot com. You might even be featured on an

1:00:15.920 --> 1:00:16.920
<v Speaker 1>upcoming episode.