WEBVTT - Fantasy Division Previews: AFC South

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Hey everybody, It's Monday, August fifth, twenty twenty four. Welcome

0:00:14.360 --> 0:00:17.040
<v Speaker 1>to the NFL Fantasy Football Podcast, where we're trying to figure.

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 2>Out how the news Kakoffs were.

0:00:18.040 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>It's me and your man MG Marcus Brand joined by

0:00:19.760 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Michael f. Florio and Lakwan Jones. You find gentlemen are

0:00:22.480 --> 0:00:25.239
<v Speaker 1>in studio today. I'm the slacker who's sitting in my

0:00:25.320 --> 0:00:26.599
<v Speaker 1>garage right yeah, just.

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 2>Wearing sweats and no shoes. Pull away chair we could

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:35.639
<v Speaker 2>bring right here. I'm sure, I'm sure. I'm sure it's

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:36.239
<v Speaker 2>lovely there.

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 1>All you guys are saying here, it's a sweat box

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:41.200
<v Speaker 1>there in the Fantasy Lounge.

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:42.200
<v Speaker 2>Good times.

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:45.960
<v Speaker 1>We gotta lot to talk about. We're gonna do our

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 1>division previews. We're doing the AFC South today. But first

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:52.159
<v Speaker 1>I gotta ask Lakwan because you now that you have

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 1>a week of Good Morning Football under your belt, like

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 1>you're a bona fide NFL Network star, Now, like, uh,

0:00:57.880 --> 0:00:59.639
<v Speaker 1>what's that first week of GMFB been?

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 3>Like, Man, it's been good, man, I've been I've been

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:04.960
<v Speaker 3>handling the sleep kind of like a pro. I want

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 3>to say, I've been pretty proud of myself for the

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:07.479
<v Speaker 3>most part.

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 2>But time have you settled on being your bedtime?

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 3>My bedtime is like seven thirty five.

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:14.479
<v Speaker 2>I like that you push that extra five minutes.

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the extra five minutes is like the brushing of teeth,

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 3>you know, finishing up dinner. But I'm definitely in bed

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:24.039
<v Speaker 3>before eight, Like I have to like let the body settle.

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 2>What time do you eat dinner?

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 3>Oh god man, We've been eating earlier and early every

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 3>day this week, honestly, Like I have the.

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:32.119
<v Speaker 2>Senior Citizen early bird special.

0:01:32.400 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, four thirty five o'clock, you know, dinner is done

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:38.040
<v Speaker 3>and we're eating. Is like, this is so weird, Like

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:39.039
<v Speaker 3>I can't do.

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 4>It because I was wondering if you did normal dinner

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:42.559
<v Speaker 4>time and then just cool immediately to bed.

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 3>No, No, that would not be good for the body.

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 2>It needs to digest.

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 3>I need to lay down good. And you know, the

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 3>whole Verteine's been it's been working.

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 2>I've been crushing it though. Yeah. Yeah, man, it's it's

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 2>been good to see.

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 1>It's cool to see the you know, your social post

0:01:56.520 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>about it, and yeah, man, I'm I'm I'm excited for

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 1>you for the opportunity and hopefully you get the sleep thing.

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 2>All.

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let's get going first with some news and rumors,

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and this one just sort of changed.

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 2>I full disclosure.

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>I started putting this thing together like on Saturday, and

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 1>then now things have changed. I so originally Gino Smith

0:02:22.560 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 1>missed a couple of practices.

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:25.960
<v Speaker 2>Had what looked like a knee injury.

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 1>But the upside is that he is back at practice

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 1>today for the Seattle Seahawks. So I was gonna ask

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 1>if there's any concern at this point, but I feel

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 1>like the answer to.

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:34.600
<v Speaker 2>That is no.

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:37.799
<v Speaker 1>So I will ask, though, Florioe, because we haven't talked

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>about Geno Smith a whole lot.

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:41.800
<v Speaker 2>Two years ago he had that phenomenal season. Last year

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 2>was just kind.

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Of meh, Which Gino do you think we see? Do

0:02:45.760 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 1>we see like super Geno or do you just see

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>like regular average. I haven't had a superstar yet, Gino.

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:54.240
<v Speaker 2>I think we're gonna see a little bit of both.

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:57.520
<v Speaker 4>I think there will be some weeks where the Seahawks

0:02:57.560 --> 0:02:59.919
<v Speaker 4>need to throw the ball and he'll air it out

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 4>down field. Like Lawan has done a really good job

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:06.360
<v Speaker 4>of pointing out about how aggressive Roan grub and the

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 4>new OC there is at throwing downfield.

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 2>I still, though, do think there will be some.

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:15.640
<v Speaker 4>Games where Seattle will have a lead and they won't

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:19.480
<v Speaker 4>ask Gino to throw a ton. How they get that

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:22.519
<v Speaker 4>lead could be him throwing. But I don't suddenly expect

0:03:22.560 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 4>the Seahawks to become one of the past happiest offenses.

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:28.240
<v Speaker 4>I think he could be more efficient and everything. He

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:30.880
<v Speaker 4>is one of those I know he goes as like

0:03:30.880 --> 0:03:33.119
<v Speaker 4>a low end QB two and I feel like that's

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 4>the appropriate price. But if like there's him, there's Daniel Jones,

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 4>there's Baker Mayfield. We both we all love Will Levis.

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 4>Here like there's a big group of QB twos that

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 4>could finish like top fifteen, and Gino Smith is in

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 4>that group.

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>For me, yeah, I mean that's sort of I think you,

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, you have a stronger take on him

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 1>than either of us do.

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 3>And yeah, I'm gonna get the grain.

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:53.720
<v Speaker 2>Man.

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean I have some concern because with a hip

0:03:56.880 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 3>and knee injury, I feel like, man, are we seeing

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 3>in the back end of Gino Smith? Now it's getting

0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 3>up there in the age. I honestly wouldn't be surprised

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 3>at some point we actually saw Sam Howe at some point,

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 3>and I feel like, you know, Sam Howe didn't really

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 3>get a fair shake in Washington if we really look

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:16.919
<v Speaker 3>at it. I mean, led the NFL in interceptions, but

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 3>seventeen of them were under pressure, which he also led

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:21.920
<v Speaker 3>the NFL in. So it's like that old line did

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:24.720
<v Speaker 3>not protect them at all. And his first full season

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:26.599
<v Speaker 3>he got in as a starter, they kind of shipped

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 3>them away when everything was in shambles. So I'm honestly

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:34.359
<v Speaker 3>stashing Sam Howe in super flex leagues just in case

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 3>if Gino's gonna have these injury concerns.

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:39.799
<v Speaker 2>I think that would be bad for DK Metcalf.

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:43.640
<v Speaker 3>It would be but in a selfish in a selfish

0:04:43.680 --> 0:04:47.920
<v Speaker 3>world where the quarterback runs, So I get him stashing

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:48.480
<v Speaker 3>Sam Howe.

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 4>I just I'm like, oh for Seattle, I don't know,

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 4>it's curtains.

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:56.479
<v Speaker 1>Well, Sam Howe was never going to be long for

0:04:56.520 --> 0:05:00.839
<v Speaker 1>that job once they once they got Jayden Daniels in Washington,

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:01.800
<v Speaker 1>like that was gonna be a rap.

0:05:01.839 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 2>So best case scenario, he stays there and he's on

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 2>the bench.

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 1>At least in Seattle, he does have I think a

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 1>more legitimate opportunity to battle to get on the field

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. Flora you mentioned will Levis he's gonna

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 1>be missing one of his targets at least for the

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 1>next month or so. DeAndre Hopkins has a knee issue.

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Expected to miss four to six weeks.

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:20.360
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 1>The upside is they don't expect that he will need

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>knee surgery, so hopefully that sort of helps his recovery

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:29.799
<v Speaker 1>time a little bit. But lakwan, I mean, look, Nuke's

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 1>been great for a long time, but it does seem

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 1>like the decline is starting to happen. Are you still

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 1>willing to take a shot at him? Or is this

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of an avoid situation?

0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 2>Now?

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this is one of those situations where it's a

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 3>clear fade for me with this injury because I've already

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:47.159
<v Speaker 3>had concerns coming into the season, and then when you

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:49.360
<v Speaker 3>see the injury pop up, Man, it's like, all right,

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:51.479
<v Speaker 3>what kind of de Hopper we're gonna get when the

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 3>season starts. I mean, the target separation rate was a

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 3>concern for me last season with two point three, which

0:05:57.000 --> 0:05:59.839
<v Speaker 3>was bottom the table among wide receivers with the hundred

0:05:59.839 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 3>tard so it's not like we're getting the d hop

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:04.480
<v Speaker 3>that we know and love. So he now maybe a

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:07.039
<v Speaker 3>little sluggish to start the season, and you know, I

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 3>don't know if I have in me the patience to

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:12.239
<v Speaker 3>hang on the d hop, you know, for those first

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:14.920
<v Speaker 3>couple of weeks, being that this injury is kind of

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:17.719
<v Speaker 3>close to starting the kickoff to where like I don't

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 3>know if I want to wait until week four or

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:22.360
<v Speaker 3>five they get some real production out of d hops.

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:24.719
<v Speaker 3>So he's kind of one of those guys, like know what,

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm good off of him.

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 4>He was already a fade for me because everything you said,

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 4>like he had declined in metrics, he was creating less separation.

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:35.720
<v Speaker 4>And I think what saved him last year was first

0:06:35.760 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 4>Will Levis was, look, he's fun for fantasy. He was

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:41.840
<v Speaker 4>not playing good quarterback out there. He was locking in

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 4>on DeAndre Hopkins and just heaving the ball downfield. I've

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 4>already been on the mindset. I think a lot of

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:49.240
<v Speaker 4>that volume is gonna go to Calvin Ridley. Now you

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 4>adding this knee issue. He's not there for the first

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 4>training camp with a new head coach. There's this, and

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 4>he's thirty two. A wide receiver thirty two or older

0:06:57.560 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 4>has not averaged fifteen Fantasy points per games since twenty twenty,

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 4>like seems recently that's almost five years ago. Now at

0:07:04.120 --> 0:07:06.479
<v Speaker 4>this point, like history is just working against the.

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:09.520
<v Speaker 2>Hop So then are either of you in on Calvin Ridley.

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 2>He is one of my most drafted.

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 4>I'm he's one of my best values, one of my

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 4>most drafted. I love stacking him in Levis in drafts.

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 3>I feel like now I have to now Like I

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 3>wasn't really as readily trained, but now I feel like

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 3>I have to pivot to somebody to stack with my guy,

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 3>Will Levis. And I really feel as though Will Levis

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 3>can get a good connection downfield, to stretch the field

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:33.840
<v Speaker 3>with Calvin Ridley's speed, and like, I think that's where

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 3>Willis would get. Will Levis would get most of his

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 3>fantasy points from Is on these deep shots in big plays.

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 4>I keep saying, I think he's upside a similar to

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 4>last year. But now you get a six round discount

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 4>on him.

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's amazing.

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 1>That's probably fair. I think there's gonna be a lot

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 1>of volatility with Levis. I think there will be some

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:53.680
<v Speaker 1>weeks where things work really well. In some weeks up

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 1>and down they cannot connect. So I mean, I think

0:07:56.360 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 1>I think the ADP sort of reflects that too, with

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the Andandre Hopkins.

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 2>It's when you have him as your wide receiver. One, yeah,

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 2>don't do that. You can live with that, don't yeh,

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 2>don't do that. Don't do that.

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm closer to where we are in Los Angeles. Justin

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Herbert right now diagnosed with plants or fascia in his

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>right foot. He's gonna be in a walking boot for

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks. I mean, Floyda, This is the

0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing that just tends to linger. And I

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 1>know that, you know Herbert's not necessarily a running quarterback,

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:25.560
<v Speaker 1>but you still need your feet to plant and throw

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the football. There was already concern about Herbert with the

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 1>coaching staff and this desire to run the football. Is

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:37.319
<v Speaker 1>this a buy the dip situation or is this a

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 1>stay away situation?

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 2>This is becoming a stay away situation for me.

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 4>Like I was firmly on the I'm fading justin Herbert

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 4>train when they hired this coaching tandem, and then he

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 4>started going as like the QB seventeen eighteen in drafts,

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 4>and I was like, at that price, I.

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 2>Can get in because we're paying for the floor.

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 4>And one thing I keep saying is like I don't

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 4>expect him to suddenly become like Josh Allen, but I

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 4>was hoping that he would set career highs in rushing

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:06.560
<v Speaker 4>numbers like this Greg Rohman and Jim Harborough, they have

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:10.200
<v Speaker 4>a lot of uh success with a quarterback that can

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 4>run the ball. And again, I don't think Herbert is

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:14.320
<v Speaker 4>gonna suddenly become Anthony Richardson.

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:17.319
<v Speaker 2>But he is a good athlete who has shown us that.

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 4>He can be mobile. So I was hoping that maybe

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 4>the passing numbers decrease a little bit, but he makes

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 4>up for it with more rushing. Now with this a

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:27.679
<v Speaker 4>foot issue, and look, I know it's different. This is

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 4>an injury that we see a lot of the times

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:32.440
<v Speaker 4>in baseball and like, hey, look it ruined Albert Pooholz

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:35.240
<v Speaker 4>for years. This is an injury that that he's, like

0:09:35.280 --> 0:09:37.840
<v Speaker 4>you said, lingers and lingers, and if he's not throwing

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:40.319
<v Speaker 4>as much into move we're already having some injury concerns.

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 4>Now with Lad mcconkee, it's becoming a situation again where

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 4>like maybe if he slides further enough and I could

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:49.199
<v Speaker 4>get him as like my low and QB two.

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:52.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm cool with it, but names around him like Jared Goff.

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:55.679
<v Speaker 3>I'd rather have, Yes, there it is. That's exactly where

0:09:55.679 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 3>I was going with the next if I could just translation.

0:09:57.440 --> 0:09:59.079
<v Speaker 2>Wait, go ahead. Yeah. I didn't want to hear you.

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:00.320
<v Speaker 2>I want to hear you make a case for Jared

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 2>Goff because you like dumping on him.

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 3>So I used to call him Jared Goof. But we're

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 3>all good.

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 2>There, we're good. I've never heard that before.

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 3>We're good now he's no longer a ram. I don't

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 3>have to scream at the TV no more, but Jared Goff.

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 3>We're in good hands. But I feel like Jared Golf

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 3>in that range where he's going in drafts, I much

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:20.720
<v Speaker 3>rather have now with this injury with Justin Herbert, because,

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:23.559
<v Speaker 3>like Florio said, this is assumed to be a run

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 3>heavy offense, and he's already gonna take a hit on

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:29.320
<v Speaker 3>the passing by him week to week, so therefore he

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:32.080
<v Speaker 3>may not be asked to do much once he gets back,

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:34.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, for week one, week two, or whatever the

0:10:34.200 --> 0:10:36.800
<v Speaker 3>case may be. They do much in that offense just

0:10:36.840 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 3>so they could stretch out the longevity of the health

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 3>of him. And I'm already looking at him like I

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 3>don't know if I really want to take that chance

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 3>on him. Like if I, like Florio said, I can

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:48.120
<v Speaker 3>get him as my low QB two, maybe, But in

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 3>a lot of situations early in drafts, I was already

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 3>waiting into the deep depths of the rounds to get

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:56.440
<v Speaker 3>him as my QB one with some type of upsiding,

0:10:56.480 --> 0:10:59.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, making sure that other positions that I was at,

0:10:59.559 --> 0:11:02.199
<v Speaker 3>tight end, wide receiver, running back, we're all solid and

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:05.199
<v Speaker 3>stacked at depth. Now I can't do that with Justin

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:07.200
<v Speaker 3>Herbert just gonna pivot the jerk off.

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 2>Now, yeah, I was.

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:12.080
<v Speaker 1>I was in before this news about the foot injury

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:13.960
<v Speaker 1>came out because I felt like we had sort of

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:16.960
<v Speaker 1>gone way too overboard with this. You know, the Chargers

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:18.520
<v Speaker 1>are gonna run the football. I'm like, they're still gonna

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 1>throw the ball a little bit. I mean they you know,

0:11:20.120 --> 0:11:23.960
<v Speaker 1>they have a guy who is a borderline franchise quarterback.

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:26.719
<v Speaker 1>You know, like it's enough to have confidence in him.

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:30.080
<v Speaker 1>But now with this, who knows how long this thing lingers.

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm gonna kind of stay away from him.

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I just saw this come across h lakwan. I'm gonna

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:36.960
<v Speaker 1>direct this at you.

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:39.439
<v Speaker 2>Knee injury practice.

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:43.080
<v Speaker 1>The latest report is that he is weak to week

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:44.960
<v Speaker 1>with a knee injury.

0:11:46.000 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 2>Your immediate thoughts on this.

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:52.200
<v Speaker 3>I was having a good Sunday, man, I really I

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 3>was having a good son. I put it off because

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:56.200
<v Speaker 3>I saw the news that got heard in practice. I

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:58.440
<v Speaker 3>put it off, and then of course I'm getting tagged

0:11:58.440 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 3>on Twitter that he week to week and I don't

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 3>like this at all. Man, this this hurts because it's like, Pookah,

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 3>we need you healthy, Cooper Cup, we need you healthy.

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:11.559
<v Speaker 3>Stafford would need you healthy. When the Avengers all assembled

0:12:11.640 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 3>in week twelve, when we were all good, the team

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 3>looked like it was unstoppable. Now with this injury, it's like, man,

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 3>we need to do something about the practice field, Like

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 3>we need to do something because guys are getting hurt

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 3>left and right, like our old line three guys. Like

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:27.719
<v Speaker 3>this is not looking good and you know, usually we're

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:30.560
<v Speaker 3>the healthy team. But you know, sad, sad day for

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 3>all the Pooka Nakua fans.

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yeah, look, it's week to week, right, So

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 1>right now, I don't know that I'm really worried about it,

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:40.680
<v Speaker 1>but you know, if this thing starts to linger and

0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:43.319
<v Speaker 1>we get closer to week one and it's still that situation,

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:45.959
<v Speaker 1>then I may have concerns.

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 3>We can no longer say it's early because we're like

0:12:48.720 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 3>four weeks out of the week one. True, you know,

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:55.319
<v Speaker 3>like this is very concerning to me, Like this reminds.

0:12:55.000 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 4>Me a lot of what happened to Cooper Cup last year,

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 4>where it happened about time and we were like, at

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 4>least I won't speak for anyone by myself, I was like,

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 4>this isn't a big deal.

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 2>He could be back for Week.

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 4>One, no problem, and then he reinjured it at the

0:13:10.000 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 4>end of August and it just derailed his whole season.

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 4>And I was already of the mindset that like Cooper Cup,

0:13:15.559 --> 0:13:18.280
<v Speaker 4>I love Pooka Nakua, but Cooper Cup to me is

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 4>the Rams receiver that I think is the best value

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 4>right now and that I still believe could be potentially

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 4>a league winner if things break right for him this year.

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:29.960
<v Speaker 4>But now at Pooka being hurt, it's like, is this look,

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:32.320
<v Speaker 4>he's younger, He's got less wear and tear and all

0:13:32.360 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 4>of that, so he could bounce back quicker. Maybe this

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:36.680
<v Speaker 4>is nothing like last year, But the pessimist in me

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 4>is just like Cooper Cup hurt a lot of my

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 4>teams last year because I was still drafting him after

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:41.600
<v Speaker 4>he got hurt.

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean we saw this last year, right, so

0:13:44.000 --> 0:13:46.400
<v Speaker 1>but hopefully this is not the same. Hopefully this is

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 1>not that, but definitely worth monitoring over the next couple

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:53.080
<v Speaker 1>of days or so, I knocked on wood. We have

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 1>to spend a long time. But there was the Hall

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 1>of Fame game over the weekend last Thursday. Bears get

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the win. They were lead when the game was called

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 1>because of inclement. Whether it's twenty one seventeen is how

0:14:04.000 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 1>it ended. What if anything, did we learn right now?

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:10.480
<v Speaker 1>And really the starters on either side played. We didn't

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 1>see CJ. Stroud, We didn't see Caleb Williams. Nobody I

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>think was surprised by that. But any takeaways, I mean, Florida,

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 1>were you are you? Are you back in on cam Akers?

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I guess this is what I'm trying to get to

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 1>sweet about it.

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 4>I've been firmly out on cam Makers. The thing I'm

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 4>hoping is that I'm hoping the Texans are like, hey,

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 4>cam Akers is such a good backup that we could

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 4>trade Damian Pierce. There you go and trade him to

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:36.120
<v Speaker 4>a team, because I just think he's a bad scheme

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:38.640
<v Speaker 4>fit here, Like, I don't believe you go from looking

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 4>like Damian Pierce did as a rookie to what he

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 4>did last year just by like losing all physical capabilities.

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 4>I just think he's a bad fit for this scheme

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 4>that they have right now. And if you trade him

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 4>to a more power scheme like the Cowboys or the Chargers,

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 4>I think.

0:14:52.560 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 2>He can really elevate and be what he was a

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 2>couple of years ago.

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 4>And yeah, maybe I'm taking a bunch of him as

0:14:57.440 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 4>my last round picks right.

0:14:58.480 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Now because I'm like, he's so cheap.

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 4>The biggest thing I learned, though, is we all say

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:06.760
<v Speaker 4>the Hall of Fame game doesn't matter, and that's largely

0:15:06.840 --> 0:15:09.600
<v Speaker 4>true until it doesn't finish. And then there's a lot

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:12.400
<v Speaker 4>of people out there who are very upset.

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 1>They might have had stuff on the line or something,

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>they might have had some other interests in that game

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 1>and they don't get to finish that out.

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, sorry about your luck on that one. I'll remember.

0:15:23.520 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 2>We're old enough to remember.

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Remember was it a couple of years ago when Josh

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Jacobs played like all of the.

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 2>Hall of Fame game?

0:15:29.040 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 1>We were like, oh no, like he's gonna get traded.

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 1>This is a bad sign. And then he had the

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:34.920
<v Speaker 1>best rushing season of his Yeah.

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 2>Shot Penny last year too.

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 4>Right, there's always one veteran that they still make play

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 4>in this game, right.

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:44.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's pretty crazy. Yeah, I mean we learned Colin Johnson.

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 3>You know, he was a breakout star in the Hall

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 3>of Fame game. He was the tallest wide receiver last season,

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 3>probably still the tallest, but six to six. You know,

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 3>shout out acbar He's a six to six guy.

0:15:54.880 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 2>I never understood why a team doesn't sign like a

0:15:57.440 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 2>seven footer and just make him a red zone like

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 2>a goal one. Specially, that's what we.

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 3>Were saying about Bar our friend. There you go, There

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 3>you go.

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 2>He could have been.

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:08.400
<v Speaker 3>He could have been like a tight end or something.

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:11.440
<v Speaker 2>So waiting for the day somebody tries to sign Victor wimb.

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 4>No one, if you put him on the one, no

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 4>one is stopping him. Six one corners is gonna be

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:21.280
<v Speaker 4>like keeps playing on a nerve hoop.

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 1>I feel but I feel like, you know, getting a

0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 1>release off the line, like he's a thin fellow, Like

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:30.160
<v Speaker 1>he's not particularly I don't know how muscular he is.

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 2>We need like Joel embiide out there.

0:16:31.960 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, we need somebody who can, like, you know,

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe deal with some press coverage at the line anyone. Uh. Anyway,

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 1>I gonna take a break, come back and dive into

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the a f C South. We talked about the Tennessee Titans.

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about them a little bit later on the

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 1>show as well. That's coming up next to her on

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 1>the NFL Fantasy Football Podcast. So the a f C

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 1>South on the docket today. As always, teams are listed

0:16:57.680 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>in alphabetical order, so that starts us off with the

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Houston Texans, a big surprise team from last season. I

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:07.400
<v Speaker 1>think everybody was thinking there was a chance for them

0:17:07.440 --> 0:17:10.119
<v Speaker 1>to elevate, but maybe not as quickly as they did.

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Their top scores from last season. CJ. Stroud the top quarterback.

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 1>He was the QB eleven overall two hundred and eighty

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:20.159
<v Speaker 1>one points, Devin Singletary the RB thirty two one sixty

0:17:20.200 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 1>seven point three, Nico Collins was their leading scoring wide

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:27.359
<v Speaker 1>receiver wide receiver twelve and fantasy two hundred and sixty

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 1>point four points, and Dalton Schultz it was the tight

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:32.439
<v Speaker 1>end ten one hundred and fifty and a half points

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 1>in the offseason, they said goodbye to Devin Singletary. They

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 1>did acquire Stefan Diggs in a trade. Also former Rams

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:42.640
<v Speaker 1>number one wide receiver Ben Scornic in a trade as well.

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 2>They did sign nothing nothing for the ugliest number.

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 3>Ugliest number possibly. I tweeted about that, like he needs

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 3>to change that, Like twenty six on a wide receiver

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 3>looks so weird.

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:54.399
<v Speaker 2>That is wild.

0:17:55.920 --> 0:17:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Other additions in the offseason, they signed Joe Mixon in

0:17:58.520 --> 0:18:01.119
<v Speaker 1>free agency. They drafted a tied and Kate Stover in

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the fourth round, and a running back Jamar Johnson Juar

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Rather.

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 2>In the sixth round.

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 1>First sexon off the board Nico Collins at thirty two.

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 1>So we've sort of talked about this, I think repeatedly,

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 1>but now I'm asking you guys to plant a flag here.

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:20.199
<v Speaker 1>Choose your fighter. You gotta pick one in redraft, not

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:24.959
<v Speaker 1>best Ball, Nico Collins, Stefan Diggs, Tank, Dell Florio.

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 2>You can start Nico Collins.

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:31.920
<v Speaker 4>He is is the one that I have firmly decided

0:18:32.000 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 4>is the one I want the most. I understand he

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:36.640
<v Speaker 4>goes first and you gotta pay up to get him,

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:39.880
<v Speaker 4>but he is the one that I feel most comfortable,

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:42.480
<v Speaker 4>will be consistently out there two wide receiver sets, three

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 4>wide receiver sets. You can move him all over the field.

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:46.639
<v Speaker 4>He could play the X, he could play in the slot.

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:49.360
<v Speaker 4>He can win downfield and better yet, he can win

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 4>after the catch, like there's nothing that he cannot do,

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 4>which is why I believe that he'll be out there

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:57.200
<v Speaker 4>the most. I think Tank Dell brings a high ceiling,

0:18:57.520 --> 0:19:00.159
<v Speaker 4>maybe not the safest floor, because is he can to

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:02.200
<v Speaker 4>be out there in two wide receiver sets stuff like that.

0:19:02.320 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 4>I think Steph Diggs will have a set role on

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:07.320
<v Speaker 4>this team. He's gonna get plenty of volume. I think

0:19:07.320 --> 0:19:10.120
<v Speaker 4>he brings a very safe floor. But getting up there

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:12.520
<v Speaker 4>in age starting to lose potentially the deep ball in

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 4>his game. So I don't I have questions about his upside.

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:18.199
<v Speaker 4>To me, Nico Collins, is that safe floor meets that

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 4>high ceiling and you kind of get the best of

0:19:20.760 --> 0:19:23.480
<v Speaker 4>both worlds that the other two give you all in one.

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:27.359
<v Speaker 2>But I love taking these guys in best ball. I

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 2>don't know about you guys in.

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 4>Redraft where you actually have to play them week to

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 4>week and everything like that. I find myself a little

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:35.879
<v Speaker 4>bit more hesitant because there's a lot. It's like kind

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 4>of what the forty nine ers were from me years ago.

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 4>I'm like, I know this offense is gonna be great.

0:19:39.640 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 4>I know at the end of the year they'll probably

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 4>have their numbers, but week to week it might be

0:19:42.920 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 4>a major headache.

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:44.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:19:44.600 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean I think that's that's the thing for me,

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 1>is that it's just gonna be so hard to try

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 1>to figure out whose week it is. If I'm picking one,

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm probably gonna pick Tank Dell in part because he

0:19:56.160 --> 0:19:58.199
<v Speaker 1>is the cheapest of the three, but also because I

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:00.280
<v Speaker 1>think he does have the most upside. I mean, he

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 1>was the guy who I think was the more consistent

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:05.120
<v Speaker 1>when both he and Collins were healthy.

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:06.440
<v Speaker 2>So that's kind of where I'm going.

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:08.879
<v Speaker 1>But I just sort of understand that, look, there are

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 1>gonna be weeks that's gonna be really, really frustrating, and

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that we're gonna be able to sell,

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 1>certainly not right away which one is, which I think

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:18.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe by the time we get a decent sample sized

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 1>midway through the season, we'll have a better idea.

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 2>But right now, I just I just don't know. I

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 2>don't know.

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you have one Lakwan that you parfectarly prefer hoping

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:27.119
<v Speaker 1>it's Digs, it is Diggs.

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:31.440
<v Speaker 3>I can't believe we all pick different players like this

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 3>is crazy, but I think it's Digs because Florie'll talk

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 3>about that safe floor like obviously scared money, don't make

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:40.199
<v Speaker 3>money with him over here. But I just feel like

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 3>Stefan Diggs is the safest floor just based on if

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 3>there is regression in Nico's game, if it's yards receptions,

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:50.640
<v Speaker 3>even if it's touchdowns, it will be because of Stefon Diggs.

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:52.639
<v Speaker 3>So therefore, I feel as though I don't have to

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 3>pay that early second round price where Nico Collins is going,

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:59.879
<v Speaker 3>where I compare Stefon Diggs with the wide receiver too

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:02.200
<v Speaker 3>price on him where if there is a headache week

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:05.040
<v Speaker 3>to week, hopefully how I draft him some of these

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 3>redrafts that are coming up to that end of this month,

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:09.919
<v Speaker 3>I will have a good depth at wide receiver to

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 3>where I could just swap him out for a potential

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:15.199
<v Speaker 3>flex guy or a potential wide receiver three. So the

0:21:15.280 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 3>safest bet here if you are going to get a

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:20.360
<v Speaker 3>piece of this Texans offense, I think, in my opinion,

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 3>Stefan Diggs is the guy that will want on the

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 3>back and in that third round.

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:25.880
<v Speaker 2>All right, so we helped everybody, not at all.

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 1>We know are different way, but you know, I think

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 1>I think honestly that speaks to how confusing the situation is.

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think it's been one of the biggest

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:41.679
<v Speaker 1>talking points across fantasy this offseason is which Texans receiver

0:21:41.760 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 1>do you want?

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:43.480
<v Speaker 2>How do you determine which one?

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:46.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think every argument I've heard for every single

0:21:46.560 --> 0:21:49.360
<v Speaker 1>one of these players is a completely valid argument, right,

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Like it's hard, it's hard to really poke holes in

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 1>any of these because we just really don't know, and

0:21:55.720 --> 0:21:58.400
<v Speaker 1>we're not gonna know. I think at least a month

0:21:58.440 --> 0:22:00.920
<v Speaker 1>before we kind of get a sense of who's who

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:05.359
<v Speaker 1>and who's doing what florio Are we undervaluing Joe Mixon?

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I feel like we haven't talked a lot

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:08.800
<v Speaker 1>about him a lot. We spent so much time on

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:11.680
<v Speaker 1>the passing game. But are we undervaluing him right now?

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 4>I think he's properly valued personally, Like he goes as

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 4>a high end RB two in a lot of drafts,

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:22.680
<v Speaker 4>and that's where I have him ranked. Like, I don't

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 4>feel comfortable with him as my RB one. I still

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 4>think he's got it left in the tank there. Last

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 4>season second best rate in his career, actually have runs

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 4>that went for ten or more yards, and I think

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:40.400
<v Speaker 4>he could see he did that despite seeing his most

0:22:40.400 --> 0:22:42.120
<v Speaker 4>loadorboxes since twenty eighteen.

0:22:42.560 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 2>The c J.

0:22:43.119 --> 0:22:46.199
<v Speaker 4>Stroud deep ball and all those receivers around him should

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:50.120
<v Speaker 4>help create running lanes. The issue is, I don't think

0:22:50.119 --> 0:22:52.400
<v Speaker 4>he's gonna get nearly as many targets as he got

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:53.200
<v Speaker 4>in Cincinnati.

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:53.920
<v Speaker 2>Like c J.

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:56.000
<v Speaker 4>Stroud is not a type of quarterback, or at least

0:22:56.040 --> 0:22:58.160
<v Speaker 4>he wasn't as a rookie who is looking to dump

0:22:58.200 --> 0:23:00.159
<v Speaker 4>the ball off. He keeps his eyes down feeling than

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:01.960
<v Speaker 4>wants to throw down field where it's Joe Burrow and

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:04.600
<v Speaker 4>the Bengals had a lot more designed stuff for mixing,

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:07.920
<v Speaker 4>So I wouldn't be surprised if he kind of had

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:10.480
<v Speaker 4>a little bit of a better season than what like

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 4>Devin Singletary gave us down the stretch last year, which

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:16.119
<v Speaker 4>was really reliable RB two numbers that you could start

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 4>each week, but the upside was capped.

0:23:20.440 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, any thought Lakwan that maybe they go a

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:26.520
<v Speaker 1>little bit more run heavy, because I feel like they

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 1>got in a lot of high scoring games, especially kind

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:31.399
<v Speaker 1>of midway through the season, that forced them to be

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:34.479
<v Speaker 1>a little pass heavy. Any any concern that maybe they

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:36.360
<v Speaker 1>decide that they want to try and run the ball

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:37.920
<v Speaker 1>and be more ball controlled, because I mean they have

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:40.879
<v Speaker 1>a defensive head coach, a Demigo Ryans. Or is this

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 1>or is it gonna be status quo from last year?

0:23:43.119 --> 0:23:44.560
<v Speaker 3>I think it would be a little bit of last

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:48.200
<v Speaker 3>year mixed in with Joe Mixon's abilities. I like Florio said,

0:23:48.200 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 3>he might not see a bunch of targets, but he's

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:52.760
<v Speaker 3>still one of the best red zone running backs since

0:23:52.800 --> 0:23:55.879
<v Speaker 3>twenty eighteen, like top five and most of the major categories.

0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 3>So I think more so you need to have your

0:23:58.320 --> 0:24:01.680
<v Speaker 3>expectations and order win game of Joe Mixon. Like they

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 3>may have a nice balance between pass and run, and

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:07.400
<v Speaker 3>I think that's where Joe Mixon can have the longevity,

0:24:07.640 --> 0:24:09.400
<v Speaker 3>you know, through the season, being that you know he

0:24:09.480 --> 0:24:11.479
<v Speaker 3>kind of has like a bumpy up and down injury

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:14.320
<v Speaker 3>history as well. So I think the positive here when

0:24:14.320 --> 0:24:16.680
<v Speaker 3>you're walking away from draft with Mixing as your RB

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:19.439
<v Speaker 3>two or RB three, wherever the case may be, because

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 3>also I don't trust him as my RB one with

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 3>a new situation in this offense. So I feel like,

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:27.359
<v Speaker 3>you know, the positive here that you're walking away mixing

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:29.199
<v Speaker 3>as your RB two or whatever the case may be,

0:24:29.560 --> 0:24:31.000
<v Speaker 3>is that he is one of the best, you know,

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:33.880
<v Speaker 3>red zone goal line scorers out there. So I think

0:24:33.920 --> 0:24:35.439
<v Speaker 3>that you're going to be leaning on a lot of

0:24:35.480 --> 0:24:38.200
<v Speaker 3>touchdowns for Joe Mixon to have some type of high

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 3>ceilings and fantasy outings, you know, week to week.

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:43.879
<v Speaker 2>I like him at ADP, though, I mean I like

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:47.720
<v Speaker 2>him where he's perfect. Right now. He's like RB fifteen sixteen,

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:48.840
<v Speaker 2>depending on where you look.

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:51.399
<v Speaker 3>It's like the sixth seventh round that he slips to,

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:54.040
<v Speaker 3>which is insane. It's insane. That's why I'm like, this

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:55.320
<v Speaker 3>is perfect where he's at.

0:24:55.680 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 4>I have started to see redraft ADP and like Derek Henry,

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:02.879
<v Speaker 4>Isaiah Pacheco, Kaien Williams, all these names that we like

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:05.120
<v Speaker 4>in like the third, fourth round are going second round.

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 4>So I think Joe Mixon might be pulled up like

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:10.119
<v Speaker 4>a round or two in redraft, But in Beastball, the

0:25:10.359 --> 0:25:12.159
<v Speaker 4>running backs ADP are insane right now.

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you're talking about a guy who win, he's

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:18.160
<v Speaker 1>been healthy in his career, has generally been a top

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:20.920
<v Speaker 1>ten running back, you know, and I know the situation

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 1>is different, but I also think they brought him in

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:25.080
<v Speaker 1>for a reason. I mean, they actually went out and

0:25:25.080 --> 0:25:27.399
<v Speaker 1>made a trade for him when it looked like the

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Bengals were just ready to cut him loose. So it

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:33.200
<v Speaker 1>just feels like the Texans have a plan in place

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:33.959
<v Speaker 1>for Joe Mixon.

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:36.199
<v Speaker 3>I feel like with this, I feel like with this

0:25:36.280 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 3>healthy Texans OH line, that he might be able to

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 3>be more efficient on the yards for carry aspect of things.

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:44.840
<v Speaker 3>And that's always been his knock, you know, with the Bengals.

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 3>But we've known the Bengals have been working on their

0:25:47.040 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 3>own line since the beginning of time, like they couldn't

0:25:49.600 --> 0:25:51.680
<v Speaker 3>really get it right, and he's still putting up a

0:25:51.720 --> 0:25:54.960
<v Speaker 3>thousand yards behind like a mid tier type of O line.

0:25:54.960 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 3>So I think this might be a good little upgrade

0:25:57.040 --> 0:25:58.960
<v Speaker 3>for him, you know, going into Houston.

0:25:59.280 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for sure.

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Uh Lakwana's Dalton Schultz cooked. I don't mean like physically cooked.

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:05.720
<v Speaker 1>I just mean cooked in terms of, like, are there

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 1>just not gonna be enough targets left for him to

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:09.000
<v Speaker 1>be anything this year?

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:12.080
<v Speaker 3>He's sitting in the crock pot right now, getting slow cooked.

0:26:12.560 --> 0:26:14.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's only because you know, the random weeks

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:17.960
<v Speaker 3>that he finds his self fantasy relevant. I mean Nico Collins,

0:26:18.000 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, he has his little injury pass as well,

0:26:20.280 --> 0:26:22.520
<v Speaker 3>and then you know Tank Dell he's building up some

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:25.439
<v Speaker 3>type of injury list, but he's always going to be

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:27.480
<v Speaker 3>on the radar of like just with his side. So

0:26:27.920 --> 0:26:30.639
<v Speaker 3>there could be some random weeks that you know, Dalton

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:33.440
<v Speaker 3>Schultz might end up relevant. But obviously this will be

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:36.359
<v Speaker 3>a best ball take. But Redraft, I don't see myself

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:37.640
<v Speaker 3>targeting him at all.

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 4>Same like, I'd rather he's going right after like Goddar

0:26:42.440 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 4>and Djoku Frar Mood.

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 2>I'd rather have all of those guys.

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:47.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, if I miss out on tight ends like that,

0:26:47.880 --> 0:26:49.760
<v Speaker 4>those are the groups that I'm targeting, and I'm pairing

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:50.200
<v Speaker 4>them with t J.

0:26:50.320 --> 0:26:50.760
<v Speaker 2>Hopkinson.

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 3>There you go.

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:53.880
<v Speaker 2>I also don't understand why Pat Fryarmooth is so low.

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:55.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I know we talked about the Steelers already,

0:26:55.720 --> 0:26:57.760
<v Speaker 1>we did our AFC North preview, but it just it

0:26:57.760 --> 0:26:59.520
<v Speaker 1>feels like Pat fryar Mooth should be pulled up a

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit more. Yeah, yeah, you know, at least two

0:27:02.359 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 1>rounds in my opinion, you know, like maybe not a

0:27:04.880 --> 0:27:08.680
<v Speaker 1>great quarterback situation, but not horrible and not a ton

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:11.080
<v Speaker 1>of target competition beyond George Pickens. It just feels like

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:12.960
<v Speaker 1>we should be giving Pat fryn With some more love.

0:27:13.000 --> 0:27:16.480
<v Speaker 1>But that's another conversation. Let's move to the Indianapolis Colts.

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Last year, Gardner Minshew was their QB one, in large

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:22.480
<v Speaker 1>part because Anthony Richardson did not hang around that long

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 1>because of an injury two hundred and five points for

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the Mustache QB twenty one. Zach Moss was actually their

0:27:29.840 --> 0:27:32.760
<v Speaker 1>top scoring running back RB thirty one, just the shy

0:27:32.800 --> 0:27:35.440
<v Speaker 1>of one hundred and seventy points for the record. Jonathan

0:27:35.440 --> 0:27:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Taylor was about thirteen points behind Moss and finished as

0:27:39.840 --> 0:27:42.399
<v Speaker 1>the RB thirty three. Michael Pittman was your top scoring

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:44.840
<v Speaker 1>receiver two hundred and fifty points for him Wide receiver

0:27:44.920 --> 0:27:47.800
<v Speaker 1>thirteen finish and I never would have come up with

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 1>this on my own. Kylon Granson was their top scoring

0:27:50.800 --> 0:27:54.119
<v Speaker 1>tight end, a whopping seventy three points, which made him

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:54.680
<v Speaker 1>be tight.

0:27:54.560 --> 0:27:55.399
<v Speaker 2>End thirty one.

0:27:56.680 --> 0:27:57.960
<v Speaker 1>I literally was like ou in my head, I'm like,

0:27:58.000 --> 0:28:00.480
<v Speaker 1>who was the Colt's tight end? And look at him

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:03.840
<v Speaker 1>like Hyland Grandson yep. Wouldn't wouldn't have remembered that on

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:07.080
<v Speaker 1>my own for sure losses. In the off season, they

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:10.720
<v Speaker 1>said goodbye to Gardner Minshew, Zach Moss, and Isaiah McKinzie.

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 1>They brought in through free agency Joe Flacco just because

0:28:15.080 --> 0:28:17.240
<v Speaker 1>you want a quarterback who does the same things as

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:22.560
<v Speaker 1>your starter. Because Anthony Richardson and Trey Sermon the running

0:28:22.600 --> 0:28:25.119
<v Speaker 1>back who just has not been able to hook on

0:28:25.240 --> 0:28:27.840
<v Speaker 1>anywhere in his career, they did draft Ad and I

0:28:28.000 --> 0:28:30.359
<v Speaker 1>Mitchell in the second round and wide receive Anthony Gold

0:28:30.440 --> 0:28:34.359
<v Speaker 1>in the fifth round. First colt off the board Jonathan

0:28:34.440 --> 0:28:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Taylor at eleven point two. So I'm gonna ask these

0:28:38.760 --> 0:28:40.480
<v Speaker 1>questions sort of out of order from the way I

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:42.960
<v Speaker 1>wrote them because I just mentioned Jonathan Taylor. So I

0:28:43.080 --> 0:28:46.840
<v Speaker 1>will ask you, Florio, is Jonathan Taylor being undervalued at

0:28:46.960 --> 0:28:48.960
<v Speaker 1>RB six. I know he's your guy.

0:28:49.400 --> 0:28:52.480
<v Speaker 4>He is my guy, but no, I do not believe

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 4>he's being undervalued there. I think maybe to me, I'm like, okay,

0:28:58.240 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 4>I can see. I think I believe I have a

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:03.120
<v Speaker 4>ranked is my RB four, So I think you can

0:29:03.240 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 4>push him up a little bit, but he belongs in

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:08.840
<v Speaker 4>that same tier. After the Elite three guys with like

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 4>Saquon Barkley, you could put Jamiir Gibbs in there, Kyrien Williams,

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:16.360
<v Speaker 4>Dereck Henry, et cetera. The second round guys, I think

0:29:16.360 --> 0:29:20.240
<v Speaker 4>that's where he belongs because the upside is sky high.

0:29:20.280 --> 0:29:24.560
<v Speaker 4>We know that we've seen him already finish before as

0:29:25.040 --> 0:29:27.640
<v Speaker 4>the RB one like a cup just a couple of

0:29:27.680 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 4>years ago.

0:29:28.120 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 2>Although it was one of the.

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:31.920
<v Speaker 4>Worst RB one seasons of all time. I still love

0:29:32.000 --> 0:29:34.800
<v Speaker 4>my guy Jonathan Taylor. The upside with him running the

0:29:34.840 --> 0:29:36.720
<v Speaker 4>option with Anthony Richardson.

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:36.920
<v Speaker 2>Is very high.

0:29:37.040 --> 0:29:40.840
<v Speaker 4>But there's also look, Anthony Richardson's probably gonna, if he

0:29:40.880 --> 0:29:43.840
<v Speaker 4>stays healthy for seventeen games, probably gonna take eight hundred

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:47.320
<v Speaker 4>rushing yards away, maybe a thousand plus away. He's also

0:29:47.360 --> 0:29:50.000
<v Speaker 4>potentially gonna take a lot of goal line work because

0:29:50.280 --> 0:29:52.240
<v Speaker 4>his head coach was one of the brain trusts that

0:29:52.760 --> 0:29:56.760
<v Speaker 4>developed the tush push in the first place. So yeah, like,

0:29:56.800 --> 0:29:59.600
<v Speaker 4>I think the floor is very safe with Jonathan Taylor,

0:29:59.640 --> 0:30:01.520
<v Speaker 4>but the the ceiling might be a little bit capped

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 4>because of Anthony Richardson. But yeah, I still love him

0:30:05.040 --> 0:30:07.280
<v Speaker 4>where he's going. He's if I take a wide receiver

0:30:07.320 --> 0:30:08.960
<v Speaker 4>in the first round. I don't love any in round

0:30:09.040 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 4>like middle of round two. I'll take Jonathan Taylor absolutely.

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:17.720
<v Speaker 3>I mean lak Jonathan Taylor is Saquon Uh Jonathan Taylor.

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 3>And I only say that because Saquon He He's one

0:30:23.280 --> 0:30:25.520
<v Speaker 3>of those guys that I can't put my hat on anymore,

0:30:25.600 --> 0:30:27.880
<v Speaker 3>just with the injury history, you know, Like I love

0:30:27.960 --> 0:30:29.840
<v Speaker 3>the town, I love what he brings to the table

0:30:29.880 --> 0:30:32.920
<v Speaker 3>when healthy, but it's just that he's been injured so

0:30:33.040 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 3>many times and burned my fantasy team so many times

0:30:36.480 --> 0:30:38.960
<v Speaker 3>to where it's like you just can't anymore, you know,

0:30:39.080 --> 0:30:41.880
<v Speaker 3>like you love him in a new winning situation with Philadelphia,

0:30:41.880 --> 0:30:44.480
<v Speaker 3>but Jonathan Taylor, to me, man is more of the

0:30:44.480 --> 0:30:46.800
<v Speaker 3>safer bet here. It's all about expectations as well with

0:30:46.880 --> 0:30:49.680
<v Speaker 3>Jonathan Taylor, Like you have to go into these drafts

0:30:49.760 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 3>having clear expectations because, like Florio said, AR fifteen, he's

0:30:53.640 --> 0:30:55.720
<v Speaker 3>gonna be going out there like he's going to be

0:30:56.000 --> 0:30:58.880
<v Speaker 3>taking some of those goal line opportunities, the red zone opportunities,

0:30:58.880 --> 0:31:01.239
<v Speaker 3>the rushing yards, and it's gonna take away a lot

0:31:01.280 --> 0:31:03.400
<v Speaker 3>from Jonathan Taylor's game where he's gonna have to eat

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:05.920
<v Speaker 3>a different way, you know, Like I really feel as

0:31:05.920 --> 0:31:08.320
<v Speaker 3>though he's still one of those top seven running backs

0:31:08.520 --> 0:31:11.920
<v Speaker 3>in that conversation, but if I could pivot to Jamier Gibbs,

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:15.000
<v Speaker 3>I honestly would you know, just based on how explosive

0:31:15.040 --> 0:31:15.360
<v Speaker 3>he is?

0:31:15.600 --> 0:31:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Am I crazy because I think I'd rather have Jonathan

0:31:18.440 --> 0:31:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Taylor over Jamier Gibbs for the reason being that I

0:31:21.760 --> 0:31:26.680
<v Speaker 1>think Cayl I think, look the floor. I don't even

0:31:26.680 --> 0:31:28.120
<v Speaker 1>know how, but like, I just think there's so much

0:31:28.160 --> 0:31:31.360
<v Speaker 1>volatility with Jimior Gibbs right where you have to draft him.

0:31:31.360 --> 0:31:32.840
<v Speaker 1>The fact that he's going off as a top four

0:31:32.920 --> 0:31:36.320
<v Speaker 1>running back, like David Montgomery still exists, right, he still

0:31:36.360 --> 0:31:40.880
<v Speaker 1>walks the earth. You look at Indianapolis, there isn't really

0:31:40.920 --> 0:31:44.440
<v Speaker 1>that level of competition for Jonathan Taylor. Like, yeah, Anthony

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Richardson will take some of that goal line work, but

0:31:46.520 --> 0:31:48.800
<v Speaker 1>everywhere else on the field, I mean, are you really

0:31:48.800 --> 0:31:52.480
<v Speaker 1>worried about Trace Sermon? You know, I remember we talked

0:31:52.480 --> 0:31:54.760
<v Speaker 1>ourselves into Evan Hall being the guy last year when

0:31:54.800 --> 0:31:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Taylor was hurt, and then Hall got hurt really early

0:31:57.080 --> 0:32:00.840
<v Speaker 1>in the season. There's just nobody there that's really gonna

0:32:00.840 --> 0:32:03.040
<v Speaker 1>take those opportunities away from Jonathan Taylor.

0:32:03.240 --> 0:32:06.760
<v Speaker 2>From from just a rushing standpoint, and I.

0:32:06.680 --> 0:32:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Look at Philadelphia, there's so many weapons there that's that's

0:32:09.400 --> 0:32:11.360
<v Speaker 1>necessarily gonna take away from Saquon Barkley.

0:32:11.400 --> 0:32:15.240
<v Speaker 2>I would rather have Taylor than both of those guys, right.

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:17.440
<v Speaker 4>And the thing with Gibbs is we've we've spent a

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 4>lot of time this offseason saying like, we don't love

0:32:20.000 --> 0:32:22.560
<v Speaker 4>taking devon a chan where he goes in like the

0:32:22.600 --> 0:32:23.920
<v Speaker 4>middle to late second round.

0:32:24.400 --> 0:32:27.800
<v Speaker 2>Gibbs and a chance situation are very similar, right they are,

0:32:28.720 --> 0:32:30.800
<v Speaker 2>And AND's got a much better both.

0:32:31.320 --> 0:32:34.840
<v Speaker 4>Explosive, smaller backs with a big back there that that

0:32:35.040 --> 0:32:37.160
<v Speaker 4>is a veteran who could take goal on touches away

0:32:37.160 --> 0:32:40.320
<v Speaker 4>on good like like the sky is the The upside

0:32:40.400 --> 0:32:43.040
<v Speaker 4>is immense for both of them, but there's another back there.

0:32:43.120 --> 0:32:43.920
<v Speaker 2>Stuff like that is.

0:32:44.400 --> 0:32:47.240
<v Speaker 3>So you look at Gibbs where it's a lot higher

0:32:47.400 --> 0:32:52.320
<v Speaker 3>when the David Montgomery came back fifty exactly. So it's like,

0:32:52.560 --> 0:32:54.680
<v Speaker 3>I feel as though you get more of the upside

0:32:54.680 --> 0:32:57.920
<v Speaker 3>of him and chances higher scoring rate with Gibbs in

0:32:58.000 --> 0:33:01.520
<v Speaker 3>that red zone versus h who's not really used in

0:33:01.520 --> 0:33:03.200
<v Speaker 3>the red zone to where you're not going to see

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:06.440
<v Speaker 3>many touchdowns opportunities That's where I just kind of have

0:33:06.520 --> 0:33:06.920
<v Speaker 3>it flipped.

0:33:06.920 --> 0:33:09.560
<v Speaker 2>But it is similar, ye, very similar.

0:33:10.680 --> 0:33:12.920
<v Speaker 1>I feel like, yeah, we all had that that sort

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:15.880
<v Speaker 1>of look in the mirror moment with Devon ait Cham,

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:17.800
<v Speaker 1>which is why his ADP came down. But I don't

0:33:17.800 --> 0:33:20.400
<v Speaker 1>feel like we've had a similar moment with Jamiir Gibbs.

0:33:20.400 --> 0:33:21.720
<v Speaker 3>Maybe not, I don't know.

0:33:21.760 --> 0:33:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Y uh, look on what is the ceiling for Anthony Richardson?

0:33:25.160 --> 0:33:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Could he be the QB one this year?

0:33:28.800 --> 0:33:31.560
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely? I mean the dude scored what seven touchdowns in

0:33:31.560 --> 0:33:33.520
<v Speaker 3>like two and a half games. I mean, if he's

0:33:33.560 --> 0:33:35.400
<v Speaker 3>going to be in an end zone more times than not,

0:33:35.520 --> 0:33:38.240
<v Speaker 3>then I don't see why him finishing as the e

0:33:38.360 --> 0:33:41.440
<v Speaker 3>QB one is out of the question, especially in seventeen games.

0:33:41.480 --> 0:33:43.520
<v Speaker 3>I feel like he's a threat with his arm, and

0:33:43.560 --> 0:33:46.400
<v Speaker 3>he's a huge threat on the ground as well. So

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 3>it's like he has that double Tandre here where it's

0:33:48.920 --> 0:33:51.640
<v Speaker 3>like I feel like, Anthony Richardson the ceiling, the sky's

0:33:51.640 --> 0:33:53.160
<v Speaker 3>the limit. It should be QB one.

0:33:53.840 --> 0:33:56.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think it easily is to me. I think

0:33:56.840 --> 0:33:59.760
<v Speaker 4>the only people in the NFL that match Anthony Richardson's

0:33:59.800 --> 0:34:02.600
<v Speaker 4>up is Jalen Hurts and Josh Allen and they have

0:34:02.680 --> 0:34:05.640
<v Speaker 4>been the top two quarterbacks drafted for years now because

0:34:07.240 --> 0:34:10.080
<v Speaker 4>of what largely because what they give you with their legs,

0:34:10.080 --> 0:34:13.600
<v Speaker 4>and Anthony Richardson I believe could give you. I don't

0:34:13.600 --> 0:34:16.000
<v Speaker 4>think he's going to this year give you fifteen rushing

0:34:16.040 --> 0:34:18.400
<v Speaker 4>touchdowns like Jalen Hurts and Josh Allen did, but he

0:34:18.440 --> 0:34:22.440
<v Speaker 4>can give you double digits like easily. And then I

0:34:22.480 --> 0:34:24.279
<v Speaker 4>know some people might be like, well, is he gonna

0:34:24.320 --> 0:34:24.680
<v Speaker 4>throw for.

0:34:24.640 --> 0:34:26.480
<v Speaker 2>Four thousand yards? He doesn't have to.

0:34:26.640 --> 0:34:30.320
<v Speaker 4>Laayer's Lamar Jackson never has, Kyler Murray never has, Jalen

0:34:30.360 --> 0:34:33.600
<v Speaker 4>Hurts never has. Like when you have such and I

0:34:33.640 --> 0:34:36.759
<v Speaker 4>think Richardson could be like what Hurts is, just with

0:34:36.840 --> 0:34:40.120
<v Speaker 4>even more rushing yards because he's faster and just a

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:41.240
<v Speaker 4>better natural runner.

0:34:41.320 --> 0:34:44.200
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, it.

0:34:43.160 --> 0:34:46.279
<v Speaker 4>It's like josh Allen Hurts and even that, I'm like,

0:34:46.440 --> 0:34:49.879
<v Speaker 4>Richardson's upside might surpass the two of them as well.

0:34:50.800 --> 0:34:52.920
<v Speaker 2>I love it. Yeah, I mean I think that that

0:34:53.040 --> 0:34:54.120
<v Speaker 2>is within the range of outcomes.

0:34:54.120 --> 0:34:55.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm just trying to come up with a number in

0:34:55.840 --> 0:34:59.520
<v Speaker 1>my head for passing yards that would get him there, right, Like,

0:35:00.920 --> 0:35:03.480
<v Speaker 1>let's put him at eight hundred rushing yards right, eight

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:07.279
<v Speaker 1>hundred rushing yards and ten touchdowns, because those seem realistic

0:35:07.320 --> 0:35:13.120
<v Speaker 1>for Anthony Richardson thirty five hundred passing yards. What twenty

0:35:13.440 --> 0:35:17.120
<v Speaker 1>five touchdowns is that? Does that feel realistic? Is that possible?

0:35:18.440 --> 0:35:20.800
<v Speaker 4>I think last year might be a blessing in disguise

0:35:20.840 --> 0:35:23.440
<v Speaker 4>for him, because obviously we want on the job training,

0:35:23.520 --> 0:35:25.960
<v Speaker 4>but like he kind of got to sit back, work

0:35:26.000 --> 0:35:29.440
<v Speaker 4>with Shane Psychen and just like from a mental standpoint,

0:35:29.600 --> 0:35:32.040
<v Speaker 4>take everything in and that's where people said he needed

0:35:32.080 --> 0:35:34.600
<v Speaker 4>to improve the most. And like the reports this year

0:35:34.600 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 4>are like, Wow, it's like he's a different person compared

0:35:37.239 --> 0:35:39.080
<v Speaker 4>to how he was breaking down the game last year.

0:35:39.080 --> 0:35:41.920
<v Speaker 4>And sometimes I think just a year kind of with

0:35:42.040 --> 0:35:44.320
<v Speaker 4>no pressure and everything just learning.

0:35:44.160 --> 0:35:46.920
<v Speaker 2>Could be a good thing. Yeah, well hopefully. I mean

0:35:46.920 --> 0:35:49.680
<v Speaker 2>the big thing is him just stay healthy. That's all

0:35:49.719 --> 0:35:53.240
<v Speaker 2>we want. That's it, Just stay healthy for sure. Lakwan.

0:35:53.360 --> 0:35:53.920
<v Speaker 2>Is there another?

0:35:53.960 --> 0:35:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Actually, I asked Floria Flora, is there another pass catcher

0:35:56.239 --> 0:35:57.520
<v Speaker 1>you want after Michael Pittman.

0:35:58.880 --> 0:36:02.040
<v Speaker 2>I love Michael Pittman a lot after him.

0:36:02.239 --> 0:36:06.399
<v Speaker 4>I like the talent that is Donna Mitchell and Josh

0:36:06.520 --> 0:36:09.319
<v Speaker 4>Downs and stuff, but I don't have a like a

0:36:09.360 --> 0:36:11.840
<v Speaker 4>flag plant or anything like that. To me, this seems

0:36:11.880 --> 0:36:14.520
<v Speaker 4>like one of those situations that will learn about it

0:36:14.560 --> 0:36:17.239
<v Speaker 4>as the year progresses, Like Pittman is clearly number one.

0:36:17.719 --> 0:36:20.040
<v Speaker 4>Uh well, we'll kind of learn who steps up the rest.

0:36:20.080 --> 0:36:23.080
<v Speaker 4>And I could see these being names that hit big

0:36:23.080 --> 0:36:25.359
<v Speaker 4>off the waiver wire in like week four or something

0:36:25.400 --> 0:36:25.759
<v Speaker 4>like that.

0:36:27.480 --> 0:36:30.319
<v Speaker 2>You look on any of these guys do anything for you.

0:36:31.120 --> 0:36:34.280
<v Speaker 3>If my leagues have like deeper bench spots, maybe I'll

0:36:34.280 --> 0:36:36.719
<v Speaker 3>go at their Josh downs because I kind of liked

0:36:36.760 --> 0:36:38.560
<v Speaker 3>way he was pulling out of that slot as a

0:36:38.560 --> 0:36:40.960
<v Speaker 3>guy that could separate. He could possibly be, you know,

0:36:41.000 --> 0:36:44.280
<v Speaker 3>a security blanket for Anthony Richardson, but that will probably

0:36:44.320 --> 0:36:46.560
<v Speaker 3>be it. Like, if I don't have the bench spots,

0:36:46.600 --> 0:36:50.040
<v Speaker 3>I probably won't look to the Colts wide receivers outside

0:36:50.080 --> 0:36:53.439
<v Speaker 3>of Pittman. But uh yeah, there's a lot there's there's

0:36:53.520 --> 0:36:54.319
<v Speaker 3>just not much there.

0:36:54.520 --> 0:36:56.520
<v Speaker 1>I can't do it. I mean, I just I think

0:36:56.600 --> 0:36:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I like there's that that there's potential there. But because

0:36:58.719 --> 0:37:01.240
<v Speaker 1>we're still sort of waiting on Richardson as a passer,

0:37:01.280 --> 0:37:02.719
<v Speaker 1>Like I just don't know how many guys he can

0:37:02.960 --> 0:37:07.359
<v Speaker 1>legitimately support beyond Michael Pittman. That's the thing that's sort

0:37:07.400 --> 0:37:10.399
<v Speaker 1>of keeping me away from him at this point. All Right,

0:37:10.640 --> 0:37:12.720
<v Speaker 1>two teams down, two teams to go. As we continue

0:37:12.719 --> 0:37:15.080
<v Speaker 1>our look at the AFC South. Stick around for more

0:37:15.120 --> 0:37:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the NFL Fantasy Football Podcast. Jacksonville Jaguars Next up. Had

0:37:24.600 --> 0:37:28.520
<v Speaker 1>a really monumental collapse at the end of last season,

0:37:28.600 --> 0:37:32.279
<v Speaker 1>ended up missing the playoffs all together. Now trying to

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:33.919
<v Speaker 1>sort of regroup and see what they have in store

0:37:33.960 --> 0:37:36.240
<v Speaker 1>for twenty twenty four. But the last year, Trevor Lawrence,

0:37:36.239 --> 0:37:39.240
<v Speaker 1>your top QB was QB thirteen two hundred and seventy

0:37:39.280 --> 0:37:43.040
<v Speaker 1>six point six points. Travis etm the RB three overall

0:37:43.080 --> 0:37:45.560
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and eighty two point four points for him.

0:37:46.200 --> 0:37:48.919
<v Speaker 1>Calvin Ridley just shy at two hundred and thirty points.

0:37:48.920 --> 0:37:51.040
<v Speaker 1>He was the wide receiver eighteen. Evan Ingram was the

0:37:51.120 --> 0:37:55.040
<v Speaker 1>tight end two two hundred and thirty point three points.

0:37:55.239 --> 0:37:58.480
<v Speaker 1>In the offseason, they moved on from Calvin Ridley, Za Jones,

0:37:58.520 --> 0:38:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and Jamal Agnew. They acquired Mac Jones in a trade.

0:38:02.239 --> 0:38:05.200
<v Speaker 1>They signed Gabe Davis, Devin Duvernet, and.

0:38:05.200 --> 0:38:06.520
<v Speaker 2>Sided in Josiah the Guara.

0:38:06.560 --> 0:38:08.759
<v Speaker 1>And they drafted Brian Thomas in the first round and

0:38:08.880 --> 0:38:12.759
<v Speaker 1>running back Kilan Robinson in the fifth, Travis etn is

0:38:12.800 --> 0:38:15.520
<v Speaker 1>your first Jaguar off the board at.

0:38:15.400 --> 0:38:17.160
<v Speaker 2>Eighteen point four.

0:38:17.760 --> 0:38:21.680
<v Speaker 1>So Lakwan, is Trevor Lawrence a value at QB fourteen

0:38:21.840 --> 0:38:22.400
<v Speaker 1>this year?

0:38:23.640 --> 0:38:25.680
<v Speaker 3>I don't know about value. I mean that's kind of

0:38:26.120 --> 0:38:28.239
<v Speaker 3>where he should be going to be honest. I mean

0:38:28.280 --> 0:38:32.080
<v Speaker 3>we haven't really seen this breakout season from Trevor Lawrence,

0:38:32.080 --> 0:38:34.440
<v Speaker 3>and there's always been I don't want to say excuses,

0:38:34.480 --> 0:38:37.479
<v Speaker 3>but there's been something keeping him from hitting his full

0:38:37.520 --> 0:38:40.640
<v Speaker 3>fantasy potential. But you know, if you're in the business

0:38:40.680 --> 0:38:43.520
<v Speaker 3>of waiting for you know, double digit rounds for your

0:38:43.600 --> 0:38:46.520
<v Speaker 3>QB one, eh, I guess you could take a shot

0:38:46.560 --> 0:38:49.080
<v Speaker 3>and you better have your rest of your positions in

0:38:49.120 --> 0:38:52.000
<v Speaker 3>solid and stone, Like this doesn't mean drafting a bunch

0:38:52.000 --> 0:38:55.000
<v Speaker 3>of rookies before you get t law or drafting z A.

0:38:55.080 --> 0:38:57.279
<v Speaker 3>Flowers or the Gabe Davises of the world. You know,

0:38:57.680 --> 0:38:59.720
<v Speaker 3>like your roster can't look like that. And you're waiting

0:38:59.760 --> 0:39:02.279
<v Speaker 3>for Lawrence like he's one of those guys that you

0:39:02.360 --> 0:39:05.000
<v Speaker 3>just need to understand, like where his ceiling is and

0:39:05.080 --> 0:39:06.920
<v Speaker 3>kind of where his floor is. It's not gonna be

0:39:07.480 --> 0:39:09.560
<v Speaker 3>something you want for X amount of weeks.

0:39:09.680 --> 0:39:10.120
<v Speaker 2>Mean Flora.

0:39:10.239 --> 0:39:12.799
<v Speaker 1>Is this the year? Is this a make or break

0:39:12.880 --> 0:39:14.759
<v Speaker 1>year at least for fantasy for Trevor Lawrence And I

0:39:14.880 --> 0:39:17.320
<v Speaker 1>only got paid by the Jaguars, so they obviously believe

0:39:17.320 --> 0:39:18.759
<v Speaker 1>in him. But for fantasy, is this the year we

0:39:18.800 --> 0:39:21.880
<v Speaker 1>either figure out is he actually good or is he

0:39:22.040 --> 0:39:22.640
<v Speaker 1>just kind of mid?

0:39:24.520 --> 0:39:27.280
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I think last year was kind of because

0:39:27.320 --> 0:39:29.279
<v Speaker 4>like his second year, we were like, all right, we're

0:39:29.640 --> 0:39:32.279
<v Speaker 4>cleaning the slate. His rookie year didn't count. He put

0:39:32.360 --> 0:39:34.400
<v Speaker 4>up a really good number two. Then they brought in

0:39:34.520 --> 0:39:37.319
<v Speaker 4>Calvin Ridley. We were all super bullish, like, look at

0:39:37.320 --> 0:39:40.160
<v Speaker 4>all the weapons he has, all this stuff, and yeah,

0:39:40.480 --> 0:39:43.600
<v Speaker 4>I mean I know he was battling like four different

0:39:43.640 --> 0:39:46.440
<v Speaker 4>injuries last season, So yeah, maybe if he if he

0:39:46.480 --> 0:39:48.560
<v Speaker 4>looks healthy again this year and he puts up better numbers,

0:39:48.600 --> 0:39:51.400
<v Speaker 4>I'll change my tune. But he's yet to average eighteen

0:39:51.480 --> 0:39:54.839
<v Speaker 4>Fantasy points per game. And the frustrating part is he's

0:39:55.000 --> 0:39:57.880
<v Speaker 4>doing it doing what I thought would kind of elevate

0:39:58.000 --> 0:40:00.160
<v Speaker 4>him in fantasy, which is being a really good, good

0:40:00.239 --> 0:40:03.120
<v Speaker 4>runner near the goal line. He's got four rushing or

0:40:03.160 --> 0:40:05.719
<v Speaker 4>more rushing touchdowns in two straight years. He had a

0:40:05.800 --> 0:40:09.719
<v Speaker 4>career high in rushing yards last season and it still

0:40:09.800 --> 0:40:12.920
<v Speaker 4>didn't translate to a huge success. And he's really as

0:40:12.920 --> 0:40:15.520
<v Speaker 4>struggled as a passer in the red zone in particular.

0:40:15.719 --> 0:40:19.879
<v Speaker 4>So if you're not racking up touchdowns, and it's gonna

0:40:19.920 --> 0:40:21.640
<v Speaker 4>be hard for you. And that's the thing. Like his

0:40:21.920 --> 0:40:25.240
<v Speaker 4>career touchdown rate is three point three percent. It dipped

0:40:25.320 --> 0:40:29.840
<v Speaker 4>last year after a solid show his second year. So like,

0:40:30.000 --> 0:40:33.120
<v Speaker 4>I think QB fourteen is appropriately priced, but he's not

0:40:33.280 --> 0:40:35.879
<v Speaker 4>someone Maybe it's because I've been burned like three years

0:40:35.920 --> 0:40:38.000
<v Speaker 4>in a row now, but he's not someone that I

0:40:38.160 --> 0:40:41.680
<v Speaker 4>find myself like bullishly targeting, Like I'd much rather wait

0:40:41.800 --> 0:40:42.919
<v Speaker 4>around to get Jared Goff.

0:40:43.200 --> 0:40:46.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, no more than twenty five touchdowns in any

0:40:46.760 --> 0:40:49.360
<v Speaker 1>given season. He's had double digit interceptions in two of

0:40:49.440 --> 0:40:52.200
<v Speaker 1>his three seasons. You know, he's gone back to back

0:40:52.320 --> 0:40:54.959
<v Speaker 1>years over four thousand yards. But it just there's nothing

0:40:55.040 --> 0:40:58.000
<v Speaker 1>about it that suggests he's ready to somehow take this

0:40:58.239 --> 0:41:01.840
<v Speaker 1>big leap. You can almost argue that I don't know

0:41:01.840 --> 0:41:05.359
<v Speaker 1>if if his wide receiver group got any better from

0:41:05.520 --> 0:41:09.080
<v Speaker 1>last year, losing Calvin Ridley and you know, adding Gabe Davis.

0:41:09.160 --> 0:41:11.600
<v Speaker 1>We'll see if Brian what Brian Thomas turns into if

0:41:11.600 --> 0:41:13.560
<v Speaker 1>he really is that deep threat, it could be a

0:41:13.600 --> 0:41:14.760
<v Speaker 1>big play guy in the offense.

0:41:14.880 --> 0:41:17.279
<v Speaker 2>But there's just there's too much unknown for me to

0:41:17.320 --> 0:41:18.040
<v Speaker 2>get excited about it.

0:41:18.080 --> 0:41:20.120
<v Speaker 1>I keep looking at Trevor Lawrence and trying to tell

0:41:20.160 --> 0:41:22.880
<v Speaker 1>myself a story of how I can sort of plug

0:41:22.960 --> 0:41:24.800
<v Speaker 1>him into a lineup, and I don't really have a

0:41:24.960 --> 0:41:28.279
<v Speaker 1>good story about it right now. So Evan Ingram was

0:41:28.280 --> 0:41:30.640
<v Speaker 1>a good story last year, finishes the tied end two

0:41:30.760 --> 0:41:31.960
<v Speaker 1>behind Sam Laporta.

0:41:32.840 --> 0:41:33.240
<v Speaker 2>Lakwan.

0:41:33.360 --> 0:41:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Any confidence that he can repeat what he did last season.

0:41:37.719 --> 0:41:40.960
<v Speaker 3>Uh maybe, I mean there there's probably some injuries that

0:41:41.120 --> 0:41:43.080
<v Speaker 3>were likely to happen. I don't want to say it's

0:41:43.080 --> 0:41:45.320
<v Speaker 3>a definite thing, but I feel like it's going to

0:41:45.360 --> 0:41:47.800
<v Speaker 3>be hard for him to kind of scratch the surface

0:41:47.840 --> 0:41:50.239
<v Speaker 3>for like four to five targets per game with the

0:41:50.360 --> 0:41:52.560
<v Speaker 3>new weapons that they have on a perimeter. So I

0:41:52.640 --> 0:41:54.839
<v Speaker 3>think a lot of people need to have their expectations.

0:41:54.920 --> 0:41:58.120
<v Speaker 3>I keep saying expectations because it's very important going into

0:41:58.160 --> 0:42:01.120
<v Speaker 3>these drafts with the tight end like Evan Ingram, who's

0:42:01.400 --> 0:42:03.520
<v Speaker 3>in a crowded room right now, so it's gonna be

0:42:03.560 --> 0:42:05.800
<v Speaker 3>hard for him to even try to do what he

0:42:05.880 --> 0:42:07.760
<v Speaker 3>did last year because a lot of that was based

0:42:07.800 --> 0:42:08.640
<v Speaker 3>on injuries.

0:42:09.280 --> 0:42:10.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean a lot of based on injuries.

0:42:11.000 --> 0:42:13.319
<v Speaker 1>And I know Florida we talked about how so much

0:42:13.360 --> 0:42:16.279
<v Speaker 1>of it was just short passing on a team that

0:42:16.360 --> 0:42:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I think wants to be more vertical, more downfield. I

0:42:19.160 --> 0:42:21.680
<v Speaker 1>know that he said himself, Ingram did that he wants

0:42:21.760 --> 0:42:24.640
<v Speaker 1>to be more of a vertical option in the passing game.

0:42:25.920 --> 0:42:28.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if he's not a vertical option, does does that?

0:42:30.600 --> 0:42:32.239
<v Speaker 1>Let's put it this way. Last year he was a

0:42:32.320 --> 0:42:34.840
<v Speaker 1>tight end too, right. I feel like the range of

0:42:34.880 --> 0:42:37.479
<v Speaker 1>outcomes could be that he's the top three tight end again,

0:42:37.680 --> 0:42:39.560
<v Speaker 1>or you know, he could be outside the top twelve.

0:42:39.640 --> 0:42:41.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, is there do you have any feeling one

0:42:41.640 --> 0:42:42.480
<v Speaker 2>way or another on that.

0:42:43.360 --> 0:42:46.120
<v Speaker 4>I think he'll probably finish more in the like eight

0:42:46.280 --> 0:42:50.320
<v Speaker 4>to twelve range at the tight end position. One hundred

0:42:50.320 --> 0:42:53.279
<v Speaker 4>and fourteen catches last year's second most ever by a

0:42:53.440 --> 0:42:56.120
<v Speaker 4>tight end, but he's the only tight end in NFL

0:42:56.239 --> 0:42:58.320
<v Speaker 4>history to have one hundred and more catches and not

0:42:58.440 --> 0:42:59.480
<v Speaker 4>get eight thousand yards.

0:42:59.560 --> 0:43:02.200
<v Speaker 2>So the efficiency is off the charts bad.

0:43:03.080 --> 0:43:07.040
<v Speaker 4>If that volume decreases back to what it like, he

0:43:07.120 --> 0:43:09.239
<v Speaker 4>could lose thirty targets and it would still be a

0:43:09.440 --> 0:43:12.400
<v Speaker 4>great year for him career wise, but that's going to

0:43:12.600 --> 0:43:14.719
<v Speaker 4>really hurt, and I think it's possible he could lose

0:43:14.760 --> 0:43:18.520
<v Speaker 4>that volume because last year with and without Christian Kirk

0:43:18.680 --> 0:43:21.480
<v Speaker 4>was night and day. He averaged over ten targets per game,

0:43:21.920 --> 0:43:25.480
<v Speaker 4>nineteen over nineteen fantasy points per game. Without Christian Watson

0:43:25.840 --> 0:43:28.319
<v Speaker 4>it was eleven point six per game, with Watson at

0:43:28.400 --> 0:43:30.560
<v Speaker 4>just seven point six targets per game, and he did

0:43:30.680 --> 0:43:33.319
<v Speaker 4>not score a touchdown while Christian Kirk. I keep saying

0:43:33.360 --> 0:43:36.080
<v Speaker 4>Chrisian Watson, I mean Christian Kirk. He did not score

0:43:36.120 --> 0:43:38.919
<v Speaker 4>a touchdown while Kirk was out on the field last year,

0:43:39.120 --> 0:43:41.839
<v Speaker 4>So that's all very problematic. And then I know they

0:43:41.920 --> 0:43:44.840
<v Speaker 4>lost Calvin Ridley, but they did bring in two targets

0:43:44.840 --> 0:43:48.000
<v Speaker 4>that you would assume are better field stretchers in Gabe

0:43:48.080 --> 0:43:51.120
<v Speaker 4>Davis and Brian Thomas. So maybe he gets a couple

0:43:51.200 --> 0:43:53.920
<v Speaker 4>of more downfield targets, but I don't think it's going

0:43:54.000 --> 0:43:56.560
<v Speaker 4>to be a routine thing, and I think a decrease.

0:43:56.200 --> 0:43:58.600
<v Speaker 2>In volume is coming as well. So, I mean, you

0:43:58.680 --> 0:44:01.200
<v Speaker 2>mentioned Christian Kirk, Lakwan is there.

0:44:01.440 --> 0:44:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Do you have confidence in any of these receivers after him,

0:44:03.920 --> 0:44:06.719
<v Speaker 1>I guess maybe Brian Thomas might be the leading candidate there.

0:44:07.600 --> 0:44:10.919
<v Speaker 3>Uh, Brian Thomas, I've grabbed in a few basketball leagues,

0:44:10.960 --> 0:44:12.719
<v Speaker 3>but redraft, I don't think I'm going to be touching

0:44:12.760 --> 0:44:16.239
<v Speaker 3>him unless I got deeper bench spots. But I feel like,

0:44:16.360 --> 0:44:18.719
<v Speaker 3>you know, it's either Kirk or nothing for me. Like

0:44:18.840 --> 0:44:21.200
<v Speaker 3>he's been my guy for a couple of years now,

0:44:21.239 --> 0:44:23.400
<v Speaker 3>and I think he's been old reliable. I mean, if

0:44:23.440 --> 0:44:25.719
<v Speaker 3>you want a safe floor, it's kind of like go

0:44:25.880 --> 0:44:28.359
<v Speaker 3>to the number one wide receiver on the team. That's

0:44:28.480 --> 0:44:30.480
<v Speaker 3>kind of at a discount. In my opinion, I think

0:44:30.560 --> 0:44:34.120
<v Speaker 3>he can stay healthy this year and kind of break

0:44:34.200 --> 0:44:36.600
<v Speaker 3>his ADP or smash his ADP whatever the kids are

0:44:36.640 --> 0:44:37.319
<v Speaker 3>saying these days.

0:44:39.080 --> 0:44:42.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean like I can see myself maybe in

0:44:42.320 --> 0:44:44.800
<v Speaker 1>some leagues taking a late shot on Thomas, But it

0:44:44.960 --> 0:44:46.880
<v Speaker 1>very much is sort of a depth ad until we

0:44:46.960 --> 0:44:50.400
<v Speaker 1>see what he is. But really it's just sort of

0:44:50.560 --> 0:44:53.759
<v Speaker 1>Christian Kirk or kind of I don't say nothing, but yeah,

0:44:53.760 --> 0:44:54.680
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of Christian Kirk.

0:44:54.800 --> 0:44:56.520
<v Speaker 2>Maybe Evan Ingram in the right situation.

0:44:56.960 --> 0:44:59.759
<v Speaker 1>I just don't I'm just not sold on any of

0:44:59.840 --> 0:45:03.360
<v Speaker 1>the these pass catchers there in Jacksonville right now. Finishing

0:45:03.440 --> 0:45:06.440
<v Speaker 1>up with the Tennessee Titans. Last year, Will Levis was

0:45:06.520 --> 0:45:09.440
<v Speaker 1>their top scoring quarterback. They went through a number of

0:45:09.520 --> 0:45:11.400
<v Speaker 1>different guys. It was Ryan Tannehill at the start of

0:45:11.440 --> 0:45:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the year, then Levis took over late one hundred and

0:45:13.920 --> 0:45:16.520
<v Speaker 1>six point one points. He was QB thirty three, Dereck

0:45:16.560 --> 0:45:19.239
<v Speaker 1>Henry the RB eight overall two hundred and forty six

0:45:19.280 --> 0:45:21.800
<v Speaker 1>point seven points for him, DeAndre Hopkins two hundred and

0:45:21.840 --> 0:45:25.279
<v Speaker 1>twenty three point six points, wide receiver twenty two, and

0:45:25.480 --> 0:45:28.239
<v Speaker 1>Chig o'conquote your top scoring tight end in Tennessee. He

0:45:28.400 --> 0:45:31.000
<v Speaker 1>was the tight end twenty one, one hundred and thirteen

0:45:31.080 --> 0:45:35.279
<v Speaker 1>point four points. The offseason, Ryan Tannehill said goodbye. Still

0:45:35.320 --> 0:45:38.120
<v Speaker 1>a free agent right now is Tannehill. Dereck Henry obviously

0:45:38.280 --> 0:45:42.000
<v Speaker 1>went to Baltimore, and wide receiver Chris Moore also left Tennessee.

0:45:42.840 --> 0:45:45.279
<v Speaker 1>They add Galvin Ridley in free agency along with Tony

0:45:45.360 --> 0:45:49.439
<v Speaker 1>Pollard and Tyler Boyd. Also signed Mason Rudolph and spent

0:45:49.520 --> 0:45:53.759
<v Speaker 1>a sixth round pick on wide receiver Jakwan Jackson. First

0:45:53.800 --> 0:45:56.560
<v Speaker 1>off the board, Covin Ridley seventy five point eight, which

0:45:56.640 --> 0:45:59.000
<v Speaker 1>tells you a lot about how people feel about this

0:45:59.200 --> 0:46:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Titans off. So Floria, I'll start with you choose your fighter,

0:46:04.400 --> 0:46:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Tony Pollard or Taija.

0:46:06.000 --> 0:46:12.719
<v Speaker 4>Spears, Uh, whichever one is cheapest, like like which right

0:46:12.760 --> 0:46:15.200
<v Speaker 4>now is Spears, but it's not by much. And I'll

0:46:15.239 --> 0:46:18.320
<v Speaker 4>tell you straight out, I have a couple of like

0:46:18.960 --> 0:46:21.719
<v Speaker 4>dabbles of Spears and of Pollard, but largely I'm not

0:46:21.920 --> 0:46:25.520
<v Speaker 4>going after this backfield because they are almost identical players.

0:46:26.080 --> 0:46:29.480
<v Speaker 4>And Spears last year was the more explosive runner, so

0:46:29.520 --> 0:46:31.560
<v Speaker 4>I'll side with him because I tend to go with

0:46:31.640 --> 0:46:34.800
<v Speaker 4>the explosive side of things when it's uh, you're competing

0:46:34.880 --> 0:46:35.960
<v Speaker 4>for touches because you could do.

0:46:36.040 --> 0:46:37.160
<v Speaker 2>More on limited volume.

0:46:37.360 --> 0:46:41.719
<v Speaker 4>But Tony Pollard was the better receiver at least statistically

0:46:41.960 --> 0:46:45.920
<v Speaker 4>like metric wise, and they knew what they had in

0:46:46.040 --> 0:46:48.719
<v Speaker 4>Taja Spears and still went chose to go out and

0:46:49.360 --> 0:46:53.000
<v Speaker 4>literally the moment free agency started, pay Tony Pollard.

0:46:53.080 --> 0:46:55.480
<v Speaker 2>And that is something that I just can't overlook. Like

0:46:55.600 --> 0:46:57.040
<v Speaker 2>everyone's like, oh, they're the same thing.

0:46:57.000 --> 0:46:59.480
<v Speaker 4>And Spears is the younger, more explosive version, so he's

0:46:59.480 --> 0:47:01.800
<v Speaker 4>gonna be way better and I get that thinking, but like,

0:47:02.520 --> 0:47:03.319
<v Speaker 4>Tony Pollard is not.

0:47:03.400 --> 0:47:04.520
<v Speaker 2>Just simply gonna go away.

0:47:04.840 --> 0:47:07.839
<v Speaker 4>And if one person does take over the line's share

0:47:07.880 --> 0:47:11.479
<v Speaker 4>of work, I think it'll be Pollard, not Spears, because

0:47:11.480 --> 0:47:14.719
<v Speaker 4>I just don't see Pollard going away after they paid him.

0:47:14.960 --> 0:47:15.680
<v Speaker 2>Which one do you like?

0:47:15.800 --> 0:47:19.239
<v Speaker 3>Ok Uh, If it's Spears, it will have to be

0:47:19.360 --> 0:47:22.360
<v Speaker 3>my RB three four. But I'm fading Pollard just based

0:47:22.400 --> 0:47:24.920
<v Speaker 3>on the fear that you know, I don't think Spears

0:47:25.000 --> 0:47:27.120
<v Speaker 3>takeover will be right out the gate. I don't want

0:47:27.160 --> 0:47:30.040
<v Speaker 3>to say that, like it'll eventually grow to a point

0:47:30.080 --> 0:47:33.279
<v Speaker 3>where like the touches are getting split to where it'll

0:47:33.280 --> 0:47:35.640
<v Speaker 3>be more annoying. So I'll be more annoyed of taking

0:47:35.880 --> 0:47:39.160
<v Speaker 3>Tony Pollard as my RB one RB two, however you

0:47:39.360 --> 0:47:40.920
<v Speaker 3>want to draft it, because it'll kind of be a

0:47:41.000 --> 0:47:44.359
<v Speaker 3>slow burned rental here getting Tony Pollard. So I would

0:47:44.360 --> 0:47:46.479
<v Speaker 3>go with Spears, being that is the cheaper option.

0:47:47.400 --> 0:47:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm going with Spears because I like Spears

0:47:49.360 --> 0:47:53.200
<v Speaker 1>last year, and you know, even frustrating as it is

0:47:53.280 --> 0:47:55.160
<v Speaker 1>to see a guy with the exact same skill set

0:47:55.280 --> 0:47:58.000
<v Speaker 1>come in the fact that he is slightly cheaper in drafts,

0:47:58.000 --> 0:47:59.319
<v Speaker 1>I think still makes me in on him.

0:47:59.360 --> 0:48:03.640
<v Speaker 2>But I I they do envision a scenario where maybe.

0:48:03.520 --> 0:48:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Tony Pollard wasn't fully healthy last year and that had

0:48:06.000 --> 0:48:08.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot to do with why he was sort of disappointing.

0:48:08.200 --> 0:48:10.359
<v Speaker 2>And if he is fully healthy, will we see him

0:48:10.360 --> 0:48:10.640
<v Speaker 2>take off?

0:48:10.680 --> 0:48:12.759
<v Speaker 1>Because remember a couple years ago when he was still

0:48:12.800 --> 0:48:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the number two to Ezekiel Elliott. There, you know there

0:48:17.000 --> 0:48:19.720
<v Speaker 1>was a reason we were all rejoicing when Zeke left Dallas,

0:48:19.800 --> 0:48:21.600
<v Speaker 1>right where like this opens things up for Pollard.

0:48:21.920 --> 0:48:24.000
<v Speaker 2>He's gonna be He's gonna be huge. It just never

0:48:24.120 --> 0:48:24.760
<v Speaker 2>quite happened.

0:48:24.800 --> 0:48:28.600
<v Speaker 1>But what if he just wasn't healthy and now that

0:48:28.719 --> 0:48:30.200
<v Speaker 1>he's fully healthy, he can kind of get back to

0:48:30.239 --> 0:48:31.439
<v Speaker 1>being that explosive guy again.

0:48:31.480 --> 0:48:32.440
<v Speaker 2>I think that's possible.

0:48:32.880 --> 0:48:35.480
<v Speaker 4>To your point, I do think that is something that

0:48:35.680 --> 0:48:38.960
<v Speaker 4>we as a fantasy community don't do a good enough

0:48:39.080 --> 0:48:41.480
<v Speaker 4>Like we just assume, oh, player got hurt last year,

0:48:41.480 --> 0:48:43.480
<v Speaker 4>he's healthy this year, and like Tony Pollard had a

0:48:43.560 --> 0:48:45.799
<v Speaker 4>severe injury late in like January.

0:48:46.120 --> 0:48:48.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so playoff in the playoff game. I think, Yeah,

0:48:48.600 --> 0:48:49.160
<v Speaker 2>he did.

0:48:49.160 --> 0:48:51.920
<v Speaker 4>Show signs of life down the stretch from like weeks

0:48:52.040 --> 0:48:54.359
<v Speaker 4>eleven on last year, so that could be the case.

0:48:54.560 --> 0:48:56.960
<v Speaker 4>I continue with my point though, since this backfield started,

0:48:57.000 --> 0:48:58.640
<v Speaker 4>I think this is this year's version of.

0:48:58.640 --> 0:48:59.879
<v Speaker 3>The Steelers nice?

0:49:01.200 --> 0:49:04.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but like they're both RB low end RB two's

0:49:04.960 --> 0:49:06.799
<v Speaker 4>maybe RBS explosive.

0:49:07.080 --> 0:49:08.000
<v Speaker 2>That's complicated.

0:49:08.760 --> 0:49:10.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean I think that's very possible. The other

0:49:10.760 --> 0:49:13.800
<v Speaker 1>part of this is, like the Titans could be bad

0:49:13.920 --> 0:49:16.520
<v Speaker 1>this year. How much is that going to impact things?

0:49:16.680 --> 0:49:18.320
<v Speaker 1>With two running backs who can do Like it's not

0:49:18.400 --> 0:49:19.880
<v Speaker 1>like you're like, oh, yeah, they're gonna be bad to

0:49:20.239 --> 0:49:24.160
<v Speaker 1>throw the ball so that means spears or like it

0:49:24.239 --> 0:49:27.799
<v Speaker 1>could be either one of them, right, Like, that's gonna

0:49:27.800 --> 0:49:29.480
<v Speaker 1>be a a big headache to figure.

0:49:29.280 --> 0:49:32.919
<v Speaker 3>Out why did they do that to themselves? I could

0:49:32.960 --> 0:49:36.520
<v Speaker 3>have signed a big back and could have signed JK. Dobbins.

0:49:36.600 --> 0:49:38.520
<v Speaker 3>They could have did a whole bunch of other things

0:49:38.600 --> 0:49:40.480
<v Speaker 3>to where this would not be an issue.

0:49:40.480 --> 0:49:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Not being they could have made a trade for you

0:49:42.960 --> 0:49:44.719
<v Speaker 1>can still make a trade for Damian Pierce, I guess,

0:49:44.760 --> 0:49:45.160
<v Speaker 1>but I could.

0:49:45.360 --> 0:49:47.600
<v Speaker 2>That would that would make things even? That would just

0:49:47.680 --> 0:49:50.359
<v Speaker 2>be that would be awful right now?

0:49:51.840 --> 0:49:54.440
<v Speaker 1>So I had two other questions here about the Titans,

0:49:54.440 --> 0:49:55.799
<v Speaker 1>but it feels like we sort of answered. I mean,

0:49:55.840 --> 0:49:59.680
<v Speaker 1>DeAndre Hopkins dealing with a knee injury, Uh you right now?

0:50:00.040 --> 0:50:02.120
<v Speaker 1>I know we both we all three kind of were like, eh,

0:50:02.400 --> 0:50:05.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe stay away. We're all sort of into Calvin Ridley.

0:50:05.960 --> 0:50:07.719
<v Speaker 1>We're all kind of into Will Levis, right is every

0:50:08.000 --> 0:50:10.440
<v Speaker 1>are you guys on the Will Levis hype train right now?

0:50:10.960 --> 0:50:14.200
<v Speaker 3>Yes, sir Cho Choco chokes.

0:50:14.160 --> 0:50:18.000
<v Speaker 4>Just draft Ridley and draft Levis and uh, look it

0:50:18.080 --> 0:50:20.640
<v Speaker 4>might I we it's not gonna be pretty. You're not

0:50:20.719 --> 0:50:24.320
<v Speaker 4>gonna want to watch the Titans games, but you're gonna

0:50:24.320 --> 0:50:26.719
<v Speaker 4>want to see the stats after. I think like three

0:50:26.840 --> 0:50:30.080
<v Speaker 4>corners could be disgustingly bad. And then you might get

0:50:30.200 --> 0:50:32.960
<v Speaker 4>like to hail Mary's to Calvin Ridley and you're like, oh,

0:50:33.000 --> 0:50:34.319
<v Speaker 4>this was a great fantasy day.

0:50:35.719 --> 0:50:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's a rough way to live. I'm still it's

0:50:38.560 --> 0:50:40.560
<v Speaker 1>my favorite way to live. That is a rough, rough

0:50:40.600 --> 0:50:46.640
<v Speaker 1>way for Sunday man. Yeah, I don't know, just one

0:50:47.160 --> 0:50:50.600
<v Speaker 1>big play hunting what is that? There's nothing, there's some

0:50:50.920 --> 0:50:53.560
<v Speaker 1>So it's so unremarkable right now the Texans or the

0:50:53.600 --> 0:50:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Titans offense, right I mean, we we think Will Levis

0:50:56.440 --> 0:50:59.680
<v Speaker 1>might develop into something. And DeAndre Hopkins is aging and

0:51:00.280 --> 0:51:03.239
<v Speaker 1>beat up. Calvin Ridley's coming off kind of a mess

0:51:03.360 --> 0:51:05.839
<v Speaker 1>season in Jacksonville. They've got two running backs that are

0:51:05.880 --> 0:51:08.279
<v Speaker 1>kind of the same. I mean, the biggest thing to

0:51:08.320 --> 0:51:10.759
<v Speaker 1>talk about with the Titans is that their running back

0:51:11.000 --> 0:51:14.120
<v Speaker 1>is in Baltimore. Now, other than that, it's just I

0:51:14.120 --> 0:51:15.799
<v Speaker 1>don't know, is there anything else that stands out about

0:51:15.880 --> 0:51:16.759
<v Speaker 1>this team to either of you?

0:51:17.400 --> 0:51:21.200
<v Speaker 4>Look good and fun in fantasy are two very The

0:51:21.360 --> 0:51:24.000
<v Speaker 4>Chiefs were good last year, they were not fun. The

0:51:24.120 --> 0:51:26.480
<v Speaker 4>Titans are. I believe are gonna be fun for me.

0:51:26.560 --> 0:51:28.080
<v Speaker 4>Like I think we're gonna get a lot of throwing

0:51:28.160 --> 0:51:29.920
<v Speaker 4>the ball. I think we're gonna get a lot of yolo.

0:51:30.040 --> 0:51:32.560
<v Speaker 2>But there's a reason why Jameis Winston is one of

0:51:32.640 --> 0:51:35.560
<v Speaker 2>my favorite players in the NFL. He's not great, but

0:51:35.680 --> 0:51:38.720
<v Speaker 2>he's never boring. And that's what I think Will Levis

0:51:38.760 --> 0:51:42.200
<v Speaker 2>and the Titans will be. All right, that's fair, that's that's.

0:51:43.000 --> 0:51:45.359
<v Speaker 3>A lot of big throws that I'm expecting, Like it's

0:51:45.360 --> 0:51:46.800
<v Speaker 3>gonna have you on the edge of you see, and

0:51:46.880 --> 0:51:48.319
<v Speaker 3>like is he going to catch it? Like that's how

0:51:48.360 --> 0:51:49.680
<v Speaker 3>long the ball is kind of hang in the air,

0:51:49.800 --> 0:51:50.600
<v Speaker 3>like I'm ready for it?

0:51:51.040 --> 0:51:53.600
<v Speaker 2>All right. I guess that's sort of there's something. There's

0:51:53.640 --> 0:51:56.440
<v Speaker 2>something there to watch, Like I'd much rather be the

0:51:56.560 --> 0:52:01.919
<v Speaker 2>Titans than say, who's like a bad boring team, the Saints. Yeah,

0:52:02.000 --> 0:52:07.239
<v Speaker 2>oh my god. This the worst place you could be

0:52:07.480 --> 0:52:09.160
<v Speaker 2>is being like seven to nine every year.

0:52:09.400 --> 0:52:12.160
<v Speaker 3>Like, how have we not talked about chrys adp yet?

0:52:12.360 --> 0:52:15.799
<v Speaker 2>I am. We'll get there. Here's it. We'll get there

0:52:15.880 --> 0:52:17.440
<v Speaker 2>on on Wednesday, since we're.

0:52:17.280 --> 0:52:20.040
<v Speaker 3>Gonna do the NFC South, I'm coming in with avent.

0:52:21.400 --> 0:52:22.279
<v Speaker 2>So everybody lock in.

0:52:22.960 --> 0:52:25.439
<v Speaker 1>Uh the pun is gonna be heated talking about talking

0:52:25.480 --> 0:52:27.640
<v Speaker 1>about Chris olaves A DP, and he probably will be

0:52:27.760 --> 0:52:29.440
<v Speaker 1>on a lack of sleep, so he'll just come off

0:52:29.480 --> 0:52:33.120
<v Speaker 1>of a morning very very He's gonna be grouchy and

0:52:33.239 --> 0:52:35.319
<v Speaker 1>tired and have a bone to pick with the Chris

0:52:35.400 --> 0:52:39.040
<v Speaker 1>olaves A DP. He's got a lot of problems with

0:52:39.120 --> 0:52:42.880
<v Speaker 1>you people. He's gonna let you hear about it. Uh

0:52:43.040 --> 0:52:44.880
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I mean that's pretty much wrap up on

0:52:44.920 --> 0:52:46.839
<v Speaker 1>the the a f C South. We'll have another show

0:52:46.880 --> 0:52:49.040
<v Speaker 1>for you on Wednesday, we talk about the NFC South

0:52:49.200 --> 0:52:51.880
<v Speaker 1>and uh, still doing the cheat sheet on Thursday. Not

0:52:51.920 --> 0:52:53.600
<v Speaker 1>too many more editions of the cheat sheet left as

0:52:53.600 --> 0:52:55.280
<v Speaker 1>we get closer to the start of the regular season,

0:52:55.400 --> 0:52:56.399
<v Speaker 1>so we got a couple left.

0:52:56.760 --> 0:52:58.600
<v Speaker 2>I think we settled on watching the Warriors.

0:52:58.960 --> 0:53:00.560
<v Speaker 1>This is like a little house keeping, letting you guys

0:53:00.640 --> 0:53:03.240
<v Speaker 1>know so we can rightly.

0:53:03.920 --> 0:53:04.160
<v Speaker 2>I was.

0:53:04.400 --> 0:53:07.239
<v Speaker 4>I had a mini moment of panic last night when

0:53:07.280 --> 0:53:09.040
<v Speaker 4>I was like, I don't remember what movie it is.

0:53:09.120 --> 0:53:11.640
<v Speaker 2>I gotta watch it. I've seen this movie literally yearly

0:53:11.800 --> 0:53:13.120
<v Speaker 2>since I'm twelve. So there it is.

0:53:13.800 --> 0:53:16.200
<v Speaker 1>So Florio is going to be locked in, so Lakwan

0:53:16.280 --> 0:53:18.239
<v Speaker 1>you get to watch the Warriors for the first time.

0:53:18.360 --> 0:53:21.120
<v Speaker 2>We'll talk about that on Thursday on the cheat sheet there.

0:53:21.160 --> 0:53:23.480
<v Speaker 1>In the meantime, that'll do it for this edition of

0:53:23.520 --> 0:53:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the NFL Fantasy Football Podcast. They happy, saving healthy, do good,

0:53:26.560 --> 0:53:29.120
<v Speaker 1>and live well. Enjoy the days. Everybody will talk to

0:53:29.120 --> 0:53:30.600
<v Speaker 1>you again on Wednesday.