WEBVTT - Reincarnation Blues

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Flow your Mind from how Stuff

0:00:06.040 --> 0:00:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com. Hey, welcome to Stuff to blow your Mind.

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:17.479
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb and J Douglas. Recently we

0:00:17.520 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>did an episode titled The Problem of Immortality where we

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:24.479
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about humanity's fear of death and

0:00:24.600 --> 0:00:28.880
<v Speaker 1>how a quest for some form of immortality permeates just

0:00:28.960 --> 0:00:33.000
<v Speaker 1>about everything we do as a species and as a civilization.

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:36.480
<v Speaker 1>So it seems like a really good idea to cover

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 1>reincarnation in its own episode. And so that's what we're

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:44.159
<v Speaker 1>talking about today. Reincarnation, which here in the Western world

0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 1>is kind of a slightly different animal than it is

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 1>in the East, but it's but it's still an idea

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 1>that you find pretty in worldviews around the world and

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 1>uh and has a certain amount of uh, well, let's

0:00:57.680 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 1>just say truthiness to it. To borrow word from Stephen Colbert.

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:05.680
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people find something in reincarnation that jives

0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:08.680
<v Speaker 1>with their worldview. Okay, I was thinking about this, and

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking that reincarnation, at least on a symbolic level,

0:01:11.920 --> 0:01:14.880
<v Speaker 1>it couldn't help but work itself into the human psyche.

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Given that nature performs a sort of reincarnation at the

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 1>molecular level every single day, right and at the most

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:26.960
<v Speaker 1>basic level, we are informed by nature in the physical

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 1>world around us. And I was thinking about Berne Heinrich.

0:01:31.160 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 1>He is the author from Life Everlasting, the Animal Way

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 1>of Death. He says, we come from life, and we

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:39.560
<v Speaker 1>are the conduit into other life. We come from and

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 1>return to incomparably amazing plants and animals, even while we

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 1>are alive, are wastes are recycled directly into beetles, grass

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and trees, which are further recycled into beef, butterflies, and

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 1>onto flycatchers, finches and hawks, and back into grass and

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 1>on into deer, cows, goats, and us. And he even

0:01:57.400 --> 0:02:00.160
<v Speaker 1>goes on to say that you could have a decaying

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 1>elephant or an arctic poppies molecules which might have been

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 1>released into the air the previous day, but they all

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 1>came from plants and animals that lived millions of years ago.

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 1>And he says all of life is linked through a

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 1>physical exchange on the cellular level. So that is a

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:21.640
<v Speaker 1>that's a deep ancient trope being played out in the

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 1>drama of nature before our very eyes. So it makes

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:28.239
<v Speaker 1>sense that we would as humans look to that cyclical

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>nature and and somehow involve it in our somewhat linear

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 1>timelines that we have set out as humans. Yeah. In fact,

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:40.399
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the reasons that the Plato, the famous philosopher,

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:43.520
<v Speaker 1>looked around in the natural world and and and thought

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 1>that the reincarnation jibe with what he was saying he saw.

0:02:46.160 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 1>He saw cycles and opposites in nature as being one

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 1>of the the leading arguments for reincarnation. Like you say,

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:57.160
<v Speaker 1>you see these cycles all around you. And then if

0:02:57.200 --> 0:03:00.520
<v Speaker 1>we were to try and imagine things, uh, the the

0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:04.920
<v Speaker 1>unseen world, we can do attribute similar shapes and similar

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>cycles to those energies as well. Yeah, and reincarnation And

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 1>just to factrack a little bit too, immortality, it really

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 1>does fulfill that um immortality narrative that is so important

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:21.799
<v Speaker 1>for humans. It does three things. Helps to manage that

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:24.959
<v Speaker 1>terror we sometimes feel when we realize that our lives

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:28.640
<v Speaker 1>are ephemeral and fleeting. The second thing is it provides

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 1>a blueprint for acceptable behavior, which we'll talk about more

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 1>while on Earth. And three in extends that assurance of

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>immortality that you live on in some way. Now, reincarnation

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:39.840
<v Speaker 1>goes by other names as well. You might know it

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 1>as a transmigration of the soul or metal psychosis. Uh.

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 1>But the idea again is truly ancient. You look back

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 1>to Africa, the birthplace of humanity, you'll find reincartercarnation traditions

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 1>such as that of the West African vote in religion,

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 1>and given the migrations of early Man that the next

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 1>great homeland of the humanity is of course the Indian subcontinent.

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 1>And that's where we see the most famous model of

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 1>recurrent reincarnation emerge and come to dominate Eastern cultures. Uh So,

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 1>really you have to start with Hinduism. And just to

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 1>give a quick refresher on Hinduism, it's the oldest of

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the dominant world religions and arguably the most difficult to summarize. Okay,

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:22.240
<v Speaker 1>It's it's roots stretch back a good five thousand years

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>through human history, and along the way you find all

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:30.720
<v Speaker 1>of these. It's varied texts, poetic epics, different sets, different diversions.

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 1>God's Goddess is religious rituals, and all of it comes

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:37.039
<v Speaker 1>into this. Uh, this, this form that is really difficult

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:39.720
<v Speaker 1>to nail down. Hinduism is kind of a just a

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:44.159
<v Speaker 1>chasm that that that dives down through human history, a

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:47.159
<v Speaker 1>lot of ideas wrapped up in it. Yeah, at the

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:49.640
<v Speaker 1>at the very basic level, though, we're talking about something

0:04:49.640 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 1>called some sorrow, which is a chain of birth and

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 1>death linked by reincarnation, and controlling some sorrow is the

0:04:56.320 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>law of karma. So Hindus believe that all individuals accumulate

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:03.719
<v Speaker 1>karma over a given course of a lifetime, and then

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>good actions create good karma and evil actions create negative karma.

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:10.480
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, we have a wonderful article by

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Dowdy called How Reincarnation Works and it goes a

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:17.040
<v Speaker 1>bit more into this. Yeah, and the wheel of Samsar

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:19.840
<v Speaker 1>is often used as a visual reminder of how of

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 1>how this system works in Hinduism and Buddhism. We have

0:05:23.360 --> 0:05:26.359
<v Speaker 1>a cool interactive version of that in the article about

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Tibetan sky Burial on the website. But in essence, it's

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 1>a big wheel, like a big pizza. It's gripped by

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 1>a big monster uh generally called Yama, and Yama is

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the embodiment of impermanence and death, this big demon and

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 1>he's he's holding this giant pizza chart that has a

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:47.280
<v Speaker 1>has these different states of being that a soul may

0:05:47.320 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 1>travel through as it's reincarnated, and those include a human realm,

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the realm that we are in now. It includes an

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:58.160
<v Speaker 1>animal realm. It includes lower realms where you'll see hungry ghosts,

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:00.919
<v Speaker 1>where you'll see raging demons as well. It's higher realms

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 1>where you'll see demi gods and gods. It kind of

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 1>reminds me of a board game like dice may land

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:11.840
<v Speaker 1>on you know, an angry god or or a creature. Yeah,

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of shoots and ladders, imagine it's really it is.

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:18.280
<v Speaker 1>It is shoots and ladders as a model of existence,

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:21.559
<v Speaker 1>except it's a game of shoots and ladders that never ends,

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:24.040
<v Speaker 1>all right, And even when a game of shoots and

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 1>ladders ends, it's a pretty tedious game to play. And

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 1>that's sort of the whole point in Hinduism and Buddhism

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:32.279
<v Speaker 1>is that the game is tiresome. The game is just

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna be ups and downs just forever unless you stop

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>playing it. And that's ultimately what what the goal of

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:43.279
<v Speaker 1>of Hinduism and Buddhism is. To free yourself from that,

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:46.039
<v Speaker 1>from that game altogether, to free yourself from the cycle,

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 1>uh the endless cycle of death. And rebirth and reincarnation

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:53.280
<v Speaker 1>into various forms, and that creates that blueprint of behavior

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:55.280
<v Speaker 1>for your time here on earth that we've talked about,

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:59.479
<v Speaker 1>which is so important to the immortality narrative. Yeah, we

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:02.360
<v Speaker 1>come back to this string of karma, this idea that

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>that no matter what form you're in, there is something

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 1>there that that is immortal. There is this uh, this string,

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 1>this thread that continues throughout it and you can just

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, think of it as the human soul, as

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 1>some sort of soul energy. That's the general idea here.

0:07:18.480 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 1>And it's uh, it's it's the piece on the board

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 1>of shoots and ladders that's going up, that's going down,

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:27.239
<v Speaker 1>and eventually you want to remove from the board altogether. Now,

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 1>in shoots and ladders, of course, it's just luck if

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 1>you're going up or down. But in reincarnation, that's driven

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 1>by karma. Uh, there's the there is, of course a

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>moral aspect to all of this. Um. How you act

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 1>in this life depends on where you'll be in the

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 1>next and the life after that and the life after that. Yeah,

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>And this interpretation of reincarnation really varies widely depending on

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the philosophy or the religion In fact. In Native American culture,

0:07:55.880 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 1>it is a feature. Reincarnation is in it. It makes

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 1>sense here if you ask me, because you really see

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 1>that reincarnation is essential to the belief in the connectedness,

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 1>the continuity, in the interdependence of all life. In some

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Native American cultures and for the Northern Arthur past candn

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>a thought the soul. I think it's really interested interesting.

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 1>The soul is regarded as a dual entity. The soul

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 1>is believed to remain in the after world and can

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 1>be prayed to, and at the same time it exists

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 1>in the human form of the reincarnate reincarnated individual also

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:35.319
<v Speaker 1>known as those made again. So you've got one foot

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 1>here and the present and one foot in the past. Yes,

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:42.560
<v Speaker 1>reincarnation often sort of bleeds over into these other ideas

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 1>of say, for instance, the ancestor. Worship or or at

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:49.720
<v Speaker 1>least holding up the ancestor is an extremely important part

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:51.840
<v Speaker 1>of not only the past but the present, and in

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 1>that you see some of these models of reincarnation are

0:08:54.360 --> 0:08:58.200
<v Speaker 1>more of a family model of reincarnation. People are reincarnated

0:08:58.400 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 1>within the bloodline, and of course that makes a lot

0:09:01.520 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 1>of sense because we know how genetics work. We know

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 1>how how genes are passed on from one generation to

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the next. So in a sense, there is something in

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 1>your grandfather that's living on in this bloodline. Now, on

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the same note, you also find uh mythic reincarnation, the

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 1>idea that gods are reborn as kings and the other

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 1>important you know, figures. And in this we see a

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:28.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of cyclical time and archetypes. We've talked to a

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 1>lot before about how when you look at this older

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 1>model of time, before the linear time um, everything was

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 1>a cycle and independent individual moments and even individuals were

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:43.320
<v Speaker 1>only important insofar as how they uh recaptured some sort

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:46.079
<v Speaker 1>of archetype from the past. Because in some ways these

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:49.000
<v Speaker 1>are delusions, right, So if you claim that a pharaoh

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:52.839
<v Speaker 1>is you are reincarnate of Pharaoh, then you are trying

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 1>to assume that Pharaoh's power. And I'm thinking about Sodom Hussein,

0:09:57.440 --> 0:10:01.320
<v Speaker 1>who claimed to have been the reincarnation of a Babylonian king.

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 1>And we see this, you know, not just in present day,

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:07.440
<v Speaker 1>but throughout history, people claiming to have the sort of

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:13.600
<v Speaker 1>powers of these um very important ancestors or historical figures

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:16.960
<v Speaker 1>throughout time. Yeah, and you always hear about the king

0:10:17.040 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 1>that somebody was in their past life. People tend not

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:21.960
<v Speaker 1>to focus on the uh, the you know, the the

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:25.280
<v Speaker 1>street bum or the or or the or some sort

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 1>of a war criminal or anything of that nature, or

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 1>does the common goatherd. But you know, that makes sense

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:34.200
<v Speaker 1>if you want to fasten your yourself to some you know,

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 1>imagine figure in the past, you want to do something inspiring,

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I guess. But and that kind of falls into another

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 1>version of reincarnation. You find sort of, especially in the West,

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 1>a kind of casual, feel good reincarnation where we just

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of just a quick path on the back to say, hey,

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:53.439
<v Speaker 1>maybe when I die, I'm gonna be reborn as an eagle.

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you don't die, maybe you're reincarnated as as this

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>plant or this person. And it's just there's not even

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:03.560
<v Speaker 1>like any kind of real religion or world view or

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 1>structure to the idea is just sort of a comforting

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 1>possible notion, a whimsical reincarnation. Yeah, but nothing could be

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 1>further from the idea of karmic reincarnation that we've discussed

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:16.320
<v Speaker 1>so far. You know that, because this is serious business.

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:19.559
<v Speaker 1>This is about for the for the practitioner of Buddhism,

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>or Hinduism. This is about where I'm going to land

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 1>in the next life, avoiding some sort of hellish reincarnation

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 1>and also eventually freeing myself from the cycle altogether. So

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:32.320
<v Speaker 1>it's not just a you know, a pad on the back.

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 1>It's it's considered serious business. That's right. It's very rich

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:40.200
<v Speaker 1>in rituals and steps are to be taken. It's not

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 1>just as you say, the casual association with if I

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:44.600
<v Speaker 1>do this one good day, perhaps I will not be

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 1>a cockroach in the next life. Yeah, I mean, the

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Tibetan Book of the Dead is all about the steps

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:52.960
<v Speaker 1>that one can take as this traveling soul, as the psychonaut,

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 1>and the steps that your that the your survivors can

0:11:56.520 --> 0:11:59.840
<v Speaker 1>take to help guide you through that gray area into

0:11:59.880 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the next life. It's it's it's a dangerous voyage for

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the practitioner of Tibetan Buddhism. And then there's one more

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:08.200
<v Speaker 1>version of reincarnation, one more take on it. That's uh,

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:09.720
<v Speaker 1>that that has a lot of Lusser to it, and

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of a metaphoric interpretation. Okay, this is the

0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 1>idea that that the idea that Buddhist reincarnation is not

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 1>a literal model of rebirth through various forums and a

0:12:20.080 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 1>karmic cycle, but rather a model for our moment to

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:27.079
<v Speaker 1>moment reincarnation. And and I tend to really like this interpretation.

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 1>It's the idea that instead of oh, if you leave

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 1>a lead a peaceful human life, then maybe you'll have

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 1>more peace in the next moment. Or if you have

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 1>a sort of an out of controlled, lavish demi god life, uh,

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:42.280
<v Speaker 1>then your next life might see you cast down into

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the hells. But rather, what am I How do I

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 1>feel right now? Am I peaceful? Now? Well? Then that

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 1>means in the next moment I may be peaceful as

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:52.559
<v Speaker 1>well if I am sort of if I'm on one

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:54.959
<v Speaker 1>end of the pendulum now, if I'm you know, angry,

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 1>then maybe I'll swing back to something a little more

0:12:58.200 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 1>reasonable in the next It's a about that moment to

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:03.720
<v Speaker 1>moment change in our our psyche and and in the

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:06.840
<v Speaker 1>way we're experiencing the world around us. I like that.

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 1>I like that sense that if you're tending your own

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 1>garden at that very moment, then you're also converging on

0:13:12.040 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the all points of time past, present, in future, and

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 1>that that tending of that garden now reaps its rewards

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:23.959
<v Speaker 1>metaphorically throughout this ripple of time. Yeah, Alan Watts put

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 1>it really well. He said that, Okay, look at a flame.

0:13:27.040 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 1>A flame is a process and not a thing. He said, said,

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:34.200
<v Speaker 1>every human being is also a process, just as a

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 1>flame is a conversion of wax into gas. Because who

0:13:38.080 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 1>are you right the at any given moment, You're a

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:44.960
<v Speaker 1>different person than than who you were five minutes ago,

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 1>a month ago, a year ago. We're perpetually changing where

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:52.200
<v Speaker 1>there We're just this this vast storm of ideas and

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 1>memories and and uh and interpretations of the world around us,

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 1>and so that that changes all the time. And we

0:13:57.720 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 1>talked a little bit about that in the Problem of

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Immortality and as well as in our episodes on Hell,

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:05.679
<v Speaker 1>like who who's judged when it comes to heaven? In hell?

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 1>The person you are now the person you were when

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:10.719
<v Speaker 1>you die. It really gets problematic when you look at it.

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 1>It gets problematic even when you look at it in

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:17.440
<v Speaker 1>terms of of crime and punishment here in the real world,

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 1>like how what happens when you judge somebody for a

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 1>crime they committed uh ten years ago? Is this the

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 1>same person that committed that crime? I was thinking about

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>this the other day. I thought, you know, so much

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 1>of life is about rutinization, about habits and about how

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, you do wake up and you do you

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 1>feel maybe a little bit different from the person you

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 1>were the day before. And the things that keep us

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the person that we are, or those uh cages of

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 1>habit that we create around us, those cues that, oh, yeah,

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 1>my name is Julie, I live in this house. These

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 1>are the things that surround me. These are the associations

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 1>that I have in this world. If all of those

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 1>cues fell away, would you be that same person? So

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 1>so again, metaphoric interpretation of reincarnation is very much the

0:15:02.400 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 1>idea that the person I am now is reincarnating into

0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 1>the person I'm going to be a second from now,

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 1>and a second from from there, and and on and

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 1>on through the course of your life. Let's take a

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 1>quick break, and when we get back, where we're going

0:15:15.720 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 1>to talk about a little bit more about ancestral reincarnation

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 1>is something called the persistence of personality. Reppy, all right,

0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 1>we're back, and indeed this is gonna be the segment

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 1>of the episode where we get into a little more

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 1>of the skeptical views of reincarnation and indeed what happens

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 1>when science gets involved and science is involved. In fact,

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 1>in two thou twelve, a five million dollar grant was

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 1>awarded to you see, a University of California Riverside to

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 1>study immortality, including reincarnation and resurrection by the John Templeton Foundation.

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 1>So that's really interesting and just a side note one

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 1>of the things that they want to try to figure

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 1>out our near death experiences because culturally, say, in the

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 1>United States, it's very different from Japan because in the

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>United States we have the little trope of you see

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 1>a light at the end of the tunnel, whereas in

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Japan it's that people are seen tending a garden, huh,

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 1>which plays into this idea of well, how much of

0:16:26.000 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 1>it is just this mental construct that we play into.

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Is there any sort of way that we can get

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 1>to it scientifically and figure out if there's a basis

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 1>to reincarnation. Yeah, because that that brings to mind episodes

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 1>we've done about alien encounters and abduction experiences and ghosts,

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 1>ghost encounters and any kind of paranormal experience one might

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 1>have the the at the core of it there might

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 1>be something similar, but a lot of it seems to

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 1>be based on the cultural script you're bringing into the experience.

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 1>So you're experiencing sleep paralysis of very real condition. But then,

0:17:03.600 --> 0:17:05.879
<v Speaker 1>what kind of myth do you lay on top of,

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:07.359
<v Speaker 1>what kind of religion do you lay on top of,

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:10.640
<v Speaker 1>what kind of uh, you know, cultural sci fi reference

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:13.640
<v Speaker 1>do you lay on top of it? To interpret the

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the this other worldly experience. Right, you're you're sleeping, you're

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:19.640
<v Speaker 1>in a dream, you're paralyzed, and you're starting to wake

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:22.359
<v Speaker 1>and your your brain is confused about what state to

0:17:22.400 --> 0:17:25.719
<v Speaker 1>be in. Maybe there's some sort of green light emanating

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:29.400
<v Speaker 1>from the hallway, you know, that becomes interpreted into, as

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 1>you say, the cultural script that's put before us. Yeah,

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 1>and so that's very much a part of the scientific

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 1>analysis of reincarnation as well. Now, when we talk about

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 1>studying reincarnation, obviously there's very little that science can do

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 1>to study reincarnation. Reincarnation largely exists as an idea outside

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 1>of the observable universe, outside of of science. It's uh,

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 1>it's like trying to scientifically prove the existence of God.

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 1>It can't be done. It's not a provable thing. It's

0:18:02.119 --> 0:18:05.960
<v Speaker 1>a matter of faith and worldview and all that. Uh So,

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:08.480
<v Speaker 1>it's the same thing with reincarnation. The studies that we

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 1>look at tend to be based in interviews with children

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 1>with their parents, rigorous note taking, and then trying to

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:20.720
<v Speaker 1>to compare different experiences in different accounts of of not

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 1>only this life but the life before. Yeah. Dr Ian Stevenson,

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:28.280
<v Speaker 1>an academic psychiatrist, led the study of reincarnation in the

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>US until his death in two thousand and seven, and

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:34.240
<v Speaker 1>he founded the Division of Personality Studies under the University

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 1>of Virginia's Department of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences. He conducted

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 1>thousands of interviews. As you say, he took rigorous notes, um,

0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:46.359
<v Speaker 1>and his studies focused really on young children, usually between

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the ages of two and five, who had inexplicable phobias

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:53.879
<v Speaker 1>or detailed memories about a previous life as reported by

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the parent. Yeah, and these cases generally, generally they broke

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:01.439
<v Speaker 1>down about like this, like, here's the kid again, some

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:04.399
<v Speaker 1>sort of weird phobia. They're afraid of busses or something,

0:19:04.440 --> 0:19:07.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, or they're suddenly talking about Ron all the time. Well,

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:10.200
<v Speaker 1>who's wrong. There's no Ron in the immediate family. Why

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 1>is Ron such a character in this three year old's life.

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 1>And then you start to you start comparing notes, and

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:19.479
<v Speaker 1>you find out, oh, well, there's a family in the

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:23.359
<v Speaker 1>next town and uh and and this uh, this woman

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:26.600
<v Speaker 1>died and her husband's name was Ron. Or here's this uh,

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 1>this case just like a few streets over where somebody

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 1>was hit by a car. And so maybe that explains

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:35.879
<v Speaker 1>the phobia. It's the idea that the soul has moved

0:19:35.880 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 1>on from one body to another, and in doing so,

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 1>has brought over at least some aspect of that previous

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:46.919
<v Speaker 1>personality enough to carry over a severe phobia or a

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 1>severe or a or a significant attachment to another person.

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:52.879
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're doing our next podcast episode on the

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 1>illusion of continuity. And I just realized the overlap here,

0:19:56.400 --> 0:20:00.480
<v Speaker 1>because if you have all of these details, and we

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:04.960
<v Speaker 1>already know that our brains are pattern recognition machines, it

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 1>can't help but sees on these details and say, oh, yeah,

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 1>four or five kilometers away, there was a girl who

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:13.960
<v Speaker 1>died in a rice patty when she was eight years old,

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:17.800
<v Speaker 1>And perhaps it's that girl's soul reincarnated into this other

0:20:17.920 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 1>little girl who's having these very serious phobias of water

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 1>and drowning. Yeah, Stevenson studied about different cases over the

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 1>course about four decades. He published several books and articles

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:34.280
<v Speaker 1>about it. Really, it's a it's an intimidating amount of

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 1>information that he put together and and it's and it's

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:39.240
<v Speaker 1>all all of it is coming down to individual cases

0:20:39.240 --> 0:20:40.879
<v Speaker 1>where they went out and analyzed that, they talked to

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the parents, they talked to the child, and uh. At

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the end of it, though, you ultimately have this this huge,

0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 1>massive information that science largely rejects because again it's it's

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 1>just based in it's it's more like a police case

0:20:56.560 --> 0:20:59.359
<v Speaker 1>really than anything. It's more about about the just asking

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 1>people when pairing accounts of the situation, rather than than

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:07.119
<v Speaker 1>any kind of actual scientific investigation. And we'll get to

0:21:07.240 --> 0:21:09.679
<v Speaker 1>why that process has flawed in a moment. But I

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 1>wanted to mention someone named Jim Techer. He is a

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:16.159
<v Speaker 1>professor of psychiatry and neurobehavioral sciences at the University of

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Virginia who really picked up where Stevenson left off and

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:22.920
<v Speaker 1>he and I believe this was an interview with PDS.

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 1>He he said this about reincarnation. He said, some leading

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:29.880
<v Speaker 1>scientists in the past, like Max Plank, who's the father

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 1>quantum theory, said that he viewed consciousness as fundamental and

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 1>that matter was derived from it. So in that case,

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:40.200
<v Speaker 1>it would mean that consciousness would not necessarily be dependent

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:43.640
<v Speaker 1>on a physical brain in order to survive, and could

0:21:43.680 --> 0:21:47.119
<v Speaker 1>continue after the physical brain and after the body dies.

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:50.680
<v Speaker 1>In these cases it seems, at least on the face

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 1>of it, that a consciousness has then become attached to

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 1>a new brain and has shown up as past life memories.

0:21:56.920 --> 0:21:59.160
<v Speaker 1>And then he goes on to say, I think these

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:02.440
<v Speaker 1>cases can tr ribute to the body of evidence that consciousness,

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:05.480
<v Speaker 1>at least in some circumstances, can survive the death of

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the body, that life after death isn't necessarily just a

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:11.239
<v Speaker 1>fantasy or something to be considered on faith, but can

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:14.880
<v Speaker 1>be approached in an analytical way, and the idea can

0:22:14.920 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 1>be judged on its own merits. That's pretty that's a

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:20.479
<v Speaker 1>heavy statement. That is that it goes right into the

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 1>mind body problem that we discussed in some past episodes.

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:26.680
<v Speaker 1>The idea that we have this physical brain and then

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 1>we have this mind, and when we compare the two,

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:33.120
<v Speaker 1>they don't seem to match up, uh, you know, one

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 1>to one. So we come into to all these various theories,

0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 1>these philosophical models for what the relationship is. Is the

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 1>is the mind merely the shadow cast by the brain,

0:22:44.640 --> 0:22:48.639
<v Speaker 1>or does the does the mind exist independently of the brain.

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:52.399
<v Speaker 1>And that's the case that Tucker is making here, the

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:56.040
<v Speaker 1>idea that that the mind doesn't need a physical brain

0:22:56.080 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 1>in order to exist. But perhaps uh is like this

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:04.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of psychic energy ghost that merely haunts and inhabits

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 1>physical brains, like the physical brain is a little hotel

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 1>room that nature has prepared for this visiting neugget of

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:15.639
<v Speaker 1>soul energy, if you will. The problem, of course, is

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 1>just runs counter to Acam's razer. Right. This is not

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the simplest explanation, Right, You're building an increasingly elaborate explanation

0:23:23.640 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 1>for the metaphysics of of an immortal soul. And it's fascinating,

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:30.159
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's it's very cool. I I really like

0:23:30.240 --> 0:23:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the idea. But but yeah, you're creating something that's more

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:37.840
<v Speaker 1>complex than the than the immediate answer. And again, it's

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:41.120
<v Speaker 1>nothing you can prove, it's nothing that can be scientifically studied.

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 1>It is ultimately Tucker is having to accept this as

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:48.040
<v Speaker 1>an article of personal faith and just like any other

0:23:48.160 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 1>model that one might assume of what happens to an

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:54.560
<v Speaker 1>immortal soul after death or before it. Yeah, I mean

0:23:54.800 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and it's just not showing up.

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:01.760
<v Speaker 1>There's compelling the interesting evidence. I guess if you can

0:24:01.800 --> 0:24:06.119
<v Speaker 1>call that with you know, those interviews. Um, but I

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:10.199
<v Speaker 1>believe that those interviews, only twenty of them have written

0:24:10.240 --> 0:24:13.639
<v Speaker 1>accounts by the parents immediately afterwards. Now what's the problem

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 1>with that, Because because when you have only twenty cases

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:21.920
<v Speaker 1>where the parents wrote the record before the match was made,

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 1>that means you only have twenty cases where the where

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the information was not yet corrupted by the match. And

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:32.680
<v Speaker 1>he discussed right to the fouible nature of memory, uh

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 1>and our our tendency to to rewrite and reinterpret our

0:24:36.359 --> 0:24:39.960
<v Speaker 1>memories in light of new evidence. UM. For instance, UH,

0:24:40.000 --> 0:24:43.800
<v Speaker 1>that the child is talking about an imaginary friend named Ron. Um.

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:48.520
<v Speaker 1>If if you are telling the investigator about Ron after

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:52.320
<v Speaker 1>you found out about the uh, the Ron whose wife

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 1>died in a neighboring city, then that potentially colors the

0:24:56.520 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 1>story that you give the the interrogator not to mention

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:03.159
<v Speaker 1>that child might have been watching parks and rec and

0:25:03.240 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 1>then watching Ron, I do keep imagining Ron Swanson and

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 1>all I do to the mustache hero of parks and

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 1>rec Now, these ideas were explored a little bit more

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:14.879
<v Speaker 1>in Mary Rich's Spook. She has a chapter on this,

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:18.480
<v Speaker 1>I believe the chapter is called You Again, and she

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 1>goes to India, where, um, these sort of narratives, these

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:27.359
<v Speaker 1>reincarnation narratives are somewhat common, I mean, at least uh

0:25:27.800 --> 0:25:31.959
<v Speaker 1>in comparison to the United States. And she says that

0:25:32.040 --> 0:25:35.199
<v Speaker 1>by the time the researcher arrives on the scene, the

0:25:35.320 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 1>family has usually found a likely candidate for the child's

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:42.720
<v Speaker 1>former incarnation. Most Indian villagers accept reincarnation is fact, and

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 1>word of a child remembering a past like travels quickly

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 1>to neighboring villages. Yeah. So, on one hand, you have

0:25:49.600 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the pre existing cultural script for what is happening and

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:56.640
<v Speaker 1>why the child is talking about Ron. And then by

0:25:56.640 --> 0:26:00.159
<v Speaker 1>the time the investigator gets there, they've already begun to uh,

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 1>to piece together the story to form their own answer

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:06.040
<v Speaker 1>of what's happening and UH and and where this particular

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:08.879
<v Speaker 1>soul has come from and UH, and that's just gonna

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:12.560
<v Speaker 1>color everything that they pass on to to the to

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:15.399
<v Speaker 1>the interrogator. Yeah, and even if it was written down,

0:26:15.440 --> 0:26:17.520
<v Speaker 1>we know that memory is fallible, and I will tell

0:26:17.520 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 1>you just as completely anecdotal. But you know, I write

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:23.040
<v Speaker 1>down a lot of things that my daughter says, and

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:25.680
<v Speaker 1>even right that split second after she says that, I

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 1>go and I grab a pen. I will write it

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 1>down and then I will read it back to her

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:30.879
<v Speaker 1>and say did you say this? And she'll say, no,

0:26:31.040 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 1>I said this because I have inadvertently rearranged from the

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 1>words you know, or in it. And when you once

0:26:38.119 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 1>you do that, you know that you have changed the

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:43.520
<v Speaker 1>context of a sentence. So that's in a split second.

0:26:43.560 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Can you imagine trying to get that trickle of babble

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:49.239
<v Speaker 1>that comes out of toddler's and makes sense of it,

0:26:49.320 --> 0:26:52.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, five minutes after the fact. Yeah, Like, uh,

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:55.480
<v Speaker 1>my son will suddenly start off singing this little song

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and he's kind of going a mingo, mingo, mingo, But

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:02.800
<v Speaker 1>we eventually started interpreting it is mango mango, and now

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:06.680
<v Speaker 1>it's the mango mango song. Uh, which is all pointless,

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 1>but again where you just instantly start forming, taking what

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:12.840
<v Speaker 1>they've given you and forming it into something that makes

0:27:12.840 --> 0:27:18.320
<v Speaker 1>a little more narrative sense and as Dr Kiri S. Robert,

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:21.680
<v Speaker 1>that's the director of International Center for Survival and Reincarnation

0:27:21.720 --> 0:27:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Researches that Mary Roach spoke with in in her research

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 1>for Spook, that the parents will latch onto almost anything,

0:27:31.320 --> 0:27:34.600
<v Speaker 1>like any little little bit. Again, we we we crave

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:38.160
<v Speaker 1>synchronicity in life. We look for our pattern recognizing brains,

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 1>look for those little uh you know, one or two

0:27:41.000 --> 0:27:43.600
<v Speaker 1>uh bits of light that match up, not all the

0:27:43.600 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 1>other ones that are out of place. So, you know,

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the mention of the name ron, the mention of fear

0:27:48.320 --> 0:27:51.200
<v Speaker 1>of automobiles. Whatever, they'll take that, they'll run with it.

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:55.040
<v Speaker 1>They'll shape that without even really having without having any

0:27:55.119 --> 0:28:00.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of mischief in mind. Uh, They'll they'll form the uh,

0:28:00.880 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 1>they'll form a story that fits everything. They'll they'll edit

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 1>it into a shape that that works with reincarnation. Which

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:11.919
<v Speaker 1>makes sense again if culturally this is a part of

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:16.440
<v Speaker 1>the fabric. And if your kid is is reincarnated, does

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:19.560
<v Speaker 1>that make your child special? You know? Is this this

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:22.200
<v Speaker 1>something that in a family that feels very special. Oh,

0:28:22.200 --> 0:28:25.800
<v Speaker 1>my child is reincarnated, he or she is an old soul. Yeah,

0:28:26.160 --> 0:28:29.520
<v Speaker 1>does that give you a higher position among your neighbors. Well,

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, as apparent, one of the things you inevitably

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 1>fear and think about is what happens if my child dies? Right,

0:28:36.040 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 1>and you're by by strengthening their bond to a a

0:28:40.840 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 1>life before this one, you're of course also strengthening the

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 1>existence of a life beyond this one. So you're kind

0:28:47.760 --> 0:28:51.560
<v Speaker 1>of answering one question with another one. You know. You know,

0:28:51.800 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of interesting because that terror management system that

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:59.720
<v Speaker 1>we talked about in the immortality problem, really I think

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 1>writes that those ages between two and five, at least

0:29:03.280 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 1>it did for me as a parent, where you get

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:09.480
<v Speaker 1>to age two with your child and you've gotten past that.

0:29:09.600 --> 0:29:11.680
<v Speaker 1>I have a baby, and I'm kind of you've got

0:29:11.680 --> 0:29:14.440
<v Speaker 1>sleep deprivation, but now I have a toddler, and it

0:29:14.480 --> 0:29:16.360
<v Speaker 1>almost feels like you have to create an even bigger

0:29:16.480 --> 0:29:20.000
<v Speaker 1>swaddle around your your child to protect him or her.

0:29:20.440 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 1>And this idea that it's not just getting your child

0:29:22.920 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 1>to age two and aged five and age seven, you're

0:29:25.640 --> 0:29:29.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna be worrying about your child age forty, age eighty,

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:31.560
<v Speaker 1>especially if you're I don't know, a hundred and twenty

0:29:31.560 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 1>at that point um for the rest of your life.

0:29:34.600 --> 0:29:39.080
<v Speaker 1>So I wonder if psychologically it's fertile ground those ages

0:29:39.120 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 1>two to five to ascribe the sort of reincarnation narrative

0:29:43.600 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 1>to a child in that culture. Yeah. And the the

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 1>other big thing too, is, of course that you know

0:29:49.040 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I've already alluded to this, but young children age two

0:29:51.880 --> 0:29:54.720
<v Speaker 1>to five here in the in the in the in

0:29:54.720 --> 0:29:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the West, tend to have a proclivity for imaginary friends.

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:00.560
<v Speaker 1>We did a whole episode on imaginary ends in the past,

0:30:00.560 --> 0:30:02.840
<v Speaker 1>and I'll try and push that back up back out

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:07.280
<v Speaker 1>on social media and on the website when this episode publishes.

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:13.800
<v Speaker 1>But kids are already bringing in unreal personalities into their

0:30:13.840 --> 0:30:16.720
<v Speaker 1>imaginative play. They're bringing in ron or they're bringing in

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Uh didn't you said that your daughter had an image?

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:23.920
<v Speaker 1>I stopped counting after eight. But she has a couple now,

0:30:24.040 --> 0:30:27.600
<v Speaker 1>twins that terrorize the house, um that show up, and

0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:30.400
<v Speaker 1>then one that she dropped about six months ago, and

0:30:30.440 --> 0:30:32.720
<v Speaker 1>her name was Delta, and she could see her in

0:30:32.760 --> 0:30:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the mirror. And Delta lived in an abandoned house and

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:39.400
<v Speaker 1>on our street, and so that of course would kind

0:30:39.400 --> 0:30:41.440
<v Speaker 1>of freak me out sometimes. But then I realized that

0:30:41.560 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 1>our faucet is a Delta faucet um, and that was

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the mirror that she was looking in. You know, she

0:30:48.680 --> 0:30:50.200
<v Speaker 1>was looking at the faucet was she was looking at

0:30:50.200 --> 0:30:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the mirror. So anyway, again you can it's very easy

0:30:53.800 --> 0:30:55.400
<v Speaker 1>for us to start to throw some of the stuff

0:30:55.440 --> 0:30:59.160
<v Speaker 1>together and create these narratives. Yeah, and as Dr Rowitt

0:30:59.200 --> 0:31:02.280
<v Speaker 1>points out, in any roaches spook uh in the West

0:31:02.640 --> 0:31:05.360
<v Speaker 1>were likely to just look at these cases, to hear

0:31:05.360 --> 0:31:08.240
<v Speaker 1>about Ron or delta and and just see it for

0:31:08.320 --> 0:31:11.160
<v Speaker 1>what it is, right to say, oh, it's just imaginary

0:31:11.200 --> 0:31:14.320
<v Speaker 1>friend and dismiss it. But in the East, where there

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:18.120
<v Speaker 1>is especially in India, where there's this cultural script of reincarnation,

0:31:18.800 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 1>parents are more likely to not only say, hey, that's reincarnation, clearly,

0:31:23.040 --> 0:31:25.000
<v Speaker 1>that's a sign of a past life. They're likely to

0:31:25.160 --> 0:31:29.560
<v Speaker 1>encourage it to to nurture the child's story into something

0:31:29.640 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 1>that that fits the reincarnation script even more, to say, oh,

0:31:34.360 --> 0:31:37.400
<v Speaker 1>did you say Ron or do you mean Wren, because

0:31:37.400 --> 0:31:40.680
<v Speaker 1>we know a wren died, a wren had a wife

0:31:40.720 --> 0:31:43.000
<v Speaker 1>die in then the neighboring city or what have you.

0:31:43.000 --> 0:31:44.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, they'll they'll begin to mold it, begin to

0:31:45.000 --> 0:31:47.520
<v Speaker 1>edit it again into something that fits the story. Mingo

0:31:47.600 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 1>mingo becomes mango mango because they have mango mango, and

0:31:52.280 --> 0:31:55.680
<v Speaker 1>then it becomes mango for him, exactly right, the mingo mango.

0:31:56.240 --> 0:31:59.840
<v Speaker 1>So these are just all examples of the problems with

0:32:00.040 --> 0:32:06.080
<v Speaker 1>any kind of quote unquote scientific exploration of reincarnation. There's

0:32:06.120 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 1>nothing about it you can actually prove in terms of

0:32:09.120 --> 0:32:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the transfer of soul energy from one being to another.

0:32:12.480 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 1>And when it comes to these interviews with parents and children,

0:32:15.560 --> 0:32:20.040
<v Speaker 1>they're they're they're just flawed at several different levels. Yeah,

0:32:20.120 --> 0:32:25.280
<v Speaker 1>information gathering, the perception of that information. UM. I wanted

0:32:25.280 --> 0:32:30.960
<v Speaker 1>to go back real quickly to molecular reincarnation because Enrico Uvo,

0:32:31.080 --> 0:32:33.240
<v Speaker 1>who was writing for Science to point oh, has a

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:36.280
<v Speaker 1>really interesting bit to say about it, just to kind

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:38.240
<v Speaker 1>of close out some of our thoughts on this. He says,

0:32:38.720 --> 0:32:41.040
<v Speaker 1>we sit to eat molecules that were once part of

0:32:41.040 --> 0:32:44.320
<v Speaker 1>fish and plants. We become the reincarnation of transient beings.

0:32:44.800 --> 0:32:48.120
<v Speaker 1>When we drink ions and uncharged atoms, we borrow them

0:32:48.120 --> 0:32:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and enrich them with nitrogenous compounds. Rivers then flow in

0:32:52.040 --> 0:32:54.800
<v Speaker 1>ocean's ebb with parts of ourselves that will soon become

0:32:54.920 --> 0:33:00.000
<v Speaker 1>parts of others. As thinking animals are molecules orchestrate into

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 1>neurons and neurotransmitters. Strongly interwoven assemblies of neurons known as ideas,

0:33:05.680 --> 0:33:09.560
<v Speaker 1>occasionally emerge. The best of these reincarnate themselves in the

0:33:09.600 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 1>minds of others, and like the molecules that make them possible,

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:18.440
<v Speaker 1>they outlive the temporary shelters of individuals. Death is simply

0:33:18.560 --> 0:33:22.360
<v Speaker 1>the final and largest repayment of a molecular debt, but

0:33:22.440 --> 0:33:25.000
<v Speaker 1>a fair amount of caring and weaving can be done

0:33:25.400 --> 0:33:29.440
<v Speaker 1>before then. Yeah, there you go. Or you know, another

0:33:29.440 --> 0:33:31.480
<v Speaker 1>way to put it is the energy cannot be created

0:33:31.560 --> 0:33:34.880
<v Speaker 1>or destroyed, and mass, uh, you and me included are

0:33:34.920 --> 0:33:39.880
<v Speaker 1>just energy and energy transposed into matter, so on, you know,

0:33:39.960 --> 0:33:43.600
<v Speaker 1>on varying levels. Reincarnation makes a lot of sense and

0:33:43.920 --> 0:33:47.760
<v Speaker 1>and feels very solid and and is something that appeals

0:33:47.760 --> 0:33:49.280
<v Speaker 1>to us because we see these cycles in the world

0:33:49.280 --> 0:33:52.600
<v Speaker 1>around us. But when you shine the light of scientific

0:33:52.640 --> 0:33:56.760
<v Speaker 1>inquiry on it, most of of of the structure doesn't

0:33:56.800 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 1>show up, and what does show up is highly suspect.

0:34:00.440 --> 0:34:05.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's a homage to how incredibly artistic

0:34:05.360 --> 0:34:08.359
<v Speaker 1>our brains are and what great storytellers we are, and

0:34:08.400 --> 0:34:12.319
<v Speaker 1>how we survive in this world which is so complex

0:34:12.320 --> 0:34:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and through so many things at us um that we

0:34:15.120 --> 0:34:18.280
<v Speaker 1>can weave these sort of narratives together which are actually

0:34:18.320 --> 0:34:21.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of lovely and give us a lot of solace. Yeah. Yeah,

0:34:21.120 --> 0:34:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I think reincarnation is is a beautiful idea, and I

0:34:24.120 --> 0:34:26.160
<v Speaker 1>do want to stress even though we're saying, you know,

0:34:26.160 --> 0:34:28.960
<v Speaker 1>when when you shine science on it, mostly nothing shows up.

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:31.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't want anyone to take that the wrong way

0:34:31.760 --> 0:34:34.920
<v Speaker 1>because I think an idea like reincarnation, like like various

0:34:35.200 --> 0:34:38.640
<v Speaker 1>metaphysical ideas about you know, what happens to the soul

0:34:38.719 --> 0:34:42.680
<v Speaker 1>after death, you don't need science to prove that to you.

0:34:42.760 --> 0:34:45.200
<v Speaker 1>That that should be a matter, in my opinion, that

0:34:45.200 --> 0:34:47.960
<v Speaker 1>should be a matter uh, completely outside of science. Let's

0:34:47.960 --> 0:34:50.480
<v Speaker 1>science prove the things that science can prove. Let science

0:34:50.520 --> 0:34:53.840
<v Speaker 1>be your guide for the observable universe in the natural world,

0:34:54.200 --> 0:34:56.520
<v Speaker 1>and in terms of anything that exists outside of that

0:34:56.640 --> 0:35:00.080
<v Speaker 1>natural world for you, anything else in that worldview U

0:35:00.160 --> 0:35:05.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, let that sort of float free. Indeed, all right, well,

0:35:05.800 --> 0:35:08.239
<v Speaker 1>speaking of floating, if you want to float us any

0:35:08.320 --> 0:35:12.280
<v Speaker 1>ideas or comments about this podcast or any other podcasts

0:35:12.280 --> 0:35:14.880
<v Speaker 1>that we've done or podcast that we may do in

0:35:14.920 --> 0:35:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the future. You can find us at all the usual places.

0:35:17.760 --> 0:35:19.919
<v Speaker 1>Our mothership is Stuff to Blow your Mind dot com.

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:22.879
<v Speaker 1>That's where you will find all the podcast episodes, all

0:35:22.920 --> 0:35:25.760
<v Speaker 1>the videos, all the blog costs, as well as links

0:35:25.800 --> 0:35:30.200
<v Speaker 1>to our various social media accounts uh Facebook, Twitter, Tumbler,

0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Google Plus, YouTube, SoundCloud. We're in all of those and

0:35:34.160 --> 0:35:35.960
<v Speaker 1>he knows what the future will bring. And if you

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:38.360
<v Speaker 1>want to send us an old fashioned email, well you

0:35:38.400 --> 0:35:40.319
<v Speaker 1>can do that too, that's right. All you have to

0:35:40.360 --> 0:35:42.560
<v Speaker 1>do is address it to Blow the Mind at discovery

0:35:42.680 --> 0:35:49.880
<v Speaker 1>dot com for more on this and thousands of other topics.

0:35:50.000 --> 0:35:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Does it how stuff works dot com