WEBVTT - Short is good

0:00:03.440 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Before Breakfast, a production of I Heart Radio.

0:00:09.480 --> 0:00:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Good Morning, This is Laura. Welcome to the Before Breakfast podcast.

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Today's tip is that short is good in many cases.

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Aiming to make things more compact will in fact make

0:00:25.920 --> 0:00:32.879
<v Speaker 1>them better and make everyone happier too. I spent some

0:00:33.000 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 1>early years of my career writing frequently for publications that

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:40.559
<v Speaker 1>were known for their brevity. I wrote op eds for

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>USA Today, and I wrote tiny, bite sized features for

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Reader's Digest, a publication whose founding purpose was to make

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:54.279
<v Speaker 1>things shorter. For both publications, I was always trying to

0:00:54.320 --> 0:00:58.640
<v Speaker 1>figure out how to say things in fewer words. Yes,

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 1>sometimes some nuance was lost, but other times a concept

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 1>was honed down to its essence or an argument made stronger.

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 1>When you think about the shortest way to make your point,

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 1>you consider every word. Some turn out to be needless,

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 1>so best to omit them. It's a lesson I've taken

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>with me since one reason this podcast is so short.

0:01:28.080 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 1>If I can share a tip in a few minutes,

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 1>why not do so. It's also a lesson I think

0:01:34.319 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>is helpful for other situations. For instance, if you are

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>planning a ceremony, how can you accomplish the ceremony's goal

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 1>without losing people's goodwill. During the pandemic, my church began

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 1>doing outdoor family services that were over in about twenty

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 1>five minutes versus an hour for regular church. I have

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 1>to say I like the concept, and my kids were

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>much better behaved and involved. Graduations likewise can seem interminable.

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 1>We need to have pity on people sitting out in

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 1>broiling robes in the hot sun. When I have given

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 1>commencement speeches, I have made a point of being brief.

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 1>In general, brief speeches forced the speaker to figure out

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the most important message, and that is a good thing.

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Witnessed the popularity of TED talks. They wouldn't be nearly

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:38.400
<v Speaker 1>as popular if they were an hour long, but twelve

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:44.360
<v Speaker 1>to eighteen minutes. That is an idea worth sharing long

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:46.800
<v Speaker 1>time before breakfast listeners know that I am a big

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 1>fan of shorter meetings. I like to ask people for

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:55.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty minutes on the phone. Most calendar programs make it

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 1>hard to block for anything other than thirty minutes or

0:02:57.560 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>sixty minutes, So if you ask for twenty in the

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>meeting runs over or probably okay. The space is most

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:07.840
<v Speaker 1>likely there, but the shorter time frame forces us to

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:11.519
<v Speaker 1>get to the point. People can always use the extra

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 1>minutes for something else. Now I know that for some

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 1>things in this world, length is part of the appeal.

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:25.640
<v Speaker 1>I am reading War and Peace this year, all pages

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>of it, and that epic scope would be hard to

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:33.360
<v Speaker 1>pull off in a shorter work. That said, Tolstoy made

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 1>his chapters, all three hundred sixty, some of them short.

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Their short length makes them feel doable and makes this

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 1>work approachable in a way that eighty page chapters inside

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 1>a four page book just wouldn't. Also, most of us

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 1>aren't Tolstoy. If you are writing a white paper, right

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 1>a draft and then see if you can cut it.

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Most likely you can, and it will be better as

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 1>a result. If you are hosting a meeting, see if

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>you can aim for a shorter time frame forty five

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:18.040
<v Speaker 1>minutes instead of an hour, twenty minutes instead of thirty.

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:23.159
<v Speaker 1>Even social gatherings can be better when brief. I attended

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a lovely virtual toast for someone recently. The planners knew

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>that the guest of honor was on a tight schedule.

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 1>We were in and out in forty five minutes. It

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:37.479
<v Speaker 1>was great. I'm not sure quite how we will be

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 1>able to replicate that sort of brevity with in person socializing,

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:45.920
<v Speaker 1>but in many cases it would be wise. Kid birthday

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:49.800
<v Speaker 1>parties tend to go off the rails after ninety minutes. Honestly,

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>most happy hours due too. So Today, as you are

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 1>thinking about any upcoming gatherings or any content you might

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 1>be producing, think about whether you could make them shorter.

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Consider whether shorter would be better. Maybe not, but often

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the answer turns out to be yes. In the meantime,

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:21.480
<v Speaker 1>this is Laura. Thanks for listening, and here's to making

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the most of our time. Hey everybody, I'd love to

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:34.039
<v Speaker 1>hear from you. You can send me your tips, your questions,

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:37.920
<v Speaker 1>or anything else. Just connect with me on Twitter, Facebook,

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 1>and Instagram at Before Breakfast Pod. That's b E the

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:47.160
<v Speaker 1>number four, then breakfast p o D. You can also

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 1>shoot me an email at Before Breakfast podcast at i

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>heeart media dot com. That Before Breakfast is spelled out

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 1>with all the letters. Thanks so much, I look forward

0:05:56.440 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 1>to staying in touch. Before Breakfast is a production of

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio. For more podcasts from I heart Radio,

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 1>visit the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your favorite shows,