1 00:00:02,480 --> 00:00:06,800 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. 2 00:00:09,760 --> 00:00:13,560 Speaker 2: This is the Bloomberg Daybreak Asia podcast. I'm Brian Curtis 3 00:00:13,560 --> 00:00:16,279 Speaker 2: along with Doug Krisner. Join us each day for the 4 00:00:16,320 --> 00:00:19,720 Speaker 2: stories making news and moving markets in the Asia Pacific. 5 00:00:19,920 --> 00:00:22,360 Speaker 2: You can subscribe to the show anywhere you get your 6 00:00:22,360 --> 00:00:26,280 Speaker 2: podcasts and always on Bloomberg Radio, the Bloomberg Terminal, and 7 00:00:26,360 --> 00:00:30,480 Speaker 2: the Bloomberg Business app. Showing us now on the program, 8 00:00:30,600 --> 00:00:35,840 Speaker 2: Frank Benzimra, head of Asia Equity Strategy at Associate General. Frank, 9 00:00:36,120 --> 00:00:38,239 Speaker 2: thanks very much for joining us. I just wanted to 10 00:00:38,440 --> 00:00:41,280 Speaker 2: ask you about Jackson Holetz. Part of the big week, 11 00:00:41,320 --> 00:00:44,839 Speaker 2: We've got a lot going on. We'll have continued trading 12 00:00:44,920 --> 00:00:47,919 Speaker 2: after the big moves we've seen, both to the downside 13 00:00:47,960 --> 00:00:50,919 Speaker 2: and the upside. Jerome Powell will be speaking about the 14 00:00:51,560 --> 00:00:55,480 Speaker 2: economic outlooks, so that'll be way up there on people's list. 15 00:00:55,480 --> 00:00:58,080 Speaker 2: The Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey will also be 16 00:00:58,640 --> 00:01:01,120 Speaker 2: making an appearance on Friday in Philip Lane. The chief 17 00:01:01,120 --> 00:01:05,400 Speaker 2: economists at the ECB speaking a day later. Will it 18 00:01:05,440 --> 00:01:09,080 Speaker 2: be kind of a consistent message that we hear. Are 19 00:01:09,120 --> 00:01:11,400 Speaker 2: you expecting a lot of divergent talk? 20 00:01:12,640 --> 00:01:15,840 Speaker 3: Well, I think probably the most important is going to 21 00:01:15,880 --> 00:01:19,640 Speaker 3: be to be Jackson Hall after the recent volatilities that 22 00:01:19,720 --> 00:01:21,640 Speaker 3: we had in the in the market. The thing is 23 00:01:21,640 --> 00:01:24,600 Speaker 3: after we are expecting to see more of the long 24 00:01:24,680 --> 00:01:27,560 Speaker 3: term issue and being being discussed. I think the theme 25 00:01:27,600 --> 00:01:31,640 Speaker 3: is a transmission of monetary policy and how effective it is. 26 00:01:31,680 --> 00:01:34,119 Speaker 3: But of course we are going to look for some 27 00:01:34,200 --> 00:01:36,800 Speaker 3: clue on the on the short term, so I think 28 00:01:36,840 --> 00:01:40,039 Speaker 3: that's that's going to be to be very very important. 29 00:01:40,560 --> 00:01:45,520 Speaker 3: What the data we've seen recently are more arguing for 30 00:01:45,760 --> 00:01:52,280 Speaker 3: a twenty five basics cut in in September, but that's 31 00:01:52,400 --> 00:01:55,240 Speaker 3: obviously something that we need to that we need to follow. 32 00:01:56,000 --> 00:01:59,280 Speaker 2: And how do Asian markets look positioned here at the moment. 33 00:02:00,200 --> 00:02:04,600 Speaker 3: Well, you have really three types of market and you 34 00:02:04,640 --> 00:02:08,520 Speaker 3: have Japan, China and the rest of Asia and Japanese 35 00:02:08,639 --> 00:02:11,400 Speaker 3: super interesting and it has rebounded by more than twenty 36 00:02:11,400 --> 00:02:16,639 Speaker 3: percent since in the law of the market with financials 37 00:02:16,760 --> 00:02:19,799 Speaker 3: more than twenty five twenty five percent. What is interesting 38 00:02:19,880 --> 00:02:24,680 Speaker 3: is that we are seeing the net position on the 39 00:02:24,720 --> 00:02:27,800 Speaker 3: on the end. Now the market is becoming net longer, 40 00:02:28,200 --> 00:02:30,840 Speaker 3: but still we are seeing some download pressure on the end. 41 00:02:30,880 --> 00:02:34,519 Speaker 3: So it means that some carriage trade are elsewhere, and 42 00:02:35,960 --> 00:02:39,200 Speaker 3: we think that it makes a lot of sense to 43 00:02:39,280 --> 00:02:44,320 Speaker 3: go more domestic on that. On that market, China is 44 00:02:44,680 --> 00:02:47,520 Speaker 3: very much in the earning season at the moment, which 45 00:02:47,560 --> 00:02:53,000 Speaker 3: is not great, not terrible, but not great. And then 46 00:02:53,040 --> 00:02:56,640 Speaker 3: you have the rest of Asia where you have this 47 00:02:58,400 --> 00:03:02,200 Speaker 3: divergence between take on the one hand and the more 48 00:03:02,280 --> 00:03:05,720 Speaker 3: domestic fem and here, as in the case of Japan, 49 00:03:06,320 --> 00:03:09,600 Speaker 3: it's going to be probably a good idea to look 50 00:03:09,639 --> 00:03:12,080 Speaker 3: more at what's happening on the domestic part of the 51 00:03:12,200 --> 00:03:12,799 Speaker 3: of the market. 52 00:03:13,400 --> 00:03:17,120 Speaker 2: Let's focus on China for the moment. China apparently is 53 00:03:17,160 --> 00:03:20,519 Speaker 2: putting private sector policy on the front burner. This is 54 00:03:20,560 --> 00:03:22,880 Speaker 2: what we heard from Premier Lee Chang at the end 55 00:03:22,880 --> 00:03:25,440 Speaker 2: of the week telling the cabinet that more has to 56 00:03:25,520 --> 00:03:28,880 Speaker 2: be done to boost domestic demand. It's just talk. We've 57 00:03:28,880 --> 00:03:30,919 Speaker 2: heard a lot of talk. There's work this. 58 00:03:30,960 --> 00:03:35,040 Speaker 3: Time, yes, that's indeed there has been a lot of 59 00:03:35,120 --> 00:03:38,760 Speaker 3: discussion about that, and again in the in the polit Bureau, 60 00:03:39,320 --> 00:03:46,080 Speaker 3: the latest the latest polit Bureau. I think the only 61 00:03:47,960 --> 00:03:50,600 Speaker 3: element which can be a little bit more comforting when 62 00:03:50,640 --> 00:03:55,120 Speaker 3: it comes to domestic consumption and the domestic economies. We 63 00:03:55,320 --> 00:03:59,240 Speaker 3: start to see some bottoming in the housing, sales and construction, 64 00:04:00,280 --> 00:04:04,600 Speaker 3: but in terms of what the government is going to 65 00:04:04,680 --> 00:04:09,080 Speaker 3: do to boost consumptions, but it really remains to be 66 00:04:09,280 --> 00:04:11,800 Speaker 3: to be seen because what we are seeing is still 67 00:04:12,560 --> 00:04:17,520 Speaker 3: it's the greatest focus is on manufacturing and on and 68 00:04:17,560 --> 00:04:22,320 Speaker 3: on building some advanced manufacturing industry. 69 00:04:22,400 --> 00:04:25,479 Speaker 2: We saw some uneven performance in the earnings of ten 70 00:04:25,560 --> 00:04:28,240 Speaker 2: Cents and Ali Baba. We did close out the week 71 00:04:28,320 --> 00:04:31,479 Speaker 2: pretty strongly for both of those names, but there was 72 00:04:31,520 --> 00:04:36,160 Speaker 2: a little bit of uncertainty about the earnings. In ten 73 00:04:36,240 --> 00:04:39,160 Speaker 2: Cents case, the gaming looked pretty pretty good, but some 74 00:04:39,200 --> 00:04:41,719 Speaker 2: of the other areas of business not so much. And 75 00:04:41,760 --> 00:04:44,800 Speaker 2: Ali Baba is still struggling a little bit with overall sales. 76 00:04:45,240 --> 00:04:47,480 Speaker 2: I don't know if you can talk about individual names, 77 00:04:47,520 --> 00:04:51,160 Speaker 2: but are some of the former star performers in Asia 78 00:04:51,279 --> 00:04:52,719 Speaker 2: about ready to get a turn again. 79 00:04:53,960 --> 00:04:57,480 Speaker 3: Yeah, well, I'm not going to talk about some single names, 80 00:04:57,680 --> 00:05:04,200 Speaker 3: but just just a couple of observation as the earnings 81 00:05:03,960 --> 00:05:07,720 Speaker 3: on China fit Tech a mess. China, for instance, the 82 00:05:07,760 --> 00:05:12,640 Speaker 3: earnings pature has not grown for the last ten years 83 00:05:12,680 --> 00:05:14,960 Speaker 3: and it has even declined over the last over the 84 00:05:15,000 --> 00:05:18,600 Speaker 3: last three years, which means that you have some expectations 85 00:05:18,600 --> 00:05:22,840 Speaker 3: which are not very not very ambitious, so you don't 86 00:05:22,839 --> 00:05:27,279 Speaker 3: have a lot of expectation when the earning season is starting. 87 00:05:27,800 --> 00:05:32,240 Speaker 3: So when we see something which is a little bit 88 00:05:32,240 --> 00:05:35,920 Speaker 3: about this slow expectation, so the market tends to take 89 00:05:35,960 --> 00:05:39,240 Speaker 3: it to take it positively. And when it comes more 90 00:05:39,320 --> 00:05:42,280 Speaker 3: specifically to the to the Internet platform and to the 91 00:05:42,279 --> 00:05:50,080 Speaker 3: big Internet Internet names, it's rather recomforting to see that 92 00:05:51,120 --> 00:05:53,200 Speaker 3: we have some sign of life. And so you were 93 00:05:53,200 --> 00:05:57,520 Speaker 3: mantaining the gaming industry, so in some more consumer oriented 94 00:05:57,600 --> 00:05:59,760 Speaker 3: industry we start to see some turn around and that's 95 00:06:00,400 --> 00:06:02,160 Speaker 3: I think this is something which is in line with 96 00:06:02,279 --> 00:06:05,680 Speaker 3: what we had in the previous quarter and it is 97 00:06:05,800 --> 00:06:07,080 Speaker 3: extending into this quarter. 98 00:06:07,920 --> 00:06:11,560 Speaker 2: Yeah, fighting really strong resistance from at least three fronts. 99 00:06:11,600 --> 00:06:15,560 Speaker 2: I mean, one, you can say policy has been pretty restrictive. Secondly, 100 00:06:15,600 --> 00:06:18,800 Speaker 2: there's massive competition in China now, something we didn't have 101 00:06:18,839 --> 00:06:21,880 Speaker 2: as much of going back a number of years, particularly 102 00:06:22,040 --> 00:06:26,479 Speaker 2: those companies we talked about earlier. And then also you 103 00:06:26,560 --> 00:06:30,919 Speaker 2: have basically a weak economy, so there's a lot of 104 00:06:30,960 --> 00:06:32,600 Speaker 2: marks against them. 105 00:06:33,560 --> 00:06:39,080 Speaker 3: Yes, so we have the big picture is that you 106 00:06:39,400 --> 00:06:46,080 Speaker 3: still have some defleationary pressure on the economy. One thought 107 00:06:46,200 --> 00:06:49,039 Speaker 3: is coming from the housing market, and the other part 108 00:06:49,120 --> 00:06:53,160 Speaker 3: is coming from this very intense competition that you are mentioning, 109 00:06:53,960 --> 00:07:00,720 Speaker 3: with over capacity being the result of it. So they're 110 00:07:01,120 --> 00:07:04,560 Speaker 3: just a couple of things. And to say here, the 111 00:07:04,600 --> 00:07:10,680 Speaker 3: first one is we are seeing export booming and the 112 00:07:10,720 --> 00:07:16,160 Speaker 3: structure of the export is also changing towards emerging economies, 113 00:07:16,680 --> 00:07:22,040 Speaker 3: and this is something that is a factor of support. 114 00:07:22,720 --> 00:07:26,680 Speaker 3: And then as I was mentioning, we start to see 115 00:07:26,760 --> 00:07:31,520 Speaker 3: some very timid sign of bottoming in the economy in 116 00:07:31,760 --> 00:07:37,000 Speaker 3: the housing market. So one question now after the latest 117 00:07:37,080 --> 00:07:39,560 Speaker 3: daya whether we are going to reach the five percent 118 00:07:39,600 --> 00:07:43,000 Speaker 3: target that the government has set for the GDPSS here 119 00:07:43,480 --> 00:07:47,800 Speaker 3: and this is where you could have some expectation of 120 00:07:48,040 --> 00:07:51,200 Speaker 3: further support if we are not reaching it. 121 00:07:51,960 --> 00:07:54,120 Speaker 2: All right, Frank, thanks very much taking out the time 122 00:07:54,160 --> 00:07:58,040 Speaker 2: to be with us. Frank Benzimra, head of Asia Equity Strategy, 123 00:07:58,480 --> 00:08:10,680 Speaker 2: Associated General, I'm Brian Curtis along with Paul Allen, and 124 00:08:10,800 --> 00:08:14,480 Speaker 2: joining us now is Steve Sosnick, chief strategist at Interactive 125 00:08:14,480 --> 00:08:17,520 Speaker 2: Brokers for a look at market. Steve, always great to 126 00:08:17,560 --> 00:08:20,440 Speaker 2: have you on the program just to give our audience 127 00:08:20,600 --> 00:08:23,720 Speaker 2: kind of an overview of how you're feeling about what 128 00:08:23,720 --> 00:08:26,720 Speaker 2: we've seen in markets over the past month. What makes 129 00:08:26,840 --> 00:08:31,640 Speaker 2: more sense to mister Steve Sosnick a Vicset fifty or 130 00:08:31,680 --> 00:08:33,400 Speaker 2: a Vicset fifteen. 131 00:08:34,600 --> 00:08:39,080 Speaker 4: Good morning, Brian, Well, I mean, fifteen is more sensible 132 00:08:39,120 --> 00:08:42,040 Speaker 4: than fifty. But I don't think that's particularly sensible either. 133 00:08:42,760 --> 00:08:44,839 Speaker 4: I think the way that we you know, obviously, the 134 00:08:45,520 --> 00:08:50,120 Speaker 4: fifty print was the result of several the overcrowded trades 135 00:08:50,160 --> 00:08:53,640 Speaker 4: converging at once. The carry trade, the dispersion trade where 136 00:08:53,640 --> 00:08:57,480 Speaker 4: people were shorting index ball and buying individual equity vall, 137 00:08:58,480 --> 00:09:01,120 Speaker 4: along with a few other mishaps, all combined that morning 138 00:09:01,160 --> 00:09:03,199 Speaker 4: to give you the crazy VIX print. But I think 139 00:09:03,240 --> 00:09:06,160 Speaker 4: the fact that we've gone, we flipped from you know, 140 00:09:06,240 --> 00:09:11,000 Speaker 4: get me protection asap to protection who needs protection? There's 141 00:09:11,000 --> 00:09:13,080 Speaker 4: nothing coming in the next thirty days, which is really 142 00:09:13,080 --> 00:09:17,040 Speaker 4: what a fifteen vix is telling you, is not correct either. 143 00:09:17,080 --> 00:09:17,640 Speaker 4: I don't think. 144 00:09:19,040 --> 00:09:21,720 Speaker 5: Yeah, it's interesting, isn't it. We got the yen knocking 145 00:09:21,760 --> 00:09:23,760 Speaker 5: on the door of one forty eight again. The NIKA 146 00:09:23,840 --> 00:09:26,960 Speaker 5: had an amazing week last week. Are we getting set 147 00:09:27,040 --> 00:09:29,640 Speaker 5: up for a sequel of the craziness of a couple 148 00:09:29,679 --> 00:09:30,200 Speaker 5: of weeks ago. 149 00:09:31,280 --> 00:09:35,960 Speaker 4: It's hard to say, Paul, because you know, the size 150 00:09:35,960 --> 00:09:38,320 Speaker 4: of the carry trade is pretty much a guess. You know, 151 00:09:38,360 --> 00:09:40,719 Speaker 4: a JP Morgan said it was seventy five percent on. 152 00:09:40,880 --> 00:09:44,680 Speaker 4: Others have said fifty percent done. It's really quite opaque, 153 00:09:44,760 --> 00:09:48,240 Speaker 4: so we don't know the extent to which the carry 154 00:09:48,240 --> 00:09:50,400 Speaker 4: trade exists, although I do get the sense that people 155 00:09:50,400 --> 00:09:53,200 Speaker 4: were putting it right back on this week, you know, 156 00:09:53,240 --> 00:09:56,360 Speaker 4: at least certainly buying US tech stocks with their bar 157 00:09:56,480 --> 00:09:58,760 Speaker 4: at the end, so you know, yes, we could be 158 00:09:58,760 --> 00:10:01,880 Speaker 4: setting up for a rerun. And especially I think, you know, 159 00:10:01,920 --> 00:10:05,400 Speaker 4: the the idea that nothing can happen in a couple 160 00:10:05,440 --> 00:10:07,880 Speaker 4: of week period where you have Powell giving a very 161 00:10:07,880 --> 00:10:11,680 Speaker 4: consequential speech, a Nvidio earnings next week does seem a 162 00:10:11,720 --> 00:10:15,920 Speaker 4: little bit risk, you know, risk tolerant, maybe more than 163 00:10:15,920 --> 00:10:16,400 Speaker 4: we should be. 164 00:10:17,400 --> 00:10:20,439 Speaker 2: It seems like we've had a lot of these really 165 00:10:20,480 --> 00:10:25,440 Speaker 2: big market shocks over the past decade or so. I 166 00:10:25,480 --> 00:10:28,240 Speaker 2: know that generally speaking, you know, when you look at markets, 167 00:10:28,240 --> 00:10:30,440 Speaker 2: you can say, well, you know, things are not really 168 00:10:30,480 --> 00:10:34,000 Speaker 2: as bad as sometimes markets suggest, and things are not 169 00:10:34,120 --> 00:10:37,120 Speaker 2: as good as they sometimes suggest. But it is a 170 00:10:37,120 --> 00:10:38,840 Speaker 2: little bit curious. I think we had a pretty good 171 00:10:38,880 --> 00:10:43,080 Speaker 2: piece on the terminal over the weekend about about these shocks. 172 00:10:43,559 --> 00:10:45,800 Speaker 2: Do you think it's greater than before, and if so, 173 00:10:45,840 --> 00:10:46,559 Speaker 2: what's causing it? 174 00:10:47,720 --> 00:10:49,599 Speaker 4: I actually don't think right now we're seeing that in 175 00:10:49,679 --> 00:10:52,240 Speaker 4: many great shocks. That's why I think for lack of 176 00:10:52,240 --> 00:10:54,199 Speaker 4: a better order was so shocking, you know, a couple 177 00:10:54,200 --> 00:10:57,360 Speaker 4: of weeks ago, because we really haven't you know, we 178 00:10:57,400 --> 00:10:59,480 Speaker 4: didn't have a two percent down day on the S 179 00:10:59,559 --> 00:11:02,080 Speaker 4: and P five hundred until about a week or two ago. 180 00:11:02,320 --> 00:11:04,440 Speaker 4: You know, it happened. I think the week prior to 181 00:11:04,480 --> 00:11:06,520 Speaker 4: Monday too, you know, it was like three weeks ago. 182 00:11:06,720 --> 00:11:09,120 Speaker 4: But we hadn't had one since December of twenty two, 183 00:11:09,960 --> 00:11:12,559 Speaker 4: so we've gone a long time without any real shocks, 184 00:11:12,840 --> 00:11:15,440 Speaker 4: at least in the stock market. You know. The part 185 00:11:15,480 --> 00:11:17,959 Speaker 4: that's a little interesting to me is the amount of 186 00:11:18,040 --> 00:11:20,880 Speaker 4: volatility that you see in the bond market. Certainly some 187 00:11:20,920 --> 00:11:24,480 Speaker 4: of very big moves, even in two year notes, but 188 00:11:24,559 --> 00:11:28,760 Speaker 4: yet somehow Normally, when you can't price safe assets, you 189 00:11:28,800 --> 00:11:31,920 Speaker 4: shouldn't be able to price risky assets. But right now, people, 190 00:11:32,080 --> 00:11:34,839 Speaker 4: I think it's really just you know, fomo drive in 191 00:11:34,880 --> 00:11:37,000 Speaker 4: the fomo and momentum. If they're going up, people are 192 00:11:37,000 --> 00:11:38,760 Speaker 4: going to buy them, and it doesn't take much to 193 00:11:38,760 --> 00:11:40,800 Speaker 4: get them to go up. And I think that's kind 194 00:11:40,840 --> 00:11:43,600 Speaker 4: of why the blow ups seem bigger than they are, 195 00:11:43,679 --> 00:11:46,000 Speaker 4: because we quite frankly, we haven't had them. We're not 196 00:11:46,160 --> 00:11:47,240 Speaker 4: used to them. 197 00:11:47,920 --> 00:11:51,240 Speaker 5: How about pricing in the Fed's next move, because we've 198 00:11:51,240 --> 00:11:53,839 Speaker 5: got less than one hundred basis points of cuts priced 199 00:11:53,880 --> 00:11:55,400 Speaker 5: in for the rest of the year, but that's still 200 00:11:55,440 --> 00:11:58,560 Speaker 5: a cup at every remaining meeting that we've gone. Is 201 00:11:58,559 --> 00:12:00,880 Speaker 5: that realistic or is the getting a bit of hit 202 00:12:00,920 --> 00:12:01,680 Speaker 5: of itself again? 203 00:12:03,120 --> 00:12:05,240 Speaker 4: Yeah, the market's been ahead of its The market's been 204 00:12:05,240 --> 00:12:07,559 Speaker 4: ahead of the Fed the entire year. Right, we came 205 00:12:07,600 --> 00:12:09,360 Speaker 4: into the year at six to seven rate cuts. We're 206 00:12:09,360 --> 00:12:11,720 Speaker 4: still waiting for our first And it's funny because I 207 00:12:11,760 --> 00:12:15,080 Speaker 4: went back and looked at the twenty twenty two Jackson 208 00:12:15,120 --> 00:12:19,160 Speaker 4: Hole conference, which which you know, really was pretty nasty 209 00:12:19,200 --> 00:12:21,880 Speaker 4: for the markets, and the talk then was the market 210 00:12:21,920 --> 00:12:24,840 Speaker 4: was waiting for the FED to pivot, which obviously they 211 00:12:24,840 --> 00:12:28,360 Speaker 4: still haven't pivoted. But this just tells you. And so 212 00:12:28,520 --> 00:12:32,600 Speaker 4: I think my concern is that Powell comes out and says, look, 213 00:12:32,600 --> 00:12:34,679 Speaker 4: I told you, I told you people to expect ray 214 00:12:34,760 --> 00:12:38,520 Speaker 4: cuts in September. You're right, but the data isn't there 215 00:12:38,559 --> 00:12:40,320 Speaker 4: to say that we're going to go to fifty. The 216 00:12:40,400 --> 00:12:42,280 Speaker 4: data isn't there to say that we're going to cut 217 00:12:42,280 --> 00:12:44,719 Speaker 4: every meeting. We'll give you an adjustment cut, and we're 218 00:12:44,760 --> 00:12:47,360 Speaker 4: going to start to go, and we'll go slowly unless 219 00:12:47,400 --> 00:12:50,880 Speaker 4: the data dictates otherwise. And the market may just like 220 00:12:51,000 --> 00:12:53,560 Speaker 4: the idea of oh oh, you mean there's a possibility. 221 00:12:53,840 --> 00:12:56,600 Speaker 4: But when you think about that, if the data dictates otherwise, 222 00:12:56,679 --> 00:12:59,000 Speaker 4: it means that the economy is not particularly friendly to 223 00:12:59,000 --> 00:13:02,080 Speaker 4: stocks at that point. So it's my risk going into 224 00:13:02,080 --> 00:13:02,520 Speaker 4: this week. 225 00:13:02,880 --> 00:13:06,040 Speaker 2: Yeah, A reference made to to when J. Powell spoke 226 00:13:06,080 --> 00:13:08,439 Speaker 2: for only eight minutes and said you're going to feel 227 00:13:08,440 --> 00:13:13,240 Speaker 2: some pain. Is there any chance that this time he says, hey, 228 00:13:13,720 --> 00:13:15,400 Speaker 2: you're going to feel some glee. 229 00:13:16,880 --> 00:13:19,240 Speaker 4: I don't think that's in his playbook. I do think 230 00:13:19,280 --> 00:13:22,040 Speaker 4: the market now, I do think see one of the 231 00:13:22,040 --> 00:13:23,720 Speaker 4: things I've always think when we have these feed meetings 232 00:13:23,800 --> 00:13:26,240 Speaker 4: is he sort of goldilocks, like, you know, not too hot, 233 00:13:26,360 --> 00:13:29,280 Speaker 4: not too cold, and the market definitely if he says, 234 00:13:29,360 --> 00:13:32,560 Speaker 4: you know, we're not likely to cut rates, but we might. 235 00:13:32,760 --> 00:13:35,319 Speaker 4: The market here as well, we might cut rates. So 236 00:13:35,520 --> 00:13:38,959 Speaker 4: the difference is at Jackson Hole, where he controls the message. 237 00:13:38,960 --> 00:13:41,320 Speaker 4: It's not a back and forth with reporters, and I 238 00:13:41,360 --> 00:13:44,120 Speaker 4: think he's got a genuinely good rapport with most of 239 00:13:44,160 --> 00:13:47,760 Speaker 4: the reporters. If he wants to tell a sterner message, 240 00:13:47,840 --> 00:13:49,840 Speaker 4: this is the one time he can actually do so, 241 00:13:50,679 --> 00:13:52,960 Speaker 4: because there's really no back and forth to it. It's 242 00:13:53,000 --> 00:13:54,840 Speaker 4: just I'm going to read. I'm going to read what 243 00:13:54,920 --> 00:13:57,120 Speaker 4: I wrote, and you're gonna take it and we'll see 244 00:13:57,160 --> 00:13:59,160 Speaker 4: what he says. I don't know that he's in the 245 00:13:59,200 --> 00:14:03,400 Speaker 4: mood to bearticularly accommodative sounding, because if you look at 246 00:14:03,400 --> 00:14:07,680 Speaker 4: what markets are doing, you know, fixed income equities, whatever, 247 00:14:07,960 --> 00:14:10,720 Speaker 4: it's not like we need a ton of stimulus right now. 248 00:14:10,920 --> 00:14:13,240 Speaker 4: We seem to be doing fine with what we have 249 00:14:13,880 --> 00:14:14,480 Speaker 4: at the moment. 250 00:14:15,880 --> 00:14:18,160 Speaker 5: Yeah, there's other data to support that as well. I 251 00:14:18,160 --> 00:14:22,160 Speaker 5: mean the Bloomberg this morning. We've got California import data 252 00:14:22,160 --> 00:14:25,720 Speaker 5: that's looking pretty strong. Goldman's kind of cirsation risk, you know, 253 00:14:26,240 --> 00:14:28,560 Speaker 5: right's excessively restrictive right now. 254 00:14:29,520 --> 00:14:32,080 Speaker 4: I don't think so, although I do think the FED 255 00:14:32,120 --> 00:14:34,440 Speaker 4: has to be quite vigilant of it, because I do 256 00:14:34,480 --> 00:14:37,560 Speaker 4: think there is there is certainly the possibility, if not 257 00:14:37,600 --> 00:14:41,040 Speaker 4: the probability, that we could slip into recession. A lot 258 00:14:41,080 --> 00:14:44,960 Speaker 4: of the data is softening. But you know, again the Fed, 259 00:14:46,120 --> 00:14:48,360 Speaker 4: it has more control over the amount of money flowing 260 00:14:48,400 --> 00:14:51,400 Speaker 4: around the system that it does necessarily the economy itself. 261 00:14:51,840 --> 00:14:55,800 Speaker 4: And certainly in terms of liquidity, the Fed, you know, 262 00:14:56,320 --> 00:14:58,480 Speaker 4: they've got to be looking around and saying, there's certainly 263 00:14:58,520 --> 00:15:01,400 Speaker 4: ample liquidity even with the rate structure that we have 264 00:15:01,560 --> 00:15:02,120 Speaker 4: these days. 265 00:15:03,000 --> 00:15:05,160 Speaker 2: So it would seem to be then that the jobs 266 00:15:05,200 --> 00:15:08,520 Speaker 2: report coming up, the September of sixth jobs report would 267 00:15:08,520 --> 00:15:11,520 Speaker 2: be considerably more important than a lot of what we've 268 00:15:11,520 --> 00:15:12,320 Speaker 2: seen of late. 269 00:15:12,920 --> 00:15:17,800 Speaker 4: Absolutely, because I think, you know, the disinflationary story I 270 00:15:17,840 --> 00:15:20,000 Speaker 4: think is here, and you know, to the extent that 271 00:15:20,040 --> 00:15:22,720 Speaker 4: the Fed really is going to you know, they've indicated 272 00:15:22,760 --> 00:15:25,040 Speaker 4: that they don't need to wait exactly till two percent, 273 00:15:25,120 --> 00:15:26,920 Speaker 4: and you know, so we could argue certainly that this 274 00:15:27,040 --> 00:15:30,240 Speaker 4: is why we might see it. You know, we're likely 275 00:15:30,280 --> 00:15:34,800 Speaker 4: to see a cut in September, but the degree to 276 00:15:34,880 --> 00:15:40,080 Speaker 4: which the job market tells that story, you know, first 277 00:15:40,080 --> 00:15:42,120 Speaker 4: week is first Friday in September is going to be 278 00:15:42,120 --> 00:15:44,840 Speaker 4: a big one because you know, we saw that slowing 279 00:15:45,560 --> 00:15:48,560 Speaker 4: in you know, in the August report, the July numbers. 280 00:15:49,160 --> 00:15:50,720 Speaker 4: Let's see what it says in August, because there were 281 00:15:50,760 --> 00:15:53,560 Speaker 4: a lot of economists saying that the temporary factors, even 282 00:15:53,600 --> 00:15:55,560 Speaker 4: though the FED kind of pooh pooed them, there was 283 00:15:55,600 --> 00:15:59,440 Speaker 4: some temporary factors relating to some hurricanes and stuff that 284 00:15:59,440 --> 00:16:01,280 Speaker 4: that messed up up the numbers a little bit, maybe 285 00:16:01,360 --> 00:16:02,400 Speaker 4: weaker than they seemed. 286 00:16:02,720 --> 00:16:05,640 Speaker 2: Okay, Steve, out of time, but a great session, Thank 287 00:16:05,680 --> 00:16:09,560 Speaker 2: you very much, Steve Soasnik, chief strategist at Interactive Brokers 288 00:16:15,960 --> 00:16:19,920 Speaker 2: through Jamalik Partner at NetBoot Capital, we take a closer 289 00:16:19,960 --> 00:16:21,600 Speaker 2: look at markets here and bore we had a good 290 00:16:21,640 --> 00:16:24,440 Speaker 2: week last week. Who it was the data? I think 291 00:16:24,440 --> 00:16:28,040 Speaker 2: that calmed a lot of frayed nerves, retail sales data 292 00:16:28,040 --> 00:16:31,600 Speaker 2: and the jobless claims. And it has some forecasters, for 293 00:16:31,640 --> 00:16:37,080 Speaker 2: instance Goldman Sachs in lowering their recession risk levels. Others 294 00:16:37,120 --> 00:16:39,160 Speaker 2: maybe think it's a little too soon for that. How 295 00:16:39,240 --> 00:16:42,280 Speaker 2: much more data would you need to see, or maybe 296 00:16:42,560 --> 00:16:45,600 Speaker 2: would the markets need to see to be reassured that 297 00:16:45,640 --> 00:16:47,160 Speaker 2: the economy is on solid footing. 298 00:16:48,240 --> 00:16:51,120 Speaker 6: It really depends what data the FED needs to see, 299 00:16:51,200 --> 00:16:54,720 Speaker 6: right and the signal that the FED sends to the markets, 300 00:16:55,440 --> 00:16:58,120 Speaker 6: and the FED really has two goals is you know, 301 00:16:58,240 --> 00:17:02,720 Speaker 6: unemployment and inflation. Right, we have an unemployment number coming 302 00:17:02,720 --> 00:17:04,880 Speaker 6: out in the first week of September, and I think 303 00:17:04,880 --> 00:17:06,600 Speaker 6: that's the critical number for the FED. 304 00:17:07,200 --> 00:17:07,800 Speaker 1: The FED is. 305 00:17:07,760 --> 00:17:10,280 Speaker 6: Trying to manage, on one hand, the risk of recession, 306 00:17:10,600 --> 00:17:14,240 Speaker 6: which seemingly is not high right now. Q two real 307 00:17:14,280 --> 00:17:16,919 Speaker 6: GDP growth came in very strong at two point four percent, 308 00:17:17,480 --> 00:17:19,680 Speaker 6: So the FED is trying to manage the risk of 309 00:17:19,760 --> 00:17:24,879 Speaker 6: recession against rising unemployment. And so the important data that 310 00:17:25,080 --> 00:17:26,760 Speaker 6: I think the FED is going to be looking out 311 00:17:26,800 --> 00:17:29,760 Speaker 6: for is the unemployment number, and I think that's going 312 00:17:29,840 --> 00:17:32,560 Speaker 6: to determine what the FED does, which in turn determines 313 00:17:32,600 --> 00:17:33,639 Speaker 6: how the market moves. 314 00:17:34,000 --> 00:17:37,040 Speaker 2: So what you're saying is this September sixth jobs report 315 00:17:37,200 --> 00:17:41,240 Speaker 2: is pretty important, maybe considerably more important than most of 316 00:17:41,240 --> 00:17:42,120 Speaker 2: what we've seen of late. 317 00:17:43,280 --> 00:17:45,720 Speaker 6: I think so because some of the other things we've seen. 318 00:17:45,760 --> 00:17:49,000 Speaker 6: For example, we've seen strong earnings, but despite that, we 319 00:17:49,080 --> 00:17:52,480 Speaker 6: had the market y when we had the unemployment number. 320 00:17:52,520 --> 00:17:55,520 Speaker 6: So the market seems to be focused more on unemployment 321 00:17:55,600 --> 00:17:58,520 Speaker 6: as unemployment and inflation as opposed to earnings. 322 00:17:59,720 --> 00:18:02,560 Speaker 2: Yeah, so I guess it's a combination of what the 323 00:18:02,600 --> 00:18:06,240 Speaker 2: market expects to hear from japwell and what the FED 324 00:18:06,359 --> 00:18:09,760 Speaker 2: needs to see that everybody will be kind of edgy over. 325 00:18:09,880 --> 00:18:12,240 Speaker 2: In some ways, I think the better data took a 326 00:18:12,280 --> 00:18:14,880 Speaker 2: little pressure off of Jypowell because you had that big 327 00:18:14,920 --> 00:18:18,600 Speaker 2: market sell off and a lot of fears of unemployment 328 00:18:18,680 --> 00:18:21,439 Speaker 2: running to the upside and such in the market was 329 00:18:21,480 --> 00:18:24,439 Speaker 2: pretty negative, and he probably would have felt at least 330 00:18:25,119 --> 00:18:30,080 Speaker 2: slightly incentivized to hint that rate cuts are coming. Now 331 00:18:30,240 --> 00:18:32,520 Speaker 2: perhaps he can be a little more nuanced, don't you think. 332 00:18:33,800 --> 00:18:35,840 Speaker 6: Yes, I agree with you. He has a little bit 333 00:18:35,840 --> 00:18:38,800 Speaker 6: more leviate than he would have otherwise, and I think 334 00:18:38,800 --> 00:18:42,760 Speaker 6: he's going to continue to be dubbish, but point towards data. 335 00:18:43,400 --> 00:18:45,880 Speaker 6: The one thing, though, I think with retail sales coming 336 00:18:45,920 --> 00:18:49,560 Speaker 6: in higher than expected, that really is an opportunity for 337 00:18:49,640 --> 00:18:53,800 Speaker 6: investors because of the bifurcation we're seeing within retail, meaning 338 00:18:53,840 --> 00:18:56,959 Speaker 6: the overall retail numbers was strong, but there are pockets 339 00:18:57,359 --> 00:19:01,879 Speaker 6: like credit card delinquencies going up, like brands like Starbucks 340 00:19:01,880 --> 00:19:06,320 Speaker 6: and Amazon that are more retail sensitive reporting weaker earnings 341 00:19:06,480 --> 00:19:09,760 Speaker 6: versus brands like Walmart doing very well. So I think 342 00:19:09,920 --> 00:19:14,880 Speaker 6: underlying that retail data, Brian, there is opportunity for good 343 00:19:14,920 --> 00:19:17,919 Speaker 6: stock picking as there's a lot of dispersion underneath that 344 00:19:18,040 --> 00:19:19,240 Speaker 6: overall retail number. 345 00:19:19,560 --> 00:19:21,560 Speaker 2: Yeah. In fact, it's been a really good year so 346 00:19:21,720 --> 00:19:25,240 Speaker 2: far for stock picking. One last question on the FED 347 00:19:25,400 --> 00:19:28,000 Speaker 2: and Jerome Palell. I mean, do you think if he 348 00:19:28,040 --> 00:19:30,159 Speaker 2: does not, because we ran a story on this actually 349 00:19:30,200 --> 00:19:32,919 Speaker 2: included some comments that well, if he doesn't hint at 350 00:19:33,040 --> 00:19:36,000 Speaker 2: rate cuts, you're going to likely see another market sell up. 351 00:19:36,119 --> 00:19:38,040 Speaker 2: Are you in that camp or do you think that 352 00:19:38,760 --> 00:19:43,720 Speaker 2: the market out there that you know, they're sort of 353 00:19:43,760 --> 00:19:46,120 Speaker 2: in a position where they feel as though they can 354 00:19:46,200 --> 00:19:46,800 Speaker 2: be patient. 355 00:19:49,680 --> 00:19:51,560 Speaker 6: No, I don't think the market wants to be patient. 356 00:19:51,560 --> 00:19:52,000 Speaker 6: I think the. 357 00:19:51,960 --> 00:19:54,679 Speaker 2: Market so you embrace the sell off idea. Then if 358 00:19:54,680 --> 00:19:55,960 Speaker 2: he doesn't hint, yes. 359 00:19:56,040 --> 00:19:58,480 Speaker 6: Yeah, I think the market is looking for at least 360 00:19:58,560 --> 00:20:01,280 Speaker 6: some kind of positive or it the neutral news that 361 00:20:01,320 --> 00:20:04,560 Speaker 6: he's going to continue on the same path of being 362 00:20:04,640 --> 00:20:08,040 Speaker 6: devision watching for data because the issue right now is 363 00:20:08,040 --> 00:20:10,800 Speaker 6: there's so much uncertainty amongst investors and as you will 364 00:20:10,880 --> 00:20:15,320 Speaker 6: now Brian August, you know there's lower trading volumes. Lots 365 00:20:15,320 --> 00:20:18,040 Speaker 6: of people are on vacation, So the lower trading volumes 366 00:20:18,160 --> 00:20:22,240 Speaker 6: combined with this uncertainty, is leading to very large market 367 00:20:22,280 --> 00:20:25,880 Speaker 6: moves in market votility and policies that so I think 368 00:20:26,560 --> 00:20:29,040 Speaker 6: I think he's going to stay neutral, just slightly positive, 369 00:20:29,920 --> 00:20:31,879 Speaker 6: hoping for a calm market reaction. 370 00:20:32,600 --> 00:20:35,119 Speaker 2: Well, you can understand how the market would be frustrated 371 00:20:35,160 --> 00:20:37,239 Speaker 2: with this because you have the FED funds rate at 372 00:20:37,240 --> 00:20:41,160 Speaker 2: five and three eight percent that was geared at inflation 373 00:20:41,200 --> 00:20:43,600 Speaker 2: at nine percent. Now you've got inflation at three percent, 374 00:20:44,080 --> 00:20:48,760 Speaker 2: so at least x amount of the cutting that ultimately comes, 375 00:20:48,800 --> 00:20:53,240 Speaker 2: it's just calibration, right, It's not saving the economy, don't 376 00:20:53,280 --> 00:20:53,679 Speaker 2: you think so? 377 00:20:54,680 --> 00:20:55,000 Speaker 6: True? 378 00:20:55,240 --> 00:20:55,640 Speaker 3: True? 379 00:20:55,800 --> 00:20:57,920 Speaker 6: I do think though investors have been spoilt in the 380 00:20:58,000 --> 00:21:01,560 Speaker 6: last decade, Brian, because yes, is not frustrated. But if 381 00:21:01,600 --> 00:21:04,639 Speaker 6: you look at where markets are, we're still fifteen percent 382 00:21:05,160 --> 00:21:07,040 Speaker 6: for the year, given that we were up twenty five 383 00:21:07,040 --> 00:21:09,920 Speaker 6: percent last year, right, so there is actually no good 384 00:21:09,960 --> 00:21:13,240 Speaker 6: reason for investors to be frustrated with either the stock 385 00:21:13,280 --> 00:21:16,560 Speaker 6: market or with the Fed. And if you step back 386 00:21:16,560 --> 00:21:18,680 Speaker 6: and think about where we were two or three years ago, 387 00:21:19,600 --> 00:21:21,760 Speaker 6: not a lot of people believed that the Fed would 388 00:21:21,800 --> 00:21:24,240 Speaker 6: be able to pull this off in terms of managing 389 00:21:24,320 --> 00:21:28,920 Speaker 6: recession and guiding rates and unemployment. But so far, so good. 390 00:21:29,280 --> 00:21:32,480 Speaker 2: Oh yeah, they'll get huge kdos if they do pull 391 00:21:32,480 --> 00:21:34,960 Speaker 2: off a soft landing. So let's go a couple of 392 00:21:34,960 --> 00:21:40,360 Speaker 2: other different directions. Here, are investors, in your view, actively 393 00:21:40,520 --> 00:21:43,840 Speaker 2: playing the election or keeping it at arm's length. 394 00:21:45,840 --> 00:21:48,080 Speaker 6: It's too early, i would say, to be actively playing 395 00:21:48,119 --> 00:21:52,639 Speaker 6: the election, but investors are definitely starting to think about 396 00:21:52,680 --> 00:21:56,920 Speaker 6: the what if scenarios. The outcome of the election still 397 00:21:56,960 --> 00:22:00,719 Speaker 6: remains unclear and we are still a few away. These 398 00:22:00,760 --> 00:22:04,399 Speaker 6: things can change pretty quickly. You know, the possibility of 399 00:22:04,560 --> 00:22:07,119 Speaker 6: US tariffs I think is the big one, depending on 400 00:22:07,240 --> 00:22:11,240 Speaker 6: election results. And as you know, for emerging markets, that's 401 00:22:11,320 --> 00:22:15,879 Speaker 6: also a big impact. Meaning if the US titans tariffs, 402 00:22:16,359 --> 00:22:18,960 Speaker 6: that impact is welled not just in China but all 403 00:22:18,960 --> 00:22:20,040 Speaker 6: through emerging markets. 404 00:22:21,160 --> 00:22:24,160 Speaker 2: Yeah. Absolutely in China. You know, every day you get 405 00:22:24,200 --> 00:22:26,679 Speaker 2: something new. We've had just in the past couple of days, 406 00:22:27,000 --> 00:22:31,320 Speaker 2: defaults on convertible bonds kind of really hurting consumers even 407 00:22:31,840 --> 00:22:35,440 Speaker 2: and then this latest development of the exchange in exchange 408 00:22:35,440 --> 00:22:39,040 Speaker 2: is not publishing the buying and selling of foreign investors, 409 00:22:39,480 --> 00:22:43,400 Speaker 2: which would seemingly turn off foreign investors even more. 410 00:22:44,560 --> 00:22:47,760 Speaker 6: Yes, that's a bad sign. Bigness and markets is always 411 00:22:47,800 --> 00:22:50,040 Speaker 6: a bad sign, right. It's like saying you have something 412 00:22:50,080 --> 00:22:55,080 Speaker 6: to hide right. Nevertheless, I think in China it's really 413 00:22:55,240 --> 00:22:57,359 Speaker 6: I think the whole economy is dependent on what the 414 00:22:57,400 --> 00:23:00,399 Speaker 6: government is going to do, because as you know, corporate 415 00:23:00,440 --> 00:23:04,879 Speaker 6: sentiment is negative. Retail investors are still saving, they're not 416 00:23:04,960 --> 00:23:08,199 Speaker 6: ready to spend, they don't have discretionary income to spend. 417 00:23:08,840 --> 00:23:12,399 Speaker 6: So the Chinese economy still comes down to what the 418 00:23:12,440 --> 00:23:15,400 Speaker 6: government can do, either in terms of physical stimulus, montre 419 00:23:15,520 --> 00:23:20,240 Speaker 6: stimulus supporting Chinese banks and state on enterprises. And I 420 00:23:20,280 --> 00:23:22,560 Speaker 6: think the new thing in China is of course the 421 00:23:22,640 --> 00:23:26,639 Speaker 6: rise of the exporters, which for a long time China 422 00:23:26,760 --> 00:23:29,800 Speaker 6: was driven by domestic demand. But the last time, I 423 00:23:29,800 --> 00:23:31,879 Speaker 6: would say eighteen months or so, the stocks that have 424 00:23:31,960 --> 00:23:35,360 Speaker 6: done well are the export oriented stocks in China, which 425 00:23:35,400 --> 00:23:38,080 Speaker 6: I think has been an interesting change in the Chinese 426 00:23:38,080 --> 00:23:39,160 Speaker 6: stock picking landscape. 427 00:23:39,200 --> 00:23:42,639 Speaker 2: Okay, so finally, and not just in China, but maybe globally. 428 00:23:43,160 --> 00:23:45,960 Speaker 2: You talked about it being a good stock pickers market. 429 00:23:46,680 --> 00:23:50,040 Speaker 2: Are there any interesting kind of corporate developments that have 430 00:23:50,080 --> 00:23:52,399 Speaker 2: caught your eye for an investing theme. 431 00:23:54,400 --> 00:23:57,679 Speaker 6: Yes, as you know, we invest broadly across emerging markets, 432 00:23:57,760 --> 00:24:01,040 Speaker 6: and in general right now, given the certain tea, we're 433 00:24:01,200 --> 00:24:03,960 Speaker 6: being very defensive, which means we're buying stocks with strong 434 00:24:04,000 --> 00:24:07,199 Speaker 6: cash flows, stocks that are likely to beat earnings and 435 00:24:07,280 --> 00:24:10,439 Speaker 6: dividend yield, but overall we're looking for stocks that are 436 00:24:10,480 --> 00:24:12,440 Speaker 6: pivoting more to global AI demand. 437 00:24:12,840 --> 00:24:15,120 Speaker 2: Poojah, thanks so much for joining us on the weekend 438 00:24:15,520 --> 00:24:20,760 Speaker 2: and getting our investors and listeners ready for Monday morning trading. Pujamaleg, 439 00:24:20,840 --> 00:24:32,480 Speaker 2: partner at Nipu and Capital. Brian Jacobson, Chief economist at 440 00:24:32,520 --> 00:24:35,960 Speaker 2: Anex Wealth Management. Brian, one of your points is that 441 00:24:36,080 --> 00:24:41,320 Speaker 2: recession fears have faded, but they haven't disappeared. Unemployment, and 442 00:24:41,359 --> 00:24:43,920 Speaker 2: this is my point. Unemployment has jumped from three point 443 00:24:44,080 --> 00:24:48,240 Speaker 2: four percent on May first to four point three percent. Now, 444 00:24:48,600 --> 00:24:52,520 Speaker 2: that's almost a full percentage point in less than three months. 445 00:24:52,880 --> 00:24:56,160 Speaker 2: Is that not worrisome? And if so, what's the FED 446 00:24:56,200 --> 00:24:56,720 Speaker 2: waiting for? 447 00:24:58,040 --> 00:25:00,879 Speaker 1: Yeah, it definitely is heading in the ro direction. I 448 00:25:00,880 --> 00:25:02,560 Speaker 1: guess you could say that, but you know, from the 449 00:25:02,560 --> 00:25:05,640 Speaker 1: FEDS perspective, it's actually somewhat heading in the right direction 450 00:25:06,040 --> 00:25:08,560 Speaker 1: because they did think that that three point four percent 451 00:25:09,040 --> 00:25:11,399 Speaker 1: was too low. And if you look at kind of 452 00:25:11,400 --> 00:25:14,320 Speaker 1: the broader arc of history, when we look at the 453 00:25:14,359 --> 00:25:16,879 Speaker 1: Bloomberg terminal, as far as what it's telling US with 454 00:25:17,320 --> 00:25:19,960 Speaker 1: going back to the nineteen fifties, with the unemployment rate, 455 00:25:20,200 --> 00:25:23,359 Speaker 1: it's averaged five point seven percent. So even though it's 456 00:25:23,400 --> 00:25:26,720 Speaker 1: gone from three point four up to four point three, 457 00:25:27,320 --> 00:25:29,600 Speaker 1: the question in my mind is whether or not it's 458 00:25:29,640 --> 00:25:32,320 Speaker 1: going to hang out around here, maybe get to four 459 00:25:32,320 --> 00:25:34,760 Speaker 1: and a half, or if it's going to keep marching higher. 460 00:25:35,000 --> 00:25:37,520 Speaker 1: I'm somewhat optimistic about the outlook, and so I think 461 00:25:37,560 --> 00:25:40,280 Speaker 1: that we're actually going to probably settle in closer to 462 00:25:40,320 --> 00:25:43,639 Speaker 1: about four point five percent, which isn't too worrying in 463 00:25:44,040 --> 00:25:44,800 Speaker 1: my mind. 464 00:25:45,000 --> 00:25:47,520 Speaker 2: And the positive news over the past week has helped 465 00:25:47,560 --> 00:25:48,120 Speaker 2: in that view. 466 00:25:48,960 --> 00:25:52,440 Speaker 1: It has, yeah, the initial unemployment claims numbers coming back down, 467 00:25:52,840 --> 00:25:56,280 Speaker 1: stronger retail sales numbers as well. However, I think that 468 00:25:56,320 --> 00:25:59,200 Speaker 1: there is a lot of superficial strength in that retail 469 00:25:59,280 --> 00:26:02,400 Speaker 1: sales number because the month of June, we know that 470 00:26:02,520 --> 00:26:06,760 Speaker 1: auto sales were adversely affected by that hacking attack on 471 00:26:06,960 --> 00:26:10,000 Speaker 1: a number of car dealers on their computer systems, and 472 00:26:10,040 --> 00:26:12,359 Speaker 1: so there was bound to be a big bounce back 473 00:26:12,640 --> 00:26:15,239 Speaker 1: in auto sales in July, and we did see that 474 00:26:15,520 --> 00:26:18,679 Speaker 1: there was also an increase in the building material and 475 00:26:18,720 --> 00:26:21,840 Speaker 1: also the garden center sales. Maybe some of that was 476 00:26:21,960 --> 00:26:25,639 Speaker 1: due to people rebuilding or cleaning up after Hurricane Barrel 477 00:26:25,760 --> 00:26:29,120 Speaker 1: barreled down on the Houston area. And so even though 478 00:26:29,160 --> 00:26:31,679 Speaker 1: a lot of people have now come out those who 479 00:26:31,760 --> 00:26:34,760 Speaker 1: are increasing their recession odds in June, they're kind of 480 00:26:34,800 --> 00:26:37,600 Speaker 1: walking that back in July. Maybe that's a little premature. 481 00:26:37,720 --> 00:26:39,560 Speaker 1: I mean, I think that we're going to a point 482 00:26:39,600 --> 00:26:43,480 Speaker 1: where we are seeing some economic slowing, but I don't 483 00:26:43,480 --> 00:26:45,520 Speaker 1: think that we're all of a sudden getting that all 484 00:26:45,680 --> 00:26:49,159 Speaker 1: clear signal that everything is all sunshine and happiness. 485 00:26:49,400 --> 00:26:51,600 Speaker 2: Still in all the Fed funds rate is up there 486 00:26:51,600 --> 00:26:54,480 Speaker 2: around five and a half percent. That did its job 487 00:26:54,600 --> 00:26:57,400 Speaker 2: on bringing inflation down all the way down from eight 488 00:26:57,520 --> 00:27:01,000 Speaker 2: nine percent down to the current levels, which depending on 489 00:27:01,080 --> 00:27:02,840 Speaker 2: how you look at it could be between say two 490 00:27:02,880 --> 00:27:06,720 Speaker 2: and a half and around three percent or so. It 491 00:27:06,720 --> 00:27:09,359 Speaker 2: would seem to be out of step with where we 492 00:27:09,480 --> 00:27:12,760 Speaker 2: are now, and that we know that a lot of 493 00:27:12,760 --> 00:27:15,719 Speaker 2: this has been in the pipeline and will be coming 494 00:27:16,080 --> 00:27:19,680 Speaker 2: even if they start cutting It seems like on balance, 495 00:27:19,800 --> 00:27:22,080 Speaker 2: a lot of people think, and perhaps even the Fed thinks, 496 00:27:22,119 --> 00:27:23,960 Speaker 2: that it's just about time to go. 497 00:27:24,960 --> 00:27:27,240 Speaker 1: Yeah, I think that they are coming to that conclusion. 498 00:27:27,280 --> 00:27:29,320 Speaker 1: It's just a question of how they want to message 499 00:27:29,359 --> 00:27:32,280 Speaker 1: it as far as the timing of the initial cut 500 00:27:32,320 --> 00:27:35,760 Speaker 1: and then also the pace of subsequent cuts. Now, in fairness, 501 00:27:35,760 --> 00:27:38,880 Speaker 1: probably half of the improvement that we've seen in inflation, 502 00:27:39,040 --> 00:27:43,159 Speaker 1: if not slightly more, has happened regardless of what the 503 00:27:43,200 --> 00:27:45,640 Speaker 1: FED did. It was mainly because it was a supply 504 00:27:45,840 --> 00:27:48,040 Speaker 1: side issue. And I think that you could I actually 505 00:27:48,040 --> 00:27:51,560 Speaker 1: make the argument that some of the Fed's policies has 506 00:27:51,720 --> 00:27:55,320 Speaker 1: actually created some supply side problems in the housing market, 507 00:27:55,440 --> 00:28:00,600 Speaker 1: keeping that owner's equivalent rent and the rental component of 508 00:28:00,600 --> 00:28:04,000 Speaker 1: the inflation numbers somewhat higher than it otherwise would be. 509 00:28:04,320 --> 00:28:06,920 Speaker 1: And so you know, half of the progress that we've 510 00:28:06,920 --> 00:28:10,000 Speaker 1: seen on inflation would have happened anyways. And so the 511 00:28:10,040 --> 00:28:14,280 Speaker 1: FED maybe they because they were slow to react to inflation, 512 00:28:14,800 --> 00:28:18,480 Speaker 1: that they overreacted, and now they do need to do 513 00:28:18,640 --> 00:28:21,159 Speaker 1: a type of course correction. And it's more than just 514 00:28:21,320 --> 00:28:24,640 Speaker 1: the course correction that Powell talked about in twenty nineteen. 515 00:28:24,920 --> 00:28:28,639 Speaker 1: This is more about recalibrating policy to what's more appropriate 516 00:28:28,960 --> 00:28:32,880 Speaker 1: for inflation that is probably going to get to their 517 00:28:32,920 --> 00:28:35,520 Speaker 1: target by some point in twenty twenty five. 518 00:28:35,880 --> 00:28:38,640 Speaker 2: Okay, I give you thirty seconds for this this question, 519 00:28:38,800 --> 00:28:41,640 Speaker 2: and this was actually a question that was in one 520 00:28:41,640 --> 00:28:44,640 Speaker 2: of our pieces as a tease. How soon do they start? 521 00:28:44,680 --> 00:28:46,880 Speaker 2: How fast do they go and where do they end? 522 00:28:47,000 --> 00:28:47,720 Speaker 2: Thirty seconds? 523 00:28:48,000 --> 00:28:50,840 Speaker 1: Yeah, I think they'll start in September at that meeting 524 00:28:50,880 --> 00:28:54,480 Speaker 1: twenty five basis points every meeting. They'll probably end up 525 00:28:54,520 --> 00:28:57,480 Speaker 1: at something close to about three percent. So we're not 526 00:28:57,600 --> 00:28:59,720 Speaker 1: too far right if you kind of do the math there, 527 00:28:59,800 --> 00:29:04,440 Speaker 1: it's only about about two years away from being to 528 00:29:04,560 --> 00:29:05,160 Speaker 1: their target. 529 00:29:06,200 --> 00:29:09,719 Speaker 2: Okay, let's talk a little bit about Asia, Pacific, China 530 00:29:10,000 --> 00:29:12,920 Speaker 2: and also some of the top themes. Maybe I can 531 00:29:12,960 --> 00:29:17,280 Speaker 2: go to the top theme of the year, which was AI. 532 00:29:18,120 --> 00:29:22,680 Speaker 2: From the economic standpoint, Brian, is AI a net positive 533 00:29:22,920 --> 00:29:24,640 Speaker 2: or negative on hiring? 534 00:29:26,320 --> 00:29:28,320 Speaker 1: It depends on who you are, right, And I think 535 00:29:28,320 --> 00:29:30,959 Speaker 1: that's one of the challenges. It was just like robotics 536 00:29:30,960 --> 00:29:34,239 Speaker 1: and automation in the nineteen eighties. It was probably just 537 00:29:34,360 --> 00:29:38,400 Speaker 1: like the assembly line in the nineteen twenties. For some 538 00:29:38,440 --> 00:29:40,959 Speaker 1: people it was a net benefit, others it was a 539 00:29:40,960 --> 00:29:44,240 Speaker 1: net negative. Longer term, it's a net positive, but it's 540 00:29:44,280 --> 00:29:47,200 Speaker 1: that adjustment that can be very difficult, especially for those 541 00:29:47,240 --> 00:29:50,400 Speaker 1: who don't have the skills to really use it as 542 00:29:50,440 --> 00:29:53,240 Speaker 1: a tool in order to help them become more productive. 543 00:29:53,480 --> 00:29:56,080 Speaker 1: So there are a number of jobs that are probably 544 00:29:56,240 --> 00:29:59,240 Speaker 1: at risk, but this is likely going to play out 545 00:29:59,360 --> 00:30:01,640 Speaker 1: over time where those people are going to be able 546 00:30:01,640 --> 00:30:05,440 Speaker 1: to put their skills and energy into something else. 547 00:30:06,200 --> 00:30:08,200 Speaker 2: Okay, I had a follow up, but I wanted to 548 00:30:08,240 --> 00:30:11,040 Speaker 2: slip in China, so we'll skip to this. We have 549 00:30:11,120 --> 00:30:15,480 Speaker 2: a story that says why China's woes don't move markets 550 00:30:15,880 --> 00:30:18,959 Speaker 2: like Americas, and I'm interested in your views on that. 551 00:30:19,720 --> 00:30:22,280 Speaker 1: Well, I think it's just because the US has been 552 00:30:22,760 --> 00:30:27,040 Speaker 1: really the locomotive of economic growth over the last couple 553 00:30:27,040 --> 00:30:29,920 Speaker 1: of years while other countries Europe was in a recession, 554 00:30:30,560 --> 00:30:33,600 Speaker 1: Japan was still struggling, China hasn't been able to kind 555 00:30:33,640 --> 00:30:37,120 Speaker 1: of turn things around. So coming out of COVID, initially 556 00:30:37,360 --> 00:30:40,880 Speaker 1: China and the US were the twin engines, but now 557 00:30:41,080 --> 00:30:44,080 Speaker 1: it's really the sole locomotive has been the United States, 558 00:30:44,080 --> 00:30:45,719 Speaker 1: And I think a lot of people have just written 559 00:30:45,760 --> 00:30:49,360 Speaker 1: off China thinking that you know, they're an aging demographic, 560 00:30:49,600 --> 00:30:52,880 Speaker 1: it's a totalitarian state and so don't really expect much 561 00:30:52,920 --> 00:30:53,360 Speaker 1: out of there. 562 00:30:54,160 --> 00:30:57,320 Speaker 2: Well, put succinct as usual, Brian, Thank you very much 563 00:30:57,320 --> 00:31:00,880 Speaker 2: for joining us, particularly given the time the weekend. Brian Jacobson, 564 00:31:01,000 --> 00:31:06,840 Speaker 2: chief Economist at NX Wealth Management. This is the Bloomberg 565 00:31:06,920 --> 00:31:10,520 Speaker 2: Daybreak Asia podcast, bringing to the stories making news and 566 00:31:10,680 --> 00:31:14,240 Speaker 2: moving markets in the Asia Pacific. Visit the Bloomberg Podcast 567 00:31:14,360 --> 00:31:17,320 Speaker 2: channel on YouTube to get more episodes of this and 568 00:31:17,440 --> 00:31:22,120 Speaker 2: other shows from Bloomberg. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify, 569 00:31:22,360 --> 00:31:25,760 Speaker 2: or anywhere else you listen and always on Bloomberg Radio, 570 00:31:25,880 --> 00:31:28,480 Speaker 2: the Bloomberg Terminal, and the Bloomberg Business App.