WEBVTT - UAW, ECB, Arm, and Casino Cyberattacks (Podcast)

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.080 --> 0:00:05.240
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller.

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Every business day we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros,

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 2>and Bloomberg experts, along with essential market moven News.

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:17.279
<v Speaker 1>Find the Bloomberg Markets podcast called Apple Podcasts or wherever

0:00:17.400 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>you listen to podcasts, and at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast.

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>David Welch, Detroit bureau chief for Bloomberg News, and Jordan Fabian,

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>white House reporter for Bloomberg News.

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 3>They join us. We're going to round table this thing

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 3>a little bit.

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:32.560
<v Speaker 1>So, David, I want to get the latest reporting out

0:00:32.600 --> 0:00:33.240
<v Speaker 1>of Detroit.

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:34.559
<v Speaker 3>What's the expectation.

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:36.839
<v Speaker 1>Will there be a strike and if so, is there

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:38.840
<v Speaker 1>any expectation of how long it may last?

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:44.040
<v Speaker 4>I think there certainly will be. All of the the

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:46.080
<v Speaker 4>vibe coming out of the union right now is the

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:50.319
<v Speaker 4>president is itching destroyed. He says he's not, but he's

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:53.559
<v Speaker 4>making plans. The writer has still really strong against the

0:00:53.600 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 4>car companies, against rich executives, all of that, so he's

0:00:56.520 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 4>getting people riled up. He says they're far apart. Sound

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 4>like they are if you look at the numbers. So

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:06.760
<v Speaker 4>I think they will and look, it could go on

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 4>for a while. I don't think it'll be something like

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 4>three months, but I could see strike going on for weeks,

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 4>and it could vary by car company too. It doesn't

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 4>necessarily two days at one and three weeks at another, right,

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:22.680
<v Speaker 4>I mean, if he gets the deal he wants from

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 4>specific companies.

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:25.479
<v Speaker 3>So, David, how far apart are they?

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 2>Because I've read now that the union has lowered its

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:32.759
<v Speaker 2>demand for pay increases slightly, and the last I saw

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 2>from automakers was about double what I had seen a

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:38.119
<v Speaker 2>week ago. So how far apart are they right now?

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:39.119
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:41.320
<v Speaker 4>So look, Forward is up to twenty percent and GM

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 4>is at eighteen percent pay raises over four years, which

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 4>is I think better than they've ever gotten, so, you know,

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 4>I think, and it's not the thirty six percent they

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 4>asked for, but I think that was sort of a

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 4>high ball offer from the union to begin with.

0:01:56.360 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 2>But they asked for that because the chief executives have

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 2>gotten those kinds of pay increases over the past four

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 2>years as well, haven't they.

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 6>That's right?

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 4>And look, you know, CEO's got to kind of be

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 4>careful what they wish for it, right, because you know,

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:12.800
<v Speaker 4>suddenly they might have a union saying you got forty

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:16.959
<v Speaker 4>percent and why didn't I? And didn't get great raises

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 4>over the last contract. And I'm sure some labor negotiators

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:22.679
<v Speaker 4>that the company's got bonuses for negotiating a pretty low

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:25.080
<v Speaker 4>cost contract last time. And they used to be careful

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:26.919
<v Speaker 4>what they wish for, because now they've got an extremely

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:30.920
<v Speaker 4>angry union. But they do, and they and with a

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 4>president who wants to make a statement about labour's role

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 4>in America. This isn't just about this contract with him,

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 4>he wants to bring the labor movement back to prominence

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:40.360
<v Speaker 4>in America.

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:41.919
<v Speaker 3>All right, and all.

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:42.959
<v Speaker 4>Right, so that's where we are.

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Yep, Jordan Fabian, let's bring you in. You covered the

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:48.160
<v Speaker 1>White House for Bloomberg News in Washington, DC. The President Biden,

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 1>he has said twice that there won't be a strike here.

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 1>What are you hearing out of the White House.

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:59.640
<v Speaker 7>I think that's the President being his usual optimistic self.

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 7>Other people I've talked to aren't so optimistic. And you know,

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:06.080
<v Speaker 7>they see what we're all seeing, which is a union

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:07.799
<v Speaker 7>and management still.

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:09.639
<v Speaker 5>A part on a contract.

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:13.399
<v Speaker 7>And you know, they have encouraged the side to stay

0:03:13.400 --> 0:03:15.240
<v Speaker 7>at the table. But you know, some people I've talked

0:03:15.240 --> 0:03:17.080
<v Speaker 7>to have said, look, we don't know how this is

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 7>going to end. It's all we can do is kind

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 7>of encourage them to keep talking. But there's really not

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:26.079
<v Speaker 7>much we can do to force them to get a contract.

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 7>So they're crossing their fingers and hoping there's not a strike,

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:31.359
<v Speaker 7>and if there is, that's not a long one.

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 2>You So, Jordan David points out that this president wants

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 2>to bring unions back to prominence. At the same time

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:42.839
<v Speaker 2>he has backed up truckloads of subsidies and dumped them

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 2>on the automaker's doorsteps to try and encourage them to

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:50.880
<v Speaker 2>build more electric vehicles for which, by the way, we

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 2>don't even know how much demand there is that is

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 2>going to require far fewer workers. So is he working

0:03:58.920 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 2>at cross purposes?

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 7>This is the central dilemma for Joe Biden is this

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 7>clean energy transition is one of his biggest domestic priorities.

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 7>But guess what, so it is empowering the US labor movement,

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 7>and in this negotiation he's found himself caught in the

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:17.919
<v Speaker 7>middle of those two priorities and they're really.

0:04:17.760 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 5>No easy answers.

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:22.720
<v Speaker 7>They've done the administration has done something recently, they've released

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:26.279
<v Speaker 7>this fifteen billion dollar tranch of money from the Energy

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:30.800
<v Speaker 7>Department to incentivize factory retooling, and they've, you know, they've

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 7>put some strings attached there. They're encouraging car companies to

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:38.839
<v Speaker 7>use that money on unionized plants and make sure the

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 7>benefits go to union workers, but they're not forced to.

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:45.480
<v Speaker 7>And this has been the bane for Sean Fain, which

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 7>is he doesn't think the administration imposed enough conditions on

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:52.440
<v Speaker 7>all this money that's going to the car companies. And

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 7>so in addition to the pay and benefits, this ev

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 7>transition issue has been at the backdrop of this negotiation

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 7>and it's really, you know, causing political problems for Joe

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:05.600
<v Speaker 7>Biden because he needs all the units support he get

0:05:05.600 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 7>going too twenty twenty four, and here you have this

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 7>major union on the side saying, not so.

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:14.279
<v Speaker 1>Fast, Hey, David, do we know how this union will strike?

0:05:14.320 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Will they strike one automaker all three? Do we know

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:20.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of their strategy?

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 4>I think they'll they will strike all three. And what

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 4>they're what they said they're going to do is they

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:29.160
<v Speaker 4>will strike individual plants. They're not going to walk out

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 4>on the entire company. That's one way of minimizing the

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 4>payouts from the strike fund, which pays workers some money

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:37.920
<v Speaker 4>while they're striking. And if they strike all three at

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:40.279
<v Speaker 4>every plant, they'd run out of money in about seven weeks.

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 4>They don't want to do that, so they'll they'll strike

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:45.040
<v Speaker 4>individual plants. And what I think they'll do is they'll

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 4>strike the plants that make the most profitable vehicles, which

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:52.559
<v Speaker 4>would be the large pickup truck and suv plants, because

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 4>that you know, if you were to take down Ford

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 4>and GM's large suv and pickup plants and it's something

0:05:58.120 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 4>like seventy or eighty percent of their profits comes from

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 4>those vehicles, you do a lot of damage and put

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 4>a lot of pressure on the companies very quickly while

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 4>paying minimally out to your strike fund. And then if

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 4>they don't get a deal, they can kind of keep,

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 4>you know, adding another plant here and there. They could

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:15.720
<v Speaker 4>strike parts plants that supply the dealers with replacement parts

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:18.159
<v Speaker 4>for customers. That could create a lot of chaos. There

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 4>are a lot of ways they could with individual plant strikes.

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 4>They could apply a lot of pressure.

0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 3>Hey, David, just person on the street in Detroit, which

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 3>way are they leaning?

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 4>I mean, like that kind of runs the gamut. But

0:06:30.680 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 4>I think, you know, it's it's a union city, so

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 4>there's going to be a lot of sympathy for them.

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:38.839
<v Speaker 4>It's also the Detroit city proper. There's a lot of

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 4>poverty there, so you know, strikers trying to get what

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 4>they think is their fair share would probably have a

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 4>lot of sympathy. You move further out in the state

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 4>and you start to see comments on social media like

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:54.920
<v Speaker 4>thirty to our work. You guys are on crack up bread,

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 4>stuff like that. So Michigans, Michigans are a very biver

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:00.839
<v Speaker 4>hated place in that.

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, forty seemed like a lot to me at first,

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:06.359
<v Speaker 2>also until I read that the chief executives were getting that.

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 2>You know, and this is an industry that was bailed

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 2>out by the US government. There you go during the

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 2>Great Financial Crisis and a union that gave a lot

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 2>of help frankly that that accepted a worse contract in

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 2>order to help the automakers stay alive. Now, the automakers

0:07:25.040 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 2>have made a ton of money over the past ten years,

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 2>and Jordan, does you know from that perspective, doesn't the

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 2>president from Scranton, Pennsylvania, who cares about the scrappy workers.

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 2>Doesn't he go march with the with the union when

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 2>they strike.

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:42.119
<v Speaker 7>That would be quite the image, wouldn't it, Joe Biden

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 7>holding a picket sign.

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 2>But that's what he wants us to think of him, right.

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:47.680
<v Speaker 5>No, he absolutely does.

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 7>He's repeatedly called himself the most pro union president in

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 7>US history. He did put out a statement about a

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 7>month ago that did voice support generally for some of

0:07:57.160 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 7>the union demands, like I better pay and betterfit's making

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 7>sure if there's a factory tooling or closing down, that

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 7>the members are taken care of and that they keep jobs.

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 6>In union communities.

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 7>But look, he also needs these corporations like he needs

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 7>them for the clean energy transition, not to mention, he

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 7>needs to Corporate America on side to give him campaign

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 7>donations for his re election campaign. So that's why you're

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 7>not going to see him wearing that red shirt that

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 7>Sean Fame was wearing in that image.

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>All right, fellows, thank you so much for joining both

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 1>of you. Jordan Fabian he covers the White House for

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:35.439
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News, and David Welch, Detroit bureau chief, out there

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>giving us kind of the feel for the two sides

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:42.520
<v Speaker 1>here again. Midnight tonight Eastern time is the deadline.

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 8>You're listening to the Team Ken's Arline program Bloomberg Markets

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 8>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com, the

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 8>iHeartRadio app, and the Bloomberg Business app, or listen on

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:56.079
<v Speaker 8>demand wherever you get your podcast.

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 1>We had the European Central Bank hike interest rates for

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the tenth time to quash inflation at the posit rate

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:09.080
<v Speaker 1>now four percent, up from three point seven three point

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 1>seventy five percent.

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 3>Where do we go from here? They've done?

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's check in with doctor Richard Portis, professor at the

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 1>London Business School. Professor, thanks so much for joining us here. A.

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 3>What do you make of the ECB move? ECB's move

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 3>today and then B are they done?

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:28.680
<v Speaker 9>I'm disappointed. I don't think they should have hiked today.

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 9>The pressures on the European economy are very great now

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:39.680
<v Speaker 9>and growth forecasts are just falling and falling. The latest

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:44.440
<v Speaker 9>European Commission forecast, independently of the ECB, has cut back

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 9>their forecasts considerably so that I think they're pushing us

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 9>into a recession, pushing the Eurozone into a recession, and

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 9>that seems to be unwise. What they should have done

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:02.840
<v Speaker 9>is wait. In my view, the data are mixed. Otherwise,

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 9>the inflation data are mixed, and it would have been

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 9>better to hold on.

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 2>They only have one mandate, though the European Central Bank,

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 2>unlike the FED, doesn't worry or isn't supposed to be

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:22.439
<v Speaker 2>focused on the labor market and I guess economic growth altogether.

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 2>Their only job is to keep inflation at a steady level.

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 9>Excuse me, they're talking about their big into climate and

0:10:31.800 --> 0:10:37.560
<v Speaker 9>all that. They're criticizing the Italian government for their windfall

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:43.720
<v Speaker 9>profit tanks on banks. Their single mandate has a very

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 9>broad scope and actually, if you look at it, they

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 9>are required to take account of their actions on the

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 9>overall level of economic activity in the Eurozone.

0:10:57.600 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 2>All right, So you're worried that they essentially push the

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 2>Eurozone into a recession. We're already seeing, you know, we're

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:07.599
<v Speaker 2>already seeing that in some of the biggest economies in

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 2>Germany for example. But they have said this is their

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 2>final rate hike. Does that, well, they haven't said it. Actually,

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 2>let me let me. In fact, in fact, Christine leguards

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 2>that she can't say that, which she can't obviously, but

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 2>we kind of you can read between the lines and

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 2>see that this is their final rate hike. So does

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 2>that kind of blunt the does that kind of reduce

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:32.599
<v Speaker 2>the damage effectively?

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 9>Well, if it's if it ready is final, yes, that's

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 9>that reduces the prospects of damage. But still I think

0:11:41.760 --> 0:11:45.640
<v Speaker 9>they've gone too far and we'll just we'll see what happens.

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:47.719
<v Speaker 6>The inflation data are not.

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:53.440
<v Speaker 9>Particularly good, that's for sure, but you know it's turning around.

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:56.679
<v Speaker 9>It has been turning around for a while, and I

0:11:56.720 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 9>think the wisest churus is to wait. But there are people,

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 9>several people with strong views in the Council Governing Council

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 9>of the ECB who think, no, we must stamp on

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 9>inflation dramatically, and that's what they're doing.

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:18.160
<v Speaker 3>Professor.

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Here in the US, the talk has been about a

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 1>soft landing. That is not the case in Europe. Can

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 1>you give us your view of kind of where the

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:30.280
<v Speaker 1>European economy is, how we should think about it.

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 3>Maybe on this side of the pond.

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:35.960
<v Speaker 9>It's certainly not a soft landing here in Europe, and

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 9>I include the UK and that of course as well.

0:12:40.520 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 9>But I think that's where we've got to the labor

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:49.680
<v Speaker 9>market is holding up fairly well as in the US

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 9>for that matter, but economic activity is slowing down very considerably.

0:12:56.600 --> 0:13:00.960
<v Speaker 9>And how long you can how they can take that? Uh,

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:06.320
<v Speaker 9>the politicians are coming European elections are coming up, not

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 9>in just in individual countries, but also the European Parliament

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:12.960
<v Speaker 9>elections are coming up, and there's gonna be a lot

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:19.320
<v Speaker 9>of criticism of the ECB if indeed we find the

0:13:19.360 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 9>Arizona going into a full scale recession.

0:13:22.679 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 5>I wonder.

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 2>You know how hesitant you are to include the UK

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 2>when you talk about Europe, because aren't there very big differences?

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:35.839
<v Speaker 2>And to some extent, the UK has you know, kind

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 2>of repeatedly shot itself in the foot.

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 9>Well, I mean depends which which gun you're talking about.

0:13:45.679 --> 0:13:47.319
<v Speaker 6>Was that the left foot or the right foot or

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 6>both the same time?

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:54.560
<v Speaker 9>Yes, I'm afraid we have done, and right now there

0:13:54.559 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 9>seems no prospect of that reversing. But but here too,

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:04.280
<v Speaker 9>I believe we should not be raising rates any further.

0:14:05.120 --> 0:14:10.559
<v Speaker 9>The data are turning around. They're turning around for inflation.

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 9>They're turning around slower than one would like, for sure,

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 9>But the cost of the restrictive policies is high.

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 6>And that I think is unwise.

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 9>The the otherwise, you know, the banking sector is in

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 9>pretty good shape, both in the Eurozone and in the UK.

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 9>How long that will last we don't know. But the

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 9>rise and interest rates as of course widened that interest

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 9>margins for a while. They will they will come down

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 9>as as banks have to pass on some of the

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 9>interest rate rises to the depositors. But the financial sector

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 9>is in pretty good shape in general, and it's just

0:14:57.840 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 9>the main suffering is in manufacturing and to some extented services,

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 9>and that's that's serious.

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 5>Yep.

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 1>And Professor, when you talk about manufacturing, European manufacturing, I

0:15:11.120 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 1>think most US investors think Germany. Can you tell us

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:17.560
<v Speaker 1>about how we should be thinking about the German economy here?

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 3>And maybe the outlook it's not.

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 6>A pretty picture.

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:25.880
<v Speaker 9>The problem is partly a slow down in external demand

0:15:25.880 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 9>from China in particular, and that is very substantial and

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:34.600
<v Speaker 9>very severe and has a big impact across a wide

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 9>range of German engineering firms.

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 6>So that's a big deal.

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:47.960
<v Speaker 9>The unions have push wages up and German manufacturing is

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 9>there's not a sector I can think of right now

0:15:53.080 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 9>that is balancing this trend downwards and If you look

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 9>at the data, they're pretty they're pretty depressing, so uh so, and.

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 6>It's it's not it's not easy to see how that's

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 6>going to turn around.

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:18.880
<v Speaker 9>Actually, the the finance minister is a very uh conservative

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 9>shall we say, uh uh minister, and he certainly has

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 9>no intention of any fiscal expansion. Indeed, just the other

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 9>way around, the prospect for next year for Germany is

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 9>fiscal contraction. Uh in the face of this uh, in

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 9>the face of this gathering recession.

0:16:37.360 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 6>That seems to me very foolish.

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 2>What do you think the solution? The solution is to

0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 2>the problems that the European Union faces in terms of

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 2>monetary policy. You have got this one uh you know,

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 2>organization setting monetary policy for so many different and diverse economies.

0:16:57.200 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 2>Does that you think work? Has it worked out so far?

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 2>Does it need to change?

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:05.359
<v Speaker 9>It's always Look if you look at the United States,

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 9>you have a single monetary authority setting policies for states

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:15.800
<v Speaker 9>as diverse as Mississippi and California, not to mention Illinois,

0:17:15.840 --> 0:17:20.640
<v Speaker 9>where I grew up a long time ago. So it's

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:24.119
<v Speaker 9>this one size fits all problem is a problem you

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 9>have in any large, single economy. And to the extent

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 9>that the European Eurozone is a single economy, it is.

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:37.439
<v Speaker 6>Diverse, and you're going to have.

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 9>Areas where even in the UK we've had this conflict

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:46.920
<v Speaker 9>in part with monetary policy having different impacts on London

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:50.240
<v Speaker 9>and say the Northeast, and there's nothing you can do

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 9>about that. You have to have a single monetary policy.

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 9>You can't have different interest rates for different zones. So

0:17:57.760 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 9>the one size fits all problem is there. It's no

0:18:00.440 --> 0:18:04.399
<v Speaker 9>more acute in my view, in the Eurozone than it

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:11.240
<v Speaker 9>is in any large, geographically diverse economy. But it's true

0:18:11.320 --> 0:18:15.359
<v Speaker 9>that you have very different, for example, in the Eurozone,

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 9>very different rates of inflation. In the Baltic countries it's

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 9>been much higher.

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:23.679
<v Speaker 6>Than the rate in.

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:30.160
<v Speaker 9>France, say, or Spain and Spain where Spain has been

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:31.720
<v Speaker 9>very low.

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:36.480
<v Speaker 6>So you know, that's something they can't they can't do

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:37.080
<v Speaker 6>much about it.

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:40.600
<v Speaker 9>They can't do anything about But it's not it's not

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 9>special to the Eurozone.

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Okay, doctor Richard Porters, thank you so much for your time.

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:49.399
<v Speaker 1>You really appreciate getting your thoughts and analysis, Doctor Richard Porters.

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 3>He's a professor at the London Business School.

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:55.440
<v Speaker 8>You're listening to the tape Can's are live program Bloomberg

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 8>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio. To

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:01.120
<v Speaker 8>tune it Upoomberg dot Com and.

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:02.400
<v Speaker 5>The Bloomberg Business App.

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:05.239
<v Speaker 8>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:10.359
<v Speaker 8>flagship New York station. Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 6>All right.

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:14.200
<v Speaker 1>When I first learned about this whole reek thing years

0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:18.720
<v Speaker 1>and years ago, fun flows from operation. That's the profitability

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 1>metric that these people focus on FFO.

0:19:21.000 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 2>I thought this, you're talking about a real estate investment.

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:23.320
<v Speaker 3>Trust.

0:19:23.359 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I know, it's kind of the thing. I thought it

0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 1>at the time was a scam, but now I understand

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 1>how it works.

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:28.960
<v Speaker 2>That's free cash flow.

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:31.879
<v Speaker 1>No, it's like their ebitda oh, I think, I don't know.

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Our next guest can help us out, Christine Mostandria.

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:37.440
<v Speaker 3>She is the COO of white.

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Stone Rate that trades on the New York Stock Exchange

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 1>ws R. Christine Whitestone read tell us about your company.

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 3>What kind of real estate do you guys own or

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:47.199
<v Speaker 3>do you guys focus on?

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:50.720
<v Speaker 10>So primarily we focus on neighborhood retail. So this would

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 10>be your high visit great corners with traffic and pretty

0:19:57.080 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 10>much based on convenience versus soft goods.

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 1>So I think about the pandemic in my home, in

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:06.760
<v Speaker 1>my town in Jersey, lots of and we have a

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:11.400
<v Speaker 1>very vibrant downtown in New Jersey. Lots of businesses went

0:20:11.440 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 1>out of UH one went out of business, so a

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:15.879
<v Speaker 1>lot of you know, for sale for rent signs. What

0:20:15.920 --> 0:20:19.919
<v Speaker 1>is the short Hills Summit Summit and better town than

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Short Hills, Better train Station. So which is why I

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:26.359
<v Speaker 1>chose somewhat over Short Hills Better train Station. Some people

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:27.440
<v Speaker 1>choose the name.

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:29.239
<v Speaker 2>I just wanted to make it clear because I can

0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:32.919
<v Speaker 2>imagine properties like that in Short Hills or Summit. I

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 2>can imagine property in Scarsdale and Bronxville.

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 4>You know this is where?

0:20:36.800 --> 0:20:38.920
<v Speaker 3>So what happened to your properties then? And kind of

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 3>where are you now?

0:20:40.359 --> 0:20:42.959
<v Speaker 10>So we have the fortune of being into very strong markets.

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 10>So we're in Texas and Arizona.

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:45.119
<v Speaker 3>Oh nice.

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:48.399
<v Speaker 10>So our rebound from COVID which was much much quicker,

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:50.679
<v Speaker 10>In fact it probably I think we're affected maybe for

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:54.159
<v Speaker 10>six months really, So yeah, we had very few tenants

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:54.680
<v Speaker 10>to fall.

0:20:54.720 --> 0:20:57.120
<v Speaker 3>Because you guys didn't shut down do the mess. Things

0:20:57.280 --> 0:20:59.919
<v Speaker 3>just partied right, well, I mean on the Ozar.

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, there was a little bit of that going on,

0:21:02.400 --> 0:21:05.440
<v Speaker 10>I'd have to say, and our restaurants for a while,

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:07.959
<v Speaker 10>there was a little bit of spacing, but you know,

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 10>they rebounded really quickly and then quickly after that same

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 10>thing with Fitness and all of other operators.

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 3>So what is this.

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:17.240
<v Speaker 2>You're not just the CEO of Whitestone, reed, you're also

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:20.240
<v Speaker 2>a professor of commercial real estate and strategic management at

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:23.919
<v Speaker 2>Rice Business School. What does this fun flow from operations?

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 2>What's the significance of that for a rate?

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:28.920
<v Speaker 10>So it's a little bit different than even up right,

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:30.919
<v Speaker 10>I mean as far as profitability. So what you have

0:21:30.960 --> 0:21:33.080
<v Speaker 10>to take into context is where an asset have you

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:35.960
<v Speaker 10>business and so that means you have to reinvest capital

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:38.400
<v Speaker 10>into the business, and so that takes that into account.

0:21:38.640 --> 0:21:40.800
<v Speaker 10>So it's a little bit different as far as getting

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:41.480
<v Speaker 10>to a bottom line.

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:44.840
<v Speaker 2>I was thinking maybe it's somewhere in the middle.

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 3>Maybe somewhere in the middle, but anyway, they buy off

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 3>on it.

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:51.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, So at Whitestone Rerate, your Texas, your Arizona,

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 1>what's the growth story for your company?

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 6>Is it?

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Is it acquisition? Is it just increasing the the you know,

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the numbers, the vacancies and all that kind of stuff.

0:22:01.520 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 3>I mean not to make it the occupancy.

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:05.879
<v Speaker 10>So I think there's a couple of different components of

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:08.880
<v Speaker 10>our business. So first of all, occupancy, and the big

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 10>part about occupancy is is you don't just want to

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:13.200
<v Speaker 10>fill the space. You really want to serve successfully serve

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:14.919
<v Speaker 10>the neighborhood. So making sure that you are the right

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:17.880
<v Speaker 10>merchandise mix is very important to what we do. That's

0:22:17.960 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 10>number one. Number two, we also take a number of centers.

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 10>We have a number of our centers in our portfolio

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 10>that we redevelop so that's improved the look, the feel,

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:30.159
<v Speaker 10>the customer convenience for that center. It may also be

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 10>taking out some parking because now you don't need as

0:22:32.680 --> 0:22:34.760
<v Speaker 10>much parking, you don't need that same in building in

0:22:34.840 --> 0:22:37.800
<v Speaker 10>some density as well. And then along with that we

0:22:38.040 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 10>do acquire and so there's always that opportunity for our acquisition.

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:44.879
<v Speaker 10>It's been a little challenging right now because the pricing

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 10>for product hasn't quite adjusted yet with cap rates. But

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:49.360
<v Speaker 10>we're starting to see that loosen out.

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 2>You're the tiny house people of real estate of commercial

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:57.000
<v Speaker 2>real estate, right you're looking in smaller spaces, less parking

0:22:58.119 --> 0:23:01.440
<v Speaker 2>and what and I guess or are closer to each other.

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 2>What's the benefit of that over big?

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:06.359
<v Speaker 10>So I think small is beautiful And one of the

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:09.080
<v Speaker 10>reasons why is because if you look at so our

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:11.960
<v Speaker 10>our space size is about twenty five hundred to three

0:23:11.960 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 10>thousand square feet and our centers are around fifty to

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:17.800
<v Speaker 10>one hundred and fifty thousand square feet in size, So

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 10>that to you know, twenty five hundred and three thousand

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:22.680
<v Speaker 10>square feet has the widest range of uses out there,

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 10>So it's the most flexible real estate. So when you

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 10>think about them all, it's not really that flexible, right,

0:23:27.880 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 10>it's large, it's big box, There's not a lot of

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 10>users that can go in and out of some of

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 10>those spaces, especially a power center. But in our case,

0:23:36.040 --> 0:23:39.359
<v Speaker 10>we primarily are service based and necessity based, so this

0:23:39.480 --> 0:23:42.119
<v Speaker 10>gives us the most flexibility to meet the neighborhood needs

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 10>with that size space.

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:45.440
<v Speaker 1>So what are some of the typical tenants or maybe

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 1>an anchor ten or what are some of the areas

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:48.400
<v Speaker 1>of growth in terms of tenants?

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:52.880
<v Speaker 10>Now we've sounded really so I found that what has

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:56.240
<v Speaker 10>transitioned the most going in twenty years in this business

0:23:56.680 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 10>is that number one grocery anchored used to be where

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:03.160
<v Speaker 10>things are, but if you think about where the competition

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 10>is for grocery, it's really restaurants and that has everything

0:24:06.280 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 10>to do with convenience in the experience. So we've seen

0:24:09.080 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 10>this real explosion in the restaurant uses in most of

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:15.600
<v Speaker 10>our centers, and so that's been the primary driver.

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Is that like a Chili's or something like that as

0:24:17.800 --> 0:24:19.639
<v Speaker 1>an anchor or more local.

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:22.720
<v Speaker 10>More local in fact, so many people that that's part

0:24:22.720 --> 0:24:25.200
<v Speaker 10>of the experiences that people are looking for right now,

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 10>is the taste of food and chef inspired and so

0:24:28.160 --> 0:24:30.919
<v Speaker 10>on and so forth. So especially in Texas, we have

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 10>a very, very broad range of restaurant uses all the way.

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 10>Houston in particular is very international.

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Texas is I mean, it's a country in and of itself.

0:24:39.040 --> 0:24:40.159
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I know you guys like to think of

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:42.959
<v Speaker 1>yourself as not even part of the country, but in Texas,

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's it's so big. Is there certain parts

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 1>of Texas that you guys focus on more urban airs or.

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:50.160
<v Speaker 10>More world So Texas was its own country.

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:54.440
<v Speaker 3>The team proud of that.

0:24:55.200 --> 0:24:58.480
<v Speaker 10>So primarily we stay in the fastest largest growing cities,

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 10>So we're in Dallas, San Antonio, Austin, Houston, and then

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:04.720
<v Speaker 10>we're in Phoenix and you know the Phoenix East Valley

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:06.400
<v Speaker 10>as well, so which is also FASc.

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:08.399
<v Speaker 2>You want to have a neighborhoody neighborhood.

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:11.159
<v Speaker 3>Everybody's moving, I mean, what's the what's it like in

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 3>your market? Everybody's moving there.

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:15.919
<v Speaker 10>That's it is very very exciting. So I think we

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 10>jokingly call Phoenix Chicago West to California East so because

0:25:20.800 --> 0:25:23.200
<v Speaker 10>that and that's really changed. So finally in Phoenix you

0:25:23.280 --> 0:25:26.320
<v Speaker 10>have really good Italian food, thank you for Chaga. But

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:28.359
<v Speaker 10>on the other side of that, I think that in

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 10>particular Dallas has had such such a gross strength because

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:36.680
<v Speaker 10>they've really focused on the job market and Fortune five

0:25:36.760 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 10>hundred to one hundred companies, so they've gone after that

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:43.400
<v Speaker 10>group of that job market. Austin has done extremely well,

0:25:43.440 --> 0:25:45.680
<v Speaker 10>and because of that, San Antonio is people are starting

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:47.840
<v Speaker 10>to move to San Antonio. So you have, of course

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 10>the educational system that really pushes that. And you have

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:53.159
<v Speaker 10>high tech there. I mean with Michael Delhi has you know,

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:54.960
<v Speaker 10>created his own ecosystem.

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:54.960
<v Speaker 3>There of tech.

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:25:55.320 --> 0:25:58.920
<v Speaker 10>So, and then Houston has been you know viewed primarily

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:02.159
<v Speaker 10>as willing gas but it's really changed with Houston is

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:04.879
<v Speaker 10>that they've gotten heavily. It's the largest medical district in

0:26:04.920 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 10>the world, so that shifted as well. So you know

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 10>a lot of people are moving there because it's a

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:13.200
<v Speaker 10>business friendly state, but it also is the job drivers

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:16.080
<v Speaker 10>that just the job growth has been tremendous. And then

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:18.440
<v Speaker 10>we're seeing the same in Phoenix and especially there it's

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:21.280
<v Speaker 10>getting younger. Used to be a retirement community, but you

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:24.440
<v Speaker 10>have ASU which has been a huge, you know, proponent

0:26:24.480 --> 0:26:25.440
<v Speaker 10>of change there as well.

0:26:25.600 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 1>It's a little hot in your markets though, but it's

0:26:27.760 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 1>a dry heat.

0:26:28.840 --> 0:26:34.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, their entire summer was like one hundred and twenty degrees.

0:26:35.600 --> 0:26:38.800
<v Speaker 10>It's been a little steamy in Houston and then Arizona

0:26:38.840 --> 0:26:39.880
<v Speaker 10>it's just it's very hot.

0:26:40.119 --> 0:26:42.560
<v Speaker 1>So wow, all right, but the great market's great growth markets.

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:45.639
<v Speaker 1>Christine messt Andre, thank you so much for joining us.

0:26:45.720 --> 0:26:49.159
<v Speaker 1>Christine is the CEO of white Stone Reit the New

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 1>York Sock Exchange. Take her to put into your Bloomberg

0:26:51.400 --> 0:26:53.840
<v Speaker 1>terminals w s R.

0:26:54.680 --> 0:26:58.119
<v Speaker 8>You're listening to the team Ken's are Live program Bloomberg

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:01.560
<v Speaker 8>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:27:01.600 --> 0:27:04.720
<v Speaker 8>the iHeartRadio app, and the Bloomberg Business app or listen

0:27:04.800 --> 0:27:06.879
<v Speaker 8>on demand wherever you get your podcast.

0:27:09.119 --> 0:27:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Silverman, government analysts caring tax policy for Bloomberg Intelligence

0:27:12.600 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Joints is Andrew, how are you looking at this arm

0:27:15.560 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 1>IPO in the context of just the IPO bus in general.

0:27:20.480 --> 0:27:23.439
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, thanks, Paul. I actually I wanted to respond to

0:27:23.480 --> 0:27:27.480
<v Speaker 11>your comment about companies going public at all. I think

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:30.439
<v Speaker 11>you're onto something. I mean, the number of companies that

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:33.560
<v Speaker 11>are public in the United States has is almost half

0:27:33.560 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 11>of what it was in nineteen ninety six. It's dropped

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 11>down to something like forty three hundred. And you know,

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:43.560
<v Speaker 11>companies can get cash in lots of lots of ways.

0:27:43.600 --> 0:27:45.280
<v Speaker 11>They don't have to go public to get their cash.

0:27:45.320 --> 0:27:50.240
<v Speaker 11>I mean, there's about what six point three trillion in

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:54.439
<v Speaker 11>assets that the private equity funds have. Compliance costs are

0:27:54.480 --> 0:27:57.600
<v Speaker 11>really high right now, it's about an average of four

0:27:57.640 --> 0:28:00.679
<v Speaker 11>percent of a company's market cap. There are more regulations

0:28:00.720 --> 0:28:03.200
<v Speaker 11>than ever, not just the thirty three and thirty four Acts,

0:28:03.200 --> 0:28:08.080
<v Speaker 11>but Sarbanes Oxley and DoD Frank and companies have to

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:12.159
<v Speaker 11>take a short term view in the sense that they

0:28:12.200 --> 0:28:17.320
<v Speaker 11>have to put out quarterly filings and make distributions to

0:28:17.320 --> 0:28:19.640
<v Speaker 11>their shareholders, and so they have to take the short

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:22.439
<v Speaker 11>term view over long term priorities. And a company like

0:28:22.600 --> 0:28:25.679
<v Speaker 11>ARM really has to prioritize a long term view. It

0:28:25.720 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 11>has to invest in R and D, so thinking short

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:32.399
<v Speaker 11>term not the greatest. And one other thing that I

0:28:32.400 --> 0:28:35.200
<v Speaker 11>would bring up, there's going to be this new standard

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:38.680
<v Speaker 11>which comes out pretty soon from from fasby the Accounting

0:28:38.680 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 11>Standards Board called Noklar, which experts believe will double or

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:47.960
<v Speaker 11>even triple the fees that companies have to pay to

0:28:48.000 --> 0:28:51.160
<v Speaker 11>their auditors. And what it does is it essentially says

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 11>to the auditors, if there's any regulation, law, anything around

0:28:54.680 --> 0:28:57.240
<v Speaker 11>the world that's going to have a material impact on

0:28:57.280 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 11>a company's filings, it has to be included. And so

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:04.480
<v Speaker 11>that means that others are responsible for checking everything everywhere

0:29:04.480 --> 0:29:07.240
<v Speaker 11>in any country that the company operates in order to

0:29:07.280 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 11>make sure that all material risks are covered. So it's

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:13.440
<v Speaker 11>not a great time to be a public company.

0:29:13.440 --> 0:29:16.040
<v Speaker 2>Those are all the reasons you wouldn't want to go public.

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 2>And I mean clearly, if you're a billionaire and you

0:29:19.800 --> 0:29:22.840
<v Speaker 2>don't have a fantastic valuation, you take your company private.

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:28.000
<v Speaker 2>That's the smart move. Andrew Silverman, hang tight for a second,

0:29:28.000 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 2>because I want to bring Kunjon Sabani leads semiconductor analysts

0:29:31.000 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 2>for Bloomberg Intelligence cou John. Having said all that, and

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure you know all the reasons why you wouldn't

0:29:37.160 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 2>necessarily want to go public. Why is massa son? Why

0:29:39.640 --> 0:29:42.960
<v Speaker 2>is SoftBank taking arm public right now rather than any

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 2>other exit exit strategy?

0:29:46.280 --> 0:29:48.480
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I mean, simple reason is they just need liquidity

0:29:48.640 --> 0:29:51.960
<v Speaker 12>right now given what's happening in their parent business, Softmak.

0:29:52.040 --> 0:29:54.040
<v Speaker 12>So they're just in need of some cash and this

0:29:54.200 --> 0:29:57.960
<v Speaker 12>is one of their biggest assets, which might not be

0:29:58.000 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 12>the perfect time, but still relatively in the pass, it's

0:30:00.520 --> 0:30:02.960
<v Speaker 12>a better time today to go public with this. The

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:05.280
<v Speaker 12>other thing to keep in account, they're limiting their flow

0:30:05.400 --> 0:30:08.520
<v Speaker 12>to really like only five billion dollars, less than ten percent,

0:30:08.640 --> 0:30:12.040
<v Speaker 12>so they are holding on to get a higher price

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 12>later in the future.

0:30:14.240 --> 0:30:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Kun John, you know, as I looked at this perspectives,

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:19.240
<v Speaker 1>it looks like this is a company that designs chips

0:30:19.240 --> 0:30:24.000
<v Speaker 1>for telephones. Great, but they are pitching this company now

0:30:24.120 --> 0:30:28.000
<v Speaker 1>as hey, we're going to be an AI company going forward.

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:29.520
<v Speaker 3>So they're asking me.

0:30:29.520 --> 0:30:33.360
<v Speaker 1>To pay an AI ish type multiple for a phone

0:30:33.440 --> 0:30:36.320
<v Speaker 1>chip manufacturer. Is that kind of what they're asking the

0:30:36.320 --> 0:30:37.560
<v Speaker 1>market to buy off on.

0:30:39.400 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 12>Yes, that's exactly right. I mean, look, they're pitching, they're

0:30:42.800 --> 0:30:45.720
<v Speaker 12>asking the market to underwrite the future, sort of the

0:30:45.760 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 12>next in media moment, and their current business is primarily,

0:30:49.560 --> 0:30:52.120
<v Speaker 12>like you said, smartphones and consumer electronics and to some

0:30:52.160 --> 0:30:55.920
<v Speaker 12>degree IoT, but the AI server and the automotive market

0:30:56.000 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 12>is where they've had recent designments which they expect to

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:02.120
<v Speaker 12>or they share there, and that is what they're selling

0:31:02.160 --> 0:31:04.160
<v Speaker 12>to the investors, like, hey, you can bet on us

0:31:04.200 --> 0:31:06.600
<v Speaker 12>for this coming in the future, so you don't miss out.

0:31:07.160 --> 0:31:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Andrew, back in today, you know, I could take

0:31:09.080 --> 0:31:11.680
<v Speaker 1>a company public with not much more than a business plan,

0:31:11.880 --> 0:31:15.040
<v Speaker 1>But today it seems like the market once not only

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:19.440
<v Speaker 1>revenues but profits. I mean that also maybe thins out

0:31:19.480 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the herd for potential IPO candidates.

0:31:23.960 --> 0:31:29.480
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, that's exactly right. And in this case, I mean, well, so,

0:31:30.280 --> 0:31:32.440
<v Speaker 11>I mean why to invest in a company. I mean,

0:31:32.480 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 11>on the one hand, you want to get your returns.

0:31:34.160 --> 0:31:37.719
<v Speaker 11>On the other hand, you have an expectation you're going

0:31:37.760 --> 0:31:40.240
<v Speaker 11>to have some sort of control over over the company

0:31:40.240 --> 0:31:41.880
<v Speaker 11>that you're investing in, and this is not one of

0:31:41.920 --> 0:31:44.680
<v Speaker 11>those cases because soft Bank is going to keep controlling

0:31:44.720 --> 0:31:47.520
<v Speaker 11>it after the IPO, and it's going to be what's

0:31:47.560 --> 0:31:50.240
<v Speaker 11>called a foreign private issuer, and so the shareholders won't

0:31:50.240 --> 0:31:53.760
<v Speaker 11>even know as much about it as a typical US company,

0:31:53.800 --> 0:31:56.200
<v Speaker 11>won't have to make quarterly filings, won't have to have

0:31:56.320 --> 0:32:00.760
<v Speaker 11>quarterly shareholder calls, and not subject to reg AfD, so

0:32:00.840 --> 0:32:04.680
<v Speaker 11>it can share material non public information selectively, not just

0:32:04.880 --> 0:32:10.560
<v Speaker 11>to a select group of shareholders, not all shareholders. So yeah,

0:32:10.600 --> 0:32:13.640
<v Speaker 11>I mean, if the only thing that people are investing

0:32:13.640 --> 0:32:16.160
<v Speaker 11>in ARMED for is a shareholders distribution, I think they're

0:32:16.160 --> 0:32:18.080
<v Speaker 11>also going to be disappointed in the fact that this

0:32:18.120 --> 0:32:20.680
<v Speaker 11>company has to invest so much and it's R and D,

0:32:20.920 --> 0:32:23.320
<v Speaker 11>and it also has such high operating expenses.

0:32:24.080 --> 0:32:26.560
<v Speaker 2>So and it's a good point that this is all

0:32:26.680 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 2>about soft Bank, Kunjohn. ARM isn't reaping any of the

0:32:31.200 --> 0:32:34.440
<v Speaker 2>proceeds from this IPO, right, It's not like they're going

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 2>to be able to reinvest and build their business. This

0:32:36.720 --> 0:32:38.960
<v Speaker 2>is just cashing out from Masa Sun.

0:32:39.800 --> 0:32:40.680
<v Speaker 4>That's exactly right.

0:32:40.800 --> 0:32:42.520
<v Speaker 12>None of the proceeds are going to ARM to be

0:32:42.520 --> 0:32:43.760
<v Speaker 12>invested in the business.

0:32:44.400 --> 0:32:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Kunjun, Just real quick thirty seconds of the chip makers

0:32:47.320 --> 0:32:49.400
<v Speaker 1>out there which ones do you think are best positioned

0:32:49.440 --> 0:32:50.760
<v Speaker 1>for this AI move?

0:32:52.120 --> 0:32:54.360
<v Speaker 12>I mean in Nvidia, of course we all are aware

0:32:54.400 --> 0:32:58.920
<v Speaker 12>of this second closes as AMD, they are also betting

0:32:58.960 --> 0:33:02.520
<v Speaker 12>big on AI, and I would go broad common Intell

0:33:02.560 --> 0:33:04.440
<v Speaker 12>also have significant air exposure.

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:09.560
<v Speaker 1>And do you expect can a company like arm make

0:33:09.600 --> 0:33:10.080
<v Speaker 1>that pivot?

0:33:10.120 --> 0:33:12.040
<v Speaker 3>Do you think? How do you view that opportunity?

0:33:13.360 --> 0:33:13.720
<v Speaker 6>They could?

0:33:13.720 --> 0:33:16.520
<v Speaker 12>I mean, look, they currently they have low single digit share,

0:33:16.720 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 12>but they have had recent massive wins Amazon, Google, startups

0:33:22.040 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 12>like mpere adopting ARMED technology Apple, so there's room to

0:33:27.520 --> 0:33:30.680
<v Speaker 12>leverage and build on those wins, and they can. I mean, look,

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:32.800
<v Speaker 12>they don't need to beat the dominant player even if

0:33:32.840 --> 0:33:35.760
<v Speaker 12>they grow their market share. But another five percent, that's

0:33:35.920 --> 0:33:38.600
<v Speaker 12>talking about billions of dollars adding to a company which

0:33:38.640 --> 0:33:41.680
<v Speaker 12>is a low three billion in revenue, So significant growth

0:33:41.680 --> 0:33:43.920
<v Speaker 12>from just a little bit of an increment share games.

0:33:44.080 --> 0:33:45.600
<v Speaker 3>All right, thanks so much for joining us.

0:33:45.640 --> 0:33:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Conjoen Sapani he is the technology analys for Bloomberg Intelligence

0:33:49.120 --> 0:33:52.320
<v Speaker 1>based in San Francisco. And Andrew Silverman government analys covering

0:33:52.320 --> 0:33:55.479
<v Speaker 1>a tax policy, looking at the IPO market in general.

0:33:55.520 --> 0:33:58.720
<v Speaker 1>He does all that stuff for Bloomberg Intelligence based down

0:33:58.800 --> 0:34:02.560
<v Speaker 1>in Washington, DC. We've got bi analysts basically everywhere.

0:34:02.120 --> 0:34:02.720
<v Speaker 3>They need to be.

0:34:02.800 --> 0:34:05.160
<v Speaker 1>If you need tech, we got folks in San Francisco.

0:34:05.200 --> 0:34:08.239
<v Speaker 1>If you need the policy stuff, we got folks down

0:34:08.239 --> 0:34:10.480
<v Speaker 1>in DC, right where it all happens. So this bifolks

0:34:10.520 --> 0:34:11.520
<v Speaker 1>know what they're doing down there.

0:34:11.920 --> 0:34:13.160
<v Speaker 5>You're listening to the tape.

0:34:13.320 --> 0:34:16.680
<v Speaker 8>Cat's are live program Bloomberg Markets weekdays at ten am

0:34:16.719 --> 0:34:20.839
<v Speaker 8>Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com.

0:34:20.560 --> 0:34:21.959
<v Speaker 5>And the Bloomberg Business app.

0:34:22.040 --> 0:34:24.839
<v Speaker 8>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:34:24.840 --> 0:34:30.040
<v Speaker 8>flagship New York station. Just say Alexa, play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:34:31.280 --> 0:34:32.080
<v Speaker 3>It's called gaming.

0:34:32.280 --> 0:34:34.960
<v Speaker 1>My favorite sectors to cover the casinos. But we're not

0:34:34.960 --> 0:34:37.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna be talking craps or blackjack.

0:34:36.760 --> 0:34:38.760
<v Speaker 3>Or any of that kind of stuff. We're talking hacking.

0:34:39.080 --> 0:34:40.799
<v Speaker 1>I think some of these casino companies have been hacked

0:34:40.840 --> 0:34:42.399
<v Speaker 1>over the past couple of days. I'm talking to big

0:34:42.440 --> 0:34:45.960
<v Speaker 1>ones like MGM and Caesars. Let's break this down, see

0:34:46.000 --> 0:34:49.040
<v Speaker 1>what the risk is here to these companies. Brian Egger,

0:34:49.360 --> 0:34:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Senior Gaming Analysts and Lodging Animals, Bloomberg Intelligence, joins Us

0:34:52.160 --> 0:34:56.399
<v Speaker 1>and Jody Lori credit analysts with Bloomberg Intelligence. She joins

0:34:56.480 --> 0:35:00.200
<v Speaker 1>us on via zoom both via Zoom here and in

0:35:00.200 --> 0:35:02.520
<v Speaker 1>our Princeton office. Brian, let's just start with you what's

0:35:02.560 --> 0:35:05.560
<v Speaker 1>going on with these big casino companies and some hacking.

0:35:07.880 --> 0:35:09.840
<v Speaker 13>So it came about we found out a couple of

0:35:09.920 --> 0:35:13.440
<v Speaker 13>days ago that MGM has been the target of an

0:35:13.440 --> 0:35:18.520
<v Speaker 13>ongoing cyber attack TEMP that has resulted in systems shutdowns

0:35:18.520 --> 0:35:23.319
<v Speaker 13>across a wide range of services. That's casino, hotel, other

0:35:23.440 --> 0:35:26.920
<v Speaker 13>systems that have had to revert to manual operations. Obviously,

0:35:26.920 --> 0:35:30.840
<v Speaker 13>it's been significantly disruptive, so there's an ongoing effort to

0:35:30.880 --> 0:35:35.720
<v Speaker 13>remediate this, but it has certainly been an ongoing topic

0:35:35.760 --> 0:35:37.480
<v Speaker 13>of interest to anyone following the industry.

0:35:38.280 --> 0:35:42.359
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Jody, from the balance sheet perspective, from the talk

0:35:42.400 --> 0:35:45.000
<v Speaker 1>to us about these two companies or the industry in general,

0:35:45.360 --> 0:35:47.120
<v Speaker 1>about kind of where we are in terms of the

0:35:47.120 --> 0:35:49.520
<v Speaker 1>capital structure and the debt loads and the leverage. Are

0:35:49.520 --> 0:35:51.240
<v Speaker 1>these balance sheets in decent shape?

0:35:52.120 --> 0:35:54.440
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, so, I think I think that's definitely a great question.

0:35:54.880 --> 0:35:57.839
<v Speaker 14>These companies have been very much improving their balance sheets

0:35:57.880 --> 0:35:59.960
<v Speaker 14>since the pandemic. But it's a little bit more complic

0:36:00.400 --> 0:36:02.319
<v Speaker 14>that and a little bit more nuanced. If you take

0:36:02.320 --> 0:36:06.759
<v Speaker 14>someone like Caesar's, they've been directly deleveraging proactively MGM. It's

0:36:06.800 --> 0:36:11.120
<v Speaker 14>a little bit touch and go because they opted to

0:36:11.160 --> 0:36:13.319
<v Speaker 14>sell out of their assets through a sale lease back,

0:36:13.760 --> 0:36:16.160
<v Speaker 14>and so a substantial portion of their of their quote

0:36:16.239 --> 0:36:19.680
<v Speaker 14>unquote debt or if you consider adjusted lease back debt

0:36:19.960 --> 0:36:22.799
<v Speaker 14>is leasebacks. I mean, that's about half of their debt

0:36:22.840 --> 0:36:25.520
<v Speaker 14>load outstanding. So from a debt perspective, you say, all right, look,

0:36:25.560 --> 0:36:28.560
<v Speaker 14>these companies are actually pretty good shape. But if you

0:36:28.600 --> 0:36:32.960
<v Speaker 14>add leases, it makes MGM look less favorable than Caesar's.

0:36:33.640 --> 0:36:34.520
<v Speaker 3>But there's no issue here.

0:36:34.600 --> 0:36:36.759
<v Speaker 1>Jody just kind of like, if there's gonna be a

0:36:36.800 --> 0:36:39.480
<v Speaker 1>material hit to their profitability or the cash loads for

0:36:40.360 --> 0:36:42.680
<v Speaker 1>either of these companies, do you think yeah?

0:36:42.760 --> 0:36:45.400
<v Speaker 14>So, I think that's the key is that you know,

0:36:45.400 --> 0:36:47.360
<v Speaker 14>and Brian and I have been talking about it all week,

0:36:47.680 --> 0:36:51.960
<v Speaker 14>is at least for now, the expected effects for their

0:36:51.960 --> 0:36:54.600
<v Speaker 14>cashlows from a long term perspective might not be so grand.

0:36:54.920 --> 0:36:56.640
<v Speaker 14>It's really a question of what is the sort of

0:36:56.719 --> 0:36:59.720
<v Speaker 14>echo effects for these companies over time that could impact

0:36:59.719 --> 0:37:02.440
<v Speaker 14>March and therefore cash flows. And I think you know,

0:37:02.800 --> 0:37:06.239
<v Speaker 14>the issue is you know, if if insurance is going

0:37:06.320 --> 0:37:08.800
<v Speaker 14>to cover a good portion of it, what sort of

0:37:08.880 --> 0:37:14.800
<v Speaker 14>knock on effects to things like reservations might might be affected.

0:37:14.840 --> 0:37:17.239
<v Speaker 14>You know, if MGM site is down all week and

0:37:17.280 --> 0:37:20.239
<v Speaker 14>it's right during their peak season of bookings, because we

0:37:20.280 --> 0:37:21.920
<v Speaker 14>have a lot of events going on that Brian has

0:37:21.920 --> 0:37:25.239
<v Speaker 14>talked dead nauseum about, does this mean that MGM is

0:37:25.239 --> 0:37:28.360
<v Speaker 14>going to lose out to competitors when people are starting

0:37:28.360 --> 0:37:30.799
<v Speaker 14>to book for things like Formula one and things going

0:37:30.840 --> 0:37:32.080
<v Speaker 14>on in the in the fourth quarter.

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:36.000
<v Speaker 2>Brian, Jody is sick of hearing you talk about the events.

0:37:36.680 --> 0:37:44.719
<v Speaker 2>Come on, man, thats absolutely so. But in terms of

0:37:45.080 --> 0:37:48.480
<v Speaker 2>I just just to wrap up the the hacking side

0:37:48.480 --> 0:37:53.359
<v Speaker 2>of this, are MGM or any of the other casinos

0:37:53.600 --> 0:37:58.880
<v Speaker 2>more at risk of hacking than other you know, I

0:37:58.880 --> 0:38:00.400
<v Speaker 2>guess financial companies.

0:38:01.400 --> 0:38:03.040
<v Speaker 13>I mean, we've begun to view this as at very

0:38:03.160 --> 0:38:06.040
<v Speaker 13>least an industry wide risk. Caesars had an AK report

0:38:06.040 --> 0:38:09.279
<v Speaker 13>out this morning indicating that they were the target of

0:38:09.360 --> 0:38:13.879
<v Speaker 13>another effort to hack into their systems. Along with that

0:38:14.000 --> 0:38:18.600
<v Speaker 13>some of their loyalty program members information was tapped. So

0:38:18.680 --> 0:38:21.680
<v Speaker 13>this is an ongoing where Caesars managed to whether that

0:38:21.760 --> 0:38:25.680
<v Speaker 13>particular or incident without the very visible systems wide outage

0:38:25.719 --> 0:38:26.680
<v Speaker 13>that MGM.

0:38:26.400 --> 0:38:27.280
<v Speaker 6>Is still undergoing.

0:38:27.920 --> 0:38:30.520
<v Speaker 13>But I think it's fair to assume this is going

0:38:30.560 --> 0:38:34.319
<v Speaker 13>to be an industry wide risk required and really coordinating

0:38:35.200 --> 0:38:38.560
<v Speaker 13>remediation and containment efforts, and you will get some offset

0:38:38.920 --> 0:38:42.480
<v Speaker 13>presumably from MGM, from cyber insurance. We just do not

0:38:42.640 --> 0:38:47.400
<v Speaker 13>know the degree to which we'll get those offsetting streams.

0:38:47.560 --> 0:38:49.719
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's step back and look at this just

0:38:49.840 --> 0:38:52.840
<v Speaker 1>this industry in general, Jody. When you talk to creditors

0:38:52.920 --> 0:38:56.200
<v Speaker 1>out there, credit investors, how did they view the gaming business?

0:38:56.239 --> 0:38:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Is this something that is a really solid credit out

0:38:59.520 --> 0:39:02.080
<v Speaker 1>there for a lot of investors? Do they buy the industry?

0:39:02.280 --> 0:39:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Do they buy individual names? How do they approach it?

0:39:05.520 --> 0:39:07.920
<v Speaker 14>I think if you like gaming, you're in gaming. You're

0:39:07.960 --> 0:39:10.560
<v Speaker 14>full fledged in gaming, and then you're just picking names.

0:39:10.640 --> 0:39:13.080
<v Speaker 14>I think there's a lot of creditors who say, I

0:39:13.120 --> 0:39:15.400
<v Speaker 14>don't even want to touch the space because it's too cyclical.

0:39:15.760 --> 0:39:18.000
<v Speaker 14>I mean, let's remember that back in two thousand and eight,

0:39:18.080 --> 0:39:22.560
<v Speaker 14>MGM got a little bit over over levered with City Center.

0:39:22.600 --> 0:39:24.040
<v Speaker 14>They were able to get themselves out of it. But

0:39:24.160 --> 0:39:27.320
<v Speaker 14>comparison to that, Caesar's and we're not talking to Caesars

0:39:27.360 --> 0:39:29.440
<v Speaker 14>of today, because the Caesars of today is El Dorado,

0:39:29.680 --> 0:39:33.279
<v Speaker 14>But historically Caesar's was lbo'ed taken private and then they

0:39:33.400 --> 0:39:38.160
<v Speaker 14>ended up going through restructuring. So it's definitely an industry

0:39:38.200 --> 0:39:39.719
<v Speaker 14>that if you like it, you really like it and

0:39:39.760 --> 0:39:41.560
<v Speaker 14>you're involved in it. If you don't like it, you

0:39:41.560 --> 0:39:42.480
<v Speaker 14>don't really go near it.

0:39:43.200 --> 0:39:45.520
<v Speaker 2>But to be clear, I mean Paul was talking about

0:39:45.520 --> 0:39:51.279
<v Speaker 2>craps and blackjack, and I mean that's not is that

0:39:51.320 --> 0:39:53.799
<v Speaker 2>still the lion's share of their revenue or is their

0:39:53.880 --> 0:39:58.239
<v Speaker 2>revenue more like you know, Banker's booking conferences.

0:39:57.480 --> 0:39:58.360
<v Speaker 3>At the resort.

0:39:59.360 --> 0:40:02.799
<v Speaker 14>They're definitely shifting, shifting their mix, and we're seeing that

0:40:02.880 --> 0:40:05.880
<v Speaker 14>with with Sands over in Macau. I mean, they're focusing

0:40:05.960 --> 0:40:08.520
<v Speaker 14>so much on their non gaming portion of their business,

0:40:08.800 --> 0:40:10.880
<v Speaker 14>and I think you're seeing that in Vegas as well.

0:40:10.960 --> 0:40:14.000
<v Speaker 14>And they would hope for the regional casinos that obviously

0:40:14.160 --> 0:40:16.640
<v Speaker 14>gaming is the bread and butter of the business, but

0:40:16.719 --> 0:40:19.040
<v Speaker 14>they want to give people the other element. They want

0:40:19.040 --> 0:40:20.880
<v Speaker 14>to give people the shows and the shopping and the

0:40:20.960 --> 0:40:23.919
<v Speaker 14>experiences because that's what's going to keep people. That's also

0:40:23.960 --> 0:40:26.919
<v Speaker 14>going to bring other types of individuals than just your

0:40:26.920 --> 0:40:36.040
<v Speaker 14>dedicated slot users or craps tables players.

0:40:31.440 --> 0:40:36.279
<v Speaker 1>Vegas of course, But Brian, I understand and reading your

0:40:36.280 --> 0:40:38.920
<v Speaker 1>research and talking to you, that the regional gaming business

0:40:39.000 --> 0:40:40.640
<v Speaker 1>is a big, big part of it. Talk to us

0:40:40.640 --> 0:40:43.520
<v Speaker 1>about some of those kind of like non Vegas aspect

0:40:43.600 --> 0:40:46.680
<v Speaker 1>to the US gaming business. How's that performing? Because gas

0:40:46.760 --> 0:40:48.600
<v Speaker 1>is expensive, It's going to cost me a lot to

0:40:48.600 --> 0:40:51.920
<v Speaker 1>get to my Mississippi River kind of casino.

0:40:52.719 --> 0:40:55.000
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, the regional gaming trends that performed well, we've probably

0:40:55.040 --> 0:40:58.480
<v Speaker 13>webbled off certainly above prevend netic levels, but compared to

0:40:58.520 --> 0:41:01.680
<v Speaker 13>last year, things that become or perhaps flatten. I think

0:41:01.719 --> 0:41:04.560
<v Speaker 13>the bigger challenge, not only for Vegas but for regional

0:41:04.600 --> 0:41:07.560
<v Speaker 13>properties is on the cost side. As the companies are

0:41:07.600 --> 0:41:11.759
<v Speaker 13>reinstated full pre pandemic service levels, they may find it

0:41:11.840 --> 0:41:15.399
<v Speaker 13>trperts to sustain the very significant margin gains to get

0:41:15.480 --> 0:41:18.839
<v Speaker 13>relative through pre pandemic experience. I will point out that

0:41:18.880 --> 0:41:24.040
<v Speaker 13>this cyber incident is affecting MGM's regional properties as well

0:41:24.080 --> 0:41:26.800
<v Speaker 13>as its Vegas properties. So this is really kind of

0:41:26.840 --> 0:41:29.400
<v Speaker 13>a national issue for MGM.

0:41:31.000 --> 0:41:35.520
<v Speaker 2>In terms of, you know, where they're getting their revenue.

0:41:35.600 --> 0:41:43.200
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned Jody mcau is Las Vegas dwindling as a

0:41:43.239 --> 0:41:46.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, revenue source. Are they getting more revenue overseas

0:41:46.200 --> 0:41:47.720
<v Speaker 2>now the bigger companies.

0:41:48.440 --> 0:41:50.680
<v Speaker 14>So if you look at it from more than revenue,

0:41:50.719 --> 0:41:53.279
<v Speaker 14>we care more on Ebadah, especially from a debt perspective,

0:41:53.320 --> 0:41:57.080
<v Speaker 14>and from an Ebadah perspective, MACAW is still coming back.

0:41:57.239 --> 0:42:02.919
<v Speaker 14>So MCAW was roughly twenty two percent of mgmbadar which

0:42:02.960 --> 0:42:07.359
<v Speaker 14>includes rent in before the pandemic, So twenty nineteen they're

0:42:07.400 --> 0:42:11.080
<v Speaker 14>not quite there yet. They have seen a significant uptick,

0:42:11.440 --> 0:42:15.400
<v Speaker 14>but Vegas and regionals are still certainly the lion's share

0:42:15.640 --> 0:42:17.840
<v Speaker 14>of what's going on in their business. No pun intended

0:42:17.920 --> 0:42:21.759
<v Speaker 14>on the line because that's MGM's logo. But I think

0:42:21.800 --> 0:42:24.680
<v Speaker 14>that's the key, is that MCAW is this source of

0:42:25.400 --> 0:42:29.920
<v Speaker 14>momentum that's happening, but it's not quite two pre pandemic levels,

0:42:29.920 --> 0:42:31.520
<v Speaker 14>and that's a function of the fact that it's only

0:42:31.520 --> 0:42:33.680
<v Speaker 14>been open since the beginning of the year. I think

0:42:33.680 --> 0:42:36.359
<v Speaker 14>that that provides some nice tailwes for MGM to make

0:42:36.440 --> 0:42:38.120
<v Speaker 14>up for the fact that the US business is having

0:42:38.120 --> 0:42:42.319
<v Speaker 14>this little blip of an issue. And even if things

0:42:42.360 --> 0:42:44.760
<v Speaker 14>start to slow down in the US and people aren't

0:42:45.120 --> 0:42:47.920
<v Speaker 14>doing this revenge spending that we saw over the past

0:42:47.960 --> 0:42:50.480
<v Speaker 14>year and a half, two years, we might see mcau

0:42:50.640 --> 0:42:52.040
<v Speaker 14>helped to sort of offset that.

0:42:52.040 --> 0:42:52.480
<v Speaker 15>A little bit.

0:42:53.840 --> 0:42:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Hey Brian, is there any new property coming online in Vegas?

0:43:00.040 --> 0:43:04.400
<v Speaker 13>There's a public things that are underway for future developments,

0:43:04.800 --> 0:43:06.120
<v Speaker 13>nothing like really.

0:43:06.120 --> 0:43:08.799
<v Speaker 3>Imminence the right.

0:43:09.200 --> 0:43:11.680
<v Speaker 2>There's that very cool orb where like you two apparently

0:43:12.480 --> 0:43:13.200
<v Speaker 2>the Spears.

0:43:13.239 --> 0:43:17.839
<v Speaker 13>The Sphere is interesting a non gaming attraction, but it's

0:43:18.040 --> 0:43:21.200
<v Speaker 13>highly significant. A lot of the recent additions to Vegas

0:43:21.200 --> 0:43:24.440
<v Speaker 13>have been not to diminish the importance of large term

0:43:24.440 --> 0:43:26.880
<v Speaker 13>resort development, but a lot of the additions to Vegas

0:43:26.920 --> 0:43:29.120
<v Speaker 13>have been in the form of non gaming entertainment. So

0:43:29.160 --> 0:43:32.600
<v Speaker 13>you've got the Sphere entertainment venue. Jody earlier mentioned the

0:43:32.600 --> 0:43:35.239
<v Speaker 13>Formula one Grand Prix, which I'll mention again. But also

0:43:35.280 --> 0:43:40.720
<v Speaker 13>you've got sports teams significantly, you have the the Golden

0:43:40.800 --> 0:43:45.320
<v Speaker 13>Knights playing at the T Mobile Center. You've got a

0:43:45.400 --> 0:43:48.319
<v Speaker 13>Legion stadium hosting the Raiders, and of course you have

0:43:48.400 --> 0:43:51.279
<v Speaker 13>the A's moving to Vegas at a site that will

0:43:51.280 --> 0:43:55.880
<v Speaker 13>be on the stadium, uh buddying the current Tropicano. So

0:43:56.120 --> 0:43:59.239
<v Speaker 13>not to diminish the importance of potential long term resort developments.

0:43:59.239 --> 0:44:05.120
<v Speaker 13>But these non gaming developments related to entertainment sports conferences,

0:44:05.680 --> 0:44:09.080
<v Speaker 13>those are all rather significant additions to draw tourism that

0:44:09.120 --> 0:44:11.320
<v Speaker 13>don't necessarily a room capacity.

0:44:11.480 --> 0:44:14.080
<v Speaker 3>All right, great stuff as always, Brian Nagger, Jody Lori.

0:44:14.239 --> 0:44:17.840
<v Speaker 1>There. You're analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence covering the gaming biz

0:44:17.840 --> 0:44:19.879
<v Speaker 1>from the equity side and the credit side. It does

0:44:19.920 --> 0:44:22.680
<v Speaker 1>not get any better than that. We got full equity

0:44:22.719 --> 0:44:23.640
<v Speaker 1>and credit coverage.

0:44:23.800 --> 0:44:26.920
<v Speaker 8>You're listening to the tape catch are live program Bloomberg

0:44:27.000 --> 0:44:30.560
<v Speaker 8>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:44:30.640 --> 0:44:32.600
<v Speaker 8>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and.

0:44:32.560 --> 0:44:33.879
<v Speaker 5>The Bloomberg Business App.

0:44:33.920 --> 0:44:36.719
<v Speaker 8>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:44:36.719 --> 0:44:40.360
<v Speaker 8>flagship New York station. Just say Alexa play Bloomberg.

0:44:40.400 --> 0:44:43.680
<v Speaker 16>Eleven thirty high school friends I have not talked to

0:44:43.680 --> 0:44:45.560
<v Speaker 16>in a long time, who are saying you never told me?

0:44:46.320 --> 0:44:49.640
<v Speaker 16>I think as we're watching this on TV. But most

0:44:49.640 --> 0:44:51.839
<v Speaker 16>of all, I'm so thrilled for the employees of ARM

0:44:52.560 --> 0:44:56.640
<v Speaker 16>thirty three year old company. Great heritage, but watching all

0:44:56.680 --> 0:45:00.319
<v Speaker 16>the employees in Cambridge celebrate simultaneously, that was magical.

0:45:00.280 --> 0:45:02.480
<v Speaker 17>And they might continue to celebrate as we see what

0:45:02.600 --> 0:45:07.160
<v Speaker 17>seventeen eighteen percent increase. How has that journey of going

0:45:07.160 --> 0:45:09.839
<v Speaker 17>out to investors the road show, the story that you've

0:45:09.880 --> 0:45:12.480
<v Speaker 17>been able seemingly to successfully sell the fact that you're

0:45:12.480 --> 0:45:13.560
<v Speaker 17>trading well on this day.

0:45:14.040 --> 0:45:16.360
<v Speaker 15>What was the vision? They wanted to hear revenue growth?

0:45:16.400 --> 0:45:18.439
<v Speaker 17>I hear of eleven percent up to twenty five percent

0:45:18.440 --> 0:45:19.279
<v Speaker 17>in the next couple of years.

0:45:19.280 --> 0:45:19.799
<v Speaker 15>What drives you?

0:45:20.160 --> 0:45:23.319
<v Speaker 16>I think it was a great process. Investors really wanted

0:45:23.320 --> 0:45:25.440
<v Speaker 16>to understand the opportunity we had in front of us,

0:45:25.640 --> 0:45:27.800
<v Speaker 16>and of course AI, which you can't really talk about

0:45:27.800 --> 0:45:30.800
<v Speaker 16>our industry without talking about AI. And I think helping

0:45:30.800 --> 0:45:34.600
<v Speaker 16>them understand that you can't really run AI without ARM,

0:45:34.680 --> 0:45:37.040
<v Speaker 16>without a CPU, and just pointing out to them that

0:45:37.080 --> 0:45:39.719
<v Speaker 16>it's in everywhere, in every device that people touch was

0:45:39.719 --> 0:45:40.839
<v Speaker 16>a big part of the process for.

0:45:40.880 --> 0:45:44.160
<v Speaker 17>Us because everyone has made the equivalent of you're a smartphone,

0:45:44.160 --> 0:45:47.120
<v Speaker 17>it's completely absorbed more than ninety percent of phones is

0:45:47.120 --> 0:45:50.000
<v Speaker 17>where your CPUs are. But the design, the fact that

0:45:50.040 --> 0:45:51.960
<v Speaker 17>you now want to be integral to data centers, and

0:45:52.000 --> 0:45:56.360
<v Speaker 17>they're like, how certain are you on the revenue vision,

0:45:56.360 --> 0:45:59.799
<v Speaker 17>on the profitability vision, even though we see concerns about

0:46:00.000 --> 0:46:02.200
<v Speaker 17>our environment still and whether or not we're in an

0:46:02.239 --> 0:46:03.160
<v Speaker 17>AI hype cycle.

0:46:03.440 --> 0:46:07.439
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, so AI is everywhere, and if it's your edge

0:46:07.440 --> 0:46:11.480
<v Speaker 16>device like the Assistant or the Alexa, or your autonomous vehicle,

0:46:11.520 --> 0:46:14.040
<v Speaker 16>that's all AI. And now we're seeing it in the

0:46:14.080 --> 0:46:15.640
<v Speaker 16>cloud in the data center with all the growth of

0:46:15.920 --> 0:46:18.640
<v Speaker 16>d in Vidia announcing one of their newest products, grace Hopper,

0:46:19.000 --> 0:46:21.440
<v Speaker 16>that is based on ARM. So ARM is everywhere relative

0:46:21.440 --> 0:46:24.120
<v Speaker 16>to AI, we also have a very unique business model

0:46:24.400 --> 0:46:26.319
<v Speaker 16>that gives us the ability to have a very very

0:46:26.360 --> 0:46:28.719
<v Speaker 16>good vision in the future in terms of when people

0:46:28.800 --> 0:46:32.040
<v Speaker 16>use our products. So relative to our confidence in the outlook,

0:46:32.760 --> 0:46:34.799
<v Speaker 16>we have a very very high confidence that the growth

0:46:34.880 --> 0:46:36.600
<v Speaker 16>rate that we have talked about will be sustained.

0:46:37.080 --> 0:46:39.600
<v Speaker 17>How word were invested about China and your exposure.

0:46:39.760 --> 0:46:41.080
<v Speaker 16>I think there were a lot of questions, as you

0:46:41.080 --> 0:46:44.920
<v Speaker 16>can imagine about China in general, given all the geopolitics,

0:46:45.040 --> 0:46:46.920
<v Speaker 16>Our business there looks a lot like the rest of

0:46:46.960 --> 0:46:49.120
<v Speaker 16>the world. We have great growth in the data center,

0:46:49.160 --> 0:46:52.560
<v Speaker 16>we have great growth and automotive China's huge on electric vehicles,

0:46:52.600 --> 0:46:55.120
<v Speaker 16>so it's been terrific there for us. I have the

0:46:55.160 --> 0:46:57.919
<v Speaker 16>same kind of headaches that every other tech CEO has

0:46:58.000 --> 0:47:00.680
<v Speaker 16>regarding how to navigate through this, but no different.

0:47:01.680 --> 0:47:03.759
<v Speaker 17>Do you think there will be more pressure now that

0:47:03.800 --> 0:47:04.800
<v Speaker 17>you're public again?

0:47:04.960 --> 0:47:05.440
<v Speaker 15>Ultimately?

0:47:05.480 --> 0:47:08.520
<v Speaker 17>I mean you came to ARM in twenty thirteen, you

0:47:08.560 --> 0:47:10.319
<v Speaker 17>were listed at that point, but it's not been since

0:47:10.440 --> 0:47:12.359
<v Speaker 17>twenty sixteen that you have been How does the game

0:47:12.480 --> 0:47:14.279
<v Speaker 17>change as a leader of that business now?

0:47:14.520 --> 0:47:16.160
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, I think there's some things that we were able

0:47:16.160 --> 0:47:18.440
<v Speaker 16>to do as a private company that will just be different. Right,

0:47:18.600 --> 0:47:21.400
<v Speaker 16>quarterly earnings, making sure that we hit all our commitments.

0:47:21.880 --> 0:47:23.879
<v Speaker 16>But ARM is not a business you measure from quarter

0:47:23.920 --> 0:47:27.359
<v Speaker 16>to quarter. You measure us over years and decades, and

0:47:27.600 --> 0:47:29.680
<v Speaker 16>the long term vision is something that I am very,

0:47:29.800 --> 0:47:31.760
<v Speaker 16>very passionate about and will continue to drive the company

0:47:31.840 --> 0:47:33.520
<v Speaker 16>the same way, private or public.

0:47:33.960 --> 0:47:36.759
<v Speaker 17>You have a lot of key vested interests, whether they

0:47:37.000 --> 0:47:40.360
<v Speaker 17>be your clients, APPLETSMC and TEIL taking big stakes in

0:47:40.400 --> 0:47:44.600
<v Speaker 17>the company today. How important are those voices? Visa v Masses,

0:47:44.960 --> 0:47:46.759
<v Speaker 17>the head of soft Bank. I'm sure you're on the

0:47:46.760 --> 0:47:47.440
<v Speaker 17>phone too daily.

0:47:47.680 --> 0:47:47.879
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:47:47.920 --> 0:47:50.520
<v Speaker 16>So one of the challenges of our industry, and prely

0:47:50.680 --> 0:47:53.560
<v Speaker 16>with ARM, is that the fact that we're everywhere, none

0:47:53.600 --> 0:47:55.879
<v Speaker 16>of this works unless we play nice with others. So

0:47:56.000 --> 0:47:58.719
<v Speaker 16>we have to have a lot of engagements with strategic

0:47:58.760 --> 0:48:02.200
<v Speaker 16>partners and making sure that we're managing that balance, including Masa,

0:48:02.280 --> 0:48:03.320
<v Speaker 16>our chief shareholder.

0:48:04.040 --> 0:48:06.840
<v Speaker 17>Do you think he lets more of ARM become public?

0:48:06.960 --> 0:48:08.320
<v Speaker 17>Is that something you'd like to see?

0:48:08.520 --> 0:48:08.680
<v Speaker 5>Now?

0:48:08.920 --> 0:48:11.640
<v Speaker 16>Massa and I talk quite frequently, but it's really not

0:48:11.680 --> 0:48:14.000
<v Speaker 16>about the day to day. It's about the long term vision,

0:48:14.040 --> 0:48:16.720
<v Speaker 16>the passion that he and I have about the future,

0:48:16.760 --> 0:48:19.120
<v Speaker 16>and really about what this company can be long term.

0:48:19.239 --> 0:48:21.880
<v Speaker 16>So I don't expect that to change being a public company.

0:48:22.000 --> 0:48:23.359
<v Speaker 15>Do you think you go public in the UK?

0:48:23.480 --> 0:48:24.919
<v Speaker 17>I'm sure it's been a bitter sweet for the London

0:48:24.960 --> 0:48:25.759
<v Speaker 17>Stock Exchange today.

0:48:25.840 --> 0:48:28.280
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, so today obviously we're in New York, but we're

0:48:28.280 --> 0:48:31.040
<v Speaker 16>incredibly proud of our UK heritage and we are opening

0:48:31.080 --> 0:48:32.359
<v Speaker 16>to considering that down the road.

0:48:32.640 --> 0:48:34.440
<v Speaker 15>Okay, any sort of timeframe for that.

0:48:34.840 --> 0:48:36.440
<v Speaker 16>None that we can talk about today. I'm trying to

0:48:36.440 --> 0:48:36.839
<v Speaker 16>get through.

0:48:36.719 --> 0:48:39.160
<v Speaker 17>Today a little bit well before you get through today.

0:48:39.200 --> 0:48:45.160
<v Speaker 17>In that respect, Investors do love all things regarding artificial intelligence.

0:48:45.200 --> 0:48:47.960
<v Speaker 17>But how have you managed to land that your story

0:48:48.080 --> 0:48:50.680
<v Speaker 17>is different? People have been so exuberant about in Nvidia,

0:48:50.719 --> 0:48:55.640
<v Speaker 17>where you used to work, but they're really exuberant about GPUs.

0:48:56.280 --> 0:48:58.920
<v Speaker 17>How have you said that you are able to claim

0:48:59.239 --> 0:49:02.879
<v Speaker 17>a larger rule share of how AI continues to be said.

0:49:02.960 --> 0:49:05.040
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, So one of the benefits of the roadshow was

0:49:05.080 --> 0:49:07.319
<v Speaker 16>spending a lot of time with the investors talking about

0:49:07.320 --> 0:49:09.239
<v Speaker 16>AI and where we fit. And I think one of

0:49:09.280 --> 0:49:12.560
<v Speaker 16>the misconceptions is that a GPU can run without a CPU,

0:49:13.080 --> 0:49:15.480
<v Speaker 16>which is just not the case. The CPU is central

0:49:15.520 --> 0:49:18.480
<v Speaker 16>to every electronics device and there are devices that ship

0:49:18.520 --> 0:49:22.239
<v Speaker 16>with a CPU and a GPU. So once investors kind

0:49:22.239 --> 0:49:25.120
<v Speaker 16>of got that, then explaining where the puck was going

0:49:25.160 --> 0:49:28.760
<v Speaker 16>relative to gosh, and Vidia's next generation host advanced product,

0:49:28.800 --> 0:49:32.120
<v Speaker 16>Grace Hopper, is using ARM CPUs instead of the competition,

0:49:32.480 --> 0:49:34.600
<v Speaker 16>the light bulb went on that, oh my gosh, you

0:49:34.680 --> 0:49:36.879
<v Speaker 16>need the CPU. And at the same time, in Vidia

0:49:36.880 --> 0:49:38.560
<v Speaker 16>has made a big bet on ARM in their most

0:49:38.560 --> 0:49:41.799
<v Speaker 16>sophisticated product, And once that message kind of sunk through,

0:49:42.719 --> 0:49:44.640
<v Speaker 16>the light bulb went on as, oh my gosh, I

0:49:44.680 --> 0:49:45.000
<v Speaker 16>get it.

0:49:46.160 --> 0:49:49.920
<v Speaker 17>There has been this moment though, at which we're trying

0:49:49.960 --> 0:49:54.120
<v Speaker 17>to understand how the landscape works with global demand and

0:49:54.120 --> 0:49:56.919
<v Speaker 17>that translating into revenue. When you think of Oracle's numbers

0:49:56.960 --> 0:49:59.400
<v Speaker 17>that came in and look, they delivered thirty percent increase,

0:49:59.440 --> 0:50:02.080
<v Speaker 17>and it comes to their cloud provision and their AI bet,

0:50:02.120 --> 0:50:04.600
<v Speaker 17>but it doesn't always immediately turn into revenue in the

0:50:04.640 --> 0:50:07.440
<v Speaker 17>here and the now. How convinced are you that it

0:50:07.520 --> 0:50:09.880
<v Speaker 17>is going to be in the bottom line evident in

0:50:09.920 --> 0:50:10.920
<v Speaker 17>the next coming quarters.

0:50:10.920 --> 0:50:15.160
<v Speaker 16>As far as AI, oh, I think it's a questionable

0:50:15.160 --> 0:50:17.960
<v Speaker 16>that AI, which has already been here right for a

0:50:18.040 --> 0:50:21.960
<v Speaker 16>number of years. The chat cheap D moment taught us that,

0:50:22.000 --> 0:50:24.040
<v Speaker 16>oh my gosh, the capability of what this can do

0:50:24.120 --> 0:50:26.879
<v Speaker 16>going forward has gone up a level. And I think

0:50:26.920 --> 0:50:29.279
<v Speaker 16>we've seen that over and over in our industry. There

0:50:29.320 --> 0:50:32.360
<v Speaker 16>tends to be lightning bolt moments that greatly accelerate the

0:50:32.360 --> 0:50:34.960
<v Speaker 16>adoption of technology. And I think with AI, as you

0:50:35.000 --> 0:50:38.480
<v Speaker 16>move towards AGI computers that can think, I think we

0:50:38.560 --> 0:50:41.360
<v Speaker 16>now have seen an accelerant for that. Ultimately down the

0:50:41.440 --> 0:50:43.919
<v Speaker 16>road how people make money off that. It'll get figured out.

0:50:44.680 --> 0:50:47.480
<v Speaker 16>But AI is here to stay. That's unquestionable.

0:50:47.760 --> 0:50:50.760
<v Speaker 17>And it seems as though you're integral to soft banks

0:50:50.840 --> 0:50:55.719
<v Speaker 17>vision of AI and Massa's vision of AI. How can

0:50:55.760 --> 0:50:57.319
<v Speaker 17>you announce it a little bit? You say, he's talking

0:50:57.320 --> 0:51:00.680
<v Speaker 17>to him daily, what his vision of ARM within ecosystem

0:51:00.719 --> 0:51:01.640
<v Speaker 17>going forward really is?

0:51:02.800 --> 0:51:05.759
<v Speaker 16>He and I share a very same view that ARM

0:51:05.840 --> 0:51:09.080
<v Speaker 16>is one of the most important technology companies in our industry.

0:51:09.320 --> 0:51:12.120
<v Speaker 16>Foundational if you will, and I would like to see

0:51:12.200 --> 0:51:14.120
<v Speaker 16>us over the next five to ten years really be

0:51:14.200 --> 0:51:16.920
<v Speaker 16>recognized that way, and he and I are very aligned

0:51:16.960 --> 0:51:18.879
<v Speaker 16>on that. As you can imagine when you think about

0:51:18.920 --> 0:51:20.960
<v Speaker 16>five to ten years out, there's a lot of things

0:51:20.960 --> 0:51:22.640
<v Speaker 16>to talk about in terms of the art of the possible,

0:51:22.800 --> 0:51:25.200
<v Speaker 16>but that's really where he's focused on when his conversations

0:51:25.239 --> 0:51:25.520
<v Speaker 16>with me.

0:51:26.280 --> 0:51:29.080
<v Speaker 17>Long term thinking but then near term action. We understand

0:51:29.160 --> 0:51:33.320
<v Speaker 17>he was pretty integral to calling the shots on price

0:51:33.360 --> 0:51:37.239
<v Speaker 17>points for today's listing. How was that as just an

0:51:37.239 --> 0:51:39.600
<v Speaker 17>IPO experience? Did he end up being like, no, we

0:51:39.640 --> 0:51:41.080
<v Speaker 17>need to leave a little bit of money on the table.

0:51:41.120 --> 0:51:42.440
<v Speaker 17>This needs to be a successful trade.

0:51:42.560 --> 0:51:44.560
<v Speaker 16>But all I can say is this is my first

0:51:44.680 --> 0:51:47.600
<v Speaker 16>road show, so everything was a leterning experience. We wanted

0:51:47.600 --> 0:51:48.719
<v Speaker 16>to be at the high end of the range that

0:51:48.719 --> 0:51:50.719
<v Speaker 16>we set forty seven to fifty one, and that's where

0:51:50.719 --> 0:51:52.479
<v Speaker 16>it ended up. So we're happy.

0:51:52.560 --> 0:51:53.680
<v Speaker 5>We're very thrilled with today.

0:51:54.160 --> 0:51:56.680
<v Speaker 15>You said that school friends are going to in touch.

0:51:56.800 --> 0:51:58.880
<v Speaker 15>Can why have you been hiding this from them?

0:51:59.560 --> 0:52:02.560
<v Speaker 17>How do you feel differently now as a CEO of

0:52:02.640 --> 0:52:03.920
<v Speaker 17>a publicly traded company.

0:52:03.960 --> 0:52:05.680
<v Speaker 15>Do you feel differently today?

0:52:06.800 --> 0:52:08.719
<v Speaker 16>I feel a little bit differently, and looking ahead at

0:52:08.719 --> 0:52:10.560
<v Speaker 16>this number than what the share price is, that wasn't

0:52:10.560 --> 0:52:14.399
<v Speaker 16>something we looked at before. But you know again when

0:52:14.600 --> 0:52:17.239
<v Speaker 16>and I told this to employees. While the IPO is

0:52:17.239 --> 0:52:19.359
<v Speaker 16>amazing and I could not be more proud of it,

0:52:19.719 --> 0:52:21.360
<v Speaker 16>I am far more excited about the next five to

0:52:21.400 --> 0:52:23.960
<v Speaker 16>ten years. And that's where my head is focused. Obviously

0:52:24.040 --> 0:52:27.640
<v Speaker 16>we needed things as a public company CEO, but I

0:52:27.640 --> 0:52:28.760
<v Speaker 16>don't feel too much different.

0:52:29.080 --> 0:52:32.960
<v Speaker 17>And sometimes these are marketing exercises. Arm is B to B,

0:52:33.760 --> 0:52:36.520
<v Speaker 17>but do you think you've become more relevant? B to

0:52:36.600 --> 0:52:39.080
<v Speaker 17>see Now you're saying how people had no idea all this,

0:52:39.160 --> 0:52:41.839
<v Speaker 17>because largely people don't realize that every day they are

0:52:41.840 --> 0:52:45.040
<v Speaker 17>interacting with your designs, with your blueprints.

0:52:45.440 --> 0:52:48.280
<v Speaker 16>The people who need to know what we do do know. Obviously,

0:52:48.360 --> 0:52:50.080
<v Speaker 16>just giving the fact that all the global partners that

0:52:50.120 --> 0:52:52.759
<v Speaker 16>we work with going forward, how to market ourselves as

0:52:52.760 --> 0:52:54.360
<v Speaker 16>a public company. That's one of the things as a

0:52:54.360 --> 0:52:57.880
<v Speaker 16>public company CEO, I'll spend some time thinking about. But

0:52:58.000 --> 0:53:00.440
<v Speaker 16>right now we're just kind of focused on today and

0:53:00.440 --> 0:53:01.040
<v Speaker 16>what that means.

0:53:01.360 --> 0:53:05.319
<v Speaker 17>And meanwhile, within there's exuberance of today. Yesterday we saw

0:53:05.400 --> 0:53:09.240
<v Speaker 17>basically every key chief executive of an AI company, AI

0:53:09.280 --> 0:53:14.400
<v Speaker 17>related company, indoors and a closed hearing with Senate Majority

0:53:14.480 --> 0:53:17.279
<v Speaker 17>Leader Chuck Tchuma. Can you tell us about regulation? How

0:53:17.320 --> 0:53:20.160
<v Speaker 17>do you see the landscape evolving to ensure that you

0:53:20.200 --> 0:53:21.640
<v Speaker 17>can harness that AI moment.

0:53:22.120 --> 0:53:25.080
<v Speaker 16>I think it is one of those areas that is

0:53:25.120 --> 0:53:27.880
<v Speaker 16>an unknown moment. And I remember talking to an executive

0:53:27.920 --> 0:53:30.680
<v Speaker 16>about the analogy or metaphor we used was when cars

0:53:30.680 --> 0:53:33.960
<v Speaker 16>were invented, you didn't have driver's licenses, you didn't have lanes,

0:53:34.000 --> 0:53:35.880
<v Speaker 16>you didn't have rules of the road. There was a

0:53:35.920 --> 0:53:37.440
<v Speaker 16>lot of things that people had to figure out in

0:53:37.520 --> 0:53:39.960
<v Speaker 16>terms of taking a device that was going to be

0:53:40.080 --> 0:53:42.440
<v Speaker 16>very very productive but could be very dangerous in terms

0:53:42.440 --> 0:53:45.400
<v Speaker 16>of automobile accidents. AI is a little bit of the

0:53:45.400 --> 0:53:48.040
<v Speaker 16>same in the sense that we're now in a new paradigm.

0:53:48.320 --> 0:53:51.399
<v Speaker 16>Were some rules and regulations and need to be figured out.

0:53:51.440 --> 0:53:53.160
<v Speaker 16>And that's why I think you're seeing all this activity

0:53:53.200 --> 0:53:55.239
<v Speaker 16>around that area.

0:53:55.440 --> 0:53:59.400
<v Speaker 17>Is the US leading the charge and regulation is Europe?

0:53:59.480 --> 0:54:00.960
<v Speaker 17>Is the UK was getting it right?

0:54:01.000 --> 0:54:03.279
<v Speaker 16>From your perspective, I think all the governments are trying

0:54:03.280 --> 0:54:05.319
<v Speaker 16>to figure it out. I know the EU has spent

0:54:05.360 --> 0:54:07.040
<v Speaker 16>a lot of energy on this, as said the UK,

0:54:07.239 --> 0:54:09.279
<v Speaker 16>so in terms of who's getting it right, I think

0:54:09.320 --> 0:54:12.400
<v Speaker 16>it's still early days and everyone's really just trying to

0:54:12.480 --> 0:54:16.640
<v Speaker 16>learn how technology and this new powerful algorithm will work together.

0:54:17.120 --> 0:54:19.319
<v Speaker 15>Keep teaching us. Great to have some time with you.

0:54:19.440 --> 0:54:20.040
<v Speaker 6>Thank you so much.

0:54:20.080 --> 0:54:22.560
<v Speaker 17>Cool's the CEO of ARM the day they're listening.

0:54:23.800 --> 0:54:26.880
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcasts. You can

0:54:26.920 --> 0:54:30.720
<v Speaker 2>subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever

0:54:30.800 --> 0:54:34.520
<v Speaker 2>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter

0:54:34.719 --> 0:54:36.640
<v Speaker 2>at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three.

0:54:37.120 --> 0:54:39.480
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Faull Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:54:39.600 --> 0:54:42.279
<v Speaker 1>Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at

0:54:42.280 --> 0:54:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio