WEBVTT - The Truth with Lisa Boothe: Who Is The Real Kamala Harris?

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:05.439
<v Speaker 1>Kamala Harris is the anointed one. She is heading towards

0:00:05.559 --> 0:00:09.920
<v Speaker 1>the Democrat National Convention basically as the presumptive nominee. She

0:00:10.039 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 1>most recently received the endorsement of the Obamas. She's never

0:00:14.480 --> 0:00:19.079
<v Speaker 1>received a single primary or Coccus vote, Yet this is

0:00:19.120 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the party that proclaims it cares about democracy. She says

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:28.360
<v Speaker 1>she's running a people powered campaign, but she's never received

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:32.640
<v Speaker 1>a presidential primary or Cocca's vote. Make it make sense?

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 1>So who is this woman? Who is Kamala Harris? What

0:00:36.479 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>do you need to know about her? We're going to

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:40.239
<v Speaker 1>talk to someone who literally wrote the book on her.

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 1>His name's Charlie Spearing. He wrote the book Amateur Hour

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Kamala Harris in the White House. So we're going to

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 1>do a little deep dive in the Kamala Harris. Stay

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 1>tuned for that with Charlie Spearing. Well, Charlie, it's great

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 1>to have you on this show. I imagine you've got

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of thoughts right now, since he wrote the

0:01:03.560 --> 0:01:07.679
<v Speaker 1>book about Kamala Harris. I guess, at first glance, you know,

0:01:07.720 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 1>it looks like she's obviously going to be the Democrat nominee.

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 1>The Obamas haven't out on doorst she pretty much has

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the green light. I guess what would a Kamala Harris

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 1>presidency look like, do you think.

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:23.039
<v Speaker 2>Thanks Lisa, Yeah, certainly that's what everybody's looking at her.

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:26.119
<v Speaker 2>You know, her record as vice president was so unimpressive.

0:01:26.600 --> 0:01:30.120
<v Speaker 2>There's really only one sort of priority that stood out,

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 2>which was her effort to campaign on abortion rights. I

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 2>really feel that if Kamala Harris did achieved the presidency,

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:40.120
<v Speaker 2>I think the issue of abortion would be number one

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 2>on her priority list, as she would use that issue

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:45.680
<v Speaker 2>to be Republicans politically. I think that's one of the

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 2>biggest strengths the Biden administration had, and it certainly one

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 2>that she was she was leading the way. So I

0:01:52.600 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 2>think she's and that's sort of already featured in her

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 2>campaign material, this idea that abortion rights are freedom and

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 2>we stand for freedom and abortion, and that's going to

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 2>be a focal point of who she is as a

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 2>as a candidate and certainly and she becomes president.

0:02:09.440 --> 0:02:12.960
<v Speaker 1>You called her book Amateur Hour. Why did you choose

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 1>that title?

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:18.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's just based on conversations I was having with Republicans.

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 2>It was clear that with Democrats, even certainly with Republicans

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 2>but also Democrats that Colin Hardison wasn't necessarily prepared to

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 2>be on the national stage. She had only had a

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 2>couple of years in the Senate before she was sort

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:34.240
<v Speaker 2>of plucked out of the in a failed presidential campaign.

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 2>Before she was sort of plucked out of the sort

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:40.640
<v Speaker 2>of the dolt from you know, the Biden administration has

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 2>really sort of resurrected her political career after her failed

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 2>presidential campaign. I think she would have been left behind,

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 2>as you know, an ordinary California senator, munched in the

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 2>lines of a Barbara Boxer or a Dianne Feinstein. She

0:02:55.960 --> 0:02:58.919
<v Speaker 2>clearly didn't have enough capital to run her own campaign

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 2>for president when she became vice president. A big part

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:05.240
<v Speaker 2>of the reason that Biden ran for reelection is that

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:08.920
<v Speaker 2>Harris was not ready to run and didn't and Democrats

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:12.160
<v Speaker 2>didn't think she could run and win against against Donald Trump.

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 2>So that's the certain that was certainly the mood in

0:03:15.240 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 2>the early part of the Biden administration, and that just

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 2>makes it even more surprising that now today they're putting

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 2>all their hopes on a on a person that they

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:26.680
<v Speaker 2>privately derided behind the scenes early in her career.

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:32.959
<v Speaker 1>You know, she grew up at Oakland, California. What do

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 1>you know about her upbringing, about her childhood.

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, she grew up as the you know, daughter of

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 2>an of the academic and you know, cancer researcher. Her

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 2>parents separated when she was young, and she sort of

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 2>grew continued to grow up under her mother's watch. Mostly

0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 2>she was at work, and so there was a sort

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:56.680
<v Speaker 2>of a community of women that surrounded her and built

0:03:56.680 --> 0:03:59.040
<v Speaker 2>her up as she was as she was raised as

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 2>a child. But she's so wasn't raised poor, and she

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 2>certainly wasn't raised in a you know, a segregated community,

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 2>and she didn't have to suffer any of the effects

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 2>of you know, her race, which is what you know

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 2>a lot of other black people and black candidates would

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 2>talk about if they grew up in the South or

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 2>they grew up poor in urban communities.

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 1>And what do we know about her parents. I know,

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 1>her dad, you know, was a Marxist, uh you know economists.

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:30.280
<v Speaker 1>But you know, give us a little insight into kind

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 1>of you know, her parents and sort of how she

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 1>was raised, like what ideologies were taught in her household

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:40.040
<v Speaker 1>and kind of was her to impact that her parents

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:41.719
<v Speaker 1>have on her what which you tell us about them?

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 2>Right, Kamala Harris lates to talk about her parents regularly

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:49.840
<v Speaker 2>attending protests. You know, she talks about her parents growing

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:52.280
<v Speaker 2>up in marching and shouting for justice and how they

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 2>pushed little Kammel and the stroller. But upon closer examination,

0:04:56.680 --> 0:05:01.160
<v Speaker 2>a lot of their activism was into sellectual activism and

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 2>at at the university where they were, Stanford, and certainly

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 2>they held a lot of talking groups and at the

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 2>Kamala's parents actually met at a seminar that her father

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 2>was giving at the time, and certainly that's how they

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 2>how they met, and so there was really more of

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:25.360
<v Speaker 2>an academic sort of discussion, and there was very limited

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:29.119
<v Speaker 2>They had very limited activism simply because they were both

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:33.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, not they were certainly there legally as students,

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:35.640
<v Speaker 2>but they were not citizens at the time, so it

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 2>was very difficult for them to you know, they very

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:40.919
<v Speaker 2>careful about their actual activism, you know.

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 1>And what kind of was she raised with religion or

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, what what did that look like in their household? Well,

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 1>it was very split, right because yes, she did have

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 1>a black father, but her black father ended up leaving

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 1>and she was raised by her Indian mother who was

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:58.560
<v Speaker 1>so her Indian mother talks about raising her as you know,

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:01.240
<v Speaker 1>and taking her to the Hindu to simple and participating

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 1>in all the Hindu rituals. But Kama likes to talk

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:08.920
<v Speaker 1>about this woman called that she calls her second mother,

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:12.920
<v Speaker 1>and that's a woman in the in the area of

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:17.239
<v Speaker 1>the household who watches over the daughters, you know, Kamala

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and her sister, and takes her to a Baptist church,

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 1>a Christian church, Black Christian church in San Francisco. So

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 1>she has this sort of dual faith upbringing. But we

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>don't really hear Kamala talk about her Hindu upbringing anymore.

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 1>She focuses more on this sort of adopted you know,

0:06:38.640 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 1>the attendance at a Black church. And then tell us

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about you know, how did she well,

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:45.800
<v Speaker 1>First of all, you know, tell us a little bit

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:48.479
<v Speaker 1>about her you know, college age, you know, college years,

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:50.760
<v Speaker 1>and then you know her entry into politics.

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 2>Right, So her college year she went to Howard University,

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 2>and you know, she spent a lot of time, you know,

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 2>enjoying college for all of its all the things that

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:05.280
<v Speaker 2>it offers. She attended a few protests, but she wasn't

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 2>seen as, you know, a radical activist. She was very practical.

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 2>She wanted to go to Howard University, get a law degree,

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 2>and go back to San Francisco and get a good job.

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 2>And she ultimately went back and became a prosecutor, working

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 2>for the Almeda County Attorney you know, district Attorney's office

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:26.679
<v Speaker 2>as a lawyer. And that's when she first met Willie Brown,

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 2>one of the most powerful politicians in California, who was

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 2>then running for mayor of San Francisco.

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 1>And then tell us about their relationship. How did he

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 1>help her get into politics?

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:41.520
<v Speaker 2>Right, So, Willie Brown is sixty years old, he's running

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 2>for mayor of San Francisco, and Harris is relatively unknown,

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 2>twenty nine years old. She is the, like I said,

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:53.760
<v Speaker 2>working in the Almita County's District Attorney's office. And that's

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 2>where they sort of kick off this relationship. Willy Brown

0:07:56.760 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 2>starts dating her, and she's seen as a stabilizing force

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 2>on his personality as he's running for office. Gossip colonists right,

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 2>for the first time, Willi Brown is having a relationship

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 2>with an adult woman because he's sort of a known

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 2>philanderer with young women on his arm, different women on

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 2>his arm because he's long estranged from his real wife, Blanche,

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 2>who lives separately from Brown, but the couple never divorced.

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 2>So Willie Brown really helped get Kamala Harris on this stage.

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 2>First of all, through the social connections on Willy Brown's arms.

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:38.359
<v Speaker 2>She meets all of his wealthy donors, all of the celebrities.

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:43.440
<v Speaker 2>There's a fun gossip column bit about Clinton Eastwood spilling

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:46.719
<v Speaker 2>champagne on the mayor's new steady is what they could

0:08:46.760 --> 0:08:49.439
<v Speaker 2>describe her as. So she's definitely rubbing shoulders with all

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 2>the top celebrities, the donors, and certainly the democratic officials

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 2>of the very powerful San Francisco Democratic community. And on

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 2>top of that, Willie Brown also appointed her to some

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 2>state board positions that paid her a great deal of money.

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:09.720
<v Speaker 2>She made over four hundred thousand dollars just after a

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:13.800
<v Speaker 2>couple of years serving in these board positions that only

0:09:13.840 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 2>met like once or twice a month. Put that in

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:19.200
<v Speaker 2>today's dollars, that's nearly a million dollars. So it was

0:09:19.480 --> 0:09:22.679
<v Speaker 2>very lucrative for Harris, put her on a very stable

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 2>footing for her to pursue her next goal. She also,

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, Brown also gave her the keys to a BMW,

0:09:30.040 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 2>so she he made sure that she was well taken

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 2>care of and perfectly positioned for a political future. So

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 2>it's partly a lucrative relationship. Then to say the leadast.

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 1>She got her start in two and three she was

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 1>elected to DA of San Francisco. You know, what can

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 1>you tell us about sort of her record there as DA?

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:52.079
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, her record is DA. She ran sort of there

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:56.680
<v Speaker 2>was already sort of a progressive, a progressive district attorney

0:09:56.760 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 2>Terrence hollanand who San Francisco voters were growing tired because

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:06.240
<v Speaker 2>there was a rise of prostitution, of drugs, and of homelessness,

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, much of the issues we see today. Harris

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:12.560
<v Speaker 2>ran almost to the right on that, you know, arguing,

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:16.000
<v Speaker 2>we don't need to be tough on crime or week

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 2>on crime, we need to be quote smart on crime.

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 2>That was Harris's campaign slogan. So she ran a little

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 2>bit to the right, to the center of Terrence halling On. So,

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 2>but when she took office, she was mostly a relatively

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, a different face, but pursued many of the

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:38.559
<v Speaker 2>same progressive priorities that the previous candidate. Had. She famously

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 2>kicked off her campaign by refusing to seek the death

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 2>penalty for a cop killer that angered the police force

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:48.560
<v Speaker 2>in San Francisco, you know, who made a big deal

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:51.200
<v Speaker 2>about that and would turn their backs on her anytime

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 2>they saw her. Even Dianne Feinstein at the time, who

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:57.440
<v Speaker 2>attended the funeral of the police officer, publicly called out

0:10:57.480 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 2>Harris for failing to pursue the death penalty. And it

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:04.080
<v Speaker 2>was it was a slight that Harris never forgot, you know.

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 1>And if she also let a man out on probation

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 1>who went on to kill two people as well, So

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 1>did she kind of carry that same you know, left

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 1>wing philosophy into her time as Attorney general as well?

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 2>Well. She ultimately moved a little further to the right

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 2>after beating sort of the last significant Republican for attorney

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:26.439
<v Speaker 2>general just by a hair, you know, very small margin,

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:29.440
<v Speaker 2>and this is Steve Cooley of Los Angeles, was a

0:11:29.480 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Republican who ran for the attorney general position. Harris just

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:37.079
<v Speaker 2>barely beat him. So she shifted a little bit further

0:11:37.160 --> 0:11:39.440
<v Speaker 2>to the right as she grew, as she grew further

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 2>up into California politics. You know, there was the famous

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 2>Supreme Court decision against California that demanded they start releasing

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 2>their overpopulated prisons. Klin Harris, as Attorney General, worked with

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 2>Governor Jerry Brown at the time to sort of slow

0:11:58.000 --> 0:12:01.720
<v Speaker 2>down and stop these and find excuses to keep these

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 2>people in prison, because, as we all know, you know,

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:08.719
<v Speaker 2>it's bad, bad luck for any sort of politician with

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 2>future political ambitions to release criminals, because one of these

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:16.400
<v Speaker 2>criminals could significantly commit another crime and that would damage

0:12:16.400 --> 0:12:17.319
<v Speaker 2>your political career.

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Got a quick commercial break, stay with us. You know,

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting because then when she was the United States senator,

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, Govtract named her as the most liberal senator,

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:31.600
<v Speaker 1>even further to the left than you know, Bernie Sanders.

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 1>And you know, since then, we've seen her say that,

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:36.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, she wants to take her to private insurance,

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 1>that she believes in Medicare for all. She's compared you know,

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I used to KKK and all these really radical left

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 1>wing policies. So it's like, I guess with her, she

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:47.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of strikes me as the kind of person that

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:51.680
<v Speaker 1>just says whatever people want to hear. It doesn't really

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 1>believe in anything. I guess, what's your sense? And obviously,

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:00.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, researching her and learning of her like, does

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 1>anything motive error or is it just power?

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that's a very astute observation because Kamala Harris famously,

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:11.079
<v Speaker 2>you know, opposed legal marijuana when she was running for

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 2>attorney general and then after she won her re election

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:17.440
<v Speaker 2>race and won a Senate seat, she changed her position

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 2>on it. And then there's examples of that all throughout

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:23.439
<v Speaker 2>her career where she changes her position on the issues.

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:26.680
<v Speaker 2>It's as soon as it becomes politically liable. But after

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 2>she became the Senator of California, she was she moved

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 2>significantly farther to the left. Even before she launched her

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 2>campaign for president, her assessment appeared to be if I,

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:40.560
<v Speaker 2>if I am on the same page of Willie's of

0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 2>Bernie Sanders, then perhaps I can earn the respect and

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:47.440
<v Speaker 2>love from his followers if I just get as far

0:13:47.520 --> 0:13:49.840
<v Speaker 2>to the left as I can, and I'll be a

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 2>candidate that doesn't have the sort of the downsides of

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 2>the Bernie Sanders, you know, a cranky old man from Vermont.

0:13:55.960 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 2>I'll be the sparkling, inspirational figures who becauses on policies.

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 2>The Democratic primary voters love so she already worked on

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 2>building that reputation, and then certainly when she launched her

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 2>campaign for president, there was no position to liberal that

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:15.480
<v Speaker 2>wasn't up for discussion or that she took a side on.

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:18.680
<v Speaker 1>But so it's kind of scary then if she would

0:14:18.720 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>assume the office of the presidency, because if you have

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 1>someone who doesn't really believe in any thing, is not

0:14:26.000 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 1>really rooted in anything, what that mean for how she

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 1>decides to to govern. You know, she sort of just

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 1>strikes me as kind of like a you know, soul

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 1>well willing to you know. I mean, we saw her

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 1>with the presidential debate for twenty twenty, which you know,

0:14:48.200 --> 0:14:51.480
<v Speaker 1>she obviously flamed out and dropped out before Iowa, where

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, she accused Joe Biden essentially of racism and

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 1>then immediately signed up to be his vice president.

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:03.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, I've disrectly seen as a very cynical politics.

0:15:03.320 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 2>She was playing very cynical politics, and she wasn't sort

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 2>of you could tell, voters could tell that she wasn't

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:12.400
<v Speaker 2>necessarily wed to the issues because she was all over

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 2>the map. One day, She's supported getting rid of private insurance,

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 2>the next day she said it was a mistake and

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 2>didn't understand the question. And when voters would ask her

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 2>these questions, she was kind of all over the map

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 2>because she initially thought she had the right answer, but

0:15:26.760 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 2>would often bracktrack and clarify.

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, do people like her? I mean she has had,

0:15:33.040 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, a ton of turnover. There's been so much

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 1>written about the turnover in her office as vice president

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 1>of just losing a lot of staff throughout her time there.

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, do people like her? You know, sort

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 1>of what's the gauge on her as just a person?

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I feel like typically staff turnover is telling

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 1>about the kind of person someone is.

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 2>Right, And when I did the research for the book,

0:15:56.680 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Harris was not a beloved figure in fact, behind the scenes,

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:04.200
<v Speaker 2>and Washington Democrats and Republicans alike would would quite you know,

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 2>privately mark her behind the scenes. It was very hard

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 2>to find any bands of Kamala Harris back when I

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 2>first started researching this book, and I was surprised that

0:16:12.920 --> 0:16:17.520
<v Speaker 2>there wasn't this solidified group of Kamala defenders. And that's

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 2>kind of the way it isn't Washington, right when you're

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 2>found wanting and she had already piled up a number

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 2>of gaffes and mistakes, people can turn on you pretty quickly,

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 2>and if you're an abusive, difficult boss, right staffers in

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 2>Washington can usually put up with that if they believe

0:16:33.040 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 2>they're on the fast track to power. But if she's

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 2>seen as not having a political future, that's when, you know,

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 2>the most the most clever positioning staffers will ship gears

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 2>and look elsewhere. And that's kind of where Kamala Harris

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 2>was until we now find ourselves in this moment where

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 2>all of a sudden she's now the darling of the

0:16:53.840 --> 0:17:00.360
<v Speaker 2>Democratic left. And certainly earlier, just just a few weeks ago, oh,

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 2>a lot of these same people that are out there

0:17:02.640 --> 0:17:06.439
<v Speaker 2>praising her now were privately sharing their concerns about her

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 2>possible campaign, whether or not she could compete with Donald Trump.

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Out of the gate, there was a reluctance from Barack

0:17:13.119 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Obama to endorse Kamala Harras now he has come around.

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 2>But what do you think that reluctance? What was behind that?

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:21.720
<v Speaker 2>Do you think? I think a lot of people were

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 2>very surprised to see that Obama wasn't out first out

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:27.640
<v Speaker 2>of the gate to endorse Kamala Harris, because he has

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:31.119
<v Speaker 2>been a longtime supporter of her throughout her political career.

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 2>I think that primarily the reason why he didn't endorse

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:39.119
<v Speaker 2>her publicly right away is because he didn't want to

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:43.200
<v Speaker 2>be seen as someone who was sort of pushing Biden

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:46.640
<v Speaker 2>out and lifting Kamala up. There was already so many

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 2>stories about how he was secretly working to get rid

0:17:49.880 --> 0:17:52.879
<v Speaker 2>of Biden. He didn't want the same stories to be

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:56.879
<v Speaker 2>written about him secretly putting Kamala into place. But don't

0:17:56.880 --> 0:18:00.080
<v Speaker 2>be fooled by that. I think that Obama is a

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 2>a huge Kamala proponent. He was obviously a big supporter

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 2>of hers when Biden was searching for a vice president,

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:10.880
<v Speaker 2>And I think that Harris has long had the Obama

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:14.399
<v Speaker 2>support and never never worried about not getting it. I

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:16.920
<v Speaker 2>think that Obama kind of wanted to make it look

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:19.119
<v Speaker 2>as if she was winning on her own steam. But

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 2>it was clear that there was already a lot of

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 2>background work done before the decision by Biden was made.

0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 2>You know, what do you think?

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:30.720
<v Speaker 1>There was also reports that part of Joe Biden's reluctant

0:18:30.960 --> 0:18:33.920
<v Speaker 1>to step aside as a candidate apparently, you know, he's

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:36.639
<v Speaker 1>fine to be president of the United States commander in

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:39.960
<v Speaker 1>chief but is not equipped to be a candidate, which

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 1>is a really interesting spin we're being told right now.

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:45.399
<v Speaker 1>But you know, part of the reporting at least was

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 1>that he didn't feel like Kamala Harris had what it

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 1>takes to win the presidency, to win the election. What

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:56.879
<v Speaker 1>has their relationship been like between the two of them.

0:18:56.440 --> 0:18:59.479
<v Speaker 2>Well, Joe Biden wanted to buddy. He really thought that

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:03.200
<v Speaker 2>he could picked Comlin, that she would be fully supportive

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 2>of him, and that he would have a friendly, buddy

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 2>like relationship like he felt that he had with Barack Obama.

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:11.919
<v Speaker 2>But it turned out Kamala Harris was not there to

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 2>be buddies with Joe. She was definitely not friends with Jill.

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 2>So she became very kind of standoffs. She was sparcely

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 2>protective of her own political brand. Biden's staffers almost threw

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:27.159
<v Speaker 2>up their hands when they were trying to deal with

0:19:27.200 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 2>her because she was so so defensive and so careful

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 2>about protecting her political future rather than just volunteering and

0:19:35.560 --> 0:19:39.159
<v Speaker 2>taking one for the team. By their several instances of

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 2>Biden and his staff asking her to take the lead

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:44.400
<v Speaker 2>on certain issues and she would decline, they would ask

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:46.359
<v Speaker 2>her to go on the Sunday shows to cover something,

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:50.439
<v Speaker 2>and she would decline. So they ended up throwing up

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 2>their hands and kind of letting her do her own

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:55.160
<v Speaker 2>thing because it became very clear she was not there.

0:19:55.800 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 2>Her number one goal was not there to support Biden.

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 2>It was to sort of protect her own brand during

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:04.240
<v Speaker 2>this entire project.

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:07.920
<v Speaker 1>And there's also been reports that, you know, she doesn't

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:12.199
<v Speaker 1>really dig in on the research and dig in on

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the issues. Can you tell us, can you give us

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:17.440
<v Speaker 1>any sort of insight into that? Right?

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:20.679
<v Speaker 2>Staffers would talk about how you know, they you know,

0:20:20.840 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 2>for instance, when she did that interview with Lester Holt

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 2>after visiting Guatemala as part of her Borders Are Duties,

0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:32.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, the famous question when are you going to

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 2>the border, and she laughs off the question and jokes

0:20:35.640 --> 0:20:37.679
<v Speaker 2>that she hasn't been to Europe, and that was widely

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:41.720
<v Speaker 2>seen as a mistake. You know, her staff had prepared

0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 2>her for that answer, they had given her briefings on

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:48.359
<v Speaker 2>that answer, and yet she, you know, ended up skipping

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:51.919
<v Speaker 2>over her prepared answer and delivering something else entirely. And

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:54.920
<v Speaker 2>that's just one example of how they, you know, staffers

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't get frustrated with Harris because they would prepare her,

0:20:57.600 --> 0:21:00.800
<v Speaker 2>but she never took the issues seriously. I guess, what

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:01.800
<v Speaker 2>do you see from her now?

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it does seem like, you know, and watching

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the few sort of you know, public speeches and things

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 1>she has done since you know all you know, basically

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:16.919
<v Speaker 1>the coronation. She's not officially the Democrat nominee, but you know,

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 1>she's essentially the presumptive nominee at this point. Got a

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:26.399
<v Speaker 1>quick commercial break, stay with us. Does it look like she's,

0:21:26.440 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of paying attention to the NAXI. I mean,

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 1>it seems like a little bit more serious. You know,

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 1>she's not doing some of the weird laughter stuff. I guess,

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 1>what have you seen from her so far as a

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:41.199
<v Speaker 1>presidential candidate and what you've read and what you know

0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:44.360
<v Speaker 1>about her, any anything, any insight on that.

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 2>In the past couple of months, Lisa, she's been very

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:51.639
<v Speaker 2>disciplined and very focused. I think bad Kamala Harris was

0:21:51.760 --> 0:21:56.679
<v Speaker 2>already sort of preparing for this moment. Her campaign events

0:21:56.680 --> 0:21:59.800
<v Speaker 2>were very scripted, and she was very disciplined, and I

0:21:59.840 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 2>think I think a Kamala heiress as a candidate has

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:04.960
<v Speaker 2>learned a lot of lessons from twenty twenty, that you know,

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:09.440
<v Speaker 2>not necessarily that you can't necessarily just thrive on your own,

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:12.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, terrorism, because it's not quite there. You're not

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, you're not seen as the next Obama. You

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:18.760
<v Speaker 2>have to be the the Kamala Aires. You have to

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 2>define yourself and you have to stay on message and

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:24.520
<v Speaker 2>you can't get distracted. So I think that she has

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:28.280
<v Speaker 2>sort of demonstrated a little bit more discipline than her

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:31.920
<v Speaker 2>previous attempts at campaigning. And we'll have to see whether

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:37.960
<v Speaker 2>she runs a kind of a very defensive, basement scripted

0:22:38.000 --> 0:22:42.119
<v Speaker 2>campaign or whether there's moments where she can actually emphasize

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 2>her true personality.

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:49.080
<v Speaker 1>What do you think are her biggest vulnerabilities from studying

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 1>her background and just studying her as a person with

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:54.679
<v Speaker 1>this book, and what are our biggest vulnerabilities biggest liabilities

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:55.400
<v Speaker 1>as a candidate.

0:22:56.480 --> 0:23:00.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, she's sort of defensive and she she's not a

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 2>risk taker, So that's and she lacks sort of the

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 2>authenticity and kerorism that it takes to be a presidential candidate.

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 2>You have to win the hearts of the American people.

0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 2>Harris had a chance to do that when she ran

0:23:13.160 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 2>for president in twenty twenty and she failed miserably. Iowa voters,

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 2>even voters in South Carolina and even in the Southern states,

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:24.959
<v Speaker 2>did not find her to be an approachable, warm candidate,

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 2>but just another power hungry senator trying to be the

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:30.679
<v Speaker 2>next Barack Obama, where there were several that ran that

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:35.000
<v Speaker 2>year that voters ultimately rejected. And so I think that's

0:23:35.080 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 2>her biggest challenge right now. Can you actually go out there,

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:41.680
<v Speaker 2>get on the stump, meet with voters, win over their

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:45.639
<v Speaker 2>hearts or is it just going to be a scripted

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:49.480
<v Speaker 2>campaign based on a couple of speeches at least interesting

0:23:49.560 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 2>to see how quickly that they can overcome that gap.

0:23:56.760 --> 0:23:57.679
<v Speaker 1>Is she intelligent?

0:23:58.680 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 2>You know, I think when she does the homework and

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:06.640
<v Speaker 2>that she does have a kind of understanding of the issues. However,

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:09.560
<v Speaker 2>she is not very good at speaking in a way

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:13.399
<v Speaker 2>that is authentic and lets people believe she's very If

0:24:13.480 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 2>you find she's in public, she's very guarded and isn't

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 2>very knowledge You can't really speak knowledgeably about the issues.

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:26.000
<v Speaker 2>She can do a good job about, you know, raising

0:24:26.040 --> 0:24:29.960
<v Speaker 2>the fears of the problems that are facing Americans, but

0:24:30.080 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 2>as far as speaking in a way that that have

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 2>resonates with the public is very difficult. She strikes me

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 2>as very insecure.

0:24:39.480 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know if that's because of how she

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:43.320
<v Speaker 1>got her start or what, but she strikes me as

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:47.240
<v Speaker 1>a very insecure person. As you mentioned, like guarded, not

0:24:47.359 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 1>very confident in herself, not very confident in her ability.

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:51.680
<v Speaker 1>It's not comfortable in her own skin.

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 2>I think that's right. She demonstrated that multiple times during

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:59.400
<v Speaker 2>her twenty twenty campaign, and because you know, our campaign

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:03.040
<v Speaker 2>ended so miserably, she's been even more guarded. She did

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 2>an interview a couple months ago with Lebron James's manager

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:10.679
<v Speaker 2>and she said, you know this, running a campaign is

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 2>like a food is like running through a food fight,

0:25:12.680 --> 0:25:16.359
<v Speaker 2>and you have to be perfect, you know, And that

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:20.119
<v Speaker 2>sort of gave a window into how she views this

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:22.200
<v Speaker 2>as like, I have to be perfect. I can't make

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 2>one slip or I will be punished. And when you

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:29.480
<v Speaker 2>have that in mind, when you're not loose and comfortable

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 2>with the idea of running in the public eye, then

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:37.840
<v Speaker 2>you're going to automatically have a sort of guarded, defensive personality.

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:40.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, We've covered a lot of ground, but I'm

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 1>sure have missed things. Is there anything that you'd like

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:45.360
<v Speaker 1>the audience to know that you know we haven't covered yet,

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 1>that you think is important or notable for people at

0:25:48.000 --> 0:25:48.399
<v Speaker 1>home to know.

0:25:49.760 --> 0:25:53.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that most people will just automatically dismiss Harris,

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:56.600
<v Speaker 2>as you know, because they know the Kamala Harris of

0:25:56.680 --> 0:25:58.960
<v Speaker 2>the word salads, of someone who was not taking the

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 2>job seriously. But I certainly view her as a formidable

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:07.159
<v Speaker 2>candidate because when you know she she has a record

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 2>of not doing very well in the job when she

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 2>gets the job, but when she wants a job, she

0:26:12.840 --> 0:26:16.720
<v Speaker 2>will rise to the occasion and and people will underestimate her.

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 2>I think that she is fully prepared to run a

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 2>good race, has the ambition to run a good race,

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:26.720
<v Speaker 2>and that you know, if there it actually is a

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:30.360
<v Speaker 2>debate between Harris and Trump, I think that Harris will

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:34.040
<v Speaker 2>take it seriously and will be a formidable opponent in

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 2>any presidential debate. Certainly, she has to answer for her

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:41.840
<v Speaker 2>very liberal record, and if Trump is wise, he'll he'll

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:44.760
<v Speaker 2>focus on that, and I think that any kind of

0:26:45.040 --> 0:26:48.919
<v Speaker 2>competition between the two will be a significant race. I

0:26:48.920 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 2>don't think it's a I don't think it's a foregone

0:26:51.760 --> 0:26:55.239
<v Speaker 2>conclusion that that she'll just spiral into words soualads and

0:26:55.280 --> 0:26:57.560
<v Speaker 2>collapse completely if she makes a debate stage.

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 1>You know what, well, she almost strikes me as ambitious,

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 1>to be perfectly honest, like the kind where you know,

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the Tanya hrting you to get ahead, you know, before

0:27:08.840 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 1>we go, you know, kind of what are some of

0:27:10.840 --> 0:27:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the big takeaways in terms of her you know, career

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 1>where you know, I mean, she does have sort of

0:27:18.040 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 1>a laundry list of very leftist policies. What stands out

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:22.320
<v Speaker 1>to you.

0:27:23.600 --> 0:27:29.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, certainly with her policies, you know, her impositions she's taken. Yeah, yeah,

0:27:30.000 --> 0:27:33.119
<v Speaker 2>And and Republicans have been reciting these off just in

0:27:33.160 --> 0:27:37.239
<v Speaker 2>the last couple of days, so so rapidly. But you know,

0:27:37.440 --> 0:27:40.040
<v Speaker 2>it's clear that she has no intention of securing the

0:27:40.080 --> 0:27:44.840
<v Speaker 2>border or doing anything to expel all of the migrants

0:27:44.880 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 2>says she left that she let come across the border,

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:50.000
<v Speaker 2>her and Biden. It's clear she has no interest in

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:56.160
<v Speaker 2>the issue of immigration, immigration enforcement. She wants to, she

0:27:56.200 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 2>certainly wants to, you know, move towards u government supported healthcare,

0:28:01.760 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 2>government funded daycare, government funded government assistance for every aspect

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 2>of a person's life. She certainly is supports the government

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:20.399
<v Speaker 2>federal federally, you know, making it codifying Roe v. Wade

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:25.200
<v Speaker 2>into law, and making zero restrictions on abortion, and certainly

0:28:25.240 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 2>even suddenly some of the more fun policies that they

0:28:27.800 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 2>talked about during the campaign, like would you consider changing

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, the government restrictions on red meat consumption? She

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:39.120
<v Speaker 2>was she was, you know, vocally in supportive that and

0:28:39.280 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 2>so many other things like banning fracking and in you know,

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:47.080
<v Speaker 2>getting rid of private health insurance. These are major issues

0:28:47.120 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 2>that she was on the record supporting and it will

0:28:49.400 --> 0:28:50.760
<v Speaker 2>be difficult to walk that back.

0:28:51.840 --> 0:28:53.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think she said she wanted to get rid

0:28:53.320 --> 0:28:54.240
<v Speaker 1>of plastic straws.

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:58.719
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. Yeah, I'm going to forget get rid

0:28:58.760 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 2>of the plastic straws.

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, it will be an interesting election, but you know,

0:29:04.080 --> 0:29:06.760
<v Speaker 1>we appreciate you bringing your insight on your book, Amateur Hour.

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Sparing, thank you so much. We appreciate your time.

0:29:10.520 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 2>You bet, Lisa, thanks so much for having me.

0:29:12.680 --> 0:29:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Those Charlie Spearing, author of Amateur Hour, Kamala Harris and

0:29:17.040 --> 0:29:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the White House appreciate him taking the time to come

0:29:19.160 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 1>on the show. Appreciate you guys at home for listening

0:29:21.400 --> 0:29:23.600
<v Speaker 1>every Monday and Thursday, but you can listen throughout the week.

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I do think John, Cassie, and my producer were putting

0:29:25.560 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the show together until next time.