WEBVTT - Tesla Abandons Mercedes to Take on Ford

0:00:01.360 --> 0:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Wait inside from the reporters and

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:09.479
<v Speaker 1>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:09.520 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>global business, finance and tech news. The Bloomberg Business Week

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Podcast with Carol Messer and Tim Stenebeck from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:20.200 --> 0:00:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Just two days after the latest price cuts from Tesla,

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:24.759
<v Speaker 2>the ev maker, as you know, we've been talking about

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 2>it here at Bloomberg, raising prices in the US on

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:31.160
<v Speaker 2>two different models, this time the MODELESSA Model X vehicles.

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 2>And this is coming one day after Tesla stock took

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:36.839
<v Speaker 2>a dive that was yesterday falling concerns about cutting prices

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 2>that led to a cutting margins. In its latest earnings release,

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 2>we got the details on that operating margins slipping to

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:45.240
<v Speaker 2>eleven point four percent, a two year low. I feel

0:00:45.240 --> 0:00:49.960
<v Speaker 2>like the strategy at Tesla raising prices, cutting prices everything

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 2>Elon is one of the most unique Harvard Business School

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 2>case studies of all time. So let's get to one

0:00:56.000 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 2>of the most read stories on the Bloomberg that kind

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 2>of wraps it all together, and it is about how

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 2>Tesla has entered a new era. Joining us with more

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:06.200
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg News Global Cars are Craig Trudell joining us on

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 2>the phone from London. Craig, thank you so much. I

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 2>know it's later there in London, so I appreciate getting

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 2>a chance to talk with you. So the new era

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:18.039
<v Speaker 2>has to do with Tesla and Elon's moving on pricing.

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:19.840
<v Speaker 2>Tell us about this new era and what it means.

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so I think you know, it's been over ten

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:27.399
<v Speaker 3>years now, right since the Model S launched, and that

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:30.399
<v Speaker 3>was a car that really sort of shook things up

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 3>for the auto industry. No one really believed that you

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:37.839
<v Speaker 3>could make a compelling electric car and make any money

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 3>selling it, right, and Tesla has absolutely proven the industry

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 3>wrong in that respect. And they tried to move into

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 3>a new era where they would sell not only compelling

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 3>electric cars, but sell them for the mass markets, and

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 3>they really struggled to pull that off. I think first

0:01:57.440 --> 0:02:00.520
<v Speaker 3>it was because if they were going to to really

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 3>stick to that, they were going to go out of business,

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 3>and so they really were not able to hit the

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:09.360
<v Speaker 3>thirty five thousand dollars price point that Elon musk long promise.

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:13.680
<v Speaker 3>And then conveniently the last few years we've seen you know,

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:16.720
<v Speaker 3>Tesla and the whole industry in this really sort of

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:20.680
<v Speaker 3>unprecedented situation of no one was making as many cars

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 3>as they had demand for and so you know, they

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 3>could sort of cover for the fact that their mission

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:31.359
<v Speaker 3>was something they were having trouble accomplishing because everybody was

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:32.360
<v Speaker 3>jacking up prices.

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:32.639
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 3>I think we now are sort of seeing them get

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:39.000
<v Speaker 3>back to what Musk wanted to do all along, which

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 3>was sell a ton of electric cars. And it's really

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:45.080
<v Speaker 3>really hard to do that at you know, forty thousand

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:48.119
<v Speaker 3>dollars plus, right, And so we're seeing the Model three

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 3>come back below that threshold. It looks like the Model

0:02:51.240 --> 0:02:53.919
<v Speaker 3>Why is going to be there in no time, because

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 3>we've seen it fall twenty nine percent in roughly three

0:02:57.360 --> 0:03:00.400
<v Speaker 3>months and we've just never seen anything like that before.

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:03.520
<v Speaker 5>Is there a bottom craig for the Model Why specifically

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 5>that you could tell us a prediction on that?

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 3>You know, I think I would. I would reckon that,

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:13.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, in that mid thirty thousand dollars range is

0:03:13.760 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 3>probably where we end up seeing it. And you know,

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 3>we're we're already seeing you know, in China in particular,

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 3>because they're you know, they've they've got a sort of

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 3>lower cost base there, They've got cheaper batteries. They It's

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:33.120
<v Speaker 3>just I think another part of this whole equation, right,

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 3>is they have so much capacity that they've added. Just

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:39.000
<v Speaker 3>in the last year, they went from having two plants

0:03:39.040 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 3>one in California and one in Shanghai, two, you know,

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 3>in the matter of a matter of a few weeks,

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 3>opening one near Berlin and one in Austin, Texas. And so,

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, I think there were only just sort of

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 3>starting to, you know, get our minds around the fact

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 3>that this is a company that has has so added

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 3>to its ability to make cars that that's going to

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 3>mean some significant changes in you know, the price that

0:04:05.440 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 3>can can command for them.

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 2>So is it a case of craig And it's funny

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 2>because Matt Miller came out of the studio, is like

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:16.040
<v Speaker 2>a nobody's understanding you know what Tesla's doing at of

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:20.920
<v Speaker 2>course our car aficionado, but along with you guys. But

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 2>what's interesting is you're saying they're raising prices on their

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:26.840
<v Speaker 2>higher end where they make the best margins, lowering it

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 2>on the lower end where they don't make their best margins,

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 2>but maybe they make it up on volume. And by

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 2>raising on the higher prices, they ultimately help kind of

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 2>pay for really getting that cheaper model out there among

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 2>quote unquote the masses. I mean, is that kind of

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 2>the strategy.

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:47.600
<v Speaker 3>It's you know, I think this latest change that they've

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:51.400
<v Speaker 3>made to you know, bump the model S and X

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:54.279
<v Speaker 3>up is really hard to understand that you alluded to

0:04:54.400 --> 0:04:58.719
<v Speaker 3>in the intro. It doesn't make a whole lot of

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:01.039
<v Speaker 3>sense because those two models have just been on the

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 3>steady march downward, and I think, you know, it's it's

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:07.839
<v Speaker 3>hard for me sometimes I feel like do I have

0:05:07.880 --> 0:05:11.040
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg brain and I'm just paying too much attention to

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 3>the to the markets. But it really feels to me

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 3>like this may well have been a case of Tesla

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:20.279
<v Speaker 3>sort of realizing that they may be kind of freaked

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:23.159
<v Speaker 3>investors out a little bit with how much they've cut

0:05:23.360 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 3>prices and how much of an effect it's having on

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 3>their margins. That maybe this was sort of a you know,

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 3>throwing the markets at bone to say, we get it,

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 3>we're going to cool it, and here's a little increase

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 3>on models that, by the way, now are just like

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:39.719
<v Speaker 3>two point five percent of their total deliveries. So they're

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 3>really sort of a rounding error. If it means you know,

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:45.920
<v Speaker 3>if raising the prices of those a little bit means

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 3>a slow down in orders, so be it. They're kind of,

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:51.719
<v Speaker 3>you know, not very meaningful to the business at this point.

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:52.279
<v Speaker 2>Interesting.

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:55.160
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it feels like they're kind of competing against themselves

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:57.160
<v Speaker 5>in that way. But who would you say as Tesla's

0:05:57.240 --> 0:05:59.320
<v Speaker 5>real external competition, Craig.

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean those the S and the X models

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:08.160
<v Speaker 3>are you know, were high before these recent little bump

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 3>up bumps up in price.

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 3>You really have to pay you know, close to ninety

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 3>thousand dollars now for the Model S. And this is

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:18.600
<v Speaker 3>a car that again is ten to eleven years old, right,

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 3>And so you know, I think that that sort of

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, helps to under helps to sort of explain

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 3>why they've brought the prices down so much. The fact

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:33.799
<v Speaker 3>that those models are a bit long in the tooth.

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:36.680
<v Speaker 3>They did make an effort a couple of years ago

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:39.160
<v Speaker 3>to at least update the interiors of them a little bit.

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:42.360
<v Speaker 3>That did seem to help, but you know, sort of

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 3>underneath and in the guts of the car there, these

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:49.160
<v Speaker 3>are pretty old vehicles at this point, and those are

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:54.159
<v Speaker 3>competing with the likes of Mercedes and BMW where you know,

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 3>and and even higher end electric vehicles the porches of

0:06:57.680 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 3>the world where you know, I think a lot of

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 3>consumers are more comfortable with build quality and you know,

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 3>sort of craftsmanship than they might be.

0:07:08.600 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 2>A Tesla, right, and network and easily a network to

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:15.240
<v Speaker 2>take it to if something goes astray. Hey, so in

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:18.560
<v Speaker 2>your story you say Tesla abandons Mercedes, or at least

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:21.240
<v Speaker 2>this is the headline on it, Tesla abandoning Mercedes battle

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:23.840
<v Speaker 2>to take on the likes of Ford. So this shift

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 2>is meaning that Mercedes, you don't maybe need to be

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 2>so worried. It's other automakers in this shift by Tesla.

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think the luxury players can't totally sort of

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 3>rest easy at this point, right. I think, you know,

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 3>we'll see at some point, although Lord knows when a

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 3>Tesla Roadster that will be another sort of a newer

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 3>model that will you know, command these high prices and

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 3>compete with the luxury players. But I think, you know,

0:07:57.080 --> 0:08:00.240
<v Speaker 3>by going into the you know, thirty thousand or mid

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:04.320
<v Speaker 3>thirty thousand range that musk seems headed toward, that's really

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 3>not where Mercedes and BMW tend to play, right, And

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 3>Mercedes in particular is very drastically going in the other direction.

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:17.440
<v Speaker 3>Ola Clinius is really sort of making a push to

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 3>move further up market, focus on AMG, focus on you know,

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:25.320
<v Speaker 3>big money spinners like the g Wagon, and he's very

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 3>comfortable with that meaning lower volume, but you know, getting

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 3>more value and commanding higher margins. So he's playing a

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 3>very different game than Musk is.

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 6>Well.

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:37.880
<v Speaker 2>I have to say, Maddie just maybe before she goes

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:40.560
<v Speaker 2>mid thirty for Tesla not so bad. I mean, it

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 2>really is a lot more manageable, you know, Craig, and

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 2>it does necessarily, you know, probably open up a lot

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 2>more consumers for Tesla. Just got about twenty seconds left here.

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:55.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Absolutely. I think it's just a question for me

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 3>of you know, what happens to this sort of brand

0:08:57.800 --> 0:09:02.839
<v Speaker 3>value and sort of cachet of Tesla and to whether,

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:06.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, weather Musk ends up sort of regretting shooting

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 3>himself in the foot a little bit moving for quickly.

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I was trying to think, is it like Apple,

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:14.320
<v Speaker 2>like who who does have a little bit of a range,

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 2>but they're pretty expensive any kind of Apple device. Craig,

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:21.680
<v Speaker 2>good stuff, Thank you so much, really appreciate it. Have

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:24.200
<v Speaker 2>a great week and Bloomberg News Global Cars are Greg

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 2>Trudell joining us on the phone from London.

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 1>live weekday afternoons from three to six Eastern Listen on

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:37.439
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, the iHeartRadio app and the Bloomberg Business app,

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 2>It has definitely there been a touch and go week

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 2>for the price of bitcoin. We've seen the benchmark for

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:51.200
<v Speaker 2>crypto currencies dropping more than seven percent in the past

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:54.959
<v Speaker 2>two trading days alone. It is, however, up around seventy

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 2>percent this year, so some back and forth, but we've

0:09:56.800 --> 0:09:59.679
<v Speaker 2>been toying around with that thirty thousand dollars mark I

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 2>feel all week. So let's get to it. Because our

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 2>next guest in our weekly look at crypto he sees

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:08.079
<v Speaker 2>a long bull run for bitcoin with his reasoning is

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 2>Corey Clipston. He is CEO at the Bitcoin Saving zapp

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:16.079
<v Speaker 2>swan Bitcoin. He does us at the zoom in la Hey, Corey,

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:18.079
<v Speaker 2>good to have you here with Maddie and myself.

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:21.160
<v Speaker 7>How are you well? Thank you so much for having

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:21.480
<v Speaker 7>me on.

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, tell us a little bit about what's been going on.

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 2>First of all, in terms of your platform, tell us

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:28.320
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of idea in terms of activity users.

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:30.200
<v Speaker 2>Give us an idea of what we're seeing and what

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 2>it tells you maybe about the bitcoin space.

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, absolutely, Yeah, I mean, first off, thanks so much

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 8>for bringing me here. We're basically a full fledged financial

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 8>service as firm at this point that we started off

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 8>as a bitcoin savings app.

0:10:44.200 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 7>I guess it's fair to say three years.

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 8>Ago volumes are up dramatically, and it basically is perfectly

0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:56.360
<v Speaker 8>correlated with the onset of the shaky ground that we

0:10:56.440 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 8>found some of the banks on about five weeks ago.

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 8>It was kind of that March ninth, tenth, eleventh with

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:06.839
<v Speaker 8>silver Gate and signature in Silicon Valley Bank and then

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:09.839
<v Speaker 8>kind of roiling over to Europe with Credit Suee.

0:11:10.520 --> 0:11:12.959
<v Speaker 7>And yeah, you mentioned this thesis.

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:14.559
<v Speaker 8>That I'm kind of developing, and you know, I think

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:16.760
<v Speaker 8>it's I've been talking about it publicly, but it's actually

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 8>very much for purposes.

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 7>Of running my own company and thinking about.

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 8>Pace of hiring and advancing partnerships and entering new markets

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 8>and rolling out new products and things like that. And

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:33.560
<v Speaker 8>basically it made me turn very aggressive in our growth

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 8>trajectory and plans. And it's specifically because I think that.

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 7>We have more people than ever.

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 8>In history that are receptive to talking about the merits

0:11:47.280 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 8>of bitcoin.

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 7>And what it's for.

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 8>And it's cleaning up this false narrative that you saw

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:56.240
<v Speaker 8>a lot of in call it twenty twenty, twenty twenty one,

0:11:56.559 --> 0:11:59.560
<v Speaker 8>maybe even into twenty twenty two, of bitcoin being a

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 8>near term inflation hedge, which makes really no sense. It's

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 8>not about a hedge against you know, CPI numbers next

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:10.600
<v Speaker 8>month or even next year. What it really is is

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:15.320
<v Speaker 8>an inflation hedge in the sense of monetary debasement.

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:17.560
<v Speaker 7>So it is a hedge.

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:21.679
<v Speaker 8>Against the credit fiat based system and against money printing

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 8>that sort of inflation. And I think that's true, but

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 8>that really is a long term play.

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:29.480
<v Speaker 2>So because we only have about six minutes left here

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:35.520
<v Speaker 2>and forgive me, so if net Neet, your bullish theory

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 2>on bitcoin is what.

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:43.200
<v Speaker 8>So specifically, I'm bullish on adoption, so number of people

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:46.079
<v Speaker 8>go up obviously long term, you know, I'm very much

0:12:46.120 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 8>on record saying I expect a million dollar price for

0:12:49.320 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 8>bitcoin by the end of the decade. But the path

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 8>that it'll take to get there, I think is anybody's guess. Yeah,

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 8>what I'm talking about is in the past three bowl

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 8>market peaks, there's only been about a four to six

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:05.199
<v Speaker 8>month window where Google search volumes have been off the

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 8>charts and where a lot of people have been rushing

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 8>in trying to learn about bitcoin and get up to speed.

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 8>And that's, you know, kind of three four to six

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 8>months at the end of twenty thirteen, twenty seventeen, twenty

0:13:14.880 --> 0:13:17.559
<v Speaker 8>twenty one. Yeah, what I think we have here is

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 8>something more like maybe twenty four months where there's a

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:24.680
<v Speaker 8>receptive audience willing to be, as we call it, orange pilled,

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 8>take the orange pill and get into bitcoin, and everybody's interested,

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:31.560
<v Speaker 8>and companies are looking at making sure that they have

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 8>enough bitcoin on the sideline to be able to pay

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 8>important vendors and make payroll in the event that their

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 8>bank runs into trouble things like that.

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 5>Well, I want to talk about the volume thing, because

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:43.040
<v Speaker 5>I keep hearing you mentioned different metrics that show that

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:46.559
<v Speaker 5>volume is great. We've got a story on the Bloomberg

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:50.200
<v Speaker 5>terminal and online about how volume for crypto training seemed

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:53.720
<v Speaker 5>amazing last quarter. But if you isolate just the bitcoin

0:13:53.760 --> 0:13:57.199
<v Speaker 5>dollar trade, parrot shows that volume was among the lowest

0:13:57.200 --> 0:13:59.400
<v Speaker 5>since twenty twenty, and that's, of course amid some of

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:03.320
<v Speaker 5>the regulatory chatter that's going on. And all of this

0:14:03.440 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 5>comes as I know, you're very familiar with the Binance

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:11.079
<v Speaker 5>effect question binance ending it's zero fee trading, Does that

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 5>pullback from binance, which happened just in the month of March,

0:14:15.760 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 5>decrease some of that volume to you? And to what

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 5>extent are you worried about the impact of binance.

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 8>Not worried at all about the impact of any centralized

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 8>crypto casino, and at least on bitcoin. And again I

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 8>obviously focus on Bitcoin only and don't see much future

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:33.480
<v Speaker 8>in the long run for any of the off coins

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 8>from a THEEUM on down. But yeah, so I guess

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 8>as far as bitcoin volumes, you know, if you have

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 8>zero fee trading and you give beneficial rates and access

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 8>to market makers so that they can sort of trade

0:14:47.000 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 8>contra with favorable terms and access versus your customers, like

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 8>Finance's rumored to have done over the past few years, yeah,

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 8>you would see some of those volumes fall off as

0:14:57.120 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 8>they are forced to see some of that behavior here.

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:02.480
<v Speaker 7>So I don't think there's any surprise that volumes would

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 7>be down.

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 5>But even in the bitcoin dollar trade we're seeing on

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:07.560
<v Speaker 5>that pair of volume down. That doesn't concern you.

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 7>Not one bit.

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean there's still plenty of liquidity and not

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 8>much slippage. If you want to make a large buy,

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 8>you know, you can do t w op or view

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 8>app and still establish your position with almost no slippage

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 8>on any major trading ven you, including SWAN.

0:15:21.520 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 2>So I just want to sure I'm understanding. So your

0:15:24.680 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 2>thesis has to do with more people maybe trading out

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 2>of traditional finance and then as a result opting into bitcoin.

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 2>Is that fair?

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 8>I think it's just more and more people recognizing that,

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 8>you know, the truth that bitcoin is the best tool

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 8>for the job of store of value, which is a

0:15:44.760 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 8>giant asset pile conservatively marked at four hundred trillion, maybe

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 8>aggressively at nine hundred trillion globally.

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 2>But how can you say that considering the volatility that

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 2>we've seen in bitcoin and how high it went and

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 2>how how how hard it fell, how is that to

0:15:59.840 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 2>be considered a store of value? And ultimately you're always

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 2>going to have a fixed amount, right, So it's you know,

0:16:06.280 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 2>the dynamics of it is not necessarily like you know,

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 2>a free trading currency.

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 8>So it is a free trading currency. And I think

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 8>we're confusing a couple of things. I said, it's the

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 8>best tool for store of value. It's going to take.

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 8>This is the technological revolution on the order of something

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 8>like steam power or the information revolution or mass production

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 8>or something like that. So it's going to disrupt all

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 8>industries over the course of four to eight decades, just

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 8>like previous technological revolutions. And so when you talk about

0:16:37.040 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 8>what your expectations are for where bitcoin will eventually end up,

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:43.480
<v Speaker 8>you have to think about it in terms of what

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 8>percentage of that asset pile that is currently the store

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 8>value asset pile do you think the best tool for

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:53.119
<v Speaker 8>the job for the job will eventually take over what timeframe?

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:55.680
<v Speaker 8>So you know, if you think that it's going to

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 8>take twenty percent of that asset pile, then that would

0:16:58.600 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 8>be eighty trillion dollars.

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 7>You have to.

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 8>Decide like when is it going to take that by

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 8>is it going to be twenty fifty is it going

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 8>to be.

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:07.400
<v Speaker 7>Twenty thirty five? And then essentially.

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 8>You just have to right size your bet on that future.

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 8>But it's going to be extremely volatile on the way.

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:17.639
<v Speaker 8>There's absolutely no way it can go in a straight

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 8>line from half a trillion dollars to say ten or

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:21.400
<v Speaker 8>twenty or thirty trillion dollar.

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 7>Market cap in a straight line.

0:17:23.119 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 8>It's going to have manias and wild crashes along the

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:30.639
<v Speaker 8>way as it grows into its rightful place as more

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:33.400
<v Speaker 8>and more people understand what it is, and one of.

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:37.879
<v Speaker 5>Those crashes, obviously being FTX SBF regulation is on the way.

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 5>Do you have concerns at all about people getting bullish

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 5>on bitcoin given the risks that we've already seen involved

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 5>in investing in cryptocurrency when you do have bad actors

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:52.640
<v Speaker 5>in the system like an SBF.

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:57.200
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, absolutely so. I mean again, the non bitcoin crypto

0:17:57.280 --> 0:17:59.880
<v Speaker 8>space is just ripe with scams. Over ninety nine percent

0:17:59.880 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 8>of those projects are deliberately set up to be pump

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 8>and dumps, and the remainder that maybe could be honest

0:18:06.640 --> 0:18:09.399
<v Speaker 8>attempts at building something still in the long run won't

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:11.639
<v Speaker 8>need their own micro currencies. We don't live in a

0:18:11.680 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 8>barter system, and monetary networks trend toward one. So if

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 8>there is some kind of innovation that comes out of

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:21.120
<v Speaker 8>the whole DE five blockchain crypto complex that still gets

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:24.480
<v Speaker 8>used by people and businesses. In the future, it'll use

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:28.399
<v Speaker 8>whatever the major currency is that dominates the monetary space.

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 8>It'll be dollars in bitcoin, I think, for the rest

0:18:30.600 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 8>of the century, and we'll see what happens with that battle.

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:34.880
<v Speaker 7>But that's that's decades off.

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:35.440
<v Speaker 6>Well.

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:39.160
<v Speaker 8>But yeah, these centralized players like they brought this regulation

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:43.399
<v Speaker 8>on themselves, right, This was outright fraud and criminality on

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:47.960
<v Speaker 8>the part of companies like FTX and Celsius, and it

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 8>was some flavor of that, maybe more toward terrible risk

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 8>management when it comes to Genesis, Gemini, Block five, Voyager

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 8>and some of these other ones that have be have

0:18:56.880 --> 0:18:59.240
<v Speaker 8>cratered and lost their client's money.

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 2>And I think, to be fair, we're still trying to

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:04.720
<v Speaker 2>figure it all out. Really, Corey, thank you so much.

0:19:05.320 --> 0:19:06.960
<v Speaker 2>Really give us a bunch of stuff to think about.

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:10.199
<v Speaker 2>Corey Clipston, he's chief executive officer at Swan Bitcoin, as

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 2>he said, really a broader financial platform. Initially started as

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:17.160
<v Speaker 2>a bitcoin savings app, but they are certainly offering more stuff.

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:21.200
<v Speaker 2>On the phone from La.

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:24.160
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:19:24.200 --> 0:19:28.200
<v Speaker 1>live weekday afternoons from three to six Eastern on Bloomberg Radio,

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:31.680
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business App, and YouTube. You can also listen

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:34.880
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:38.119
<v Speaker 1>Just Say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:41.919
<v Speaker 2>In the last twenty four hours, the state of Arizona

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 2>rescinded its approval for two new deep water wells for

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:48.400
<v Speaker 2>a controversial Saudi Arabia owned farm in the desert west

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:51.320
<v Speaker 2>of Phoenix. This on the heels of a CBS News

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:54.199
<v Speaker 2>report about farms in western Arizona that are growing alfalfa,

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:56.880
<v Speaker 2>one of the most water intensive crops in an area

0:19:56.920 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 2>where there's a shortage of water. CBS noting that some

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 2>farms are fore owned and are shipping the crop to

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:04.280
<v Speaker 2>Saudi Arabia, where it is legal to grow because it

0:20:04.320 --> 0:20:08.360
<v Speaker 2>takes too much water. Stories about water access to lack

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:11.520
<v Speaker 2>of and investing in seem to be everywhere. And our

0:20:11.560 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 2>next guest is the CEO of Eco Lab. It's a

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:17.159
<v Speaker 2>forty seven billion dollar market cap company that is a

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 2>global provider of water hygiene and infection prevention solutions for

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 2>everyone and everyone in the food, safety, sanitation, and oil

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:26.400
<v Speaker 2>and gas industries and more. Ecolobe shares by the way,

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:29.399
<v Speaker 2>up nearly fourteen percent year to date, and we welcome

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 2>the CEO joining us via zoom from Saint Paul, Minnesota,

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 2>where the company is based. Christophe Beck is here with us. Christoph,

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:40.439
<v Speaker 2>nice to have you here with Maddie and myself. I

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 2>have to say this CBS report, I'm sure you saw

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:45.239
<v Speaker 2>it or I just feel like there's been a lot

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 2>of reporting about access to water around the country or

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:52.919
<v Speaker 2>water as an investment. What are you seeing when it

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 2>comes to global water supplies and the conditions of the

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 2>available water to us?

0:20:57.040 --> 0:21:01.399
<v Speaker 9>All good, def and Maddie so are great to be

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 9>with you on a happy Earth Day a little bit early.

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:06.160
<v Speaker 7>It's going to happen tomorrow.

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 9>Water scarce city is a big issue, and it's one

0:21:11.040 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 9>that's getting bigger. Climate change is having most of the

0:21:14.400 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 9>impact on water, and water is having most of the

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 9>impact on climate change as well. When we think about

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:22.440
<v Speaker 9>it's about twenty thirty, it's expected that we will need

0:21:22.520 --> 0:21:25.919
<v Speaker 9>forty percent more water than what nature can replenish. So

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:28.919
<v Speaker 9>the problem is big and he's getting bigger, and we

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:32.159
<v Speaker 9>can see so in places like in California with the

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 9>Colorado River drying up as well, getting challenges as well

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:41.600
<v Speaker 9>so to feed big cities like Los Angeles. So the

0:21:41.720 --> 0:21:44.880
<v Speaker 9>challenge is big and at the same time for industries, well,

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 9>there is not only no life without water, but there's

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:50.600
<v Speaker 9>no industry without water as well. And the good news

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 9>is that if we save water, well, we save energy

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 9>as well at the same time, because we need a

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:58.119
<v Speaker 9>bunch of energy to heat water, to cool water, to

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:01.680
<v Speaker 9>transport water, to tweat water. And that's why dealing well

0:22:01.760 --> 0:22:04.640
<v Speaker 9>with water ultimately is a very good thing for business

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:05.399
<v Speaker 9>and for the years.

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:08.960
<v Speaker 5>Christophf you bring up some of the major water sources

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:11.359
<v Speaker 5>in the United States, and of course Michigan comes to

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 5>mind in the situation in Flint. I wonder to what

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 5>extent you think that Biden's push on infrastructure and the

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 5>Infrastructure plan could have a positive impact. Does it move

0:22:23.880 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 5>the needle enough to kind of satisfy you in terms

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:30.840
<v Speaker 5>of lessening the concerns that you have about the status

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:32.800
<v Speaker 5>of water infrastructure in the United States.

0:22:33.800 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 9>Well, let's put it that way. It's a good step

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:39.760
<v Speaker 9>in the right direction. But interestingly enough, so most of

0:22:39.800 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 9>the focus today is on a renovating older infrastructure. It's

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 9>a little bit like if we were to renovate older

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:51.160
<v Speaker 9>phone lines when everybody's using cell phones. So we believe

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 9>in our company since we serve a million of customers

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:57.920
<v Speaker 9>or around the world and really helping them produce more

0:22:58.000 --> 0:23:02.639
<v Speaker 9>better products with less water. That ultimately so sites, industrial

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:06.400
<v Speaker 9>park cities will have to become water sufficient and that

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 9>means that there should be in a place that to

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:11.440
<v Speaker 9>reuse and recycle water. So that's why we need even

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:15.159
<v Speaker 9>more innovation. Solutions exist, but we need to support companies

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:17.479
<v Speaker 9>in order to go in that direction and re use

0:23:17.560 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 9>and recycle water on site and not just in terms

0:23:20.560 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 9>of distribution, like the example in Flint that you just mentioned.

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, what sounds like getting more R and D done

0:23:26.600 --> 0:23:29.880
<v Speaker 2>is something that the Water Equity Global Access Fund might

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 2>certainly help tell us about this. You and a few

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:35.760
<v Speaker 2>other partners, a few other companies have been partnering on

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:37.200
<v Speaker 2>this tell us about.

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 9>It absolutely well. The whole idea started a few years

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:43.359
<v Speaker 9>back when when you looked at the facts and really

0:23:43.400 --> 0:23:45.960
<v Speaker 9>realizing that for the world and for the industries, we

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:48.919
<v Speaker 9>won't have enough water so to keep growing, which is

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:52.040
<v Speaker 9>a major issue for industry, for business and for people.

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 9>And we realized that one hured and fifty companies worldwide

0:23:55.760 --> 0:23:59.359
<v Speaker 9>impact a third of the world water consumption. So we

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:02.359
<v Speaker 9>came together together with the United Nations and saying we

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:05.680
<v Speaker 9>will create the Water Resilience Coalition, getting those one hundred

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:08.800
<v Speaker 9>and fifty companies together in order to reach three objective.

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 9>The first one, it's all of us to get to

0:24:10.680 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 9>net zero, which means that we're using all the water

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 9>that we are using. Second, it's really set to protect

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 9>one hundred basins around the world that are supporting three

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:25.160
<v Speaker 9>billion people's lives. And the third it's to provide access

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:29.040
<v Speaker 9>to three hundred million people who do not have access

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:33.199
<v Speaker 9>to clean water today. And we've partnered with many companies.

0:24:33.280 --> 0:24:36.719
<v Speaker 9>Microsoft was one of the founders together with us. We

0:24:36.760 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 9>had Cargill, we had Jajo, we had Starbucks as well.

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 9>A lot of companies have joined and one of the

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 9>partners has been water dot Org, a remarkable organization which

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 9>is not a freeland tropic organization. It's investments in order

0:24:50.320 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 9>to provide water for people who will pay for it.

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:55.720
<v Speaker 9>But it's less expensive then to go and get water

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 9>in those places where there is no access. So we've

0:24:59.080 --> 0:25:03.439
<v Speaker 9>helped fund that organization. So far, almost four billions so

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 9>have been mobilized to provide access to fifty two million people.

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:09.720
<v Speaker 7>So the world the Water.

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 9>Access Fund you just mentioned is one additional step in

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 9>that direction.

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 2>Christoph, I have to say, twenty years ago, fifteen years ago,

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:18.959
<v Speaker 2>you know, wanted to do this documentary and I'm like, guys,

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:21.200
<v Speaker 2>water it's the next commodity we're all going to be

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 2>fighting over. And everybody's like, oh, come on, We've all

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:25.359
<v Speaker 2>been like talking about that for years. We're going to

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:27.160
<v Speaker 2>have plenty of water. It's just like a non event

0:25:27.480 --> 0:25:29.880
<v Speaker 2>here we are. What has changed maybe in the last

0:25:29.920 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 2>five to ten years when it comes to global water supplies.

0:25:33.640 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 9>The thing that I've changed are good things. We are

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:38.239
<v Speaker 9>much more people on the planet. We will be two

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:41.160
<v Speaker 9>three billion more in the decades to come. We've been

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:44.399
<v Speaker 9>growing as well. The diets have changed as well, moving

0:25:44.400 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 9>from most cell based to more proteins, which means meat.

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 9>And to get meat, well you need to feed the

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:54.120
<v Speaker 9>animals as well. You need more water for it as well.

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:57.920
<v Speaker 9>So it's driven by the right things, except that human

0:25:57.960 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 9>being and industries are thinking in a linear way. You know,

0:26:01.640 --> 0:26:03.600
<v Speaker 9>you take the water, you use it, you dump it.

0:26:04.400 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 9>We should more do it like nature does, which is

0:26:07.240 --> 0:26:09.600
<v Speaker 9>using it in a closed circle. It goes to the

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:13.359
<v Speaker 9>cloudy trains, it comes back. You use it and you

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:17.200
<v Speaker 9>work in a psycho. So good changes, but we need

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:19.240
<v Speaker 9>to rethink the way we manage water in order to

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 9>keep growing.

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:23.080
<v Speaker 2>Amen. Yeah, and here are one day before Earth Day,

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:26.880
<v Speaker 2>and really appreciate you and having this conversation. Christoph Beck,

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:29.879
<v Speaker 2>thank you so much, chief executive officer of the publicly

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 2>held Eco Lab. As we said, a forty seven billion

0:26:32.600 --> 0:26:35.480
<v Speaker 2>dollar market cap company, but really talking about initiatives and

0:26:35.480 --> 0:26:39.119
<v Speaker 2>companies banding together when it comes to water. Joining us

0:26:39.200 --> 0:26:41.960
<v Speaker 2>via zoom from Saint Paul, Minnesota. Yeah, we've had a

0:26:42.000 --> 0:26:44.480
<v Speaker 2>lot of great conversations this week. Tomorrow is Earth Day everybody,

0:26:44.520 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 2>so birthday. Yeah, and if you're missing the conversations, check

0:26:48.040 --> 0:26:52.240
<v Speaker 2>out our podcast for you're talking about agriculture, water, just

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:54.680
<v Speaker 2>our environment. We got to care Mother Earth.

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:57.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's critical, it's the most important resources we've.

0:26:57.480 --> 0:26:59.880
<v Speaker 2>Got a absolutely all right, This is Bloomberg.

0:27:01.240 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week inside from the reporters and

0:27:05.760 --> 0:27:09.320
<v Speaker 1>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:27:09.400 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 1>gloom Wal business finance and tech news. The Bloomberg Business

0:27:13.320 --> 0:27:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Week Podcast with Carol Messer and Tim Stenebeck from Bloomberg Radio.

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:41.160
<v Speaker 2>You got to put your headphones on for that one,

0:27:41.520 --> 0:27:47.160
<v Speaker 2>mister Webber, Paul Brennan going into the archives. Nice, that's

0:27:47.160 --> 0:27:50.119
<v Speaker 2>an old Pepsi commercial. I don't know, that's a pretty

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:53.639
<v Speaker 2>old one. Cold Wars they're on again, everybody, although this

0:27:53.680 --> 0:27:56.119
<v Speaker 2>time it's over lemons and limes. So this next story

0:27:56.119 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 2>in the new rat show, Bloomberg business Week out on newsstands,

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 2>online at Bloomberg dot com, Sash business Week, and also

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:03.320
<v Speaker 2>of course on the Bloomberg turbel. So let's get to it.

0:28:03.480 --> 0:28:06.600
<v Speaker 2>Brett Pully wrote it. He is Bloomberg News Atlanta bureau chief,

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:09.080
<v Speaker 2>home to Coca Cola. Brett is on the phone from

0:28:09.080 --> 0:28:11.600
<v Speaker 2>our bureau. There also here the editor of Bloomberg BusinessWeek,

0:28:11.640 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 2>Jill Weber. Here in our Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio. First

0:28:15.160 --> 0:28:16.240
<v Speaker 2>Jell Coca Pepsi.

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:23.560
<v Speaker 10>You know there's a place for both, and funny enough,

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 10>Pepsi is still fighting for that space in the lemon

0:28:28.359 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 10>lime conversation, which is what we're going to talk about now. Okay,

0:28:32.359 --> 0:28:35.480
<v Speaker 10>I did not know this sprite has this category on

0:28:35.640 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 10>lock and has basically just like pulled away and it

0:28:41.720 --> 0:28:46.000
<v Speaker 10>looks like the dominant lemon lime flavor, which I found surprising,

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:50.040
<v Speaker 10>mister Polly, I did not know that Sprite had this

0:28:50.080 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 10>category on lock. And it was such a lock that

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:55.080
<v Speaker 10>Pepsi said, you know, we've had this other brands here

0:28:55.080 --> 0:28:57.960
<v Speaker 10>I missed for a while. That is no more, what

0:28:58.040 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 10>do they bring out?

0:28:58.880 --> 0:28:59.240
<v Speaker 6>Instead?

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:05.960
<v Speaker 4>They keep trying. That's the thing, Spright, as you've pointed out, dominated, Yeah,

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:09.920
<v Speaker 4>they've dominated this category for such a long time now,

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:13.440
<v Speaker 4>and you know it's it's the thing. It's not this time,

0:29:13.440 --> 0:29:16.200
<v Speaker 4>it's not Coco Pepsi, right, it's the it's the on Kola,

0:29:16.600 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 4>as the other brand famously called. It's seven Up. And

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 4>this lemon lime category that was really created by seven

0:29:24.120 --> 0:29:27.680
<v Speaker 4>Up back in the twenties has for the last oh,

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:31.160
<v Speaker 4>you know, thirty plus years been dominated by Sprite, which

0:29:31.200 --> 0:29:38.920
<v Speaker 4>has done really an incredible job of focusing some key

0:29:39.400 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 4>demographics with this lemon lime flavor. You know, they signed

0:29:43.280 --> 0:29:47.959
<v Speaker 4>on early to the whole hip hop culture and really

0:29:48.000 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 4>penetrated those multi multicultural markets. And we're the big sponsor

0:29:53.720 --> 0:29:58.720
<v Speaker 4>of the NBA, et cetera. And now the new sponsor

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:02.040
<v Speaker 4>of the NBA is pep sees. The latest entrant in

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 4>this category that they launched earlier this year, which is

0:30:06.560 --> 0:30:12.200
<v Speaker 4>called Starry. So Pepsi had picked up the NBA partnership

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:15.520
<v Speaker 4>a few years back and put its It's Mountain Dew

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:21.240
<v Speaker 4>beverage as the NBA primary drink. But just change at

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:24.400
<v Speaker 4>the story, and of course mountain Dew they dominate their

0:30:24.480 --> 0:30:30.480
<v Speaker 4>category which is highly caffeinated let's just say caffeinated, which

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:35.600
<v Speaker 4>is caffeinated citrus flavor and lemon lime. The big distinction

0:30:35.680 --> 0:30:39.440
<v Speaker 4>with lemon lime is that it is not caffeinated, and

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:41.800
<v Speaker 4>that's where sprite this absolutely dominates.

0:30:42.080 --> 0:30:44.360
<v Speaker 10>Okay, so what about seven Up.

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:48.640
<v Speaker 4>Well, seven Up they're still there. They're still in that category.

0:30:48.680 --> 0:30:53.040
<v Speaker 4>And interestingly seven Up is kind of controlled by two entities.

0:30:53.080 --> 0:30:58.240
<v Speaker 4>In the US, it's controlled by Curing Doctor Pepper, which

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:04.160
<v Speaker 4>of course makes another cat glory spicy Pepper, and internationally

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 4>seven Up is controlled by PepsiCo. So this has to

0:31:09.000 --> 0:31:11.640
<v Speaker 4>do with some antitrust stuff in the past. But what

0:31:11.720 --> 0:31:16.040
<v Speaker 4>it probably means is that Pepsi COO while they're pushing

0:31:16.080 --> 0:31:20.280
<v Speaker 4>their new products storry very hard in the US, they

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:24.720
<v Speaker 4>might not do the same in global markets, given the

0:31:24.720 --> 0:31:27.120
<v Speaker 4>fact that they do have seven Up in those markets,

0:31:27.240 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 4>and of course Sprite is strong in those markets as well.

0:31:30.520 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 4>The other big big thing is that sprite is so

0:31:35.320 --> 0:31:39.600
<v Speaker 4>strong at the fountains, you know, the stadiums and the

0:31:39.680 --> 0:31:43.320
<v Speaker 4>restaurants and all the places where people pour fountain drinks.

0:31:43.520 --> 0:31:46.960
<v Speaker 4>It's like you almost have to have a good lemon

0:31:47.080 --> 0:31:50.920
<v Speaker 4>lime non caffeinated soda for people who you know, people

0:31:50.960 --> 0:31:53.280
<v Speaker 4>are concerned about other things when it comes to soda. Right,

0:31:53.280 --> 0:31:55.680
<v Speaker 4>they're the health concerns, But there are a lot of

0:31:55.720 --> 0:31:59.240
<v Speaker 4>people who are concerned about two things, the health concerns

0:31:59.280 --> 0:32:02.520
<v Speaker 4>and the caffeine. Maybe they're letting their kids indulge when

0:32:02.560 --> 0:32:05.280
<v Speaker 4>they're at a restaurant or something. They're letting them indulge

0:32:05.280 --> 0:32:08.440
<v Speaker 4>with some soda. G I wanted to be caffeinated. So

0:32:08.440 --> 0:32:10.959
<v Speaker 4>so it's really important to have a lemon lime so

0:32:11.000 --> 0:32:15.400
<v Speaker 4>that you can get those uh those fountain that fountain business.

0:32:15.600 --> 0:32:16.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:32:16.440 --> 0:32:19.719
<v Speaker 5>On the health piece, though, Brett, I wonder if they

0:32:19.800 --> 0:32:23.160
<v Speaker 5>wouldn't be better off just launching a sparkling water for

0:32:23.280 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 5>gen Z because it's seen as like really uncool and

0:32:26.960 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 5>unhealthy to be drinking soda.

0:32:29.920 --> 0:32:31.480
<v Speaker 2>Gen Z or which one are you?

0:32:31.960 --> 0:32:34.680
<v Speaker 5>I'm a millennial. I'm millennial, but I'll moonlight as a

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:37.320
<v Speaker 5>gen zer to seem cool, but like, I would never

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:39.760
<v Speaker 5>drink soda around a younger person than me because I

0:32:39.760 --> 0:32:40.960
<v Speaker 5>would feel like they're judging me.

0:32:41.200 --> 0:32:43.960
<v Speaker 7>You know, I totally hear you, and in fact, you

0:32:43.960 --> 0:32:44.840
<v Speaker 7>don't have to drink soda.

0:32:45.960 --> 0:32:49.880
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I'm sorry, too.

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:54.760
<v Speaker 5>Easy, Okay, Brett, But seriously, what's what's the deal?

0:32:54.840 --> 0:32:55.920
<v Speaker 4>You're just gonna say no?

0:32:56.400 --> 0:32:56.600
<v Speaker 6>You know.

0:32:56.640 --> 0:32:58.760
<v Speaker 4>I talked to people on this story, people in the

0:32:58.800 --> 0:33:01.360
<v Speaker 4>business who are competing in trying to figure out how

0:33:01.400 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 4>to steal some of that market share that that sprite

0:33:04.080 --> 0:33:08.000
<v Speaker 4>has in this category, and there are there are those

0:33:08.040 --> 0:33:12.440
<v Speaker 4>without starts and who say that absolutely it won't be

0:33:13.040 --> 0:33:17.040
<v Speaker 4>this new drink from PepsiCo and it what it will

0:33:17.080 --> 0:33:20.160
<v Speaker 4>be is a drink that comes along that is focused

0:33:20.200 --> 0:33:23.680
<v Speaker 4>on the health concerns the younger, the younger demographic ass

0:33:24.480 --> 0:33:28.240
<v Speaker 4>and that is really the big, big challenge for soda

0:33:28.320 --> 0:33:32.960
<v Speaker 4>companies overall. I mean, the overall consumption is like, you know,

0:33:33.160 --> 0:33:37.160
<v Speaker 4>kind of a bit of a slow melting iceberg, but

0:33:37.200 --> 0:33:39.800
<v Speaker 4>it has been shrinking, so.

0:33:40.520 --> 0:33:43.360
<v Speaker 10>So does so to go down and lemon line stays

0:33:43.480 --> 0:33:46.600
<v Speaker 10>flat or goes up? Like, what is demand like for

0:33:46.720 --> 0:33:48.160
<v Speaker 10>this particular category.

0:33:48.880 --> 0:33:52.280
<v Speaker 4>I think this category I mean, it stayed around about

0:33:52.320 --> 0:33:57.920
<v Speaker 4>around ten percent, looks like for the last decade or so,

0:33:58.120 --> 0:34:01.080
<v Speaker 4>ten percent of overall. So to say, what we see

0:34:01.080 --> 0:34:06.680
<v Speaker 4>happening globally with overall soda sales, however, is that in

0:34:06.760 --> 0:34:11.120
<v Speaker 4>recent years, you know, they've ticked down a couple of

0:34:11.160 --> 0:34:15.400
<v Speaker 4>points and have been trending that way for some time.

0:34:15.800 --> 0:34:18.319
<v Speaker 4>And as a result, you know, will you come out

0:34:18.320 --> 0:34:20.600
<v Speaker 4>with the new Starry or a new drink You're not.

0:34:21.760 --> 0:34:24.560
<v Speaker 4>It's all about market share. It's all about stealing share

0:34:24.560 --> 0:34:27.880
<v Speaker 4>from each other. Right, It's like they've they've penetrated the

0:34:27.920 --> 0:34:30.879
<v Speaker 4>market and that market shrinking, So it's all about stealing share.

0:34:30.920 --> 0:34:34.440
<v Speaker 4>And for Pepsi COO, if a drink like Starry can

0:34:34.480 --> 0:34:37.520
<v Speaker 4>get just like five to ten percent.

0:34:37.719 --> 0:34:39.120
<v Speaker 2>It's not too shabby, right.

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:40.200
<v Speaker 4>It's not too shabby.

0:34:40.520 --> 0:34:42.680
<v Speaker 2>Can I just say, as you remind us, this is

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:46.280
<v Speaker 2>Pepsi's fourth stab at the category, so y hat Siera missed.

0:34:46.600 --> 0:34:49.800
<v Speaker 2>There was Slice in eighty four team back in the

0:34:49.880 --> 0:34:53.000
<v Speaker 2>nineteen fifties, and then there were Storm that actually never

0:34:53.040 --> 0:34:55.359
<v Speaker 2>made it to market. So I'm not going to say

0:34:55.400 --> 0:34:59.279
<v Speaker 2>that that bodes well or badly or whatever, but it's

0:34:59.320 --> 0:35:03.239
<v Speaker 2>just a reminder they've been they've been trying to go there.

0:35:03.360 --> 0:35:08.440
<v Speaker 10>Here's a little fact too. Take seventy percent sprite, thirty

0:35:08.480 --> 0:35:10.320
<v Speaker 10>percent coke or so guess what you get?

0:35:10.640 --> 0:35:13.440
<v Speaker 2>What do you get? Gingerl Are you kidding?

0:35:13.800 --> 0:35:17.000
<v Speaker 5>This is a bartender trick. Yes, if a customer asks

0:35:17.040 --> 0:35:19.040
<v Speaker 5>you for ginger ale, you say you have it.

0:35:19.000 --> 0:35:22.080
<v Speaker 2>And you mix the two together. Yes, it's to you guys.

0:35:22.120 --> 0:35:23.880
<v Speaker 2>Never approach Jil Weber.

0:35:23.920 --> 0:35:26.120
<v Speaker 10>You're just like man tips on a Friday.

0:35:26.120 --> 0:35:28.880
<v Speaker 5>What do you do on the weekends. I mixed Briten

0:35:29.400 --> 0:35:30.160
<v Speaker 5>code for my kid.

0:35:30.360 --> 0:35:34.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, please kick it up cocktail. Hey, thank you so much, Brett.

0:35:34.880 --> 0:35:36.560
<v Speaker 2>Fun to check in with you and the story. As

0:35:36.600 --> 0:35:38.480
<v Speaker 2>we mentioned, the new is show of Bloomberg Business Week

0:35:38.520 --> 0:35:42.040
<v Speaker 2>at on newsstands as we speak. It's also online on

0:35:42.080 --> 0:35:46.040
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg terminal and online at Bloomberg dot com slash BusinessWeek.

0:35:46.040 --> 0:35:49.360
<v Speaker 2>Brot Pulley, he's our Atlanta beer chief out there in Atlanta.

0:35:49.520 --> 0:35:53.360
<v Speaker 2>And of course Joe Webber on fire on this Friday,

0:35:53.800 --> 0:35:56.880
<v Speaker 2>Editor of Bloomberg Business Week, This is Bloomberg Radio.

0:36:02.280 --> 0:36:04.160
<v Speaker 9>Un brother mac.

0:36:05.840 --> 0:36:06.520
<v Speaker 5>A journal.

0:36:07.560 --> 0:36:08.520
<v Speaker 2>How about you let me drive?

0:36:09.040 --> 0:36:10.799
<v Speaker 6>No, no, no, no, who's going to drive?

0:36:11.080 --> 0:36:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Honey?

0:36:12.360 --> 0:36:12.680
<v Speaker 9>Please?

0:36:12.800 --> 0:36:14.359
<v Speaker 7>How do the riding gravels.

0:36:14.680 --> 0:36:16.040
<v Speaker 8>Let's mate, I want to drive.

0:36:16.040 --> 0:36:24.360
<v Speaker 1>It's a good question time. This is the drive to

0:36:24.400 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the globe dot com me efek well buy around on

0:36:28.520 --> 0:36:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Bluemberg Radio.

0:36:29.560 --> 0:36:32.640
<v Speaker 2>All right, everybody, just about seventeen and a half minutes

0:36:32.680 --> 0:36:34.960
<v Speaker 2>left in today's trading session, getting ready to wrap up

0:36:34.960 --> 0:36:37.799
<v Speaker 2>that Friday trade and the trade for the week. Carol

0:36:37.840 --> 0:36:40.480
<v Speaker 2>Master along with Madison Mills, live in our Bloueberg Interactive

0:36:40.480 --> 0:36:43.520
<v Speaker 2>Brokers studio on YouTube on Blueberg Originals. I want to

0:36:43.560 --> 0:36:45.479
<v Speaker 2>get to our drive through the close on a palm.

0:36:45.520 --> 0:36:49.040
<v Speaker 2>Demani is head of International and Emerging marketsteat at Nouve.

0:36:49.320 --> 0:36:52.440
<v Speaker 2>They've got about one point one trullion in assets under management,

0:36:52.520 --> 0:36:54.160
<v Speaker 2>so they get to see an awful lot when it

0:36:54.200 --> 0:36:57.960
<v Speaker 2>comes to investor thinking. She is with us via zoom

0:36:58.000 --> 0:37:00.319
<v Speaker 2>in New York City on a palm. Son to have

0:37:00.360 --> 0:37:03.600
<v Speaker 2>you here with Maddie and myself. You know, I would

0:37:03.600 --> 0:37:05.480
<v Speaker 2>love to first just start there with a big picture

0:37:05.760 --> 0:37:07.840
<v Speaker 2>from you in terms of what we are seeing, especially

0:37:07.840 --> 0:37:09.839
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to the emerging market economies. We got

0:37:09.920 --> 0:37:14.120
<v Speaker 2>updates on growth, global growth and activity and concerns from

0:37:14.120 --> 0:37:17.000
<v Speaker 2>the IMF and World Bank just last week. How do

0:37:17.080 --> 0:37:19.080
<v Speaker 2>you see it where are we seeing strength, where are

0:37:19.080 --> 0:37:21.480
<v Speaker 2>we seeing weakness? And as a result, we'll get into

0:37:21.520 --> 0:37:22.560
<v Speaker 2>some of the opportunities.

0:37:23.520 --> 0:37:28.359
<v Speaker 6>Thanks for having me, Carolyn Madison. Yeah, emerging markets, right, so,

0:37:29.080 --> 0:37:33.560
<v Speaker 6>I think the growth differential is expected to outpace developed

0:37:33.600 --> 0:37:36.520
<v Speaker 6>markets growth both this year as well as going into

0:37:36.640 --> 0:37:41.480
<v Speaker 6>next year. And although IMF downgraded both developed market and

0:37:41.520 --> 0:37:44.399
<v Speaker 6>emerging markets growth, I think the downgrade was much most

0:37:44.400 --> 0:37:47.600
<v Speaker 6>star in developed markets. So the differential is going to

0:37:47.640 --> 0:37:50.640
<v Speaker 6>be about two and a half percent in favor of

0:37:50.719 --> 0:37:54.640
<v Speaker 6>emerging markets this year, which only expands going into next year.

0:37:55.000 --> 0:37:58.040
<v Speaker 6>And historically, if you look at that differential, that has

0:37:58.080 --> 0:38:02.200
<v Speaker 6>been a driver for inflows into the asset class. Additionally,

0:38:02.239 --> 0:38:06.480
<v Speaker 6>I would say both cyclically and structurally, emerging markets is

0:38:06.560 --> 0:38:10.640
<v Speaker 6>quite under owned compared to historical levels. And there's pretty

0:38:10.680 --> 0:38:14.520
<v Speaker 6>limited net supply in both the sovereign heart currency market

0:38:14.640 --> 0:38:18.600
<v Speaker 6>as well almost a negative net supply in the corporate market.

0:38:18.840 --> 0:38:22.279
<v Speaker 6>So the technicals well vote also quite well for the

0:38:22.320 --> 0:38:23.239
<v Speaker 6>asset class.

0:38:23.600 --> 0:38:27.160
<v Speaker 5>Can you talk a little bit about specifics here? I

0:38:27.200 --> 0:38:28.920
<v Speaker 5>know you have a lot to talk about, but the

0:38:28.920 --> 0:38:32.840
<v Speaker 5>emerging market sector can mean so many different things. Is

0:38:32.880 --> 0:38:36.439
<v Speaker 5>there a specific area or currency that you're looking at

0:38:36.440 --> 0:38:41.760
<v Speaker 5>that's particularly notable to you as potential for upside.

0:38:42.040 --> 0:38:45.560
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, no, you're totally right. Em is such a diverse

0:38:45.600 --> 0:38:48.279
<v Speaker 6>opportunity set. I like to always say, it's not a

0:38:48.320 --> 0:38:52.360
<v Speaker 6>monolithic asset class. It's a very heterogeneous mix of countries

0:38:52.400 --> 0:38:55.560
<v Speaker 6>with different drivers of growth. You know, we can choose

0:38:55.600 --> 0:38:59.719
<v Speaker 6>between sovereigns, corporates, and heart currency, which is US dollar denominated,

0:38:59.760 --> 0:39:03.040
<v Speaker 6>as well as local currency opportunities. And there are as

0:39:03.080 --> 0:39:06.439
<v Speaker 6>many as seventy countries, right that you can actually pick from.

0:39:06.840 --> 0:39:09.040
<v Speaker 6>So some of the countries that we are focused on,

0:39:09.120 --> 0:39:11.960
<v Speaker 6>I like to sort of divide them into three groupings.

0:39:12.000 --> 0:39:15.280
<v Speaker 6>One is stable to improving macro stories such as Mexico

0:39:15.400 --> 0:39:20.120
<v Speaker 6>and India, right, And these both benefit also from this

0:39:20.239 --> 0:39:25.040
<v Speaker 6>new paradigm and the geopolitical space of near shoring or

0:39:25.280 --> 0:39:30.480
<v Speaker 6>French shoring so to speak. They have positive demographic dividend,

0:39:30.800 --> 0:39:35.640
<v Speaker 6>their improving growth inflation pictures, and really they have a

0:39:35.680 --> 0:39:39.480
<v Speaker 6>whole host of corporates, a very dynamic and a robust

0:39:39.560 --> 0:39:43.920
<v Speaker 6>corporate sector for us to choose from. And oftentimes many

0:39:43.960 --> 0:39:48.839
<v Speaker 6>of these companies have lower leverage and higher you know

0:39:49.040 --> 0:39:52.920
<v Speaker 6>net cash flow or our net cash flow positive compared

0:39:52.960 --> 0:39:55.919
<v Speaker 6>to some of their developed market peers, and yet they

0:39:55.960 --> 0:40:00.720
<v Speaker 6>offer a higher sort of yield advantage with the develop

0:40:00.840 --> 0:40:04.000
<v Speaker 6>market counterparts. So that's one of the groups. The other

0:40:04.040 --> 0:40:07.560
<v Speaker 6>group that we like is really, you know, thinking about

0:40:07.920 --> 0:40:13.399
<v Speaker 6>more reformers countries that are in upward rating trajictories such

0:40:13.440 --> 0:40:17.719
<v Speaker 6>as Serbia, where we think there's improved fiscal dynamics and

0:40:17.760 --> 0:40:22.120
<v Speaker 6>there's a strong FDI pipeline. So that's another sort of

0:40:22.280 --> 0:40:24.040
<v Speaker 6>grouping of countries that we do.

0:40:24.200 --> 0:40:24.239
<v Speaker 7>Like.

0:40:24.440 --> 0:40:26.520
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Annapop, can we go back to what you said

0:40:26.520 --> 0:40:30.840
<v Speaker 2>about Mexico and India near shoring front shoring. I'm assuming

0:40:31.320 --> 0:40:33.680
<v Speaker 2>does some of that play have to do with the

0:40:33.800 --> 0:40:37.920
<v Speaker 2>tensions we're seeing between the US and China and you know,

0:40:37.960 --> 0:40:39.919
<v Speaker 2>the pushback that we've seen over the last couple of years.

0:40:39.960 --> 0:40:43.120
<v Speaker 2>It feels like increasingly it gets globalization, and then as

0:40:43.160 --> 0:40:47.839
<v Speaker 2>a result, something like Mexico certainly benefits by its proximity

0:40:47.840 --> 0:40:51.440
<v Speaker 2>to the United States India as another possibility of a

0:40:51.520 --> 0:40:55.160
<v Speaker 2>lower labor workforce at least lower cost to some extent,

0:40:55.160 --> 0:40:56.920
<v Speaker 2>and just having lots of people where they can do it.

0:40:58.040 --> 0:41:01.200
<v Speaker 6>Absolutely, I think you hit it on the spot. Posts

0:41:01.200 --> 0:41:06.799
<v Speaker 6>the pandemic and then further exacerbated by the Russia Ukraine conflict. Right,

0:41:06.960 --> 0:41:11.160
<v Speaker 6>We're sitting in a geopolitical landscape that many countries are

0:41:11.280 --> 0:41:15.319
<v Speaker 6>very focused on making their supply chains quite resilient and

0:41:15.440 --> 0:41:19.480
<v Speaker 6>also in general just diversifying their supply chains. And for

0:41:19.560 --> 0:41:22.319
<v Speaker 6>the US it's a little bit more looking at it

0:41:22.440 --> 0:41:27.399
<v Speaker 6>from a similar values perspective, So they are thinking about

0:41:27.440 --> 0:41:31.920
<v Speaker 6>deepening economic integration with sort of dependable trading partners to

0:41:32.040 --> 0:41:36.520
<v Speaker 6>diversify away from nations that pose geopolitical and security risk

0:41:36.520 --> 0:41:38.960
<v Speaker 6>to their supply chains. And I think that's where India

0:41:39.000 --> 0:41:41.560
<v Speaker 6>comes in, even though it's a lot farther from the

0:41:41.719 --> 0:41:46.960
<v Speaker 6>US by you know, Mexico, clearly closer to home, you know,

0:41:47.040 --> 0:41:49.680
<v Speaker 6>and already benefits with some of the trading links and

0:41:49.800 --> 0:41:53.439
<v Speaker 6>the trade framework that we have in place with them.

0:41:53.600 --> 0:41:56.279
<v Speaker 2>So what does it mean for China as an emerging market?

0:41:56.320 --> 0:41:58.800
<v Speaker 2>Although I always feel mixed. It is an emerging market,

0:41:58.840 --> 0:42:02.719
<v Speaker 2>but it's so much more complex. I feel like in

0:42:02.840 --> 0:42:07.160
<v Speaker 2>terms of opportunities, there is it even on your radar.

0:42:08.680 --> 0:42:10.879
<v Speaker 6>Yes, So I think the way to think about it

0:42:10.960 --> 0:42:15.520
<v Speaker 6>is the China reopening, as chaotic and messy as it

0:42:15.560 --> 0:42:20.279
<v Speaker 6>has been, uh, it is surely and slowly. Uh. The

0:42:20.520 --> 0:42:23.720
<v Speaker 6>recovery is gaining momentum. You know, some of the recent

0:42:23.800 --> 0:42:27.080
<v Speaker 6>indicators that came out also suggested so much that the

0:42:27.239 --> 0:42:30.920
<v Speaker 6>economic rebound as well in place. I think we are

0:42:30.920 --> 0:42:34.480
<v Speaker 6>trying to rather than play just through China, because all

0:42:34.600 --> 0:42:37.319
<v Speaker 6>investments in China almost have to be looked at from

0:42:37.360 --> 0:42:41.719
<v Speaker 6>the US security lens, being a US based investor here,

0:42:42.440 --> 0:42:48.520
<v Speaker 6>and we rather play China through the outbound tourism. So

0:42:48.719 --> 0:42:53.160
<v Speaker 6>countries like you know, Singapore, Thailand, Malaysia may benefit as

0:42:53.200 --> 0:42:56.719
<v Speaker 6>the Chinese start to travel outside again. You know, it's

0:42:56.760 --> 0:42:59.640
<v Speaker 6>going to be more consumption driven this time the recovery,

0:42:59.800 --> 0:43:03.200
<v Speaker 6>and so really thinking about the countries that export in

0:43:03.280 --> 0:43:07.399
<v Speaker 6>terms of manufacturing exports or electronics that would benefit from

0:43:07.440 --> 0:43:11.560
<v Speaker 6>that reopening, such as Korea or Taiwan. And then finally,

0:43:12.200 --> 0:43:16.279
<v Speaker 6>you know, Chinese with the reopening consuming more commodities, and

0:43:16.360 --> 0:43:19.560
<v Speaker 6>so that's the other channel through commodities, which impacts and

0:43:19.680 --> 0:43:22.400
<v Speaker 6>positively a lot of the Latin American economies.

0:43:22.560 --> 0:43:25.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, really appreciate you weighing in. Have a great weekend.

0:43:25.400 --> 0:43:28.439
<v Speaker 2>Anna Palm Domani, she's head of International and Emergency market

0:43:28.440 --> 0:43:30.799
<v Speaker 2>instead over at New Veen. As we mentioned earlier, about

0:43:30.800 --> 0:43:33.880
<v Speaker 2>one point one trillion in assets under management. Joining us

0:43:33.960 --> 0:43:35.360
<v Speaker 2>via zoom from New York City.

0:43:36.000 --> 0:43:40.640
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Week podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:43:40.800 --> 0:43:44.520
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday

0:43:44.520 --> 0:43:48.160
<v Speaker 1>afternoons from three to six Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:43:48.200 --> 0:43:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:43:51.560 --> 0:43:54.520
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:43:54.760 --> 0:43:56.680
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg Journal