WEBVTT - Week 3 NFL Bets: Nick’s 5 Picks

0:00:00.440 --> 0:00:02.800
<v Speaker 1>If your football team had one option in their playbook,

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the results probably wouldn't be great. The same could be

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>said for your investments. CIBO index options like SPX and

0:00:09.600 --> 0:00:12.960
<v Speaker 1>XSP can help expand your investing strategies with cash settlement

0:00:13.080 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and potential tax advantages. If you're ready for a more

0:00:15.920 --> 0:00:19.160
<v Speaker 1>dynamic game plan, head to Better with Options dot Com.

0:00:19.280 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Cebo life is better with options, Your investments.

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:23.119
<v Speaker 2>Could be too.

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:26.159
<v Speaker 1>There are risks associated with CBO company products. Review the

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 1>disclosures and disclaimers at CBO dot com slash us underscore disclaimers.

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 3>Welcome in episode seventy three What's Right, Nick Right, the

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 3>podcast and YouTube show, It is our Week three NFL

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:49.239
<v Speaker 3>gambling show and.

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 2>Demons.

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm a little stressed out.

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, i'd be too.

0:00:54.320 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 4>What does that mean?

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 3>What does that mean?

0:00:56.680 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 2>I'd be stressed out if if what I had your

0:00:59.240 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 2>betting career.

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 3>Okay, okay, a guy's allowed to have a couple of

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 3>rough weeks. Week one, I got a little unlucky.

0:01:09.480 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 4>Went two and three. Week two, let's show it to you.

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 3>I can't say I got unlucky because I did get

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 3>unlucky on the lock in Baltimore. I'm still angry about that.

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 3>But I got very lucky to cover Arizona. But those

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 3>other two misses green Bay minus ten was good, Arizona

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:28.960
<v Speaker 3>plus five and a half. I got lucky my lock

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:30.760
<v Speaker 3>of the week Baltimore minus three and a half. I

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:34.119
<v Speaker 3>still can't believe Miami had that comeback. But those other

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:36.680
<v Speaker 3>two on the right hand column, Cincinnati minus seven, Minniso

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 3>plus threo just bad picks. They're just bad picks. So

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 3>we're shaking up the snow globe this morning. We're changing

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 3>the order of the podcast. We're giving you the picks

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 3>right off the top. Our brain trust. Gabe and Matt

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 3>were like, Nick, if you do the picture off the top,

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 3>why are people going to stick around for the rest

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 3>of the show, because the lock's coming later the you

0:01:57.320 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 3>know the offer from demons Or Survived pick, which thankfully

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 3>Survivor's been brutal this year. We've given out two winners

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 3>in Survivor. We gave out Baltimore and Green Bay first

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 3>two weeks. So we're still alive in Survivor, and I

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:12.000
<v Speaker 3>hope someone's jotting down to make sure we can't give

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 3>out you know, team a second time. But I made

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 3>some I went back and rewatched our episode Week two

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 3>Gambling Show. I made some grievous strategic errors. I went

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 3>against some of my principles. At one point on the

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:32.200
<v Speaker 3>Cincinnati pick, I said, and I quote, I hate laying

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:34.639
<v Speaker 3>a touchdown on the road, and then I did it.

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 3>I don't feel badly about the Baltimore pick. I don't

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 3>at all. And I know I said I got lucky

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 3>on the Arizona thing, but I said the Arizona the

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:45.360
<v Speaker 3>back door cover is gonna be open for them all game.

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 4>They ended up turning into a backdoor win.

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:51.919
<v Speaker 3>But we're gonna We're gonna get back to what two

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 3>of the last three years prior to this best I

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 3>can tell I had, well.

0:02:57.840 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 4>Not best I can tell.

0:02:58.800 --> 0:03:02.799
<v Speaker 3>I know I had profitable public records above fifty five

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:05.519
<v Speaker 3>percent against the spread, and one of the last three years,

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 3>I think I was the best of all national sports

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 3>media members. Handicapper, We're gonna get back to it. Two

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 3>and three weeks are not good, but they're not crushing.

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 3>We aught one four and one week and we're back

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 3>above five hundred. That's all we need this week is

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:21.920
<v Speaker 3>a nice four and one week.

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:23.559
<v Speaker 4>The way this works.

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:26.799
<v Speaker 3>Is I give you five picks I give, and then

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:29.519
<v Speaker 3>I give the categories of stay away, be careful and

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 3>perfectly priced. Let's demonse, get right into the picks.

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:34.640
<v Speaker 2>Let's do it and do it.

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 4>What's our first pick?

0:03:36.600 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 2>Nicks picks?

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 5>We got Baltimore minus two and a half in New England. Okay,

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 5>Baltimore again.

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you know what, Baltimore.

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 3>We picked them week one as our lock, right, it

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 3>did mean well, Baltimore. He picked them week two in

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 3>our lock. I thought they were gonna do me well.

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 3>Some bad shit happened.

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 4>I almost wanted to make Baltimore.

0:03:56.080 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 3>My lock again, and I was like, you know what,

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 3>let's ease off on the lock part of it. But

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 3>Baltimore laying less than a field goal right now. The

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 3>injury report is terrifying. As we record this Thursday morning,

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 3>Baltimore's injury report is is fifteen people long. Do I

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 3>think mac Jones can take advantage of it? No where.

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:22.919
<v Speaker 3>The Patriots lucky to escape last week thanks to Nelson

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:24.599
<v Speaker 3>agil Are making the best play of his career on

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:28.040
<v Speaker 3>a terrible mac Jones pass against the bad Sewers. Yes,

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:34.280
<v Speaker 3>did Lamar play a great game last week? Yes? Does

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:39.560
<v Speaker 3>Belichick historically struggle a bit against the mobile quarterbacks. Cam

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:42.280
<v Speaker 3>gave him trouble. Russ when he used to run around,

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:47.359
<v Speaker 3>gave him trouble. Yes, Also, we don't want to overreact

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:49.800
<v Speaker 3>to what happened last week. Going into the year, all

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:54.599
<v Speaker 3>my study told me we're long on Baltimore, we're short

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 3>on New England. We're now getting the Ravens. We're laying

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:00.280
<v Speaker 3>less than a field goal. We're in it being of

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:03.920
<v Speaker 3>laying less than a field goal. I've never seen a

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:09.280
<v Speaker 3>gambling week like this. Sixteen games, eight of them the

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:13.720
<v Speaker 3>line is less than three. Eight of these games the

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 3>line is between a point and two and a half points.

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 3>Never seen it. There is not a single huge favorite

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 3>this week. Fifteen of the sixteen games the line is

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:28.039
<v Speaker 3>six and a half or less. The one game that

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 3>is more than six and a half, it's seven. It's

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:34.600
<v Speaker 3>a brutal survivor week. It's a brutal gambling week, which

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 3>is why we got in the lab late into the

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 3>night to find our five picks. The first one is

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 3>Baltimore minus two and a half.

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 4>We're riding Baltimore again.

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:48.360
<v Speaker 5>Ride the Baltimore train to death. Well, we'll see, we'll see.

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 4>We told you last week. See the other thing.

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:53.840
<v Speaker 3>You know what frustrated me last week when I say

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:55.040
<v Speaker 3>I screwed up my process.

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:58.279
<v Speaker 4>There were a few process errors. One was like, don't.

0:05:58.120 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 3>Bet this game.

0:05:58.680 --> 0:05:59.839
<v Speaker 4>You don't want to watch it, that's the way to.

0:05:59.839 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 3>Make The other one was the moment I heard those

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 3>dopes Victor and Matt the all in on Pittsburgh. I

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:16.239
<v Speaker 3>put New England in the be careful category. I should

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 3>have put them in the picks whenever. And that's you

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 3>know what. We'll see how this week goes. But we

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:26.039
<v Speaker 3>might have to incorporate into the pre show analysis in

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 3>the group chat, asking everyone what their favorite bet of

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 3>the week is and see if there's a little group

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:37.479
<v Speaker 3>think on the square side from our producers. Okay, Baltimore

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 3>minus two and a half first one.

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 5>Next, Minnesota six point favorites at home against Detroit.

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:51.480
<v Speaker 3>Sorry, Matt, I offended, Matt, Victory's not offended. Victor knows

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 3>we're gonna lay the six with Minnesota. Minnesota minus six.

0:06:57.080 --> 0:06:59.279
<v Speaker 2>I think that's I think that's crazy. Tell me what

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:01.039
<v Speaker 2>I mean. Only the only thing I'm thinking about is

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 2>the fact that they're at home.

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:03.720
<v Speaker 3>But I just feel tell me why you think it's

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:04.360
<v Speaker 3>crazy though, I.

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:06.719
<v Speaker 2>Just think the Lions don't look that bad. The Lions

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:07.600
<v Speaker 2>looking good. I don't think.

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:09.520
<v Speaker 3>The offensive scored the most points in football.

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 5>I don't think the Vikings have have done that well.

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 5>I mean, they just got their asses kicked yep. And

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 5>then I just I just don't see it. And then

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 5>six points.

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 3>I feel even better now. Now I don't like Minnesota

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 3>on the short week, I will admit that. But Minnesota

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 3>coming off an embarrassing performance on national TV. We're now

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 3>in a one pm window where Kirk Cousins is comfortable.

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 3>The Lions may be riding a little too high. Justin Jefferson.

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 3>The Lions defense has not been able to stop anybody.

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 3>Justin Jefferson. Gonna have a field day. A field day.

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 3>This is a game Minnesota's got to have. We're not

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 3>at seven and a half. I feel a little differently.

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 3>The reason at six is because of what demands just said,

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 3>and so it doesn't look that good.

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 4>Detroit's been fun.

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 3>All of a sudden. If if this game we're in Detroit,

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 3>it would just be a pick them. Come on, come on,

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 3>I don't listen. I don't love laying the points. I'd

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 3>rather when you're in a slump gambling go with the underdogs.

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 3>But I don't think I'm in a slump. I don't

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:20.280
<v Speaker 3>I think that I win against my principles.

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 2>I think you're at five hundred right now.

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 4>I'm actually below five hundred and four and six.

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 3>But against my principles on the Cincinnati bet, and aside

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 3>from that, I've liked the process of a lot of

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 3>these things. I think this is a bounce back spot

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 3>for Minnesota. I don't think Jared Goff is going to

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:40.080
<v Speaker 3>continue to play the best football of his life all

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 3>year long. I think this is a game that you

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 3>don't see much that is nobody's nobody's locked in on.

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:53.440
<v Speaker 3>Because this is a game that is seventeen to three

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 3>at halftime. Minister and Minister, I think Detroit's offense grinds

0:08:57.800 --> 0:09:03.679
<v Speaker 3>to a bit of a halt. Temporarily, Minnesota has a nice, cool, comfortable,

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 3>easy victory. Justin Jefferson bounces back, Kirk Cousins bounces back

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 3>after his brutal game, Dalvin Cook bounces back, and Detroit

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:15.839
<v Speaker 3>which is a nice story but coming off it's first

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 3>time favored in a couple of years.

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:20.120
<v Speaker 2>Cousin bounces back from his terrible game.

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean Kirk Cousins is not going to be

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:26.319
<v Speaker 3>awful every game. This is a get right spot. Minnesota

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 3>minus six, put it down, might be a Survivor pick.

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 4>We'll see next.

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 5>Ustin plus two and a half in Chicago. Yeah, you

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:38.320
<v Speaker 5>really want to watch it? Justin Fields versus Davis Miller's showdown.

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:42.680
<v Speaker 3>I don't and that to me In week two, I

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:44.560
<v Speaker 3>was like, Oh, you don't want to watch this game.

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:47.559
<v Speaker 4>Don't bet this game. That is not how this works, right.

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:53.520
<v Speaker 3>We have to be aesthetically agnostic. We can't worry about, Oh,

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 3>this is gonna be a fun game to watch. That's

0:09:55.720 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 3>why we're putting action on it. That's not how you

0:09:58.160 --> 0:10:01.560
<v Speaker 3>make money. You know, how you make laying less than

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:03.359
<v Speaker 3>a field goal against the Bears.

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 4>Sorry, I said that wrong.

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:09.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm not even laying a field goal getting points against

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 3>the Bears.

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 4>Pardon me? Why are the Bears favored over anybody?

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:15.840
<v Speaker 2>Why?

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:20.319
<v Speaker 3>Someone tell me? Now, I understand getting the two and

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 3>a half. You'd much rather this be three, obviously, you'd

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:29.440
<v Speaker 3>rather it be three. But Houston, I think they play

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 3>hard for Lovey Smith. Davis Mills knows if he doesn't

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:37.080
<v Speaker 3>play well, his jobs on the line. The Bears clearly

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:41.839
<v Speaker 3>don't trust justin fields to throw. The offensive line is horrible,

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 3>just horrible, and Chicago's now the.

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:48.440
<v Speaker 4>Team on the short week.

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:54.800
<v Speaker 3>I simply can't pass up the value of getting points

0:10:55.040 --> 0:10:58.199
<v Speaker 3>playing a team that might end up with the worst

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 3>record in football this year. Chicago. I know they won

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 3>Week one in the monsoon in Trey lancemca's first start,

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, since being anointed the starter. I get all that,

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:12.560
<v Speaker 3>and no, I'm not excited about watching this game, but

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:16.600
<v Speaker 3>I like the rookie running back for Houston. I like

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:23.080
<v Speaker 3>that Houston understands that after a let's call it frisky

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 3>week one, that they let them get away from them

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 3>at the very end and they ended up having to

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 3>settle for a tie. That they were underwhelming to say

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 3>the least in Week two. But there were things in

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 3>the Broncos game where defensively, just like in the Colts game,

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:44.319
<v Speaker 3>you're like, oh, this Texans defense is interesting. And the

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:47.719
<v Speaker 3>Texans have covered both times this year. They covered the

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:50.840
<v Speaker 3>nine against Denver, they covered whatever they were against Indy

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 3>I think eight. Now they're only getting two and a half,

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 3>but they're playing far and away the worst team that

0:11:56.160 --> 0:12:00.120
<v Speaker 3>they've played. I think Chicago's far worse than Indy. I'm

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 3>not gonna be watching a lot of this game. I'm

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 3>not gonna act like I am. But Houston getting points

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:09.199
<v Speaker 3>at Chicago, we like it. Houston plus two and a

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:10.719
<v Speaker 3>half next, all.

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 5>Right, Jacksonville plus seven playing the Chargers in La Okay.

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 3>We know the Chargers have no home field. We know

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 3>Jacksonville is I believe deserves to be two and zero.

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:28.000
<v Speaker 3>A defensive breakdown, a few drop touchdowns in week one

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 3>is the reason they're not two and Oh. Jacksonville looked

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 3>awesome on both sides of the ball in Week two

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 3>against Indy the Chargers. Now, what the Chargers have going

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 3>for them is the extra rest they played on Thursday. Right, However,

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:49.319
<v Speaker 3>I think the Jags could win this game. I'm not

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 3>picking them to win. I think they could win this game.

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:56.200
<v Speaker 3>I definitely expect this game to be close and getting

0:12:56.280 --> 0:13:00.880
<v Speaker 3>the full seven. Even if Jacksonville is getting beat by

0:13:00.920 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 3>two scores. The back door is gonna be opened the

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 3>whole game and Jacksonville is going to keep throwing the football.

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 3>Jacksonville is gonna keep throwing it to get Trevor. They

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 3>I think they want to build up Trevor's confidence. They

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 3>want to build up his numbers. So there's so many

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:23.079
<v Speaker 3>scenarios where this where Jacksonville can cover this seven even

0:13:23.120 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 3>if they lose. Additionally, now, am I a little worried

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 3>about the Chargers pass rush against the Jags offensive line?

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:36.560
<v Speaker 3>I am? However, what do we know about Justin Herbert?

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 3>The Chiefs just broke his ribs. Now he's limited in practice,

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 3>but he's expected to play. They're gonna inject him. They're

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 3>gonna be paying killing essentially with morphine. How about this, Demansey.

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:52.520
<v Speaker 3>You don't know this. Justin Herbert got his first career

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 3>start because two years ago this week, Tyrod Taylor had

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 3>the same injury. Before the game, the team doctor went

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:04.200
<v Speaker 3>to inject him with a painkiller in his ribs, put

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 3>the needle in too far and punctured his lung. Punctured

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 3>Tyrod Taylor's lung the Chargers team doctor. So Herbert had

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:15.840
<v Speaker 3>to make an emergency start almost beat the Chiefs that

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 3>game in his first start ever. Two things, One is

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 3>Tyrod Taylor just sued the team for the doctor five

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:24.360
<v Speaker 3>million bucks. Second of all, it's the same doctor. He

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 3>didn't lose his job. He's the guy that's going to

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 3>be injecting Justin Herbert with the same painkilling thing. But

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 3>here's why I think it's noteworthy. The Chargers are not

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:41.720
<v Speaker 3>going to be if they have a lead late, They're

0:14:41.760 --> 0:14:44.360
<v Speaker 3>not going to put Justin Herbert in jeopard They're going

0:14:44.440 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 3>to be running the ball just trying to get home.

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm not worried about the Chargers being up six and

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 3>then throwing for a late touchdown. They want to have

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:57.760
<v Speaker 3>Justin Herbert have his few pass attempts at you know,

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 3>break glass in case of emergen on the Justin Herbert rocket.

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 3>So the idea that they're gonna blow out the Jags

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 3>in this context, I think it's low. They also have

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 3>a crummy injury report. At the moment, the Jags of

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 3>the cleanest injury report in football. It's the one game

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 3>of the weekend where you're getting a full touchdown Jacksonville

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 3>plus seven. That was the other thing that screwed me

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 3>up last week. I was high on the Jags preseason.

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 3>I bet them in Week one they were part of

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 3>my picks, and I felt like I got kind of.

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 4>Screwed at the end.

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 3>And last week, if you remember on the show, I

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:35.720
<v Speaker 3>said I liked the Jags. The Jags had beaten Indy

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 3>in Indy or in Jacksonville like more than five straight years.

0:15:39.320 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 3>The Colts didn't look good in Week one. There were

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:44.640
<v Speaker 3>so many signals to me to go with the Jags.

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 3>But I said to myself, Ah, do I really you know?

0:15:48.120 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 3>Maybe I'm just wrong about the Jaguars. Do I really

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 3>want them to be I think I said twenty percent

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 3>of my card the first two weeks of the year,

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 3>and I stayed away from him when I shouldn't have.

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 3>We're back on them. Jacksonville plus seven Herbert banged up Jags,

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 3>have a lot of ways to cover.

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 4>Small chance to win. Jags plus seven.

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:11.000
<v Speaker 2>Next San fran minus a pointing a half in Denver.

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 5>No love for the home field Denver team and hasn't

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 5>Russ always owned the forty nine ers that was.

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:21.240
<v Speaker 3>In Seattle Pete Carroll the Russ part. Here's where we're

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 3>at on this until proven otherwise. If the spread is

0:16:32.400 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 3>less than three and Denver is playing a good coach,

0:16:40.160 --> 0:16:45.640
<v Speaker 3>Nathaniel Hackett, is a must fade blindly bet against Hackett

0:16:46.080 --> 0:16:50.320
<v Speaker 3>until proven Otherwise. If the other team we know is

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 3>a good coach and you're laying less than a field goal.

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 4>There is no reason.

0:16:56.320 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 3>To have any faith in Nathaniel Hackett's operation, his ability

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 3>to get plays in anything. The Bronco crowd is already angry.

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 3>The Niners, on the other hand, because the players do

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:14.160
<v Speaker 3>have a true affinity for Jimmy Garoppolo, might be playing

0:17:14.160 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 3>with a little more energy. I Russ looks like a

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:25.239
<v Speaker 3>shell of himself. All of these things to me. I

0:17:25.320 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 3>know it's in Denver, and I know it's a desperation

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 3>spot for Denver. I don't think Denver's very good. Their

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:38.120
<v Speaker 3>coach is utterly incompetent. Russ has been terrible. And San

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 3>Francisco I'm laying less than a field goal. Now, I

0:17:41.640 --> 0:17:45.399
<v Speaker 3>understand another road favorite that I'm betting. But a road

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 3>favorite of less than three is so different than a

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:52.960
<v Speaker 3>road favorite of six plus. So all those reasons also

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:57.880
<v Speaker 3>one note on Nathaniel Hackett. Ben Solack wrote a whole

0:17:57.960 --> 0:18:01.480
<v Speaker 3>article about this. I referenced it on but I want

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:05.360
<v Speaker 3>to reiterate it here. There was I mean, he has

0:18:05.400 --> 0:18:08.119
<v Speaker 3>been in so far over his head. A lot of

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:11.200
<v Speaker 3>us are like, can he really be this bad? I mean,

0:18:11.280 --> 0:18:14.160
<v Speaker 3>he did get this, get a head coaching job, he

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 3>interviewed and got the job. Now, granted, keep in mind

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:22.719
<v Speaker 3>they got new ownership in Denver. Rob Walton, the Walmart

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:24.880
<v Speaker 3>air bought the team since he was hired, so he's

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 3>not gonna have loyalty to him. But it's like, how

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 3>did he get the job? And then Solac reminded us

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:37.560
<v Speaker 3>that Denver thought they were getting Aaron Rodgers. They hired

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:41.919
<v Speaker 3>him as Aaron Rodgers bait, so I don't think he

0:18:41.960 --> 0:18:45.960
<v Speaker 3>was Aaron Rodgers offensive coordinator. Then Collinsworth told us Rogers

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 3>loved him because they can played darts together and he

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:52.560
<v Speaker 3>made him laugh, not because he was some genius schematically.

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 3>So January twenty seventh, Nathaniel Hackett gets hired. Denver was

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:00.520
<v Speaker 3>the number one team everyone thought Rogers was going to.

0:19:00.920 --> 0:19:05.359
<v Speaker 3>Two days later, Rogers resigns in Green Bay, Denver. Panics

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 3>makes the rust trade. But they hired a guy because

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 3>they thought it would mean Rogers would go there a

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:20.200
<v Speaker 3>means to an end exactly right. Me if some up

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 3>and coming podcasting platform was like, Hey, no, we're gonna

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:28.879
<v Speaker 3>make the face of our sports unit demons, and then

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 3>I resigned with Fox, they're gonna be.

0:19:30.880 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 4>Like, oh boy, let's see how this thing works.

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:38.879
<v Speaker 3>And everyone's like, oh man Demanse sure seems to know

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:41.520
<v Speaker 3>a lot about basketball struggles with the other stuff. Why'd

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 3>you make him the face.

0:19:42.440 --> 0:19:45.359
<v Speaker 4>Of your whole enterprise. It's like, well, I thought someone

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:46.120
<v Speaker 4>might go with him.

0:19:46.680 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 3>Uh So all this is until proven. Otherwise, if you

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 3>have to lay less than three points and the opposing

0:19:57.600 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 3>team has what I consider to be a top ten

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 3>coach auto bet, San Francisco minus a point and a half.

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 3>So there's our five picks. We're gonna go over the

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:12.280
<v Speaker 3>other eleven games on the slate next, and then we'll

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:14.879
<v Speaker 3>give you our locks. There's the five picks. Baltimore minus

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:18.639
<v Speaker 3>one and a half, Houston getting two and a half,

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 3>San Francisco minus one and a half, Jacksonville getting seven,

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:27.040
<v Speaker 3>Minnesota laying six. Only one home team on our card

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:32.159
<v Speaker 3>this week, very odd week, half the card being point

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:33.680
<v Speaker 3>point and a half, two or two and a half

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 3>point lines. I've never seen it before, but we're working

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 3>through it. There's our five. We'll be right back.

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 6>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable Discover the

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 6>inspiring true story about Anthony Robless, who defined every expectation

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:56.199
<v Speaker 6>to become a national wrestling Champion and Unstoppable, a new

0:20:56.240 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 6>original movie from Amazon MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg.

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 6>Building the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 6>thrilling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:10.119
<v Speaker 6>including Jerrell Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheatle, Michael Tanya, and

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:14.359
<v Speaker 6>Bobby Canavali. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 3>All Right, welcome back in episode seventy three. What's right,

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:20.120
<v Speaker 3>Nick Rdit's our Week three gambling show. We just gave

0:21:20.160 --> 0:21:22.480
<v Speaker 3>you our five picks of the week. Now we have

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:25.240
<v Speaker 3>all the other games fall into three buckets. Stay away,

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:28.960
<v Speaker 3>be careful and perfectly priced. Stay away games or games

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:32.000
<v Speaker 3>were either the weather, the injury report, or too many

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 3>questions make it something that I just don't have confidence

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:36.680
<v Speaker 3>in betting demons.

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:39.680
<v Speaker 4>Let's go through them. What our state?

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 3>Do we do?

0:21:40.640 --> 0:21:40.800
<v Speaker 2>These?

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 3>One by one? I think we do?

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:42.920
<v Speaker 4>What's our first stay away?

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 2>Cincinnati minus five at the New York Jets.

0:21:46.240 --> 0:21:48.360
<v Speaker 5>This isn't a shit and Joe Burrow turning on at

0:21:48.359 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 5>some point like what this isn't going to keep happening?

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So let's talk about this one. There you see

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:56.960
<v Speaker 3>all four games of stay Away Pittsburgh, Cleveland, New Orleans, Carolina,

0:21:57.600 --> 0:22:00.639
<v Speaker 3>Vegas and Tennessee and Cinceanne the Jets. Let's start with

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 3>CINCINNTAI the Jets. I think Cincinnati is gonna win the Jets.

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 3>I understand they got a nice win last week. It

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 3>also I don't blame Nick Chubb for what happened. But

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:14.119
<v Speaker 3>if Kareem Hunt doesn't go out of bounds, or if

0:22:14.160 --> 0:22:17.480
<v Speaker 3>Nick Chubb just goes down, or if the Jet the

0:22:18.960 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 3>Browns defense doesn't self immolate on back to back possessions,

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 3>or if they get an on side kick, the Jets

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:26.200
<v Speaker 3>a zero and two and looked at is one of

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:31.120
<v Speaker 3>the worst teams in football right so, and I think

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:33.359
<v Speaker 3>Sinat is still going to make the playoffs. Why is

0:22:33.400 --> 0:22:37.439
<v Speaker 3>it a stay away? Cincinnati right now appears to be

0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 3>so poorly coached and so unable to keep Joe Burrow upright,

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:46.680
<v Speaker 3>I can't lay five points against any team that might

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 3>have any semblance of a pass rush now in Cincinnati's defense,

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:56.120
<v Speaker 3>if you do have a shaky offensive line. This two

0:22:56.320 --> 0:22:58.359
<v Speaker 3>worst players in the league to play in weeks one

0:22:58.359 --> 0:23:00.320
<v Speaker 3>and Week two, or TJ. Watt and Michael Parks the

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 3>two best edge rushers in football. The Jets don't have

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 3>somebody like that, so I I don't know that the

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 3>Jets are going to be able to take advantage the

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:15.399
<v Speaker 3>way the Steelers and Cowboys did. But I'm not betting

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:19.720
<v Speaker 3>the Jets getting less than a touchdown against any good team.

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:20.600
<v Speaker 4>I'm just not.

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:23.639
<v Speaker 3>I think this line should probably be seven and a half,

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 3>like it was for Cincinnati against Dallas. I'm also, however,

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 3>not going to bet the Bengals until they put together

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:36.160
<v Speaker 3>one good half of football, much less one good game.

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 3>So I'm staying away.

0:23:37.320 --> 0:23:39.800
<v Speaker 5>Next all right, New Orleans minus two and a half

0:23:39.840 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 5>at Carolina.

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:44.160
<v Speaker 3>All Right, Yeah, I listen. The Saints offense is a disaster.

0:23:44.720 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 3>The Panthers offense is a disaster. They keep Carolina has

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 3>been getting, has been the underdog and getting less than

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:57.920
<v Speaker 3>a field goal every game this year, and they can't cover.

0:23:58.359 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 3>I I'm just I have no feel on this whatsoever.

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:05.439
<v Speaker 3>I want to believe in Carolina. Baker's been awful. I

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:08.480
<v Speaker 3>don't believe in New Orleans. I don't want to lay

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:10.520
<v Speaker 3>points with New Orleans on the road.

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 4>It's a stay away.

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 3>There's too many questions about either team's offense being able

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:17.680
<v Speaker 3>to do anything. Usually in that instance, it's like grab

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 3>the points. But when the points is less than a

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:22.520
<v Speaker 3>field goal, the points aren't quite as useful.

0:24:22.640 --> 0:24:23.560
<v Speaker 4>So we're staying away.

0:24:23.600 --> 0:24:26.560
<v Speaker 5>Next all right, Pittsburgh plus four and a half at Cleveland.

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:28.480
<v Speaker 4>All right, So this is stay away for this reason.

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:32.360
<v Speaker 2>Why are we staying away from betting against Minchester Bisky though.

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 3>Because it would be laying points with Jakobe Bursseatt. That's

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 3>why it's a stay away. Now. Usually, when two bad

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 3>quarterbacks play each other and you're getting more than a

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:46.399
<v Speaker 3>field goal, you'd bet Pittsburgh plus the four and a half,

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:50.680
<v Speaker 3>and I had on my card initially Pittsburgh plus four

0:24:50.680 --> 0:24:52.920
<v Speaker 3>and a half. That was and it's the Thursday night game,

0:24:52.960 --> 0:24:55.480
<v Speaker 3>so when people hear this, this game will have been played.

0:24:55.480 --> 0:25:00.160
<v Speaker 3>It's been played tonight. So you're saying, why are we're

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:02.920
<v Speaker 3>betting against Mitch Trubisky. I almost bet on Mitch Trubisky

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 3>because I'm getting four and a half points, right, and

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:08.719
<v Speaker 3>it's Tomlin. It's the division. I expected to be close,

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 3>but Pittsburgh looked so bad last week, and the Browns

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 3>were two minutes away from looking pretty good. Throughout the

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:27.399
<v Speaker 3>first two weeks. Week one, they beat Baker in the

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:30.720
<v Speaker 3>revenge game. Week two, they're beating up the Jets until

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:36.080
<v Speaker 3>they blow it at the end. I just I can't

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:41.720
<v Speaker 3>lay four and a half with uh Brissette the Steelers

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:46.200
<v Speaker 3>with know what what I think might be Trubisky's last game.

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:48.639
<v Speaker 3>I think they might go to Kiney Pickett because they

0:25:48.640 --> 0:25:51.680
<v Speaker 3>have the long week, you know, Thursday to the next Sunday.

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 3>This to me, it's just if I was going to

0:25:55.600 --> 0:25:57.879
<v Speaker 3>better side, it be Pittsburgh plus four and a half.

0:25:58.119 --> 0:26:01.600
<v Speaker 3>But Cleveland's running game has been so efficient, so deadly,

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:04.400
<v Speaker 3>that I do worry. They just run the ball down

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:08.719
<v Speaker 3>Pittsburgh's throat and it's Dondra Kobbersett game. My lean is Pittsburgh.

0:26:08.720 --> 0:26:10.360
<v Speaker 3>But I'm staying away, all right. Last one?

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:10.720
<v Speaker 2>All right?

0:26:10.800 --> 0:26:16.040
<v Speaker 5>Those Vegas minus two at Tennessee. Yep, both these.

0:26:15.880 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 3>Teams are just gross right now. Tennessee's awful. Vegas has

0:26:21.560 --> 0:26:26.320
<v Speaker 3>to feel terrible. I have no idea what we're getting

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:27.880
<v Speaker 3>from either of these teams.

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 4>I'm staying away. There's no more analysis there.

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 3>I looked at it. I was like, if Vegas was

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:37.240
<v Speaker 3>favored by three, then I would take Tennessee as a

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:41.200
<v Speaker 3>home favorite as a home dog. But at two it's

0:26:41.280 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 3>not enough that these lines this week are so hard.

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:47.640
<v Speaker 3>It's not enough. I don't feel comfortable after the way

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 3>the Raiders blew that game betting them as road favorites

0:26:50.600 --> 0:26:54.960
<v Speaker 3>over anybody. I also don't feel comfortable betting Tennessee as

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:57.800
<v Speaker 3>awful as they've looked. When I'm getting less than a

0:26:57.840 --> 0:27:00.719
<v Speaker 3>field goal. It's a stay away, all right. Next, all right,

0:27:00.760 --> 0:27:02.359
<v Speaker 3>we go to be careful category.

0:27:02.720 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 5>We are now in the be careful category category, And

0:27:05.119 --> 0:27:07.480
<v Speaker 5>first up is Philly minus six and a.

0:27:07.520 --> 0:27:11.639
<v Speaker 2>Half at Washington. Yeah, the whole media is on Philly.

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:14.440
<v Speaker 2>What's up with you? All right? Still not there yet?

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:17.399
<v Speaker 3>Well, and it's not that I'm not there yet. The

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:22.160
<v Speaker 3>short week concerns me a bit also, And the other

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:25.440
<v Speaker 3>games were discussed are Casey Andy and Dallas at the Giants.

0:27:26.400 --> 0:27:31.360
<v Speaker 3>But here's the other aspect here, right, I don't think

0:27:31.440 --> 0:27:34.720
<v Speaker 3>anyone is gonna bet Washington. And the fact that this

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 3>thing is staying at six and a half and not

0:27:37.440 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 3>moved to seven or seven and a half, to me,

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:46.359
<v Speaker 3>they are daring you to bet Philly. Washington looks like

0:27:46.400 --> 0:27:51.879
<v Speaker 3>they're a mess. Philly looks awesome. It's less than a touchdown,

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:57.119
<v Speaker 3>and that is the vintage be careful spot that Philly.

0:27:57.240 --> 0:28:00.679
<v Speaker 3>Right now, Jalen Hurts is like third and MVP candidacy.

0:28:00.840 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 3>The Eagles are a super Bowl team. Ron Rivera. People

0:28:04.040 --> 0:28:07.720
<v Speaker 3>are talking about him getting fired. It's a divisional game.

0:28:09.200 --> 0:28:12.240
<v Speaker 3>You're on the road. In order to cover, you've got

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:16.280
<v Speaker 3>to win by a touchdown or more, and everyone is

0:28:16.320 --> 0:28:20.080
<v Speaker 3>gonna be on you be careful because I feel like

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:23.520
<v Speaker 3>they are daring you to bet the Eagles. I don't

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:25.760
<v Speaker 3>have the guts there to bet Washington because I think

0:28:25.760 --> 0:28:28.000
<v Speaker 3>the Eagles could blow them out. It's a vintage be

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:30.440
<v Speaker 3>careful spot, stay away from it.

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 2>Next Casey minus five and a half at Indy.

0:28:35.480 --> 0:28:37.439
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so, by the way, you don't you don't think

0:28:37.440 --> 0:28:39.440
<v Speaker 5>they're gonna smoke Indy and he just got shut out

0:28:39.440 --> 0:28:40.080
<v Speaker 5>by Jacksonville.

0:28:40.120 --> 0:28:43.080
<v Speaker 3>Lest I do think they're gonna smoke Indy. Okay, mahomes

0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:45.080
<v Speaker 3>the greatest September quarterback of all time.

0:28:45.520 --> 0:28:48.440
<v Speaker 2>Greatest September quarterback of all time. What a title?

0:28:50.320 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 4>So let me hold on, well, let me just like

0:28:53.200 --> 0:28:54.360
<v Speaker 4>uh hold on.

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:56.720
<v Speaker 2>The Bills called the best September team.

0:28:56.920 --> 0:28:58.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I actually Yeah.

0:28:58.440 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 4>This year they have been.

0:28:59.720 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 3>Here's Mahomes though in his career he's played fifteen This

0:29:03.520 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 3>courtesy of James Palmer. Patrick Mahomes has played fifteen games

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:13.680
<v Speaker 3>in September. His record is thirteen and two. That is

0:29:13.720 --> 0:29:17.160
<v Speaker 3>the best in NFL history. He averages in September three

0:29:17.200 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 3>hundred As far as winning percentage starts, he averages three

0:29:21.160 --> 0:29:24.120
<v Speaker 3>hundred and twenty two yards per game passing in September.

0:29:24.720 --> 0:29:26.440
<v Speaker 3>You where do you think that is in NFL history?

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 3>It's the best. He averages eight point seven yards per

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:31.280
<v Speaker 3>attempt in September.

0:29:31.360 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 4>Where do you think that is.

0:29:32.000 --> 0:29:32.760
<v Speaker 3>In NFL history?

0:29:32.960 --> 0:29:33.600
<v Speaker 2>It's the best.

0:29:33.760 --> 0:29:36.360
<v Speaker 3>It's the best He has in his career in September

0:29:36.960 --> 0:29:41.240
<v Speaker 3>forty eight touchdowns, three interceptions. Where do you think that

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 3>ranks and NFL history? Oh, it's the best. And his

0:29:43.840 --> 0:29:46.480
<v Speaker 3>pass writing in September is one twenty two whording that

0:29:46.520 --> 0:29:47.480
<v Speaker 3>ranks in NFL history.

0:29:47.640 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 4>Oh, it's the best.

0:29:48.920 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 2>That is.

0:29:50.040 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 3>That is not my tweet. That's from James Palmer of

0:29:52.080 --> 0:29:55.120
<v Speaker 3>the NFL Network. James Palmer, who used to work in Houston,

0:29:55.520 --> 0:29:57.960
<v Speaker 3>And there is a big you know that giant Houston

0:29:58.120 --> 0:30:00.080
<v Speaker 3>sign off the highway in Houston. One of the I

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:03.000
<v Speaker 3>always it's like the big colorful letters. It's like it's

0:30:03.080 --> 0:30:05.160
<v Speaker 3>oh yeah, yeah, yeah. James Palmer and I one time

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:07.200
<v Speaker 3>climbed it and drank beers atop it in the middle

0:30:07.200 --> 0:30:08.400
<v Speaker 3>of the night. That's a true story.

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:10.360
<v Speaker 2>That's not a true story.

0:30:10.560 --> 0:30:11.160
<v Speaker 4>I swear to God.

0:30:11.200 --> 0:30:14.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm talking about the the little on like the almost

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 2>a bridge liking thing.

0:30:15.680 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, off the side of the highway.

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:18.360
<v Speaker 2>You guys climbed it.

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 3>We climbed the oh, sat on it and drank beers.

0:30:23.640 --> 0:30:26.880
<v Speaker 5>I'm just imagining, like, how does that even?

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:29.000
<v Speaker 4>He lived right behind it?

0:30:29.520 --> 0:30:31.400
<v Speaker 3>Is that his house? He used to work in Houston

0:30:31.480 --> 0:30:33.440
<v Speaker 3>now it works for the NFL network. All right, check

0:30:33.960 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 3>drank some beers. What'd you say?

0:30:35.560 --> 0:30:36.560
<v Speaker 2>I said, all right, it checks out.

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:39.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's not okay. So I just gave you all

0:30:39.960 --> 0:30:47.160
<v Speaker 3>those Chiefs numbers. So why am I not laying less

0:30:47.200 --> 0:30:50.000
<v Speaker 3>than a touchdown with them when I do think they're

0:30:50.000 --> 0:30:58.160
<v Speaker 3>going to blow out Indy? Seems too easy, seems too easy.

0:30:58.640 --> 0:31:03.120
<v Speaker 3>Indy looks awful, but they're desperate. Jonathan Taylor might be

0:31:03.160 --> 0:31:07.200
<v Speaker 3>the best running back in football. Matt Listen, Matt Ryan

0:31:07.280 --> 0:31:09.680
<v Speaker 3>might be cooked. He did this self sack last week

0:31:09.880 --> 0:31:12.200
<v Speaker 3>where like there was pressure around him. Instead of getting touched,

0:31:12.200 --> 0:31:18.520
<v Speaker 3>he just crumbled. Everything in me says bet the Chiefs.

0:31:19.120 --> 0:31:22.120
<v Speaker 3>So I'm not gonna do it. I'm not gonna do it.

0:31:22.520 --> 0:31:23.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm just not gonna do it.

0:31:23.440 --> 0:31:26.480
<v Speaker 5>I feel exactly how I felt about the Bill's game.

0:31:26.560 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 5>Now about this Chiefs topic.

0:31:28.280 --> 0:31:30.480
<v Speaker 3>I'd love it. Listen, I'll be rooting for you.

0:31:30.840 --> 0:31:31.480
<v Speaker 2>I like it.

0:31:31.680 --> 0:31:34.440
<v Speaker 3>No one's gonna be betting the Colts. The problem is

0:31:35.440 --> 0:31:38.360
<v Speaker 3>the be careful category is if you see it and

0:31:38.400 --> 0:31:43.040
<v Speaker 3>you're like, is anyone going to bet Indy? No?

0:31:43.920 --> 0:31:45.120
<v Speaker 4>Do I think the Chiefs are gonna win?

0:31:45.240 --> 0:31:48.720
<v Speaker 3>Yes? Does a backdoor cover situation scare me? There are

0:31:48.760 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 3>a lot of things the Chiefs Willie Gay. They're inside

0:31:51.680 --> 0:31:54.600
<v Speaker 3>linebackers suspended the next four games. Could that hurt their

0:31:54.680 --> 0:31:58.840
<v Speaker 3>run defense? It could just it looks so obvious we're

0:31:58.880 --> 0:32:02.960
<v Speaker 3>staying away. But with that said, well, I don't want

0:32:03.000 --> 0:32:04.680
<v Speaker 3>to lay the six and a half with filling. I

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:06.200
<v Speaker 3>want to lay the five and a half with KC.

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:10.200
<v Speaker 3>That does feel like a very tasty teaser situation. So

0:32:10.240 --> 0:32:12.440
<v Speaker 3>we might talk about that in exotics. All right, last one?

0:32:12.600 --> 0:32:15.080
<v Speaker 5>All right, Dallas plus a point and a half at

0:32:15.120 --> 0:32:16.560
<v Speaker 5>the Giants plus a point.

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:18.640
<v Speaker 2>Sorry nine point a half, no.

0:32:18.240 --> 0:32:23.120
<v Speaker 3>No problem. Uh, the Giants are only minus one. The

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:27.480
<v Speaker 3>reason this is a be careful to me is because

0:32:28.320 --> 0:32:30.960
<v Speaker 3>I have no Maybe I should have put this in

0:32:31.040 --> 0:32:34.240
<v Speaker 3>a different category. I have no feel for this game.

0:32:35.280 --> 0:32:39.120
<v Speaker 3>I think the Giants are gonna win, but I have

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:40.640
<v Speaker 3>no feel. I don't even want to talk about this game.

0:32:40.920 --> 0:32:42.960
<v Speaker 3>I have no feel for it. I was so wrong in.

0:32:42.960 --> 0:32:44.000
<v Speaker 4>The Cowboys last week.

0:32:44.200 --> 0:32:45.800
<v Speaker 3>I think the Giants are gonna win, but I also

0:32:45.880 --> 0:32:47.880
<v Speaker 3>feel like Michael Parsons might be able to force like

0:32:48.000 --> 0:32:50.920
<v Speaker 3>four fumbles of Daniel Jones. I have no feel for it.

0:32:51.000 --> 0:32:52.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm just you know what. I should have put it

0:32:52.840 --> 0:32:54.680
<v Speaker 3>in the state away category. But let's move on to

0:32:54.720 --> 0:32:57.040
<v Speaker 3>perfectly priced quickly, because I said we're gonna go fast,

0:32:57.040 --> 0:32:57.840
<v Speaker 3>and once again we're late.

0:32:58.160 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 2>Price.

0:32:58.680 --> 0:33:02.840
<v Speaker 5>Bill's minus six at Miami. Yeah, still refusing to go

0:33:02.920 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 5>in on the bills. Are you saying that you believe

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:06.200
<v Speaker 5>in Miami or well?

0:33:06.240 --> 0:33:08.840
<v Speaker 3>No, I just think that it's perfectly priced. I think

0:33:08.880 --> 0:33:12.160
<v Speaker 3>that if Miami's a playoff team, which Vegas says they are,

0:33:12.440 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 3>they're at home. Buffalo is on. But you know, keep

0:33:15.320 --> 0:33:18.880
<v Speaker 3>in mind Buffalo Game one. Everyone's fully rested. Right, they

0:33:18.880 --> 0:33:22.280
<v Speaker 3>play on a Thursday. Week two, they go from Thursday

0:33:22.320 --> 0:33:24.360
<v Speaker 3>to Monday, damn near a bye week.

0:33:24.560 --> 0:33:26.120
<v Speaker 4>So they go from all off.

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:28.640
<v Speaker 3>Season of rest, then a week and a half. Now

0:33:28.640 --> 0:33:31.720
<v Speaker 3>they're on a short week, right, and it's going to

0:33:31.760 --> 0:33:34.840
<v Speaker 3>be hot. You know those new England Buffalo and the Jets.

0:33:34.920 --> 0:33:37.800
<v Speaker 3>Going down to Miami has caused problems in the past.

0:33:38.000 --> 0:33:40.480
<v Speaker 3>And if Miami is supposed to be a playoff team,

0:33:41.520 --> 0:33:45.800
<v Speaker 3>then at home they shouldn't be more than six and

0:33:45.840 --> 0:33:49.040
<v Speaker 3>a half point underdogs against anybody. So I do think,

0:33:49.080 --> 0:33:52.000
<v Speaker 3>and I do think that with Buffalo suffered some injuries

0:33:52.000 --> 0:33:54.680
<v Speaker 3>to the secondary, Miami might be able to take advantage

0:33:54.680 --> 0:33:58.320
<v Speaker 3>of it. I think the Bills win by a touchdown.

0:33:58.640 --> 0:34:01.640
<v Speaker 3>I think it's perfect price. I expect the Bills to win.

0:34:02.440 --> 0:34:04.720
<v Speaker 3>The line's just right, so we're staying away next.

0:34:04.600 --> 0:34:07.120
<v Speaker 2>All right, Green Bay plus a point at Tampa Bay.

0:34:07.600 --> 0:34:10.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think that's also perfectly priced. No, Mike Evans,

0:34:10.200 --> 0:34:13.359
<v Speaker 3>Tampa's offense has struggled, So what they're saying is they think,

0:34:13.440 --> 0:34:15.880
<v Speaker 3>right now Green Bay is slightly better than Tampa, but

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:18.400
<v Speaker 3>the game's in Tampa, so this game is essentially a

0:34:18.440 --> 0:34:21.680
<v Speaker 3>pick them. I totally agree with that, and I think

0:34:21.680 --> 0:34:23.080
<v Speaker 3>this is gonna be the game of the week. I'm

0:34:23.160 --> 0:34:25.560
<v Speaker 3>very excited to see it. But it's a coin flip game.

0:34:25.600 --> 0:34:26.560
<v Speaker 3>It's perfectly priced.

0:34:26.600 --> 0:34:28.880
<v Speaker 5>Next all right, Falcons plus a plaint in a half

0:34:28.920 --> 0:34:29.759
<v Speaker 5>at the Seahawks.

0:34:29.880 --> 0:34:32.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, this is maybe the two worst teams

0:34:32.360 --> 0:34:35.400
<v Speaker 3>in football. What they're saying is that they think Seattle

0:34:35.800 --> 0:34:38.560
<v Speaker 3>is slightly worse than Atlanta, but Atlanta's got to go.

0:34:39.000 --> 0:34:42.160
<v Speaker 3>I wanted to bet Atlanta because I think Seattle's gonna

0:34:42.160 --> 0:34:44.120
<v Speaker 3>struggle to win. I think their Super Bowl was that

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:47.680
<v Speaker 3>Denver game and they looked awful and weak two awful.

0:34:48.160 --> 0:34:48.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:34:49.280 --> 0:34:51.959
<v Speaker 3>All year, the all off season, it was about beating Russ.

0:34:52.000 --> 0:34:56.319
<v Speaker 3>They wanted to beat Russ. My problem is it is

0:34:56.360 --> 0:34:59.320
<v Speaker 3>hard to find a longer trip for any one schedule

0:34:59.560 --> 0:35:03.440
<v Speaker 3>than to Seattle. So that flight the East coast to

0:35:03.480 --> 0:35:06.840
<v Speaker 3>West coast, I don't love it. I don't love that

0:35:06.920 --> 0:35:10.040
<v Speaker 3>we're getting less than a field Goalden lumen Field. I

0:35:10.120 --> 0:35:13.160
<v Speaker 3>also don't let love the idea of betting Seattle and

0:35:13.280 --> 0:35:17.279
<v Speaker 3>under any circumstances laying points. It's price just right, that's it.

0:35:17.400 --> 0:35:20.759
<v Speaker 2>Last right, Rams minus three and a half at the Cardinals.

0:35:20.440 --> 0:35:25.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, again. I think this is mcveigh's owned Kingsbury. But

0:35:25.400 --> 0:35:28.560
<v Speaker 3>the Cardinals, I'm sorry. The Rams have not looked overwhelming.

0:35:28.560 --> 0:35:31.319
<v Speaker 3>They almost they haven't covered yet this year. The three

0:35:31.400 --> 0:35:33.759
<v Speaker 3>and a half is just right at Rams minus three,

0:35:33.800 --> 0:35:37.280
<v Speaker 3>I would bet it. At Cardinals plus four, i'd probably

0:35:37.320 --> 0:35:40.640
<v Speaker 3>bet them. I think the I probably wouldn't bet either.

0:35:40.680 --> 0:35:42.239
<v Speaker 3>But those are the sides I have. I think three

0:35:42.239 --> 0:35:44.799
<v Speaker 3>and a half's perfectly priced. I expect the Rams win

0:35:44.840 --> 0:35:47.719
<v Speaker 3>this game by around by three or four points. It's

0:35:47.719 --> 0:35:50.359
<v Speaker 3>perfectly priced. All right, We've got to give you our lock,

0:35:50.719 --> 0:35:53.080
<v Speaker 3>got to give you some exotics, our survivor pick, and

0:35:53.080 --> 0:35:55.600
<v Speaker 3>Demont's gotten offer for us. That's all. Next, we wrap

0:35:55.680 --> 0:36:03.720
<v Speaker 3>the show What's Right? All right? Welcome back in final segment,

0:36:04.120 --> 0:36:08.160
<v Speaker 3>What's Right, Nick Right? Episode seventy three, Week three gambling Show.

0:36:08.520 --> 0:36:12.320
<v Speaker 3>Our five picks this week are Baltimore minus two and

0:36:12.360 --> 0:36:14.520
<v Speaker 3>a half. We're staying on Baltimore for the third straight week.

0:36:14.600 --> 0:36:16.680
<v Speaker 3>This time they're in New England Minnesota minus six at

0:36:16.680 --> 0:36:19.360
<v Speaker 3>home against Detroit, Houston plus two and a half in

0:36:19.480 --> 0:36:24.840
<v Speaker 3>Chicago Jacksonville plus seven playing the Chargers in LA and

0:36:25.000 --> 0:36:29.520
<v Speaker 3>San Francisco minus one and a half. Last year, last week,

0:36:29.560 --> 0:36:32.560
<v Speaker 3>we got screwed on our lock the Baltimore bit. I

0:36:32.680 --> 0:36:36.080
<v Speaker 3>almost Demons wanted to lock up Baltimore again. Happy for

0:36:36.120 --> 0:36:38.839
<v Speaker 3>the third straight week we go with Baltimore. But we're

0:36:38.840 --> 0:36:42.120
<v Speaker 3>not gonna do that. Instead, we're gonna take this opportunity

0:36:42.160 --> 0:36:46.600
<v Speaker 3>to fade Nathaniel Hackett. Kyle Shanahan versus Nathaniel Hackett. It

0:36:46.760 --> 0:36:51.120
<v Speaker 3>is truly one of the best coaches, smartest coaches in

0:36:51.160 --> 0:36:55.680
<v Speaker 3>football against one of the most overmatched dufuses I've ever

0:36:55.719 --> 0:36:57.080
<v Speaker 3>seen coach in an NFL game.

0:36:57.160 --> 0:36:58.640
<v Speaker 4>I'm laying less than a field goal.

0:36:59.000 --> 0:37:02.719
<v Speaker 3>San Francisco minus a point and a half is the

0:37:02.800 --> 0:37:06.040
<v Speaker 3>right move. They have now added to the graphic. More

0:37:06.400 --> 0:37:09.520
<v Speaker 3>look at this, more versions of me when I was

0:37:09.560 --> 0:37:12.800
<v Speaker 3>slightly overweight and shaved head, and you are now holding

0:37:12.920 --> 0:37:15.759
<v Speaker 3>money in a football and all these things there it

0:37:15.880 --> 0:37:19.160
<v Speaker 3>is San Francisco minus a point and a half. And

0:37:19.320 --> 0:37:26.600
<v Speaker 3>then yeah, okay, now we're going to teach Demans about teasers. Okay,

0:37:27.160 --> 0:37:30.440
<v Speaker 3>so there are six point, seven point and eight point teasers.

0:37:31.080 --> 0:37:34.520
<v Speaker 3>So a teaser means you have to add you know

0:37:34.560 --> 0:37:36.839
<v Speaker 3>what a parlay is. Parlay is when you just take

0:37:36.840 --> 0:37:40.400
<v Speaker 3>a bunch of bets, put them together teaser is similar,

0:37:40.400 --> 0:37:42.680
<v Speaker 3>but you get to move the line six, seven, or

0:37:42.719 --> 0:37:45.640
<v Speaker 3>ten points and you pay a bigger big depending on

0:37:45.920 --> 0:37:52.000
<v Speaker 3>how many points. So the rules of teasers are that

0:37:52.400 --> 0:37:55.440
<v Speaker 3>you don't want to tease across zero. So if you

0:37:55.480 --> 0:37:58.759
<v Speaker 3>have a team that's favored by three, you wouldn't then

0:37:58.880 --> 0:38:03.520
<v Speaker 3>tease them to plus three because you're not getting true

0:38:03.600 --> 0:38:06.480
<v Speaker 3>value on it, because the game's not going to end

0:38:06.960 --> 0:38:12.520
<v Speaker 3>tied typically, So what you want when you're teasing is

0:38:12.600 --> 0:38:17.000
<v Speaker 3>to take it across key numbers. Right, So like a

0:38:17.200 --> 0:38:20.640
<v Speaker 3>seven and a half point favorite, you might want to

0:38:20.760 --> 0:38:23.880
<v Speaker 3>tease down to a point and a half because seven

0:38:23.920 --> 0:38:27.120
<v Speaker 3>is a key number, six is an important number, three

0:38:27.160 --> 0:38:29.200
<v Speaker 3>is an important number, and then that's seven and a

0:38:29.200 --> 0:38:30.520
<v Speaker 3>half point favor we'll just have to win by at

0:38:30.560 --> 0:38:32.920
<v Speaker 3>least a point and a half, right. Or you can

0:38:32.960 --> 0:38:35.719
<v Speaker 3>also go in the other direction. You know, you can

0:38:35.760 --> 0:38:40.439
<v Speaker 3>tease an underdog, so this if there are a lot

0:38:40.480 --> 0:38:43.840
<v Speaker 3>of two and a half point underdogs, those are great

0:38:44.040 --> 0:38:47.560
<v Speaker 3>teaser legs because you are getting it through the three,

0:38:48.280 --> 0:38:52.200
<v Speaker 3>through the seven, through the six obviously, and through the eight.

0:38:52.640 --> 0:38:54.200
<v Speaker 3>So you take a six a two and a half

0:38:54.239 --> 0:38:56.560
<v Speaker 3>point dog and make them an eight and a half

0:38:56.640 --> 0:39:01.040
<v Speaker 3>point dog. With that said, I'm gonna slightly break one

0:39:01.040 --> 0:39:03.799
<v Speaker 3>of those rules I just told you about. Here we go.

0:39:05.840 --> 0:39:11.000
<v Speaker 3>We have Philly minus six and a half. We are

0:39:11.080 --> 0:39:15.799
<v Speaker 3>teasing it down to Philly minus half point, Philly just

0:39:15.840 --> 0:39:21.160
<v Speaker 3>to win, okay, Philly just to win. And we are

0:39:21.200 --> 0:39:25.719
<v Speaker 3>teasing it with the Chiefs from minus five and a

0:39:25.760 --> 0:39:28.680
<v Speaker 3>half to plus a half point. Again, we're giving up

0:39:28.719 --> 0:39:31.560
<v Speaker 3>one point of value there, because plus half points basically

0:39:31.560 --> 0:39:33.759
<v Speaker 3>the same thing as minus half point. It's gonna end

0:39:33.800 --> 0:39:39.360
<v Speaker 3>on and tie. A two team six point teaser, I

0:39:39.640 --> 0:39:44.799
<v Speaker 3>kind of want to include Houston. In fact, we are

0:39:44.840 --> 0:39:48.760
<v Speaker 3>including Houston. We're getting aggressive. We're going with a three

0:39:48.840 --> 0:39:52.960
<v Speaker 3>team teaser, the Chiefs from five and a half down

0:39:52.960 --> 0:39:56.160
<v Speaker 3>to plus a half point, Philly from six and a

0:39:56.200 --> 0:40:00.160
<v Speaker 3>half to minus half point, and Houston from plus two

0:40:00.200 --> 0:40:01.919
<v Speaker 3>and a half to plus eight and a half.

0:40:02.400 --> 0:40:04.879
<v Speaker 4>So a three team teaser, just so you know how

0:40:04.920 --> 0:40:08.320
<v Speaker 4>the math works on it. A three team six point

0:40:08.360 --> 0:40:13.279
<v Speaker 4>teaser will pay out plus one forty Okay, so one

0:40:13.320 --> 0:40:15.279
<v Speaker 4>hundred bucks to win one hundred and forty bucks, so

0:40:15.360 --> 0:40:18.239
<v Speaker 4>on and so forth. That's our first teaser of the year.

0:40:18.320 --> 0:40:21.080
<v Speaker 4>We will keep track of those as well.

0:40:21.600 --> 0:40:25.319
<v Speaker 3>I'll look at Look at the graphic. Wow, look at

0:40:25.320 --> 0:40:25.960
<v Speaker 3>the graphic.

0:40:26.440 --> 0:40:27.360
<v Speaker 4>US Exotic.

0:40:28.320 --> 0:40:28.920
<v Speaker 3>I like it.

0:40:29.239 --> 0:40:31.000
<v Speaker 2>Exotics Exotics.

0:40:31.200 --> 0:40:32.240
<v Speaker 3>I like it all right.

0:40:32.719 --> 0:40:35.520
<v Speaker 4>Now, do you have an offer you'd like to make me?

0:40:35.840 --> 0:40:37.480
<v Speaker 5>I do have an offer I'd like to make you,

0:40:38.480 --> 0:40:42.200
<v Speaker 5>all right. So this week's offer the Giants to remain

0:40:42.280 --> 0:40:46.600
<v Speaker 5>as the last undefeated team at fifty to one, and

0:40:46.640 --> 0:40:49.319
<v Speaker 5>we've also got the Dolphins to remain as the last

0:40:49.360 --> 0:40:54.000
<v Speaker 5>undefeated team at twenty six to one. Either take those

0:40:54.080 --> 0:40:57.920
<v Speaker 5>two bets and one of these delicious cupcakes that I

0:40:57.960 --> 0:41:01.120
<v Speaker 5>have under my seat.

0:41:01.840 --> 0:41:04.680
<v Speaker 3>You actually have cupcakes with you? Why do you have

0:41:04.760 --> 0:41:05.600
<v Speaker 3>cupcakes with you?

0:41:05.840 --> 0:41:07.920
<v Speaker 2>Bought them specifically to match the chair?

0:41:08.680 --> 0:41:11.240
<v Speaker 3>Oh? Let me see these?

0:41:11.480 --> 0:41:13.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? These are some Yeah.

0:41:15.280 --> 0:41:17.320
<v Speaker 3>So you're saying if I take one of these offers,

0:41:17.320 --> 0:41:21.080
<v Speaker 3>I get the cupcakes too. No, no, I think that's

0:41:21.080 --> 0:41:22.120
<v Speaker 3>what you're supposed to be saying.

0:41:22.160 --> 0:41:25.160
<v Speaker 4>But that's fine, no problem. Here's the thing.

0:41:27.320 --> 0:41:31.840
<v Speaker 3>I don't like the Dolphins at twenty six to one.

0:41:32.560 --> 0:41:36.440
<v Speaker 3>The Giants at fifty to one is interesting. So let's

0:41:36.440 --> 0:41:39.799
<v Speaker 3>look at this. I believe the Giants have a very

0:41:39.840 --> 0:41:44.319
<v Speaker 3>good chance at being four and oh okay, so who

0:41:44.320 --> 0:41:49.920
<v Speaker 3>are the other undefeated teams? Kansas City. Kansas City is

0:41:50.040 --> 0:41:55.719
<v Speaker 3>in Tampa next week, and then against Buffalo two weeks later,

0:41:55.800 --> 0:41:59.440
<v Speaker 3>and against San Francisco after that. He'll lose one of

0:41:59.480 --> 0:42:03.280
<v Speaker 3>those games, all right, So Kansas City max is out

0:42:03.520 --> 0:42:07.640
<v Speaker 3>at six and zero. Miami and Buffalo play each other

0:42:07.680 --> 0:42:10.320
<v Speaker 3>this week. I think Miami's gonna win. I'm sorry, Buffalo

0:42:10.400 --> 0:42:13.120
<v Speaker 3>is gonna win. So Miami's off the board. Who are

0:42:13.239 --> 0:42:18.000
<v Speaker 3>other undefeated teams? We talked about the Giants Philadelphia. Let's

0:42:18.000 --> 0:42:22.799
<v Speaker 3>see what they've got. Philadelphia is at their home for Jacksonville.

0:42:22.840 --> 0:42:27.319
<v Speaker 3>They're at Arizona, their home for Dallas. Maybe Dax back

0:42:27.400 --> 0:42:33.800
<v Speaker 3>by then Philadelphia, could you know? I think they max

0:42:33.840 --> 0:42:36.480
<v Speaker 3>out and then they're home for Pittsburgh. Philadelphia doesn't really

0:42:36.480 --> 0:42:37.879
<v Speaker 3>have a really tough game for a while.

0:42:37.920 --> 0:42:40.800
<v Speaker 4>They're interesting. Who are other undefeated teams?

0:42:40.840 --> 0:42:44.799
<v Speaker 3>Tampa? Tampa obviously could lose this week, right, and then

0:42:44.800 --> 0:42:47.239
<v Speaker 3>they play the Chiefs. So Tampa and the Chiefs, one

0:42:47.239 --> 0:42:49.239
<v Speaker 3>of them is gonna knock each other out. So what

0:42:49.480 --> 0:42:52.440
<v Speaker 3>do the Giants max out at? I think they're getting

0:42:52.480 --> 0:42:56.239
<v Speaker 3>to four and oh who at Green Bay Sunday, October ninth,

0:42:56.560 --> 0:42:59.480
<v Speaker 3>then home for Baltimore. All right, that's no good, But

0:43:00.080 --> 0:43:03.759
<v Speaker 3>fifty to one when I think they're getting to four

0:43:03.800 --> 0:43:10.160
<v Speaker 3>and zero, and I could then like hedge out of

0:43:10.200 --> 0:43:14.800
<v Speaker 3>it by if there's only other one undefeated team left,

0:43:15.440 --> 0:43:20.239
<v Speaker 3>betting on that team each week at fifty to one,

0:43:20.360 --> 0:43:24.319
<v Speaker 3>the Giants to be the last remaining undefeated team. I

0:43:24.320 --> 0:43:26.520
<v Speaker 3>think that's good value. That's the first time you've given

0:43:26.560 --> 0:43:27.720
<v Speaker 3>me one of these. That's good value.

0:43:28.040 --> 0:43:28.600
<v Speaker 2>I like it.

0:43:29.239 --> 0:43:32.440
<v Speaker 3>If we were to play out this scenario fifty times,

0:43:33.080 --> 0:43:35.560
<v Speaker 3>would at least one of those times the Giants be

0:43:35.560 --> 0:43:39.200
<v Speaker 3>the last remaining undefeated team. I say yes, I like

0:43:39.280 --> 0:43:42.480
<v Speaker 3>that bet. For the first time, I take that offer.

0:43:42.920 --> 0:43:45.400
<v Speaker 3>You understand what this means, because I've never taken one

0:43:45.440 --> 0:43:48.880
<v Speaker 3>of these. You are making the offer, so I'll make

0:43:48.920 --> 0:43:52.720
<v Speaker 3>it easy on you this time. I'll just bet fifty dollars.

0:43:54.000 --> 0:43:56.759
<v Speaker 3>If the Giants are not the last remaining undefeated team,

0:43:57.120 --> 0:44:00.000
<v Speaker 3>I owe you fifty dollars. But since you made the offer,

0:44:00.239 --> 0:44:02.920
<v Speaker 3>you're the house on this, so you if they are

0:44:02.920 --> 0:44:04.600
<v Speaker 3>the last remaining undefeated.

0:44:04.160 --> 0:44:08.080
<v Speaker 2>Team, you owe me books no hundred and fifty bucks.

0:44:08.160 --> 0:44:11.640
<v Speaker 3>No no, no, no, no no no. It is fifty to one,

0:44:12.239 --> 0:44:14.279
<v Speaker 3>and I bet if I bet one dollar, you'd owe

0:44:14.280 --> 0:44:18.759
<v Speaker 3>me fifty oh, twenty five hundred, so.

0:44:18.840 --> 0:44:21.160
<v Speaker 2>You bucks to get twenty five hundred day.

0:44:21.560 --> 0:44:23.839
<v Speaker 3>Now you're trying to but you're you're like, oh, maybe

0:44:23.840 --> 0:44:26.160
<v Speaker 3>I should make this bet too late. You made the offer.

0:44:26.719 --> 0:44:30.560
<v Speaker 3>I've accepted the offer. It is the first one. If

0:44:30.560 --> 0:44:34.840
<v Speaker 3>the Giants lose before you know, if they're not the

0:44:34.920 --> 0:44:37.759
<v Speaker 3>last remaining undefeated team, I could have done more, But

0:44:38.560 --> 0:44:41.319
<v Speaker 3>to fifty to twenty five hundred feels good. You got

0:44:41.320 --> 0:44:43.839
<v Speaker 3>me for ten thousands FID weeks ago. By the way,

0:44:43.880 --> 0:44:48.439
<v Speaker 3>speaking of that as of recording, let me check real quick. Oh,

0:44:48.480 --> 0:44:52.120
<v Speaker 3>we're getting close. Four hundred and ninety nine thousand, six

0:44:52.239 --> 0:44:53.120
<v Speaker 3>hundred and twenty one.

0:44:53.200 --> 0:44:55.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I did see that the churn number was going on.

0:44:55.160 --> 0:44:57.239
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we're getting close. But I take it.

0:44:57.280 --> 0:44:59.200
<v Speaker 3>So the Giants, last remaining undefeated team, you own me

0:44:59.200 --> 0:45:01.520
<v Speaker 3>twenty five hundred buck. If they're not, I owe you

0:45:01.560 --> 0:45:02.280
<v Speaker 3>fifty dollars.

0:45:02.600 --> 0:45:04.919
<v Speaker 2>The cupcakes cancels out the fifty.

0:45:05.960 --> 0:45:08.239
<v Speaker 3>The fifty Yeah, so I don't have to pay you

0:45:08.239 --> 0:45:10.200
<v Speaker 3>even the fifty dollars. What I'm saying, I think you're

0:45:10.280 --> 0:45:13.400
<v Speaker 3>very confused. I ain't our guy. Nick Winer's here in

0:45:13.440 --> 0:45:15.560
<v Speaker 3>New York tried to add an element to the show,

0:45:15.600 --> 0:45:17.360
<v Speaker 3>and that being you offering the cupcakes.

0:45:17.400 --> 0:45:19.839
<v Speaker 2>Wait, so I owe you fifty dollars if it doesn't hit.

0:45:19.960 --> 0:45:24.000
<v Speaker 3>Right, No, I owe you fifty dollars if it doesn't.

0:45:23.719 --> 0:45:26.120
<v Speaker 2>Hit, and if it does hit, you owe me.

0:45:26.120 --> 0:45:27.440
<v Speaker 4>Twenty five hundred dollars.

0:45:27.719 --> 0:45:28.319
<v Speaker 2>Oh, what the hell?

0:45:28.360 --> 0:45:31.480
<v Speaker 3>You've made the offer. You should have talked to them

0:45:31.520 --> 0:45:34.240
<v Speaker 3>about it. You made the offer, Buddy, I accepted the offer.

0:45:34.480 --> 0:45:36.840
<v Speaker 3>It's the first one that I actually think was good value.

0:45:36.960 --> 0:45:50.720
<v Speaker 3>That's today's show.