WEBVTT - FTX Bankruptcy Fallout Continues to Cause Crypto Chaos

0:00:03.440 --> 0:00:07.480
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Crypto Daily Bloomberg Podcast. It's Tuesday in

0:00:07.520 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>November and I'm Baldana Hirich in today for Stacy Marie Ishmael.

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:28.159
<v Speaker 1>Listeners of this show who followed the news know that

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:32.279
<v Speaker 1>the crypto industry erupted into chaos in recent days when

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>there was a run on the crypto exchange f t X,

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 1>which froze withdrawals and in a matter of ours, declared bankruptcy.

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:41.560
<v Speaker 1>If you are just joining us, turn up the volume

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:45.360
<v Speaker 1>for this cryptocurrency exchange, f t X filed for Chapter

0:00:45.479 --> 0:00:50.200
<v Speaker 1>eleven bankruptcy following several days of enormous turmoil. The latest

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:53.520
<v Speaker 1>reporting from Reuters says SPF is seeking a nine point

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 1>four billion dollar package for an f t X bailout.

0:00:57.320 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>It started way back when last week when a tweet

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>finance CEO Chang pangs Al said that his crypto exchange

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:07.120
<v Speaker 1>planned to sell ft x's native token f t t

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 1>due to risk management issues that ended up driving the

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 1>token's price down by some ninety percent. And soon after

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>f t x as CEO Sam Bankman Freed started shopping

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 1>around for a bailout and halted withdrawals on his platform.

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 1>We also just thirty six hours later, got news that

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:26.320
<v Speaker 1>f t X ended up filing for bankruptcy and that

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 1>SPF was resigning. Here with us today to go over

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:34.399
<v Speaker 1>everything that happened is Bloomberg reporter Katie Greifeld. Katie, thank

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining me today. So, Katie, obviously

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 1>this has been incredibly hard on so many people. So

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 1>we have institutions that have been involved with this that

0:01:56.520 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 1>are hurting. We also have a ton of retail investors

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 1>who are who have lost a lot of money. So

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe just to start tell us what the hell happened?

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:08.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's a great question, but I think you

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:11.920
<v Speaker 1>make a great point that that's what's at stake when

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 1>you think about this. Whole conversation is centered around customer funds.

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 1>What happened to the customer funds where they mishandled. Those

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>are people's investments, that's people's money. So again, I think

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 1>that's an important jumping off point that that's what we're

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 1>really talking about at the end of the day, just

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 1>exactly we're going to lose money in terms of what

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the hell happened. I think we're still facing that together.

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 1>But it seemed like it started as a big Twitter

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 1>feud basically between c Z at Finance and SPF at

0:02:44.960 --> 0:02:50.080
<v Speaker 1>fd X, and it quickly turned into I think even

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:52.320
<v Speaker 1>people in the know would tell you that they were

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 1>shocked at how quickly this moved, that they didn't even

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 1>know f t X was on sale, let alone that

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Finance would buy it. And then almost as quickly as

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Binance had said that they were going to basically buy

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 1>FTX to help with their liquidity issue getting back to

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the customer funds, they pulled out. And then I mean

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:14.360
<v Speaker 1>all they deal exactly, and all of this was happening

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:15.840
<v Speaker 1>in the span of a few days, and by the

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 1>end of the week, ft X had filed for Chapter

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 1>eleven bankruptcy. And now it just feels like we're watching

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:24.239
<v Speaker 1>for the fallout. Where do we go from here? And

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:26.839
<v Speaker 1>even in that very quick timeline that I just laid out,

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 1>there's so many details and happenings that, uh, it just

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:33.639
<v Speaker 1>felt like a house of cards when it all came

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 1>down at once, basically, and just for me in talking

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 1>to people, and for you as well, because you and

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 1>I have covered f t X in the past. Over

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of years, we've been writing quite a

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 1>bit about it and obviously about the crypto space, but

0:03:45.720 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 1>this really had been the gold start within crypto, right.

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 1>People thought of it as a very reputable place and

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>people a lot of people thought very highly of SPF,

0:03:56.480 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 1>of same Maignement Freed, and so possibly that's also one

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons that this has just been so much

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 1>more shocking for a lot of people, right. I think

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly right. I mean, if you think back to

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 1>what happened a few months ago with Do Kwan and

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Terra and Luna, for example, I mean there had been

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:17.040
<v Speaker 1>do Kwant skeptics out there, it was still shocking the

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 1>scale in the magnitude, but you could go back in

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:23.920
<v Speaker 1>the timeline, go back to Twitter and find people sort

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 1>of ringing the alarm bells for months as to this

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 1>looks unsustainable f t X, totally different situation. Like you said,

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 1>SPF was really really trusted. I mean, the man was

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:38.920
<v Speaker 1>testifying in front of Congress, mazines exactly on the cover

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 1>of magazines. And I think that's the common denominator now

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:46.279
<v Speaker 1>when I talked to people, it's it's it's shocked, but

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 1>it's also it feels like people are just stunned, and

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 1>it feels like the magnitude of you know, how far

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:56.599
<v Speaker 1>f t X is reached is much larger. It feels

0:04:56.600 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>like everyone had exposure to f t X some how,

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:03.040
<v Speaker 1>or to Alameda somehow, because again we're talking about an

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 1>entire empire here. That SPF was running a huge empire.

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>You know that the FTX was not only one of

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the biggest crypto exchanges, it was also seeking to bail

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:15.039
<v Speaker 1>out other struggling crypto firms across the industry, while Sam

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:18.360
<v Speaker 1>making Freed was actively trying to change policies in the

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 1>United States. Actually, in their bankruptcy filing on Friday, something

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:27.360
<v Speaker 1>like a hundred and thirty subsidiaries or companies that are

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:31.160
<v Speaker 1>tied to the ft X empire are also named in

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the bankruptcy filing. But Katie, were still obviously sifting through

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:38.839
<v Speaker 1>the rubble. We might be for years to come, depending

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 1>on what happens in terms of the bankruptcy and what

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:45.400
<v Speaker 1>regulators do. But Bloomberg did report over the weekend about

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:48.919
<v Speaker 1>just what a mess the books actually were at f

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 1>t X. Maybe you can talk about that. Yeah, you

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 1>read this story and you, I don't know, kind of

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 1>get a clearer picture of why finance pulled out because

0:05:56.880 --> 0:06:00.360
<v Speaker 1>uh a, look at a breakdown of the balance sheet again.

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 1>The day before that, they that f t X, ultimately

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:07.600
<v Speaker 1>filed for bankruptcy, had nine billion dollars in liabilities nine

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred million dollars in liquid assets. So that's a pretty

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 1>big mismatch five point five billion dollars in quote less

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 1>liquid assets and three point two billion dollars in a

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:23.160
<v Speaker 1>liquid assets. This is, of course, according to sources familiar

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 1>with the matter. Um the st has been all over

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 1>this story too, and they broke the news that the

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:32.360
<v Speaker 1>largest asset was two point two billion dollars worth of

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:36.480
<v Speaker 1>a cryptocurrency called serum filled Donna. I had never heard

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 1>of serum before I read that story. I had, but

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 1>only because I used so many face serums, so the

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 1>name had really like caught my eye, that is so funny.

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I had not my skin was serums. Yeah, my skincare

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 1>routine is not as rigorous. So this was total news

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:55.359
<v Speaker 1>to me. But what it's just, I mean, what do

0:06:55.400 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>you even say? It's shocking speechless, which is bad for

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 1>a podcast, bad talking, But it's gonna make for really

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 1>really interesting core case. I think, yes, bankruptcy core case.

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:08.599
<v Speaker 1>But just to go back to your point about what

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:12.680
<v Speaker 1>happened over the summer with the Tera Luna implosion, just

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 1>to catch up listeners. That was a stable coin, an

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 1>algorithmic stable coin that lost its peg basically and wiped out.

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it was something like sixty billion dollars in value.

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>And I know, for me, having covered crypto for almost

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 1>five years now, every time something does implode or something

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 1>negative happens, when I talk to people, what they tend

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 1>to tell me is, well, you know, whether it's some

0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of some form of regulation. What they tell me

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 1>is the regulation is good, we need regulation, or some

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 1>price crash they say it's fine, we're taking some froth

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 1>out of the market, or I mean, it doesn't matter.

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 1>There's always some sort of positive spin where you can argue, well,

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 1>it's taking out weaker players, etcetera, etcetera. This time around,

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 1>I feel like the commentary, at least from people I

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 1>talked to, has been much more serious, almost like gravely serious,

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 1>where people are telling me that they're scared of everything

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 1>that's going on. I don't know what conversations have been

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 1>like for your what the Maybe you can give us

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 1>a sentiment check. Yeah, I would agree with that. I

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 1>mean it seems like the consensus is that this should accelerate.

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the US has been all over the place

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 1>on crypto regulation. It's still unclear which of the letters,

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 1>meaning the CFTC, the SEC who actually act has any

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 1>oversight over the industry. And I mean Congress too has

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 1>made noises about you know, we're looking at this, we're

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>taking this seriously. I don't know the consensus at this point.

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:39.599
<v Speaker 1>And again, the industry, it just feels like everyone is

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 1>very shell shocked at this moment. But the consensus seems

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 1>to be surely this accelerates regulation in some way. What

0:08:46.360 --> 0:08:50.079
<v Speaker 1>that looks like, I'm not sure, but it remains to

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 1>be seen. Well, we tend to hear the word regulation

0:08:52.679 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 1>thrown out, thrown around a lot, but yeah, we'll see

0:08:56.160 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>what actually happens. Whereas we have people on one end

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 1>saying maybe we'll see more regulation of these centralized exchanges,

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:05.720
<v Speaker 1>and on the other hand saying, you know, it could

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>be much more widespread than that. Joe Wisenthal actually hit

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 1>a great point newsletter. He made the point that crypto

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:16.439
<v Speaker 1>regulation it's a bit of an oxymoron. We've heard that

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:20.120
<v Speaker 1>phrase before, that regulation crypto oxymoron. But he made the

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>point that if you think about the blockchains, they are

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the law. The consensus mechanism is the law of that

0:09:27.840 --> 0:09:30.320
<v Speaker 1>blockchain and how the coins move around, and you compare

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:34.560
<v Speaker 1>that to actual fiat currency. They are creatures of the

0:09:34.600 --> 0:09:39.200
<v Speaker 1>government of that law. So if you regulate crypto, you

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 1>have two competing laws there. So again there's a lot

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 1>of this is a meta conversation. I know, there's a

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:49.559
<v Speaker 1>lot of philosophical questions about can you even regulate crypto? So,

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:52.079
<v Speaker 1>just to go back to your point about the terror, unplotion,

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. You have actually written about this, How does

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>this compare to past implosions? And I think actually in

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 1>your story you may some comparisons even to what happened

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:06.240
<v Speaker 1>with Enron back in two Yeah, yeah, no, it it's

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 1>important context to put this in past blow ups that

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 1>we've seen over the past few decades. I mean a

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:16.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of people have compared this to a Lehman moment.

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it was Larry Summers, the former Treasury secretary,

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 1>who said, no, this is more like Endron. But if

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>you again, if you look at all these big scandals,

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:27.439
<v Speaker 1>they have the same basic ingredients. You have a lot

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 1>of easy money coming from the governments, from the central banks.

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 1>You have really hyped innovation, uh, and you tend to

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 1>have some central characters. And that's what's going on here.

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 1>And it's just not to blame everything on the Federal Reserve,

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 1>which is really easy to do, but think about how

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 1>aggressively the cycle has changed since this time last year.

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the FETE is on its biggest rate hiking,

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:58.439
<v Speaker 1>most aggressive rate hiking cycle that we've seen in decades.

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of liquidity coming out of the system.

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, lines go up in a bowl market. One

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 1>of my favorite lines in that story was that a

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 1>bowl market basically covers a lot of sins. And now

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing the flip side of that. The cycle is

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:17.680
<v Speaker 1>turning and the bad actors are getting exposed. Bad actors

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 1>being used very broadly here. Obviously there's a lot of

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 1>investigations going on which will hopefully bear fruit. But the

0:11:23.840 --> 0:11:26.840
<v Speaker 1>point being that once you do have the shift in

0:11:27.040 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 1>the macroeconomic backdrop, the lines stopped going up and it

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:35.280
<v Speaker 1>gets a lot harder. So should we be blaming the

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 1>FED or crypt people blaming the Fed? I think crypto

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 1>people don't really know who to blame at this point.

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean again, to compare it to what we saw

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 1>with Tera, you had a lot of you know, people

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:50.439
<v Speaker 1>feeling vindicated, saying like I called this, you know, like

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the red flags were there, you just weren't looking closely enough.

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:56.240
<v Speaker 1>It feels like what's happening with f t X. It's

0:11:56.360 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>just a very existential moment for the entire crypto industry

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 1>because again you think about spfs reached the reach of

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the f t X empire. It had its tentacles in

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:11.199
<v Speaker 1>virtually every corner of the market. Coming up more with

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Katie and me on the future of digital assets after

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 1>one of the toughest weeks in crypto, we'll be right back. Well,

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 1>even if you didn't know what f t X was,

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:36.559
<v Speaker 1>you likely saw their logo or their branding because they

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 1>what they did over the last two years during the

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 1>pandemic is they did a huge sports push, right Larry

0:12:42.679 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 1>David was in their s David was in their Super

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Bowl ads, so was Tom Brady, and so was Gasel

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:49.959
<v Speaker 1>his his now ex wife. Can I talk to you

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 1>about something, Yeah, we talked about it. I got another

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:56.440
<v Speaker 1>ten years left. Not that this is big, you know.

0:12:56.520 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>So they had celebrities going out during their advertising. They

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:02.040
<v Speaker 1>had their name on some on a sports arena, I

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 1>believe the one where the Miami Heat place. They also

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 1>had branding on umpire jerseys. It was everywhere. It was everywhere.

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:15.679
<v Speaker 1>So for for the average person, it's very likely that

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:19.600
<v Speaker 1>they were at least aware of the company. If not, Yeah,

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:21.959
<v Speaker 1>I had money, and that was all by design. I mean,

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 1>that was f t X wanting to be the face

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 1>of crypto and it worked. I mean, I don't know

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 1>what your personal conversations or your weekend looked like. This

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 1>was all I talked about. Against my will, I would

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:38.960
<v Speaker 1>actually will to take a break, but it's all anyone

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 1>wants to talk about. It is. It's shocking. It's mainstream shocking.

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 1>One one reason it's been so shocking is because crypto

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 1>prices have sold off precipitously in the wake of this, Right,

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 1>So maybe we can we can talk and about this

0:13:52.960 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 1>a bit more and how it's also impacting retail investors

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:58.080
<v Speaker 1>who might not have had money on ft X, but

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:01.439
<v Speaker 1>they've they owned cryptocurrencies in some other way. And what

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 1>we saw is the ft t token, which is the

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:07.839
<v Speaker 1>utility token from f t X, dropped something like and

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:10.480
<v Speaker 1>then you had this huge sell off in bitcoin and ether,

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 1>and then some of the sort of like f t

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 1>X adjacent tokens like Salona Salona token. Really it's selling

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 1>off precipitously. Yeah, I don't know. I want to turn

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 1>this question. Do you actually Bitcoin obviously has sold off

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 1>a bunch. It's down well over sixty two, just as

0:14:30.280 --> 0:14:32.360
<v Speaker 1>tremendous draw down. And again you think about all the

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 1>retail players who were piling in this time last year.

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 1>It's a very painful story. But at the same time,

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of surprised that Bitcoin isn't even lower. Like

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 1>I made this point in this little email distribution list

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 1>I sent out on which you would you refuse to

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 1>add me too. By the way, it's just so listeners

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 1>are aware, I've never seen this, But I made the

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 1>point that if you had told me that f t

0:14:55.320 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 1>X would file for bankruptcy, I would not have believed you.

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Like if you had told me a week or two

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 1>ago that it would come in the next five days,

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 1>I would be like, Okay, cool dream. And then if

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 1>you had told me that bitcoin would still be above

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 1>ten thousand dollars after that happened, I'd be like, no

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 1>way on earth this is a systemic player. So Bitcoin

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 1>has dropped a lot, and its dropped off a lot

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:25.120
<v Speaker 1>of this news, but not as much as maybe I

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>would have expected. Maybe I'm naive there, but it seems

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 1>like there is some resilience to some Yeah, so it's

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 1>scary for people who are in the market, who are

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 1>very closely paying attention to the market and to the charts,

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 1>to see it dropped below certain key levels like the

0:15:40.680 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 1>low reached earlier this year, which we broke through, and

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 1>then even the round numbers like seventeen thousand per coin,

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 1>we broke through that. Then at one point we broke

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 1>through sixteen thousand. So the cell of has been you know,

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:57.200
<v Speaker 1>it was over twenty at one point during last week

0:15:57.240 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 1>when everything was unfolding and happening. But we've had huge

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 1>sell offs in some other ones, I mean just huge,

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, more more than some of these alternative or

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 1>all coins. So I think a lot of the selling

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 1>also was happening there, and I think it makes the

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 1>point that bitcoin and the Bitcoin blockchain, like they really

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:21.240
<v Speaker 1>are the o G s, you know, that is the

0:16:21.320 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 1>safe haven asset of the cryptocurrency safe haven. But obviously

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:28.440
<v Speaker 1>you've still lost a lot of money, but you've lost

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 1>less money than if you were in Salana, for example,

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:35.600
<v Speaker 1>which was very very hyped as the Ethereum killer Ethereum

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 1>being the second biggest blockchain, but again thinking about just

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 1>second biggest token exactly, you think about the vast reach

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 1>of SPF, of fd X, of Alameda. They were such

0:16:45.640 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 1>huge advocates of Salona, such big backers that that token

0:16:50.760 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 1>has taken the brunt of the selling here. Yeah, for sure.

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:55.320
<v Speaker 1>So maybe just to wrap things up, we can talk

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about some of the outstanding questions. What

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 1>are people telling you they'd like to be here about.

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:04.359
<v Speaker 1>I've heard it seems like everyone would like to know

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the fallout, like where to look for the next shoe

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:11.160
<v Speaker 1>to drop, And there's a lot of potentials I've heard

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 1>to take a look at the lenders, for example, because

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 1>again Alameda SPFS Trading Arm was a big borrower, so

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that will be important. Block five, for example,

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:25.600
<v Speaker 1>has you know, halted withdrawals. I believe there's a few

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:28.480
<v Speaker 1>other lenders out there, and the lending the crypto lendic

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:31.280
<v Speaker 1>space was already shaky after what happened with Terra and

0:17:31.320 --> 0:17:35.680
<v Speaker 1>then the summer three hours Capital, so there's that. I mean,

0:17:36.200 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 1>it's been interesting. We heard from Galaxy, for example, they

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:43.840
<v Speaker 1>had exposure in the tens of millions. I think that

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 1>is going to be sort of the drip feed of

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:50.960
<v Speaker 1>information to watch is who else is exactly how how

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 1>how widespread is the fallout? But again, I've been asking

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 1>people exactly that question, what is the next shoe to drop?

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:02.120
<v Speaker 1>And it's a long list. I'm sure by the time

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:05.679
<v Speaker 1>this podcast runs will actually have so much more information

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:10.440
<v Speaker 1>because the news, the headlines, they've just been coming out incessantly.

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:13.439
<v Speaker 1>It's like a five or ten year cycle compressed into

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:16.679
<v Speaker 1>three days. Yeah. Well, Katie, it's been a joy as

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:18.360
<v Speaker 1>always to talk to you, so thank you so much

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 1>for letting me chat with you today. Let's do it

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 1>again soon. I hope we can do it tomorrow again, beautiful.

0:18:24.280 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 1>You can find more of our reporting on the Bloomberg

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:29.679
<v Speaker 1>Terminal and on Bloomberg dot com, and for more, be

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:32.880
<v Speaker 1>sure to check out our twice weekly newsletter, Bloomberg Crypto.

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:42.480
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Crypto, a daily podcast from Bloomberg and

0:18:42.560 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio. For more shows from I Heart Radio,

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 1>visit the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:52.440
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts. Send us your comments, questions, or

0:18:52.440 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 1>suggestions for the show to Crypto at bloomberg dot net.

0:18:58.680 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 1>The supervising producer of Bloomberg Crypto is Vicky very Galina.

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Our senior producer is Janet Babin. Our producers are Mohammed

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Faruk and Sharon Barriro. Our associate producers are Ty Butler

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and Moses on Them. Desta wonder At is our engineer.

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Original music by Leo Sidron. I'm Stacy Marie Shmal. We'll

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 1>be back tomorrow.