WEBVTT - Bankers on the Frontlines

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to What Goes Up, a Bloomberg weekly

0:00:15.760 --> 0:00:19.200
<v Speaker 1>market podcast. I'm Sara Pants, a reporter on the Cross

0:00:19.200 --> 0:00:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Asset team, and I'm Mike Reagan, a senior editor on

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the Markets team. This week on the show, we've gotten

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:27.720
<v Speaker 1>some of the first real reads into the effect of

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>the coronavirus on the economy. It's disheartening to say, but

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:35.840
<v Speaker 1>a record six point six million people filed for unemployment

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 1>insurance in the last week, a record by far. While

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 1>markets remain volatile, resiliency has remained, and that too as

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>oil prices fell to the lowest since two thousand and one.

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:48.239
<v Speaker 1>You know, and Sarah, I feel like we jinxed it

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:51.280
<v Speaker 1>by having the Craziest Thing we Saw in Markets on

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 1>this show, because now all of a sudden, we're almost

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 1>year into the show, and I feel like everything in

0:00:56.040 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 1>markets is crazy. It's it's all. We should have just

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>named the podcast the Craziest Things we Saw in Markets

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 1>this week, and then it could just be a general

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 1>market recap. What do you think maybe we should have

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:09.679
<v Speaker 1>Although we also did get someone we officially launched the

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 1>podcast with the name What Goes Up? They said, you know,

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 1>you're just waiting for what goes down to happen to then, yeah,

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:19.040
<v Speaker 1>that might that might have by the jinxta too, Sarah,

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:21.759
<v Speaker 1>before we start talking about the markets and get into

0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and introduced our guests, I'm curious what life is like

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:28.399
<v Speaker 1>for you. You've been quarantined there in Manhattan for the

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:31.120
<v Speaker 1>duration of this virus. I I stopped going into New

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>York City round March twelve. I never thought i'd i'd

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:39.960
<v Speaker 1>ever missed that daily commute from New Jersey, but sure enough, Uh, strangely,

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm beginning to miss it. But I'm wondering. You know,

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:44.360
<v Speaker 1>we have listeners around the world on this podcast. I'm

0:01:44.400 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>sure a lot of people are as curious as I

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 1>am as far as what's just what's life like in

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Manhattan right now? In this situation. You know, it's really strange,

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 1>especially for the city, and it's it's really quiet, which

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 1>when you think of Manhattan obvious so you don't think quiet.

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 1>But if I were to go to my window right

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 1>now and just look outside, I likely wouldn't see a

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 1>single soul. I mean, I try to get outside every

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:10.840
<v Speaker 1>now and then to go on walks, but keep my distance.

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 1>But you can pretty much walk in the middle of

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the street. There's hardly any cars around, um, which is

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:19.000
<v Speaker 1>so strange to say. Usually you would see taxis, there'll

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:20.960
<v Speaker 1>be plenty of traffic. Now you're walking in the middle

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 1>of the street to keep your six feet distance. But yeah,

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>it's just there's an eerie feel. Especially it rained a

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 1>lot this week, so it was particularly eerie because there

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 1>was no one around and it was just gray and rainy. Um.

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:36.920
<v Speaker 1>But it's definitely strange. It doesn't it doesn't feel like

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the city. It's such a weird phenomenon. You have these

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:43.639
<v Speaker 1>markets in just this spasm of turmoil, and your New

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 1>York City is quieter than it's ever been. It's just

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:48.960
<v Speaker 1>a very surreal experience all around. It's it's weird still

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:53.239
<v Speaker 1>being here. I can promise you that. Well, let's get

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 1>right to the markets then, and UM happy to introduce

0:02:56.320 --> 0:02:58.399
<v Speaker 1>a new guest, first time on the show. Her name

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>is Diane Jaffee. She is a senior portfolio manager at TCW. Diane,

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 1>welcome to the show. Thank you, grilled to be here.

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:09.080
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know where you're quarantining. Maybe you're in

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the city too or not anymore. I was there with

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Sarah for a while, but now we're in Thermon, Vermont.

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 1>I think Vermont would be one of my top choices

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>to uh to quarantine and get some fresh air and

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>uh blue skies and everything. So good wise choice, social

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 1>distance all the time in vermach nothing's changed. It comes natural,

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 1>especially if you tell them you're from New Jersey. They

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:40.280
<v Speaker 1>keep their distance. I've I've learned in But Diane, let's

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>talk about these crazy markets. Because I know you're a

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 1>value focused investor. You your senior portfolio manager at tc W.

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>You manage several funds or at least on the management

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 1>committee of several um But I I gotta say I've

0:03:55.600 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 1>been doing this for many years now. I won't tell

0:03:57.360 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>everyone how many. I like to keep the illusion that

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm a young, hip her. But I don't think I've

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>ever seen anything like this as far as just the

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 1>complete unknowns about what the earnings outlook is, what the

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 1>GDP outlook is? UH. And I know you focus a

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:17.600
<v Speaker 1>lot on dividends and dividend growth. What the you know

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:19.839
<v Speaker 1>where the stable dividends are going to come from? Who's

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 1>going to cut their dividends? So I guess you know,

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 1>to make a long question very short, like how do

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 1>you do your job in this environment when there's so

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 1>many unknowns. Well, Luckily, I have a great team of

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:32.480
<v Speaker 1>analysts who work with me. We have the largest internal

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>research team on the equity side at TCW, with six

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 1>dedicated analysts. And I'm proud to say that our strategies

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 1>are going to hit their twenty five year GIFTS compliant

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 1>track record this month of April. So um that you know.

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:50.360
<v Speaker 1>So we've been through a lot of cycles together. We've

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 1>worked together for eight team years on average. But you're right,

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>this is different. This is a pandemic and um, and

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:00.360
<v Speaker 1>you can get bits and pieces of inform Asian if

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:03.279
<v Speaker 1>you go to Stars back in two thousand and three

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 1>or a bowla and two thousand and eighteen. But um,

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 1>really we haven't seen anything like this for over a

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:15.160
<v Speaker 1>hundred years back to night. It really is unbelievable. And

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 1>you shared a timeline with us in the notes, and

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was really great. It's a stylized timeline,

0:05:21.120 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and essentially what you did was you lay out the

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:27.919
<v Speaker 1>months and you lay out at different areas of where

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 1>we have passed and what we are looking forward to,

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:32.360
<v Speaker 1>so as what we have passed or in the midst

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:36.559
<v Speaker 1>of some are consumer panic and social distancing, US cases, Peak,

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:40.160
<v Speaker 1>policymakers Act, which have all happened. Now where you say

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the next test of the market is that's earnings downgrades

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:46.720
<v Speaker 1>because even when we look at bottoms up analysts estimates,

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>they haven't really haven't been able to keep up. Right now,

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>they're only estimating pretty much a modest decline in earnings

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 1>for the year. I mean, what are you guys expecting

0:05:57.839 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 1>once we potentially do see the is flowing in or

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 1>once earning season does start in a few weeks, what

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 1>do you expect and how do you expect the market

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:10.040
<v Speaker 1>to take that? Yeah, I think there will definitely be

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:12.160
<v Speaker 1>a real test of the market bottom we saw in

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the last week of March. I'd like to source a

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:19.240
<v Speaker 1>fund Strett. You know, they provided that graphic, which is

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 1>great and I think it does help give a realistic

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 1>picture within days or weeks of what we can anticipate.

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:28.479
<v Speaker 1>But earning season, we'll start with the big banks. They're

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 1>on the front lines of this and um and it

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:34.839
<v Speaker 1>gives me a lot of comfort just to know that

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:39.359
<v Speaker 1>this economic backbone of the economy is really in a

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 1>good place right now, you know, much different than it

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>was in two thousand and eight, we've been stress tests,

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 1>we've been steacard, we've been defast and so they're they're

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 1>really going to be the front lines here in terms

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 1>of the conduit for the Treasury and the Fed to

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 1>reach out to businesses, to reach out to lenders, to

0:06:57.760 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 1>reach out to borrowers, um, and so it will be

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 1>very telling what the banks say. Where do dividends and

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 1>by backs typically fit into your investment process? Goldman Sacks

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:10.640
<v Speaker 1>had an analysis out saying that already this year we've

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 1>seen roughly a quarter of the amount of by bucks

0:07:12.960 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 1>we saw last year already pulled by companies. I mean,

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 1>is this disheartening to you, guys, or do you feel

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 1>as though that's okay? Because companies have to allocate cash

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 1>where necessary at this point in time, or maybe keep

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 1>more cash on their balance sheets. I think, um that

0:07:31.200 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm a big fan of dividends because it not only

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 1>says that the there's good stewardship by the management teams

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 1>of those companies saying, Okay, we've already fulfilled what we

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 1>need to do for capex or you growth opportunities, and

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 1>so we're returning cash to our shareholders in the form

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 1>of dividends, and no entity likes to cut or suspend dividends,

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>so they have to think long and hard. In fact,

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 1>said the other day that you know, even before the coronavirus,

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 1>they were contemplating any kind of black swan event to

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 1>make sure that those dividends were safe. So, for US,

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>dividends are one of our five valuation factors. We look

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 1>at price to book, price to cash flow, price to sales,

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 1>price to earnings ratio, and dividend yields, and we particularly

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:24.640
<v Speaker 1>like it when those dividends can grow over time. UM

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>So buy backs, you know, I think you have to

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 1>be very careful with them because you know, all those

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 1>buybacks companies made last year or in January February this year,

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 1>it looked pretty poor investments. And I don't want of

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the strategies at TCW is a dividend appreciation fund. And

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:49.479
<v Speaker 1>I just have to assume that the universe of companies

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 1>that are going to be able to increase their dividends,

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:55.440
<v Speaker 1>uh this year, maybe even next year, just it's call

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:58.680
<v Speaker 1>it the near future. It must be a very swiftly

0:08:58.800 --> 0:09:02.840
<v Speaker 1>shrinking universe. I mean, where could one possibly look for

0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:06.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of a dividend aristocrat in this scenario, a company

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 1>that is able going to have the strength to be

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 1>able to increase its dividend. I mean, am I right?

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:14.960
<v Speaker 1>That that's that's almost a very much a dying breed

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 1>right now right there. Definitely know IBM right has famous

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:24.080
<v Speaker 1>stalwart provider of dividends. That's a big holding for us UM.

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:27.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, our goal is to give our clients a

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 1>diversified value portfolio that has capital return plus dividend appreciation.

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 1>So uh, right now are yields in the dividend appreciation

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 1>they're higher than SMP and the Russell one thousand value.

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 1>We do have to be super careful about UM finding

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the companies that can. Definitely, Chevron won't increase its dividend,

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:51.679
<v Speaker 1>right They've already said that, but they're doing everything to

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 1>preserve their dividend and UM and that's important to us

0:09:56.640 --> 0:10:00.120
<v Speaker 1>that they've been disciplined for the last five years or

0:10:00.160 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 1>so that when we do have a pandemic, they are

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:07.080
<v Speaker 1>able to continue to provide their shareholders with their dividends.

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 1>So dividends sanctity as well as the appreciation is going

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 1>to matter now going forward. Earlier on in the show, Diane,

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:16.600
<v Speaker 1>you said that you believe that what we would likely

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 1>retest the lows that we saw back in March in

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the market. And I bring this up because you guys

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:26.960
<v Speaker 1>are in a survey and in the survey, seventy of

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 1>respondent said that they believe that what we're seeing now

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:32.319
<v Speaker 1>and what we saw particularly last week is a bear

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:35.960
<v Speaker 1>market rally and will likely retest the lows. Why are

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 1>you so sure or why do you believe that we

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 1>will retest the lows? And why do you think so

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 1>many people out there believe the same as well. It's

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:48.440
<v Speaker 1>like Warren Buffett said that when the tide goes out,

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 1>you can see who's wearing their bathing suits. And that's

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 1>what's going to happen with earning suitis right? You know?

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:58.680
<v Speaker 1>You might think this company that you own, um, you know,

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:02.240
<v Speaker 1>has the balance sheet and income statement to uh persevere

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:05.560
<v Speaker 1>through this environment, and then reality hits like a pie

0:11:05.679 --> 0:11:10.440
<v Speaker 1>of face. So um, that's why earning season will be

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:13.880
<v Speaker 1>so super important because while we won't have a full quarter,

0:11:14.000 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 1>test will have um, you know, the latter half of

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:22.200
<v Speaker 1>March for fiscal year quarterly earnings report, but we certainly

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 1>will start to hear company guidance and and I think

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 1>that's when reality will hit. Yeah, diet, I wanted to

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:51.559
<v Speaker 1>bring up a good question from a listener on Twitter,

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 1>UH and see what your thoughts are. His handle is

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>at j y Squall, and he said, I'm watching for

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 1>this week's episode to understand how can the market be

0:12:03.120 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 1>up when the jobless claims are skyrocketing? Now, specifically, I

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>think I can answer his question for that day. He

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:12.959
<v Speaker 1>he wrote to us on Thursday, when President Trump had

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:17.200
<v Speaker 1>tweeted about his hopes for Saudi Arabia and Russia to

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 1>UH cut oil production to to bolster that market. And

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that was a big part of that bounce

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:25.679
<v Speaker 1>that day. It's sort of faded as the day went on,

0:12:25.720 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 1>as people realized maybe this was a little bit of

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 1>wishful thinking on the presence part. But in the bigger

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 1>scheme of things, you know, we you see these ferocious

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:36.719
<v Speaker 1>rebounds in the middle of bear markets like we saw

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 1>in fact, you know, the Dow was technically in a

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 1>in a bull market that, like like Sarah wrote about,

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 1>up off its lows. I'm just trying to figure out

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 1>if you have any sense of who does the buying

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 1>at that point. I mean to me, it's almost as

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:55.440
<v Speaker 1>if traders understand sort of the playbook for a bear market,

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 1>that you get these huge bounces in the middle of

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 1>a market that is in the longer term trending downward.

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:04.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean, do you think it's as simple as that,

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of these fast twitch traders that that sort of

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 1>take command of the market at times like this when

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 1>real fundamental investors may be still on the sidelines more

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:17.439
<v Speaker 1>or less, there is a lot of cash on the sidelines.

0:13:17.520 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Still surprising to me actually, um, considering how long and

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:25.680
<v Speaker 1>far the school market was. But you know, everyone likes

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:27.600
<v Speaker 1>to look in the rear view mirror in two thousand

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 1>and eight, two thousand and nine were so horrible that

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people kept cash on the sidelines. What's

0:13:33.600 --> 0:13:38.679
<v Speaker 1>um making it very difficult for investors in the in

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the here and now is that for the last thirty

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 1>days or so, the stock moves have been plus or

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 1>minus five percent. That's on heard of. That's an unprecedented

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:54.080
<v Speaker 1>type of alatility. We're a big believer in dollar cost averaging. Uh.

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 1>If we have found great opportunities in the market because

0:13:57.400 --> 0:14:00.319
<v Speaker 1>of this set off, and you think the catalysts there

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:03.200
<v Speaker 1>for the future, we wouldn't go full out and buy

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the biggest position UM we would normally hold in the portfolio.

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a really good strategy for all investors.

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:15.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, leg into the position, um, because tomorrow maybe

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 1>down or tomorrow might be up. So UM, i'd like

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 1>to I'd like to offer that really time tested advice.

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 1>And UM, yeah, this is once we once we there

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 1>are two hundred and sixties seven drugs in trial right now,

0:14:33.000 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 1>whether to ameliorate or be a potential vaccine for the coronavirus.

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Something is going to work. You know, they're they're making

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 1>do with antibiotics or old malaria UM drugs that are

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 1>on the shelf that they're trying to dust off. But

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 1>we're going to find something. And this volatility is because

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>people just don't now and we do need some some

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 1>hope and resolution in terms of the disease to help

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:06.680
<v Speaker 1>us look forward for the longer term. But I will say,

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 1>in terms of your comment about you know, how could

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the market be up when John was claims are so high.

0:15:13.880 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 1>The market is an anticipatory animal and we like to

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 1>look forward. UM. I don't think anybody thinks this is

0:15:22.840 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 1>going to be the peak in the job was claims

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Um but the markets will advance, uh when they can

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 1>see beyond that, and that's super important. Over the next

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 1>six to twelve months. Investors are looking at far out.

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 1>So you mentioned dollar cost averaging, so you can spread

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 1>it out. But of course timing the market is virtually impossible,

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 1>even for some of the biggest professionals out there, but

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 1>for those who are dying to try to figure out

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 1>if the bottom has passed, when one is best to

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 1>get in. Is it typically better to be earlier or

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 1>is it typically better to be late and be sure

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>at least that we're headed on the way up and

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 1>things are ameliorating or getting better. That is the age

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 1>old question. I have so many clients who who who

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 1>think you know exactly you know? Should I be earlier?

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Should I wake till everything is good? And what happens

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:21.240
<v Speaker 1>is if you wait till everything is great, then you're

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 1>afraid to invest because you think he's peaked. So you

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:30.120
<v Speaker 1>know value you know, and particularly are so we do

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 1>tend to be early. But I do, like, I really

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 1>do love the idea of dollar cost averaging in that's amazing.

0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:41.960
<v Speaker 1>You said two hundred and sixties. Some drugs are in

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:46.920
<v Speaker 1>trial right now for something either too as a vaccine.

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess we were to treat the symptoms of the virus.

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:56.520
<v Speaker 1>It's amazing, isn't it brings me? Brings me uh to

0:16:56.920 --> 0:17:01.600
<v Speaker 1>uh point you made in this note uh opportunistic realization

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 1>of profits uh meaning you know, selling your your winners

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 1>when they've when they've may be gone a little too

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 1>far where you've at least you know, been able to

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:12.480
<v Speaker 1>ride them a long time. And you you mentioned Jilliad,

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the stock appreciated because of its has this army of

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 1>anti viral medications uh potentially to use in the fighting

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:23.919
<v Speaker 1>assist fires. I've noticed. I mean, it seems like there's

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:28.480
<v Speaker 1>been in the midst of all this panic selling, there's

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 1>been almost um an irrational exuberance towards some of these

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:36.359
<v Speaker 1>drug stocks. You know, I remember the Maderna Pharmaceuticals, very small,

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:40.959
<v Speaker 1>uh drug developer. Is that part of it with with

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:43.880
<v Speaker 1>why you you may have trimmed some of the Giliad steak?

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:46.919
<v Speaker 1>Is it? Are people just getting a little too excited

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:49.440
<v Speaker 1>about some of these drug makers? Do you think, well,

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:53.639
<v Speaker 1>we still like the valuation of Gilead and um and

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:56.400
<v Speaker 1>you do you know, I'd like to think that investors

0:17:56.400 --> 0:17:59.639
<v Speaker 1>when looking for companies that might be winners here in

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the event against COVID nineteen. When they saw that gilly

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 1>I could be one of the winners and then looked

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:09.640
<v Speaker 1>at their batton sheet and their cash flow statement said oh, well,

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:13.720
<v Speaker 1>that's a juicy dividend that I can feel quite confident about. That.

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:16.679
<v Speaker 1>It was a key prompt thought process for them in

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:20.919
<v Speaker 1>terms of um, Gillia as a stock in the portfolio. Um,

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 1>but it did run up a little bit. And um

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:26.879
<v Speaker 1>and while they do have an army avantiid their old drugs,

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:29.520
<v Speaker 1>and that's you know, one of them, for example, help

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:34.040
<v Speaker 1>cure help, see right, help, it's helping to eradicated, which

0:18:34.080 --> 0:18:37.440
<v Speaker 1>is amazing. Um. You know, we did get a little

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:41.119
<v Speaker 1>worried that if there were too many hopes pinned from Disappear,

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:44.040
<v Speaker 1>which is the one that is being tested in China

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 1>and in the US right now, that there might be

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:50.399
<v Speaker 1>a near term self. And one of our disciplines is

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 1>if stock appreciates above five per cent in the portfolio,

0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:57.480
<v Speaker 1>we're automatically going to scale it back because we don't

0:18:57.520 --> 0:19:02.199
<v Speaker 1>want any name to be too big. That's interesting, So

0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 1>yet you have a five percent cap on on any

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 1>single holding in the portfolio. Yeah, it's just it's proven

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 1>to be a good one. Yeah. Well, Mike, some would

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 1>say that certainly, as you alluded to that some of

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:17.880
<v Speaker 1>these moves in the healthcare names are or have been

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 1>a bit crazy. So you know what time it is, then,

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:26.240
<v Speaker 1>I guess it's that time. Um, Sarah, we got a

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:30.959
<v Speaker 1>great uh call over the podcast hotline. For once in

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:33.960
<v Speaker 1>my life, I have the number handy, so I'll take

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the pressure off of you the only time, Mike. This

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:39.119
<v Speaker 1>is the only time I haven't never had. So the

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 1>number is six four six three to four three four nine. Oh.

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 1>So please, if you saw something crazy in the markets,

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:49.720
<v Speaker 1>give us a call, leave us a voicemail and maybe

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 1>we'll play your voicemail on the show. And if you

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:55.440
<v Speaker 1>have any other comments, Uh, we're happy to be very

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:57.440
<v Speaker 1>happy to hear from you. But we got a call

0:19:57.520 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 1>all the way from Hong Kong a listener named Gerald,

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:03.240
<v Speaker 1>So let's listen to what he had to say. Hi,

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:05.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to cheat just a little bit, you know,

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:11.680
<v Speaker 1>like Mike. First, what I saw was a webcast from

0:20:11.800 --> 0:20:15.639
<v Speaker 1>a Tree Capital. In it, their co founder Howard Marks

0:20:15.880 --> 0:20:18.920
<v Speaker 1>mentioned a memo he wrote twenty years ago with a

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:23.720
<v Speaker 1>quote that says you cannot predict the nixt recession or

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:27.720
<v Speaker 1>the next market sell off, but you can prepare for it,

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 1>so for a wisdom as usual. Then the crazy part

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:36.400
<v Speaker 1>hits me. Just three months ago, when fund managers were

0:20:36.400 --> 0:20:42.119
<v Speaker 1>making theasts. How many times have you heard some very smart,

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:47.960
<v Speaker 1>very respectable managers say that although the market is richly valued,

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:52.159
<v Speaker 1>they could see absolutely no reason for a recession in

0:20:52.240 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the next six to twelve months. I may have heard

0:20:55.840 --> 0:21:00.160
<v Speaker 1>this a dozen times on various podcasts, and I at

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 1>every time there was no argument from me. These are

0:21:03.600 --> 0:21:07.639
<v Speaker 1>smart and successful investment professionals. But that was just three

0:21:07.680 --> 0:21:11.359
<v Speaker 1>months ago. It is crazy how things can change on

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:16.000
<v Speaker 1>a dime like that. How far in the future can

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:20.240
<v Speaker 1>we really see? Yeah, I think he makes a great point.

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:24.120
<v Speaker 1>You think of all those look ahead uh forecast pieces

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 1>that people spent countless hours on and you know about

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 1>a month end of the year, they're all sort of

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:31.439
<v Speaker 1>null and void. What do you take exception, Sarah with

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 1>him saying I cheat a little bit. I thought you

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:35.359
<v Speaker 1>were going to say, that's what you agreed with. He

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 1>was calling you out. But it does remind me of

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 1>one line, I won't I won't call the shop out.

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 1>But there was one line I read earlier this year

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:43.720
<v Speaker 1>that said, maybe the best reason to be bullish is

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 1>the fact that there's no reason to be bearished. And

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:49.639
<v Speaker 1>then you have all of this evolve and it just

0:21:49.720 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 1>goes to show really it's nothing anyone could have predicted,

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:57.280
<v Speaker 1>right right, Yeah, Diane, I'm wondering how you handle something

0:21:57.359 --> 0:21:59.120
<v Speaker 1>like that. I mean, it feels like not so long ago,

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:02.879
<v Speaker 1>everyone had to be a European political science expert to

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 1>get through the debt crisis, you know. Then we were

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 1>all became sort of oil field experts and credit oil

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:15.919
<v Speaker 1>credit experts, and then Iranian experts and US trying to

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:20.159
<v Speaker 1>trade experts. But I gotta say having to become a

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 1>an expert on viruses is something new. Was It must

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 1>get overwhelming as a fund manager to try to have

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:30.560
<v Speaker 1>to react to crisis after crisis like this, especially when

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 1>so many of them turned out to be sort of

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:35.360
<v Speaker 1>false alarms, and then all of a sudden you get

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:37.639
<v Speaker 1>hit by something like this. I mean, is this this

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>must have been one of the more stressful episodes of

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:44.879
<v Speaker 1>your career. I would imagine, Well, I care deeply about

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 1>our clients and my most important job and we have

0:22:48.359 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of dear friends in Hong Kong. My most

0:22:51.119 --> 0:22:53.359
<v Speaker 1>important job is really to hold their hands during this

0:22:53.560 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 1>time and say, you know, let's you know, we're going

0:22:57.560 --> 0:23:01.360
<v Speaker 1>to be vigilant here. We're coming through the portfolio. We're

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:04.440
<v Speaker 1>doing it for you. We're going to lead out the

0:23:04.760 --> 0:23:07.680
<v Speaker 1>names that should be leaded out in mature. We're investing

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:10.359
<v Speaker 1>in the ones that will prosper for you and have

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:13.919
<v Speaker 1>power for you and your portfolio going forward. So that

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 1>surprisingly um comes to be called upon more often than not,

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the job of saying this is our job, this is

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 1>what we love to do, and we love to take

0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 1>care of you. You know, trust us. We're going to

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:29.359
<v Speaker 1>guide you through this and come out the other side

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:32.400
<v Speaker 1>for your investment portfolio. Okay, Diana, I just hope you're

0:23:32.440 --> 0:23:36.960
<v Speaker 1>washing your hands after you're holding all those hands. Right, sir,

0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 1>what's the craziest thing you saw in markets this week?

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:42.679
<v Speaker 1>So my goes back to what we are discussing as

0:23:42.680 --> 0:23:45.399
<v Speaker 1>it relates to earning seasons. So Jonathan Golf, who had

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 1>on the podcast a while back from Credit Sweeze, he

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:53.600
<v Speaker 1>had a statistic saying that last week, seventeen percent of

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 1>analysts revised their estimates, So that's actually a lot. That

0:23:58.040 --> 0:24:00.960
<v Speaker 1>would amount to about four times of arder or fifteen

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:04.120
<v Speaker 1>times a year, So it's very high. But it's the

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 1>problem is, and what's crazy is it's just not fast enough. Still.

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Estimates continue to be stale, and it seems as though

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:14.439
<v Speaker 1>bottoms up sells size. Analysts just can't keep up with

0:24:14.520 --> 0:24:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the news flow or even just try to figure out

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 1>what companies are going to go about reporting. So it's

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 1>just pretty crazy because we're heading into this earning season

0:24:23.600 --> 0:24:27.199
<v Speaker 1>and we don't really have a consensus for the market

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 1>to base anything off of. I agree, I and I

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:32.480
<v Speaker 1>read that story of yours certain In fact, I quoted

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:34.800
<v Speaker 1>it on the Tom Keans radio show to think you

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:37.199
<v Speaker 1>show you how how much I'm paying attention there, and

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:39.680
<v Speaker 1>that is It's true. Though you think in a normal

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 1>world you would think seventeen percent of earnings estimates were changed.

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like a massive number, but it seems low

0:24:46.040 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 1>in this environment. You know, it seems like every single

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:51.879
<v Speaker 1>estimate out there should be changed. It's crazy, Diane, have

0:24:51.960 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 1>you seen anything crazy in markets this week? I know

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:58.440
<v Speaker 1>it was a pretty calm week. Well, we've got two

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:03.200
<v Speaker 1>conflicting stories. Will there be uh, because of cohabitation and

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:06.919
<v Speaker 1>self quarantine me with your significant other, Will there be

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:11.719
<v Speaker 1>a baby boom? Um or countered by you know, post

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:16.119
<v Speaker 1>the major quarantine process in China. Is there going to

0:25:16.200 --> 0:25:18.879
<v Speaker 1>be a spike in divorce rates? And there was a

0:25:18.920 --> 0:25:22.639
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg article that said, um, and you know it's from China,

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 1>so you know, we're not sure, but that that divorce

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 1>rates are picking up steadily and um and that maybe, uh,

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 1>they're going to put some laws into place. They have

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:35.720
<v Speaker 1>a third day cooling off terry when they go back

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 1>to work and maybe say, oh, well, it wasn't so bad.

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:44.400
<v Speaker 1>It's it's crazy how it's changing everything in society, like

0:25:44.680 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that. You would never think, you know, it

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:49.920
<v Speaker 1>would have that big an effect. That reminds me sort

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:52.720
<v Speaker 1>of another crazy thing we had offered to us from

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:56.439
<v Speaker 1>our our friend Ben Emmons at Medley Global Advisors. He

0:25:56.480 --> 0:26:00.000
<v Speaker 1>pointed out that Bloomberg story mentioning and Diane, you remind

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:02.199
<v Speaker 1>ided me of this talking about a baby boom. But

0:26:02.320 --> 0:26:05.200
<v Speaker 1>he pointed out the story that there is a shortage

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:08.760
<v Speaker 1>of condoms in the world. I guess because because the

0:26:08.840 --> 0:26:14.760
<v Speaker 1>raw materials are being used for for the gloves so, um,

0:26:14.760 --> 0:26:16.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe that baby boom is not not such a

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:20.919
<v Speaker 1>wild idea. It sounds crazy, but Diane, I'm actually curious.

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, people think about demographics. When you think about

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 1>long term investing opportunities. If you think of the possibility

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 1>for a baby boom, could you imagine anyone out there

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe betting on that or investing based on the possibility

0:26:34.280 --> 0:26:37.800
<v Speaker 1>of a baby boom coming forwards? Of course, you know,

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:41.440
<v Speaker 1>for nine eleven, there was some thought that maybe that tragedy,

0:26:41.520 --> 0:26:44.720
<v Speaker 1>that horrific tragedy, would cause people to think about and

0:26:44.800 --> 0:26:47.399
<v Speaker 1>then we didn't see, we didn't see much of a

0:26:47.440 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 1>baby boom. But when it's from that, but when it's

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:56.879
<v Speaker 1>a prolonged period of cohabitation, and um, I think I

0:26:56.920 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 1>think that it would be surprising to see people either

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:05.480
<v Speaker 1>duck pets or decided to have a family and um,

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:08.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of them into our portfolios Propter and

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:13.359
<v Speaker 1>gamble and certainly Pampers you know, might be right there

0:27:13.400 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 1>you go, it's you know, I actually did predict a

0:27:16.840 --> 0:27:19.359
<v Speaker 1>baby boom on Twitter early on in this and I

0:27:19.400 --> 0:27:21.720
<v Speaker 1>was joking, but I'm gonna resend the joking part of it.

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:23.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm now now I'm going to say that was a

0:27:23.680 --> 0:27:26.800
<v Speaker 1>serious It was very early to Mike in case anyone

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:31.960
<v Speaker 1>that was a serious prediction, not a joke. I'm going

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:35.000
<v Speaker 1>on the record train. All right. Well, I'll end it

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:37.679
<v Speaker 1>with the craziest thing I saw. And God bless the

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:39.560
<v Speaker 1>New York Post. Whenever I think I've run out of

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:42.360
<v Speaker 1>crazy things in the markets, they're they're They're always there

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 1>for me. Uh and Sarah. This is interesting for two reasons. Obviously,

0:27:46.359 --> 0:27:48.399
<v Speaker 1>like yourself, everyone is supposed to be staying in their

0:27:48.440 --> 0:27:52.040
<v Speaker 1>apartments in New York. You're not supposed to be going out. Um,

0:27:52.080 --> 0:27:55.359
<v Speaker 1>but you're familiar with the famous statue on Wall Street

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:59.159
<v Speaker 1>of the charging bowl. It's called everyone knows that famous

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 1>iconic at you. Well, I'm gonta left. The New York

0:28:01.600 --> 0:28:05.159
<v Speaker 1>Post take it away here with their headline nude woman

0:28:05.359 --> 0:28:11.760
<v Speaker 1>ignores coronavirus warnings to straddle the charging bull statue. Did

0:28:11.760 --> 0:28:14.840
<v Speaker 1>you see that? So this the snaked woman decided to

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:18.159
<v Speaker 1>go and jump on the back of the charging bull statue.

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:23.720
<v Speaker 1>This is really sanitary, I know, and I guess it.

0:28:23.800 --> 0:28:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Look there's no one around, I mean no one's probably

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 1>touched the bull in in days. I will say she

0:28:28.640 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 1>wasn't completely nude though. I I researched this. I looked

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:34.919
<v Speaker 1>at the pictures. She had a cowboy had on and

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:39.120
<v Speaker 1>some New York fashion, yeah, some kind of bandanna around

0:28:39.120 --> 0:28:41.400
<v Speaker 1>her face. And this being the New York Post, you

0:28:41.440 --> 0:28:43.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't get just one picture. You got a full five

0:28:43.920 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 1>picture photo essay of this incident. Um And as the

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Post points out, I am cheating a little bit. The

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 1>guy in Hong Kong's right, I'm cheating a little bit

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:53.960
<v Speaker 1>because this was actually last week, but it was wasn't

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 1>published until after we UH published the podcast. So I

0:28:57.240 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 1>feel like I'm in the clear there. And where's the

0:28:58.760 --> 0:29:03.440
<v Speaker 1>connection to markets? Mike, I get the charging, but well

0:29:03.440 --> 0:29:06.760
<v Speaker 1>here it is. Here it is, And I'll just let

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:10.080
<v Speaker 1>you make your own conclusion based on the final sentence

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:13.240
<v Speaker 1>of the New York Post story, which says the unsanitary

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 1>stunt came as US stocks rallied for a third straight

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:21.080
<v Speaker 1>day with the DAL finishing up and fifty two points.

0:29:20.720 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 1>There's a connection, so they might want to get her

0:29:24.320 --> 0:29:26.520
<v Speaker 1>back out there. I don't know. I'm just just just

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 1>in case that's hysterical. All right, Well, I'm sure going

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:33.480
<v Speaker 1>forwards there will be up plenty more for us to

0:29:33.560 --> 0:29:36.000
<v Speaker 1>choose from and to include. But Diane JOFFI, thank you

0:29:36.000 --> 0:29:38.520
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining the show this week. Thank you guys,

0:29:38.520 --> 0:29:48.479
<v Speaker 1>it was really a lot of fun What Goes Up.

0:29:48.560 --> 0:29:51.240
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back next week. Until then, you can find

0:29:51.320 --> 0:29:54.040
<v Speaker 1>us on the Blueberg Terminal website and app or ever

0:29:54.120 --> 0:29:56.560
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts. We'd love it if you took

0:29:56.560 --> 0:29:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the time to rate interview the show on Apple podcast

0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:01.600
<v Speaker 1>so more listeners can find us. And you can find

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:05.120
<v Speaker 1>us on Twitter, follow me at Sara Ponzach and Mike

0:30:05.360 --> 0:30:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Is at Reunonymous. You can also follow Bloomberg Podcasts at Podcasts.

0:30:10.400 --> 0:30:12.960
<v Speaker 1>What Goes Up is produced by Topur Forehead. The head

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:16.320
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg podcast is Francesca Levie. Thanks for listening, See

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 1>you next time.