WEBVTT - Markets, ETFs, and Commodities

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.480
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>called Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com Slash podcast. Geopolitics certainly moving markets

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:26.000
<v Speaker 1>today and pretty much every day this week as well.

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>But let's step back take a look at some of

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 1>these fundamentals. Because we do have inflation, we do have

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 1>rising interest rates, we do have a slowing economy. Howard

0:00:34.120 --> 0:00:37.199
<v Speaker 1>risk assets to perform in that environment. Let's check in

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>with Mark yesco CEO, CEE, IO and founder of Morgan

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Creep Capital Management, located in some third rate hamlet called

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Chapel Hill, North Carolina. I mean, I guess you couldn't

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:52.240
<v Speaker 1>find any office space in Mark. Paul's a duke guy

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:56.160
<v Speaker 1>in Durham, North Carolina. But we'll check in with Mark anyway, Mark,

0:00:56.560 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>what are you telling your clients here as a kind

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 1>raise all some of these you know, these bricks in

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>this wall of worry here. Now it's a great, great

0:01:06.760 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 1>point and uh, you know, congrats to the boys at

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:11.959
<v Speaker 1>the University of New Jersey at Durham down the road.

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Very good. Um, but look, we we are cautious in

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the current environment. You know, we were living in a

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 1>world of financial repression. As to me is the biggest problem.

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Savers are just being punished with these low interest rates.

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>And although the Feds making noises about raising I actually

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>don't think they can. So that'll cause that'll take one

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:37.840
<v Speaker 1>of the stressors away when they finally do what I'll

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 1>call the Powell pivot and he finally admits that he

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>really can't raise rates. You mentioned that economic growth is

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 1>slowing very dramatically. We're just gonna see negative growth in

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Europe in the first quarter, could possibly see little zero

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>growth in the US. And then corporate profits are rolling over.

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Earnings estimates are being slashed. So we feel that you

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>should be head with a capital duh. And hedge funds

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 1>are are likely to have a much better year this

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 1>year than they did last year. We still do like

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 1>one area, which is oil. We think energy is an

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 1>interesting place to be. Things like MLPs good place to hide.

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:19.680
<v Speaker 1>They're just very very cheap because even if everybody wants

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:21.600
<v Speaker 1>an e V. It will take a thirty years to

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 1>everyone to have an EV, so it's going to take

0:02:24.320 --> 0:02:29.919
<v Speaker 1>a while before oil is not necessary. That what's true,

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:31.239
<v Speaker 1>that's that's the only thing that you know, some of

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:35.680
<v Speaker 1>us have range anxiety, right, we like to travel long distances. Um.

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 1>But but then I think the last thing we're telling

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:42.679
<v Speaker 1>people is, uh, don't really stress too much about the

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:48.359
<v Speaker 1>noise of geopolitics, really focus on the signal, and um,

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, we think there's lower risk of some big event.

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 1>And then I think many in the DC area would

0:02:56.200 --> 0:03:00.679
<v Speaker 1>have us believe, but um, you know, we're we're we're cautious,

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:03.960
<v Speaker 1>but but not completely out of markets. So why do

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>you think we've seen such an outperformance of you know,

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 1>we were just graphing oil. Um, since the pandemic against

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the producers and the underlying commodity has done so much better.

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 1>It's great, great, great point. And I think that the challenges,

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 1>particularly in the US, we had a lot of producers

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 1>that were over levered and a whole bunch of them

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 1>went out of business. So that clearly impacts the indices

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:34.680
<v Speaker 1>that that you know, the broad baskets of those producers.

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 1>There are some individual companies you know my favorite Diamondback Energy.

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 1>I would say Fang has outperformed Fang, Facebook, Amazon, Netflix,

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Google over the past year. Again this year, we think

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 1>it all out performed for a while. Uh. And then

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:53.720
<v Speaker 1>there's a other company like ovent Iv and Marathon Oxy

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 1>which has done really really well, outperformed oil. But you're right,

0:03:57.240 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the basket has underperformed because there's just a lot of

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>companies that uh. And this across all industries. You know,

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 1>we we extended credit to not so credit worthy businesses. Um.

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 1>I say we, I mean the economy, and some of

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:16.800
<v Speaker 1>those went out of business I guess in in the

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 1>lockdowns after the pandemic, and it's it's really been tough.

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's one of the reasons oil prices

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:26.840
<v Speaker 1>surged so much, is so much supply came offline. So

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:29.599
<v Speaker 1>Mark in the fixed income space, do you guys see

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:32.920
<v Speaker 1>opportunities there? Again, we have a federal reserve that is

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:36.480
<v Speaker 1>clearly signaled a rising interest rates and if you look

0:04:36.480 --> 0:04:38.839
<v Speaker 1>at the w I r P functional on the Bloomberg terminal,

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 1>could be as many seven hikes two. How do you

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:45.159
<v Speaker 1>think about that as a rates to fixed income opportunities? Yeah,

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:48.039
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna take the under. I'm gonna take the way

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 1>under on that. I don't think there'll be anywhere close

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 1>to seven. I don't even think there'll be, you know,

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 1>three or four. I think they probably will try to

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 1>hike here in March. I think they'll probably whimp out

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:05.600
<v Speaker 1>and not do fifty basis points. Um. You know, the

0:05:05.680 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>challenges have been behind the curve since two thousand. Uh,

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 1>for a hundred and something years, the average short term

0:05:13.720 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 1>rate roughly equal nominal GDP growth. And you know that

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been true for eight years. And I think they

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 1>should get back to a normal functioning interest rate environment. Uh,

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:31.839
<v Speaker 1>because that's what capitalism is predicated on. That you know,

0:05:31.880 --> 0:05:33.719
<v Speaker 1>you can put your capital at work and get and

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 1>get paid for it. Think about being in Europe or Japan,

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 1>you have to pay banks to keep your money. At

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:44.599
<v Speaker 1>least here you get zero point five. That's why we

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>actually came up with this thing csh new E t

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 1>F that takes advantage of spack arbitrage to give people

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:55.920
<v Speaker 1>something you know, we think low single digits on their

0:05:55.960 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 1>their savings. Because we think traditional bonds, high yield bonds

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:03.400
<v Speaker 1>are very high. Taking credit risk, you're taking duration risk.

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Both of which look kind of dicey in this market.

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:10.480
<v Speaker 1>So having at least something on your your savings leaving

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 1>makes a lot of sense. All right, Mark, thank you

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:16.920
<v Speaker 1>so much. We appreciate checking in with you. Mark. Yesco

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:20.720
<v Speaker 1>uh He is with CEO, c I O and founder

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Creek Capital Management based in Chapel Hill, North Carolina,

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:28.839
<v Speaker 1>which is actually a very very beautiful community there, despite

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the University of North Carolina. And you want to see

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 1>such a great school and they have such a great

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 1>basketball history. Yeah, just not quite as great as their

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 1>friends down route fifteen five oh one at the Duke University.

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, we all respect the u n C. Chapel

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Hill there. You're good, good hoops and we love playing

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 1>against them. We have our E t S. She wants

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 1>to talk ETFs, dying to talk ETFs. I was gonna say,

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Maestro mice Straw maybe has taken there's already an et

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 1>US are here E t F S arena in the

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>house right now. And we were talking about an e

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:10.280
<v Speaker 1>t F fund earlier, weren't we U E s H

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 1>hre we talking about E s H earlier? Which is

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 1>um no, I think those are the sp futures. No,

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 1>it was it was some e t F fund that

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 1>somehow dealt with SPACs in a way to that's leverage

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 1>on leverage there, Katie, What do you got for us?

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 1>We can talk about spack ets, we can talk about

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 1>fix income et s because it doesn't sound exciting, but

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 1>there have been a ton of really interesting launches when

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 1>it comes to fix income e t s this week.

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, just today you had State Street and Blackstone

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 1>launch and e t F that will be half high yield,

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:51.760
<v Speaker 1>half clos and they're trying to really appeal to the

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 1>retail crowd there, which caught my eye. You also have

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of black black Rock alumni debuting UH seven

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>junk on et just today, and then earlier this week

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:05.760
<v Speaker 1>you also had a CDs e t F debut. So

0:08:05.880 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 1>it's been a really fascinating week for just bond ETFs

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 1>in general. Speaking of leverage on leverage, Yeah, who buys

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 1>ETFs these days? Is it retail? Is it institutional? Is

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 1>it hedge funds? These things? It's a really interesting mix

0:08:20.400 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 1>of both. I mean, institutional and professional traders love et

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 1>s because the liquidity there is so much greater than

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 1>you would get in buying any sort of individual bond.

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:32.720
<v Speaker 1>So they use them often as liquidity sleeves, but you

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:37.760
<v Speaker 1>also have a very sleeve liquidity sleeve. I do too.

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I try to put that in stories whenever I can.

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 1>But I mean they do appeal appeal to retail because

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 1>some of the products, or some of the asset classes

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:47.200
<v Speaker 1>you can get exposure to through an e t F.

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you're a retail trader, you're never gonna

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:52.959
<v Speaker 1>be buying, you know, Russian debt, You're never going to

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 1>be buying oil futures, those types of asset classes that

0:08:56.840 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>you really can't get exposure to, but now you can

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 1>through an e t F. You invite it on any

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of brokerage platform. So it's Tony from UBS ever

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:07.080
<v Speaker 1>calls me and pitches an e t F to me,

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 1>that might be the end of our Oh no, are

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 1>you not in E t F. I don't know, Yeah,

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I guess I can. I mean that the low fees,

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 1>I guess they're targeted, which is pretty cool. I don't know,

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 1>it just feels a little I'd love to see s

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 1>h C s mark Yusco. Right, yes, exactly exactly. So

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:30.200
<v Speaker 1>we were talking to mark Yusco about and by the way,

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 1>you know how I found that I couldn't remember what

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 1>I had typed in, and I just typed an h

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I S t go and it shows you the history

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 1>of all the commands that you've typed down the Bloombergs.

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:43.560
<v Speaker 1>You can scroll back. That is a very cool in itself.

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:45.960
<v Speaker 1>That is a good another function. You know, I was

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 1>reading about this fund and I was so mad that

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:52.679
<v Speaker 1>I didn't write about it because it's really interesting. Basically that, um,

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 1>it feels like he's pitching this e t F A

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 1>is you can use it almost as a money market fund,

0:09:56.920 --> 0:09:59.040
<v Speaker 1>like just store your cash here. You're probably going to

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:03.680
<v Speaker 1>get a few basis above treasury is not very exciting,

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 1>but you know it should work all right. So the

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:10.280
<v Speaker 1>new issue market for e t f s, where are

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>we kind of over the last twelve months? Is it

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 1>accelerating and we kind of peaked on fire? They say, yeah, no,

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:20.840
<v Speaker 1>you saw a record number of e t f s

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 1>launched last year, which is interesting to me because they've

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:26.480
<v Speaker 1>all been mostly active and thematic. But if you look

0:10:26.480 --> 0:10:28.559
<v Speaker 1>at where the money is going, it's all too pretty

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:32.079
<v Speaker 1>vanilla funds. It's all SMP five hundred index tracking funds.

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:35.600
<v Speaker 1>So you're seeing this huge surge in issue once. But

0:10:35.880 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean those new funds are attracting very little of

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 1>the actual money that's flowing into the e t F market,

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:44.200
<v Speaker 1>which is largely just dominated by Vanguard and black Rock UM.

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 1>And Vanguard has been the boss of e t s

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 1>really since their inceptions. Right, they own, they own this market.

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 1>They well, okay, this is the storyline that you have

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 1>to watch very closely. Black or Vanguard's share of the

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>e t F market has grown every since go year,

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 1>for twenty years straight. Black Rock is still your incumbent.

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I think they control about thirty four percent of all

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:10.080
<v Speaker 1>U S E t F assets, Vanguards at twenty nine

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 1>per cent. So that flippening it's going to happen one day,

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:15.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's not this year. But I also just think

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 1>because of you know, the uh, the legend of Jack

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Bogel and to me, e t F s fits so

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:25.319
<v Speaker 1>well with that passive investing legend. But of course they

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 1>probably have active investing e t f s there as well.

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:30.440
<v Speaker 1>They do, and Vanguard will be quick to tell you

0:11:30.480 --> 0:11:32.080
<v Speaker 1>that they do have active ETFs. But if you look

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 1>at their AD two product and they just have a

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 1>D two products, which is also mind blowing. It's mostly passive.

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:40.439
<v Speaker 1>That's where all the money is. And I SPACE E

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 1>t F gets all the Bloomberg News written stuff on

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:46.719
<v Speaker 1>E t F and E t F. E t F

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 1>go is a great et F and b I E

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 1>t F s to get the research there. Alright, let's

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:59.559
<v Speaker 1>talk global oil Brent crude nine cents. We were on

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 1>I guess we still are on a one watch. I'm

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:04.240
<v Speaker 1>hearing some hundred dollar numbers coming out of Wall Street.

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:08.200
<v Speaker 1>But when we want to talk oil or commodities, pork bellies, crypto,

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:12.200
<v Speaker 1>we go to Mike McLane. He's from Bloomberg Intelligence Commodities. Uh.

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Analysts there. Uh, Mike, you're in a Bloomberg Interactive broker studio.

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 1>He's here, folks. Usually he's down in Miami Beach kicking

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:22.080
<v Speaker 1>back at the pool with a cocktail with an umbrella

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 1>in it. But he is here in New York working

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:26.720
<v Speaker 1>this week. Mike, what do you make a crude oil? Here?

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Are we gonna see that one handle? I think it's

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:31.680
<v Speaker 1>part of the process that it did in two thousand

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 1>and eight. Elevator escalator up, elevator down. So right now

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:37.599
<v Speaker 1>we're in that upstage today is not so great, but

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 1>it's factoring a pretty significant armed conflict between you know,

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 1>with in Europe with a large exporter of crudel and

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 1>a large exporter of grains. To me, that's otherwise. Once

0:12:47.559 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 1>we get through this period, it happens, are not crudel

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 1>is going back to fifty and that is are below

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:56.200
<v Speaker 1>and because two and two thousand and eight it's peaked

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 1>at one and then dropped the forty um the next

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:01.679
<v Speaker 1>year and then what happened was that we went up

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:03.319
<v Speaker 1>to a hundred for till two thousand eleven. Then the

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 1>whole U. S. Shelle Revolution happened. Oil sands in Canada.

0:13:06.840 --> 0:13:09.319
<v Speaker 1>That's happening again now. The differences Matt loves is the

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 1>evs are really kicking in. That's it's and our consumption

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:15.599
<v Speaker 1>in North America peaked in two thousand eighteen, and so

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>it's starting to head lower. So also the key thing

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 1>is war. Okay, war keeps it elevated and the shorter term,

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 1>but the big picture is higher prices bringing more supply,

0:13:24.640 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's worse this time. So here's what that part

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 1>at that part, I don't we don't see happening yet,

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 1>right We don't see the shale guys recounts pulling more

0:13:33.280 --> 0:13:35.679
<v Speaker 1>oil out of the ground. We don't see Texas pulling

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the trigger. They just don't seem to be downey at

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Why why lagging? So what are we doing right now?

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 1>We're the reciprocal negative negative prices. We're going to do

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the exact opposite within the next year. Might be three

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:49.559
<v Speaker 1>months high prices. Now back to the more enduring trends.

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 1>So let's give you this fact. Crude picked at one

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:55.000
<v Speaker 1>in July m July two thou eight. I think we're

0:13:55.080 --> 0:13:57.200
<v Speaker 1>catch up to p P. I'd be two hundred dollars.

0:13:57.760 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 1>So that's a bear market that's bouncing with an range.

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:02.599
<v Speaker 1>So yes, it's a lot of fear, but this is

0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:04.599
<v Speaker 1>just the facts of the market. If you can, you

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 1>can create more of it. We use less of it.

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:08.840
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I came from a corn mail background.

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:11.079
<v Speaker 1>Twelve percent of our gasoline is from ethanol, which I

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:14.440
<v Speaker 1>know you love. I'm against that. Well, I'm not against

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:16.439
<v Speaker 1>it if you don't care about your motor, you know,

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 1>but it's not good. I don't want to put that

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 1>in my I will drive the extra mile to get

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 1>pure gasoline. Really, I don't want, Yes, you do. I

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 1>don't care, do I you don't care? I don't care?

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 1>All right? So alright, So, but supply and demand here

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 1>OPEC has remained pretty disciplined. Is that something you expect

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 1>to continue it does? Does OPEC really have that much

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 1>spare capacity? Well, one of the things we've been hearing

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 1>from the guests we bring on is okay, Saudi does,

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:50.080
<v Speaker 1>and you can see it with OPEC GO. It's a

0:14:50.120 --> 0:14:54.120
<v Speaker 1>really cool chart for spare capacity. Um. But the guests

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 1>that we have on lately have been doubtful that other

0:14:57.360 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 1>countries really have that much spare capacity. And actually you

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>don't see anything on OPEC GO besides Saudi Arabia and

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the UAE. Don't underestimate how prices bring on supply and commodities.

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I learned what I used to have hair. It's just exactly,

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 1>it's just so entertaining the hair because I remember how

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 1>we were gonna have peak oil ten years ago, what

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 1>really peaked consumption in North America, So that will come.

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 1>The discipline is impressive. Iran could come back and look

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 1>at Venezuela. They have as much oils crude at some

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 1>point that comes back in higher prices, bringing that on.

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 1>But I think what's happening now is more than macro.

0:15:28.640 --> 0:15:31.120
<v Speaker 1>I think we're beginning part of the great reversion of

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 1>this massive period of economic fiscal, monetary stimulus. And so

0:15:36.080 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 1>if if we don't have the war, we face the

0:15:37.720 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 1>fet If we do have the war, we have other

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 1>issues of potential recession. But you know, the unique thing

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 1>that's really been happening lately, I was impressed with how

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:48.280
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin has been a leading indicat If you come in

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the morning like today, bitcoin was heavy the stock markets. Yeah,

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 1>you see, you watch the ticker and then you have

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:55.880
<v Speaker 1>those days when stock markets down and Bitcoin starts taking

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 1>up the stock market files. It's amazing how this crypto

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>has become the leading in the lead the indicator markets.

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 1>But in a big picture, I think that's what comes

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 1>out ahead. So I published a piece recently. As we know,

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:10.040
<v Speaker 1>lack of supply decline to supply increasing adoptions not not

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 1>part of multiples portfolios. Bitcoin and you look at crude

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>oil we're using lesson. You mentioned ethano I driven electric

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and I've had it for eight years now. It's great electric.

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:21.240
<v Speaker 1>You know what, if any beach, I'll drive it all

0:16:21.240 --> 0:16:24.920
<v Speaker 1>the way. It's I lawed you wait, a Shaddy Vault

0:16:25.000 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 1>or a bolt A Vault, so they don't make them anymore,

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:30.000
<v Speaker 1>but it's a hybrid. Yeah, So basically I love that

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 1>car exactly. Um I test drove that when they first

0:16:32.960 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 1>came out. So my thing is, as I've been telling

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Paul and anyone who listened, I love the idea of

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:42.080
<v Speaker 1>electric cars. I love the acceleration of electric cars. I

0:16:42.200 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 1>missed the vibrations and the sound of an internal combustion

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 1>engine and shifting gears obviously as well. I love a

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 1>good hybrid, so I loved the Chevy Vault when that

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:55.760
<v Speaker 1>came out, and I don't know why they don't make

0:16:55.800 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 1>it anymore. I love the BMW now has um An

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 1>X five that has an in line six, so fantastic

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:07.159
<v Speaker 1>power plant. That's the power plant that made them famous,

0:17:07.320 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and a huge like thirty kilowatt battery. So you can

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 1>drive miles without a motor, but when you need it,

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 1>you kick it on. It's your enthusiasm is to me,

0:17:20.200 --> 0:17:22.879
<v Speaker 1>that's profound because that's where it's going, and it's happening

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:25.400
<v Speaker 1>more in the wealthier companies. But I heard last year

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:29.119
<v Speaker 1>in China of new auto sales were e vs. Now.

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:31.280
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned hybrids. My mine gets ninety miles for the

0:17:31.320 --> 0:17:33.440
<v Speaker 1>getting per Gillan and my brother's a mechanics. Is a

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:36.479
<v Speaker 1>cool thing about these is they the engine doesn't work,

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:39.120
<v Speaker 1>card they last forever because we use electric for stop

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 1>and go and the engine only works for the long

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:42.919
<v Speaker 1>distances it works. It's a good system. I wish they

0:17:42.920 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 1>would make cars where you could easily swap out the

0:17:45.000 --> 0:17:47.200
<v Speaker 1>batteries because my concern is I buy one now or

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 1>the thirty kilowatt battery, and in ten years from now

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 1>there's a five kilowatt battery and the same size. Mike McLoone,

0:17:54.119 --> 0:17:55.880
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. We appreciate it. We didn't get

0:17:55.880 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 1>to talk pork bellies. We got tripped up by cryptos

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:01.720
<v Speaker 1>and concentrated orange. You will do or bellies next time,

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:09.199
<v Speaker 1>I guarantee it. This Federal Reserve is looking clearly at

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 1>some of the economic data coming up, and we want

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 1>to check in with Michael McKee covers all things economics

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:17.960
<v Speaker 1>for us. Here, Michael, as you think about this Federal Reserve,

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about hiking rates. W I r P is

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:26.160
<v Speaker 1>saying seven rate hikes this year. What do you think

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the federal reserve is really looking at in terms of data.

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:31.439
<v Speaker 1>Can I also say the word function looks better than

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:35.680
<v Speaker 1>ever you. I know we're on radio you can't see it,

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:40.159
<v Speaker 1>but it's so improved to the old word functions. So

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:42.120
<v Speaker 1>I highly recommend people check it out. The thing that's

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 1>interesting is that we consider one rate hike to be

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty five basis points. That always is that just the

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:51.920
<v Speaker 1>standard rate hike measurement. Well, it became that under Alan

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Greenspan the years before they used to announce what was

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:58.360
<v Speaker 1>going on, they would raise it by all kinds of numbers,

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 1>fifteen or ten or thirty five five, whatever they thought

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:03.919
<v Speaker 1>was necessary, particularly in the Vulcar years when they were

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 1>doing UH monetary aggregates as a guide, so they were

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out how much money they'd be creating.

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:14.439
<v Speaker 1>But um, at this point the Fed is UH looking

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 1>at to answer your question, inflation and unemployment. Unemployment, they

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 1>noted in the Minutes yesterday had pretty much gotten to

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:25.440
<v Speaker 1>where they wanted it to be. It's inflation they're worried about.

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 1>So the Fed is at this point planning on moving

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:33.120
<v Speaker 1>in March. By the way, has employment changed that much

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:34.880
<v Speaker 1>or did they just start to get worried enough about

0:19:34.880 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 1>inflation that they felt like it was changed a huge amount.

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's it's already down basically to almost where

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 1>it was before the pandemic. We were at three point

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:50.120
<v Speaker 1>five three point six, and now we're at three, while

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 1>we're at four, but we were at three point nine.

0:19:52.800 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 1>As more people come back, so pretty much at full employment,

0:19:56.240 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to get the same statistics that we

0:19:58.119 --> 0:20:02.239
<v Speaker 1>got before the pandemic because people have not come back

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:04.920
<v Speaker 1>into the labor force. So that great resignation starts. Yeah,

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:07.240
<v Speaker 1>well we're all working, so I don't I don't see

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 1>any of it's not in this room. But but you're right, man,

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:14.680
<v Speaker 1>it's basis points become the standard. And now they don't

0:20:14.680 --> 0:20:17.440
<v Speaker 1>even do it by basis points. They're doing it by

0:20:18.119 --> 0:20:24.119
<v Speaker 1>range of now and then it will be fifty. And

0:20:24.240 --> 0:20:27.200
<v Speaker 1>what the market is doing, and this is your w I. R. P.

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Lesson is looking at what the effective Fed funds rate

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 1>is likely to be, which is right now around seven

0:20:33.960 --> 0:20:36.360
<v Speaker 1>basis points. So if you look at the next move

0:20:36.400 --> 0:20:38.480
<v Speaker 1>and you see that the implied rate is thirty two

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:41.000
<v Speaker 1>basis points, then that's a twenty five basis point move.

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:44.639
<v Speaker 1>So uh, it's it's a little complicated, but once you

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 1>get used to it. YouTube you know, in terms of

0:20:48.840 --> 0:20:57.920
<v Speaker 1>that um uh measured policy behavior and the transparency that

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the FED wants to I mean, are we gonna stick

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 1>with that throughout the pal FED? Will we ever get

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 1>back to them saying, you know what, let's have an

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 1>emergency meeting and you know what, we'll raise my fifty

0:21:06.760 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 1>basis points now or forty five. Well, they've had emergency meetings.

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 1>They had an emergency meeting, but they can only do

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:15.680
<v Speaker 1>an emergency meeting to cut right, Because the could do

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:19.200
<v Speaker 1>an emergency meeting to raise if they felt it was necessary.

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 1>It's it's hard to do because I'm doubtful you're legally

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 1>they can do it, but you're right, it's it would

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 1>be a shock to markets. Uh. And it was pretty

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:33.199
<v Speaker 1>obvious when we hit the pandemic and markets seized up

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:35.119
<v Speaker 1>and weren't working that they had to cut rate. So

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the meeting, the emergency meeting they held was not a

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:41.959
<v Speaker 1>bad thing. But do you know who was saying this yesterday?

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Actually I was struggling to remember because I'm getting it

0:21:46.680 --> 0:21:49.840
<v Speaker 1>was Daniel D. Martino booth Um, And to be fair,

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:52.120
<v Speaker 1>her book was titled fed Up, so you can tell

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 1>where she's coming from. But she was saying yesterday, you

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:57.959
<v Speaker 1>know this isn't cool because the FED is so careful

0:21:58.000 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to markets, right, they want to spoot

0:22:00.840 --> 0:22:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the markets, but they don't care about the common man

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:07.639
<v Speaker 1>paying five dollars at the pump. If they wanted to

0:22:07.680 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 1>tackle inflation right now, she was she was saying, and

0:22:10.359 --> 0:22:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Paul made a great counter argument that it's really about

0:22:13.119 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the supply chain. If they wanted to fight inflation, they

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:18.879
<v Speaker 1>would just have an emergency meeting and raise fifty basis

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 1>points now and maybe six eight months from now. That

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 1>would slow start to slow business activity. Policy working with

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 1>a lag, so it's not really going to help. I mean,

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 1>we were surprised by retail sales yesterday and how good

0:22:32.880 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 1>they were, and we've been surprised by how strong consumer

0:22:36.280 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 1>credit has been. People want to spend money. Well, retail

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 1>sales disappointed the last two reports. Think about how bad

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:45.119
<v Speaker 1>it was in December, and that was Christmas, but that

0:22:45.280 --> 0:22:48.480
<v Speaker 1>was because October was better, So I mean we pulled

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 1>it forward. That's you're just basically outlining that why it's

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:55.160
<v Speaker 1>so hard for anyone to do monetary policy these days,

0:22:55.320 --> 0:22:58.560
<v Speaker 1>especially when you're working with a blunt instrument like one

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:01.680
<v Speaker 1>interest rate. Well, and of Paul's point, if you're if

0:23:01.960 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 1>it's supply constraints that are causing inflation, you know, if

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:10.120
<v Speaker 1>if I'm paying so much more for my GMC yukon

0:23:10.840 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 1>a T four because they just can't make enough, it

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:17.919
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter if the FED raises rates. Does the FEDS

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 1>going to raise rates on March sixteenth and on March seventeenth.

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:23.119
<v Speaker 1>We aren't going to suddenly have a big supply of

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:25.760
<v Speaker 1>semi conductors that all of a sudden show up. So

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the car problem is going to continue. And that's the issue,

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:33.160
<v Speaker 1>is we bought I mean, we've had several separate issues

0:23:33.200 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 1>that get rolled into one. The semiconductor's issue was a

0:23:37.560 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 1>result of a number of factory problems, and then the

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:45.840
<v Speaker 1>car issues, uh flowed from that. But then we have

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:48.479
<v Speaker 1>other supply chain issues where we ordered so many goods

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:52.120
<v Speaker 1>that they couldn't keep up with the shipping of the mall.

0:23:52.600 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 1>And that's slowly beginning to rationalize, but we're not there yet. Yeah,

0:23:57.280 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 1>we just had the lead class go on from Bloomberg

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Intelligence covers all the ocean shipping companies, the railroads, the

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:04.640
<v Speaker 1>truck and companies. He sees it all, and he says

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:07.720
<v Speaker 1>he consisted going to stretch into next year. You know,

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:09.920
<v Speaker 1>he kind of thought it might be at mid event

0:24:09.960 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 1>where we get some meaningful improvement in supply chain. But

0:24:12.920 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 1>now he's pushing that out even further. So that written

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the Rails. I have took a great Canadian Pacific investor

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:23.760
<v Speaker 1>trip through the Canadian Rockies. It was awesome and three

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:25.679
<v Speaker 1>day trip, a lot of fun. You know, I bets

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:28.960
<v Speaker 1>written the rails? What Greg Jarrett? Yeah, I'm sure he

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:31.960
<v Speaker 1>hasn't hold as a whole bolt, you know out in

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the West. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast.

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to introduce Apple Podcasts or

0:24:39.280 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 1>whatever podcast platform you prefer. But I'm Matt Miller. I'm

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:46.919
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter and Matt Miller talking about on False Swinney.

0:24:46.920 --> 0:24:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney before the podcast. You

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio.