WEBVTT - Interview With Jack Schwager: Masters in Business (Audio)

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by B A. S F. We create chemistry.

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:11.559
<v Speaker 1>This is Masters in Business with Barry Ridholts on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:11.760 --> 0:00:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the one addition of the Masters in Business

0:00:16.960 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 1>podcast here on Bloomberg Radio. I am so thrilled and

0:00:20.720 --> 0:00:25.599
<v Speaker 1>excited to have hit this milestone if you would have

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 1>told me when we began what really started as a

0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:35.639
<v Speaker 1>skunk works project on the down low. Quick digression as

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 1>to how this podcast came about. Tim O'Brien, who runs

0:00:39.360 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg View and Bloomberg Gadfly, He's the one who set

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:47.959
<v Speaker 1>it up. Uh was recruiting me to, uh come right

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:51.280
<v Speaker 1>from Bloomberg and I said, listen, you guys have a website.

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>I have a website. Why do I wanna publish for

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 1>for you guys instead of on my own site? And

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:01.280
<v Speaker 1>he said, well, look at this fantastic playground that we

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>have here at Bloomberg. Look at the technology, the facilities.

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I have to tell you that was really a very

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:11.960
<v Speaker 1>persuasive argument. The Bloomberg Building, if you've never been, is

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 1>it's mind blowing. It is a purpose built technology and

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 1>media high rise in the middle of midtown. It's really

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:23.959
<v Speaker 1>an amazing, amazing place. And if there's any way you

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:28.640
<v Speaker 1>could find uh, the opportunity to come here professionally, you should.

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:32.679
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty awesome. And when Tim was showing me around

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the facilities, I noticed all these super cool um radio

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 1>booths and studios. Now I've been to the Bloomberg Building

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:44.479
<v Speaker 1>numerous times before. I've been on the radio here, I've

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 1>been on the Bloomberg TV set, I've been here for conferences,

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 1>so I'm somewhat familiar with the space. But when you're

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 1>looking at it not as just a guest who's blowing

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 1>in and out in order to do a television show,

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 1>but as a facility. The if that someone says, hey,

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 1>you have access to all all of these really cool toys,

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 1>you see it from a slightly different perspective. And so

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 1>when we started chit chatting about what we could actually

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:16.919
<v Speaker 1>do with these facilities, I started to get all sorts

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:22.080
<v Speaker 1>of interesting, interesting ideas, the first of which was I

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 1>would love to do a podcast and actually talk to

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 1>some of the most intelligent and influential and important people

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:35.800
<v Speaker 1>in the industry in business and finance on Wall Street. Uh.

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:38.400
<v Speaker 1>We kicked a few ideas around. Someone had suggested, how

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 1>about a television show I said, no, go get Joe.

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Reason thought to do that. I don't want to do TV.

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:46.239
<v Speaker 1>I I don't want to wear a suit and tie

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:47.799
<v Speaker 1>every day, and I want to shave. I don't want

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 1>to have to go on a diet. Um. I've dropped

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 1>about twenty pounds, but to do TV I would have

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:54.520
<v Speaker 1>to drop another twenty and that would be a lot

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 1>of work. So when they said what do you want

0:02:57.000 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 1>to do? My answer was I'm want to sit with

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:06.240
<v Speaker 1>these people and have an adult conversation about important things. Well, podcast,

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:10.360
<v Speaker 1>what do you mean? And the elevator pitch was Mark

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Marin's WTF meets Charlie Rose. But I went back and

0:03:14.200 --> 0:03:18.519
<v Speaker 1>looked at my notes, and my notes said a podcast

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:24.079
<v Speaker 1>version of Jack Schweger's Market Wizards. And that was really

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>the motivation for this show. And so who better to

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>do our hundred podcast? Then the man the legend himself,

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Jack Schweger. He is the author of numerous market wizards books.

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 1>The first one is Market Wizards, the second one is

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 1>New Market Wizards, the third one is Hedge Fund Wizards. Uh,

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 1>plus a number of of different books on options and

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:53.120
<v Speaker 1>trading and futures. And you know he he has been

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 1>a trader his whole career, and and the writing and

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>editing started as a sort of side project, but obviously

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 1>it blew up on its own. Um A quick another

0:04:03.680 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 1>digression about Jack and I. So, I don't know. I'm

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>a new being in the industry. I'm around for less

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:16.040
<v Speaker 1>than ten years. The first book anybody gives me UM

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:19.039
<v Speaker 1>to read when I'm studying for my series seven a

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:22.479
<v Speaker 1>hundred years ago, uh was Market Wizards, and I just

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 1>devoured it. And I wasn't fascinated by the fact that

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:29.360
<v Speaker 1>all these different traders and fund managers in all these

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 1>different fields somewhere commodities, somewhere where equities, somewhere, bonds, somewhere,

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:39.080
<v Speaker 1>more complex products, somewhere really simple strategies. There was a

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:43.360
<v Speaker 1>theme that ran through all of these interviews. And so

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:45.600
<v Speaker 1>not only did I devour the first book, but I

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 1>reread it every five years. I find it to be

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 1>absolutely fascinating. And the second time I read it, I

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 1>want to say that was nine or two thousand or

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 1>something like that, I decided to do something I almost

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:04.599
<v Speaker 1>never do, which is write a review on Amazon dot

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Com for the book, and you'll see, other than whining

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:11.359
<v Speaker 1>about you know, a poorly made product. I almost never

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 1>do book reviews. Uh, I got stuff to do. I

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:19.039
<v Speaker 1>would rather read books than write book reviews. So I

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:21.919
<v Speaker 1>happened to be so moved by market Wizards that I

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 1>wrote a review of it. This was I don't know

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 1>one oh three something like that and posting on Amazon

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:32.599
<v Speaker 1>completely forget about it. Fast forward to episode I don't

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 1>know fift something like that, and Jack Schwager is one

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:38.599
<v Speaker 1>of our early guests. He was nice enough to come on,

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and he not only reminds me that I wrote a

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:48.360
<v Speaker 1>review of market Wizards for Amazon, but yeah, Amazon does

0:05:48.400 --> 0:05:51.160
<v Speaker 1>this sort of crowdsourcing thing where you could thumbs up

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:54.479
<v Speaker 1>or thumbs down a review, And it turned out that

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the readers of the Amazon page on market Wizards had

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 1>made that at the top review of market Wizards. Go

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:07.919
<v Speaker 1>to Amazon click positive reviews. It's the first one, Jack says,

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 1>it's it's been the first one for over a decade.

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Who knew. Just one of those funny little ironies. Fifteen

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:18.279
<v Speaker 1>years ago, I wrote a review of a book that

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 1>I thought was really really interesting and important, and now

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 1>in it turns out that our one guests on Bloomberg

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Radio's Masters in Business show and podcast is the same

0:06:34.120 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>gentleman Jack Schweger. So with tremendous amount of excitement, I

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 1>am thrilled to present our podcast here. He is author

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:54.480
<v Speaker 1>and trader Jack Schweger. This is Masters in Business with

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:59.039
<v Speaker 1>Barry Ridholts on Bloomberg Radio. I have a special guest

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:03.040
<v Speaker 1>today who is should be very well known if you

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 1>are an investor or trader and like to read books

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 1>about the craft. His name is Jack Schwager, and I

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 1>have to tell you the first book I have received

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 1>in the industry when I began was Market Wizards. I

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 1>make it a point to reread it every five years

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 1>or so. There are now three versions. There's Market Wizards,

0:07:24.240 --> 0:07:27.960
<v Speaker 1>New Market Wizards, and Hedge Fund Wizards, as well as

0:07:27.960 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 1>an audio book of actually all of them are three

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 1>are now Jack Schweger. Welcome to bloom Thank you very

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>good to be here again. So so I really didn't

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:42.520
<v Speaker 1>give your your background and introduction enough of a play up.

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:46.800
<v Speaker 1>You're you're in addition to being an author, you're a trader.

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 1>You've written a number of books on technical trading and

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:53.720
<v Speaker 1>future trading along those lines as well as an entrepreneur.

0:07:54.600 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 1>I cannot under estimate I cannot under emphasize how influential

0:08:01.280 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Market Wizards was. When when did the first book, first

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Market Wizars came out, and how many copies has that,

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, printings? It first of all, has been translated

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 1>in so many language I mean weird language, I mean

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 1>languages I wouldn't all expect, like Turkish and Croatian and

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the Vietnamese and whatever. You know. So, and you have

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 1>no idea they sell these books. They make it a

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 1>contract and you have no idea what it sells. So

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and the China and China is like there's two official

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 1>language versions, not to count the bootleg versions. But that's

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:35.680
<v Speaker 1>true of everything. But absolutely, when whenever someone talks about China,

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 1>there should be implied in parentheses not to count the

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:42.720
<v Speaker 1>bootlet that's that's that's a given. So in other words,

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:44.839
<v Speaker 1>but I would guess, I would guess between all the

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:47.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, all the books I've written globally, i'd say

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 1>probably a couple of million sold. That's huge. And for

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:54.439
<v Speaker 1>those people who may not be familiar with Market Wizards,

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the premise of the book is essentially, let's speak to

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:02.839
<v Speaker 1>some some very six sucessful investors and traders and see

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:06.839
<v Speaker 1>how they do and what their secret sources and what's

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:09.720
<v Speaker 1>fascinating In the book, you spoke to people who are

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 1>commodities traders, bond traders, equity traders, currency traders, and there

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 1>were some really consistent themes. No matter what these people

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:21.439
<v Speaker 1>were doing, whether whether they were long term investors or

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:24.959
<v Speaker 1>or the shortest of short term traders, certain themes came

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:27.120
<v Speaker 1>out in the book over and over again, right, And

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 1>and that was what I was trying to do. I

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 1>was write, what is the secret source, what separates this

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 1>group of extremely successful successful and just off the child

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 1>and some of them, I mean just extraordinary and and

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:40.960
<v Speaker 1>and the people I've interviewed included sort of the most

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>famous traders. We're gonna go into the specifics about some

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:47.360
<v Speaker 1>of them, Okay a few minutes. So so as far

0:09:47.400 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 1>as the the lessons, and there are tons of them.

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:53.200
<v Speaker 1>And I probably in the later books when I did summaries,

0:09:53.840 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 1>I might have had, like, you know, forty points forty points,

0:09:57.240 --> 0:09:59.719
<v Speaker 1>and you had all or if you had ad all

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the like all the common denominators, I wouldn't be surprised

0:10:02.840 --> 0:10:04.440
<v Speaker 1>if it got close to a hundred. So it's kind

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:07.240
<v Speaker 1>of hard to just say which ones, but what the

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:11.440
<v Speaker 1>fact that they were radically different from each other was

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:14.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe one of the most important common denominators, because what

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:17.680
<v Speaker 1>it spoke to is they each found their own way.

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I can't tell you how many times people, uh, you know,

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 1>we'll ask me or write me, what traders should I follow?

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:26.720
<v Speaker 1>That's right, what trader should I follow? Or who's the

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:29.320
<v Speaker 1>best trader you know? And and you know to me

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:32.679
<v Speaker 1>that that's it has no that question has no answer,

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 1>And the question actually makes no sense. It makes no

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:37.679
<v Speaker 1>more sense than somebody calling me and asking me, I've

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:39.679
<v Speaker 1>got to go buy a suit, what side should I get?

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:41.679
<v Speaker 1>And I've never seen the person. I mean, it's as

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 1>relevant to question as that. So these people found would

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 1>work for them, and it was always different. So let's

0:10:47.520 --> 0:10:49.959
<v Speaker 1>talk about a couple of themes though that run through

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 1>all the traders. Let's let's start with discipline, probably the

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:57.439
<v Speaker 1>single most important lesson at least that I took. What

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:02.560
<v Speaker 1>was the general take on being a disciplined persson when

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I asked? I asked that question to a lot, you know,

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>some questions I I tried to count the interviews and

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 1>conversational format. You know what you're like? You you do right?

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 1>So we'll discuss. You are the inspiration, so and you know,

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 1>don't start. I would have like questions sort of back up,

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, but I'd like talk and talk, you know,

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes going at two days of conversation sometimes and

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 1>only the end would I like, look, did I miss anything?

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 1>And usually nothing, you know, usually picked up everything. So, um,

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 1>I got off a tangent to it. I was kind

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 1>on The original question was on discipline. Discipline, right, So

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 1>one question I asked, did ask everybody or just about

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:43.720
<v Speaker 1>is what what separates you know? What differentiate too? What? What?

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Why are you different? And and discipline was the single

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:51.960
<v Speaker 1>most answered, you know, answer to that. That was the

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:54.680
<v Speaker 1>most common answer to that question was discipline. Now, when

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 1>let's let's dig in a little bit. When they say

0:11:56.960 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 1>their disciplines, are they referring to keeping them most in check?

0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Are they referring to I have a methodology and I

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:06.560
<v Speaker 1>find it follow it no matter what? What did they mean?

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:09.160
<v Speaker 1>And and those two are not separate? Um? Yeah, but

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 1>they mean primarily I've got a methronology and I'm not

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna straight from it. And I know you at your

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 1>trader and I'm I'm a trader. And but anybody's trade

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 1>and knows this that if you if you've got an

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:22.720
<v Speaker 1>approach that sort of work. And to be clear, no

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 1>approach work, no, no approach works any great amount of time.

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Everything falls into that affairs just just a question of probabilities.

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:33.680
<v Speaker 1>But if you've got an approach that over time probabilities

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 1>are in your favor and you make more money than

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 1>you lose and you keep control. If you've got that

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 1>approach and you've got rules or trades that you do, uh,

0:12:43.160 --> 0:12:45.280
<v Speaker 1>and you're losing some of them, that's fine because you're

0:12:45.280 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna lose on a certain percentage. But when you do

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 1>stuff that is counter to what you're supposed to do,

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 1>like well, I got, I got. This is how I

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:53.320
<v Speaker 1>get into a trade. And then you look at the market. Gee,

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, let's take it. We got Brexit going on here,

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, and you've got this market crashing. Boy, this

0:12:57.360 --> 0:12:59.320
<v Speaker 1>must be really over sold. It's not really part of

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 1>my trade. But I'll take a flyer the pounds down

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 1>eighteen cents, you know, that's probably good for a balance.

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll buy it. Those type of trade. So that's breaking discipline.

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:10.079
<v Speaker 1>That's not part of your plan, that's not part of

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 1>your approach. Unless your plan is unless randomly file the

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:15.679
<v Speaker 1>headline and the news and chase everything, well, those people

0:13:15.679 --> 0:13:18.599
<v Speaker 1>don't stay in business that well, or that this is

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:20.960
<v Speaker 1>this is actually going. My my example wasn't just the

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 1>opposite sort of like you're gonna you're gonna try to

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:24.559
<v Speaker 1>pick the bottom and you know you're gonna try to

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 1>catch the falling knife, so to speak. Um and and

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:29.079
<v Speaker 1>some people could that could be, that could be in

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 1>a strategy in fact, catching a following knife. I've been

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:34.920
<v Speaker 1>through traders who do trade like that. But you have

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:37.200
<v Speaker 1>to have um. But then you know what you're getting out.

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:39.160
<v Speaker 1>You know you you think it's gonna hold here and

0:13:39.200 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 1>if it doesn't, your out. So that's but just to

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 1>blindly take a trade that's not part of your your approach,

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 1>that's where that would be breaking discipline or more more important,

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:49.959
<v Speaker 1>even more important is is not getting in and we

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 1>we and I know I'm sort of preaching to the

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:53.720
<v Speaker 1>choir when I talk to you, but you know all

0:13:53.760 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 1>of this stuff, and this is I know you've got

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 1>the exact same view. Getting in is the least important part.

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Getting out. That's what you gotta worry about. That's what

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:02.680
<v Speaker 1>people don't worry about I used to jokingly sell there's

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:05.120
<v Speaker 1>a million books on what to buy, but other than

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 1>justin mamos what to sell exactly. Hey, here's your exit

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 1>and that and that's when the discipline and that's where

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the discipline comes in. Yeah, exactly. So let me back

0:14:16.679 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 1>up and talk a little bit about you, because people

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 1>may not be familiar with with your background. So how

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 1>did you find your way to finance? Oh? Purely accidentally,

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I graduated, um, you know, from from an Ivy League

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 1>school for which to ground. I went to Brown with

0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 1>a master's in economics, and I kind of expected sort

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 1>of day after graduation, i'd sort of stick my head

0:14:38.200 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>out and I'd have five offers, you know, and all that.

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>And I didn't know how to look for a job.

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:44.640
<v Speaker 1>And my first maybe, I mean, I had the temporary point,

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:46.160
<v Speaker 1>but the first real job is looking for So I

0:14:46.200 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 1>went to employment agencies and I get they probably haven't

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 1>chased since that they don't exist. Yeah all right, So

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:56.720
<v Speaker 1>but they weren't very effective, and I like a two

0:14:56.720 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 1>weeks I think, you know, I didn't hair back anythings.

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 1>I got frustrated. So I just at the time New York,

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the New York Times had a help not a help wanted,

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 1>but but position wanted a section and so for about

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:12.400
<v Speaker 1>six job secret so like I think it costs me

0:15:12.520 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 1>like fourteen dollars or fifteen dollars. I put a two

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>line ad in and something along the line, uh, you know,

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 1>masters and an economics minor and math looking for an

0:15:22.400 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 1>analytical job pretty much. And I had about I don't

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 1>know the sixteen seventeen responses to that, uh all but one.

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>All but one were come ons. In other words, the

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 1>people they want you to say, they want you exactly

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 1>they want you to buy. It was like these chain

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 1>cell you know you they'll sell you, uh two thousand

0:15:42.640 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 1>dollars worth of soap bubbles and you go find double

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 1>people to sell at that type of thing. I went.

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I went to one of these, uh thinking I was

0:15:49.160 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 1>going to a meeting of the company, and uh that

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 1>it was a manager. I said, well, I said, I

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 1>asked even the phone, this is not a sales we

0:15:56.600 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 1>have sales, but this is and I'm expecting to meet

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:01.440
<v Speaker 1>this group of uh you know, at ah at the

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 1>quarterly meeting or whatever. And I walked in. It is

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 1>like this huge auditorium and it's like a display in

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the front. And then and they have her on a

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 1>film with I think of Sebastian Cabital telling you, telling

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:13.600
<v Speaker 1>how great this product. And then they have a guy

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 1>who has some sort of chemist who fell off a

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 1>roof supposedly, and while he was in the hospital to

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 1>think how he can make his life his wife's job easier,

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and sort of came up with this miracle cleaning product

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and anyway, and and then they have a guy come

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 1>out and tell you how he drives a portion uh

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:31.040
<v Speaker 1>makes uh you know, how you can make ten dollars

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 1>spare time. Really literally, this was it. Uh. I went

0:16:34.120 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 1>to one of these obviously, and then any calls I

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 1>got there after. But there was one legitimate call, and

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:43.800
<v Speaker 1>that legitimate call, as fate would have it, was a

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 1>research analyst position that was being vacated by Michael Marcus.

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Michael Marcus who ultimately who was leaving to become a trader,

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:57.920
<v Speaker 1>and um, he ultimately became an incredible trader. We can

0:16:57.960 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 1>talk more about him later if you want. But he

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 1>and I met as he was leaving and I was

0:17:03.320 --> 0:17:05.919
<v Speaker 1>going in and sort of he still was in New

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 1>York for a while and he would get together for lunches,

0:17:08.080 --> 0:17:11.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, because this uh well, this was a firm

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 1>called at the times called the Rentals Securities, which then

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 1>mergeds the Dean Withino Reynolds and went into you know,

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 1>multiple ultimately it became well yes or who, I don't

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:24.160
<v Speaker 1>know where they ultimately ended up. I didn't stay. I

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I stayed for two years, and you know I was

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 1>I started out like making two thousands less than my secretary. Um,

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:34.240
<v Speaker 1>why shared with the research director. And I was doing

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:38.160
<v Speaker 1>I and enough analyst, we're doing really almost all the work. Um.

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 1>And then after two years, I just stuck and I

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 1>was writing for for the Predecessor. Now it's called Modern Trading,

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:45.919
<v Speaker 1>and then before that was called Futures, and before that

0:17:45.960 --> 0:17:49.440
<v Speaker 1>it was originally called Commodities Magazine. And that's why I

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:51.919
<v Speaker 1>started writing. As I started writing, and you know, column

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I came. So so two years I had a little

0:17:54.080 --> 0:17:55.880
<v Speaker 1>bit of a reputation. I went and stuck my head out,

0:17:56.119 --> 0:17:59.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, instantaneously got a job, uh you know as

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:03.160
<v Speaker 1>research director. Triple my salary, triple that salary, and so

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:05.000
<v Speaker 1>so I left it that so, I you know, I

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:08.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't stay at Reynolds too long. I'm Barry Rihults. You're

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:11.880
<v Speaker 1>listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio. My special

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:15.399
<v Speaker 1>guest today is Jack Schweger. He is the author of

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the famous Market Wizard series of books, as well as

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:23.440
<v Speaker 1>being a trader and entrepreneur. UM, let's talk a little

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 1>bit about the role of luck and skill with traders.

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 1>And I want to ask, what is a deceptively simple question,

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:37.440
<v Speaker 1>how difficult is trading as a profession, as a as

0:18:37.480 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 1>to a profession when you can actually earn a living,

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 1>extremely extremely difficult than I don't think most people are

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:45.439
<v Speaker 1>cut out for it. In fact, I don't think I'm

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:49.200
<v Speaker 1>cut out for it. I know I've never wanted to. Uh.

0:18:49.320 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 1>If I were really good, then I maybe would have

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 1>entertained the idea of being a full time trader. But

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I never was good enough, you know. UH, Being good

0:18:57.240 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 1>enough to be net profitable in the markets as very

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 1>very different from being good enough to your living, coming

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 1>from that you're you know, you're you're you're paying for

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:09.879
<v Speaker 1>your expenses. So I never had that particular confidence that

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I was I was good enough. And the only reason

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm even profitable as a trader, uh is just because

0:19:16.320 --> 0:19:18.640
<v Speaker 1>I've I've just spoken his own e people, and I've

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:23.200
<v Speaker 1>had so much experience. I actually as my my natural instincts,

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:27.400
<v Speaker 1>uh are pretty poorly attuned for trading. I think most people. Yeah,

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:29.680
<v Speaker 1>well actually most people's are, and I'm no exception. And

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 1>in fact, some of the traits that are important for

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:35.320
<v Speaker 1>good trading. Which something you asked before, what one? That

0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 1>one that comes up all the time is patients. Um,

0:19:38.640 --> 0:19:40.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, somebody like Jim Rogers has a great line.

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 1>He says, I don't do anything until there's there's money

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:44.960
<v Speaker 1>lying in a corner on the floor, and all I

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 1>have to do is to go and pick it up.

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, yeah, patients, just to wait for something that's

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 1>like a real setup, you know, a real fat pitch um.

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:54.159
<v Speaker 1>And and similarly to stay with a position. You know

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 1>that the famous line from Reminiscences of a Stock Operator,

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:00.720
<v Speaker 1>which I like the girl paraphrase, but I think it

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 1>was it might be the exact quote he said. It

0:20:03.160 --> 0:20:05.919
<v Speaker 1>was never uh. And for those listeners who don't know

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:09.359
<v Speaker 1>the book, it's it's a book with the father's book

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:13.200
<v Speaker 1>about Jesse Livermore. The Livermore is never identified. Everybody knows

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 1>it's Livermore and where the protagonist says. Uh. Talking about

0:20:17.280 --> 0:20:19.199
<v Speaker 1>what his success was due to, he says, it was

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 1>never my thinking that made the money. It was my sitting.

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:25.399
<v Speaker 1>Got that my sitting. So he said, hey, I'm not

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:27.680
<v Speaker 1>so smart. It's just I was able to stay and

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:30.360
<v Speaker 1>stay and stay with a position I was working out.

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:33.439
<v Speaker 1>So those that all speaks to patients. And it's a

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:36.479
<v Speaker 1>trait that I my wife is listening to this recording

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 1>in the next room and actually probably would not ahead

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:40.639
<v Speaker 1>when I say, you don't want to be with me

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 1>in the same car during a traffic jam. I am

0:20:42.560 --> 0:20:45.840
<v Speaker 1>not a patient person. That's that's that's interesting that there's

0:20:45.880 --> 0:20:49.680
<v Speaker 1>a wonderful book, you know, given all the wonderful books

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:56.200
<v Speaker 1>on behavioral economics and and how people's cognitive issues are

0:20:56.320 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 1>are so very suspect. Frank Portnoy, who's probably best known

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:02.880
<v Speaker 1>and for writing the book Infectious Greed, wrote a book

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:06.479
<v Speaker 1>a few years ago called weight Um and it's a

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 1>fascinating look at the psychology behind that exact thing behind patients.

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:15.280
<v Speaker 1>And it really is a trait that can be learned.

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 1>It's so important for for both traders and investors. Uh,

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:23.240
<v Speaker 1>just look, you mentioned Brexit in the crazy market. You know,

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:25.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty confident that twenty years from now, when we

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:28.879
<v Speaker 1>look back, this is gonna be a blip that we

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 1>will have forgotten, just like Abola was forgotten. Just like

0:21:33.240 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, zekea I suspect is the next one that

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:39.200
<v Speaker 1>makes huge headlines and then two years later it's like, oh,

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>whatever happened to you know, whatever happened to the chicken flu?

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:44.439
<v Speaker 1>Wasn't that a big thing that was coming along? And

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 1>so anyway, um, let's so let's talk a little bit

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 1>about Look, how can somebody who's had a good run

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:57.680
<v Speaker 1>of trades identify the difference between trades that are based

0:21:57.720 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 1>on skill and just getting lucky in there? Right? You

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:03.400
<v Speaker 1>can never identify any particularly group of trades whether you're

0:22:03.560 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 1>just lucky your skill and it's always luck involved. But

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 1>luck is is the longer you go, the less luck

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 1>will win out. In other words, you can you can

0:22:13.119 --> 0:22:15.200
<v Speaker 1>have a streak, have a hot streak for a while,

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and that could last for days, weeks, maybe even months,

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:21.560
<v Speaker 1>but that's not gonna go on for you, right, So um,

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 1>eventually skill wins. Yeah. And and so if you're kind

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:27.440
<v Speaker 1>of almost most years a year in, year out, you're

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 1>you're kind of that profitable. You never put your account

0:22:29.800 --> 0:22:33.399
<v Speaker 1>into real danger by allowing a deep draw down. And

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:37.880
<v Speaker 1>so if if you're doing that, that's probably skilled then

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 1>because luck alone, unless unless I should make a provis

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:44.159
<v Speaker 1>so you can have more bull markets go on for

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:47.520
<v Speaker 1>multiple years. So if your approach is just to to

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:51.199
<v Speaker 1>just go long, uh and stay long, and it's and

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 1>you're making you're doing well, and it's in a bull market,

0:22:53.960 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 1>all you can assume is you've been long during a

0:22:56.119 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 1>bull market. You have no idea what's gonna happen when

0:22:58.320 --> 0:22:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you have a bear market. So well, but there is

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:03.320
<v Speaker 1>some skill to being on the right side. Well it's fine,

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:06.440
<v Speaker 1>but if you've only been on one side in your trading.

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, people saw trading, they saw trading. How many

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:10.639
<v Speaker 1>people thought they were genius as they saw the trading

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 1>in the right so uh, and they you know, but

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:16.680
<v Speaker 1>they continue trading through two thousand and two thousand and

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 1>one thinking it was gonna be the same thing. And

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:21.280
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, they may have doubled their money, tripled their money,

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 1>but then draw down takes care of all of that.

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:27.240
<v Speaker 1>That that's the famous Buffett quote is when the tide

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 1>goes out, we find out who's been swimming naked. And

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:32.879
<v Speaker 1>so that that that no doubt about that. You go

0:23:33.000 --> 0:23:36.400
<v Speaker 1>through a full cycle, you find out if you actually yeah,

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 1>so that's that's only you can't tell if anybody is

0:23:38.800 --> 0:23:42.720
<v Speaker 1>good or not, uh without you know, out really seeing

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 1>them through through a bare phase. And actually just to

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:48.880
<v Speaker 1>criticize myself here, um, there was one I have another

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 1>have A fourth market was a book called stock Market Wizards,

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 1>which I wrote right at the tail it was right

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:57.879
<v Speaker 1>to turn you know, night late, so really at the

0:23:57.960 --> 0:24:00.960
<v Speaker 1>end of the bull market. Um. And and I was

0:24:01.040 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 1>specific to make the book different from the other market

0:24:03.080 --> 0:24:05.120
<v Speaker 1>was the books. I took the theme just stock marks.

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 1>I was interviewed only stock traders. So by by definition,

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 1>when I was doing the book, I was doing a

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 1>book of only stock traders right after a long long act.

0:24:12.840 --> 0:24:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Bullmarket was eighty two, right, we both know that. So

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:20.680
<v Speaker 1>and but I tried. I thought I was taking people

0:24:20.680 --> 0:24:23.760
<v Speaker 1>who you know, also had the control, you know, who

0:24:23.760 --> 0:24:26.480
<v Speaker 1>would who would do okay uh in a bear market?

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 1>And oh would survive? But it turned out that yeah,

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 1>some of them did, but but quite a few didn't.

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 1>And so no, the book is out. The book is out,

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:39.199
<v Speaker 1>and some of the guy you know, there are some

0:24:39.400 --> 0:24:41.480
<v Speaker 1>there are some famous people in there, like the Shaw

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:45.919
<v Speaker 1>and and well controversial on Stevie Combe. But regardless of

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:49.040
<v Speaker 1>what a yeah, regardless of you know, my my thing

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:51.639
<v Speaker 1>about Steve coolee I I don't know anything more than

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 1>anybody else knows how to reading the press and all

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:55.920
<v Speaker 1>of that. Uh. I know if that if there was

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 1>anything really obvious, they would have certainly have loved to

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:01.680
<v Speaker 1>nail him, and they never did. Um. But if people

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 1>want to argue that he made so you know he

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:06.240
<v Speaker 1>made inside of trades, I don't. I don't know. I

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:08.359
<v Speaker 1>don't know the question with him, But was there a

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 1>lack of supervision over the pel Well that's that's that's question,

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 1>right right. But so but even if you wanted what

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:15.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying is evening people want to say, hey, you

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:17.720
<v Speaker 1>know these people work for him. He would have known

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:21.680
<v Speaker 1>he was, but he there's a guy who does, like god,

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:24.560
<v Speaker 1>thirty thousand trades a year, who knows why he's half

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:28.480
<v Speaker 1>the volume and you look at his record. You could

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:30.640
<v Speaker 1>cut his record in half and you still have one

0:25:30.640 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 1>of the best records of all time. So you know,

0:25:32.920 --> 0:25:34.680
<v Speaker 1>so what if you if af you trades it doesn't

0:25:34.680 --> 0:25:38.879
<v Speaker 1>make it. It doesn't from him. He is an incredible trader,

0:25:38.960 --> 0:25:41.360
<v Speaker 1>didn't no matter what anybody says. So let me ask

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:44.399
<v Speaker 1>you one question that I've always found fascinating. And this

0:25:44.440 --> 0:25:47.840
<v Speaker 1>has to be right in your in your sweet spot

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:53.119
<v Speaker 1>when you talk about skill and luck and psychology. We

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 1>all know traders who are like this. They take credit

0:25:56.560 --> 0:25:59.440
<v Speaker 1>for all the winning trades, but there's always an excuse.

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:04.000
<v Speaker 1>They're always casting blame on any of the losses. Why

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:06.960
<v Speaker 1>what's that about. That's well, actually the trader. If trader

0:26:07.040 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 1>does that, I'll take I'll give you better than even

0:26:09.920 --> 0:26:11.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you two to one odds. They're gonna they're

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:13.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna they're gonna fail. They're gonna blow up, They're gonna

0:26:13.960 --> 0:26:16.240
<v Speaker 1>blow there. They're gonna fail anybody. And that's when I

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 1>talk about trades. I mean, any decent trader will admit

0:26:20.600 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 1>that it's his, you know, or hard fault, who pull

0:26:23.320 --> 0:26:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the trigger, whose fingers were right? And and and the

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 1>bad luck comes into it all the time. I can't

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:31.040
<v Speaker 1>tell you how many times I get, oh, the other thing,

0:26:31.200 --> 0:26:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the one for the last week, I uh, it was

0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:36.320
<v Speaker 1>like a coco trade, and uh, I kind of picked

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:37.800
<v Speaker 1>my and one of my one of my types of

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 1>trade is I'd like to buy markets um counter trend

0:26:42.240 --> 0:26:46.119
<v Speaker 1>uh at spots where I think that they'll they'll be

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:50.159
<v Speaker 1>sold sold out, aboard out or whatever risk reward and

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:53.960
<v Speaker 1>or you get a bounced dealing exactly. And so my

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 1>my er, my order rests there, and I have a

0:26:56.320 --> 0:26:59.240
<v Speaker 1>stop that dress there. So one morning, well you know,

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:01.880
<v Speaker 1>I like up and I look at the trades, and boy,

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:04.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm in and out of the coco trade um. And

0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:08.359
<v Speaker 1>this was the one day was like bizarre. It was like,

0:27:08.440 --> 0:27:10.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, the market that day, don't even know if

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:12.480
<v Speaker 1>there was any news, but it traded like about twenty

0:27:12.520 --> 0:27:14.560
<v Speaker 1>times the range of normally trades. And I remember that

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:16.240
<v Speaker 1>one day and its spiked down in one minute. I

0:27:16.240 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 1>don't even know if there was any news. It spiked

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:20.399
<v Speaker 1>down a few under points in one minute. My so

0:27:20.520 --> 0:27:22.439
<v Speaker 1>here I get in, which would have been I think

0:27:22.480 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 1>a great entry. But then like and within one minute's time,

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, within seconds, it's like ticks down

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:31.399
<v Speaker 1>sort of like three ticks. You know, I had two

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:33.760
<v Speaker 1>stops when you know one is it like right almost

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:35.760
<v Speaker 1>at a low one thing but like a second apart

0:27:35.840 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. And then it goes right back up again.

0:27:37.640 --> 0:27:40.000
<v Speaker 1>So sure you could say that's bad luck. And maybe

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:43.000
<v Speaker 1>you know that trade I think was bad luck. But

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:45.880
<v Speaker 1>that does make a difference. The point is, over time, Uh,

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:47.800
<v Speaker 1>it should make any difference, because I'll have good luck

0:27:47.800 --> 0:27:50.240
<v Speaker 1>to you know, just the bad ones. You really notice

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the good ones, you figure the good ones. You're small

0:27:52.640 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 1>on on the bad ones of bad luck. Right, So

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 1>in the old days I would have blamed the specialist

0:27:56.640 --> 0:27:59.640
<v Speaker 1>for I don't know if we could do that. I'm

0:27:59.760 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 1>very hults. You're listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio.

0:28:04.000 --> 0:28:07.800
<v Speaker 1>My special guest today is Jack Schweger. He is the

0:28:07.840 --> 0:28:11.560
<v Speaker 1>author of the Market Wizards series of books, as well

0:28:11.600 --> 0:28:15.359
<v Speaker 1>as a number of books on futures trading and technical training. Uh.

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:19.639
<v Speaker 1>He's also has been a trader for for several decades.

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:22.399
<v Speaker 1>You know, the last time you were visiting us, you

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:26.800
<v Speaker 1>were just in the process of launching a company called

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:30.720
<v Speaker 1>fund Seeder, and you're using some technology to try to

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:36.160
<v Speaker 1>identify the new emerging traders that are coming up through

0:28:36.200 --> 0:28:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the ranks. Tell us a little bit about about how

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:42.680
<v Speaker 1>this works. Sure, so the concept of fund Seeder is

0:28:42.800 --> 0:28:46.400
<v Speaker 1>globally now, not just the US or industrialized nations. There

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:49.160
<v Speaker 1>are there are just who knows how many hundreds of

0:28:49.240 --> 0:28:52.040
<v Speaker 1>thousands of millions of traders. Now most of them are

0:28:52.040 --> 0:28:54.480
<v Speaker 1>not gonna be any good, but you don't need You

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 1>only need a tiny fraction of one percent that are good.

0:28:57.480 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 1>And that's a realistic expectation. But don't have it. They'll

0:29:00.840 --> 0:29:02.920
<v Speaker 1>never be discovered. They might be in countries where there's

0:29:02.920 --> 0:29:07.600
<v Speaker 1>no no real place for no institutional infrastructure exactly. Yeah,

0:29:07.600 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 1>you've got people. Let's say you got a mathematician in

0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:11.200
<v Speaker 1>East and Europe. Let's say right comes up with a

0:29:11.280 --> 0:29:13.840
<v Speaker 1>great algorithm and making money on markets. It doesn't have

0:29:13.920 --> 0:29:16.040
<v Speaker 1>much money to trade. Nobody will discover them, nobody will

0:29:16.040 --> 0:29:19.960
<v Speaker 1>speak to him. So you know, our idea was create

0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:23.480
<v Speaker 1>a central spot on the web where traders could go

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:28.280
<v Speaker 1>get their track records verified on daily data and by verified,

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:31.600
<v Speaker 1>verified by because the track records and the numbers come

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 1>not from the traders, but they come directly by linking

0:29:34.240 --> 0:29:36.880
<v Speaker 1>their account from their custodians. Yeah, it's from the broker.

0:29:37.160 --> 0:29:39.440
<v Speaker 1>So so we're getting downloads direct of course with the

0:29:39.520 --> 0:29:42.400
<v Speaker 1>traders or for rization, we're getting downloads of the daily results.

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:44.160
<v Speaker 1>So so let me, let me stop you right there.

0:29:44.240 --> 0:29:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I know that when guys are launching hedge funds or

0:29:46.680 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 1>any sort of proprietary trading operation, the first question that

0:29:50.760 --> 0:29:55.320
<v Speaker 1>gets asked is show me your ordered returns. This really

0:29:55.440 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 1>is a way to say without spending tens of thousand

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 1>dollars on audits and with out going through the whole

0:30:02.680 --> 0:30:05.520
<v Speaker 1>process which could be thirty or fifty or a hundred

0:30:05.600 --> 0:30:08.480
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars to tee up a fund, this at least

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:11.840
<v Speaker 1>gives you a way to rank different traders on their

0:30:12.600 --> 0:30:16.120
<v Speaker 1>at least recent performance. Yeah, or actually as depending on

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 1>what broker, could be their entire performance. Uh. But it's

0:30:19.320 --> 0:30:21.560
<v Speaker 1>not mentor as replacement for a lot, but it is

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:25.480
<v Speaker 1>meant as getting really numbers we believe are probably quite true.

0:30:25.640 --> 0:30:28.560
<v Speaker 1>It's an initial screens initial screening, right, So before this,

0:30:28.760 --> 0:30:32.160
<v Speaker 1>how would any of these people ever be found? They

0:30:32.240 --> 0:30:34.640
<v Speaker 1>were seen? They wouldn't. I mean they wouldn't. And that's

0:30:34.680 --> 0:30:37.240
<v Speaker 1>why I mean, I think, what is like something like

0:30:37.320 --> 0:30:42.040
<v Speaker 1>six or eighty um plus billion dollar funds controls sort

0:30:42.080 --> 0:30:47.880
<v Speaker 1>of of the I think the numbers like any it's

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:51.960
<v Speaker 1>a very I mean, it's just super and it gets

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:54.640
<v Speaker 1>more and more concentrated seams over the years. So we

0:30:54.760 --> 0:30:57.680
<v Speaker 1>live in a world where big money, all the instance,

0:30:57.880 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 1>tuial money goes to the same big traders, and everybody

0:31:00.400 --> 0:31:02.480
<v Speaker 1>else has sort of left out of it. Robert Frankl's

0:31:02.560 --> 0:31:06.040
<v Speaker 1>this the winner take All society, And uh, it's true

0:31:06.240 --> 0:31:09.200
<v Speaker 1>about movies. It's true about you know, there's a handful

0:31:09.240 --> 0:31:11.880
<v Speaker 1>of superstar musicians and then everybody and we're trying to

0:31:11.920 --> 0:31:13.800
<v Speaker 1>swim in the other direction. Our our though, it is

0:31:13.920 --> 0:31:15.400
<v Speaker 1>is a lot of talent out there that just has

0:31:15.480 --> 0:31:17.720
<v Speaker 1>no way of getting found. If we provide a venue

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 1>where they can be found discovered, then we can utilize

0:31:21.480 --> 0:31:25.280
<v Speaker 1>that database to uh even introduce them to invest So

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 1>that on one side is fun suitor technology. So this

0:31:28.600 --> 0:31:30.680
<v Speaker 1>is how you you're screening for these people? Well yeah,

0:31:30.720 --> 0:31:32.239
<v Speaker 1>and what what what fun see? The technology The main

0:31:32.280 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 1>technology there is it's a platform for traders traders. First

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:36.720
<v Speaker 1>of all, it's the link you know, traders can get

0:31:36.760 --> 0:31:39.440
<v Speaker 1>their track records linked through the broker and getting verified

0:31:39.560 --> 0:31:42.440
<v Speaker 1>daily record. But then it does nice neat stuff which

0:31:43.080 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 1>like a trader would love to see a daily equity curve,

0:31:45.760 --> 0:31:47.360
<v Speaker 1>it's let be very difficult to get. I don't know

0:31:47.360 --> 0:31:49.640
<v Speaker 1>if any brokers that have daily equity curves, and and

0:31:50.120 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 1>I find what that is because I'm when I think

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:54.840
<v Speaker 1>here curve, I'm thinking yield curve. No, No, so your

0:31:54.880 --> 0:31:57.320
<v Speaker 1>equity day by day, you know, you think simply he's

0:31:57.320 --> 0:31:59.240
<v Speaker 1>trying to start off a hundred thousand, you make five thousand,

0:31:59.320 --> 0:32:01.320
<v Speaker 1>got a hundred five, you lose seven, you got ninety eight?

0:32:01.720 --> 0:32:04.320
<v Speaker 1>That track record over time? What does it look like?

0:32:04.440 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 1>You know? So HOPEFU up the right right, but when

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:10.960
<v Speaker 1>are you starting to deviate comm you know on pattern?

0:32:11.120 --> 0:32:13.000
<v Speaker 1>What what does it look like over time? What are

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the what are the average or what are the We

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 1>have all sorts of analytics on that. So but just

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:19.400
<v Speaker 1>to saw the basic equicur of just to be able

0:32:19.440 --> 0:32:22.880
<v Speaker 1>to see how your equity is fluctuating over time itself

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:25.600
<v Speaker 1>is a really good important thing to have. So that

0:32:25.880 --> 0:32:30.560
<v Speaker 1>that's the find these obscure and unknown that's what they get. Well,

0:32:30.600 --> 0:32:31.920
<v Speaker 1>that's what they create, and then they can do all

0:32:31.920 --> 0:32:34.440
<v Speaker 1>sorts e finality, they can create underwater curves. Also the stats,

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of studies like what happens like you could

0:32:37.680 --> 0:32:40.040
<v Speaker 1>apply moving averages, let the cross over moving average your

0:32:40.040 --> 0:32:42.120
<v Speaker 1>equity curve and say what would have happened if every

0:32:42.160 --> 0:32:45.600
<v Speaker 1>time there's a tenant forty moving average cross down, I

0:32:45.720 --> 0:32:47.840
<v Speaker 1>stopped trading and I didn't start until the cross stop

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:50.000
<v Speaker 1>questions like that. So that that stuff is there and

0:32:50.080 --> 0:32:52.360
<v Speaker 1>it's free. So let's take the flips oute of this.

0:32:52.680 --> 0:32:57.200
<v Speaker 1>What is okay? So we can't do any investment on

0:32:57.280 --> 0:33:00.440
<v Speaker 1>that for compliance reason and all that. You know. So

0:33:00.720 --> 0:33:03.480
<v Speaker 1>we have a separate company called fund Seeder Investments, which

0:33:03.640 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 1>will use the database created on fund seater Technologies, which

0:33:07.440 --> 0:33:10.080
<v Speaker 1>is the fund seater dot com side is fund Seater Technologies,

0:33:10.720 --> 0:33:14.240
<v Speaker 1>and we'll find the you know, by ranking, by searching.

0:33:14.280 --> 0:33:16.080
<v Speaker 1>We got search fielders and all that will find the

0:33:16.160 --> 0:33:19.720
<v Speaker 1>best traders. Those traders we that we leave have potential.

0:33:20.120 --> 0:33:22.600
<v Speaker 1>We may have investors who are looking for certain types

0:33:22.600 --> 0:33:25.640
<v Speaker 1>of traders. We can play the introductory role or one

0:33:25.680 --> 0:33:27.360
<v Speaker 1>of one. One of our plans is hopefully by next

0:33:27.440 --> 0:33:30.120
<v Speaker 1>year we'll have an emerging manager fund and so we'll

0:33:30.160 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 1>take a bunch of these guys and gals and put

0:33:32.960 --> 0:33:35.480
<v Speaker 1>them into one fund and UH and also create a

0:33:35.520 --> 0:33:38.040
<v Speaker 1>fund and this is important. Our our plan right now

0:33:38.680 --> 0:33:40.840
<v Speaker 1>is to create a fund that also is much fairer

0:33:40.880 --> 0:33:43.920
<v Speaker 1>to investors because as you're being part of this is

0:33:43.960 --> 0:33:48.200
<v Speaker 1>this industry. No, it's you know, it's heads head's eye win,

0:33:48.680 --> 0:33:53.000
<v Speaker 1>tails you lose, you know, I mean it's like you can't.

0:33:53.040 --> 0:33:55.520
<v Speaker 1>The trader, no matter what happens, always has a free call.

0:33:55.680 --> 0:33:59.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm Barry rid Hilts. You're listening to Masters in Business

0:33:59.240 --> 0:34:03.360
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio. My special guest today is author and

0:34:03.480 --> 0:34:08.160
<v Speaker 1>trader Jack schweger Uh, author of the famous Market Wizards

0:34:08.360 --> 0:34:12.279
<v Speaker 1>series of books. So let's let's go back to those

0:34:12.400 --> 0:34:16.080
<v Speaker 1>three books or four books. And I wanted to ask

0:34:16.600 --> 0:34:19.399
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned the idea came to you because you really

0:34:19.440 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 1>just wanted to chat with some traders and maybe maybe

0:34:22.719 --> 0:34:28.200
<v Speaker 1>learn some stuff. Um. The response had to be really tremendous.

0:34:28.680 --> 0:34:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Were you surprised at how well received the books became? Yes? Yes,

0:34:33.200 --> 0:34:34.920
<v Speaker 1>And but it always sounds a little bit kind of

0:34:35.160 --> 0:34:37.719
<v Speaker 1>conceder what I did when I wrote the book I

0:34:38.239 --> 0:34:41.560
<v Speaker 1>mentioned like Reminiscences of a Stock Operator originally right, Um,

0:34:41.960 --> 0:34:44.840
<v Speaker 1>I did. I did have a goal of doing a

0:34:44.960 --> 0:34:48.200
<v Speaker 1>modern day version over my formats totally different, But I didn't.

0:34:49.040 --> 0:34:51.560
<v Speaker 1>The thing I had in mind is I was reading Reminiscences,

0:34:51.600 --> 0:34:54.080
<v Speaker 1>which I've always the best book on trading that I

0:34:54.239 --> 0:34:57.000
<v Speaker 1>ever you know read. Um, I was reading at sixty

0:34:57.040 --> 0:34:59.000
<v Speaker 1>five years after his publication day, and it was still

0:34:59.120 --> 0:35:02.000
<v Speaker 1>totally reliant even though the market today, Yeah that is

0:35:02.080 --> 0:35:05.000
<v Speaker 1>today is too right. So my goal was to do

0:35:05.120 --> 0:35:08.480
<v Speaker 1>a book that hopefully in sixty five years from then,

0:35:08.560 --> 0:35:10.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, people would still be reading because it's still

0:35:10.239 --> 0:35:13.680
<v Speaker 1>totally relevant. So that was my goal. Uh, the fact that, yeah,

0:35:13.880 --> 0:35:15.640
<v Speaker 1>you had to feel like as you were working your

0:35:15.680 --> 0:35:18.520
<v Speaker 1>way through it and and re editing it and rereading it,

0:35:19.000 --> 0:35:21.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, you you had to be hey, this stuff

0:35:21.120 --> 0:35:22.960
<v Speaker 1>is pretty I thought, well yeah, and and and to

0:35:23.239 --> 0:35:26.440
<v Speaker 1>that the editing part is interesting and you maybe appreciate it. Um.

0:35:26.840 --> 0:35:29.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, people sometimes think, hey, one comment I get

0:35:29.680 --> 0:35:31.759
<v Speaker 1>is for you know, you're you're a great interview you know,

0:35:31.880 --> 0:35:33.959
<v Speaker 1>you're a great interviewer. You know you really ask great questions.

0:35:34.000 --> 0:35:36.400
<v Speaker 1>You're really you know, and I say, no, I'm not

0:35:36.600 --> 0:35:38.920
<v Speaker 1>a great interviewer. When I'm what I am is I'm

0:35:38.920 --> 0:35:42.600
<v Speaker 1>a really great editor because I because I got like,

0:35:43.120 --> 0:35:44.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, I have like ten or twenty times and

0:35:44.800 --> 0:35:48.440
<v Speaker 1>material I actually used for the book. And not only that, Um,

0:35:49.480 --> 0:35:50.800
<v Speaker 1>you know a lot of times you have these guys,

0:35:50.800 --> 0:35:52.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, you get conversations people go off from tangents,

0:35:52.840 --> 0:35:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and it works well in this type of format, right,

0:35:56.239 --> 0:35:58.000
<v Speaker 1>It's okay, you don't notice it because that's the way

0:35:58.000 --> 0:36:00.760
<v Speaker 1>we speak. But in a written in a written format,

0:36:00.840 --> 0:36:04.200
<v Speaker 1>if you if I did verbatim of what everybody said,

0:36:04.960 --> 0:36:10.160
<v Speaker 1>it would sound deliterate, confusing, boring, you know. So my goal,

0:36:10.400 --> 0:36:12.719
<v Speaker 1>and a journalist, I guess the journalist goal is, would

0:36:12.719 --> 0:36:15.840
<v Speaker 1>be exactly word for word accurate. My goal was to

0:36:15.960 --> 0:36:18.640
<v Speaker 1>be as accurate to the truth that I could. So

0:36:18.719 --> 0:36:20.920
<v Speaker 1>if I if a trader was like going somewhere, it

0:36:20.920 --> 0:36:23.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't finish the point. I knew what he was going

0:36:23.120 --> 0:36:25.279
<v Speaker 1>to make the point, I would finish the point. But

0:36:25.360 --> 0:36:27.319
<v Speaker 1>of course the traders I get. Let the traders read

0:36:27.360 --> 0:36:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the end of product, and they always so they actually

0:36:29.040 --> 0:36:32.279
<v Speaker 1>reviewed and said, well, the words, well, they never even

0:36:32.320 --> 0:36:35.480
<v Speaker 1>knew I changed I mean anything, you know. They what

0:36:35.560 --> 0:36:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I was trying to do was get as close to

0:36:37.280 --> 0:36:40.240
<v Speaker 1>what they were trying to say in a most readable form,

0:36:40.680 --> 0:36:43.520
<v Speaker 1>throwing out the stuff that was didn't have anything to say.

0:36:43.560 --> 0:36:46.800
<v Speaker 1>And I was boring and and keeping the best parts

0:36:46.880 --> 0:36:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and and reshuffling it so it's flowed so you don't

0:36:50.120 --> 0:36:52.880
<v Speaker 1>discuss the same thing in eighteen different spots. And but

0:36:53.040 --> 0:36:55.640
<v Speaker 1>it was all It was a combination of trying to

0:36:55.680 --> 0:36:58.120
<v Speaker 1>be as true as possible to what they were communicating

0:36:58.239 --> 0:37:00.920
<v Speaker 1>while making it as readable as possib so trying to

0:37:01.080 --> 0:37:03.000
<v Speaker 1>really serve both purposes. And that was that was what

0:37:03.080 --> 0:37:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I was trying to do. And nobody ever thought that

0:37:05.600 --> 0:37:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I had changed. I don't think they ever realized that.

0:37:07.960 --> 0:37:10.360
<v Speaker 1>They probably thought it was verbat him because that's what

0:37:10.440 --> 0:37:12.960
<v Speaker 1>I was just pretty close to. It was what they

0:37:13.040 --> 0:37:16.080
<v Speaker 1>hoped for being a Yeah. So, so, over the course

0:37:16.120 --> 0:37:19.800
<v Speaker 1>of the fore Market Wizards books, did you notice anything

0:37:19.880 --> 0:37:22.560
<v Speaker 1>that had changed in the world and in the markets

0:37:23.040 --> 0:37:25.880
<v Speaker 1>or was it the focus just simply in a different

0:37:25.920 --> 0:37:29.480
<v Speaker 1>aspect of of in the world. The world marks to change.

0:37:29.520 --> 0:37:31.680
<v Speaker 1>For one thing, I had like people who had floor

0:37:31.760 --> 0:37:34.200
<v Speaker 1>trading experience, and some of the most colorful stories, and

0:37:34.560 --> 0:37:36.920
<v Speaker 1>in Market Wizards come you know, like Paul tr To

0:37:37.000 --> 0:37:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Jones with the trade that almost blew them out of business.

0:37:39.040 --> 0:37:41.680
<v Speaker 1>You know where we he puts on a trade way

0:37:41.719 --> 0:37:44.080
<v Speaker 1>too large, and and it's in a cotton pit, and

0:37:44.560 --> 0:37:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and that the broker who almost kills himself trying to

0:37:47.120 --> 0:37:50.319
<v Speaker 1>get to the the opposite side of the order. Has

0:37:50.400 --> 0:37:52.960
<v Speaker 1>they is they broken? For the merchant that owns all

0:37:53.000 --> 0:37:55.400
<v Speaker 1>of the Liberals supply, and Paul knows he's dead in

0:37:55.440 --> 0:37:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the water and he really almost completely wiped out in

0:37:57.840 --> 0:38:00.279
<v Speaker 1>a trade. But stories like that, those couldn't not more

0:38:00.280 --> 0:38:03.120
<v Speaker 1>because the floors don't exist anymore. So those things change.

0:38:03.600 --> 0:38:07.600
<v Speaker 1>But but the realities and what what makes trading successful

0:38:07.640 --> 0:38:11.839
<v Speaker 1>and not successful, those things happened. So last question before

0:38:11.880 --> 0:38:14.200
<v Speaker 1>we get into some of the specific trades that are

0:38:14.280 --> 0:38:19.560
<v Speaker 1>so fascinating. Um it has to be just tremendously gratifying

0:38:19.680 --> 0:38:22.560
<v Speaker 1>to see how successful the books have comes you do

0:38:22.640 --> 0:38:24.799
<v Speaker 1>you ever stop and say, I never in a million

0:38:24.880 --> 0:38:26.920
<v Speaker 1>years expected this that. Yeah, I guess I didn't think

0:38:27.040 --> 0:38:30.000
<v Speaker 1>that far. I like, I say, the fact that the

0:38:30.120 --> 0:38:32.120
<v Speaker 1>visual market was is now is going on, I don't

0:38:32.120 --> 0:38:38.239
<v Speaker 1>know twenty Uh, well it was past. It's well eight

0:38:38.440 --> 0:38:40.560
<v Speaker 1>and two years we will be eight now, something like

0:38:40.600 --> 0:38:43.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight years since I wrote it. So um, so

0:38:44.160 --> 0:38:46.520
<v Speaker 1>that is really was like the goal I was trying

0:38:46.600 --> 0:38:49.960
<v Speaker 1>to reach, and my surprise, I don't know, maybe I was.

0:38:50.160 --> 0:38:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I was didn't realize how difficult, how difficult that

0:38:52.960 --> 0:38:55.520
<v Speaker 1>should be, but it, uh, it was what I was

0:38:55.560 --> 0:38:58.880
<v Speaker 1>trying to achieve. So let's talk about a few specific

0:38:58.960 --> 0:39:03.080
<v Speaker 1>traders who I find to be uh fascinating. Um ed,

0:39:03.600 --> 0:39:06.480
<v Speaker 1>I want to pronounce his name Dakota. Dakota. So he

0:39:06.520 --> 0:39:09.320
<v Speaker 1>says he doesn't trust publish his track record, but he

0:39:09.480 --> 0:39:13.200
<v Speaker 1>was rumored to have started with five thousand dollars and

0:39:13.480 --> 0:39:15.840
<v Speaker 1>turned it into tens of millions of dollars. Yeah. So,

0:39:16.160 --> 0:39:18.600
<v Speaker 1>so here's the thing with Sakoda. Um And this is

0:39:18.640 --> 0:39:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the thing. I try to verify people as much as

0:39:20.880 --> 0:39:22.719
<v Speaker 1>I can in any ways you can, but sometimes you're

0:39:22.719 --> 0:39:24.840
<v Speaker 1>you're dealing with people that are just probably not managing

0:39:25.080 --> 0:39:28.320
<v Speaker 1>people's money that you're lucky to get them to interview. Now, Sakoda,

0:39:29.719 --> 0:39:31.800
<v Speaker 1>his name came up because I didn't know who he was.

0:39:32.480 --> 0:39:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I had interviewed Michael Marcus, who I knew personally mentioned

0:39:36.000 --> 0:39:38.919
<v Speaker 1>and just so people have context, Michael Mark, we're talking

0:39:38.920 --> 0:39:41.400
<v Speaker 1>about a guy that Commodity Scope, which used to be

0:39:41.440 --> 0:39:42.920
<v Speaker 1>a different type of firm, but they were like a

0:39:43.000 --> 0:39:47.359
<v Speaker 1>prop trading firm, future traders. Uh. They gave Michael thirty

0:39:47.400 --> 0:39:49.880
<v Speaker 1>thou dollar account and about a dozen years later that

0:39:50.120 --> 0:39:52.520
<v Speaker 1>that account was worth eighty million, and that was with

0:39:52.640 --> 0:39:56.040
<v Speaker 1>them taking out like a year for expenses. Uh. So

0:39:56.440 --> 0:39:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I just the normally that track. He had a string

0:39:59.600 --> 0:40:02.760
<v Speaker 1>of year Marcus. Yeah, Michael Mark said triple digit returns

0:40:02.880 --> 0:40:05.120
<v Speaker 1>for you know, he might have had a quadruple digit

0:40:05.280 --> 0:40:08.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean he had he had just astounding, He did astounding.

0:40:09.160 --> 0:40:11.960
<v Speaker 1>That was all all. This was all futures, and this

0:40:12.120 --> 0:40:14.920
<v Speaker 1>was in the seventies and early eighties and these markets

0:40:14.960 --> 0:40:17.680
<v Speaker 1>were just but he he knew how to He just

0:40:17.800 --> 0:40:19.360
<v Speaker 1>knew how to exploit that type of market and so

0:40:19.480 --> 0:40:21.920
<v Speaker 1>he built a fortune in that period. But when I

0:40:22.000 --> 0:40:25.400
<v Speaker 1>interviewed him, he said, you know, he should speak, and

0:40:25.480 --> 0:40:27.359
<v Speaker 1>he didn't. He didn't want to do the interview because

0:40:27.360 --> 0:40:29.120
<v Speaker 1>he's a very very private person. He's never done another

0:40:29.160 --> 0:40:33.120
<v Speaker 1>interview as far as I know. Uh yeah, he nobody

0:40:33.160 --> 0:40:35.840
<v Speaker 1>would have known who he is. He's very shy, very quiet,

0:40:35.960 --> 0:40:39.160
<v Speaker 1>very photos Uh yeah, that doesn't give any talks, doesn't Yeah.

0:40:39.360 --> 0:40:41.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you'll find a photo of him. Uh

0:40:41.280 --> 0:40:44.680
<v Speaker 1>So that's Michael Marcus. And he agreed reluctantly and only

0:40:44.719 --> 0:40:46.960
<v Speaker 1>through the intervention of a mutual friend to do the interview,

0:40:47.200 --> 0:40:49.839
<v Speaker 1>and I flew out the Malibudha interview him, spent the day,

0:40:50.120 --> 0:40:52.040
<v Speaker 1>spent two days at his house, and the day we

0:40:52.080 --> 0:40:54.239
<v Speaker 1>did the full interviews all over the on the beach

0:40:54.280 --> 0:40:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and walking and sitting and whatever. You recording it, are

0:40:58.000 --> 0:41:00.160
<v Speaker 1>recording it? Yeah, oh yeah, yeah, you know every mean

0:41:00.680 --> 0:41:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I had two recorders. I didn't take any chances. And uh, anyway,

0:41:04.640 --> 0:41:06.919
<v Speaker 1>at the end of dinner, which cooked by his ship,

0:41:07.000 --> 0:41:10.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, his his in house chef, and and uh

0:41:10.160 --> 0:41:12.719
<v Speaker 1>he puts pull push us back the chair, and he says,

0:41:12.800 --> 0:41:15.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know this wasn't half bad. This was

0:41:15.320 --> 0:41:17.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of a cathodic experience. You know, I kind of

0:41:17.760 --> 0:41:20.239
<v Speaker 1>find the found that much of that strong praise from

0:41:20.640 --> 0:41:25.279
<v Speaker 1>not half bad. So he was the one who said,

0:41:25.280 --> 0:41:27.200
<v Speaker 1>then you too, you know you should didn't the view,

0:41:27.200 --> 0:41:29.919
<v Speaker 1>you shouldn't use Sakoda be courts. Dakota is the best

0:41:30.000 --> 0:41:32.879
<v Speaker 1>trader I know. Really, so this is a guy that turns.

0:41:32.960 --> 0:41:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Coming from a rock star, he turns so so I

0:41:36.160 --> 0:41:38.239
<v Speaker 1>know sa Coda is the real thing, because I know

0:41:38.440 --> 0:41:40.520
<v Speaker 1>this guy I worked to come out in his corps.

0:41:40.520 --> 0:41:43.279
<v Speaker 1>I know he's real. I know he did this amazing sting.

0:41:43.440 --> 0:41:46.160
<v Speaker 1>And and Michael Marcus not only that, he Michael Marcus

0:41:46.280 --> 0:41:50.120
<v Speaker 1>hired Covenor and was you know Covernor worked with you

0:41:50.160 --> 0:41:53.400
<v Speaker 1>know that was that was Marcus protege Covenan had his

0:41:53.480 --> 0:41:57.400
<v Speaker 1>own style. And and Caxton, you know, getting one of

0:41:57.440 --> 0:42:00.759
<v Speaker 1>the greatest traders of modern times. You know he can

0:42:00.960 --> 0:42:03.000
<v Speaker 1>that that and and so just to give you an idea,

0:42:03.040 --> 0:42:05.080
<v Speaker 1>so so Mark, So somebody like Marcus is telling you

0:42:05.480 --> 0:42:08.879
<v Speaker 1>about the best trading he knows. Um, you know, means

0:42:09.080 --> 0:42:12.400
<v Speaker 1>that's real, that's real. Yeah. And was it like with Sakoda?

0:42:12.880 --> 0:42:16.560
<v Speaker 1>How Sakoda is a very odd character, very very kind

0:42:16.600 --> 0:42:20.400
<v Speaker 1>of galactic. If you could use that as a colorful.

0:42:20.480 --> 0:42:22.239
<v Speaker 1>He'd like to free He had all he had a

0:42:22.320 --> 0:42:25.480
<v Speaker 1>phrase for everything, you know. So I noticed, like I

0:42:25.560 --> 0:42:27.560
<v Speaker 1>was there and I said, you know, hey, I noticed

0:42:27.600 --> 0:42:30.680
<v Speaker 1>you don't have a quote machine on your desk. And

0:42:30.800 --> 0:42:32.920
<v Speaker 1>he said, he said, having a coute machine in your

0:42:33.000 --> 0:42:35.839
<v Speaker 1>desk is like having a slot machine on your desk

0:42:35.880 --> 0:42:38.960
<v Speaker 1>and the feeding ofod quarters all day. So his idea

0:42:39.080 --> 0:42:40.920
<v Speaker 1>was he picks his trades. You know, he did a

0:42:40.960 --> 0:42:43.120
<v Speaker 1>sustematically he put it in, he doesn't want to watch it,

0:42:43.120 --> 0:42:44.759
<v Speaker 1>doesn't want to be he doesn't want to be enticed

0:42:44.800 --> 0:42:46.680
<v Speaker 1>by the market to do stuff that's outside of what

0:42:46.800 --> 0:42:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the approaches. So the noise uh in the background is

0:42:50.920 --> 0:42:54.279
<v Speaker 1>can be compelling and attractive and he basically, so I'm

0:42:54.280 --> 0:42:56.759
<v Speaker 1>gonna assume no TVs in his office? Well no, and

0:42:56.800 --> 0:42:58.560
<v Speaker 1>then this is back into this is what we did

0:42:58.640 --> 0:43:00.840
<v Speaker 1>this in the eighties he off to TVs and stuff,

0:43:00.840 --> 0:43:02.200
<v Speaker 1>but it was it wasn't as prevalent to have the

0:43:02.239 --> 0:43:06.000
<v Speaker 1>big screens and all that. How about Marty Schwartz, Schwartz was, Yeah,

0:43:06.160 --> 0:43:09.720
<v Speaker 1>he was very intense. Schwartz is a very intense guy. Schwartz,

0:43:09.800 --> 0:43:12.160
<v Speaker 1>by the way, also had this when I and people,

0:43:12.320 --> 0:43:15.600
<v Speaker 1>these people can't keep up records like this, but Schwartz, Uh,

0:43:15.920 --> 0:43:18.400
<v Speaker 1>like a ten year record, which he had ordered. This

0:43:18.480 --> 0:43:21.000
<v Speaker 1>is one of the times he was very proudly showing

0:43:21.000 --> 0:43:24.200
<v Speaker 1>me his numbers because I know it. I want you. Yeah, okay,

0:43:24.840 --> 0:43:27.480
<v Speaker 1>it is nobody's gonna believe this. It's twenty five percent

0:43:27.560 --> 0:43:36.160
<v Speaker 1>a year, a month, a month for ten years, for

0:43:36.280 --> 0:43:41.440
<v Speaker 1>ten ten years. Uh stock only stock index futures, stocking.

0:43:41.520 --> 0:43:44.960
<v Speaker 1>He just traded stock index futures and and he had

0:43:45.040 --> 0:43:48.200
<v Speaker 1>only he only had I think two or three losing

0:43:48.280 --> 0:43:50.040
<v Speaker 1>months in the entire period. And I think his worse

0:43:50.080 --> 0:43:52.080
<v Speaker 1>than losing Hi ups like a three percent loss. And

0:43:52.160 --> 0:43:53.680
<v Speaker 1>he went out and it was two and he went

0:43:53.719 --> 0:43:55.920
<v Speaker 1>out of his way to tell me that those were

0:43:55.960 --> 0:43:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the months his kids were born, so he had distractions.

0:43:59.040 --> 0:44:02.360
<v Speaker 1>That's fair enough that those are some astonishing numbers and

0:44:02.520 --> 0:44:06.080
<v Speaker 1>and let's do uh Stanley Drucon Miller. Yeah, so you know,

0:44:06.239 --> 0:44:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Stanley Druccon Miller again one of the incredible traders of

0:44:09.239 --> 0:44:11.759
<v Speaker 1>all time. I think people don't know how great he

0:44:12.000 --> 0:44:13.480
<v Speaker 1>he was. I mean, first of all, he ran his

0:44:13.560 --> 0:44:17.320
<v Speaker 1>own Docane fund for close to forty years and probably

0:44:17.360 --> 0:44:22.760
<v Speaker 1>average around compounded trading billions of dollars. Uh uh. People

0:44:22.800 --> 0:44:24.840
<v Speaker 1>also a lot unless they read my book, would not

0:44:24.880 --> 0:44:27.600
<v Speaker 1>necessarily know that druck and Miller ran the Sources Quantum

0:44:27.640 --> 0:44:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Fund for a long period the when Source was in

0:44:30.200 --> 0:44:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Eastern Europe kind of doing of his stuff that he

0:44:32.719 --> 0:44:36.040
<v Speaker 1>was interested in doing, and so uh, really an extraordinary trader.

0:44:37.040 --> 0:44:39.840
<v Speaker 1>So if people want to find out more information about

0:44:40.239 --> 0:44:42.680
<v Speaker 1>either yourself for a fund seat or a market, wizards

0:44:42.719 --> 0:44:46.040
<v Speaker 1>with the best fund seater dot com. You know, just

0:44:46.160 --> 0:44:47.920
<v Speaker 1>a fun seater is like one word and what it

0:44:48.000 --> 0:44:50.080
<v Speaker 1>sounds like. And I have my own side which I

0:44:50.080 --> 0:44:51.759
<v Speaker 1>didn't do anything with. But you know, if you want

0:44:51.800 --> 0:44:53.800
<v Speaker 1>to get the books or any other links to any stuff.

0:44:54.080 --> 0:44:56.719
<v Speaker 1>Jack Schwegger dot com Jeff, thank you so much for

0:44:56.800 --> 0:45:01.360
<v Speaker 1>being say your time. We've in speaking with Jack Schwager,

0:45:01.440 --> 0:45:05.239
<v Speaker 1>author of Market Wizards. If you enjoy this conversation, be

0:45:05.360 --> 0:45:07.759
<v Speaker 1>sure and stick around for the podcast extras, where we

0:45:07.920 --> 0:45:10.880
<v Speaker 1>keep the tape rolling and continue chatting. Be sure to

0:45:10.960 --> 0:45:14.759
<v Speaker 1>check out my daily column on Bloomberg dot com or

0:45:14.880 --> 0:45:18.880
<v Speaker 1>follow me on Twitter at Rid Halts. I'm Barry Rit Halts.

0:45:19.000 --> 0:45:23.279
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio, brought

0:45:23.360 --> 0:45:26.320
<v Speaker 1>to you by B A s F. We Create Chemistry.

0:45:27.160 --> 0:45:30.799
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the podcast. Thank you so much, Jack, Thank

0:45:30.800 --> 0:45:32.160
<v Speaker 1>you so much for doing this. You're you're one of

0:45:32.239 --> 0:45:36.800
<v Speaker 1>our few repeat guests. And I know I've said this before,

0:45:37.520 --> 0:45:43.800
<v Speaker 1>but I really have to reiterate. This show came about

0:45:45.080 --> 0:45:48.360
<v Speaker 1>because of because of Market Wizards. It came about because

0:45:49.080 --> 0:45:51.719
<v Speaker 1>I said, that looks like so much fun. When I

0:45:51.800 --> 0:45:54.600
<v Speaker 1>first started writing for Bloomberg, they said, hey, we have

0:45:54.719 --> 0:45:57.000
<v Speaker 1>these great facilities, it's a playground. What would you like

0:45:57.120 --> 0:46:01.279
<v Speaker 1>to do? And my answer was I want to find intelligent,

0:46:01.360 --> 0:46:06.080
<v Speaker 1>accomplished people, both from in investing and outside and sit

0:46:06.160 --> 0:46:09.440
<v Speaker 1>them down and have a Market Wizards like conversation. And

0:46:09.560 --> 0:46:13.040
<v Speaker 1>they were, okay, go do that that's really how this

0:46:13.160 --> 0:46:16.160
<v Speaker 1>came about. So the last time we spoke, I would

0:46:16.200 --> 0:46:18.440
<v Speaker 1>be I would be remiss if I did not point

0:46:18.520 --> 0:46:22.840
<v Speaker 1>this out. You reminded me of something fairly hilarious that

0:46:23.000 --> 0:46:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I had forgotten about, which was Amazon review of Market

0:46:28.560 --> 0:46:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Wizards from two thousand and three. So I actually went

0:46:32.440 --> 0:46:37.239
<v Speaker 1>out and pulled that review today and I just have

0:46:37.400 --> 0:46:39.680
<v Speaker 1>to share this with the audience because it's so funny.

0:46:40.600 --> 0:46:42.719
<v Speaker 1>Um the market strategist for New York City Investment Bank

0:46:42.760 --> 0:46:45.120
<v Speaker 1>bl blah blah blah. So when gave me this book

0:46:45.239 --> 0:46:48.319
<v Speaker 1>when I first got into the industry a decade ago.

0:46:48.640 --> 0:46:51.560
<v Speaker 1>So this is written in oh three, God, we are

0:46:51.640 --> 0:46:55.840
<v Speaker 1>getting old. I find myself rereading it every five years. Quote.

0:46:55.960 --> 0:46:59.440
<v Speaker 1>I highly recommended to anyone who was involved in the markets,

0:46:59.719 --> 0:47:03.040
<v Speaker 1>say we stated, this is the book for anyone who

0:47:03.120 --> 0:47:06.360
<v Speaker 1>wants to learn about trading or investing. It is simply

0:47:06.440 --> 0:47:10.120
<v Speaker 1>a must read. What's so utterly compelling about the interviews

0:47:10.320 --> 0:47:13.880
<v Speaker 1>is how consistent the themes are that arise from so

0:47:13.960 --> 0:47:17.040
<v Speaker 1>many different traders. This is true regardless of the markets

0:47:17.080 --> 0:47:21.000
<v Speaker 1>they work in, commodities, equities, currencies, bonds, or the style

0:47:21.120 --> 0:47:27.440
<v Speaker 1>they employ technical macro economic, fundamental quantitative the basic concepts

0:47:27.520 --> 0:47:33.799
<v Speaker 1>revealed by the Wizards or these discipline, capital, preservation, risk management,

0:47:34.320 --> 0:47:42.560
<v Speaker 1>individual responsibility, flexibility, intellectual honesty, and consistency. Now that's pretty fascinating.

0:47:42.760 --> 0:47:45.000
<v Speaker 1>And and that is a in the mouth the words

0:47:45.080 --> 0:47:47.880
<v Speaker 1>you use. You couldn't capture the book better. I mean

0:47:48.120 --> 0:47:50.960
<v Speaker 1>that really is what the what the book had said

0:47:51.000 --> 0:47:55.400
<v Speaker 1>to me. And I completely forgot about that. And that

0:47:55.600 --> 0:47:58.040
<v Speaker 1>is that. Yeah. But the thing is your review. You

0:47:58.120 --> 0:48:00.720
<v Speaker 1>know how Amazon has, uh, if you like a review,

0:48:00.840 --> 0:48:03.520
<v Speaker 1>you know it was helpful. Yeah, And so that review,

0:48:03.680 --> 0:48:05.080
<v Speaker 1>like I I don't know what it was like in

0:48:05.200 --> 0:48:06.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, ninety eight out of nine and nine people

0:48:06.840 --> 0:48:09.000
<v Speaker 1>found it helpful or something like it shows up as

0:48:09.080 --> 0:48:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the top reviewed review. And I completely so it's the

0:48:13.560 --> 0:48:16.040
<v Speaker 1>top ranked review of market Wizards. If you go to

0:48:16.120 --> 0:48:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the people, it will be always be the first one.

0:48:18.160 --> 0:48:20.480
<v Speaker 1>And nobody's ever going to replace that. Because so you

0:48:20.600 --> 0:48:23.239
<v Speaker 1>reminded me of that, and I hadn't a I had

0:48:23.280 --> 0:48:26.640
<v Speaker 1>no idea that was of all the little of all

0:48:26.719 --> 0:48:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the little ego things to go out and google yourself

0:48:30.200 --> 0:48:33.880
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. I just and by the way, I almost

0:48:34.520 --> 0:48:39.760
<v Speaker 1>never never write reviews of stuff. Usually it's because something

0:48:39.920 --> 0:48:43.280
<v Speaker 1>is this is not how it's advertised. This was advertised

0:48:43.320 --> 0:48:46.120
<v Speaker 1>as a twelve pack and only one showed up or

0:48:46.440 --> 0:48:51.200
<v Speaker 1>whatever it was. And and I was moved enough by

0:48:51.239 --> 0:48:54.359
<v Speaker 1>the book to write that review, and then I never

0:48:54.480 --> 0:48:56.840
<v Speaker 1>thought a second And I'm sure it was very helpful.

0:48:56.920 --> 0:48:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean that because when people go to that and

0:48:58.760 --> 0:49:00.399
<v Speaker 1>then the first thing I see is your you. It's

0:49:00.480 --> 0:49:03.919
<v Speaker 1>it's it's sincere. It's honest, it's sincere. So so let's

0:49:03.960 --> 0:49:07.280
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about about some of the other wizards,

0:49:07.400 --> 0:49:11.560
<v Speaker 1>because I think people are are genuinely interested. During the

0:49:11.600 --> 0:49:16.040
<v Speaker 1>broadcast portion, we didn't get to Richard Dennis. Uh. Tell

0:49:16.160 --> 0:49:19.000
<v Speaker 1>us a little bit about Richard Dennis. All right, Richard

0:49:19.080 --> 0:49:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Dennis h started out as a floor trader. Uh. He

0:49:22.440 --> 0:49:25.239
<v Speaker 1>started on the Mid America Exchange. Of course, we don't

0:49:25.239 --> 0:49:28.600
<v Speaker 1>have any floors altogether, but the midor Erica for people

0:49:28.680 --> 0:49:30.839
<v Speaker 1>who were unless their old time is like us. Uh.

0:49:31.520 --> 0:49:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Mid America's change was exchange for people small conquered mini contracts,

0:49:35.640 --> 0:49:37.840
<v Speaker 1>so people who couldn't afford the trade to regular grain contracts,

0:49:37.840 --> 0:49:40.440
<v Speaker 1>which weren't that big really, they would trade the Mid American.

0:49:40.480 --> 0:49:42.200
<v Speaker 1>That's what he started out. And he started out literally,

0:49:42.239 --> 0:49:44.160
<v Speaker 1>I think we're about the two hundred dollars and uh

0:49:44.840 --> 0:49:46.880
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, eventually got it up a few thousand.

0:49:46.960 --> 0:49:51.000
<v Speaker 1>But he that that that the little steak got multiplied

0:49:51.080 --> 0:49:55.680
<v Speaker 1>ultimately a couple hundred million dollars a couple hundred yeah,

0:49:55.719 --> 0:49:58.880
<v Speaker 1>two hundred million plus whatever I mean to two hundred

0:49:59.800 --> 0:50:03.280
<v Speaker 1>ye yeah, yeah yeah, Uh. It could be the greatest

0:50:03.320 --> 0:50:06.879
<v Speaker 1>compounded return of Yeah, there's uh, there's quite a few.

0:50:06.920 --> 0:50:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean that would certainly if you want of them,

0:50:08.680 --> 0:50:13.160
<v Speaker 1>for sure. Yeah. Uh. And and now Dennis ultimately went

0:50:13.200 --> 0:50:16.040
<v Speaker 1>on to manage money that didn't work out so well. Uh,

0:50:16.200 --> 0:50:17.759
<v Speaker 1>he did much better for his own money, and he

0:50:18.040 --> 0:50:21.360
<v Speaker 1>he started he started blew up, you know, back he

0:50:21.440 --> 0:50:23.960
<v Speaker 1>got stuck in the big thing that that hurt Dennis

0:50:24.200 --> 0:50:26.399
<v Speaker 1>was And that was also a bit of bad luck,

0:50:26.440 --> 0:50:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I would say, uh was the eighties seven crash. Uh.

0:50:30.600 --> 0:50:32.279
<v Speaker 1>And everybody thinks that the eighty seven crash. Of course,

0:50:32.280 --> 0:50:34.920
<v Speaker 1>it was like the the immense decline to stock market.

0:50:35.080 --> 0:50:37.440
<v Speaker 1>But what also happened in eight seven crash was this

0:50:37.760 --> 0:50:42.040
<v Speaker 1>amazing rally in in the interest rate markets and your

0:50:42.200 --> 0:50:45.120
<v Speaker 1>dollars which nowadays you think of your dollars, we'll trade

0:50:45.160 --> 0:50:47.040
<v Speaker 1>a cup, you know, they go five or ten points

0:50:47.200 --> 0:50:51.080
<v Speaker 1>right there, there was an overnight move of two hundred

0:50:51.080 --> 0:50:53.840
<v Speaker 1>and fifty points. I mean, think about that. That's like

0:50:53.960 --> 0:50:58.560
<v Speaker 1>in that that's per contract, you know. So uh it

0:50:58.719 --> 0:51:00.520
<v Speaker 1>was like a seven thousand dollar move roughly. I think

0:51:00.560 --> 0:51:03.000
<v Speaker 1>it was per contract, and we're talking a guy who's trading,

0:51:03.320 --> 0:51:06.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, thousands of contracts. Uh so, but that and

0:51:06.280 --> 0:51:08.760
<v Speaker 1>he couldn't do anything. It was like, oh, it was instantaneous.

0:51:08.840 --> 0:51:12.200
<v Speaker 1>It's just like it was the gap. You couldn't do anything.

0:51:13.320 --> 0:51:15.360
<v Speaker 1>So that that trade I think pretty much wipe. You

0:51:15.400 --> 0:51:17.839
<v Speaker 1>know that. That that killed his first advent or one

0:51:17.880 --> 0:51:20.680
<v Speaker 1>of it would adventures and so but he never again

0:51:21.040 --> 0:51:23.960
<v Speaker 1>reached that. Uh but what was he especially famous for?

0:51:24.280 --> 0:51:27.480
<v Speaker 1>He was a trend follower, and part of it I

0:51:27.520 --> 0:51:30.520
<v Speaker 1>think maybe was like he when he operated when the

0:51:30.600 --> 0:51:34.200
<v Speaker 1>markets were conducive to that. Now, trend following, we can

0:51:34.239 --> 0:51:35.840
<v Speaker 1>get into this if you want. I mean, there's a

0:51:35.880 --> 0:51:40.200
<v Speaker 1>reason why trend following works to some extent all the time.

0:51:40.280 --> 0:51:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Over time, there are elements of momentum and persistency that

0:51:44.239 --> 0:51:47.880
<v Speaker 1>exists in all markets because people's mood tend to not

0:51:48.080 --> 0:51:51.840
<v Speaker 1>flip flop from day to day. If there's an expansionary period.

0:51:51.960 --> 0:51:54.160
<v Speaker 1>It has a tendency that that's one. It's more it's

0:51:54.200 --> 0:51:56.440
<v Speaker 1>more that it's more fundamental than that is because the

0:51:56.520 --> 0:52:00.520
<v Speaker 1>things that really drive the big moves are things that blasts.

0:52:00.600 --> 0:52:04.120
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's a central bank decides to secular. So yeah,

0:52:04.239 --> 0:52:06.840
<v Speaker 1>they decide, well, we're gonna weekend the dollar or strengthen

0:52:06.920 --> 0:52:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the euro, whatever they're gonna do. Uh And they're not

0:52:09.200 --> 0:52:11.359
<v Speaker 1>gonna just do it for two days or two weeks

0:52:11.400 --> 0:52:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and these day or or there's a move to say, okay,

0:52:14.320 --> 0:52:17.000
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna start lowering interest rates, and usually when that

0:52:17.120 --> 0:52:20.240
<v Speaker 1>happens or raised interests, once that trend begins, it usually

0:52:20.280 --> 0:52:22.759
<v Speaker 1>goes on. So trends have a way of persisting. And

0:52:22.840 --> 0:52:26.359
<v Speaker 1>even if it's something like commodities or whatever, if there's

0:52:26.360 --> 0:52:28.799
<v Speaker 1>a shortage of metals, it takes kiars to open new

0:52:28.840 --> 0:52:30.759
<v Speaker 1>minds and stuff. So these trends can go on for

0:52:30.840 --> 0:52:33.279
<v Speaker 1>a while. Uh. So that's why it works, But it's

0:52:33.280 --> 0:52:36.560
<v Speaker 1>gotten much more difficult to exploit because the markets there's

0:52:36.560 --> 0:52:38.520
<v Speaker 1>so many people who try to do this. When we

0:52:38.640 --> 0:52:40.920
<v Speaker 1>were starting this early on or why should say we

0:52:41.200 --> 0:52:43.760
<v Speaker 1>but the trade aside, somebody Dresy interviewed you know, they

0:52:43.800 --> 0:52:45.560
<v Speaker 1>were the early ones doing this stuff, and they were

0:52:45.600 --> 0:52:47.960
<v Speaker 1>doing trend following techniques, and but now there's so many

0:52:48.120 --> 0:52:50.040
<v Speaker 1>people doing it that you've got a lot of a

0:52:50.120 --> 0:52:52.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of false breakouts, and it's much more difficult to

0:52:52.560 --> 0:52:56.480
<v Speaker 1>make money that way. That's that's fascinating. So not only

0:52:56.840 --> 0:52:59.080
<v Speaker 1>was he a big trend follower, but there's a famous

0:52:59.120 --> 0:53:02.279
<v Speaker 1>total story with him with the turtles. Well yeah, I mean,

0:53:02.400 --> 0:53:04.839
<v Speaker 1>well there's a group of traders called the Turtles, uh,

0:53:05.200 --> 0:53:08.239
<v Speaker 1>which where the name comes from the story is that

0:53:08.360 --> 0:53:10.560
<v Speaker 1>he was in Singapore and he went he saw a

0:53:11.040 --> 0:53:14.080
<v Speaker 1>farm where they were raising turtles as Vada turtles. By

0:53:14.160 --> 0:53:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the tens of that. His thought was, Gee, wouldn't be

0:53:17.520 --> 0:53:20.040
<v Speaker 1>being interesting if we could if I could trace traders

0:53:20.120 --> 0:53:22.719
<v Speaker 1>like their raising turtles. Here you trying to do with

0:53:22.960 --> 0:53:24.799
<v Speaker 1>which is why we're trying front seat or except we're

0:53:24.840 --> 0:53:27.800
<v Speaker 1>not trying to train them or anything. We're yeah, and

0:53:27.920 --> 0:53:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and and Dennis and another trader we talked about an intermission.

0:53:31.640 --> 0:53:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Neck Cart who was his partner, trained a group of

0:53:34.120 --> 0:53:36.160
<v Speaker 1>traders called the Turtles, and some of them went on

0:53:36.320 --> 0:53:39.440
<v Speaker 1>to do quite well. Uh. And so that's kind of

0:53:39.480 --> 0:53:43.960
<v Speaker 1>a famous story. And they put an Times and yeah,

0:53:44.120 --> 0:53:46.040
<v Speaker 1>or not think we actually was the Wall Street Journal, right,

0:53:46.040 --> 0:53:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the Wall Street Journal. They did two years, uh, and

0:53:48.600 --> 0:53:51.120
<v Speaker 1>they picked about twenty people each time, and they had

0:53:51.280 --> 0:53:53.880
<v Speaker 1>no previous way. They were not looking for training. They

0:53:53.880 --> 0:53:56.040
<v Speaker 1>were looking for people like game inventors, they were looking

0:53:56.080 --> 0:53:58.000
<v Speaker 1>for chess players, they were looking they were looking at

0:53:58.040 --> 0:54:01.480
<v Speaker 1>people who kind of had create to an analytical and thing.

0:54:01.480 --> 0:54:03.319
<v Speaker 1>But they didn't want people who actually know anything about

0:54:03.360 --> 0:54:05.560
<v Speaker 1>market any want they want. They don't want to be

0:54:06.239 --> 0:54:09.719
<v Speaker 1>sullied by the wrong approach. You know. So Renaissance Technology

0:54:09.800 --> 0:54:14.320
<v Speaker 1>out out in Umsa talking near Stony Brook, Jim Simon's

0:54:14.880 --> 0:54:16.840
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't hire Wall Street people, you know, well that

0:54:16.960 --> 0:54:18.840
<v Speaker 1>but that's a that's a pure that's how that's a

0:54:19.080 --> 0:54:24.320
<v Speaker 1>really pure deep quantitative really you know, really deep quantitative stuff.

0:54:24.560 --> 0:54:27.560
<v Speaker 1>So people like Simon's yeah, and and and Shore is similar,

0:54:27.719 --> 0:54:33.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, uh, they basically very highly quantitative approaches. So

0:54:33.960 --> 0:54:37.000
<v Speaker 1>so those are some of the uh, those are some

0:54:37.080 --> 0:54:38.879
<v Speaker 1>of the people you mentioned. Druck and Mill. We talked

0:54:38.920 --> 0:54:42.640
<v Speaker 1>about Marty Schwartz and any Trader in particular. You think, uh,

0:54:43.400 --> 0:54:46.080
<v Speaker 1>we're worth mentioning that. Yeah, the one trader we didn't

0:54:46.080 --> 0:54:49.080
<v Speaker 1>talk about who I I just think is a phenomenal,

0:54:49.239 --> 0:54:53.160
<v Speaker 1>phenomenal individual is and and probably in in some ways,

0:54:53.239 --> 0:54:55.760
<v Speaker 1>of all the great people that I interviewed, is probably

0:54:55.800 --> 0:54:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the most amazing. And that would be that would be

0:54:58.239 --> 0:55:01.919
<v Speaker 1>Ed Thorpe. Sure be Eat the Dealer, his first book,

0:55:01.920 --> 0:55:04.759
<v Speaker 1>and then beat the market, Beat the markets. Right, he

0:55:04.800 --> 0:55:07.400
<v Speaker 1>was out in Stanford or yeah, yeah, he's out in

0:55:07.480 --> 0:55:11.319
<v Speaker 1>California around. He's still around. He's now when I interviewed him,

0:55:11.480 --> 0:55:14.680
<v Speaker 1>he think he was like interviewed two thousand and twelve.

0:55:14.800 --> 0:55:18.399
<v Speaker 1>I think he was seventy eight or so or seventy nine,

0:55:18.520 --> 0:55:21.040
<v Speaker 1>so he's low low eighties. Now this is you know,

0:55:21.280 --> 0:55:26.600
<v Speaker 1>he's a just he's a mathematician, PhD mathematician. He actually

0:55:26.760 --> 0:55:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the way he became a PhD athetician, which tells you

0:55:29.200 --> 0:55:31.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot about the man, is he was doing his PhD.

0:55:31.920 --> 0:55:33.160
<v Speaker 1>And this is a kid who grew up in the

0:55:33.239 --> 0:55:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Depression um in a poor school district, very bad education

0:55:37.440 --> 0:55:40.800
<v Speaker 1>toward himself physics at at a young age, got you know,

0:55:41.200 --> 0:55:45.040
<v Speaker 1>got accepted into uh, you know, top universities in California,

0:55:45.040 --> 0:55:47.840
<v Speaker 1>and was getting his PhD, was working on his thesis

0:55:47.880 --> 0:55:50.759
<v Speaker 1>and PhD in physics. Decided he didn't he decided he

0:55:50.800 --> 0:55:54.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't have enough math knowledge, started the order thing courses

0:55:54.360 --> 0:55:56.880
<v Speaker 1>in the graduate math courses, ended up with the PhD.

0:55:56.960 --> 0:55:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Math never rots thesis, so he you know, in in physics,

0:56:00.000 --> 0:56:02.000
<v Speaker 1>technically speaking, he's not a PhD in physics. They never

0:56:02.040 --> 0:56:05.239
<v Speaker 1>bore writing the but some some stuff he did. He

0:56:05.360 --> 0:56:08.800
<v Speaker 1>actually and he has this amazing track record. Uh his

0:56:08.960 --> 0:56:13.480
<v Speaker 1>first fund nineteen years, um, nineteen years, he only had

0:56:13.760 --> 0:56:16.719
<v Speaker 1>uh like two or three losing months in all those

0:56:16.760 --> 0:56:20.759
<v Speaker 1>nineteen years one percent losses. The largest loss ninete cent compounded.

0:56:21.640 --> 0:56:24.480
<v Speaker 1>But that's the that's that's that's a track record. He

0:56:24.520 --> 0:56:27.120
<v Speaker 1>also did stuff like the reason he did so well.

0:56:27.680 --> 0:56:31.080
<v Speaker 1>He he came up with the Black a mathematical equivalent

0:56:31.160 --> 0:56:35.440
<v Speaker 1>formulation of the Black Shows model about five years before then,

0:56:35.560 --> 0:56:38.359
<v Speaker 1>famous paper that want the nob prize. And he didn't

0:56:38.400 --> 0:56:40.279
<v Speaker 1>publish it because why I asked him, why he was

0:56:40.320 --> 0:56:43.319
<v Speaker 1>too busy. Yeah, think of it for five years. He's

0:56:43.440 --> 0:56:45.399
<v Speaker 1>he may be the world the only person in world

0:56:45.440 --> 0:56:48.440
<v Speaker 1>who knows how the price options correctly at and and

0:56:48.680 --> 0:56:52.719
<v Speaker 1>and that's what he made it. And he he was.

0:56:52.880 --> 0:56:55.319
<v Speaker 1>He had the first the first war you know type

0:56:55.360 --> 0:56:57.520
<v Speaker 1>option fund. He had the first convertible bond fund. He

0:56:57.640 --> 0:57:00.160
<v Speaker 1>had the first statop fund. He came up with all

0:57:00.160 --> 0:57:02.080
<v Speaker 1>of these things on his own. He and when he

0:57:02.200 --> 0:57:04.840
<v Speaker 1>was before his trading career, then he was doing stuff

0:57:04.920 --> 0:57:07.520
<v Speaker 1>like UH. He was the first person to h with

0:57:07.760 --> 0:57:10.960
<v Speaker 1>with UH. With an MT Professor Shannon, who was the

0:57:11.000 --> 0:57:14.280
<v Speaker 1>father farther information theory, they did the first miniature computer.

0:57:14.719 --> 0:57:16.760
<v Speaker 1>This is back in the sixties when god, you know,

0:57:17.000 --> 0:57:20.800
<v Speaker 1>we had we had IBM IBM mainframes as large as

0:57:20.800 --> 0:57:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the room to do simple calculations. They created their own

0:57:23.640 --> 0:57:26.920
<v Speaker 1>own mini ministure computer and did the studies to use

0:57:27.000 --> 0:57:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Newtonian physics to beat Roulette wheel, just to show that

0:57:30.000 --> 0:57:32.000
<v Speaker 1>it could be done. And they got like a forty

0:57:32.040 --> 0:57:35.280
<v Speaker 1>four percent edge on the Roulette um. And and so

0:57:35.720 --> 0:57:38.640
<v Speaker 1>he did all these amazing things. That's fascinating. Why do

0:57:38.720 --> 0:57:41.320
<v Speaker 1>you say he's the most interesting character. Well, because he

0:57:41.400 --> 0:57:43.880
<v Speaker 1>has all that those elements. You know, he figured out

0:57:43.960 --> 0:57:46.720
<v Speaker 1>how to beat you know, the casinos at their own game.

0:57:46.760 --> 0:57:49.360
<v Speaker 1>They changed. In fact, they had meetings about what to

0:57:49.400 --> 0:57:51.919
<v Speaker 1>do about Thorpe, you know about this man, professor. Yeah,

0:57:51.960 --> 0:57:54.360
<v Speaker 1>and and there's a story and they were they thinking

0:57:54.360 --> 0:57:57.160
<v Speaker 1>about banning him from the worst band. Let's put it

0:57:57.240 --> 0:57:58.919
<v Speaker 1>this way. One of those stories in hedge fund markt

0:57:58.960 --> 0:58:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Wizards tell us about and this is like out of

0:58:01.360 --> 0:58:05.000
<v Speaker 1>a movie with his brakes not working, you know, going

0:58:05.160 --> 0:58:08.520
<v Speaker 1>downhead car on the car and just throwing the corn

0:58:08.560 --> 0:58:11.040
<v Speaker 1>reverse and and finding out that the car has been

0:58:11.160 --> 0:58:13.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, tampered with, you know really Yeah, yeah, so

0:58:14.040 --> 0:58:18.040
<v Speaker 1>we had the vegas. We had so But anyway, So

0:58:18.200 --> 0:58:19.720
<v Speaker 1>had that side of his life and then he did

0:58:19.800 --> 0:58:21.960
<v Speaker 1>all these He was the creator of so many catch

0:58:22.000 --> 0:58:24.600
<v Speaker 1>fund strategy He's the first guy to do it. Um

0:58:25.080 --> 0:58:28.480
<v Speaker 1>and uh uh and there all sorts. The thing that

0:58:28.880 --> 0:58:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I can't even think he was a made off. He

0:58:30.920 --> 0:58:33.640
<v Speaker 1>he kind of he he knew made off. He figured

0:58:33.680 --> 0:58:36.320
<v Speaker 1>out what made off was up to like a dozen

0:58:36.440 --> 0:58:40.120
<v Speaker 1>years before. Uh. And he had he investors because investor,

0:58:40.200 --> 0:58:41.560
<v Speaker 1>one of his investors said hey, what do you think

0:58:41.600 --> 0:58:43.280
<v Speaker 1>of this? He said, give me the trades. And he

0:58:43.600 --> 0:58:47.960
<v Speaker 1>he's a mathematician. He he gave mateen reasons why it

0:58:48.080 --> 0:58:52.360
<v Speaker 1>was why he was out. That's fascinating. It's a shame

0:58:52.400 --> 0:58:54.200
<v Speaker 1>he didn't go public with that. Yeah, I think he

0:58:54.680 --> 0:58:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I think I think I might have discussed that in

0:58:57.000 --> 0:58:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the book. And there were reasons why. You know, he

0:58:58.560 --> 0:59:01.760
<v Speaker 1>just felt that you know he couldn't get and of

0:59:01.840 --> 0:59:05.200
<v Speaker 1>course that you know, Actually, uh, I should know the

0:59:05.320 --> 0:59:09.720
<v Speaker 1>name the fellow went public um uh mark uh Greek

0:59:09.840 --> 0:59:15.560
<v Speaker 1>name uh Marcot pop Harry, Marco, Marco Polos, Marco Polos, right, Uh,

0:59:15.680 --> 0:59:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean he wrote this great paper which beautifully beautiful analysis,

0:59:21.360 --> 0:59:24.960
<v Speaker 1>and they ignored it. I thought from Marco Polos's paper

0:59:25.000 --> 0:59:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the most compelling thing was if he's doing this by

0:59:28.200 --> 0:59:31.320
<v Speaker 1>right strategy, there aren't enough options in the world that

0:59:32.800 --> 0:59:35.960
<v Speaker 1>this isn't complicated. He's got to be like he's doing

0:59:36.000 --> 0:59:38.000
<v Speaker 1>trades and markets that had no volume on that day,

0:59:38.240 --> 0:59:40.600
<v Speaker 1>and he's doing what he's doing tens of thousillions of

0:59:40.640 --> 0:59:42.920
<v Speaker 1>dollars right, and tens of thousands of trades and a

0:59:43.000 --> 0:59:46.880
<v Speaker 1>market that didn't even have any option trades. It's it's hindsight.

0:59:46.960 --> 0:59:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Bias is always present. But that was foresight of market

0:59:50.280 --> 0:59:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Polosis party he was. It was foresight that that's quite

0:59:54.520 --> 0:59:57.800
<v Speaker 1>that's quite fascinating. So let's talk a little bit about

0:59:57.880 --> 1:00:01.120
<v Speaker 1>technical Since you've written a book about trend following and

1:00:01.840 --> 1:00:04.800
<v Speaker 1>market trading in futures, I shouldn't really call it trend following. Yeah,

1:00:04.800 --> 1:00:08.680
<v Speaker 1>it's not yet. It's really more technically answered. The book

1:00:08.720 --> 1:00:11.600
<v Speaker 1>that got me into this whole thing writing was was

1:00:11.920 --> 1:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>was an analygical book called Complete Guide to the Futures Market,

1:00:15.480 --> 1:00:18.160
<v Speaker 1>which was the catalyst for the Market Wizard books. Because

1:00:18.640 --> 1:00:20.480
<v Speaker 1>that book, I told you had the idea of years before.

1:00:21.000 --> 1:00:22.720
<v Speaker 1>That book did well for an analytical book. I had

1:00:22.760 --> 1:00:24.720
<v Speaker 1>some publishers say, hey, why don't you do want you

1:00:24.720 --> 1:00:26.280
<v Speaker 1>to do a whole bunch of analygal books. I said, no,

1:00:26.360 --> 1:00:27.640
<v Speaker 1>thank you, I've done that once. It was a lot

1:00:27.680 --> 1:00:29.600
<v Speaker 1>of work, and so I did the Market Wizards. But

1:00:30.000 --> 1:00:32.440
<v Speaker 1>that book is now getting redone. I have a co

1:00:32.600 --> 1:00:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Aufered Markets going and doing a great job, doing great

1:00:35.240 --> 1:00:39.040
<v Speaker 1>legwork getting it updated. And UH so that the updated

1:00:39.160 --> 1:00:42.200
<v Speaker 1>version the new the new version of the Complete Guide

1:00:42.200 --> 1:00:45.000
<v Speaker 1>of the Market. Uh, Complete Guide to the Futures of markets,

1:00:45.040 --> 1:00:49.360
<v Speaker 1>like guid the Future market is fundamentals, technical options, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera. Trading.

1:00:49.800 --> 1:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Uh that comes out this fall sometimes that's that's interesting.

1:00:53.840 --> 1:00:56.680
<v Speaker 1>So so how did you find your way to technicals?

1:00:56.760 --> 1:00:59.040
<v Speaker 1>What made you like? Ah? Yeah, so I said, you're

1:00:59.040 --> 1:01:02.480
<v Speaker 1>looking at somebody who started out as a fundamental analysts.

1:01:02.720 --> 1:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I hear this on a regular basis, starts out as

1:01:06.760 --> 1:01:09.440
<v Speaker 1>a c f A or or a macro economist. And

1:01:09.480 --> 1:01:11.680
<v Speaker 1>then because I come, you know, I come from an

1:01:11.680 --> 1:01:15.520
<v Speaker 1>account what's my education, I'm I'm I've got a degree

1:01:15.560 --> 1:01:18.560
<v Speaker 1>in economic so so, uh, you know you're to be

1:01:18.600 --> 1:01:21.280
<v Speaker 1>inclined to look for a statistical analysts, you know, that

1:01:21.360 --> 1:01:25.080
<v Speaker 1>type of analysis approach. Um. But I found that the

1:01:25.160 --> 1:01:29.400
<v Speaker 1>fundamental analysis was very poorly attuned to trading, because fundamentals

1:01:29.480 --> 1:01:33.640
<v Speaker 1>don't give you timing, uh, And it's worse than Actually,

1:01:33.760 --> 1:01:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I say, the only way that fundamentals are useful for

1:01:37.120 --> 1:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>timing is in a contrarian way. So in other words,

1:01:40.840 --> 1:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>if you have something that's supposed to be bullish for

1:01:42.880 --> 1:01:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the market and it doesn't cause the market to go

1:01:45.560 --> 1:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>up much or as much as you think, or cause

1:01:47.240 --> 1:01:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the market goes down, that might be very useful bearish information,

1:01:50.960 --> 1:01:54.080
<v Speaker 1>but used as the way it's intended, fundamentals do not

1:01:54.280 --> 1:01:57.000
<v Speaker 1>work for timing because they're just too broad, much too broad.

1:01:57.480 --> 1:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Ralph Acampora, I think had the greatest explanation on the

1:02:02.720 --> 1:02:06.800
<v Speaker 1>tension between fundamentals and technicals. I actually have a quote

1:02:06.800 --> 1:02:10.360
<v Speaker 1>of his Fundamentals tell you what to buy, technicals tell

1:02:10.400 --> 1:02:12.120
<v Speaker 1>you when. Yeah, that's a good way to do it

1:02:12.160 --> 1:02:13.880
<v Speaker 1>and you could use fundamentals of that you can't say

1:02:13.920 --> 1:02:16.000
<v Speaker 1>you can say well yeah, and if you're a good

1:02:16.040 --> 1:02:19.160
<v Speaker 1>fundamental analyst, you can get say well this market should

1:02:19.160 --> 1:02:21.040
<v Speaker 1>go up over time. I wanted to look for only

1:02:21.120 --> 1:02:24.680
<v Speaker 1>by trade. That's that's a that's a good use of fundamentals.

1:02:25.280 --> 1:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>And the way I got into technicals because I was

1:02:26.920 --> 1:02:29.920
<v Speaker 1>a research director and uh, one of my analysts was

1:02:29.960 --> 1:02:32.400
<v Speaker 1>a technical anals. So I didn't do anything, but I

1:02:32.520 --> 1:02:34.640
<v Speaker 1>noticed that of all the analysts, he was the only

1:02:34.760 --> 1:02:38.640
<v Speaker 1>one who was doing well, right, And so I didn't

1:02:38.680 --> 1:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>want I like to think I was a little bit

1:02:40.520 --> 1:02:42.160
<v Speaker 1>open minded. So I said, Steve, you tell me what

1:02:42.240 --> 1:02:45.480
<v Speaker 1>you do and he started, you know and Steve who

1:02:45.520 --> 1:02:48.240
<v Speaker 1>which okay, So I showed that absolutely Steve Kronowits And

1:02:48.640 --> 1:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately Steve Proms was I know, he was a very

1:02:51.320 --> 1:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>close friend and he unfortunately died just a couple of

1:02:54.520 --> 1:02:56.480
<v Speaker 1>months ago. So I was, you know, probably the big

1:02:56.600 --> 1:03:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the worst loss I had as a friend in my life. Yeah, yeah,

1:03:00.800 --> 1:03:03.720
<v Speaker 1>just like he was a great person. Um, but Steve

1:03:03.800 --> 1:03:05.880
<v Speaker 1>was the one who talked me techno analysis. When when

1:03:05.920 --> 1:03:08.120
<v Speaker 1>you said tell me what you do, how does he

1:03:08.520 --> 1:03:11.000
<v Speaker 1>So he said you know, well, he made me understand

1:03:11.120 --> 1:03:13.240
<v Speaker 1>why these things work. You know, so I came in

1:03:13.320 --> 1:03:15.439
<v Speaker 1>with the well, this is the pocket of stuff work,

1:03:15.520 --> 1:03:18.800
<v Speaker 1>and they appreciate that it works because it reflects everything

1:03:18.840 --> 1:03:21.680
<v Speaker 1>going to market. It's reflecting the psychology of what you're seeing.

1:03:21.680 --> 1:03:24.400
<v Speaker 1>You're seeing fundamentals in the charts. It's just you're seeing

1:03:24.480 --> 1:03:26.919
<v Speaker 1>him through the price action. And that's what the people

1:03:26.960 --> 1:03:29.160
<v Speaker 1>don't understand that. People say, oh, it's a bunch of

1:03:29.200 --> 1:03:33.200
<v Speaker 1>mambo jumbo and all that. Well, no, because anything that's fundamental,

1:03:33.280 --> 1:03:36.440
<v Speaker 1>people who were moving the markets for fundamentals, you they

1:03:36.520 --> 1:03:38.760
<v Speaker 1>can't hide what they're doing. It shows up in the supply,

1:03:39.400 --> 1:03:41.200
<v Speaker 1>it shows up in the price. So so that leads

1:03:41.240 --> 1:03:43.640
<v Speaker 1>to a question I had written down to ask you,

1:03:43.800 --> 1:03:48.080
<v Speaker 1>what do you think people misunderstand about technicals? That that

1:03:48.280 --> 1:03:50.680
<v Speaker 1>that's that's the key thing, that that the technicals aren't

1:03:50.720 --> 1:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>some mysterious thing. They are the reflection of all the

1:03:53.240 --> 1:03:57.200
<v Speaker 1>participants in the market. So they do reflect fundamentals. Another thing,

1:03:57.320 --> 1:03:58.840
<v Speaker 1>and this is one of the main one of the

1:03:58.920 --> 1:04:01.520
<v Speaker 1>main things, like my complete guard the futures market, one

1:04:01.520 --> 1:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>of my main points is you don't when you and

1:04:04.000 --> 1:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>I go through lots of charged analysis, techno analysis all

1:04:06.600 --> 1:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>that I say, it's not so much interpreting when these

1:04:10.200 --> 1:04:13.120
<v Speaker 1>patterns and it's a lot of subjectivity. What's even more

1:04:13.200 --> 1:04:16.560
<v Speaker 1>important is when things that should work one way based

1:04:16.600 --> 1:04:20.000
<v Speaker 1>upon the techno analysis don't work. So what I call

1:04:20.080 --> 1:04:22.560
<v Speaker 1>a sort of a failed signal is more important than

1:04:22.800 --> 1:04:25.600
<v Speaker 1>than a classical signal tells you something is happened. So

1:04:25.680 --> 1:04:28.080
<v Speaker 1>if you get a you get a market. Hey, this

1:04:28.240 --> 1:04:32.000
<v Speaker 1>is actually my favorite example is this is really terrible

1:04:32.080 --> 1:04:35.360
<v Speaker 1>news and and the stock actually rallied on. That's right,

1:04:35.440 --> 1:04:37.080
<v Speaker 1>that's that's the type of thing. And but I'll give

1:04:37.080 --> 1:04:40.720
<v Speaker 1>you like one example that the personally, Uh, it was

1:04:40.760 --> 1:04:43.440
<v Speaker 1>a week or two ago. It was along the bonds

1:04:43.440 --> 1:04:45.680
<v Speaker 1>of the market was going up, and then one morning

1:04:45.800 --> 1:04:49.120
<v Speaker 1>gaps into highs. I'm I'm doing great, right, and it's

1:04:49.160 --> 1:04:51.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of and then during the day just goes down

1:04:51.080 --> 1:04:53.520
<v Speaker 1>and starts going down and down and down and down,

1:04:54.080 --> 1:04:55.920
<v Speaker 1>and I say, hey, that is just not the right

1:04:56.000 --> 1:04:57.800
<v Speaker 1>type of action. And I had stops in so if

1:04:57.800 --> 1:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>it got close to unchanged, I'd be out. I got out.

1:05:00.280 --> 1:05:02.439
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, now with Brexit is going back up again,

1:05:02.480 --> 1:05:05.160
<v Speaker 1>but it had a good size reaction, and that's that's

1:05:05.160 --> 1:05:07.480
<v Speaker 1>a good example of you had a gap breakout, it

1:05:07.480 --> 1:05:10.080
<v Speaker 1>should have been strong, and it failed. It came back

1:05:10.120 --> 1:05:13.120
<v Speaker 1>into you know, so that's again so to me, that's

1:05:13.160 --> 1:05:16.720
<v Speaker 1>a that's a much better signal than the breakout. So

1:05:17.400 --> 1:05:20.720
<v Speaker 1>today we're sitting in this room with one to three, four,

1:05:20.880 --> 1:05:24.959
<v Speaker 1>five like ten monitors and you know, five computers hooked

1:05:25.000 --> 1:05:30.400
<v Speaker 1>up to a network of industrial military grade computing technology.

1:05:31.040 --> 1:05:37.080
<v Speaker 1>What has all of this computing horsepower and and all

1:05:37.200 --> 1:05:41.200
<v Speaker 1>of this charting software done to the world of technicals?

1:05:41.560 --> 1:05:46.120
<v Speaker 1>And I say that with with the admission that I

1:05:46.280 --> 1:05:49.080
<v Speaker 1>came up with guys who would do charts by hands

1:05:49.320 --> 1:05:52.640
<v Speaker 1>every night. And and the traders there, traders who are

1:05:52.680 --> 1:05:54.680
<v Speaker 1>interviewed who still in system. You know, it's a little

1:05:54.720 --> 1:05:56.360
<v Speaker 1>insistem to or met you know, that was a little

1:05:56.360 --> 1:05:58.800
<v Speaker 1>system doing it by hand. Uh. And as far as

1:05:58.880 --> 1:06:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I go for exam call, I don't use any of

1:06:01.400 --> 1:06:04.120
<v Speaker 1>the indicatorsn't I just look at charts. I mean, I'm

1:06:04.120 --> 1:06:07.680
<v Speaker 1>more comfortable of that. And my attitude is I think

1:06:07.760 --> 1:06:10.760
<v Speaker 1>all these indicators are just vivetives or price anyway. Yeah,

1:06:10.840 --> 1:06:15.080
<v Speaker 1>so and my eneving averages and oscillators and all the Yeah,

1:06:15.400 --> 1:06:17.840
<v Speaker 1>they're just they're just formulations of price, so you're really

1:06:17.880 --> 1:06:19.480
<v Speaker 1>not getting anything more and price, you're just getting it

1:06:19.520 --> 1:06:22.160
<v Speaker 1>in a different type of picture. And my analogy for

1:06:22.240 --> 1:06:24.919
<v Speaker 1>that is it's, you know, you take something like sunglasses,

1:06:25.000 --> 1:06:27.280
<v Speaker 1>and some people are like an amber collar better. So

1:06:27.280 --> 1:06:29.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, you know, bluish callar better. You know, it's

1:06:29.360 --> 1:06:32.360
<v Speaker 1>a personal taste. And and some people who work one

1:06:32.440 --> 1:06:33.880
<v Speaker 1>call it work better. For some people who one call

1:06:33.920 --> 1:06:36.560
<v Speaker 1>it work better. For other people, it's amount of personal taste.

1:06:36.600 --> 1:06:38.360
<v Speaker 1>So in my case, I just like the plain charts,

1:06:38.440 --> 1:06:41.560
<v Speaker 1>plain vanilla clear. But but not you're not an Elliott

1:06:41.560 --> 1:06:44.880
<v Speaker 1>wave guy, You're not a demark. I'm not out of again,

1:06:45.200 --> 1:06:48.880
<v Speaker 1>an analyst or Fibonacci or my approach, and again I'm

1:06:48.880 --> 1:06:51.240
<v Speaker 1>not a great trader, but my approach basically is just

1:06:51.640 --> 1:06:54.160
<v Speaker 1>look at the charts for an opinion. Could be trend,

1:06:54.480 --> 1:06:57.360
<v Speaker 1>could be trend following type, trade, could be counter trend.

1:06:57.440 --> 1:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>But evil way, it's got some sort of reasonable of

1:06:59.920 --> 1:07:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the charts while I'm looking at it that way, And

1:07:02.600 --> 1:07:05.240
<v Speaker 1>in every case, I'm putting in a stop along with

1:07:05.320 --> 1:07:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the entry. So so does all let me ask you

1:07:08.200 --> 1:07:11.600
<v Speaker 1>a slightly different questions, does all this charting software that's

1:07:11.640 --> 1:07:15.440
<v Speaker 1>out there. Uh so anyone could have access to an

1:07:15.480 --> 1:07:20.000
<v Speaker 1>immense amount of technical analysis that really wasn't all that

1:07:20.040 --> 1:07:23.520
<v Speaker 1>available when I was starting. What has that done to

1:07:23.600 --> 1:07:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the world of trading? If anything? I don't know. Yeah.

1:07:26.960 --> 1:07:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I think for some people they learned to use some

1:07:30.080 --> 1:07:32.560
<v Speaker 1>of those indicators in certain ways that work for them,

1:07:32.640 --> 1:07:34.760
<v Speaker 1>and so it gives them there's like it's much more variety.

1:07:34.800 --> 1:07:36.240
<v Speaker 1>And then so far as people need to find a

1:07:36.280 --> 1:07:39.360
<v Speaker 1>way that works for them, it makes it possible. Just

1:07:39.480 --> 1:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>multiplies tremendously the amount of ways people can trade the markets.

1:07:42.280 --> 1:07:45.040
<v Speaker 1>So I guess in that way it's probably useful. But

1:07:45.680 --> 1:07:48.280
<v Speaker 1>no matter back then and now there's only gonna be all,

1:07:48.320 --> 1:07:50.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, smaller number of people that will excel in

1:07:50.120 --> 1:07:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the markets. Alright, so I know I only have you

1:07:53.320 --> 1:07:56.880
<v Speaker 1>for a few minutes longer. Let me get to my

1:07:57.200 --> 1:08:01.840
<v Speaker 1>list of favorite questions and start plowing into this. Let's

1:08:01.880 --> 1:08:05.080
<v Speaker 1>let's jump right in with the mentors. So you mentioned

1:08:05.920 --> 1:08:08.920
<v Speaker 1>my mentors. Yeah, so the one mentor I really have

1:08:09.040 --> 1:08:11.160
<v Speaker 1>one mentor, and that mentor would be would be Steve

1:08:11.240 --> 1:08:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Chronowitz because he's he's a fellow. Taught me classical chart

1:08:14.080 --> 1:08:18.760
<v Speaker 1>analysis and uh yeah, and I didn't read actually never

1:08:18.840 --> 1:08:20.400
<v Speaker 1>even read and I never I had to ment this.

1:08:20.479 --> 1:08:22.479
<v Speaker 1>I never read the classical charge books and everything else

1:08:22.760 --> 1:08:25.600
<v Speaker 1>McGee and yeah, which was not. I just ended up

1:08:25.680 --> 1:08:29.240
<v Speaker 1>not because I learned. I learned the basic things from

1:08:29.320 --> 1:08:31.839
<v Speaker 1>from Steve and then from probably markets. I fund everybody,

1:08:31.960 --> 1:08:34.040
<v Speaker 1>if you look at charts, you get your own biases

1:08:34.080 --> 1:08:37.760
<v Speaker 1>certain things. And uh, I I'll mention another fellow who's

1:08:37.760 --> 1:08:42.000
<v Speaker 1>a close friend, Peter Brandt. And not that he's a friend,

1:08:42.040 --> 1:08:46.559
<v Speaker 1>although Pete is well known on Twitter and traders who

1:08:46.600 --> 1:08:49.439
<v Speaker 1>follow him. Yeah, so uh not that not that I

1:08:49.560 --> 1:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>meant to say, not that he's a mentor um because

1:08:53.320 --> 1:08:56.639
<v Speaker 1>but but he is. He and I are very similar

1:08:56.760 --> 1:08:58.840
<v Speaker 1>in the type of approach. I mean we may not

1:08:58.880 --> 1:09:00.920
<v Speaker 1>look at the child and get the same opinion sometimes yes,

1:09:00.960 --> 1:09:03.040
<v Speaker 1>sometimes No, that's not what we're similar. But it's the

1:09:03.120 --> 1:09:05.479
<v Speaker 1>same type of thought that you know you're only gonna

1:09:05.479 --> 1:09:07.360
<v Speaker 1>win a certain sentences your time. You always know your

1:09:07.439 --> 1:09:10.040
<v Speaker 1>risk point is much more important. To keep your losses

1:09:10.120 --> 1:09:14.280
<v Speaker 1>controlled and uh, and be unemotional and just use just

1:09:14.560 --> 1:09:17.240
<v Speaker 1>use the information. Don't try to make the markets work,

1:09:17.360 --> 1:09:19.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, do what you wanted to do. Just follow

1:09:19.200 --> 1:09:21.280
<v Speaker 1>what the markets are telling you and it's a lot

1:09:21.360 --> 1:09:26.920
<v Speaker 1>of similar philosophy, so not not necessarily a mentor question,

1:09:27.080 --> 1:09:30.479
<v Speaker 1>but what other of all the traders and investors we mentioned,

1:09:30.560 --> 1:09:36.080
<v Speaker 1>who who influenced you philosophically? It sounds like Brandon you

1:09:36.200 --> 1:09:39.280
<v Speaker 1>are very sympatico. But in the formative days. But yeah,

1:09:39.280 --> 1:09:42.240
<v Speaker 1>in the formative days. Um well, I I would say,

1:09:42.479 --> 1:09:44.360
<v Speaker 1>of all, there are a number of people who made

1:09:44.400 --> 1:09:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the same point. But as a line that sticks in

1:09:46.960 --> 1:09:50.880
<v Speaker 1>my mind, U maybe the single most important sentence that

1:09:50.960 --> 1:09:54.320
<v Speaker 1>anybody uttered, you know, okay, that that's a that's something

1:09:54.360 --> 1:09:58.360
<v Speaker 1>to get people right right is Bruce Covernor's line is

1:09:58.400 --> 1:10:00.400
<v Speaker 1>always know where you're gonna get out before you get in.

1:10:01.479 --> 1:10:04.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, I started on a desk with the head

1:10:04.439 --> 1:10:09.080
<v Speaker 1>of the desk was a marine jungle combat instructor. This

1:10:09.160 --> 1:10:13.559
<v Speaker 1>is a big, badass guy, and you know, he had

1:10:13.680 --> 1:10:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the same exact line, but he would always couch it

1:10:16.760 --> 1:10:20.400
<v Speaker 1>in marine terms. He said, before you take you're gonna

1:10:20.400 --> 1:10:22.160
<v Speaker 1>take a village, You're gonna take a house, You're gonna

1:10:22.200 --> 1:10:24.960
<v Speaker 1>take a hell. You have to know we're getting in,

1:10:25.320 --> 1:10:27.960
<v Speaker 1>we're getting out, but we have to know what's our exit,

1:10:28.080 --> 1:10:29.960
<v Speaker 1>and if that exit is blocked, what's our plan B

1:10:30.080 --> 1:10:32.640
<v Speaker 1>and what's our plans? Say you always have if you

1:10:32.720 --> 1:10:35.120
<v Speaker 1>want to get out alive, you have to know what

1:10:35.320 --> 1:10:38.760
<v Speaker 1>your exit strategy is and what the alternatives are if

1:10:38.840 --> 1:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>something MUCKs up that person. And that sounds very much

1:10:42.960 --> 1:10:46.160
<v Speaker 1>like what what Coke said, only only that's got a

1:10:46.200 --> 1:10:48.680
<v Speaker 1>little more mud and and and teeth in it. Well,

1:10:48.880 --> 1:10:50.759
<v Speaker 1>the one thing I would add to that is also

1:10:50.960 --> 1:10:53.920
<v Speaker 1>that the key about it is that what he's really

1:10:54.000 --> 1:10:56.760
<v Speaker 1>saying there is dude, before you get in, because that's

1:10:56.800 --> 1:10:59.439
<v Speaker 1>when used to have objectivity. You're your objective kind of

1:10:59.560 --> 1:11:01.880
<v Speaker 1>motion it. Don't do it, don't have bullets or your

1:11:01.880 --> 1:11:03.679
<v Speaker 1>analogy works. Don't do it in the heat of combat

1:11:04.560 --> 1:11:08.560
<v Speaker 1>when you're playing. That's exactly right that that's my analogy

1:11:08.800 --> 1:11:11.559
<v Speaker 1>is you know that that card in the seat back

1:11:11.640 --> 1:11:13.920
<v Speaker 1>in front of you, Well you're on the ground. That's

1:11:13.920 --> 1:11:15.639
<v Speaker 1>when you want to read it and see where where

1:11:15.640 --> 1:11:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the right, where the exits, where's the flotation devices? Not

1:11:20.720 --> 1:11:23.160
<v Speaker 1>oh look the wing is on fire, which was on

1:11:23.240 --> 1:11:26.719
<v Speaker 1>the news today at thirty feet probably not the time

1:11:26.800 --> 1:11:29.479
<v Speaker 1>where you're gonna have the presence of mind to learn

1:11:29.520 --> 1:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>anything from that. So so let's talk a little bit

1:11:31.880 --> 1:11:35.320
<v Speaker 1>about books. We've been talking about your books? What other

1:11:35.439 --> 1:11:39.519
<v Speaker 1>books have you read fiction, nonfiction, investing, not what other

1:11:39.560 --> 1:11:43.240
<v Speaker 1>books have you found to be Hey, people should read this? Okay, well,

1:11:43.280 --> 1:11:47.120
<v Speaker 1>I I'd recommend as as authors um for for if no,

1:11:47.479 --> 1:11:50.200
<v Speaker 1>even for entertaining purposes. You know, anything Michael Lewis has

1:11:50.240 --> 1:11:53.360
<v Speaker 1>written is just I think Michael is one of great

1:11:53.360 --> 1:11:56.680
<v Speaker 1>authors of all time. I mean just surmendously entertaining any

1:11:56.880 --> 1:11:59.439
<v Speaker 1>but also a brilliant talent. You take a book like

1:11:59.560 --> 1:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>The Big Ord, and I gonna appreciate this because I

1:12:01.439 --> 1:12:03.160
<v Speaker 1>wrote an ente for the market Wizards, I had to

1:12:03.160 --> 1:12:05.760
<v Speaker 1>cover some of the same territory. Uh To take the

1:12:05.920 --> 1:12:08.519
<v Speaker 1>complexity what went on there and to make it entertaining

1:12:08.560 --> 1:12:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and understandable is a talent. Uh So anything he consistently

1:12:13.400 --> 1:12:17.880
<v Speaker 1>finds these angles to to bring and these personalities to

1:12:17.960 --> 1:12:21.960
<v Speaker 1>tell the story just just wonderful. I will admit I

1:12:22.120 --> 1:12:25.080
<v Speaker 1>have never read one of his books. I've read all

1:12:25.120 --> 1:12:27.280
<v Speaker 1>of his books except one. It's eat Way to Say It.

1:12:27.680 --> 1:12:30.439
<v Speaker 1>And I'm saving The blind Side from my next vacation

1:12:31.040 --> 1:12:33.920
<v Speaker 1>because I always read his books and I will plas

1:12:34.160 --> 1:12:38.680
<v Speaker 1>him in a day, The Big Short a day, Flashboys

1:12:38.960 --> 1:12:42.120
<v Speaker 1>a day, money Ball a day, You sit on the beach,

1:12:42.160 --> 1:12:44.759
<v Speaker 1>it's like, wow, yeah it was. It's it's it's it's entertaining,

1:12:44.760 --> 1:12:48.559
<v Speaker 1>you learn stuff, it's insightful, it's creative. Yeah. So uh

1:12:49.520 --> 1:12:52.240
<v Speaker 1>another offer I would put you know, very high up

1:12:52.360 --> 1:12:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and and who influence I think will stay for a

1:12:55.040 --> 1:12:58.360
<v Speaker 1>long time does not seem to tell that. Uh So,

1:12:59.400 --> 1:13:02.120
<v Speaker 1>I guess Xwan is probably the most famous book. Personally

1:13:02.400 --> 1:13:07.240
<v Speaker 1>by randomness is more famous and more useful, well, personally

1:13:07.479 --> 1:13:10.000
<v Speaker 1>fooled by randomness and and tally would not agree with me.

1:13:10.160 --> 1:13:12.760
<v Speaker 1>But but because I think he thinks block Swan is

1:13:12.800 --> 1:13:15.600
<v Speaker 1>his best book, I think I'm not sure, but I

1:13:15.880 --> 1:13:18.439
<v Speaker 1>I think Fooled by Randomness he is not, just because

1:13:18.439 --> 1:13:19.920
<v Speaker 1>it was the first of those type of books, but

1:13:20.000 --> 1:13:23.120
<v Speaker 1>it really got all the key lessons and it's it's

1:13:23.160 --> 1:13:26.040
<v Speaker 1>so much captured how a lot of what people think

1:13:26.200 --> 1:13:29.120
<v Speaker 1>is skill is really luck and and confused two and

1:13:29.280 --> 1:13:33.600
<v Speaker 1>and also not appreciate the fact that there are the

1:13:34.200 --> 1:13:37.360
<v Speaker 1>tail nature of events in the markets as uh, and

1:13:38.080 --> 1:13:40.160
<v Speaker 1>that and and so all those themes really come out

1:13:40.280 --> 1:13:42.320
<v Speaker 1>very well. It's a shame that he's not going to

1:13:42.439 --> 1:13:47.200
<v Speaker 1>hear this interview because I tweeted, I retweeted something somebody

1:13:47.240 --> 1:13:50.160
<v Speaker 1>else had written and he was so angry at that

1:13:50.320 --> 1:13:54.160
<v Speaker 1>person that he not only did he block them on Twitter,

1:13:54.760 --> 1:13:56.560
<v Speaker 1>but he blocked me. Oh, I know it was. It

1:13:56.640 --> 1:14:01.240
<v Speaker 1>was Noah Smith, who writes for Who's and let me go?

1:14:01.400 --> 1:14:06.280
<v Speaker 1>So let me give Aroduce here. Noah Smith, who's a blogger, economist, blogger,

1:14:06.400 --> 1:14:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and tollaly By. Noah hates him. But Noah Smith is

1:14:10.680 --> 1:14:14.600
<v Speaker 1>for a guy who writes short, succinct articles on on

1:14:14.760 --> 1:14:20.080
<v Speaker 1>economics that are pertinent. They're they're just extremely well explained.

1:14:20.400 --> 1:14:23.040
<v Speaker 1>He's not He's not a liberal. He's not a conservative.

1:14:23.080 --> 1:14:26.120
<v Speaker 1>He's That's why I love about Let me let me

1:14:26.200 --> 1:14:28.519
<v Speaker 1>share a little inside baseball with you about Noah Smith.

1:14:29.240 --> 1:14:32.360
<v Speaker 1>So I'm the guy who brought Noah Smith to Bloomberg View.

1:14:32.520 --> 1:14:35.679
<v Speaker 1>How how do I know Noah Smith? So he comes.

1:14:35.800 --> 1:14:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Listen to his background. It's really fascinating. I think he

1:14:38.320 --> 1:14:41.760
<v Speaker 1>comes out of Berkeley with a degree in physics. Then

1:14:41.840 --> 1:14:45.360
<v Speaker 1>he goes to Michigan University of Michigan to to get

1:14:45.479 --> 1:14:48.920
<v Speaker 1>his PhD in economics. Then he's teaching at my alma

1:14:49.000 --> 1:14:52.280
<v Speaker 1>matera State University of New York at Stony Brook in

1:14:52.360 --> 1:14:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the economics department I've spoken to his class a couple

1:14:54.800 --> 1:14:59.559
<v Speaker 1>of times, and when Bloomberg View was coming together. Um

1:15:00.000 --> 1:15:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I every now and then would say, Hey, are you

1:15:02.280 --> 1:15:05.360
<v Speaker 1>looking for a guy to cover this or that? Yes,

1:15:05.439 --> 1:15:08.120
<v Speaker 1>send the name. So a number of people I referred

1:15:08.160 --> 1:15:13.000
<v Speaker 1>them to ultimately became writers here. I always loved for

1:15:13.120 --> 1:15:16.679
<v Speaker 1>the same reasons that you do Noah Smith's work. He's

1:15:16.680 --> 1:15:21.439
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating guy. Then add to that just absolutely brilliant,

1:15:21.479 --> 1:15:25.040
<v Speaker 1>smart as a whip. Add to that, PSC speaks fluent

1:15:25.200 --> 1:15:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Japanese and spends summers in Japan every year for the

1:15:28.960 --> 1:15:33.800
<v Speaker 1>past decade. This is really an interesting, unusual talk about

1:15:33.800 --> 1:15:38.200
<v Speaker 1>eclectic physics, economics Japanese. But he right, and he writes

1:15:38.400 --> 1:15:43.280
<v Speaker 1>very clearly, very very understandable, takes really complex issues and

1:15:43.400 --> 1:15:47.519
<v Speaker 1>makes it really accessible. From what I followed with him

1:15:47.560 --> 1:15:51.639
<v Speaker 1>and Teleb, he used the concept of a black swan,

1:15:52.520 --> 1:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>apparently in a way that Teleb was not happy about. Now,

1:15:56.000 --> 1:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>last I checked, TELEB doesn't have the trademark on a

1:15:59.720 --> 1:16:02.400
<v Speaker 1>black swan, meaning we were expecting this and we got

1:16:02.520 --> 1:16:04.600
<v Speaker 1>something else. Oh and by the way, it was a

1:16:04.680 --> 1:16:09.280
<v Speaker 1>tail event. It was a low probability but significant outcome event.

1:16:10.439 --> 1:16:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I think the two of them use the phrase slightly differently.

1:16:15.120 --> 1:16:17.439
<v Speaker 1>And look, I have no beef with with to Leb,

1:16:17.520 --> 1:16:20.559
<v Speaker 1>and I love Noah Smith's work. He went so postal

1:16:20.920 --> 1:16:24.400
<v Speaker 1>at him. To Leb went so postal at Smith for

1:16:24.680 --> 1:16:27.799
<v Speaker 1>for writing this. He was so angry at me merely

1:16:27.880 --> 1:16:31.479
<v Speaker 1>for retweeting it. He goes, I just can't continent you

1:16:32.200 --> 1:16:34.200
<v Speaker 1>you retweeting this, and I have to block you so

1:16:34.520 --> 1:16:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and we should tell people for Noah Smith. His his

1:16:37.760 --> 1:16:40.920
<v Speaker 1>blog is called no No No opinion, with the word

1:16:41.000 --> 1:16:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Noah an opinion to combine sort of a uh, I

1:16:44.080 --> 1:16:46.960
<v Speaker 1>forgot the word of what what what that's called? When

1:16:47.040 --> 1:16:49.479
<v Speaker 1>you when you combine? Uh, it's on the tip of

1:16:49.560 --> 1:16:53.679
<v Speaker 1>my tongue. Um. I I don't have an issue with Teleb,

1:16:53.760 --> 1:16:57.519
<v Speaker 1>but I find his his work to be fascinating. I

1:16:57.640 --> 1:17:00.680
<v Speaker 1>don't think he what he does on Twitter is a

1:17:00.720 --> 1:17:04.560
<v Speaker 1>good look, crushing it, you know, getting into fights with

1:17:04.640 --> 1:17:07.160
<v Speaker 1>people at the time. But I understand it. Listen, we

1:17:07.240 --> 1:17:11.519
<v Speaker 1>all have a certain amount of road rage that doesn't

1:17:11.560 --> 1:17:17.640
<v Speaker 1>suffer that doesn't suffer fools, but exactly exactly. But I

1:17:17.720 --> 1:17:21.960
<v Speaker 1>think sometimes maybe he may confuse you know, uh, who

1:17:22.040 --> 1:17:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the fools are? You know? So yeah, no, that that's

1:17:24.320 --> 1:17:29.920
<v Speaker 1>exactly listen if when over the weekend following Brexit, I

1:17:30.680 --> 1:17:34.519
<v Speaker 1>saw a data point that said, um, you know, you

1:17:34.560 --> 1:17:38.640
<v Speaker 1>look at how the older folks voted, they voted overwhelmingly

1:17:38.720 --> 1:17:41.760
<v Speaker 1>to leave. And you look at how the younger folks vote,

1:17:41.800 --> 1:17:44.519
<v Speaker 1>and they voted overwhelming in these stay And I saw

1:17:44.680 --> 1:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I tweeted this data point out that had come from

1:17:47.840 --> 1:17:53.400
<v Speaker 1>one of the UK papers, and and someone tweeted tweeted

1:17:53.439 --> 1:17:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the line with there's a British soldier saluting in a

1:17:58.400 --> 1:18:02.160
<v Speaker 1>in a huge cemetery and they tweeted, yeah, what did

1:18:02.200 --> 1:18:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the old folks ever do for the UK? And I

1:18:05.160 --> 1:18:07.160
<v Speaker 1>had to call the guy out. I'm like, well, if

1:18:07.200 --> 1:18:10.600
<v Speaker 1>you're eighty and you voted for Brexit, that's fantastic. You

1:18:10.640 --> 1:18:13.400
<v Speaker 1>were three years old when World War two started, so

1:18:13.680 --> 1:18:18.120
<v Speaker 1>please do some basic math and stop lying about this.

1:18:19.000 --> 1:18:21.880
<v Speaker 1>You already won, but you don't have to. You could

1:18:21.920 --> 1:18:23.720
<v Speaker 1>stop lying now that you won. You don't have to.

1:18:24.160 --> 1:18:27.479
<v Speaker 1>And I just I felt myself wanting to go full

1:18:27.560 --> 1:18:32.640
<v Speaker 1>talent the guy. But there's a difference between calling out

1:18:32.720 --> 1:18:36.240
<v Speaker 1>someone who's intellectually dusanest someone who's a liar not suffering

1:18:36.320 --> 1:18:38.280
<v Speaker 1>fools glad, And I was very surprised when I saw

1:18:38.439 --> 1:18:40.000
<v Speaker 1>there was some you know, comments that he was inking.

1:18:40.000 --> 1:18:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I didn't really read the whole thing, not see him

1:18:41.800 --> 1:18:44.960
<v Speaker 1>come back on BlackBerry and and no, we we miss you,

1:18:45.080 --> 1:18:47.600
<v Speaker 1>we love you, and and be less of a By

1:18:47.640 --> 1:18:49.720
<v Speaker 1>the way, he's another guy that I would love to

1:18:49.800 --> 1:18:52.559
<v Speaker 1>have on the show, but I'm afraid he'll just chew

1:18:52.680 --> 1:18:55.720
<v Speaker 1>the furniture. He's you know, I've met him, I've had

1:18:55.800 --> 1:18:57.760
<v Speaker 1>lunch with him. I think he's an interesting guy. He's

1:18:57.800 --> 1:19:02.800
<v Speaker 1>certainly smart enough. I maybe it's a generational thing. I

1:19:02.880 --> 1:19:05.800
<v Speaker 1>got enough of a foot in the under fifty, asked him.

1:19:07.320 --> 1:19:09.400
<v Speaker 1>I'd ask him on Twitter, but I'm but I'm blocked.

1:19:09.479 --> 1:19:13.559
<v Speaker 1>But all right, let's let's not um have this. Let's

1:19:13.640 --> 1:19:17.000
<v Speaker 1>let's go back to what other books besides Michael Lewis

1:19:17.040 --> 1:19:18.800
<v Speaker 1>and Not seemed to like. Okay, what are the books

1:19:18.800 --> 1:19:21.080
<v Speaker 1>do you find? Well? I mentioned Reminiscence of the Stock Operators,

1:19:22.600 --> 1:19:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Beat the Deal or Beat the Market, and then my,

1:19:25.520 --> 1:19:28.760
<v Speaker 1>uh yeah, my favorite book, my personal favorite book of

1:19:28.840 --> 1:19:31.240
<v Speaker 1>all time. One of the only books I've read several

1:19:31.320 --> 1:19:35.080
<v Speaker 1>times is a book called Endurance about Shock Shackleton's uh

1:19:35.840 --> 1:19:38.840
<v Speaker 1>endurance Endurance, So it was original book there has been

1:19:38.840 --> 1:19:43.160
<v Speaker 1>several books about Shackleton that the Anton. Now, yeah, there's

1:19:43.160 --> 1:19:45.400
<v Speaker 1>a movies and stuff I think well have been. Uh,

1:19:45.880 --> 1:19:48.080
<v Speaker 1>but that first book, I think it was by Lansing,

1:19:49.040 --> 1:19:51.479
<v Speaker 1>which was written if I remember I remember, I think

1:19:51.479 --> 1:19:53.960
<v Speaker 1>it was written fifty five. But it is the most

1:19:54.040 --> 1:19:57.920
<v Speaker 1>compelling story. Uh. It is just just so tell quickly

1:19:58.000 --> 1:20:01.400
<v Speaker 1>tell the shaff So the shack the story an antontic

1:20:01.479 --> 1:20:05.000
<v Speaker 1>expedition bottom line gets stuck trapped in the ice. Uh

1:20:05.160 --> 1:20:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and in middle life is no, they just have nothing

1:20:08.160 --> 1:20:12.400
<v Speaker 1>and uh they by all means they should have been. Yeah,

1:20:12.560 --> 1:20:15.960
<v Speaker 1>they hunted to some extent, but they couldn't be rescued

1:20:16.040 --> 1:20:19.200
<v Speaker 1>for for years. But I almost don't want to say

1:20:19.280 --> 1:20:22.920
<v Speaker 1>what happened or what happened with survival because because it's

1:20:22.960 --> 1:20:24.400
<v Speaker 1>because you don't know. If you don't know, it makes

1:20:24.520 --> 1:20:28.320
<v Speaker 1>much more interesting. But as a tale of survival, it is.

1:20:29.320 --> 1:20:32.479
<v Speaker 1>If it's not the best tale of survival ever written,

1:20:33.240 --> 1:20:36.000
<v Speaker 1>it's um and you you know you an endurance, I

1:20:36.040 --> 1:20:41.040
<v Speaker 1>mean the endurance. Endurance is well titled and there are

1:20:41.080 --> 1:20:43.680
<v Speaker 1>so many images in there and so many, so many

1:20:43.880 --> 1:20:47.120
<v Speaker 1>it's the story itself is so compelling. Uh, it's just

1:20:47.200 --> 1:20:49.000
<v Speaker 1>a great reason I'll put that on my list. That

1:20:49.080 --> 1:20:53.240
<v Speaker 1>sounds fascinating. Um So since you joined the finance industry,

1:20:53.760 --> 1:20:56.439
<v Speaker 1>what what are some of the most significant changes that

1:20:56.560 --> 1:21:00.280
<v Speaker 1>you've you've witnessed. Well, we talked about the floors disappear ring,

1:21:00.720 --> 1:21:04.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, tremendousity, the computers, I mean, the whole why

1:21:04.600 --> 1:21:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I started out in the day or we we you know,

1:21:07.479 --> 1:21:10.519
<v Speaker 1>most people, we didn't have quotepaciet you know, on desk.

1:21:10.600 --> 1:21:13.360
<v Speaker 1>We had these giant wall boards where the click and

1:21:13.439 --> 1:21:16.320
<v Speaker 1>that was technology, the board wall boards which you know,

1:21:16.400 --> 1:21:19.120
<v Speaker 1>clicked every time the price changed. Technology has been a

1:21:19.160 --> 1:21:22.519
<v Speaker 1>tremendous change, and that's that's brought into uh into existence

1:21:22.520 --> 1:21:25.400
<v Speaker 1>a whole bunch of uh the approaches that would have

1:21:25.439 --> 1:21:28.160
<v Speaker 1>been impossible because of the calculations of all the just

1:21:28.280 --> 1:21:30.680
<v Speaker 1>two intends to do any other way. So you have

1:21:30.800 --> 1:21:34.160
<v Speaker 1>a change the nature of trading in that sense. Um,

1:21:35.200 --> 1:21:37.320
<v Speaker 1>I guess a lot more strategies. I mean, it used

1:21:37.360 --> 1:21:39.360
<v Speaker 1>to be much simpler and you got you got a

1:21:39.600 --> 1:21:42.280
<v Speaker 1>fifty eight different head fund strategies now all sorts of

1:21:42.400 --> 1:21:45.320
<v Speaker 1>arcane stuff. So those are some of that changes. But

1:21:45.600 --> 1:21:48.160
<v Speaker 1>human nature doesn't change. And that's where the similarity of

1:21:48.240 --> 1:21:53.200
<v Speaker 1>markets remains so given the technology changes in the past,

1:21:53.439 --> 1:21:55.040
<v Speaker 1>what what do you think might be some of the

1:21:55.160 --> 1:21:58.240
<v Speaker 1>next major shifts we see going forward? See, I'm not

1:21:58.320 --> 1:22:02.880
<v Speaker 1>a predictor. I don't know. You know that's the right answer, don't.

1:22:02.920 --> 1:22:05.519
<v Speaker 1>I always like that answer. If nobody if you don't know,

1:22:05.600 --> 1:22:08.439
<v Speaker 1>you're better off saying that then then guessing. And so

1:22:08.600 --> 1:22:10.720
<v Speaker 1>few people in this industry of willingness. I never I

1:22:10.840 --> 1:22:12.320
<v Speaker 1>never answer a question. You know, I don't think I

1:22:12.360 --> 1:22:14.040
<v Speaker 1>know the answer to right now. But by the way,

1:22:14.320 --> 1:22:17.200
<v Speaker 1>I've done enough TV in my career that when someone

1:22:17.280 --> 1:22:19.360
<v Speaker 1>asked you a question and you say I don't know,

1:22:19.760 --> 1:22:22.280
<v Speaker 1>it throws them off. They have no idea what I've

1:22:22.320 --> 1:22:24.960
<v Speaker 1>done that? So where's the down gonna be? Right right?

1:22:25.439 --> 1:22:26.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. They look at you like you have

1:22:27.000 --> 1:22:30.720
<v Speaker 1>two heads. Come on, give me a number seven I've

1:22:30.760 --> 1:22:32.960
<v Speaker 1>done in three I remember doing inenter you in Australia

1:22:32.960 --> 1:22:34.639
<v Speaker 1>and I said, look, you know, I can talk about

1:22:34.640 --> 1:22:36.080
<v Speaker 1>training and I can talk about this. I don't but

1:22:36.240 --> 1:22:38.080
<v Speaker 1>that because I don't ask me. I'm not. You don't

1:22:38.080 --> 1:22:41.840
<v Speaker 1>ask me, I'm not and I'm not fo First question,

1:22:41.920 --> 1:22:43.760
<v Speaker 1>what do you think the Australian stock Market's gonna do

1:22:43.880 --> 1:22:47.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, I have no idea and it's basically what

1:22:47.360 --> 1:22:50.720
<v Speaker 1>I answered. So, um, so let's get to our our

1:22:50.840 --> 1:22:55.840
<v Speaker 1>two are too, uh A two favorite questions that we

1:22:55.920 --> 1:22:59.920
<v Speaker 1>ask all of our guests. So a millennial or Reese

1:23:00.080 --> 1:23:02.200
<v Speaker 1>graduate comes to you and says, I'm thinking of getting

1:23:02.200 --> 1:23:05.400
<v Speaker 1>into finance as a career. What sort of advice would

1:23:05.439 --> 1:23:10.080
<v Speaker 1>you give them? Oh that's a tough one. Uh you're

1:23:10.080 --> 1:23:13.280
<v Speaker 1>talking about trading, You're talking just finances, anything and anything,

1:23:13.400 --> 1:23:17.120
<v Speaker 1>and uh, well, uh, first make sure it's what you

1:23:17.200 --> 1:23:19.240
<v Speaker 1>really want to do. I mean, it's not you're not

1:23:19.360 --> 1:23:26.000
<v Speaker 1>just looking to do for the money. Um, you know.

1:23:26.080 --> 1:23:28.280
<v Speaker 1>I guess in terms of finding a job, probably the

1:23:28.280 --> 1:23:30.360
<v Speaker 1>only effective way to do it these days is networking.

1:23:31.720 --> 1:23:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Umbo career itself. The treer has to be geared to

1:23:37.400 --> 1:23:41.040
<v Speaker 1>something that well, you want to go with your strength. So, uh,

1:23:41.720 --> 1:23:43.280
<v Speaker 1>if you can write, you want to try to find

1:23:43.280 --> 1:23:46.480
<v Speaker 1>an angle it and fanthasized writing. If you can do analytics,

1:23:46.560 --> 1:23:48.760
<v Speaker 1>he didn't do that. If you good in computers, you know,

1:23:49.160 --> 1:23:51.360
<v Speaker 1>so take advantage of your strength and try to break

1:23:51.400 --> 1:23:54.720
<v Speaker 1>into the career on your strong point. Basically, focus on

1:23:54.840 --> 1:23:58.200
<v Speaker 1>your strong point and and our last question, um, what

1:23:58.400 --> 1:24:00.960
<v Speaker 1>is it that you know about investing today you wish

1:24:01.000 --> 1:24:04.280
<v Speaker 1>you knew thirty plus years ago when you started. Well.

1:24:04.680 --> 1:24:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Uh that one of the themes of Marco Wizzards is

1:24:08.240 --> 1:24:11.040
<v Speaker 1>that the risk of management is more important than than

1:24:11.160 --> 1:24:15.160
<v Speaker 1>trading strategy. Uh. Oh you know what. Uh And this

1:24:15.320 --> 1:24:18.559
<v Speaker 1>is what I've made mistake I've made made made more recently,

1:24:18.600 --> 1:24:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and I wish I learned much quicker. And even if

1:24:20.200 --> 1:24:22.240
<v Speaker 1>I learned it, I kind of repeated it. Hopefully I'll

1:24:22.280 --> 1:24:26.680
<v Speaker 1>never repeat it again. But um, and maybe my my

1:24:26.760 --> 1:24:30.719
<v Speaker 1>biggest flaw as a trader is be careful of getting

1:24:30.760 --> 1:24:34.720
<v Speaker 1>too complacent when you're doing very well. Uh so all

1:24:34.920 --> 1:24:37.639
<v Speaker 1>my you know, for for years and years, every time

1:24:37.680 --> 1:24:41.519
<v Speaker 1>I've had any significant draw downs, that's always been after

1:24:41.640 --> 1:24:44.439
<v Speaker 1>I've done extremely well. Yeah, you know that I've witnessed

1:24:44.520 --> 1:24:47.200
<v Speaker 1>that and experienced it. So I'm I'm actually I'm actually

1:24:47.280 --> 1:24:49.840
<v Speaker 1>superb at not at coming in for a small steak

1:24:50.360 --> 1:24:52.960
<v Speaker 1>and even just controlling the lost tiny amount or not

1:24:53.080 --> 1:24:55.679
<v Speaker 1>losing anything and just getting ahead and never being behind.

1:24:55.760 --> 1:24:58.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm really really good at that. Um. But I'm really

1:24:59.400 --> 1:25:02.599
<v Speaker 1>been terror ball about once I get ahead, not a lot,

1:25:02.680 --> 1:25:06.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, than than giving back a chunk, which I would,

1:25:06.840 --> 1:25:09.920
<v Speaker 1>But because I do things or take more risk, or

1:25:10.280 --> 1:25:12.720
<v Speaker 1>do things differently than I would have done when I

1:25:12.800 --> 1:25:14.720
<v Speaker 1>was being so super cautious. So when i'm when I

1:25:14.760 --> 1:25:16.639
<v Speaker 1>thought out in the beginning, I'm every time I got

1:25:16.720 --> 1:25:18.320
<v Speaker 1>and I don't trade all the time, so it depends

1:25:18.320 --> 1:25:20.200
<v Speaker 1>on how busy i'm. But every time I saw trading,

1:25:20.240 --> 1:25:22.439
<v Speaker 1>I started very small and very cautious, and that's when

1:25:22.479 --> 1:25:24.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm best. So it's so funny you say that when

1:25:24.479 --> 1:25:26.920
<v Speaker 1>I when I began as a trader, I ended up

1:25:26.960 --> 1:25:29.800
<v Speaker 1>creating a number of rules, one of which was never

1:25:29.960 --> 1:25:33.639
<v Speaker 1>let a profit turn into a loss. But then mid nineties,

1:25:33.800 --> 1:25:35.800
<v Speaker 1>just like you talked, what happens when you have these

1:25:35.880 --> 1:25:39.639
<v Speaker 1>giant winners. So that's where the rule came from, which

1:25:39.760 --> 1:25:42.240
<v Speaker 1>is when you're up x percent and x has to

1:25:42.320 --> 1:25:46.120
<v Speaker 1>be substantial. If you give back, that's it cut cut

1:25:46.240 --> 1:25:49.680
<v Speaker 1>your losses, and I think, and there's something along there.

1:25:49.760 --> 1:25:51.880
<v Speaker 1>So in other words, you you're up a hundred up,

1:25:51.920 --> 1:25:54.240
<v Speaker 1>now I'm alling up seventy five. That's it. I'm out.

1:25:54.320 --> 1:25:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Otherwise we've all seen those round trips too many times. Jack.

1:25:58.360 --> 1:26:01.760
<v Speaker 1>This is absolutely fascinating. Thank you so much, Thank you

1:26:01.840 --> 1:26:04.639
<v Speaker 1>so much for doing this, for those of you who

1:26:04.880 --> 1:26:09.320
<v Speaker 1>are still with us almost two hours later. Um, we've

1:26:09.360 --> 1:26:11.760
<v Speaker 1>been speaking with Jack Squager. He is the author of

1:26:13.120 --> 1:26:15.439
<v Speaker 1>the Complete Guide to Futures Trading. Look for the new

1:26:15.640 --> 1:26:20.040
<v Speaker 1>edition coming out in the fall. Market Wizards, Stock Market Wizards,

1:26:20.439 --> 1:26:24.000
<v Speaker 1>New Market Wizards, and Hedge Fund Wizards, as well as

1:26:24.520 --> 1:26:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the Little Book of Market Wizards. Diday I got I

1:26:27.600 --> 1:26:30.240
<v Speaker 1>nailed them all. Uh, and be sure and check out

1:26:30.560 --> 1:26:35.479
<v Speaker 1>Jack's new entrepreneurial venture UH fund seater dot com, where

1:26:35.520 --> 1:26:38.960
<v Speaker 1>you could see how they are trying to find the

1:26:39.120 --> 1:26:42.439
<v Speaker 1>new uh, the new emerging managers. Perhaps, if you're an

1:26:42.439 --> 1:26:45.360
<v Speaker 1>active trader, you might want to register at fund seater

1:26:45.439 --> 1:26:49.200
<v Speaker 1>and see if eventually they find you as as one

1:26:49.240 --> 1:26:53.640
<v Speaker 1>of the outstanding performers. If you have enjoyed this conversation,

1:26:54.280 --> 1:26:56.280
<v Speaker 1>be sure and look Up an Inch or Down an

1:26:56.320 --> 1:26:58.479
<v Speaker 1>Inch on Apple iTunes and see any of the other

1:26:59.120 --> 1:27:02.439
<v Speaker 1>nineties seven or so such chats that we've had. Check

1:27:02.520 --> 1:27:05.800
<v Speaker 1>out my daily column on Bloomberg dot com, or you

1:27:05.840 --> 1:27:08.519
<v Speaker 1>can follow me on Twitter. Are you on Twitter these days? Jack? Yeah?

1:27:08.520 --> 1:27:12.960
<v Speaker 1>I am Jack Schweger Jack at Jack Schweger. Um, I

1:27:13.040 --> 1:27:16.000
<v Speaker 1>would be remiss if I did not think Taylor Riggs

1:27:16.120 --> 1:27:20.479
<v Speaker 1>my booker, Charlie Volmer our producer, and Reggie our recording engineer.

1:27:21.240 --> 1:27:25.000
<v Speaker 1>You've been listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio,

1:27:28.040 --> 1:27:31.320
<v Speaker 1>brought to you by B A s F. We create chemistry.