WEBVTT - ADP Report, Economy, Markets, Cannabis

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Penel podcast. I'm Paul swing you

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>along with my co host Lisa Brahmas. Each day we

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:10.399
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for you

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:12.640
<v Speaker 1>and your money. Whether at the grocery store or the

0:00:12.640 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 1>trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple podcast

0:00:16.120 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as at

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com. We're sitting here in our Bloomberg ter

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:25.319
<v Speaker 1>Active Broger Studios trying to peg what my co host

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:28.960
<v Speaker 1>and colleague very correctly called the smoking gun or the

0:00:28.960 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 1>red flag with the smoking talking the smoking gun, smoking

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 1>flag for why markets are feeling so low today. A

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:40.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of people pointing their fingers at the ADP report. Carracadana,

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 1>who is the chief US economist for Bloomberg Economics, sitting

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:47.800
<v Speaker 1>here maybe agreeing right, I mean, is this is this

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>a surprise? The disappointing ADP reproach showing the payrolls at

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 1>US employers cooled in September. I don't think it is

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:56.279
<v Speaker 1>a surprise. I mean it's a little bit weaker than

0:00:56.320 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 1>what the consensus was looking for, but not materially just

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:01.800
<v Speaker 1>a five thou in or so, but we are slowing

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:04.479
<v Speaker 1>down relative to what we saw earlier in the year.

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 1>That being said, this kind of negative sentiment in the market,

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 1>it was evident during Asia hours, intensified during europe trading hours,

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 1>and then now what spreads into the US, although not

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 1>quite to the same degree as what we saw in Europe.

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know that there's a single smoking gun.

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:25.119
<v Speaker 1>It's more of a confluence of events. So a DP

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 1>tells us to labor markets a little weaker. Boris Johnson,

0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>continuing to try to wrangle hard break for today's everyone

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:39.760
<v Speaker 1>sings a few bars in this song. Right, you have

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:44.559
<v Speaker 1>W t O talking about trade sanctions with Europe over

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, squabbling over airbus and bowing and whatnot. So

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>there's just a lot of little things adding up which

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of build on what we saw in yesterday, which

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 1>was a big surprise in the manufacturing. I s m alright, Paul,

0:01:56.680 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 1>some blame Boris Johnson, Yes, exactly. I always like to

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 1>blame break another among others among others. So Carl, is

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>this change you good folks down in Bloomber economics. You're

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:09.120
<v Speaker 1>crunching the numbers. You've seen the you know, the manufacturing

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>are you know, the I s M for the latest

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>month was weaker than expected. So we know that manufacturing

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:17.240
<v Speaker 1>UH is weak and probably weakening, certainly in the US,

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:20.639
<v Speaker 1>and we know what's happening internationally. Um. Sorry, you kind

0:02:20.639 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 1>of taken down your outlook or preparing to take down

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:27.240
<v Speaker 1>your outlook is maybe the consumer isn't quite as strong

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:29.640
<v Speaker 1>as we thought. Well, we took our outlook down on

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>August one when the next round of tariffs were announced

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:36.239
<v Speaker 1>back after the July FED meeting. The very next day,

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 1>President Trump announced that the tariffs would go into effect

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 1>at the start of August, start of October, excuse me, uh,

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 1>and also again in in December, they moved that October

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 1>first deadline back to October. But it does look like

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the tariffs will go up to in the middle of

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 1>this month, it doesn't. You know, there've been very little

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 1>indication that we're actually moving away from that at this

0:02:57.080 --> 0:02:59.360
<v Speaker 1>point in time, and you see the impact of those

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 1>trade for action showing up in things like the I

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:05.679
<v Speaker 1>s M survey yesterday. Additionally, another roughly a hundred and

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 1>fifty billion of product subject to tariff in the middle

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:12.160
<v Speaker 1>of December, so the price tag on tariffs is about

0:03:12.240 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 1>two and a half times larger in twenty nineteen compared

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 1>to eighteen and so that does move the needle on growth.

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 1>And we're in a slower moving economy already, so when

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>you have slower growth, the economy is more susceptible to

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>those types of shocks. That being said, I know there's

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>been talked this morning about one handle on GDP and whatnot.

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 1>We have been looking for about one point eight one

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 1>point seven percent to GDP growth in the back half

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 1>of the year, and we moved to that call back

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 1>on August first, when the tariffs went into effect. So, uh,

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the tone we were seeing in the market was not

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>consistent with sub two percent GDP growth. Now we're starting

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 1>to see that reality set in as job creation, manufacturing

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>activity all looks more consistent with US sub two percent number.

0:03:56.760 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 1>But to answer your question, stall speed for the US economy,

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 1>it's about one point four one point five percent growth,

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>So we are closer to stall speed, but we're not

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 1>there yet. And that's why my team thinks that we

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 1>can actually muddle through this soft patch, thanks very much

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 1>to consumers remaining resilient. So that was my question, right,

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 1>at what point do you reach a tipping point. How

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:19.719
<v Speaker 1>much pessimism should be baked in right now. Is it

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 1>a recession that we're facing, or is it simply uh,

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:28.720
<v Speaker 1>lower inflation, lower growth, and just lower asset increases. Well,

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 1>it's not recession, uh, And it's not even growth recession.

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:35.720
<v Speaker 1>And there's a distinction between recession and growth recession. Everyone

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 1>knows what recession is. Growth recession is a period where

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:42.160
<v Speaker 1>growth slows down so much, not that we fall into contraction,

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 1>but actually that things start to unravel, like the unemployment

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>rate starts to drift higher. I don't think we'll even

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:51.039
<v Speaker 1>get to a growth recession in the back half of

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:54.839
<v Speaker 1>this year. So labor market continues to produce job gains

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:58.880
<v Speaker 1>in excess of eighty five thousand per month, that will

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:02.799
<v Speaker 1>keep the unemployment rate out relatively steady at the current levels.

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 1>So I think we're just accepting a reality of a

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:09.280
<v Speaker 1>of a much more sluggish profile to the economy here

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 1>in the US, and then much weaker conditions abroad Germany

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:16.679
<v Speaker 1>probably slipping into technical recession uh UK on the cusp

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:21.839
<v Speaker 1>of recession once Brexit is executed. Boom Brick Economics have

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:26.359
<v Speaker 1>a GDP forecast. GDP growth will be about two to

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 1>two and a quarter percent, So we're kind of refining

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:31.480
<v Speaker 1>things as we look at that. Um. That being said,

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 1>one thing we should keep in mind here right everyone's

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 1>talking about the R word. Uh. The ground is very

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 1>fertile for a significant rebounded activity if these trade headwinds

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 1>are removed. So the Fed has policy rates set in

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:48.599
<v Speaker 1>a very accommodative stance right there, giving the economy steroids,

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 1>so to speak. So rates are accommodative, Corporate profit growth

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 1>is positive, corporate balance sheets are in good condition. In

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the unemployment rate is the lowest sense of Vietnam Draft

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:00.359
<v Speaker 1>was in effect, So things are well posed. Issue that

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 1>if we don't just squandered this all with increase in

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 1>tariff after increase and tariff now the economy could rebound

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:11.159
<v Speaker 1>quite nicely and beyond. Carraco Donna, Chief economists for a

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Economics, thanks so much for joining us here on

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:33.040
<v Speaker 1>our Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio. Today we're joined by opinion

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 1>columnists Terres Rafael. She joins us from the London Bureau.

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 1>So Terres, it looks like bars. Johnson today outlined his

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:43.840
<v Speaker 1>plan for new Brexit agreement and warned the European Union

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 1>to compromise or watch the UK walk away from the

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>talks and leave the block with added deal. How did

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 1>that go over? Well, we're still waiting to hear an

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:57.160
<v Speaker 1>official EU response. UM the the EU said it wants

0:06:57.160 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 1>to examine the details of the proposal, but the kind

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 1>of early indications uh were that, uh, you know, we're

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:08.599
<v Speaker 1>not that warm to the deal because it's proposing what

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:12.240
<v Speaker 1>looks like a breach of the EU's read lines in

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>that there is no way to do the Johnson uh

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 1>deal without putting customs checks somewhere. Now he said they

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be and we're talking about Ireland in the border

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:24.680
<v Speaker 1>between Northern Ireland the Republic of Ireland, which is the

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 1>key to sort of unlocking this whole Brexit problem and

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 1>getting a deal. And Johnson has said there will be

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 1>no checks at the border. Um, they will honor the

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Good Friday peace agreement. However, he's also said they will

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 1>have to be checked somewhere, and so I think the

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>sticking point is how you actually do that. The other

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 1>sticking point is that Boris Johnson is quickly losing support

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:47.239
<v Speaker 1>even from his own party. I mean, how much power

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 1>does he have in setting this this this proposal over

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 1>to EU. Well, he doesn't have power if you look

0:07:55.880 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 1>at the number of sort of MPs that he commands

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 1>in parliament. Um. However, the real, uh, you know, question

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:05.280
<v Speaker 1>is whether he would have enough support to get his

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 1>deal through before October nineteenth, when parliamentary legislation requires him

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 1>to seek an extension. Now, if the Northern Ireland Land

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Democratic Unionist Party go along with Johnson is say, has

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 1>indicated so far they're open to doing, and he can

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 1>reclaim Tory MPs that he expelled from the party, whip

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 1>from from the sort of the voting part of the party.

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 1>If he can get their support and a few Labor

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:34.040
<v Speaker 1>MPs on side, then he gets a deal through and

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 1>then we're in very very different territory because he can

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 1>then call an election claiming he's delivered Brexit and uh,

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:43.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, and then it's really game on for Johnson.

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 1>But whether you know, the Labor Party is going to

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:48.880
<v Speaker 1>give him that you know, gift, whether the EU is

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:51.679
<v Speaker 1>going to give him enough to allow him to recommend

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the deal to Parliament, all those are unclear right now.

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:57.600
<v Speaker 1>So tre's can you just update this on the timing.

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:00.120
<v Speaker 1>I know we're kind of getting towards the thin at

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the end of this process, and somehow the Halloween holiday

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of is stuck in my mind. So okay, it's

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:10.320
<v Speaker 1>incredibly confusing, But you know, let's start by saying the

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:12.960
<v Speaker 1>next forty eight hours or key to find out how

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the EU responds to uh to Johnson's proposals. If they

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>agree to negotiate, then we've got a sort of ten

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:23.720
<v Speaker 1>day period before the EU summit, which is happening on

0:09:23.760 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the seventeenth of October. Now, legislation passed in Parliament requires Johnson,

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:30.960
<v Speaker 1>if he cannot get a deal, to ask the EU

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:35.359
<v Speaker 1>for an extension by October nineteen. October thirty one, Halloween

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:39.959
<v Speaker 1>is Brexit Day. If nothing else happens. If there's no extension,

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:43.599
<v Speaker 1>the UK leaves the EU without a deal on October one.

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>The parliamentary legislation is designed to make that impossible. It's

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:51.200
<v Speaker 1>triggered this request for an extension. Johnson is vowed that

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:53.840
<v Speaker 1>he will not seek that extension. He said it would

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 1>signal the extinction of the Tory Party. So don't be

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:59.440
<v Speaker 1>surprised if this ends up where else but in court. Again.

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:03.679
<v Speaker 1>The other thing it could do, what about a second referendum, right.

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:06.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean, are we still talking about that or does

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:08.679
<v Speaker 1>that seem less likely more likely? Now I'll tell you

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:11.200
<v Speaker 1>who's talking about it. The Labor Party is talking about it.

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>So at their conference which was a week ago, they

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:17.680
<v Speaker 1>agreed that the official Labor policy would be to win

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:23.840
<v Speaker 1>an election, uh, renegotiate a deal or renegotiate Theresa May's deal,

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 1>so they would would be a Labor deal and then

0:10:26.040 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 1>put it to the people in a referendum, with the

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Labor Party not specifying which way it would urge people

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:35.680
<v Speaker 1>to vote. So you could have a situation which they've

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 1>negotiated the deal but but you know, campaign against it.

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:42.319
<v Speaker 1>So the Labor Party wants a referendum, that's very clear.

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 1>The other two sort of major parties, mainly the Conservatives,

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 1>they want to just get Brexit done is we've heard

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:50.960
<v Speaker 1>in their party conference. And the Liberal Democrats, who have

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 1>been revived are campaigning to revoke Article fifty, that is

0:10:56.200 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 1>canceled Brexit all together. So just real quickly, I know

0:10:59.840 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 1>you said we're gonna were waiting on the EU, but

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:04.840
<v Speaker 1>they haven't given any indication that they're going to budge. Right, Well,

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I think the for the EU it's a very delicate

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 1>UH point in this process. They don't want to be

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:13.640
<v Speaker 1>blamed for allowing a no deal Brexit to go ahead.

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Of course, they will be blamed if it happens. Johnson

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 1>made very clear in his speech today and in his

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:22.719
<v Speaker 1>letter to UH European Commissioned President Jean claud Yonker. He

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:24.679
<v Speaker 1>says it would be a failure of state craft. So

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:27.839
<v Speaker 1>the EU wants to avoid the blame, which means so

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 1>I think they're likely to engage to some extent um

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:35.840
<v Speaker 1>in negotiations. But this is a very big ask for them,

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:40.080
<v Speaker 1>because it's Johnson dismisses as a technicality what the EU

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 1>regards is very fundamental, and that is maintaining the piece

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 1>on UH in Northern Ireland by ensuring that there are

0:11:47.400 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 1>no physical infrastructure that could be attacked by by terrorists

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 1>or sectarian groups. Jos Raphael, thank you so much, as

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:57.360
<v Speaker 1>always for that insight on the morass that is Brexit.

0:11:57.520 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Teresa Hale is Bloomberg Opinion editor joining us from London.

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I remember after I had my first child, there was

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 1>a game changing moment. Moment. It was when he was

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:29.440
<v Speaker 1>big enough to fit into an Ergo carrier. It was

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 1>a carrier where I could carry him around, not have

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 1>a stroller, get on the subway, go up and downstairs,

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:37.080
<v Speaker 1>and it was fine. And here we have a Lia

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Sabo who just joined us in our offices here, chief

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:43.080
<v Speaker 1>executive officer of Compass Diversified Holdings, and one of his

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:47.560
<v Speaker 1>portfolio companies is the Ergo company. So I I had

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>to I had to sort of reminisce a little bit.

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 1>But I want to just ask you about a company

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 1>like that, which has expanded tremendously since the time when

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I had my first child. I'm wondering, how do you

0:12:57.280 --> 0:13:01.320
<v Speaker 1>expand it when it's got such a specific focus, well,

0:13:01.920 --> 0:13:05.080
<v Speaker 1>remaining true to the brand, but also getting big enough scale.

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:07.080
<v Speaker 1>And this is sort of a really key question right

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 1>now as we look at say we Work, and some

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 1>of these other companies that are struggling to do just that. Yeah, So, Lisa,

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:17.080
<v Speaker 1>it's one of the challenges that any consumer company has.

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:19.840
<v Speaker 1>And you know, in our business we invest in industrial

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:23.320
<v Speaker 1>and branded consumer companies. You know, a company like Ergo.

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:26.000
<v Speaker 1>When we acquired the business, it was from the founder

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:29.320
<v Speaker 1>car and Frost and Karen was looking for us to

0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 1>help build the business distribution wise globally, and so the

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>first part of the playbook was to establish distribution in

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Europe and Asia, China being one of the faster growing

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:45.400
<v Speaker 1>markets that we have right now. And then, as with

0:13:45.559 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 1>every consumer product business that we own, the lifeblood of

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 1>it is innovation, So figuring out what are the pain

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:55.960
<v Speaker 1>points that consumers have with that product, how can we

0:13:56.080 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 1>innovate to create, you know, a better product that better

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 1>addresses the consumers needs. And then to understand what freedom

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the customer is going to give us to be able

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 1>to extend, expend into adjacent markets without deluding down the

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, the core market that we're addressing. So last,

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 1>your your company, Compass Diversifi Holdings is essentially a holding

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 1>company and you you mentioned you have some brand new

0:14:21.880 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 1>consumer uh companies that you own. So what we're seeing

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 1>in the markets stay is concerned about the consumer, uh

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, and I think so from your perspective, what

0:14:32.120 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 1>is your sense of how the consumer is right now? Yes,

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 1>So the consumer has been strong, and the consumer has

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 1>been strong over the course of twenty nineteen, and it's

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:44.080
<v Speaker 1>really been a carryover for a number of years. And

0:14:44.120 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing is, you know, in today's market, the

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 1>consumer has a lot of choices, so you have to

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 1>give them reasons to want to buy. And how you

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>connect to your consumer is changing dramatically. Clearly, the rise

0:14:57.080 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 1>of digital media and social media is change changing the

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 1>connectivity and how you interact. But generally the consumer feels strong.

0:15:06.000 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Labor markets continue to be very tight, wage gains continue

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 1>to be strong, and that continues to fuel spending. And

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, at the same time, we have very easy

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 1>financial conditions. So I think if you look at balance

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:21.760
<v Speaker 1>sheets of consumers today, they are incredibly strong. And so

0:15:21.800 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 1>that would I would say, you know, from our standpoint,

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>is the real pillar of strength in the economy. Luckily

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:31.480
<v Speaker 1>that represents the economy. So the economy is still you know, growing,

0:15:31.520 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 1>but uh, you know, it's remained strong throughout the year.

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Well as how many of your portfolio companies sort of

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 1>sit within this retail consumer facing category? Yeah, so we

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:44.040
<v Speaker 1>have four companies in the consumer facing and then we

0:15:44.080 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 1>have four in the true industrial side. Okay, so of

0:15:47.640 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 1>those four, how many do you think that the tariffs

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 1>will be a serious concern if they do go into effect,

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the more serious or significant tariffs that have been proposed

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 1>by President Trump in China. Yeah, so we're fortunate and

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 1>that we have very little exposure to tariffs. We move

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 1>production out of China years ago, so Ergo Baby would

0:16:10.200 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 1>be a classic example. We moved into Vietnam many years

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 1>ago for reasons that were totally different. There was a

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of IP theft. As we hear about a lot

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 1>in these trade talks, we experienced at firsthand, and so

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 1>as a result of that, we redomiciled where a production

0:16:26.000 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 1>base was gonna be for Ergo and for all of

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 1>our companies out of China. Now we've had some minor

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 1>exposure where products are still produced in China, and on

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 1>those instances, what we have found is with tariffs going

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 1>into effect, the dollar is strengthened. Our vendors find that

0:16:44.480 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 1>they have significant capacity in China. So the vast majority

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 1>of the tariff has been pushed back on the vendor

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 1>and dollar strength is enabling that some of the cost

0:16:54.760 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 1>pressure that you do get. We've found receptivity with our

0:16:58.320 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 1>retail partners and pushing through, but the vast majority, you know,

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 1>has been pushed back to our our trade partners. So

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:08.440
<v Speaker 1>alias again about the four companies in the industrial space,

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 1>four companies in the consumer space, Where is Compass diversified

0:17:12.520 --> 0:17:16.840
<v Speaker 1>holdings looking now to deploy capital. Yeah, well, now is

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 1>an interesting time and I would say we were looking

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:23.679
<v Speaker 1>out and as our strategic direction this year was we

0:17:23.680 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 1>were looking to be more net divestors than investors. And

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:30.439
<v Speaker 1>the reason for that is we looked at risk that

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:34.679
<v Speaker 1>seemed elevated from the economy. Um, we have a trade

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:38.120
<v Speaker 1>war that's ongoing, we have a presidential election, we have brexit,

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you have seventeen trillion dollars of global negative rates, which

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:43.680
<v Speaker 1>probably tells you everything you need to know about the

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 1>global economy and the health of it. And so we

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 1>felt that the environment to be putting capital to work

0:17:50.320 --> 0:17:54.240
<v Speaker 1>today was not conducive because at the same time, prices

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:57.960
<v Speaker 1>are extraordinarily high, and so that felt like a you know,

0:17:58.200 --> 0:18:01.879
<v Speaker 1>upside down risk reward balance for us. Now that being said,

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:05.680
<v Speaker 1>we're constantly out there looking for new opportunities. I would

0:18:05.680 --> 0:18:09.120
<v Speaker 1>say we principally are looking to invest through the eight

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:13.119
<v Speaker 1>different platform companies that we have to do add on acquisitions,

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 1>and we still remain open to divestitures just as a

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:19.959
<v Speaker 1>broad strategy mandate. So, given your experience, what do you

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 1>think the next downturn will look like? And this is

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 1>The reason why I ask is because that's what's on

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 1>everyone's mind today. Yeah, well, so, I guess this could

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 1>be a bit of a you know, I don't know

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:32.200
<v Speaker 1>if it's contrarian or it maybe a little bit of

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 1>an outlier. But you know, our view is the policies

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:39.920
<v Speaker 1>of the Federal Reserve have really pushed a lot more

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the you know, the money, the quantitative easing,

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the lowering of interest rates. We believe that it has

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:49.399
<v Speaker 1>pushed the cycles to be both stronger on the up

0:18:49.440 --> 0:18:52.639
<v Speaker 1>cycle and longer in duration, but probably more violent on

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the downside. And I think you know, what we saw

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:58.439
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and the first correction was a pretty

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 1>significant you know, draw down in economic contraction. But then

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the policies that created the two thousand and two to

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:11.680
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eight expansion, driven by you know, quantitative

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:15.439
<v Speaker 1>easing type policies, caused a much bigger draw down. I

0:19:15.480 --> 0:19:18.639
<v Speaker 1>think today we fear that those could it could be

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:24.040
<v Speaker 1>an even bigger draw down. That would be our fear. Well, interesting,

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:25.919
<v Speaker 1>Elias say, well, thank you so much for joining us.

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Elias's chief executive officer accomplished diversified holdings, joining us here

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:48.640
<v Speaker 1>in a Bloomberg Interactive Brooker Studio. There has been a

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:52.959
<v Speaker 1>big question hovering over the cannabis and the tobacco industries

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:55.840
<v Speaker 1>over the past few months, and that is what will

0:19:55.920 --> 0:19:59.399
<v Speaker 1>the vaping outbreak the deaths that are mounting in the

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 1>United States tied to vaping due to their industries joining

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:05.639
<v Speaker 1>US now, Mark Zuglan, he is CEO of Canopy Growth

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 1>joining us from Ontario. Mark, I want to start there

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:13.040
<v Speaker 1>because it's something that I'm sure all of your investors

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:15.439
<v Speaker 1>are asking, what do you do with the fact that

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the FDA has raised serious concerns about vaping devices and

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:22.639
<v Speaker 1>that fifteen people at least have been uh, have died

0:20:22.760 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 1>in what has been linked to the cigarettes at a

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:27.879
<v Speaker 1>time when that is sort of the preferred vehicle for

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:32.720
<v Speaker 1>using cannabis right now. Yeah, I think you know, the

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:34.920
<v Speaker 1>stories that we're hearing, certainly out of the out of

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the US are are tragic, and I think you know,

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 1>compounding um that tragedy is that um, there's still a

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:45.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of unknown people are still this many months later, UM,

0:20:45.520 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 1>trying to gather the information and understand um, you know

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the role of of of the illicit market, whether it's

0:20:52.680 --> 0:20:55.199
<v Speaker 1>people are tampering with products, whether it's you know, vitamin

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:56.679
<v Speaker 1>E is being added. You know, a lot of a

0:20:56.680 --> 0:20:59.199
<v Speaker 1>lot of questions on on what's happening and so UM,

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 1>it's very hard for me to speak to that particular

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 1>set of details. But what I can do is speak

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:06.639
<v Speaker 1>to can Be growth and what's happening in Canada because

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 1>as as you point out, in the next several months, um,

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:12.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, we will be launching bait products in Canada,

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's important to talk about what that

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 1>structure looks like. Right in Canada, we have a fully

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:22.159
<v Speaker 1>regulated market, so the way we make our products, what

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 1>goes into the products, where those products are sold, UM,

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:28.120
<v Speaker 1>all have rules that surround them and rules that we

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>need to operate in. And you know, I think that

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the second thing if you look at you know, players

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 1>like Canopy, you know we we did not go out

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:37.200
<v Speaker 1>to China and just source the first product we could

0:21:37.200 --> 0:21:39.160
<v Speaker 1>find and ask somebody else to fill it and put

0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 1>our brand on it. Um. We've been building these products

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:44.360
<v Speaker 1>for two years and even you know, many many months ago.

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, the focus has been on consumer features and

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:50.920
<v Speaker 1>consumer safety. So our products, our tamper resistant, our products

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 1>will be UL certified, meaning the heating elements are controlled

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:57.680
<v Speaker 1>and the battery is controlled. You will have you know, serialization,

0:21:57.720 --> 0:22:00.520
<v Speaker 1>so God forbides something does happen, you're able to trace

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:03.320
<v Speaker 1>it back and immediately know what's happened. And again we

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:06.399
<v Speaker 1>control the full process. We control what goes in, so

0:22:06.440 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 1>we can ensure it is only cannabis and it is

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:12.920
<v Speaker 1>only turpins, which which you know do naturally occur in cannabis.

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 1>So there's a number of things so I think focused

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 1>on and it comes down to threefold. One being transparent.

0:22:20.119 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 1>There are unknowns and there are risks associate with vaping,

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 1>and we need to be transparent about that. And we

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 1>need to do research to understand more. To a regulated

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 1>environment to control the products going out is essential. And

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 1>three have companies that are investing long term to build

0:22:36.280 --> 0:22:39.400
<v Speaker 1>products and brands. So Mark, just give us a sense

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 1>of kind of in your experience and based upon your knowledge,

0:22:42.560 --> 0:22:48.440
<v Speaker 1>how are consumers using vaping products with cannabis and is

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:53.919
<v Speaker 1>that a problem in and of itself. So you know,

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:58.199
<v Speaker 1>in in Canada today there are no actual legal venues

0:22:58.240 --> 0:23:02.239
<v Speaker 1>to sell th HC or CBD bait pen so you know,

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 1>anything being sold in Canada today is essentially through an unregulated,

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:09.879
<v Speaker 1>uncontrolled market in the United States. UM, there is you know,

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:13.159
<v Speaker 1>of course state level rules governing some products, but you

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 1>know other products you know, are are our listens? I

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:18.159
<v Speaker 1>think you know the the Again I fall back to,

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:20.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, this need for regulation. You know where one

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:22.439
<v Speaker 1>of these these few companies who who go on there

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:25.480
<v Speaker 1>and ask for more regulation, ask for more UM controls

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 1>because I think it's it's good for our sector, it's

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:32.080
<v Speaker 1>good for UM the consumer. So what lesson should the

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 1>United States take from Canada? If you're saying that you

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 1>do have the regulatory regime, is there a lesson that

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:40.639
<v Speaker 1>can be derived as the US tries to understand the

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:46.680
<v Speaker 1>underpinnings of this vaping epidemic. So, you know, without even

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 1>speaking specifically to to Bates, you know, be, this is

0:23:50.280 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 1>a message we're carrying with respect to CBD and frankly

0:23:52.880 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 1>with respect to UM. You know, a state's right system,

0:23:55.760 --> 0:23:59.639
<v Speaker 1>you know for UM, for th HC products, which is UM.

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, a clear federal set of rules, a clear

0:24:04.440 --> 0:24:08.119
<v Speaker 1>set of regulatory processes UM UH, you know testing that

0:24:08.160 --> 0:24:11.679
<v Speaker 1>a consumer can rely on UM. You know, understanding a

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:13.639
<v Speaker 1>brand and how it relates back to the producer. You

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 1>know all of these things. You know these are these

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 1>are good things for for the sector, for the businesses

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 1>in the sector, and the consumers who buy the products.

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Mark so cool and thanks so much for joining us.

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Mark is the CEO of Cannopy Growth Corporation, calling us

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:30.680
<v Speaker 1>a vafone from Smith Falls, Ontario. Thanks for listening to

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:33.119
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can subscribe and

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:36.280
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:38.880
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. M Paul Sweeney, I'm on Twitter at pt

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:41.639
<v Speaker 1>Sweeney and Lisa bram Woyds I'm on Twitter at Lisa

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:44.360
<v Speaker 1>bramwo wits one Before the podcast, you can always catch

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:46.240
<v Speaker 1>us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio.