WEBVTT - It's a Numbers Game: Unpacking 'Original Sin' with Alex Thompson

0:00:00.960 --> 0:00:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to a Numbers Game Podcast, Ryan Kurdoski, Happy

0:00:04.280 --> 0:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Memorial Day. I hope you are all having a wonderful

0:00:07.000 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Memorial Day, whatever you're doing, having a barbecue or going

0:00:10.080 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>to the racetrack like my family always did, being degenerates.

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:16.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm just joking. We didn't. We weren't that degenerate anyway.

0:00:16.760 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I hope you guys have a great Memorial Day. Thank

0:00:18.560 --> 0:00:23.160
<v Speaker 1>you for listening on this holiday. I am exhausted because

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:25.119
<v Speaker 1>I spent up. I was up two nights in a

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:27.480
<v Speaker 1>row at three o'clock in the morning each night reading

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Original Sin President Biden's Decline, It's cover up and his

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:35.600
<v Speaker 1>disastrous choice to run again by Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson.

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:38.880
<v Speaker 1>It's a good book, really good pick. I mean, it

0:00:39.000 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>kept me up because it was it wasn't bad. It

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 1>was actually a patren or. It was quick and there

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>were things that I learned there. And I want to

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 1>talk about the book in this episode special Memorial the

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 1>episode maybe you're looking for summer reading. I actually do

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 1>recommend this spoke to people. I do. I know there's

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of anger by conservatives around, especially Jake Tapper.

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>And the scene ends coverage over Joe Biden. I understand,

0:00:58.120 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 1>and very few people have been as wronged by CNN

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 1>as I have, and I can still get past it.

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:06.760
<v Speaker 1>So you can get past it read this book. Certain

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 1>things that I think were super interesting in this book

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:14.759
<v Speaker 1>that I just I'm kind of blown away from one

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the people involved in Joe Biden's like to

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>make Joe Biden look better and was with Joe Biden

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 1>frequently to do all of his videos with Steven Spielberg.

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I never knew that. I did not hear. Maybe it

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:33.480
<v Speaker 1>was reported, I don't know, but Steven Spielberg et director Jaws,

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:38.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, Stephen Freakin Spielberg was involved in trying to

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:41.320
<v Speaker 1>make Joe Biden look better because he couldn't record videos.

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>I found that absolutely fascinating. I also found it fascinating

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 1>which Democratic politicians would go on record to talk about it.

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Governor Massachusetts would go sat there and went on record.

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 1>A senator from Colorado sat there, went on record and said,

0:01:57.320 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 1>I knew Joe Biden wasn't well. I think, in my

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>personal opinion, they're underplaying how concerned they actually were. Also

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 1>super interesting and fascinating part of the book, the Colorado senator.

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I forget which one it was now because I didn't

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:14.640
<v Speaker 1>make a big note about it. But the Colorado Senator

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:17.960
<v Speaker 1>sat there and said, who keeps pushing Joe Biden to

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:22.919
<v Speaker 1>the left? And it seemed like he was well aware

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>that where Biden Biden was doing as president wasn't always

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>in the Joe Biden lexicona what he did policy wise,

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of the blame is put on Ron Klein.

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Ron Klain's main purpose was to do as much as

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 1>what the progressive caucus in Congress wanted as possible. It

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:46.239
<v Speaker 1>was always to lean to the far left, which I

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 1>think was fascinating because conservatives what always say, I understand

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Biden said he was a moderate for so many years.

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Obvious there was this leaning evolution of Biden to the left,

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:57.959
<v Speaker 1>but it was hard left on things like immigration, to

0:02:58.040 --> 0:03:01.639
<v Speaker 1>the left of Obama on immigration. Who was responsible for that?

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Just my orkis is there something in the White House?

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 1>It turns out it was Ron and Klean. Super fascinating. Also,

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:10.799
<v Speaker 1>super interesting part of the book was I'm saying the

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 1>word super too much, so I'm going to stop that.

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>But really interesting part of the book was when Biden

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:21.119
<v Speaker 1>said in the debate, we defeated medicaire the famous line, right.

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Dana Bash looked over at Jake Tapper, passed him a

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>note and said, he just lost this election. Which is

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 1>great because I've never actually heard what the people in

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the debate moderators are saying to each other while it's

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 1>going on, and they are communicating, So that was really fascinating.

0:03:39.040 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 1>The other thing that I wanted, I thought was highlighted,

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 1>was when they brought all the Democratic centers together. This

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 1>is post debate when Biden is down seven points nationally

0:03:48.840 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 1>and he's going to lose not only in the swing states,

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 1>but also in Maine, in Minnesota, in New Mexico, and

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 1>the governors of these states are saying, you're going to

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 1>lose New Mexico, You're going to lose Maine, all the

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 1>rest of it. John Fetterman gets up and starts screaming

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 1>at his fellow Democratic senators and saying, how dare you,

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 1>how dare you betray a great president? How dare you

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>do this to him? And it was and John Fetterman

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:18.919
<v Speaker 1>was one of only five Democrats in the room, along

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:21.159
<v Speaker 1>with Tammy Duckworth and like one or two other ones

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>who sat there and John Fedneron was the most vocal

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>supporter post debate, which was fascinating because Fetterman, I guess

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 1>because he suffered a seizure, but was willing to overlook

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:40.040
<v Speaker 1>everything after we knew everything. Fetterman was completely complicit, and

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:42.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't care that he cannot operate as a person.

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:47.680
<v Speaker 1>We need to support him. Loved that. Loved that. Only governor,

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:49.719
<v Speaker 1>by the way, to sit there democratic governor post debate

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 1>to say you need to drop out right now, ned

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 1>La Mom from Connecticut, super moderate governor. Stop saying super

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:59.919
<v Speaker 1>moderate governor of Connecticut. Thought that was really really interesting.

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:06.480
<v Speaker 1>And the relationship between Kamala and Joe is so deep

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 1>because Joe never wanted Kamala Harris, and Kamala Harris her

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:15.480
<v Speaker 1>loyalty to Biden it had a ceiling. She was loyal

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:18.839
<v Speaker 1>to a point, but she wouldn't put herself out there

0:05:19.120 --> 0:05:22.479
<v Speaker 1>if it meant hurting her. So much so that at

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 1>the debate, at a debate watch party, one of the

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:30.599
<v Speaker 1>Democratic donors looked at Doug and Hooff, Kamala's husband, and

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 1>started screaming at him, you destroyed democracy, You destroyed democracy tonight.

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:42.599
<v Speaker 1>I was stunned. The book has a lot. The authors

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>are getting scrutinized a lot, as they should. In some cases,

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:48.039
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of questions the authors should answer. Luckily

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 1>for us, one of the two authors, Alex Thompson, a

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 1>very very good reporter who reported on Biden's health and

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 1>well being long before the mainstream media did, is with

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:01.240
<v Speaker 1>me today. So coming up next is author of the

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 1>book Original Sin, Alex Thompson. I am one of only

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 1>two conservatives that have gotten to interview one of the

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:10.360
<v Speaker 1>authors besides Megan Kelly. So stay tuned. You're not going

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 1>to want to miss what I ask him. Alex Thompson

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 1>is the national political correspondent for Axios and the co

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 1>author of the book Original Sin, President Biden's decline, It's

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 1>cover up, and his disastrous choice to run for president again.

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Right here, Alex, you ruin my sleep. I was up

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 1>for two nights till three o'clock in the morning reading

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>this book, getting everything down, getting notes and questions. It

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 1>is a page turner. It is genuinely a very very

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:41.480
<v Speaker 1>well written, compelling, even sympathetic book. At times, it really

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 1>was very good. Thank you so, and I know that

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:48.479
<v Speaker 1>conservative media is definitely having its moment with you guys,

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 1>But I don't want to ask. I don't want to.

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I want since it's not to makeing Kelly interview. She's fine,

0:06:53.040 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 1>but not an interview. So my first question about like

0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the book, because I want to get to the bones

0:06:57.080 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 1>of the book, is when you, as someone who's written

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:01.159
<v Speaker 1>a book before, when you write a book, when you

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:04.360
<v Speaker 1>reach out to the publisher, you the publisher asked, who

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 1>is the audience? Who was the audience in mind when

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 1>you were writing this book, because a lot of times

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 1>it seems like it's for a democratic audience.

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 2>M h. Is that you mean that this You mean

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:17.680
<v Speaker 2>this book? You think it's very democratic your book?

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. No, I actually think our intention, and I don't

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 3>know if we achieved it, was that it actually would

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 3>be both the right and the left. We thought that basically,

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 3>we pitched that liberals are going to be sort of

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:36.480
<v Speaker 3>disoriented and want to know how what what happened? And

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 3>our hope was that conservatives, even though a lot of

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 3>conservatives obviously feel deep frustration because they feel they had

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 3>been saying that, hey, he was in decline for a

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 3>long time and felt that that was not being covered

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 3>aggressively by much of the mainstream media. We thought that

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 3>still conservatives would be interested in the behind the scenes.

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 1>The Highncy stories are wild. I touched upon them. When

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the donor's yelling at Doug m Hoff saying you ruined democracy,

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 1>I was like, whoa and John.

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 2>That was director Rob Regner.

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 3>So, you know, we were hoping that even the Republicans,

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 3>I think, feel a little dis ilusions and also feel like, uh,

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, I think that the behind the scenes details

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 3>of how the Democratic Party covered up for Biden for

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:32.120
<v Speaker 3>so long. We thought that and we said this, I mean,

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:35.080
<v Speaker 3>this was literally our pitch to the publisher that this

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 3>is not a right leaning book or a left leaning book,

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:40.679
<v Speaker 3>Like the audience is not necessarily left lean or right.

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 3>We think there's good arguments to both sides to be interested.

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that maybe because all the sources were mostly

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 1>all Democrats, I think that maybe that's why there's a

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 1>left leaning comp Like what Manners was speaking, I noticed that,

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 1>but I just wanted to know your opinion on that.

0:08:56.280 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>So there is Joe Biden, Donald Trump have something very

0:08:59.840 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 1>much comment, which is their internal ethos, is that they

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 1>believe that they are outsiders. They believe that the media,

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the leads the establishment hate them, and that everything that

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 1>they have accomplished is in defiance of those forces. Can

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 1>you describe the ethos, because Biden almost is like a

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Kennedy esque mentality where he created his own legend, like

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:23.319
<v Speaker 1>Jackie created the legend of Camelot and then all the

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:27.200
<v Speaker 1>living Kennedy's just assumed it. Biden created a legend of

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 1>himself and then everyone just assumed it. Could you describe that?

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:30.600
<v Speaker 1>In the book?

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we even call it became a Biden theology, and

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 3>I'd say the first commandment of that theology is that

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 3>Biden always gets back up. Biden is always counted out,

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 3>and he always comes back and proves his critics wrong.

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 3>I'd say, there, you know, there's also parts of the theology,

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:49.560
<v Speaker 3>and the same way there are with you know, with

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 3>Camelot and with whatever you know, I don't know if

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 3>you want to call it mag a court or something,

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:57.079
<v Speaker 3>but with Trump that there are there are parts of

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:00.560
<v Speaker 3>the theology that you know, if you take a set back,

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:06.120
<v Speaker 3>certainly ring faults and you know, and you know, for

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 3>for instance, one person very close to the family, they

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 3>they basically said, you know, parts of the like parts

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:16.600
<v Speaker 3>of the tenants of the Biden theology are like, you

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 3>know that hunters, you know that that Hunter's sobriety is stable,

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:25.199
<v Speaker 3>that Joe cares more about his family than his ambition.

0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:30.800
<v Speaker 2>That Jill is like a very warm and nice person, and.

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:35.079
<v Speaker 3>Uh and and they repeat these things as if they

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 3>are just obvious facts.

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 1>And don't call people fat, which Joe did at the

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>campaign Hampshire, which was so fascinating.

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 3>But but the Biden press team insisted to us that

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:51.040
<v Speaker 3>he didn't.

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:52.560
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's on camera.

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 2>I have to fact check you there. Uh.

0:10:57.559 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 3>I think I don't remember what their spin was. I

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 3>think they they were like, I can't remember what word

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:06.199
<v Speaker 3>they said he said, but it was obvious, like a.

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 3>But yes, the rule, the other Biden rule of don't

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 3>call fat people fat, which you know in some ways

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:15.320
<v Speaker 3>is being polite, but the other, the dark side of

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 3>that saying is ignore inconvenient truths.

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 1>So the evolution of Jill Biden in your book is

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 1>fascinating because you say in the beginning of the book

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:29.320
<v Speaker 1>that Jill did not like being a politician's wife, or

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 1>she wasn't a natural, She wasn't she didn't because she worked.

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I did not know that she was a professor or

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:37.959
<v Speaker 1>even while she was second Lady, and she all of

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 1>a sudden goes from being kind of in the background

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 1>and begrudgingly in the background to being a quasi chief

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 1>of staff and having her own team run the large

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 1>segments of the White House. That was why did she change?

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:53.160
<v Speaker 2>Great question, I think.

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:58.840
<v Speaker 3>Some people, and I guess there's no one clean answer,

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 3>according to people that i've that have talked to her,

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:04.319
<v Speaker 3>or that worked for or our sources within the White House.

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:06.560
<v Speaker 2>And to your point, you know, she she taught college

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:09.559
<v Speaker 2>even through the presidency. She's still taught at a community college.

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 3>And I think what people around her say is that

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:19.680
<v Speaker 3>something seemed to change over the course of the vice

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 3>presidency and then certainly in the intervening years post the

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 3>vice presidency, And some people felt that she fell in

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 3>love with the life and you know, the Vogue covers

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:35.080
<v Speaker 3>and sort of you know, the elevated style and elegance.

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 3>And I also think that she definitely deeply loves Joe.

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 3>And I think I remember I remember someone said to

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 3>me that, you know, Joe Biden is nothing if not

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:52.079
<v Speaker 3>for this, and saw him sort of in the wilderness

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 3>in those years seventeen eighteen and saw that this gave

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:58.199
<v Speaker 3>him purpose and that you know, it was.

0:12:58.200 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 2>Everything he ever wanted.

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 3>I think I think both the combination of falling in

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:06.559
<v Speaker 3>love with life but also this, you know, it's sort

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 3>of like the dark side of loyalty and love, right,

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:11.720
<v Speaker 3>is that it can't you know, you can end up

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:16.439
<v Speaker 3>justifying more and more and so And to your point,

0:13:16.840 --> 0:13:19.560
<v Speaker 3>the early signs that she is going to be a

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 3>very as someone in the White House put it there,

0:13:22.679 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 3>several people in the whitest put one of the most

0:13:24.360 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 3>powerful first ladies in American history. The signs are there

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 3>at the beginning of twenty nineteen, twenty twenty, when her

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 3>top aide, a man named Anthony Bernall, is made one.

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Of the Your characterizations of him, by the way, are hysterical. Sorry,

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:40.719
<v Speaker 1>they're so funny. I could picture him, Evefough. I've never

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:42.839
<v Speaker 1>seen him or heard him before. I was like, oh,

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 1>I know this person.

0:13:44.440 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 3>He's he's certainly there is a certain archetype both as

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:52.239
<v Speaker 3>a person in a DC sort of DC like advanced

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 3>man operative right.

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:55.960
<v Speaker 2>Anyway, he he becomes one.

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 3>Of the deputy campaign managers on the campaign, very unusual,

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:02.200
<v Speaker 3>and then once they go into the White House, he

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:07.199
<v Speaker 3>becomes sort of like a shadow like personnel officer, placing

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 3>this person and that person, you know, and his main

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 3>coda is like loyalty above everything, and there is there

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 3>is no greater virtue and no greater sin than being

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 3>even perceived as disloyal. And he becomes seen internally as

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 3>sort of loyalty to police. And he is constantly in

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:31.080
<v Speaker 3>the First Lady's ear. This person is this, this person

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 3>is this. And so when he and he becomes incredibly

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 3>important in the president's scheduling, he's sitting in the president

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 3>scheduling meetings, and you know, like basically the conversation ender

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:44.640
<v Speaker 3>is He'll be like, Jill won't like this, you know, yea,

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 3>and then and the conversation's over. And because if you object,

0:14:49.080 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 3>then maybe, oh, is that because you're disloyal, you know.

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:56.160
<v Speaker 2>And the way that she eventually.

0:14:57.600 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 3>The combination of them two sort of slowly pushed out

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 3>anyone seen as disloyal and sort of placed all people

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:10.440
<v Speaker 3>that they trusted, you know, I think they you know,

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 3>people have said that both if she was like the

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 3>most powerful, one of the most powerful slaves, he was

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 3>certainly probably the most powerful First Lady chief of staff.

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 2>We've maybe ever seen.

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so you brought the Vogue covers. And that's interesting

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 1>because I remember hearing from my friends in Capitol Hill

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 1>and in various positions that that was a big contention

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 1>because Kamala Harris got a Vogue cover before Jill Biden,

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 1>which is not traditional that we've never had a female

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 1>vice president before. And Jill, Jill never seemed to like

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Kamala Harris, she never trusted her because of the original thing.

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:50.240
<v Speaker 1>I was calling basically Biden a racist during the debate,

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 1>and you made an illusion that she, you know, Forgabe

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 1>and not forget YadA, YadA, YadA, and Biden didn't really

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 1>want her. He woned Gretchen Whitmer and was really pushing

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:05.760
<v Speaker 1>to her. Do you think that he ever did? And

0:16:05.800 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 1>he was by incredibly destructive to her presidential campaign, and

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 1>you characterizes her being more loyal to him than him

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 1>to her. Do you think that he at the end

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 1>of his presidency regretted picking her?

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 3>No, because it's like one of those things like a

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:23.800
<v Speaker 3>president can't ever say they regretted it, right, It's such

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 3>a consement decision. Do I think there were I can

0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:28.920
<v Speaker 3>tell you this, there were a lot of feelings among

0:16:29.080 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 3>Biden's top staff that regretted picking her. I remember while

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 3>I was reporting this book, the book's called original Sin.

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 3>They were like, no, no, no, the original sin is

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:40.440
<v Speaker 3>not him running again, it's picking Kamala Harris because they

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 3>did not have confidence that she would be a good

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 3>candidate or that she could win.

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Right well, even when they realized top Democrats realize something's

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:50.760
<v Speaker 1>wrong with Joe Biden, we may need to replace him,

0:16:50.840 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 1>their initial thing is, let's get Gretchen Whitmer. Her name

0:16:53.800 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 1>comes up far more frequently in the early conversations, and

0:16:57.680 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 1>it's only the Black caucus that's It's like, you're not

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 1>going to pick You're not going to side stuff the

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 1>first black female president, female vice president for the nomination.

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:10.320
<v Speaker 1>What did top Democrats see in her as a liability

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:13.119
<v Speaker 1>early on? That they knew about his way before? I

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:15.440
<v Speaker 1>think most other ones did well.

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 3>She ran a disastrous twenty twenty presidential campaign despite massive

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:23.520
<v Speaker 3>hype and you know, big crowds early on. She didn't

0:17:23.560 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 3>even she had to drop out early and didn't have

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 3>to go to Iowa.

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:27.360
<v Speaker 2>You can see the.

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 3>Revolving door of staff that have gone through her office

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 3>back when she was a state attorney general. She'd also

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 3>really with the exception of like twenty ten attorney general race,

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:41.400
<v Speaker 3>she never won a tough race, and that twenty ten

0:17:41.440 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 3>attorney general race she barely won. She I mean, she

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:45.919
<v Speaker 3>underperformed the rest of the ticket.

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Two points I think are a point and a half

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 1>in California, which is good for a Democrat.

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 3>And a lot of people thought that, you know, she

0:17:57.200 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 3>wasn't especially nice to staff and didn't seem to get

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:04.760
<v Speaker 3>in the weeds of the substance. And I just think

0:18:05.400 --> 0:18:09.919
<v Speaker 3>also I think, you know, I think Democrats, especially this

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:12.639
<v Speaker 3>generation of Democrats, which remembers sort of like you know,

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 3>Northeast liberal, were worried about you know, San Francisco liberal, right,

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:21.879
<v Speaker 3>and what's a different kind of liberal, Yeah, but a

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:26.879
<v Speaker 3>similar sort of you know, a similar can can be

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:29.680
<v Speaker 3>sort of seen. Especially it's a different sort of liberal,

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:31.720
<v Speaker 3>especially on cultural issues, which you saw in sort of

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 3>the Trump campaign response to her.

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 2>She had she had joined much of the rest of

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 2>the party and running to the left in twenty nineteen.

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 3>So I think the combination of all of those things,

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 3>plus Pelosi and Kamala have never gone along going back

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 3>to San Francisco days, like Pelosi supported her opponent in

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 3>the DA race back in like two.

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 2>Thousand and four, whatever year that was. So this goes

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 2>back like a long.

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Way, and Gavin Newsom didn't like her a lot of people.

0:18:57.080 --> 0:18:59.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Kamala, you don't have to be likable to

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 1>be to make friends. Apparently something you didn't touch on

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:05.399
<v Speaker 1>the book that much, And I thought it was a

0:19:05.520 --> 0:19:09.680
<v Speaker 1>glaring thing with conservatives that we talk about and we've

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 1>talked about for a long time, is this the Biden

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 1>family business is very much connected to their connection towards

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Joe and Joe's connection to power. Was that a motivating

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:26.360
<v Speaker 1>factor in why Jill and Hunter did not want him

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to drop out was that they're now and the brother

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:30.919
<v Speaker 1>too did not want him to drop out, and they

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:33.479
<v Speaker 1>all make money off of being close to the president

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:34.640
<v Speaker 1>and the former vice president.

0:19:35.520 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think, you know, with Hunter, I think he

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 3>was actually more because it wasn't like Hunter was able

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:45.879
<v Speaker 3>to do any more business anymore, right, because there was

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 3>so much scrutiny.

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:48.640
<v Speaker 1>He was still signed paintings though.

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well he had to stop because of the scrutiny already,

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 3>Like in twenty twenty one, he was still painting, but

0:19:55.600 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 3>he wasn't able to sell them.

0:19:56.600 --> 0:19:58.760
<v Speaker 1>So, you know, had Hitler been as successful as Hunter Biden,

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>world War two would have never happened.

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:05.160
<v Speaker 2>But it was I think.

0:20:06.720 --> 0:20:09.879
<v Speaker 3>I think it was a combination of Actually, for Hunter

0:20:09.960 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 3>in particular, I think it was a combination of both,

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, livelihood, because you know, while Biden was president,

0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:20.400
<v Speaker 3>you know, I think he felt confident he would stay

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:24.679
<v Speaker 3>out of jail. And I think he you know, he

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 3>has like a very nice life that's sort of propped

0:20:27.840 --> 0:20:32.159
<v Speaker 3>up by this former Hollywood agent. He lives in like

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 3>this great beautiful house in Malibu, you know, so he's

0:20:35.640 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 3>living like a comfortable existence and doesn't have a job

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:39.119
<v Speaker 3>besides painting.

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:40.880
<v Speaker 2>So I think there's a livelihood part of it.

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 3>But also I think, you know, I think, and we

0:20:46.080 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 3>get into this a little bit, the Hunter's sobriety is

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:54.280
<v Speaker 3>so caught up in his dad's.

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 2>Staying in office. Because you have to remember, when Joe Ran.

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 3>Decided to run in April twenty was still in like

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 3>the depths of his crack addiction, and they didn't even

0:21:03.600 --> 0:21:06.080
<v Speaker 3>know where he was most of the time.

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 1>That scene where Joe was chasing him trying to get

0:21:09.080 --> 0:21:12.680
<v Speaker 1>him into rehab is really powerful and compelling thank you, and.

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:17.240
<v Speaker 3>He's you know, he's he's following, and it's it's so striking.

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:21.640
<v Speaker 3>He gets sober like three weeks after his dad gets

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 3>in the presidential race. That's his sobriety date under oath

0:21:24.600 --> 0:21:28.880
<v Speaker 3>and core right, and so, you know, I think that

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:32.359
<v Speaker 3>was sort of keeping him stable. You know, Jill, I

0:21:32.359 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 3>think like, as we said, like liked the life. You know,

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:36.760
<v Speaker 3>her top aid would always be like, we'll do this

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 3>in the second term. We're going to do this trip

0:21:38.359 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 3>in the second term, this and that. You know, I

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:44.399
<v Speaker 3>think there was like a livelihood the I think, and

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:46.879
<v Speaker 3>I get the question of like why didn't you go

0:21:46.960 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 3>more into the business stuff. I think because of the

0:21:49.680 --> 0:21:55.240
<v Speaker 3>tremendous scrutiny and the Republican investigations a lot of like

0:21:55.320 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 3>the sketchy, the sketchy details that they got away with

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:03.160
<v Speaker 3>and the VP years and in the in the years

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 3>between VP and president, they actually weren't doing as much.

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but even I mean, after Biden leaves the White

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:12.400
<v Speaker 1>House he gets a talent agent, like, yeah.

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:14.360
<v Speaker 2>But he did that after he was vice president too.

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:16.879
<v Speaker 1>I guess. So I don't know, I've heard. I mean,

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:19.240
<v Speaker 1>there's reportings that they are looking to try to make

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 1>more money right now and the family needs money. And

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:25.399
<v Speaker 1>it's just it's a fascinating thing that this was so

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 1>often their business model as being close to power, and

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:32.440
<v Speaker 1>was Bo going to be that person to offer them

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 1>then access had he not died? I make that's a

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 1>question lurks in my mind. Obviously you can't. No one

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 1>knows what the answer is. But they do, but no

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:43.200
<v Speaker 1>one else knows the answer. Say e's fascinating your book.

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Robert Hurr couldn't find a job after his thing because

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:50.320
<v Speaker 1>he was smeared so badly by Kamala Harrison Democrats.

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:53.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and you know this is a point when like

0:22:54.840 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 3>any any potential plausible deniability by like Democrats who had

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:01.480
<v Speaker 3>spent time with hip Biden goes out the window, because

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:03.679
<v Speaker 3>you know, you could, you could try to make an

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:05.879
<v Speaker 3>argument that they're just like they're doing their job and

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:08.160
<v Speaker 3>they're spinning, you know, they're spinning for him, and they're

0:23:08.160 --> 0:23:10.000
<v Speaker 3>they're trying to you know, prop him up and make

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 3>him the best you know Biden possible. But after her report,

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:19.440
<v Speaker 3>they they not only slime Robert Hurr, they slime Merrik Garland,

0:23:19.480 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 3>the slim their own just department in order to try

0:23:23.320 --> 0:23:28.440
<v Speaker 3>to save him, even though I just find it, even

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 3>though they a lot of people in that White House,

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:35.159
<v Speaker 3>even if they won't admit it publicly, knew that Robert

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 3>Hurr was right. They may object to him putting in

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:41.160
<v Speaker 3>the report, but they knew he was right, and they

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 3>decided to try to destroy him.

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:46.360
<v Speaker 1>So George Clooney has mentioned a lot in the book

0:23:46.359 --> 0:23:48.040
<v Speaker 1>because he does all these fundraisers and he's a very

0:23:48.040 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 1>well known Democrat. Someone I never knew that was involved

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:53.679
<v Speaker 1>in the campaign was Steven Spielberg. I don't know if

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 1>that was reported before, you guys, I never knew that before.

0:23:56.280 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Spielberg was cutting videos for Biden. So he had one

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:05.120
<v Speaker 1>on one time, significant one on one time with Joe Biden.

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Did anyone from his camp ever say something like George

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Clooney did.

0:24:10.960 --> 0:24:13.160
<v Speaker 3>Not that I'm aware of, and we would have obviously

0:24:13.160 --> 0:24:15.440
<v Speaker 3>put in the book if that was the case. But yes,

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:18.160
<v Speaker 3>you know they were trying because and we talked about

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:21.680
<v Speaker 3>this before, you know, like the Biden struggled with taped

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:24.480
<v Speaker 3>remarks and that's why they had to do all the

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 3>jump cuts and everything right, and so you know, it

0:24:27.800 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 3>got to the point of in some ways you could

0:24:30.560 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 3>look at it like from the outset and you're like

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 3>it got to the point when they were so desperate

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 3>for him to improve that they had to bring in

0:24:39.240 --> 0:24:40.879
<v Speaker 3>Steven Spielberg as a coach.

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:44.119
<v Speaker 1>Right, right. And I want to ask something about the

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:47.720
<v Speaker 1>media though, because obviously this is the for conservatives. The

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 1>media angle is the angle because it was so obvious

0:24:50.320 --> 0:24:52.959
<v Speaker 1>to conservatives, and you were a great reporting at it early.

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:56.639
<v Speaker 1>So this is not anything on you. But like Joe Scarborough,

0:24:56.680 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I know you were on a show I think yesterday

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the day before he'd I didn't just say Joe Biden

0:25:01.440 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 1>is smart. He said he's the best he's ever been

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>at eighty years old. Eighty one years old. That's not

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:11.240
<v Speaker 1>true of anybody. Like, it's just not true of anybody.

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 1>You had the guy from the Atlantic who said it's

0:25:14.040 --> 0:25:17.920
<v Speaker 1>a smear and a lie. Is there. I know that

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the media leans left, and I know that the media

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:25.159
<v Speaker 1>does even when they get the Iraq War wrong, or

0:25:25.200 --> 0:25:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the financial crisis wrong, or these big, big, big stories

0:25:29.040 --> 0:25:32.200
<v Speaker 1>completely incorrect, and a lot of people are kind of

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:34.840
<v Speaker 1>like hit have egg on their face. I think this

0:25:35.080 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 1>time is different than those times like the Iraq war

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 1>like the financial crisis, because the number one I guess

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 1>victims of getting it wrong on victims, But the people

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:48.160
<v Speaker 1>who felt the hurt from getting it wrong were Democrats.

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:51.680
<v Speaker 1>When I feel like when Republicans are the ones hurt

0:25:51.680 --> 0:25:54.200
<v Speaker 1>from a Median Ara getting it wrong, or small town

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:59.639
<v Speaker 1>America or wherever, it doesn't matter as much to them.

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:01.920
<v Speaker 1>And that's something that is completely off the mark.

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:06.000
<v Speaker 2>So you think that the media doesn't feel as guilty, they.

0:26:05.960 --> 0:26:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Think more guilty now than they would.

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:10.200
<v Speaker 2>Oh oh, because they didn't when.

0:26:10.119 --> 0:26:12.720
<v Speaker 1>The Iraq War happened and everyone got it completely wrong.

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:14.199
<v Speaker 1>No one quit their job and said, oh my god,

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I can't believe I'm such a bad reporter. This one

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:19.199
<v Speaker 1>there at least in there and saying, wow, we have

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:22.879
<v Speaker 1>to have a culpability moment, and they haven't, despite losing

0:26:24.040 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 1>support in the public for a very long time.

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:29.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So what's the question exactly?

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:32.480
<v Speaker 1>So the question is is that is that is my

0:26:32.760 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 1>assumption anywhere close to the mark, is that the people

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:39.639
<v Speaker 1>in the media are having a come to Jesus moment

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:43.879
<v Speaker 1>in some capacity because their readership leans left, their friends

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:47.119
<v Speaker 1>lean left, and they all want to know what, why,

0:26:47.160 --> 0:26:50.399
<v Speaker 1>why they weren't more honest, is it like or and

0:26:50.440 --> 0:26:53.280
<v Speaker 1>why aren't anyone. I just have a very tough time.

0:26:53.320 --> 0:26:54.679
<v Speaker 1>I have a very tough time people like in the

0:26:54.720 --> 0:26:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Atlantic saying it's a smear, it's a lie, and everyone

0:26:58.720 --> 0:27:01.040
<v Speaker 1>in the media just refused to sit there and say

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:04.040
<v Speaker 1>what we saw, like they just took the White House's word.

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:06.920
<v Speaker 1>As as as Carbelanche.

0:27:06.440 --> 0:27:07.200
<v Speaker 2>That's interesting.

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:13.280
<v Speaker 3>I haven't detected a huge I mean I think, you know,

0:27:13.400 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 3>I think, uh, you know, I think it's too I

0:27:18.880 --> 0:27:22.439
<v Speaker 3>haven't detected actually a huge sort of like you know,

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 3>reckoning or being like I honestly still feel there's like

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:31.720
<v Speaker 3>a defensiveness. And I think it's because they can point

0:27:31.760 --> 0:27:34.600
<v Speaker 3>back and like we were talking about age plenty and like.

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 3>But the thing is they were often talking about age

0:27:37.119 --> 0:27:39.919
<v Speaker 3>in a horse race sense, as like oh, the Poles

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:43.520
<v Speaker 3>say his age is a liability and then talk about whatever.

0:27:43.600 --> 0:27:45.639
<v Speaker 3>But like that was so they were like we there

0:27:45.720 --> 0:27:48.520
<v Speaker 3>was volume, but there wasn't excavation, if that makes sense.

0:27:48.960 --> 0:27:50.360
<v Speaker 1>So it still hasn't happened.

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:53.119
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I mean, I will, you know, for for

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:55.959
<v Speaker 3>what it's worth, and I know probably I know some conservatives,

0:27:56.040 --> 0:28:00.080
<v Speaker 3>a lot of conservatives really don't like Jake Tapper. I

0:28:00.880 --> 0:28:02.760
<v Speaker 3>wasn't going to bring that up, no, no, no, But I

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:03.879
<v Speaker 3>mean my co author, Jake Captor.

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:06.320
<v Speaker 2>I think it's to his credit.

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:10.200
<v Speaker 3>That he has been like on this issue, I should

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 3>have done better, and I would.

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Love to know from Jake. Does he And I'll ask

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:16.480
<v Speaker 1>you the same question. Do you read any alternative media?

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:17.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:28:17.119 --> 0:28:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Of course, like who I just wanted curious.

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:21.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I mean, I don't know.

0:28:21.520 --> 0:28:24.959
<v Speaker 3>I listened to may Do, listen to Megan Kelly like

0:28:25.119 --> 0:28:30.880
<v Speaker 3>fairly often, okay, obviously, like free Press, a free beacon.

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:32.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to think.

0:28:32.560 --> 0:28:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Like twitter Feed.

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:34.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm just joking twitter Feed.

0:28:36.119 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, I don't know if you consider like

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:41.120
<v Speaker 3>even like commentary or like some of those guys or

0:28:41.160 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 3>like yeah, Victor Scott Hansen or.

0:28:45.640 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Just I think it's important because people we feel like

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:51.240
<v Speaker 1>we're screaming into a void sometimes. So I think for

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 1>conservitives to even know that you read something is really important.

0:28:55.080 --> 0:28:56.680
<v Speaker 1>And I think that you're a really good journalist. I'm

0:28:56.720 --> 0:28:58.640
<v Speaker 1>not blaming, I'm not saying you, but I think that

0:28:58.960 --> 0:29:00.760
<v Speaker 1>I do feel that my last.

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:04.360
<v Speaker 3>They feel disrespected like and then and then like and

0:29:04.480 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 3>I can understand how then they're like we were saying

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:09.240
<v Speaker 3>that he was having trouble, and then like two mainstream

0:29:09.280 --> 0:29:10.360
<v Speaker 3>reporters come in and're.

0:29:10.120 --> 0:29:11.320
<v Speaker 2>Like, well, we wrote a book about it.

0:29:11.400 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 3>See, so I can understand like the skepticism. But yeah,

0:29:17.480 --> 0:29:20.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean I think I think it's like really because

0:29:20.320 --> 0:29:22.960
<v Speaker 3>the thing is that, like I think the mainstream, some

0:29:23.080 --> 0:29:29.440
<v Speaker 3>mainstream reporters just do not recognize they're still in sort

0:29:29.480 --> 0:29:33.080
<v Speaker 3>of denial about the power of alternative and that includes

0:29:33.120 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 3>even sort of like you know, somewhat adjacent, which is

0:29:36.160 --> 0:29:39.480
<v Speaker 3>like flagrant or like you know, obviously Rogan is the

0:29:39.480 --> 0:29:41.920
<v Speaker 3>other famous be event, you know, Cleovonne and all those

0:29:42.080 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 3>ones that.

0:29:42.520 --> 0:29:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Well establish the media matters because it is a qualifying thing.

0:29:47.080 --> 0:29:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Oftentimes alternative media just echoes or battles establishing media to themselves.

0:29:51.880 --> 0:29:53.360
<v Speaker 1>That's why I think it's important that they know you

0:29:53.400 --> 0:29:56.680
<v Speaker 1>even pay attention to them. So I know you've short

0:29:56.680 --> 0:29:58.520
<v Speaker 1>on time, so I don't want to charge. There's one

0:29:58.600 --> 0:30:01.600
<v Speaker 1>last question. I asked my Twitter followers to ask you,

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:03.200
<v Speaker 1>what's a question ask you? So this is the one

0:30:03.200 --> 0:30:04.880
<v Speaker 1>that I got a lot we saw on a press

0:30:04.920 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 1>meeting the President Biden received a question ahead of time

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:11.960
<v Speaker 1>from Courtney Sorban, was that the standard that he would

0:30:12.000 --> 0:30:14.760
<v Speaker 1>get questions in the press ahead of time and who

0:30:14.840 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 1>was in charge of giving him questions from the press

0:30:17.240 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 1>ahead of time?

0:30:18.680 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 2>So no, it's not standard.

0:30:20.120 --> 0:30:23.440
<v Speaker 3>So what we'll tell you what happens is that, but

0:30:23.600 --> 0:30:27.160
<v Speaker 3>they do, they do decide who gets a question, and

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:29.680
<v Speaker 3>then what the White House will do, the Press Office

0:30:29.720 --> 0:30:31.640
<v Speaker 3>will do is then they'll go to the person, right,

0:30:31.680 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 3>and they'll like sort of sidle up and they'll be

0:30:33.280 --> 0:30:35.160
<v Speaker 3>very friendly and they're like, what are you thinking about asking?

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:35.760
<v Speaker 2>What do you think of?

0:30:35.880 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 3>You know, and you know, most of the time reporters

0:30:40.120 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 3>just like show like a little bit of leg but

0:30:42.200 --> 0:30:46.720
<v Speaker 3>like not really And I think in that case it

0:30:46.800 --> 0:30:49.680
<v Speaker 3>was probably just a case where and I don't know,

0:30:49.760 --> 0:30:52.719
<v Speaker 3>but you know, sometimes I won't take that example out

0:30:52.760 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 3>of it. I think sometimes reporters sort of said too much, right,

0:30:57.040 --> 0:30:58.480
<v Speaker 3>But I think that was the exception to the rule.

0:30:58.520 --> 0:30:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I think.

0:30:58.760 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 3>The bigger you, I think, to your reader's point, though,

0:31:02.240 --> 0:31:05.560
<v Speaker 3>the bigger problem in my mind was pre selecting which

0:31:05.640 --> 0:31:08.840
<v Speaker 3>reporters got the questions. And it wasn't like he did

0:31:08.880 --> 0:31:10.920
<v Speaker 3>a ton anyway, but like I never got a question

0:31:11.240 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 3>in four years, really never, And I don't think even

0:31:14.920 --> 0:31:17.480
<v Speaker 3>I don't think Axios ever got a question, and when

0:31:17.480 --> 0:31:19.680
<v Speaker 3>I was at Politico, I don't know if Politico ever

0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:22.480
<v Speaker 3>got a question. So it was the pre selecting of

0:31:22.560 --> 0:31:26.560
<v Speaker 3>reporters that I mean, they know enough about which reporters

0:31:26.600 --> 0:31:29.320
<v Speaker 3>care about which issue, right, so they're like, we know

0:31:29.440 --> 0:31:31.120
<v Speaker 3>this guy's interested in this, and we this is what

0:31:31.160 --> 0:31:33.760
<v Speaker 3>we want to talk about. Right. So I think that

0:31:33.920 --> 0:31:38.680
<v Speaker 3>was actually the way that they controlled you know, what

0:31:38.880 --> 0:31:41.760
<v Speaker 3>he was going to be asked, more so than like

0:31:41.880 --> 0:31:42.760
<v Speaker 3>the note card thing.

0:31:43.320 --> 0:31:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Right, Well, Alex, this is the book of the year,

0:31:46.080 --> 0:31:48.520
<v Speaker 1>right now. Congratulates all the good press you've got to

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:51.320
<v Speaker 1>all my listeners. Original Sin is a great It's a

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:54.320
<v Speaker 1>great read one to understand the humanity of certain people

0:31:54.480 --> 0:31:56.680
<v Speaker 1>that seem so distant because they are the president and

0:31:56.760 --> 0:32:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the president's family, and also to see really what it

0:32:01.200 --> 0:32:04.120
<v Speaker 1>is like in political circles. The scene of John Fetterman

0:32:04.200 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 1>screaming at his fellow senators was like jaw dropping. And

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:10.200
<v Speaker 1>I also got the audiobook as well to hear it

0:32:10.240 --> 0:32:13.560
<v Speaker 1>when I was doing things and Jake Tapper doing voices

0:32:13.840 --> 0:32:16.760
<v Speaker 1>accents is hilarious. So if you can't actually read and

0:32:16.760 --> 0:32:18.600
<v Speaker 1>you want to listen to it, his accents of like

0:32:18.640 --> 0:32:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Bernie Sanders and when I was very very funny.

0:32:20.920 --> 0:32:23.320
<v Speaker 3>It is a great I haven't listened to the audiobook yet.

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:24.800
<v Speaker 3>I had no idea about the accents.

0:32:24.840 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Well he does accents for all the people. Oh it's

0:32:27.080 --> 0:32:30.080
<v Speaker 1>really now, there are times there it's actually like I

0:32:30.120 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 1>was like, this is actually really good, and I'm like, whoa,

0:32:32.840 --> 0:32:34.800
<v Speaker 1>this is a rough New York accent right over here.

0:32:35.000 --> 0:32:38.160
<v Speaker 1>But it is. It's really really good. Congratulations on it,

0:32:38.800 --> 0:32:42.640
<v Speaker 1>and I highly recommend it to all my listeners. I

0:32:42.680 --> 0:32:44.680
<v Speaker 1>think that it's definitely the book of the year so far.

0:32:45.040 --> 0:32:46.760
<v Speaker 2>That really means a lot. Thank you very much for

0:32:46.760 --> 0:32:47.080
<v Speaker 2>having me.

0:32:50.600 --> 0:32:53.800
<v Speaker 1>That was Alex Thompson once again, of the great book

0:32:53.800 --> 0:32:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Original Sin. I really did like it. I'm not just

0:32:55.880 --> 0:32:58.040
<v Speaker 1>saying it because he was here, because I don't peddle

0:32:58.120 --> 0:33:02.000
<v Speaker 1>other people's nonsense besides my own. But it was, it was.

0:33:02.120 --> 0:33:04.200
<v Speaker 1>It was a really good book, and it really really

0:33:04.280 --> 0:33:07.480
<v Speaker 1>really went into like the human interactions of senators and

0:33:07.480 --> 0:33:09.920
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that, and I think he looked he gave

0:33:10.000 --> 0:33:12.560
<v Speaker 1>us some good tidbits right there of interactions with people,

0:33:12.600 --> 0:33:16.480
<v Speaker 1>especially on Jill Biden. I think that she's really the

0:33:16.560 --> 0:33:20.640
<v Speaker 1>lady Macbeth figure in this entire thing. So I want

0:33:20.680 --> 0:33:23.720
<v Speaker 1>to go into my question and answer. You can ask

0:33:23.760 --> 0:33:26.760
<v Speaker 1>me a question on basically anything. Email me Ryan at

0:33:26.840 --> 0:33:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Numbers Game Podcast dot com. That's Ryan at numbers Plural

0:33:30.160 --> 0:33:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Numbers gamepodcast dot com. Send me a tweet, ask me

0:33:33.240 --> 0:33:35.640
<v Speaker 1>a question, and I love to answer it. Someone asked

0:33:35.680 --> 0:33:38.760
<v Speaker 1>me today, have you watched the Nancy Mace footage on

0:33:38.800 --> 0:33:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the House floor this week? So if you guys do

0:33:41.000 --> 0:33:47.520
<v Speaker 1>not know, Nancy Mace post a video of herself naked

0:33:47.560 --> 0:33:50.560
<v Speaker 1>that I think someone else took without her permission, and

0:33:50.640 --> 0:33:52.960
<v Speaker 1>she put into the Congressional record, which means it's there

0:33:53.000 --> 0:33:57.920
<v Speaker 1>for like all time. That was wild, and no, I

0:33:57.960 --> 0:34:01.320
<v Speaker 1>did not watch it. I didn't watch it because I've

0:34:01.360 --> 0:34:04.600
<v Speaker 1>only met Nancy Mace one time before. It was in

0:34:04.640 --> 0:34:07.680
<v Speaker 1>a private meeting with people. It wasn't on the record

0:34:07.720 --> 0:34:10.520
<v Speaker 1>or anything like that. But it was really kind of crazy.

0:34:10.600 --> 0:34:13.239
<v Speaker 1>And she was there with her then fiance, who I

0:34:13.280 --> 0:34:16.960
<v Speaker 1>think she has accused of something horrible. I don't want

0:34:16.960 --> 0:34:18.359
<v Speaker 1>to say that the accusation was. It was some kind

0:34:18.360 --> 0:34:21.439
<v Speaker 1>of accusation. They have since broken up. And we get

0:34:21.600 --> 0:34:24.000
<v Speaker 1>into the dinner table and Nancy is like talking a

0:34:24.000 --> 0:34:25.880
<v Speaker 1>mile a minute and one of her first things that

0:34:25.960 --> 0:34:28.040
<v Speaker 1>she says is she's like, oh, I'm down to just

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:31.120
<v Speaker 1>one glass of wine a day, to which her person

0:34:31.120 --> 0:34:34.160
<v Speaker 1>who worked with her like went like this like like,

0:34:34.239 --> 0:34:36.279
<v Speaker 1>not a no, I forget there's no camera. He not

0:34:36.400 --> 0:34:38.560
<v Speaker 1>a no. He was like, she's not down to one

0:34:38.560 --> 0:34:41.000
<v Speaker 1>glass a day. And then she's introducing her fiance and

0:34:41.080 --> 0:34:42.680
<v Speaker 1>she's like, I thought that he was wealthy the first

0:34:42.680 --> 0:34:44.279
<v Speaker 1>time I met him, and turns out that he's broke.

0:34:44.360 --> 0:34:47.279
<v Speaker 1>And I was like what. I was like, Hi, my

0:34:47.400 --> 0:34:49.399
<v Speaker 1>name is Ryan. We didn't gotten to that part yet.

0:34:49.440 --> 0:34:52.640
<v Speaker 1>She was talking a mile a minute, and the context

0:34:52.680 --> 0:34:55.520
<v Speaker 1>that we had a conversation with was great afterwards, but

0:34:55.680 --> 0:34:58.239
<v Speaker 1>it was like started at an eleven and it worked

0:34:58.280 --> 0:35:00.680
<v Speaker 1>its way down from there rather than work its way up.

0:35:00.800 --> 0:35:05.640
<v Speaker 1>She was perfectly lovely, but very intense, and she seems

0:35:05.680 --> 0:35:09.560
<v Speaker 1>to go through husband's fiances and staff very very quickly.

0:35:10.239 --> 0:35:12.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what that's all about. I don't know

0:35:12.760 --> 0:35:15.400
<v Speaker 1>why she seeks this much attention on many things, but

0:35:15.520 --> 0:35:20.000
<v Speaker 1>she does. And I did not watch her include her

0:35:20.080 --> 0:35:25.200
<v Speaker 1>naked photos in the congressional record because I have other

0:35:25.280 --> 0:35:28.319
<v Speaker 1>things to do with my time. Anyway, that's my little

0:35:28.400 --> 0:35:32.839
<v Speaker 1>Nancy May story. These congressional stories, my political run ends

0:35:32.840 --> 0:35:35.680
<v Speaker 1>over time are pretty funny. I am like Forrest Gump.

0:35:35.760 --> 0:35:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I am like a New York version of Forrest Gump.

0:35:37.960 --> 0:35:40.200
<v Speaker 1>It's a different accent. Well, thank you guys again for

0:35:40.280 --> 0:35:42.680
<v Speaker 1>listening for this episode. Have a happy Memorial Day. I

0:35:42.680 --> 0:35:44.359
<v Speaker 1>hope you have had a great three day weekend, nice

0:35:44.400 --> 0:35:46.480
<v Speaker 1>and relaxing. And come back on Thursday and listen to

0:35:46.560 --> 0:35:49.680
<v Speaker 1>our next episode. Like and subscribe on the iHeartRadio app,

0:35:49.719 --> 0:35:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcasts, wherever you get your podcasts. If you're generous,

0:35:52.719 --> 0:35:54.319
<v Speaker 1>and if you're feeling generous, and I hope you are,

0:35:55.000 --> 0:35:57.080
<v Speaker 1>give us a five star review. Thank you so much,