WEBVTT - The TechTV Story

0:00:04.240 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production of I Heart Radios

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:13.880
<v Speaker 1>How Stuff Works. Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff.

0:00:13.920 --> 0:00:17.599
<v Speaker 1>I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio and How Stuff Works and I love

0:00:20.040 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 1>all things tech. And today I'm going to do the

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:26.720
<v Speaker 1>first of a couple of episodes. Actually, this one, I'm

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about a cable television channel that was

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 1>geared toward a tech savvy audience, specifically computer nerds. It

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:40.560
<v Speaker 1>was a channel that included reviews, how to guides, interactive programs,

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:43.960
<v Speaker 1>and a bunch of stuff that really geeky computer nerds

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>like yours truly would really be interested in. It was

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 1>an attempt to build out some niche programming that ultimately

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:55.280
<v Speaker 1>lasted about six years before things would change dramatically and

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the channel would get merged into a different niche oriented

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>cable chan annel. So today we're going to talk about

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:06.200
<v Speaker 1>tech TV, and in our next episode, I will cover

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:09.400
<v Speaker 1>the story of G four TV, the channel that tech

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:12.760
<v Speaker 1>TV would get merged into in two thousand four. So

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:17.199
<v Speaker 1>spoiler alert for that, I guess uh. I will attempt

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>to tell all of G four's story, including what happened

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 1>after the merger in one episode. We'll see if that

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 1>pans out, because a lot happened in those years. So

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:31.120
<v Speaker 1>one thing I do want to mention is that these

0:01:31.120 --> 0:01:35.840
<v Speaker 1>episodes were a little challenging to research simply because a

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:39.559
<v Speaker 1>lot of the information about them happened to be online

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 1>on their own websites, and once those channels ceased to exist,

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>because neither of them are around anymore, a lot of

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>that web based material just kind of lapsed. People didn't

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>maintain the sites, companies stopped paying for hosting fees, and

0:01:57.200 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>a ton of information disappeared. And I our databases, and

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I went through the Internet archive and I looked at

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 1>lots of different stuff to get a kind of a

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:09.240
<v Speaker 1>big picture of what was going on. And I should

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 1>also mention that a lot of the decisions made both

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>at tech TV and G four resulted in a lot

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 1>of hurt feelings among the employees there, and as a result,

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:26.959
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of um Vitriolic is a good word,

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 1>of hashion. It is another good word. There are a

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of high emotion type texts and messages and articles

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 1>that were written in blog posts that kind of thing

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 1>that we're written in the wake of both Tech TV

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 1>and G four. So trying to parse all that and

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 1>get to the nuggets of truth that are buried in

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of emotional baggage can sometimes be a bit challenging,

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's understandable why there was so much emotional baggage.

0:02:57.120 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>We'll get into all of that. So the story of

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:04.519
<v Speaker 1>tech TV starts with a publishing company that was originally

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 1>founded by William Ziff Sr. And Bernard Davis way back

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:14.120
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen seven, decades before there would ever be any

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:18.840
<v Speaker 1>dream of a cable television channel. Obviously, the original name

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:23.360
<v Speaker 1>for this publishing company was Popular Aviation Company, named after

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the magazine it published, Popular Aviation, But before very long,

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:31.680
<v Speaker 1>the founders decided to rename the company and call it

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>the Ziff Davis Publishing Company. Now, this company largely focused

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 1>on hobbyist topics. Hobbyists tend to be a passionate customer base,

0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 1>and they tend to have a lot of disposable income

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 1>because hobbies cost money to maintain, and it was relatively

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 1>easy to get companies that catered to hobbyists to advertise

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 1>in those magazines, so it wasn't hard to sell ad space.

0:03:56.120 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>So when we skip ahead a few decades, into the

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighties. Because obviously this is not an episode about

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Ziff Davis the publishing company, it should come as a

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>little a little surprise to anyone really that the publishing

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 1>company soon explored magazines catering to computer enthusiasts. Ziff Davis,

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:17.839
<v Speaker 1>then under the control of williams If Senior's son, clearly

0:04:17.880 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 1>William Jr. Purchased the publishing rights to a magazine called

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:26.160
<v Speaker 1>PC Magazine in nineteen two. PC Magazine had just started

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:29.719
<v Speaker 1>publishing only a few months earlier. This would usher in

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:32.839
<v Speaker 1>a new era for Ziff Davis, one that was increasingly

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:37.240
<v Speaker 1>connected to the world of technology. That wasn't necessarily by choice.

0:04:37.600 --> 0:04:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Zif the younger had developed cancer and he wished to

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:44.200
<v Speaker 1>simplify the magazine empire of Ziff Davis in the early

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:49.600
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighties. By that time, the publishing company was enormous,

0:04:49.640 --> 0:04:53.799
<v Speaker 1>so it would sell off two big branches of the company.

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:58.360
<v Speaker 1>One was the Consumer Group Magazines, which had sold to CBS,

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 1>and the other was the Business Group Magazines, which it

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:05.719
<v Speaker 1>sold off to Rupert Murdoch. Ziff Davis, the company really

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:10.480
<v Speaker 1>only held onto the computer magazine titles. PC Magazine would

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:16.160
<v Speaker 1>go into great some might say excruciatingly great detail about

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:20.360
<v Speaker 1>computer specs and recommendations, and it really was not for

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the computer illiterate. It also did quite well, growing to

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>become one of the top ten largest magazines in the

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 1>US by and if Davis would complement this with other

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 1>magazines such as a one called Mac User, so for

0:05:35.600 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the Mac users out there, not just the PC owners

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 1>and others. And back in the nineteen eighties, the company

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:44.680
<v Speaker 1>had acquired the Information Access Company, which was an early

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:49.839
<v Speaker 1>electronic publishing organization. It largely oversaw lots of databases that

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 1>were useful for library functions. If Davis would build upon

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:57.600
<v Speaker 1>this innovation with the development of zif net and electronic

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>version of various magazines that the publisher offered to subscribers

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:05.479
<v Speaker 1>of online service providers like American Online or Prodigy, then

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>the company became an online service provider of its own

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:12.840
<v Speaker 1>with the Interchange Online Network, though that would not go

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 1>live before the company would get broken up. Spoiler alert now,

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 1>in case you're not familiar with the termin online service

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 1>provider was sort of a predecessor to the internet service

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 1>providers we use today. The online service providers would offer

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:30.839
<v Speaker 1>access to a computer network and sometimes limited access to

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the Internet at large, and keep in mind that in

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 1>the very early days there was no Worldwide Web yet,

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:40.640
<v Speaker 1>so it would usually mean things like email exchanges and

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 1>uh FDP servers that kind of thing. OSPs would provide news,

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:49.680
<v Speaker 1>entertainment and communication services like email, although depending on the USP,

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:53.640
<v Speaker 1>you might be limited to sending and receiving email with

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:57.800
<v Speaker 1>other members of that same online service provider. There wasn't

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:03.160
<v Speaker 1>necessarily interser of us connectivity between different online service providers

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 1>in the early days. After Ziff Jr. Would retire, the

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Ziff Davis Publishing Company got broken up a second time.

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 1>The publishing arm would go to an investment firm called Fortsman,

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Little and Company for the princely sum of one point

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 1>for billion. With a B dollars, the Soft Bank Corporation

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 1>from Japan would buy a division called Ziff Davis Exhibitors,

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 1>which organized and managed computer trade shows, and the Information

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Access Company would go to the Thompson Corporation and A

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:41.280
<v Speaker 1>T and T would scoop up the Interchange Online network. Now,

0:07:41.320 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 1>despite this breakup, the publishing arm continued business as usual,

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 1>growing in the process. By it launched a new magazine

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 1>called Yahoo Internet Life. Obviously inspired by Yahoo the web portal,

0:07:56.280 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 1>and it was kind of described as the TV guide

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 1>for the Internet. That same year, soft Bank, which you

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 1>know I just mentioned had purchased the exhibitor part of

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Ziff Davis back in decided it was gonna try again

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 1>because it had tried to buy the publishing branch but

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 1>got outbid by Fortsman Little. So SoftBank went to Fortsman

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Little and said, tell you what, We'll give you two

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 1>point one billion dollars for the publishing arm. Now keep

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 1>in mind Fortsman had purchased this publishing arm for one

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 1>point four billion dollars the year before, so this was

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good deal, you know, turning around and selling

0:08:36.880 --> 0:08:39.679
<v Speaker 1>it for two point one billion dollars. So soft Bank

0:08:39.800 --> 0:08:44.200
<v Speaker 1>then took ownership of the Ziff Davis publishing part of

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the business. In as part of the launch of the

0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 1>MSNBC cable channel, Ziff Davis dipped its corporate toe in

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the waters of TV programming. The company produced an hour

0:08:57.040 --> 0:09:01.679
<v Speaker 1>long show called The Site s I T E. Solo.

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Doda Brian acted as host for the show. She would

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:08.440
<v Speaker 1>go on to do many amazing things in TV and beyond,

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:13.079
<v Speaker 1>and she had a motion capture animated sidekick named dev Null,

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>voiced by a certain Leo Laporte, who would go on

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:20.679
<v Speaker 1>to become a host on the future tech TV. I'm

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 1>sure it must have been a lot of fun seeing

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:26.199
<v Speaker 1>Leo in that motion capture suit. The site was a

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:30.559
<v Speaker 1>technology news and culture program that focused primarily on the Internet.

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 1>It also had a companion website that complimented the programming

0:09:34.640 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 1>on the television show. Now. Sadly, the site the TV

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:42.320
<v Speaker 1>show didn't last very long. MSNBC would preempt episodes of

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the show in in the wake of Princess Diana's death,

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and the show never returned to air. Instead, in MSNBC

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 1>changed formats to become a twenty four hour news channel

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and Ziff Davis would hire back all the staff of

0:09:58.600 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the show with a new goal. They decided that they

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>were going to launch a dedicated television channel, a cable

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 1>channel of its very own, and it was going to

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 1>leverage the expertise it had with its print and web

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:16.120
<v Speaker 1>content and adapted for the medium of television. Now, the

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>ownership of the channel, which was originally not called tech TV.

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 1>The original name was z d TV gets a bit confusing,

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 1>so originally it was not the Ziff Davis division of

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:35.440
<v Speaker 1>soft Bank that would own this channel. Instead, a soft

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Bank affiliate holding company called MAC owned the channel. And

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:42.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe it pays to talk about that a bit, because

0:10:43.600 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I think the corporate ownership of Ziff Davis gives us

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of insight into how much or how

0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:55.840
<v Speaker 1>little support initiatives like z d t V would get

0:10:56.280 --> 0:11:00.840
<v Speaker 1>from its corporate overlords. Okay, So soft Bank is an

0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:05.960
<v Speaker 1>investment company and it's it's headquartered in Japan. It's publicly

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 1>traded and was and still is led by a guy

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:14.000
<v Speaker 1>named Masa Yoshi. San San owns a large stake of

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 1>soft Bank, and he did it through this holding company

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 1>MAC M a C. And he used companies kind of

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 1>like how a magician uses cups and balls. So to

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:30.439
<v Speaker 1>avoid affecting soft Bank's bottom line and thus the value

0:11:30.480 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 1>of its shares, he used the MAC company to purchase

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 1>some of the more risky divisions for acquisitions like Ziff Davis. So,

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:41.959
<v Speaker 1>in other words, if it was part of a company

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 1>that made money, it could go to soft Bank because

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 1>that would help boost SoftBank's numbers and it would improve

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 1>the price on the shares. But if it was a

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 1>loss making business, if it was something there's a little

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 1>more risky, MAC would scoop it up because it was

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:59.440
<v Speaker 1>a private company, and as a private company it could

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of eyed those losses. So in other words, all

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:07.079
<v Speaker 1>the hits would go to soft Bank, all the strikes

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 1>would go to MAC, which could just sort of absorb

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 1>it as divisions stabilized. Sun would oversee soft Bank purchasing

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 1>those divisions back from Mac, frequently at cost. So essentially

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:24.960
<v Speaker 1>he was transferring ownership from one company, a private company,

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 1>to another, a public company. So z d t V

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 1>would initially fall under MAC Holdings. That was essentially the

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:35.320
<v Speaker 1>American version of the Mac company that Saun was using

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 1>in Japan, and about a year after that things would change. MAC,

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:45.679
<v Speaker 1>the Japanese one would get merged into soft Bank, ostensibly

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 1>to improve transparency, and if Davis would buy z d

0:12:50.280 --> 0:12:54.600
<v Speaker 1>t V from Mac Holdings in late n But a

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit of other stuff happened in between the launch

0:12:58.000 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 1>of z d t V in early nine d eight

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:06.199
<v Speaker 1>and z if David's purchasing the rights over from MAC Holdings. Now,

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:08.199
<v Speaker 1>the reason that all of this is important, apart from

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the fact that it illustrates how extremely rich people manipulate systems.

0:13:12.640 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 1>In order to get even more rich is that for

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:19.479
<v Speaker 1>a time it hid z d t vs financial performance,

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:22.200
<v Speaker 1>and I'll get to that in a second. The channel

0:13:22.200 --> 0:13:27.000
<v Speaker 1>would launch on May tenth or May eleventh. Really was

0:13:27.040 --> 0:13:29.560
<v Speaker 1>announced on the tenth and really launched on the eleventh,

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 1>but it also launched in a very limited distribution. Larry Weinberg,

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:36.760
<v Speaker 1>who had previously served as president and CEO of a

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 1>cable television company, would sign on as president and CEO

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 1>of z d t V, and originally z d TV

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:46.840
<v Speaker 1>was only available on a few smaller cable providers like

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 1>clear Vision Cable or Helicon Cable, and Georgia, where I'm from,

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:54.959
<v Speaker 1>there was a little carrier called Teleview that offered it.

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I was not a tele of View customer, so I

0:13:57.600 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 1>actually remained completely ignorant of zd TV and later tech

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 1>tv for quite some time. A bit later in the summer,

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:08.959
<v Speaker 1>of Direct TV and z d TV would put together

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:13.199
<v Speaker 1>a carriage deal that would put the new programming on

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:17.840
<v Speaker 1>channel two hundred seventy three of the satellite TV service.

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 1>That would also mark the first time that certain people

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco, that being Direct TV customers where z

0:14:25.400 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 1>d t V was actually shot, could finally watch the channel.

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 1>In fact, for a very long time in the z

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 1>d TV tech TV history. Despite the fact that it

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 1>was shot and produced in San Francisco, most people in

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco had no access to the show. They couldn't

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 1>watch it. The company decided not to publish how many

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 1>households it would reach on its debut, but analysts estimated

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 1>that was likely fewer than a million households. Now, keep

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 1>in mind that meant that the channel would be available

0:14:56.200 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 1>for fewer than one million households. Presumably, even on the

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 1>households that got the channel, not all of them were

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be glued to the television to watch tech

0:15:05.520 --> 0:15:10.120
<v Speaker 1>related contents. So we're talking about significantly fewer than one

0:15:10.160 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 1>million viewers. But you gotta start somewhere. Now. I'll get

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 1>to some of the programs that the channel carried in

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the next section of this episode. But first I want

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 1>to mention that in November of just half a year

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 1>after the channel had debuted, a company called Vulcan Ventures

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 1>would invest more than fifty million dollars into z d

0:15:31.760 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 1>t V in exchange for one third ownership of the company. Now,

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Vulcan Ventures had a famous founder Paul Allen, co founder

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 1>of a little company called Microsoft. This is also around

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the time when Ziff Davis would exercise its options to

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 1>buy z d t V from Mac Holdings. Now I

0:15:52.440 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 1>mentioned the financial performance a second ago by The Times.

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 1>If Davis would buy z d t V from Mac Holdings,

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the Ziff Dave subsidiary overall had an operating profit of

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 1>thirty one point one million dollars, and because z d

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:14.239
<v Speaker 1>t V wasn't organized under Zif Davis, the channels operating

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 1>losses would not affect that company's budget sheets, which is

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 1>a good thing, because it turned out that z d

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 1>t V had operated at a loss of forty seven

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 1>point five million dollars, which means the channel's losses were

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 1>more than ten million dollars greater than the operating profit

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 1>of the entire Ziff Davis company, including all the magazine publishing,

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 1>which is scary. Now. Granted, the launch was at best

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 1>a modest one, and the startup costs of launching a

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 1>cable channel are incredibly high. You could say they're pretty substantial,

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 1>so it would have been remarkable if z d TV

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 1>had turned a profit in its first year. But this

0:16:57.200 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 1>would create a pretty hefty burden on the little channel

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:05.160
<v Speaker 1>and for Ziff Davis in general. On the other hand,

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Paul Allen had also made another significant purchase that could

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:11.639
<v Speaker 1>give the fledgling channel a little bit of a boost.

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:15.919
<v Speaker 1>He had purchased Charter Communications, a cable TV operator, for

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:19.720
<v Speaker 1>four and a half billion With a B dollars. In

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:24.160
<v Speaker 1>November of Vulcan Ventures would strike a deal to acquire

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:27.639
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the shares of z d TV, buying

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:31.480
<v Speaker 1>it from Ziff Davis. So now it would become wholly

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 1>owned by Vulcan Ventures. The channel would continue with its

0:17:36.240 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 1>original name for nearly a year more until September two thousand,

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 1>when it would rebrand itself as tech TV. Now. I'll

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:47.399
<v Speaker 1>have more to say about this in just a moment,

0:17:47.400 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 1>but first let's take a quick break. So one thing

0:17:57.320 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I want to mention before I go into the sorts

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:02.359
<v Speaker 1>of shows that were on z d t V and

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 1>then tech TV, is a bit of confusion regarding the

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:09.760
<v Speaker 1>channel and then the company c Net, which is today

0:18:09.800 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 1>part of CBS. I've seen some videos and read some

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:17.640
<v Speaker 1>news reports even some articles that conflated c nets purchase

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 1>of z d net, which was a family of websites

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 1>that were operated by Ziff Davis and z d t

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 1>V the television channel. So to clear this up, c

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:33.240
<v Speaker 1>NET purchased z d net and these two things were competitors.

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Zd net actually for a while was out performing c

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 1>NET back in those days, but it did not include

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the television channel that remained under Paul Allen's general ownership

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 1>through Vulcan Ventures. This did complicate things a little bit

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:52.400
<v Speaker 1>because up until the acquisition, some of the content from

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 1>z d t V would then be featured on the

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:58.920
<v Speaker 1>z d net sites, so maybe that's where the confusion

0:18:58.920 --> 0:19:03.400
<v Speaker 1>stems from. Also, Vulcan Ventures, Paul Allen's investment company, at

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:07.399
<v Speaker 1>one time nearly owned twenty percent of all the shares

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 1>of c NET, but the company, the investment company, had

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 1>begun divesting itself of those shares leading up to the

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 1>purchase of z d TV. That also makes it all confusing.

0:19:18.280 --> 0:19:20.119
<v Speaker 1>But the important thing to remember here is that c

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 1>NET did not at any time acquire z d t

0:19:24.400 --> 0:19:27.040
<v Speaker 1>V and thus tech TV. Now, when the channel went

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:29.640
<v Speaker 1>on the air, there was a mixture of excitement and

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 1>skepticism about its fate. It's a cliche and it's obvious,

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:39.639
<v Speaker 1>but was a very different landscape from today. Back in

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 1>less than half of all American homes even owned a computer,

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:48.200
<v Speaker 1>and only about a quarter of all American households had

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Internet access. So there was a question, and it seemed

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 1>a legitimate one, was there even enough demand to support

0:19:55.640 --> 0:20:01.880
<v Speaker 1>a tech oriented computer NERD targeted twenty for our cable channel,

0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:06.320
<v Speaker 1>particularly one that was going to focus heavily on the Internet. Now,

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 1>on the flip side of that, the Internet was considered

0:20:10.520 --> 0:20:16.120
<v Speaker 1>virgin territory, wide open landscape, just ripe for making your fortune.

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 1>It was like a gold rush, So there was a

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:23.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of optimism about how important the Internet was going

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:26.919
<v Speaker 1>to be in the very near future. So in that sense,

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:32.400
<v Speaker 1>they were kind of taking a gamble, but they felt

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:34.480
<v Speaker 1>like it was a gamble that was pretty sure it

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:37.120
<v Speaker 1>was going to pay off. But let's talk a little

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:40.240
<v Speaker 1>bit about the programming on the channel. When z DTV

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:44.639
<v Speaker 1>launched in it had around six hours of programming a

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:47.160
<v Speaker 1>day that would repeat to create the twenty four hour

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 1>cable TV channel. The programming, most of which was live.

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:54.480
<v Speaker 1>By the way, they would actually broadcast live for the

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:59.359
<v Speaker 1>initial uh airing of the shows ran across a pretty

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 1>decent spectrum of the computer experience. There was an on

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:07.199
<v Speaker 1>air tech advice show called Call for Help, and that

0:21:07.240 --> 0:21:09.159
<v Speaker 1>one was aimed at people who are either new to

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 1>computers or only had a little experience with them, hosted

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:15.960
<v Speaker 1>famously by Leo Laporte. One thing the channel did early

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:19.480
<v Speaker 1>on was to offer free net cameras or web cameras

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:22.719
<v Speaker 1>to users who registered on the show's online forums. If

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:25.199
<v Speaker 1>they wanted to ask a question, they could register, they

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 1>could get a camera sent to them. They would hook

0:21:27.400 --> 0:21:30.320
<v Speaker 1>up the camera and then their web camera footage would

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 1>actually be used in the show. So you do a

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:35.880
<v Speaker 1>live call, your video would be up on screen as

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 1>you're asking people for computer advice. Let's say that you're

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 1>having an issue with your computer crashing and you're calling

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:44.240
<v Speaker 1>them to find out what you can do to solve

0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 1>this problem. It was a really neat idea and it

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:50.480
<v Speaker 1>really built a sense of community among the viewers. The

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 1>channel also had a half hour show that focused on

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:57.240
<v Speaker 1>new tech called Fresh Gear UH. There was also a

0:21:57.320 --> 0:22:01.680
<v Speaker 1>money oriented computer show called The the Machine that gave

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 1>users advice on how to leverage computers to do stuff

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:08.200
<v Speaker 1>like make financial investments. UH. There was also the entertainment

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 1>and news segment that was mostly covered in a show

0:22:11.880 --> 0:22:17.760
<v Speaker 1>called Internet Tonight that featured segments about Internet trends, rumors, news,

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 1>They had segments on music, They had segments on memes

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:24.920
<v Speaker 1>before we called them memes. Funny little side note. While

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:27.800
<v Speaker 1>I was researching this episode, I happened to read an

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 1>article that had a fully embedded episode of Internet Tonight

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:36.119
<v Speaker 1>on it. I believe it was for July, so I

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:38.439
<v Speaker 1>watched a good good amount of it just to kind

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 1>of get a feel for what it was like. And

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, it was a fairly slick production that was

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:48.640
<v Speaker 1>covering tech news, and I thought it was pretty interesting.

0:22:48.880 --> 0:22:52.159
<v Speaker 1>I scrubbed through it and just around nineteen minutes and

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:56.040
<v Speaker 1>thirty seconds or so, it goes into a segment about

0:22:56.080 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 1>a website that was pretty useful. That website turned out

0:22:59.840 --> 0:23:04.160
<v Speaker 1>to how stuff works dot com, which I found really amusing. Obviously,

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:06.879
<v Speaker 1>being someone who had worked for how Stuff Works since

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:12.159
<v Speaker 1>two thousand seven, h seeing a feature from about the

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:15.440
<v Speaker 1>website really tickled me. Also, boy, the website has come

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:18.680
<v Speaker 1>a long way since those days, but it did make

0:23:18.680 --> 0:23:23.480
<v Speaker 1>me chuckle. There was another show called Silicon Spin, hosted

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 1>by John C. Dvorak, who was an editor for PC magazine,

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:32.399
<v Speaker 1>which she will remember, was a magazine published by Ziff Davis. Uh.

0:23:32.440 --> 0:23:35.479
<v Speaker 1>He kind of gave an opinion show about technology and

0:23:35.520 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 1>tech news and developments. One of the big shows to

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 1>come out of this debut was called The Screen Savers,

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 1>another computer oriented show that included reviews, advice, and news.

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 1>This one also was hosted by Leo Laporte and Kate Botello.

0:23:50.320 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 1>This show, like Call for Help, often include questions from

0:23:53.119 --> 0:23:55.360
<v Speaker 1>viewers to help solve issues they were having with their

0:23:55.359 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 1>computer systems, and also would include net camera footage. This

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:02.880
<v Speaker 1>show was more are for intermediate to advanced computer users.

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, they didn't really pussy foot around talking about

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:11.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, computer terminology and and and tech terms, and

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:14.480
<v Speaker 1>if you didn't know your stuff at least the basics,

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:18.080
<v Speaker 1>you can very quickly get lost. So this was something

0:24:18.080 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 1>that appealed to a lot of the tech savvy audience

0:24:20.800 --> 0:24:23.560
<v Speaker 1>because they felt like they weren't being patronized, they weren't

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:28.120
<v Speaker 1>being talked down to. This show would undergo massive changes

0:24:28.359 --> 0:24:33.240
<v Speaker 1>over the following years, usually involving it being dialed back

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:37.640
<v Speaker 1>from being quite so tech heavy to the point where

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:41.159
<v Speaker 1>by the time it was in its final incarnation, you

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:44.960
<v Speaker 1>could argue it was unrecognizable. Now, it was a pretty

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:48.119
<v Speaker 1>bold move to put out this kind of niche oriented

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:51.240
<v Speaker 1>programming out on the air. Now at this time, we're

0:24:51.280 --> 0:24:53.400
<v Speaker 1>we're also seeing a lot of other channels that were

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:57.960
<v Speaker 1>catering to specific interests. Channels like MTV had paved the

0:24:57.960 --> 0:25:01.120
<v Speaker 1>way for other cable channels that would focus on specific

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 1>subject matter, though by this time MTV had already drifted

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 1>far away from its origins as music television that is

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 1>what MTV used to stand for. Channels like the Learning Channel,

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:16.720
<v Speaker 1>which would later become TLC, and Sci Fi which would

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:20.440
<v Speaker 1>later become SIFFY, and American Movie Classics which would later

0:25:20.480 --> 0:25:24.600
<v Speaker 1>become a MC, we're all attempting to build audiences using

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:27.760
<v Speaker 1>a sort of laser like focus on subject matter. The

0:25:27.800 --> 0:25:31.520
<v Speaker 1>idea was, if you focus on a specific topic, you

0:25:31.560 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 1>can dominate for that topic and you can become the

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 1>go to source. Now, as we'll see when we talk

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:42.720
<v Speaker 1>about G four in our next episode, the strategy would

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:47.919
<v Speaker 1>shift away from catering to that core audience over time

0:25:48.000 --> 0:25:51.680
<v Speaker 1>in an effort to build out a larger viewership, something

0:25:51.720 --> 0:25:54.240
<v Speaker 1>we've seen time and time again, not just with tech

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:57.760
<v Speaker 1>TV and G four, but MTV is a great example.

0:25:57.920 --> 0:25:59.880
<v Speaker 1>That was an early example of how we would see

0:25:59.880 --> 0:26:04.639
<v Speaker 1>that at and show channels like the Learning Channel or

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:08.320
<v Speaker 1>TLC as another great example, and sci Fi as another one,

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 1>and even Cartoon Network that's another one. Well. According to

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:17.159
<v Speaker 1>Russ Pitts, who served as a line producer on the

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Screen Savers, employees were not told how many people were

0:26:21.160 --> 0:26:25.720
<v Speaker 1>actually watching the programs. The best and employee could hope

0:26:25.760 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 1>for at the time was an estimate of how many

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 1>people could potentially watch a show based on the number

0:26:31.840 --> 0:26:34.960
<v Speaker 1>of households that z d t V was reaching, like

0:26:35.040 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 1>how many how many cable companies were actually carrying z

0:26:39.200 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 1>d t V By the middle of that was around

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 1>eleven million households, and four million of those were through

0:26:47.119 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 1>cable providers and the other seven million were through satellite

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 1>television providers. Two years after the channel went on the air,

0:26:56.119 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the bottom fell out under the dot com industry the

0:27:00.240 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 1>dot com investment bubble burst, as the same year the

0:27:03.880 --> 0:27:08.359
<v Speaker 1>channel would undergo its transformation into tech TV. Several months after,

0:27:08.600 --> 0:27:12.199
<v Speaker 1>Vulcan Ventures had purchased the remaining ownership from zip Davis

0:27:12.520 --> 0:27:15.920
<v Speaker 1>for somewhere in the neighborhood of three hundred million dollars

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 1>a princely Some keep in mind they had already spent

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 1>another fifty million dollars just to get that first third

0:27:22.320 --> 0:27:24.880
<v Speaker 1>of the ownership. So it's a bit hard to remember

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:29.280
<v Speaker 1>exactly how big an impact this dot com bubble collapse

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:33.399
<v Speaker 1>had on the world in general and San Francisco in particular.

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:37.480
<v Speaker 1>During the boom years, San Francisco was doing incredibly well.

0:27:37.560 --> 0:27:40.399
<v Speaker 1>The city was really turning around. There were all sorts

0:27:40.400 --> 0:27:43.359
<v Speaker 1>of innovative startups and more than a few ventures built

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:45.919
<v Speaker 1>on little more than wishful thinking, and as we all know,

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:49.240
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't something that would go on forever. The collapse

0:27:49.320 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 1>hit those companies hard, and it also delivered a big

0:27:52.080 --> 0:27:55.960
<v Speaker 1>blow to the advertising industry. Companies that had survived the

0:27:56.000 --> 0:27:59.720
<v Speaker 1>dot com crash and the economic fallout that fought that

0:27:59.760 --> 0:28:02.960
<v Speaker 1>went behind that were becoming much more careful with their

0:28:03.000 --> 0:28:06.280
<v Speaker 1>money and they would spend less on advertising and marketing.

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:09.720
<v Speaker 1>So for a television channel that drew its revenue from

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:13.440
<v Speaker 1>selling ad space, this was really bad news and it

0:28:13.480 --> 0:28:15.720
<v Speaker 1>was a big ripple effects. So think of it like

0:28:15.760 --> 0:28:18.119
<v Speaker 1>a bull's eye. Target at the very center of this

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:21.520
<v Speaker 1>bull's eye, we have the companies that went under when

0:28:21.520 --> 0:28:25.439
<v Speaker 1>the dot com bubble collapsed around that the circle just

0:28:25.560 --> 0:28:29.160
<v Speaker 1>outside of the core were the companies that survived. They

0:28:29.160 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 1>had enough money, they were able to pivot, they were

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:33.880
<v Speaker 1>able to weather the storm, but they took a big

0:28:33.960 --> 0:28:37.240
<v Speaker 1>hit further out from them, where companies like tech TV

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:42.680
<v Speaker 1>that depended upon these entities further inside the circles to survive,

0:28:42.800 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 1>they were getting ad revenue from those companies. Wasn't just

0:28:46.040 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 1>tech TV, I mean, obviously websites were also deeply affected,

0:28:50.360 --> 0:28:53.800
<v Speaker 1>including how Stuff Works. That one was really hit hard

0:28:53.840 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 1>as well, when the advertising industry as a whole took

0:28:57.760 --> 0:29:00.320
<v Speaker 1>a big step backward in the wake of the dot

0:29:00.400 --> 0:29:03.520
<v Speaker 1>com collapse. To make things even more complicated, tech TV

0:29:03.760 --> 0:29:07.640
<v Speaker 1>also had a large complementary web presence that ran in

0:29:07.720 --> 0:29:12.040
<v Speaker 1>parallel with the television station. So the company had two

0:29:12.080 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 1>sets of staff. You had one on the table TV

0:29:15.760 --> 0:29:19.560
<v Speaker 1>production side and you had one on the website development

0:29:19.720 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 1>production side. And as the belts began to tighten in

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the wake of the dot com crash, it became clear

0:29:25.520 --> 0:29:29.120
<v Speaker 1>that there just wasn't enough money to support everyone. Now,

0:29:29.160 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure many of you have been through a situation

0:29:31.520 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 1>in which there was a major change of the company

0:29:33.320 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 1>you worked for and you felt the effects of that

0:29:36.080 --> 0:29:39.680
<v Speaker 1>ripple through the organization. That was definitely the case with

0:29:39.840 --> 0:29:42.840
<v Speaker 1>z d t V slash tech TV. Paul Allen had

0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:45.560
<v Speaker 1>some ideas about programming, and one of those was that

0:29:45.600 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the channel should launch a television show dedicated to music

0:29:48.840 --> 0:29:52.680
<v Speaker 1>called Audio File f I l E. Which had a

0:29:52.720 --> 0:29:55.240
<v Speaker 1>higher budget than most of the other shows on the channel,

0:29:55.560 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 1>including the two best performing shows on the channel, which

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:01.920
<v Speaker 1>were Called for Help and This Green Savers. So that

0:30:02.400 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 1>raised some hackles over at tech TV. You saw producers

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:09.280
<v Speaker 1>get a little upset when they saw how much money

0:30:09.280 --> 0:30:12.480
<v Speaker 1>and care was being poured into this this pet project

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:16.560
<v Speaker 1>of Paul Allen's. And meanwhile, the shows that were consistently

0:30:16.640 --> 0:30:21.400
<v Speaker 1>performing well with their audiences weren't getting much love from

0:30:21.840 --> 0:30:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the executives. But the first really big change that would

0:30:25.560 --> 0:30:28.680
<v Speaker 1>have a disastrous effect for the channel would start in

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 1>two thousand one, and in March of two thousand one,

0:30:31.360 --> 0:30:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the company would have its first round of layoffs. Now

0:30:33.960 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 1>this was a very small round of layoffs, but it

0:30:37.200 --> 0:30:39.640
<v Speaker 1>was something that would set a tone for the next

0:30:39.680 --> 0:30:42.840
<v Speaker 1>couple of years. They laid off about a dozen employees,

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 1>so in the grand scheme of things, not a huge

0:30:46.080 --> 0:30:48.360
<v Speaker 1>number of people. These were all employees who worked on

0:30:48.400 --> 0:30:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the website side of the business. That also started to

0:30:52.520 --> 0:30:55.600
<v Speaker 1>build a further divide within the company. You had people

0:30:55.640 --> 0:30:58.120
<v Speaker 1>who were working very hard on the website side to

0:30:58.680 --> 0:31:02.960
<v Speaker 1>support the television shows and to build out more information

0:31:03.000 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 1>about actual tech and they were seeing this start to

0:31:07.560 --> 0:31:11.840
<v Speaker 1>transform where the focus, at least from the TV executive side,

0:31:12.440 --> 0:31:17.600
<v Speaker 1>was more on pushing the channel toward an entertainment path

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:22.200
<v Speaker 1>rather than on the very tech focused path that was

0:31:22.600 --> 0:31:26.160
<v Speaker 1>the original purpose of tech TV. This is also when

0:31:26.200 --> 0:31:29.360
<v Speaker 1>tech TV would launch a nine and a half hour

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:35.360
<v Speaker 1>block of programming called Tech Live. This was essentially a

0:31:35.600 --> 0:31:39.080
<v Speaker 1>very long cable news show dedicated to all things tech,

0:31:39.600 --> 0:31:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and it was largely geared towards business professionals like day traders,

0:31:44.000 --> 0:31:48.000
<v Speaker 1>things like that investors, which was a tough sell in

0:31:48.080 --> 0:31:50.640
<v Speaker 1>those days. The behind the scenes leader for this show

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:54.280
<v Speaker 1>was Jim Lauderback, who had also served as host of

0:31:54.520 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Fresh Gear And in the interest of full disclosure, I

0:31:57.440 --> 0:31:59.840
<v Speaker 1>used to work with Jim lauder Back, but briefly back

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:02.560
<v Speaker 1>How Stuff Works and Revision three were both part of

0:32:02.600 --> 0:32:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Discovery Communications. We technically worked in the same departments, but

0:32:06.800 --> 0:32:09.560
<v Speaker 1>our path didn't really cross that much, so I never

0:32:09.600 --> 0:32:12.280
<v Speaker 1>really got much of a strong sense of of who

0:32:12.320 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 1>he is as a leader. But there were several problems

0:32:16.720 --> 0:32:20.320
<v Speaker 1>that were later connected to this big push of tech Live.

0:32:21.000 --> 0:32:23.960
<v Speaker 1>One of those was that it was really expensive and

0:32:24.000 --> 0:32:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the channel wasn't exactly a huge cash cow. According to

0:32:27.640 --> 0:32:31.200
<v Speaker 1>a Wired magazine article from two thousand two, expenses included

0:32:31.280 --> 0:32:35.480
<v Speaker 1>opening up news bureaus in Seattle, New York City, and Washington,

0:32:35.640 --> 0:32:39.480
<v Speaker 1>d C. Also, they built out a broadcast center in

0:32:39.480 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the San Francisco headquarters, and meanwhile, the channel was still

0:32:43.160 --> 0:32:46.520
<v Speaker 1>fighting to gain more purchase on cable networks, so recapturing

0:32:46.560 --> 0:32:51.680
<v Speaker 1>those costs was a big challenge. Another problem with tech

0:32:51.720 --> 0:32:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Live was that the move began to alienate some of

0:32:56.400 --> 0:33:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the channel's most faithful audience, so viewership number is actually

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:06.240
<v Speaker 1>went into decline. They were wanting to see the programs

0:33:06.280 --> 0:33:09.800
<v Speaker 1>that they had loved from the very beginning of z

0:33:09.880 --> 0:33:12.040
<v Speaker 1>d t V, and more of those were getting kind

0:33:12.080 --> 0:33:14.560
<v Speaker 1>of pushed off to the side because of this enormous

0:33:14.600 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 1>block of programming with tech Live. Another issue was that

0:33:18.200 --> 0:33:21.120
<v Speaker 1>it's really really hard to fill that many hours with

0:33:21.240 --> 0:33:24.320
<v Speaker 1>content without retreading the same stuff on a regular basis,

0:33:24.760 --> 0:33:28.520
<v Speaker 1>So within six months, executives decided to pair back tech

0:33:28.560 --> 0:33:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Live into three separate programs. One was a ninety minute

0:33:32.800 --> 0:33:36.520
<v Speaker 1>morning show, another was an hour long afternoon show, and

0:33:36.600 --> 0:33:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the third was a half hour nightly program. A former

0:33:39.840 --> 0:33:43.120
<v Speaker 1>tech TV employee named Josh Green wrote a post on

0:33:43.240 --> 0:33:47.479
<v Speaker 1>Leo Laporte's site, his blog site that laid out a

0:33:47.560 --> 0:33:52.760
<v Speaker 1>bunch of complaints about tech TV around this time, and

0:33:52.840 --> 0:33:57.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a heck of a read. Green is, let's say,

0:33:58.000 --> 0:34:02.640
<v Speaker 1>acidic in his uh. In his criticism, he argued that

0:34:02.960 --> 0:34:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the top leadership, both at the channel side of tech

0:34:06.960 --> 0:34:11.239
<v Speaker 1>TV and the website side was unqualified. He even went

0:34:11.280 --> 0:34:14.120
<v Speaker 1>so far as to call them incompetent. He also argued

0:34:14.160 --> 0:34:18.720
<v Speaker 1>that tech TV launched tech Live at precisely the worst

0:34:18.920 --> 0:34:22.200
<v Speaker 1>time because it was the aftermath of the dot com bubble,

0:34:22.480 --> 0:34:26.480
<v Speaker 1>so there was not a whole lot of consumer interest

0:34:26.719 --> 0:34:29.600
<v Speaker 1>for technology in general, and certainly not a lot of

0:34:29.719 --> 0:34:34.759
<v Speaker 1>enthusiasm about investing in tech companies mere months after the

0:34:34.960 --> 0:34:38.319
<v Speaker 1>entire market had had such a massive collapse. It does

0:34:38.360 --> 0:34:41.120
<v Speaker 1>seem odd that a channel would pour resources into a

0:34:41.200 --> 0:34:44.960
<v Speaker 1>huge commitment revolving around the tech financial industry when the

0:34:45.000 --> 0:34:47.520
<v Speaker 1>desire to invest in that industry was less than ideal.

0:34:48.160 --> 0:34:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Green's post again is really vitriolic, and that's an understatement.

0:34:52.440 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 1>He clearly held a lot of contempt for many on

0:34:55.640 --> 0:34:58.719
<v Speaker 1>the television side of tech TV. He also was a

0:34:58.719 --> 0:35:01.960
<v Speaker 1>little prophetic. He wrote in two thousand one that much

0:35:01.960 --> 0:35:04.240
<v Speaker 1>of the content on the channel was being created for

0:35:04.520 --> 0:35:08.680
<v Speaker 1>quote an audience of one end quote, and by that

0:35:08.719 --> 0:35:12.880
<v Speaker 1>he meant that the creative decisions guiding the executives for

0:35:13.040 --> 0:35:15.880
<v Speaker 1>creating programming for tech TV all seemed to be geared

0:35:16.440 --> 0:35:20.680
<v Speaker 1>as an effort to please Paul Allen, because ultimately it

0:35:20.760 --> 0:35:23.760
<v Speaker 1>was Alan who was kind of floating the company through

0:35:24.000 --> 0:35:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the Vulcan Ventures investment firm, and Green stated correctly as

0:35:28.680 --> 0:35:30.960
<v Speaker 1>it would turn out that Alan would only do that

0:35:31.080 --> 0:35:33.560
<v Speaker 1>for a certain amount of time before he would want

0:35:33.600 --> 0:35:36.319
<v Speaker 1>to dump the venture, and it would take a couple

0:35:36.360 --> 0:35:38.879
<v Speaker 1>of years. But that's pretty much what would happen. I'll

0:35:38.880 --> 0:35:41.600
<v Speaker 1>explain more in just a moment, but first let's take

0:35:41.680 --> 0:35:52.279
<v Speaker 1>another quick break. So something else that happened in two

0:35:52.280 --> 0:35:56.600
<v Speaker 1>thousand one that would have a lot of consequences for

0:35:57.320 --> 0:36:00.000
<v Speaker 1>not just tech TV, but obviously the entire world, where

0:36:00.200 --> 0:36:03.759
<v Speaker 1>the terrorist attacks on September eleven, two thousand one. It

0:36:03.840 --> 0:36:07.759
<v Speaker 1>had repercussions around the world, and tech TV was not excluded.

0:36:08.160 --> 0:36:10.439
<v Speaker 1>The channel would go dark for a couple of days.

0:36:10.520 --> 0:36:14.120
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco was viewed as a possible target for further attacks,

0:36:14.600 --> 0:36:18.760
<v Speaker 1>so much of the staff didn't come into work following

0:36:18.760 --> 0:36:22.279
<v Speaker 1>September eleven. Also was a very tough psychological challenge for

0:36:22.320 --> 0:36:26.320
<v Speaker 1>the writers and the hosts and the producers to produce

0:36:26.400 --> 0:36:31.279
<v Speaker 1>shows and talk about something that was seemingly inconsequential. Technology

0:36:31.520 --> 0:36:36.720
<v Speaker 1>news and goofy gadgets just didn't seem important or valid

0:36:36.880 --> 0:36:40.120
<v Speaker 1>in the wake of such an enormous tragedy. The tech

0:36:40.160 --> 0:36:42.640
<v Speaker 1>industry as a whole, which was still unsteady after the

0:36:42.719 --> 0:36:46.200
<v Speaker 1>dot com bust, was knocked off balance again, but the

0:36:46.640 --> 0:36:50.680
<v Speaker 1>shows eventually started coming back. The channel came back with

0:36:50.680 --> 0:36:55.040
<v Speaker 1>with new programming. People soldiered on, and then two months

0:36:55.120 --> 0:36:58.600
<v Speaker 1>later a large round of layoffs would follow. It happened

0:36:58.640 --> 0:37:01.839
<v Speaker 1>on November six and one. The company let go of

0:37:01.920 --> 0:37:07.000
<v Speaker 1>one hundred thirty employees. That was about twenty of the

0:37:07.160 --> 0:37:11.200
<v Speaker 1>entire staff, according to Leo Report on his blog. This

0:37:11.320 --> 0:37:14.080
<v Speaker 1>was around when tech Live was first cut back from

0:37:14.080 --> 0:37:16.960
<v Speaker 1>its gargantuan nine and a half hours to three programs.

0:37:17.360 --> 0:37:21.480
<v Speaker 1>The live programming in general shrank from eleven hours to

0:37:22.200 --> 0:37:24.640
<v Speaker 1>six and a half hours a day. A half year

0:37:24.719 --> 0:37:29.760
<v Speaker 1>later and the company did another round of layoffs. This time,

0:37:30.200 --> 0:37:33.800
<v Speaker 1>it laid off about fifty people, and Tech Live shrank again.

0:37:34.600 --> 0:37:38.080
<v Speaker 1>At this point, it was just a half hour nightly program.

0:37:38.120 --> 0:37:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Gone was the morning program, gone was the afternoon program,

0:37:41.120 --> 0:37:43.200
<v Speaker 1>and most of the folks who were laid off had

0:37:43.239 --> 0:37:45.560
<v Speaker 1>worked on the morning edition of the show. Both the

0:37:45.680 --> 0:37:49.759
<v Speaker 1>Paul Allen Pet Project audio File and the opinion show

0:37:49.840 --> 0:37:53.319
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Spin were canceled around this time as well. At

0:37:53.320 --> 0:37:56.319
<v Speaker 1>this point, in the spring of two thousand two, there

0:37:56.400 --> 0:37:59.240
<v Speaker 1>was a new push from the executives of tech TV.

0:37:59.600 --> 0:38:04.080
<v Speaker 1>The goal was to transform the channel into a lifestyle channel.

0:38:04.480 --> 0:38:07.720
<v Speaker 1>This would mean less of an emphasis on the tech

0:38:07.800 --> 0:38:10.800
<v Speaker 1>e stuff like you know, fewer talks about hard drives,

0:38:11.080 --> 0:38:16.080
<v Speaker 1>fewer talks about ram. It was, fewer episodes or or

0:38:16.239 --> 0:38:19.839
<v Speaker 1>or segments dedicated to helping people with computer problems. If

0:38:19.880 --> 0:38:23.520
<v Speaker 1>you research tech TV, you'll likely come across many accounts

0:38:23.920 --> 0:38:26.799
<v Speaker 1>that lament these changes, and in fact, a lot of

0:38:27.200 --> 0:38:31.279
<v Speaker 1>people have posted about how upset they were leading up

0:38:31.320 --> 0:38:34.040
<v Speaker 1>to this point in the first place. Generally speaking, the

0:38:34.080 --> 0:38:37.360
<v Speaker 1>original writers and hosts for shows on the network felt

0:38:37.400 --> 0:38:40.000
<v Speaker 1>that it was kind of a mistake to move away

0:38:40.040 --> 0:38:42.720
<v Speaker 1>from the core content the channel had been built around,

0:38:43.280 --> 0:38:46.000
<v Speaker 1>and many of the more faithful viewers felt the same way.

0:38:46.320 --> 0:38:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Shows like Call for Help in the Screensavers remains some

0:38:49.440 --> 0:38:52.320
<v Speaker 1>of the most popular programs on the channel, and advocates

0:38:52.360 --> 0:38:56.160
<v Speaker 1>for those shows point to how those remained more anchored

0:38:56.239 --> 0:38:59.480
<v Speaker 1>in the original philosophy of tech TV compared to programs

0:38:59.520 --> 0:39:03.680
<v Speaker 1>that were either are changed dramatically or had been introduced

0:39:03.760 --> 0:39:07.239
<v Speaker 1>later on. So people were saying, why do you keep

0:39:07.440 --> 0:39:12.040
<v Speaker 1>changing away from your core focus when the shows that

0:39:12.120 --> 0:39:15.120
<v Speaker 1>do best are the ones that are closest to that

0:39:15.200 --> 0:39:18.360
<v Speaker 1>core focus. Still, while people in the channel might have

0:39:18.400 --> 0:39:21.520
<v Speaker 1>been upset at the time at those changes, the channel

0:39:21.560 --> 0:39:24.680
<v Speaker 1>as a whole was starting to reach more households. Tech

0:39:24.719 --> 0:39:28.280
<v Speaker 1>TV landed more carriage deals with cable companies and increased

0:39:28.280 --> 0:39:31.520
<v Speaker 1>its range to somewhere between forty five and fifty seven

0:39:31.719 --> 0:39:36.239
<v Speaker 1>million homes. The numbers for how large tech TVs reach

0:39:36.440 --> 0:39:38.719
<v Speaker 1>was are kind of all over the place, but the

0:39:38.840 --> 0:39:41.600
<v Speaker 1>range I encounter was essentially forty five to fifty seven

0:39:41.600 --> 0:39:45.719
<v Speaker 1>million households in America. It's made more complicated because Comcast,

0:39:46.120 --> 0:39:49.680
<v Speaker 1>which had been carrying the channel in several markets, began

0:39:49.800 --> 0:39:53.160
<v Speaker 1>to drop Tech TV from its lineup around two thousand

0:39:53.200 --> 0:39:55.640
<v Speaker 1>one and two thousand two. More on that in just

0:39:55.680 --> 0:39:59.960
<v Speaker 1>a second. The channel began to run more non original work,

0:40:00.360 --> 0:40:04.319
<v Speaker 1>stuff that had been produced independently, such as reruns of

0:40:04.320 --> 0:40:08.040
<v Speaker 1>old Max Headroom TV series and films like Forbidden Planet,

0:40:08.280 --> 0:40:12.840
<v Speaker 1>an anime series from Japan. Some shows stuck around but

0:40:13.200 --> 0:40:16.040
<v Speaker 1>changed a bit in branding. What used to be called

0:40:16.200 --> 0:40:21.439
<v Speaker 1>Game Spot TV would transform into Extended Play before then

0:40:21.480 --> 0:40:25.359
<v Speaker 1>turning into the video game review series x Play, which

0:40:25.360 --> 0:40:27.239
<v Speaker 1>was one of my favorite shows when I finally got

0:40:27.239 --> 0:40:30.719
<v Speaker 1>a chance to watch some Tech TV programming, and one

0:40:30.760 --> 0:40:33.239
<v Speaker 1>of just a couple of shows that would survive the

0:40:33.280 --> 0:40:36.200
<v Speaker 1>transition that would happen in two thousand four. It was

0:40:36.239 --> 0:40:38.680
<v Speaker 1>back in two thousand three that x Play would pair

0:40:38.760 --> 0:40:41.279
<v Speaker 1>the original host, Adam Sessler, who had been with the

0:40:41.280 --> 0:40:43.959
<v Speaker 1>show since the beginning, back when it was Game Spot TV,

0:40:44.600 --> 0:40:48.120
<v Speaker 1>with Morgan Webb, who had previously hosted the Screen Savers

0:40:48.239 --> 0:40:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and Call for Help, and then they would take that

0:40:50.600 --> 0:40:54.719
<v Speaker 1>show to new heights. So remember a minute ago when

0:40:54.719 --> 0:40:57.759
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned that Comcast had been dropping tech TV from

0:40:57.840 --> 0:41:00.480
<v Speaker 1>some of its markets. Well, here's where things get a

0:41:00.480 --> 0:41:05.400
<v Speaker 1>little juicy. Comcast had its own tech oriented cable channel

0:41:05.480 --> 0:41:09.520
<v Speaker 1>called G four that was specifically focusing on video games

0:41:09.560 --> 0:41:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and video game culture, but not many cable companies outside

0:41:13.640 --> 0:41:18.560
<v Speaker 1>of Comcast would carry the channel. Danielle Levitas and an

0:41:18.600 --> 0:41:22.080
<v Speaker 1>analyst at the time, estimated that tech TV reached probably

0:41:22.120 --> 0:41:25.839
<v Speaker 1>about four times as many households as G four did,

0:41:26.400 --> 0:41:30.200
<v Speaker 1>so in two thousand four, Comcast had a proposition, which

0:41:30.280 --> 0:41:33.000
<v Speaker 1>was to acquire tech TV. In fact, some people suggest

0:41:33.080 --> 0:41:37.560
<v Speaker 1>that the real reason Comcast started dropping tech TV wasn't

0:41:37.600 --> 0:41:42.200
<v Speaker 1>so much to eliminate the competition from its channel G four,

0:41:42.680 --> 0:41:46.480
<v Speaker 1>but rather in an effort to perhaps decrease the value

0:41:46.800 --> 0:41:50.920
<v Speaker 1>of tech TV because the company had anticipated making a

0:41:50.960 --> 0:41:55.320
<v Speaker 1>move to acquire it a couple of years later. Well, anyway,

0:41:55.360 --> 0:41:57.719
<v Speaker 1>by that time, Paul Allen must have been a bit

0:41:57.800 --> 0:42:02.120
<v Speaker 1>disenchanted with his tech reented cable channel. Much of the

0:42:02.120 --> 0:42:04.919
<v Speaker 1>programming had failed to get a huge audience. Many who

0:42:04.920 --> 0:42:07.920
<v Speaker 1>worked on the flagship shows were frustrated with changes in

0:42:07.960 --> 0:42:10.839
<v Speaker 1>the company and seeing a lot of their coworkers let

0:42:10.880 --> 0:42:14.080
<v Speaker 1>go over the past year and a half. I'm not sure,

0:42:14.280 --> 0:42:17.520
<v Speaker 1>it was an agonizing decision on Allen's part to agree

0:42:17.520 --> 0:42:21.799
<v Speaker 1>with the sale, and it was set for an unreported sum,

0:42:21.880 --> 0:42:23.520
<v Speaker 1>but most of the guests, as I saw, there were

0:42:23.520 --> 0:42:27.040
<v Speaker 1>around three hundred million dollars, which means that Paul Allen

0:42:27.040 --> 0:42:30.279
<v Speaker 1>would have seen a little bit of a loss because remember,

0:42:30.520 --> 0:42:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the company originally spent almost three hundred sixty million dollars

0:42:34.480 --> 0:42:37.960
<v Speaker 1>just buying you know, tech TV back when it was

0:42:38.040 --> 0:42:41.719
<v Speaker 1>z d TV, let alone how much money they must

0:42:41.760 --> 0:42:44.040
<v Speaker 1>have poured into the channel to keep it floating over

0:42:44.080 --> 0:42:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the following years. But the pitch was Comcast was going

0:42:48.680 --> 0:42:52.640
<v Speaker 1>to merge tech TV with G four and there would

0:42:52.640 --> 0:42:56.160
<v Speaker 1>be a brand new channel, G four tech TV, and

0:42:56.239 --> 0:42:59.440
<v Speaker 1>it would combine the best of tech TVs programming with

0:42:59.600 --> 0:43:02.759
<v Speaker 1>the best of G four's programming. It would also mean

0:43:02.800 --> 0:43:05.799
<v Speaker 1>that anyone who wanted to continue their employment was going

0:43:05.840 --> 0:43:09.839
<v Speaker 1>to have to pick up stakes. Technically, what Comcast would

0:43:09.920 --> 0:43:15.120
<v Speaker 1>do when they finally completed this merger was fire everybody

0:43:15.239 --> 0:43:19.880
<v Speaker 1>at tech TV, but several of them would be offered

0:43:19.880 --> 0:43:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity to take on a job at the new company,

0:43:24.120 --> 0:43:26.400
<v Speaker 1>G four tech TV. The folks at G four, by

0:43:26.400 --> 0:43:30.359
<v Speaker 1>the way, did not go through this process. This also

0:43:30.400 --> 0:43:32.239
<v Speaker 1>would mean that you would have to move from San

0:43:32.280 --> 0:43:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Francisco to Los Angeles, because that's where G four's headquarters were,

0:43:36.880 --> 0:43:39.839
<v Speaker 1>and most of the tech TV staff really didn't have

0:43:39.920 --> 0:43:43.880
<v Speaker 1>that option. The new channel would cancel nearly all the

0:43:43.960 --> 0:43:47.560
<v Speaker 1>shows produced by the older tech TV, and about two

0:43:48.239 --> 0:43:52.160
<v Speaker 1>five people were fired when this merger process was completed.

0:43:53.080 --> 0:43:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Shows that were canceled included a Call for Help, the

0:43:56.239 --> 0:43:59.240
<v Speaker 1>show that was hosted by Leo Laporte. Laporte himself decided

0:43:59.280 --> 0:44:02.680
<v Speaker 1>to leave the company he did not go with the

0:44:03.360 --> 0:44:06.719
<v Speaker 1>transformation for G four tech TV. He would get a

0:44:06.800 --> 0:44:09.640
<v Speaker 1>chance to host Call for Help for G four tech

0:44:09.719 --> 0:44:13.719
<v Speaker 1>TV Canada, but the American version of the channel would

0:44:13.760 --> 0:44:17.440
<v Speaker 1>not carry the program, so he did continue to host

0:44:17.480 --> 0:44:20.279
<v Speaker 1>the show for a while, but it wasn't shown in

0:44:20.320 --> 0:44:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the US. In fact, it's actually more efficient for us

0:44:23.120 --> 0:44:26.920
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the shows that successfully transferred over to

0:44:27.000 --> 0:44:29.880
<v Speaker 1>G four tech TV rather than list out all the

0:44:29.920 --> 0:44:33.720
<v Speaker 1>ones that disappeared. Once G four merged with tech TV,

0:44:34.360 --> 0:44:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the screen savers would make the transition, though after a

0:44:38.680 --> 0:44:41.719
<v Speaker 1>short while it would get rebranded as a new show

0:44:41.760 --> 0:44:45.600
<v Speaker 1>called Attack of the Show, and it would change significantly

0:44:45.800 --> 0:44:49.719
<v Speaker 1>in the process. Anime Unleashed, which was a block of

0:44:49.760 --> 0:44:52.759
<v Speaker 1>anime programming that I mentioned earlier that tech TV had

0:44:52.800 --> 0:44:55.200
<v Speaker 1>added to the lineup in late two thousand to early

0:44:55.239 --> 0:44:58.239
<v Speaker 1>two thousand three, That one made the transition over to

0:44:58.280 --> 0:45:01.239
<v Speaker 1>G four tech TV. That show would stick arounduntil two

0:45:01.320 --> 0:45:04.280
<v Speaker 1>thousand six, and then it kind of quietly faded away.

0:45:04.680 --> 0:45:07.960
<v Speaker 1>There was never any official notification of cancelation as far

0:45:07.960 --> 0:45:10.640
<v Speaker 1>as I could tell, but it just got dropped from

0:45:10.680 --> 0:45:16.840
<v Speaker 1>the lineup, possibly because of licensing expiration for the various

0:45:17.320 --> 0:45:20.879
<v Speaker 1>anime programs that was showing, and it never came back.

0:45:21.360 --> 0:45:25.120
<v Speaker 1>The other show that made the transition was ex playing

0:45:25.320 --> 0:45:28.160
<v Speaker 1>The Video Game Review Show, which is no big surprise

0:45:28.200 --> 0:45:31.080
<v Speaker 1>since G four's whole identity was, at least in theory,

0:45:31.400 --> 0:45:34.279
<v Speaker 1>wrapped up in the world of video games. Everything else

0:45:34.280 --> 0:45:36.759
<v Speaker 1>pretty much got the ax once the move to Los

0:45:36.800 --> 0:45:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Angeles was complete. The list of folks who worked at

0:45:39.719 --> 0:45:42.799
<v Speaker 1>tech TV in its six years before being merged with

0:45:42.920 --> 0:45:47.160
<v Speaker 1>G four is effectively a who's whose list of of technology,

0:45:47.200 --> 0:45:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and not just in tech news. So I mentioned Leo

0:45:50.080 --> 0:45:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Laporte several times. He would later go on to create

0:45:52.920 --> 0:45:56.480
<v Speaker 1>This Week in Tech or Twit, which is a phenomenally

0:45:56.600 --> 0:46:01.200
<v Speaker 1>successful tech news podcast Empire. John C. Dvorak, the host

0:46:01.239 --> 0:46:04.360
<v Speaker 1>of The Silicon Spin Show, would become a frequent guest

0:46:04.400 --> 0:46:07.560
<v Speaker 1>on Laport's shows, though the two had a bit of

0:46:07.560 --> 0:46:10.600
<v Speaker 1>a public falling out in two thousand fifteen that eventually

0:46:10.600 --> 0:46:15.080
<v Speaker 1>got patched up by Kevin Rose, another former tech TV

0:46:15.239 --> 0:46:18.560
<v Speaker 1>producer and personality, would go on to found the Revision

0:46:18.600 --> 0:46:21.959
<v Speaker 1>three network and be joined by several other former tech

0:46:22.000 --> 0:46:27.920
<v Speaker 1>TV personalities and hosts and producers, and the website dig

0:46:28.040 --> 0:46:32.040
<v Speaker 1>was also founded by Kevin Rose. The Dig was essentially

0:46:32.080 --> 0:46:35.160
<v Speaker 1>read it before there was read It, and then of

0:46:35.160 --> 0:46:40.200
<v Speaker 1>course dig would sort of fall apart. That's another story

0:46:40.239 --> 0:46:43.319
<v Speaker 1>for another day. Martin Sargent, who had worked as a

0:46:43.320 --> 0:46:45.560
<v Speaker 1>segment producer on the Screen Savers, would go on to

0:46:45.680 --> 0:46:48.799
<v Speaker 1>host or co host several other shows, both online video

0:46:48.840 --> 0:46:52.280
<v Speaker 1>and podcasts. Tom Merritt, who had worked as a producer

0:46:52.280 --> 0:46:55.520
<v Speaker 1>on tech TV shows, would go on to join c Net,

0:46:55.960 --> 0:46:59.279
<v Speaker 1>then he joined twit, and ultimately he would launch his

0:46:59.320 --> 0:47:04.120
<v Speaker 1>own independent podcast, The Daily Tech News Show, and used

0:47:04.360 --> 0:47:08.799
<v Speaker 1>the Patreon support model. He's brilliant and The Daily Tech

0:47:08.840 --> 0:47:11.440
<v Speaker 1>News Show is a great show. He also tends to

0:47:11.480 --> 0:47:14.200
<v Speaker 1>host about a billion other shows at any given time.

0:47:14.640 --> 0:47:18.239
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Norton, who was co host of The Screensavers with Leolport,

0:47:18.560 --> 0:47:21.800
<v Speaker 1>would join Revision three and he would co host a

0:47:21.840 --> 0:47:26.040
<v Speaker 1>show called tech Zilla with my buddy Shannon Morse. Roger Chang,

0:47:26.080 --> 0:47:28.520
<v Speaker 1>who was also a producer over at tech TV, would

0:47:28.520 --> 0:47:31.919
<v Speaker 1>similarly joined Revision three, and the list goes on and on.

0:47:32.040 --> 0:47:35.200
<v Speaker 1>There was Becky Warley, who hosted The Screensavers for a while.

0:47:35.280 --> 0:47:37.560
<v Speaker 1>She went on to become a tech contributor for Good

0:47:37.560 --> 0:47:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Morning America. Chris Parrello, who hosted Call for Help for

0:47:41.520 --> 0:47:44.239
<v Speaker 1>a few years, would go on to do a lot

0:47:44.280 --> 0:47:48.560
<v Speaker 1>of other web related endeavors, and some folks like Sarah Lane,

0:47:48.680 --> 0:47:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Adam Sessler, Morgan Webb, and for a short while Kevin

0:47:51.640 --> 0:47:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Rose would actually make the transition over to G four

0:47:54.280 --> 0:47:59.120
<v Speaker 1>tech TV. Now our story doesn't really end here, even

0:47:59.120 --> 0:48:02.000
<v Speaker 1>though tech Tv had essentially come to an end at

0:48:02.040 --> 0:48:05.160
<v Speaker 1>this point. In our next episode, I will talk about

0:48:05.200 --> 0:48:08.080
<v Speaker 1>G four and how it was founded, so it will

0:48:08.560 --> 0:48:11.480
<v Speaker 1>involve a little bit of backtracking, But then also what

0:48:11.680 --> 0:48:17.520
<v Speaker 1>happened following this merger and the ultimate fate of both channels,

0:48:17.560 --> 0:48:21.200
<v Speaker 1>which I'm sure most of you are aware of, is

0:48:21.239 --> 0:48:25.200
<v Speaker 1>not a happy one. But that leads me to the

0:48:25.320 --> 0:48:28.319
<v Speaker 1>end of this episode. If you guys have any suggestions,

0:48:28.360 --> 0:48:31.120
<v Speaker 1>you can email me the addresses tech stuff at how

0:48:31.200 --> 0:48:33.759
<v Speaker 1>stuff works dot com. You can drop me a line

0:48:33.760 --> 0:48:35.680
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook or Twitter. The handle of both of those

0:48:35.760 --> 0:48:39.000
<v Speaker 1>is tech Stuff hs W. Head on over to our

0:48:39.040 --> 0:48:42.640
<v Speaker 1>website that's tech stuff podcast dot com. You can find

0:48:42.680 --> 0:48:45.360
<v Speaker 1>an archive of all of our past episodes. There. You

0:48:45.360 --> 0:48:47.879
<v Speaker 1>will also find a link to our online store, where

0:48:47.880 --> 0:48:50.120
<v Speaker 1>every purchase you make goes to help the show. We

0:48:50.239 --> 0:48:53.120
<v Speaker 1>greatly appreciate it, and I will talk to you again

0:48:54.239 --> 0:49:01.279
<v Speaker 1>really soon. Text Stuff is a production of I Heart

0:49:01.360 --> 0:49:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Radio's How Stuff Works. For more podcasts from I Heart Radio,

0:49:05.120 --> 0:49:08.280
<v Speaker 1>visit the I heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:49:08.360 --> 0:49:09.880
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your favorite shows.